WEBVTT - Two Years On

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion listeners. I'm Bonnie Quinn. This week,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it's deeply dysfunctional, has turned antidemocratic, and it's a huge

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>problem for the nation. Jonathan Bernstein on echoes of past

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>eras for the Republican Party in today's GOP and these

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are the cheapest calories that are at there. David Fickling

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on the food insecurity and worse potentially coming for huge populations.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>First though, it's been two years since George Floyd was

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>murdered on twenty and of course the movement towards accountability

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on race in the wake of that moment. This week,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>John Rogers, junior founder of Arial Investments, was a guest

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Economic Club of New York and I got

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to speak with him. Rogers will celebrate forty years of

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Ariels founding next year, yet Ariel is still one of

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a tiny fraction of minority run investment firms. I spoke

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>with Rogers about change in the industry and I got

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on the macro environment. Let's get straight into it.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been a tough time, John, with almost eighteen billion

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets on an management how are you looking

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>at this market? Itself when we're looking at it as

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a time for opportunity. You know, Warren Buffett always talks

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about the ball at somebody should be your friend. And

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>when you have this kind of dramatic shifts in the market,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and so many companies have changed so dramatically, we think

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an opportunity to take advantage of some real, real,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>unique bargains in this environment. So we've been adding to

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>our positions each and every week, finding more and more

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>areas where again we're excited about putting money to work.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this a major pivot point or is this just

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a resetting of repricing? Well, I think it's In some ways,

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a I guess it's a repricing high pe multiples

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>have had a multiple compression because you know, with interest

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>rates going higher, you don't want to pay a lot

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for future earnings they are gonna be delivered ten twenty

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>years down the road. And this ToxS had gone too far.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they were too expensive and people just hadn't

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>factored in the higher interest rates and how much it

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>can impact how you value these businesses. So we've had

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>an array of events contribute to the as well as

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as you say, massive inflation and huge on certainty. Do

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we see more of a sell off? I think we're

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>getting You know, you never know. We all know this

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is impossible to predict the markets, and you know we're

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>long term investors with a turtle, you know, as a

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>logo to remind us the patient's winds. But I do

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like the amount of pessimism in gloom in the

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>market is so high. Everywhere we go people are talking

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>about how afraid that they are, so when there's so

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>much pessimism, so much barishness. I do believe you mentioned

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>John Templeton earlier. He always said you want to buy

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>when there's maximum pessimism. I think we're getting into that

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>type of environment that gives me optimism that we're starting

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to bottom here. Let's talk a little bit about the

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>economy and what the federalers are is trying to do

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in order to engineer a softish lending. Do we get

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to neutral by the end of the year and roughly

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>where is that. One thing I've learned over the thirty

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>nine years that i've been an arial is what gets

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you as always the surprises, the things you didn't think about,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the things you couldn't have worried about. So I think

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>when you have all the Federal Reserve and all the

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>top economists in the world, and everybody fixated on whether

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we can avoid this recession, whether that can do the

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>right thing, I don't think they're gonna be too far off.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there'll be some big negative surprise they

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>will come from this. It's so well identified, it so

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>well talked about, So I don't think we'll get hurt

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>by it. So that's a lot of optimism we have

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>heard in the last couple of days alone from various

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>investors suggesting that it's a very narrow path to avoid

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a recession. What is the likelihood that we can avoid

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that recession. Well, someday we'll have another recession. You know,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone is always predicting many more recessions than ever occur.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of one of those cliches that we all

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about and here about. So I don't see a

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>recession coming anytime soon. As we talk to our management teams,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've just gone through the learning season. We've

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>been on the phone with CEOs and CFOs of dozens

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of companies in the last several weeks. Everyone is telling

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>us they're seeing no signs of a recession. The consumer

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of money. The consumer has been saving.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>We know the low unemployment rate, so we don't think

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it can be a consumer lead recession. I think it

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a ways off. But if it comes a

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit early, I means it'll just end a little

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier. You know, people always think it's like this

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>great bookie man out there, we have this great recession.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But eventually, you know, we all know, once you have

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the recession, we have a recovery. And you know, when

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you go to the annual meeting for Berkshire, Hathaway and

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>my you know, my favorite thing is he always talked

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about what the dial did last century, how it started

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>at sixty six and ended it over eleven thousand. I

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>keep reminding myself that last century we had great depression,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>we had many recessions. We had World War one, World

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>War two, we had a pandemic. We get through these.

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he always says, our capitalist democracy is the

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>best system ever invented, And so I try not to

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>get too troubled by this short term worry of something

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that can commit it. So we do get through them.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>But it's the question of the damage that's done. I

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>guess in the getting through them. When you talk to

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these CEO, CFO, supply chain managers and so on,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and I know you do, you speak to them on

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a quarterly basis, at least, what are their main worries

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? I think the supply chain issue is a

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>worry for a lot of the companies we talked to.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's called it's it's it's a headwind. It's

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it's a problem. But they're working through

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it and for the most part getting through it, and

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with some challenges, some higher expenses they would have hoped,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a catastrophe by any means. At the

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think people are worried about inflation these managements.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>As we know, most CEOs have never lived through an

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>inflationary period before. They don't know what to expect, They

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how this can impact them. But so far,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so good. People are feeling they're able to raise prices,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so we're spending a lot of time

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to check on that, double check on that, ask

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all these management teams how they're dealing with it, But

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so far they're managing it. So inflation still at an

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>eight percent handle. We're not sure exactly how fast it's

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>going to come down or what kind of outside factors

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>are going to help it come down, because right now

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>things are not alleviating all that much when it comes

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to energy prices and frictions in the system. Where do

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you see the FED being able to bring inflation down

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to by the end of the year. I'm not sure

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year it will be down

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>very much, you know. I still think that they got

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>started too late, and they kept saying this was transitory,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>kept saying it was transitory, and they didn't quite get

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it right. So ultimately it's gonna take longer for it

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to get under control. So whether we get there by

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, maybe it's the middle of

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>next year, but eventually they obtain this beast and things

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>will be back on track. So if you could put

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>a figure on it, or if you could cite what

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>some of your CEOs are telling you, are they seeing

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>six percent still at the end of the year four

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to five, I think it will be higher, since nically

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>higher than that, that's our view. I would take the

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>over on how high inflation will be at the end

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year. It's been two years since George Floyd's

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>murder on and the movement towards accountability on race. In

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the wake of that moment, I spoke with John Rogers

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the financial industry and it's race record. We began

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>with his own experience and the people that led him

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>into finance, starting with his father. I was very fortunate.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>My dad was a Tuskegee airman and you flew over

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred missions in World War Two. And he was

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine when I was born, so he had a

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to decide exactly what I was going

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to do. At different ages and certain agents had of

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a checking account, certain age, I had a saving his account.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned my being a vendor. I had to have

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a summer job by the time I was sixteen, and

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>then by the time I was twelve, I had to

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have a stock market portfolio, and right, yeah, it was

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. And you know the thing was he

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>my parents were divorced when I was three, So I'd

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>go visit my dad on the weekends and he'd have

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his newsletters piled up for me to read, and the

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>annual reports and the quarterly reports the companies that he

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had invested in for me. He wasn't wealthy. It was

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty dollars here and five dollars there. But

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as the years went on, and you know, and then

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he took me to meet his stockbroker, guy named Stacy Adams,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>who was the first American stockbroker in the South Street.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, he became my role model, he became my mentor.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I just go and sit with Stacy and watched the

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ticker tape go by, and he was this unique guy.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He'd been there forever. But to have him there for

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>me all the difference, and my father introduced me to him,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and it just became a labor of love. It came

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>fun well and a phenomenal that you had that you know,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so many people don't know, most people don't you know,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you're probably the exception that you had a dad that

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was that interested in that, you know, aware of how

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>young he should start teaching you, and that you had

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>other mentors like that. If you went out there today,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>would there be any more mentors or is the ratio

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>still that tiny? It feels to me like, you know,

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I've been in this business years that not that much

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed in that time. So what about forty years.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Has much changed in forty years. Um, it's it's changed.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's you know, and it's accelerating and changed.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Since the George Floyd murder, there's a much much more

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>rigorous and serious efforts to diversify the financial services industry.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Melody Hops and you know and my co CEO, and

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're both getting more opportunities to speak to groups like this,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>speak to boards of directors, speaking to different types of

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>organizations and political leaders. There really is a push and

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to see some real traction and something's happening.

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I have to stay here in New York City.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, you guys have been way way

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of any other city in the country by far

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of leadership. You know, we've had from

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kinchin Alds to the world and others

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and leadership roles, but also the Ray mcguires and Bill

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Lewis's that have been an investment banking, We've had a

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of progress in private equity. So New York City

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is one that I think is just really truly making

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a difference. But unfortunately it hasn't been extrapolated throughout the

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>United states and the way that it should. Well, there's

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one statistics that I just found absolutely terrifying from one

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of your surveys, and that it's that one point two

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of all assets under management are a minority you

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>owned firms. Is that still the case? And that's that's

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for all minority firms. I think the data correct, so

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just African American or Latin X. Now the

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers are really really bad when it comes to money

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>management mutual funds. And what makes that a particularly heartbreaking

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as you all know here again here in New York,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, so much of the wealth and jobs and

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>philanthropy comes through Wall Street. That's a part of the

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>economy where again it's been so successful. You have the

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>high profit margins, and in the past, so many progressive institutions,

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>even when they wanted to do the right thing, they

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>did it through the term supplier diversity, which implies that, okay,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna work with minority owned business, it's going

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to come through supply chain, construction, catering, janitorial services, office

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>supplies the lowest margin part of the spin. And we're

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the least amount of wealth of been creating, and we

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have hard data that shows that you know from Mackenzie

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and BCG showing in the Chicago land spend business and

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>professional services is seventy five billion dollars profit margins five.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Construction is tenth on the list at roughly twenty five

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars profit margins less than one. So if you

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>really want to make difference, you have to get rid

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of this term supplier diversity. The University of Chicago coin

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to term business diversity, and now our Civic Committee is

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>used in that terminology. In Chicago are eighty four largest

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses the Barack Obama Foundations using the terminology business diversity.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think to make a difference, we have to

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>signal to two people you want to be able to

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>do business minorities and everything that we do that it's

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a kind of unconscious or implicit bias if

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you only work with minority firms in the commodity parts

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of spend and not in the most lucrative parts of

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>our economy. So this that's the reality. And the other

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>part I would say, lastly outside it's disappointing, is I

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bet if you look at one point two percent, most

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of that spend is coming from government and Unfortunately, the universities,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the hospitals and museums, many of the anchorings, tuitions, and

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the foundations have been the least progressive. You would have

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>expected the exact opposite, but they have been the least

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for progressive. What changes that? Is it just complacency? Is it? Well,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the way we've been doing it for the

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>last twenty thirty four years. Therefore, let's just sign up

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the dotted line again. What gets the fire a lit?

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I think it's partly the fact

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that people done it the same way for fifty years,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just supply or diversity construction being the focus,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyone just thinks that's the way to do it

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>without actually thinking about it. People have this definition of

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>small business that hasn't been really thought through in an

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>economy where these giant companies that are trillion dollar market caps,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so the prison with which people look at these things

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they just look at them the same way and having

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to evolved as our economy has evolved into this again

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>professional services, capital, light industries, less manufacturing. So that you see, right,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people have an adjusted People haven't changed in the way

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that the world is. The second thing is because there's

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so few of us in the finance to services industry.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I was lucky to, you know, learn about the marketscy

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>or earlier, he said earlier, but then be on boards

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like a on corporation in Chicago for eighteen years and

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>watch Pat Ryan build that into extraordinary enterprise and see

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>how a successful financial and professional services business can grow

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and thrive and create all kinds of jobs and philanthropy

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and political empowerment and all aspects. You have, Pats a genius.

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But because there's so few of us in those spots.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>When we sit on a board of a hospital or

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a museum and university, when they put someone who's diverse

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>on those boards, it's often people who are not coming

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of financial services experience, and so they're

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there to think about maybe social justice issues, but not

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as comfortable raising their hand and pushing for economic justice.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And um, I mean Dr King used to talk about

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that all the time, that many progressive white Americans deplore

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>prejudice but except or ignore economic injustice. And so you

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have progressive leaders and people of coloring the board.

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We're willing to fight that sort of standard way of

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at the world. John Rogers Jr. Of Aurial Investments,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to get in touch. All thoughts and opinions welcome.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Vonnie Quinn on Twitter or email v Quinn

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. Bloomberg Opinion is also available, by

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, as a podcast on Apple, Spotify or wherever

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. A review of this week's primaries

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Now with Jonathan Bernstein. Jonathan, we had the extraordinarily interesting

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>primary that we knew it was going to be. Obviously,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not just Pennsylvania happened this week. We had Kentucky, Oregon, Idaho,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina. But what do we learn overall that

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>might be applicable to national campaigns. Well, certainly, one of

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that we're confirming out of these last set

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of primaries is that, you know, if you look at it,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in one sense, Republican voters are not zombies who do

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever Donald Trump says. We've had a series now of candidates,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the Idaho lieutenant governor who Trump endorsed, or

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Oz in Pennsylvania or j d Vance who won

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>his Senate nomination, of these candidates are getting about a

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>third of the vote. Now, we've had a couple who

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>did a little better, and incumbents the Trump endorses are

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>doing perfectly well as you would expect because they're incumbents.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know that means that a contested races, two

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>thirds of Republican voters are very comfortable ignoring or opposing

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what Donald Trump tells them to do. So that's something

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when people say it's Trump's party, he controls them. It's

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly not the case that all Republican voters are sort

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of in a cult of Trump and will do whatever

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he says. At the same time, you point out in

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>one of your recent columns that Trump is um is

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not exactly everything Trump says at the moment. It's this

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>incarnation of writing radicalism that changes over time. So if

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you were a Republican operative, how much would you be

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to what Trump is doing and saying? And

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>how much would you be paying attention to the two

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>thirds of Republican primary voters that are either ignoring some

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of what he says or all of what he says? Well, exactly,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the Republican part he has suddenly become

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a functional normal party in some of these cases. The

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>reason that Trump's candidates are only getting a third of

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the vote is because even more radical candidates are getting

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a big chunkle of vote. This goes back, as you said, historically,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to Joe McCarthy to Nixon, to Gingrich to the Tea Party,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the same in every incarnation, but there

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are deep connections between that strain of the Republican Party

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all the way going back to the ninety fifties or

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>before that, and the strain that is now the dominant

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>coalition within the Republican Party, and it's deeply dysfunctional, has

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>turned antidemocratic, and it's a huge problem for the nation.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>What happens in the cycle where you see that part

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of the party dominance ebbs. That's a good question and

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a good answer for that. Um I

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a good answer for why it comes

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and goes, but where it is now is extremely dangerous.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the nominee for governor of Pennsylvania, radical candidate

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>who Trump endorsed only at the last minute, so he

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>really rose to front runner status on his own. His

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>campaign is based on that he would if he's governor

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania certified the Republican candidate as the winner of

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the presidential election regardless of what the voters saying. Yeah,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and you sort of have to do a double take

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and wait, is that really where they are? And the

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes, that is really where a number of

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>these politicians have found themselves. And you know, the democracy

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>can't work if one of the political parties is essentially

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>anti democratic. Jonathan, what role did Kathy Barnett fulfill in

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the end um? This is the extremely radical candidate who

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had been in Washington and January six, etcetera, etcetera, and

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ran for Senate and wound up getting quite a bit

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of support in Republican talk radio, but then fell short

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the actual election, in part because Republican aligned media

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>turned against her in the last week. Trump also came

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out against her, but when she gave her post election statements,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>she singled out I believe Sean Hannity for coming after

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>her and for interfering in the election. Of course, that's

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>not interfering selection. That's how parties work, is there. You know,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>party actors weigh in on on elections. It's unusual to

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>have party aligned media at such a central portion of

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the party so important to who picks which candidate. But

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially where the Republican Party is now, and that's

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that they've become so radical, and

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that they are willing to nominate people like the candidate

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for governor who are probably lousy candidates who may well

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>lose an election that Republicans could win, but that as

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>long as it's a good product you in the Republican marketplace,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>in the conservative marketplace, that's fine with them. They're making

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>money off of it. It's starry telling that the Senate

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>primary between Dr Oz David Warmick, obviously Kathy Ornett was

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in there as well, ended up being so close. Does

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it say anything about the amount of money that's being spent.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>It does. Two of the candidates spent a lot of

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>money and a lot of very close and the third

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot less money that probably made her more

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to the last minute attacks. One of the reasons

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>she had a chance is because the two leading candidates

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>spent a ton of money attacking each other, both their

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>own campaigns and outside organized groups that played in the race,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and spent a lot of money attacking the other candidate.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So money matters, But it's never been as simple as

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>money determines the nomination Jonathan Bernstein there and next week

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>brings primaries in Georgia, Arkansas, and Alabama. We will be

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>back with Jonathan Bernstein for a review. It's known as

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>red gold. It's been feeding billions of people in places

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>such as India. Indonesia embargoed as export last months, and

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that pattern replicate across markets, with India banning

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>most exports of feet this week, sending prices of feet skyrocketing.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I asked David Fickling, what is this mysterious red gold.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Palm oil which people probably have heard a fair bit

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>about from some of the environmental campaigns. Most of the

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>world's palm oil is made in Indonesia and Malaysia, and

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>palm oil is the core of the global vegetable oil market,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which is it does not get a lot of attention,

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but vegetable oils are absolutely crucial for multiple ways. Now,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, palm oil is about of all vegetable oil.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So when you hear, for instance, in relation to the

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine, there was a lot of talk about

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is the biggest producer of sun flour oil and

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>those exports would end and that would be a problem.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>This is true, but sun Floril is two to five

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of global vegetable oil supply. Palm oil is being

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>oil is about everything else is about ten percent. So

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>palm oil is absolutely crucial. And also I think it's

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>important to understand it's a product with multiple different uses.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You can use it for food. It's an ingredient in

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of foods. That's a lovely mouth feel, frankly

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from ducts with palm oil in them. Um. It's also

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a very cheap cooking oil, and you'll see in countries

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like India it's the largest importer of palm oil. It's

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a good value cooking all. It's not particularly healthy, but

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a very cheap sort of calories we look at

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been reading that Indian street vendors have to actually

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>steam at the moment because of a lack of palm

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>oils that are not able to fry their food exactly.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is an interesting thing in the aspect of

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>global nutrition and hunger. Like I said, if you look

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at the calories that you get from a kilogram, for instance,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of cereal staples of wheat or rice, the calories from

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>vegetables are about thirty cheaper than that, and the calories

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>from sugar are about cheaper than the starchy staples. So

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason things like fat and sugar are so crucial

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to nutrition in lower income countries is that is the

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cheapest sort of calories out there. And this is one

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons. I mean, actually going back to Pakistan,

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Pakistan has um some of the highest and fastest rising

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>rates of things like type two diabetes of anywhere in

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. And you're seeing this transition in a lot

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of lower middle income countries from under nourishment problems of

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>proportion of people being overweight, being substantially hard in the

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>proportion of people underweight. And that's not unconnected to the

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that these are the cheapest calories that are out there.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a phenomenal thing. I did not know that at all,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually that's it's a pretty tragic in fact.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, without this palm oil, these

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>populations are also in trouble and they're not getting the

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>palm oil or it's it's the prices inflated. Explained to us,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Yeah, this is where we come back

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to Indonesia and we come back again to this issue

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of import dependence in the mid two thousands, Indonesia was

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at the rising price of crude oil and it's

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>growing dependence on imports of crude oil, and did very

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to what you see in the US, saying well,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the solution to this is we blend in some biofuel.

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is also there may be environmental benefits to this,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>although there's question marks around that which we can we

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>can come to later. So there have been blending mandates

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very similar to the blending mandates that you see in

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the US. Here in Australia where I live, there's a

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of blended fuel as well, for blending in a

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>rising proportion of palm oul derived biodiesel into into road fuel,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and at present thirty percent of road fuel has to

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be derived from palm bio diesel. Now that's a problem

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.479
<v Speaker 1>because the capacity of the palm oil plantations to supply

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this is fairly limited. And although transport fuel is a

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly small source of palm oil demand at this point

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe like fifteen percent of the total, whereas goes to food,

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the bit that's growing faster, and in Indonesia it's

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>growing fastest due to a government mandate. There's no way

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>around the blending mandate. So if you look for the

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>past few years back to about more than half of

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the growth of palm ol demand globally has been Indonesian

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic demands, and that's putting pressure on the whole sector.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>The Indonesia has essentially put an embargo on exports of

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>palm oil and palm al derivatives altogether. Prices have risen

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>very fast over the last three years. That's pushing up

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the prices of cooking oil from palm oil in Indonesia.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a political problem for Indonesia. In an attempt to

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>push down those prices, you have this export embargo, but

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of course that pushes the price pressure onto other countries,

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly as as I said, India, the biggest importer of

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>palm oil, which is ultimately sort of cutting nutritional calories,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not the highest quality nutritional calories, but raising the cost

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of those calories to Indians. All of this is feeding inflation.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess we see this with a of fuels, but

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>one country can feed inflation around the entire world, to

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the point of austin governments absolutely. And you can think

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of Indonesia in relation to palma or Indonesia, Malaysia certainly

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they are the opeque of palm oil. You know, they control,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact a much more substantial share of the palm

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>oil market and the vegetable market as a whole OPEC plus.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Even if you put all the other economies that you know,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Russia in that did account for barely fifty percent of

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>global crude oil supply, Indonesia and Malaysia put them together,

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's six plus of vegetable oil supply. Is there a substitute, David?

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously sunflower oil at least coming from Ukraine.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a problem, you know, in the

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>near future. And as you say, it's only a tiny

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>present of oil globally. But is there a substitute for

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>palm oil. I'm going to sound like a bit of

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a broken record here, but it's a little bit similar

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to Pakistan. I think the solution is renewables and electrification.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Electric vehicles in Indonesia, actually they're running costs are substantially

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>cheaper than internal combustion engine vehicles. That's despite the fact

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that Indonesia very heavily subsidizes fuel and bio fuel. The

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>problem is the infrastructure is not there. The government had

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a target by one that they would have a hundred

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and seventy thousand charging stations. In fact, they're only a

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty eight um, so no zeros afterward, It okay

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>against a hundred and seventy You know, if you have

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a look at a country like India. India has made

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>great strides around two and three wheelers, scooters and rickshaws

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to electrify that fleet and is moving quite fast, not

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>moving fast enough. But the point is if you look

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>at India, it's energy production is not the cleanest. It's

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the world's biggest uses of coal in the grid,

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're seeing a fast increase in renewable production and crucially,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>electrification of the road sector is moving at a fair pace.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And you see this in China as well, another country

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, very dependent on imports of petroleum. If you

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>power your road sector with a large and rising share

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicles, and you power your grid with a

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>rising share of domestically produced energy, ideally for climate reasons,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that should be renewable energy. But in the case of

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>India China, a lot of that is still coal, but

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it will still actually have a less of a climate

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>impact of footprint and petroleum because of the efficiencies of

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. You do that and you reduce the dependence

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on imported petroleum, and you reduce the dependence on bio

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>fuel which really should not be going into road vehicles

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>where there is a good alternatives. Now, well, that sounds

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's quite a long term plan. So just to

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>answer for is then why is it called red gold

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>palm oil. It's fantastically profitable for some of the sort

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of lowest income constituency groups in Indney here in Malaysia,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is the reason. You know, I talk about

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a biofield industrial complex in Indonesia similar

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to what you have with corn ethanol in the US.

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of rural votes in palmer production.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Small holders account for more of production. All of those

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>people vote, and these are people who really need the

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>income from it. That's one of the things that makes

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this hard thing to break. There was an interesting study

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>last year that looked at mayoral elections in Indonesia and

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.479
<v Speaker 1>it found that in the run up to a mayor election,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when palmer prices are high, you see an eighteen percent

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rise in deforestation. And that's essentially because they argue mayors

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are sort of loosening some of the regulations against deforestation

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to win votes in the election. It's it's popular. Bear

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in mind with Indonesia, there are some big elections coming up.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing palma prices at a record. The world,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>i think, clearly is hoping that we've seen the end

0:28:55.200 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the expansion of palmer plantations and deforestation. One these

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>plantations are established there by a fuel is pretty good

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in climate terms, that sort of six or seventy less

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>than petroleum. But if you cut down rainforest to build

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a new plantation, the emissions work out is roughly twice

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what they are from petroleum. So what the world needs

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to do at this point is to maximize the yield

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from his palmer plantations that have already been established. But

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what we can't afford to do is increase the area

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that's planted. But looking at the politics of it, looking

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at the economics of it, at these high prices, I

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to bet that deforestation has ended. David Fickling there,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we're now choosing to exit all conversations. Not with you, though,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Do get in touch. I'm at Bonney Quinn on Twitter

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or email v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. We're produced

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>by Eric mollow Till next time on Neoomberg Opinion. I

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean when it happened.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a sudden jolt in our submarine crashed on

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the sea floor. We were in total darkness. That's Dr

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>de Jona Figaroa, a marine biologist and STEM teacher, talking

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about a deep sea dive. She'll never forget. It's funny.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, I was afraid of the ocean,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and there I was, two miles below the surface. But

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as a scientist, you prepare for that using our training.

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>In a little creativity, we fixed the sub and finished

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>our experiments. The dive was just too important. Every dive

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>gives us glimpses at thinks. Few people ever get to

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>see blowing creatures, fiery undersea volcanoes. When we got back

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to the surface, I kissed the ground and called my mom.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, but you know what, I wouldn't trade that

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>dive for anything. Dr Figaroa uses her passion for STEM

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to discover new things and make the world a better place.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>She can Stem, so can you check out she can

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Stem for more stories and inspiration. A message from the

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>AD Council