WEBVTT - Wall Street's Big Gamble

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Max Chaffkin, Stacy Van Smith.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Hello, Hello, it.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Is another week, another giant set of confusing data from

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the US economy.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 5>Every big company has reported earnings or is about to

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 5>report earnings. That's sending the markets all over the place.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 5>You got the Federal Reserve, you got GDP numbers, you

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 5>got inflation super confidence.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 3>The economy is.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Kind of teetering, maybe, and we're going to talk about that.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we are.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 4>In addition to that, we are talking about tariffs.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>We are talking to a company.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 4>That is suing the Trump administration over this latest rounds

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 4>of tariffs.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 2>And of course prediction markets, yes, your right to vote.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 5>We are going to talk about the brave prediction market

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 5>traders who are having their franchise threatened by some Wisconsin.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Bureaucrats of life.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 6>Or maybe you.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Shouldn't bet on elections.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, but we will get into it on

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 5>our this week in Prediction Market segment.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 4>This is Everybody's business from Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm Stacey Vanocksmith, I'm Max Schafkin. We got the economy,

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 5>We've got tariffs, prediction markets, it's.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 2>All there, it's all there.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Stick around, Stacy.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 5>We've had just a ton of economic news, some of

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 5>it related to the FED, some of it related to

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 5>stock market.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>We've got a great person to talk about this.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 5>It's Eric Wiener, Bloomberg Senior Editor, author of The Shadow

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Market and What Goes Up?

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Hey? Eric, Hi, how you doing? Okay? So here's where

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to start.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 5>I feel like this has been going on so long

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 5>that I forgot when it started. But there was a

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 5>point where we started saying, like all of the stock

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 5>market gains are related to the Magnificent Seven. There were

0:01:53.120 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 5>these seven stocks, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon Video, Tesla forgot, I forgot,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Alphabet Google, Yeah, okay, all those stocks. They are basically

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 5>these sort of AI powerhouses in one way or another.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's excited about AI, and you know, everyone's excited about

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Trump and the way he's managing AI and all. And

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 5>for like about a year, maybe even longer, Eric, I

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 5>don't know, these stocks just kind of ripped.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 3>They were driving so much wealth creation, and.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 5>We're kind of seeing that breakdown right now, right Eric.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 6>It is breaking down in a very strange way. The

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 6>mag seven, for lack of a better term, is no

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 6>longer really a coherent group AI has messed the whole

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 6>thing up. And what you're seeing now is within the

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 6>Magnificent seven, four of them are huge spenders on AI.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 6>That's Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta. Then you have Tesla,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 6>which isn't a tech company and is trying to get

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 6>into AI, but isn't spending very much on it. You

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 6>have Nvidia, which is the chip maker for these guys,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 6>and then you have Apple, which isn't spending at all.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 6>So this year Apple is dominating the Magnificent seven because

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 6>they don't have the AI risk that the others do. Today,

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft is ripping higher because they had this great cloud revenue,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 6>which means that they're getting a lot of traction in

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 6>their AI sales. And Meta is getting killed because well,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 6>really nobody believes in Mark.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Zuckerberg because they're AI stinks.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 5>They've spent a fortune on these potentially game changing but

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 5>still unproven sort of augmented reality technologies. They don't have

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 5>like a clear AI revenue stream.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 6>There's a bigger problem, and it's the metaverse. Nobody buys

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 6>what Zuckerberg is selling. And then so like you look

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 6>at Google and or well Alphabet and they're all over

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 6>the police. At this time last year, they were considered

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of an AI afterthought, and then all of a sudden,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 6>Gemini takes off, and then people realize, oh my god,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 6>they're the search engine for all of this.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>So they're diversified.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 6>And all of these companies which we all had lumped

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 6>together into one kind of group, have fallen apart the

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 6>same way that like they always do bricks or whatever else,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 6>pick your you know your name, and this happens.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, to back up.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 4>A little bit here, we've been getting earnings from a

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of these companies that had been really not only

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 4>driving the stock market, but really driving a lot of

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 4>the economic growth. Like Max was saying, I mean just

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 4>really seeping into all these parts of the economy. Now

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 4>that there's a more mixed picture maybe within these companies,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 4>what does that mean for the economy?

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean for us?

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 6>So the economy is actually doing pretty well when you

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 6>look at the overall the top line numbers. Yeah, when

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 6>you look underneath, it's not so great. The whole idea

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 6>is predicated on a linear growth pattern, and if you

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 6>look at the history of technology, that just isn't what happens.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 6>So right now you are looking at trying to price

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 6>AI as if it's going to happen tomorrow, and that's

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 6>just not the way technology evolves. So the concern about

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 6>the economy is interest rates. Are these companies going to

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 6>be able to continue to raise money at the levels

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 6>that they were raising them at before stock prices because

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 6>if they can't sell their stock, they can't offer you know,

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 6>it can't do more issuance. That means they're not going

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 6>to be able to get the capital. And if they

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 6>can't do that, then all those those chip makers they

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 6>don't get their money, and then all of this that

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 6>money that filters down into the economy that creates growth.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean right now we're seeing booming growth in construction

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 6>because who's going to build the data centers? You know,

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 6>all of these things flick off in different ways. When

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 6>markets tighten up, it's always because of a liquidity crisis.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 6>People can't get money. And so this is what I'm

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 6>describing right now, is the fear is that if interest

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 6>rates get to a point where they can't raise cash,

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 6>and stock prices get to a point where they're not

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 6>issuing stock, then where are they going to get the money.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 6>So now they have to raise money, and if that

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 6>money isn't there. Suddenly liquidity dries up and the market

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 6>goes crazy over that because it means that money isn't

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 6>flowing and all of commerce just slows down when that happens.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Enter Kevin warsh right and Ken wars and that is

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 5>one of the reasons why this FED meeting, which which

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 5>happened yesterday as we're recording this on Thursday, was so interesting.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 5>So just Sacey, you follow this more closely than I do.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 5>You are a more of a FED watcher than me.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Give us the kind of top line on what happened,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 5>and you know what you found interesting.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>So people were not sure quite what to expect. Everybody

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of thought the Federalserve Board would hold interest rates

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 4>where they were because inflation is higher than we want,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 4>but also the job market is a little sluggish.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 3>And also Donald Trump set Kevin Worshed down, I want

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>you to raise interest rates.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Actually it was like you, we want you to cut

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 2>interest rates.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>And then Kevin Wassh got into the job and was like,

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 4>I really care about inflation. I feel a little bit

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 4>for Trump in that way. So yeah, so Worsh basically

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 4>came out and they held interest rates steady. But I

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 4>think what rattled It's part of what rattled the markets

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>this week, along with some of the mixed earnings, is

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>that there were they show you how people vote. There

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>are twelve voting members of the Federal Reserve Board, and

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>three people voted to raise interest rates. So this is

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of maybe hinting that interest rates are going to

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>go up.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 5>And just for not that's a lot for this board.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Three people who stand up, raise their hand and disagree

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 5>with the fetcher.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>That's unusual.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 4>That is yeah, they like used to like unanimity. So

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm so curious, like, how did the market see this moment?

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're angry, traders are are upset, and the reason is, well,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 6>they're calling it a hawkish hold. That is the terminology

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 6>that they're using, which means that they are leaning toward

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 6>hiking rates and they're pointing toward raising rates. But they

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>held and to your point, Max, the idea that three

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 6>people disagreed. So on the prior FED you had one

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 6>member who was decidedly against Powell, so he was there

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 6>to descent, but there was one meeting where he dissented,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 6>and then two people dissented the other way, and we

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 6>had headlines all over the place feding crisis or feding chaos.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 6>That we're not getting feding chaos very muted opposite. Yes,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 6>we're now having a good family.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Three respectful dissenting votes. Chaos.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, so before the next meeting, we're going to have

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 6>a couple of readings on inflation. We're going to have

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 6>the Fed's meeting in Jackson Hole where they'll be speaking,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 6>and we should have, you know, a somewhat of a

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 6>better idea. But the concern among traders is that they're

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 6>not getting any guidance on where things are going. So

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 6>how do you come out of this meeting When they

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 6>are looking at trying to price any asset, whether it's stocks, bonds,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 6>or whatever, they are looking at what is going to

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 6>happen in the future, where is where are things going

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 6>down the line, and you don't know, Like so in

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 6>when they were giving guidance, they you would have a

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 6>sense that like, okay, we're looking probably at two or

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 6>three hikes, or when inflation really got out of hand

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 6>in UH twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two, it was

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 6>like we're going to be going seventy five basis points

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 6>or you know, three twenty five.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 4>They were like this is what we're doing this time,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>this is what we're probably doing next time, and worsh

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 4>is like none of that.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Right, and the market like that. Speaking in normal English,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 6>we need to communicate with the market frequently.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>We need to kind of let people know so.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 6>We don't have wild swings, so we don't get volatility,

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 6>which is where traders make money. However, when things break

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 6>the other way from what they were betting on, they

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 6>get really angry.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 5>All right, So we're talking about the threat that you know,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 5>interest rates go up and there's a cash shortage, and

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden, all these AI bets they're not

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 5>generating revenue and their companies have not enough money to

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 5>keep it going, and we have some kind of crisis,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 5>either a stock market crash even an economic crist But

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 5>there's one thing that I think we may not be considering, Eric,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 5>which is that if the AI happens, we will have

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 5>all the money we possibly need. And I bring this

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 5>up because Elon Musk, in an interview with the economist

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 5>I believe it was last week, said that by twenty

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 5>thirty six, that's like ten years from now, we will

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 5>have no need for money.

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, Elon Musk. He's obviously a bit

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>of a Carnival barker. He's selling he's selling AI.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 5>He has an incentive, perhaps to exaggerate the timeline here.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 5>But you know who doesn't or who should not have

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 5>an incentive to do that. It's Scott Besson, the Treasury Secretary.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 5>And I bring this up because in an interview with

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Sean Hannity, let's just give a listen to Scott Besson's

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 5>take on the end of money purple question.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk gave an interview to I believe to the economists,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 7>and he said that in five to six years, it

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 7>will have five times besides the economy we have now.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 7>And he talked about abundance. He talked about every American

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 7>having every need and there won't be even a need

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 7>to save, you know, for your retirement like we have

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 7>historically because of this quote abundance that he believes AI

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 7>will create.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 8>Do you believe that I think I would change the

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 8>timeline that I've seen Elon speak for a long time,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 8>and his record speaks for itself, both in terms as

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 8>an inventor, as a venture capitalist, as a great American.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 8>But he's normally early. He's just so far ahead of

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 8>the curve. He sees things that no one else sees.

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 8>But I do think we are building this incredible economy

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 8>that we can't even imagine have sewn. Twenty five percent

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 8>of the jobs that exist today did not exist in

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 8>two thousand.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 7>That's an amazing thing.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 5>I love always like Elon's track record, great innovator, not

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 5>so good on timelines.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, so, look he's going to Mars. He's competing with NASA.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>But do you think there is an inconsistency here?

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 5>You have all these guys who are saying we are

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 5>mirror years away from complete abundance. Meanwhile they're doing layoffs.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 5>One of the things that I felt watching this whole

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 5>AI boom play out is that the people who are

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 5>participating in it don't really believe the things that they're saying,

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 5>because if they did believe the things they were saying,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 5>they'd be doing different things.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 6>I feel like that actually is the big difference between

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 6>this bubble and the Internet bubble, where people actually did

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 6>believe all of that stuff. They did believe that pets

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 6>dot Com was a technology company rather than a pet

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 6>store that was on. You didn't really understand where things were.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 6>The point on all of this is technology advances the economy.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 6>It dislocates workers, Automobiles put buggy whips out of business,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, like that that all of that's real. But

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 6>the idea that we are going to reinvent the economy,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 6>the entire economy because of one area of technology, seems

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 6>quite hyperbolic. And to the bond markets perspective, they're expecting

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 6>the long bond five percent in thirty years, so they're

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 6>still expecting there to be money.

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>They're expecting to be paid in thirty years.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 6>That so like, well, you know, we're done, but I mean.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>This is in case money is still around.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Five percent. Sir, Eric, thanks for being here. Come back soon.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 9>Eric Somacs Stacy tariffs, Wait, which tariffs?

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Which tariffs?

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Is right?

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Because we have been through many iterations of tariffs since

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Liberation Day. We are on I think tariffs three point zero.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Now the tariffs that were in place, the emergency tariffs

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 4>expired I think there was one hundred and eighty days

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and now there is a new set of tariffs in place.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, what keeps happening is courts keep saying no, these

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 5>terror dice are not allowed. You need an Act of Congress,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 5>and the Trump administration, making good on its promise, keeps

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 5>coming up with new tariffs to replace the old tariffs,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 5>and then we do it all again. Meanwhile, no one

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 5>knows what anything costs. It's very confusing. The thing that

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 5>I've wondered, or that I've been wondering, is who are

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 5>these people who are like challenging that the businesses that

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 5>are that are challenging the Trump's tariffs, Like, what are

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 5>they going through?

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad that you asked this question.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, the tariff have been incredibly hard on all kinds

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 4>of businesses, especially small businesses, and we're very lucky to

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 4>have or Zohar with us. He's the co founder of

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Burlap and Baryl, a single origin spice company.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 10>Ori, welcome, Hey, great to be here.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 4>We invited you on the show because in fact, there

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 4>are a couple of small businesses that are suing the

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration over this latest round of tariffs, and one

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 4>of those businesses is your business is Burlap and Baryl.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 11>This is actually our second lawsuit against the tariffs so far. So,

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 11>as you mentioned, there have been kind of three kind

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 11>of waves, three regimes of tariffs.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 10>The first one the APA.

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 11>Tariffs where which got refunded, and we just got a

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 11>kind of refund for all the tariffs that we paid

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 11>plus interest.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Because those tuck it down or were the tariffs on

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 5>the big board right where where were the penguins, We're

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 5>gonna get tariffed and every That was the round one.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 11>And the penguins got their tariffs back as long as

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 11>they filed.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 12>You know, with.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Immigrant they're not great with paperwork.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 11>But we got those tariffs back with interest, which was

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 11>just like a very expensive exercise for the American tariffs

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 11>and things that really increased prices and the government ended

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 11>up having to pay it all back with interest. The

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 11>second round came the same day that the Supreme Court

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 11>struck down the EPA tariffs, the Section one twenty two,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 11>which was based on a nineteen seventy four kind of

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 11>bill around America moving off of the gold standard and

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 11>all that stuff said in some cases.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 10>The president can push through tariffs.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 11>We sued on that and we won at the Court

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 11>of International Trade, and now that's going through the appeal process.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 11>And then as soon as these temporary six month tariffs expired,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 11>the government introduced three oh one tariffs and so we

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 11>suit on those also, So we just were small business.

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 11>I don't know why it's up to small businesses to

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 11>kind of hold the government accountable with all the kind

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 11>of enterprise in America, but it was really important to

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 11>us to kind of take a stand against these tariffs

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 11>that didn't make any sense to us, made things more

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 11>expensive for American customers, and just seemed to not go

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 11>through any of the right channels for passing tariffs and

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 11>for actually managing economic policy here in the US.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 4>So you are a spice company, I am imagining you

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 4>import a lot of what you sell. Can you maybe

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 4>run down some of the things that you sell and

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 4>how they've been affected by the tariffs and what that's

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 4>kind of meant for you.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So we are a ten year old social enterprise,

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 11>Burlap and Barrel. We import spices directly from small holder

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 11>farmers all around the world. Our best selling one is

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 11>our royal cinnamon that comes from Vietnam, a true Vietnamese cinnamon.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 11>But we import spices from about thirty different countries, all

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 11>based on where they grow.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 10>So we have herbs the province from Provence.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 11>We bring in really incredible garlic and onion powder from

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 11>Central Vietnam. It's kind of ancestral home and cuman from

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 11>Afghanistan and all over the world. So that's been our business,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 11>is working with small holder farmers to bring in spices

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 11>directly from the farm and bring them to American home cooks.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 11>We bring in about ten percent of our spices from

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 11>the US. We bring in really great Chileias from California,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 11>actually salt from upstate New York wild ramps and all that.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 10>So we do import.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 11>Everything that we need to import, but we also buy

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 11>domestically everything that grows domestically, and yet we're still kind

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 11>of paying this broad ranges of tariffs on things that

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 11>there really is no domestic industry here for.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Can you talk a little bit about the cost of

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs for your business since Liberation Day?

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Like, what does this cost you?

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so we've paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 11>tariffs so far, and it's on things that don't grow

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 11>in the US. So initially tariffs we were paying on

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 11>cinnamon and black pepper corns, both of which don't grow

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 11>in the US. Since then, there's been about four hundred

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 11>and seventy one I believe carve outs of the tariff

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 11>which just shows you this is kind of a shoddy framework.

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, right, it's for all this stuff.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 11>So now we don't pay tariffs on cinnamon and black

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 11>pepper anymore, but we still do pay on herbs like

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 11>herbs of province, which you know, yes, can do herbs

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 11>grow in America? Absolutely? Can you get herbs of province

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 11>in America? Not exactly. We bring in our Vietnamese cinnamon

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 11>from Vietnam, we bring in garlic from also from Vietnam,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 11>and we do bring some stuff in domestically, but the

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.239
<v Speaker 11>tariffs are still this kind of very broad instrument that

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 11>are kind of increasing costs for us. And as a

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 11>small business, we can't bring in herbs of province not

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 11>from Provence, we can't bring in all these spices not

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 11>from their kind of origin, and so we find ourselves

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 11>in this kind of ironic, kind of tough spot where

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 11>the only place where we can cut costs is domestically.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 10>How can we kind of save.

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 11>Money on our innovation, on our hiring, on our shipping speed,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 11>on our corrigate costs for our boxes. So it's had

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 11>this kind of backwards impact on our business, has been

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 11>pulling investment domestically while We're still kind of doubling down

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 11>on our partner Farmers Abroad because that's our only option.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Or how do you wind up being the one who sues?

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 5>Like are there groups that are fighting these tariffs that

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 5>are going out looking for plaintifs or like did you

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 5>go seek somebody?

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 12>Like?

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>How does this? How does this kind of thing actually happen?

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 11>So that's a great question. We have a legal partner

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 11>here called the Liberty Justice Center. They're the ones that

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 11>are actually bringing the legal might for this and also

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 11>footing the bill because you know, taking a court, a

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 11>case of the Supreme Court, as they did with the

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 11>AIPA tariffs in one is literally millions of dollars in

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 11>litigation for that case, we actually saw, we.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 10>Looked at suing.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 11>We said, we don't know what we're doing here, we're

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 11>not legal experts. We ended up filing an amaricus brief,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 11>a kind of friend of the court document to so

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 11>Liberty Justice Center said, who is this company and what's

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 11>their deal? And so we got in touch with them,

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 11>and then when they were when the one twenty two

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 11>tariffs came out, they said, hey, are you willing to

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 11>actually step up and be the plaintiff here and then

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 11>again for the three oh one tariffs. So we found

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 11>this really lovely partnership us being able to do what

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 11>we do best, which is being a small business that

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 11>kind of is showing that the impact of the tariffs

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 11>on everyday Americans and kind of talking about the legal

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 11>frameworks and the hoops that we have to jump through,

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 11>and then with their kind of legal expertise and might

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 11>being able to actually litigate this case properly to the

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 11>highest extent, which we have no business doing ourselves.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Why did you decide to do this? Because this does

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>take time and energy away. I think you're you're quite

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>a small business.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 4>You have a lot on your plate, Like why devote

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 4>some time and energy to lawsuits?

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 11>So during Liberation Day, we made kind of two promises

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 11>to our customers. We said, we're not going to pass

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 11>the tariff costs onto our partner farmers, and we're not

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 11>going to increase cost to Americans. Costs are already high,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 11>inflation is already out of control. And we got a

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 11>really strong reception for that. People were really looking for

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 11>somebody to step into this void.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 10>And make a statement. Everybody else has been kind of

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 10>worried scared.

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 11>There have been you know, boards of directors and public

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 11>shareholders and all of that stuff. There's been a really

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 11>big void, and I think people are worried about retaliation

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 11>and are worried about their businesses getting hurt. We saw

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 11>this as as the right moment, and internally we kind

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 11>of discussed this as a kind of like Patagonia moment

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 11>where we've seen a lot of other companies that really

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 11>inspired by use legal action to kind of shape shape policy,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 11>not just for themselves, like we're not going to get,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, any punitive fees from this, We're going to

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 11>change the law.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 10>And so this is something we've been really proud of.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 11>We got the win on the one twenty two tariffs

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 11>at the Court of International Trade, and that only emboldened

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 11>us to bring a second lawsuit once the three oh

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 11>one tariffs were were kind of introduced, or you.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Brought up prospect of retaliation as maybe one of the

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 5>reasons why the business community in general kind of went

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 5>along with this without a lot of without speaking up

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 5>too much. You know, the fear is if you if

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 5>you're a big company, if you're an investor, maybe you're

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 5>attempting to a merger or something like that, and you're worried, like, oh,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 5>is is when the FTC goes to evaluate this merger,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 5>are they gonna get a call from somebody and you

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 5>know whatever, some kind of some somehow this will hurt

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 5>some other part of their business. There's this other area

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 5>of retaliation that I'm wondering about and wondering if you

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 5>thought about, which is kind of consumer backlash to fighting

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 5>the Trump administration. You know, we saw especially towards the

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 5>end of the Biden administration and then even in the

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 5>beginning of the Trump administration. Trump has power to direct

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 5>consumer rage and so on.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>He's gone after the NFL.

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 5>You know, he will periodically sort of truth social about

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 5>some company. And I think a lot of big companies,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 5>like big consumer facing companies, really live in fear of

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 5>that of Trump going out and saying this company is bad.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 5>They are woke, and and then you know, half of America,

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 5>the MAGA part of America, will basically boycott them and

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 5>will have you know what happened to bud Light, And

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 5>we saw this happen a bunch of times over the

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 5>last I don't know, five years or so. What how

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 5>what did you think about the consumer reaction to that.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 11>So if that leads us into a true social post like,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 11>welcome it. We're happy to have the conversation. We're a

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 11>crunchy liberal business, you know, just for me and my

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 11>co founders, like personal beliefs. This is really in across

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 11>the aisle issue that we kind of both align on,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 11>and so it's been also really lovely to find people

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 11>that the head of the Liberty Justice Center voted for

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 11>Trump three times.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 10>We voted for Trump zero times.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 11>But we both kind of agree on this issue that

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 11>we're that this is worth fighting for and worth kind

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 11>of standing up for on behalf of small businesses and

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 11>American consumers.

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard from your customers about this at all?

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 11>We have gotten a lot of kudoses from other folks

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 11>in the industry because there's so many other small food

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 11>companies that are doing this, because businesses are really struggling

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 11>with this, and there's some existential kind of questions for

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 11>a lot of businesses that are being caused by these tariffs.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 11>From our customers, we've also gotten a lot of kudoses

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 11>and wins. We've gotten also some messages saying, hey, keep

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 11>politics out of my spices.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 10>I don't care about.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 11>This and we've tried really hard to be like, we're

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 11>where if you love America and want to buy American spices,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 11>guess what. We work with a bunch of American spice

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 11>farmers and here are there're spices you can do that.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 11>So we're really trying to not kind of split the

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 11>audience or go one way or the other. We're trying

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 11>to say, what's going to help Americans eat eat well,

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 11>bring in greens from all over the world. And by

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 11>the way, spices love tropical and subtropical environments. We have

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 11>so many amazing things that we can grow in America.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 11>Spices are not one of those things.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for talking with us or and

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>good luck.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 4>Please we hope you can come back and talk with

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 4>us again about how things are going.

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 11>I'm looking forward to it.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Stacey, it's been a while, but it's that time for

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 5>our recurring segment this week in prediction markets.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 3>I know you love the sting.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 2>I've been waiting for the sting.

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 5>But you know what, We've got a lot to talk

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 5>about because Calshe is the big prediction market company, is

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 5>fighting with Wisconsin. There's also just so much news around

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 5>this space and politics but before we even get there,

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 5>we often go out into the world and ask people

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 5>how these kind of abstract economic concepts we've been talking

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 5>about on this show affect them in their real life.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 3>We hadn't actually done that for prediction markets yet.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, Jasmine JT.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 4>Green remedy that you went out onto the mean streets

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 4>of New York and talk to people about what their

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 4>relationship is with call she polymarket and all of the

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 4>betting markets of the world.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 13>Do you use prediction markets? Why do you use them?

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 14>Are more well versed in pop culture than I am

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 14>in like terms of like crypto and finance. Betting on

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 14>who's gonna win Love Island is more plausible for me

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 14>because it's easier for me to analyze.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 13>So I'm curious, like, what are your thoughts on prediction

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 13>markets entering in the election process.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 14>Definitely something that is like a cannon worms we do

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 14>not want to open. Not only will it influence people

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 14>on who's more popular during an election, it can sway

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 14>votes for sure, especially if you have money on the line.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 2>People would just.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 10>Not be thinking for themselves.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 14>On coffee you or not putting your bid on who

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 14>you want to win. It's on who you think will win.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 15>People who maybe would have the money to be gambling,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 15>are sometimes people who don't feel as inclined to vote anyway.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 15>Maybe in a political context, I think that it would

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 15>discourage voting, which I think is really important and we

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 15>should be encouraging that in any way.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 12>Shape and form a gambling market for politicians more than

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 12>we already have seems probably part like problematic and would

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 12>discourage working class people from participating.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>And voting more than maybe they already feel.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And I just see the ads on the subway and

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't use them. I don't gamble at all.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.239
<v Speaker 1>That seems like it would open the space for some

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of corruption. What's it called in boxing when somebody

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>takes a fall? I mean, it seems like you could

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you could set up something like that for an election, right.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 5>You know? My favorite boxing term is is like is

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 5>tomato can, which is like the person who if you're like,

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 5>if you want a boxer to win about and beat

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 5>somebody up, you get a tomato can to get beat up.

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh sorry, okay, apropos of nothing. I feel like the

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 5>people that JAS been talked to were in on this.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 5>They were all over the main point of this segment,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 5>which is all about the ways in which prediction markets

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 5>might affect the political system, might even manipulate the political system.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 5>And we have a great person to talk to about this,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg reporter Denisa Setkova. She is here right now now

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 5>she covers prediction markets here here with us. Denisa, great

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 5>to have.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 16>You, Thanks for having me.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 17>So what happened is wiscons in Wisconsin, is that the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 17>Wisconsin election officials warren voters in the state that they

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 17>cannot bet on prediction market on the same vote they

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 17>cast their bout on and that made this.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 16>Qualify the vote.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 17>So obviously that raised a lot of issues. So we

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 17>have one of the biggest platforms Kushi. They have a

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 17>very strong social media presence. They're really advocating for a

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 17>lot of topics. They took on social media saying that

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:36.239
<v Speaker 17>this is not good for voters and this is some

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 17>kind of voter suppression. The reason behind with Wisconsin election

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 17>officials for pretty simple. They were like, there is this woe.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 17>It's been written one hundred and seventy years ago.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Denis is referring to an eighteen forty nine law basically

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 5>says a bunch of things of who is an eligible

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 5>to vote. Felons are not eligible to vote in Wisconsin.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 5>You got to be eighteen of voting Wisconsin. But of

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 5>the one of the eighteen forty nine provisions of this

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 5>is that if you have placed a bet on the

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 5>vote that you are going to cast, you are not

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 5>allowed to vote.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 3>That's like a conflict of interest.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 5>And Wisconsin basically just put out an advisory saying, hey, guys,

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 5>we've seen a lot of ads for this thing called

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 5>like these.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Things called prediction markets.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Just a little reminder, do not bet on the Wisconsin

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 5>election if you hope to vote in Wisconsin. And Calshi

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 5>has basically gone to the mats. What are they saying

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 5>you need some election suppression.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, they're saying voter suppression. They're saying that your vote

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 17>might be disqualified. What their stance is, First, election prediction

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 17>markets and election bets are regulated by the federal government

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 17>is in their case, the CFTC. So they're like, it's

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 17>not up to state's decide. There is a massive lego

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 17>betto about that. It's mostly about sports. We can talk

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 17>about it for hours. But that's their first thing. The

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 17>second thing they say is like, oh, actually, young voters

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 17>placing bets on prediction markets is good for us. It

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 17>means that a lot of those people who are maybe

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 17>not interested in elections will be a lot more interested now,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 17>and we are encouraging voter turnover. You can judge whether

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 17>this is true or not, but this is the case.

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 17>They're federally regulated and they're doing nothing bad because they're

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 17>encouraging young people to care about politics.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Is there evidence that having prediction markets involved in an

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>election does mess with the election? I mean, we've talked

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 4>about a lot on the show, as with sports, with

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 4>athletes maybe doing certain things or not doing certain things

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 4>because they had money on the line. Is there evidence

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 4>that could possibly enter into the equation with an election?

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 17>I mean, majority of the cases we've seen a prediction

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 17>market that have been connected with elections, that can be

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 17>connected with manipulation, that can be connected with desider trading

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 17>have been all about politics. We saw obviously Trump's teleprompter

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 17>person being blamed for insider trading.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 16>This case is currently being under jurisdiction.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 17>But then we also have the famous case of the

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 17>US soldier betting on Maduro's ulster. We have cause specifically

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 17>banning political candidates for betting on their races.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 16>There have been three people. It was kind of simple cases.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 17>You know, I bet five hundred doors on my campaign,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 17>I filmed the TikTok, and then eventually you get banned.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 17>We also have a great story in the Bloomberg terminal

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 17>about Romania how one trader placed one million in the

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 17>span of six days over one presidential candidate and really

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 17>boosted their olds. So clearly in smaller markets are less liquid,

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 17>we have seen the case that indeed people place big

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 17>bets that really change the oats. And then that obviously

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 17>follows a lot of social media news and other coverage

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 17>that can influence the vote.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that story also on of course Bloomberg dot Com

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 5>by Liam Vaughan, super interesting, also, Stacy, not just this

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Romanian election that Denitza is talking about, but the governor's

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 5>race in California. There were suggestions that you know, sort

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 5>of one of the fringier candidates that some ally or

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 5>somebody looking to boost one of these candidates had placed

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, tens of thousands of dollars worth of bets

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 5>as like instead of like buying advertising. To answer your question,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I think the answer is, yeah, it could have an impact.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 5>I think there's some question about like how big that

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 5>impact would be.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I do remember this conversation coming up, not around

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 4>prediction markets, but around polling and polling results in Trump

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 4>won when the polls showed Hillary Clinton winning by such

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 4>a huge margin, and there was a lot of speculation

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 4>that maybe voter stayed home because of that or it

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 4>did affect voter actions. I remember thinking a lot about

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 4>that and how influential polls are, and it does make sense,

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 4>especially in smaller elections, if you could sway the polls

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 4>enough to get reported on that, you could potentially at

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 4>least get people talking about you, and you know in politics,

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 4>that can make a big difference for sure.

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 17>And those platforms are everywhere, like you can see it

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 17>on the subway. It was a big thing in the

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 17>New York City mirror election. And another important aspect is

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 17>that those companies have big partnership with medias, So you're

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 17>gonna turn on TV, watch CNN and potentially see cowshields

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 17>or polar market alts, depending on the partnership. They're entering

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 17>our mainstream just daily life lives, and that changes everything.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 17>And also, like the twenty twenty four election was a

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 17>big turning moment for them because both of the prediction

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 17>market platforms were giving a lead to Trump winning the election.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.719
<v Speaker 17>And I feel as though a lot of people are

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 17>saying they were more accurate.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 16>Than posts when it comes to the election.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 17>So there is also like the truth machine accurate polling,

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 17>prediction market and go as well as just like it's

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 17>probably exciting for a lot of people to put their

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 17>money and say I was right.

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 5>It's kind of funny that cal She's like, this is

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 5>voter suppression. They're trying to take the vote away from

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, hard working gambling Americans who just want to

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 5>gamble on their elections.

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>The American dream. They just want to vote and place

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 2>their bet on who's.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Going to open.

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but I do think like in the context of

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 5>the way that calsi and also as Deniza knows, many

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 5>of these crypto companies are trying to kind of create

0:33:54.400 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 5>a voting block of like young pro crypto pro didiction

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 5>markets and so on, Like they see this as a

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 5>political force. And I'm kind of curious, you know, having

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 5>followed the sort of crypto industry and the way that

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 5>they kind of you know, got behind Trump during the

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 5>twenty four election. Are there any of the same dynamics

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 5>that play here with prediction markets are there, Like prediction

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 5>market enthusiasts who feel passionate about this are the people

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 5>like threatening to leave Wisconsin or demonstrate at the state

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 5>capital or do anything, you know, in response to this.

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 17>I haven't seen this particular case, but I know in

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 17>previous because there's similar lawsuits about sports betting in different states,

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 17>and I've seen people threaten to leave states so they

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 17>can actually use prediction markets if something happens.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 16>So indeed, I can see how if this case evolves,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 16>people might be talking about it more and more.

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 17>But I think the comparison to crypto is very important,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 17>very similar. Of course, we have a lot of people

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 17>from the Trump's family getting involved in both platforms, both

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 17>polymarket and Koushi. We even had Trump Media look into

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 17>launching a prediction market. So there are a lot of

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 17>political parallels here, a lot of things we should think about.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 17>And obviously the current CFTC and the general White House

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 17>administration has been very supportive of prediction market. A big

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 17>part of why those lawsuits are so contested and it

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 17>takes so long is because the CFTC is standing behind

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 17>those firms and in this case, because CAUSHI is the

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 17>big CFTC US based one and it's saying we regulate this.

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 17>These are our markets and we're going to take care

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 17>of them. It's not up to the states to the side.

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 17>So the political force of this is very important. Politics

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 17>are important. Elections are the essence of this. It's what

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 17>you tell people. It's what they've been telling for ages

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 17>that we were right about twenty twenty four and we

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 17>will continue to be the best aggregator of information for elections,

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 17>economy and other important topics.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 4>So, Denita, I just have one last question I want

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 4>to make sure to ask you, which is you've been

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 4>covering this for a long time, looking at this issue.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 4>How serious is this? If you were deciding Wisconsin v. Kaushi, Like,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 4>what what would you call?

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 17>Wow, that's a great owner of my career. It's a

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 17>complicated case. I think there are two aspects. They are

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 17>the aspect for manipulation, whether if in fact I'm a

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 17>foreign agent or in fact someone wants to interfere in election.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 17>If I have the money and desire to do that,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 17>and I have access to prediction market, how important my

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 17>actions might be if also I have some other parties

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 17>and reason to boost a candidate.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 16>Maybe perhaps that's giving.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 17>Me means to do that. And the second big thing

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 17>is insider trading. What if I have information about this

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 17>which obviously election walls are very very strong, there are

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 17>a lot of protections about about counting. But if I

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 17>have an incentive to do that, I may benefit a

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 17>lot of money. And you know, maybe I have information,

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 17>maybe I pass it on someone. It just opens a

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 17>big network of people that may profit from that.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 16>And the last thing is just elections is very complicated topic.

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 17>There are so many contested topics, and just adding money

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 17>to that equation and adding to like chances of many

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 17>the insider trading, I think it completely complicates the future

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 17>of how we contest elections and talk about this topic.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>We're going to keep following this.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 5>We'll have to have you back for a future segment

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 5>of this weekend Prediction Markets.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Really great having you see soon.

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having Medanita, and also if you have thoughts

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 4>on this, please send us an email.

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this is an interesting.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 3>If you're if you have been disenfranchised by this.

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and you feel like your voter's rights have been

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 4>suppressed because you could not place your bed on Calshi.

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, are you already placed it? It's too late now

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 5>you're now you're looking at a felon. Well, you have to,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 5>you just wouldn't be able to vote. I'm not sure

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 5>what the enforcement mechanism.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was gonna say.

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 5>This show is produced by Jasmine J. T. Green and

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Stacey Wong. Mangus Hendrickson is a supervising producer. Sam Rogan

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 5>handles engineering and Dave Purcell fact checks. Special thanks to

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Muscus, Julia Rubin and if you have a minute,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 5>please rate and review the show.

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 3>It'll mean a lot to us.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 5>And if you have a story that should be our business,

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 5>email us at Everybody's at bloomer dot net. That's everybody

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 5>with an ass at Bloomberg dot net. Thank you for

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 5>listening and we will see

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 10>You next week.