WEBVTT - Parallels PT 2

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a journalist who's spent the last twenty five years

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 2>writing about true crime.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Paul Hols, a retired cold case investigator who's

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 3>worked some of America's most complicated cases and solve them.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Each week, I present Paul with one of history's most

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>compelling true crimes.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 3>And I weigh in using modern forensic techniques to bring

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 3>new insights to old mysteries.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Together, using our individual expertise, we're examining historical true crime

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>cases through a twenty first century lens.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Some are solved and some are cold, very cold.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 4>This is buried Bones.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 3>Hey Paul, Hey Kate, you know you've got this case.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm really interested to hear this other case. It might

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 3>or might not be related.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll wrap up some stuff with Nancy first and I'll

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>give you a recap, and then we'll get into the

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>other case and we'll see where we go here. So,

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>just to recap for the last episode, we are in

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy Sacramento and twenty eight year old Nancy beIN

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Alac was murdered and sexually assaulted in her apartment. The

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>front door was locked. There doesn't seem to be any theft,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>any disturbance in anywhere in the apartment except for in

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the bedroom. Nancy is face down, thirty stab wounds, very

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>very violent. They collect evidence, including these weird finger coverings

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>that the offender apparently made. Now they're going to start

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>really trying to get the timeline down. We have some

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>ear witnesses who say somewhere in the one am to

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>two am range they heard different kinds of noises. We

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>have no idea if any of it has to do

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>with Nancy, and so now you know, we're at a

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a loss. As they moved forward, Did

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I miss anything? Is there anything that I didn't include? Paul?

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, the one thing that I think stands out

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>is the prowler that had been seen. So they have

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>the composite of that prowler, but that may or may

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 3>not be the person responsible for Nancy's homicide.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right, So let's continue. They talk to a lot

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of people, including of course her fiance, Ferris, who is

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the chief public defender. And I read an obituary of

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>him and he just seems like this legend in that area,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 2>so that was really interesting. He tells police that he

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>last saw Nancy Sunday night, so presumably not long before

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>she was killed. So aside from the offender, if he

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>is not the offender. Aside from the offender, it seems

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>like her fiance is the last one to have seen

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>her so earlier in the day. They went from Nancy's hometown,

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Grass Valley, which is about an hour outside of Sacramento,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 2>where they hung out with her mom, and they went

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>back to Sacramento. They got dinner, Ferris brought Nancy to

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 2>her apartment. They spent some time together, which could have

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 2>meant sex. I don't have a lot of details here,

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>but he did not stay the night. He left around

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>one thirty and then he went back home. So he

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 2>says when he left Nancy's apartment, she was asleep in

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>bed and wearing just her underwear, which would have been

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, her way. He said that her sliding glass

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>door is where he was sure the entry was made.

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'll tell you why in a minute. Looking for patterns.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think so far? You know, I mean,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the fiance nobody saw him coming or going. He was

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>around all the time, you know, I don't know if

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 2>police buy his story or not. It seems feasible for

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a Sunday.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I think you know, of course, he has

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>to be looked at pretty hard because he's putting himself

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 3>in her apartment almost in the middle of what the

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>ear witnesses are saying when they hear, you know, the

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>baby cry, hurried footsteps, somebody driving out of the parking

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>lot at a I'm assuming a high rate of speed,

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you know. So it's like, okay, so what is going

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>on here with him? We see this all the time.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 3>It's entirely possible. He's telling absolute truth, you know. It

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>just so happens that once he left, the offender came

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 3>in and then is, for whatever reason, attacking Nancy.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>The interesting part of the entry is when we talk

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>about Nancy's sliding glass door. You know, the droplets were there,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>there was a trail of blood that dropped down to

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the first floor, the ground floor, the boat shoe that

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>was there, the print, and then the trail off to

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the parking lot. So he said that nancy sliding glass

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 2>door when he left was slightly open, okay, And the

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>reason was she had a cat and that way the

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>cat could go in and out of the apartment. So

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the police find this out from Ferris, and of course

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 2>they're not crossing him off the list just yet. But

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about access, they're saying, okay, well that

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>that seems to make sense. But they now feel pretty certain.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>And this is what I want to know from you too,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that whomever killed Nancy knew this, knew her habit, knew

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 2>that this would be accessible at some point, and was

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>potentially watching.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, my question would be, well, what's the visibility

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of that sliding door, Let's say, from somebody who is

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 3>just kind of wandering the grounds. You know, at least

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>with the photo of the apartment complex, I could kind

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>of see that the top of like I'm assuming windows

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>or sliding doors, So it's possible you have a prowler

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>who happens to notice, oh there's an there's an opening.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 3>How does the prowler get up to the second floor.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Is there something that this this person could climb up

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>to get onto the balcony to walk through this open

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>sliding door. That's one thing I'd be taking a look at.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And this is where it's just trying to trying to determine,

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 3>like you had brought up all this, did the offender

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 3>have pre existing knowledge of Nancy's habit and knew that

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>sliding door would be unlocked and open. And is this

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 3>something that's because the offender has, you know, a personal

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>connection to Nancy or is this a stranger who is

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 3>doing surveillance ahead of time and happens to notice this.

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely, I think And I had forgotten to mention

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>this in my recap. Investigators think that the offender climbed

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>up that fence. So if you look at that photo again,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a fence, and that once he got on the fence,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 2>he was able to sort of pull himself over the

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>railing onto her balcony. The question would be would he

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>be able to see whether or not she was leaving

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 2>this door open and letting the cat in and out.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>I think he could, you know, based on what I'm

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 3>seeing from this this photo of the apartment complex. Now, Yeah,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>to climb up that fence and to get up over

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 3>that balcony, I mean there's some physical agility here. Yeah,

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, so that's that would be something you know,

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>as I'm eballing, you know, suspects, you know, does this

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 3>guy look like he's physically capable of getting up into

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Nancy's apartment as well? As being able to jump down

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>and run away. You know, I know I might be

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 3>able to do that today, but I would probably struggle

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 3>at my age, right. So that's just an interesting observation,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>is that the physicality he's demonstrating to get in and

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 3>out of her apartment.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Glenn Campbell, as in our sketch, the prowler would

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>have been able to do something like that. We'll see

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 2>how it goes. Okay, so faris the fiance doesn't have

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>an alibi for that evening. She says alibi basically. Then

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>she goes home. He goes home, and that's it. He's

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>very cooperative with the police. He says, come search my house,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>take all my clothing, look for anything you want. He

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>takes that light detector. He even says, take some of

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>my blood. You know. They compare it against the blood

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>they found at the scene, and he's ultimately ruled out

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>as a suspect. I don't know what that means. I

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they look at the blood and he's

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>got an obvious different blood type and that is ruling

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>him out, and that's it. Is that going to be enough,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess in the nineteen seventies to rule somebody out right.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's you know, that really was the power of

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the ABO testing was to exclude. And so under the

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>circumstances of the crime scene, it sounds like they were

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>confident that the blood trail or the blood that was

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>left behind, came from the offender, and it's a different

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>blood type than the fiance, and so they can say, well,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 3>he's not the one that's dripping blood and running off,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>so he's likely as not her killer. Now is that

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>an absolute elimination of his involvement in the case. You'll

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>probably hit me some detail down in a few minutes.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>That probably puts more suspicion on him, But right now

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 3>I would say it sounds like he's excluded.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so, No, no more suspicion. Ferris goes

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>on to live until eighty four, and as a legend

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>in defense, they eventually rule out the fiance. The police

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>began interviewing the people closest to her family and friends,

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>especially those with fresh injuries. That makes sense, you know,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>with the stabbing. So then they go to Nancy's father.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 2>So his name's braun In, and when police interview him,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 2>he has a bandage on his hand that he says

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>is the result of a workplace accident. But he says,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>just so you know, Nancy and I have never had

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a great relationship. He was abusive towards Nancy's mother in

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 2>the past, but he's also ruled out as a suspect,

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's just not enough solid evidence tying him to

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the daughter's murder. So the wound on the hand, I know,

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>is valid. And I guess that's just one little thing

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to be looking at and saying, oh,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you've got these, you know, fresh wounds. Let's talk about

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it in your past relationship with her?

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 3>No, you know, but this is this is just investigation

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 3>one oh one. They are checking the boxes, looking at

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 3>family friends, you know, the fiance and when something like

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the a fresh wound on dad's hand, you know that's

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>going to stand out. They're going, oh, you know, that

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 3>is consistent with our offender having been cut. But of

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>course we know, just like what he explained is there's

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 3>innocent explanations for that as well.

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. Okay, well, let's see, We've got a couple

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of other people that I need to run by you.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 2>This might be a dead end, but here it goes.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a guy named Barry Segal. He is a name

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 2>dropped as a person of interest from a Sacramento Bee article,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting October twenty ninth, which is just days

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 2>after Nancy's murder. So this is one of the early

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>people on their suspect list. He spent more than eight

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>years in prison during the nineteen sixties with the second

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>degree murder of his landlady. When he's in prison, he

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>befriends a supervising deputy district attorney, Vincent Rigar. I have

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>no idea why or how, but when the killer is paroled,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the deputy assistant attorney offered him a place to stay.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And almost immediately after Nancy's murder, the sheriff tries to

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>suggest that Sagall might have been involved with this, and

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like it's just simply because he was a

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>criminal and had killed a woman and that was basically.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>But all of these people are being pulled into this

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>case because the police are really desperate, obviously to try

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to find out who did this.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, and this is part of just starting

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to assess characteristics of your offender and what suspect pool

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that offender would be found in. And you know, of course,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 3>with a let's say, sexually motivated homicide, you're looking at

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 3>individuals that have a past that includes that type of crime.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 3>And it sounds like this Barry Cigal, it was somebody

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>that you know, the DA's office was aware of and

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 3>had been released. So so Matt, you have to have

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>to look at him for sure.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But there are different categories, right, So peeping Tom would

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>be the beginning of being a sexual predator, right, and

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>then what are the beginnings of the serial killer aside

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>from you know, we've talked about hurting animals and having

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 2>problems in childhood. I know there are these different tiers,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>but they're categories too, yep.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's not it's not hard and fast, you know.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>And when you take a look, typically when you start

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 3>looking at offenders that are breaking into houses, and this

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 3>was a much more common from a from a serial

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 3>predator standpoint, much more common back in the seventies than

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 3>today because of technology and surveillance and dead bolts and

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>all that. But usually it's these barriers to a fence.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the peeping Tom. Well, I like to, you know,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>talk initially to people and say, think about walking in

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>your neighborhood and you accidentally walk on your neighbor's front lawn,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>you get nervous. It's like, oh no, you know, that's

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of not socially acceptable. And so imagine taking that

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to the point where now you're walking up all the

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>way across the lawn to look into your neighbor's house

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>through a window. You know you've crossed a certain social

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>barrier to do that. Now you're breaking into houses when

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>nobody's home. Then you're breaking into houses when somebody's home.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>And it's when you start to see that where now

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 3>you have the like the cat burglar spect where they're

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 3>going into how occupied houses. That is a predictor of

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 3>being a very dangerous offender because they are just one

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>step away from going hands on with a person. So

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 3>that's one kind of prototypical evolution. That's Joseph DiAngelo, that's

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the Golden State killer. But they don't necessarily follow that

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 3>pattern in the same way. It varies from person to person.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 3>And then you brought up the serial killer triad, the

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>bed wetting, the animal cruelty, the fire setting, and then

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the reality is the only one I put really any

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>weight on is the animal cruelty, because if you're willing

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to inflict violence on a creature, You're one step away

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>from doing that to a person.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>You know. There is a story that I thought about you,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and I heard there's a story happening not in Austin,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 2>in the Austin area about a high school club where,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know if it was a four

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 2>h but students were raising animals and they caught a

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 2>young woman, a teenager, poisoning and killing a goat from

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>her competitor. And I just thought, oh my god, I mean,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that's unbelievable. I don't remember ultimately what happened to her,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>if she was eighteen or you know, whatever happened, but

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to just brazenly be willing to do that to a goat,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, just for a contest. I mean, I'm real.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Once I trained a couple of the prosecutors in my

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>former office. You know, they would be presented cases of

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, your teenage boys doing bad things to cats

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and dogs, and so they would bring me the details,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, and so I'm assessing, going, yeah, this is

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a predictor, this is a person that is likely going

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to hurt somebody down the road, and we need to

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>intercede now to try to prevent that person from that

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 3>boy from doing that in the future, and then that's

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>when it's you know, mandated psychological counseling, et cetera.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Now we're going to put a pause in Nancy's case

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>because we have another case and police are not yet

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>able to determine whether these cases related, but they seem

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 2>very similar. So this is about a woman named Judith

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>hawk Aary. She's in Sacramento, and she is murdered six

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>months before Nancy and I have pictures around this too.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Now you know, you can imagine this is a twenty

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>three year old nurse. She is also engaged. They look

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>fairly similar. I know you don't put a ton of

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 2>weight on that, and I'll show you a picture of

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Judy in a second, but they are struck by the similarities. Here,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you a little bit about Judy and

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>then we'll look at some photos. So she is, as

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I said, twenty three years old, she's engaged, she's in

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the workforce. They live within one block of each other,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 2>these two women. So go to your photos. I told

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you there are a lot of photos with this one.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>This is what happens when we dip into the nineteen seventies.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>This photos galore. If you look on your page seven,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a picture of Judy sixties hair. We're barely in

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventies, so she's got the high hair again.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Love it, you know, if you find it valuable to

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>compare the way they both look and you know all

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of that. But the photo of Nancy's on.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Page one, well, you know Nancy and Judiths. You know,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>they do have a somewhat similar look. Both appear to

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 3>be brunettes, classic nineteen sixties kind of look about them.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's you know, the fact that you do

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>have them living so close, and that Judith, you know,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>six months prior, had been killed. You have to look

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 3>at the possibility that these cases are related. Now, I'd

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>like to know more details about what happened in Judas case.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, look on the next page, because I just want

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you to see the distance with their apartments. I mean,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I told you a block of block's a block. But

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>if you look on page your page eight, you'll see

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Nancy's apartment in judish apartment. Is that a coincidence? I mean,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>how is that? I don't know there are such things

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>as coincidences.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess yes, I mean, it absolutely could be a coincidence. However,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you have to put some weight on that proximity. You know,

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 3>these offenders, you know, when they're out prowling, they get

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with a ser in geographic location, you can go

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 3>into any neighborhood and find a victim. So it's possible

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 3>this could be a watering hole. This is what I were.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 3>A predator is just comfortable in this particular area of

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>town for one reason or another, and has killed two

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>women six months apart in that same area. But I've

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 3>just seen it enough to where it's also possible these

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>are two completely separate cases and just coincidentally happened to

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 3>be in the same part of the area of town.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, Okay, here are the circumstances with Judy. So

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 2>it is eleven thirty pm on the night of March

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy, about six months before Nancy goes missing. Judy

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 2>is a nurse. She leaves her shift at the hospital

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>and she tells Raymond, I'll see you at my apartment

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 2>and she starts to head home. So Raymond, her fiance,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 2>his name's Raymond Willis, he was at her apartment waiting

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>there for her, and he said it. It should have

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>only taken her ten minutes, so he knew she should

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>have been home before midnight. She left at eleven thirty,

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>so she doesn't show up, and when she hasn't come

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 2>home by one forty five, he becomes very worried. He

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>goes outside. He sees Judy's car parked in the apartment

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 2>complex's parking lot, but she's not there.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it appears that she drove from the job

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 3>the hospital to her apartment complex but never makes it

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>up to her residence.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, I don't know when he calls the police yet,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>but he said that the car's doors were all unlocked,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the keys were on the floorboard, and a few buttons

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>from the coat that she was wearing seemed to be

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 2>yanked off, and they were in the back seat as

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>if there had been a struggle between Judy and we

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>presume to be the offender. No blood in the car.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>There were strips of towel in the back seat which

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't belong to Judy, and so you know, obviously none

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>of this sounds very good, and we have some speculation

0:18:58.680 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>coming up.

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, sounds like, you know, the offender could have been

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 3>inside judas vehicle out there at the hospital, and you know,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 3>she gets in and at a certain point the offender

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>pops up from the rear seat. That's you know, with

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the strips of towel, like, you know, binding material that

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the offender brought with him. And you know, then if

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of the scenario, and you know, right now,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm just kind of doing like a you know, a

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>little speculation. But if that's the scenario, then Judath isn't

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the one that drove the vehicle all the way back

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to the you know, the parking lot. The offender likely

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 3>did that once he got her under control inside her

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 3>own vehicle.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>So interesting, Okay, so here's where we may see the

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>man we may not. Her co workers. Judy's coworkers later

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>say that a man with red hair had stopped by

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the hospital earlier in the day asking for Judith her

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 2>real name. But there are three Judiths at that place

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and so we don't know which Judith

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>he was looking for, and it doesn't sound like he

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>connected with any of them, so that sort of went

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 2>a little cold. There was witness that reported seeing a

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 2>brown car turn into her apartment's parking lot around the

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>time that Judy would have arrived home. So between eleven

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty and twelve, another person said they saw a dark

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>colored car driving so fast and recklessly from the area

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>that it nearly sideswiped their vehicle, and neither car is

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 2>ever identified. So I presume what that means, Paul is

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the first witness, if it's connected to this case, is

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing the guy pull into the parking lot. Because they're

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>not saying Judy's car is pulling into the parking lot.

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>They're saying a brown car pulls into the parking lot

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>around the time she got home, and then there's another

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>car that leaves very quickly and recklessly.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And so there's a possibility, taking it to consideration those details,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 3>that Judy could have driven to her parking lot and

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is abducted as soon as she opens the door to

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>her vehicle. Under that circumstance, I would expect that there

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 3>would be some ear witnesses, because I don't think Judy

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>would be very I think should be, you know, pretty loud,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>screaming and trying to fight this guy as he's trying

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 3>to get her into his vehicle.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>But remember her coat, jacket buttons are in the back seat,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and those strips of towel are in the back seat.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 2>So do you think he tried to get her in

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the back seat first and then there was a struggle

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and he gagged her with these towel strips. I'm not

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>saying that's what happened. I'm just saying I wonder if

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 2>that could have been a possibility too.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>That's a big chance it is, you know, and that

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of goes back to my initial speculation that he's

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, you have an offender lying in wait inside

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>her own vehicle. This could have been a tandem, you know,

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 3>where he gets her under control, and then you have

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>another offender that's that's driving a vehicle. And now you

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 3>have let's say two offenders that are the ones that

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>are abducting Judith and so at her apartment. You know,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>why why let her get all the way to her

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 3>apartment if your plan is is to attack her initially

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>at the hospital?

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, let's keep going. Okay, no solid leads. They

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>are searching, searching. We still don't know that Nancy is

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be a victim. That's several months away. But

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 2>about a month and a half ish later into April

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy two, hikers like always hikers or the bottle

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>collectors or kids discover Judy's body. It's in a shallow

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 2>grave near an abandoned mind shaft series of abandoned mind shafts,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>about fifty miles from Sacramento. It's a long way from

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>her apartment. So that's the next photo. So page nine

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>is the photo of the shallow grave that looks so

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>shallow to me. It looks pretty deep.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 3>It's hard the perspective of this photo. It's a black

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and white photo, and it's showing the grave in front,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>in the front of the foreground of the photo, and

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>then you have what appear to be two detectives standing

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 3>looking down into it. So obviously Judy's body has been

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>collected at the point. But the grave itself, that's I mean,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that's down several feet, you know. It's not like a

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 3>cemetery grave, you know, but most certainly relative to my

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>experience with shallow graves usually that's like eighteen inches, you know,

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and part of the victim is sticking up out of

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the ground. This looks like it's possible that she could

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 3>have been completely out of sight because it looks like

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>it's deep enough.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what the mind shafts If this was doug already,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just some hole. Maybe machinery had been removed or something,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and this was something I can't see. Sure this guy

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 2>digging that? I mean, boy, when I think shallow grave,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think just enough to cover up a body. Well,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you what they find. Okay, they find

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 2>her body, and here's what the medical examiner says. She

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>was brutally beaten. She was sexually assaulted, she was bludgeoned.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>They don't know with what she was Then she was

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 2>also strangled with her own nylon stockings. So he put

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>her in a large canvas that was buried. Now they say,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>here two feet deep. You're right, the perspective is wonky

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>on this. Then two feet That's not two feet when

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I see But anyway, So they also find more of

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>those towel strips like the ones found in her car,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>so they think that he used those to gag Judy.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>They also find a gray sweatshirt that they believe belonged

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to her killer, probably because it must have been buried

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>with her, and even trace the canvas bag to a

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 2>company that produced them specifically for the San Juan Unified

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 2>School District. In Sacramento County, which seems like a specific clue.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think about that? I mean, does

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 2>it sound like somebody who is the same kind of

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>killer as the person who ends up killing Nancy? Also

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 2>totally different.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 3>It is different in terms of the mo you know,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>you've got an abduction sexual assault on the side, and

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, hiding the body fifty miles away than you

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>have with Nancy. Of course, you have the offender going

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 3>in and having her. You know, there's some planning going

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 3>on here with with Judith in terms of the towel strips,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, so that's that's kind of interesting from Okay,

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 3>the offender is deciding to use the towel strips, you know,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>for for binding. Maybe it possibly a ligature or a

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>gig the canvas bag. Coming back to San Juan School District,

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's where Okay, who all would have access

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 3>to these bags? You know? Is this something that you know,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's not affiliated with the San Juan School District

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 3>would be able to just casually grab, you know, while

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 3>being on school ground somewhere, or is this something where

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a specific person, let's say, a maintenance person, a

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 3>janitor that would have access to these these bags. But

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>that's also a little bit of a mess up on

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the offender's part to have something that could be traced

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 3>back to him. You know, this could also be staged

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 3>where it's you know, purposely choosing something that doesn't come

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the offender. You know. So, but right now,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting. I mean, there's overlap in terms of the victimology.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 3>There's overlap in terms of sexual assault homicide of a female,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>but there are some significant differences. I still would consider

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>the possibility of the same offender even with those differences.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 2>It's so interesting because you know, if you were to

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>tell me about these two cases and the way that

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the crimes were structured, in the way they were planned out,

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought it would have been flipped. I

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 2>would have thought he would have gone in and realized

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 2>this was too quick. With Nancy, I'm probably going to

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>get caught. They're probably going to be able to trace me.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 2>And then he works harder on the next on Judy

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>to really he takes her really far out to cover

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 2>it up. And this is sort of the opposite so

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>that when I initially read that, I thought, I don't know,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, don't they usually get a little bit more sophisticated,

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 2>not less sophisticated when they do these I guess not right.

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 3>They learn from their experiences, but they also experiment as

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 3>they do you know cases. But I open up when

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I when I teach the serial Predator course, I bring

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 3>up three cases out of the nineteen seventies that you

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>go this is from three different offenders. And it turns out, no,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 3>it's the same guy. He's doing it differently each time.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's part of the linkage. The difficulty of linkage

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 3>using behaviors and mo aspects, it is a very difficult

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>thing unless you have really unique set of circumstances. That's

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the beauty of having DNA today because we can really

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 3>link cases through DNA showing it's the same offender, even

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>though the cases on the surface look like completely different

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 3>types of cases.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me tell you. In Judith's case, who they're

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 2>looking at. They looked at Raymond and cleared him. I

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 2>told you that the fiance. The news spreads about Judy's murder.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>The guy who owns the property these mining shafts, he

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>comes forward. He says that three men he had never

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>met before were digging a hole on his property about

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a week after Judy was last seen, and the guys

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>told him they were digging for antique to sell, which

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I had not heard of, but sounds interesting. They said

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 2>it was a thing that people actually still do at

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 2>old mining sites.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 2>But he was uncomfortable with the encounter and so he

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>wanted to call the police. These three guys were never

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 2>fully identified. You know, there's a vague description of one

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of them, slim, six foot tall, has brown hair, but

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>there just doesn't seem to be any kind of a

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>strong link between Judy and these men. Another weird thing

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>about this story is the hiker who found Judy's body

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>happened to actually live near both of the women in Sacramento.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 2>He's hiking fifty miles outside of Sacramento and he finds

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>these bodies and he lives, you know, within a couple

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of blocks of these women. They look at the guy

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 2>and then they rule him out, and there's just never

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a clear connection. And there's never, Paul a clear connection

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>between Judy's case and Nancy's case. And this goes cold.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Both of these cases go cold for a long time.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, but both cases have sets of circumstances in

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 3>which modern technology might be able to pay off.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're gonna flash forward thirty years. I'm going to

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>name drop in a second, and you can tell me

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 2>if you know this person. So in two thousand and four,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>investigators reopen Nancy's case, so the second case, and they

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>create a DNA profile based on I'm presuming the blood evidence.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not the semen. This isn't something that was possible,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, after the murder. And so the

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>DNA profile helps investigators eliminate every single one of their

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 2>original suspects. So all of these guys it eliminates, and

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>they also submit it to FBI's CODIS and there's no match.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's a guy who works in the Sacramento DA's

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>office during this time period. His name is Scott Triplett.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever heard that name?

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the name is vaguely familiar, but I can't picture him.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So Scott Triplett says, the staff uploaded the DNA in

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Dakotis in two thousand and four, and the DNA profile

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>was run through the CA California Department of Justice familiar

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Search five times between two thousand and nine and twenty

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty one each with negative results. So explain how that works.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>It's different than CODIS, right, So tell me how often

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you know they end up running these searches. It has

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to be requested, is that right?

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it has to be requested. There is a formal

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 3>process to make a familial search request, and you would

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 3>have a group of people at the DOJ level that

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>would evaluate each request and whether or not it merited

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 3>doing this familial search. It's still relying upon CODIS now.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 3>CODIS is actually broken up basically at three tiers. You

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>have a local CODIS, you have a state level CODIS,

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and then of course you have the national CODIS. Most

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 3>states in two thousand and four. In fact, many states

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>today don't allow familial searching to be done on their database.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 3>And so for a familiar search in California, you can

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 3>only do that for the DNA profiles that are at

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 3>the California level. So even though it's possible that this

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>guy would have a son that's in CODIS in some

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>up Midwestern state, they're not legally permitted to search that

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 3>data base. So within California, we would just do the

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 3>familial request against the California database and we would attempt

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 3>to try to do familial requests on other states that

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 3>would allow it, but that typically would be rejected.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, the detectives in Sacramento keep this case going and

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>going and going for decades. They of course see what

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>happens with the Golden State killer, and they're hopeful that

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>they might be able to crack Nancy's case. Two. I

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 2>know that they were trying to make that connection in

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy between the two, but it sounds like that

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of dropped off and they were really trying to

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 2>concentrate on Nancy's case because I'm not quite sure what

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>they collected on Judy's case, and I don't know if

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>this you know, probably her case would still offficial, be open,

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>But they were really concentrating on breaking Nancy's.

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Case well, and that's because they were confident that they

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 3>had DNA evidence that would link back to the offender

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 3>in Nancy's case. In Judy's case, you know, her body's

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 3>found a month later. You know it's possible she's so decomposed,

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and they just never did get a good DNA profile

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 3>in Judy's case, even though you know, investigatively they're going, well,

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance that these cases are related, but their

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 3>efforts are going to be going on that DNA evidence

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>from Nancy's case.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Okay, So in twenty nineteen, so just six

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 2>years ago, they uploaded the Suspected killers DNA profile into

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the public genealogical databases. It takes three years and financial

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>support in the form of a grant from the Bureau

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of Justice Assistance. Tell me that, I don't know if

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I've heard that before, Bureau of Justice Assistance.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, this is a federal entity we shortened,

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>we refer to them as BGA, and so law enforcement

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 3>gets a wide variety of different grants out of these

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 3>BGA programs, and so there are grants that at the

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>federal level were coming out, you know, specifically for cold

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 3>cases or prosecuting cold cases. And these grants have been

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 3>modified over the past few years to permit that funding

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 3>to fund the genealogy testing.

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good well, thank goodness for that Bureau of Justice assistants,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>because they helped figure out this killer. So eventually, using

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 2>those funds and using genealogy, they land on the name

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Richard John Davis. He was twenty seven years old when

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>he murdered Nancy I can give you details. You can

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>also see his photo and I don't know if you

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>just want to compare him to the boy scout looking,

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, Glenn Campbell. But Davis is on the very

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 2>last page, and of course it's photo.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, in some ways he he almost has a

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Ted Bundy look to him. Yeah, it's hard to say

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 3>if does he match that composite, but most certainly you

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 3>could see even at his age, he's got a fairly

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 3>full head of hair, so it's possible, you know, maybe

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>he did match the Glenn Campbell look. But you know,

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the composite is on the side. Now, they got DNA right,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 3>and so once they identify him as as a potential

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 3>through genealogy, then they would have done a direct sample

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 3>from him and compared you know, his DNA profile using

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 3>the traditional law enforcement type of DNA the STRs, to

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 3>the str profile that had previously been generated from assuming

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the bloodstains collected at Nancy's apartment or along that blood trail,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and would be one hundred percent match. So they know

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 3>he's the guy.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me tell you about Richard John Davis. He

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>lived in the same apartment complex as Nancy. Okay, that

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 2>brings me back to ear witnesses who said, oh, we

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>heard a car take off out of the parking lot.

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 2>We don't know if that was him or not. But

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll let me tell you a little bit more about

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the circumstances. So he has a roommate. Both Richard and

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 2>his roommate were interviewed after Nancy's death, and they provided

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 2>alibis for each other. You know, certainly, I don't know

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>what that means. I mean, my goodness, if we were

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 2>hanging out at my house, you could slip out for

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty minutes or go to that state I have to

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>go to bathroom, Kate and slip out and you know,

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 2>come back out. And if you're living right across the way,

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I maybe the roommate isn't making up this alibi.

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but I could see it being possible

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 2>that he slips across the way and doesn't take very

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>long to do all this. But I don't know.

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, like Nancy's case, you know, this is not where

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 3>the offender has spent a ton of time. Like I said,

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>this type of promise I can occur very quickly. Now

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 3>if he you know, was in there sexually assaulting her

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 3>over the course of hours. That's one thing. But I

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 3>mean it appears based on Ferris in his interview, is

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 3>that well, when I left Nancy was you know, she's

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 3>closed like she would be for bed, which basically was

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 3>just in our underwear. So it looks like Richard Davis

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 3>breaks in confronts Nancy. She probably puts up much greater

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>resistance than what he was expecting, and now he kills

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 3>her and he runs off. And this is a matter

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:33.959
<v Speaker 3>of a few minutes in which all of that could

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 3>have occurred versus that other scenario brought up where he's

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 3>spending a lot of time sexually assaulting her. He never

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 3>got to the point of sexually assaulting her in all

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 3>likelihood under this set of circumstances.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 2>The police have for fifty years quietly believed that Richard

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 2>should be on the radar. And here's one main reason.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>They said that his apartment had the perfect vantage point

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 2>of her door. Okay, he would be able to see

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the fiance going and coming, and all he would have

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>had to do is walk toward the back to see her,

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 2>leaving the door open just a crack to let the

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 2>cat in and out. And you know, he lived there

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>he lived in the apartment complex, so he would have

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 2>known very well about her habits, even though I think

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 2>she would have had a more predictable schedule I would

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 2>guess as a court reporter than somebody like Judy as

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a nurse who probably worked all kinds of different shifts.

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know, he's there, he's able to see everything,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think the police just had a bad feeling

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 2>about him. They think that the bloody trail that we

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 2>were talking about that ends in the parking lot that

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>someone said, oh yeah, I heard a car take off,

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and I think this complex is small enough where people

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it would have been unusual for a car to leave

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that early in the morning. They think, actually, maybe this

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>blood trail doesn't actually end in the parking lot. It

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 2>could have extended all the way to a staircase where

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Richard could have gotten into his place.

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, but you also have to you know, this guy's

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 3>rapidly getting out of Nancy's apartment, you know, and at

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 3>a certain point, once he's you know, separated himself, he's

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 3>now looking on I'm bleeding, and now he wraps his

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 3>hand in his shirt or something, and so now you're

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 3>not getting that consistent trail That's just a normal response

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 3>that you see from offenders in flight. You know, once

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 3>they get a certain distance away, you know, now they're

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of assessing what happened and looking at themselves. It's

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 3>also entirely possible he got into his vehicle and drove off,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, because he's now thinking, oh shit, I need

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 3>to get away from here because they're going to, you know,

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 3>find out you know, that I tried to attack Nancy

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 3>or I killed Nancy.

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Would you expect now, I guess this is what I thought.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I expected that level of violence and sort of planning.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Whether I think the finger protectors you're silly or not,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 2>he's planning stuff. I would have thought this was not

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 2>his first encounter, a violent encounter. But would that surprise

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 2>you or not surprised you, regardless of whatever his background is.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Would you think that he has done something along these

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>lines before or no?

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that's That's one of the things that

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 3>we are finding out with the cases being solved with

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 3>genealogy as cases that I normally would evaluate and go,

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, this looks predatory, Like you mentioned with Nancy's case,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.959
<v Speaker 3>the pre planning, the covering up, the you know, the fingertips.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 3>He's obviously going in there with a knife. He's figured

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 3>out that that sliding door would would be available for

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 3>him to be able to get into and out of

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>and nobody would know, and you'd go, yeah, this guy

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 3>possibly has others. And he was you said, twenty seven

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 3>at the time of her homicide, you know, And generally

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, where you do see offenders have

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 3>a few cases at a younger age and in a predatory,

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 3>fantasy motivated type of homicide. However, we're seeing those types

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 3>of cases where these offenders commit them once and never

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 3>do it again. It's what we call the one off offender.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 3>There's likely a lot of fantasy going on in Richard

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Davis's head, you know, and he's watching her, he's watching Nancy,

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 3>fantasizing about what he wants to do with Nancy, and

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 3>then develops a planned and he got scared or you know,

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 3>when she fought back and he wasn't expecting it, and

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 3>now he's going, oh god, you know, don't I didn't

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 3>like that. I'm paranoid. I'm never going to do that again.

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's just what we're finding. You do have offenders

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 3>that commit this horrific type of crime and then never

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 3>do it again. That's why they're not being solved in CODIS,

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>because they COTIS is predicated on the repeat offender versus genealogy.

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 3>He may never offend to get his DNA collected from him,

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 3>but he can't help his third cousins from doing genealogy research.

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 3>And now we can triangulate from the third cousins and

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 3>drop down on Richard Davis.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me tell you about Richard. He had no

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>violent record, He had a couple of DUI's, he had

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a drinking problem according to people in his life. But

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 2>after he was killed, Richard seemed to live a quiet

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>life with a wife and children. I mean, you know

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that we know of of course, I always say that

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't arrested for anything violent. We don't know what happened.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Investigators are incredibly happy about this, as is I'm assuming

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Nancy's family. This is solved fifty years later. The really

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 2>sad part of this to me is that Richard Davis

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>died in ninety seven in Sacramento County, Okay.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 3>So he died before they ever discovered who he was. Yep,

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 3>you know I've had that happen.

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 2>He got away with it right.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 3>But you know, it's still it's an answer. It is,

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Nancy's family. It will never bring Nancy back,

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 3>but having an answer at least is something.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 2>And you know, just talking about the other case that

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 2>they were never able to connect, which is Judy huck

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Awry's case, it's unsolved. They were never able to move

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the needle on that, and you know, it's considered I

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 2>believe in an open case at this point, but at

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>least we're able to talk about it in case people

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 2>do know anything that happened. These are relive for us,

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 2>relatively recent cases where there could be people out there.

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 2>I think through those circumstances, and Richard living in that

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.959
<v Speaker 2>complex makes sense as the offender. You know, he's able

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to see her pattern in everything. I'm not sure Richard

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 2>with Judy makes sense. It's not his apartment complex. I

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>guess he could be stalking her, but she has an

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 2>unpredictable schedule. I guess it could be a crime of opportunity.

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But if he was interested in that, he had one already,

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, there in the apartment complex. I mean, I

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 2>guess you never know, but I was just thinking, to me,

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 2>this feels like two different offenders, but I don't know,

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 2>we don't know.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 3>It would not surprise me, you know. With with Judith,

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 3>you know that Richard is prowling a different apartment complex

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 3>than his own right, and for that first case, maybe

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 3>he does do surveillance on Judy, finds the life pattern

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the offender. In Judas case, I mean the torn towelstrips

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 3>that shows pre planning, if the offender is at her

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 3>place of work and is maybe hiding in her car.

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's definitely showing that there's been some thought

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 3>put into attacking Judith and then figuring out how I'm

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 3>going to dispose of her body. That very well could

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 3>be Richard Davis, yeah, you know, and he can't help

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 3>himself when he's seeing Nancy day in and day out

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 3>in his own apartment complex. You know. I think with

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Judas case, it sounds like enough. Of course, I don't

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 3>know to what extent that they've gone after the evidence,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, and it's a much more difficult case from

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 3>a DNA standpoint, But I those torn towel strips, I

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 3>think the technology today, the sensitivity of the DNA testing

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 3>today could potentially find offender DNA, you know, So I'm

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 3>hoping that they've at least pursued that and maybe they

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 3>struck out, But if they haven't, that would be one

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of the things I would I would recommend you never know,

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 3>this guy could have put the towel in his mouth

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 3>while he's tearing it, and you actually have a saliva

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 3>stain with a whole bunch of DNA on it, and

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 3>you just need to have the right DNA analyst who's

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 3>very thorough to find something like that.

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, one thing that I think you'll find interesting. There

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of chatter online on Reddit and other

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 2>message boards and blogs that the belief that Nancy might

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 2>have been a victim of the Zodiac killer. I didn't

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 2>explore it because, of course, now we know this was

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this predates, of course, the DNA evidence.

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't sure why that would have been an option

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 2>for folks on Reddit to think that she would have

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 2>been Do you have any ideas about this?

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Yeah, no, for sure. This is I You know,

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I kind of got into the Zodiac world because I

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 3>was working that and you know, my lab had actually

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 3>done work on the Zodiac case, so I had access

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to some materials, and you know, once my name kind

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 3>of got associated with work in the Zodiac. Then of

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 3>course I've got all the various online people you know,

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 3>hitting me up, and with Zodiac, there's a thought that

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Zodiac has many, many more cases than the actual you know,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 3>four attacks that we know he did, even some of

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 3>my unsolved cases out of Contacosta County, these Zodiac slews

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 3>are saying, well, it's got to be Zodiac, he must

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 3>have done all of this. And then as we solve

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 3>cases like, no, it's not. You know, we have a

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of these predators out there, particularly back in the

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventies, so it's not surprising to me, you know,

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 3>like with Nancy's case, that somebody would go, well, that's

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 3>got to be Zodiac, you know, because he had one

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 3>point he sent like a card in it was like

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 3>me thirty eight you know, SFPD zero or something. You know.

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 3>So they're thinking, well, he's now admitting that he's done

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight cases, and so they're trying to scoop all

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 3>these unsolved cases as being Zodiac and that's just not

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the case.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I hope somebody is involved still with Judy Hakari's case,

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:42.240
<v Speaker 2>because you know, she deserves justice too, And I don't

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>know what the reaction was of Nancy's family about at

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 2>least having some answers here. I'm sure there's some sort

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of sense of relief, not closure, but just some sort

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 2>of knowing, you know that that this is this is

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 2>a person who, though he died without facing justice, there

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 2>still is you know that being able to put that

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 2>part of it to rest. That's a hard case. I mean,

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about young women dying in their twenties in such

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a horrible way and with such promise, not even the

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get married part, but that just these

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, they seem like effervescent, well liked people, and

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just so awful to kind of go through that.

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 2>But I also I like this case, these two cases,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 2>because the juxtaposition of them, to me, really kind of

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 2>shows how unpredictable a killer could be, because you and

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I are both kind of going it could be and

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 2>they might be connected and they might not. What you

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>can't do is rely on a profile or what we've

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 2>heard on TV to say this was overkill. It had

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to have been the fiance or somebody knew her, or

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>somebody who was in love with her, when that was

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>clearly not the case. But a lot of people would

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 2>say something like that. So that's why I bring these

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of cases to you.

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 3>No, well, I think you know, and like you when

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 3>you say a profile, you know, the sort of that

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 3>behavioral analysis there. I do believe that there is there

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 3>is value to having you know, that somebody who has

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 3>expertise in that, but it's also recognized the limitations of that,

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, and it's it's really where, you know, if

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 3>there is something that the offender has done that is

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 3>just so unique that behavioral profiler possibly can spot that

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 3>where the average detective won't because the average detective doesn't

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 3>work these types of cases day in and day out

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 3>and hasn't seen stuff. So there is value, but sometimes

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 3>people way overreach and you know, and it's not necessarily

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 3>appreciating that. You can have, you know, what appear to

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 3>be the same types of cases happening at the same

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 3>time in the same neighborhood and it's all by different offenders,

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.959
<v Speaker 3>that's a reality, or you can have cases that don't

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.760
<v Speaker 3>look related at all, like Judith and Nancy. He's outside

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of the geographic connection and it could be the same offender,

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 3>he's just doing different things.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, next week will probably not be diving into DNA,

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 2>much to your chagrin, will probably be stomping around on

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 2>a farmhouse in the eighteen hundreds trying to figure out

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>what somebody would do with like a pickaxe or something.

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But they're all valuable. These are all the same people

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 2>every I mean, I just don't you see that that pattern.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just people are people, and that's it. It doesn't

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 2>matter if it's from the seventeen hundreds or twenty twenty five.

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 2>They all kind of react exactly the same to things.

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 2>They cover stuff up, and you know, we might have

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 2>more resources now, but it doesn't mean you're going to

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 2>get caught. They got caught in the eighteen hundreds. You'll

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 2>get caught now.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Nope, for sure. Well I'm looking forward to it.

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, I will see you next week.

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Sounds good, Kate.

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 1>This has been an exactly right production.

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 3>For our sources and show notes go to exactly rightmedia

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash Buried Bones sources.

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Alexis Emirosi.

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Research by Maren mcclashan, Ali Elkin, and Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Our mixing engineer is Ben Tolliday.

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Our theme song is by Brivogel.

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Our artwork is by Vanessa Lilac.

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Executive produced by Karen Kilgaroff, Georgia hard Stark, and Daniel Kramer.

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 2>You can follow Buried Bones on Instagram and Facebook at

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 2>buried Bones pod.

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Kate's most recent book, All That Is Wicked, a Gilded

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Age story of murder and the race to decode the

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 3>criminal mind, is available now.

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 2>And Paul's best selling memoir Unmasked, My life solving America's

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 2>cold Cases, is also available now.

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Listen to Buried Bones on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you get your podcasts