WEBVTT - What Growing Starlings Need: USCIT, GSEs, SBET

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. That's your body battery.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I slept terribly last night. I'm so

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 2>glad you asked. This is bad. I'm at seventeen. I

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 2>woke up in my body battery. It was at fifty one.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Usually I wake up in the eighties or the low nineties.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So what was wearing on you?

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm moving tomorrow. I'm psyched. I'm going back to New Jersey.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It's where I belong.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to say you're a stressed

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>about your bird.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, I'm so glad you brought up the bird.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So, Katy is a bird?

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a bird?

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is like the Katy's Exotic pet hower.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I have a lot to say about this bird.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So he's a European starling.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Sure, by the way, one of my proudest moments. And like,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you didn't really notice this, but you showed me like

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>two pictures of this bird on your phone. Yeah, he's

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>like pretty small on this pictures. And I was on

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>your phone and I was like, oh, a starling. You're like, yes,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the starling. I was like, yes, yeah, you closed

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the bird identifier.

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well they're super common around these parts because they're

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>an invasive species, which explains why now we're in possession

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of the bird. My dad actually found him at my parents' house,

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 2>like as a creepy crawley little like no feathers, alien

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>baby thing. And I called the Raptor Trust and they said,

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, because it's a non native species, we can't

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>help it. They said, try to return to the nest.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I tried that, I couldn't find the nest. And I said,

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>hypothetically speaking, how hard would it be to raise this bird?

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>And they said, actually, it's really easy to hand raise

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>European starlings. So that's what we've done.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>He's sitting here at the podcast right now.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>My parents are taking care of him at my direction.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of fun because it feels like they're my employees.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>How many like video calls? Are you doing a day

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with your parents?

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Many? Actually have a new photo to show you now

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>he's about three to four weeks old. I'm really proud

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of this photo, not that anyone listening can see it.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Hold on put in. My dad texted it to me

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>this morning.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can put it in my email.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. Yeah, Well I won't put this photo.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Look at him.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh he's a bird.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's a real bird now, so we want to

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>release him? So no, not yet. There's three important milestones

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>that this bird needs to pass before we can think

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>about releasing him to the wild. He needs to be

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>able to perch. He's getting better. My mom has been

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>putting him on a stick and he will perch on

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the stick. He needs to be able to fly. Obviously

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>he's flapping around. He's not flying yet.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Is your mom like clapping our arms to demonstrate to him?

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what the conversation we keep having is we're not birds,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>so it's not a bird. It's really hard. And the

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 2>third thing he needs to be able to do is

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>feed himself. The hand of God has been feeding him

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>mush mush for weeks now, so he needs to you know, Oh,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad you asked. So high protein dry cat food.

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 2>You soak it for you know a while. I've been

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>doing a hard boiled egg and then you mash it up. Yeah,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of feels bad, hag to a bird, but

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't know. And then I have this like egg

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>shell mix it's made for chickens to try to give

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 2>them more calcium so they lay better eggs. But basically,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>what starling, baby, Starling, growing Starling's need is a lot

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of protein and a lot of calcium. So this mix

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>seems to be working pretty well. I've adjusted it as

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>he's gotten a little bit older. As the photo shows,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>he looks like a real bird, so we'll see if

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>his bones will support himself as he continues to learn

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>how to perch and fly.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope you will bring him into the podcast

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>before you.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, the thing is, and I promise we'll move

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>on soon, is that if he's not able to be released,

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and we're not going to release him to a certain death,

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 2>if he isn't meeting these milestones, then we just have

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a bird now, which isn't the worst thing.

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>No, it's clearly the outcome you're rooting for. All right,

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're done. We'll see you next week.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think that that was a good update.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, hello, come to the Money Stuff Podcast. You're

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levigne and I write the Money Stuff column

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg news and

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there's been some tariff news.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I feel like we have to timestamp this conversation

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 2>because everything is changing very rapidly.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this at four o'clock on the Thursday, May

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and about twenty four hours ago or less than that.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>A court, which I learned existed.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So U asked Court for International Trade.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, based in Manhattan. Sure, yeah, so it blocked the

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs that Trump put on on Liberation Day.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, most of his tariffs are, yeah, the Liberation Day tariffs,

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and actually like the pre Liberation Day like Canada and

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>China tariffs, the opioid tariffs, the personal tariffs, those were

0:04:53.480 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>all blocked by the court as of like Thursday afternoon.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit, which is like

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the appeals court the handles that you also just learned exist.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>That the handles it feels from the court from the

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>International Trade. That court at a temporary stay, so it

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>could like consider whether to put a longer stay. So

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everything's very much in flex. But yeah, the Court for

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>International Trade said these tariffs are illegal.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it seems like we're heading to the Supreme Court.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean certainly, yeah, yeah, yes, yeah. Probably won't

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be at the Supreme Court by the time this podcast

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>air is on Friday.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Probably not. But you know, crazy things have happened. I mean,

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>coming into this morning, futures were up a ton on

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred because it was like, Okay,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the trade war's over. It's not. It seems like the

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>consensus that has emerged is that Trump has plenty of

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>other tools to put on tariffs somehow, And I don't

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>know what this does to the US negotiating stance. It

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>feels like it lessens it by quite a bit.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's right. I don't know. It's just like

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the US negotiating stance is so mercurial

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and so unreliable that I'm not sure how much it

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>affects the negotiating stents or going. On the one hand,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as you said, he has a lot of tools to

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>put on tariffs, and if you are a trade partner

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in negotiations with him, the threat has gone from I

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>will put on whatever tariffs I like, pursuing to my

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>unlimited authority to put on tariffs too. I will find

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>some stuff to do and it'll be super annoying and confusing.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like that's not that much better, right, That's still

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty bad threat. And in some ways, I feel

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of what I read about people who

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>are in the posture of negotiating with Trump, like you

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>read about this, and like the situation with Harvard, right,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>people worry about making deals because he is not a

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>reliable interlocutor and can always just change the deal and

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot you can do about it. In

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>some ways, like you having a little court supervision might

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>be kind of good for negotiating postures. I don't know

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but like it's just like it's nice that

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there's like just a soup song of like law here, right,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and like procedures, because you know, I wrote about this today.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>There's in some ways this is a complicated case. There's

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all these statutes, there's all these questions of like what

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>things should be left to the executive's discretion. But in

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>many ways it's a very very simple case, which is

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Constitution of the United States just like a

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>real document. You can read it like it's a real

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that exists, right, Like, not everyone involved in the

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>government has read it. But like, you know, there's like

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a real document that people at least say they care about.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution just says the Congress has the power to

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>impose taffs and the president doesn't. So like all this

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff of like executive orders imposing tariffs is really like

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>on a first order analysis, just not what the Constitution says.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's kind of the court starting point here. Yeah,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so it seems like kind of simple stuff and there's

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>more complicated stuff, but it is in some ways a

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>relief to see that the Constitution still has some controlling power.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that does seem like something a couple hours that

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you would root for.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm weird like that.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when it comes into the negotiating stance, the standpoint

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that I've seen bandied about is basically, if you're another

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>country negotiating with the US, like this kind of removes

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 2>the urgency or the incentive to make a deal with

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the US because now it's in flux. You know how

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>much power Trump actually has to enact these tariffs.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. But you wouldn't that against him having

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power to do whatever he wants, if.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 2>You would, I don't know, yeah, yeah, I don't know.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>The one can say spring quick tomorrow.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at least on this Thursday. The consensus that has

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>seemed to emerge throughout the day. And you've seen this

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>in like the slow bleed of the S and P

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>five hundred from you know, our pre market euphoria was

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 2>this just turns up the volume so much on the

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 2>trade policy noise because who knows what's going to happen and.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Not other noise, right, I mean, like one overhang to

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>finance is how much rule of law is there? And

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>every time the court says Trump can't do something, you

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have wider variant in the outcome of how much rule

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of fla is there because like maybe you'll be like,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, the constitution does say that never mind, or

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe like Peter Navara said, nothing has changed after a

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>court said the terriss around constitutional Like how did that's

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like ating posture?

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of funny that this all happens within

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>hours of Trump being told about the taco trade. The

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>tacos trade, taco trade being Trump always chickens out. It

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>was coined by an.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>FT columnist Rob Armshuk at the FT.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, basically that okay, Trump comes out with this

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>big announcement, you know, we're going to slap a gazillion

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>percent tariff on so and so, and then you know,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>inevitably it's walked back, and that's the taco trade. You

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>bet on this is going to be walked back. And

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump was told about that in the Oval Office, and

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>he was upset, as you would imagine, and said, no,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>this is negotiating. This is how it's done, which you know,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's some truth to that, but you know, as

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>an investor, I can see how you could also turn

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>that into a trade, even though it feels like, you know,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>in the last couple of weeks or so, it's become

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>less profitable because it feels like the shock value is fading, right, right, right.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of things. One like Trump always chickens

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>out is the insulting to him phrasing of it. Yeah,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but the trade is when a drastic tariff announcement comes out,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the actual result will be less than that, either because

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the negotiation or because you checked, like you can

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be agnostic about the cause, or you can just say, like,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this isn't as bad as it sounds. The second thing

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to say is that Lewis Astroth at ft Alphaville,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like apparently got jealous of his colleagues ability to quinna

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>term that became so famous, so he wrote a bunch

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of other potential acronyms, like Mexican food themed acronyms, and

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the one I liked was takita, which is Trump always

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>quickly undoes initial trade offensive just like a little thing.

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>It's more a specific about the thing that's happening. The

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>other thing I want to say is that a reader

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>emailed me to be like, would it be a good

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>trade if you were a journalist to short the market

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and then ask Trump about the taco trade, because like

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism there is like you asked Trump about the

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>taco trade and he gets really mad, and then he

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>says I'll never chicken out again, and tarriffs get higher,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the market drops, Like I think, like you could have

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>imagined for a second that like Trump getting mad about

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the phrase taco trade could have been bad for stock prices,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but of course it was quickly followed by the trade

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>cord ruling, which is good for stack prices. So it's

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a little hard to isolate the impact of getting Trump

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mad about the taco trade Yeah.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty funny. It could work if he had explicitly

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>said I'm going to tear iff even harder. Right now,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>That it would have been reasonable to think that he

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>might have thought that. But then, you know, events moved on.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what happens a lot.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the real core of the taco trade,

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which is events just keep moving on.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, it'll be interesting to see what happens to

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the taco trade as we continue to muddle through whether

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>or not these tariffs are illegal and what other types

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of terrifts were going to get. There's all these different

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>tariffs that this ruling doesn't cover. When you think about

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>steel and aluminum for example, Well.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So the Liberation Day tariffs are ten percent to you know,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty percent towers on everything, right, it's

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ten percent baseline, But then every country had like quote

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote reciprocal tariffs that were much higher. Amazing calculation of

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the trade deficits. It's like the whole thing. It was

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like truly universal, and it was basically you talk about

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like steel taffs, there's like you have like a sort

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of national security justification or whatever right you have some

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>theory behind steel tiers. But like this the Liberation Day tariffs,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>where the US runs a trade deficit and we want

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop that, and so we have tariffs that are

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>calculated through some formula designed to zero the trade deficit essentially, right,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And the court said you can't do that. The law

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that he used AEPA International Emergency Economic Powers Act of

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy seven. The AEPA allows you to respond to

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>an emergency, and if you have tariffs that are responsive

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to an emergency, that's fine, but like, it can't be

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the case that all international trade for the last thirty

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>years is an emergency. Like this is like too much,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like too much power to the executive. So you

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. But can you find specific goods to

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tariff and use other laws that say you have like

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>specific economic tariffing powers, like maybe probably often there are

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>more limits in those laws if you have to like

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>do fact finding and like put out a report and

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they're time limited, right, So it's not as completely broad

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as the powers that they claimed under AYEPA, which is

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>why they did the AEPA stuff. They're like, we're you

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>do everything all at once with no you know, review,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>no fact finding. So AEPA was the law they thought

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they could use for that. If they can't use that,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>then they have to find other laws which will be

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more narrow, but you can still do

0:13:59.440 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of terror.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there's section two thirty two, for example,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>that's what's being used on steel, aluminum, vehicle and auto parts.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 2>There's other laws as well, but usually there's some investigation

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>associated with him, so it takes months versus President Trump

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 2>is sitting in the Oval office and he signed something.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Because again, like the Constitution says that Congress can make tariffs. Yeah,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and so Congress has in the past past laws saying

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>here are some tariffs that the president can impose, right,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but like, ultimately it's the Congress's tariff power, and the

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress doesn't say in any of those laws the president

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can make any tariffs he wants. It says, you know,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he does an investigation these particular things, for these particular reasons,

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you can make tariffs. But it's not an open ended

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>grant of power. And one thing that the court so

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>yesterday is that if it were an open ended grant

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of power, and one way to read AIPA is that's

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>an open ended grant to make whatever twists you want.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a good reading, but it's like

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration reading the court said, if you read

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it that way, then it would be unconstitutional for the

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress to give all of its tariff power to the

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>president with no limitations whatsoever. And I think that's right.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a personal interest in this. I don't know

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if I've talked about this on the podcast a column,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but like that idea that Congress can't just give its

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>power to the executive with no constraints is called the

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>non delegation doctrine and it is had a controversial career

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court. But one of the important cases

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in the recent Supreme Court about the non delegation doctrine

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was argued by my wife. Wow, he's a criminal defense layer.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I was in the audience for that, and

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I have like a little rooting interest

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the non delegation doctrine.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I get it, even though to oversimplify and dumb it down.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>It seems like that is what has happened here, and

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it does just seem like Congress is too upset about it.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So the podded history of the non delegation doctrine is

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's never had any effect whatsoever. Like there is

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>lip service paid to the idea that Congress can't delegate

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>all of its legislative powers to the president, but that

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>lip service has always paid in cases saying but this

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>delegation is fine, right, including my West case. But there

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is like this notion that interest in it has been relived,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and like one day they're going to find a delegation

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that is too broad and maybe it's ayepa. I don't know.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. Again timestamp this is on Thursday.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>It'll be fun to see how this shakes out. I

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I would love to be a fly on

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the wall and like some of these negotiations, because I

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>don't know, if you're Japan negotiating with the US right

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>now or India, do you just wait and see.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why this would really change it that much.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think that like the thing that you know

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>as like the Japan trade negotiator or whatever, is that

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump really wants to make deals, he really wants to

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have wins, he really doesn't trust free trade. He's really

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to push the boundaries of the law as much

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as possible. He's not really aware of what those boundaries are.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>To think like I'm going to tell him to stuff

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because a court struck him down. Seems crazy, Like now

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more than ever, you make a deal, more than you're like, look,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this court was wrong. We understand. Here's our tariff concessions.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe you get a better deal now, and like

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you're rushing to make a deal. I don't know. I

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the idea that like now you're like, oh,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, like no more tariffs, Like I'll just walk

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>away from the negotiating table.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's crazy. I don't know. Maybe you don't walk away,

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>but maybe you say, why don't we break for lunch

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit. Why don't we.

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the opportunity to make a bigod deal.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't listen to me, I don't

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything, but like to me like calling

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>him up and being like, I'm in your camp, buddy,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to make a deal. I know that you

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have the constitual parademphosies tariffs. Let's make a deal. To me,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to the opportunity. You don't break for.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Lunch that's true.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You cut the deal now, Yeah, no exaggerating because like

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>if the deal involves like him imposing lower ABA tariffs

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on you, like those are illegal maybe maybe. So I

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's harder to know what the deal is,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how it changes the poster.

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 2>That most of our topics today are vaguely and in

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 2>some cases explicitly. Donald Trump related Fanny and Freddy for example,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 2>back in the.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>News another bit of you knowilateral.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Pol an explicit implicit guarantee.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Donald Trump, the verb is so hard. I want

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to say he tweeted, but in fact he posted on

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>truth social which you can say he truthed.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the truth.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I am working on all caps taking these amazing companies public,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but I want to be clear the US government will

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>keep its implicit all caps guarantees, and I will stay

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>strong in my position on overseeing them as president. So

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Fanny and Freddie, the government sponsored enterprises had a long

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>prehistory as being implicitly guaranteed by the US government. So

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like they explicitly said, Morgus, they have trillion dollars Morgue,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and they issued mortgage backed securities that are guaranteed by them,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and those securities. Always said, these securities are not guaranteed

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>by the US government, And they said that because otherwise

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd be confused, because everyone thought they were guaranteed by

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the US government. That's what it's called an implicit guarantee.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They say it's not guaranteed, but everyone thinks it's guaranteed.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And then in two thousand and eight they went past

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and they turned out to be guaranteed by the US

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>government effectively because the government like stepped in and took

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>them over, bailed them out, and made sure that creditors

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>were made whole. And that was roughly sixteen years ago.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And ever since, people have said this can't continue forever.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>They have to return to private hands. And I always said, why,

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, like no one. Yeah. But so now once again,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>because Trump is in office, and because there's a lot

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of money to me, there's a talk of returning Fanny

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie to private hands. And the mechanics of that

0:19:52.560 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are really complicated, and there's opportunity for people to get

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars of value. Yeah, and so

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that's of great interest to a lot of investors.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's bags to be made, uh, bags to be made, yeah,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 2>which could bring us to Bill Ackman, but we don't

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>have to talk about we don't have to.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But Bill Ackman is one of the big investors in

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that trade. And when Fanny and Freddie were put into

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>conservativeship by the government in the financial crisis, their stock

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>became like you know, in the ballpark of worthless, but

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>never stopped trading. And at some point in like twenty twelve,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the government changed the deal from the bailout

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to say from now on, all of the profits of

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Fanny and Freddy forever we'll go to the government and

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>shareholders will never get anything ever again, which you might

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think would make the stock worthless and like made it

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>almost worthless, yeah, but some people thought that can't be true,

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like that'll change, and so they bought the stock and

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>now they own stock. And it is unclear from first

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>principles how you would reprivatize Fanny and Freddy, but it

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>seems likely that whatever happens, the current shareholders of Fanny

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and Freddy, who bought the stock at you know penny

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is when it was declared to be worthless for all time,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that the current shareholders will get a

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>back yeah.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Haven't they already though, like well like in market prices.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, yeah, because people are anticipating that Fanny and

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Freddy will be returned to private hands, and specifically their

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>private hands, like specifically the existing shareholders of Fanny and

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Freddy will not in fact be zeroed, but will end

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>up being shareholders of Fanny Freddy and look at a

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of value.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be you know, kind of funny if

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 2>some of these big vocal investors who are calling for

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 2>the reprivatization, who you know, have bought the stock when

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 2>it was pretty much worthless sold now in this insane

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>run up that it's seens. Yeah, yeah, this is good. Yeah.

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Stocks of both companies are trading at their highest level

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 2>since two thousand and eight. But you look at the

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>long term chart, like going back to the nineteen eighties,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and it's still nowhere close to where it was.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because right now they're controlled by the federal government

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're charters. Say that their shareholders can never get

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>any money ever. Yeah, so that's worse than the old

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>old business model.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. I don't know this timeline. Even though

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump is posting on truth social about it, it seems like

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>this has picked up an urgency, like this process would

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>take years and years.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to just be clear, Like there's two things.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>There's like you can return Fanny and predat to private hands,

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the specific question of like how much

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of it do you give to the existing shareholders? Yeah,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>weird as zero? You can say, Okay, the deal is

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the deal. And by the way, the deal is probably controversial.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>People think it's really unfair. There's been a lot of lawsuits.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to respect their feelings that, like, in fact,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twelve deal to zero the shareholders, there's a

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>good case that it's pretty unfair. But whatever, given that

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it exists, you could reprivatize them without giving existing shareholders anything.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You could just raise new money to cap them. You

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>can say, I mean, but like there's like some corporate

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>complexities to doing that, but like, you know, you could

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>raise a lot of new money and like essentially dilute

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the existing charolders down to zero. And you could do

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>that by saying, you know, the government has I think

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>when I last read about this in January, in the

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>accounting of Fanny and Freddy, they owe the government three

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty billion dollars before the sholders can get

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>anything right, and so you could say, well, okay, we're

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out and raise three hundred and forty billion

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars of new capital to repay the government. And after

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he raised that three hundred and forty billion dollars, then

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the existing cherolders will have you know,

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>zero point zero zero zero one percent of the companies

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and so like their shold will be worthless,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not worthless, that's not worth very much. But the other

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>extreme is you can say, you know what that three

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty billion dollars that Fanny and Freddy o

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the government, that was a mistake. They don't really owe that,

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>so we'll just cancel that that right, And then the

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>existing shaerolders are sitting on shaares worth one hundred billions

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, more than one hundred billion dollars. And those

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>are kind of the two poles, right easting shareolders have

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing or they have like more than one hundred billion

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars of equity.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Two scenarios.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Two scenarios. I don't think it's like a prayer necessary

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to choose the second one. I think there's reasons to

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>choose the second one. You might think it's fairer to

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the shareholders. You might think the sharelder's got a raw

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>deal on twenty twelve. It's a reasonable thing to think.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And you might think that giving the charrelders a good

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>deal is a good way too. You know, you'll need

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to raise money for Pannion and Freddy. You'll have better

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>capital markets access if you treat the shareolders nicely. But

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it's also the case that like giving one hundred billion

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars of value to these existing shareholders is like it's

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of an optically strange move.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I don't know. It feels like any scenario

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 2>is just going to be messy and optically strange. So

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>what I care about, circling back to ummoving is what

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 2>this could mean for mortgage rates.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So Bill Polsey, he's the head of the FHFA, which

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 2>oversees Fanny and Freddy. He said back in February that

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>any effort to reprivatize the two must be carefully planned

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that the housing markets to remain safe

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 2>without pressure on mortgage rates. So the explicit implicit guarantee,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 2>even though you know, there's a lot of question marks

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and details to be worked out there. At least that

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 2>seemed to remove some of the risk that mortgage rates

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>would spike here, right.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Like who knows what every privatized Fanny and Freddy looks like,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>but like here's some possibilities. One is, like there's an

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>explicit government guarantee that they pay for, so there's like

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a fee, Yeah, that would be incorporated into your mortgage rates.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>It might raise rates because right now Fanning's Fredady kind

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of have an implicit somewhat more than implicit but less

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>than explicit guarantee because like they're in conservatorship and that

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>line of credit with the federal government and they don't

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for that, or they they pay a lot for it,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>but the accounting is somewhat complicated. But like in a

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>world where the government charged a fifty basis point fee

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for a mortgage guarantee, then like that's fifty basis points

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>on your mortgage. Right, you could have a fully private

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Fanny and Freddy where either they are fortress balance sheet

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>triple A super safe and raise a lot of capital

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and that raises their costs and thus raises mortgage rates,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or they're like, yeah, double a pretty good and like

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>rais capital and then like possibly the mortgage backed security

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is trade wider and that raises your mortgage rates. Right,

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the implicit guarantee is essentially they're backed by the government,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but they don't pay for that backing. That's probably the

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 1>cheapest free of mortgage.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's go with Allen then, seems to be what.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going with.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>That's good.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I know there's other stuff too, Like I was reading

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a paper today, like a privatized Fanny and Freddy, Like,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right now there are arms of the government. They kind

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of have always been arms of the government. You could

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine them being like more kind of free market, ye, right,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Like one thing that Fanny and Freddy do is there's

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like a thing called a conforming mortgage. And if you

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>meet the requirements of a conforming mortgage, which are not

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that low but not that high, then you kind of

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get the same rate. The rate for a conforming mortgage

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is the rate for a conforming mortgage. But like you

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>can imagine a fully private Fan and Freddy having more

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>discrimination among borrowers where there's less cross subsidization, and like

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>very credit worthy borrowers get lower rates than like medium

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>credit worthy borrowers, So like you could have the effect

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of not raising her lowering mortgage rates, but just like

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>increasing the dispersion of mortgage rates. That would probably be

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>fine for you.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>You don't know that. I guess maybe I have a

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 2>horrible credit score. You don't know.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, well, seems like we're going to be talking

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 2>about this for years.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I've a lot. You know. It's

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like heated up and cool down over

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the years. And I used to write about it a lot,

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I didn't for a long time because like

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Biden administration, nobody every time about this. And

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's right about it again in January because like people

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>started tweeting about it, and now it's like it feels

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of coming back.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the shares are just a good metric

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of how much this is being tweeted about.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the show's just yeah, the market some real action.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a lot of social media activity.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin treasury companies.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when did that phrase become real? I guess Microsoft,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Micro Strategy probably years ago, but like it's become like

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>everywhere in the last few.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, especially everywhere, like in just in the last few months,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>because MicroStrategy started doing this in twenty twenty.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that when micro Strategy started doing the first

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, the micro Strategy is kind of a real company, yeah.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And they are a software company, right, And like they.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Sort of started slow. They bought some bitcoin. It got

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of MEMI and so like early in the days

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of micro Strategy buying bitcoin, you could say, and I

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>probably did say that it looks like every time they

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>spend one dollar buying bitcoin, it increased their market cap

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by two dollars and that's a good trade. But it

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like super super super obvious, right, I think they

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>would say things are or levered bitcoin. It was like

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they had a business. Who knows how you value the business? Yeah,

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. You could look at that and be like, well,

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't just copy that. I can't just like put

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins in a public company and have them be worth

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>twice what they're worth as bitcoins. And so I think

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a little bit slow adoption if people copy them,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but like it was, you know, not everyone covered them.

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the last few months, like people have realized

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that you could take any random public company and just

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff it full of bitcoins and like it'll double the

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>value of the bitcoins, and so that just feels like

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a great trade. There are a lot of people who

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>own a lot of bitcoins, right, And if you own

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars worth a bitcoin, you sell them

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for two hundred million dollars. But if you stuff them

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>into a public company, they'll be worth a billion dollars

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's more. Yeah, So everyone's doing it.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's doing it, and especially this week, it feels like

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 2>everyone is doing this. So you know, you kicked off

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the week by talking about sharplink.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess they did it. No, they did this, they

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>did the Monday, Yeah, or.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Time they did this is a flat circle.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.239
<v Speaker 1>So sharplink is great. Like sharplink is the purest form

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of list because they were a sports betting marketing company

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>or some Yeah, they had a two million dollar market

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>cap as of like mid last week. Someone pumped them

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>full of four hundred and twenty five million dollars of

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ethereum right or eth and so now they're trading it

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like a two plus billion dollar pro form a market cup.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear, like I wrote about this

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I said market cup, but it's not. They're done

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have two point four billion dollar market They have a

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two point four billion dollar pro form a market cup

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. They have some share with outstanding, not very

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>many of them, and the shares traded a high price,

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and they have like whatever like Bloomberg will tell you

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty million dollar market caps something like that. But they've

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>also agreed to issue all these shares to these investors

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>who want to pump them full of ethereum. And if

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you count those shares to the market caps like two

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars. And this is important because

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we talked about QXO a few times. Yeah,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>same deal, where you have a company with like very

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>few shares outstanding and a huge pot of money coming in,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and like the retail investors are like, oh, look, this

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>company has four hundred million dollars with ethereum and its

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>market cap is eighty million dollars. I should buy some

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more stock. Right, That's wrong, right, because like the eighty

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>million doesn't count the four and twenty five million of ethereum.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But the stock is like the publicly traded stub is

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>small enough, and like the market cap is confusing enough

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that people are buying it at a five or ten

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>times premium to the value of the ethereum and the pot,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and like there's nothing else, right, two million dollar company, Right,

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's a ethereum in a pot and it trades

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>at a large multiple of the value of the ethereum.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 2>It is somewhat interesting that they went with ethereum versus bitcoin.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I just think that people need to pick a lane.

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And like Bitcoin is so saturated that like people are

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>doing Solana, they're doing ethereum, they're.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Doing you mostly hear popcoin, they're.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Doing doage coin, they're doing everything. But yeah, a lot

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of them aren't bitcoin. But it's not only bitcoin.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about two other big ones this week, household

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>name meme companies are you know, DJT Trump Media and

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Technology Group and game Stop both announced bitcoin treasury buys

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and their stocks both went down, which is like, that's the.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 2>End of it, Okay, the trade's over.

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the trades are literally over, because I

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think those are special cases of companies that were kind

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of already meme stocks. But it's definitely the case that

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any random company for at least several weeks that announced

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it bought a lot of bitcoin, like the stock would

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>go way up and people are like, oh, we should

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah, and then these two big name ish

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>meme companies announced it and their stocks went down.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like, yeah, trades over for game Stop. So they

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>announced in March that they plan to.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually this is not new news for games. They actually

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bought them coin this week and it went down.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 2>But like, in some ways, it's amazing that it took

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this long for them to come up with the plan

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to do this for game Stop. I

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like, I don't know, I would have expected it

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago, but here we are.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, First of all, I would expect it from AMC,

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>who does everything like AFC bought a gold mine because

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that was funny, right, like AFC.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Should somehow I had forgotten about.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>That they bought a gold mine.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we should talk about that more. I would like

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to get a status report on that.

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I know every stuff, And I'm like, they bought a

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>gold mine and I read about it, but I never did.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure they literally, but I think they

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like did some sort of murder with a gold coin.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anyway, Games Stop has always been like

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less like doing every meme, but they

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of memes stuff. But yeah, I think

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 1>that if you want to do a viitcoin treasury strategy,

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to be all in on it.

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And like gamesop, I still want to sell video games

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>at them all, And I think it was reasonable for

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a long time to think that if you're just GameStop,

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have an advantage in doing that strategy.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>M h macro strategy was there to do at first.

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear why a copycat would be particularly valuable,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so you might have tried to do something else before

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>getting into the viccoins state.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>So you wrote that, you know, you compare maybe Michael

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Saylor will do something cooler with it's bitcoin than the

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 2>CEO of DJT. But it doesn't seem like there's anything

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to do with it that's cool other than just buy

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>more of it.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I hear you.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't really disagree it. They're not going to say

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I was being.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Intentionally vague about doing cool stuff, Okay. One view of

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these bitcoin treasury companies is that like they're sort of

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like a like meta pump for pitcoin, right, The idea

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is they will buy all the bitcoin and not sell it,

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and that will cause the price of pitcoin to go

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>up and they'll be rich. It's just like a diamond

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>hands like theory of pitcoin like abstracted back one level

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to these treasury companies, but another theory and a related theory,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess is like a lot of them, including micro strategy.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about like investor education efforts right right, And

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this with like twenty one. It's like

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>another big Jack Muller's Jack Millers, Yeah, like big bitcoin

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 1>treasury company with like Tether's bitcoins and you know they're

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.439
<v Speaker 1>like we're going to do investor education or like knack

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Amoto holdings like merch the opioid company, like a.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Tiny drug company now on I haven't heard of.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>It's called kindly Empty. It's just like it's just random mania,

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>all these like random like tiny companies, like you can

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>pump them full of bitcoins, and like they all talk

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>about like we're gonna do marketing, media, investor education. It's

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all like you know, we're gonna make the price of

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin go up, right yeah, And so like your theory

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is not only will they own bitcoin, but they'll do

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff to make the price of bitcoin go up. I

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know why that would make you buy them rather

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>than bitcoin, but whatever. But like I will say, like

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>micro Strategy, I have like a really interesting capital market

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy where they're like, we're gonna use every part of

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>our cab structure to raise more money to buy a bitcoin.

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And you can imagine being like, I'll buy the equity

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>because like they will get more attractive funding to buy

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin by like selling converts at a high volatility. I

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, that's not a crazy position, but like most

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of these companies are, so yeah, we're gonna buy bitcoin

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk about buying bitcoin. Why would you

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>have a premium for that?

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. This is a tangent, but I

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>just want to talk to like the average employee at MicroStrategy,

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 2>which is now just strategy by the way, we've been

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 2>calling a micro strategy.

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's still like a fish or whatever.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Nothing matters because they employed thousands of people. I want

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk to an average employee there who isn't involved

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 2>with the bitcoin strategy at all.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>It is a little perplexing, but you know, like if

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they get data stock, they're.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Pretty happy I don't know, but I agree obviously, But

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, do they just think of it like I

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 2>work at a conglomerate, Like there's part of the business

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 2>that is just so totally disconnected to what I do.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's funny, I've already said that, like the software

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>company really matters because like I don't know, like some

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>part I don't know what part, at least some small

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the micro strategy thesis is like they could

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get in the S and B one day, yeah, and

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>then like yeah, you're in the NAZAC one yeah, right,

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>because they're a real company, right yeah, And like if

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just a bitcoin ETF, you can't get into these indexes.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like a little bit harder for like an active

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>equity manager to buy an ETF share than it is

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy a share of an operating company. So I

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think like there's something very important about what the software

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>employees do at micro Strategy that's a little bit undermined

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by like kindly MD and you know, sharplink, where like

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the operating business is so small, so small compared to

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the pot of the Coiner Earth theorem.

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Just to your point that you know, perhaps you could

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>see micro strategy entered the S and P five hundred.

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 2>It is amusing how much crypto exposure there is in

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred right now, especially with

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Coinbase being added. These are our I assume that your

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 2>four one k is in the S and P five hundred.

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't own any crypto because in part because like

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a notion of journalists together because you're not supposed

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to enryptos. You've heard about it, and like to me,

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, like I don't know like shares of Tesla,

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but I own mostly index funds, which on's.

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Tesla, right, Oh, yes, you do.

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like to me, like, the neutral portfolio is

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not owning nothing. The neutral portfolio is owning all of

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the financial assets in the world proportion to their like,

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, value. And so if you own zero bitcoin,

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're like structurally biased against bitcoin because bitcoin is like

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars of value. So you should own like

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of bitcoin to like fully reflect the

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>global financial portfolio.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And now I do through that, you do, yeah.

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like why am I so smart?

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Right? Like why are you so smart if.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>One percent of like the global financial portfolio is bitcoin?

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Like why shouldn't I own that one percent of mys

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a pretty reasonable take.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And then I have to like it. But they have

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to like a lot of companies, right, Like I'm not right.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So you just want a market cap weighted total

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 2>asset portfolio.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at me like that's a weird thing to want.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>That's like the most normal possible thing to want. Everyone

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>wants that, just you can't get it, but you can

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>get closer to it by like having bitcoin treasury companies

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>in the ass and.

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>P Maybe I sound skeptical, but I'm not. I think

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>that's great.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a simple man. I just want the global financial

0:38:58.320 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>asset portfolio.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Simple man. I just want to go home and see

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 2>my bird.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>stuffnewsletter on Bloomberg dot.

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 2>day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>email to you Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:31.479
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Moses ONEm Our.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake.

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Maples, Brandon, Francis Nuinimnsara executive producer and Stage Bauman is

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. Thanks for listening to The Money

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week with more stuff.