WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Greenspan, Palmisano and Johnson

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals to the financial stories

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, Star CEO,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio Science gave us some hope.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>The economic numbers they gave us none. This is Bloomberg

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. Welcome back. Equity markets

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>held up pretty well this week, although below the surface

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there are clearly some winners and some losers who are

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>emerging and judging for what we saw this week, big

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>tech is tending to come out on top. That's something

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we talked with Wall Street Week contributor Sam Paulmisano about.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the former CEO of IBM. It's interesting, Dave,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>if you watch what's going on. I mean, the guys

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that are well position into the pandemic are continuing to

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do well, especially those that are providing services like you

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>were mentioning connectivity in business as well as to the individual,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and we all connect with our families that way. In

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this environment, issues associated with the entertainment in the home

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of things facilitating that. And you see

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that also in the large tech companies, especially those that

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are have other business models, but also like YouTube with

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>part of Google, etcetera, etcetera. Alphabet now, so fundamentally, you know,

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of that going on. I think

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that the broader trend long term for tech is how

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>behavior is changing and how tech isn't facilitating that change.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>There's some classic examples. One I think that leaps off

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the charts is telemedicine. I mean telling medicine obviously uses

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the connectivity technology, whether that be web bacs or zoom

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it happens to be, but fundamentally, at the

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, it's a whole different web of

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>practicing medicine. Now, this has been around for a while,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and their companies like Hell that I've known quite well,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have been around, but as soon as it was approved

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>from a payment perspective, the insurance companies in medicare, etcetera.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>These now approaches have lit up. Now that the point

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of that is that people will get used to that.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you have the option of not going to

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the doctor's office and waiting and waiting in the reception

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>area for as you know, a very long time sometimes

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because things happen, uh, you'll that could be attracted to you.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean you'll never go see a doctor again,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but it could be an attractive alternative. Uh. You look

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at things that are going on in commerce. Of course,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody talks about the big commerce player being Amazon, and

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what they've been able to do in non prescription drugs

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is like a ninefold growth, if I'm not mistaken. But

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>even small small groceries, small retailers and the stuff at

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>least in our environment are using things like insta cart

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you can order and deliver everything to the home. So

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>all those patterns are going to continue to expand. Tele

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>medicine touched with payments, e commerce, those sorted down to

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the small retailers, while grocers those kinds of things I've

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>leave that the consumer will change and as a result

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer changing their consumption patterns, it creates opportunities

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for big tech. Sam talk to us as the former

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>head of a big public company as well, about the

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>role of a public company in this In this world,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we now have the government handing out a lot of money,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in exchange for equity. At the same time, some

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>companies are becoming criticized if they're not socially responsible. Is

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>e s G more important than ever? First of all,

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with e s G or social responsibility. Connecting

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to your society was always fundamentally important. We can argue

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about the extent that people did that or not did that.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We could talk about the pressure of short term investment, etcetera, etcetera,

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But fundamentally it's it's it was strategically important to your

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>brand because if you do things that are valuable to

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your individual customers or to society, your brand will be enhanced,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Your value will be created that will show up in

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>your shareholder price as well. So I think it's always

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>been important. I believe, quite honestly, large companies that have

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>been extremely responsible. If you look at what people are doing,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's three AM or whether it's going on in biotech.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You just heard about talking about Gilead, what they've been

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>able to do in a very short period of time

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. You talk about what other guys are doing

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to help in the pandemic. Even the energy companies that

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are constantly maligned, you know from sustainability activists and those

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things, turned over their chemical facilities to produce

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the chemicals that go into the products such as PPE

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of things. So and automotive with four

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>GM and ventilators, all those things. I mean, those guys

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have been phenomenally responsible. So I believe that you know

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of behavior. When you get into a crisis,

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>big companies are stepping up. I mean yeah, I mean

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no business case to justify some of these

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>things in this environment, which we do all do understand,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but fundamentally they're doing the responsible thing. You even see

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 1>some creative things in small companies. Uh there's a small

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>little company in Connecticut in New York. It's actually created

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the platform and technology that allows people to get back

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to work faster. I mean I won't go take it

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>through all the details, but basically it certifies your test

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>results in your hell and whether you're working in the

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>work or you're going into a restaurant for that matter,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>or you and I in the studio again, it'll say, hey,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Sam's technically healthy. He's passed all these tests, and it's

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>on his phone, and you let him in and he

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>goes on and we can do this again like we

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>used to do it live in your studio. Sam, You've

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of experience with supply chains and a

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience with China. Do you anticipate that one

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the consequences of this pandemic when we come out

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of it, which we will at some point, will be

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>some permanent changes in our relations are business relations with

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>China and for that matter, and extended supply chains around

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. Supply chains should have been designed for resiliency.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>By that, I mean you have multiple alternatives. So you

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't you weren't you didn't have a major component in

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>one geography wherever it happened to be, so you could

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>read balance. If a crisis occurred, that could have been

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a tsunami, it could be whether it could be lots

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of things, it could have been a military action, and

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we all designed our supply chains so if those events

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>occurred on the global basis, you could readjust if you

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the companies that have not been as impacted

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as dramatically by this. They're the ones that had a

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll called resilient balance supply chain. What's good at what's

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>driving the changes to the supply chain, quite honestly, David,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that technology more so than low cost.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, therefore, which drove it up until I'd say

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten years ago was cost. Where do you locate

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for costs? And you see that over the world, Yes,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot with the China. China became the manufacturing hub

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world, There's no doubt about it. However, that

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was more of a cost driven scenario. It started with

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the trade negotiations, but fundamentally people were looking at this

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>thing and say, look, I need to have flexibility in

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>my supply chain. I also want to be close to

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the market so I could respond quickly. That was Wall

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Street Week contributor Sam Paulmisano coming up on Wall Street Week.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>China is two months ahead of the United States in

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the coronavirus, and Starbucks is seeing both sides.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>We talked with CEO Kevin Johnson about what their experience

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in China taught them about getting back to business in

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States. That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Will Street Week with David Weston from

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Businesses in the United States have been closed

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for about seven weeks now, but in China it's been

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>closer to fifteen weeks, and China is well on its

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>way back in many of its businesses. Starbucks has seen

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it in both places, and we talked with Starbucks CEO

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and president Kevin Johnson about what they learned in China

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that might help us get back to business here in

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States. We started working on the COVID nineteam

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>response in China in mid January, and so we're now

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in week fifteen in China, and we've learned some very

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>important things from that experience. You know. The first is

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that there are phases that everyone, every market around the

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>world goes through. And the first phase, you know, we

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we really refer to that as sort of the mitigate

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and contain phase, and that's that period lasted for three

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks in China where uh people were asked to shelter

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>at home, businesses were shut down, social distancing all with

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the focus on how to flatten the curve and slow

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the spread of the virus. Coming out of the mitigating

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>contained phase in China, we then transition into a phase

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that we call monitor and adapt. And monitor and adapt

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>basically means we begin to reopen stores, but we reopened

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>them with different store protocols, you know, amplifying safety. Oftentimes

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's for mobile order for pickup only UH and and

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we did that in China, while at the same time

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we monitor the number of COVID cases that that that

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>might pop up in certain in cities around China and UH.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>In the US here we are now just coming out

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the mitigating contained phase. We've been in that for

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>six weeks now in the US, and as we transition

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>into this monitor and adapt phase, you know, we plan

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to open reopen over our Starbucks stores by early June.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, next week, the majority of those stores in

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States will reopen, and we will reopen using

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>safety protocols that we developed in China and have adapted

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for the US. We'll reopen in a way that provides

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>our customers a safe, familiar, and convenient experience. And so

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we're excited for next week. Many of our Starbucks partners

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>are referring to it as homecoming week. Because they too,

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like all of us, have been sheltering at home, and

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to to to get out and do something,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but do something that's safe and responsible. And that's the

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>balance that we work to strike in this monitor and

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>adapt phase. As you say, Kevin, as you came back

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>online and you have the vast majority of your stores

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>now in China back up and running, as I understand

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you have modified your hours, modified how many people can

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be there. I see that the same store sales, even

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>though you have almost all the stores open, are down somewhat.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell how much of that is just reluctance

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on the part of consumers to come back out and

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>buy things, as opposed to just having fewer people in

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the stores and shorter hours. Yeah, it's a combination of

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all of those things, David, and I can't I can't

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily attribute it to anyone, although I do know that

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you know in our store protocols, for example, UH, in China,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know most stores are not open for seating. They're

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>open for customer was to come in for takeaway in China,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and some stores have limited seating so that we can

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>enforce social distancing. UH. And one of the differences between

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>China and the US. In the US pre COVID, over

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of our customer occasions in the US were for takeaway

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>or to go, and so, uh, the US consumer was

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>much more sort of on the go, and so we

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>think opening in the US, we're going to get a

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>very significant result. But the positive news is every week

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we see continuous improvement in China as we monitor and adapt.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We turned the dial up slowly and start to open

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>limited seating, open other services. And now as we begin

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that path in the US, we're very optimistic that uh,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the end of the end of May,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>early June, you know, we're gonna have a much better

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>perspective on how quickly this is going to recover. Kevin,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do you have any projections on how the overall state

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the economy and the employment situation might affect the

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>consumers coming back to Starbucks stories, but right here in

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States, we now know officially we are intercession.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get worse. Is this something that really

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>could put pressure downward pressure on your volume? Well, you know, certainly, Starbucks,

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we've we've gone through recessions in the past, and if

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the past is an indicator of of of how customers behave. Uh.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think we're going to be in a

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very very strong position. We work to have a premium

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>experience uh and build long term loyal customers and you

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>know what we offer as an affordable luxury and even

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in times uh you know of a recession. Uh, you know,

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>customers are looking for something to uplift the every day

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and if it's if it's their daily Starbucks, or maybe

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they cut back a little bit, but there's an affinity

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that customers have for Starbucks and we work hard to

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>earn that loyalty and that trust, and and that's what

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>has carried us through recessions in the past. But I

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>think competitively, we we understand that we differentiate by by

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the work that we do to create a great customer

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>experience in our stores through the beverage innovation and through

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>those digital customer relationships. And that model was working pre COVID.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the first part of this UH this quarter

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, we were posting an eight comp

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with four percent growth and transaction. And so going through COVID,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>being responsible, thoughtful, focusing on that safe, familiar, convenient experience,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we think that's going to become the on ramp, and

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then as we go forward, we're going to continue to

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do everything we can to provide that great experience to customers.

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And in the past that has gotten us through recessions

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's gonna that's gonna play out through

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>this one as well. Kevin, you have any sense at

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this point what what might be permanent or long term

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>changes in Starbucks business, For example, percentage of digital orders,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>percentage of takeouts. You said it was already high in

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, But are we facing a world where

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe we won't have any sit down in Starbucks stores. Well,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be that extreme, but certainly

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, what customers are going to look for safe, familiar,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>and convenient. And you know, we've all been sheltering in

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>our homes for six weeks. We've got a little stir crazy.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>People want to get out and do something, but they

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be responsible. They don't want to, you know,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>create an unsafe situation or do things that create sort

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of reignite the spread of the virus. And so that's

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what we've tuned these initial experiences for. But longer term,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think about you know, once we get

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine and treatments for this, then I think consumer

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>behavior can start to adapt even more. And it'll take time.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, the effect in this experience of COVID nineteam

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>will affect all of us for the rest of our lifetimes.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is that as human beings, we have

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this natural gravitational pull to interact with other humans, and

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>so the need state of community and feeling a part

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of the community really is what the third place is about.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a mindset and UH and and people people have

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that inherent in them as just part of humanity. And

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so as we focus on being safe and familiar and

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>convenient coming out of this, we're gonna slowly open up

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stores and uh provide the opportunity for customers to connect

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with one another in a in a safe and social

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>distance way. But I think, uh, you know, I think

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>long term the Starbucks third Place is going to be

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as relevant as ever. It's just gonna take time. So

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as a last question, Kevin, talk about the long term

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about growth for Starbucks in this new world. Where do

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you see growth? And let me be a very specific.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You and I have talked in the past about how

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>many stories you're opening in China. Is it gonna be

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fewer stories you're opening in China? I saw luck and

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is really having some trouble. Can you take market share there? Well,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we've been taking market share, you know,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>throughout this entire period and Uh, but what's important is

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been in China for for over twenty years now, David,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and throughout that twenty year period, we have worked to

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>establish an admired and trusted brand UH in a way

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that resonates with our with our Chinese customers. And and

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that's by showing respect to the Chinese culture. It's it's

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's designing stores that are that are that are appropriate,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:46.119
<v Speaker 1>that that have you know, artwork and built by local craftsmen.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And our our partners in China are fantastic. They create

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that magical Starbucks experience. That was Starbucks President CEO Kevin Johnson.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, We've talked with our Wall Street contributor and

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>senior executive editor for Economic It's at Bloomberg, Stephanie Flanders,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about just how bad those European numbers are. That's next

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Street Week with David Western from Bloomberg Radio. The economic

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers kept coming in worse this week, and the central bankers, well,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they were listening. We talked with our Wall Street Week

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>contributor and Senior executive editor for Economics at Bloomberg, Stephanie Flanders,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about just how bad those European numbers are. I am

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit assured in the funny kind of way

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>by these numbers, which obviously relate to the first quarter,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so not even before we had some of the biggest

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lockdown measures in some of the economies, because it suggests

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have a handle on how this is affecting

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. It's not much of a silver lining, but actually,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>our economist at Bloomberg Economics we have been looking at

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more high frequency data and looking at some data that

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the French Ship School together on the impact of lockdown,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and our numbers were a bit bigger than the consensus,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've been kind of borne out by this. So

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not not to gloat, but at least it suggests that

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a handle on what the second quarter is

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to look like, what the impact of these broader

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns is going to be, and we might also start

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to take some heart from the high frequency numbers. We're looking,

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for example at Germany where electricity usage is starting to

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>pick back up. You know, we are starting to see

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>some benefits from that slow move away from total lockdown,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but of course the big picture is still a historic

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>decline Stefinitely. You have a handle perhaps on the numbers

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and how bad they're like to get. Do we have

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a handle on what needs to be done about it.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We had the e c V come out and make

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some changes today to try to help things. At the

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, Animal Guard said we really need a coordinated

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus. I think it's fair to say that both

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States ever in Europe, the first responses we

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have to supply a fact I have to really protect

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the supply side. But how do we get the demand

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and going in well, all the consumers having sat home

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for so long and frankly being concerned about their health. Yeah,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen that as you know, and Mohan, some

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the places that have had, you know, a removal

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of the supply side shock if you're like, you know,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>people are going to work there in the factories, but

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the demands not coming back. People are not going back

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to restaurants and not going out suspense of course that

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is a worry, and I think the fiscal programs so far,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the national policies have been all about keeping the economy

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and suspended animation, keeping jobs in place, and they've been

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>quite successful at that, I think, probably more successful than

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the stakes. But where they may be missing, and where

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly Leguard the European Central Bank will be looking for

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>more for governments than from the European Commission. Is that

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>piece you're talking about, the spiny list. Once we start

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to see economy slowly moving out of lockdown as we

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>now are, what's going to be there to actually stimulate

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>economies as opposed to just keeping them keeping them on hold,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>which is effectively what they've been doing for this seriod

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of lockdown. But so many, so much uncertainty about the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>path of that lockdown from here, because we know Germany,

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>for example, is starting to see a push back up

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>an infection, so other countries are looking and saying, maybe

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we can't follow some Germany's footsteps. So Stephanie to bring

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it back to the United States for a moment and

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>compare and contrast. We heard from the FED and the

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>FED chair j Pal yesterday, and one of the things

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he said was over the medium term, not just the

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>short term. The medium term, we really health challenges, and

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he's suggested even there might be longer turn damage. We

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have had the fiscal stimulus, at least a lot of

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it here in the United States. How can we learn

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>from the US experience as it applies to Europe? You know,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's took me. I mean, I think we

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>have seen a thing. If you'd like to have more

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>people learning out employment soles and then increase that support

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for people who aren't employed, so we have more double

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>acclaimed numbers today from the US. You know, that's been

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if you like the US way, that they've been less

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>protective of employment but pushing a lot more money to

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy and perhaps getting into businesses as well, though

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we know not some states more than others, So I

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>guess there is a lesson there. But the worry that

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>said is stating is putting all these people out of work.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would be nice to think that a

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of this work will immediately spring back. You know,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>big workers, younger workers may be able to be flexible,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but we know historically once you lose your job, even

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>especially if perhaps if you're at the beginning of your career.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You can have a permanent hit in terms of wages,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can find it permanently harder to get jobs.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>So that's the kind of longer term hits that the

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>FED is talking about, and thankfully why they're seeing maybe

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>unemployment not getting back in the four or five range

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>for several years. And it's a hit that is not

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>necessarily evenly distributed. We're seeing dispersion. For example, let's just

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>take big tech in the United States. It's doing really,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>really well. We've had earnings out this week are very

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>very good. Are you seeing that in Europe as well

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>as the United States? In effect, you're seeing some parts

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>of the economy that are likely to come back faster

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and better, others are really much more challenged. Yeah, I mean,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things. Of course, we've also had

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that of a story of the sort of market performance

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the lab few years, like one of the reasons

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>why Europe has consistently lagged because it was the tech

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sector that was doing so well, and you have just

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>had a smaller tech sector. So that's definitely a concern

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>if you think that that one that sector is the

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one that's also coming out of the strongest I think

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in Europe's favor was the point and made earlier, that

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you are they have perhaps done a better job of

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>preserving work in places like Germany and face that you

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>can get the demand back, you possibly don't have quite

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>such a health decline in terms of getting people back

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>into work. But I think that sexual breakdown is going

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a concern in the US as well, because

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we know that for example, you know women and lower

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>paid workers who had actually been doing a bit better

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the last four or five years in the US after

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time of problems. But that certainly to the

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>low wage sector. It's that bit of the labor market

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>that has now been really hit and of course you

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about that on both sides of the Atlantis.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>That was words Stephanie Flanders coming up the Central Banks

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got to work. This week. We talked with former FED

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>chairman Alan Greenspan about how different it is this time.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that the FED confirmed for us this week

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is that the old rules, well they've sort of gone

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>away at least for the time being, including things like

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>concern or a fiscal discipline. We talked with former FED

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Alan Greenspan about whether this pandemic crisis maybe fundamentally

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>altering the way the government regulates the economy. Well, I

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be longer ways expect, largely because

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the defining characteristic of the next century will be an

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>inexorable aging of the population. More than of the population

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the industrialized countries of the world are age sixty

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>five and older, and until the last century, the vast

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 1>proportion of the population worked until they died. Retirement was

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a rare outcome. As a consequence of this, the US

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>retirement benefits, especially social security and health care, have escalated

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>significantly and are projected to expand materially further in the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>decades has it And that is an issue which I

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>can explain in some considerable details for you after what

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to happen. But I think it's

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be a dominant force in slowing down the

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rate of growth. And it's unclear at this stage whether

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be looking at the type of

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Gotturn that Sweden looked out for a number of years

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and cured were we're going to be in trouble. But

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but but Mr Chairman, what is the solution to that

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or the answer to that? Because if anything, this pandemic

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I think will push countries, the United States and other

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>countries perhaps in the direction of greater social support, of

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>greater social benefit programs because so many people are being

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hurt so badly. I absolutely agree with that. I think

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that uh um. The bottom line as a retirement benefits

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and essentially social security and medicare in the life are

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be major forces in the years ahead and

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in government programs. At the same time, as the Federal

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Reserve meets today, should they be more concerned about deflation?

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>At this point in inflation we've had as you, oil

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>futures contracts actually trade well into the negative numbers, commodities

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>are weak around the world, and the go forward inflation

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>numbers are quite disturbing. Is there a real risk of

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>deflation right now in the United States and globally? Let

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>me just say, I'll answer it generically, but uh Since

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I was left office, I've been very scrupulous and not

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>commenting specifically on what my successors we're doing. But as

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a general question, there's no doubt that the problems involved was.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The difficulties of recent weeks are having a profound effect,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can judge them as well as any are there.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Hubbard, whom you know the economists now at Columbia,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>has warn't warned about demand destruction and the possibility what

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>he calls a doom loop. Do we face even the

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>procect of possible depression, not just recession, and not that

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit that presumes that we don't do

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>take the type of actions that Sweden did and resolved

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the problems which are very similar to those in which

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we have been confronted with. And what that would be

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally entail is solving the whole question of how you

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>go from us socialist society and which Sweden was and

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it finally came collapsed in the ratees h and made

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>major visions of the type that were we to make,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would make our social security medicure and other problems are resolved.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>But we have nowhere near that as yet. And it's

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of issues which I'm not sure we wanted

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>get into, but the problems are aren't there, and right

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope we come to grips certain sooner rather than later.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder Dr Greensman, whether we haven't taken a step,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it was the right step, but a step

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of what you call socialized economy, uh,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>starting with the two thousand eight, two and nine, but

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly now with the extent in which the federal government,

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>through fiscal means, is really intervening into the economy very regularly,

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and for that matter, the central banks, not just the

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve but others, have grown their balance sheet to

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 1>increasing degree. Investment decisions even depend as much on what

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>we think the government's going to do, is on what

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we think the economy is doing or the consumer. Well

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been I would say the investment process of of

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all the companies with whom I doubt I could not

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>get around the fact that what the government is doing

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>is having a very significant impact on financial world. And

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the financial world is where the bottom line and this

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>profits and which you're working at. So our fully can

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>concur what you're saying, and we we are moving in

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>directions which are quite surprising, and obviously the virus issue

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>coming up has made us a very much more difficult

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>problem to deal with. But how we come out of

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing, it's going to depend very much on fundamental

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>issues with dispect the government. And it seems ironic, but

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying we ought to be looking at Sweden, which

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be the crintessential socialist society, as a measure

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which we are to direct ourselves to get our system

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and more balanced. And I speak to a lot of people,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>pres people listen. Well, so we're listening and we want

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear what you have to suggest, because any crisis,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from from what I've read in history, can give opportunities

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as real perils. If we were to forgive

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the expression, use this crisis to move the economy, move

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the government in the direction you think would be more constructive,

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>how would we do that? Well, I think the first

0:28:52.320 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is to recognize that, uh, what the data are

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>arkably show is that for the last fifty years, AH

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>social benefits have been crowding out gross domestic savings in

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States, uh, dollar for dollar. And that is

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>meant effectively that if gross domestic savings is being reduced,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that's being the major source of gross domestic investment. Then

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we are dealing with the situation where productivity growth slows down,

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>which is precisely what has been happening, and if what

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to do. We're now at a one percent

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>annual rate productivity growth that's intolerably low and unlessen until

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>we can turn it up, and the only way we

0:29:54.520 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can do that is by structuring our investment towards capital goods,

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're not doing that and then does not earth

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>At the moment. There are some who are very concerned

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on in the government right now because

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of what is called moral hazard that in the effort

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to bail out companies that we are bailing out some

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>who have been profligate, not just those who have been prudent, uh,

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>including investing in things like high yield bonds and things

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. Is this a time to be concerned about

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>moral hazard or should we put that to one side

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and deal with the much bigger hazard of the coronavirus.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it's not. I mean, I agree it's

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>an issue, but there are lots of issues which we

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can deal with without really being concerned about. And Dr Greenspan,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you assess the situation with unemployment? Obviously, we've

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>lost twenty six million jobs or so in five weeks

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and projections it will get worse, some people saying it

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>may even get to an unemployment level that beats what

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was going on during the Great Depression. What do you

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>project in terms of unemployment through the rest of the years.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem basically is, uh, we we actually are looking

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at the terrible first quarter. Obviously second quarters pretty awful.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But if the issue of the virus works, it's way

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we the way we expect. We probably have a very

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>strong third quarter. But my concern is going is the

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter and beyond Uh, it's it's the years they

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>had where the changes have got to be made. Uh.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And I would be less concerned about many of the

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>issues which confront us today, although I dude say importantly

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the Irish issue has got to be resolved in a

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>rational and sensible matter and change, for examples, social security

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>benefits and the way they are paid so that we

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't run in to the crisis that's reading right into

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as a consequence that was former FED chair Alan Greensband.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>This has been another edition of Wall Street Week. See

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you next week.