WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 983)

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle, Part three of the week.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I am Ryan Warmley, joined as always by Mike Mayor.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>If you missed our first two sections of the show,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>either on audio or on YouTube, be sure to go

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>check those out. We did a little round in the

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>bases talking some trending topics around baseball. We also did

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>some bilos sell high and some waivers pickups for you.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>This is our pitching streamers and of course our two

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>start pitcher competition is back for this year. What we've

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>been doing this is Mayor is picking his favorite streamers

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of every day of the week. We'll highlight some

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites as well the ones that he's picked,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and he'll throw out some honorable mentions. So we'll get

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>into the rest of the pictures we want to talk about, Mayor,

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>let's five indoor streamers.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure, let's start right, And since this is going to

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 2>be like three videos and three shows, should we have

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>like a wardrobe change and you know, should we really

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>treat it like three separate things and just like Vito Vito. Okay,

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we are using the Fantasy pros what

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 2>is it called streaming rankings? The streaming picture tool, which

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>is pretty cool. You can sink your leagues and it'll

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>show you, like which of these players is actually available

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 2>in your league without having to like look them all up,

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty cool, very handy for someone like me

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>who's in eight leagues and I can just kind of

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>like filter through them see who I can probably stream.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So let's go through it day by day. For Monday,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>someone I talked about in the previous video or previous

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>episode is Nick Martinez, and the interesting thing here is

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 2>not up to a great start, but he is at

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins, so good matchup in a good picture friendly ballpark. However,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>if you have to stream weekly, he does have a

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 2>second start that is supposed to come at Course Field,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>so you do a kind of have to take your

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>medicine if you want to stream him and it's a

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>weekly league. But if it's a day league, you can

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>just stream him at Miami and then either drop him

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>running back on your bench for that rocky start. Jose

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Kintana someone I'm interested in picking up this week. Also

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>a two star pitcher this week. Not the worst matchups,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>not great matchups, but not terrible for Tuesday. He's streaming.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 2>He's a streaming option for someone at the San Francisco Giants.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Later in the week, he has the Cardinals, who are

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>off to a strong start on the hitter side of things.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>For Wednesday, David Festa against the White Sox. Just you know,

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>every day pretty much see who's pitching against the White

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Sox and see if they're available, and if they are,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 2>pick them up. But David Festa also is off to

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good start, so good for him. Tyler Anderston

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I famously did not write down who's pitching against, but

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it looks like he's at home against the Pirates again,

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>someone I think is off to a pretty good start

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that you know, is readily available. His roster. His consensus

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>roster percentage just three percent, so that'll probably be a

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit higher in leagues on CBS, but I can't

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>imagine it's very high. So if you need a streaming option,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he's pretty good. Friday is a rough one.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Friday I stared at for a while and I tried

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 2>to think of I was missing something, And I think

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>for the first time in his career, we might be

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at Justin Burlander as a streaming option. However, I

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 2>don't feel great about it because Justin Burlander is not

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 2>up to a great start and he doesn't have a

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>great matchup. He's home against Texas Rangers.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, yeah.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to stream this week, maybe don't

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>look at Friday. But I was looking at other options.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not great out there either. There was like Fridays,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Ben Brown versus the Phillies, Matthew Liberatory against the Brewers,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Jake Irvining is the Mets. Bobby Miller who probably won't

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>even be on the Dodgers at that point. Maybe whoever

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers replaced Bobby Miller with against the Pirates should

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>be your option for Friday.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth pointing out though, that sometimes the

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>best streaming option is not streaming anybody. Yeah, right, Like,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>if there are literally no options, you don't have to

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>force it just for the sake of having a streamer

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>every day. If that's something that is a part of

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your approach, you can say we're taking this day off

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's just not any good options. That's that's a lot.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a good point. I don't think

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>you probably should be streaming every day. You probably get

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>some crooked numbers if you do that. So Yeah, for

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>this week, I would say Friday. Probably stay away from Friday.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I know, sometimes you have to get creative with how

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you're streaming because you have like certain transaction limits or

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>like you have certain pictures pitching on certain days, so

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 2>you might only have like the ability to stream on

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>certain days or pick up a player who like you're like, oh,

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I have an open spot on Wednesday kind of a thing,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and so I would just get Friday this week. You know,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>if you have to, you know, water pistol to your head,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>have to stream someone, I guess justin Verlander, but I

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 2>would agree with you Worm that the better option would

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>be to not stream anyone. Saturday wasn't much better, but

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I did land on Edward Cabrera at the Mariners. But

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 2>that's also you know one like if you do have to,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably just avoid that one. And that's something I

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>feel a little bit better about. Richard Fitz at the

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland Guardians. Richard Fitz's kind of just a guy, but

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>he's been pitching like fine, he's been good for the

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Red Sox.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a favorite for these. It's kind

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of a you know, whatever week of options. I guess

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you did try to sell usan Jose Kintana in our

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>previous show for this week, so maybe him, maybe Anderson

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>actually against the Pirates I could get into.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Anderson would be my pick. I think if

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you need the two starts and you need the volume,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I would go with Katana. But I think if I

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.119
<v Speaker 2>just had to pick one, i'd probably go Anderson against

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you don't have the matchup in the sheet, but

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>now that I remember it's the Pirates, because you said

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that in your read through, I think I would go

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Anderson as well as my favorite there and yeah, I would,

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I wouldn't do anything on Friday.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 2>In some weeks, I have like an honorable mention or two.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I have no honorable mentions this week because it's not

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>a good week.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you have any dishonorable mentions.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>All of them? Yeah, it's just it's brutal out there.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>If you're looking for stream and pitching, maybe more is

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 2>coming and you know, we'll see some other pitchers get dropped,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 2>but this is not the best week for it. We

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>have some you know, potential pittures coming back from injury soon,

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, not great.

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to our two start picture competition. We do

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have our Week one is now in the books. Hunter

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Green ended up in our kind of league that we're in,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>which is just kind of the easiest way to track

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring and put a number to it, forty seven point

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>six Fantasy points in his two starts. Michael King for

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>me had forty five point seven, so a very close outing.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>After the first starts of each guy, it looked like

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Green was going to win this running away, and

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then Michael King goes out and throws a complete game shutout,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>which helped me tremendously. But ultimately, though I suppose it

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>comes down to because those those scores are really close,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to two very good starts versus one

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>elite start, one bad one. I think I would rather

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have had Hunter Greens two starts this week, so I

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>will I will see the victory in Week one. To you,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and also, Hunter Green, is you know, is your guy guy?

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I planted my flag on him,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, from day one in this draft season, so

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't complain too much about him getting a victory.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Whereas I picked him in the two start competition and

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>then wrote him up as a cell high and dissed

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 2>him last week as someone I'm selling high because of

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>injury concerns, which is also why I used a contest.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Also, I faced you last week in this league, and

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you have Michael King, So I was going against you know,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>my golden child, and you were going up against your

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>actual starter against me. Uh So we had a lot

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of crossover there. So we'll give Mayor a slight edge

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for week one to take the victory. Still waiting to

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>see the result of Scooble versus Max Free. We also

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have a note to check out. Taiwan Walker did good,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so smart to not pick him.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>If you watched last week, you'll know why we mentioned

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan Walker. But there is a noe in the sheet

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>to see how Tywin Walker did just in case. But

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to be okay there.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for week three, I got to the sheet first

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't decide between Max Meyer or Hunter Brown,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and I ultimately went with Hunter Brown, just giving them

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>matchups against the Blue Jays and at Kansas City. Those

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are two of the bottom four teams in baseball and

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>home runs this season. That appealed to me. Hunter Brown

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is pitched well that appealed to me, so I was

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>between Brown and Meyer and ultimately with Brown. Mayor then

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>came in and said, hey, actually, Hunter Brown might not

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be a two start pitcher because McCullers is probably coming

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>back next week, and that will push Hunter Brown out

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of being a two start pitcher.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Which would give you.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Said. I said, I'll switch to Max Meyer then, and

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Mayer said, no, I already took him. As you might

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell, there were not a lot of

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>good options this week. It is a horrific two start

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>pitcher week. But I'm gonna do and I'm gonna kind

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of insist that you allow me to do. This is

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, because we don't know that mccullors is

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>coming back in so I'm gonna say Hunter Brown is

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my pick if he does make two starts, and this

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is regardless of how he performs, like, if he performs poorly,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm still locked in him if he makes two starts.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>If he performs well in his one start, I'm still

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to use him if he gets two. If

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he makes two starts, I'm still picking Hunter Brown if

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't make that second start. Because it has not

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>been announced about mccollors. Yet I will I will have

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>another pick that I'm making and said, I don't know

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>who that is gonna be. I said I was gonna

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>decide live on the show. And I'm just still looking

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>at these names, and just like ever, the pictures that

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good have bad matchups, and the pictures that

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have good matchups aren't any good. So I'm looking at

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like Kevin Gossman, who I just pitched you as a

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>cell high. He's at the Yankees and at Houston. Like

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Schwellenbox had a couple downstarts, also not the easiest couple

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of matchups. Brandon Fotts facing the Rays and the Braves,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Flahertys facing the Padres and the Orioles. I don't want

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>really anything to do with that.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You know what you're coming Bryce Miller, you know what

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>you're coming back? Like Walker bet Right.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, Walker Bueler gets the White Sox, which is uh,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, appealing. He also gets the the Guardians. And

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>then Bryce Miller, who's a player I like, you know,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at Boston against Miami Bailey Ober we talked a little

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bit in the rounding the bases. You know, he gets

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox and the Angels. That's not terrible. A

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of ify choices. I wish I could have gone

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>with Max Meyer, as you've already staked your claim to

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>who would you go with?

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>If you were me, I would probably go with by

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the way. Not to spoil it for you, but I

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>have like multiple sites open while we're doing this to see,

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, because like a lot of it's projection. You know,

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>we're you know, we recorded this a few days early.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Teams do weird things with their with their rotations all

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the time, so a lot of is it projecting to

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>start pay So one of these sites does not have

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Bailey Obra as a two star pitcher either, Okay, so

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I would not pick him just for the you know,

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>for the sake.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at fan tracks by the way, just in

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>case anybody's wondering where I'm getting these, and yes, sometimes

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they are not accurate.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 2>So I think I would go if I were you

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 2>with where is it I'm looking at.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels to me like like Bryce Miller. I was

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, like Bryce Miller or Kevin Gossman. I feel

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like because Gosmin's pitched well and I almost kind of

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>want to ride the hot streak, but I mean at

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston and at the Yankees, so that's really tough to overlook.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I will go with Bryce Miller. That would be my

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>official pick, So Bryce Miller at the Red Sox and

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>home against the Marlins. So I'm really counting on that

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>my official back my official backup. But yes, Hunter Brown

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is my If Hunter Brown makes two starts, it doesn't

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>matter how he performs in them, he is the pick.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But given that there's some uncertainty, hear, my official backup

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>pick is Bryce Miller at the Red Sox and home

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Miami Martin.

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 2>And I will say in the YouTube comments, if you

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 2>want to throw out your preferred two star pitchers, you know,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>we'll see how they do against you know, because it's

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 2>a rough week, but we can do this every week too,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>But throw out who you would you use this week

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>as a two star pitcher if you were in the competition,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and we'll look at some of them next week and see,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, just how much better they would have been

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>than the players were.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Did we have any comments last week for people who

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pick Taiwan Walker.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was overwhelming Taiwan Walker love last week. Everyone

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>was like Wow, what a what a move. You should

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>have used him yeah in your league and lock him

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>in for those two starts like I did.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent. All right, let's wrap up with

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some weekend excitement. Last week I sat here and said,

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there really wasn't a ton I was that interested in

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>This week, I think there's a ton of fun matchups. Honestly,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Friday alone, listen to some of these fun at somebody.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I might be lopsided, like, I'm not saying these are

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all going to be like like neck and neck, but

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot of fun names going ahead to

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>head Cole Reagan's against Jackson Joe, And again, this is

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>all Friday alone, Sandy al Katara versus Zach Wheeler. Should

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a typo in here, but Yamamoto versus Jacob

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>de Gram and Mackenzie Gore versus Chase Dolander, who again

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it is as good as him, but

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just really interesting to watch those guys. So a lot

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of really fun matchups on Friday, and just in general,

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like from the series perspective, like Padre's Astros is a

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fun series. Rangers, Dodgers, you know, possible world series previews,

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's a really exciting looking weekend.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree, and you took most of them.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I only took Fridays. You could have taken anything Saturday

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and Sun.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've mentioned the series, so like the Corvers, a

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of the series. The one thing I mentioned that

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to First off, it's Easter weekend, so I

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 2>have young kids and they're at the age now where

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>they're going to really enjoy Easter weekend. So I'm looking

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>forward to that. I'm spending time with them, and from

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>baseball perspective, Tyler Molly against the Dodgers is someone I

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>want to watch just because he's off to a really

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>strong start, kind of smoking mirrors like he has. He

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>has a non elite fastball with an elite with fright.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't know how long that's going to last. And I

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 2>think this will be a test of the this blow

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 2>up and he turns into a pumpkin or can he

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 2>at least hold his own against probably the best offense

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in baseball?

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is interesting one to watch as well. Which

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is your favorite pitching matchup with the ones I listed

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>since I took them from you, was there one that

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you would have definitely picked if it was available.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I think probably Yama Moto de Gram, uh, because I

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>really like Yamamoto and then also like de Gram. You know,

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of like I don't want to say,

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>like confusion, but it's like is he going to be elite?

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to just work with his lower velocity?

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And so like, you know, can he pitch around the Dodgers?

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll be. You know, we're going to continue

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>to see some interesting results out of de Gram. So

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>this is obviously a really big early test and you know,

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>we'll probably have some answers there.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're wrap things up there. If you missed

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>our other segments of the cycle, be sure check them

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>out on YouTube and also on audio. We've got the

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>whole show split up on all platforms this week, so

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out every little bit of the cycle.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>For Mayor, I'm Ryan Warmley. Thanks everybody for tuning in

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not just to this segment, but to all the segments,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to drop your thoughts in the comments.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Like Mayor said, in terms of your two start pitchers

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or any other streamers that you guys might like. We

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>got out here on that and see again next week.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB