1
00:00:01,080 --> 00:00:11,400
Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuffy Missed in History Class from dot Com. Hello,

2
00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:14,320
Speaker 1: and welcome to the podcast. I'm Trac c V Wilson

3
00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:17,280
Speaker 1: and I'm Holly Frying. We are going to spend a

4
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:20,599
Speaker 1: few episodes over the next few weeks talking about the

5
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:25,239
Speaker 1: two Supreme Court cases that, uh sort of in a way,

6
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:29,280
Speaker 1: book ended segregation in the United States and plus E

7
00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:33,360
Speaker 1: versus Ferguson. The Supreme Court ruled that segregation was legal

8
00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:37,360
Speaker 1: as long as the separate facilities were equal, and then

9
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:41,640
Speaker 1: many years later, Round versus Board of Education overturned Plus

10
00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:46,319
Speaker 1: versus Ferguson and found that school segregation was unconstitutional. That

11
00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:49,040
Speaker 1: decision was such a big deal and was so monumental

12
00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:52,160
Speaker 1: and led to such a huge backlash. They were actually

13
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:54,880
Speaker 1: going to split that part of the conversation into two

14
00:00:54,920 --> 00:01:00,400
Speaker 1: episodes later down the road. So those two facts about

15
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:04,800
Speaker 1: Plessy versus. Ferguson and Brown versus Board are things that

16
00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:07,480
Speaker 1: most people who have studied the Civil rights movement or

17
00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:10,760
Speaker 1: United States history in any way are pretty familiar with.

18
00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,280
Speaker 1: But I think for me and for you, both both

19
00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 1: of us, and probably a lot of other people, the

20
00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:21,680
Speaker 1: names of the cases and what they did is the

21
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,759
Speaker 1: beginning and the end of the conversation, like, I had

22
00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:27,399
Speaker 1: no idea what the story was behind how these cases

23
00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:29,679
Speaker 1: came to be or any of that until I really

24
00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:33,080
Speaker 1: got into researching them for these episodes. So that's why

25
00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:34,520
Speaker 1: we're going to spend some time on this to talk

26
00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:38,360
Speaker 1: about who the people were involved in Plessy versus Ferguson

27
00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:40,520
Speaker 1: and Brown versus Board, and sort of the journey that

28
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:42,600
Speaker 1: these cases took to come to the Supreme Court in

29
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:45,600
Speaker 1: the first place. So the context that we're going to

30
00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:47,960
Speaker 1: start with today is actually the U. S. Civil War.

31
00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:50,880
Speaker 1: There are people who will argue that the Civil War

32
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,560
Speaker 1: was not fought over slavery, that it was about states

33
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:56,840
Speaker 1: rights or economics. And while states rights and economics were

34
00:01:56,920 --> 00:02:01,360
Speaker 1: certainly involved, the primary rights in questions in were the

35
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:04,160
Speaker 1: right to own slaves and the right to travel freely

36
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:08,560
Speaker 1: with slaves into states where slavery was illegal. The primary

37
00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:11,960
Speaker 1: economic factor at issue was that the Southern economy really

38
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:16,600
Speaker 1: relied on slavery in labor intensive industries such as cotton farming.

39
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:19,639
Speaker 1: You could also make the argument that the Civil War

40
00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:22,760
Speaker 1: was fought, oh the b over neither of those two things.

41
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:25,560
Speaker 1: That it was spought because the North wanted to preserve

42
00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:27,840
Speaker 1: the Union of the States, but the South wanted to

43
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,920
Speaker 1: succede from that union. And while strictly speaking this is

44
00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:35,360
Speaker 1: also true, the big factor that was driving states to succeed,

45
00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:38,919
Speaker 1: which was specifically cited in the declarations of causes that

46
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:44,360
Speaker 1: were issued by Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas, was slavery.

47
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:47,000
Speaker 1: This is all relevant because after the Union won the

48
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:50,440
Speaker 1: war in eighteen sixty five, slavery was abolished in the

49
00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:53,519
Speaker 1: places where it was still legal. The federal government tried

50
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,360
Speaker 1: to rebuild the Southern infrastructure and encourage racial equality in

51
00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:01,960
Speaker 1: a period that became known as the Reconstruction. Three amendments

52
00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:04,600
Speaker 1: were added to the United States Constitution as part of

53
00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:09,880
Speaker 1: this effort. The thirteenth Amendment formally abolished slavery. The fourteenth

54
00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:13,040
Speaker 1: Amendment granted citizenship to anyone who was born in the

55
00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:16,720
Speaker 1: United States or nationalized, which included former slaves, and the

56
00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:19,919
Speaker 1: fifteenth Amendment read, in part, the right of citizens of

57
00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:23,000
Speaker 1: the United States to vote shall not be denied or

58
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:25,920
Speaker 1: abridged by the United States or by any State, on

59
00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:30,359
Speaker 1: account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. There

60
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:33,560
Speaker 1: was a lot more going on during Reconstruction all of

61
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,000
Speaker 1: the twists and turns could easily be their own whole

62
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,720
Speaker 1: series of episodes. But to make an extremely long story short,

63
00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:44,040
Speaker 1: the South overall resented the largely Northern pressure to free

64
00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:46,680
Speaker 1: slaves and give them the right to vote. This was

65
00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:49,560
Speaker 1: especially true as black officials were elected to office in

66
00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:52,200
Speaker 1: the South, and for a brief period of time, some

67
00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:56,960
Speaker 1: progress was made towards rachel equality. As the Southern states

68
00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,840
Speaker 1: were readmitted to the Union and the federal government had

69
00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,400
Speaker 1: less influence on how those states were run, the states

70
00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:07,480
Speaker 1: started passing laws that restricted African Americans right to vote

71
00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:10,560
Speaker 1: by basically taking advantage of the fact that most of

72
00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:13,480
Speaker 1: them had been slaves, and during their time as slaves,

73
00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:16,000
Speaker 1: they had not been allowed to learn to read or write,

74
00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:19,640
Speaker 1: or to earn money or to hold property. So new

75
00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:22,279
Speaker 1: laws required that in order to vote, people had to

76
00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:24,960
Speaker 1: pass a literacy test, or pay up poll tax, or

77
00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:29,080
Speaker 1: own property, something that in general, white people in the

78
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:31,640
Speaker 1: South could do much more easily than black people could.

79
00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:36,200
Speaker 1: Some of these tests were also virtually unpassable, but were

80
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:40,880
Speaker 1: only required for black voters, but their right to vote restricted,

81
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,080
Speaker 1: Black Americans lost many of their prior gains in terms

82
00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:48,799
Speaker 1: of representation in the government. Afterwards, states, both southern states

83
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:52,680
Speaker 1: and border states enacted segregation laws that became known as

84
00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:56,159
Speaker 1: Jim Crow laws, which separated black and white citizens in

85
00:04:56,320 --> 00:05:00,320
Speaker 1: everything from hospitals to water fountains. Just the name Jim

86
00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,760
Speaker 1: Crow was an insult. It came from a heavily stereotypical

87
00:05:03,839 --> 00:05:08,280
Speaker 1: character in minstrel shows. These laws were enforced not just

88
00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:11,359
Speaker 1: through the usual means of making arrests and bringing people

89
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,919
Speaker 1: to trial, but also through a social structure that insisted

90
00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,400
Speaker 1: that black people be subservient to white people. The laws

91
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:22,600
Speaker 1: were also enforced more directly through intimidation and violence, up

92
00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:26,800
Speaker 1: to and including murder. White supremacy organizations like the Ku

93
00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:30,520
Speaker 1: Klux Klan really flourished, and violence against black citizens at

94
00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:35,360
Speaker 1: the hand of white citizens became both commonplace and rarely prosecuted.

95
00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:38,400
Speaker 1: Before we get into talking about a Jim Crow law

96
00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:40,720
Speaker 1: and how it led to a Supreme Court ruling that

97
00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:43,280
Speaker 1: legalized segregation, do you want to have a word from

98
00:05:43,320 --> 00:05:47,560
Speaker 1: a sponsor? Sure stupendous, So to return to the story

99
00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:51,479
Speaker 1: of Plessy versus Ferguson. One example of these Jim Crow

100
00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:55,120
Speaker 1: laws was Louisiana's separate car law, and this law was

101
00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,839
Speaker 1: to quote promote the comfort of passengers on their trains

102
00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:03,640
Speaker 1: by provide quote equal but separate accommodations for the white

103
00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:07,039
Speaker 1: and colored races. So anyone who boarded a car in

104
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,560
Speaker 1: Louisiana that was not meant for their race could be

105
00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:14,279
Speaker 1: fined or jailed. Interracial couples were not exempt from the law,

106
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:17,280
Speaker 1: nor were black maids and servants who were traveling with

107
00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:21,360
Speaker 1: white employers. Really, the only exception was nurses who were

108
00:06:21,400 --> 00:06:24,880
Speaker 1: taking care of children of another race. This was signed

109
00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:30,760
Speaker 1: into law on July tenth. Thanks to its sizable black population,

110
00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:35,000
Speaker 1: including slaves, free slaves, and creoles of color, and to

111
00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:37,599
Speaker 1: the Union's presence in New Orleans during much of the

112
00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:40,599
Speaker 1: Civil War, New Orleans have become home to a large

113
00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:45,120
Speaker 1: population of affluent, politically active black citizens. When the separate

114
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:47,960
Speaker 1: car law was passed, activists in New Orleans set to

115
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:51,000
Speaker 1: work immediately trying to put together a plan to challenge it.

116
00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:56,280
Speaker 1: On September one, eighteen, prominent black and Creole New Orleans

117
00:06:56,279 --> 00:07:00,800
Speaker 1: citizens formed the Citizens Committee to test the constitutionality of

118
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:05,320
Speaker 1: the Separate Car Law, or the Committoya. They got legal

119
00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:08,200
Speaker 1: help from a white lawyer named Albion W. Tourge he

120
00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,440
Speaker 1: was from New York and had been an abolitionist. Toorgey

121
00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:13,920
Speaker 1: waved his fees and he promised to argue the case

122
00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:16,600
Speaker 1: before the Supreme Court. Shouldn't make it all the way there,

123
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,440
Speaker 1: since torge was both very busy and also very far

124
00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:23,080
Speaker 1: away from Louisiana. They also had the help of a

125
00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:27,560
Speaker 1: local lawyer named James C. Walker. The committee settled on

126
00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:31,280
Speaker 1: a strategy of civil disobedience. They would find someone to

127
00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:33,680
Speaker 1: break the separate car law and get arrested, and then

128
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,720
Speaker 1: they would take the case through the court system. This,

129
00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:39,760
Speaker 1: they hoped would lead to overturning segregation, not just on

130
00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:44,040
Speaker 1: Louisiana trains, but in all of the United States. Then

131
00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:47,160
Speaker 1: they started looking for volunteers who the law would consider

132
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:51,240
Speaker 1: to be colored, but who looked white. Legal distinctions about

133
00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:53,720
Speaker 1: who was considered to be part of which race really

134
00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:56,640
Speaker 1: varied from state to state and through the years, and

135
00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:59,760
Speaker 1: as a general rule, particularly in the South, the law

136
00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:03,800
Speaker 1: of quired smaller and smaller amounts of African American ancestry

137
00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:07,280
Speaker 1: to be considered colored, and eventually this came down to

138
00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:10,600
Speaker 1: the one drop rule, meaning that in a lot of places,

139
00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:14,200
Speaker 1: if a person had one drop of African blood that

140
00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:18,360
Speaker 1: person was considered to be black. Candidates had to be

141
00:08:18,440 --> 00:08:22,160
Speaker 1: law abiding citizens with good reputations, people who would not

142
00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:25,080
Speaker 1: be dismissed as disreputable, and who had nothing in their

143
00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:28,320
Speaker 1: background that could be that could become an easy excuse

144
00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:32,280
Speaker 1: for not taking their case seriously. Their first attempts to

145
00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:34,319
Speaker 1: break the separate car law was made by a man

146
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,080
Speaker 1: named Daniel did Dunes, and he was a musician. He

147
00:08:37,160 --> 00:08:38,800
Speaker 1: was also the son of one of the members of

148
00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:42,160
Speaker 1: the committee, and he was one eighth black. He boarded

149
00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:46,600
Speaker 1: the first class car of a train on February and

150
00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:49,240
Speaker 1: then he told the conductor that he was colored. He

151
00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:52,800
Speaker 1: was removed from the train and arrested, but before the

152
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,000
Speaker 1: case could go to trial, the charges against him were

153
00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:58,040
Speaker 1: dismissed because the state Supreme Court ruled in a different

154
00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:02,400
Speaker 1: case that state segregation laws couldn't apply to interstate travel.

155
00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:06,720
Speaker 1: Dating's tickets had been to Mobile, Alabama, so per the

156
00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:10,520
Speaker 1: Louisiana Supreme Court, that ride was regulated by federal law

157
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,960
Speaker 1: and not state law. The committee had actually chosen an

158
00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,760
Speaker 1: interstate ticket on purpose because they were hoping to draw

159
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:20,720
Speaker 1: on interstate commerce commerce laws in the case. The committee

160
00:09:20,720 --> 00:09:23,640
Speaker 1: tried again, and this time. The man breaking the law

161
00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:27,640
Speaker 1: was Homer Plessy, a thirty year old shoemaker. He was

162
00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,160
Speaker 1: also one eighth African American, one of his great grandmothers

163
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:33,600
Speaker 1: had been black, and he had skin light enough that

164
00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:36,760
Speaker 1: he would not be questioned boarding the car. He bought

165
00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:39,600
Speaker 1: his first class ticket to Covington, Louisiana on the East

166
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:43,319
Speaker 1: Louisiana Railroad, so that the whole trip would take place

167
00:09:43,400 --> 00:09:47,199
Speaker 1: within the borders of the state. Nobody raised any questions

168
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:50,400
Speaker 1: when Plus he boarded the first class car, and different

169
00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:53,560
Speaker 1: accounts vary and exactly how the conductor came to know

170
00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:55,680
Speaker 1: that he was legally a colored man and in the

171
00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:58,720
Speaker 1: wrong place, and some of the versions Plus he just

172
00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:02,880
Speaker 1: told him, and in others the conductor asked because he

173
00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:05,320
Speaker 1: knew that the committee was sending someone to test the

174
00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:09,800
Speaker 1: segregation law that day, and in others the conductor asked

175
00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:11,800
Speaker 1: everyone in the car because it was part of his

176
00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:14,400
Speaker 1: job to confirm the race of all passengers and that

177
00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:19,120
Speaker 1: everyone was in the correct car on the train. Regardless

178
00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:21,760
Speaker 1: of how it played out, and this information came to light,

179
00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:25,840
Speaker 1: the train's conductor, J. J. Dowling, asked Homer Plessy to

180
00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:29,120
Speaker 1: leave the train after learning his race, and even though

181
00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:32,480
Speaker 1: the law designated separate but equal cars, there was not

182
00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:36,040
Speaker 1: actually a car for black passengers on the train that day.

183
00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:39,560
Speaker 1: Plus he refused, he was arrested by a private detective

184
00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:44,000
Speaker 1: hired by the Committee and jailed. Members of the Citizens

185
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:48,720
Speaker 1: Committee pulled their money to bail Plusy out. Plessy's trial

186
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:53,560
Speaker 1: was set for October thirteenth, eighteen two. James Walker, who

187
00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:57,360
Speaker 1: we mentioned earlier, argued that his arrest violated the thirteenth

188
00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:01,280
Speaker 1: and fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. Previous court rulings had

189
00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:04,480
Speaker 1: expanded on the interpretation of the thirteenth Amendment not just

190
00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:09,520
Speaker 1: to include literal slavery, but also quote badges of slavery

191
00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:11,800
Speaker 1: and service ude, which is how an amendment that was

192
00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:15,200
Speaker 1: set up to abolish slavery was being applied to the

193
00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:19,280
Speaker 1: matter of being segregated on a train. But Lionel Adams,

194
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:22,320
Speaker 1: the attorney for the prosecution, argued that the Separate Car

195
00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:25,679
Speaker 1: Act reduced racial tension and so it was actually good

196
00:11:25,720 --> 00:11:28,760
Speaker 1: for the state. He also argued that because the separate

197
00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:32,000
Speaker 1: cars were equal, it was not discriminatory to separate people

198
00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:35,560
Speaker 1: into them by their race, although we're not clear on

199
00:11:35,640 --> 00:11:38,800
Speaker 1: how that applied given that there was reportedly no actual

200
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:44,240
Speaker 1: car for black passengers on that particular train. Judge John H.

201
00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:48,240
Speaker 1: Ferguson ruled in favor of the prosecution on November the eighteen,

202
00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:51,320
Speaker 1: and the next step in the case was the appeal.

203
00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:53,520
Speaker 1: But again, we're gonna pause for a second for a

204
00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:55,560
Speaker 1: word from a sponsor before we dig into all of

205
00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:59,520
Speaker 1: that juicy material. So let's let's get back to the story,

206
00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:01,240
Speaker 1: which at the point is going to go to the

207
00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,640
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Plus He's case went to the Louisiana Supreme

208
00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:07,120
Speaker 1: Court first, which heard it on November the twenty two

209
00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:10,840
Speaker 1: of that year. The arguments were essentially the same as

210
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:13,400
Speaker 1: what had been argued in the court before, and in

211
00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:15,880
Speaker 1: what came as a surprise to no one, the court

212
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,080
Speaker 1: ruled that the law was not discriminatory because it applied

213
00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:23,040
Speaker 1: equally to everyone. It would actually be four years before

214
00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,280
Speaker 1: the case would get to the U. S. Supreme Corps,

215
00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:27,920
Speaker 1: And as he had promised when originally agreeing to work

216
00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:31,480
Speaker 1: with the Citizens Committee, albion Tourge planned to argue the

217
00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:35,240
Speaker 1: case before the Supreme Court rather than appealing immediately. He

218
00:12:35,280 --> 00:12:37,560
Speaker 1: actually decided to take some time to try to raise

219
00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:41,240
Speaker 1: funds for the case and work out his strategy. In

220
00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:43,959
Speaker 1: addition to that, he and the Committee were also hoping

221
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:46,559
Speaker 1: that by delaying a little bit, they would find themselves

222
00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:49,320
Speaker 1: before a court that would see their case more favorably.

223
00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:53,760
Speaker 1: Based on decisions that the court had already issued, justices

224
00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,840
Speaker 1: in two were really not very likely to find that

225
00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,640
Speaker 1: the separate car law was on the constitution all. The

226
00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,120
Speaker 1: President was just not running in favor of this case.

227
00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:06,000
Speaker 1: So the committee crossed their fingers that some of the

228
00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,360
Speaker 1: justices would be replaced before they submitted their own case,

229
00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:14,480
Speaker 1: and in eighteen two Supreme Court justices died and new

230
00:13:14,520 --> 00:13:18,480
Speaker 1: appointees took their place. However, this did not look much

231
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,280
Speaker 1: better for Plessy in the Citizens Committee than the previous

232
00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:24,480
Speaker 1: court had. One of the new justices was a former

233
00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:27,480
Speaker 1: Confederate soldier and the other had a reputation for being

234
00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:31,800
Speaker 1: quite conservative. The new court also set an immediate precedent

235
00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:36,000
Speaker 1: of upholding other Jim Crow laws. Plus, in just those

236
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,960
Speaker 1: couple of years, the overall racial climate in the United

237
00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:43,400
Speaker 1: States had gotten worse instead of better. So, in spite

238
00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:44,800
Speaker 1: of the fact that things seemed to be kind of

239
00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,480
Speaker 1: running against them towards a submitted the case which he

240
00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:51,640
Speaker 1: prepared along with Walker and Samuel F. Phillips, and he

241
00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:55,760
Speaker 1: submitted it four review towards the end of the Supreme

242
00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:57,840
Speaker 1: Court heard the case, which was now known as Plessy

243
00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:02,160
Speaker 1: versus Ferguson in eighteen ninety six. In the written briefs

244
00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:05,360
Speaker 1: and oral arguments, Tourge and team argued that the separate

245
00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:10,000
Speaker 1: car law was unconstitutional in several ways, including the following.

246
00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:14,120
Speaker 1: This is very much an abridged list, but first up,

247
00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:18,080
Speaker 1: it violated the Fourteenth Amendment from several different angles by

248
00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:21,760
Speaker 1: giving white citizens and the colored citizens different rights and

249
00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:25,360
Speaker 1: protections under the law. Second, while proponents of the law

250
00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:27,360
Speaker 1: claimed that it was for the comfort of both black

251
00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:30,560
Speaker 1: and white passengers towards they argued that it was really

252
00:14:30,640 --> 00:14:33,240
Speaker 1: for the comfort of white passengers at the expense of

253
00:14:33,280 --> 00:14:38,160
Speaker 1: black passengers, and therefore discriminatory. He also argued that the

254
00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:41,800
Speaker 1: law violated the Fourteenth Amendment to do process clause by

255
00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:45,640
Speaker 1: giving train conductors the power of law enforcement while giving

256
00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:50,400
Speaker 1: trained passengers no legal recourse about decisions the conductors made.

257
00:14:51,560 --> 00:14:55,960
Speaker 1: And last that it created conditions of subjection and inferiority,

258
00:14:56,080 --> 00:14:59,160
Speaker 1: which previous court decisions had interpreted to be in violation

259
00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:05,280
Speaker 1: of the Amendment. Representing Louisiana's side was Alexander Peter Morse,

260
00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:09,640
Speaker 1: whose legal specialty was federal appeals. He argued that the

261
00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:12,840
Speaker 1: separate car law was designed to prevent problems and serve

262
00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:16,680
Speaker 1: the common good, so, rather than making African American passengers

263
00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:20,640
Speaker 1: second class citizens, according to him, it actually protected them

264
00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:24,760
Speaker 1: from harassment and discrimination by white passengers. He also noted

265
00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:27,680
Speaker 1: several prior cases in which the Supreme Court had had

266
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:31,600
Speaker 1: upheld States rights in the matter of segregation, and he

267
00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:33,880
Speaker 1: said that the rights that issue in the separate car

268
00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:37,240
Speaker 1: law were not civil rights at all. They were social

269
00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:42,280
Speaker 1: rights which are not constitutionally protected. The Supreme Court announced

270
00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:46,960
Speaker 1: its decision on May eighteenth. Of eight, Justice David J.

271
00:15:47,120 --> 00:15:51,240
Speaker 1: Brewer excused himself from participating because his daughter had just died,

272
00:15:51,760 --> 00:15:54,920
Speaker 1: and the remaining eight judges upheld the constitutionality of the

273
00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:59,120
Speaker 1: separate car law in a seven to one ruling. Henry

274
00:15:59,120 --> 00:16:03,200
Speaker 1: Billings Brown wrote the majority opinion, which dismissed the idea

275
00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:06,760
Speaker 1: that the separate car law violated the Thirteenth Amendment entirely.

276
00:16:07,680 --> 00:16:10,400
Speaker 1: He also cited several cases in which the Court had

277
00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:14,040
Speaker 1: upheld States rights to segregate, and he dismissed the idea

278
00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:18,560
Speaker 1: that providing separate facilities was inherently discriminatory. This is the

279
00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:22,359
Speaker 1: thing he wrote on that point. We consider the underlying

280
00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:25,880
Speaker 1: fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in the assumption

281
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:29,280
Speaker 1: that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the

282
00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,560
Speaker 1: colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so,

283
00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,160
Speaker 1: it is not by reason of anything found in the Act,

284
00:16:36,600 --> 00:16:39,520
Speaker 1: but solely because the colored race chooses to put that

285
00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:44,160
Speaker 1: construction upon it. So it goes on to say that

286
00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:47,120
Speaker 1: if quote, the colored race became the majority in the

287
00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:51,120
Speaker 1: state legislature and enacted the same law, that white people

288
00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,800
Speaker 1: would not think themselves inferior because of it. This was

289
00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:57,560
Speaker 1: the point where I had to stop reading Supreme Court

290
00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:01,000
Speaker 1: rulings and take a little break. That's probably for the

291
00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:05,040
Speaker 1: best in terms of your usual stability. There's a lot

292
00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:09,920
Speaker 1: that's really offensive in in the whole majority opinion, and

293
00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:12,040
Speaker 1: and the part where it's like this, you guys are

294
00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:13,920
Speaker 1: making a big deal out of it. This is on you,

295
00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,159
Speaker 1: not on us. That was the part that made me like, uh,

296
00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:20,360
Speaker 1: I feel like they haven't changed very much, because this

297
00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:23,399
Speaker 1: feels like the stop playing the race card of the

298
00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:27,399
Speaker 1: late ninetiesh injury. So the sole dissenter and all of

299
00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:31,000
Speaker 1: this was John Marshall Harlan, who went against the majority

300
00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:33,119
Speaker 1: with so much vigor that he became known as the

301
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:37,560
Speaker 1: Great Dissenter. His dissent accurately predicted what was going to

302
00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:40,120
Speaker 1: happen next, which was the States were going to use

303
00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:43,000
Speaker 1: this ruling as a justification to enact a whole lot

304
00:17:43,040 --> 00:17:48,560
Speaker 1: more segregation laws, uh and to be more blatantly districted, discriminatory,

305
00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:50,680
Speaker 1: feeling like they had the backing of the Supreme Court

306
00:17:50,720 --> 00:17:54,880
Speaker 1: in doing so. One of his statements like this quote,

307
00:17:55,320 --> 00:17:58,199
Speaker 1: In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will in

308
00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:01,440
Speaker 1: time proved to be quite as print as the decision

309
00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:04,760
Speaker 1: made by this tribunal in the dread Scott case. So

310
00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:07,399
Speaker 1: if you're not familiar with that one, that's dread Scott

311
00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:10,199
Speaker 1: versus Sanford, when dread Scott, who was a slave, sued

312
00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:13,119
Speaker 1: for his freedom, and the court decided that anyone with

313
00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:16,480
Speaker 1: African ancestry, whether they were a slave or free, was

314
00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,240
Speaker 1: not intended to be a citizen of the United States

315
00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:22,160
Speaker 1: and therefore was not entitled to bring such a suit

316
00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:25,600
Speaker 1: in federal court. The court also ruled that the federal

317
00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:29,080
Speaker 1: government couldn't prohibit slavery in territory that it had acquired

318
00:18:29,240 --> 00:18:33,639
Speaker 1: after the United States was founded. Harlan's descent also argued

319
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:38,159
Speaker 1: strenuously against the idea that segregation was good for race relations.

320
00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:42,280
Speaker 1: To quote, sixty millions of whites are in no danger

321
00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:45,560
Speaker 1: from the presence here of eight millions of blacks. The

322
00:18:45,600 --> 00:18:48,680
Speaker 1: destinies of the two races in this country are indissolubly

323
00:18:48,760 --> 00:18:51,800
Speaker 1: linked together, and the interests of both require that the

324
00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:54,679
Speaker 1: common government of all shall not permit the seeds of

325
00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:57,240
Speaker 1: race hate to be planted under the sanction of law.

326
00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:02,480
Speaker 1: What can more certainly arouse race hate, What more certainly

327
00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:07,840
Speaker 1: create and perpetuate a feeling of distrust between these races

328
00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:11,919
Speaker 1: than state enactments, which in fact proceed on the ground

329
00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:15,520
Speaker 1: that colored citizens are so far inferior and degraded that

330
00:19:15,560 --> 00:19:18,919
Speaker 1: they cannot be allowed to sit in public coaches occupied

331
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:22,480
Speaker 1: by white citizens. That, as all will admit, is the

332
00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:27,520
Speaker 1: real meaning of such legislation as was enacted in Louisiana. Yeah,

333
00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:30,840
Speaker 1: his whole tone is basically, Uh, It's completely obvious to

334
00:19:30,880 --> 00:19:33,520
Speaker 1: everyone that the intent here is to subjugate an entire

335
00:19:33,600 --> 00:19:36,600
Speaker 1: race of people and upholding this law is going to

336
00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:41,200
Speaker 1: make it so much worse today. Plessy versus Ferguson is

337
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,159
Speaker 1: a pretty infamous and notorious Supreme Court case, but at

338
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:45,959
Speaker 1: the time it really did not make a lot of

339
00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:49,479
Speaker 1: big news. The reaction of a lot of the media

340
00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:52,400
Speaker 1: and of the majority as a whole was sort of

341
00:19:52,480 --> 00:19:57,360
Speaker 1: well obviously um Afterwards, though, states really did begin passing

342
00:19:57,400 --> 00:20:00,520
Speaker 1: more and more segregation laws, and in spite of the

343
00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:03,320
Speaker 1: ruling being based on the idea that things were separate

344
00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:06,159
Speaker 1: but equal, a lot of these separate facilities were not

345
00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:10,240
Speaker 1: equal at all. They were often massively and deliberately inferior

346
00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:13,640
Speaker 1: that from the facilities for white people, and a lot

347
00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,840
Speaker 1: of people interpreted this ruling to mean that all discrimination

348
00:20:16,920 --> 00:20:20,159
Speaker 1: and everything was legal, not just the separation of races

349
00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:24,440
Speaker 1: into two separate but supposedly equal facilities. And while most

350
00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:26,560
Speaker 1: of these laws were passed in the South, this was

351
00:20:26,640 --> 00:20:31,320
Speaker 1: not exclusively a Southern phenomenon. Of the segregation laws in

352
00:20:31,359 --> 00:20:34,199
Speaker 1: the United States were in the North, Midwest, and the West,

353
00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:37,800
Speaker 1: and it also was not just about segregating African Americans

354
00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:42,639
Speaker 1: in states with sizable populations of Asians, Mexicans, and Native Americans,

355
00:20:42,680 --> 00:20:46,760
Speaker 1: for example, these populations were segregated from the white population

356
00:20:46,840 --> 00:20:51,600
Speaker 1: as well since the Supreme Court had upheld the previous verdict.

357
00:20:51,880 --> 00:20:55,280
Speaker 1: Homer Plessy then appeared before Judge Ferguson in Louisiana one

358
00:20:55,280 --> 00:21:00,200
Speaker 1: more time until on January eleven. This was to lead

359
00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:02,560
Speaker 1: guilty and to pay his fine for violating the separate

360
00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:05,320
Speaker 1: car law. He spent the rest of his life working

361
00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:07,880
Speaker 1: as a laborer and then a clerk, and then eventually

362
00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:10,600
Speaker 1: he became an insurance salesman for an African American owned

363
00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:16,399
Speaker 1: insurance company, Homer Plus. He died on March one. It

364
00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:20,040
Speaker 1: would be almost sixty years before this decision was overturned,

365
00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:24,400
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about that, uh in another episode,

366
00:21:24,840 --> 00:21:26,960
Speaker 1: and then in another episode after that, we're going to

367
00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:30,360
Speaker 1: talk about what happened after it was overturned. And I'm

368
00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:34,160
Speaker 1: going to change courses completely to talk about some listener mail.

369
00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:39,320
Speaker 1: So this listener mail is from Neely, and Neely says, Hello,

370
00:21:39,359 --> 00:21:41,720
Speaker 1: Holly and Tracy. I love the podcast and have wanted

371
00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:44,359
Speaker 1: an excuse to be able to write and include picks

372
00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:47,399
Speaker 1: of my fur babies. I lived an Anchorage for two

373
00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:49,960
Speaker 1: point five years and my husband was born and raised

374
00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:53,919
Speaker 1: in Homer, Alaska. His grandma homesteaded there and Fairbanks and

375
00:21:53,960 --> 00:21:56,480
Speaker 1: likes to tell everyone she voted against becoming a state.

376
00:21:57,440 --> 00:21:59,240
Speaker 1: I wanted to give you a quick correction on the

377
00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:01,919
Speaker 1: start of the Ida Rod. The ceremonial start as an

378
00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:04,920
Speaker 1: anchorage during for Rondie, but this is just the mushers

379
00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:08,399
Speaker 1: coming through town to being announced. The actual race start

380
00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:11,560
Speaker 1: is in Willow, Alaska. This is a common fact misquoted

381
00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:14,280
Speaker 1: when the race is discussed. I also wanted to give

382
00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:16,560
Speaker 1: you a few other fun facts. When you mentioned that

383
00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:18,800
Speaker 1: you felt sorry for the musher who only had a

384
00:22:18,840 --> 00:22:21,159
Speaker 1: fifty degree hut to warm in, I assure you it

385
00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:23,640
Speaker 1: probably felt like a sauna. I remember a two week

386
00:22:23,680 --> 00:22:26,280
Speaker 1: spell and anchorage when it didn't get above negative ten.

387
00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:28,760
Speaker 1: One morning, I was walking to my car in my

388
00:22:28,800 --> 00:22:31,560
Speaker 1: warmest gear and had to change into a light place

389
00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,440
Speaker 1: because it was just much too warm. I got to

390
00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:37,720
Speaker 1: my car to see that much too warm was four degrees.

391
00:22:37,840 --> 00:22:41,560
Speaker 1: It was really all relative. Also google for Rondie. That

392
00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:44,879
Speaker 1: is a hilariously Alaska event that includes not only the

393
00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:48,920
Speaker 1: ceremonial race start, but fur ball, snowshoe football, and the

394
00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:51,720
Speaker 1: running of the reindeer. Think running of the bulls. Only

395
00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:54,360
Speaker 1: reindeer are pretty chilled, so they kind of just wander

396
00:22:54,480 --> 00:22:58,680
Speaker 1: behind wondering what those crazy humans are doing. Another random

397
00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:01,639
Speaker 1: non fact from my Alaska native from from Nome. You

398
00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:04,040
Speaker 1: may want to fact checked. The town is named Nome

399
00:23:04,160 --> 00:23:06,360
Speaker 1: because on a census report that asked for the name,

400
00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:08,840
Speaker 1: it was written none because it was too small for

401
00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:12,280
Speaker 1: a name. It was misreads Nome, and thus Gnome is

402
00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:16,919
Speaker 1: Gnome uh And then Neely sent some episode suggestions. I

403
00:23:16,960 --> 00:23:20,200
Speaker 1: did find that Gnome fact in a couple of places,

404
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:22,040
Speaker 1: but the reason it didn't make it into the episode

405
00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:26,120
Speaker 1: is that I similarly had a hard time substantiating whether

406
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:28,879
Speaker 1: that was actually true. But the reason that I wanted

407
00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:32,159
Speaker 1: to read this email is that, not very long after

408
00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:37,000
Speaker 1: the Gnome Serium Run podcast aired, I had the experience

409
00:23:37,000 --> 00:23:40,480
Speaker 1: of having to take a fifteen minute walk in a

410
00:23:40,560 --> 00:23:44,760
Speaker 1: twenty degree below zero windshill and I went from that

411
00:23:44,880 --> 00:23:48,560
Speaker 1: twenty or fifteen however many minutes, some minutes not that long,

412
00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:53,240
Speaker 1: actually into an apartment that was seventy two degrees and

413
00:23:53,359 --> 00:23:57,160
Speaker 1: I was immediately sweltering, And my absolute first thought was, yet, yeah,

414
00:23:57,320 --> 00:24:00,960
Speaker 1: fifty degrees, that was fine. That guy on this serre

415
00:24:01,080 --> 00:24:04,439
Speaker 1: run So if you would like to write to us

416
00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:07,520
Speaker 1: about this or any other episode, where at History podcast

417
00:24:07,560 --> 00:24:10,520
Speaker 1: at how stuff works dot com. Our Facebook is Facebook

418
00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:12,960
Speaker 1: dot com plus missed in History, and our Twitter is

419
00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:15,679
Speaker 1: miss in History. Are Tumbler is miss and History dot

420
00:24:15,720 --> 00:24:18,000
Speaker 1: tumbler dot com, and are also on interest at pinterest

421
00:24:18,040 --> 00:24:21,280
Speaker 1: dot com slash missed in History. We also have a

422
00:24:21,400 --> 00:24:24,400
Speaker 1: spreadshirt store at ms in history dot spreadshirt dot com

423
00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:27,920
Speaker 1: where you can find shirts and other cool stuff. If

424
00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:30,480
Speaker 1: you would like to learn more about what we've talked

425
00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:34,159
Speaker 1: about today, come to our parent company's website, which is

426
00:24:34,160 --> 00:24:36,560
Speaker 1: how stuff Works dot com and put the word let's

427
00:24:36,560 --> 00:24:38,439
Speaker 1: see in the search bar, and you will find an

428
00:24:38,520 --> 00:24:42,240
Speaker 1: article called ten Overturned Supreme Court Cases which talks about

429
00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,280
Speaker 1: this one in addition to nine others. You can also

430
00:24:45,320 --> 00:24:47,640
Speaker 1: come to our website, which is missed in History dot

431
00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:50,320
Speaker 1: com to see an archive of every episode we have

432
00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:53,960
Speaker 1: ever done, show notes for every episode Holly and I

433
00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:57,800
Speaker 1: have ever done, along with some other nice goodies, so

434
00:24:57,840 --> 00:24:58,520
Speaker 1: you can do all that