1 00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:09,000 Speaker 1: Why do we all believe our own truths so strongly? 2 00:00:09,520 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 1: And is there any possibility that we can at least 3 00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 1: see other points of view? What is steel manning and 4 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,360 Speaker 1: why is it so important? What does any of this 5 00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:23,000 Speaker 1: have to do with f Scott Fitzgerald or John Keats 6 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 1: or the future of our society? Welcome to Inner Cosmos 7 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:32,880 Speaker 1: with me David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and an author 8 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 1: at Stanford, and in these episodes we come from the 9 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: perspective of the brain to understand why and how our 10 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 1: lives look the way they do. Today's episode is about 11 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:56,160 Speaker 1: something that I've talked about on here before, which is 12 00:00:56,200 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 1: the extreme and seemingly growing rization that characterizes much of 13 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:05,039 Speaker 1: our society at this moment, and I'm interested in it 14 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 1: from the point of view of neuroscience. I'm not banging 15 00:01:08,319 --> 00:01:12,000 Speaker 1: on about any particular political position here. What I'm interested 16 00:01:12,040 --> 00:01:16,520 Speaker 1: in is how we come to form our truths and 17 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:20,280 Speaker 1: why we each believe in them so strongly. For all 18 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: of us, with whatever political issue, our intuition usually is 19 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: to say, well, I know that I'm correct about this, 20 00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 1: but the important part to point out is that, depending 21 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 1: on the issue, roughly half of the society has a 22 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:37,560 Speaker 1: different point of view than you do, and on almost 23 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 1: any hot button political issue, you'll find that the people 24 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: on the other side of the issue have exactly the 25 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,320 Speaker 1: same dedication and passion that you do, the same absolute 26 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:52,480 Speaker 1: belief that they are right and that you are misinformed. Generally, 27 00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:55,360 Speaker 1: it's hard to see this with politics, and I don't 28 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,240 Speaker 1: want to ruffle any feathers here, but I just want 29 00:01:57,240 --> 00:01:59,160 Speaker 1: to point out that it's often easier to see this 30 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:03,520 Speaker 1: with something like religion, whatever deity you were brought up with. 31 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: You tend to think, okay, well, I know that's right, 32 00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:08,840 Speaker 1: and I know that the other two thousand religions on 33 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 1: this planet are all diluted and incorrect. But of course 34 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 1: each of those people is looking at you and thinking 35 00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: exactly the same thing. The way the atheist community sometimes 36 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:23,720 Speaker 1: phrases this is we are all atheists. I just believe 37 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: in one fewer God than you do. And it's always 38 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:30,920 Speaker 1: a worthwhile exercise to think about what your beliefs would 39 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:34,639 Speaker 1: be if you happened to be born into a different religion, 40 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 1: Let's say, on a different spot on the globe, where 41 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 1: everyone that you cared about, your mentors, your hero is 42 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:45,720 Speaker 1: your relatives all believed in that deity. So ask yourself, 43 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:49,720 Speaker 1: what would be your worldview? Now, if there were a 44 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:53,520 Speaker 1: single truth about which deity is correct, you might expect 45 00:02:53,760 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 1: that that would spread everywhere equally. So you'd look for 46 00:02:56,919 --> 00:03:02,280 Speaker 1: evidence of a grassroots takeover of Ottestanism in Mecca, or 47 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 1: maybe a blossoming of Islam in North Dakota. But that's 48 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 1: not what we see. We all take whatever our culture 49 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:13,079 Speaker 1: pours into our nervous systems. Now, I use this as 50 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:16,880 Speaker 1: an example only to illustrate that it's easy to recognize 51 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:19,800 Speaker 1: that there are many points of view on things that 52 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:23,480 Speaker 1: we feel our fundamental truths, and for better or worse, 53 00:03:23,560 --> 00:03:27,639 Speaker 1: people can hold these truths with absolute conviction and take 54 00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:30,920 Speaker 1: up arms over this stuff, and we might be able 55 00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:33,720 Speaker 1: to get ourselves to a point of realizing that if 56 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 1: you were brought up in a different place, you might 57 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:40,160 Speaker 1: have a different point of view. Okay, now you've heard 58 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:42,880 Speaker 1: me talk about on other episodes. Is that the brain 59 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:47,120 Speaker 1: is locked in silence and darkness inside your skull and 60 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,320 Speaker 1: its whole life. It's just trying to make a model 61 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: of the world out there. We slide into the world 62 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: half baked, and we each experience a very thin trajectory 63 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: in this world. We're born in a particular spot at 64 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:05,360 Speaker 1: a particular moment in time, and we have a handful 65 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 1: of experiences that shape our view, and the massive flexibility 66 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:13,480 Speaker 1: of the human brain, what's called brain plasticity, is what 67 00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 1: allows us to absorb our local experiences and shape our model. 68 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:22,840 Speaker 1: So we each end up with an idiosyncratic model about 69 00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: what makes sense. But the interesting thing is that our 70 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:30,960 Speaker 1: human brains are generally terrible at seeing outside of their 71 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:35,039 Speaker 1: own walls. We generally believe that our view of the 72 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 1: world is the correct view, and we're typically likely to 73 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: think that anyone who votes differently than we do is 74 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 1: a real problem because they are misinformed or stubborn, or 75 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:50,320 Speaker 1: at the extreme, they're simply evil. So we have limited 76 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 1: internal models combined with a sense that we know the truth. 77 00:04:55,160 --> 00:04:57,159 Speaker 1: This is just the way that brains work, and for 78 00:04:57,240 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 1: much more detailedness, please listen to some of my previous episodes, 79 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:03,480 Speaker 1: which I've linked in the show notes on Eagleman dot 80 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:07,000 Speaker 1: com slash podcast. Now, one of the things that's been 81 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,960 Speaker 1: hard to miss is watching millions of humans on both 82 00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:14,640 Speaker 1: sides of society doubling down and saying that they need 83 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:18,719 Speaker 1: to protect our democracy, which is being threatened by the 84 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:22,080 Speaker 1: other side. And part of what makes me feel dismayed 85 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:25,479 Speaker 1: is that I have intelligent friends on both sides of 86 00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:27,479 Speaker 1: the aisle, and many of the people that I know 87 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 1: and love are truly unable to see the viewpoint of 88 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 1: the other side. People on both sides claim to have 89 00:05:35,440 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 1: logic on their side, and morality and the statistics, and 90 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 1: they feel certain that they're right and the other side 91 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 1: is wrong. And for that matter, a lot of people 92 00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:49,239 Speaker 1: feel certain that there even are clearly definable sides, even 93 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:53,840 Speaker 1: though so much of political life on Earth's complexities in 94 00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 1: which issues go with which. And again, what this comes 95 00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:00,480 Speaker 1: down to is the limitations of the internal model. Without 96 00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:04,720 Speaker 1: real effort, we have a difficult time putting ourselves at 97 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: other people's shoes. And it would be one thing if 98 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,719 Speaker 1: only a few people had this other point of view. 99 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:13,600 Speaker 1: But in the case of current political upheaval, it's usually 100 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 1: the case that about half of the humans that you 101 00:06:16,440 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 1: spin with might be on the other side of some issues. 102 00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:22,919 Speaker 1: So it's not just a few people with a wacky opinion. 103 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 1: We're talking about millions of people who genuinely feel differently 104 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: about some issue. Than you do. And the question is, 105 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: is there a way for us to expand our internal 106 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:37,760 Speaker 1: models to at least see their point of view, not 107 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:41,520 Speaker 1: even agree with it, just understand what their perspective is 108 00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 1: and why. Now we're all familiar with the problem that's 109 00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: currently worsening our political discourse, which is we all tend 110 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:51,359 Speaker 1: to seek out the people who agree with us, and 111 00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:54,280 Speaker 1: it's a self reinforcing loop such that we tend to 112 00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:59,240 Speaker 1: believe that most or all sane and reasonable people agree 113 00:06:59,279 --> 00:07:02,400 Speaker 1: with us. But the question for today is is there 114 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 1: any meaningful way that we could combat this tendency to 115 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 1: retreat into our own echo chambers and at least here 116 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:13,160 Speaker 1: with the other side of the political issue is saying 117 00:07:13,640 --> 00:07:17,640 Speaker 1: and how they're feeling, and to appreciate the complexities and 118 00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 1: diversity of opinions on the other side. There's a great 119 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 1: quotation from the writer F. Scott Fitzgerald who says, quote, 120 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:30,400 Speaker 1: the test of a first rate intelligence is the ability 121 00:07:30,480 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 1: to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same 122 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: time and still retain the ability to function. And the 123 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,280 Speaker 1: poet John Keats, who was a believer in this concept 124 00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 1: as well, he called this ability negative capability, which he 125 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 1: just meant as a person being capable of being in 126 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:55,640 Speaker 1: uncertainties and mysteries and doubts. So there's some nodding to 127 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 1: this in the intellectual community, but we're not seeing a 128 00:07:58,320 --> 00:08:01,240 Speaker 1: great deal of this in the political media. This holding 129 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: two opposed ideas in mind at the same time, well 130 00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 1: why not. I suspect there are at least two issues here. 131 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:09,800 Speaker 1: The first is that we all like to believe our 132 00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:13,239 Speaker 1: own truths in the second is that people often feel 133 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 1: that they will seem smarter and get more followers if 134 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:20,480 Speaker 1: they take a hardline position and say I understand this 135 00:08:20,680 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 1: with crystal clarity, I have no doubts. 136 00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 2: Now. 137 00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 1: This is true for politicians and also for media outlets, 138 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 1: which are rewarded for speaking the language that their constituents 139 00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:36,480 Speaker 1: want to hear. And of course we see on all 140 00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 1: sides of the spectrum the media that say, look, we 141 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:43,600 Speaker 1: only care to tell the truth. Everyone else might be 142 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:46,560 Speaker 1: a liar or misdirected, but we're finally going to get 143 00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,319 Speaker 1: this right. We see this on all sides, and what 144 00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 1: this represents is our certainty that we know the truth 145 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 1: and if we could just shout it loudly enough and 146 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 1: start our own website, then everyone would see the wisdom 147 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: of what we're saying and come to agree with us. 148 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:04,640 Speaker 1: And you may know that I made a triptich of 149 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 1: episodes on this issue of the meaning of truth and 150 00:09:08,160 --> 00:09:10,839 Speaker 1: truth on the Internet and truth in media. Those were 151 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,520 Speaker 1: episodes forty to forty two. And if you heard my 152 00:09:13,679 --> 00:09:16,360 Speaker 1: argument there, you'll know that I think this notion of 153 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 1: telling the truth in media is a lost cause because, 154 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:25,600 Speaker 1: with the exception of a very few factual issues, most 155 00:09:25,679 --> 00:09:30,320 Speaker 1: of telling a political story is interpretation, which is to say, 156 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:33,960 Speaker 1: even putting aside the fog of war issues, the issue 157 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 1: of perspective determines which facts make it into your story 158 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 1: and which do not. So the question I want to 159 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: ask say is this, is there a different approach to 160 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,480 Speaker 1: news telling? Is there a way to think about doing 161 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:52,239 Speaker 1: this totally differently? And I think one of the cleverest approaches, 162 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:55,200 Speaker 1: which is attempted every once in a while, is to 163 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 1: build something that instead of trying to pick aside and 164 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:02,920 Speaker 1: fight and die for it, but instead works to say, look, 165 00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 1: there are multiple points of view here. Let's genuinely dig 166 00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:10,720 Speaker 1: into the complexity of the issues and try to see 167 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 1: if we can build a more multi dimensional understanding. Instead 168 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:18,760 Speaker 1: of the typical approach of saying I have my team 169 00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 1: and the other team is simply misinformed or misanthropic. And 170 00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 1: one such attempt at making a site like this is 171 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:28,800 Speaker 1: from a journalist named Isaac Sahl, who runs a newsletter 172 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 1: called Tangle. The idea of Tangle is to present different 173 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 1: sides of the same argument to understand something about the 174 00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:42,080 Speaker 1: complexities therein. It's not about saying both sides are right 175 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 1: and we're going to land in the middle. Instead, it's 176 00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:47,440 Speaker 1: about saying, wherever you might land, can you do this 177 00:10:47,640 --> 00:10:53,080 Speaker 1: with curiosity and intellectual humility and a meaningful level of 178 00:10:53,120 --> 00:10:58,560 Speaker 1: self education on the position rather than tribalism and assumption. 179 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 1: Big fan of what sites like Tangle are working to do, 180 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 1: so I called up Tangles founder Isaac Sahl to talk 181 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 1: with him about this. Okay, Isaac, it's so great to 182 00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 1: have you here. You run a newsletter called Tangle, which 183 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 1: I'm a giant fan of, and one of the things 184 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:26,200 Speaker 1: that has struck me as amazing is that you tell 185 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:30,320 Speaker 1: your readers if they disagree with you, not to throw 186 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:35,000 Speaker 1: vitriol your way or or you know, unsubscribe, but to 187 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 1: tell you why they disagree and to make their argument 188 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 1: to you. So tell us about that, tell us about 189 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:44,559 Speaker 1: Tangle and how you came to run a newsletter like that. 190 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure. So first of all, thanks for having me. 191 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:50,680 Speaker 2: You know, I'm Stan of the show, glad to be here. 192 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:53,000 Speaker 2: It's been fun listening to you guys last few weeks. 193 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:55,720 Speaker 2: You know, I have kind of two genesis stories. I'd 194 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:57,320 Speaker 2: say the first one is just that I grew up 195 00:11:57,320 --> 00:12:00,920 Speaker 2: in a really politically divided place in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 196 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:05,520 Speaker 2: Bellweather County, Bellweather State. Obviously, Pennsylvania kind of goes where 197 00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 2: the presidential election goes. So I just grew up around 198 00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:11,680 Speaker 2: a lot of people who had very different political views 199 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 2: than each other, and so I saw how those divides 200 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,600 Speaker 2: manifested and also how people kind of talked through those 201 00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:20,439 Speaker 2: divides in real time. And have a lot of friends 202 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:22,440 Speaker 2: and family people I love and care about who have 203 00:12:22,520 --> 00:12:25,079 Speaker 2: different political views, which I think just makes me a 204 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,840 Speaker 2: little bit more open minded to them. And then the 205 00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:31,439 Speaker 2: second kind of genesis story was just being on the 206 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:34,400 Speaker 2: inside of media organizations and kind of seeing how the 207 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 2: sausage was made. And it became very clear to me 208 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 2: early on that a lot of media organizations are catering 209 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:43,880 Speaker 2: their content to their audience. You know, we have a 210 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:47,480 Speaker 2: term for it now, audience capture. The idea that you know, 211 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:50,200 Speaker 2: an audience likes something, they like a certain tone or 212 00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:53,960 Speaker 2: a certain editorial slam, and so news organizations give them 213 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 2: more and more of that because they recognize that's what 214 00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:00,280 Speaker 2: the audience wants. And we've created a lot of echo 215 00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:04,720 Speaker 2: chambers and bias and you know, confirming people's preconceived notions. 216 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 2: And when I decided to go out and start my 217 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:10,760 Speaker 2: own media company, I was just looking at a blank 218 00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:14,079 Speaker 2: page and that was super exciting for me to think about, 219 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:16,720 Speaker 2: how could I tear this whole thing down and start 220 00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:19,199 Speaker 2: from the beginning. And what are some of the ethos 221 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:23,400 Speaker 2: that I would want a news organization to have. And 222 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 2: one of them is that I want us to be 223 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:29,800 Speaker 2: really open minded and fair. Another is I want to 224 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 2: make sure we're representing people from across the political spectrum 225 00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:36,840 Speaker 2: and not just presenting people with arguments reviews that they 226 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 2: already believe. And the third is that I want my 227 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:44,559 Speaker 2: audience to be involved in the conversation and the production 228 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 2: of the content and feel like their voice is heard 229 00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 2: and feel like they can actually interact and learn from 230 00:13:51,280 --> 00:13:54,320 Speaker 2: the news and talk to me or our staff, or 231 00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:56,720 Speaker 2: have a space where they can kind of express themselves. 232 00:13:57,240 --> 00:13:59,959 Speaker 2: You know, I look at the comment section on Facebook 233 00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 2: on an article, and a lot of people see, you know, 234 00:14:03,400 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 2: craziness and people spouting off and fighting, and it's always like, 235 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:10,480 Speaker 2: don't look at the comments section. And when I go 236 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:13,520 Speaker 2: and do that, I see something that I think is 237 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:17,400 Speaker 2: a gold mine for people who care about issues, people 238 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:19,600 Speaker 2: who want to express themselves, people want to be involved 239 00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:22,200 Speaker 2: in the conversation, And so I try and invite those 240 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:24,320 Speaker 2: people in a bit. And frankly, I learn a lot 241 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:26,560 Speaker 2: from my readers when they write in and tell me 242 00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:28,760 Speaker 2: about why they view the world a certain way. It's 243 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 2: almost always illuminating. 244 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 1: Now a lot of folks, especially in this moment in time, 245 00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 1: seem less interested in instigating dialogue than in terminating it. 246 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: So why do you think that is what's happening? And 247 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: do you feel that this time is different than previous eras? 248 00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 2: Look, I mean, anybody who takes a dive into the 249 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:55,040 Speaker 2: history of free speech will learn pretty quickly that what 250 00:14:55,120 --> 00:14:58,160 Speaker 2: we're living through right now is not a particularly unique thing. 251 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:03,000 Speaker 2: I think beach goes through expansions and contractions, and it 252 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:06,560 Speaker 2: always has throughout you know, civil society. There were times 253 00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 2: when the idea of a printing press was exactly the 254 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 2: same way we talk about you know, the internet today, 255 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 2: that this would be too big and too easy to 256 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 2: disseminate information, and we needed to limit this thing because 257 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 2: it was so scary that someone could write down their ideas, 258 00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:27,440 Speaker 2: you know, print a thousand copies of them, and cover 259 00:15:27,520 --> 00:15:29,680 Speaker 2: a city in them, you know, in a matter of hours. 260 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:31,600 Speaker 2: And we went through the same thing with the radio. 261 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:33,600 Speaker 2: We went through the same thing with the Internet, and 262 00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:35,760 Speaker 2: it's something that's going to happen over and over again 263 00:15:35,760 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 2: throughout society. And I'm sure there's communication methods we haven't 264 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:42,040 Speaker 2: even considered yet that are coming down the pike that 265 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 2: are going to make it a lot easier to you know, 266 00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 2: transmit thoughts or ideas and create all sorts of different issues. 267 00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 2: And I don't want to downplay the idea that you know, 268 00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:57,200 Speaker 2: misinformation or bad information is a you know, a threat 269 00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:02,720 Speaker 2: to democracy or a threat to an informed populace. It is. 270 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 2: There are certain things about it that are really problematic. 271 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,840 Speaker 2: The Internet has a lot of really dark corners, and 272 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 2: it's really easy for people to sort of sit in 273 00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 2: their own echo chambers and be radicalized. I mean, there's 274 00:16:13,640 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 2: a plethora of evidence for that. But the way to 275 00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:23,840 Speaker 2: sort of address these issues is almost never to eliminate them, 276 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:28,200 Speaker 2: and oftentimes it's not even good to quarantine them, because 277 00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 2: what you basically do is you just put people off 278 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 2: into their own silos. You put them into their own 279 00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:37,040 Speaker 2: little corners of the Internet where they're only interacting with 280 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 2: the people who agree with them, and it just pushes 281 00:16:39,200 --> 00:16:41,720 Speaker 2: them further into the fringe. And you know, there are 282 00:16:41,760 --> 00:16:44,600 Speaker 2: a lot of examples of this. I think the number 283 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:48,160 Speaker 2: of people who have been quote unquote canceled or silenced 284 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:51,040 Speaker 2: and the people who have done the cancelation or silencing 285 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,640 Speaker 2: have gotten what they want is quite limited. You know, 286 00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 2: I could think of maybe two or three people who 287 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 2: have I'm like, oh, I forgot that person existed because 288 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:02,320 Speaker 2: they got canceled or they got kicked off a platform 289 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 2: or whatever. Most of the time, what happens is like 290 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:08,119 Speaker 2: what happened to somebody like Alex Jones, where you know, 291 00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:11,520 Speaker 2: he becomes a martyr by being silenced, and then he 292 00:17:11,600 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 2: builds his audience in his own space where nothing he 293 00:17:14,040 --> 00:17:16,919 Speaker 2: says or does gets challenged. And then you know, you 294 00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:20,399 Speaker 2: look at something like January sixth, and who's there standing 295 00:17:20,440 --> 00:17:23,399 Speaker 2: on the White House lawn on a table giving instructions 296 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:25,639 Speaker 2: on a megaphone. It's Alex Jones with a bunch of 297 00:17:25,640 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 2: his supporters. And yeah, maybe we haven't seen him on 298 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 2: Twitter for five years, but guess what, he's still building 299 00:17:30,840 --> 00:17:33,160 Speaker 2: a massive audience, speaking to millions of people, and he's 300 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,959 Speaker 2: just doing it in a space where his perspectives are 301 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,520 Speaker 2: never getting challenged. So I think that's the kind of 302 00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:43,160 Speaker 2: illustration of why silencing these you know, quote unquote dangerous 303 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:45,479 Speaker 2: people is a really dangerous thing to do, and why 304 00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:48,360 Speaker 2: I prefer to have the engagement and have it out 305 00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 2: and let the audience sort of make up their minds. 306 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:54,119 Speaker 1: So I love your point of view and your approach 307 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:57,600 Speaker 1: to this. Why do you think it's so rare? As in, 308 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:00,600 Speaker 1: why are you one of the few people who's running 309 00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:01,240 Speaker 1: a site like this? 310 00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:05,119 Speaker 2: You know, it's a question I asked myself a lot, 311 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 2: because when I started, I recognized that there was a 312 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:16,880 Speaker 2: desire for this from people. But I also remember when 313 00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:20,360 Speaker 2: I first launched Tangle that I was not confident that 314 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 2: it was going to work. The idea that I was 315 00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:25,960 Speaker 2: going to bring a bunch of people from across the 316 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:29,199 Speaker 2: political spectrum under one roof and convince them all to 317 00:18:29,240 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 2: trust me and to trust my news, and to trust 318 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:36,120 Speaker 2: us as a place to provide them balanced perspectives. It 319 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:40,199 Speaker 2: was really daunting. It seemed kind of unrealistic, and in 320 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:43,119 Speaker 2: a lot of ways, I thought, this probably isn't going 321 00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:46,119 Speaker 2: to work, but it's worth trying. And I think most 322 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 2: people who are looking at the media as a business 323 00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:53,560 Speaker 2: understand that the best way to make money and the 324 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:56,120 Speaker 2: best way to grow is to give people the red 325 00:18:56,160 --> 00:18:58,040 Speaker 2: meat that they want. You know, I mean the vast 326 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 2: majority of trash and viewers on a station like Fox 327 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,520 Speaker 2: News or a website like the New York Times dot 328 00:19:05,560 --> 00:19:08,639 Speaker 2: com or whatever it is, they're political junkies. They are 329 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 2: people who are going back to that every single day. 330 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:13,080 Speaker 2: You know, they represent maybe five or ten percent of 331 00:19:13,119 --> 00:19:17,720 Speaker 2: the population. And if you can capture that group and 332 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:20,119 Speaker 2: keep them coming back day to day and keep giving 333 00:19:20,119 --> 00:19:22,800 Speaker 2: them what they want, keep giving them ammunition for their 334 00:19:22,880 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 2: arguments and their worldviews, that's a really good way to 335 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:28,760 Speaker 2: build a subscription, you know, a subscriber base. It's a 336 00:19:28,760 --> 00:19:31,880 Speaker 2: really good way to build an audience for primetime television. 337 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:34,600 Speaker 2: It's a really good way to build an advertising business 338 00:19:34,600 --> 00:19:37,359 Speaker 2: that has consistent traffic and metricks. And so I think 339 00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:39,280 Speaker 2: there's a lot of business stuff happening in the media 340 00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 2: space that's sort of influencing these things. I had a 341 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:48,240 Speaker 2: vision for a subscriber supported news outlet where people were 342 00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:51,040 Speaker 2: coming to us because they trusted us, because they wanted 343 00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:53,480 Speaker 2: to understand the news better, because they wanted to get 344 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 2: out of their bubbles. And I thought we could sell 345 00:19:56,200 --> 00:19:59,120 Speaker 2: it to them if the content, you know, followed through 346 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 2: on the promise, and we've been able to do that. 347 00:20:02,080 --> 00:20:05,159 Speaker 2: But you know, I have one hundred thousand plus subscribers 348 00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 2: on my newsletter, which is a huge number, and I'm 349 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:09,760 Speaker 2: super proud of it. And five years ago, if you 350 00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 2: told me that, I would have been really happy that 351 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:14,400 Speaker 2: we hit this milestone. But two million people watch Fox 352 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:16,439 Speaker 2: News every night, you know, The New York Times has 353 00:20:16,560 --> 00:20:19,959 Speaker 2: two million subscribers. That Huffing and Post still gets hundreds 354 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:23,399 Speaker 2: of thousand of hits a day. So there's a lot 355 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 2: of people who are competing with that make us look 356 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:30,280 Speaker 2: like a small fish still. But I think that, you know, 357 00:20:30,359 --> 00:20:32,800 Speaker 2: we're a growing movement of people who are interested in 358 00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 2: stepping into this kind of media ecosystem, and I hope 359 00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:37,640 Speaker 2: it keeps growling. 360 00:20:53,080 --> 00:20:55,120 Speaker 1: So I just want to touch on this issue about 361 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:58,320 Speaker 1: the extremes about you said maybe five percent of the 362 00:20:58,359 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 1: people are going for the extreme things. That leaves a 363 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:04,920 Speaker 1: lot of people somewhere in the middle. And so what 364 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:07,639 Speaker 1: opportunities do they have, for example, from the point of 365 00:21:07,720 --> 00:21:10,640 Speaker 1: view of candidates. You know, we have a system that 366 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:15,240 Speaker 1: tends to privilege people who take extreme positions, and so 367 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:19,199 Speaker 1: what does this mean for our political system? 368 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:23,240 Speaker 2: I had nothing great. It's not I would say the 369 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:27,080 Speaker 2: news is not super optimistic in that sense. You know. 370 00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 2: I got the chance to interview a guy named Hiram 371 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:33,119 Speaker 2: Lewis who co authored a book called The Myth of 372 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:36,879 Speaker 2: the Lefts and the Right. Really fascinating guy who talks about, 373 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:40,879 Speaker 2: you know, basically, we're not operating around a left and 374 00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 2: right political orientation that is fixed and we're all moving. 375 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:48,760 Speaker 2: Those political orientations are actually moving, and it's really just 376 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:52,560 Speaker 2: tribal motivations and kind of tribal dynamics that are driving 377 00:21:52,600 --> 00:21:55,679 Speaker 2: what constitutes being a conservative or what constant's being in liberal. 378 00:21:56,119 --> 00:21:57,720 Speaker 2: And one of the things that he said to me. 379 00:21:58,400 --> 00:22:01,040 Speaker 2: That has always stuck with me, which I really like 380 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:06,239 Speaker 2: is most voters go to the voting booth, and what 381 00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:09,639 Speaker 2: they are doing effectively is like being a shop or 382 00:22:09,640 --> 00:22:11,600 Speaker 2: going to a grocery store where you're looking for a 383 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:13,320 Speaker 2: bunch of things. You want to go pick out all 384 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 2: the things you want, and you get to the grocery 385 00:22:15,600 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 2: store and there's one card A that's just full of 386 00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 2: half stuff you really want and half stuff you really don't, 387 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:24,119 Speaker 2: and one car card B full of half stuff you 388 00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:26,199 Speaker 2: really want and half stuff you really don't. And you 389 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:27,960 Speaker 2: just have to pick one of the carts, and you 390 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:29,959 Speaker 2: pick the one with more stuff that you really like 391 00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:32,399 Speaker 2: and less stuff that you really don't. And that's what 392 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:35,320 Speaker 2: most American voters you're doing. And I think it's true 393 00:22:35,359 --> 00:22:38,840 Speaker 2: of Democrats, and it's true of Republicans. And what's really 394 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,560 Speaker 2: interesting about it is the dynamic we have in our 395 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 2: country right now is a lot of people who go 396 00:22:45,880 --> 00:22:48,879 Speaker 2: to the grocery store and pick cart A. Look at 397 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:50,640 Speaker 2: people who go to the grocery store and pick cart 398 00:22:50,680 --> 00:22:53,480 Speaker 2: B and think you're totally insane. I can't believe you 399 00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:56,320 Speaker 2: would do that, like you're a nut. Even though there's 400 00:22:56,359 --> 00:22:58,119 Speaker 2: a bunch of stuff in card b they want to 401 00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:00,760 Speaker 2: and a bunch of stuff in there cart that they 402 00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:03,600 Speaker 2: don't really want, but they have a hard time seeing 403 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:06,800 Speaker 2: that about the other person. And there's tons of dynamics 404 00:23:06,840 --> 00:23:09,199 Speaker 2: I think that drive that, you know, whether it's the 405 00:23:09,320 --> 00:23:12,359 Speaker 2: media polarization, which is an issue that I'm trying to solve, 406 00:23:12,760 --> 00:23:15,680 Speaker 2: Whether it's the fact that, you know, we only talk 407 00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:17,840 Speaker 2: about the people who are on the fringe when we 408 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,080 Speaker 2: talk about the other side, or the fact that in 409 00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:23,119 Speaker 2: American society today, people are becoming a lot more siloed. 410 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:26,800 Speaker 2: So it's not just that we consume news that you know, 411 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:28,920 Speaker 2: affirms a lot of our priority. It's that we also 412 00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:32,919 Speaker 2: spend time with people in our social lives who mostly 413 00:23:32,960 --> 00:23:36,199 Speaker 2: agree with us politically. So, you know, if you're a 414 00:23:36,240 --> 00:23:40,679 Speaker 2: conservative living somewhere in rural West Texas, you might not 415 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:43,240 Speaker 2: know very many in Muslims. And so the things that 416 00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:45,200 Speaker 2: you see about Muslims on the news are the things 417 00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 2: that we all see about Muslims on the news, and 418 00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:50,560 Speaker 2: you don't get to learn or meet somebody who maybe 419 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:53,639 Speaker 2: is not what you see characterized on the news, And 420 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:58,760 Speaker 2: that goes every direction in our country and it creates, 421 00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:01,160 Speaker 2: you know, a really dangerous sort of boiling pot, which 422 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:03,080 Speaker 2: I think is part of what we have right now. 423 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:05,960 Speaker 1: So I want to return to this issue about what 424 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:10,040 Speaker 1: makes you care about taking this middle position, about standing 425 00:24:10,040 --> 00:24:12,359 Speaker 1: in between the two carts and saying, look, I get it, 426 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:14,040 Speaker 1: there's some good stuff in here. There's some good stuff 427 00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: in here. You said that you grew up in a 428 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:18,879 Speaker 1: place where there were different opinions and so on, but 429 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:21,359 Speaker 1: still a lot of people grew up in that. What 430 00:24:21,520 --> 00:24:23,719 Speaker 1: is it that allowed you to feel like, all right, 431 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:26,520 Speaker 1: I want to tackle this. I want to represent everyone's 432 00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:28,880 Speaker 1: point of view here so that we can understand each other. 433 00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:31,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, first of all, I just want to address 434 00:24:31,040 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 2: something you just said, because it's something I try and 435 00:24:33,119 --> 00:24:35,560 Speaker 2: talk a little bit about in my writing, which is 436 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:39,920 Speaker 2: I'm not trying to be a middle my own personal 437 00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:42,639 Speaker 2: perspectives and my own views. I'm not just trying to 438 00:24:42,720 --> 00:24:46,080 Speaker 2: find some middle ground. I actually think doing that is 439 00:24:46,119 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 2: an ideology of its own. If you're always looking for 440 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:51,199 Speaker 2: what's between the left and the right, you're just going 441 00:24:51,240 --> 00:24:53,560 Speaker 2: to land on a bunch of half baked solutions. Sometimes 442 00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:55,320 Speaker 2: the people on the left are right, sometimes the people 443 00:24:55,359 --> 00:24:57,280 Speaker 2: on the right are right. I try and just take 444 00:24:57,320 --> 00:24:59,800 Speaker 2: it issue by issue, and I don't know. I consider 445 00:24:59,800 --> 00:25:02,160 Speaker 2: my self a moderate and open minded, but I don't 446 00:25:02,200 --> 00:25:04,560 Speaker 2: consider myself, you know, middle on a lot of the 447 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 2: really contentious issues. Sometimes I'd land there, but I try 448 00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 2: and you know, come to it organically and not seek 449 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:13,879 Speaker 2: it out. In terms of like the the motivation for 450 00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 2: starting Tangle, I mean, part of it was the classic 451 00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:21,760 Speaker 2: entrepreneurial thing, which was I wanted a product and I 452 00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:23,959 Speaker 2: went looking for it and I couldn't find it, and 453 00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 2: so I thought, oh, it wouldn't be that hard to 454 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:29,359 Speaker 2: make that. I mean, I would go read the news 455 00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:32,600 Speaker 2: and there'd be a story about Donald Trump's border wall, 456 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:35,880 Speaker 2: and in order for me to feel like I had 457 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:39,480 Speaker 2: a full understanding of all the arguments about whether a 458 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:41,840 Speaker 2: border wall was a good or bad thing, I'd have 459 00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 2: to read the Wall Street Journal opinion page. I'd have 460 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:46,159 Speaker 2: to watch Fox News. I'd have to read the New 461 00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:48,080 Speaker 2: York Times opinion page. I'd read an article on the 462 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 2: Huffington Post. I'd read a piece from some immigration lawyers 463 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 2: who are on the left or at the ACLU. I 464 00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:57,119 Speaker 2: would listen to some conservative podcasts like Ben Shapiro or something. 465 00:25:57,280 --> 00:26:00,399 Speaker 2: I would go to twenty different sources and I'd six 466 00:26:00,480 --> 00:26:03,120 Speaker 2: hours doing it, and then at the end of all that, 467 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:05,920 Speaker 2: I'd feel like, Okay, now I kind of have some clarity, 468 00:26:05,960 --> 00:26:08,480 Speaker 2: and I've seen a bunch of the arguments on this issue, 469 00:26:08,840 --> 00:26:11,040 Speaker 2: and God, I really wish there was a place that 470 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:14,480 Speaker 2: I could just go get that and not spend half 471 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:16,600 Speaker 2: my day doing it, and it would just take ten 472 00:26:16,680 --> 00:26:19,720 Speaker 2: or fifteen minutes. And I went looking for that product 473 00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:23,160 Speaker 2: and I didn't see it anywhere, and so I started 474 00:26:23,200 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 2: a product that I felt fulfilled that need and figured 475 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,040 Speaker 2: I wasn't building the person who wanted that. I think, 476 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:30,439 Speaker 2: you know, some of our growth has definitely confirmed that 477 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:33,159 Speaker 2: there's a lot of people out there, and over time 478 00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:36,199 Speaker 2: the newsletter, in the podcast and the YouTube channel and 479 00:26:36,200 --> 00:26:38,040 Speaker 2: all the stuff we have, it's just become a lot 480 00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:41,639 Speaker 2: more personal because people want to know who's providing the 481 00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:45,320 Speaker 2: news to them. So early on readers would say, hey, 482 00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:48,200 Speaker 2: it's like, thanks for explaining this story. Cool to see 483 00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:49,479 Speaker 2: what the left and the right are saying, but I'm 484 00:26:49,520 --> 00:26:52,199 Speaker 2: really curious, like what do you think? And that was 485 00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 2: like the genesis of my take, which is a section 486 00:26:55,760 --> 00:26:58,280 Speaker 2: in the newsletter where I share my own personal opinion 487 00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 2: on stories and that's one of the engage parts of 488 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 2: the newsletter because people are really interested in the kind 489 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:07,040 Speaker 2: of personal element and the person that is providing them 490 00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 2: this information why they view things certain ways. And I 491 00:27:10,080 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 2: try not to just make that section a little mini 492 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:15,840 Speaker 2: opinion piece. I try and address the arguments that we 493 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:17,840 Speaker 2: just laid out in the newsletter and talk about why 494 00:27:17,880 --> 00:27:20,040 Speaker 2: so I'm resident with me and why they don't. And 495 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:22,600 Speaker 2: I go to it with, you know, just humility, with 496 00:27:22,760 --> 00:27:25,280 Speaker 2: the acknowledgement that my position is not the right one 497 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:28,320 Speaker 2: and I'm trying to learn and figure out what i believe, 498 00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:29,640 Speaker 2: just like a lot of Americans are. 499 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's the key, is intellectual humility. One 500 00:27:33,359 --> 00:27:36,120 Speaker 1: of the things that I find so remarkable about your 501 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:39,919 Speaker 1: newsletter is first of all, you present the what the 502 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:42,159 Speaker 1: left is saying, what the right is thing. Even within 503 00:27:42,320 --> 00:27:45,680 Speaker 1: those there are different voices representing different points of view. 504 00:27:46,040 --> 00:27:48,840 Speaker 1: Then you tell your opinion. But the important part is 505 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:51,719 Speaker 1: then you say, look, I'm really aware, I'm trying to 506 00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:55,440 Speaker 1: see my own blind spots, and so next week I'm 507 00:27:55,480 --> 00:27:57,840 Speaker 1: going to write from the opposite point of view. I'm 508 00:27:57,840 --> 00:28:02,680 Speaker 1: going to stealman the other point of view and represent 509 00:28:02,720 --> 00:28:04,399 Speaker 1: that and try to see my own blind spots, and 510 00:28:04,440 --> 00:28:08,000 Speaker 1: that is so rare, and I'm still I'm trying to 511 00:28:08,000 --> 00:28:12,440 Speaker 1: figure out what makes you do that? And why isn't 512 00:28:12,520 --> 00:28:13,720 Speaker 1: everybody trying to do that? 513 00:28:14,760 --> 00:28:17,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a good question. I mean I, first of all, 514 00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:21,080 Speaker 2: from a personal perspective, I find that exercise exhilarating. I mean, 515 00:28:21,119 --> 00:28:24,560 Speaker 2: I genuinely find it really interesting and fun, and it 516 00:28:24,680 --> 00:28:27,440 Speaker 2: excites me to challenge myself that way, and it excites 517 00:28:27,480 --> 00:28:30,200 Speaker 2: me to see people write in and make an argument 518 00:28:30,280 --> 00:28:33,680 Speaker 2: I haven't thought of. I think I have a curious disposition, 519 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:37,879 Speaker 2: and I'm open minded, and I'm speaking publicly about issues 520 00:28:37,880 --> 00:28:39,400 Speaker 2: that I really care about, and so I want to 521 00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:43,960 Speaker 2: get them right. So the idea that I can go 522 00:28:44,080 --> 00:28:46,720 Speaker 2: back and read an article I wrote a few weeks 523 00:28:46,720 --> 00:28:50,040 Speaker 2: ago and then write an entire opinion piece criticizing the 524 00:28:50,080 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 2: thing I just wrote that exercise for me is actually 525 00:28:53,440 --> 00:28:57,440 Speaker 2: really fun and rewarding. But I'll say candidly that I 526 00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:01,080 Speaker 2: wasn't always like that, and it wasn't always easy for 527 00:29:01,120 --> 00:29:02,640 Speaker 2: me to do that. And one of the things that 528 00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:05,920 Speaker 2: made it easy was the actual exercise of doing the 529 00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:09,080 Speaker 2: newsletter every day, and that is created in me, you know, 530 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 2: like a muscle that I think I've trained the same 531 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 2: way I trained muscles going to the gym, where I 532 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:19,680 Speaker 2: have taught myself that it's okay, it's okay to just 533 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:23,280 Speaker 2: like step out of my own belief step out of 534 00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:25,840 Speaker 2: my own viewpoint, and try and put myself in another 535 00:29:25,880 --> 00:29:29,400 Speaker 2: person's perspective or put myself in another person's you know, 536 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:33,360 Speaker 2: ideological framework, and explore that a bit and think along 537 00:29:33,360 --> 00:29:36,000 Speaker 2: those lines and play with it and going there. It's 538 00:29:36,120 --> 00:29:37,640 Speaker 2: you know, I think a lot of people feel like 539 00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:40,960 Speaker 2: they can't go do that because if they do, they'll 540 00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:44,080 Speaker 2: never return to their core self or their values. And 541 00:29:44,120 --> 00:29:47,320 Speaker 2: it's not true. You can sit down at your computer 542 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,880 Speaker 2: and write a five hundred word piece making an argument 543 00:29:50,920 --> 00:29:53,040 Speaker 2: for a position you don't believe, just to see what 544 00:29:53,080 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 2: it feels like and what comes out of you and 545 00:29:55,360 --> 00:29:57,880 Speaker 2: what positions come up and what ideas come up. And 546 00:29:57,920 --> 00:29:59,840 Speaker 2: then you can delete it and never publish it or 547 00:30:00,200 --> 00:30:01,800 Speaker 2: do anything with it, or you can show it to 548 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:03,520 Speaker 2: people and try and get feedback on it. And that 549 00:30:03,640 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 2: exercise doesn't change who you are fundamentally. It just makes 550 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:09,640 Speaker 2: you a little more open minded. I think teaches you 551 00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:13,320 Speaker 2: to empathize with people who maybe you disagree, and I 552 00:30:13,440 --> 00:30:16,400 Speaker 2: was fortunate enough that I did that publicly through Tangle 553 00:30:16,520 --> 00:30:18,560 Speaker 2: with a community of readers who are interested in that, 554 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:21,560 Speaker 2: and they gave me a lot of positive reinforcement for it. 555 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,719 Speaker 2: You know, Like we published a piece today where I 556 00:30:24,840 --> 00:30:28,160 Speaker 2: took the position that Israel should not have it like, 557 00:30:28,280 --> 00:30:31,280 Speaker 2: not engage in a ceasefire in Gaza, which is not 558 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:33,560 Speaker 2: a position I believe. I've been writing a lot about 559 00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:37,880 Speaker 2: how I want Israel to make a ceasefire deal, and 560 00:30:38,400 --> 00:30:40,920 Speaker 2: I said today I'm going to step out of that 561 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:44,240 Speaker 2: view and try and articulate the best arguments against my position. 562 00:30:44,800 --> 00:30:47,360 Speaker 2: And you know, I've read fifty emails that have come 563 00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:48,880 Speaker 2: in in the last hour and a half since we 564 00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:52,400 Speaker 2: published that piece, and forty eight of them have been positive. 565 00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:54,200 Speaker 2: You know. They are people saying, thank you so much 566 00:30:54,240 --> 00:30:57,080 Speaker 2: for doing this. I know you don't totally believe all 567 00:30:57,120 --> 00:30:58,960 Speaker 2: these things, but it's so fascinating to watch you go 568 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:01,880 Speaker 2: through this process, and it's helping me better understand the conflict, 569 00:31:02,360 --> 00:31:04,960 Speaker 2: and getting that positive reinforcement makes me want to do 570 00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:08,200 Speaker 2: it more. So I'm very lucky in that sense, you know. 571 00:31:08,240 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 2: I mean, I'm getting some of that feedback that it's 572 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:12,440 Speaker 2: clear people are interested in this kind of. 573 00:31:12,400 --> 00:31:15,640 Speaker 1: Thing, and when you do this, I know you try 574 00:31:15,640 --> 00:31:18,720 Speaker 1: to be really careful to make sure that you're bringing 575 00:31:18,760 --> 00:31:21,760 Speaker 1: readers in and you're not stopping anybody at the door 576 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:24,400 Speaker 1: from wanting to come in, and so you're careful about 577 00:31:24,760 --> 00:31:26,960 Speaker 1: language and the language choices you make. 578 00:31:27,000 --> 00:31:30,080 Speaker 2: So tell us about that. Yeah, sure, you know. This 579 00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 2: is something that I care a lot about because what 580 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:36,600 Speaker 2: I've learned over time from doing this is it's often 581 00:31:36,680 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 2: not the content of the argument that sends people scurrying 582 00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:44,600 Speaker 2: away from you know, your perspective or your writing. It's 583 00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 2: the language that you're using to sort of communicate it. 584 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 2: And so one of the classic examples that I give 585 00:31:50,640 --> 00:31:53,040 Speaker 2: that I think is really relevant in the media space 586 00:31:53,160 --> 00:31:55,880 Speaker 2: is the ways in which we talk about illegal immigration 587 00:31:55,960 --> 00:31:58,920 Speaker 2: in the United States. Anybody can go do this right now. 588 00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:01,800 Speaker 2: If you go to funews dot com and look up 589 00:32:01,840 --> 00:32:06,120 Speaker 2: a story about, you know, President Biden's border policies, you'll 590 00:32:06,160 --> 00:32:10,000 Speaker 2: see Fox News referring to legal aliens or illegal immigrants. 591 00:32:10,040 --> 00:32:12,080 Speaker 2: And if you go to the New York Times and 592 00:32:12,240 --> 00:32:15,680 Speaker 2: look up stories about Biden's border policies, you'll see them 593 00:32:15,800 --> 00:32:20,840 Speaker 2: referring to undocumented immigrants and that language choice might seem 594 00:32:20,880 --> 00:32:23,640 Speaker 2: not that important to somebody who is really a political junkie, 595 00:32:23,920 --> 00:32:26,440 Speaker 2: but to people who really care about that issue, that 596 00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 2: those language choices matter a lot. And we found early 597 00:32:31,120 --> 00:32:34,320 Speaker 2: on that people would write in and say, you know, 598 00:32:34,760 --> 00:32:38,040 Speaker 2: I saw you refer to undocumented immigrants, and it's clear 599 00:32:38,120 --> 00:32:40,920 Speaker 2: that you're on the left, so I've unsubscribed, And it's 600 00:32:40,960 --> 00:32:42,680 Speaker 2: like they didn't even get to the arguments. They just 601 00:32:42,760 --> 00:32:45,800 Speaker 2: saw that language choice, and to them, that's a tip 602 00:32:45,920 --> 00:32:50,120 Speaker 2: that we are taking some ideological stance. And so, you know, 603 00:32:50,200 --> 00:32:52,640 Speaker 2: sometimes we would do articles where we mixed it, where 604 00:32:52,680 --> 00:32:55,880 Speaker 2: we do some undocumented and some illegal immigrants, and then 605 00:32:56,200 --> 00:32:58,760 Speaker 2: you know, people on the left would write in and say, like, 606 00:32:58,920 --> 00:33:02,360 Speaker 2: no person is a lead goal, you're dehumanizing immigrants. I 607 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:05,040 Speaker 2: thought I was getting something better than this. I've unsubscribed 608 00:33:05,080 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 2: from the newsletter. And so we looked at our whole 609 00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:13,320 Speaker 2: you know, vocabulary across the website and started thinking about 610 00:33:13,320 --> 00:33:15,040 Speaker 2: ways in which we could find a little bit more 611 00:33:15,080 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 2: neutral language that still articulated the thing we were trying 612 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:22,120 Speaker 2: to get across to our readers or listeners, so you know, 613 00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:24,760 Speaker 2: on the question of immigration. Our solution to that was 614 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 2: we refer to illegal immigrants or undocumented immigrants as unauthorized migrants, 615 00:33:29,720 --> 00:33:32,840 Speaker 2: which is actually the legal term that something like the 616 00:33:32,840 --> 00:33:35,960 Speaker 2: Department of Homeland Security will use to describe somebody who's 617 00:33:36,000 --> 00:33:38,960 Speaker 2: coming to the country illegally. And we find that that 618 00:33:39,040 --> 00:33:42,800 Speaker 2: doesn't offend the sensibilities at either side. It articulates exactly 619 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:45,320 Speaker 2: what we're trying to say, and it keeps people focus 620 00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:47,680 Speaker 2: on the arguments we're presenting and not just the language 621 00:33:47,720 --> 00:33:50,920 Speaker 2: choices we're making. And you know this is relevant for abortion, 622 00:33:51,560 --> 00:33:55,160 Speaker 2: drug policy, every issue you can think of under the sun. 623 00:33:55,200 --> 00:33:58,400 Speaker 2: There there are language choices like this that readers are 624 00:33:58,400 --> 00:34:00,760 Speaker 2: really keen on, and it's a good way to kind 625 00:34:00,760 --> 00:34:03,440 Speaker 2: of get people's barriers down and make it so you 626 00:34:03,480 --> 00:34:05,680 Speaker 2: can communicate with them a little bit more openly. 627 00:34:06,760 --> 00:34:09,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm so glad you're really thinking about these trip 628 00:34:09,120 --> 00:34:11,799 Speaker 1: wires and removing those so you can get everyone in 629 00:34:12,400 --> 00:34:15,640 Speaker 1: to talk about these issues. So, as a neuroscientist, what 630 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:18,200 Speaker 1: I'm really interested in is how we each have our 631 00:34:18,280 --> 00:34:22,040 Speaker 1: internal model of the world and we believe our truths. 632 00:34:22,080 --> 00:34:24,560 Speaker 1: We believe our models are complete, and we have those 633 00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:26,960 Speaker 1: From your point of view, why do you think it's 634 00:34:26,960 --> 00:34:31,280 Speaker 1: so difficult for people to see both sides of an issue, 635 00:34:31,400 --> 00:34:34,360 Speaker 1: or usually more than two sides, all sides of an issue. 636 00:34:34,360 --> 00:34:36,840 Speaker 1: Why is that such a challenge for people generally? 637 00:34:37,600 --> 00:34:40,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, look, I don't this is probably closer 638 00:34:40,920 --> 00:34:43,319 Speaker 2: to your expertise than mine, to be frank, and I 639 00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:46,319 Speaker 2: don't want to, you know, step out of my lane here. 640 00:34:46,360 --> 00:34:49,040 Speaker 2: But from what I understand from reading a lot of 641 00:34:49,120 --> 00:34:51,239 Speaker 2: you know, people like Jonathan Haate who write a lot 642 00:34:51,280 --> 00:34:53,840 Speaker 2: about the way our brains work, and you know, the 643 00:34:54,200 --> 00:34:58,879 Speaker 2: competing things that happened and reasoning, what we know is that, 644 00:34:59,560 --> 00:35:02,359 Speaker 2: you know, use is the analogy of the elephant and 645 00:35:02,400 --> 00:35:05,440 Speaker 2: the rider, that our emotional response is like this ninety 646 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:08,080 Speaker 2: percent part of our brain, this kind of instinctive response 647 00:35:08,120 --> 00:35:12,520 Speaker 2: we have to certain ideas to certain politicians or whatever 648 00:35:12,560 --> 00:35:14,960 Speaker 2: it is. That's the elephant, and then there's the rider, 649 00:35:15,120 --> 00:35:18,800 Speaker 2: that's the ten percent logic reason that's trying to control 650 00:35:18,880 --> 00:35:21,800 Speaker 2: this emotional thing. But sometimes we've lost the battle before 651 00:35:21,840 --> 00:35:26,879 Speaker 2: we even you begin. There's tons of super interesting political, 652 00:35:27,120 --> 00:35:31,080 Speaker 2: you know, poly sized studies about this stuff. Like, for instance, 653 00:35:31,719 --> 00:35:34,080 Speaker 2: one of the things that I've read about is a 654 00:35:34,120 --> 00:35:37,879 Speaker 2: study where people are shown the image of a politician 655 00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:42,240 Speaker 2: for about three seconds, and then the image is removed. 656 00:35:42,239 --> 00:35:44,359 Speaker 2: Then there's some the image of another politician for about 657 00:35:44,360 --> 00:35:47,040 Speaker 2: three seconds. The image is removed, and then they're asked 658 00:35:47,080 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 2: to vote on which politician they like more. And then 659 00:35:50,640 --> 00:35:54,360 Speaker 2: they do the same experiment again with people where they 660 00:35:54,719 --> 00:35:57,360 Speaker 2: show them these politicians and then they spend twenty minutes 661 00:35:57,400 --> 00:35:59,640 Speaker 2: explaining the views and they do the same thing and 662 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:03,040 Speaker 2: the results are almost identical. And so what the researchers 663 00:36:03,040 --> 00:36:04,920 Speaker 2: take away is that a lot of times people are 664 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:07,319 Speaker 2: making their minds up in a split second, just like 665 00:36:07,440 --> 00:36:10,000 Speaker 2: literally based on how somebody looks, all the things they 666 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:12,719 Speaker 2: can assume about them, just based on their appearance and 667 00:36:12,760 --> 00:36:14,520 Speaker 2: what they look like, and that by the time they 668 00:36:14,600 --> 00:36:18,080 Speaker 2: get to know their actual views and policies, you're only 669 00:36:18,120 --> 00:36:20,920 Speaker 2: moving like ten percent of the population. Kind of a 670 00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:25,680 Speaker 2: scary thought, right, I mean, really like whoa. But it's 671 00:36:25,800 --> 00:36:29,040 Speaker 2: reflective of the fact that we are a tribal species, 672 00:36:29,160 --> 00:36:31,520 Speaker 2: you know, like there are people that we've interacted with, 673 00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:34,759 Speaker 2: there are people that we've spent our lives growing up with, 674 00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:38,239 Speaker 2: people that feel foreign, are different from us, and when 675 00:36:38,239 --> 00:36:42,160 Speaker 2: push comes to shove, those kind of like instinctual based 676 00:36:42,200 --> 00:36:45,440 Speaker 2: lizard brain type responses do a lot of the driving. 677 00:36:45,640 --> 00:36:48,200 Speaker 2: And you know, to the point I was making earlier, 678 00:36:48,239 --> 00:36:51,200 Speaker 2: I think it's a muscle you have to flex. It's 679 00:36:51,200 --> 00:36:53,560 Speaker 2: something you have to be very intentional about to do. 680 00:36:54,120 --> 00:36:56,640 Speaker 2: Everybody's capable of it. But I don't think it's something 681 00:36:56,680 --> 00:37:00,239 Speaker 2: that comes totally organically to people to just you know, 682 00:37:00,400 --> 00:37:04,200 Speaker 2: be open minded about the views or ideas or politicians 683 00:37:04,280 --> 00:37:06,680 Speaker 2: or whoever they're considering. That's right. 684 00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:09,719 Speaker 1: We all have a drive for certainty where we feel like, hey, 685 00:37:09,760 --> 00:37:11,400 Speaker 1: look I know the truth, I know it's right and 686 00:37:11,440 --> 00:37:14,640 Speaker 1: what's wrong here. Do people ever look at what you 687 00:37:14,719 --> 00:37:19,120 Speaker 1: are doing and accuse you of being wishy washy? 688 00:37:19,200 --> 00:37:22,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, they do. That's something I get a lot. 689 00:37:22,600 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 2: I mean, the common accusation is, you know, both SiZ 690 00:37:26,280 --> 00:37:30,040 Speaker 2: ism or what about ism or you know whatever else. 691 00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:33,440 Speaker 2: And look, I get it if you're somebody who has 692 00:37:33,640 --> 00:37:38,279 Speaker 2: a strong political view about an issue and you sign 693 00:37:38,360 --> 00:37:40,840 Speaker 2: up for our newsletter or start listening to our podcast 694 00:37:40,920 --> 00:37:43,279 Speaker 2: and you hear me talk about an issue and take 695 00:37:43,360 --> 00:37:46,919 Speaker 2: a squishy stance on something where you know, sometimes I'll 696 00:37:46,960 --> 00:37:49,680 Speaker 2: just say I actually don't know. I mean, I'll literally which, 697 00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:51,880 Speaker 2: by the way, everybody should do a lot more. But 698 00:37:51,960 --> 00:37:53,799 Speaker 2: I'll just say I don't you know, I don't know 699 00:37:54,120 --> 00:37:56,520 Speaker 2: like I feel conflicted about this. I don't feel confident 700 00:37:56,640 --> 00:37:59,279 Speaker 2: saying strongly that what my view is one way or 701 00:37:59,280 --> 00:38:01,400 Speaker 2: the other. Here's why I feel conflicted, and I'm just 702 00:38:01,440 --> 00:38:03,800 Speaker 2: not sure where I land on. You know, whether Congress 703 00:38:03,800 --> 00:38:07,640 Speaker 2: should pass this bill or not. And people feel strongly 704 00:38:07,680 --> 00:38:10,520 Speaker 2: about that issue, will you know, write in accusing me 705 00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:15,120 Speaker 2: of being wishy washy or whatever else, and my response 706 00:38:15,200 --> 00:38:17,920 Speaker 2: to them, like the standard response is I understand why 707 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:20,880 Speaker 2: you feel strongly about this issue, and I can see 708 00:38:21,000 --> 00:38:23,680 Speaker 2: very clearly you know why this matters to you, what's 709 00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:26,239 Speaker 2: important to you about it. If you were looking for 710 00:38:26,320 --> 00:38:29,360 Speaker 2: somebody who's just going to give you something in black 711 00:38:29,400 --> 00:38:31,799 Speaker 2: and white terms all the time, I'll tell you right 712 00:38:31,840 --> 00:38:33,319 Speaker 2: now you're not going to get that here. And this 713 00:38:33,440 --> 00:38:35,680 Speaker 2: isn't the news outlet for you. I think there's a 714 00:38:35,719 --> 00:38:38,000 Speaker 2: lot of people doing that, and I hope you keep 715 00:38:38,080 --> 00:38:40,279 Speaker 2: reading them and you keep engaging them and supporting them 716 00:38:40,280 --> 00:38:42,960 Speaker 2: if you like their work. But to me, it seems 717 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:45,440 Speaker 2: like we are actually the place you should be spending 718 00:38:45,440 --> 00:38:47,120 Speaker 2: some time with to get a little bit more of 719 00:38:47,120 --> 00:38:52,240 Speaker 2: the gray. And that response oftentimes goes over well, sometimes 720 00:38:52,239 --> 00:38:55,080 Speaker 2: it lands a little condescending or off putting or whatever, 721 00:38:55,120 --> 00:38:58,800 Speaker 2: but oftentimes people are receptive to that and they're appreciative 722 00:38:58,840 --> 00:39:01,160 Speaker 2: I took the time to write back or answer them somehow, 723 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:03,640 Speaker 2: and so I just try and you know, be authentic 724 00:39:03,680 --> 00:39:06,040 Speaker 2: about what we're trying to do and who I am 725 00:39:06,040 --> 00:39:09,440 Speaker 2: as a person. And people typically, you know, they reply 726 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:13,560 Speaker 2: positively when you just transparent and authentic and put a 727 00:39:13,560 --> 00:39:14,239 Speaker 2: little effort in. 728 00:39:27,440 --> 00:39:30,080 Speaker 1: One of the things that I've been writing about and 729 00:39:30,120 --> 00:39:34,040 Speaker 1: talking about in this podcast is the way that I 730 00:39:34,400 --> 00:39:37,600 Speaker 1: possibly the only way that I see of trying to 731 00:39:37,680 --> 00:39:41,640 Speaker 1: bring sides a little bit closer together is the complexification 732 00:39:42,200 --> 00:39:45,960 Speaker 1: of allegiances, by which I mean understanding. Okay, well, look, 733 00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:47,759 Speaker 1: you know I feel strongly about this issue and you 734 00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:50,200 Speaker 1: feel the opposite about this. But you know, we actually 735 00:39:50,200 --> 00:39:53,120 Speaker 1: have this in common, and we both like to surf, 736 00:39:53,200 --> 00:39:55,120 Speaker 1: and we both like this kind of dog, and we 737 00:39:55,239 --> 00:39:57,600 Speaker 1: both have children at the same elementary school, and we 738 00:39:58,000 --> 00:40:01,560 Speaker 1: love the you know, activities there. And so when things 739 00:40:01,640 --> 00:40:05,280 Speaker 1: get tangled like that, then people find it a little 740 00:40:05,320 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 1: harder to completely dismiss the person and say you're my enemy. 741 00:40:10,600 --> 00:40:14,200 Speaker 1: So I'm just curious, you know, your newsletter I think 742 00:40:14,239 --> 00:40:16,239 Speaker 1: goes a long way to doing that. What would you 743 00:40:16,400 --> 00:40:20,000 Speaker 1: see in terms of the ways that we can entangle 744 00:40:20,280 --> 00:40:23,560 Speaker 1: the allegiances that people have in our society. 745 00:40:24,400 --> 00:40:27,399 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I get a lot of emails that 746 00:40:27,600 --> 00:40:30,160 Speaker 2: I think ask a really similar question in a different way, 747 00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:34,719 Speaker 2: which is, you know, my niece is like a radical 748 00:40:34,920 --> 00:40:37,680 Speaker 2: socialist and I don't know how to talk to her 749 00:40:37,680 --> 00:40:41,120 Speaker 2: about politics. Or my neighbor is a diehard Trump supporter 750 00:40:41,239 --> 00:40:43,439 Speaker 2: and he flies the Trump flag and it freaks me out, 751 00:40:43,760 --> 00:40:45,879 Speaker 2: but you know, I want to learn more about him, 752 00:40:45,880 --> 00:40:47,600 Speaker 2: and you know, do you have any advice about how 753 00:40:47,640 --> 00:40:52,279 Speaker 2: to approach this the conversation or whatever? And you know, 754 00:40:52,719 --> 00:40:55,200 Speaker 2: depending on the context, I think one of my common 755 00:40:55,280 --> 00:40:58,240 Speaker 2: go to answers is just like, have you ever tried 756 00:40:58,600 --> 00:41:00,799 Speaker 2: grabbing a six packup ear and ocking on their door 757 00:41:00,840 --> 00:41:02,760 Speaker 2: and asking if they want to spend a little time together? 758 00:41:02,800 --> 00:41:09,040 Speaker 2: I mean, genuinely, like, people are social creatures. We're typically curious, 759 00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:13,560 Speaker 2: you know, we're typically peaceful if people approach them in 760 00:41:13,600 --> 00:41:18,880 Speaker 2: a peaceful manner. And I don't think it's particularly dangerous 761 00:41:19,239 --> 00:41:22,360 Speaker 2: to just try and go open a conversation with somebody 762 00:41:22,719 --> 00:41:27,239 Speaker 2: who you recognize might feel really differently about your worldview. 763 00:41:28,160 --> 00:41:30,839 Speaker 2: One rule that I have, I like a rule of 764 00:41:30,880 --> 00:41:36,000 Speaker 2: engagement I have about doing that is just try your 765 00:41:36,080 --> 00:41:40,439 Speaker 2: best to ask two or three questions before you make 766 00:41:40,480 --> 00:41:43,960 Speaker 2: any statements. And so like, when I'm speaking to somebody 767 00:41:44,040 --> 00:41:47,280 Speaker 2: who's somebody new and what will happen to me because 768 00:41:47,280 --> 00:41:49,960 Speaker 2: of my work, and you know, someone might know me, 769 00:41:50,120 --> 00:41:51,799 Speaker 2: or somebody a friend tells them that I write this 770 00:41:51,840 --> 00:41:55,200 Speaker 2: politics podcast, they'll come over and just like start drilling 771 00:41:55,239 --> 00:41:58,480 Speaker 2: me with political stuff immediately, you know, like spraying me 772 00:41:58,520 --> 00:42:01,719 Speaker 2: with their opinions whatever it is, are peppering me with questions, 773 00:42:02,120 --> 00:42:06,279 Speaker 2: and I my rule is just like, don't like get 774 00:42:06,280 --> 00:42:11,560 Speaker 2: on your stool and start pontificating out of the gate. 775 00:42:12,080 --> 00:42:14,480 Speaker 2: Do your best to ask like two or three questions, 776 00:42:14,600 --> 00:42:18,600 Speaker 2: earnest questions, like real genuine questions, and hear the person, 777 00:42:18,880 --> 00:42:21,239 Speaker 2: listen to them, pay attention to what they're saying, and 778 00:42:21,360 --> 00:42:23,280 Speaker 2: just try to understand them a little bit better before 779 00:42:23,280 --> 00:42:26,520 Speaker 2: you start trying to explain anything to them, or you know, 780 00:42:26,640 --> 00:42:30,000 Speaker 2: convince them that your position's right. And that exercise to 781 00:42:30,080 --> 00:42:33,799 Speaker 2: me has always you know, entangled me in some sort 782 00:42:33,840 --> 00:42:37,040 Speaker 2: of societal fabric way where they'll say something or I'll 783 00:42:37,040 --> 00:42:40,319 Speaker 2: hear something that they that they offer that makes me 784 00:42:40,360 --> 00:42:43,160 Speaker 2: think of a friend or a relative, or you know, 785 00:42:43,200 --> 00:42:45,440 Speaker 2: I recognize a little bit of who this person is 786 00:42:45,520 --> 00:42:47,239 Speaker 2: or where they're from, and I can connect them to 787 00:42:47,280 --> 00:42:49,200 Speaker 2: some other part of my life, and that makes me 788 00:42:49,719 --> 00:42:52,000 Speaker 2: a little bit more empathetic to whatever else is coming 789 00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:53,880 Speaker 2: out of their mouth, or maybe some positions they have 790 00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:57,239 Speaker 2: that I find a boor or whatever it is. And so, 791 00:42:57,800 --> 00:43:01,759 Speaker 2: you know, I think earnestly asking questions is genuinely you know, 792 00:43:01,840 --> 00:43:04,759 Speaker 2: spending time with somebody trying to talk to them is 793 00:43:04,960 --> 00:43:08,560 Speaker 2: a good strategy. And I know it sounds so cheesy 794 00:43:08,600 --> 00:43:11,719 Speaker 2: and corny, and people can pretend it's not true, but 795 00:43:12,320 --> 00:43:16,360 Speaker 2: it is really genuinely true that the vast majority of people, 796 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,440 Speaker 2: not just in the United States but all across the world, 797 00:43:19,760 --> 00:43:22,040 Speaker 2: you know, they they care about their family, They care 798 00:43:22,040 --> 00:43:25,839 Speaker 2: about safety and security and eating having food on their 799 00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:29,080 Speaker 2: table and taking care of their kids, and you know, 800 00:43:29,160 --> 00:43:31,759 Speaker 2: growing up in an environment that's kind of safe and 801 00:43:31,800 --> 00:43:34,319 Speaker 2: boiling off some steam and having some fun and you know, 802 00:43:34,440 --> 00:43:38,240 Speaker 2: everybody smiles and everybody laughs. Everybody can do that. Everybody 803 00:43:38,280 --> 00:43:41,840 Speaker 2: has that capacity, and you can reach people who feel 804 00:43:41,920 --> 00:43:45,000 Speaker 2: unreachable if you're you know, asking the right questions or 805 00:43:45,000 --> 00:43:48,000 Speaker 2: coming into I think with a truly open minded posture. 806 00:43:48,080 --> 00:43:50,759 Speaker 2: So that's kind of what I preach and I think 807 00:43:50,800 --> 00:43:52,560 Speaker 2: it's effective in my personal life. 808 00:43:52,600 --> 00:43:54,880 Speaker 1: Have you thought about how to get this into the 809 00:43:55,440 --> 00:43:59,080 Speaker 1: education system with high schoolers and college students? Plus what 810 00:43:59,120 --> 00:44:03,279 Speaker 1: you mentioned before about the value of steel manning the 811 00:44:03,440 --> 00:44:06,520 Speaker 1: other side's argument, if we could work this into our 812 00:44:06,600 --> 00:44:10,040 Speaker 1: educational system and even this, you know, the simple thing 813 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:12,480 Speaker 1: of okay, ask two or three questions before you say 814 00:44:12,520 --> 00:44:14,879 Speaker 1: your thing. How would you think about getting that in there? 815 00:44:15,440 --> 00:44:18,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, So one of my big goals for Tangle actually 816 00:44:18,560 --> 00:44:22,319 Speaker 2: is to get more engagement at the high school and 817 00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:25,680 Speaker 2: college level. I have a partnership with a poly side 818 00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:29,400 Speaker 2: professor at Georgia State University who actually sells a digital 819 00:44:29,440 --> 00:44:32,759 Speaker 2: poly side textbook, and Tangle is part of the textbook, 820 00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:36,440 Speaker 2: so included in the textbook yard daily editions of Tangle 821 00:44:36,520 --> 00:44:39,200 Speaker 2: every day, which is really cool. And we have teachers 822 00:44:39,239 --> 00:44:42,160 Speaker 2: from all over the country who are high school teachers 823 00:44:42,200 --> 00:44:45,200 Speaker 2: who are subscribers to the newsletter of the podcast and 824 00:44:45,239 --> 00:44:47,160 Speaker 2: have written in and told me, you know, they're using 825 00:44:47,320 --> 00:44:49,920 Speaker 2: editions that we've written about controversial issues as sort of 826 00:44:50,000 --> 00:44:53,279 Speaker 2: jumping off points for their classes. You know, it's a 827 00:44:53,320 --> 00:44:57,160 Speaker 2: really big problem. I think the education side of it 828 00:44:57,239 --> 00:45:00,759 Speaker 2: and bringing kids up, you know, in an environ that 829 00:45:00,880 --> 00:45:02,920 Speaker 2: teaches them to be a lot more open minded, and 830 00:45:03,000 --> 00:45:04,839 Speaker 2: we need to do it at that age. I mean, 831 00:45:04,880 --> 00:45:06,960 Speaker 2: the question you're asking, in my opinion is really the 832 00:45:07,040 --> 00:45:10,920 Speaker 2: right question, is how do we get the next generation 833 00:45:11,560 --> 00:45:13,840 Speaker 2: to a place where they're a lot more open minded 834 00:45:13,880 --> 00:45:17,120 Speaker 2: and inquisitive and you know, tolerant of the other side 835 00:45:17,320 --> 00:45:20,120 Speaker 2: or people who have different political views in them, because 836 00:45:20,480 --> 00:45:24,040 Speaker 2: I think we're seeing a hardening right now. And you know, 837 00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:28,440 Speaker 2: I think the really the really cynical part of me 838 00:45:28,719 --> 00:45:31,440 Speaker 2: feels in some ways like, you know, the people who 839 00:45:31,440 --> 00:45:34,719 Speaker 2: are in their fifties and sixties and seventies, they are 840 00:45:35,520 --> 00:45:38,919 Speaker 2: not lost, but it's you know, it's like a euphemism 841 00:45:38,920 --> 00:45:41,239 Speaker 2: that it's so hard to you know, teach an old 842 00:45:41,239 --> 00:45:44,400 Speaker 2: dog nutrix. For a reason, it's it is, And we 843 00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:46,719 Speaker 2: need to focus on, like the young people and our 844 00:45:46,800 --> 00:45:51,120 Speaker 2: generation who are coming up next and are entering a 845 00:45:51,120 --> 00:45:54,239 Speaker 2: society that is really black and white and really hard 846 00:45:54,480 --> 00:45:57,799 Speaker 2: and really ideological right now and break them out of 847 00:45:57,840 --> 00:46:00,760 Speaker 2: that because it's getting worse in a lot of ways. 848 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:03,200 Speaker 2: And I think we have a small window to kind 849 00:46:03,239 --> 00:46:06,920 Speaker 2: of course correct that. So I'm doing my best to 850 00:46:07,600 --> 00:46:11,000 Speaker 2: you know, spread tangle to the masses, and I hope 851 00:46:11,160 --> 00:46:13,920 Speaker 2: model some of this, you know, model the way that 852 00:46:14,000 --> 00:46:17,839 Speaker 2: I want to see people go about this. But the 853 00:46:17,840 --> 00:46:20,399 Speaker 2: more participants the better, and kind of spreading the word 854 00:46:20,480 --> 00:46:23,560 Speaker 2: is really one of the only good ways to fight 855 00:46:23,600 --> 00:46:25,320 Speaker 2: back against some of the stuff we're saying. 856 00:46:26,000 --> 00:46:28,319 Speaker 1: Let me trill into that for one second, because I 857 00:46:28,400 --> 00:46:31,480 Speaker 1: know that some people are of the opinion that the 858 00:46:31,600 --> 00:46:34,800 Speaker 1: young people are the ones that it's hard to teach 859 00:46:34,880 --> 00:46:38,560 Speaker 1: new tricks to and that as people mature and they gray, 860 00:46:39,160 --> 00:46:41,520 Speaker 1: they think, well, you know, maybe this we've had I've 861 00:46:41,560 --> 00:46:45,239 Speaker 1: seen more things now, I've known people with different opinions. 862 00:46:45,640 --> 00:46:49,000 Speaker 1: I'm just curious that you mentioned fifty sixty seven year 863 00:46:49,000 --> 00:46:51,960 Speaker 1: olds are the ones that are less plastic in their 864 00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:53,800 Speaker 1: views and the young people are more plastic. 865 00:46:54,360 --> 00:46:57,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's an interesting point. I mean, I guess I've 866 00:46:57,239 --> 00:47:01,320 Speaker 2: heard that framing too, and haven't thought super deeply about 867 00:47:02,040 --> 00:47:03,840 Speaker 2: the kind of counter to that. I would say. My 868 00:47:04,680 --> 00:47:09,840 Speaker 2: perspective is folks who are older and have been around longer, 869 00:47:09,920 --> 00:47:14,360 Speaker 2: I think have a better understanding of the complexity and 870 00:47:14,400 --> 00:47:17,400 Speaker 2: the gray that exists between the black and white, but 871 00:47:17,880 --> 00:47:22,399 Speaker 2: they're less willing to move out of whatever their positions are. 872 00:47:22,760 --> 00:47:25,879 Speaker 2: And I think that's kind of what I'm more articulating, 873 00:47:26,040 --> 00:47:29,799 Speaker 2: is that, you know, if you're a sixty five year 874 00:47:29,800 --> 00:47:34,400 Speaker 2: old and you're a lifelong Democratic voter and you know 875 00:47:34,680 --> 00:47:36,959 Speaker 2: you think Trump is the worst thing you've ever seen 876 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:39,919 Speaker 2: in the history of US politics, I am way more 877 00:47:39,920 --> 00:47:42,800 Speaker 2: skeptical that in the next fifteen years you're going to 878 00:47:42,880 --> 00:47:45,640 Speaker 2: change your mind about that position than I am if 879 00:47:45,680 --> 00:47:49,600 Speaker 2: you're a twenty year old college student who feels that way, 880 00:47:49,760 --> 00:47:51,759 Speaker 2: and I know you're about to go through this next 881 00:47:51,760 --> 00:47:54,560 Speaker 2: phase of your life and your world's going to change 882 00:47:54,560 --> 00:47:58,080 Speaker 2: and your world's going to evolve, and you know, I 883 00:47:58,080 --> 00:48:00,480 Speaker 2: think it's true. I think you make a great point 884 00:48:00,520 --> 00:48:03,480 Speaker 2: that a lot of the longer you are around, I 885 00:48:03,520 --> 00:48:05,520 Speaker 2: think the more you realize that the world is not 886 00:48:05,680 --> 00:48:09,239 Speaker 2: black and white. But I think people also become more 887 00:48:09,320 --> 00:48:11,799 Speaker 2: fixed in their positions and less willing to kind of 888 00:48:11,800 --> 00:48:16,080 Speaker 2: have their mind changed by other people. And part of that, 889 00:48:16,440 --> 00:48:18,800 Speaker 2: I think, part of what scares me I think about 890 00:48:18,800 --> 00:48:23,000 Speaker 2: this moment right now in particular, is that we're in 891 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:25,560 Speaker 2: this weird kind of societal moment where a lot of 892 00:48:25,640 --> 00:48:30,800 Speaker 2: younger Americans are entering a space where, you know, silence 893 00:48:30,880 --> 00:48:34,279 Speaker 2: is complicity. There is a perception that if you are 894 00:48:34,320 --> 00:48:38,360 Speaker 2: not tapped into or have a strong opinion about certain 895 00:48:38,400 --> 00:48:42,279 Speaker 2: issues that our country is facing, that you are somehow, 896 00:48:42,760 --> 00:48:45,960 Speaker 2: you know, part of the problem rather than somebody who's 897 00:48:46,120 --> 00:48:49,480 Speaker 2: just ripe to become educated or learn more about an 898 00:48:49,480 --> 00:48:52,360 Speaker 2: issue or whatever else it is. And so people feel 899 00:48:52,400 --> 00:48:55,040 Speaker 2: really really compelled to take sides and sort of this 900 00:48:55,600 --> 00:48:57,879 Speaker 2: blue versus red culture war that we have right now 901 00:48:57,920 --> 00:49:01,399 Speaker 2: that I don't think has always existed the past. And 902 00:49:01,480 --> 00:49:04,319 Speaker 2: so a lot of young people that I know and 903 00:49:04,400 --> 00:49:07,480 Speaker 2: I'm seeing, you know, on college campuses across the country 904 00:49:08,040 --> 00:49:12,439 Speaker 2: are jumping into issues, you know, headfirst in a way 905 00:49:12,440 --> 00:49:14,840 Speaker 2: that I'm like, yes, you should care about this, you 906 00:49:14,880 --> 00:49:17,440 Speaker 2: should be thinking about this, Like I love seeing this 907 00:49:17,760 --> 00:49:21,399 Speaker 2: civic participation and whatever else it is. But they're doing 908 00:49:21,480 --> 00:49:25,000 Speaker 2: it because it's it's almost like a social phenomenon. It's 909 00:49:25,040 --> 00:49:28,200 Speaker 2: a community thing. It's not it's not necessarily like an 910 00:49:28,400 --> 00:49:32,080 Speaker 2: educational thing that pushed them there or an interest in 911 00:49:32,239 --> 00:49:34,239 Speaker 2: you know, going really deep on this topic and learning 912 00:49:34,239 --> 00:49:37,319 Speaker 2: about all the complexities. It's like, oh, all my friends 913 00:49:37,360 --> 00:49:39,720 Speaker 2: are doing this thing, or you know, all my friends 914 00:49:39,800 --> 00:49:41,480 Speaker 2: have picked this side, and I feel like I need 915 00:49:41,520 --> 00:49:43,600 Speaker 2: to go pick this side. And there's a really really strong, 916 00:49:44,000 --> 00:49:45,880 Speaker 2: you know, social pressure, I think in part because of 917 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:48,160 Speaker 2: social media and just also how divided the rest of 918 00:49:48,160 --> 00:49:50,680 Speaker 2: the country is. And I really want to get to 919 00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:53,880 Speaker 2: those kids and try and just like teach them that, 920 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:56,080 Speaker 2: you know, it's okay to change your mind. It's okay 921 00:49:56,120 --> 00:49:58,680 Speaker 2: to not have a position yet, it's okay to say 922 00:49:58,719 --> 00:50:02,239 Speaker 2: you're still learning, and it's okay to feel really radically 923 00:50:02,280 --> 00:50:05,200 Speaker 2: passionate about a certain issue if like you spent the 924 00:50:05,280 --> 00:50:08,719 Speaker 2: requisite time to learn about it, and that that's kind 925 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:10,880 Speaker 2: of like what I'm hoping to get out there a 926 00:50:10,880 --> 00:50:13,040 Speaker 2: little bit. And I think sort of the distinction I 927 00:50:13,080 --> 00:50:15,399 Speaker 2: see between the older and younger generations. 928 00:50:16,040 --> 00:50:18,759 Speaker 1: One more question. So you and I both think a 929 00:50:18,800 --> 00:50:23,800 Speaker 1: lot about how to maintain curiosity and hopefully humility about 930 00:50:23,800 --> 00:50:27,880 Speaker 1: our political opinions. But it's tough, right and you recently 931 00:50:27,920 --> 00:50:32,200 Speaker 1: posted on x that things seem so fraud right now 932 00:50:32,239 --> 00:50:35,759 Speaker 1: that sometimes you feel tempted just to run back to 933 00:50:35,840 --> 00:50:38,319 Speaker 1: your side to people who agree with you and just 934 00:50:39,160 --> 00:50:41,480 Speaker 1: quit talking about it and quit being out there in 935 00:50:41,520 --> 00:50:44,520 Speaker 1: public advocating for curiosity and humility. 936 00:50:44,680 --> 00:50:47,279 Speaker 2: So how do you stay strong on that? 937 00:50:47,320 --> 00:50:49,680 Speaker 1: How do you stay somebody who says, you know what, 938 00:50:49,719 --> 00:50:53,200 Speaker 1: I'm going to keep trying to understand the different sides 939 00:50:53,239 --> 00:50:53,520 Speaker 1: of this. 940 00:50:54,360 --> 00:50:58,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, first of all, I pace myself, you know. 941 00:50:58,440 --> 00:51:02,479 Speaker 2: I think one thing that's really important for someone who's 942 00:51:02,520 --> 00:51:05,879 Speaker 2: in my line of work is that, you know, you 943 00:51:05,920 --> 00:51:09,160 Speaker 2: can't spend ten hours with your head down just reading 944 00:51:09,200 --> 00:51:13,040 Speaker 2: the news and watching you know, videos of what's happening 945 00:51:13,080 --> 00:51:16,319 Speaker 2: in war zones across the world, or you know, congressional 946 00:51:16,320 --> 00:51:19,600 Speaker 2: hearings or whatever else it is. You actually have to 947 00:51:19,680 --> 00:51:21,960 Speaker 2: separate yourself from that and go live your day to 948 00:51:22,040 --> 00:51:24,560 Speaker 2: day life and experience the world as it is right 949 00:51:24,600 --> 00:51:27,279 Speaker 2: in front of you, to stay really grounded and to 950 00:51:27,680 --> 00:51:30,680 Speaker 2: understand that, you know, not everything is what's happening on 951 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:33,640 Speaker 2: the kind of political fringes and whether it's in congress 952 00:51:33,680 --> 00:51:35,759 Speaker 2: or in war zones or whatever else it is. So 953 00:51:36,600 --> 00:51:39,600 Speaker 2: I try really hard to just like get some space 954 00:51:39,640 --> 00:51:43,719 Speaker 2: from that and take breaks and live and experience, you know, 955 00:51:43,760 --> 00:51:47,120 Speaker 2: the things that I'm talking about myself. And I also 956 00:51:47,239 --> 00:51:50,720 Speaker 2: just think we are sort of programmed in a way 957 00:51:50,920 --> 00:51:57,040 Speaker 2: to remember and focus on and emphasize the negative feedback 958 00:51:57,120 --> 00:52:00,479 Speaker 2: we get and not necessarily the positive feedback we get. 959 00:52:00,560 --> 00:52:04,960 Speaker 2: And I know in my work, when somebody writes in 960 00:52:05,040 --> 00:52:09,320 Speaker 2: really critically or says something that's really sharp or biting 961 00:52:09,400 --> 00:52:12,640 Speaker 2: about something I've said or my writing, that's the thing 962 00:52:12,680 --> 00:52:14,920 Speaker 2: that I spend all day thinking about. It's not the 963 00:52:15,000 --> 00:52:18,120 Speaker 2: email from somebody telling me your news source is like 964 00:52:18,160 --> 00:52:19,880 Speaker 2: the best thing that's ever happened to me. I'm so 965 00:52:19,960 --> 00:52:22,520 Speaker 2: glad to be a subscriber. And I could get ten 966 00:52:22,560 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 2: of those emails and one of the kind of biting ones, 967 00:52:26,040 --> 00:52:27,759 Speaker 2: and I'll think about the biting one the rest of 968 00:52:27,800 --> 00:52:30,560 Speaker 2: the day, and I just dismissed the other ten. And 969 00:52:30,640 --> 00:52:33,040 Speaker 2: so I've tried to be a lot more intentional about like, 970 00:52:33,680 --> 00:52:37,120 Speaker 2: you know, focusing on the people who are standing up 971 00:52:37,160 --> 00:52:39,520 Speaker 2: and clapping and saying we want more of this, like 972 00:52:39,560 --> 00:52:42,400 Speaker 2: this is what I've been looking for, and remembering that 973 00:52:42,480 --> 00:52:45,759 Speaker 2: like those people are relying on folks like me to 974 00:52:45,880 --> 00:52:49,439 Speaker 2: kind of step into the fray. And you know, as 975 00:52:49,480 --> 00:52:51,520 Speaker 2: I like to say, like I'm going to war with 976 00:52:51,600 --> 00:52:54,680 Speaker 2: partisan news, like that's the battle that I have is 977 00:52:54,680 --> 00:52:56,560 Speaker 2: that there's a lot of people out there who are 978 00:52:57,440 --> 00:53:00,880 Speaker 2: intentionally turning the temperature up when they don't need to. 979 00:53:01,080 --> 00:53:04,120 Speaker 2: That's going to happen organically. We don't need to manufacture that. 980 00:53:04,239 --> 00:53:07,560 Speaker 2: But they're doing it on purpose, and I'm trying to 981 00:53:07,600 --> 00:53:11,200 Speaker 2: fight against those people. That's sort of my quote unquote 982 00:53:11,360 --> 00:53:13,680 Speaker 2: enemy is the people who are trying to turn the 983 00:53:13,680 --> 00:53:16,520 Speaker 2: temperature up. And I just want people to be more 984 00:53:16,560 --> 00:53:18,879 Speaker 2: informed and have a more holistic view of things. And 985 00:53:19,719 --> 00:53:22,800 Speaker 2: when I feel that exhaustion, I just like step away, 986 00:53:23,000 --> 00:53:25,160 Speaker 2: give myself a little bit of a break, and then 987 00:53:25,200 --> 00:53:27,520 Speaker 2: try and focus on and remember the people who are 988 00:53:27,880 --> 00:53:30,080 Speaker 2: I know are like rooting for us and rooting for 989 00:53:30,160 --> 00:53:32,759 Speaker 2: me and rooting for my company, and want what we're 990 00:53:32,760 --> 00:53:35,239 Speaker 2: doing to kind of prevail, and hope that they just 991 00:53:35,280 --> 00:53:36,839 Speaker 2: stick around and keep supporting us. 992 00:53:37,440 --> 00:53:40,839 Speaker 1: Well, keep up the strong work, Isaac. There are many 993 00:53:40,880 --> 00:53:43,279 Speaker 1: of us who are rooting for you, and we thank 994 00:53:43,360 --> 00:53:43,839 Speaker 1: you a lot. 995 00:53:44,360 --> 00:53:45,719 Speaker 2: Thank you, I appreciate that man. 996 00:53:50,680 --> 00:53:53,640 Speaker 1: That was my interview with Isaac Soahl from Tangle. I 997 00:53:53,719 --> 00:53:57,200 Speaker 1: highly recommend his newsletter, which is one of the few outlets, 998 00:53:57,280 --> 00:53:59,520 Speaker 1: along with some others that I list in my show notes, 999 00:54:00,040 --> 00:54:04,839 Speaker 1: that operates at a different level of curious intelligence. It 1000 00:54:04,840 --> 00:54:08,440 Speaker 1: doesn't simply plug into our limbic systems to get us 1001 00:54:08,480 --> 00:54:11,440 Speaker 1: angry and verify that we're right and those others are wrong. 1002 00:54:12,280 --> 00:54:16,680 Speaker 1: But instead this pushes us into the prefrontal cortex, forcing 1003 00:54:16,760 --> 00:54:20,279 Speaker 1: us to think about multiple points of view. One does 1004 00:54:20,320 --> 00:54:23,160 Speaker 1: not have to agree with the other points of view, 1005 00:54:23,160 --> 00:54:25,960 Speaker 1: and one may still feel dismissive towards them, but at 1006 00:54:26,120 --> 00:54:31,160 Speaker 1: least one sees that reasonable people can hold different points 1007 00:54:31,160 --> 00:54:36,600 Speaker 1: of view, can wrestle internally with deeply uncomfortable issues, can 1008 00:54:36,640 --> 00:54:41,520 Speaker 1: even feel lost and confused about issues. Rather than pretending 1009 00:54:41,520 --> 00:54:44,360 Speaker 1: that everything is black and white, this sort of approach 1010 00:54:44,560 --> 00:54:49,560 Speaker 1: values a wide embrace of society rather than dismissing half 1011 00:54:49,600 --> 00:54:54,080 Speaker 1: the population. If we have any hopes of retrieving a 1012 00:54:54,160 --> 00:54:58,360 Speaker 1: more communicative and less polarized world, it's only going to 1013 00:54:58,400 --> 00:55:02,600 Speaker 1: be having a willingness to expand our viewpoint just a 1014 00:55:02,600 --> 00:55:06,759 Speaker 1: little bit, to not assume that everything is our way 1015 00:55:06,840 --> 00:55:10,960 Speaker 1: or the highway, and to force ourselves at all moments 1016 00:55:11,040 --> 00:55:18,719 Speaker 1: to see and celebrate our common humanity. 1017 00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:21,959 Speaker 2: Go to Eagleman dot. 1018 00:55:21,920 --> 00:55:25,800 Speaker 1: Com slash podcast for more information and to find further reading. 1019 00:55:26,400 --> 00:55:29,720 Speaker 1: Send me an email at podcast at eagleman dot com 1020 00:55:29,760 --> 00:55:33,160 Speaker 1: with any questions or discussion, and check out and subscribe 1021 00:55:33,200 --> 00:55:36,800 Speaker 1: to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos of each episode 1022 00:55:36,920 --> 00:55:40,720 Speaker 1: and to leave comments until next time. I'm David Eagleman 1023 00:55:41,040 --> 00:55:45,000 Speaker 1: and this is Inner Cosmos.