WEBVTT - Masters in Business: Janus Capital Group Bill Gross (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. Okay,

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so I am very excited about this week's guest. There's

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a backstory. Um, you're gonna hear

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this interview in two parts. This first part, for those

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of you who are either listening on Apple iTunes or

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, is about an hour. Part two

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>will be posted next week or if you're listening to

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this at some point in the future, half an inch down. Um,

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this is really a fascinating interview with a fascinating character. Uh.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>A little backstory to how this interview came about. And

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make a really long story, not as short

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>as some people would like, but it's really interesting and

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I like sharing this behind the scenes stuff with with listeners.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So gross gets fired from Pimco or there's certainly a

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>palace coup back in September, and lots of people are

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>writing about it, and lots of people are piling on.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a whisper campaign to discredit him.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Ever since Muhammed Hillarian left Pimco, there was a little

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sort of change in the air, and

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>I think people got a little more bold. Some of

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the people who were the next tier below Gross and

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Hillarian began plotting to essentially depose the king, and effectively

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what what happened. But around that time September twenty

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>early October, lots of stories came out. Everybody piled on.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>And you know, people sometimes say, hey, why don't you

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>write about Bill Gross, And my answer was, I'm not interested.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I have nothing to add. I think people are just

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ignoring a guy with a forty year track record. Look,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he built a firm that and he I say this specifically,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>even though he gives credit to other people who worked

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with him and that it was a team effort, and

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>there were thousands of people who work at PIMCO. The

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>reality is the vast majority of the two trillion dollars

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>let me repeat that, to trillion dollars that PIMCO raised

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>over forty years came there because of Gross. End of story,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>And so I didn't want to pile on. We don't

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have any PIMCO funds. We don't, we're not a client

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>of theirs. I just look at them and say, I don't.

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to add something if I'm not adding

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>some value, And just to kick a guy when he's

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>down despite a spectacular longtime track record seemed ridiculous to me.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I said this to one or two people, And

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these things travel around, and word gets to a

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>friend of a friend of Bill, and we'll call it

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>friends of Bill. And the friend of Bill reaches out

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I know him through other parties, and

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he says, so, I hear you're not interested in writing

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about Gross because you think it's not right to kick

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy with his track record when he's down. And

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my answer was yeah. He goes, well, what would happen

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>if I shared with you a couple of bullet points

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about his exit? And I'm like, I'm happy to listen.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And so he proceeds to give me one or two thoughts,

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I say, you know, he's due to write a

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>monthly letter and he left before he sent out is.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They're called iOS, investment Outlooks. He's been publishing these for decades.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I might want to write a monthly IO

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in the voice of Bill Gross. Now understand I've been

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>reading him and Paul McCulley and Muhammad Allarian and the

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>rest of the Pimco crew for a long time. Sometimes

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what they write resonates with me. Sometimes it doesn't. But

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew it didn't take much to get into the

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>head of Bill Gross. All I had to do is

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>download a dozen i os and read it on the

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>train on the way home. And I did that. And

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>after reading a few of these i os, you know,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever they catch a forger of some great artwork, the

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>guy says, you know, I had to get this stroke down.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Once I had that stroke, I can anything I did

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>looked like van Go or Picasso or whatever it is.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Once you get Gross in your head, it's easy to

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>write like him. It's easy to adopt his syncopations and

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>his tones and his rhythms. And so that's exactly what

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I did, and I wrote this parody. You know, Gross

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is farewell letter, And I imagined, Hey, I built one

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the most fantastic firms in the world, two trillion dollars.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Less people have put um raised two trillion dollars and

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have hit five home runs in the in the major leagues.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought I would parody that perspective. And

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>apparently I did too good a job, because we got

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>panicked phone calls. Hey is this real? People are upset

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Pimco is upset this one, screaming how did you guys

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get this letter? Astonishingly, it was on Bloomberg View. People

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize it was a joke, or at least some

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people didn't realize it was a joke. I got a

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of emails. But because of that, and I'm told

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>through the grape vine that the parody farewell letter from

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross amused the real Bill Gross, and so he

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>reached out at a certain point and said I thought

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of interesting, as did other friends of Bill,

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>other people who were still at Pimco when not happy

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with his being deposed. Eventually led to my getting my

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>hands on a copy of a uh set of bonuses,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet of all the bonuses that went out to Pimco.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote a column that talked about Gross is

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>two million dollar bonus and and and then allarians and

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is down the road. It was a billion

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>five in Pimco bonuses. And I got an email from

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Gross who doesn't say anything about the bonus, but says,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you guys keep misrepresenting my track record in

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in total returns. It's much better than is claimed. And

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I as well as the same as true for the

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>closed end funds, and so I said, send me the data,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll end research and independently and if it's correct, I'll

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pony up in a minute. Was correct, and it turns

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out that he was more or less right, absolutely right

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about the closed end funds there were. The performance was spectacular.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>According to morning Star, there were one to three, four

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and six in the universe of multisector fixed income funds.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>That's just, you know, just swept the It's like winning

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Laman's one, two and three e race team takes all

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>three pole positions and and amazing set of numbers. He

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was kind of right about total returns. It wasn't nearly

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>as bad as people had depicted. He had been top ten,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>top desk isle and often top one percent. And in

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the years that followed he had a bad year after

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven was he underperformed two thousand twelve, he

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>did really well about flat relative to the benchmark. Underperformed

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about points uh fourteen until until the

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>end of September, but he essentially didn't put in the

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of numbers that leads to, you know, a founder

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>getting deposed. And so I ran the story and but

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>along the course of having this conversation with him, said,

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would love to have you sit down

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and just you tell your story. I'll throw some questions

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at you, but you say what happened. And and I

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>know you don't trust people in the media, and I

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know you are fearful of filters and and spin. This

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is pretty and varnished. You get to say whatever the

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>heck you want to say. And so for two hours

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we spoke and he said whatever the heck he wanted

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to say. So this is the first hour of the interview.

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially him describing the creation of PIMCO. What it

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, was early mentors were, how things developed, what

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it was like running money in the flashnary periods of

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies, uh the seven crash. He talked about

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really fascinating things. And I've now babbled

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for over five minutes, So let me stop now and

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, Bill Gross, this is Masters in

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. Today. We have

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a very special guest. You probably have heard his name

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.359
<v Speaker 1>once or twice if you're involved in the world of investing.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>His name is Bill Gross, perhaps the most famous bond

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>investor in history. A quick background on who he is.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Born in Middletown, Ohio, moved to San Francisco ten years later,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up going to Duke University as a Duke scholar

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with a degree in psychology, which is quite fascinating. And

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>UM served during the Vietnam War in the navy. Is

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that correct? Unfortunately, that is correct, and thank you for

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>having me very oh my pleasure, sons long a long

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>time ago, not not really, not not too long, just

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>long enough to have developed some wisdom and experience. So

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>so let's we're gonna cover a lot of different material,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of of um areas. But I really want

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to start out with your backgrounds in the early days,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned you've been doing this for forty years.

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You have some history and some perspective. But what I

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>find fascinating is that you essentially began as a c

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>f A at Pacific Life, at an insurance company. How

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>did you go from being an analyst to saying I

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have an idea, let's set up a bond shop in

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>v one or so. Well, it was serendipity. Perhaps I

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>did private placements for Pacific Mutual life insurance companies. A

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, I made two private placements to the

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>eventual too richest people in the world, Sam Walton and

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett unbeknownst to me, and Pacific Mutual at the time.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's how I got started making five and ten

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollar loans. At time, downtown Los Angeles, there was

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>a budding development of bond trading. UM Traders actually put

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>their bonds physical bonds in a box UH, the ones

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted to trade, and when they sold them,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they would shift them up by career and then they

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>get some new bonds in to the box US that

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they would be trading on a weekly basis. So it

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was very rudimentary and fundamental. And as a matter of fact,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Mutual bonds were held in a vault down below

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in a basement, and one of my first assignments was

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to go down and clip coupons, to send those coupons

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and get the interest and UH and earned Pacific Mutuals

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>some some premiums. So you started and as an analyst,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>literally clipping bond coupons. But how do you go from

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that too? Here's an idea. Let's set set up a

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>standalone bond shot. Well, there was a setup, and at

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the setup was basically developing inflation. In the early seventies,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>after the the Vietnam War, um, you know, became apparent

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that bonds could go down in price as well as up.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>A matter of fact, I've been going down for ten

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years. And uh, there came a time when

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>someone thought, and there were some early people. I was

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them, that thought that perhaps some bonds down

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in those vaults should be sold in order to preserve principle.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And so uh in Los Angeles, and I'm sure to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>some extent in New York and Chicago and Detroit, which

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>were the hubs back then. You know, some early young

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>individuals like myself began trading and selling bonds primarily in

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>order to keep them from going from a hundred to

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>sixty five and sixty and some of was a T

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and T buns in the seventies actually with the two

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and three eights coupons got as low as thirty three

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar. Oh my god. And what was

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the net So if anybody bought that, what sort of

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>yield are they looking at? Practically nine percent at the time. Well, yes,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the peak in one with the Volker

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>peak um long treasuries for fourteen and a half percent,

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and so a T and T was probably trading at

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixteen and a half percent. And um they had,

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, some Gennu May mortgages with a

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent coupon. So really for two of his timing,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>when you you began right with the right call and

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>at the right moment more or less, yeah, I think so.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>When I came out of u c l A. With

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>my master's degree having done a thesis on a book

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>called Beat the Market by Ed Thorpe, but I had

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>studied black jack. You were sort of professional black jack player,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>well was for three or four months, not a big

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>hitter like Ed Thorpe. But I proved that the system

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>could work, and I went to u c l A.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Did my master is on Beat the Market, which was

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a book on hedging, warrants and convertible bonds, and that's

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>how I got my job at Pacific Mutual. And um,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so there was just the beginnings, um of option types

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of theories and and arbitrage types of trades that you know,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody like myself that had studied it usually had done

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a master's you could could begin to take advantage of

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>a trading atmosphere in which you could compare a value

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of one bond versus another. Back in those days, mostly

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>utility bonds, but there'd be a Detroit five and a

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Detroit six, and the Detroit six would be trading at

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a yield of the fifteen basis points less than the

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Detroit five. And uh so, some of the early trades

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>were easy trades in which you could just clip ten

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen basis points. But you didn't have the same

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>technology we had today. It was much harder to do

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the compare. It's not like if you just punched something

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>into the terminal and say, all right, here's the expected

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>returns for these similarly graded bonds. It was really interesting

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and really different. Um. The first time I saw a

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>tolerate machine was in nineteen seventy five. I came back

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to New York to do a speech and uh at

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hilton they had this fabulous machine that showed ongoing

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>prices for treasuries. I said, we've got to get one

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of those, and barely could convince my boss at the

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>time in terms of private placements, to to do one.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you know, very few screens and very little technology.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Everything was done by phone, which was interesting because if

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if although don't I don't have a great phone voice,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a great trader demeanor on the phone, and

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I can get the best price frequently, or could in

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>my early days. And so the ability to deal by

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>phone back and forth was much different, I think than

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it is today with electronic trading. So you had to

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sell your bosses on the idea of a toll rate machine.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>How did you sell them on the idea of let's

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>spin out a fixed income division and this way we

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>can attract other clients and other capital. And hey, you

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>own most of it anyway, so what do you care.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a chairman of the board, Walter Girkin. He's

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>still alive. He's five miles away from Newport Beach up

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the hills. UH. I revere him because of his

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>UH Walter Walter came from Northwestern Mutual, came out to

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Mutual about the same time I came to Pacific Mutual.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But he had this attitude, this aggressive attitude that um

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was expressed I think in our building in Newport Beach.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They moved a year later from downtown l a to

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Newport Beach with his fabulous new building and expressed an

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>attitude towards the future. Um we and when I say

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we've Jim Muzzy who is the marketing person, and Bill Publick,

0:15:55.800 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>who is the the business person. We three the uh

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we three kings of um not orient Are but the

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Newport Beach got together and said, hey, um, yeah, that

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got the potential here for a business. And we

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>walked into the chairman's office scared as uh baby ducks

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and um with with leg shaking, said we'd like to

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>start a company called Pacific Investment Management, and we'd like

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a piece of the action. Um. He didn't kick us out.

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>He thought about it. Uh he said, it sounds like

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, even though within twelve months we were

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>making more than he was, and and on and on

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and on it it went. We we started with our

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>first client, the Southern California Edison, which to be fair,

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was a local board related um win so to speak.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>We uh got a second client, A T and T,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which was the the beginning of it all because at

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the time H T n T was the biggest of

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the big and they chose us. The young kids we

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>were still in our twenties as the their first West

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Coast manager. At the time, Bury there was this legislation

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>called Arissa in which pension funds were being nudged, forced,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically to open u their choices for managers.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Typically they've been Chicago Banks, Detroit Banks, New York Banks,

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but now they had to choose amongst the different set

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and so PIMCO became their first West Coast independent investment manager.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And boy, once you get a ten T, your your

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on and up. So you start out, you garner a

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>few clients. Did you have any clue when you first

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>launched the shop what the future held or did you think, hey,

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>we can make a nice living doing this. No, we

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thought we could. I I thought unbelievably And I told

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>my parents, Uh, when they came down the shin Via,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>which about twenty miles south of the Newport Beach. First

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>house was a thirty one tho dollar house. UM, so

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we weren't making much um. But I told my parents

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>about the bond business. They didn't know what a bond was,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>but I told them that I was going to be

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the best bond manager in the world. Um. At age

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty something, at age twenty eight. They looked at me quizzically.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>UM weren't quite sure whether I had gone up to

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>deep end, but in any case, that was my goal.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And UM, I think by that time my mom passed

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two, that I was UM pretty

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>well in that direction. That that's quite fascinating. Um. Initially,

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys began with twelve million dollars. Is that urban

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>legend or is that accurate now that it is twelve million?

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So the early days is the three of you, when

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>did you start inning employee ease at a rapid clip?

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was it was it a small three

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>man shop for a while? Or how soon will you

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>adding analyst, traders, bodies, etcetera. It took three or four years,

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and we were stelling in a little wing of the

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Mutual Building. Yeah, the business expanded from ten fifteen

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty people. We developed the marketing staff, we developed obviously

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>accounting and internal staffs, and we developed importantly what we

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>call account management, where the account management would connect with

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>clients and where the portfolio managers Gross and uh now

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Christal and us Um would be able to stay at

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>home and manage money as opposed to travel all around

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and talk to clients. So in the early eighties, we

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were a company of forty fifty people. We were close

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to a billion dollars. Are are the theoretical? Boss Thompson,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>who was head of the investment division and this have

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a mutual, promised the company a trip to Hawaii if

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we could ever reach a billion dollars in assets, And

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>when we finally did, he found a way to uh,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to put off or to reneg on the promise. We

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>never got to Hawaii. On Twitter, I did hashtag ask

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross, Hey, bill y bonds instead of equities. I

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that was kind of an interesting I don't think

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard you anyone ask you that question. For me? Yes,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because I couldn't get a job in the stock area.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, No, I came out of U c. L A.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was pretty smart, but nobody else did.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And Pacific Life gave me a job, like I said,

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>clipping those coupons and doing private placements for prospective people

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>like Walton and Buffett and uh yeah they by the

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>way of those the sort of names they give to hey,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>those guys, or nobody give it to the kid. Is

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that how that works? You know? It's it's sort of

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like at the you know, the meat counter at the

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>grocery store. Take a number, and just like uh, just

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like it popped up. And and Sam Walton, by the way,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>was not like I said, he had two stores. I

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>traveled to Bentonville. He picked me up in his pickup

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>truck with his two sons and his dog and took

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>me round to the stores. And that was Walmart at

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, and two stores, two stores. And when when

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffett came in, he came in with Charlie Munger, and

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>they were much younger people, and they had this dilapidated

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>company called Berkshire Hathaway it uh it consisted to seize

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>candy blue chips stamps in this industrial complex in the

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>east that they were gonna, um, you know, close down anyway.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But they wanted five million dollars. And I can't recall

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>why I thought it was a good investment, but obviously

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Buffett and Munger impressed me, and they got they got

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ten million bucks. Not not that Pacific Investment or Pacific

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Life was the beginning for them, because the it it

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>helped them on their way. But if you're still in

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>touch with either of them, yeah, Warren. I talk a lot,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and did talk considerably during the crisis, the Layman crisis

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight and two thousand and nine,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>putting together plans and so on. Of course, Sam Walton's dead,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>but um, yeah, for a while there it was interesting.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about what else helped form

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your views on investing. Do you did you have any

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>early mentors? You know, a business mentor, Walter Gerkin, certainly

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because he at the foresight to give us a start.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But from the standpoint of investing, um, certainly at Thorpe.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds strange why a book called Beat the

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Dealer could serve as that initial example, but but it did.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>It taught me the principle of Gambler's ruined, basically the

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that even if the odds are in your favor,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can do that in blackjack by counting the cards,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and at some point in time you know, instead of

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the house being favored, the client can be favored seven, etcetera, etcetera.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But it taught me at the time that even when

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>odds and your favorite, you can only be a small

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>portion of your principle because you have streaks of bad

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>luck and uh, and you can experience what they call

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>gamblers ruined. So it's the same thing and investing. You know,

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>even with a very significant confident bet, you don't want

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to put all your chips on the table. You want

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to hold it back. And the theory of gamblers around

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was that you needed at least fifty times your your

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>maximum bet at any time, no matter what your confidence level.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And so that was a two you know, a type

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of maximum bet. It's held pretty well in terms of

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>corporate credits and sovereign credits. And it gave me a

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sense of risk taking and when to take risk, when

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>not to take risk, and how much to take Uh.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It was perfect for uh marko Witz uh diversified genre

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of portfolio management that was budding in the seven and

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>these so so Gambler's ruin leads to modern portfolio theory,

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>which leads to broadly diversified holdings even with a high

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>degree of confidence. Yeah, I would say his book too. On.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a book called Beat the Market. Uh. I

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this before about convertible bonds and and um warrants

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and and the hedging aspects of it. I developed a

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>very crude computer program about it. In any case, It

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gave me a sense that markets weren't perfect, that they're

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not fully efficient. Is that fully session? Yes? That was

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>my last class at U C l A, the Efficient

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>market theory, and uh yours truly. Bill Gross exited Efficient

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Market Theory with a C minus, which in grad school

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>basically means you funked at What other books um or

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>investors influenced you? B sides Edgar Well, um, you know

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>several there's a there's a book by Jim Grant, and

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he's written quite a few. Uh one at I go

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>back to if only because of the title, Uh, the

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Trouble with Prosperity. How could there be trouble with prosperity?

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>H He came, I guess from the same theory. Although

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Grant wouldn't claim a not a kinship with Minsky at all. No,

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and you you got right there. Yeah, he wouldn't claim

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a kinship with Minski. But this is the same thing.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Mensky saying that stability leads to instabilities about the same

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thing to saying there's a trouble with prosperity and um

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and so both of those. I I got into Mensky

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in the early eight early twenty one century thanks to

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul McCulley. I was gonna say, Paul, of your colleague,

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I go fishing with him every summer up in Maine.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>And he's the first person, I want to say, about

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eight or ten years ago who first introduced me to

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>him in Minsky. Yeah, me too, And this was in

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and two and three, before the crisis.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But but he said, hey, here's uh, you know, here's

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy called Minsky. And of course, you know, he

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>wrote some very technical and lengthy tone I guess, and

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>you had to work through them with difficulty. But the

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>essence of it was the stability leads to in stability

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and the combination of the the classical Keynesian um neo classical,

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will, uh concept of the economy in terms

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of an outside influence that ultimately would re equibal equival

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lead to a real equilibrium, I guess, As opposed to Minski,

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>who said, hey, no, the problem isn't the fact that

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the economy itself and the financial economy are connected and

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>when one moves to access then uh, that it comes

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>from the inside as opposed to the outside. And that

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was a brilliant observation because at PIMCO we began looking

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the early twenty one century for problems in terms

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of debt creation and leverage in the housing market. And

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we we sent our own people very um and we

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>took ten credit analysts in two thousand five and two

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five and turned them into real estate u

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>uh phony real estate shoppers. We sent them to Phoenix

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Vegas and Miami and Cincinnati and and pretended

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy a house to see exactly what was going

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on from the inside. Because of Minski and because of

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this uh developing bubble and housing so we had it

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty well down and thanks to Paul McCully um and

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like I said, thanks to Minsky and Jim Grant, all

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which you know, gave me and gave us this common

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sense a goal, uh a lesson that that simply by

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>keeping inflation low at two percent does not necessarily mean

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that the financial system remains totally stable forever. It doesn't.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>It creates its own problems. And we all know what happened.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the typical investor does wrong? From

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a psychological perspective? Is it simply giving into fear and

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>greed or is it more nuanced than that? I think

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you know primarily that berry not although it's more nuanced.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But I can see it myself. Um, you know these

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>days and in recent days, UM, you know, I can

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>recognize where I turn right when I should have turned left,

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and turned left when I should turn right. I'm a

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>human being. I get afraid. I'm a human being. I

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>get greedy when things are going the right way. Hopefully

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this tempered by the gamblers ruined rules of

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ed Thorpe. But yeah, I think the bane of all

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>investors is um is not doing what what Rothschild says.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, buying when there's blood in the streets. Hard

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy when there's blood in the streets, and it's

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to sell when the trumpets are are sounding. So

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the ability to temper that, I think for all investors,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not just individuals, is the ultimate key. And to know

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that things you know simply can't continue forever. Now. I

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>get a principle in my book called the alarm clock principle,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh. It basically says that everybody has an individual

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>alarm clock in terms of when they get up a

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>relative to the markets, meaning so say people get up

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>at six uh on average. In the investment world, very

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>few people get up at six, meaning at the right time.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them get up way too early, at

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>one in the morning or two in the morning. In

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, they sound the clarion called the arm agedding

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>warning far too early, and and by the time it

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gets to be six o'clock, Uh, they're out of business

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or out of money, or they've kept their money in

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cash for so long that the pack is distanced them

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>by by miles. And we certainly have seen that. On

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the equity side. From O nine, people have been calling

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for the end of the bowl market for I don't know,

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>six months after the bottom um, and that can be done,

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and yours truly has done that. I've got I've gotten

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up in many cases at one and two o'clock. But

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, investors can get up far too

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>late at ten or eleven. Were more familiar with that

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because that tends to connote either a teenager or laziness

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But it basically means you've missed the boat,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and by the time you get into the market, the

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>markets over its high noon, so to speak. Anyway, you know,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think an individual investor has to know um through

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>experience and through analysis and thinking. When they get up

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. And obviously the perfect time to get

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>up is five for five or six o'clock. You you

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>won't miss a thing, You'll be right on the money.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But we all have dispositions, predispositions like you mentioned. And uh,

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my individual alarm clock is I think around four thirty.

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit early, but not too bad. Um.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And so knowing that it's four thirty, I try and

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>blend that into uh to what I do on the

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>investment side from the standpoint of timing markets. And so

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you stay longer than your gut wants you to. Is

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that the way you're describing it. And my my gut

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>wants me to get in there at four thirty, but

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but my brain tells me it's really six. And and

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's just like a it's like a batter. I

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>guess at the plate um, uh, you know, seeing a

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of fastballs, and and now it is getting a curveball,

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and a curveball comes in at ten miles an hour less.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And so the key for hitting a curveball, um is

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to wait, wait, wait, wait, wait boom uh. And and

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so the mikey uh, you know, it's seeing something about

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen at four thirty is to wait for an

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half and then you know, take a

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>swing and hopefully get a hit. So, um, every investor

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think has to know who they are from that standpoint,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because we're all different. Um, this is Barry Rehults. You're

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio and my

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>guest today one Bill Gross, formerly of Pacific Life in

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO now with Janice. So. I began my career on

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a trading desk, and I've one of the things that

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have always stayed with me from the head trader at

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the time, a guy named Bill used to say to me,

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's okay to be wrong, it's not okay to stay wrong.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And throughout your career you've had a lot of great calls,

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but you've had some calls that have been wrong, which

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you subsequently reversed fairly quickly. So let's talk a little

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>bit about two thousand and eleven, where I think a

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have made a big deal about that.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You said, hey, we're gonna have a problem, but you

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>reverse that trade fairly quickly, didn't you. You took treasuries

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>off in eleven, thinking we're gonna see higher inflation, higher

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rate, it's bigger deficit. But you didn't marry that

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>position at all. No, you can't get married to a position.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like you're suggesting, and I had just

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>suggested with the alarm clock. You know that the timings

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>article is to win, to get in and win to

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>get out. But being married to a position, yeah, is

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>death for an investor. You can't fall in love with

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>your certificates. Um, some of them are very pretty, by

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, and you can fall in love with him

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>spoken like a stamp. So yeah. And in two thousand eleven, um,

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>yeah it was. It was the wrong call in terms

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of treasury. Sort of a famous year, I guess for PIMCO.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, like you're suggesting. Uh, that was

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>reversed later in the year and in two thousand and twelve, actually,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by March of two thousand and twelve, everything that had

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>been lost from an alpha standpoint, about three d and

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points as I remember, came back in a

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>period of three or four months, And in two thousand

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and twelve went on too to have a six hundred

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>basis point off a year versus the minus three fifties.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember in ten cent and total return, I think

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the benchmark was three seven thing like that. So you

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>had made that up. And at the same time, not

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>only because you and I let me a little background

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for listeners, so you and I had been emailing about this.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Krugman famously chastised you after you left Pimco, saying

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Pimco and gross never recovered from two thousand eleven. And

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.919
<v Speaker 1>you said, hey, this isn't true. To take a look

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at it, and so I did. I went back. I

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>looked at the data. Not only did total return regain

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>all the outflows and then some the following year. Two

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>years later, PIMCO had gone from one point to five

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to two trillion dollars. So it was fairly clear this

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was far from quote haunting Pimco. It was a trade

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work out. You reversed it, and it certainly

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't stop the asset gathering process over the next couple

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of years, nor did it impact negatively um the performance

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the following year. Yeah, I think that's right, and it's

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad rap. And I don't I don't know what

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Krugman is doing waning in on h uh, you know,

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not buying treasuries and and being unpatriotic, which was I

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's an inflation debate from his perspective as an economist,

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>not a investing debate. But you were certainly an available,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>full guy to use as an example. Look, you got

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the inflation call wrong and then all sorts of bad

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>things happen, or that was the argument, you know, did

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you just shake that off at the time? Did you

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think that would really be a significant issue on a

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>long and story track record, Because there are a number

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of people I've been through so many of those, um mistakes, Um,

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>nature of trading. It's the nature of trading. Um. And

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>almost every time, like my wife says, um, you know,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll make it up. And and we always did and

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and um. So it didn't bother me. It seemed to

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>bother a lot of people under the impression, I guess

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that the gross and pimpco were infallible. But because and

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and and it's fair to say we came through the crisis,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Layman crisis with shining colors because of what I

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about with Mensky and McCaulay, and knowing about the

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>housing market, we uh, you know, we were nine percentile

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>stars and oh eight No. Nine, and that was really

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the basis for the total return fund going to two

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars at it at its peaked a confidence that

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we could protect principle and then, like I say, with

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a mild mistake in two thousand and eleven, make it

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>grow in two thousand and ten and two thousand and twelve.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And to me, it was a sleepless, uh you know,

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>period of months um as always, but never one without

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the confidence that we'd get it back. I have to

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ask you one question. You mentioned two hundred and nine,

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>almost three hundred billion dollars. Did the size of total

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>returns have an outsized impact on your ability to maneuver?

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Did it just get to be too big at that

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>point in retrospect? And you know, I would have to say, yes,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of money, you know, not that the

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>markets uh haven't grown with us, didn't grow with Pemco.

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, through the years, that was always our claim

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to clients that hey, we're still only one and a

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>half percent of the market. That cider eat side of

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the market gets bigger, It's fair to say in the

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>last few years that the street would always know what

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Pemco was doing. We would always know in the early

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>years what the state of California was doing. They were

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the big horse and a big wheel back then, and

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'd know within five or ten minutes via

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the brokerage wires and the phones the state was in,

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the state was out. And so it became the same

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thing with PEMCO. Any trade that we did obviously had

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to be an enormous size relative to the rest of

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the market, and we affected markets and we paid a

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>price for that in terms of in and outs and

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately in terms of the street being well informed and

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in some cases working against us. Any plans on a

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.399
<v Speaker 1>cap at the young constrained funded janis well not yet.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>We're only a two billion dollars and and so you

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>know that to me is um maybe not a perfect size,

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like to get a little bit bigger, but it's certainly

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>size where uh you can move and you're flexible and

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the problems of the street, you know,

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering what Janie is going to do, because two billion

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't move markets like two nobody's front running, you know,

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one's training against you. It's not the same situation. So

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the Lehman situation, the

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. So you're running firm that has at the time,

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, oh seven, total return was about

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty billion dollars. Is that about right? Okay,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with it. UM, and PIMCO was just under

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars. So now you're sitting on this huge

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>pile of other people's capital that you're managing on their behalf,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly the world tum into the abyss. What's that like?

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It was sheer panic, not just from the standpoint of

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the company, but personally. UM. It's a well told story

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that Mohammad al Arian and and Bill Gross both on

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the same day independently called their wives uh and told

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>them to take all the money they had in the

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>bank out of the bank. Um in cash. Of course,

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a ten dollar limit, but we

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>said get it out of there. UM. So that tells you, uh,

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>personally what was going on and institutionally. UM. You know,

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we were we were full time. We were sleeping in

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the garage, sleeping in cars. Uh. You know, many of

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>us never left the building. Uh. It was good to

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>have Mohammed uh with us at the time because he

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>had more expertise than I had in terms of the

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the technical dealings, in terms of money markets and brokers

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and repo and collateral. Um, you know I was. I

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was a trader and a portfolio manager. Um. Some Mohammed

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>really helped us, uh back then in terms of preserving

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what we had. We we had money invested in Lehman Brothers.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We had money invested in um, you know, unsettled positions

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with Lehman Brothers. And there were some uh you know,

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>minute a minute maneuver and yelling screaming, uh you mean

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:28.959
<v Speaker 1>them as a counterparty. It's actually we owned Lehman brother

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>paper too unfortunate. Yeah, and and everybody did. Yeah, And

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we came out of it very very well. And in

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the positions that we owned that that countered

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>our Layman positions, I mean we own you know, billions

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of billions of euro dollar features that were

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>screaming higher in price because the FED was dropping interest

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>rates are about the Trump indust rates to zero. And

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we had some insurance against the Layman positions,

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but no, we weren't. Some were enough to completely avoid

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the situation. And as you know, during Layman it was

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>not just Layman, but you know Goldman and Meryl and

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley, they were all next, so to speak, and

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so everything was thinking like a rock and um, everyone

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was trying to preserve their own uh collateral, their own cash.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was really a dog fight of food fight,

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not just between um, you know, private institutions and Layman

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and the street and Layman, but between each other. Everybody

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>was looking after their own little skinny. You were at

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the time a huge holder of Fannie Mae and Freddie

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Mac the g s c S. That was a trade

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that could have turned out to be disastrous. It actually

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be a big money maker for you.

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>To describe the thinking beyond that, well, the thinking was

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that they were money good. I I know, the Chinese

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time, we're asking questions of Paulson and and

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so on, and legitimate questions as to whether they were

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:01.760
<v Speaker 1>money good and um holders of treasure. Reason and Fannie

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie and thinking might have been something along the

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>lines of, hey, if you guys aren't going to back

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the g s c s, why should we think you're

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna back your own treasuries? And that that certainly was

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the case, and that was the reason why we thought

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that they would back the the g S c S

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, there was I think a five

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar you know, line of credit to the G

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>S S technically in a prospective, but that was nothing

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>relative to their size. Ultimately, it was a position of

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>faith that that the G S S and the agencies

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and the U. S. Treasury were one and the same.

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they're not one and the same, but one and

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the same in terms of protection of principle and interest.

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that was the bit, and it was a

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>big bit, and and others were moving in the other

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>direction because like I said, um, you know, no one

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>was deemed safe other than the the the U. S.

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Treasury per se, and uh, you know, it's just a

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>question of of where to where to put your money.

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We we decided that the agencies were okay, and certainly

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the agency mortgages, which was the key because even if

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the agency has failed you, you theoretically and in reality

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>had collateral behind your loan that ultimately could be foreclosed on. Now,

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as we know through experience, the foreclosure ultimately resulted in

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>forty and thirty and twenty cents on the dollar in

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>some cases. So it wasn't perfect, But the combination of

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, our confidence in money, goodness of the agencies,

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and the collateral made an attractive risk reward situation. So

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>now let's talk about You've been a pretty I don't

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>want to say critic, but you've been a commentator and

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>observer of of the markets and of the Fed. So

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>let's ask the big question. What is the impact of

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ZERP and zero interest rate policy and quantitative easing? How

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>has this impacted the markets? What is this mean to

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>risk assets? And and how do you think this is

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>going to impact this current generation of portfolio match And

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>how has it affected the real economy? Because I think

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>it's all connected and and most observers don't connect it

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to the real economy, but certainly it's affected financial markets, uh,

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, with interest rates where they are, and we're

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure because it's a counterfactual that are where

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they would be if we hadn't have QUI in the

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, or if the b o J

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have que and if you know, the ECB doesn't

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>do q E. Um. You know, all very uncertain. But yeah,

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>many studies by the FED itself, not that they can

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>be the trusted verbatim. Uh, in terms of uh you

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>know the facts so to speak, but you know they suggest,

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, impact of maybe basis points on ten year treasuries,

0:44:58.080 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and we know the impact in terms of money mark

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it rates just so in other words, instead of two

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we'd have three. That seems kind of low, although when

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we look around the rest of the world, everybody else's

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>rates at least the major countries much lower than than

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>us here are in the US, right, Um, well, that's

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>because the US at the moment has a stronger economy

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and a potential for um, some inflation as opposed to

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the negative inflation. So you know we have that that

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>spread in the expectation that will remain a a dominant

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>leader in terms of the global recovery. Um, you know,

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so so que He's definitely had an impact on on bonds,

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on money market rates, on and on stock prices to

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>h you know, that's the hard one. Where would a

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>peb if the tenure was at three instead of two,

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and if money market rates were at uh two percent

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that is zero? Um, you know, always hard to answer,

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's no doubt that the tripling of the stock

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>market since the the bottom has been significantly affected by

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>QUEI money has gone out from the course, so to speak,

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>from the banks in terms of reserves, and not entirely so,

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but out from the banks in terms of reserves into

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the outer reaches of the asset markets. And that would

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>include you know, bonds and long term bonds and corporate bonds,

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and then stocks and equities and real estate, and so

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the asset markets have been fertilized, undoubtedly, h fertilized, that's

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a good word. Yeah. The question to me becomes, you know,

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the effect on the real economy again, a counterfactual, would

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the real economy be at three now if we hadn't

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:46.720
<v Speaker 1>done quantitative easing? Probably not, because there is, in my opinion,

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a wealth effect that trickles down very slowly, but trickles

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>down from wealthy investors into the economy, and so the

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>real economy is better. But I would make this point,

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think others such as uh, you know

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Fisher in Dallas and several others you know are have

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>quietly tried to make the point that interest rate should

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be higher, and not because of the inflationary menace, but

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>because it affects the returns, the real returns on investment

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the real economy. Look at it this way. If

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a long term thirty year treasury bond was at uh,

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, instead of you know, below three percent, was

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at one percent, bond investors would know that, you know,

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the the duration would be uh, you know, probably forty years,

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and that the risk return would be inappropriate. So they

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't invest in a thirty year bond at a one

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>percent level. It's the same thing in the real economy,

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, C e O S and and uh you know,

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate leaders look at the return on investment and the

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>return on equity and they've come down, down, down, you know,

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because proportionately, uh, the the financial market leads those types

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of returns. And secondly, because of structural influences that Larry

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Summers is mentioned in recent months, aggregate demand, dearth on

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a global basis, etcetera. I could go on, but in

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>any case, the return on investment is so sufficiently low.

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's call it four or five percent as opposed to six,

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight percent. That and and and remember, return

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on investment is a long term return or investment. In

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>many cases, we're talking about a building here that will

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be up there for thirty, forty fifty years, So it

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like a long term bond. Corporate leaders

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in the real economy are reluctant to make an investment

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the real economy because the returns are too low

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and the risk is too great from a durational standpoint

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and from a lack of perceived aggregate demand, and so

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>having gone so low in terms of interest rates, to

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>my way of thinking, and I think to Fisher at Dallas,

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 1>UH and others was was probably believe the critical mistake.

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 1>They should have stopped at one or two. They should

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have left something for savers. It wouldn't have made much

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>difference if if FED funds work one percent instead of

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points. Leave something for savers, leave something

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the investing in the real economy, so that you

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know there would be an impetus and the potential to

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have an attractive rate of return. There isn't that today,

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and so um you know, central banks are in this

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 1>conundrum of knowing what will happen when they raise rates.

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the potential for another moment like in

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and thirteen at Taper tantrum. But yet at

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time recognizing that zero percent interest rates distort capitalism,

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to a significant degree. And that's my main point. Zero

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>percent interest rates distort capitalism. So a couple of examples

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>stock by backs instead of capital investing, increased dividends instead

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of hiring. Is that the sort of thing you're alluding to, exactly,

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the fault of corporation. If they can

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>buy their stock at a at a sixte and a

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>perceived return of the six or seven percent, uh, you know,

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with relative certainty and with the certainty that earnings for

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.240
<v Speaker 1>share will go up because of it in their tenure

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>while they're getting a bonus. Then you know who who's

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>default that. But it's just math. That is just math,

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and and the same thing with dividends. But but dividends

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and stock buybacks do not make for investment in the

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 1>real economy. And that's that that. The net savings rate

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and net savings rate in most countries.

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Some have avoided this, like Mexico, but the net savings

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>writ in the United States is very close to zero.

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>A dip below zero, you know, during the Layman recession

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Great Recession, it's crawled above zero. Uh, you know,

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last year or two, but typically it hung

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 1>out around five to ten percent in terms of net investment,

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's after corporate depreciation um and netting out the

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>entire ball of walks and and so it basically means

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not investing in our economy. We're eating our seed

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>corn because of this distortion in the financial markets where

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>zero interest rates make financial assets attractive but not real assets.

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business with Barry rid Holts

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio