1 00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:07,600 Speaker 1: Zone Media. Hello on, Welcome to this week's Better Offline Monologue. 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:18,520 Speaker 1: I'm your host ed Zetron. What it's been a peculiar week. 3 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:22,079 Speaker 1: Two days ago, Sarah Fryar, chief financial officer of open AI, 4 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: said in a stage at a Wall Street Journal conference 5 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:27,480 Speaker 1: that an IPO isn't on the cards and foolishly said 6 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 1: the open AI was and I quote looking for an 7 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: ecosystem of banks, private equity, maybe even governmental and that 8 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:36,400 Speaker 1: the way governments can come to bear can really drop 9 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,240 Speaker 1: the cost of financing but also increase the loan to value, 10 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:41,120 Speaker 1: so the amount of debt you can take on top 11 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:44,880 Speaker 1: of an equity portion. Now, she also, according to Bloomberg, 12 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: hinted at some sort of federal backstop, literal government backing 13 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:52,280 Speaker 1: for loans for data centers. Very strange. Now, I will 14 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:55,440 Speaker 1: add this as being completely misreported as open AI demanding 15 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 1: government funds. Had someone ring me the other night say 16 00:00:57,640 --> 00:00:59,760 Speaker 1: did you hear about this? It's not what happened. To 17 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 1: be clear, I believe absolutely that Sarah Fryer was throwing 18 00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:05,839 Speaker 1: out the idea to see if governments might buy, only 19 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:08,120 Speaker 1: to find the entirety of social media and most of 20 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:12,400 Speaker 1: the mainstream media reacting like Friar had kicked the family dog. Nevertheless, 21 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 1: I want to be clear that open AI has not 22 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 1: requested a federal backstop, and that as ever, it appears 23 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:19,520 Speaker 1: that even the big media outlets do not seem to 24 00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:22,119 Speaker 1: go and listen to the things that people say or check. 25 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:26,040 Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. This is a huge story if you misreported, 26 00:01:26,360 --> 00:01:30,559 Speaker 1: which is what's happened. Nevertheless, as I said on Blue Sky, 27 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 1: this is an absolute diva moment for open AI. Oh 28 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:36,760 Speaker 1: I'm so messy. I can't even afford mid data centers. Please, 29 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: Uncle Sam, I promised to spend one point five trillion 30 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:41,399 Speaker 1: dollars in the next five years. Oh, I'm so weak 31 00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 1: and powerless in the face of all the promises I made. 32 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:46,919 Speaker 1: Grow up, wipe your own ass. If regular people promised 33 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:48,480 Speaker 1: a bunch of people a ton of money that they 34 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: couldn't afford, they be sued, but in prison or have 35 00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:52,880 Speaker 1: their assets reduced to zero. Why do we have to 36 00:01:52,880 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 1: do something different for open AI? Anyway, this is not 37 00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:58,559 Speaker 1: going to happen. I've never seen a more aggressive bipartisan 38 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 1: descent for an idea by everyone from better offline listeners 39 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:03,920 Speaker 1: in the middle of prying hubcaps off of cars to 40 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 1: the powerful Dunce coalition led by Matty Iglesias. Everybody fucking 41 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,880 Speaker 1: hates this idea, and if I'm honest, I think everybody 42 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:12,920 Speaker 1: is sick and tired of AI. What was once a 43 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: market wide consensus that AI was the future has now 44 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 1: become a cacophony of hand ringing in just about every 45 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:21,079 Speaker 1: major media outlet. What hasn't helped was a very very 46 00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:23,919 Speaker 1: weird post through a Nvidia's social media account, a single 47 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:27,560 Speaker 1: image that said, statement from Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang. As 48 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,600 Speaker 1: I have long said, China is nanoseconds behind America in AI, 49 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:33,360 Speaker 1: it's vital that America wins by wrestling ahead and winning 50 00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 1: developers worldwide. Not really sure what that meant, but this 51 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 1: was I found after the fact, tied to a statement 52 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: Huang made to the Financial Times that mostly said the 53 00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 1: same thing. But I've got to say, this is the 54 00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:49,359 Speaker 1: weirdest statement I've seen. It's so weird. What do you want, Jensen? 55 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 1: More developers to developers by GPUs or so wait a second, 56 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,720 Speaker 1: China doesn't have the latest in video GPUs. How are 57 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:02,200 Speaker 1: they nanoseconds behind America? Surely America should be I don't 58 00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:05,639 Speaker 1: know hours days at Jensen, I don't know why you're 59 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:08,160 Speaker 1: using words that relate to time as measures of distance. 60 00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:11,720 Speaker 1: But nevertheless, why aren't American companies further ahead when they 61 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: have easy access to Blackwell and soon via Rubin GPUs? 62 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 1: What exactly do you want us to do? Jensen? What 63 00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:21,040 Speaker 1: is the thing? It's like vague posting, being like I 64 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:23,680 Speaker 1: really shouldn't be alone right now, you know, I just 65 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:25,840 Speaker 1: I've had such a bad night. I wish someone would 66 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 1: text me and tell me they're buying a gpu Hanah. No, man, 67 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 1: you're the CEO of the largest company on the stock market. 68 00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:37,000 Speaker 1: Do you not have a little more bizaz, little more 69 00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: riz rizzless? Jensen, You're rizzless even with those beautiful leather jackets. 70 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: And it's almost as if there isn't a coherent reason 71 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 1: to buy GPUs or any real progress coming out of 72 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:50,320 Speaker 1: American AI labs, or really any of them were still though, 73 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 1: and this was the one that really I think was underreported. 74 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 1: During Microsoft's last earnings, the company reported a four point 75 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 1: one billion dollar loss on their thirty two point five 76 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:01,920 Speaker 1: percent staking open air, meaning that due to the company 77 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 1: using the equity method for accounting OpenAI lost twelve billion 78 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:09,000 Speaker 1: dollars in the third quarter of this calendar year. Now, 79 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 1: open Ai CFO Sarah Fryar said that this was way overestimated. 80 00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:16,799 Speaker 1: And I want to be clear about something. Microsoft's earnings 81 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:20,239 Speaker 1: are public filings as they are a public company, meaning 82 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:23,640 Speaker 1: that these are looked over by accountants and lawyers. Why 83 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 1: is the chief financial officer of open ai disputing these numbers. 84 00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 1: That's extremely goddamn weird. And this isn't the first time 85 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:34,800 Speaker 1: Sarah Friar has said some weird shit, even in this 86 00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 1: conference appearance, but in general. The other time I saw 87 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:39,919 Speaker 1: her say that it was thirty five dollars a token 88 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,600 Speaker 1: in the past for open AI's models. Thirty five bucks 89 00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:45,680 Speaker 1: per million tokens doesn't even make sense, but I think 90 00:04:45,680 --> 00:04:47,760 Speaker 1: thirty five bucks per token would mean if they spend 91 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:50,680 Speaker 1: like trillions of dollars a year. Regardless, you're the CFO 92 00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:52,760 Speaker 1: of open Ai. Shouldn't you know this shit a little 93 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 1: bit better? Now? Before you email me something about gap 94 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:58,000 Speaker 1: earnings or accounting. I'm going to include links in the 95 00:04:58,040 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 1: show notes because I assure you this loss is directly 96 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 1: reflective of open Eye's actual losses, and that's really weird. 97 00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:08,359 Speaker 1: By the way. It's really weird. Indeed, and now that 98 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:11,240 Speaker 1: we know that, we have to ask how bad are 99 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:15,840 Speaker 1: open aye's actual losses? How much worse are things than 100 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:20,640 Speaker 1: we know? I assure you this loss is real. I 101 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 1: trust it. It's been well reported, looked over by actual accountants, 102 00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 1: and a link to a Wall Street Journal piece where 103 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:28,480 Speaker 1: an actual accountant looked at this and made this statement. 104 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:31,159 Speaker 1: And I got to ask, what is it that Sarah 105 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:34,640 Speaker 1: Fryar and Clammy Sammy don't want us to know what 106 00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 1: is going on? The Information reported that in the first 107 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 1: half of this year, open aye made four point three 108 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:42,520 Speaker 1: billion dollars of revenue but had a net loss of 109 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: thirteen point five billion dollars. But that's in six months. 110 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:51,600 Speaker 1: Are those indicative of the real numbers? Has someone been fibbing? 111 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,599 Speaker 1: I trust the Information's reporting, by the way, I fully 112 00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:58,720 Speaker 1: believe them, and I at this point am just concerned 113 00:05:58,839 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 1: that we're not getting the full picture. I don't know 114 00:06:02,279 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 1: what open ai is sharing to people. I don't know 115 00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 1: how these reporters have got these numbers, But that twelve 116 00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 1: billion dollar loss in a quarter that feels quite dramatic, 117 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 1: and it feels a lot more than open ai has 118 00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:18,919 Speaker 1: been hinting they're losing. What else? Don't we know what 119 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:21,800 Speaker 1: else is going on in Open Ai that we are 120 00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 1: not Party two? Hopefully we find out soon. In any case, 121 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:31,040 Speaker 1: it feels like something came unbuckled this week. Glamuel the 122 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:42,000 Speaker 1: Smiling Man is watching a specter horned Silicon Valley