WEBVTT - This is Not Normal

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to wok F Daily with

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl Danielle Moody. Pre recording from the Home Bunker. So, folks,

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of the time of this recording, Donald Trump has yet

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be indicted for a third time, and so we

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>remain on indictment Watch. And I just got to pull

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>back for a second, because I tell you that all

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of this shit has just become way too normalized for us.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>That a former president of the United States twice in

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>peach president of the United States who's been found guilty

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of defamation and rape, a person that has stolen documents

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>from the federal government and refused to return them. Somebody

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>who made a phone call that said, hey, find me

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand, two hundred and seventy some odd votes. A

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>person that has use their broke down fucking Twitter in

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>order to harass and degrade and defame regular just poll

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>workers who wanted to do good by their community. That

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we're on indictment Watch number three, and frankly, by the

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the summer beginning of fall, he could have

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>been indicted for a fourth time. Because we have also

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>have eyes on Fannie Willis in Georgia, and as we

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to talk about these things. I think it is

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>important to remind ourselves that this shit should not be normal.

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that Kevin McCarthy, with his Fisher Price gabble,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is sitting around pontificating on whether or not he's going

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to open up an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden for

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>no other reason but to appease his master Donald Trump,

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just shows you how degraded our politics have become. And

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so I understand when people are like, I'm done and

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn off from this, But it is

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>more important than ever that we pay attention to what

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>is happening. Just this week, Greg Abbott down in Texas

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>has decided that guess what he's gonna do as governor.

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>He's reading all public schools of libraries. What is he

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>putting in their place detention centers. So when we say

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that these motherfuckers are fascists, that they are authoritarians, look

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>at what they are doing to our public schools. Because

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>who will this affect Because white people with means will

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pull their children out of public schools, which is what

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have wanted, which is why they've been defunding

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>public education for the last several decades, they'll pull their

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kids out, and the ones that will be subjected to

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the lies right and to the discipline will be black

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and brown children. Folks, this set up and the rig

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>is in, and it's up to all of us to

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. Coming up next, my conversation with friend of

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>the show Gentobb, our friend and lawyer who we look

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to to kind of help us understand the legal woes

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump is facing and the legal woes the

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>nation is facing because of our grifting ass illegal Supreme Court.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That conversation is coming up next, Folks. I am always

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so happy when one of my friends, fellow nerd Avenger,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just fellow colleague in the space who loses their mind

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a regular bathists try to keep drek with the news cycle.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Gentob joins wo k F daily. You know her. She's

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a law professor and the author of Big Dirty Money

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and Other People's Houses, and she is the host of

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>booked Up with Gentobb Again, Danielle, Where to begin in

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all honesty in the legal landscape or minefield that is

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>America these days? But because I don't have my medication present,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>let's not talk about the Supreme Court, shall we. Let's

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just talk about the Donald Trump. But so here's what

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:32.679
<v Speaker 1>we know. Judge Alien Cannon who should have recused herself

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but didn't and is still overseeing Jack Smith's documents case

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>against Donald Trump. Folks, I know that there are so

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>many cases, so it's hard to keep track, but let

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>us start with the document's case has set a court

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>date for May twenty fourth, I believe twenty twenty four.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So five twenty four, twenty four. Ha ha on usu, Jen,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you make Aileen Cannons moves thus far? Uh

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in this in this case and whether or not we

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>will we'll see pushback from the Department of Justice by

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>way of Jack Smith because he said he was ready

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to go in December. We knew that that was unlikely.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>But but where what are you thinking so far about

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>her moves and then the timing of this trial.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, in my past life, Danielle, like I don't know,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 2>pre COVID, pre Trump, and even maybe up until a

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>few weeks ago, I tend to be a glass half

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>full person. Now I'm a the glass has been smashed

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>into pieces against the wall and I'm just drinking coffee

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>straight from straight to the staff. You know, kind of

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 2>person so but that being said, I am trying to

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>find the silver lining in the storm cloud that Eileen

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Cannon has created for the future of democracy because May

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, twenty twenty four, there's only one good two

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>good things about that date. One that's literally the last

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the last day, like when grades are

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>due spring semester for my classes, so like I will

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>be done teaching. So if that's going to take over

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>all of my time, I'm ready. That's but you know,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>that's the one good thing, hardly enough to recommend the date.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 2>But the other good thing is it is so far

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 2>out there as a preliminary date that I'm hoping that

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Jack Smith is ready to go on the insurrection case

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 2>on the January sixth case, that we expect to be

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 2>charged any day now, and that a judge in DC

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>sees it as perfect timing. There's no In other words,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the reason why, as you know, that the Justice Department

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>pushed out the date to December from the judge's original

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 2>summer date, which wasn't going to happen, was because there's

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 2>some complications around how to share top secret type documents

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that will not be the case in the January sixth indictment,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>you know. And I think the Justice Department has brought

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of cases involving the rioters and has already the

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 2>benefit of, as you know, the special Committee investigating the

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>attack on the Capitol. They have done incredible amounts of

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>work even before this Special Council got involved. I think

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>they're ready to go one day in DT. So my

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>hope is they ask for a November date, October even

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>for that case. So the again, the only true other

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>than the selfish motive, the only true good thing about

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>May twenty fourth is it gives the opportunity a wide

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>open field to bring the most important case again, this

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>guy which is trying to stage a coup to stay

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in office, and the you know, ongoing lie that that

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>is associated with all that, all the time between the

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>November election when he lost, through the attack on the

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Capitol and his role, all of that is feeding into

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>his campaign and the undermining of what little we have

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 2>left of our democratic institution. So that's the bright note. Now,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>if there I am hoping he asks for October or

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>November or December date. If Jack Smith doesn't, you know,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I give up, I really do. I don't know what

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to tell you.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, we have a couple of things that

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are brewing, right, and I think one of them, uh

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that on Donald Trump's broke ass Twitter

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that I refer to, I guess he truth's on there.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what one does on that apparatus,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but on that application. But you know, he sent out

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a real ominous and threatening video the other day which

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was basically saying, if you come for us, will come

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for you. We're not afraid. You know which, Jen, I'm

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>no lawyer, That's why I have you on the show.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But he seems to be doing the same exact things

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that he did prior to January sixth. With the rollout

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of these indictments, you know, he sends up a flare,

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all of mainstream media jumps on the Trump train right,

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>giving him once again all just the free press that

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he needs. He uses that attention to then send out

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>threats to Jack Smith and to others, and then sends

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>out this video basically another digital stand back and stand by.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So tell me how these kinds of things can be

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>used in a court of law that he's doing.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 2>I think, once there is an indictment, assuming there is one,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and there's a judge assigned that judge can issue in

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>theory a kind of gag order related to specifically making

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>threats to the prosecutor specifically related to other kind of

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say incitement activity. And the question is, you know,

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>will the judge, Will the judge do that?

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, the the he's gotten away with so much,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and a judge has to be careful in what they

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>do because if they're not going to actually enforce in order,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 2>then it becomes a victory for him. You know, what

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 2>does that look like in other words, of a judge

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>makes an order and then some sort of contempt citation

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>against them, is you know, is he going to actually

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 2>bring him into court? You know, we saw similar activity

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>during the Carol II trial. It was Carol two because

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>it was brought second even though charged you know, she

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>filed the the defamation and sexual assault case. This was

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the second case, even though it went first. And there

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 2>were things that you know, the Donald Trump was doing

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter, and the judge I was in the courtroom,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, said to his lawyers, you got to talk

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>to your client, and sometimes he took down what he

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>was saying off Twitter. But then when he continued that

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>behavior after he lost the case. Now that's become part

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of the next case. I mean, Carol won, It's been

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>added to that case against him. Now this is all

0:11:54.440 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>about a civil case, right, You're more concerned about him standbacks,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>stand by kind of language actually creating violence. I remain

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit less concerned because when he was indicted

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>his first federal indictment, as opposed to the Manhattan DA indictment,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the first federal grand jury indictment, we didn't see that

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 2>much support for him around the courthouse in Florida. Now

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 2>I realized this is probably this is different because these

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>are the same people, right, this is all about But however,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of people who were charged and

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>either serve time or are going to serve time, who

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>feel abandoned by Donald Trump, in other words, he so

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 2>they may not come and also they may themselves not

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>want to get arrested again. So we've got to think

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>about that. So I don't know if you're if you're worried.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, the thing is, I wasn't stating that as

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to say that I'm worried that his words

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>will incite the same type of violence as January sixth.

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It was really about whether or not the prosecution can

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>show a pattern of behavior and did, Yeah, a pattern

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of behavior and basic intent with his continued language. Now

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you could have yeah, because my thought was if Donald Trump,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say, had been a normal human being and you're

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>caught doing something and then you decide I'm going to

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>back away from that said behavior, so that my attorneys

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can say that this was an isolated event, caught up

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in passion whatever bullshit kind of you know, defense is

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be created. You could say that that was

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an isolated event. But over the last few years, since

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, we've watched Donald Trump continue to use social

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>media as a way to either virtually assault people, right,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>make them a target in an attack, the same way

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that he did with the voting staff in uh in Georgia. Right.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And so my question really is like, how is the process?

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel how can the prosecution use Donald

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's continued behavior or there for their case.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so it's more of a legal analysis that you're

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>asking me for. So, yeah, so two ways. One if

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>they if the prosecution wants to bring in evidence like

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>as a pattern of behavior, this is how he tries

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to obstruct and try to stir up violence in terms

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of admitting evidence that his lawyers are obviously gonna want

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to exclude that kind of evidence, and they want to

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 2>narrow what jury can hear, right, And so the tension

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>and our rules of federal rules of evidence is, first

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>of all, only things that are considered relevant can be admitted.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>This would obviously, you know, I think it's relevant to

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>his intent and so on. So but the next thing is,

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and of course the other side, his defense will say

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not. But even if a judge thinks it's relevant,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the judge then has to decide whether something is two

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>what's called too prejudicial to be probative. It's this concept

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of you know, for example, when a defendant is trial

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>for a particular let's say, you know, breaking into a

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>grocery store to steal formula for their kid or something,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 2>God forbid we prosecute for that, you know, whether they

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>had been caught doing, you know, shoplifting something else at

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a different time. You know, if a jury gets to

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>hear the other shoplifting, it's going to make them think, oh,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a bad person. I'm going to convict them.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>And so the defense is going to want to say,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's not really relevant. What they were shoplifting

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>before was you know, I don't know Amazon, you know,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>gift cards or whatever, and that just has nothing to

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>do with this. However, you know, the idea would be, well,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>if the way that this person did this was similar,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>then we can look for a pattern of behavior. But

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the idea is it's relevant because it shows this person

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>has the intent to take things that aren't theirs. But

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of judges would exclude that earlier, that earlier

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>evidence because they would say, you know, that's going to

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 2>make a jury try him for being a bad person,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>and we don't do that in America. You're supposed to

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>be tried for your your actual offenses. So it's going

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 2>to really be up to what a jury, what the

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>judge is, and how the judge rules. So that's going

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to be an evidentiary battle. The second way, though, I

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>think is interesting, is if his tweeting or his it's

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>not even tweeting xing, or his his what is it

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that we call him now is true thing? Whatever? If?

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 2>What if his public statements are directed toward this particular case,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and it could be seen as trying to influence witnesses

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>or tamper with them or somehow create threats against physical

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>or other threats against jurors or the court. That could

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 2>be its own kind of separate case, you know. And

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you saw this, but the other

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 2>day I saw, like, was it Mike Huckabee? Did you

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>see this thing going around on threads like he put up?

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 2>It could have been on true Social maybe it was

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 2>an interview on the news, but what I saw is

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>he was on air or something saying the most important

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>values are loyalty, and he was like saying it was

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a very weird, like if you don't get it, like

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 2>they're all out there sending signals for people to not

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 2>not squeal, you know, not rat out the mob boss.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And the closer he gets to this prospect of being

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>convicted for something in federal court and maybe he believes

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>jail time, which I don't think would happen. But the

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 2>closer he gets to that, the more desperate his moves

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 2>will become. And so I think we should keep our

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 2>eye on both both avenues.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So let's now take a little trip down south to

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Georgia right where we are waiting yet and again, folks,

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jen and I are having this conversation at

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a time when they're when you know, we're doing our

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>best to read the tea leaves and shake a magic

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>eight ball, but we have no idea when and if

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>these things are actually coming down the pike. My assumption

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is yes, it is why from Georgia because Fanni Willis

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>had sent up a flare months ago telling us that

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>between July and September for law enforcement to prepare, so

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>we know that those things are are underway. Part of

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Jen I guess the rumors that are circulating is that

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Fannie Willis the DA in Georgia could potentially be looking

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>at racketeering charges. So Jen talk to us about this,

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what if this big? What if that we don't know yet?

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Why would this be a BFD.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it would be a BFD because of what activity

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 2>you can scoop up once you decide something is racketeering

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 2>or a racketeering conspiracy. So there is a federal RICO law,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and there are than state ones. And the people think

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of RICO Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act law, they think

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of it as being something to get organized crime. But

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that's not the only thing it can be used for.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And the idea with racketeering is that you the law,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the Georgia one or the federal one, is

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>designed to criminalize, to create, criminalize a pattern of racketeering activity.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 2>So that's how the language works. And then you have

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to say, well, what is racketeering activity and what is

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a pattern? Well, racketeering activity at the federal level is

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different at the state the federal level.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>The reason why RICO was established is so that you

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>could turn into a federal crime or a pattern of

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 2>state criminal behavior, so as well as a series of

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>different federal crimes, so that we call them predicate offenses.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>So all of a sudden, someone who's just committing crimes

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 2>like doing you know, black met or bribery or shaking

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 2>people down, or murder. At the state level, you know,

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 2>murdering people, you could now say, well, murder's usually a

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 2>state offense. But now if it's a pattern of racketeering activity,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 2>if it's a if you have an enterprise, which is

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, a group of two or more people working

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>together to commit a series of murders, now all of

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 2>a sudden and instead of just a state crime, you

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 2>could charge that at the federal level. Right, or kidnapping.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>So think of that. That's the federal way. Similarly, things

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>like wirefraud or counterfeiting or all kinds of other federal offenses.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>If someone is a pattern of it, if you call it,

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>you call it a pattern of racketeering activity. Now, what

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 2>you've done, if you've said, okay, Danielle, if you're at

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the hub of this group, if you're in charge of

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you know this activity. You if you set up this

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 2>sort of racketeering enterprise and you're either making money or

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>benefiting from this kind of behavior, even if you were

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>not involved in all these underlying things, if you're part

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>of this rico enterprise, you now can be tagged with

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>all this other stuff. It's a way of creating a

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>web around a sort of amorphous activity where you cannot see.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's put Donald Trump at the center of this,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and let's look at the Let's look at the efforts

0:21:54.480 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 2>to change the vote count in Georgia. The reason why racketeering. Now,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 2>let's look at the state level. The reason why racketeering

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 2>would be helpful is if if RICO at the state,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Georgia level, is also criminalizing a pattern of

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 2>racketeering activity. Rico at the Georgia level has a whole

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>bunch of other types of crimes state crimes, and some

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>of those are the you know, the activities that people

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>like Giuliani and anyone he.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Was working with Graham, Lindsey.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Graham, or maybe any of the electors. And so all

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, you have all these people doing all

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>these different activities that were all furthering the efforts of

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump to overturn the election in Georgia. And Rico

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 2>helps because you might if you cannot find a phone

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>call where every single person who did bad things in

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>this puzzle was told by Donald Trump to do it,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really matter. Creating this Rico theory, this Rico enterprise,

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 2>you could now create liability for him. I don't know

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>if that makes sense to you. That's what I'm trying

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>to So that's why it's sort of a big deal.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it just as layers of liability and

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>just yet another crime. And it also sounds bad. But

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>remember he already settled Rico state Rico charges with his

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>fake university. You know, it's not like he hasn't been

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 2>tagged with RICO before. I just think people like they

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 2>think it sounds they think it sounds scary. But the

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>other thing is that Fawnie Willis has had success using

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>the Georgia Rico statute before. Wasn't she involved in the

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>whole thing about teachers cheating helping students cheat on exams? Yes,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>So again, when you.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Have an organized crime ring, it doesn't need to be

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a mob. It doesn't need to be a mob association.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood has allowed us to make that connection, but that

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is not the only connection that it has. And if

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we're looking and we're talking about all the ways in

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>which Donald Trump has a legal tsunami against him, it

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>is to pull back and say, this is an organized

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>crime ring that has engulfed an entire political party. And

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>there are many mechanisms, much in the same way that

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, organized crime members have different hands in different jars.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And what's super interesting is when you say organized crime ring,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>will become super interesting is how is the ring defined?

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Who's in it right and who's not in it right?

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Because because that will tell us more about you know,

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>who flipped who didn't based on whether they're charged or not.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we've got to go back to that

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to remember this special grand jury report when that woman

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 2>was making the rounds who was absolutely giddy going on television. Yeah,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 2>so she told us, you know, there aren't going to

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 2>be any plot twists. There are lots of people's names.

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Were not going to be surprised to see them. You know,

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 2>I would like to see those.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, Jen, just to think about all the ways

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in which for a normal person the walls would be

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>closing in and this would just amount to, you know,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>guilty verdict after guilty verdict. But we know that in

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the America that we live in, where rich, white cis

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>hetero men, very rarely are held to account, let alone

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>those that were former presidents of the United States. I

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>want to turn your attention to Michigan for a moment

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and the sixteen sixteen Republican of fake electors who were

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>caught up in that scheme, who were charged with felonies

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for their quote for their role in the alleged false

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>electors scheme. How does that How does what is happening

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan tie into what is happening in Georgia and

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as a larger part of this overall twenty twenty scheme

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>by Trump and company.

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it tells me I mean, first of all,

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm so proud of the women from my home state.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, you know, we don't come to play. I

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>mean I recognize, I recognize those women as people that

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 2>some people I grew up with him that I admire.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And what it tells me is a couple of things.

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 2>The in Michigan, the Attorney General Dana Nessel took this

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>case back after she had referred it over to Merrick Garland.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So remember Merrick Garland, you know, as in my view,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>was not in a big hurry to do justice when

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it came to anything Donald Trump was involved in. And

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>only when he announced his plan to run for office

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>does he appoint Jack Smith. And only I think shortly

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>after maybe they found those documents at Biden's house. Did

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that to you? Even do that? Like he should have

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>a pointed some a long time ago. And he also

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 2>should have done something about the flake collectors in Michigan

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and the other states. And so I admired Dana Nessel

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>for saying, you know what, I don't have to wait forever.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to bring this case. And she, you know,

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 2>she brought this case against these against these these people.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>It was sixteen of them and the kinds of charges

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 2>you used were ordinary state charges. I love this one

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 2>one crime called uttering and publishing. When I worked in

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the courthouses when I was a teenager and I had

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 2>some summer jobs. They're uttering publishing was something you charge

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 2>people with if they wrote a bad check. It's kind

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of any kind of sort of false written statement. Others

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>were charged with, you know, other charges included for each

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 2>of them election law forgery, and these are these are serious,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 2>serious felonies. These are you know, when they're at this level,

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 2>when it's not just passing a bad check, when it's

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 2>actually trying to falsify the electoral slate, and and you know,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>given opportunity for overturning a lawful election. We're talking about

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>fourteen years for each of these offenses. There's like one, two, three, four,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>or five, like six different felonies here in several accounts each.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 2>To my hope is that other states, not just Georgia

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and Michigan where this was going on, the prosecutors decide

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that they're not going to wait around for the federal government.

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonith's obviously very busy at this point, and whatever else

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>he's not working on, I wouldn't leave it to Merrick

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Garland and hopefully they step up.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but isn't that just a fucking travesty that, like,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Merrick Garland's attempt to not play politics

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to restore integrity into an institution, That's exactly what he's

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>been doing. That's exactly what he's done. And what we

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>know to be true is that if Donald Trump had

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not announced his run for reelection, then Merrick Garland would

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have done absolutely nothing.

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, if it weren't for I think the biggest

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>in addition to that, one hundred percent agree, I think

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the biggest game changer was the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson's

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And yet again, you know, look, there's you know, people

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>who are closest to the activity, who don't have fancy

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>titles always know what's going on in this world. But

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>here she is, this young woman, and not only did

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>they not take her seriously, they tried to destroy her,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, afterward. And you know, my question for you is,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>why did she go Why did her lawyers when they

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>decided to seek her own counsel, why did they feel

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 2>safe going to the commission, and why did they not

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 2>go to the Justice Department first? And there's a reason. Yeah,

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>because I you know, and I don't know. I I

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 2>have a lot, you know, I'm very disappointed. I you know,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 2>as you know, I believe a special counsel should have

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 2>been appointed right away at the outset. But we're where

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>we are. But if there had been a special counsel

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>appointed the minute Merrick Garland was sworn in in March

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty one, we may have actually had some

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>trials by now. This is ridiculous.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not what they that's not that's not what they wanted,

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's not what he wanted.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 2>But we're really it's a terrible situation for the country

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to be in. You know, I'm not someone who's who's

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>happy that Donald Trump is going to most likely be

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the candidate for the Republican Party, because they all know

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the only way that he can win is if there's

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a third party candidate. I mean, that's how Bill Clinton won.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Ross Perow was there. It's very hard, even under normal circumstances,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 2>for anyone to either party to win the presidential election

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the way that the electoral College is set up, in

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the way our country has always been divided, and now

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 2>we're in a real danger of Donald Trump being re elected.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I blame that on the Justice Department

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>because and I'm not saying it because this is not

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a partisan issue. I'm saying someone who tried to overthrow

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the election should not be running again. And that is

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 2>if you don't if you don't understand that, then you

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 2>really don't know what you're doing in your job. And

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how that was in his priority day one.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, that is a that is a question that I

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think we'll ever have an answer to, my friend,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but we will have to leave it here today. Genob,

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for making the time to join

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wo KF read some tea leaves with me here because

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Lord only knows what's coming. But I'm sure it's not good.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But but I'm sure we'll have you back to unpack

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it all when it does come to fruition.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad that you say that, because it's nothing good.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It's going to happen in this space if something even small,

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 2>even the essence of something good, I guess yeah that

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I can you know, have a little a little rejoicing. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>oh we'll see.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today? Dear friends on Woke

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a f as always Power to the people and to

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all the people power, Get woke and stay woke as

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fun