Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. You're not allowed to
Speaker 1: do a better job than the Democrats favored by the
Speaker 1: corporate media. That's a rule. Now. You may not have
Speaker 1: seen it or read that posted anywhere, but it's true
Speaker 1: because Governor Ronda Santis of Florida is under assault from
Speaker 1: all across the country now from the Libs, from the
Speaker 1: Democrats who insist that what he is doing is reckless,
Speaker 1: who insists that the state of Florida is some god
Speaker 1: forsaken hell hole, when in reality, everybody who goes there says,
Speaker 1: how do I move here? If you live in a
Speaker 1: blue state that has been under lockdowns for months and
Speaker 1: months and months, if you live in one of these
Speaker 1: Democrat run tyrannies and you go down for a visit
Speaker 1: to Florida, you say, oh, so is just better down
Speaker 1: here right now? Why don't I get a piece of this?
Speaker 1: And they hate him for it. They hate him also
Speaker 1: because now they're just making incoherent arguments. Incoherent arguments, New
Speaker 1: York Times writing about how Americans must ensure that their
Speaker 1: masks are doubled up or tightened up. Now, those of
Speaker 1: you who listen to this show every day, now that
Speaker 1: I have been on this for many months now, I've
Speaker 1: been telling you, they're going to tell you double mask.
Speaker 1: They're going to suddenly discover, oh, n ninety five masks
Speaker 1: are in fact, considerably more effective than the little cloth
Speaker 1: mask you have on. They're going to figure out that
Speaker 1: bandanas do very little. And they're going to tell you
Speaker 1: that this is now the grounds for new mandates, new restrictions,
Speaker 1: more power for them, less freedom for you. And now
Speaker 1: here we are. Let's just go over this argument for
Speaker 1: a second. I want to get back into the Florida
Speaker 1: situation because I think that that now is going to
Speaker 1: be the primary struggle for liberty in this country is
Speaker 1: going to play out in many ways with Florida versus
Speaker 1: the federal government. The Biden administration cannot allow the success
Speaker 1: of the Sunshine State in the face of COVID to continue.
Speaker 1: They have to create a different narrative. And if they
Speaker 1: have to cheat somehow, if they have to create a
Speaker 1: travel ban for people from Florida or to Florida. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's already being reported. They're thinking about it. That's right,
Speaker 1: the place where everyone's going to escape the idiot tyranny
Speaker 1: of the Fauciites. That's the place that has to be punished.
Speaker 1: But let's start with their argument on masks. And this
Speaker 1: is why I have been once again throttled on Twitter.
Speaker 1: So people can't see what I say on Twitter. They
Speaker 1: show it to maybe three percent or two percent my
Speaker 1: Twitter audience. Thank god I have this show, I have
Speaker 1: this radio program, I have my podcast. Thank God I
Speaker 1: can actually still reach people and make these arguments in
Speaker 1: this way, because if I try to rely on the
Speaker 1: social media platforms, they shut me down. They shut the
Speaker 1: guy down. To be clear, who is documented as saying
Speaker 1: in October of last year, the double mask mandate is coming.
Speaker 1: It is now the middle of February. And guess what
Speaker 1: CDC guidances double mask or wear a more tightly fitted mask.
Speaker 1: That's the way they're going to try to get around this.
Speaker 1: So it's enough of a CDC mandate to harass you.
Speaker 1: So now people can say, excuse me, sir, can you
Speaker 1: put two masks on before you come into my store?
Speaker 1: And if you don't, someone's gonna say, why don't you
Speaker 1: take the virus? Seriously? But when you see politicians and
Speaker 1: people who are telling you to be terrified, and they're
Speaker 1: clearly not terrified of the virus, they'll say, whoa, my
Speaker 1: mask was very snugly fitted. Remember this, do not forget it.
Speaker 1: It will be essential to understand what is happening in
Speaker 1: the months ahead. The worst tyranny is not the absolute
Speaker 1: enforcement of strict rules. The worst tiery tyranny is the
Speaker 1: capricious enforcement of arbitrary rules. Some people get punished, some
Speaker 1: people don't. Some people have to live with these extreme measures.
Speaker 1: Other people always get a pass, because how do you
Speaker 1: even operate it in a society like that. It's actually
Speaker 1: just all about power. It's not even based on shared
Speaker 1: belief and shared principle at all. There's no shared goal
Speaker 1: in a society like that. It's just people wanting to
Speaker 1: control you. So now the guy who tells you me
Speaker 1: that this is what's going to happen, how did I
Speaker 1: know it was going to happen? How did I know
Speaker 1: that we would get to a double mask mandate. Well,
Speaker 1: I looked at what was happening in countries all over
Speaker 1: the world where they were lying primarily on their mask
Speaker 1: policy to bring down COVID nineteen cases, and you couldn't
Speaker 1: see a clear correlation. And if you can't see a
Speaker 1: clear correlation, how effective can it possibly be? And you
Speaker 1: sit here and you look around, you say, also, if
Speaker 1: this is so straightforward, I mean, this is the primary
Speaker 1: argument that I've been making for a long time. If
Speaker 1: this is so straightforward, how is it that the height
Speaker 1: of the medical profession, that the top of the national
Speaker 1: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease doctor Fauci,
Speaker 1: who you know, I think is really he's like the
Speaker 1: evil little you know, Rasputin in a lab coat of
Speaker 1: our time. I mean, I think this guy is a
Speaker 1: nightmare for civil liberties. I think he's a nightmare for
Speaker 1: the politicization of medicine. I think he's awful. I want
Speaker 1: to be very clear about this. And he's been wrong
Speaker 1: and he never admits it, and he won't stand up
Speaker 1: in favor of freedom. This guy's the worst. How is
Speaker 1: it that, exactly, give or take a few weeks, a
Speaker 1: year ago, he's laughing at the idea we have a
Speaker 1: pandemic coming that we believe has a four to five
Speaker 1: percent fatality rate. That was a year ago. As we know,
Speaker 1: it's considerably less than one percent, but we thought it
Speaker 1: was four or five percent. That was what the early
Speaker 1: reports were, and it was spreading all over the place,
Speaker 1: and Fauci basically waved his hand. It might make people
Speaker 1: feel better to wear masks, but it really doesn't do anything.
Speaker 1: That's a year ago, and they can't erase that. They can.
Speaker 1: They can shout at you, they can yell at you.
Speaker 1: They can do if it's that effective. I mean, can
Speaker 1: you imagine do you think that, you know, do you
Speaker 1: think that a doctor would go on TV and say, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, turns out, you know, the polio vaccination. We
Speaker 1: really don't think it's that effective. So like, you know,
Speaker 1: no one needs to get it, don't worry about it,
Speaker 1: and then a year later go, actually, the only way
Speaker 1: we're going to defeat polios with a vaccination. No, they wouldn't,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't change their tomb that dramatically on something so
Speaker 1: essential with so many lives at stake, And they say
Speaker 1: it's obvious. Remember they didn't do some brand new study,
Speaker 1: they didn't have some new scientific discovery. It's oh, what
Speaker 1: do you mean, of course we all have to wear masks.
Speaker 1: Of course, a year ago you were saying it was dumb,
Speaker 1: It was silly. Why do they have people go what
Speaker 1: about doctors. Doctors wear a mask in a limited clinical setting,
Speaker 1: properly fitted, they change them, they wear fresh ones, and
Speaker 1: even then they can still get sick. But they're directly
Speaker 1: exposing themselves. We could all walk around with helmets on
Speaker 1: because of falling debris from buildings, but construction workers more important,
Speaker 1: they wear helmets. Right. How many construction workers do you
Speaker 1: know have actually been hit with debris on their head?
Speaker 1: Probably zero, But in that one situation, in that one
Speaker 1: k it, you know, in that limited circumstance, it's fine.
Speaker 1: What we're doing now is we're all construction workers and
Speaker 1: we have to sleep with our helmets on all the
Speaker 1: time because you never know when falling debris is gonna happen. Right,
Speaker 1: I mean they've expanded our risk parameters into silly territory,
Speaker 1: meaning that we actually we can't allow for any risk
Speaker 1: in society. This is how I saw this coming because
Speaker 1: the places that are the most I mean, they were smoked.
Speaker 1: I mean, there was an arrogance in California, you remember
Speaker 1: this with Gavin Newsom. In the middle of the summer,
Speaker 1: the weather was a little bit warmer, Yeah, we masked up.
Speaker 1: We know what we're doing. I had people that were
Speaker 1: telling me friends of mine who are lives because I
Speaker 1: do have lib friends. Yeah, so what if there's all
Speaker 1: these BLM protests, they're all masked up, it's not a problem.
Speaker 1: And it's say, is that really the Is that really
Speaker 1: the standard? Now, it's not a problem to mass together
Speaker 1: in close quarters when you're when you're masked up. That's interesting.
Speaker 1: Let's see how that. Let's see how that turns out.
Speaker 1: And then the explosion of cases in California, explosion of
Speaker 1: cases in New York and New Jersey, all across the country,
Speaker 1: and you know what they're saying, now, mask up even more.
Speaker 1: This is from the New York Times piece. Doctor Brooks
Speaker 1: emphasized that masking as Americans currently practice it is not insufficient,
Speaker 1: but the new advice offers an opportunity to take it
Speaker 1: to the next level. Oh okay. Quote, Now, we're worried
Speaker 1: about forms of the virus that may transmit more efficiently
Speaker 1: or undercut the utility of existing diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines.
Speaker 1: We need to up our game to slow the spread
Speaker 1: of the virus. The real problem, folks, they won't say
Speaker 1: it this way, because then the public might realize what
Speaker 1: a bunch of clowns who don't understand life trade offs
Speaker 1: and policy we're listening to here. And you know, the
Speaker 1: Great Barentting Declaration has essentially been scrubbed from the internet.
Speaker 1: The thousands and thousands of doctors and scientists who are
Speaker 1: saying we're doing this wrong, scrubbed, took it down off
Speaker 1: a Facebook. It's like it never happened. This is Soviet
Speaker 1: Union level cleansing of history and debate and thought. It's
Speaker 1: going on in America right now. It's either real problem.
Speaker 1: The reason that we have all these issues with COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: it's not that this is a virus that spreads easily
Speaker 1: among human beings and there's no way the government was
Speaker 1: going to be able to protect you from this that.
Speaker 1: It's not any of that. It's we didn't do a
Speaker 1: good enough job listening to them, which is what I
Speaker 1: told you would be their excuse all along, all the
Speaker 1: mask mandates, all the lockdowns. You cannot look at what
Speaker 1: happened in this country over this winter and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: we stopped the virus. Remember at the beginning, it was
Speaker 1: flattened the curve, which is just a slowing of cases.
Speaker 1: We got sold into this with the understanding that, oh,
Speaker 1: this virus was gonna spread. We just didn't want it
Speaker 1: to all hit it one, so we were trying to
Speaker 1: extend the caseload over a longer period of time to
Speaker 1: make sure that we didn't overwhelmed hospital capacity. Let me
Speaker 1: ask you this, how many hospitals were overwhelmed in this country?
Speaker 1: Unable and when I say hospital, if someone had to
Speaker 1: go from one hospital to another where they had that,
Speaker 1: that's not an overwhelmed hospital system, so you still get care.
Speaker 1: How many places were there people who were unable to
Speaker 1: be treated for COVID nineteen in America because the hospital
Speaker 1: system simply had no more doctors, no more beds, nothing.
Speaker 1: Last I checked, it was zero. How many times did
Speaker 1: you hear that was going to happen? I don't know.
Speaker 1: A thousand news articles probably came across my screen. Oh,
Speaker 1: the overwhelmed, the hospitals close to overwhelmed, about to be overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: Who was telling you last June that test in trace
Speaker 1: was moronic? Moronic for a disease at this level of spread.
Speaker 1: What they're gonna They're gonna trace one hundred thousand cases
Speaker 1: a day, And are they kidding? They're gonna find everyone
Speaker 1: who's been in contact with hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: across the country and that's how we're going to fight
Speaker 1: the virus. Yeah. That to remember, you were hearing a
Speaker 1: lot Nancy Plesy. Test and trace was supposed to be
Speaker 1: what would be necessary to get us out of this.
Speaker 1: They actually had test and trace mandates in place from
Speaker 1: New York before we could reopen, and then they realized
Speaker 1: they were never going to get it in place and time,
Speaker 1: so they had to finally reopen without actually meeting their
Speaker 1: own standards. They've been wrong so much. When when are
Speaker 1: we allowed to say enough is enough? They've been wrong
Speaker 1: so many times. Now they're telling you double mask. I
Speaker 1: said they would, they would tell you this is what
Speaker 1: we needed to do. It's on record. I said it
Speaker 1: months ago, and people who were now saying double mask
Speaker 1: shouted me down. That's idiotic. Don't say you don't know
Speaker 1: what you're listen to. As listen to Fauci the bleating
Speaker 1: of sheep. They're really sheep whose aspiration as a society
Speaker 1: is to turn into lemmings so they can take us
Speaker 1: all over the cliff together, all because they think if
Speaker 1: they listen to the so smart people, we'll be safer,
Speaker 1: we'll be fine. We'll all live forever our news for them,
Speaker 1: none of us will. This is the Buck Sexton Show Podcast.
Speaker 1: Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The media is
Speaker 1: worried about that, obviously, you guys really love that. You
Speaker 1: don't care as much if it's a quote peaceful protest,
Speaker 1: and then it's fine. You don't care as much if
Speaker 1: they're celebrating a Biden election. You only care about it
Speaker 1: if it's people that you don't like. So I'm a
Speaker 1: Bucks fan. I'm damn proud of what they did on
Speaker 1: Sunday night. And so in terms of the UK variant,
Speaker 1: here's what we know. We know based on all the
Speaker 1: evidence that these vaccines are going to be effective against that,
Speaker 1: and that's really the main concern. I mean, we're getting
Speaker 1: our seniors vaccinated. We've not seen any data or any
Speaker 1: evidence to suggest that these vaccines are not effective, and
Speaker 1: so if we get the seniors vaccinated, we're going to
Speaker 1: be good. And that's what we're gonna do, not panicking,
Speaker 1: not allowing the media narrative to drive policy, governed scientists,
Speaker 1: just saying we got this We're going to do what
Speaker 1: is reasonable and what we can do, and that's all
Speaker 1: I ask for. That's all I've wanted all along, for
Speaker 1: politicians to understand that a do no harm approach for
Speaker 1: COVID policy would have been far better than what we've had,
Speaker 1: because they've made so much worse. They've politicized the hell
Speaker 1: out of this thing. And we see it all the time.
Speaker 1: If there are people that the media doesn't like who
Speaker 1: aren't wearing masks outside and so it doesn't matter, it's
Speaker 1: a front page news story. If there are BLM protesters
Speaker 1: for just oh yes, they've achieved so much of that,
Speaker 1: haven't they so much justice? Then we're told that it's fine,
Speaker 1: that the virus all of a sudden will take a
Speaker 1: kind of holiday and nothing will happen. That's just not true.
Speaker 1: And yet there's the possibility the federal government will go
Speaker 1: after Florida here, that's right. The federal government may decide
Speaker 1: to make an example of Rhonda Santis and those who
Speaker 1: support his approach. This is from the Miami Herald. The
Speaker 1: Biden administration is considering whether to impose domestic travel restrictions,
Speaker 1: including on Florida, fearful that coronavirus mutations are threatening to
Speaker 1: reverse hard fought progress on the pandemic. Now, notice that
Speaker 1: they're going They're going specifically after Florida here because they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: they've and the excuses, well, they found more of the
Speaker 1: variance in Florida. Does anyone think that the variance of
Speaker 1: the UK strain or the South Africa strain or whatever
Speaker 1: strain are limited to Florida at this point? Does anyone
Speaker 1: really think that the federal government isn't isn't a little
Speaker 1: bit at least thinking about how they can slap down
Speaker 1: the descentists approach, because it undermines what has Joe Biden
Speaker 1: done that's better than what Trump was doing. Name one
Speaker 1: thing on COVID response one thing. I'm a double mask,
Speaker 1: come or a double mask because you know, because I
Speaker 1: believe in science. So in our triple mask, come triple masking.
Speaker 1: You know. The problem with everyone thinking that the masks
Speaker 1: are going to be our salvation here is that people
Speaker 1: unmask themselves in front of other people constantly. You can't
Speaker 1: have an entirely masked society, and so over time people
Speaker 1: are just exposed of this. Over time, essentially everybody gets
Speaker 1: exposed to it. They've led us to believe, if only
Speaker 1: we listen more, some people would never even come into
Speaker 1: contact with the virus to be fun, no real threat
Speaker 1: of infection. Well, we're seeing how that plan has worked
Speaker 1: out so far. How much worse would it be anywhere else?
Speaker 1: Take a look at what's gone on here the Biden
Speaker 1: administration imposing possible domestic travel restrictions. I am starting to
Speaker 1: get really worried that the reset in the stock market,
Speaker 1: in the economy, and a great financial calamity is coming
Speaker 1: to this country because of moron woke lib Biden voters.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket
Speaker 1: I Heartmedia dot com. If you may read it on
Speaker 1: the show. If you look at the projection, I would
Speaker 1: imagine by the time we get to April, that will
Speaker 1: be what I would call from you for better wording
Speaker 1: open season. Namely, virtually everybody in anybody, in any category
Speaker 1: could start to get vaccinated. Now, shouldn't that mean that
Speaker 1: we could establish at some point, all right, everybody, we've
Speaker 1: all had our chance to get vaccinated. Can't we just
Speaker 1: decide now? Okay? By June we go back to normal life. Enough,
Speaker 1: they won't do that. In fact, Fouci has already said
Speaker 1: that you should be prepared to wear your mask and
Speaker 1: all the nonsense, all the anxiety, all the finger pointing
Speaker 1: from the anxious little tattle tales that watch too much MSNBC.
Speaker 1: How dare you take your mask off in the store
Speaker 1: to drink water? You're putting us all at risk? How
Speaker 1: much longer we'll deal with that till at least the
Speaker 1: end of this year, he says. Then, if Fauci's telling
Speaker 1: you by November or December, we can start to let
Speaker 1: our guard down, as he calls it. Oh, it'll be
Speaker 1: it'll be next summer before they finally take their grubby
Speaker 1: little fingers out of your life. That's what That's what
Speaker 1: you're really Oh and they've done such a great job,
Speaker 1: haven't they, with with all the mitigation measures in stopping
Speaker 1: the virus? Has it been amazing listening to all these
Speaker 1: people mass compliance? Highest it's ever been by far. Look
Speaker 1: what that did for us over the winter. Oh, it
Speaker 1: was magical, wasn't it. We had we had such a
Speaker 1: great result. It's awful. And yet if we listen this
Speaker 1: time around, they promise us everything will be so much better.
Speaker 1: There's no you know, there's no h leeway whatsoever for
Speaker 1: individual choice here, because of course you're a threat to
Speaker 1: other people. It's like, well, isn't that interesting. They've created
Speaker 1: a narrative here where they can continue this forever if
Speaker 1: they want to. They have new variants, new strains of
Speaker 1: the virus. Maybe they we've gotten into the Maybe this
Speaker 1: could be true. So let's build policy on its stage
Speaker 1: of the panic, the COVID panic that has been forced
Speaker 1: on all of us. Perfect example, where's the science on
Speaker 1: if you're vaccinated and or have already had and cleared
Speaker 1: the disease officially, you were tested, you had it, you
Speaker 1: got sick, you're better that you should still mask and quarantine. Well,
Speaker 1: it's because we haven't done massive specific studies for COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen about how long you have immunity. But we know
Speaker 1: that based on all other science to date, based on
Speaker 1: all other data we have about vaccinations, you're going to
Speaker 1: be immune for quite some time, unless somehow this is different.
Speaker 1: But oh, the possibility is enough. Everyone still has to mask.
Speaker 1: You know what this is really about. They realize that
Speaker 1: if they made the allowance for people who had gotten
Speaker 1: vaccinated not to mask, there'd probably be people who just say,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm not going to ask any more period.
Speaker 1: And that's that's why, because because their explanation is absurd. Otherwise,
Speaker 1: oh you could, you can get the virus and spread
Speaker 1: the virus, but your body's already protected against it. Is
Speaker 1: that true of other viruses? Is that a common thing
Speaker 1: that that occurs in science in medicine? No, but with
Speaker 1: this one maybe it is. That's what they tell you.
Speaker 1: So because they can't prove that their theory that goes
Speaker 1: against all other vaccination data and science for you know,
Speaker 1: for over well first vaccinations were around the ear eighteen hundreds,
Speaker 1: we're going to a couple hundred years, but certainly the
Speaker 1: last hundred years of modern medicine. And yeah, now they're
Speaker 1: telling you what we can't prove. I'm not wrong. So
Speaker 1: wear your mask. And it's a symbol of all this stuff,
Speaker 1: all the restrictions, all that continued hell that they put
Speaker 1: people through. And to give you an idea of how
Speaker 1: how stupid they really are. Right, Remember I told detest
Speaker 1: and trace as a means of controlling the virus was stupid,
Speaker 1: and I was right. No one they could put any
Speaker 1: MD up against me any PhD. I said, how are
Speaker 1: you gonna do? This isn't about Oh but I look
Speaker 1: at slides under a microscope and I have an MD PhD. Mph.
Speaker 1: It's just logic. You're gonna find hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: cases a day. You're gonna track all these people down,
Speaker 1: and so excuse me? Can you corn? And what will
Speaker 1: that even do? Can you quarantine? Please? Uh? No? Boop?
Speaker 1: What are you gonna send people with guns to everyone's house?
Speaker 1: Make them stay at home? Is this is this communist China?
Speaker 1: I know some Democrats wanted to be test and trace
Speaker 1: was a joke. Double masking was coming because masking did
Speaker 1: not work sufficiently even with mass adoption. That is what
Speaker 1: happened in this country. So now it's double masking or
Speaker 1: better fitted masks, to which I just say, triple mask baby.
Speaker 1: We already saw there was a news story on NBC
Speaker 1: or maybe it was CNBC to talking about how effective
Speaker 1: triple masking would be. And sure enough, now some people
Speaker 1: are going to start doing that. So I knew that
Speaker 1: was going to happen. And there are so many of
Speaker 1: these these rules, these regulations that are idiotic. But if
Speaker 1: you tell them that they yell at you. I'm amazed
Speaker 1: at how many people. I'm trying to give them back
Speaker 1: some autonomy, some freedom, some dignity, Get some of their
Speaker 1: dignity back that has been taken from them by the Fauciites.
Speaker 1: Got to be terrified or relatives. They told you to
Speaker 1: be afraid of your family members over Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Speaker 1: Remember every two weeks it was, oh my gosh, the
Speaker 1: explosion from a Holidays. Now it's called wintertime. And there
Speaker 1: were more viruses spreading then, as is always the case,
Speaker 1: they wanted to avoid family members. There'll be a lot
Speaker 1: of people who don't die from COVID, but this was
Speaker 1: their last Christmas, or this was their last Thanksgiving, and
Speaker 1: if they loosened to fauci, they didn't spend it with family.
Speaker 1: Thanks fouch. And now they're talking about a test before
Speaker 1: you can get on for domestic domestic flights, a test
Speaker 1: for COVID. Gee, that's not going to be a giant
Speaker 1: pain in the ass. What is it going to be
Speaker 1: three days before, two days before? When are you good?
Speaker 1: You know that there are a number of there are
Speaker 1: a number of people who are going to get false positives.
Speaker 1: That's just baked into the testing system because especially the
Speaker 1: way they were doing it before, with the amplification of
Speaker 1: the of the virus particles, with the way they were
Speaker 1: doing it was at such a sensitive level that it
Speaker 1: would pick up old virus, dead virus, discarded virus. They've,
Speaker 1: I believe, begun to scale that back a little bit,
Speaker 1: and so now they're telling you if the test before
Speaker 1: you get on a plane, you could still get sick
Speaker 1: the day after you get on the plane. And also
Speaker 1: we're taking precautions on planes. I thought, plane, we're supposed
Speaker 1: to be pretty safe. What the heck happened? I thought
Speaker 1: if we were our masks on the plane, it's not
Speaker 1: that big a deal. It's an acceptable risk. This is
Speaker 1: all about acceptable risk. And then the dumbest thing of all,
Speaker 1: but it's political. That's why I understand why they're doing it.
Speaker 1: It's not really about science. It's definitely not about keeping
Speaker 1: you safe. It's political. Where are we with domestic restrictions
Speaker 1: on travel that there's a possibility that that could even happen.
Speaker 1: This is back to this piece in the Miami Herald
Speaker 1: where they're saying, quote, the Biden administration is considering whether
Speaker 1: to impose domestic travel restrictions, including on Florida, fearful that
Speaker 1: coronavirus mutations are threatening to reverse hard fought progress on
Speaker 1: the pandemic. By the way, the progress is, it's burning
Speaker 1: through our population, and we have vaccinations. That's the only
Speaker 1: progress that's happening. We haven't contained. We didn't stop it. Obviously,
Speaker 1: outbreaks of the new variants, including a highly contagious one
Speaker 1: first identified in the United Kingdom, as well as others
Speaker 1: from South Africa and Brazil that scientists worry can evade
Speaker 1: existing vaccines, have lent urgency to a review of potential
Speaker 1: travel restrictions within the United States. Discussions in the the administration
Speaker 1: over potential travel restrictions do not target a specific state,
Speaker 1: but focus on how to prevent the spread of variants
Speaker 1: that are surging in a number of states, including Florida
Speaker 1: and California. But oh, this was this was so interesting
Speaker 1: to see. You mean the place that we're this article
Speaker 1: has been updated. I was going to say that they've
Speaker 1: been some of this language has been changed since I
Speaker 1: read it yesterday, the addition of California, and there everybody
Speaker 1: latched onto this and they said, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: because the initial headlines were just about Florida. They're going
Speaker 1: to have travel restrictions in place for Florida. How is
Speaker 1: that going to stop the virus. Let's just sit here
Speaker 1: for a second. This means that people they're trying to
Speaker 1: test this one out. They're putting it out. There's kind
Speaker 1: of a trial balloon people in and around the Biden
Speaker 1: administration at the top level. But this means Fauci. Of course,
Speaker 1: Fauci's just sitting there like the little bureaucrat hacky is
Speaker 1: and he's talking to whomever on Biden's task force and
Speaker 1: probably Biden himself, and they're thinking, you know, Florence got
Speaker 1: these problems I'm hearing with the new strain, the new variant.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe we gotta do a little something about that.
Speaker 1: Oh you mean you're going to isolate and perhaps even
Speaker 1: quarantine from travel one state in order to protect us
Speaker 1: all from the South African variant, which is not more deadly.
Speaker 1: They just say it's more transmissible. They don't know that
Speaker 1: it goes around any vaccinations. They have no proof of that.
Speaker 1: These are just theories. But you see, when they want
Speaker 1: to do something, a theoretical justification for it is enough.
Speaker 1: Oh you can't travel the flora anymore. Why because we're
Speaker 1: not sure if the vaccines will work against this variant.
Speaker 1: That there's one hundred cases I think or two hundred
Speaker 1: cases of it in Florida. Okay, but it could the
Speaker 1: vaccine may well work against it. We don't know that.
Speaker 1: So what Oh yeah, but we gotta do we gotta
Speaker 1: take the precaution as if it's only in Florida or
Speaker 1: only in a few states. And then let's let's take
Speaker 1: a step back even further. How dumb are the people
Speaker 1: in charge really? I mean, do not let the possibility
Speaker 1: that we are truly ruled by morons ever stray too
Speaker 1: far from your mind. Okay, you're gonna limit domestic domestic
Speaker 1: airline travel. Well, this thing exists in America called cars,
Speaker 1: and people go to other places, they go to other states,
Speaker 1: and they see other human beings. So unless you're going
Speaker 1: to do a full on statewide quarantine lockdown, no one
Speaker 1: in or out, what do you really going to accomplish?
Speaker 1: And so it's a dumb idea top to bottom. It's
Speaker 1: it's an enormous and an enormous restriction of the rights
Speaker 1: of Americans to travel freely between the states. And I
Speaker 1: know they haven't done it, but the fact that they're
Speaker 1: even considering it just shows they would love nothing more
Speaker 1: than an opportunity. They'd love nothing more than an opportunity
Speaker 1: to take a big shot at Florida. Because the data,
Speaker 1: the data is there now last twelve months. You don't
Speaker 1: You're you're picking where you're going to be just based
Speaker 1: on the on the economy and the COVID Response'd rather
Speaker 1: be in New York or Florida. Rather be in New
Speaker 1: Jersey or Florida. Rather be in California or Florida. You
Speaker 1: get on the list. It's pretty clear they've got to
Speaker 1: do something about this. They can't, they can't allow this
Speaker 1: narrative to continue because it's a threat to their continued
Speaker 1: p hour. And then there's just one more thing, back
Speaker 1: to this other point, when do you think this really stops?
Speaker 1: I want you to really keep that in mind, because
Speaker 1: if possibilities are enough for infringements on your liberty and
Speaker 1: on your day to day life, you don't think they
Speaker 1: can always conjure up another possible strain, another possible variant.
Speaker 1: Libs have no problem with this, They have no issue
Speaker 1: at all. They like this stay at home zoom life
Speaker 1: They like wearing the mask. They like having working class
Speaker 1: people out there being the ones that are actually exposing
Speaker 1: themselves to the virus. Will they just stay at home
Speaker 1: and type in their computers with their mask on? Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, they're fine with it. They think the mask
Speaker 1: is no but they always say, oh, it's like seat
Speaker 1: belt wearing. It's like, really, do you have to wear
Speaker 1: a seat belt when you go for a walk alone
Speaker 1: in the woods with your dog? Because that's what these
Speaker 1: idiot libs want. Now. I worry. I worry this country
Speaker 1: has has lost, has lost it guts that our population
Speaker 1: we're just we're too we're just too soft and and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, as long as we're to borrow from it's
Speaker 1: the souls and eats and lines. As long as we're
Speaker 1: safe and warm and fed, it's all the same to us.
Speaker 1: Doesn't really matter. You know, whatever they tell you to do,
Speaker 1: we'll just do it. You know, it'd be one of
Speaker 1: the bad people. I'm amazed. I amazed to one of
Speaker 1: my fellow Americans have willing to go through. I try
Speaker 1: my own little private acts of protest against this, and
Speaker 1: eventually the system overwhelmed me too. Won't silence me, I
Speaker 1: still speak about it, but I'm not going to get
Speaker 1: arrested for being the one person in Manhattan who refuses
Speaker 1: to wear a mask. Right, that's it's not worth it.
Speaker 1: Everyone else around here is like, oh my gosh, he's
Speaker 1: killing grandma. They've all been brainwashed and they can't. Another
Speaker 1: problem here is they can't disassociate this from Trump. They
Speaker 1: view this as a Trump thing. I could care less
Speaker 1: what Trump says or does about, or did about the
Speaker 1: mass situation or the virus in general. This is about
Speaker 1: right now. They just don't want to give up the control.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Buck at
Speaker 1: buck sexton dot com. It's nearly a unanimous opinion from
Speaker 1: health officials the schools have not been particularly high. Sources
Speaker 1: transmission that they have been safe places for adequate ventilation
Speaker 1: and social distancing, That schools have been safe, and so
Speaker 1: many American parents, of course, want their children to be
Speaker 1: back there. The Biden demonstration has caught some real criticism
Speaker 1: on this that they seem to be not living up
Speaker 1: to the goals that President Biden first set out, and
Speaker 1: Yes Press secondary Stocky suggested that they're one day a week,
Speaker 1: that that would first of all the sure number of schools,
Speaker 1: but they're talking about narrowed that it would be the
Speaker 1: younger kids as opposed to the older kids, and that
Speaker 1: alienated some parents. And then that yes, that one day
Speaker 1: a week for a certain percentage of students would be
Speaker 1: enough to hit their threshold. She walked this back a
Speaker 1: little bit yesterday. She said they're still pressing forward. That
Speaker 1: she acknowledged that they that they want this is still
Speaker 1: a major centerpiece of their plan, but it does seem
Speaker 1: like right now that they're behind on that while and
Speaker 1: that's something that they have taken criticism for. As we
Speaker 1: see schools like Chicago, cities like Chicago and Philadelphia have
Speaker 1: real issues, and there's a sense that they're being reluctant
Speaker 1: to challenge the teachers unions to put those teachers back
Speaker 1: in classrooms. There's not a sense, there's the obvious reality
Speaker 1: that the teachers unions are just using this for maximum
Speaker 1: leverage for their adults at the expensive kids. That's it.
Speaker 1: That's it. Democrats need them, Democrats want their donations, want
Speaker 1: their support. And remember it's not even just the federal level.
Speaker 1: It's really important at the state and local level too.
Speaker 1: The whole Democrat machinery doesn't want to touch teachers unions,
Speaker 1: although they're in the back pocket of the Democrat party,
Speaker 1: or rather the Democrat parties in the back pocket of
Speaker 1: the unions. But why is this so important to look at?
Speaker 1: Here we have put in front of us the most
Speaker 1: clear possible data. We've run the experiment. We have private, private,
Speaker 1: and prochial schools have been opened for months. They're fine.
Speaker 1: All the data from America, from Europe, from every country
Speaker 1: in the world. Children are fine. There's no real risk.
Speaker 1: Democrats won't act on it. Democrats won't act on it.
Speaker 1: This is the if you needed proof that they are
Speaker 1: unreasonable and acting in bad faith on COVID nineteen, here
Speaker 1: is your clear as it can possibly be proof that
Speaker 1: that is what is going on. You know, I think
Speaker 1: some folks are just coming to this recognition now. For
Speaker 1: a lot of the rest of us, it's hard not
Speaker 1: to say, yeah, I told you so. This was never
Speaker 1: about protecting the kids. This was never about keeping you
Speaker 1: safe either. For a lot of Democrats, the shutdown of
Speaker 1: the schools was one thing and one thing, only using
Speaker 1: the kids as hostages to get adults easier, better paying,
Speaker 1: lazier jobs. That's it that they're unfiable from courtesy of
Speaker 1: their taxpayer paychecks. That's what's really going on. You're listening
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe
Speaker 1: to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. What should we make now of
Speaker 1: what we've seen so far and what we're going to
Speaker 1: see in this impeachment trial. I'm trying to only take
Speaker 1: the important takeaways and give them to you folks. So
Speaker 1: let's bring in our friend Ned Ryan. He's the founder
Speaker 1: of American Majority. Tell us what he's seeing. Ned. How
Speaker 1: are you doing, buddy, Hey, I'm good Buck. Good to
Speaker 1: be with you. And you know, it's interesting times we
Speaker 1: live in. But I was thinking yesterday as I watched
Speaker 1: Ted lu and Eric Swalwell, you know, I guess if
Speaker 1: you're gonna have a proper circus, you've got to have
Speaker 1: a paray to clowns. And so one after one of
Speaker 1: those clowns came up, and you know it's the big lie.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the thing Buck, that I think people,
Speaker 1: I hope understand and that all of this neither impeachment
Speaker 1: was based in fact, right, there are no facts involved
Speaker 1: with the first one, and there's no facts really involved
Speaker 1: with this one. And it based on a big line.
Speaker 1: And you know that Democrats know it too, because they
Speaker 1: edited out three very keywords in their video peaceful and patriotic,
Speaker 1: when they were trying to to show in this video
Speaker 1: that somehow Trump incited violence and sedition and insurrection. But
Speaker 1: of course they eded out three very key words in that.
Speaker 1: It's all a big life based off them trying to
Speaker 1: pin down President Trump on on somehow inciting all of
Speaker 1: this when in fact it wasn't insurrection at worst, it
Speaker 1: was it was a ride of some really stupid people.
Speaker 1: And again we're finding out facts two buck, this was
Speaker 1: premeditated people that there there now is evidence that there
Speaker 1: were planning being a month ahead of time to do
Speaker 1: this at the Capitol. And in fact, we now know
Speaker 1: that those pipe poblems were actually planted at the DNC
Speaker 1: and the RNC the night before. So all of this
Speaker 1: is a big line. And my supposition in all of
Speaker 1: this book is it's a big to cover the big rig. Right,
Speaker 1: if you're if you're distracted by this, you're not focused
Speaker 1: on that Time magazine article talking about the big rig
Speaker 1: of what they actually did in twenty twenty. So this
Speaker 1: is all kind of, I think, part of their plan
Speaker 1: to distract people because they're not they're never going to
Speaker 1: convict them. Tell us one more Republicans go ahead, They're
Speaker 1: going to convictim and they already said it was unconstitutional
Speaker 1: to continue on with this trial. Tell us about the
Speaker 1: the Time magazine twenty twenty article that was celebrating I mean,
Speaker 1: you're somebody who understands the inner workings of elections and
Speaker 1: what actually goes on here from messaging to ballot boxes.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you're somebody who knows that top to bottom.
Speaker 1: What were they celebrating about how they stacked the deck
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty in favor of you know, in favor
Speaker 1: of the Democrats. Yeah, yeah, no, I would encourage people
Speaker 1: if you've not read Molly Ball's article at Time magazine
Speaker 1: about the secret campaign to say the twenty twenty elections,
Speaker 1: which of course they demolished electoral integrity to to fortify
Speaker 1: the election. That was one of the most curious or
Speaker 1: welliam words I've seen in recent times. They weren't rigging
Speaker 1: the election, but they were fortifying it. But it really
Speaker 1: was the big rig. It was collusion between big tech,
Speaker 1: big labor unions, Chamber of Commerce, who has always been
Speaker 1: they've always been problematic. They've always been more corporatist than capitalist.
Speaker 1: And obviously the big tech not only playing a role
Speaker 1: in basically stopping the free flow of information right censoring
Speaker 1: the New York Post, Google not really letting some of
Speaker 1: this information that would be damaging to Joe Biden come out.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, you know, I've talked about
Speaker 1: this some, but people need to be what Mark Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: did with the Center for Tech and Civic Life, in
Speaker 1: which he dropped three hundred and fifty million into a
Speaker 1: nonprofit that then was used to paid private funds used
Speaker 1: to paid election officials in these battleground states, specifically in
Speaker 1: blue counties and blue cities, to boost the blue vote
Speaker 1: Democratic vote. I mean literally by a margin of ten
Speaker 1: to one buck. We know on Wisconsint thanks to the
Speaker 1: Amistead project that it was consint alone. In the Center
Speaker 1: for Tech and Civic Life money was basically forty seven
Speaker 1: dollars per vote inside of blue counties and Blue cities
Speaker 1: versus more to four to seven dollars in Republican counties.
Speaker 1: So what they were doing in this Time article, and
Speaker 1: I have to tell you, when I first read it
Speaker 1: last week, book, I was torn between feelings of completely
Speaker 1: infuriated because they completely destroyed I believe, in my mind,
Speaker 1: and are not proud of it, Americans' ability to truly
Speaker 1: self governed. Right. They're kind of done with democracy. Right,
Speaker 1: We're not going to let this happen in such a way.
Speaker 1: We're going to manipulate it and rig it to get
Speaker 1: the election results. We want to make sure that the
Speaker 1: great outsider doesn't win again. And so you start to
Speaker 1: really understand and they're proud of it, and so you're
Speaker 1: infuriated at the same time. But the thing that concerns
Speaker 1: me they only brag about these things that they think
Speaker 1: they've won. Right, people that are this braise and think
Speaker 1: they've somehow pulled it off with the American people are
Speaker 1: too stupid to understand what they actually did, or just
Speaker 1: simply not going to pay attention. So I would encourage
Speaker 1: everybody go read that Time article, and I hope you
Speaker 1: have the same feeling I did, complete completely infuriated by
Speaker 1: what they did in manipulating our twenty twenty elections. We're
Speaker 1: speaking of NED Ryan, founder of American Majority NED. I
Speaker 1: also have to say that it seems as this impeachment
Speaker 1: farce continues on with this in this trial this week.
Speaker 1: There are very important things that are not known publicly,
Speaker 1: and I do not believe are known by members of
Speaker 1: the Senate who are supposed to be adjudicating this whole thing.
Speaker 1: And the first one that comes to mind is how
Speaker 1: is it that we were told? And I I am
Speaker 1: somebody who fell into this category, we were told something
Speaker 1: as straightforward as a police officer was beaten to death
Speaker 1: with a fire extinguisher. That was the report, right given,
Speaker 1: given the violence. There was violence involving cops. They did
Speaker 1: hit them, and you know, there were there were scuffles
Speaker 1: and there was assaults on officers. But we were told
Speaker 1: that somebody was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher,
Speaker 1: or at least was hey with a fire extinguisher and
Speaker 1: died as a result of the injury. And now it's
Speaker 1: quite clear that that is not what happened. How could
Speaker 1: we have I mean, that has been the singular. That
Speaker 1: was the murder that was supposed to be the basis
Speaker 1: of the violent insurrection narrative, because other than that you
Speaker 1: have what's clearly a riot. You have people running around
Speaker 1: taking photos, being idiots, breaking the law. Should be punished,
Speaker 1: no question. But it seems pretty important that we get
Speaker 1: the officer sick nick story correct. But yeah, we don't
Speaker 1: have it. We don't know, no, And I think I
Speaker 1: would encourage people to read two articles that have been
Speaker 1: done on this very specific topic. One is Julie Kelly's
Speaker 1: An American Greatness. I believe it either rand yesterday or
Speaker 1: the day before, but Julie Kelly an American Greatness and
Speaker 1: it Revolvernews Darren Beatty. I'm not sure if Darren was
Speaker 1: the actual author of it, but there's another good piece
Speaker 1: on this that Revolver News about the exact same issue
Speaker 1: in which this was pushed. This was, you know, this
Speaker 1: officer setting it was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher.
Speaker 1: This is murder, et cetera. And now they're realizing, yeah,
Speaker 1: that those aren't really the facts. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: questions about that. There are a lot of questions about
Speaker 1: obviously the premeditation. FBI's knowledge of this. Apparently they knew
Speaker 1: it beforehand. You know, Mark Meadows came out the other
Speaker 1: day and said Trump realized that with that many people
Speaker 1: in DC and a lot of people coming in, that
Speaker 1: we should have more National Guard. You've made a request
Speaker 1: to have more National Guard in the city before January sixth.
Speaker 1: Mayor Bowser said no. I mean, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: different details that need to be addressed and understood. But
Speaker 1: again again I go back to my earlier point. Neither
Speaker 1: of these impeachments or the trials had anything to do
Speaker 1: with facts. And the ultimate purpose, and I wrote about
Speaker 1: this at American Greatness yesterday, is to basically say that
Speaker 1: any descent to our narrative, any descent to our status quo,
Speaker 1: to our system, will not be tolerated. We will punish
Speaker 1: you financially, your reputation, we will shut you down. Now
Speaker 1: distance is not patriotic. In fact, it's seditious, and it's
Speaker 1: in your insurrectionist and in fact you're even a domestic terrorist.
Speaker 1: Descent will not be allowed at how dare you question us?
Speaker 1: But the other thing, too, Buck really quick that that's
Speaker 1: kind of fascinating to me. People that really think they
Speaker 1: have one, that really feel confident about this, don't do
Speaker 1: this right. There's almost an element of fear and some
Speaker 1: of the things that they're doing trying to get Trump
Speaker 1: disqualified from running again, trying to shut down seventy four
Speaker 1: plus a million people and saying, you know you made
Speaker 1: a bad choice. We're going to take away your right
Speaker 1: to choose any candidate moving forward, and if you choose
Speaker 1: the wrong one, they'll be they'll be consequences for you.
Speaker 1: But there's almost this element of fear of what they're doing,
Speaker 1: because I don't know how confident they really actually feel,
Speaker 1: because they really had to do a lot of things
Speaker 1: to kind of rig to get the results they wanted to,
Speaker 1: and it doesn't feel like they're terribly confident in their
Speaker 1: position right now. I mean, that's at least one of
Speaker 1: my thoughts. Ned. I also think that everyone should should
Speaker 1: be aware. In my estimation, what's going on here is
Speaker 1: that they're they're setting a narrative of events with this
Speaker 1: Senate trial that is actually, in many ways more more
Speaker 1: to create the basis for steps that have nothing to
Speaker 1: do with this right, to create the basis for enhanced
Speaker 1: counter terrorism based surveillance of Trump supporters, to create a
Speaker 1: narrative of of of kicking people off of social media
Speaker 1: who are Trump supporters because of violence policies and that
Speaker 1: that essentially this what the what the the Democrats Senate
Speaker 1: is doing right now, or Democrats on the Senator doing
Speaker 1: right now, is creating the excuse for the abuse of
Speaker 1: Trump supporters that's going to occur in the rest of society,
Speaker 1: and they're going to point to this trial and say, see,
Speaker 1: those were the facts presented. Yeah. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: we're in a very dangerous period in American politics in
Speaker 1: which they are trying to, for all intents and purposes,
Speaker 1: dehumanize a very significant percentage in population. Right if you
Speaker 1: can say these people were insurrectionists, they're domestic terrorists, they're Unamerican.
Speaker 1: If you can say that and actually convince enough of
Speaker 1: the American people, well maybe they're right, maybe these people
Speaker 1: are very dangerous. Well, then it lays the ground work.
Speaker 1: You'd be able to justify what you're going to do next,
Speaker 1: you know, and be able to punish them, whether it's
Speaker 1: censored them, whether you know it's it's concerning you don't
Speaker 1: even really want to think about where they're headed. But
Speaker 1: I know this is the first step in a very
Speaker 1: dangerous path. If you want to be able to do
Speaker 1: certain things to people, you have to first dehumanize them.
Speaker 1: And then once you dehumanize them in a certain segment
Speaker 1: of the population's eyes, you can do whatever you want
Speaker 1: to them moving forward, deeply, troubling, deeply concerning Ned. Ryan
Speaker 1: is a found of American Majority and Ned to that end.
Speaker 1: You're a guy who is in the political trenches and
Speaker 1: you're trying to actually organize and mobilize people for constitutionalism, conservatism.
Speaker 1: What do we do now? I keep getting this question,
Speaker 1: and it's one that I think there's no there's no
Speaker 1: single answer. It's really an evolving answers as more situations
Speaker 1: arise here. But what do we say to people right
Speaker 1: now who are feeling exactly what I think you and
Speaker 1: I are, which is that this is a precarious moment
Speaker 1: in American politics? How do we go forward? Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, I think people need to fully understand what
Speaker 1: they did last year, and one of our big projects
Speaker 1: with American Majority this year is Electoral Integrity Project, in
Speaker 1: which we're going to be spelling out here's what they
Speaker 1: did in twenty twenty, using the Time article, using the
Speaker 1: Honest Dead Projects Report, using some of our other research
Speaker 1: that we pulled together to really explain to people, here's
Speaker 1: what happened in twenty twenty, we can never let it
Speaker 1: happen again. Right with universal mail in ballots, twice as
Speaker 1: many absentee ballots cast this time around than there were
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, a lot of questions about the validity
Speaker 1: of a lot of those votes. So explain to people
Speaker 1: what took place, and then reform items. And I'm telling
Speaker 1: people what you need to be focused on over the
Speaker 1: next eighteen months, because I really do feel this buck
Speaker 1: we've got one shot at the death star. When you
Speaker 1: see some of the things that Nancy Pelosi and these
Speaker 1: people are doing to kind of entrench some of the
Speaker 1: stuff they got away with last year and turn it
Speaker 1: into law, I think we've got one shot at it
Speaker 1: between now and twenty twenty two. We got to do
Speaker 1: electoral reform. And there's a whole list of electoral reforms
Speaker 1: that we're going to be going through, whether it's dealing
Speaker 1: with absentee ballot laws, state legislators actually knowing their rights
Speaker 1: and you can't skirt state constitutions. We're going to try
Speaker 1: and clean voter roles, dirty day that leads to dirty elections,
Speaker 1: and then encourage people as they find out the right
Speaker 1: bills that are being pushed in these state legislatures to
Speaker 1: actually call and lobby their elected officials on that to
Speaker 1: make sure reform happens and at the same time to
Speaker 1: take it another step book. I think some people that
Speaker 1: are listening and people that we're going to be training
Speaker 1: moving forward this year, I'm gonna challenge you gotta run
Speaker 1: for county clurk, you gotta run for county registrar. You
Speaker 1: gotta run through these municipal level positions that have oversight
Speaker 1: into elections. Some of them might even actually end up
Speaker 1: running for Secretary of State or other positions that have
Speaker 1: to do with the electoral process. We cannot allow what
Speaker 1: happened in twenty twenty to take place again because it
Speaker 1: really was hollowed out the American right to self governance.
Speaker 1: It was manipulated. Laws were broken and skirted. State constitutions
Speaker 1: were skirted. And we've got to be aware of what
Speaker 1: took place and then followed these action items and get
Speaker 1: it done before twenty twenty two. And I have to
Speaker 1: tell you, but there are twenty seven Republican governors out there.
Speaker 1: There are twenty three trifectas in which we have in
Speaker 1: the state, the governor, the state Senate, and the state House.
Speaker 1: If we do not have meaningful legislation in at least
Speaker 1: those twenty three states, you know, I'm gonna question Republicans
Speaker 1: intelligence on this issue because they have to address this,
Speaker 1: and if they don't, Republicans, I don't think they might
Speaker 1: never win a national election again, And if it gets
Speaker 1: really bad, they'll never win an election at any level
Speaker 1: inside of a battle Brown state. And one last quick
Speaker 1: one for you, what do you think the former president's
Speaker 1: thoughts are on running again Donald Trump? I think the
Speaker 1: real test is twenty twenty If he wants to be
Speaker 1: the kingmaker and really shows some political clout in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two and pick us a series of House races
Speaker 1: and Senate races and do rallies and raise money and
Speaker 1: have a huge impact, right, a huge winning percentage in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, I think it sets the stage for
Speaker 1: running again in twenty twenty four. But for me, the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two elections and his role in his impact
Speaker 1: on those elections really are indicative of what he'll do
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. Ned Ryan of American Majority, Everybody
Speaker 1: Ned always a pleasures. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Follow Buck on Facebook Instagram and Twitter. I just want
Speaker 1: to know as this played out for hours and hours
Speaker 1: and Senators, we're listening to this and watching it, some
Speaker 1: of it for the first time. Can you imagine can
Speaker 1: you imagine one of them sitting in the gallery with
Speaker 1: his feet up reading magazines or unrelated material during this
Speaker 1: unbelievable full presentation of what happened to our US capital
Speaker 1: that day. Well, you have people that are clearly unfit
Speaker 1: and that was Josh Holly, and unfit to serve in
Speaker 1: the United States Capital, in the United States Senate. And
Speaker 1: of course, if you're Josh Holly, you actually are the
Speaker 1: person who led the insurrection. You're the person most responsible
Speaker 1: other than Donald Trump, for that insurrection. You're the person
Speaker 1: most responsible or police officer being beaten to death. You're
Speaker 1: the person most responsible for the cop killing, for the
Speaker 1: cop beating, for the abusing. It is Josh Holly who
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell begged, begged to not do what he did.
Speaker 1: Do we ever get to hold people accountable for lying
Speaker 1: about this situation or not. Officer sick Nick was not
Speaker 1: beaten to death. That's the latest reporting we have as
Speaker 1: of me going on air right now. Was not beaten
Speaker 1: to death. I believe he had a medical condition. They
Speaker 1: don't know. Just by the way, Still a tragedy and
Speaker 1: still horrible that any officers and there were officers assaulted
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill that should never have happened. But I
Speaker 1: think the facts are supposed to matter, especially in the
Speaker 1: context of a impeachment trial. But they just keep repeating
Speaker 1: this thing. And Josh Holly is the most responsible. Josh
Speaker 1: Holly's responsible for somebody hitting a police officer with their
Speaker 1: fists outside of the capitolil. Why is he responsible for that?
Speaker 1: I mean, isn't then Joe Scarborough and all the other
Speaker 1: total phony elitist frauds over at MSNBC. Aren't they responsible
Speaker 1: for every business burned down, every officer punched, attacked, spit on,
Speaker 1: feces thrown in their face, bottles of urine smashed over them,
Speaker 1: happening all summer long. Not a few times, not even
Speaker 1: dozens of times, hundreds of times. See responsible for that? Oh?
Speaker 1: I see. We have a very we have a very
Speaker 1: different set of rules apparently for Democrats and Republicans. Isn't
Speaker 1: that well, it's exactly what we expect. There's there's no difference,
Speaker 1: there's no change at all and what we would assume.
Speaker 1: This is a troubling time in American politics because as
Speaker 1: I as I see this, I can tell that this
Speaker 1: isn't really even about removing Trump. This is about using
Speaker 1: the so called insurrection as the justification for doing truly
Speaker 1: awful on American things, using government force as well as
Speaker 1: corporate force in the private sector, to attack people, to
Speaker 1: ruin people, to emmiserate them for their wrong think. They
Speaker 1: seek to emiserate us for our wrong think. That that's
Speaker 1: what's really going on with all of this. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter that they're not going to get a conviction of
Speaker 1: Trump in the end, don't you see. They're presenting all
Speaker 1: of this as evidence and as propaganda, and so they
Speaker 1: can then take action because they will have convinced so
Speaker 1: many Democrats that this was an insurrection and it was awful,
Speaker 1: and that the Trump supporters or terrorists. I'm worried about
Speaker 1: what they're gonna do in six months or three months
Speaker 1: with the passage of legislation to quasi criminalized conservatism. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Joined the conversation and
Speaker 1: message buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot Com. He may read it on the show. I
Speaker 1: sat down with Member of the House Intelligence Committee Devin
Speaker 1: Newness yesterday. I had a chance to ask him about
Speaker 1: what's going on here with all the unfolding craziness with
Speaker 1: the senators talking about insurrection and how Trump is directly
Speaker 1: responsible and all that stuff. But he pointed out that
Speaker 1: there's there's a bigger trend here of yes, lies from Democrats,
Speaker 1: but also the abuse of institutions, and he raised some
Speaker 1: other questions. I wanted to share some of this with you.
Speaker 1: I think you need to hear this because here's a
Speaker 1: guy who, as you remember Devin Newness, at the very
Speaker 1: beginning of the Russia collusion madness, he was a voice saying,
Speaker 1: hold on, we need to actually get the facts straight here.
Speaker 1: There's something not right. They're not telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: There was FISA abuse, there was surveillance of the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: He was that guy, and they said, of course, terrible
Speaker 1: things about him as a result of this. The media
Speaker 1: was slandering him all the time, but Newness stood his
Speaker 1: ground and he's really one of the unsung heroes of
Speaker 1: fighting back against the Russia collusion madness. He should be
Speaker 1: far We should have a there should have been a
Speaker 1: much bigger, I think surge of public recognition about just
Speaker 1: what an important service Devin Newness provided by bringing that
Speaker 1: true to the forefront. Well, he also in looking at
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion insanity, is somebody who really understands what
Speaker 1: has gone on in our intelligence agencies. And I wanted
Speaker 1: to share with you this is what he told me yesterday.
Speaker 1: Play one. Well, it's been dark days for America for
Speaker 1: five years since our intelligence agencies were corrupted as far
Speaker 1: as late twenty fifteen when they began effectively, for lack
Speaker 1: of a better definition, spine on the Republican Party. I
Speaker 1: know they'll say hard Page or Trump or Man of
Speaker 1: Ford or whatever the hell it is. At the end
Speaker 1: of the day, this has been going on for five years.
Speaker 1: You had the first so there was an impeachment. It's
Speaker 1: basically the continued coup, and I think what you're seeing
Speaker 1: now is essentially the grand finale of it all, where
Speaker 1: they want to get sixty seven votes the left because
Speaker 1: they don't want Donald Trump to be able to run again. Now,
Speaker 1: it's kind of interesting because you know, very seldom, I
Speaker 1: think only once or twice in US history has a
Speaker 1: president actually one lost and then come back and one again.
Speaker 1: So they're really afraid of Donald Trump. It's kind of interesting.
Speaker 1: That's the only possible reason they're impeaching it. That's the
Speaker 1: only possible reason they're impeaching. Well, I actually think there
Speaker 1: are even more reasons. I think that this is setting
Speaker 1: the groundwork for an enormous effort from the left to
Speaker 1: go on offense against Conservatism. You know, we give them
Speaker 1: through this election process. They now have power. They have
Speaker 1: legislative authority, they have executive branch authority. But it's all
Speaker 1: supposed to be one done in good faith. You're not
Speaker 1: supposed to be persecuting your fellow Americans with that power,
Speaker 1: which they will certainly they're already doing, and they'll certainly
Speaker 1: do more of that. But beyond that, you're you're also
Speaker 1: not supposed to try to structurally change the country so
Speaker 1: that you stay in power forever. Then you start to
Speaker 1: get something more along the lines of you know, one man,
Speaker 1: one vote, one time, right, this is the last free
Speaker 1: and fair election. And they would argue this and say, oh,
Speaker 1: but if you're changing the structure and you're doing it legally,
Speaker 1: then you know, all's fair in love and war. But
Speaker 1: I mean amnesty is essentially ending something that had been illegal. Right,
Speaker 1: if you give amnesty to twelve or fifteen or twenty million,
Speaker 1: or whatever many millions of people it is, you're just deciding, well,
Speaker 1: the law isn't really the law anymore because it benefits
Speaker 1: one political party. Right, the law isn't really the law.
Speaker 1: And when you think about DC statehood, that would be
Speaker 1: another way that they would be structurally changing things. You
Speaker 1: look at add A Puerto Rico. These are the kinds
Speaker 1: of moves that they're thinking about, and it's just a
Speaker 1: question whether they can execute on them. But they're hoping
Speaker 1: to destroy the Republican Party once and for all. They
Speaker 1: don't like the checks and balances aspect of government. They
Speaker 1: don't like that there are there's a two party system
Speaker 1: where you always have some check, some control on the
Speaker 1: power of whoever's actually in authority at any one point
Speaker 1: in time. But the intelligence agencies being used as weapons
Speaker 1: in this whole process is deeply disconcerting. And I've been
Speaker 1: telling everyone just wait until the social media companies decide
Speaker 1: that they want to get even more in on this one.
Speaker 1: Social media companies are gonna they essentially have chat logs, searches,
Speaker 1: everything from everybody in existence, stretching back for decades now,
Speaker 1: I mean certainly stretching back for ten or fifteen years
Speaker 1: for all of us, probably more like twenty years. And
Speaker 1: for anybody who's continuing to use them. They're giving them
Speaker 1: all this data. That's a lot of information that these socials,
Speaker 1: these are private companies, and they're already selling your data.
Speaker 1: But what if they decide that they want to do
Speaker 1: more than just sell it? You know, how how long
Speaker 1: do you really think it is before you have a
Speaker 1: Republican presidential candidate who suddenly, you know, naughty messages that
Speaker 1: he was writing his his don't it could even be
Speaker 1: his wife. I mean, I don't think people should be
Speaker 1: outraged about that or anything, but you know, I don't know,
Speaker 1: but whatever embarrassing stuff. But again, writing your wife naughty messages,
Speaker 1: I don't think that should be embarrassing at all. It's
Speaker 1: your wife. But something else, something bad, whatever, it may be,
Speaker 1: something that's but some private issue, and and that's splashed
Speaker 1: across the pages of all the major or splash across
Speaker 1: I should say, the websites and everything out there in
Speaker 1: the news news ecosystem. They have enormous, enormous authority in
Speaker 1: political discussions at these social media companies, and there you
Speaker 1: add that to the intelligence communities willingness to work with
Speaker 1: the media, and you start to say, hold on a second.
Speaker 1: If face Book, CNN, and the CIA are all against you,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have a really tough time. With the way
Speaker 1: our society currently functions, You're gonna have a really tough
Speaker 1: time getting the kind of political power you need to
Speaker 1: break the tech oligarch stranglehold on our society, to push
Speaker 1: back against the authoritarian democrat madness, and to counter the
Speaker 1: lies of the corporate media. Right that those when when
Speaker 1: you think about it, those three entities, corporate media, social media,
Speaker 1: and intelligence agencies all worked against actively worked against Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: against this campaign, and against the MAGA movement. That's just
Speaker 1: a matter. That's a fact. You had the suppression of
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden story by social media right before the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election. You had the corporate media's concoction of
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion ridiculousness. You have the intelligence agencies feeding
Speaker 1: the corporate media everything from the General Flynn phone call
Speaker 1: transcript to all kinds of things you can point to
Speaker 1: from Russia Russia Gate, feeding that to the media. It
Speaker 1: was like a big self looking ice cream cone, and
Speaker 1: they all were working against Donald Trump. You know, they're
Speaker 1: all now working in favor of Joe Biden. That's tremendously
Speaker 1: powerful and it's something we have to be very concerned about. Anyway,
Speaker 1: back to this Devin Newness interview that I just did
Speaker 1: yesterday on the First TV, which I really hope you
Speaker 1: will all check out. It's a free app, the First TV.
Speaker 1: Just download it. You can watch it anytime. Hold the
Speaker 1: Line is the Hold the Line with Buck Saxton as
Speaker 1: a show, doing a show every day, but you can
Speaker 1: watch it on demand, So just watch whenever you want to.
Speaker 1: Certainly watch my opening monologue. All of you listening to
Speaker 1: this check it out. But here's Newness on another and
Speaker 1: this is going to get very contentious. But here he
Speaker 1: is talking about what happened on January sixth. He's raising
Speaker 1: some questions Play two. Of course, I think that the
Speaker 1: president's lawyers need to do a very good job making
Speaker 1: the case here and look at it shouldn't be very
Speaker 1: hard to prove the fact of the matter is is
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's own words don't show that he was trying
Speaker 1: to lead an insurrection. There's no hard evidence. Right, there's
Speaker 1: no intelligence, and in fact the intelligence shows both before
Speaker 1: there were several groups. The FBI knew about it. They
Speaker 1: opened up that information to the US Congress. At the
Speaker 1: end of the day, Nancy Pelosi is effectively the mayor.
Speaker 1: So some but the Capitol Police wanted more security. The
Speaker 1: Sergeant of arms wanted more security. I knew they needed
Speaker 1: more security. And I'm just the top Republican on the
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee. I have no power. I find found out
Speaker 1: that morning for some reason, there was no fencing put
Speaker 1: in place. The military was offered to come in that
Speaker 1: the request was for them to come in. Somebody killed that. Now,
Speaker 1: who could that possibly be? It has to be Speaker Pelosi,
Speaker 1: and so that should be. Now, we don't have the
Speaker 1: hard evidence of that, because of course we can't put
Speaker 1: her or her staff on the stand. But when you
Speaker 1: match up the timelines, for example, that there were pipe
Speaker 1: bombs placed the night before, So should we get answers?
Speaker 1: Can we get answers to this? Doesn't it really matter
Speaker 1: if the riot was planned in advance? Doesn't that completely
Speaker 1: undercut the Donald Trump ordered this thing. Incitement to insurrection
Speaker 1: is not saying something. And then months later people get
Speaker 1: upset and they remember your words and they do something bad.
Speaker 1: Incitement to insurrection is hey, big angry mob, go burn
Speaker 1: down that building. That's incitement to insurrection. And so already
Speaker 1: we have Trump saying peacefully, have your voice is heard.
Speaker 1: But add to that the clear evidence so far that
Speaker 1: this was planned in advance of any Trump's statement whatsoever,
Speaker 1: and the incitement to insurrection charge just falls apart. But
Speaker 1: also what about this lack of a demand for additional security.
Speaker 1: I think that's interesting. I think that's not something that
Speaker 1: we should just we should just forget easily. Why did
Speaker 1: that happen? Remember, Devin Newness was the guy asking the
Speaker 1: questions at the beginning of Russia collusion. He's, you know,
Speaker 1: as a member of Congress on the House Intelligence Committee.
Speaker 1: He's somebody was asking the questions that the media was
Speaker 1: going into fits of rage about. Now Here he is
Speaker 1: asking more questions, and they're obviously going to try to stifle,
Speaker 1: shut down and attack in response to it. I think
Speaker 1: we should get answers. I think Devin Newness has proven
Speaker 1: that he's a guy who sees what's going on and
Speaker 1: isn't afraid to push for the truth. And these days
Speaker 1: that is a rarity. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast,
Speaker 1: follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram and Gina Corrano fired from
Speaker 1: the Mandalorian. What is the world coming to? I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say I like miss Corono. I thought she was very
Speaker 1: I thought she was good in the role um. I
Speaker 1: think she's got a lot of screen presence. I also
Speaker 1: think that, you know, if if we're going to have
Speaker 1: females on TV who are warriors, I think that it's
Speaker 1: just it's more even in a fantasy situation of of fiction.
Speaker 1: It's it's you know, Gina Corano, like kicking some bud
Speaker 1: is a little bit more credible than you know, one
Speaker 1: hundred one hundred pound runway model who's like doing fly
Speaker 1: kicks everywhere. I'm just saying, I mean, in general, I
Speaker 1: think that's I know, people oh, they get mad Amuna said,
Speaker 1: it's I'm sorry, It's true, all right. If you've ever
Speaker 1: ever seen, you know the difference between a hundred pound
Speaker 1: male and a two hundred and twenty pound male, you
Speaker 1: know in a wrestle matt and wrestling match or a fight,
Speaker 1: you understand the malee anyway, But the point here is
Speaker 1: that she got fired from The Mandalorian. For well, just
Speaker 1: the usual cancel culture nonsense. Lucas Film said they got
Speaker 1: rid of her because of social media posts. Now what
Speaker 1: was it that she had made? Oh? She so this
Speaker 1: is one thing that I love about her. She made
Speaker 1: fun of masks. She mocked mask wearing. Oh no, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, she just had something. She
Speaker 1: shared a photo apparently where there were a lot of
Speaker 1: people with a whole lot of masks on, or there
Speaker 1: was a person with a whole bunch of masks on.
Speaker 1: And isn't that just be an extra safe isn't isn't
Speaker 1: eight years? Isn't I'm sorry? Isn't eight masks rather safer
Speaker 1: than one mask? Why not? So? The Hollywood reporter here writes,
Speaker 1: this is not the first time Krano, who played former
Speaker 1: Rebel Alliance soldier Kara Dune on The Mandalorian, has been
Speaker 1: the focus of social media are for her political comments.
Speaker 1: Last November, she issued contentious tweets and which she mocked
Speaker 1: mask wearing and which she falsely suggested voter fraud occurred
Speaker 1: in the twenty twenty election. They have been looking for
Speaker 1: a reason to fire her for two months, and today
Speaker 1: was the final straw. A source with knowledge of Lucasfilms,
Speaker 1: thinking yeah, that's just their press, that's just their own
Speaker 1: press shop putting that out there, but not taking credit
Speaker 1: for that's all that is. Corona was an MMA star.
Speaker 1: She's appeared in Deadpool, Fast and Furious six, and I
Speaker 1: think she did what was it she she compared? She
Speaker 1: posted something about about Nazis and comparing how the Nazis
Speaker 1: were dehumanizing their neighbors. And isn't that sort you know,
Speaker 1: isn't that similar to something that's going on right now.
Speaker 1: Pedro Pascal, who is very woke, so he's of course protected.
Speaker 1: You know, this week he was expressing support on social
Speaker 1: media for his expressing support on social media for his
Speaker 1: transgender transistor on Instagram. Anyway, Pascal compared American treatment of
Speaker 1: migrant detention to Auschwitz a couple of years ago, with photos,
Speaker 1: the whole thing. No problem, that's fine. And he's also
Speaker 1: as you know, he's in the Mandalorian, he's the he's
Speaker 1: the main Mandalorian guy. You know, I've had a couple
Speaker 1: of friends already that have sent me just they've screenshot
Speaker 1: unto me, they're cancelations of Disney, other Disney subscription. I
Speaker 1: don't have a Disney subscription, but I would cancel it
Speaker 1: if I did, because we either we either hit them
Speaker 1: in the bottom line, we either actually make choices that
Speaker 1: affect the finances of these places, or they keep doing
Speaker 1: it and the left keeps getting their way. That's it.
Speaker 1: Everything else is just chattering. Oh oh, maybe they'll get
Speaker 1: nice here, Oh maybe they'll stop. It's not true. Yeah.
Speaker 1: The problem is that Corono compared being a Republican to
Speaker 1: the treatment that the way that Nazis have, yeah, to
Speaker 1: the way that the Nazis dehumanized people around them, something
Speaker 1: like that. I'm looking for the actual post now. Pedro Pascal,
Speaker 1: who plays the Mandalorian on Disney Plus, was not fired
Speaker 1: for this post on Instagram where the US oh comparing
Speaker 1: Trump supporters to Nazis. Actually I'm sorry, I mean, look,
Speaker 1: this is it doesn't even you look at this. We
Speaker 1: all know there's a huge double standard. We all know
Speaker 1: that you can get away with all kinds of stuff
Speaker 1: being left wing. Can I just say, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: Marilyn Manson, it's come out now, is like a sick,
Speaker 1: abusive maniac. Is this a surprise to anybody? This guy
Speaker 1: is First of all, his music is awful. It's not
Speaker 1: even music, it's just ear trash. It's garbage. There's no
Speaker 1: you know, this was this was the music that people
Speaker 1: that honestly had like emotional problems were drawn to. And
Speaker 1: you know, the guy's like, I'm the devil basically, and
Speaker 1: it's a surprise to find out that he's abusive to women.
Speaker 1: I mean, I look around, as it does anyone. This
Speaker 1: guy's is like a sick, weirdo obviously who stands for
Speaker 1: really bad things. But he was, you know, it was
Speaker 1: sort of he's associated with the left, with that sort
Speaker 1: of libertine nihilism of the left, so they let him
Speaker 1: get away with stuff for a long time. You're listening
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe
Speaker 1: to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Our friend Ben Ferguson now joins us.
Speaker 1: He is a talk radio host. He's got a podcast,
Speaker 1: the Ben Ferguson Show. He's coming to us from the
Speaker 1: great state of Texas. Mister Ferguson, what's going on? How
Speaker 1: are you brother? Are you ready to trout for the
Speaker 1: NBA because apparently they're gonna get some players pretty soon.
Speaker 1: You should be. I know you got a great jump shot.
Speaker 1: I'm actually in my day I will tell you I
Speaker 1: was a decent little point guard in eighth grade, but
Speaker 1: I'll go beyond that now. Yeah, my career ended at
Speaker 1: high school level, So that probably tells you my skill set.
Speaker 1: What's going on with you? You know what if you
Speaker 1: if you identify is a female, we could probably get
Speaker 1: you a good salary in the w NBA. Well, apparently
Speaker 1: there's no difference between male and female athletes now according
Speaker 1: to the Biden administration. So there's that. But I want
Speaker 1: to ask about the NBA anthem. Tell me this what
Speaker 1: national anthem? Why has there been this back and forth?
Speaker 1: Mark Cuban said it wasn't going to happen, and people
Speaker 1: there was outrage, and now now the NBA says it
Speaker 1: is going to happen. What's going on here? So people
Speaker 1: need to understand the real story here, which is not
Speaker 1: being reported. Mark Cuban did not play the national anthem
Speaker 1: for his first thirteen games this season, right, so it
Speaker 1: was already implemented, and they think they were just trying
Speaker 1: to move it along to act like, hey, this has
Speaker 1: already happened. It's not a new decision, right, you guys
Speaker 1: are just now noticing it, so there'd be less pressure politically.
Speaker 1: It would be like, hey, this has not been going on.
Speaker 1: No one's been freaking out. Now you guys are given
Speaker 1: a snake outrage. Well then the backlash went nationwide, obviously
Speaker 1: very quickly, and the NBA then steps in within twenty
Speaker 1: four hours and realize this is a massive mistake and
Speaker 1: that people are going to run away from their league
Speaker 1: and it's going to alienate people now when they need
Speaker 1: fans more than ever. And so Adam Silvan NBA basically says,
Speaker 1: all right, we're gonna throw Mark Cuban under the bus
Speaker 1: and say to Mark Cuban, no, you are going to
Speaker 1: play the national anthem. Here's the part of the story
Speaker 1: that needs to be report on that is not Adam
Speaker 1: silver We know spoke with Mark Cuban and gave the
Speaker 1: okay to Mark Cuban to not play the national anthem.
Speaker 1: That's a fact. We know the NBA gave permission okay
Speaker 1: to Mark Cuban to make the initial decision. It was
Speaker 1: only after the public outrage apparently did the NBA say, oops,
Speaker 1: we made a bad decision, but we're not going to
Speaker 1: be blamed for it. We're gonna look like we're pro
Speaker 1: America and we'll throw Mark Cuban under the bus us
Speaker 1: in the Dallas Mavericks and make him look bad. The
Speaker 1: second part of the story, which is also I think
Speaker 1: been completely missed by ESPN and all these other quote
Speaker 1: sports networks that should be doing their job, is why
Speaker 1: did Mark Cuban make this decision? The only reason why
Speaker 1: Mark Cuban made his decisions because he saw it as
Speaker 1: an opportunity to reach out to players that were disgruntled
Speaker 1: where they currently are playing because of owners that are conservative.
Speaker 1: If you don't believe me, look exactly what happened to
Speaker 1: the Houston Rockets. They lost their number one player, James Hardens,
Speaker 1: who virtually refused to play basketball anymore because the owner
Speaker 1: of the Rockets is a conservative, a donor to the
Speaker 1: Republican Party and a donor to Donald Trump. And he said,
Speaker 1: all right, I'm not playing for you anymore. You're going
Speaker 1: to be forced to trade me. And I think what
Speaker 1: Cuban pretty much said is I have no scruples, I
Speaker 1: don't have any pride in the United States of America.
Speaker 1: I want to win ballgames, so I'm going to be
Speaker 1: the first guy to say the hell with the national anthem,
Speaker 1: and then I can go after the best players in
Speaker 1: the league and say, hey, guys, you want to your
Speaker 1: black lives matter, You're you're in you know you're one
Speaker 1: of these players. You want to have a voice, you
Speaker 1: want to kneel. How about this, We don't even play
Speaker 1: the national anthem in our games. You want to come
Speaker 1: to my team, Get out of the Rockets, get out
Speaker 1: of whatever X summer teams is around the country. They
Speaker 1: have quote conservative ownership. So this was nothing more than
Speaker 1: a play for Cuban to get better talent. The NBA
Speaker 1: approved it, the backlash happened, and then the NBA said, oops, sorry,
Speaker 1: we'll throw you under the bus, Cuban, and we'll save face,
Speaker 1: even though they actually approved the move originally. One question
Speaker 1: I have though, is if this is Cuban using a
Speaker 1: policy of wokeness at the expense of the anthem to
Speaker 1: try to get top players who would not want to
Speaker 1: be as you said, at conservative teams like the Houston
Speaker 1: Robert you know, quote conservative teams like the Houston Rockets
Speaker 1: wouldn't some of the woke players won't the anthem to play,
Speaker 1: so they could make a scene during it, or you know,
Speaker 1: or is it they actually prefer to not have to
Speaker 1: sit through that at all because the anthem upsets them
Speaker 1: or what? What are what are the dynamics here? I look,
Speaker 1: I think we're the players, and I've got a couple
Speaker 1: of buddies that play in the NBA, and I asked them,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of off the record, dude, what do
Speaker 1: you guys do? Most guys just get annoyed by it.
Speaker 1: So it's it's it's in the way now, right of
Speaker 1: playing the game. It's a waste of their time. They
Speaker 1: want to walk out there play basketball and then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they got to sit there and do
Speaker 1: this thing. So now they you know, they do the
Speaker 1: kneeling and disrespect it and the and the The other
Speaker 1: part that just drives me insane about this issue is
Speaker 1: do not forget that the American players stood for the
Speaker 1: Chinese national anthem and nolt for the American national anthem
Speaker 1: within the last year when they were playing games overseas, right,
Speaker 1: So so don't don't forget that that this is this
Speaker 1: is how ridiculous these players actually are. But I think
Speaker 1: they look at the national anthem is basically I can't
Speaker 1: stand it. I don't like it. Screw this country, right,
Speaker 1: and it's and it's history because we're we don't because
Speaker 1: that's what we've been told to say from Black Lives Matter, etc.
Speaker 1: And so now they just want it gone. And I
Speaker 1: think Cuban saw that opportunity to connect with those players
Speaker 1: on that level by doing this, and then you saw
Speaker 1: the NBA realize, Okay, this is maybe going too far
Speaker 1: right now. I would suspect in the next couple of years, though,
Speaker 1: that the NBA will stop playing the national anthem because
Speaker 1: so many of the players clearly want that to happen.
Speaker 1: That's that's pretty astonishing. How's the NBA? We're speaking of?
Speaker 1: Ben Ferguson, by the way, host of the Ben Ferguson podcast,
Speaker 1: does great stuff. You should definitely check him out. Politics, sports, culture,
Speaker 1: you name it, Ben. How has the NBA been doing? Given?
Speaker 1: I mean, I thought that all the BLM stuff over
Speaker 1: the summer. I look, I don't watch anymore, and I
Speaker 1: never was a big watcher, to be fair, I shouldn't
Speaker 1: say never, that's not true. I haven't been somebody who
Speaker 1: watched much NBA since I'd say the last ten or
Speaker 1: fifteen years. But that's said. I used to watch and
Speaker 1: occasionally would watch it on the TV. Now no, I
Speaker 1: have no interest whatsoever. Have they had a real drop
Speaker 1: in ratings? I mean, is there is there a wokeness
Speaker 1: penalty that the NBA has paid already? I would say yes,
Speaker 1: But how big it is we don't know. Because what
Speaker 1: we've learned from about sports is one thing, and that
Speaker 1: is if you can't attend a game, If you can't
Speaker 1: go to a game, you're way less likely to get
Speaker 1: engaged emotionally with that team during the season. You've seen
Speaker 1: it with the basketball ratings in the NCAA. We've seen
Speaker 1: it with baseball. We've seen it with football. Look at
Speaker 1: the Super Bowl ratings went down significantly, and you would
Speaker 1: think that this year they would have been up the
Speaker 1: Super Bowl ratings because you had a a very popular
Speaker 1: player in Tom Brady on one side of the ball,
Speaker 1: a very popular team that won the Super Bowl last
Speaker 1: year in Kansas City, and this would have been a
Speaker 1: game where right everybody is on lockdown, everybody's at home.
Speaker 1: You would have assumed the ratings would have been through
Speaker 1: the roof because you had a captive crowd that was
Speaker 1: stuck at home with COVID lockdowns, and they would have
Speaker 1: watched the game that did not happen because people aren't
Speaker 1: investing Moore. Now, I think what Cuban, for example, going
Speaker 1: back to his decision, is he was betting. I think
Speaker 1: on the long game here. Hey, once the fans come back,
Speaker 1: if I get rid of the national anthem and I
Speaker 1: can get some of these James Harden players to defect
Speaker 1: and come play for me and I'm winning, then my
Speaker 1: fans will come back faster than anybody else's fans because
Speaker 1: I'm winning the games, and I can capitalize off of
Speaker 1: that and make money back quickly by doing this calculated decision.
Speaker 1: Mark Cuban is not an idiot. I've done some TV
Speaker 1: with him, done radio with him before, He's been on
Speaker 1: my show, and Mark Cuban is a guy that doesn't
Speaker 1: make decisions based on ignorance. This was a calculated decision
Speaker 1: discussed with the NBA, discussed with the commissioner to get
Speaker 1: better players quickly so that when we come out of lockdown,
Speaker 1: maybe the fans would be just so ready to get
Speaker 1: out and do something again right, to get back to normality,
Speaker 1: to get back to watching, that he would capitalize faster
Speaker 1: than anybody else. And he's a smart guy. But but
Speaker 1: but to be clear, the guy doesn't really care about
Speaker 1: this country. And I'm talking about from a patriarch standpoint.
Speaker 1: And the proof of it is if he's if he
Speaker 1: really thought this the right move, then he would have
Speaker 1: fired the American Airlines from being all over his building.
Speaker 1: Because the word American is on every cup of the
Speaker 1: American Airline Center. It's on every seat, it's on every ticket,
Speaker 1: it's on every all their websites and all their merchandise.
Speaker 1: It's on the side of the building, it's on the roof,
Speaker 1: and the word American is on everything. So it don't
Speaker 1: don't don't be disguised by this guy and think that
Speaker 1: it's not a money decision. And if it was about
Speaker 1: if you know, if this wasn't about money for him,
Speaker 1: and it was about you know, not liking this country
Speaker 1: or a patriarch issue, how would you keep American on
Speaker 1: the side of your building. He makes money off that,
Speaker 1: he could gets the national anthem and make more money,
Speaker 1: he thought, and that's why did it. Ben. I'm I'm
Speaker 1: somebody that tries to take a perspective of of well,
Speaker 1: there's what's happening here. I wanted to transition us to
Speaker 1: the lockdowns in the COVID situation for a moment, because
Speaker 1: that's what's happening in New York. And I know that's
Speaker 1: different from what's happening in other places across the country.
Speaker 1: But I'm here in New York City. I know you're
Speaker 1: you're down in Texas, but you also spend a lot
Speaker 1: of time in Memphis. You own a great barbecue place.
Speaker 1: When I'm told in Memphis, Tennessee, yeah, man, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: I'm gonna come check out. I I have high brisket standards,
Speaker 1: I will say, because you actually can get pretty good
Speaker 1: brisket in Brooklyn. But I'm sure your barbecue is gonna
Speaker 1: be fantastic. But how is it going, you know, in Tennessee,
Speaker 1: in Texas with with COVID lockdowns? Because I just I'm
Speaker 1: amazed that more places in the country aren't just just
Speaker 1: fed up with all the nonsense, with all the you know,
Speaker 1: now it's double mask and maybe there's gonna be flight restrictions.
Speaker 1: You know, it's one thing for people in New York
Speaker 1: to go along with this. Our Texans and Tennessee's just
Speaker 1: kind of okay with it or what no and what
Speaker 1: you have now is you're having these big grand battles.
Speaker 1: I'll give you example, my hometown of Memphis. It's the liberal,
Speaker 1: most liberal city in Tennessee. Nashville come second, right, but
Speaker 1: Memphis is hardcore liberal. I'll give you example of how
Speaker 1: liberal it is. You remember the guy that the congressman,
Speaker 1: the guy that was eating a greasy bucket of chicken KFC.
Speaker 1: Steve Cohen, the guy that refers to conservatives is nothing
Speaker 1: more than like Nazis. That guy, Steve Cohen, is the
Speaker 1: congressman for Memphis. And there have been extreme lockdowns and
Speaker 1: Memphis we were at twenty five percent capacity at restaurants
Speaker 1: last week and they finally went back to fifty percent.
Speaker 1: I mean, they've suffocated the economy and minority businesses and
Speaker 1: the majority of Memphis as minority owned businesses. They had enough,
Speaker 1: and they've really gone to the city council, which is
Speaker 1: you know, liberal liberal, and the mayor that's extremely liberal.
Speaker 1: In the county government, it's extremely liberal. And so if
Speaker 1: you guys are killing us, you gotta give us some
Speaker 1: room to operate. This is getting ridiculous. And so now
Speaker 1: we're back at fifty percent, but even at fifty percent occupancy.
Speaker 1: No restaurant can make it long term, and we're seeing
Speaker 1: massive failure rates. You look at Dallas, you look at
Speaker 1: Houston for example, same thing, right concern ovative states, very
Speaker 1: liberal cities, and the liberal cities because they have their
Speaker 1: own health departments, have the right to make up their
Speaker 1: own rules, and they're suffocating these businesses and these lockdowns.
Speaker 1: And at some point, I think what's going to happen
Speaker 1: is you're going to have a lot of these liberals
Speaker 1: that own these businesses that are going to lose them,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna start fighting back before they lose them
Speaker 1: and go to these elective ficials saying, you guys are
Speaker 1: destroying our economy. But I think Democrats have understand something,
Speaker 1: and you go back to the Obama years, what these
Speaker 1: liberals and Congress, what Biden, what Kama Harris, with these
Speaker 1: local elect officials understand is for them to have power,
Speaker 1: they need a percentage of the contrary to be suffering
Speaker 1: and dependent on them. They need to be food stamp
Speaker 1: presents like Obama was right, where you have more people
Speaker 1: on food stamps than ever before, because that gives you
Speaker 1: power over those people. They need an unemployment rate of
Speaker 1: seven eight percent, at least six six and a half percent.
Speaker 1: So there's enough Americans that need them and need their
Speaker 1: government aid and need their government paychecks, they can control them.
Speaker 1: What Donald Trump did and what they do under the
Speaker 1: last four years is he empowered people did not need
Speaker 1: the government. You had the lowest unemployment rate for Hispanics
Speaker 1: from among African Americans and history, single mothers in history,
Speaker 1: you get my point, And they didn't need the government.
Speaker 1: We set here, we're gonna get out of your way.
Speaker 1: We're gonna allow for job creation, we're gonna allow for
Speaker 1: manufacturing jobs. We're gonna allow for the American economy to work.
Speaker 1: And the Democrats have come in said, hey, we need
Speaker 1: these unemployment rates back up where they were under Obama,
Speaker 1: and these lockdowns are allowing that to happen, and that
Speaker 1: gives them ultimately control over enough voters where they can say,
Speaker 1: become election day, Hey you better vote for us, and
Speaker 1: if you don't, you might lose that government paycheck. Ben
Speaker 1: Ferguson everybody the Ben Ferguson Podcast, and Ben appreciated my friend,
Speaker 1: thanks as always for joining. We'll have you back soon.
Speaker 1: Les do it Man. Thanks you're listening. To the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast
Speaker 1: on the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: The Senate has a solemn responsibility to try and hold
Speaker 1: Donald Trump accountable for the most serious charges ever ever
Speaker 1: levied against a president. Those who say let's move on
Speaker 1: that brings unity are false. When you had such a
Speaker 1: serious invasion of the Capitol incited by a president who
Speaker 1: we know, Urge people, told people the election was false,
Speaker 1: Urge people to come to Washington, Urge people to march
Speaker 1: on the Capitol. The Senate has to find is he
Speaker 1: guilty of inciting the violence that ensued When you have
Speaker 1: such a serious charge, sweeping it under the rug will
Speaker 1: not bring unity. It will keep the sore open and
Speaker 1: the wounds open. Does anybody really think Chuck Schumer, Chucky
Speaker 1: Schumer here cares about unity? I would like to meet
Speaker 1: that person. Would I like to have actually have a
Speaker 1: sit down and ask how they think any of what
Speaker 1: we're seeing from the Democrat leadership. The Democrat Party leadership
Speaker 1: is devoted toward bringing the country together and taking us
Speaker 1: into a better place going forward. I've got to tell
Speaker 1: you something. The thing that many of us couldn't have anticipated.
Speaker 1: Is the degree to which Trump't arrangement syndrome has rotted
Speaker 1: the brains of so many Democrats and really their souls
Speaker 1: in such a way that they they're not willing to
Speaker 1: go past this stuff. They insist on dragging us all
Speaker 1: into it. There's a there's a mania, there's a fixation
Speaker 1: that they have. And they're also I think not comfortable
Speaker 1: with the idea that there won't be the great Orange
Speaker 1: Menace of Donald Trump to be this this constant presence
Speaker 1: that they can they can have their their two minutes
Speaker 1: hate against all the time. They want something there, and
Speaker 1: that's something is going to be anybody who doesn't want
Speaker 1: to go along with their agenda. It's gonna be you
Speaker 1: and me. And that's what I think is really so disturbing.
Speaker 1: Right now. They're trying to find people that they're saying
Speaker 1: that Josh Holly is calling for murder, and AOC said
Speaker 1: that Ted Cruz tried quote you know, tried to have
Speaker 1: her killed end quote. That was the That's insane. This
Speaker 1: is insane. But this stuff is being said now, and
Speaker 1: if you were to just dismiss it, disregard it, I
Speaker 1: think you'd be you'd be missing that they really do
Speaker 1: believe this stuff. They take this seriously. I mean, here's
Speaker 1: Bro Cuomo over on CNN, who is when he's not
Speaker 1: running propaganda for his brother, who's doing the worst job
Speaker 1: as a governor of New York of any governor of
Speaker 1: the country is out there either be just being a
Speaker 1: part of the propaganda machine here that the GOP senators
Speaker 1: they're complicit in this too. If they don't convict Play twelve,
Speaker 1: If you acquit after what you were shown today at
Speaker 1: trial on day two, it would be a giant middle
Speaker 1: finger to the men and women who saved you that day.
Speaker 1: We saw today more than ever, how they were fighting
Speaker 1: for your and their lives. They were beaten, maimed, they
Speaker 1: died for you, and you will be saying with your
Speaker 1: vote that that doesn't matter enough for you to risk
Speaker 1: political clout with the people who attack them. Yeah, this
Speaker 1: is this is just what you're going to hear. Do
Speaker 1: you think that they're going to let this go? Do
Speaker 1: you think that they're going to take a more reasonable
Speaker 1: tone toward people that disagree with them after this? This
Speaker 1: is what the Democrat Party has become. Now everybody is
Speaker 1: the insurrectionist. Now you stand in their way. You're an insurrections.
Speaker 1: This happened in this oviout Union. They call them counter revolutionaries.
Speaker 1: Anybody that needed to be destroyed, attacked, needed to be
Speaker 1: disposed was a counter revolutionary. You stand in the way.
Speaker 1: Counter revolutionary insurrectionist is the term they're using right now.
Speaker 1: They may find others. White supremacist is another version of
Speaker 1: a term of disparagement, applied broadly to justify any kind
Speaker 1: of demeaning and repressive measures that they want to engage
Speaker 1: in to utilize and wield power without any without any
Speaker 1: real pushback. That is what we see happening. That is
Speaker 1: the reality of the circumstance around us right now. I
Speaker 1: think it's important for all of us to recognize that.
Speaker 1: I think it's important for all of us to see that.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it on the show
Speaker 1: like soft butter on warm toast. It's time to spread
Speaker 1: some freedom from coast to coast. It's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: We might have to take this one out of the rotation.
Speaker 1: This was just a little too weird. It's like it's
Speaker 1: like an anthem for Space Force or something. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't know. I thought maybe you were
Speaker 1: getting back into public service. Yeah, perhaps, but where where
Speaker 1: are you are? You're a Mandalorian fan, right, No, I
Speaker 1: don't like anything Star Wars all, that's right. I forget
Speaker 1: because you know you're you're it's not easy to know
Speaker 1: what producer Mark is gonna be gonna be into with
Speaker 1: with the shows. So it's you know, there's some that
Speaker 1: some that surprised me, some that don't. Yeah, Star Wars,
Speaker 1: I don't know. There's a lot of bad Star Wars stuff.
Speaker 1: I'll just say it. There's a lot of like really me,
Speaker 1: there's some good stuff, but I think it's a little
Speaker 1: overplayed personally. I did like the Mandalorian season one. I
Speaker 1: thought season two was really not that good. So now
Speaker 1: and I borrowed I borrowed a family members Disney Plus,
Speaker 1: and that family member has canceled because of the Gina
Speaker 1: Corono firing or Disney Plus. Do you ever watch MMA,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, like if it's a huge fight, maybe, but
Speaker 1: very rarely. Yeah, I don't know. I have never really
Speaker 1: gotten into MM. I've watched some never really gotten that into, Mma,
Speaker 1: I don't know, it's not really not something I've been into.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get to uh, but that could change,
Speaker 1: you know, check it out. I don't know. Let's get
Speaker 1: to all of our role call in box here. We
Speaker 1: got a lot of stuff to get to, a lot
Speaker 1: of things happening in the world. So let's, uh, let's
Speaker 1: see what we got here. We have first up, Evan, Hello,
Speaker 1: bucket producer, Mark. How much do we actually think Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is involved in his own presidency? How many of
Speaker 1: these decisions is he actually involved in or getting any
Speaker 1: say on. I continue to get the feeling he's just
Speaker 1: a marrionette flopping around at the whim of those around him.
Speaker 1: But do you think he's making any of these wide
Speaker 1: sweeping decisions, or any at all, for that matter, for himself.
Speaker 1: Or is all this just the deepest telling him to
Speaker 1: sign the papers and don't ask and he's just a figurehead?
Speaker 1: Evan Evan, Evan, Evan, it's a very it's a it's
Speaker 1: a question that nobody can really have a great answer to,
Speaker 1: but I'll try to give you a reasonable answer. I
Speaker 1: think that Joe Biden is a guy who's going to
Speaker 1: do whatever he thinks makes Joe Biden look the best
Speaker 1: to the people he cares about. So as long as
Speaker 1: the Washington Post and the New York Times editorial boards
Speaker 1: and CNN and politically correct Corporate America and the teachers unions,
Speaker 1: as long as they're happy with whatever Joe Biden does,
Speaker 1: he's happy. I don't think that he's a man of
Speaker 1: any strong ideological convictions one way or the other. I
Speaker 1: don't think that he's somebody who comes into comes into
Speaker 1: the Oval office every day now and goes, I've really
Speaker 1: got it. There's some things that I really want to
Speaker 1: get done for America. It's just it's all transactional for
Speaker 1: this guy. If I do this, how does it? You know,
Speaker 1: how does it make me look? If I do that?
Speaker 1: Are people going to be happy with me? I don't
Speaker 1: think he's got a really deep seat. I think he
Speaker 1: probably has a very generalized sense that, you know, I
Speaker 1: want to I want to help America. You don't want
Speaker 1: to do the good America stuff. But then you actually
Speaker 1: think we'll hold on If you're going to pursue all
Speaker 1: these left wing policies, how does that really helping to America?
Speaker 1: But yeah, I think he's mostly a pass through or
Speaker 1: a or a puppet for left wing interests, and that
Speaker 1: he was very useful for them because they knew if
Speaker 1: they ran somebody who really represented what the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: was all about, if they really ran you know, for example,
Speaker 1: I mean, if they ran somebody with the with the
Speaker 1: open politics of AOC, they wouldn't be able, they wouldn't
Speaker 1: been able to be Trump. But they were able to
Speaker 1: run Joe Biden and pretend that he was just going
Speaker 1: to be good old uncle Joe and nothing, nothing to
Speaker 1: worry about, no problems here. And that was the big
Speaker 1: that was really in a sense of the big scam,
Speaker 1: because Joe Biden isn't what you're getting. Joe Biden's just
Speaker 1: some old dude. He's just some guy who is going
Speaker 1: to do what they tell him to do. And I
Speaker 1: think that's that's really the best way to do this.
Speaker 1: So I don't know how much of it is coming
Speaker 1: directly from Biden versus who's whispering in his ear. I
Speaker 1: mentioned Rasputin earlier on the show, and I do wonder
Speaker 1: who who has the most influence on Biden right now.
Speaker 1: That's something I haven't gotten a clear picture of it.
Speaker 1: Who does he listen to the most? Sean, Why can't
Speaker 1: states fund the Keystone XEL pipeline, Sean, The Keystone XEL
Speaker 1: pipeline is a because it connects Canada through the United States,
Speaker 1: it's automatically going to be a federal matter. And because
Speaker 1: it crosses state lines, it falls under it. It'll fall
Speaker 1: under a federal jurisdiction. And I mean, I'm sure you
Speaker 1: could probably fill a you know, an entire library with
Speaker 1: all the applicable laws and statutes and regulations and everything else.
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's states are not going to be able
Speaker 1: to do it. It needed to remember, Sean, it needed
Speaker 1: State Department approval to get done US State Department approval
Speaker 1: because it's a it's technically an international agreement and it's
Speaker 1: an international project. Even though I know we think where
Speaker 1: it's like, is Canada really international? Though I know a
Speaker 1: lot of us think that, come on, it is Canada
Speaker 1: really another country? I mean, isn't it just kind of
Speaker 1: like America Junior up there and it's own way. You know,
Speaker 1: we love our Canadian brothers and sisters. Come on, but yeah,
Speaker 1: technically it is a another country, So it's right. Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: A lot of a lot of great skaters and uh
Speaker 1: maple syrup and what else amant leaven out? I mean,
Speaker 1: they gave us hockey. That's all I need from them, right,
Speaker 1: That's all you need from them. So they get it.
Speaker 1: They get it done. For producer Mark uh Wayne Buck.
Speaker 1: It seems to Democrats would have us believe that the
Speaker 1: commander in chief of the most powerful military on the
Speaker 1: planet resorted to dog whistles and innuendo to get a
Speaker 1: bunch of unarmed civilians, civilian peaceful protesters to spontaneously overthrow
Speaker 1: the government. Yeah, that sounds legit, you know why. And
Speaker 1: you make a good point here in the sense that
Speaker 1: if this was supposed to be an insurrection or a coup,
Speaker 1: it's the worst, most pathetic, most poorly planned, thought out,
Speaker 1: and of course insufficient insurrection in the history of the world.
Speaker 1: I mean it's almost like, you know, if I were to,
Speaker 1: you know, walk up the White House and say, I
Speaker 1: declare this, you know, the land of buck Topia, Like
Speaker 1: I can say that, but it's not gonna work. They
Speaker 1: weren't armed. They weren't. They weren't. There was no hope
Speaker 1: of them, you know, holding the facility. And even if
Speaker 1: they had done some kind of a sit in or something.
Speaker 1: They would have been all escorted out. I mean, they
Speaker 1: cleared this again number of hours. So if we're really
Speaker 1: going to call this an insurrection, it's an insurrection of
Speaker 1: unarmed jackasses running around taking selfies. How is that? How
Speaker 1: is that going to overthrow the government? How is that
Speaker 1: going to deal with what would have obviously been a
Speaker 1: massive deployment of US federal agents and and even military force,
Speaker 1: National Guard to clear them out. I mean, it was that.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is absurd. Donald Trump was trying. First
Speaker 1: of all, Donald Trump didn't order them do it, as
Speaker 1: we all know, but even just the action itself. Calling
Speaker 1: this an attempt to overthrow the government, how is that
Speaker 1: going to work? You know, really think this one through.
Speaker 1: And they keep saying, oh, they were trying to they
Speaker 1: were trying to assassinate members of Congress. Where where's the
Speaker 1: evidence that that was attempted at all? I mean, I
Speaker 1: haven't said, maybe it's possible I've missed something, but I
Speaker 1: haven't seen that. I mean, you could see video of
Speaker 1: people once they get inside the building, they're kind of
Speaker 1: just walking around. I mean, there's that guy with the
Speaker 1: furry hat on being an idiot. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: who's going to overthrow the United States government? Really astonishing,
Speaker 1: Wayne Vary astute observation from Wayne, Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for writing in Dave hey buck great show today. I
Speaker 1: think it's interesting most of our existing newspapers supported segregation
Speaker 1: back in the day, but nobody wants to bring that up.
Speaker 1: If people paid attention to the articles that were written
Speaker 1: in that era about segregation, they would be canceled. They
Speaker 1: just advocate tearing statues down because they're hateful. Dave. I
Speaker 1: don't know which papers you're talking about specifically, but you
Speaker 1: to look, if you go back, if publications that have
Speaker 1: been around for a couple of hundred years or one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty years or whatever it may be, are
Speaker 1: clearly going to be you know, insufficiently social justice aware
Speaker 1: and woke and everything. I mean, I'm sure you could
Speaker 1: make a huge list of them. So yeah, I'm not
Speaker 1: surprised here. Oh he's got more. Cyclists are the absolute worst.
Speaker 1: They buy multiple two thousand dollars bicycles, load up on spandex,
Speaker 1: and decide to ride the most dangerous roads they can
Speaker 1: find inconvenience. Normal people like me that are just trying
Speaker 1: to get where I'm going on time. Then they like
Speaker 1: to brag on social media about their rides. They don't
Speaker 1: understand this isn't Europe, and they've pissed off of the
Speaker 1: other road travelers they've encountered that day. Keep up the
Speaker 1: great work. Producer Mark loved the podcast Thank You, Thank
Speaker 1: You pruson marker you let's say thank you, thank you.
Speaker 1: Yeah and yeah, I mean, look, I'm sure there's some
Speaker 1: very nice team Buck cyclist who are listening to this.
Speaker 1: But I'm sure they're also very courteous and respectful of
Speaker 1: other people on the road and don't make it a
Speaker 1: point of being incredibly annoying all the time, and aren't
Speaker 1: militant about it, and don't act like it's a crazy
Speaker 1: idea that somebody would want to drive a car and
Speaker 1: and not slow down to four miles an hour because
Speaker 1: the cyclist is going uphill or something right, And so
Speaker 1: you know, there's there's definitely some room here. There's definitely
Speaker 1: some we could meet in the middle a little bit.
Speaker 1: Let's see, Producer Mark, I bring I bring the people together.
Speaker 1: Look at you with your unity. I'll call you Buck Biden. Yeah, wouchum.
Speaker 1: Actually we could do a Buck Biden T shirt, but
Speaker 1: it'd be a very different, very different kind of slogan.
Speaker 1: I'll add it to the store coming soon in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five. But yeah, so um. But the problem with
Speaker 1: the cycles that I really have is the ones who
Speaker 1: are in the big cities and they clog up the
Speaker 1: streets and then they act like maniacs and they yell
Speaker 1: at people and they run into me and producer Mark apparently.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just trying to get out of a cab, man, Like,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry that I didn't see you swerve around a
Speaker 1: corner going between two park cars and then try to
Speaker 1: run the run the ambit through an eighteen inch space
Speaker 1: between the car door and the car next next to
Speaker 1: the door, you know, Like, I'm sorry about that, bicyclist,
Speaker 1: but stop being crazy. How about that? Huh? How about that?
Speaker 1: Cyclists right? Yeah, follow the rules of the road too, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's Oh. I hate when they go the wrong way
Speaker 1: down the road, especially when you're driving and like there's
Speaker 1: a stop sign, a four way stop sign, but a
Speaker 1: bike just goes right past it out of nowhere. After
Speaker 1: you stop, you almost killed. Oh. I've screamed, screamed at
Speaker 1: bikers for that before telling you, man, I'm sure there's
Speaker 1: some Hell's Angels bikers listen this right now who are like, yeah, man, cyclists,
Speaker 1: those guys obey no rules. You know, they're like those guys,
Speaker 1: the real terrors of the road. So I'm just saying, Um, Sarah,
Speaker 1: hey Buck, and Mark an aspect of this impeachment charade
Speaker 1: that I haven't heard anyone address. They say Trump insided violence,
Speaker 1: but they don't take into account that the people didn't
Speaker 1: need to be stirred up. We have had just a
Speaker 1: year of we have just out a year rather of shutdowns,
Speaker 1: of having our constitutional rights trampled on, having our businesses
Speaker 1: slash and when we turn out and droves to peaceably
Speaker 1: fight back, i e. Vote, we were gaslighted. So many inconsistencies,
Speaker 1: so little willingness to investigate, we left the people are
Speaker 1: we The people are angry not because Trump stirred us up,
Speaker 1: because we know what the left is doing and we
Speaker 1: don't like it. If anyone's guilty of inciting violence, it
Speaker 1: is the left. We don't follow Trump because he tells
Speaker 1: us what to think. He is one of us. We
Speaker 1: follow him because we have the same ideals. America First, Sarah,
Speaker 1: thank you for your powerful and eloquent message. Were very
Speaker 1: much appreciate you listening and for writing in This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram
Speaker 1: and Twitter. Back into the row call and now we
Speaker 1: get to it. Here we have in the roll call
Speaker 1: the latest Here, Greg Buxter, a conservative trying desperately to
Speaker 1: stay warm in frigid, deep blue Minnesota. Sounds cold? Greg,
Speaker 1: weren't the bakers who refuse to bake cakes for the
Speaker 1: weddings of gay couples ultimately forced to bake the cakes
Speaker 1: by the courts. Basically, these were private companies who tried
Speaker 1: to refuse service over beliefs. Twitter is refusing service because
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump hurt their feelings and calls out the
Speaker 1: status for what they are. Shouldn't Twitter be forced to
Speaker 1: provide service just like the bakers were. Load this one
Speaker 1: on the ever expanding pile of leftist hypocrisy using my
Speaker 1: shield to go sledding. Yeah. Greg, See that has to
Speaker 1: do with what is considered a protected category. So there
Speaker 1: are protected categories in federal law now, and sexual orientation
Speaker 1: is one of them. But if you were if you
Speaker 1: look at what's going on right now, we should probably
Speaker 1: consider adding as a matter of law, political or political
Speaker 1: orientation or affiliation to protect a category status. That's where
Speaker 1: we're heading to a place where I think that's necessary,
Speaker 1: and I think if we didn't do that, we would
Speaker 1: be we're just missing what's really happening all around us.
Speaker 1: So but now, of course, you have to be in
Speaker 1: power in order to actually get that stuff done, and
Speaker 1: we're not right now. So we'll continue to see what
Speaker 1: we can do, all right. Going into some of the
Speaker 1: Instagram messages here, who voted for this drooling sew party
Speaker 1: hack idiot Joe Biden Butch writes that in apparently eighty
Speaker 1: million people did Butch, which I know is an amazing thing.
Speaker 1: It's it's pretty stunning that that that's where we are.
Speaker 1: But that is what we are told. Danny writes, Where
Speaker 1: the where's the gift of you dancing at Mark's wedding? Danny,
Speaker 1: It's it is pretty fantastic. I don't know, we we
Speaker 1: we I gotta I gotta give approval to share that
Speaker 1: one though. We'll think about it. We'll think about it.
Speaker 1: Mark will probably convince me one day, But for right now,
Speaker 1: I think we're we're gonna hold off on it. I mean.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark ken Ken can confirm though Buck does have
Speaker 1: some funky moves, funky being the operative word. Yes, funky
Speaker 1: is a great way to describe it. Definitely funky. Martin
Speaker 1: writes Buck love the show. I keep listening and no
Speaker 1: one's bringing this up. I understand the importance of Georgia,
Speaker 1: but what the heck makes us think they aren't going
Speaker 1: to do the same with these mail in ballots? Uh?
Speaker 1: They already said all absentee ballots are requested. You're a
Speaker 1: smart guy. Um, you know, I mean absentee ballots, Martin,
Speaker 1: are something that uh you know, Yeah, we saw how
Speaker 1: this worked in the national lecture. We saw this worked
Speaker 1: in Georgia. Uh, mail in ballots really what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here? This is a big This is a big
Speaker 1: advantage that the Democrats are going to keep pushing very
Speaker 1: hard on. So I don't know what else to say.
Speaker 1: That's that's something we're gonna have to try to get
Speaker 1: them to stop being able to do. I'm gonna have
Speaker 1: to get them to cut it out because there's so
Speaker 1: much room for fraud in all that, and I think
Speaker 1: that we should all be aware that that room for
Speaker 1: fraud is going to be exploited and it's going to continue.
Speaker 1: It's going to continue. I wish it weren't friends. I
Speaker 1: wish I could tell you that there was an easy
Speaker 1: way around. But mail in ballots are definitely, definitely going
Speaker 1: to be a problem if it continues to expand the
Speaker 1: way that it has. So you Channing Rights, Hey, Buck
Speaker 1: and listen to your show regularly. Want to call your
Speaker 1: attention to HR one twenty seven a massive invasion to
Speaker 1: our privacy and gun rights. You're listening to you to
Speaker 1: be aware of this bill and they need to contact
Speaker 1: their Congressman. Channing, thank you so much for listening. Appreciate
Speaker 1: it. It It honored by it, and I got to check
Speaker 1: out HR one twenty seven. I don't know what it
Speaker 1: is yet, but I will team. That's it for today.
Speaker 1: She'll tie