WEBVTT - What Does the Antifa Executive Order Mean for Free Speech?

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>As media. Hey everyone, it's James here. We promised that

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we would get you something on the changes or lack

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thereof after Donald Trump's series of executive orders targeting certain groups,

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and we reached out to a lawyer, Moe, who is

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic lawyer, and we asked her into you them.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They said they had just done an interview with Final

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Store Radio, which is an excellent show, and they suggested

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that I take listen to that. I took listen to that,

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a fantastic interview and I don't

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>think as much as that we can add to it.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to re air that interview in full.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I would add to it is that

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there have been a number of cases recently where grand

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>juries have not returned an indictment. That's relatively rare, but

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing that more frequently, and that just enforces

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>everything that Moe says here, which is that at this

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>time we still have sep of powers, and at this

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>time the executive cannot simply make law. One still has

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to be prosecuted according to a statute by a district

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>attorney or a USA attorney. Right they president cannot just

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>make law in this instance pertaining to the First Amendment

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by executive order, that doesn't mean that they will not

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be harassment. And as you're here here, those two are

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>distinct things, and I think MO gives an excellent outline

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on how we should think about and conceive this moment

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in American history. So, without any more of me taking

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>your time, this is an excellent interview that bursted with MO.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoy it, and if you would like

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to check out Final Store Radio, you can do so

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>using the link that I will put below this episode.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Could you please introduce yourself for the audience with any name, pronouns, location,

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>or other contexts that would help us understand who you are.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Good morning. I'm more a Meltzer Cohen. Everybody calls me MO.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>My pronouns are they are MO. I'm an adultists and

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>educator and an attorney in New York. Primarily I represent

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>people who are arrested in the course of justice struggles

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and do advocacy for incarcerated people and movements.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So we're here to talk about the recent White House

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 2>statements following the assassin I mean, I mean following the

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 2>reelection of Trump, but more recently the assassination of Charles Kirk,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Can you talk about what.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Legally changed with the executive order of September twenty second

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of this year or yesterday? Is from when we're recording

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>this National Presidential Security Memo number seven titled Countering Domestic

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. Again, it came out on

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>September twenty fifth. What changed with those Well.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Before I answer that question, the first thing I want

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>to say is nothing that I say on this program

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>is legal advice is in information. If you want legal advice,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I vigorously encourage you to have a privileged conversation with

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>a human attorney who is admitted to practice in your jurisdiction.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>As to your overall question, what changed legally is essentially nothing.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the top level takeaway here is that these

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>executive orders are frightening. They are a frightening contribution to

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>an already dangerous political discourse, and they may very well

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>end up being quite disruptive to left movements, including I

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>think primarily centrist liberal movements. But nothing that was legal

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>last week is illegal this week, certainly not because of

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>those statements, and the state cannot prosecute you for things

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>that were legal when you did them. So yeah, I

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 3>mean I can't see the future, but as of right now,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the law and the constitution have So if this administration

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>wants to in any meaningful legal way designate anyone, any

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>group as domestic terrorists, they can change the law, which

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>is not going to be quick or easy, or they

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>can dispense with the law. But under the current legal regime,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>there is no mechanism that would make it illegal to

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>be and to whatever that means, or to hold anti

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 3>fascist values, or to assemble or to petition the government.

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 3>And you know, to be clear, not that doing any

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>of those things or being any of those things are

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>necessarily effective at creating social change right now, but my

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 3>point really is they're not illegal.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Just to sort of throw this back your way, So

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>there was when you were responding to that, it made

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>me think of there's a veteran who lost a bunch

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 2>of his property during the Aleen hurricane that is about

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>a year ago hit this region. He was recorded, like

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>he went pretty viral, calling out and shouting down a

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>state politician who had a like public meeting here in

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the area, just saying there's been like total like lack

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 2>of support after the storm, and here are all the

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 2>needs and you're just allowing politician this sort of thing.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The same man, right after the executive order that Trump

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>made about burning US flags, went out and burned one

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 2>across from the White House and then he got arrested

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>for it. Like, I thought that there was a Supreme

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Court decision back in the eighties that said it's not

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>actually illegal to burn a flag. So does that make

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>his executive orders now law?

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>No, there is a Supreme Court decision. It's called Texas d. Johnson,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 3>and it is still law. And in fact, after Texas d. Johnson,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Congress actually tried to make a federal statute criminalizing burning

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>the American flag and it was found unconstitutional. It is

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:15.239
<v Speaker 3>astonishing and illuminating that that man was arrested for burning

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>an American flag, which is absolutely constitutionally protected conduct. I

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 3>will say, I'm not sure what he was actually charged with.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Right If he was charged with, you know, creating a

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>fire hazard, I suppose that, apart from the fact that

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 3>it's clearly First Amendment retaliation, I suppose that you could

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>be criminally charged with creating a fire hazard in a

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>public place or something like that, but no flag burning

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 3>remains protected regardless of what the President or Congress says

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>about it. It would take either an amendment to the

0:06:55.160 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Constitution or a very serious change and Supreme Court jurisprudence

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to make five burning illegal.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, so this is the distinction I'd love for

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>us to get back to in a moment between like

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>legality versus what, you know, the sort of like box

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>that that powers decide to put a thing into. Like

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I know, I've I've definitely been detained not for being

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>an annoyance to the cops, but within my legal rights.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>But they'll say, ah, but your shoes untied on a

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday whatever, and then waste my time.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about that, And because I do want to

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>talk with more specificity about these specific executive orders and

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>statements and also about what legal mechanisms do exist that

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>are and can be and have long been used to

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 3>surveil and disrupt and target the left. But actually, before

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>we do that, why don't we talk about sort of

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 3>some of the categories that are playing in playing here

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 3>and be really clear about definitions or at least understand

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 3>that there are differences between these categories, right, because there

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 3>is a difference between the law and political discourse. And

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>there is a difference importantly between law and power. And

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>there's certainly at least some daylight between the legal constraints

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 3>on state power and the state's power to ignore those constraints.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 3>And then I think what will be significant to this

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>discussion is there is a significant difference between antifa, which

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 3>is a set of practices or beliefs that are not

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>necessarily even all that well defined, and what this administration

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 3>refers to when it uses or deploys the word antifa.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And there is yet more difference between the booking man

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that is being invoked by that and the individuals and

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 3>organizations that the administration actually intends to target. There's a

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 3>difference between political targeting, surveillance, disruption, and prosecution, right, those

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.239
<v Speaker 3>things are all different, And there's a difference between prosecution

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and conviction. And there is an important difference between someone's

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 3>political beliefs and associations which are and remain protected by

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the First Amendment, and politically motivated conduct that means illegal.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>So you know, executive orders and these kinds of statements

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 3>on national security are policy statements. They don't in and

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 3>of themselves make things happen, they don't in and of

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 3>themselves change the law, and an executive order that is

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>inconsistent with the constitution or the existing law at least

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>ought to be unenforceable.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but yeah, but recognizing that that distinction, you know,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>cops are going to cop, investigators are going to investigate,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>and those processes are disruptive for people whose lives they're affecting.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>They can affect your job prospects, they can affect your

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 2>housing stability, they can affect whether or not some unhinged

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>person decides to attack you because they've heard some conspiracy

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>theory about you. But so that distinction of like, well,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 2>you might get exonerated by a court after you've been

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>held in pre trial for a year, I guess that

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is an important distinction, right, because it means you're not

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>spending you know, an extra thirty years or twenty years

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>or whatever behind bars.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>With the terrorism enhancement.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean that is also called comfort. I'm really

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 3>not trying to be dismissive. I think it's important to

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>recognize what these distinctions are and the primarily because I

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>want people to understand what exactly we need to be

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>prepared for and what we need to be worried about

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and what tools we have and what tools are effective

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>at resisting what's coming down the pike. And in order

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 3>to do that, we need to know what's coming down

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the pipe. We need to know who actually has power

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 3>in this situation. The fact that an executive order doesn't

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>change the law does not mean an executive order will

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 3>not result in a lot more state repression, or that

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>it won't disrupt movements or even ruin lives. It doesn't

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 3>mean that Trump is not going to accomplish the thing

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 3>that I think he's actually trying to accomplish here in

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the immediate short term, which is broadcasting to his base

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that non state action against people identified as or perceived

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 3>to be part of the despised group you know is

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>desirable by this administration will be condoned by this administration.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that is important to recognize. Saying that it

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change the law does not mean it isn't dangerous.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I just want to be very precise about I think

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the ways in which it is likely to be dangerous

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 3>and some of the ways that it might not might

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>not be. And again I'm not trying to be dismissive

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>but state repression exists all the time. State repression against

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>leftists and anarchism in particular has been ongoing the whole time.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>This is not a Trump thing. And in fact, I

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 3>think it's important to note that the executive who's probably

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>most responsible for having laid this groundwork is Biden, who

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 3>set forth a policy strategy that focused on funding the

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 3>federal targeting of what at that point he was calling

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>political extremists, which was a label that was being applied

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 3>to groups on the left as well as neo Nazis

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and all right groups. So this administration has already been engaged,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>and not just this administration, right, we have centuries at

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 3>this point of targeted disruption of left movements. The way

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 3>that it's currently being rationalized is a little bit different,

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 3>the way that it's being broadcast normalized is a little

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 3>bit different, but it's I will say, I don't think

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 3>this is actually anything all that new or different, And

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the difference in how dangerous it is is one of

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 3>scale maybe rather than it's a difference in scope rather

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>than nature.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think that's an important distinction. I

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>think that like sometimes people in the center and even

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 2>sometimes people on the left, will look at in particular

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>things that Trump administrations do because they are obfuscatory, they're

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>like confusing, and they're bombastic, and there's a part of

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>us that that we'll say like, no, but that's that's

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 2>not what's actually happening. That's not what actually was the

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 2>motivation for that person or like that person voted you know,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Republican in the last election.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 2>And so I think that that distinction that you're making

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 2>of you know this, this may not this may be

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>like an approach to motivate the base, it may prove

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 2>not to be legally like standing, but that doesn't mean

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>that it doesn't have an impact on people. Yeah, and

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 2>what we should be able to looking for out of

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 2>this is a projection of not only like a call

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to action or red meat for the base or whatever,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>but also like a clear proposition of that's meant to

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>chill us and chill some society, that these are the

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>intentions moving forward. This is the narrative, and this is

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the story that they're going to be going with.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Right absolutely, And I think it is important to point

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>out right now we're seeing a lot of people pointing

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 3>out the hypocrisy and sort of the fact that these

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>rationales are really untethered from factual reality. And I suppose

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>that's true and important to note, but pointing out the

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>hypocrisy is not going to be particularly useful. I mean,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:51.119
<v Speaker 3>I think it's part of the point, right. Manipulating the facts,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>making narrative claims that are totally unsupportable, and muddying the

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 3>waters in this really fundamental way is part of the project.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>There was a German jurist I guess who became the

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>highest jurist during the Nazi regime in Germany, but continued

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>writing theory like was writing it before as a member

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of the Conservative Revolution that they called it, and then

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 2>afterwards he survived the war and continued living in Germany

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>writing Karl Schmidt, who talks a lot about like the

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>limits of liberal approaches towards legality and liberal governance, with

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>a belief that it makes sense to push it to

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>its limits and beyond break it and recognize that governance

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>is about the imposition of power and the sheltering of

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>those who are under the controller or in the protected

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>community of the state, with a consideration of war through

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the state's power against internal enemies as well as external enemies.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>And this is the devil's bargain that we make. It's

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 2>like Hobbes on steroids. And it feels like a lot

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>of the stuff that the Heritage Foundation and Project twenty

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty five has been pushing was that they have this.

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I know that there are some theocrats in that movement.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>There's the unitary executive theory that a lot of them

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>have been pushing, and they'll play with this idea like

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration will play with this identity of the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>King King Trump or whatever the Dawn as it were,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>like making these executive decisions and being unbeholden to anything else.

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>And they've actually been, like you know, saying to courts,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you can't stop us from deporting these peoples who with

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>unsafe third country whatever, stop us. I wonder if, like

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if you have any comments on this, if

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm coming out of left field or what.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I'll say it is for Karl Schmidt as

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>opposed to the Heritage Foundation, he was at least intellectually honest. Yeah,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 5>We are in this moment where they're trying to normalize

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 5>what we Schmidt would have called like a state of exception,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 5>where they're sort of unbridled executive power, the sort of

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 5>suspension of any constraints on state power.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Right. And it's funny because I've been in conversations over

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 3>the last months where and talking with a bunch of

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 3>my friends, none of them are particularly enamored of the

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>current legal regime, and we're talking about how dangerous it

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>is that the administration is dispensing with the rule of law,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, And it's sort of amusing for a bunch

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 3>of anarchists to be like, oh, no, the rule of

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>laws collapsing. But when I'm talking about the rule of

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 3>law in this way, I'm really talking about constraints on

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 3>state power, and those are what's collapsing. And that's exactly

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>what Schmidt envisioned and argued for Frankly, and I do

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>think we're seeing that. I think one of the things

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 3>that I've noticed in some of these eos, especially the

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>couple of statements from the last few days, is he

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>keeps talking about things like love of God and Christian

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>anti Christian sentiment, which is I mean, you know, this

0:17:54.960 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 3>is entirely incompatible with the First Amendment, which provides no

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 3>state shall establish our religion, right. I mean, we really

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 3>are outside the contours of recognized you know, legal norms,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>constitutional norms, and I think a lot of this stuff

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 3>is functioning and is meant to normalize this kind of

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>discourse and to inject it not only into the exercise

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 3>of government power, but to normalize it in terms of

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>what people understand to be legitimate legal discourse.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Kind of shifting a bit like let's get into some

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of the implications of this. So if it hasn't changed law,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>but we recognize that practices and culture are being shifted.

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I've heard of a bunch of people getting fired and

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>getting docxing attention. There's a website now I think called

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 2>like who Killed Charlie Kirk? The People who Killed Charlie

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Kirk or something like that, and maybe an app. It's

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the post Charlie Kirk assassination version of

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Canary emission. Does this mean that police are coming after

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 2>people for sharing memes? Is that happening? Is that what's

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>happening in these cases?

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean police have always been coming after people for

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 3>sharing memes. I would say I get calls at least

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 3>every month from people who have been visited by federal

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 3>agents because they said something on the Internet that was

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 3>upsetting to somebody else and then they reported it, and

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the FBI is just following up on a tip. But

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 3>that said, this doesn't vitiate the First Amendment. Let me

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 3>say that in human language, thank you. This does not

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 3>undermine the First Amendment. The First Amendment still exists, and

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 3>all of the legal framework around having the right to

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>say things as long as those things are not true threats,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 3>that still exists. So it is not unusual for people

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 3>to be targeted or monitored or visited by law enforcement,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>but typically that stuff doesn't actually really go anywhere. I

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>am concerned about people being subject to doxing and having

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 3>negative social consequences and fallout from this kind of stuff,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and it certainly is you know, can be life ruining. Again,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean to trivialize the effects of this kind

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of retaliation social retaliate, but it is not the same

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 3>thing as a criminal prosecution or a criminal conviction. It's

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>a different set of mechanisms. Now, one thing that I

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>do think is interesting is that these eos and the

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 3>statement that came out on the twenty second and yesterday

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>particularly identify certain modes of that kind of social conduct

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that you're talking about, like doxing swatting rag, which is

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>making false report of like an ongoing violent crime, so

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>that a swap team shows up and raids somebody's.

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Home, which can be deadly right, this is very.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Dangerous and interestingly to me anyway, there are these specific

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 3>behaviors that are identified and condemned in those statements, and

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>those specific behaviors are largely tools of the right. People

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 3>on the left are not notably interested in sending law

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 3>enforcement to someone's house. So there is a perverse way

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 3>in which this may end up being sort of protective,

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 3>I suppose, because I think it would be very difficult

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>for the government to go after the people who are

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 3>exposing ICE agents, which again is not illegal right now.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Even if it were to become illegal, it isn't right now,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and it would be very hard for them to go

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 3>after those folks and not also go after the folks

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>who are running that silly website about people who say

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 3>something mean about Charlie Kirk.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess to me, And this is the speculation

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>outside of like legal advice or anything. Not that we're

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>giving legal advice, but outside of like the legal framework.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Definitely not giving legal advice.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it kind of points to a thing that

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>already this this hypocrisy or this difference between what it's

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 2>called when one party does it versus what it's called

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>when another party does it, like outside of the fact

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 2>that the government gets to do what it wants to

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 2>until the government stops itself from doing a thing. I mean,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>it feels like it's a part of the creation of

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a differentiated subjectivity. Like there's the subject of the state

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>that falls under the values that are being attacked Christianity, whiteness, heteronormativity,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 2>these like patriotism in these certain ways versus the people

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that are doing these same things but are corrupt, are dirty,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>are outside our internal enemies, are Soros funded. However we

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 2>want to like yeah that, but yeah, I guess that's

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>not I mean, that's this is nothing new.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 4>It's just an amplification of that same right.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very much. And you know what is changing a

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit, although all of these threads have been present,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 3>is that this administration is rationalizing this particular kind of

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 3>targeting with respect to in particular Palestine solidarity movements, gender

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 3>nonconforming people and what they're calling anti buzz. So you know,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing we've been see congressional investigations, the allocation of

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 3>funds to federal law enforcement, purging not just individuals, but

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>whole agencies that the administration feels are insufficiently aligned with

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>its priority replacing federal law enforcement. That and I mean

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>ranging from FBI agents on the ground to doj with

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 3>people who will enthusiastically and blindly pursue these priorities, and

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 3>using a lot of resources to target the nonprofit text

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>status and funding of groups identified as being aligned with

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>any of the disfavored movements. And one of the things

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that they're doing is kind of it's this real spaghetti,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, throwing everything at it, and it's very overwhelming.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 3>It's overwhelming for movement infrastructure, it's overwhelming for legal for

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 3>people on the ground, and it's all happening at once,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's all being it's mutually compounding, it's

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 3>mutually reinforcing, it's demoralizing, and in particular, the stuff that's

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 3>happening with immigration is so devastating. And because immigration is

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 3>so wholly under the control of the executive that is

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 3>an area where he's able to sort of make a

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>policy and make it so and have it be carried

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>out by FIAT, and he has made his own private

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>army with ICE. And I think one of the effects

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that I in just in my observation, that that has

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 3>had is that people see that happening and assume that

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 3>he has that level of control over everything else. And

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I do want to point out again it's absolutely devastating

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 3>to see what's happening in the immigration space, but in

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 3>fact he does not have that level of control over

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the rest of government and over non immigration laws, and

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really important to remember.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seems about pushing boundaries and experimenting. There's a

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of people that have talked and not to get

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 2>too far down the road with this, but like with

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the like attempt to normalize sending national guard or sending

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 2>active military to different states, or federalizing national guards to

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 2>be present from different states in these places. Almost like

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 2>if it's constant and overlapping enough, then eventually just military

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>being on the streets, generally rousting houseless folks is going

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to be a normal thing.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Man, I'm in New York. There's military people in all

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 3>sub price like that got very normalized post nine to

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 3>eleven in certain places, and so you know, again this

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>is not to say that it's okay, but it isn't new.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So take it back to antifa. Sure, Antifa, Antifa. How

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is the administration identifying Antifa and the left and what

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 2>are they actually dismantling and attacking. I'm thinking, like, let's

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>talk about bilfunds or like lgbt QI, a youth advocacy

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 2>organization's secularist groups, like yeah, what's going on?

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well this is this is where things get really fun.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Most of the groups that are actually being targeted are

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 3>not remotely related to antifa. George Soros is not Antifa,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 3>the various legal defense funds are not Antifa. Antifa is

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the rationale, but not the reality. So one of the

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>interesting issues here is that a significant group of the

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 3>people who really need to be very worried are people

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:10.239
<v Speaker 3>who work in the nonprofit sector, in extremely normal and

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 3>liberal community advocacy organizations and NGOs. And these are people

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>who have nothing whatsoever to do with Antifa, by any

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 3>stretch of the imagination, who are being attacked, whose funding

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 3>is being attacked, who are primarily I would say at risk,

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 3>not because they have engaged in anything approaching unlawful conduct.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>And frankly, I think the biggest risk for many of

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 3>those people is the anticipatory compliance of their funders. We

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>have seen a really similar thing happen with universities, where

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 3>universities have been targeted by the state, by the federal

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 3>government and have been accused in particular of anti Semitism,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>and frankly, I think it would be the work of

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>an afternoon for general counsel at any of these universes

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 3>cities to point out that in fact, there is a

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 3>legally established difference between anti Semitism and anti Zionism, that

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 3>criticism of the nation state of Israel is in fact

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 3>entirely legally distinct from criticism of or threats against Jewish people,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 3>And if any of these universities actually bothered to challenge

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 3>these allegations, I think that they would win in court

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>on the law. And what we're seeing instead is the

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>universities declining to challenge these allegations, settling out of court,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>paying large amounts of money to the allegedly aggrieved parties,

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>and capitulating in ways that are unnecessary, unwarranted, not legally justified, irrational,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and seed more ground, not just more ground than is

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>legally called for, but more ground than is even being

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>asked for in these cases. And so you know, this

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>is to me one of the great dangers of normalizing

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 3>these discourses is that these large institutions are engaged in

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 3>acts of self preservation that actually undermine civil society, when

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 3>even a small amount of courage would go a very

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 3>long way to preserving it.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we also sort of saw this in the

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>early days of the administration, with legal firms that had

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>brought challenges to the administration in the past backing down

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>or refusing to offering their fealty or whatever to the administration.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And we're seeing it now also with some of these

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 2>large media corporations silencing some of their pundits or whatever,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>or in some cases, I mean it's clearly quid pro

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 2>quo because they've got, you know, a merger that's being

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>discussed by the FCC at the moment.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, what we've seen, though, we have seen a lot

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 3>of that sort of craven capitulation. But what we've also

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 3>seen is when we fight, we win. Now, I'm not

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to be a Pollyanna about this. What I'm trying

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 3>to say is the demands that are being made by

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>this particular administration are actually so far beyond the pale

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>that based on our legal regime as it currently is,

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 3>when we fight, we win, and so I think it

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 3>is very worth reminding people that, however imperfect the law, is,

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 3>the current state of the law forbids much of what

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>this administration is doing, and it is actually worth standing

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>up to it. There are other groups of people similarly

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 3>who are not related to Antifa, and one of those

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 3>groups is coasters, like including boomers, who are on Facebook

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and Twitter making jokes about how the right it's so

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 3>hip critical, and those people are getting targeted, and I

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 3>would just gently remind everyone that the First Amendment does

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>still exist and that the solution to repression is not

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 3>self censorship but courage. And also, as I have said

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>many times, including to you on this program, discretion is

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the better part of valor, and not everything needs to

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>be said on the internet, So maybe think about it

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 3>before you post something that you would not like to

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>hear read back to you by a humorless prosecutor. Then

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we have these other groups that are engaged in exposing

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement, which I referred to a minute ago, and

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the groups that are you know, exposing ice

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 3>are definitely going to be targeted have already been targeted

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>for that activity, but it sort of remains to be

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 3>seen how that can happen while also protecting Canary mission.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Right then, we have groups that are being perceived as

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 3>or identified as Antifa. Who are the people who are

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 3>like doing food not bombs and community gardening and cooperative

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>bookstores and prisoner letter writing, all of which are extremely

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 3>First Amendment protected activities and all of which are not

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 3>only likely to be highly surveiled, are already highly surveiled.

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 3>And this is the group of people who I think

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 3>are actually probably most used to this and best prepared

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 3>for it, and also might be really hard to prosecute

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 3>effectively because they're not doing crimes and you know, like

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the NGOs that we were talking about. The biggest point

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of exposure for all of these groups is likely to

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 3>be financial. We can certainly anticipate that the state is

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 3>highly interested in looking at all of our bank records,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to the extent that our bank records exist with all

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the money we have, right Like, we're all handing around

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the same staff of twenty singles to each other. But hey,

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 3>you know wirefraud. What I can say is that you know,

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 3>something like a bail fund, and you know, community support

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 3>funds do need to be very cautious. That has already

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 3>always been the case, and this is a really good

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 3>time to hire a CPA to go over your books

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and to make sure that you have kept really meticulous records,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that if you have raised money for something,

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 3>you have only used it for the thing that you

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 3>said it was going to be used for. And this

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>is once again something that largely is a feature of

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 3>far right organizing. Right. I don't know if you remember,

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 3>but Steve Bannon was actually prosecuted for wire fraud because

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 3>he was raising money to do something.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Build the wall, Build the wall.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 3>He was raising money to build the wall, but not

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 3>using it for that purpose, which is wirefraud. Right. So

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 3>if you run a bail fund, presumably you already know

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>that you have to be very careful about how you

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 3>raise that money and how you monitor and track and

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>use that money. So most of the people, I would say,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 3>the overwhelming majority of people who are sort of going

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 3>to be subject to this kind of monitoring A have

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>already been subject to it, and b haven't actually done

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 3>anything unlawful. And you know that doesn't mean this won't

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>be disrupted. It just means, look, I'm not naive enough

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 3>to say that your innocence will protect you, but it's

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 3>a good start. And then we have folks who maybe

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>actually do engage in unlawful conduct or revolutionary action, or

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 3>people about whom that claim could somewhat credibly be made.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's actually just a different a different group, right,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 3>And those things were illegal last week and they're illegal now,

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 3>and they're not more illegal because they're politically motivated. Right,

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Although you know there are terrorism enhancements and sentencing enhancements

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 3>and things like that, the fact is, like, you know,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 3>it can't be more illegal to spray paint Free Gaza

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 3>on the side of a building than it is to

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 3>spray paint I Love Trump on the side of a building. Right.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what whether or not this like pans out

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 2>in the courts, right is one thing. But I know

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 2>that like, say, for the library case that happened here

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 2>where people were arrested because some people were filming in

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>this like Palestine related workshop in a public library and

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they were asked to stop filming and then a scuffle

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>broke out and a phone got knocked to the ground

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and people got apparently dragged outside. Again, I was not

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 2>there for this, but like now the people are facing

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>like people who were in the crowd, who are not

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the people who were filming or facing charges of ethnic intimidation.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a very specific case in a different jurisdiction from

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 2>where you are practicing law. But it's not just about

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>like what's being charged against them isn't about assault per se.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>It's this enhanced, politically driven statement based on the rhetoric

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that's based on the politics.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 3>Right. Absolutely, And I'm glad you pointed that out because

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 3>I certainly do not want to suggest that politically motivated

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 3>prosecutions don't happen. They absolutely happen. These reset statements don't

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 3>change the way in which they happen, right, And there

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 3>are ways of targeting people for prosecution based on their politics,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and those have those are again not new. I think

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the point that I'm trying to make is that I

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>don't think this has changed substantively. Yeah, like the fact

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 3>that the President said Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 3>just doesn't really change the legal landscape. This has been

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the targeted surveillance of the left, whether you call it Antifa,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the Green scare, whether it's the Black Liberation Army.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 3>This has been a priority for decades of administrations. More

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and more legislation has been developed to criminalize garden variety

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 3>protest conduct. We saw that a lot around Standing Rock

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and BLM. More and more resources are allocated to testing

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 3>creative strategies for monitoring and criminalizing political activities. You know, again,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>state repression and the tools that are used in the

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>service of state repression are just not new. And the

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 3>fact that you put out these statements is maybe a

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>good reminder that we should be circums fact and aware

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 3>of repression and prepared to bear up under it.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 2>So is the RICO sixty one Atlanta case a model

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 2>for what we see moving forward at a federal level

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in relation to these domestic terrorism charges conspiracy, racketeering, the

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>focus on bail funds, and other abolitionist infrastructure, civil liberties organizations.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Section H of that September twenty fifth statement refers to

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the Attorney General pursuing quote, politically motivated terrorist acts such

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>as organizing docs and campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault,

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>destruction of property, threats of violence, and civil disorder like

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, those are all things that you know, they've

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 2>already got charges attached to them. It's just these are

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 2>now being framed within the framework of being terrorist acts.

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you said, like these practices of attacking

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>adjacent like supportive movement and civil society organs. It's not

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 2>in and of itself new, but it seems like the framing,

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 2>especially with the Atlanta case, where the prosecutors brought up

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning ernark like they gave a Merriam Webster

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Dictionary definition of anarchism and then said, all these people

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 2>fall under this umbrella because they all have this ideology.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Therefore they are a conspiracy. Is that what the administration

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 2>is trying to do? And is that different from what

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they've already done at a federal level.

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 3>So, first of all, I do think that that's very

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>likely that they will try. I think this is signaling

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 3>a real interest in that. I don't think that's particularly new,

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think that it's clearly being prioritized. So let's

0:38:54.000 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 3>talk about RICO. RICO, let's talk about RIGO. Briefly, is

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the Racketeer, Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and it was

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 3>enacted in I think nineteen seventy to go after the mob. Right,

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 3>it was to go after crime families, but it's been

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 3>used against so called gangs and other politically motivated prosecutions

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, and so RICO has really used

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 3>to kind of criminalize whole communities. But it requires that

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 3>an actual crime has happened. Right, association or ideology in

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 3>itself is not sufficient. So it requires an actual crime

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 3>has happened. And it also requires an quote an enterprise,

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 3>like a coordinated enterprise. And because the first Amendment for

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 3>text association and a large diffuse group of people sharing

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 3>values is not an enterprise, you know, I'm not sure.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 3>It's not a straightforward path to say we want to

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 3>use rego in a politically motiv motivated way and to

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 3>actually be able to have I'm sure this group under

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 3>a net. Right. That's like, you know, saying we want

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 3>to go after Antifa is like saying we want to

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 3>go after people who like cats. Right, there are people

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 3>who like cats, but they certainly aren't coordinating together. I

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 3>suppose that there are actually people who would say, like, yes,

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 3>I identify strongly with this set of values, but it's

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 3>not a membership organization, and it would I think be

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>very difficult to mount a prosecution or to mount a

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 3>successful prosecution on the basis of what are clearly First

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Amendment protected beliefs and associations. And there's pretty good law

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 3>on this point, actually, and it comes from an effort

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 3>to prosecute a bunch of anti abortion protesters under RICO

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 3>and the court said you can't do that. The fact

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 3>that there's a large group of people who happen to

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 3>believe the same things does not mean that they are

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 3>an enterprise. So look, get me wrong again, this would

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 3>be hugely disruptive, but it would be very difficult to

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 3>sustain an effective prosecution or obtain a conviction if there

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 3>was one competent investigator, prosecutor judge or jury member anywhere

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 3>along the way. But yes, hugely disruptive if if they

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 3>managed to do it. I would like to note something

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 3>about the stop coup City Rico. That's important. So first

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>of all, yay, those all those charges, those ricos were

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 3>dismissed for legal reasons of being utter bolts. And I

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>know that you know there's some concern that that will

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 3>be appealed, but I think it is worth noting and

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 3>celebrating that when we fight, we win. But sort of

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 3>more to the point in this context, I do want

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 3>to note that Georgia's RIGO statute is different from the

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 3>federal reco statute, and it's actually even worse than the

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 3>federal RICO statute, and it still couldn't be effectively used

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 3>in this way. And also federal RICO has often failed.

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Right efforts to use federal RICO in a politically motivated

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 3>way have also failed. So if you look up like

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the Ohio seven, which was a fairly early effort to

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 3>bring a politically motivated RICO that did not go great

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 3>for the government. So yeah, I think that's important to

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 3>note about RICO.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned this like FBI designation earlier, it had

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 2>been for a while. I think under I thought this

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 2>came up under Obama, but maybe it came up under

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Biden for the prosecution of January sixth. But anti government extremists,

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 2>which included militia movements and also anarchists, it's been shifted

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 2>to far left extremists in the verbiage of the DOJ

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and who they're pursuing. Anti law enforcement and anti conservative

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 2>attacks have been framed as you know, of considered effort

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 2>by far left extremists in the media, and also like

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 2>by these institutions as they're you know, moving forward before

0:42:57.920 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>they actually make any arrests or whatever, and through their

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>prossecutution sometimes using terms like you know, antifa or trantifa

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 2>or whatever sort of motivations they're giving. I also wonder

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 2>if you could say a thing specifically about this sort

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 2>of framing that is being given.

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Again, that is like.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Like I was thinking about this before more recent mass

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 2>shooting events that have happened, or before the hullabaloo around

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Kirk's assassination and the shooter the alleged shooters relationships

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 2>to other people, that there seems to be this concidered

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 2>effort around clinically framing and politically framing transness as a

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 2>mental health issue but also as a political extension of

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 2>woke gender ideology that's coming for your children. And it's like,

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 2>it's it's interesting because like, in order for people in

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of cases in the US to be able

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 2>to gain access to medical care that they desire or

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 2>need around maybe gender dysorio or some some other experience,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 2>they often have to use these like clinical terms for

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 2>what they are experiencing and why they need medication for it,

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and not faulting people for making that approach because you

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 2>need the medicine that you need.

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 4>But now this is.

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Being turned around and reframed as therefore, if people need

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 2>this stuff and they're making this argument, therefore they have

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>some sort of mental deficiency or some sort of issue

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.439
<v Speaker 2>which is being used in order to challenge people's right

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>to keep in bear arms under the Second Amendment, or

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 2>saying that people are like because of their transnits being

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 2>motivated towards this attacks like, I don't know if you

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 2>have anything to again, not exactly like, not exactly a

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 2>legal issue.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know if you have any observations.

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I guess when it comes down to it.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Just to be very clear, the DSM makes it very

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 3>clear that or that being trans is not a mental illness.

0:44:55.840 --> 0:45:02.720
<v Speaker 3>That gender dys for you is distress cause by discrepancy

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 3>between the assigned gender and your actual gender, which would

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 3>exist if any cisperson were being treated as a gender

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 3>that they didn't identify with right that would be a

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 3>distress that would arise for any person. I think that

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 3>there are real problems with the sort of clinicization or

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 3>medicalization of gender affirming care. But I do want to

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 3>be very clear that that does not have to and

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 3>does not formally or officially include pathologizing trans identity. That's

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 3>something that's being imputed and being imposed, but it has

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 3>no basis in clinical practice. Not that that necessarily matters

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 3>to the government, but I do think it's important to

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:54.280
<v Speaker 3>point that out. I think given that previous efforts to

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.959
<v Speaker 3>restrict gun ownership on the basis of previously diagnosed mental

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 3>illness have not been super successful, I don't know that

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 3>this one will be either. But again, this is an

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 3>issue of power and less an issue of law or

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 3>logical coherent legal philosophy.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So this term has been coming up a lot of

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, with Trump or the administration talking about domestic terrorists,

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot of pushback from the legal community

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 2>or from civil libertarians, saying, what the hell are you

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about? Can you talk about like what it means

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>to be called domestic terrorists? What changes that makes in

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 2>like how the law approaches he or how you can

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 2>be convicted?

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, gladly. So, at this point, what it means to

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 3>be called a domestic terrorist is actually nothing. There is

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 3>no legal procedure for designating a domestic terrorist group, for

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 3>designating a domestic group a terrorist organization, and given the

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 3>current law on the matter, even with this Supreme Court,

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be very, very difficult to change

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 3>the law in the way it would have to be

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 3>changed in order to make that designation. There are ways

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 3>to freeze the assets of a domestic group. There are

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 3>ways to posit or show a connection between a domestic

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 3>group and a designated foreign terrorist organization, which is a

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 3>real thing that has legal effect. There is a way

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 3>to financially designate a group or an individual, as you know,

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 3>having this kind of relationship to foreign terrorist organization or

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 3>an FTO. So, but there's no legal mechanism for designating

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a domestic terrorist group. That's not a thing. So this

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is a place where the government could simply dispense with

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 3>the law. But I do not think this is a

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 3>place where the government can use the law to create

0:47:55.400 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 3>a category of domestic terrorist organizations. Just to like explain

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 3>ftos a little bit, there is a category of organization

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 3>that are designated by the State Department as quote, foreign

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 3>terrorist organizations ftos are designated by the State Department, and

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 3>they are listed on the State Department website. Right, it's

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 3>not a secret who they are. You're not going to

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 3>suddenly find out that you know, you gave money that

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 3>to I don't know the Greek equivalent of the ACLU,

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and now it's you know, it turns out it's an FTO.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 3>There are certainly cases where the government has successfully claimed

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 3>that a connection between a domestic group and an FDO exists,

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 3>even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 3>And if you have a connection to an FTO, you

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 3>can be prosecuted for what's called material support for terrorism.

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's a very serious charge. It's a very frightening charge,

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and it does criminalize a lot of things that most

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 3>people understand to be protected by the First Amendment.

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:11.280
<v Speaker 3>It criminalizes providing things like medical care to certain groups.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 3>It criminalizes providing education or legal support to certain groups

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 3>that are designated foreign terrorist organizations. And frankly, this is

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the idea that underpins material support for terrorism charges is

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 3>offensive to many people because it does feel very much

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 3>incompatible with constitutional norms under the First Amendment. It's an

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 3>important thing to be aware of, but it would be

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 3>very surprising to me if the government were able to

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>successfully make broad claims connecting quote Antifa to foreign terrorist organizations.

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I was when you were saying that that had me

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 2>thinking a little bit about the Holy Land five case.

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to remember that example. I guess like

0:49:56.520 --> 0:50:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to belabor this. Can we talk about the distinction between

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 2>domestic terrorist organization, which is a classification that doesn't exist,

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 2>versus the charge of committing terrorism because people who get

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 2>terrorism enhancements at least like the Maryus Mason one example

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.399
<v Speaker 2>that comes to my mind, right, who is a member

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of cell that was associated with the Earth Liberation Front

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 2>like so that that person got over two decades in

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 2>prison based on being convicted of crimes that existed and

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>then getting enhancements based on the definition that those were terrorists,

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 2>amplifying the amount of time.

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Right. The difference is the difference between criminalizing conduct or

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 3>defining conduct as being terroristic, and criminalizing a group. The

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 3>First Amendment protects freedom of belief, association, and expression, and

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 3>that means that however much we might be targeted for

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 3>our beliefsciations, and expression, we cannot be prosecuted criminally for

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 3>anything besides our conduct our actions. And so there can

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 3>be terrorist offenses and enhancements for sentencing on the basis

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 3>of conduct that you are convicted of. If you engage

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 3>in certain illegal acts and a judge determines that those

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 3>acts were motivated by desire to do terrorism, that the

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 3>penalty for engaging in those acts can be enhanced. But

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 3>you cannot designate a group of belief or an expression

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 3>as being a crime in itself unless there is conduct

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 3>associated with it, because we don't criminalize people's identities. I mean,

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 3>we do criminalize people's identities, but it's impermissible to prosecute

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:01.919
<v Speaker 3>people for having those identities.

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess I have note as I understand the terrorism

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 2>enhancements that the prosecutors are pursuing in the Luis gim

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Angioni case have been dropped.

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Is a thing that I heard, yes.

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Which I mean at the same time, this is referenced

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 2>in one of those documents that came out from the

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 2>White House as being a terroristic act. So yes, what

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 2>do the courts know? Okay, thank you for making that

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 2>distinction more clear. All right, So how might those of

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 2>us on the left or in justice movements as you

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 2>stated it, conceive of the state's view of us? How

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 2>do we rally support for our identities and positions, what

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 2>are some good practices understanding, Like, having had this conversation,

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the terrain on which we're operating.

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, So I guess what I'd say about best practices

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 3>is understand whether you are at risk, even if you're

0:52:55.760 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 3>somebody who has not traditionally been at risk, even if

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 3>you're someone who has lived your whole life believing that

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 3>the system works and that this particular administration is like

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 3>an aberration. I would say, Look, this administration is preoccupied

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 3>with the funding streams for very mainstream liberal causes, and

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the fact that it's sort of lumping everything under the

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 3>banner of antifa, you know, is probably a big surprise

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 3>for some of these groups, like you know, suburban white

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 3>moms against guns or whatever. But they are very focused

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:32.879
<v Speaker 3>on things like wirefraud and money laundering and stripping nonprofits

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of their tax status if there's even a whisper of

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the possibility that those nonprofits are pursuing goals that are

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 3>in any way antagonistic to state interests. So, if you

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 3>are in a group that has a bank account or

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 3>raises money, the best practices here haven't changed. Keep very

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 3>precise track of your funds. If you raise money, use

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 3>it for that they knew said you were going to

0:53:58.080 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 3>use it for. Have an accountant, you know, be very

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 3>very careful about your money. And again, the best practices

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of us also haven't changed. This is

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 3>political discourse that reaffirms what we already know about targeted surveillance,

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 3>and we have for a long time known how to

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 3>deal with this. If you are approached by law enforcement,

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 3>remember that the Fifth Amendment protects your right not to

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.800
<v Speaker 3>speak to them. You have no obligation to speak to

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement. It is a crime to light of federal agents,

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and that means that it is safest not to say anything. Besides,

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm represented by counsel. Please leave your name a number,

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 3>and my lawyer will call you. There is truly never

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 3>a compelling reason to speak to federal agents before consulting

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 3>with an attorney. The Energy Anti Repression Hotline can be

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 3>reached at two one two six seven nine two eight

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 3>one one. You can call to have a free, privileged

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 3>conversation about your rights, risks, and responsibilities and to be

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 3>connected with appropriate legal resources in your area. And at

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, we keep ourselves safe by

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 3>refusing to submit to this fear, refusing to comply in advance,

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 3>refusing to second guess whether we actually have rights, and

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:19.799
<v Speaker 3>more importantly, we persist by being confident in the fact that,

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 3>no matter what, our communities are going to rally around

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 3>and care for each other.

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be a great place to tie up.

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having this conversation and for

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the insights that you shared, and for the work that

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:31.439
<v Speaker 2>you do.

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 3>MO. You're very welcome. It's always a pleasure. It Could

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 3>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 3>now find sources for It Could Happen here, listed directly

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 3>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.