WEBVTT - SHARP NFL Week 8 Bets: Ravens-Bills, Chiefs-Broncos and more

0:00:00.810 --> 0:00:05.050
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square presented by Polymarket. We are part

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.299
<v Speaker 1>of the Volume Podcast Network. This is the show that

0:00:09.340 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>makes the squares sharper and makes the wise guys pay attention.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I am Chad Millman. I am joined as always by

0:00:16.290 --> 0:00:21.430
<v Speaker 1>my co-host, my BFF, my companion, my compadre, professional bettor,

0:00:21.570 --> 0:00:24.770
<v Speaker 1>Simon Hunter. Hello, Simon.

0:00:25.790 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Chad, how are we doing? Brother.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:37.390
<v Speaker 1>Sports are the freaking best. We're not from Milwaukee, but

0:00:37.729 --> 0:00:41.190
<v Speaker 1>I fell in love with this Brewers team, stayed up

0:00:41.250 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>way past my bedtime watching these World Series games. My

0:00:45.350 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite celebration in all of sports is when teams win

0:00:51.260 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the World Series and the reaction shots of players throwing

0:00:55.060 --> 0:00:57.500
<v Speaker 1>their gloves in the air and they all run to

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.130
<v Speaker 1>the pitcher's mound and It brings me such joy. It

0:01:02.530 --> 0:01:07.060
<v Speaker 1>looks like they are kids again playing Little League. And

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>it is just such overwhelming happiness. And then before we

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.340
<v Speaker 1>get on the call, on the show, we're chatting with

0:01:16.380 --> 0:01:21.370
<v Speaker 1>Matt Mitchell, who lives in Milwaukee, who is an avowed

0:01:21.410 --> 0:01:26.010
<v Speaker 1>Brewers fan, who's raising his family in Milwaukee, who woke

0:01:26.130 --> 0:01:32.140
<v Speaker 1>up his young son, The past two nights to see

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.979
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers win the World Series and the kids suffered

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.260
<v Speaker 1>heartache in the 12th inning the first time and last

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.180
<v Speaker 1>night got to see the final three outs and now

0:01:41.220 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they will go to a parade. And this kid is

0:01:42.780 --> 0:01:48.389
<v Speaker 1>old enough. Monty is old enough. He'll remember this. Like

0:01:48.990 --> 0:01:52.350
<v Speaker 1>he's what it, Matt Mitchell, he's probably nine years old

0:01:52.410 --> 0:01:56.850
<v Speaker 1>right now. He will remember this for the rest of

0:01:56.890 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>his life. He's old enough to get it. It's so beautiful.

0:02:02.140 --> 0:02:04.230
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm being sentimental, but I freaking love it.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.889
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was a can't lose World Series.

0:02:07.930 --> 0:02:09.669
<v Speaker 3>We had two teams that were going to win their

0:02:09.730 --> 0:02:12.950
<v Speaker 3>first World Series. And we talk all the time of

0:02:12.990 --> 0:02:15.970
<v Speaker 3>football that, you know, someday it's going to be Cleveland

0:02:16.050 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>versus Detroit or the Bills versus Detroit. These long, true,

0:02:20.940 --> 0:02:24.100
<v Speaker 3>passionate fan bases. And I don't know about you, but

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 3>for me, it always rings true in my head.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.260
<v Speaker 2>I think of past fans.

0:02:28.950 --> 0:02:30.269
<v Speaker 3>Ones that couldn't make, I know that happened to a

0:02:30.270 --> 0:02:33.130
<v Speaker 3>lot of Cubs fans, but like immediately thought of Bob Uecker,

0:02:33.490 --> 0:02:36.050
<v Speaker 3>like most legendary people ever.

0:02:36.070 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I have some really funny stories about him.

0:02:40.260 --> 0:02:42.780
<v Speaker 3>He was, you know, one of a kind people, someone

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.579
<v Speaker 3>that I was in the same room as, I never

0:02:45.620 --> 0:02:48.700
<v Speaker 3>got to speak to personally, but you know, I think

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>of him as like this massive personality and this.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.260
<v Speaker 2>Diehard Milwaukee fan. And I think he passed away like

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.710
<v Speaker 2>a year ago or something like that.

0:02:55.770 --> 0:02:56.790
<v Speaker 1>January of 25, I think.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah like he was like 90 ish and you think

0:03:00.060 --> 0:03:02.340
<v Speaker 3>of those guys who just you know you probably never

0:03:02.380 --> 0:03:05.190
<v Speaker 3>missed a game of this milwaukee team and you know

0:03:05.230 --> 0:03:08.050
<v Speaker 3>you can say i know it's corny the angels in

0:03:08.070 --> 0:03:10.130
<v Speaker 3>the outfit all that stuff but it's like they felt

0:03:10.150 --> 0:03:12.169
<v Speaker 3>like a team of destiny they really did we said

0:03:12.190 --> 0:03:14.450
<v Speaker 3>that two weeks two or three weeks ago this milwaukee

0:03:14.470 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 3>team felt like something special so yeah between matt mitchell

0:03:18.700 --> 0:03:22.340
<v Speaker 3>you know all these brewer fans it was just it

0:03:22.380 --> 0:03:24.260
<v Speaker 3>was great i mean the ratings were big too so

0:03:24.300 --> 0:03:26.700
<v Speaker 3>people can't you know complain about small market teams the

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.910
<v Speaker 3>whole thing and You know, if we are heading into

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.540
<v Speaker 3>a lockdown, a lockout for baseball this upcoming year, what

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 3>a high note to end on. It really was, where

0:03:34.180 --> 0:03:38.150
<v Speaker 3>it's just two franchises that never won it, got to it.

0:03:38.460 --> 0:03:41.420
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, it should have been a sweep, 1-4-1. What

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a way to end it for the Brewers and their fans.

0:03:44.940 --> 0:03:48.620
<v Speaker 1>As they say in one of my favorite movies, how

0:03:48.660 --> 0:03:53.940
<v Speaker 1>can you not be romantic about baseball? It's just, it's great.

0:03:54.060 --> 0:03:59.670
<v Speaker 1>It's so tense. Those games are just phenomenal. Meanwhile, breaking

0:03:59.730 --> 0:04:03.290
<v Speaker 1>news right before we're coming on air, my phone is

0:04:03.330 --> 0:04:07.310
<v Speaker 1>blowing up because the Chicago Bears have traded two first

0:04:07.370 --> 0:04:11.070
<v Speaker 1>round picks and a fourth round pick for one of

0:04:11.130 --> 0:04:15.750
<v Speaker 1>our favorite players in the NFL. A guy who single-handedly

0:04:15.810 --> 0:04:19.340
<v Speaker 1>sometimes makes us reevaluate whether or not we want to

0:04:19.460 --> 0:04:22.219
<v Speaker 1>bet on the Tennessee Titans in a positive way. We

0:04:22.260 --> 0:04:29.090
<v Speaker 1>are talking about grown man strength, red armband Jeffrey Simmons

0:04:29.870 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to play for the Chicago Bears. Giving up

0:04:35.180 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I freaking love it. I was just

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>texting with my kid about this. And to me, this

0:04:41.380 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is the Bears knowing the window is short, knowing they

0:04:44.020 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>have so much talent, knowing that there are opportunities in

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:53.230
<v Speaker 1>the NFC to grab hold of this conference. And they

0:04:53.270 --> 0:04:55.510
<v Speaker 1>got to go for it. So I love the gumption.

0:04:55.990 --> 0:04:59.330
<v Speaker 1>I love the risk-taking. I love the move. You're getting

0:04:59.770 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>a stupendous player to come and really have an impact

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:08.020
<v Speaker 1>on the defense. I'm overwhelmed with joy. The sports just

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps giving today.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.140
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't hate it because it is a great

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.220
<v Speaker 3>player at a great position. It's not like it's Sauce Gardner, right?

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 3>And you're not just lighting these draft picks on fire.

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:24.260
<v Speaker 3>My only pushback is the window– has never been more

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>open for the next 10 to 15 years.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the only thing I don't get.

0:05:28.140 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 3>You have the coach, you have the quarterback, this, this

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>whole misconstruction of you need to win while the QB

0:05:34.540 --> 0:05:37.860
<v Speaker 3>still in the rookie contract. This isn't, this is not true.

0:05:38.220 --> 0:05:40.940
<v Speaker 3>We have the data. I mean, we we've seen who

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:42.930
<v Speaker 3>was the last Superbowl winner, Sam Donald. He's not a

0:05:42.950 --> 0:05:44.330
<v Speaker 3>rookie contract. Who was before him?

0:05:44.390 --> 0:05:46.590
<v Speaker 2>Jalen hurts. He wasn't on a rookie contract.

0:05:47.010 --> 0:05:48.550
<v Speaker 3>I know it's him in my homes. They pushed the

0:05:48.589 --> 0:05:51.010
<v Speaker 3>money down the line, but the bears could do the

0:05:51.050 --> 0:05:53.230
<v Speaker 3>same thing. So, That was my only thing I didn't

0:05:53.250 --> 0:05:55.529
<v Speaker 3>really get where it's just, yeah, the league's wide.

0:05:55.430 --> 0:05:59.529
<v Speaker 2>Open this year. When will it not be for Caleb

0:05:59.589 --> 0:06:01.450
<v Speaker 2>Williams and your head coach?

0:06:01.490 --> 0:06:05.050
<v Speaker 3>It just feels like you guys have the pieces. But, yeah,

0:06:05.070 --> 0:06:06.450
<v Speaker 3>you have a chance to go out and win the

0:06:06.470 --> 0:06:08.990
<v Speaker 3>best he tackles in all football. Give him up a

0:06:08.990 --> 0:06:11.450
<v Speaker 3>lot of assets, but you go get him, right?

0:06:11.630 --> 0:06:12.510
<v Speaker 2>It's a key position.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So, to me, normally I would not be a big

0:06:15.650 --> 0:06:18.540
<v Speaker 3>fan of it, but you're talking about one of the best–

0:06:18.830 --> 0:06:20.610
<v Speaker 3>Two best D tackles in all of football.

0:06:20.790 --> 0:06:23.810
<v Speaker 2>Total game changer. And your defense has nothing up the middle.

0:06:23.890 --> 0:06:26.740
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, like you said, got to be excited and

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>looking forward for the prospects of this Bears team.

0:06:30.820 --> 0:06:35.859
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy. It's just a glorious, glorious morning.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.300
<v Speaker 2>You know what else might bring you some joy?

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:38.300
<v Speaker 1>What's that?

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Something came in the mail for me today.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:41.670
<v Speaker 1>What'd you get?

0:06:43.990 --> 0:06:47.510
<v Speaker 2>The Game by Peter King. Oh, dude. Dude. Don't psych

0:06:47.529 --> 0:06:47.789
<v Speaker 2>you out.

0:06:47.810 --> 0:06:49.770
<v Speaker 3>I was just messing with Chad. Chad sent me his

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.580
<v Speaker 3>book in the mail, but it didn't come yet. But

0:06:52.620 --> 0:06:53.860
<v Speaker 3>Peter King's book.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.860
<v Speaker 1>Dude, I'm reading the book right now. It's great.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:58.580
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.770
<v Speaker 1>Peter King is my first job out of college was

0:07:03.850 --> 0:07:08.330
<v Speaker 1>fact checking Peter King. He is no joke. He is

0:07:08.390 --> 0:07:16.930
<v Speaker 1>the nicest, kindest, most well-respected person. guy I've met in

0:07:17.850 --> 0:07:21.490
<v Speaker 1>all of my years in media. Peter King is so

0:07:21.550 --> 0:07:25.910
<v Speaker 1>nice that when I was living in the city, he

0:07:25.970 --> 0:07:28.330
<v Speaker 1>wrote me a recommendation when I was trying to buy

0:07:28.350 --> 0:07:32.090
<v Speaker 1>an apartment in New York City. Like the guy is just,

0:07:33.650 --> 0:07:36.230
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak more highly of him. And he's got

0:07:36.270 --> 0:07:39.330
<v Speaker 1>such a, everyone should buy the book. He's got such

0:07:39.380 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a unique way of telling stories. And the way he

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.950
<v Speaker 1>writes is the way he speaks. And so you're so

0:07:47.010 --> 0:07:50.330
<v Speaker 1>comfortable and it's so intimate. And the stories he tells

0:07:50.390 --> 0:07:54.650
<v Speaker 1>in this book are so, they're such great football stories

0:07:54.930 --> 0:07:59.090
<v Speaker 1>and it's traces the history of the modern NFL, which

0:07:59.130 --> 0:08:02.530
<v Speaker 1>he was there for everything. And so he's got stories

0:08:02.570 --> 0:08:05.730
<v Speaker 1>about Bill Walsh crying in a conference room with Eddie

0:08:05.750 --> 0:08:09.180
<v Speaker 1>DiBartolo and Carmen policy. He's got stories about being in a,

0:08:09.180 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in a hotel room with Deon Sanders, as he's trying

0:08:12.380 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, is he going to play professional baseball

0:08:14.420 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or professional football? He's in the room where they are

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>debating if Joe Montana should come back and be the

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.700
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback after Steve Young had won an MVP. And

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.540
<v Speaker 1>it goes on and on and on. He's so connected.

0:08:29.580 --> 0:08:33.180
<v Speaker 1>And I fact-checked so many of his stories. I've heard

0:08:34.250 --> 0:08:37.030
<v Speaker 1>so many intimate details of people's lives because of what

0:08:37.090 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Peter King was able to get from them And then

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.380
<v Speaker 1>they will sit with me and say, I can't believe

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I told Peter King this. But you can because Peter

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:49.140
<v Speaker 1>King is so gracious and warm. You get so comfortable.

0:08:49.220 --> 0:08:51.070
<v Speaker 1>You want to share with him everything. And the book

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.500
<v Speaker 1>is freaking awesome. You'll love it. You'll love it.

0:08:54.510 --> 0:08:57.089
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that was just a joke.

0:08:57.170 --> 0:08:59.090
<v Speaker 3>He has no idea who I am compared to Chad.

0:08:59.130 --> 0:09:01.490
<v Speaker 2>This was just simply sent by his agents or whoever

0:09:01.510 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 2>are managing his books. And yeah, Chad's right.

0:09:04.150 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 3>If you're a fan of football, I would say since

0:09:05.980 --> 0:09:10.850
<v Speaker 3>the 1980s to 2020– Peter King was footballing, man, was

0:09:10.929 --> 0:09:14.490
<v Speaker 3>always on the inside, always had info and was so

0:09:14.570 --> 0:09:18.530
<v Speaker 3>great at walking that line of giving up information, but

0:09:18.570 --> 0:09:20.250
<v Speaker 3>not showing his full hand because he doesn't want people

0:09:20.270 --> 0:09:21.630
<v Speaker 3>to know where he's getting the information from.

0:09:21.710 --> 0:09:25.770
<v Speaker 2>So true masterclass. And just I was going to be

0:09:25.790 --> 0:09:28.329
<v Speaker 2>a small segue into that. I'm an idiot.

0:09:28.650 --> 0:09:30.569
<v Speaker 3>Most people listen to the show. I am very gifted

0:09:30.590 --> 0:09:33.170
<v Speaker 3>at what I do at sports betting. But my core,

0:09:33.390 --> 0:09:35.449
<v Speaker 3>I am very dumb and I will say dumb things.

0:09:36.070 --> 0:09:37.490
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate all the fans who ever reach out to

0:09:37.500 --> 0:09:38.650
<v Speaker 3>me and say, hey, you said this.

0:09:39.110 --> 0:09:41.790
<v Speaker 2>You're an idiot. You were wrong. Two things will knock

0:09:41.890 --> 0:09:45.089
<v Speaker 2>out super quick. Jared Goff, he's great against the Blitz.

0:09:45.770 --> 0:09:47.050
<v Speaker 2>I misspoke. My bad.

0:09:47.770 --> 0:09:51.069
<v Speaker 3>Number two, Baker Mayfield did hurt his throwing hand. It

0:09:51.090 --> 0:09:52.910
<v Speaker 3>wasn't his not throwing hand. Those are the two things

0:09:52.929 --> 0:09:53.770
<v Speaker 3>I heard from a ton of people.

0:09:53.790 --> 0:09:55.969
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, people. We talk a lot for a living.

0:09:56.570 --> 0:09:59.350
<v Speaker 3>This is not early in the morning for Chad, but

0:09:59.370 --> 0:10:01.620
<v Speaker 3>early in the morning for me. So, yes, anytime I

0:10:01.660 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 3>say something dumb, please message me. I'm happy to correct myself.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.740
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to mislead people in any way on

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>this show.

0:10:07.780 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my God. I'm so glad you brought that up

0:10:09.260 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was going to bring both of those things up,

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.020
<v Speaker 1>especially when we talked about the Lions and the Vikings,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.329
<v Speaker 1>which we should get to. but you're a pro. I

0:10:20.370 --> 0:10:24.460
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you doing that. Let's talk about what we're going

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to do today. It's Thursday, NFL week eight. We got

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sharp calls. We got brass balls. We got our underdog

0:10:29.580 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and favorite round Robbins. We've got Simon's biggest bets, sharp

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.819
<v Speaker 1>versus square, our discord grouper.

0:10:35.500 --> 0:10:35.980
<v Speaker 2>Of the week.

0:10:36.950 --> 0:10:40.170
<v Speaker 1>We will narrow down our final five picks for the

0:10:40.270 --> 0:10:44.970
<v Speaker 1>free $ 25, 000 NFL pick them contest. All right, Simon, every week,

0:10:45.470 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss our picks on Tuesdays, And by Thursday,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.140
<v Speaker 1>you've gotten an earful. I've gotten an earful from professional bettors,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.140
<v Speaker 1>what they like, what they don't like, what they didn't

0:10:58.179 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>agree with. It's time for Sharp Calls.

0:11:01.830 --> 0:11:02.330
<v Speaker 2>Who's there?

0:11:02.380 --> 0:11:03.030
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking.

0:11:03.630 --> 0:11:05.890
<v Speaker 2>Ring, ring, telephone ring.

0:11:05.910 --> 0:11:09.050
<v Speaker 1>Somebody said, baby, what you doing?

0:11:10.190 --> 0:11:14.970
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the Thursday game. It's pretty split.

0:11:15.370 --> 0:11:17.390
<v Speaker 3>Between pros i know a lot of pros are on

0:11:17.429 --> 0:11:18.550
<v Speaker 3>green bay and a lot of pros are on the

0:11:18.590 --> 0:11:21.290
<v Speaker 3>panthers and that's a line i won't be shocked to

0:11:21.309 --> 0:11:23.210
<v Speaker 3>see if it gets the four just there's just so

0:11:23.250 --> 0:11:25.830
<v Speaker 3>much respect the money right now coming in on green

0:11:25.850 --> 0:11:28.330
<v Speaker 3>bay especially guys i've talked to where they want the

0:11:28.370 --> 0:11:30.229
<v Speaker 3>three and they've been trying to be patient with it

0:11:30.290 --> 0:11:32.330
<v Speaker 3>but i think it's it's it's at the point now

0:11:32.350 --> 0:11:34.010
<v Speaker 3>where they realize they're never going to get there they

0:11:34.030 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>might as well grab the three and a half so

0:11:35.860 --> 0:11:37.910
<v Speaker 3>yeah it's a game where we both love carolina i'm

0:11:37.929 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>happy to go against these other pro groups you know

0:11:39.820 --> 0:11:42.730
<v Speaker 3>it's not defended on one side or the other We

0:11:42.750 --> 0:11:45.050
<v Speaker 3>talked about that Ravens line was such a pro line,

0:11:45.110 --> 0:11:47.229
<v Speaker 3>plus three and a half. You're basically just taking it

0:11:47.270 --> 0:11:49.980
<v Speaker 3>just in case Lamar comes back. So it's another game

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.580
<v Speaker 3>early in the week. Lazy pros like me are just

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.500
<v Speaker 3>going to take that Ravens number and just say, well,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.740
<v Speaker 3>if he's back, this is what, two and a half, three?

0:11:57.860 --> 0:12:00.100
<v Speaker 3>That's this number where it should be in a very

0:12:00.210 --> 0:12:04.130
<v Speaker 3>desperate Ravens team having Lamar back. And, you know, another

0:12:04.150 --> 0:12:06.250
<v Speaker 3>game that jumped out, big conversation this week that wasn't

0:12:06.290 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>really split. tons of love by the pros and the jets.

0:12:09.059 --> 0:12:10.739
<v Speaker 3>And we saw that number go from plus one and

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.540
<v Speaker 3>a half right back to minus one and a half.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.900
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully you could have grabbed that plus number or

0:12:14.940 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 3>tease it up to seven and a half, whatever you

0:12:16.420 --> 0:12:18.020
<v Speaker 3>want to do with it. But I don't think we

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:19.660
<v Speaker 3>ever get back to that plus number on the jets.

0:12:19.700 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I just think there's too much respect and love about

0:12:21.740 --> 0:12:24.660
<v Speaker 3>these pro bettors. Again, we're on the other side of

0:12:24.820 --> 0:12:26.900
<v Speaker 3>tons of pro money on Pittsburgh guys.

0:12:26.940 --> 0:12:28.580
<v Speaker 2>I really respect, really love Pittsburgh.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.699
<v Speaker 3>And I told you I on a normal week, I

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 3>would get it. But if you're talking about team flying

0:12:33.700 --> 0:12:37.370
<v Speaker 3>across the Atlantic ocean and And now playing against a

0:12:37.470 --> 0:12:40.790
<v Speaker 3>divisional foe that beat them early in the year, I

0:12:40.830 --> 0:12:42.490
<v Speaker 3>just can't get there. So that's going to be a

0:12:42.490 --> 0:12:47.030
<v Speaker 3>fun one to break down. Obviously, I'm pretty split on

0:12:47.050 --> 0:12:51.130
<v Speaker 3>that one. This Detroit-Minnesota game, Barry, split. No tons of

0:12:51.170 --> 0:12:55.110
<v Speaker 3>pro money. On Detroit, same thing. I think what most

0:12:55.130 --> 0:12:56.870
<v Speaker 3>of the general public is looking at is that just

0:12:57.390 --> 0:13:00.100
<v Speaker 3>they don't trust Kyler, don't trust that Vikings offense, but

0:13:00.809 --> 0:13:02.390
<v Speaker 3>I keep pushing back against them at plus three and

0:13:02.410 --> 0:13:02.590
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:13:02.610 --> 0:13:04.150
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to. You're getting the hook.

0:13:04.350 --> 0:13:06.310
<v Speaker 3>Like you can trust the defense with that type of number.

0:13:06.350 --> 0:13:10.030
<v Speaker 3>So that's a really fun other game to debate. Another

0:13:10.050 --> 0:13:13.150
<v Speaker 3>game that shocked me, talking to pros, tons of guys

0:13:13.190 --> 0:13:15.930
<v Speaker 3>I really respect that love the Rams against the Chargers.

0:13:16.429 --> 0:13:18.070
<v Speaker 3>So that was one I didn't see coming where it's

0:13:18.090 --> 0:13:20.689
<v Speaker 3>like I thought it was going to be all pros

0:13:20.730 --> 0:13:22.630
<v Speaker 3>versus shows the public all over the Rams and the

0:13:22.670 --> 0:13:25.250
<v Speaker 3>pros all over this Chargers line. But that's actually a

0:13:25.290 --> 0:13:29.250
<v Speaker 3>pretty split between different groups, which shocked me.

0:13:30.020 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Comes a shock to no one. That Jaguars game, we

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:34.660
<v Speaker 2>talked about it. It was 7.5.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.100
<v Speaker 3>It's run all the way up to 10 now just

0:13:37.140 --> 0:13:39.020
<v Speaker 3>because the Colts are selling off a bunch of players.

0:13:39.500 --> 0:13:41.940
<v Speaker 3>That's not the only reason, right? DeForest Buckner's not moving

0:13:41.980 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a line 2.5 points. They're just, Quentin Nelson's not moving

0:13:44.620 --> 0:13:47.420
<v Speaker 3>a line 2.5 points. This is really, really, really respected

0:13:47.470 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>money coming in heavy on this Jaguars team.

0:13:49.210 --> 0:13:51.510
<v Speaker 2>So, I'll own it. Totally missed that one. I thought

0:13:51.550 --> 0:13:54.070
<v Speaker 2>it'd be a Colts line. Now it's really a Colts line.

0:13:54.090 --> 0:13:55.869
<v Speaker 3>You're getting plus 10 in a lot of shops on

0:13:55.890 --> 0:13:57.990
<v Speaker 3>this Colts team. So, just interesting to hear so many

0:13:58.030 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 3>pros coming in on this Jaguars team and them chasing

0:14:00.620 --> 0:14:02.140
<v Speaker 3>the steam. Like they bet it at seven and a half,

0:14:02.179 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 3>but at eight and a half, I know some groups

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.020
<v Speaker 3>even better than nine. So the pros do really love

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 3>that Jaguar side. I just, I can't see what that

0:14:09.460 --> 0:14:12.780
<v Speaker 3>many points in a divisional game. And yeah, the last

0:14:12.830 --> 0:14:14.730
<v Speaker 3>one that really jumped out to me, a lot of conversations,

0:14:14.830 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 3>just Denver over the chiefs, tons of pros on it.

0:14:18.670 --> 0:14:20.170
<v Speaker 2>Public office is going to be all over the chiefs.

0:14:20.250 --> 0:14:22.630
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it's one we'll have to talk about. Cause I'm,

0:14:22.870 --> 0:14:23.450
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:14:23.350 --> 0:14:25.290
<v Speaker 3>Seeing what the pros are seeing on this one with Denver.

0:14:25.330 --> 0:14:27.130
<v Speaker 3>So I'm interested in your take on it, but yeah,

0:14:27.150 --> 0:14:28.670
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pro money coming in on Denver in

0:14:28.690 --> 0:14:29.030
<v Speaker 3>that game.

0:14:30.050 --> 0:14:35.690
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Carolina for a second, because I was

0:14:35.870 --> 0:14:38.670
<v Speaker 1>curious where we were going to go in sharp calls

0:14:38.750 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on this one, because it's fascinating to me that this

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.340
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's running to four. You look at the

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>juice on this line across the board, and it's much

0:14:51.780 --> 0:14:53.860
<v Speaker 1>more likely to go to four than it is to three.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So I've been waiting to take a second bite at

0:14:56.740 --> 0:15:00.260
<v Speaker 1>the apple on Carolina. because I'm hoping that it's going

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.500
<v Speaker 1>to get to four before the game, even though the

0:15:02.540 --> 0:15:05.580
<v Speaker 1>fact that it getting to four before the game to

0:15:05.620 --> 0:15:08.260
<v Speaker 1>me is much more of an indicator that professionals have

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:13.850
<v Speaker 1>been not as aggressive on Carolina as I would have

0:15:13.910 --> 0:15:19.650
<v Speaker 1>liked them to be to feel better about Carolina at

0:15:19.690 --> 0:15:25.109
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. I'm still on them. Like Bryce

0:15:25.150 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>coming off a bad game as a dog on the road,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>against a defensive backfield that is susceptible to big plays,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.980
<v Speaker 1>which we saw again and again and again against the

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:41.070
<v Speaker 1>Lions the week before. I like that spot. I like

0:15:41.470 --> 0:15:46.530
<v Speaker 1>playing a dog that was just blown out seven and

0:15:46.550 --> 0:15:51.630
<v Speaker 1>two this season, historically 57%. So I'm a little surprised

0:15:51.670 --> 0:15:53.330
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been for three, especially by the way, we

0:15:54.150 --> 0:15:57.270
<v Speaker 1>know the Packers have some pretty considerable issues on the

0:15:57.350 --> 0:16:02.820
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. And now Matthew Golden has popped up as

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:10.460
<v Speaker 1>questionable and a limited practice participant on Wednesday. So explain

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to me the Packers' love. What are we missing here?

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it anti-Carolina or is it pro-Green Bay?

0:16:14.820 --> 0:16:18.510
<v Speaker 3>It could be a little anti-Carolina because, like you said,

0:16:18.530 --> 0:16:21.930
<v Speaker 3>that was just such a bad loss. And now you're

0:16:21.970 --> 0:16:25.090
<v Speaker 3>going from Bucky Irvin to a fresh Josh Jacobs, like

0:16:25.110 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>you would think. This favorites the Packers' run game in

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 3>many ways as well. But I'm like you. I don't

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:31.250
<v Speaker 3>get it.

0:16:31.580 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Three, I totally get the love for the Packers, right?

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.590
<v Speaker 3>The pros loving that number made total sense, but it's

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>never going to get there.

0:16:38.750 --> 0:16:40.150
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I don't get why they're just taking

0:16:40.170 --> 0:16:41.650
<v Speaker 2>the three and a half. And they're not just taking it.

0:16:41.650 --> 0:16:44.350
<v Speaker 2>They're betting it pretty heavily. So it's just a game

0:16:44.370 --> 0:16:46.470
<v Speaker 2>where maybe we're missing something here. But I agree.

0:16:46.710 --> 0:16:49.229
<v Speaker 3>To me, it feels like a no-brainer spot with Carolina.

0:16:49.250 --> 0:16:52.110
<v Speaker 3>You're getting them at a plus number after an embarrassing

0:16:52.170 --> 0:16:53.210
<v Speaker 3>loss on a short.

0:16:53.030 --> 0:16:54.750
<v Speaker 2>Week with a talented team.

0:16:54.850 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Like they're not– Maybe they're not going to be, you know,

0:16:58.660 --> 0:16:59.620
<v Speaker 3>like the Bears type, right?

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>A team that you trust to go on a playoff run.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:02.740
<v Speaker 2>But I think we all.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Agree that Panthers being a team that could win their

0:17:05.180 --> 0:17:08.110
<v Speaker 3>division or a possible seventh seed feels real. Like they

0:17:08.130 --> 0:17:10.929
<v Speaker 3>feel like they have enough talent offensively and defensively. I know,

0:17:10.950 --> 0:17:13.870
<v Speaker 3>you know, they've been up and down certain weeks, but overall,

0:17:14.350 --> 0:17:16.450
<v Speaker 3>like that defensive unit's not as terrible as we thought

0:17:16.470 --> 0:17:17.970
<v Speaker 3>they were going to be coming into the season. So

0:17:18.530 --> 0:17:20.290
<v Speaker 3>when I look at this Carolina team, it really is

0:17:20.310 --> 0:17:23.050
<v Speaker 3>a bet on what we've seen with Bryce Young, which

0:17:23.109 --> 0:17:26.010
<v Speaker 3>is just, anytime he's what Chad said, he's like a

0:17:26.090 --> 0:17:28.930
<v Speaker 3>dog in this position after a really bad loss, especially

0:17:28.950 --> 0:17:31.650
<v Speaker 3>the last two years tends to bounce back. He doesn't

0:17:31.750 --> 0:17:34.629
<v Speaker 3>consistently have bad games in a row. That's what you can,

0:17:34.730 --> 0:17:37.020
<v Speaker 3>you can bash price on for all these different things,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.770
<v Speaker 3>but being consistently good and not letting bad losses pile up.

0:17:42.140 --> 0:17:44.139
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't really done that since he's taken over this

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.180
<v Speaker 3>job from Andy Dalton a few years ago. So yeah,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.220
<v Speaker 3>looking at this number, Chad, I think that's, and I

0:17:49.220 --> 0:17:50.990
<v Speaker 3>think it's because right now it's just the movement of it.

0:17:51.260 --> 0:17:53.610
<v Speaker 3>If this was going down to three, We'd both feel

0:17:53.670 --> 0:17:56.730
<v Speaker 3>way more confident about it. The fact that it is

0:17:56.780 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>touching forward a lot of shops to show how much

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 3>resistance there is and how much pro money is coming

0:18:00.300 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 3>on the Packers. And I've talked about, I think the

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Packers are a really good team. Obviously going to be

0:18:04.180 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 3>a desperate team to win here after a bad divisional loss,

0:18:07.020 --> 0:18:08.860
<v Speaker 3>but still think they'll win this game.

0:18:08.900 --> 0:18:10.180
<v Speaker 2>But it's like by more than a field goal. I

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.420
<v Speaker 3>Just feels like a lot of points where you're betting

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot on the Packers, a lot of Panthers team

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.980
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen. They've had two uncompetitive games. I still

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.220
<v Speaker 3>think those are two outliers. Those are really two outlier

0:18:20.260 --> 0:18:23.869
<v Speaker 3>games to me. And we've seen this pattern with Bryce

0:18:23.890 --> 0:18:25.550
<v Speaker 3>Young to bounce back after bad losses.

0:18:26.869 --> 0:18:29.530
<v Speaker 1>Simon, I don't know about you. It's going to be

0:18:29.590 --> 0:18:36.869
<v Speaker 1>another night past my bedtime, watching sports, sweating a game

0:18:37.550 --> 0:18:44.650
<v Speaker 1>on TV. Arizona at Dallas. You had said on Sunday,

0:18:44.730 --> 0:18:47.570
<v Speaker 1>and we said it again on Tuesday before, We like

0:18:47.650 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Arizona here. We just want to see it get to seven.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.219
<v Speaker 1>Let's just be patient, get the number to seven. The

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>number is finally at seven. Arizona's seven point underdog at

0:18:57.820 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Look, lots of micro and macro trends

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.790
<v Speaker 1>here that we can address, but there's all of them say,

0:19:07.570 --> 0:19:16.090
<v Speaker 1>take Arizona from a non-quarterback specific point of view, meaning Dak,

0:19:16.540 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>has success in these situations, but historically teams in this spot,

0:19:21.170 --> 0:19:23.830
<v Speaker 1>you want to be back in the underdog. This season,

0:19:24.150 --> 0:19:28.570
<v Speaker 1>teams that are six plus point underdogs covering it in

0:19:28.630 --> 0:19:32.830
<v Speaker 1>a store clip, a little bit of inflation because of

0:19:32.869 --> 0:19:36.710
<v Speaker 1>last week's results, primarily with the Cowboys beating up on

0:19:36.730 --> 0:19:42.500
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. But you look at that game, the Cowboys

0:19:42.540 --> 0:19:47.139
<v Speaker 1>were not exactly dominant. They needed until late in the

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>third quarter to take the lead. The underlying numbers are

0:19:53.180 --> 0:19:58.500
<v Speaker 1>relatively even. The Eagles just didn't have the talent to

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.330
<v Speaker 1>stick with the Cowboys late in the game. The Cards

0:20:02.369 --> 0:20:04.870
<v Speaker 1>are clearly more talented than the Eagles right now. They

0:20:04.910 --> 0:20:10.220
<v Speaker 1>have been competitive. I'm more and more comfortable backing the Cardinals,

0:20:10.980 --> 0:20:11.900
<v Speaker 1>especially at seven.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:15.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm trying to think it.

0:20:16.190 --> 0:20:18.609
<v Speaker 3>It is tough to want to back the Cardinals in

0:20:18.630 --> 0:20:21.830
<v Speaker 3>the sense that they are such a bad team, but

0:20:21.850 --> 0:20:23.910
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about they're a.

0:20:23.850 --> 0:20:25.110
<v Speaker 2>Bad team that has a good offense.

0:20:25.190 --> 0:20:28.090
<v Speaker 3>And against the Cowboys, they just have not, to my opinion,

0:20:28.330 --> 0:20:31.290
<v Speaker 3>earned a seven-point spread.

0:20:31.450 --> 0:20:32.810
<v Speaker 2>That defense is so bad.

0:20:32.850 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 3>And we could get burned here, but I've told people–

0:20:36.170 --> 0:20:38.490
<v Speaker 3>Arizona has some weird history with Dallas. And I always

0:20:38.510 --> 0:20:40.709
<v Speaker 3>look into this stuff. There's certain teams that just play

0:20:40.869 --> 0:20:43.530
<v Speaker 3>well against other teams. And, you know, when they're out

0:20:43.570 --> 0:20:45.750
<v Speaker 3>of division, it is weird. But I just wanted to

0:20:45.790 --> 0:20:47.110
<v Speaker 3>go back and look. Because I'm like, am I just

0:20:47.150 --> 0:20:49.830
<v Speaker 3>misremembering things? Because I'm telling the truth to you. It

0:20:49.869 --> 0:20:52.609
<v Speaker 3>feels like every other year I've lost my survivor pools

0:20:52.830 --> 0:20:55.450
<v Speaker 3>on Dallas at home against Arizona Cardinals.

0:20:56.100 --> 0:20:59.820
<v Speaker 2>So last year, Arizona was a three-and-a-half point dog. They

0:20:59.859 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 2>beat the Cowboys 27-17. Okay, 20-23. Okay.

0:21:04.310 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 3>They were at 11, 11 and a half point dog,

0:21:06.250 --> 0:21:10.859
<v Speaker 3>Arizona Cardinals. They beat the Cowboys 28 to 16. All right. 2022,

0:21:10.850 --> 0:21:15.369
<v Speaker 3>they beat them 25 to 22 Arizona Cardinals 2020. They

0:21:15.390 --> 0:21:19.190
<v Speaker 3>beat them 38 to 10 Cardinals. This is all during

0:21:19.250 --> 0:21:20.729
<v Speaker 3>Dak's run. I know you could say, well, it's not

0:21:20.750 --> 0:21:22.990
<v Speaker 3>this part of Kyler. Kyler didn't start some of those games.

0:21:23.170 --> 0:21:26.030
<v Speaker 3>Like it's, it's crazy going through it that this Cardinals

0:21:26.050 --> 0:21:30.389
<v Speaker 3>team for some reason, since 2020 has owned this Dallas team. And,

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.620
<v Speaker 3>You could say it's because they have such terrible defense. Well,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 3>nothing's changed here. I mean, they've always had a good

0:21:35.859 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>offense in that stretch with Dak. Whatever it is, their

0:21:38.980 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 3>defense no-shows in these type of games. I just look

0:21:41.900 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 3>at this matchup with Brissette, and we've seen them this

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.620
<v Speaker 3>year come from behind in so many games. Like last week,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:49.609
<v Speaker 3>if you wanted to beat Arizona, you really needed to

0:21:49.650 --> 0:21:52.430
<v Speaker 3>kill them, right? They put up 30 Denver. Their defense

0:21:52.470 --> 0:21:54.270
<v Speaker 3>didn't give up anything. I think they gave up 16

0:21:54.270 --> 0:21:56.409
<v Speaker 3>points to Arizona. That's what you need to do to

0:21:56.450 --> 0:22:00.050
<v Speaker 3>beat Arizona. Dallas is not the same beast in any measurement. Dallas,

0:22:00.390 --> 0:22:03.129
<v Speaker 3>Dak against bad teams. Yeah. Dak might get his, he

0:22:03.150 --> 0:22:05.830
<v Speaker 3>might put up 35, no doubt about it. But the

0:22:05.869 --> 0:22:08.050
<v Speaker 3>fact that now we all need to get to is 28.

0:22:08.050 --> 0:22:10.250
<v Speaker 3>The fact that we can always have this option for

0:22:10.270 --> 0:22:13.050
<v Speaker 3>this back door with this plus seven. Now it's, I

0:22:13.090 --> 0:22:15.050
<v Speaker 3>honestly feel like it's a gift. So yeah, probably market.

0:22:15.090 --> 0:22:16.790
<v Speaker 3>I'm hoping they move to the seven and a half,

0:22:16.869 --> 0:22:19.429
<v Speaker 3>but I'll grab this seven. Now I still can at

0:22:19.470 --> 0:22:23.389
<v Speaker 3>different shops and hope, hope, hope, hope, hope the public

0:22:23.410 --> 0:22:25.390
<v Speaker 3>keeps coming in heavy on teasers and money line, but

0:22:25.410 --> 0:22:26.929
<v Speaker 3>it's cause that's what it is right now. The Cowboys it's,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.300
<v Speaker 3>if you look at different shops, it's like 90% of

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the bets and money is all on the Cowboys money line.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.179
<v Speaker 2>You just know that's teasers, right? People are coming in

0:22:34.220 --> 0:22:34.459
<v Speaker 2>heavy on.

0:22:34.420 --> 0:22:36.699
<v Speaker 3>This Cowboys team that win this game after what Chad said,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.500
<v Speaker 3>they're feeling good after them beating up on a bad

0:22:39.540 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Eagles team. And it's like, I don't know, on a

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 3>short week, seven point favorite at home after feeling themselves,

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:46.419
<v Speaker 3>this is.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>The exact moment. There's a letdown spot here for the Cowboys.

0:22:48.900 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'm really hoping to get seven and a half,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.140
<v Speaker 3>but I've noticed you taking the seven, obviously.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.690
<v Speaker 1>The, uh, I think what you're talking about with the

0:22:56.970 --> 0:22:59.109
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and the Cardinals, if I can put on my

0:22:59.850 --> 0:23:03.820
<v Speaker 1>old head hat for a second, as someone whose mom

0:23:04.420 --> 0:23:08.860
<v Speaker 1>grew up in St. Louis, Missouri, and I spent so

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.780
<v Speaker 1>much of my youth going to visit my grandparents in St. Louis.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So I had this affinity or interest really in the St.

0:23:17.060 --> 0:23:20.540
<v Speaker 1>Louis Cardinals. I think when you're talking about the Cowboys Cardinals,

0:23:20.820 --> 0:23:24.910
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the ghosts of the NFC East. You're

0:23:24.930 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about Dan Deardorff. You're talking about Larry Wilson. You're

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about Jim Hart and Neil Lomax. That's what you're

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It's those old rivalries, even though none of

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys were alive when it happened. It's the ghosts, man.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.659
<v Speaker 1>They're bubbling up. It's the supernatural. That's what it is.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.530
<v Speaker 1>That's why we're back in the years of the Cardinals

0:23:48.980 --> 0:23:51.770
<v Speaker 1>and plus seven. We're doing it for Neil Lomax and

0:23:51.810 --> 0:23:58.430
<v Speaker 1>Jim Hart. Simon. Minnesota at Detroit. Detroit is a three

0:23:58.450 --> 0:24:00.949
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite in this game. This one

0:24:01.010 --> 0:24:02.770
<v Speaker 1>was Simon Says. We're going to talk a little bit

0:24:02.790 --> 0:24:06.450
<v Speaker 1>more about this later on. I bet it at three

0:24:06.470 --> 0:24:11.450
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Minnesota. I'm not going to lie. I'm

0:24:11.510 --> 0:24:15.050
<v Speaker 1>not as confident as I was. I keep telling myself

0:24:15.090 --> 0:24:19.629
<v Speaker 1>we're just playing the number here. Even though there are

0:24:19.650 --> 0:24:22.830
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stats to say don't take Minnesota in

0:24:22.850 --> 0:24:26.419
<v Speaker 1>this spot. You mentioned Jared Goff. I got the same

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>emails and notes from people that he's actually been incredible

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.270
<v Speaker 1>against the Blitz this year. To our credit, he has

0:24:35.330 --> 0:24:42.109
<v Speaker 1>been mediocre in years past, especially has trouble when he

0:24:42.130 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>has pushed off his spot with the Blitz coming from

0:24:45.140 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle, right? Can Minnesota do that? Will it matter

0:24:50.740 --> 0:24:53.700
<v Speaker 1>because he's been so much more effective this year? Are

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.580
<v Speaker 1>we walking into it right now and just being stubborn

0:24:57.140 --> 0:25:00.180
<v Speaker 1>because we're looking at this hook and saying that's what

0:25:00.220 --> 0:25:03.130
<v Speaker 1>we're betting on regardless of any scheme on the field?

0:25:05.190 --> 0:25:05.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:05.410 --> 0:25:08.350
<v Speaker 3>And also, speaking of the past, I've seen some crazy

0:25:08.390 --> 0:25:12.100
<v Speaker 3>stats I'm sure other people have where this Vikings team

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 3>who's 6-0, they're like the first team since like 1932.

0:25:17.109 --> 0:25:19.149
<v Speaker 3>to be six and oh with their low the the

0:25:19.170 --> 0:25:21.890
<v Speaker 3>amount of touchdowns they've scored this season which is fewer

0:25:21.910 --> 0:25:24.130
<v Speaker 3>than 10 whatever it is so um.

0:25:24.350 --> 0:25:26.250
<v Speaker 2>I totally get that the general public's.

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Hesitation right it is really all about this offense in

0:25:30.340 --> 0:25:33.780
<v Speaker 3>minnesota and i'm not trusting the quarterback and my whole

0:25:33.820 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>view is is this not the perfect opportunity for kyler

0:25:38.030 --> 0:25:40.450
<v Speaker 3>to finally put a complete game together he's playing against

0:25:40.470 --> 0:25:44.750
<v Speaker 3>a defense that is um you know all their rankings

0:25:44.830 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 3>right they're 28th on third down defense they're 32nd giving

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>up passing yards they're uh 28th and giving up points

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.590
<v Speaker 3>this year Detroit they're 24th in turnovers like they're just

0:25:56.220 --> 0:25:59.810
<v Speaker 3>a bad defense obviously and yeah their offense is top

0:25:59.850 --> 0:26:04.369
<v Speaker 3>five in basically every category but everyone knows Minnesota equally

0:26:04.410 --> 0:26:06.909
<v Speaker 3>is top one and two in every defensive category this

0:26:06.930 --> 0:26:11.690
<v Speaker 3>year they've been absolutely dominant and I went through and

0:26:11.710 --> 0:26:14.270
<v Speaker 3>I talked about where Jared Goff shockingly has done well

0:26:14.470 --> 0:26:17.230
<v Speaker 3>against Flores defenses and even his career. I think he's

0:26:17.250 --> 0:26:20.030
<v Speaker 3>seven to five against Minnesota's career. So he's not, you know,

0:26:20.230 --> 0:26:21.710
<v Speaker 3>Flores doesn't have the same effect on him as he

0:26:21.730 --> 0:26:22.870
<v Speaker 3>has on other quarterbacks, right?

0:26:22.890 --> 0:26:24.750
<v Speaker 2>Goff, he's seen it all. And we've talked about it.

0:26:24.830 --> 0:26:25.710
<v Speaker 2>We just did that.

0:26:26.170 --> 0:26:28.070
<v Speaker 3>He's gotten much better than he was early in his

0:26:28.109 --> 0:26:31.050
<v Speaker 3>career against the blitz this year. It went a whole

0:26:31.090 --> 0:26:33.530
<v Speaker 3>different world, right? I didn't realize he was 75, 75%

0:26:33.530 --> 0:26:35.030
<v Speaker 3>completion percentage against the blitz this year.

0:26:35.390 --> 0:26:35.990
<v Speaker 2>That's insane.

0:26:36.350 --> 0:26:39.369
<v Speaker 3>And when you go and break it down, It's not

0:26:39.450 --> 0:26:42.590
<v Speaker 3>like it's, you know, people assuming it's these big plays, right?

0:26:43.410 --> 0:26:45.570
<v Speaker 3>It's the quick read where he's either taking the three

0:26:45.869 --> 0:26:47.889
<v Speaker 3>or he's getting a big play on St. Brown or

0:26:47.910 --> 0:26:50.580
<v Speaker 3>wherever on these quick reads, which, you know, tons of

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>respect to golf. That's a big thing you need to

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.340
<v Speaker 3>prove on because he was so bad with pressure up

0:26:55.380 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the middle. So, yeah, I totally get why people are

0:26:58.500 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 3>betting this Lions team and why people aren't buying this

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Vikings team. But I still think this is the type

0:27:02.260 --> 0:27:04.660
<v Speaker 3>of game where it's just an inflated lot like that.

0:27:05.330 --> 0:27:07.930
<v Speaker 3>The Lions stole one last week. Minnesota on the flip side,

0:27:07.970 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 3>they earned that win in every retrospect in the fact

0:27:11.180 --> 0:27:13.460
<v Speaker 3>that they were trying– like Chad said, they were trying

0:27:13.500 --> 0:27:14.020
<v Speaker 3>so many ways.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:14.540
<v Speaker 2>To lose that game.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:20.020
<v Speaker 3>They were so bad, so bad offensively. I just think

0:27:20.060 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 3>here this is a get-right spot for this Minnesota offense.

0:27:22.460 --> 0:27:24.300
<v Speaker 2>You don't think they're hearing all this noise.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.490
<v Speaker 3>You don't think KOC is seeing all the stuff written

0:27:28.510 --> 0:27:31.250
<v Speaker 3>about J.J. McCarthy and the fact they let him walk

0:27:31.310 --> 0:27:32.030
<v Speaker 3>and they kept Kyler.

0:27:32.930 --> 0:27:33.580
<v Speaker 2>It's all there.

0:27:33.730 --> 0:27:35.980
<v Speaker 3>So I do think the pressure is heavily on this

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.380
<v Speaker 3>offense despite being 6-0. And, yeah, that's the only hesitation

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>for me here is just Minnesota, their defense has been

0:27:44.180 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>so good.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.100
<v Speaker 2>Are they finally going to get burned here? Because, I mean,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>you go through it.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.100
<v Speaker 3>They haven't really played, obviously, anything close to this Detroit

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 3>offense where, you know, that Caleb game, you throw it out.

0:27:54.310 --> 0:27:57.210
<v Speaker 3>It was in the rain. Tons of things went wrong.

0:27:57.270 --> 0:27:59.010
<v Speaker 3>But if you go back and watch that first half,

0:27:59.410 --> 0:28:01.180
<v Speaker 3>they did annoy the hell out of Caleb. They did

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.609
<v Speaker 3>annoy the hell out of that Bears offense.

0:28:02.660 --> 0:28:05.169
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, that's what I'm making it where Flores,

0:28:05.190 --> 0:28:06.830
<v Speaker 2>he could find what pisses you off, what annoys you

0:28:06.869 --> 0:28:08.580
<v Speaker 2>and really attack it and exploit it.

0:28:08.670 --> 0:28:11.310
<v Speaker 3>So we're getting plus three and a half. I just,

0:28:11.390 --> 0:28:13.130
<v Speaker 3>that's the issue with me. I can't avoid it. And,

0:28:13.609 --> 0:28:15.619
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've seen a couple of books hold at three.

0:28:15.630 --> 0:28:18.580
<v Speaker 3>That's giving me even more confidence because right now it's

0:28:18.700 --> 0:28:20.860
<v Speaker 3>all the money's pouring in on Detroit, especially at those

0:28:20.900 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 3>shops holding at the minus three.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:24.780
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see where this one goes.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.459
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, if it goes up to plus four, like this

0:28:26.500 --> 0:28:29.460
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay line, Not going to be a great feeling

0:28:29.500 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 3>coming in Sunday if this is up to plus four.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 3>But the only reason I gave this out is because

0:28:32.780 --> 0:28:34.140
<v Speaker 3>I just thought the pros would come in. This would

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.460
<v Speaker 3>be bet down to either plus three or plus two

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:36.820
<v Speaker 3>and a half.

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're just playing the number. We can go through

0:28:41.610 --> 0:28:47.390
<v Speaker 1>the schematics all we want. And I think one thing

0:28:47.470 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we know, Brian Flores isn't going to change who he is, right?

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.270
<v Speaker 1>The team blitzing 85% of the time. They're not going

0:28:57.290 --> 0:28:59.530
<v Speaker 1>to stop blitzing because Jared Goff is all of a

0:28:59.550 --> 0:29:02.190
<v Speaker 1>sudden really good at throwing against the blitz.

0:29:02.410 --> 0:29:03.850
<v Speaker 2>Or he will because he's that smart.

0:29:03.950 --> 0:29:06.300
<v Speaker 3>Or he'll do something where he'll blitz 10% in this game.

0:29:06.620 --> 0:29:07.740
<v Speaker 2>That's why I love the head games.

0:29:08.220 --> 0:29:11.580
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he will, though. It's what he does.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a huge Brian Flores fan. I feel like

0:29:14.820 --> 0:29:17.260
<v Speaker 1>what he has done with this defense, I just wonder,

0:29:17.300 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>will he make the blitzes look different? Will he make

0:29:19.530 --> 0:29:21.530
<v Speaker 1>them more exotic? Will he bring them from different places

0:29:21.570 --> 0:29:25.100
<v Speaker 1>than what he's shown so far this year? That's going

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:26.940
<v Speaker 1>to be the key to this game. How can they

0:29:27.060 --> 0:29:30.860
<v Speaker 1>get Jared Goff to be uncomfortable? Because he has been

0:29:30.900 --> 0:29:37.390
<v Speaker 1>really good. And so that to me is why the

0:29:37.450 --> 0:29:43.170
<v Speaker 1>hook is so interesting. because the books are, as you

0:29:43.190 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like to say, they're telling us something right now. The

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that it hasn't gone to three, they are telling

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.239
<v Speaker 1>us something. So either we think we're getting value or

0:29:52.300 --> 0:29:58.180
<v Speaker 1>we are totally, totally suckers. And I guess we're going

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:03.260
<v Speaker 1>to find out. Atlanta, Tampa Bay. Tampa Bay, minus two

0:30:03.300 --> 0:30:06.750
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So Baker's hand is injured, obviously. He

0:30:06.770 --> 0:30:11.430
<v Speaker 1>only threw 11 times against the Panthers the week before,

0:30:11.470 --> 0:30:15.670
<v Speaker 1>but didn't need to throw. The discrepancy on the money

0:30:15.860 --> 0:30:21.260
<v Speaker 1>in this game is insane. 81% of the money is

0:30:21.300 --> 0:30:25.380
<v Speaker 1>coming in on the Falcons. The number has not budged

0:30:25.660 --> 0:30:29.150
<v Speaker 1>since last It's been Atlanta minus, it's been Tampa Bay

0:30:29.190 --> 0:30:34.490
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. Every trend here says fade

0:30:35.310 --> 0:30:41.469
<v Speaker 1>the bucks. So the money coming in on Atlanta is

0:30:41.490 --> 0:30:43.670
<v Speaker 1>what's curious to me. I wouldn't have been surprised if

0:30:43.690 --> 0:30:47.860
<v Speaker 1>it was tickets, if the public was backing Atlanta as

0:30:47.940 --> 0:30:54.340
<v Speaker 1>a public dog, as a dog. But are we, if

0:30:54.380 --> 0:30:58.310
<v Speaker 1>we back the bucks here, Are we missing something?

0:31:01.210 --> 0:31:04.550
<v Speaker 3>Which is fair to ask. This game definitely has been

0:31:04.570 --> 0:31:05.650
<v Speaker 3>more split than I thought it was going to be.

0:31:05.650 --> 0:31:06.690
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was going to be another game where

0:31:06.710 --> 0:31:09.310
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be all pros all over the Bucs

0:31:09.430 --> 0:31:11.830
<v Speaker 3>and the general public all over Atlanta. Just because Atlanta,

0:31:12.670 --> 0:31:14.850
<v Speaker 3>I was coming off that big win against 49ers, that's

0:31:14.870 --> 0:31:16.370
<v Speaker 3>going to stick with people. That's going to stick with

0:31:16.390 --> 0:31:19.490
<v Speaker 3>people way more than a Bucs win over Carolina, especially

0:31:19.510 --> 0:31:21.910
<v Speaker 3>in a game where, like we said, Baker didn't do much.

0:31:21.930 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 3>So we still have no idea what we're getting from Baker.

0:31:23.580 --> 0:31:25.860
<v Speaker 3>That's the fear. And I know a lot of groups

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.430
<v Speaker 3>are betting into Atlanta. simply because they trust that offense

0:31:29.770 --> 0:31:31.950
<v Speaker 3>and you could say that offense is more healthy right

0:31:31.970 --> 0:31:33.469
<v Speaker 3>we don't know if mecca book's gonna play in this

0:31:33.530 --> 0:31:36.450
<v Speaker 3>matchup like a mecca book uh they struggle with injuries

0:31:36.470 --> 0:31:38.810
<v Speaker 3>this year and baker we just talked about like he

0:31:38.850 --> 0:31:42.010
<v Speaker 3>came back early because he's not not worried about losing

0:31:42.050 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 3>his job but it's just he's a high highly competitive

0:31:44.980 --> 0:31:47.420
<v Speaker 3>guy these guys are all psychos and like he just

0:31:47.940 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 3>he's watching his team win games without him he's just

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 3>like i gotta get back out there i don't care

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>if it's my throwing hand i need to wear a

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.630
<v Speaker 3>glove i'm making it work so I totally get the

0:31:56.650 --> 0:31:59.450
<v Speaker 3>hesitation from the general public. You talk all the time

0:31:59.470 --> 0:32:02.050
<v Speaker 3>about situation spots. This feels like a Bucs spot. This

0:32:02.070 --> 0:32:03.650
<v Speaker 3>is a good matchup for the Bucs team as well.

0:32:03.810 --> 0:32:06.370
<v Speaker 3>I can't say enough about this Bucs defense, how they've

0:32:06.390 --> 0:32:08.890
<v Speaker 3>turned it around. They just have looked so much better here.

0:32:09.150 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 3>That was a great test last week. Carolina was a

0:32:13.020 --> 0:32:16.180
<v Speaker 3>really good offense coming into that game. They totally neutralized them,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.260
<v Speaker 3>shut them down. I don't think they'll do the same, obviously,

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.060
<v Speaker 3>against this Atlanta team where they have the B. John

0:32:22.100 --> 0:32:24.490
<v Speaker 3>Robinson piece where You know, you can stop him in

0:32:24.510 --> 0:32:26.150
<v Speaker 3>the run game. He'll burn you in the pass game.

0:32:26.190 --> 0:32:28.580
<v Speaker 3>He's just, you know, one of the best running backs

0:32:28.620 --> 0:32:31.660
<v Speaker 3>in all of football. We know that deal where I

0:32:31.700 --> 0:32:33.700
<v Speaker 3>look at this matchup, though, for Tampa, and it just

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 3>feels like as long as it's under three, it's a

0:32:36.300 --> 0:32:38.260
<v Speaker 3>good number in this divisional game. Like, you're getting the

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Bucs under three at home, and, you know, we've seen

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.230
<v Speaker 3>this kind of work out where they were, what was it,

0:32:46.230 --> 0:32:49.890
<v Speaker 3>0-11 against the spread shot or 0-12? Now they've been covering.

0:32:50.210 --> 0:32:52.890
<v Speaker 3>It's come back around. That Pittsburgh game, I know we

0:32:52.930 --> 0:32:55.050
<v Speaker 3>were on the other side and they dropped it. That

0:32:55.070 --> 0:32:57.010
<v Speaker 3>game had to go overtime just so they wouldn't cover it.

0:32:57.110 --> 0:33:01.260
<v Speaker 3>They had a 10-point lead in that fourth quarter. This

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 3>is a team where I feel like the Bucs had

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.500
<v Speaker 3>over-adjusted and now they've over-adjusted too much the other way.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 3>We're getting good lines every week here on this Bucs team.

0:33:11.860 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still a good line. This probably should

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.870
<v Speaker 3>be closer to 3-3.5, honestly. People are so high in

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.209
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta right now and Still think they have a lot

0:33:20.230 --> 0:33:21.850
<v Speaker 3>of questions about Baker and this Bucs team that you're

0:33:21.870 --> 0:33:22.610
<v Speaker 3>going to get in line here.

0:33:22.650 --> 0:33:25.070
<v Speaker 2>So, unfortunately, it's not. If this was all.

0:33:24.990 --> 0:33:26.770
<v Speaker 3>Pros lined up on the Bucs side, I would have

0:33:26.790 --> 0:33:29.490
<v Speaker 3>been way more confident, way higher in this game. But

0:33:29.950 --> 0:33:32.390
<v Speaker 3>it's just a little lukewarm, both sides being played right now. So,

0:33:32.410 --> 0:33:34.220
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a debate for sure Sunday morning

0:33:34.260 --> 0:33:35.540
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to get this one in because it's

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 3>one of.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:36.420
<v Speaker 2>My bigger bets.

0:33:36.500 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if it'll end up being two

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half come contest Sunday morning.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:47.060
<v Speaker 1>All right, Simon. It is time for our Brass Balls

0:33:47.500 --> 0:33:52.180
<v Speaker 1>Trade of the Week. Presented by Polymarket, it is going

0:33:52.260 --> 0:33:58.860
<v Speaker 1>to be the New York Jets minus one and a

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.210
<v Speaker 1>half trading at 50% on Polymarket.

0:34:03.230 --> 0:34:06.650
<v Speaker 2>You know what it takes? It takes brass balls.

0:34:09.310 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>They are hosting the Las Vegas Raiders. Look, very interesting move.

0:34:15.810 --> 0:34:18.690
<v Speaker 1>When we discussed this on Tuesday, the line had actually flipped.

0:34:18.730 --> 0:34:26.700
<v Speaker 1>It was Raiders minus a half. So much public love

0:34:27.300 --> 0:34:29.420
<v Speaker 1>for the Raiders. We were trying to be patient. We

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.779
<v Speaker 1>were hoping that it actually might move a little bit

0:34:32.860 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>higher and we could get the Jets at a plus number.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.470
<v Speaker 1>Wise guys came in and changed that completely. Books have

0:34:41.530 --> 0:34:45.170
<v Speaker 1>not moved off of the Jets minus one and a half.

0:34:45.860 --> 0:34:49.779
<v Speaker 1>Still loads of tickets coming in on Vegas. We're both

0:34:49.820 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>aligned on this. My only fear is the line flip.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.469
<v Speaker 1>It's not a true line flip to me, but it

0:34:58.530 --> 0:35:07.069
<v Speaker 1>still is a line flip, meaning it wasn't Raiders minus one,

0:35:07.210 --> 0:35:09.490
<v Speaker 1>one and a half for extended days.

0:35:09.570 --> 0:35:10.090
<v Speaker 2>It was a.

0:35:11.810 --> 0:35:18.580
<v Speaker 1>Minute and then it went right back. New York football jets.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.290
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be our brass balls for the week.

0:35:22.870 --> 0:35:23.350
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:35:24.070 --> 0:35:27.850
<v Speaker 3>It sounds very excited, but yeah, it's a, this one

0:35:27.870 --> 0:35:31.009
<v Speaker 3>definitely takes some brass balls. I'm already cracking myself thinking

0:35:31.050 --> 0:35:33.490
<v Speaker 3>about like, I got these local guys where I go

0:35:33.510 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>for a pizza, a pizza shop.

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.220
<v Speaker 2>I go to, and they're obviously big fans of the show.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 3>And I got them to the show that started this year,

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:42.379
<v Speaker 3>like talking to a guy and it's like, Hey man,

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:43.819
<v Speaker 3>if you like football, check out our show, blah.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Blah, blah.

0:35:44.660 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 3>And where I went in there on Monday, my God,

0:35:48.219 --> 0:35:50.450
<v Speaker 3>you thought I was the King of this place because

0:35:51.290 --> 0:35:52.810
<v Speaker 3>Miami dolphins last week.

0:35:53.590 --> 0:35:55.330
<v Speaker 2>And I said they were going to win outright.

0:35:56.330 --> 0:35:58.370
<v Speaker 3>And this guy said they were making fun of me,

0:35:58.410 --> 0:35:59.830
<v Speaker 3>shitting on me for about three days.

0:35:59.850 --> 0:36:01.670
<v Speaker 1>Free pizza for Simon.

0:36:02.090 --> 0:36:04.970
<v Speaker 2>Exactly though. They were just like, how do you do it?

0:36:05.219 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like, there's no secret here. I wish there was

0:36:07.020 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 2>some secret sauce, but there really isn't. I can already

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 2>feel that.

0:36:09.580 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to walk in tomorrow and they're going to

0:36:11.940 --> 0:36:13.419
<v Speaker 3>be all over me about this Jets pick.

0:36:13.739 --> 0:36:17.290
<v Speaker 2>And, um, Because it is true, though. It's back-to-back weeks.

0:36:17.310 --> 0:36:18.870
<v Speaker 2>These take some cojones.

0:36:19.070 --> 0:36:21.150
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm trying to beat into the general public here,

0:36:21.190 --> 0:36:23.970
<v Speaker 3>the listeners of this show, where it's like, these are winners.

0:36:23.989 --> 0:36:26.110
<v Speaker 3>These are long-term winners. Can we get burnt here and

0:36:26.130 --> 0:36:27.450
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders blow out the Jets?

0:36:28.050 --> 0:36:31.029
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the Jets. It's Aaron Glenn and the Jets.

0:36:31.070 --> 0:36:33.380
<v Speaker 3>This is a man that's laughing, having the time of

0:36:33.390 --> 0:36:35.570
<v Speaker 3>his life at halftime while he's losing by double digits

0:36:35.590 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to Miami at home. I know what we're walking into here,

0:36:39.300 --> 0:36:41.900
<v Speaker 3>but me and Chad talk. I love the matchups here.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 3>Not just the run game for this Jets team, but

0:36:44.850 --> 0:36:47.109
<v Speaker 3>think it's a nice bounce back spot for them defensively

0:36:47.489 --> 0:36:50.930
<v Speaker 3>that was how do you not get embarrassed and humbled

0:36:50.989 --> 0:36:53.029
<v Speaker 3>when you when you get dominated especially on the ground

0:36:53.070 --> 0:36:55.110
<v Speaker 3>against miami the previous yeah i think they're going to

0:36:55.150 --> 0:36:57.310
<v Speaker 3>bounce back a major way where the raiders really haven't

0:36:57.330 --> 0:36:59.029
<v Speaker 3>had a run game this year like genti has not

0:36:59.110 --> 0:37:01.390
<v Speaker 3>been i mean that's a whole another story we can

0:37:01.430 --> 0:37:05.410
<v Speaker 3>go down but genti jeremiah love like these these running

0:37:05.450 --> 0:37:07.930
<v Speaker 3>backs they take in these top 10 picks me and

0:37:07.950 --> 0:37:10.460
<v Speaker 3>chad talking about it it's a dumb pick these are

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 3>dumb organizations and This Raiders team, it's all on Kirk

0:37:15.020 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 3>right now. And this is another matchup that's not going

0:37:16.780 --> 0:37:20.220
<v Speaker 3>to be that great, in my opinion, for Kirk. So, yeah,

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not shocked to see the general public on the Raiders,

0:37:23.219 --> 0:37:25.540
<v Speaker 3>but I am shocked to see that the pros showed

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 3>their hands so early and hammered this Jets line and

0:37:27.780 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 3>flipped it back because I was like, I was so

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 3>happy to see it move. I was like, oh, my God,

0:37:31.620 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I might be able to get a plus two on

0:37:33.140 --> 0:37:37.270
<v Speaker 3>this Jets team. So minus one and a half. In

0:37:37.290 --> 0:37:38.469
<v Speaker 3>my mind, anything below.

0:37:38.270 --> 0:37:40.489
<v Speaker 2>Two is a really, really good number on this Jets team.

0:37:40.530 --> 0:37:43.230
<v Speaker 2>Like I have this. Two and a half, closer to three.

0:37:43.430 --> 0:37:45.670
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that we're getting a good number here

0:37:45.730 --> 0:37:49.290
<v Speaker 3>is a big deal, and we just love the matchup. So, yeah,

0:37:49.660 --> 0:37:54.219
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking, what's the brassiest ball? This one jumped

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 3>right off the page. It's like I'm really bad at

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.140
<v Speaker 3>having to, and it's one of these I can feel

0:37:58.160 --> 0:37:59.580
<v Speaker 3>it in the pit of my stomach where it's like,

0:37:59.620 --> 0:38:01.569
<v Speaker 3>my God, this is going to be a tough one

0:38:01.610 --> 0:38:02.770
<v Speaker 3>to watch come Sunday.

0:38:02.830 --> 0:38:04.670
<v Speaker 2>But I really think we're getting a good number here

0:38:04.690 --> 0:38:05.330
<v Speaker 2>on this Jets side.

0:38:05.890 --> 0:38:08.489
<v Speaker 1>Well, we considered the Cardinals. We considered one other team.

0:38:08.530 --> 0:38:10.590
<v Speaker 1>We landed on the Jets. This has to be a

0:38:10.630 --> 0:38:14.569
<v Speaker 1>free pizza pick for Simon. Let's just get Simon some

0:38:14.610 --> 0:38:15.330
<v Speaker 1>free pizza.

0:38:15.969 --> 0:38:16.729
<v Speaker 2>Never, never.

0:38:16.770 --> 0:38:18.910
<v Speaker 3>And I always leave a big tip, people. Don't you worry.

0:38:18.989 --> 0:38:20.739
<v Speaker 3>Simon takes good care of these guys.

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.980
<v Speaker 1>Simon's a class act. Everyone knows that. Simon's a generous,

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>classy guy. I need to tell you about this new

0:38:27.380 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>prediction market called Polymarket. It's the best new way to

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.430
<v Speaker 1>trade in sports in the past. If you wanted action

0:38:33.469 --> 0:38:34.900
<v Speaker 1>on the game, you'd put some money in. And if

0:38:34.940 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>your team was doing well and you wanted to cash out,

0:38:37.460 --> 0:38:39.779
<v Speaker 1>they'd lock the trade or take a huge fee. But

0:38:39.820 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Polymarket is a prediction market, a stock exchange for sports

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.299
<v Speaker 1>where you can buy and sell on your teams. I've

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.180
<v Speaker 1>tried them all. And Polymarket is simply the best prediction market.

0:38:49.219 --> 0:38:52.860
<v Speaker 1>They're so confident. You'll never go back to the other guys.

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.660
<v Speaker 1>They're giving you a free $ 25 on your first trade

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>when you deposit just $ 10. And now they've launched a

0:39:00.180 --> 0:39:03.629
<v Speaker 1>new feature, squads. a group chat where you can see

0:39:03.650 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what everyone is trading on. Check the link in the

0:39:05.739 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>description to join my squad today. Sweat picks together every

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.580
<v Speaker 1>Sunday in the Polymarket app. Download the Polymarket app today.

0:39:12.700 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Use SHARP when you sign up. That's SHARP to get

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:21.009
<v Speaker 1>$ 25 free after you deposit just $ 10. Another game, I

0:39:21.810 --> 0:39:25.790
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit bummed to see the line hasn't

0:39:25.830 --> 0:39:30.850
<v Speaker 1>been moving in our favor, the Cleveland Browns. plus three

0:39:30.870 --> 0:39:34.390
<v Speaker 1>and a half at the Pittsburgh Steelers. It was four

0:39:34.489 --> 0:39:37.910
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday when we first talked about it. It's moved

0:39:37.930 --> 0:39:41.060
<v Speaker 1>to three and a half. My concern here is that

0:39:41.980 --> 0:39:48.299
<v Speaker 1>it feels very, very, very public. And it worries me

0:39:48.340 --> 0:39:54.109
<v Speaker 1>that the line has not moved. Are we a little

0:39:54.150 --> 0:39:58.630
<v Speaker 1>bit too big for our britches with the Cleveland Browns

0:39:58.910 --> 0:40:02.770
<v Speaker 1>right now? I'm totally impressed with both teams. I'm totally

0:40:02.790 --> 0:40:05.790
<v Speaker 1>impressed with the coaching on both teams. Totally impressed with

0:40:05.810 --> 0:40:11.490
<v Speaker 1>the defenses on both teams. I mean, they're both playing

0:40:11.530 --> 0:40:13.290
<v Speaker 1>like competent professional football teams.

0:40:15.230 --> 0:40:19.010
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my biggest pushbacks against these pro groups were you

0:40:19.050 --> 0:40:20.910
<v Speaker 3>guys are the same guys are telling me I had

0:40:20.930 --> 0:40:22.910
<v Speaker 3>to bet Tennessee last week. I had to fade this

0:40:22.950 --> 0:40:25.930
<v Speaker 3>Browns team. It's no, it's honestly no different. They're just,

0:40:26.350 --> 0:40:28.690
<v Speaker 3>they're waiting for the other shooter drop on this Browns team. Honestly,

0:40:28.730 --> 0:40:32.470
<v Speaker 3>they're like, their, their view is Watson cannot keep, cannot

0:40:32.530 --> 0:40:36.890
<v Speaker 3>keep up these fourth quarter comebacks. And I mean, we've

0:40:36.989 --> 0:40:40.049
<v Speaker 3>seen him consistently do it now. Like this isn't just,

0:40:40.110 --> 0:40:43.090
<v Speaker 3>you can't say it's a fluke. It's happened multiple games.

0:40:43.140 --> 0:40:44.980
<v Speaker 3>It was a four, four games to be exact where

0:40:45.020 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 3>he's had these fourth quarter comebacks. So, um, Yeah, I

0:40:50.020 --> 0:40:52.259
<v Speaker 3>get what they're trying to do, but me and Chad

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 3>always talk about you can't time the market. It's just

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.910
<v Speaker 3>like trading stocks. You cannot time the market. It feels

0:40:56.930 --> 0:40:59.150
<v Speaker 3>like they're trying to time the market here. They're trying

0:40:59.170 --> 0:41:01.350
<v Speaker 3>to do it on a Steelers team that, I mean,

0:41:01.590 --> 0:41:03.330
<v Speaker 3>you can't say this is a good spot. They're coming

0:41:03.370 --> 0:41:07.290
<v Speaker 3>back from Paris. If anything, this is the worst spot

0:41:07.330 --> 0:41:10.609
<v Speaker 3>it could possibly be for an old team that Pittsburgh is.

0:41:11.070 --> 0:41:13.370
<v Speaker 3>They're an old team coming off a ton of travel now,

0:41:13.910 --> 0:41:16.850
<v Speaker 3>coming home against a Browns team that is young. It's

0:41:16.890 --> 0:41:19.989
<v Speaker 3>why we love this Browns team, man. They've hit these

0:41:20.050 --> 0:41:23.049
<v Speaker 3>drafts the last two, three years. All the talent is

0:41:23.110 --> 0:41:26.730
<v Speaker 3>working out. I mean, that game, their number one tight

0:41:26.770 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 3>end who they drafted two years ago showed up. Concepcion

0:41:30.580 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>showed up in that game. It's just these offensive pieces

0:41:33.340 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 3>they've drafted have shown up. We know their defense, obviously,

0:41:35.820 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 3>across the board, all these defensive guys they've drafted have

0:41:38.380 --> 0:41:41.299
<v Speaker 3>shown up. So, yeah, it's something I'm clearly missing. I

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:42.930
<v Speaker 3>told you. A bunch of pros I talked to, like

0:41:42.969 --> 0:41:44.740
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers, like Chad said, they're holding the number up.

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the public and pros aligned on this Browns team because

0:41:48.820 --> 0:41:50.979
<v Speaker 3>it's the easy route right now this year we've seen

0:41:51.020 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 3>of just fading these teams that travel internationally. And it's

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.740
<v Speaker 3>just they drag in the second half. And you can say, well,

0:41:58.140 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is the time to try to go

0:42:00.620 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>against that pattern. But we're talking about a Browns team

0:42:03.020 --> 0:42:05.700
<v Speaker 3>that's better in the second half going against a team

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.969
<v Speaker 3>we expect to drag and slow down in the second half. And,

0:42:09.550 --> 0:42:10.930
<v Speaker 3>you know, as much as I want to say Aaron

0:42:10.969 --> 0:42:13.660
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers has been playing incredible out of his mind, you

0:42:13.700 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 3>saw the first time these two teams played, I think

0:42:15.540 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 3>it was a Thursday night game.

0:42:17.820 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Rogers absolutely lit up this defense. He was incredible. But

0:42:21.260 --> 0:42:23.610
<v Speaker 2>then when they needed him to have a drive, he

0:42:23.630 --> 0:42:24.350
<v Speaker 2>couldn't put it together.

0:42:24.390 --> 0:42:26.490
<v Speaker 3>They did finally get some stops and it's like, okay,

0:42:26.950 --> 0:42:28.630
<v Speaker 3>at least there's some stuff to take away on tape.

0:42:28.670 --> 0:42:30.310
<v Speaker 3>The Browns are going to look at it and be like, okay,

0:42:30.810 --> 0:42:32.650
<v Speaker 3>these are the adjustments we made the first time we played.

0:42:33.110 --> 0:42:35.430
<v Speaker 2>Can we counteract Aaron Rogers.

0:42:35.150 --> 0:42:39.089
<v Speaker 3>Doing offensively, which is these quick five, six minute, you know,

0:42:39.110 --> 0:42:42.110
<v Speaker 3>these quick throws, these two, three step drops and the

0:42:42.150 --> 0:42:45.690
<v Speaker 3>quick throws and, I look at this matchup, and I'm

0:42:45.730 --> 0:42:48.130
<v Speaker 3>like you, where it's just my own hesitation. It's just

0:42:48.150 --> 0:42:51.009
<v Speaker 3>like the Minnesota one. I don't get the hook, and

0:42:51.050 --> 0:42:54.859
<v Speaker 3>it feels too easy, and that's my hesitation. I mean,

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 3>you've seen the board crystal clear. It's like Chad Wright.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Are we walking right into it right now? It's another

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:00.980
<v Speaker 3>really tough.

0:43:01.020 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Debated game where I would– if.

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.450
<v Speaker 3>This wasn't the Steelers coming back from Paris, I'd be

0:43:10.469 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 3>all over the Steelers, but because it is, that's my–

0:43:12.940 --> 0:43:14.859
<v Speaker 3>That's my biggest push against the Steelers pick.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>This one's for Luke. He wants me to say it's

0:43:17.460 --> 0:43:20.790
<v Speaker 1>Chad and I, and now Luke owes me 10 books,

0:43:21.610 --> 0:43:25.270
<v Speaker 1>number one. Number two, when I looked at my lineup

0:43:25.350 --> 0:43:33.700
<v Speaker 1>this week, now Simon is trolling me by flashing Peter

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.339
<v Speaker 1>King's book, The Game, which is brilliant and everyone should

0:43:36.380 --> 0:43:41.340
<v Speaker 1>buy it. No bigger fan. Listen, we're a literary podcast.

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I want everyone to buy a lot of books, all

0:43:44.380 --> 0:43:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the books. I don't want anyone to not have books

0:43:47.380 --> 0:43:52.739
<v Speaker 1>on their bookshelves. I'm a huge fan of reading. I

0:43:52.780 --> 0:43:56.940
<v Speaker 1>love the reading. Riff, reading is fundamental. When I look

0:43:56.980 --> 0:43:59.339
<v Speaker 1>at my lineup of bets this week, I looked at

0:44:00.780 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland plus three and a half, Minnesota plus three and

0:44:03.780 --> 0:44:06.780
<v Speaker 1>a half. This next game that we're going to talk about,

0:44:07.410 --> 0:44:12.450
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Ravens at the Buffalo Bills, that one, was

0:44:12.510 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half. That one finally moved to three.

0:44:17.660 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because Lamar was a full participant in practice.

0:44:22.219 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what the number was waiting on. This is 100%, Simon,

0:44:26.700 --> 0:44:30.900
<v Speaker 1>a pros-Joes game. The wise guys have been taking the

0:44:30.940 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. It's not because the wise guys

0:44:32.500 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>are taking the number at three. It's because the number

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was at three and a half and professional bettors have

0:44:36.980 --> 0:44:40.900
<v Speaker 1>been buying that up with the expectation Lamar Jackson was

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>going to practice.

0:44:44.100 --> 0:44:46.380
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to be stubborn because I was lying to

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 3>myself saying, well, once it gets to three, maybe I'll

0:44:49.219 --> 0:44:50.750
<v Speaker 3>buy in on this Bill's side.

0:44:50.930 --> 0:44:52.540
<v Speaker 2>But I haven't done it.

0:44:52.610 --> 0:44:55.029
<v Speaker 3>I've only bet the Ravens three and a half. And

0:44:55.590 --> 0:44:57.250
<v Speaker 3>if you shop around, there's still three and a halves

0:44:57.350 --> 0:45:00.430
<v Speaker 3>out there. Not that these books hate Lamar.

0:45:00.489 --> 0:45:02.549
<v Speaker 2>They're mad at him, but they are. They're mad at

0:45:02.590 --> 0:45:04.890
<v Speaker 2>this guy because, like, he burned him so bad last week.

0:45:05.450 --> 0:45:07.219
<v Speaker 2>He was practicing all week.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:08.980
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, he practiced on Friday last week and

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 3>then didn't play. So I hate it where I want to–

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.049
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to, you know, put the house on the

0:45:16.070 --> 0:45:17.750
<v Speaker 3>plus three and a half on this Ravens team because

0:45:17.770 --> 0:45:21.430
<v Speaker 3>they're just going to be so desperate. And they're facing

0:45:21.469 --> 0:45:23.750
<v Speaker 3>a Bills team that, yeah, Josh Allen's desperate and he

0:45:23.770 --> 0:45:26.150
<v Speaker 3>wants to win every game. But they're 5-1 coming off

0:45:26.170 --> 0:45:28.390
<v Speaker 3>a bye week facing a team that, what, they dropped

0:45:28.410 --> 0:45:29.660
<v Speaker 3>two straight, this Ravens team?

0:45:30.060 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 2>And if they drop this game, guess what? They have

0:45:31.860 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 2>a short week and they're playing the Jaguars.

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 3>Like, it's just, it's all stacking up against this Ravens team.

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And they're blowing double-digit leads.

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:43.700
<v Speaker 2>Every game. Every game in the world.

0:45:44.219 --> 0:45:48.420
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, it is really tough where it's just I

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 3>wanted I want to be on the Ravens. If this,

0:45:51.940 --> 0:45:54.620
<v Speaker 3>you know, if Lamar news breaks and everyone's all in

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.220
<v Speaker 3>on and does eventually finally go to two and a half,

0:45:57.800 --> 0:45:59.750
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'll take my position on the bills. But

0:46:00.130 --> 0:46:02.630
<v Speaker 3>if you're looking for right now, the best bet, how

0:46:02.650 --> 0:46:04.009
<v Speaker 3>do you not take a three and a half? You

0:46:04.050 --> 0:46:05.750
<v Speaker 3>have to bet the Ravens at three and a half.

0:46:05.810 --> 0:46:08.009
<v Speaker 3>That's what the pros are doing, just because it's just

0:46:08.370 --> 0:46:10.629
<v Speaker 3>you get Lamar back at that plus number against this

0:46:10.710 --> 0:46:11.810
<v Speaker 3>defense in the bills, which.

0:46:12.510 --> 0:46:14.149
<v Speaker 2>They're historically bad right now, right?

0:46:14.190 --> 0:46:16.669
<v Speaker 3>They're just, you look at all the underlying numbers, they're

0:46:16.690 --> 0:46:18.770
<v Speaker 3>not getting the turnovers like the bears or these other

0:46:18.790 --> 0:46:21.270
<v Speaker 3>teams that have bad defenses that you can desperately need.

0:46:21.890 --> 0:46:24.210
<v Speaker 3>They're being ran through and they're horrible.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.339
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth quarter. Defensively, this pills team, like they

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.340
<v Speaker 2>get worse as the game goes along.

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.660
<v Speaker 3>So you're, you're telling me to fade the MVP, the

0:46:31.700 --> 0:46:34.339
<v Speaker 3>best athlete potentially ever play this game against a really

0:46:34.380 --> 0:46:34.980
<v Speaker 3>bad defense.

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't do it until I get a really good number.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.259
<v Speaker 2>And to me, that's two and a half or below. So, Three,

0:46:40.510 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 2>three and a half, whatever you can get. If you

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 2>want to take the Ravens with me, that to me

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.900
<v Speaker 2>is where I want to be for right now. But yeah,

0:46:45.940 --> 0:46:47.340
<v Speaker 2>Sunday morning, if me and Chad have a choice of

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the contest at two and a half, maybe Chad could

0:46:49.900 --> 0:46:51.500
<v Speaker 2>talk me into it. But if it's three and a half,

0:46:51.540 --> 0:46:53.220
<v Speaker 2>that's a no brainer slam on the Ravens.

0:46:54.260 --> 0:46:56.830
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Ravens are trading at three and a half

0:46:56.870 --> 0:46:59.390
<v Speaker 1>at the prediction market. This is where it's always interesting because,

0:47:00.290 --> 0:47:02.710
<v Speaker 1>and I hope people do this, like you can use

0:47:02.770 --> 0:47:08.220
<v Speaker 1>the prediction markets and the traditional online sports books to

0:47:08.260 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get a sense, A, to find better numbers because the

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:16.020
<v Speaker 1>prediction markets have to be in half-point increments, number one.

0:47:16.060 --> 0:47:19.739
<v Speaker 1>Number two, you can use it as a tool to

0:47:19.860 --> 0:47:25.210
<v Speaker 1>figure out where is money going, where might the line

0:47:25.270 --> 0:47:28.530
<v Speaker 1>on a traditional sportsbook go if you're not comfortable betting

0:47:29.070 --> 0:47:31.390
<v Speaker 1>on prediction markets, like if you're not able to bet

0:47:31.430 --> 0:47:34.370
<v Speaker 1>on prediction markets. You can use these things as tools

0:47:34.450 --> 0:47:38.130
<v Speaker 1>to understand how markets are moving. Right now, the Ravens

0:47:38.190 --> 0:47:42.780
<v Speaker 1>are at 3.5%. on prediction markets, but at three on

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:49.750
<v Speaker 1>the online sports books. Los Angeles Chargers at the Los

0:47:49.810 --> 0:47:53.569
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Rams. You mentioned it in sharp calls. It's gone

0:47:53.610 --> 0:47:55.190
<v Speaker 1>down from seven and a half to six and a half.

0:47:55.430 --> 0:47:57.330
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are getting the tickets. So we know that

0:47:57.390 --> 0:48:00.690
<v Speaker 1>this move because professional bettors, at least initially, came in

0:48:00.730 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Chargers at six and a half, maybe at

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Maybe at six and a half,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going on the Rams. Joe Alt, should be back

0:48:08.380 --> 0:48:11.060
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers. Lad McConkie should be back for the Chargers.

0:48:11.460 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Derwin James, I'm pretty sure is not going to play.

0:48:14.390 --> 0:48:16.930
<v Speaker 1>Latest reports are that he had a setback with his

0:48:17.130 --> 0:48:20.790
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury. I think the Chargers are one of those

0:48:20.830 --> 0:48:23.130
<v Speaker 1>teams that are in our head. Like we should be

0:48:23.170 --> 0:48:25.109
<v Speaker 1>playing them here, at least at seven and a half,

0:48:25.170 --> 0:48:26.709
<v Speaker 1>we should have. It should have been a blind bet.

0:48:27.130 --> 0:48:31.540
<v Speaker 1>Don't look at the logos. We're not pulling the trigger.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.390
<v Speaker 1>Do we just Is it because we believe our eyes?

0:48:35.570 --> 0:48:38.489
<v Speaker 1>Because we have been off this team since before the

0:48:38.530 --> 0:48:41.989
<v Speaker 1>season began. We are not praying at the altar of

0:48:42.030 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike McDaniel and his cool glasses and ankle pants. Like,

0:48:47.300 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what has kept us from pulling the trigger here?

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:55.620
<v Speaker 3>I mean, me personally, I'll never, ever, ever get over

0:48:55.660 --> 0:49:00.390
<v Speaker 3>that Bills-Chargers game. Like I talk about, it's historical. They

0:49:00.450 --> 0:49:03.570
<v Speaker 3>had five turnovers. They're a plus three in the turnover margin.

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.339
<v Speaker 3>They didn't cover a plus eight and a half, which

0:49:06.380 --> 0:49:10.379
<v Speaker 3>was the first time since they've been tracking betting numbers ever.

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 3>A dog over seven points or more at plus three

0:49:13.100 --> 0:49:15.910
<v Speaker 3>turnovers didn't cover a number. And you've seen it this

0:49:15.930 --> 0:49:19.569
<v Speaker 3>year with this Chargers team, the non-covers they've had, it's

0:49:19.610 --> 0:49:21.610
<v Speaker 3>things you've never seen from that denver game we covered

0:49:21.730 --> 0:49:24.210
<v Speaker 3>on horrible going for it on his own 20 he

0:49:24.250 --> 0:49:26.890
<v Speaker 3>did uh the genius campbell move and went for his

0:49:26.910 --> 0:49:30.110
<v Speaker 3>own 20 didn't get it they kick a field goal

0:49:30.170 --> 0:49:32.690
<v Speaker 3>now you're not covering which they cover the entire game

0:49:32.730 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 3>like it's just they've had the most insane non-covers ever

0:49:36.020 --> 0:49:38.450
<v Speaker 3>this chargers team and To me, the books will give

0:49:38.469 --> 0:49:40.830
<v Speaker 3>you a good number then because the markets sell against them, right?

0:49:40.850 --> 0:49:44.970
<v Speaker 3>They're 0-5-1 or 0-6-1, whatever it is, against the spread. Well,

0:49:45.230 --> 0:49:47.790
<v Speaker 3>that 7.5 made sense, but 6.5, I totally get why

0:49:47.830 --> 0:49:50.610
<v Speaker 3>pros are betting this Rams side and why they're throwing

0:49:50.630 --> 0:49:53.310
<v Speaker 3>them in tees or stuff like that. My fear and

0:49:53.330 --> 0:49:54.810
<v Speaker 3>my reason I would stay away is because, like I've

0:49:54.830 --> 0:49:57.930
<v Speaker 3>talked about, the Chargers, they're going to win a game somewhere.

0:49:58.810 --> 0:50:03.140
<v Speaker 3>And this Rams team, As much as I want to

0:50:03.180 --> 0:50:06.029
<v Speaker 3>get them, they've been super up and down this year.

0:50:06.110 --> 0:50:08.110
<v Speaker 3>And they've played to the level of their competition in

0:50:08.150 --> 0:50:10.210
<v Speaker 3>a lot of their games this season. Like, they're just,

0:50:10.750 --> 0:50:13.009
<v Speaker 3>you know, that Raiders game, or I guess you could

0:50:13.030 --> 0:50:17.069
<v Speaker 3>say the Giants game, those two complete games they played, yeah,

0:50:17.130 --> 0:50:19.290
<v Speaker 3>obviously great games, great wins.

0:50:19.910 --> 0:50:21.590
<v Speaker 2>Stafford had to play out of his mind in those games.

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 3>And, yeah, you could do it again against another, like

0:50:24.100 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Chad said, Derwin James is out of this game. I

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:30.410
<v Speaker 3>think Khalil Mack, unless he gets traded, you know, that's

0:50:30.550 --> 0:50:32.150
<v Speaker 3>another guy that they're going to definitely need in this

0:50:32.230 --> 0:50:33.529
<v Speaker 3>matchup for this Chargers team.

0:50:33.570 --> 0:50:36.169
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure he's playing. He had a rest day.

0:50:36.230 --> 0:50:37.870
<v Speaker 1>So he will be playing, but he had a rest

0:50:37.890 --> 0:50:39.549
<v Speaker 1>day of practices. A veteran rest day.

0:50:39.790 --> 0:50:40.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just saw that he missed and I was

0:50:40.930 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 3>just like, oh my God, they can't have him out too.

0:50:42.780 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 3>So I just look at this matchup and I totally

0:50:45.739 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 3>get why the pros have now flipped, right? The seven

0:50:48.100 --> 0:50:49.780
<v Speaker 3>and a half was the pro number on the Chargers.

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.219
<v Speaker 3>Now pros are taking a taste on this Rams team

0:50:52.260 --> 0:50:52.980
<v Speaker 3>of minus six and a half.

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I totally get.

0:50:53.540 --> 0:50:55.420
<v Speaker 3>So it's a game where, you know, there's a lot

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:56.819
<v Speaker 3>of options on the board this week if I can

0:50:56.840 --> 0:50:59.380
<v Speaker 3>stay away from it. Great, but I really wanted to

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 3>be on the Chargers. I just don't think I'm ever

0:51:00.860 --> 0:51:01.780
<v Speaker 3>going to get there on this number.

0:51:02.540 --> 0:51:09.410
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we're in agreement because I feel like I

0:51:09.450 --> 0:51:13.290
<v Speaker 1>need some discipline here and I cannot fire away on

0:51:13.830 --> 0:51:16.150
<v Speaker 1>a Chargers team that has looked the way it has

0:51:16.730 --> 0:51:20.190
<v Speaker 1>getting less than the best of the number. Maybe if

0:51:20.230 --> 0:51:21.989
<v Speaker 1>the public comes in on the Rams, if the wise

0:51:22.010 --> 0:51:24.490
<v Speaker 1>guys continue to come in, the game gets back to seven,

0:51:24.510 --> 0:51:26.009
<v Speaker 1>if by a miracle it's at seven and a half,

0:51:26.550 --> 0:51:32.540
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's responsible to play the Chargers

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.700
<v Speaker 1>at anything less than seven. So I'm glad we are aligned.

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:40.259
<v Speaker 1>Are we aligned on Kansas City at Denver? Denver's a

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:43.549
<v Speaker 1>one and a half point underdog. The Broncos are very

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:46.089
<v Speaker 1>clearly the sharp side here. You said it on sharp calls,

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:51.990
<v Speaker 1>all the indicators, money, tickets, everything is pointing the direction

0:51:52.010 --> 0:51:57.450
<v Speaker 1>that the Broncos are the sharp side. Are we comfortable,

0:51:58.390 --> 0:52:03.450
<v Speaker 1>given our love of Patrick Mahomes, despite what I wrote

0:52:03.469 --> 0:52:08.950
<v Speaker 1>in The Athletic this week, where out of 101 quarterbacks

0:52:09.570 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>since 2018, Patrick Mahomes is ranked 101st when he is

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:22.300
<v Speaker 1>a favorite getting the majority of the tickets in terms

0:52:22.420 --> 0:52:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of against the spread and ROI. If you had bet

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:32.299
<v Speaker 1>$ 100 on every game in which Patrick Mahomes was the

0:52:32.620 --> 0:52:36.290
<v Speaker 1>favorite getting the majority of tickets, meaning more than 51%

0:52:36.290 --> 0:52:47.190
<v Speaker 1>over the past nine seasons, you would be down $ 1, 300.

0:52:44.410 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're betting into if we decide to bet

0:52:48.460 --> 0:52:50.060
<v Speaker 1>on Patrick Mahomes in this spot.

0:52:52.460 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Pat's a great quarterback, though. He doesn't cover, but

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.430
<v Speaker 2>he always wins. That's kind of what that stat shows me.

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.100
<v Speaker 1>And that's what this number is saying. Essentially, this number

0:53:00.140 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is saying there's only one way we don't cover, right?

0:53:03.780 --> 0:53:07.009
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a little bit. And I've had people ask about

0:53:07.030 --> 0:53:08.950
<v Speaker 2>this one. It's another game where, like, if you're scared

0:53:08.989 --> 0:53:11.910
<v Speaker 2>about Mahomes, you got the teaser option, people.

0:53:11.950 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 3>That's another great number. Take it up.

0:53:14.750 --> 0:53:18.090
<v Speaker 2>Seven and a half. It's a great number. No worries.

0:53:18.130 --> 0:53:20.250
<v Speaker 3>If you want to, I mean, you got tons of

0:53:20.290 --> 0:53:22.670
<v Speaker 3>other options out there, right? Commanders, you want to fade

0:53:23.090 --> 0:53:24.690
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles. You can get them now down to a

0:53:24.770 --> 0:53:27.460
<v Speaker 3>pick or, you know, go crazy. You can take the

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Ravens up to nine and a half for Lamar, you know,

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:32.140
<v Speaker 3>do a bunch of crazy stuff for these teasers this week,

0:53:32.219 --> 0:53:36.180
<v Speaker 3>take the Rams down to a pickle. But I, I

0:53:36.219 --> 0:53:37.870
<v Speaker 3>look at that stat. I just always think it's what

0:53:37.890 --> 0:53:39.629
<v Speaker 3>we talked about in the homes, right? He came out

0:53:40.390 --> 0:53:43.290
<v Speaker 3>his first year, went to AFC championship game, won an

0:53:43.370 --> 0:53:47.529
<v Speaker 3>MVP that, it was all from running from the general public, right?

0:53:47.550 --> 0:53:50.060
<v Speaker 3>They're always me back in my homes. Cause he's that good.

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.900
<v Speaker 3>And we've always talked about this with the market. We've

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:54.980
<v Speaker 3>always kind of faded my home, especially when he's greater

0:53:55.020 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 3>than a three and a half point favorite. It's been like,

0:53:57.820 --> 0:54:00.489
<v Speaker 3>Chad just said, very profitable betting. This is, this is

0:54:00.570 --> 0:54:02.350
<v Speaker 3>kind of that, but not really. Cause like Chad said,

0:54:02.390 --> 0:54:05.049
<v Speaker 3>this is such a short number. The odds of this

0:54:05.110 --> 0:54:08.690
<v Speaker 3>landing on one. So marginal, like my home is not

0:54:08.730 --> 0:54:09.790
<v Speaker 3>winning this game by one.

0:54:09.850 --> 0:54:14.550
<v Speaker 2>Right. But I think we both look at this as, We've.

0:54:14.469 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Seen the weaknesses in the Chiefs, and Denver does have

0:54:19.060 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 3>the type of team that can exploit that type of stuff.

0:54:21.660 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 2>They have a wide receiving group. They've got a tax need.

0:54:26.780 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 2>We saw this Chiefs team, as much as they took.

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:35.390
<v Speaker 3>Away the run against the Seattle Seahawks, they don't have

0:54:35.450 --> 0:54:37.530
<v Speaker 3>a backfield anywhere close to as good as a backfield

0:54:37.590 --> 0:54:40.450
<v Speaker 3>as this Broncos team. The backfield is really talented. You

0:54:40.469 --> 0:54:42.790
<v Speaker 3>could take Dobbins, Harvey. There's a bunch of really talented

0:54:42.810 --> 0:54:46.859
<v Speaker 3>guys here. in the Broncos universe. And I was happy

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:48.660
<v Speaker 3>to see the pros were on Denver. Cause it was

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:50.840
<v Speaker 3>another time where I was like, Oh my God, my

0:54:50.860 --> 0:54:52.780
<v Speaker 3>guy have to back this chiefs again, this team again,

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:54.570
<v Speaker 3>where now I have so many questions about this chiefs

0:54:54.590 --> 0:54:56.430
<v Speaker 3>team and all it really is about my homes. And that's,

0:54:57.170 --> 0:54:58.950
<v Speaker 3>I know guys who are taking the chief spot. It's like, well,

0:54:58.969 --> 0:55:02.029
<v Speaker 3>you expect my homes to bounce back. I thought that

0:55:02.070 --> 0:55:03.830
<v Speaker 3>was such a great spot for him against Seattle where

0:55:04.750 --> 0:55:05.570
<v Speaker 3>he has not played.

0:55:05.410 --> 0:55:06.009
<v Speaker 2>Well this year.

0:55:06.489 --> 0:55:10.900
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we can, we can blame his weapons.

0:55:10.940 --> 0:55:13.989
<v Speaker 3>What I do think is fair, like worthy, He's not

0:55:14.030 --> 0:55:16.049
<v Speaker 3>lived up to being their number one. And with Rice

0:55:16.130 --> 0:55:18.029
<v Speaker 3>out there, he has to be their number one. And Kelsey,

0:55:18.969 --> 0:55:22.550
<v Speaker 3>he's 35, 36 years old now. Like, you've seen that loss.

0:55:22.750 --> 0:55:25.110
<v Speaker 3>Whatever that is, the loss of a step, there is

0:55:25.150 --> 0:55:28.089
<v Speaker 3>a loss there. He's just not obviously what Kelsey used

0:55:28.110 --> 0:55:30.250
<v Speaker 3>to be. And even on third downs, where he used

0:55:30.270 --> 0:55:32.050
<v Speaker 3>to be a guaranteed he'd be looking for Kelsey, a

0:55:32.630 --> 0:55:34.710
<v Speaker 3>lot of times he's not. Like, he's using Kelsey as

0:55:34.750 --> 0:55:37.489
<v Speaker 3>a decoy because these teams are still dubbing him because

0:55:37.510 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 3>they're happy to have Worthy be the guy to let

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:39.800
<v Speaker 3>them beat them.

0:55:39.890 --> 0:55:40.049
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:55:40.860 --> 0:55:42.490
<v Speaker 3>That's some stuff you have to really dive into and

0:55:42.510 --> 0:55:44.730
<v Speaker 3>take away from that. This Chiefs team, everyone I talk to,

0:55:45.290 --> 0:55:47.490
<v Speaker 3>they're in the market for wide receiver. They're trying desperately

0:55:47.530 --> 0:55:50.009
<v Speaker 3>to get a wide receiver at cost, right? And that

0:55:50.050 --> 0:55:52.050
<v Speaker 3>kind of tells the story of this team, even themselves

0:55:52.070 --> 0:55:54.500
<v Speaker 3>and other Chiefs, that they don't have the guys on

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:55.980
<v Speaker 3>the outside right now. And you're going to need those

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:57.779
<v Speaker 3>guys against this Denver team. They're going to totally try

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:00.500
<v Speaker 3>to make them one-dimensional and take away Kenneth Walker, which

0:56:00.540 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 3>sounds crazy, trying to make Mahomes beat you, but You've

0:56:03.780 --> 0:56:05.900
<v Speaker 3>seen it. If you let Walker go for 100, you're

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:09.700
<v Speaker 3>not beating the Chiefs. They can ball control the clock,

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:12.890
<v Speaker 3>especially with the spags in that defense. That's how they're

0:56:12.910 --> 0:56:15.850
<v Speaker 3>going to beat you. There's a lot of games I

0:56:15.890 --> 0:56:17.649
<v Speaker 3>like this week, so it's not one of my bigger bets,

0:56:17.670 --> 0:56:20.750
<v Speaker 3>but I'd definitely take a position on the Denver Broncos.

0:56:21.770 --> 0:56:23.029
<v Speaker 3>If this wanted to be one of our five, this

0:56:23.050 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 3>would definitely have to be you pushing it in. I'm

0:56:25.980 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 3>not super heavy betting into this Broncos team because I

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 3>still don't know how much I trust Sean Payton and

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.029
<v Speaker 3>Bo Nix. It's just Last week was a great spot

0:56:34.050 --> 0:56:34.370
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:56:34.770 --> 0:56:36.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The Cardinals' defense, obviously, is night and day compared

0:56:36.930 --> 0:56:37.790
<v Speaker 2>to Spag's defense.

0:56:41.810 --> 0:56:44.310
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, it's a heart versus head game, right?

0:56:44.770 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>My head is saying, pull the trigger, take the Broncos.

0:56:48.300 --> 0:56:52.459
<v Speaker 1>What happened last week for the Chiefs doesn't impact this week.

0:56:53.580 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You're getting the price. I don't know that it'll be

0:56:57.340 --> 0:57:03.779
<v Speaker 1>one of our five. I think there are... Actually... it's

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:05.140
<v Speaker 1>going to be tight. We'll have to see what the

0:57:05.180 --> 0:57:07.859
<v Speaker 1>numbers are offered in the, in the contest. It can

0:57:07.900 --> 0:57:10.299
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting. I might take a stand on this one.

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:14.900
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Monday night football, the Chicago bears are now

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>three point underdogs visiting the Seattle Seahawks. It's come down

0:57:18.740 --> 0:57:21.650
<v Speaker 1>to tick half a point was Chicago minus three plus

0:57:21.670 --> 0:57:24.630
<v Speaker 1>three and a half Jeffrey Simmons. I don't know what

0:57:24.650 --> 0:57:26.990
<v Speaker 1>kind of impact he can have in the game on

0:57:27.030 --> 0:57:31.370
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. I, I, I kind of don't want to

0:57:31.390 --> 0:57:33.530
<v Speaker 1>bet this one. I just want to enjoy it. I

0:57:33.550 --> 0:57:37.710
<v Speaker 1>don't need to have money on this one because like,

0:57:37.730 --> 0:57:41.430
<v Speaker 1>I think the Seahawks just could end up getting better

0:57:41.470 --> 0:57:44.070
<v Speaker 1>and better. I think these could be two teams that

0:57:44.090 --> 0:57:47.380
<v Speaker 1>meet each other in the NFC title game. Uh, and it,

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just perfectly priced. Like I'm not finding

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:51.180
<v Speaker 1>an edge one way or the other.

0:57:52.100 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And I was surprised that like some books you

0:57:53.980 --> 0:57:56.340
<v Speaker 3>were still able to get three and a half on

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the bears, which I was really shocked about.

0:57:59.060 --> 0:58:03.150
<v Speaker 2>Um, Just like, you know, they're still popping up. I'm

0:58:03.170 --> 0:58:04.470
<v Speaker 2>looking right now. There's still three and a halfs out

0:58:04.510 --> 0:58:07.100
<v Speaker 2>there on the Bears. So, I am surprised by that

0:58:07.140 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 2>with the books.

0:58:07.720 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Like, they're really digging in here on the Seattle team.

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:12.500
<v Speaker 3>And obviously, it paid out for them last week, right?

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 3>It all broke right. But we talked about that game.

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:20.970
<v Speaker 3>Sam Darnold was insane on third downs. Like, just absolutely insane. Now, obviously,

0:58:20.990 --> 0:58:22.510
<v Speaker 3>Bears defense is bad. And he should be able to

0:58:22.530 --> 0:58:25.390
<v Speaker 3>do the same against them. But we've seen his career.

0:58:26.530 --> 0:58:29.450
<v Speaker 3>He's never been consistent, Sam Darnold. The most consistent run

0:58:29.470 --> 0:58:32.290
<v Speaker 3>he ever had in his career was that Super Bowl run,

0:58:32.830 --> 0:58:35.150
<v Speaker 3>and they basically hit him. He had that one game

0:58:35.170 --> 0:58:37.430
<v Speaker 3>against the Rams. All the other games, they really didn't

0:58:37.470 --> 0:58:38.780
<v Speaker 3>ask him to do much. They really wanted to rely

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 3>on that defense in the run game. Can you beat

0:58:41.500 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the Bears here with the same exact mentality?

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.220
<v Speaker 3>That's basically the only way to really beat the Bears

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:50.950
<v Speaker 3>this year is running the ball, great defense, obviously, and

0:58:50.990 --> 0:58:53.370
<v Speaker 3>keeping the ball out of Caleb's hands. Never let Caleb

0:58:53.390 --> 0:58:55.700
<v Speaker 3>get into that rhythm where we've seen Caleb Once you

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:57.660
<v Speaker 3>let him get a rhythm, he'll rattle off 21 straight

0:58:57.680 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 3>points off you. And then you've seen if you could

0:58:59.900 --> 0:59:01.700
<v Speaker 3>take him out of that rhythm, it kind of will

0:59:01.740 --> 0:59:03.570
<v Speaker 3>do nothing for a quarter or two. Like that's kind

0:59:03.610 --> 0:59:06.300
<v Speaker 3>of been the the mo for caleb and this ben

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 3>johnson offense where if you can just get him out

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.260
<v Speaker 3>of rhythm keep him off the field he has a

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:11.940
<v Speaker 3>tough time getting back into that rhythm as the game

0:59:11.980 --> 0:59:15.230
<v Speaker 3>goes along so um another game where i might be

0:59:15.270 --> 0:59:17.410
<v Speaker 3>a sucker here like i just how do you not

0:59:17.450 --> 0:59:18.990
<v Speaker 3>take a plus three and a half on this bears

0:59:19.010 --> 0:59:22.310
<v Speaker 3>team they're just so good so well coached as as

0:59:22.350 --> 0:59:25.900
<v Speaker 3>much respect we're giving to this Seahawks team and their defense,

0:59:26.260 --> 0:59:28.180
<v Speaker 3>and especially it being a primetime game at home, and

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.590
<v Speaker 3>they've just obviously played better at home in these primetime games.

0:59:30.660 --> 0:59:34.150
<v Speaker 3>But it's a lot of points to cover here for

0:59:34.590 --> 0:59:37.230
<v Speaker 3>an offense that, to me, I still don't know if

0:59:37.270 --> 0:59:38.050
<v Speaker 3>I trust their identity.

0:59:38.070 --> 0:59:39.470
<v Speaker 2>I know it's all JSN right.

0:59:39.350 --> 0:59:42.270
<v Speaker 3>Now, but that only could take you so far. Like,

0:59:42.290 --> 0:59:43.770
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have to have other guys step up,

0:59:43.830 --> 0:59:46.450
<v Speaker 3>and we've just not seen that from Seattle right now. So, yeah,

0:59:46.470 --> 0:59:48.450
<v Speaker 3>another game I'm happy to avoid if we can, Chad,

0:59:48.490 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 3>because I just– I wanted to be on Seattle, but

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the line is making me take the Bears.

0:59:52.740 --> 0:59:54.820
<v Speaker 2>I really don't want to be taking the Bears here. Yeah.

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:56.220
<v Speaker 1>If it's three and a half, by the way, I'm

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm just looking at, I was looking at

0:59:58.020 --> 0:59:59.940
<v Speaker 1>the three and to me, it's like, all right, that's

0:59:59.960 --> 1:00:02.940
<v Speaker 1>what it's supposed to be. There's no, there's no inherent

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:08.750
<v Speaker 1>edge for me there. Simon, it is time to reveal

1:00:09.390 --> 1:00:13.790
<v Speaker 1>the Discord grouper of the week. I think you're going

1:00:13.810 --> 1:00:14.110
<v Speaker 1>to like it.

1:00:15.230 --> 1:00:17.910
<v Speaker 2>Buy my book. Buy my book.

1:00:18.230 --> 1:00:22.270
<v Speaker 1>Buy my book. You know, Peter King is not the

1:00:22.350 --> 1:00:25.630
<v Speaker 1>only author around here. You can join the Discord. Pre-order

1:00:25.650 --> 1:00:31.030
<v Speaker 1>the number at readthenumber.com. You'll get the invite helping us

1:00:31.070 --> 1:00:33.430
<v Speaker 1>raise money for St. Jude's. You know what's wild, Simon?

1:00:34.370 --> 1:00:38.110
<v Speaker 1>This is proof that the Internet is connected to everything

1:00:38.150 --> 1:00:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and that somebody is tracking us somewhere. I've never given

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>money to St. Jude's. I've really only talked about it

1:00:46.020 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on this show. I am getting mayo from St. Jude's

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:57.450
<v Speaker 1>and I've never gotten it before. Isn't that crazy?

1:00:57.470 --> 1:01:00.870
<v Speaker 2>A little bit, but like you said, we know our

1:01:00.910 --> 1:01:01.770
<v Speaker 2>phones listen to us.

1:01:02.450 --> 1:01:02.710
<v Speaker 1>I know.

1:01:03.050 --> 1:01:06.070
<v Speaker 3>It's just a buzzword. So you must have said the buzzwords.

1:01:06.470 --> 1:01:08.150
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say their name because now I'm

1:01:08.170 --> 1:01:09.770
<v Speaker 3>going to be getting these texts, but that's what you did.

1:01:09.810 --> 1:01:12.340
<v Speaker 3>You said their name and now they're sending these emails.

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.110
<v Speaker 2>Somehow that's legal. I can't believe it's illegal, but it is.

1:01:15.510 --> 1:01:20.330
<v Speaker 1>They're listening. Listen, the Grouper lost on the Grouper. The

1:01:20.370 --> 1:01:22.830
<v Speaker 1>Discord lost the Grouper last week. We had the Chiefs

1:01:22.870 --> 1:01:26.430
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings in a teaser. This week, the winner, Simon,

1:01:26.450 --> 1:01:31.210
<v Speaker 1>you're going to love it. Minnesota plus three and a half.

1:01:31.310 --> 1:01:34.370
<v Speaker 1>The group had lots of options, including a very gross

1:01:35.350 --> 1:01:41.690
<v Speaker 1>Raiders-Jets first half under from my guy at PMARC86. It

1:01:42.250 --> 1:01:47.220
<v Speaker 1>got one vote. from PMARC86. But it was the Minnesota

1:01:47.260 --> 1:01:49.220
<v Speaker 1>Vikings plus three and a half. Is there a grouper?

1:01:49.300 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll report the results. As usual, I got injury update

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>news from the Discord faster than any of the internet

1:01:55.580 --> 1:02:00.390
<v Speaker 1>doctors on X. So join us. Go to readthenumber.com. Pre-order

1:02:00.410 --> 1:02:04.250
<v Speaker 1>the book. Get the invite. Simon, what should our... And also,

1:02:04.530 --> 1:02:09.590
<v Speaker 1>Buy the Game by Peter King. What should our Moneyline

1:02:09.850 --> 1:02:12.430
<v Speaker 1>underdog round robin for week eight.

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make a bold choice here. Arizona Cardinals.

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:25.390
<v Speaker 2>Arizona's plus 260. I love that. Yep.

1:02:25.430 --> 1:02:27.180
<v Speaker 3>I think we got to ride with our guys. If

1:02:27.220 --> 1:02:29.570
<v Speaker 3>we're going to, we're going to keep believing them. Cleveland Browns.

1:02:30.270 --> 1:02:32.970
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Plus 160.

1:02:32.970 --> 1:02:36.310
<v Speaker 3>I want to take a little piece of that. Third

1:02:36.430 --> 1:02:39.450
<v Speaker 3>option here is tough. We can go Ravens plus 142.

1:02:39.450 --> 1:02:41.090
<v Speaker 3>Like that hinges on Lamar, obviously.

1:02:41.910 --> 1:02:43.910
<v Speaker 2>Or we can just go the coward route and take

1:02:44.330 --> 1:02:45.390
<v Speaker 2>Denver at a pick.

1:02:46.310 --> 1:02:46.910
<v Speaker 1>Let's do them both.

1:02:48.570 --> 1:02:50.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or I'll just say we're in Minnesota.

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we have so much invested in Minnesota

1:02:53.980 --> 1:02:56.660
<v Speaker 1>at this point that it's probably going to blow up

1:02:56.700 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in our face. For Moneyline, underdog, round robin, let's go Cardinals, Cleveland, Baltimore,

1:03:03.340 --> 1:03:09.990
<v Speaker 1>and Denver. For favorites, let's do Jets.

1:03:11.780 --> 1:03:14.060
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Bucs. Bucs.

1:03:14.780 --> 1:03:15.140
<v Speaker 1>Rams.

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Rams.

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>And I know we didn't talk much about it. I

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:22.700
<v Speaker 3>still am on Miami. I still love Miami. You could

1:03:22.740 --> 1:03:25.150
<v Speaker 3>do New England. I'd give out that stat 15-0.

1:03:25.290 --> 1:03:25.510
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:25.870 --> 1:03:28.370
<v Speaker 3>Is Drake May, if you want to stay away from that.

1:03:29.210 --> 1:03:31.350
<v Speaker 3>Jayden Daniels hasn't won a game in whatever it was.

1:03:31.670 --> 1:03:32.910
<v Speaker 2>Chad, since last October.

1:03:33.150 --> 1:03:34.650
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's been more than a year.

1:03:35.210 --> 1:03:35.370
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:35.570 --> 1:03:38.580
<v Speaker 3>If you can't beat this backup Eagles team with all

1:03:38.620 --> 1:03:41.990
<v Speaker 3>these injuries– Who can you beat? That also jumps out.

1:03:42.010 --> 1:03:43.700
<v Speaker 3>But I'd rather put in your Drake, man, than I

1:03:43.720 --> 1:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>would Jay Daniels, honestly.

1:03:45.900 --> 1:03:46.180
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Biggest bets. Biggest bets. Pull up those pants and be

1:03:51.340 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a man.

1:03:52.660 --> 1:03:54.900
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say this week is very tame compared

1:03:54.920 --> 1:03:57.350
<v Speaker 3>to last week. Last week, I was betting numbers all week.

1:03:57.410 --> 1:04:00.110
<v Speaker 3>This week, I've been trying to get numbers a full

1:04:00.130 --> 1:04:01.930
<v Speaker 3>to me and the numbers I won. It's not really

1:04:02.310 --> 1:04:04.950
<v Speaker 3>broken that way. So I would say like Minnesota plus

1:04:04.970 --> 1:04:06.310
<v Speaker 3>three and a half. Yeah, that's one of my bigger

1:04:06.410 --> 1:04:09.490
<v Speaker 3>bets right now. Will it be scum Sunday? Might not,

1:04:09.530 --> 1:04:11.250
<v Speaker 3>depending on how the market goes on certain other on

1:04:11.510 --> 1:04:14.169
<v Speaker 3>other games like Jets at plus one and a half. Also,

1:04:14.190 --> 1:04:15.970
<v Speaker 3>one of my bigger bets still betting it at minus

1:04:16.030 --> 1:04:18.330
<v Speaker 3>one and a half. It was just simply betting the number.

1:04:19.830 --> 1:04:23.380
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, like if this short in the week, Carolina,

1:04:23.450 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>obviously one of my bigger bets, just because obviously the

1:04:25.660 --> 1:04:29.660
<v Speaker 3>game's tonight. So I've taken a position on that. But yeah,

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 3>like my biggest bets on numbers that don't exist anymore

1:04:34.140 --> 1:04:36.300
<v Speaker 3>is that Miami plus seven and a half, which was

1:04:36.340 --> 1:04:38.970
<v Speaker 3>a great number. If it's still plus seven come Sunday,

1:04:38.990 --> 1:04:41.260
<v Speaker 3>it might end up being one of my bigger bets.

1:04:41.380 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 3>But that's just unfortunate it's moved off the plus seven

1:04:44.420 --> 1:04:44.820
<v Speaker 3>and a half.

1:04:46.720 --> 1:04:50.260
<v Speaker 1>Sharp versus square. We are rocking and rolling in sharp

1:04:50.280 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>versus square. I'm six and one on the year. You're

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:58.740
<v Speaker 1>five and two on the year. So if anyone's tailing anything,

1:04:58.820 --> 1:05:01.910
<v Speaker 1>it should probably be that. I guess I'll go first

1:05:01.950 --> 1:05:02.530
<v Speaker 1>this week.

1:05:03.010 --> 1:05:03.410
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:05:05.250 --> 1:05:10.710
<v Speaker 1>So let's see. Chad's choice was, I already forgot. Oh,

1:05:10.710 --> 1:05:12.730
<v Speaker 1>it was the Carolina Panthers plus three and a half.

1:05:13.490 --> 1:05:14.310
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with Baltimore.

1:05:15.030 --> 1:05:15.250
<v Speaker 2>I'll go.

1:05:15.370 --> 1:05:18.370
<v Speaker 1>If you're saying, is there a three and a half available? Yes,

1:05:18.430 --> 1:05:21.490
<v Speaker 1>there are on prediction markets. I'd like Baltimore plus three

1:05:21.530 --> 1:05:23.370
<v Speaker 1>and a half. That's my choice.

1:05:23.390 --> 1:05:27.830
<v Speaker 2>There you go. And I always try to give out

1:05:27.850 --> 1:05:30.110
<v Speaker 2>a favorite in this because people say I only give

1:05:30.150 --> 1:05:35.310
<v Speaker 2>out dogs. Um, Can't do the Jets because we already

1:05:35.330 --> 1:05:37.850
<v Speaker 2>did that breast balls. I'll do.

1:05:39.830 --> 1:05:43.510
<v Speaker 2>Oh, God. I'll do it. Give me Baker and the Bucks.

1:05:44.130 --> 1:05:44.910
<v Speaker 1>Jesus.

1:05:45.630 --> 1:05:45.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:46.470 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That is disgusting. That... Dude. It almost feels like you're

1:05:52.820 --> 1:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just falling on your sword for making a mistake.

1:05:56.060 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't see any other favorites I love, really.

1:05:57.820 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Rich Hand was injured.

1:05:59.140 --> 1:05:59.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:59.890 --> 1:06:03.430
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what to do about Survivor. Like...

1:06:03.790 --> 1:06:06.270
<v Speaker 1>Last week, we told people to take Minnesota, but you

1:06:06.310 --> 1:06:09.180
<v Speaker 1>and I are both so far gone from Survivors. The

1:06:09.220 --> 1:06:12.380
<v Speaker 1>Survivor pool I was in only has three people left.

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>If they want to, they can split a massive pool

1:06:15.700 --> 1:06:16.020
<v Speaker 1>right now.

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:19.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a pretty easy week if you want to play.

1:06:19.400 --> 1:06:23.070
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing safe, obviously, but you could do Jacksonville. They're

1:06:23.090 --> 1:06:26.550
<v Speaker 3>a 10-point favorite at home. You could do Cincinnati. I'd

1:06:26.570 --> 1:06:28.390
<v Speaker 3>play Tennessee without just Jeffrey Simmons.

1:06:29.310 --> 1:06:30.870
<v Speaker 2>Or you're.

1:06:32.350 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Someone that's Got multiple entries left and you want to

1:06:34.960 --> 1:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>play a high risk commanders.

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>When else are you going to play the commanders? So,

1:06:39.300 --> 1:06:43.530
<v Speaker 2>you know, you got some good options. It's a last

1:06:43.570 --> 1:06:45.170
<v Speaker 2>week was a tough week. Truly this week feels a

1:06:45.170 --> 1:06:47.730
<v Speaker 2>little easier. So yeah, good luck. Anyone survivor pools.

1:06:48.770 --> 1:06:50.930
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's our show. We're going to be back

1:06:51.070 --> 1:06:54.070
<v Speaker 1>on a Sunday morning. We'll, we'll figure out our final

1:06:55.070 --> 1:07:02.010
<v Speaker 1>picks for week eight and our official pick them contest.

1:07:02.250 --> 1:07:08.100
<v Speaker 1>Sign up, sharpersquare.thevolume.com to join for free. Well, it's getting

1:07:08.140 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of late. This has been Sharper Square, sponsored by Polymarket,

1:07:12.180 --> 1:07:15.340
<v Speaker 1>part of the Volume Podcast Network. Watch or listen on

1:07:15.380 --> 1:07:18.550
<v Speaker 1>YouTube at Sharper Square. Like this video, subscribe to the channel,

1:07:18.570 --> 1:07:23.110
<v Speaker 1>download some Spotify, Apple Pods, wherever you get your pods. Rate, review, subscribe,

1:07:23.150 --> 1:07:26.930
<v Speaker 1>leave us five stars, say whatever you want. Feedback is

1:07:26.970 --> 1:07:30.930
<v Speaker 1>a gift. Until Sunday, 11 a.m. Eastern Live. Love you.

1:07:31.820 --> 1:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to celebrate besides right now?

1:07:34.120 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm probably, is this live? Is this going to

1:07:36.980 --> 1:07:39.070
<v Speaker 2>be live? I'm probably going to get a little drunk.

1:07:40.270 --> 1:07:42.930
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to do it with my boys. And

1:07:42.950 --> 1:07:45.130
<v Speaker 2>then we're going to bring the party back to Milwaukee.

1:07:45.350 --> 1:07:46.370
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah.

1:07:47.150 --> 1:07:48.910
<v Speaker 2>And they're probably going to do some damage as well.