WEBVTT - What We Oughta Be Worrying About.  Ian Bremmer Talks to A&G

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>The fabulous Ian Bremmer and what we all ought to

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.359
<v Speaker 1>be worrying about. It's Armstrong and Getty extra large.

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Because four hours simply.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 3>This is Armstrong and Getty extra large. So Ian, we're

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 3>making this part of our podcast. The highlights will air

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 3>on the radio show are.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 4>The reason we've had to put you on the podcast

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 4>is because of your merchant Marine foul mouth. I don't

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 4>know if you remember this from years ago. Play the clip, Michael, Yes,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 4>you dropped an S bomb on our radio show, nearly

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 4>causing us to lose their jobs.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.319
<v Speaker 3>You have no self control. So now we're on. Now

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>we're on the podcast.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow I want.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean I can say whatever I want?

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>You can say shit shit shit? Yes, you're in good

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>shape Mouth.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you're better than that. But feel free also,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And before we get started in earnest, I don't know

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>if you remember this, Ian, but we have a bit

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of unfinished business.

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I remember one half of this.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Bet.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I bet you my thumbs that Joseph R. Biden would

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not be the cannon date in November. I can't remember

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>if you put anything up, but I'm glad I get

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep my thumbs.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you get to keep your thumbs.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 5>It was such an embarrassment and so clear that he

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 5>should have stepped down so much.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Earlier than he had.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the idea that he he somehow voluntarily,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of for the grace of the country abdicated,

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 5>of course, is crazy. He was basically utterly forced and

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 5>still was dragging his feet at the very last day.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>It was not a great moment for the country.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Well about you, But as a fan of a history,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 4>I can't wait to read the books that are going

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 4>to be written about a lot of that decision making

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>and behind the scenes and people who knew and what

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 4>they knew and what they saw and didn't say, And

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be unbelievable over the next twenty five

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 4>years to read it.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, George Clooney apparently had the inside information.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no kidding, and was in charge.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group also its founder

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>political risk research and consulting firm, and every year they

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>put up put out the list of global risks which agreed,

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>disagree are both. Is just always such a great and

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting read and we look forward to chatting with you

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Ian. Your first risk is funny because we

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get your newsletter, the G zero, the email every day

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you put it up. It hadn't occurred to

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>me to ask, what does G zero mean? Well, your

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>risk number one is the G zero wins. What are

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we talking about.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 5>We're talking about the law of the jungle, right, We're

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>talking which which, by the way, the jungle is a

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 5>great place for an apex predator, but it's not so

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 5>great if you're weak and not and don't have a

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 5>strong government.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we're seeing play out. We're seeing the.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 5>United States embrace unilateralism, reject global rule of law, reject

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the idea of being the world's policeman or the architect

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 5>of free trade or the promoter of democracy, and instead

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 5>say we're going to.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Do things the way we want to.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 5>You guys are weaker, and you better get along with that.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 5>And both America's adversaries and its allies are a lot

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 5>weaker right now, economically, technologically, militarily, and also in terms

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>of their governments just in trouble.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Right. Look at South.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 5>Korea and Germany and France and Canada these days. I mean,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 5>this is a this is a really interesting time to

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 5>be someone like Donald Trump coming into power and saying

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to use that power, and I'm going to

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 5>use it in ways it's going to force you to acquiesce.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So ajzero world is a very volatile it's.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 5>A very unstable world, and it's one that comes from

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 5>the Americans and some allies no longer willing to play

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 5>the role they had been.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Told to in the world over over decades.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 5>It's come from Russia not being integrated with the West,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 5>being angry at the US about that, and alliging with

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 5>chaos actors like North Korea. And it's come from China

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 5>that was integrated into the global economy, but on the

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 5>presumption that as that happened, they would become more westlike,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, more political, open reforms, rule of law, free market.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 5>None of that happened, and now the US is angry

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 5>about it. So you put those things together and you

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 5>get this geopolitical disorder, which is pretty unique, and it's

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 5>pretty unique for a country that created a global order

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 5>to start taking its own order apart.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we're living through in twenty twenty five.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Nice job not cursing during that answer, by the way,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 4>good self control. So even if Kamala Harris had won.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Even before we go into the future, where do you

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 4>rank the lack of world order compared to recent history.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 4>I remember I heard hearing Henry Is Kissinger talk about

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 4>it back when he was alive. He thought we were

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.039
<v Speaker 4>at a pretty bad point. We are slash were.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that again, bad point depends on whose perspective

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 5>you're taking the I think the United States is going

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 5>to get a lot of wins in this environment. We

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 5>say that this is the most dangerous period since the thirties,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 5>but you know, there was a lot of appeasement going

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 5>on in the thirties. There's a lot of appeasement that's

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 5>going to happen in twenty twenty five. I mean, Mark

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Zuckerberg looked like he was appeasing yesterday, right, And if

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 5>you think that he's in a weak position, you haven't

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 5>been talking to the Canadians or the Danes in the

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 5>last forty eight hours.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the United States is actually going to get

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of wins in the early days.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 5>But it's going to be unnerving for people that feel

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 5>like they're being targeted. It's unnerving for countries that feel

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 5>like they're on the wrong side of this, and that's

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 5>going to lead to a lot of fragmentation and a

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of hedging around the world. But the funny thing

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 5>is when we talked about this last year, you and I,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, we were were about these big wars that

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 5>were going on in the Middle East, in Ukraine, and

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 5>even the growing fighting happening inside the United States.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing about twenty twenty five is that

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 2>all of those wars are receding. Right.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a good chance that the Middle East wars are

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 5>going to be fought less strongly than they were, in

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 5>part because the Israelis don't have much more to hit

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to Hamas. Secondly, in the Middle in Russia, Ukraine,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 5>there's a good likelihood we're going to get a ceasefire

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 5>over the course of the year. And in the US,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 5>despite all of the fighting over the elections, the fact

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 5>is that nobody thinks that Trump stole it.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>It was free, it was fair, it wasn't rigged.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 5>And whether you like Trump or not, you recognize, yeah,

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 5>he won the presidency, he's going to mandate. So those

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 5>things that were bothering us so much in twenty twenty

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>four and played out over twenty twenty four in ways

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 5>that we're very damaging for twenty twenty five have actually

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 5>started to started to hit the rear view mirror so well.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Not only am I one of the great prognosticators of

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>our time or any other ian, I'm also willing to

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>offer my services to go abroad and explain Trump's negotiating style,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because I see on your list of risks several of

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>them are related to Trump's governing style, whether the checks

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and balances of the American system will hold, whether alliances

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>will hold. And you know, I look back to his

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>first term and he has said some outrageous things about

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>NATO that bothered me. I don't particularly appreciate his negotiating style,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but the threats to like disband NATO or let anybody

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>attack him or whatever, I found wildly inappropriate. But the

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>net result was a stronger, more responsible NATO in terms

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of self funding.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely and when he said that Mexico was going to

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 5>build a wall and pay for it, they paid for

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 5>absolutely nothing on the border, but they did strengthen their

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 5>own border security in the South, which led to far

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 5>fewer illegal immigrants going through Mexico into the United States

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 5>under the Trump administration.

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't agree with you more.

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That is super interesting, And I would also cite China

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>where Trump was maybe you know, more blunt and hard

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ass than he needed to be, but that relationship really

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>need to be turned around. How do you see that

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>progressing this year? The US China breakdown as you put it.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Let me say first broadly that Trump is because he's

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 5>in a much stronger position internationally because power is relational

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 5>this time around, and also because he's in a much

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 5>stronger position domestically. He's got the House, he's got the Senate,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 5>but he also has the entire GOP that recognizes they

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>need him and all of his appointees a loyalist that

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 5>you don't see any Nicky Haley's or Mike Pompeo's or

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 5>mad Dog Matis's in this bunch. People are not going

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 5>to be able to get around him to try to

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 5>moderate his impulses.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's going to lead to Trump being able to

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 2>do more of what he wants to do.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 5>And what he wants to do is not make Canada

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 5>the fifty first state, but he does want to change

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 5>the nature of US trade deficits with countries all over

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 5>the world. He wants to use tariffs to accomplish that.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 5>He also wants to get rid of a lot of

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 5>illegal immigrants in the US deport them, and I think

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 5>he's going to do that too with China.

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>That means that in.

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 5>The early weeks of this relationship, we are going to

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 5>see more tariffs from the United States against China. We're

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 5>going to see more export controls on semiconductors. And if

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 5>you look at the people that Trump has appointed, like

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Mike Waltz and Marco Arrubio, who I think are quite capable,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 5>and I'm known for a while, they're very hawkish on China.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 5>They are people that are not trusted by the Chinese

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 5>to engage the way that say Jake Sullivan and some

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 5>of his team have been. So I think that the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 5>relationship between the US and China, which has been comparatively

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 5>well managed in the last year and and in a

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 5>way that did not give away the store to the Chinese. So,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Democrats and Republicans largely think that Biden's done

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 5>a pretty good job on China. It's one of the

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 5>few things they agree on when it comes to Biden's

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 5>foreign policy. I suspect that's not going to hold. It's

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 5>going to break down and so we will start slipping

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 5>into an active trade war between the US China, and

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 5>we'll see more of an act of decoupling between the

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 5>two economies than we've presently had.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 4>Do you think at some point like Apple can't make

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>phones there anymore and that sort of thing.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's already happening.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 5>We already see Apple putting a lot more money into

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 5>India and to Vietnam and to Indonesia.

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Now some of that is not political.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Some of that is because the Chinese economy is really underperforming.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Hijinping has made it tougher for the private sector. He's

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 5>supported state owned enterprises, and consumer sentiment in China has

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 5>fallen off a cliff, so people aren't buying as much.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>They're not they're they're keeping money in savings because they

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 5>don't really trust the Chinese government to be able to

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 5>perform the way they had. Some of that was the

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 5>pandemic in zero COVID too, which they handled.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Really badly in my view.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 5>And so when you talk to Western multinationals about China,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 5>they're saying, we're reducing our exposure, we're firing people, we're

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 5>ending strategic partnerships. Then you add on top of that,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Trump saying I'm going to come in and put a

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 5>sixty percent tariff across the board, and even if you

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 5>expect that is exaggerated, and I do, it is hitting

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 5>China at a time that frankly, no one's super excited

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 5>about spending more money there.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, anybody who predicts the imminent downfall of the

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist Party as a fool. But they do have

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable headwinds, including demographics. How bearish are you on China

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and xesiin Ping in the medium to long term?

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean in a sense.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 5>The fact that chijin Ping reached out to India, had

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 5>a two hour plus summit and and pulled back Chinese

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 5>troops from their contested border shows that China knows they've

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 5>got big headwinds and they don't want a big crisis

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 5>with India.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>They reached out to Japan and asked for a summit.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 5>Usually it's the other way around, and they offered to

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 5>start buying Japanese seafood, which just a few months ago

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 5>they said you can't sell here because it's all radioactive

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 5>because of Fukushima. I've seen them do a lot of

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 5>this around the world, Now, some of this is because

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 5>they're worried about Trump and the uncertainty coming from the

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 5>US that they don't think they can manage. But some

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 5>of it is a recognition that they're in a bad position,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>and so frankly, it behooves them to stabilize these relations.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 5>And that comes from a deep concern that you just

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 5>asked about.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Do I think they're about to fall? No, But I

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>mean they're demographics.

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 5>They're at what one point four billion people right now,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 5>and expectations for twenty one hundred, when you know, you

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and I are going to be pretty pretty geezerly is

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 5>that they're going to be down to five hundred million

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 5>to seven hundred and fifty million. So I mean a

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 5>significant I mean the biggest contraction of a population that

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 5>you would ever see in an economy outside of like.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>War or famine.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 5>It's peacetime in China, and they're just saying, we just

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 5>don't want to have any kids, and there's nothing the

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 5>Chinese government can do about it. This is not a

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 5>five year a ten year problem. Their retirement age for

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 5>men is fifty five. They can extend that for five

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 5>or ten years. They're not very urbanized. They can move

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 5>more people into cities. They can make agriculture more efficient,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 5>they can lean into AI. There's a lot of things

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 5>they can do that can give them a ten year buffer,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 5>But they don't have a generational solution here, so long term,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they're in very big trouble.

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you read David Sanger's book New

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Cold Wars, but he opened yeah, great book, but he

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 4>opened with the quote, which I think is underappreciated. When

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>it was hot on a hot mic or on purpose,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know when she was talking to Putin before

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 4>he got in the car and said basically, you know,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna change the world order. We're gonna drive, and

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 4>we are going to drive these big changes. Do you

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 4>think he's still focused on that or are think he's

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 4>gotten so tough internally that he can't be focused on

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 4>that anymore.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that he at a very minimum recognizes that

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 5>the timing for such a statement, for such policies is inopportunite.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when I was last in China two.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 5>Months ago, two and a half months ago, they were

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 5>telling me that they've pushed out their projections of when

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 5>China would become the largest economy overtaking the US by

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 5>five years, so they're not looking at being able to

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 5>take over Taiwan by twenty twenty nine the way that

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 5>many in the US included had expected was sort of coming.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean that she Ping actually believes that he

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 5>no longer is going to have the ultimately the world's

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 5>leading economy, that his plans for global domination and artificial

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 5>intelligence are going away. I wouldn't go that far, but

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he's not getting any younger. I mean, and

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 5>at some point kicking the can down the road does

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 5>become a strategic change of mind. I wouldn't dare to

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 5>say how far in his personal mental processes he's traveled

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 5>along that road, but I mean he certainly started the path.

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>He's no kid either, right, absolutely right. Risk number six

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Iran on the ropes. They are a cornered beast. Are

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they a dangerous cornered beast?

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 5>I think less so what we have seen over the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 5>last years, they've been hit pretty hard, particularly by Israel,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 5>and the response has been very little. You'll remember when

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 5>the head of Hamasa's political division, their leader, was assassinated

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 5>by Israel on the day of the Iranian president's inauguration,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 5>in Tehran, and the Iranian response was essentially nothing.

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>They didn't blow up Israel on the back of it.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 5>They didn't blow up Israel on the back of taking

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 5>out Hazbala, their most important proxy.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>They didn't blow up.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Israel on the back of launching a series of missiles

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 5>against Iran. So I mean, I think the Iranians recognize

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 5>that they've lost their deterrent capability and they just don't

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 5>have an effective way to hit the United States or Israel,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 5>which has made them very cautious and very risk averse. Now,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 5>the one thing, of course, they could do, and President

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Macron or France has been warning about this in the

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 5>past couple of days, is they could significantly ramp up

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 5>their dash to a nuclear bomb.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I was going to ask you about that. Is

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Trump Israel?

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 4>From what I read the other day in some publication,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Israel can't do it on the realm, they'd need our help.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Is Trump willing to help Israel take out their nuclear

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 4>facilities their bomb making program?

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Can we do it?

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 5>There are certainly people around Trump that are coming into

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 5>the administration that believe that is what the US should do,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 5>that this is a historic opportunity to take out America

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 5>and Israel's top enemy in the Middle East.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Is Trump personally willing to do that.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he's very reluctant to use military force. He

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 5>doesn't want to get involved in new wars. He's proud

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 5>of ending wars, not starting new ones. And he also

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 5>knows that a war with Iran would lead to significantly

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 5>high oil prices, though they're low right now and there's

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 5>a lot of oil and reserve that's not being produced,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 5>but it would certainly impact the stock market, all things

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 5>that he doesn't really like.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 3>He took out Solem Mooney.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Look he did.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 5>He did take out Solomoney, the head of the Iranian

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 5>defense for but he did it after months of Iranian

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 5>strikes against Saudi Arabia, including their largest refinery in the world,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 5>including the UAE, and including even American bases in the region.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 5>And then finally he hit Sulimani assassinated him.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So again, I think it is possible.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I think at a minimum, Trump is going to put

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 5>much more pressure against Iran, including shutting down a lot

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 5>of these illegal, non flaged tankers that are helping Iran

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 5>get oil out illegally, which the Chinese will not be happy.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 2>With because they're the ones buying most of it.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I think he'll do that, so he's gonna put Iran

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 5>under a lot more economic pressure. Would he support nat

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 5>YAHOO directly in strikes against the nuclear facilities?

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I think in the early days the answer is no, But.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 5>I suspect if Iran started to go towards the bomb,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 5>he probably would.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 4>That's gonna be an interesting one to follow because I

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 4>don't know what it's going to happen there. I've listened

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 4>to a bunch of different policy podcasts where people talk

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 4>about it. A round's never going to be in a

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 4>weaker state than they are right now, if not now when, So.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's a good one. Could happen, It could

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>easily happen.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 5>I think at the very least, US pressure economically much

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 5>more meaningful. And the Israelis continuing to hit them with

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 5>cyber espionage.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Hit the critical infrastructure assassinations.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>All of that is putting more pressure on the Iranian regime.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 5>And they've lost their empire in the Middle East, they

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 5>lost the axis of resistance, and now there's growing insurgency

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 5>inside Iranian provinces too. So I mean, it's also plausible

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 5>that we would see internal regime change. I mean, you know,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 5>these things happened.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Very slowly and then very quickly.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no one expected Asad was going to suddenly fall

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 5>after fifty years of dictatorship. And yet two weeks after

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 5>the revolution started with some rebels, suddenly he was fleet

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 5>being the Moscow where he awaited getting poisoned.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey, it was it last year of the year before

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 4>you made some big AI predictions. Is AI further along

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 4>then you thought it would be, or did you think

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 4>it would be further along?

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it's further along, And we've been pretty bullish

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 5>on AI, and yet we continue to be pretty as

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 5>staggered by just how many use cases there are for

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 5>industrial innovation in every sector, every company around the world.

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 5>We're pretty staggered by, you know, the fact that you know,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 5>the touring test has basically been shattered, and that human

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 5>beings engaging with boughts can no longer tell if it's

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 5>a boud or human being. In fact, the only way

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 5>you can really tell is because they're faster and smarter

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 5>on a lot of on a lot of aspects.

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, Ian, I heard a story I was

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 4>talking to some of yesterday, was in a meeting with

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of farmers who are single and they've gotten

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>into chat GPT girlfriends and they and I mean this

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 4>is like this is the last crowd in the world

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 4>you'd think would in brak this sort of thing, but

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of like really like the companionship of So getting

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 4>to your whole turning test, can you tell if it's

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 4>a human being or not? I mean they are like

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 4>getting comfort from talking to some chick on whose AI.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, that's where we're headed.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I do think I've never been a

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 5>big one for pronouns, but I'd go gender neutral when

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 5>it comes to AI.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, as the guy who predicted Biden dropping out, Ian,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>AI will be the undoing of mankind. It is the

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>fruit of the true knowledge from the joke of Genesis.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Soon it will be our end. A bit of a

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lightning round here. How screwed up and horrible is Africa.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 5>They're they're slipping farther behind in terms of, you know,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 5>the the how their economy is going.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I think the the upside.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Of AI is that you can actually get access to

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 5>world class knowledge, medicine, education, and the rest without having

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 5>to build a lot of expensive infrastructure, which will create

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 5>opportunities for Africans that they otherwise don't have. That's a

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 5>really good thing. But they're getting hit harder by climate

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 5>change than anybody else. That were hit just harder last

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 5>year by El Nino than anybody else. I mean, there

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 5>isn't the money to do a lot of the you know,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 5>the big state building in nation building. Even China's Belton

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Road is you know, a fraction of what it used

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>to be given China's economic challenges. So I'd like to

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 5>say that there are some silver linings here, but generally speaking,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 5>Africa is not hitting where we want to go.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Horrifying, blood letting, violence, instability, starvation. There we know you're

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>up against time. You have to drop out. So another

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>very quick question, to what extent is this true? America's

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>neighbor to the south, Mexico, is a highly unstable narco state.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>False, It is not highly unstable.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 5>In fact, it has one of the most popular governments

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 5>of any democracy in the world that won on the

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 5>back of the same a leader from the same party,

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 5>so easy transition, and they have a pretty capable cabinet.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 5>They also are incredibly well integrated in terms of investment

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 5>in supply chain with the largest, most robust economy in

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 5>the world, which is a great place for them to be.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 5>But they are going to have to step up their

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 5>game on fentanyl. They're going to have to step up

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 5>their game on border security, and they're going to step

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 5>up the game on allowing China to pass through a

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 5>whole bunch of goods from China through Mexico into the

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 5>United States.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And that's going to be very hard for them. So

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a tough year.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 5>They'll get there, they'll get there with the Americans, they'll

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 5>stabilize the relationship.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>They'll do what they need to do because they have

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>no choice. But I think this is going to be

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>tough year from Mexico.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Bueno on that answer, Trump was going to send Persia

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 4>down to fight Pancho Villa and now he doesn't have to.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Right that Excellent Ian Bremer of the Eurasia Group Global Risks.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It's such a great read. We suggest you downloaded. Ian.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>It's all it's a pleasure. Thanks a million, gentlemen.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Good to talk to you.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, nice job of not cursing. Also great self control.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 5>I did if I You guys always were like the

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 5>biggest joke tellers when I was talking to you. You

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 5>are like just having a party, and so I ipself loose.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 4>You slipped into regular talk. But hey, thanks for the time.

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.479
<v Speaker 2>How long have I been How long have I been

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 2>suspended for?

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, obviously you're back, so.

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>That's good. I love it. OK, good to talk to

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you guys. All right extra large