WEBVTT - Beating the Book: 2019 Fantasy Football preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man Now Down Now. Tuesday morning, August

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty Reading the Book podcast Fantasy Football Special, Warren Sharp

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on the show to talk about the schedules faced doing

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it his way, Which are the most difficult, which are

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the easiest. Then we'll hear from Jeff Ratlin from Pro

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. He's got answers to some big fantasy questions

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>going into the fantasy football season. We'll close it out

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with her old friend Todd Right, He's got perspective as well.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's all brought to you today by The Football Analytics Show.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a podcast run by Ed Fang, frequent guests on

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the Megapod, and during the final two weeks of August

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>he's doing the Preview Series. It's a set of ten

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>episodes of ten minutes each that previews the season. Ten

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>episodes of ten minutes each. I like them kind of nuggets.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Both college football and fil will be covered. Of course.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It's The Football Analytics Show. You can find it on

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. Check that out.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, enjoy the Fantasy Football Special on the

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book podcast and won those gidiots and believe

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in analytics, analytics, statistics and more are used to win wagers,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and Gil has every number you need to cash your

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>tickets now live from the Visa in studios in the

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>South Point Hotel and Casino. It's Gil Alexander, our number

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two of a numbers game right here in Visa. We're

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>sports betting analytics, live, actionable sports betting information. Serious except

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Channel two O four, Visa dot Com, the Visa App.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you prefer Foobo TV or Sling or Game Plus

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>throughout Canada New York City. I like, I'm just happy

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you're on any of them, tuning us in. We appreciate

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it here. Jeff Parls, producing number five is here as well. Uh, Jeff,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>always a treat when we bring in this gentleman. He

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>has his own professional football preview guide each and every offseason,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's about thing number ten in his world these days,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ladies and gentlemen, it's the great Warren Sharp. Good morning

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to you. Warren Hey, good morning Gil. Happy to join

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you again. I'm looking forward to the start of the

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>season and hopefully the first of many conversations I hope. So, Warren,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>first of all, before you even got on Airge, the

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>last segment I just went through the Doctor David Chow

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>portion of your preview guide, and I was reading off

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on on injuries of certain players Cam Newton,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, Sony Michelle, and Darius Guys. Good lord man,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that put me in a bad mood as a Redskin fan. Well,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that coupled with you know the fact that this has

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>been the most injured team in the NFL for the

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>last five years. Uh, their field is a terrible travesty.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh they don't do a very good job of

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>resigning players. You know, if there's plenty to uh to

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>check into some counseling over other than that, Mrs Lincoln,

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the play? Um? Before we get to

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the strength of schedule stuff from you, I just want

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to cherry pi because now your preview guys. First of all,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>how long does it take you to put together your preview? Guy,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Because it would take me from now to like mid

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>August to fully digest every nugget in there. What's that process? Like? Yeah,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and and that's actually not a bad thing, Um to

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>spend some time with it and dive in. So I

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty much you know, the Super Bowl is the beginning

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of February. I took a little bit of time off

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>immediately thereafter, and then I start going through updating statistics,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>updating metrics that are going to be used for the

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>guide comprising the entire season, updating all of the visualizations

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that are in here. And that's one of the things

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for listeners. You can't see it. You know, it's it's

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>full color. It's full color. Every team has seven pages

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>devoted to metrics that are color coded and coordinated, so

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for you to see which players in which

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>which areas your team is doing well in and poorly

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in UM And never came that it's a visualized uh

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>learning tool, uh from the color coding perspective at any rate. Yeah,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then pretty much working on it UM from i'd say,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like early March all the way through till the end

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of June when I publish it, and especially the last month.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm working just as much as I am

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>during the season when I'm consulting for some teams, and

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's pretty much until like three am every night. Uh,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't get a whole lot of sleep, you know.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>In in the month of May. It's tough because you

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have to incorporate NFL draft related information, and that sometimes changes, uh,

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>some of your perspectives on the direction of team is heading.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>As you know, Gil, you know, certain draft picks apart

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>from quarterback don't actually modify a team's win total. That addically, however,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it sort of impacts your thought process on what this

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>team is valuing and what direction they're headed, and some

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of the trades they might make in the draft and

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>players they might acquire in exchange for picks, and so

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of you know, the right up is

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in the narrative, forces a lot of theoretical dis rushing

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>about the team's philosophies, and so you can't do any

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of that until the draft has occurred. Alright, let me

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>try to try to address a couple of dangling participles

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there which which we brought up. One. First of all,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>where do people get the preview guide? So the best

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>place for me to get it is if you go

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to short Football Analysis dot com. We completely revamped that

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>site and we've brought in on a lot of new

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>writers or providing content. We're really excited about the website.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>But you could buy the PDF version there um and

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the other way you can get it if you want

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to have the printed copy, which I makes per copy

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on by the way, is over at Amazon, and that's

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that you can get the full color book. Now,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I will admit, even though I make a lot more

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>money on you purchasing it from the website. Uh, I

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>love having a printed copy to to just thumb through

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and have my fingertips on. But there are those people

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that for PDF, and so we certainly are offering that

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. All right, the PDF option and then the

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hard copy, which makes warrant twenty one cents per per issue.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You decide whichever one you want. And the other thing

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there is you threw it in. You did very casually

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>their warrant Before we get into this, you threw it.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I will be consulting for NFL teams plural. Uh. Please

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>explain what you can about that? Well, yeah, I was.

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I was then approached this offseason by almost ten teams

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to do consulting workforce. Some we're interested in full time

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 1>roles that would have required me to, you know, jump

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>off everything Twitter, social media, leave the this world and

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>go live in their city and work for their team.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 1>And I got to need a lot of different people

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with those teams from you know, the GM to the

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>head coach to the offense coordinated, all the all the

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>people founded, the strength and conditioning guys, and it was

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a great process. UM. Ultimately, I'm still remaining in a

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in a consulting role for UM a couple of different

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>teams UH this upcoming season, and I'm super excited about

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>doing that kind of kind of trying to implement some

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of the strategies that I've come up with UH and

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>actually make them have real success on the field on

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Sundays and and that's always a challenge, but it's very

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>rewarding at the same time when it works. Man, Congratulations

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to you Warrant. I know this is a long time coming.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been a it's been hard work through the years,

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and no one deserves it more than you do. So Mozel,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>top to you on that. As far as your guide

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, here, there's no way we can do it

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>justice here in two segments. But let me just let

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>me throw out a few nuggets here before we get

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to some strength of schedule stuff. Let me throw out

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a few nuggets and this is just from the very

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>first section of your book, UM, and I'm gonna try

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to aggravate a few fan bases here, Buffalo Bills. This

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>might even be from from your first section in the book,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. Uh. The Bills called the most runs on

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>second and ten plus yards plays to go in the

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL last year, running the ball on forty percent of

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>those play calls. Those runs produced a successful gain just

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent of the time. Because of their early

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>downplay calling, the Bills faced third and eight point three

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>yards to go on average, the longest distance to go

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League. Now, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but didn't Lashawn McCoy the previous year just do unbelievable

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>things with the Bill's offense, putting him in the worst

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>possible situations. I think that. I think I recall that

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Is there any hope for you? Given that?

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>And again so much what you and I talked about

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with Crackman through the football season is all right, You've

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>identified the problem. Do you have any confidence in the

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff figuring that out right? Well? The you know,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the bigger kind of underlying steam here is that, unfortunately

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of coaches believe that they're going to quote

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote protect their rookie quarterbacks by running the ball a

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>lot by being conservative on early downs and will only

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pass the ball when we need to, which is when

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we're in third and long situations. Well, you know, when

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>when you get in these second inten situations you gotta

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>try to pass the ball. You can't You're not gonna

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>get enough efficiency running it, and then you're going to

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be stuck in situations where you're being predictable on third

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and long. And the key for offenses you must realize.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Offensive coordinators must realize that all the chips are in

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>your stack. Like you control so much and dictate so much,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the rules are explaanted in your favor. The one thing

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't give up is predictability towards the defense. When

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you're just giving them portions of your chips.

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you cannot be in predictable situations. So uh,

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily choosing to be in third and long situations because

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you're calling run plays on second intent is a terrible decision.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They thought they were protecting Josh Allen. They actually compounded

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this situation and made it worse on Josh Allen because

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of these third and very long situations. It can improve

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if they feel like Josh Allen is no longer a rookie,

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can put a little bit more are on

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>his plate. So in this situation, I think it could

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>improve a little bit for Bill's fans, But I still

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>think at their core they're probably going to be to

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>run oriented than I would prefer. Denver Broncos war And

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to Warren Sharp at Sharp Football on Twitter,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Great Great Football follow through the season. I mean sometimes

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Warren's rants on Twitter or epic Uh, Denver Broncos. Uh,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>your point, arm strength does not equate to efficient deep

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>passing and twenty eighteen, Joe Flacco ranked thirty second of

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty three quarterbacks on deep passes. His thirty four percent

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>completion rate was also thirty second. In seventeen, Flacco ranked

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty one thirty two quarterbacks on deep as is. His

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent completion rate was also thirty one. Flacco

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine thirty one quarterbacks on deep asses completion rate

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ranked thirty over the last three years combined of twenty

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seven qualifying quarterbacks with enough deep attempts, Flacco's deep passing

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ranks dead last in the NFL. As you point out,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco may have a big arm but it hasn't

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>held at all with his ability to make deep throws yet.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the bill season win total, who

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about with seven, So is the Broncos

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>right at seven um still better off with Flacco or

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>or are we trying to say maybe not so much? Well,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're I think John Elway. The problem with John

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Alway is he's so infatuated with arm strength, right Like,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the number one that he talks about when he's

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at quarterback prospects is arm strength because he had

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a decent arm and so that's what he thinks makes

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a great quarterback. In Joe Flacco's case, yes, he can

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball far, he's got a good arm, but

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>his accuracy, his success on this passes is terrible. So

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you actually getting. You're getting a guy you

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>can throw it far but not well. Um, I don't

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's beneficial. And the other thing that we know

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it's not about your arm. Mike Leach talked

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about it at slow in this pass off season. It's

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about your accuracy. That's the number one. Uh. You know,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of tenants that Mike Leach, professor, is

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that the quarterback must have an accuracy is the best one.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And you can't teach accuracy. You just are accurate or

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not. You just have that kind of ability to

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>judge depth, perception and speed and you know distance and

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>how you got to pass the football. Joe Flacco is

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not that accurate. So um, I'm not saying he's a

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>downgrade over what they've had in the past few years.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>There he could be an upgrade, but he's certainly not

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback just because he has arm strength. And

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, John Alway continues to fail and

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>draft these big, tall guys with strong arms like brock

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all Swiler who have been colossal disasters and he hasn't

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>learned his lesson. We'll see how Joe Flacco pans out

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. Man, I'm sitting here, Smiley Warren because I

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for football season because we you me crack

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardi when he's on this show. We spend so

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>much time talking about the mind boggling thing my modeling

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>things that coaches and organizations doing the National Football League.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me pick on just and more. The Oakland Raiders,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>UH soon to be in Las Vegas. Uh, there's a

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>note here Tom Cable, and again we're just cherry picking

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff from about Warren's Pro Football Guide, his twenty nineteen

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football preview. Guy Tom Cable's an offensive line coach.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Here's his lines, rankings and pass protection during Tom Cable's

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>NFL career. Again, Tom Cable with the Oakland Raiders. Now

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>UH six Atlanta thirty one? Is that a thirty two?

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>UH seven, Oakland seven, OAKLANDTE nine, oaklandte Oakland Silen, Seattle, Seattle,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>U Seattle thirty second, dead last Seattle, Seattle, Seattle seventeen,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Seattle twenty five. Last year, Oakland twenty five. And it

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>should be pointed out in many of these cases, the

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>year prior to his arrival, the team's offensive lines and

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>pass protection were top ten operations in many cases. And

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>then he took over. And yet here he is offensive

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>line coach with the Oakland Raiders. When you see stuff

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, are you just like what's going on here? Yeah?

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we too Many fans assume that the coaching

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>staff understands everything, the owners are making good decisions, that

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>if the team isn't winning, it's largely because players aren't executing.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Players are making mistakes the reality is that oftentimes the

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>person in charge of hiring some of these people just

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the numbers at their fingertips. They don't have

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the understanding, nor do they care. And a perfect example

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is Tom Cable. I mean, this guy, he's made four

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>different stops. He's bottomed ten virtually everywhere he's been. He

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>makes offensive lines worse when he starts coaching them, and

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the longer he's with them, oftentimes they get worse. So

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a problem as a NFL offensive line coach. Um,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's just mind boggling, nothing more to say.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why he keeps getting jobs. Greater season

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>win total six um again over slightly juiced minus one thirty.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>These courtesy of the Westgate season win totals in the lines.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The individual game lines you see on the screen all

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of CG Technology. I could go on and on,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but again it's just a flavor for what you can

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>find nuggets in Warren Sharp's Pro Football preview guide. UM, So,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just generally speaking that because I won't pick on anyone

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>individually here anymore, but generally speaking, what are the teams Warren?

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The team war teams that you feel shuns analytics the

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>most or just has the most general lack of awareness

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of most of the tenants that you point out in

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>your guide at chart football Stats and a chart Football Analysis. Uh, well,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a couple of teams that, um, you know,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>have talent and they're not using analytics enough to help

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>get them over the edge. The two teams that perhaps

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are the most talented but aren't using enough analytics out there,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, are the Seattle Seahawks in the l

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>A Chargers. I mean, these are perennial playoff contenders, um,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and over the last several years. You know, in the

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Chargers case longer than that, they can't get over that hump.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know for the Chargers their cases, they just

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't do enough there. They've started to throw the football

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to the running backs more so. That's great, that's perfectly

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in line on early downs with what you're supposed to

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be doing. But I mean, I just wrote an article

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>up at her Football Analysis earlier today. Philip Rivers has

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>started every single game since Deal, every single game. No

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback has started more games than him. The best play

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on short yard is is a quarterback sneak. They convert

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>about seventy eight percent at a time running back you

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hand off to them about worse conversion rate. How many

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback sneaks does Philip Rivers have in those four years

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>since two thous of fifteen when he started every single

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>game one one sneak? It makes no sense. Brady's got

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like thirty eight. Even a guy like Drew Brees, shorter,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>smaller than both Uh Brady and Philip Rivers, has attempts

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's converted twenty six of them into first dound that.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Philip Rivers refuses two quarterbacks snake the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>ball in these short yard of situations, it's amazing. Yeah,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's almost worn, like it's written into his

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>contract if you didn't know any better. Right, Like, you

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>never see Philip Rivers quarterback sneake, You never see Ben

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Roethlisberger run play action like it just doesn't happen like

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>as often as it should. And you point out at

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>some point in the book to Uh, these are two

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>things we've talked about on the show before. But that's

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a thing with the Steelers. They just don't Why aren't

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>they running more play action? Play action helps tremendously in

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>certain situations with the Seahawks. So you mentioned it's all

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>about they run too much. Uh, it's just so many

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating tidbits. We'll come back, war We'll take a break.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into some strength schedule stuff because

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you do that very well. It's Warren Sharp from at

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Sharp Football on Twitter, Sharp football stats dot com, Sharp

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>football Analysis dot com. We'll talk more about his preview

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>guide straight the schedule. Next on a Numbers game at Visa.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Down Back to a Numbers game with your host, Gil Alexander,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting live from our Visa in studios in Las Vegas.

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Back on the Numbers game, Sports Betting Analytics Live Gil

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Alexander right here at Visa in Series XM, Channel two.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh for Warren Sharp, kind enough to join us this

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>morning for a spell. Warren, just before the break, I

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>asked you, what are the team war teams in the

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>National Football League that are least embracing of analytics, And

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, of the teams with talent it would have

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of talent, would be the Chargers in

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. If we took away that qualifier of the

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>teams with talent, and let's just set all thirty two teams,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Redskins being number one on that list. Well,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they would be close. Um. They certainly are problematic with

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>their run rate on early downs. It got worse with

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dream Peterson. You know, Jake Gruten's infatuated with that,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's very unproductive. And the problem is that

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>now they may be starting. I mean, for while you

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>thought there he was doing it because he didn't love

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>his quarterbacks, but I mean Kirk Cousins was giving him

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of play. Uh. And you know, they

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to run the football stage. Maybe it was maybe

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Jay didn't think as highly as Kirk. Okay, Well, so

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>they brought in Alex Smith to hand picked them. They

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>still were doing it. Without Alex Smith, they still were

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>doing it. And now you've got either case Keenum or

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>possibly a rookie, and I think they're probably still going

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to run too much. Now. They did hire

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>an analytics guy, uh this this upcoming season to try

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to assist them. How much though influence he will be

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>able to have over like play calls in that capacity,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>uh is I'm skeptical of. But we'll see. I Mean,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I always hope that teams change their ways and do

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>things more intelligently. But I take a realistic approach to it,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a pragmatic approach. And you know, Jake Gluten, you know

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it can't change his stripes back quickly. I don't think. Yeah,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if they push Scott mcluin out, they can push anybody

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out in d C. Uh famous Sloan sports conference with you.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we're on a panel for this past year,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so it congratulates to you on that, but a famous one.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, few years back, I ran

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>into Matthew Berry from ESPN Fantasy Guy, who of course

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is a huge Redskin fan as well for those who

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, from d C, and I said, does it

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bother you, like the the only NFL team not here

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Redskins, and and he looked around, he goes, yeah,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>actually it does. So just not very exciting for those

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of us who would like the Redskins to approach things

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with a little more brain power. All right, So, Warren,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule, we talked about this every year, and

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked a little bit about it earlier in the

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>off season when season win totals were first coming out.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But break this down for us in terms of the

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>easiest and hardest past defenses run defenses faced. However, you

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>wanna to parse it out right, So I think first,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have to understand just who who are

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you facing? Um and the team that has the most

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting schedule variants from the team season is the Houston Texans,

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about that before. They have my number

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>one easiest schedule last year. They have the number one

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>most difficult UH schedule this year, and other teams that

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are grouped near them are the Broncos, the Raiders, and

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>now the Dolphins. The Dolphins as I've adjusted my strength

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of schedule analytics based on some tweaks that Vegas has

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>made to the season win totals. By the way, there

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been a whole lot of movement which season

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>totals since they've opened. It's a it's been a kind

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of a unique year. Imagine we'll see more as training

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>camps open and injuries start to occur. But Um and

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titans also have a very difficult schedule. On the

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>flip side of that, the teams that I projected, what

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a month or two ago with you to have the

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>easiest schedule still have the easiest schedules. Of Patriots, of course,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>because they play in the NFC starr of the FC East.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The Jets also have a very easy schedule. How do

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bills? So the a f C East plays the

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>easy schedule of opponents throwing there the Eagles and the Browns.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.239
<v Speaker 1>That's your top five easiest to overall schedules. Uh, if

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk about from a fantasy perspective, um

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as you know what's going to help quarterback play.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think you've known this for a while now.

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>We've kind of alluded to it. But when teams are

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>when when fans are looking at, what's my team? How

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are we going to do this year? Keep in mind

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>offense is more important to your wins and losses than

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his defense, and passing offense is more important to your

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>wins and losses than rushing offense. To the first place

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you might want to start with strength of schedule is

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>just analyzing um which teams are going to face easier,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tough schedules of opposing past defenses. Taking the mind these

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are projections. Also taken to mind that great quarterbacks and

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>passing offenses can overcome tough schedules. Where it hurts is

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where mediocre passing offenses face a tough schedule, and where

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it really helps is when a good passing offense faces

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a really easy schedule. So let's run through the five

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>easiest schedules of passing defenses this year. Arizona partners with

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury. They're going to face the number one easiest

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule of past defenses, which should be really interesting and

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>makings fun out in Arizona with Kyler Murray obviously growing pains,

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but they will face the easiest schedule of past defenses.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina with Cam Newton. How's the should they're going to do?

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be interesting. The forty Niners with Jimmy

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo at number three, obviously getting him back is valuable.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That offense was way beyond expectations in terms of doing

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>really good last year with backup caliber quarterbacks. I love

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the job that Kyle Shanahan did. Number four is the

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings Kirk Cousins getting another shot at having a

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>good season this year with the new offensive coordinator. And

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>tied at fifth are the Saints and the Bucks, two

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>teams from the NFC South. Bruce Arians now coaching the Buck.

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 1>That offense should be interesting. Obviously lost Sehn Jackson, but UH,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton and Drew Brees. Fifth easiest schedules. Look at

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult schedules the top five. The Chiefs hardest

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>past schedule of any team this upcoming season. But I

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the past, a great offense can overcome that,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and they certainly do have a great offense and a

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback. But it's going to hurt teams like uh,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers, the Miami Dolphins, the Oakland Raiders. Those

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are numbers two through four in terms of the most

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult schedule of past defenses, and rounding out the rear

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Cleveland Browns. So Baker Mayfield, he struggled last

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>year against good past defenses, but he was a rookie

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was modifying into a system that he wasn't

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>taught in training camp because Freddie Kitchens took over. So

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna strike, you know, will he adapt to that

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in year two and play better against his tough defenses.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Time will tell, But he's going to face a much

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>more difficult schedule than he did last year. That is

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating stuff right there, and you're right, especially the past

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>defenses faced, especially for fantasy purposes. Uh, is really good

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff right there. Um, your fantasy guy who's also in

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>your preview guy, is it rich Rebar? Is that how

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you pronounced his name? Yeah? He he also uh he

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he likes Jamis Winston and the Bucks did show up

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on your five top easiest past defenses faced. He thought

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that was a breakout possibility for Winston, which I found interesting.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so much of that is great fantasy information

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because you're right not to be taken as the gospel.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say Patrick Mahomes is going all of

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a sudden crater because of that. But for the other

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>teams there, the Dolphins and the Raiders, little Baker Mayfield perhaps, uh,

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, dousing of the flame there, and then on

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the easiest side, you're right, Kyler Murray maybe a flyer

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there under Cliff Kingsbury as a very easy group of

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fast defenses faced, you know, assuming he'll play all all

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty games. But I mean, that stuff is great. How

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do you do this for rush defenses as well? Yes,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely for rush defenses. We can run through that quickly

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's not gonna have as many implications for

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>your overall, um, you know, win losses, but let's hit

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it anyways. The easiest schedule is going to be for

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners, So um, that's going to be interesting

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>because they have a big running back by committee there

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and they've got Kevin Coleman now Jacks and Kennan is healthy.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>They brought him in last year but towards a c

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>L so he missed the whole year. How will he perform?

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting situation. Maybe not a lot of fantasy value

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to chew on until we see who's gonna actually take

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of those carries. Another team that's really interesting

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Baltimore Ravens. That number two EASIESTU team obviously

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>loves to run the football, so they've got an easy

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>schedule this year. Uh. This Seattle Seahawks, another team ran

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>too much last year, but how are they going to

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>get away from it when they've got an easier schedule

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of run defenses this year? And then Arizona another team

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they got they just have an easier schedule of overall

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>defense UM and easy schedule run. And then number five

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Pittsburgh Steelers. So James Conner year two with

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>him as a starter, That should be interesting. Overall the

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>most difficult schedule of run defenses, UH, Kansas City Chiefs.

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So the Chiefs just played like the most difficult overall

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>schedule of opposing defenses. UM, and it's very tough against

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>run defenses. I still think that Damian Williams what he

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>does in the past game and what he can contribute

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the run game, couple with how terrible Carlos Hide

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>really is. I mean, look at the stats. I had

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a tweet about him yesterday. Guys terrible, He's I doubt

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take away substantial carries from Damian Williams.

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So I still like him in fantasy a lot. Um

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>green Bay, you know it's going to be interesting now

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>before wants to start running the football more and being

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a little up more balanced. But Green Bay faces the

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>second most difficult schedules run defenses. Your team the Washington

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Redskins Tennessee for the third most difficult schedule of run defenses.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course, you know Jake Gruden likes to run

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the football lot. So does the Tennessee Titans, and they're

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do so against tough schedule run defenses.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>In the Atlanta Falcons Round, up the bottom five as

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult run defensive space warrant. That is outstanding stuff.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Last question before I let you go, though Chief's toughest

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they're in They're among the toughest when they face past defenses.

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>They're also among the toughest rush defense schedules they're facing.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to word that properly. So Chiefs once again,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the past defenses and rush defenses they face, uh, their

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>number one in the toughest in those categories. But yet

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not in the top five of the toughest overall schedules. Uh.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the defenses they face. They are in

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the schedule. In terms of the overall schedule,

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they ranked twenty if so they have what is that like,

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the eight toughest schedule of overall opponents they face based

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on wind totals, But they will be facing the most

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult schedule of opposing defenses this year based on my projection.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Got you Okay? That clarifies it for me? Okay, same thing,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I was gonna ask for the Cardinals,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but I guess that was the distinction. It's it's tough,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really easy defense as they face, but not necessarily overall.

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Is their schedule that easy? It's really on that side

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. Um Warren Sharp again at Sharp Football,

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Sharp Football Analysis dot Com, Sharp Football Stats dot Com,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and again the preview guide for everybody on the way out,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>warrant work. Can they get that Sharp Football Analysis dot

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Com if you want the pdf or Sharp or just

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>go on Amazon if you want the printed book and

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just search for Warren Sharp's football Preview. All right, Warrant

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. We'll talk to you during the season, my friend.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Joe Warren Sharp, best in the business, right there,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to join us in years past each and

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>every Thursday with Bill Crackenburger round table here on a

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game at Visa, and we go through that week's

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL schedule and we of course rail on stuff we

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>saw the previous season. Hopefully we can get Warred to

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>do that this year. He's a busy man, though. We'll

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>try to, uh, we'll try to get him to do

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it again, back for another season. Support for today's show

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from Bookmaker dot eu. Bookmaker dot eu and industry

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>leader for close to thirty years. Pro players consider them

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a must because of these three things. They are first

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to post odds, They take the highest limits, and they

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>pride themselves on never having kicked out a winning player.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>That is the holy trifecta, especially that last one, never

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>having kicked out a winning player a rarer and rarer

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>commodity in this day and age. They're high volume sports

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>book their best suited for the sophisticated players who understands

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sports betting also cater to large recreational players, though in

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>their motto, as I mentioned, where are the lines originate?

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Because chances are the sports book at which you've been

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>betting follows their lines, whether they want to admit it

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or not. Right now, if you visit bookmaker dot eu

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>slash guild that's Bookmaker dot U slash g i l L,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you can claim an exclusive welcome bonus of up to

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars. That's Bookmaker dot E slash gill to

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>join and claim you're welcome bonus of up to three

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars right now. Now back to a numbers game

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with your host Gil Alexander, broadcasting live from our visa

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in studios in Las Vegas. Back on the numbers game.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Right here at Visa were sports betting analytics live accitable

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>sports betting information here at Serious except Channel two four. Uh,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>first time on the show. Real happy to have this

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>gentleman on from Pro Football Focus, also a serious XM

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>host himself. Ladies and gentlemen, Jeff Radcliffe, good morning to you, Jeff,

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, glad to be here. I appreciate it, man, Jeff.

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a buddy who's in the Mountain time zone

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>who told me before the show, when I told him

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you were coming on, he said, please tell Jeff. I'm

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a little upset because his time slot changed for him.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So now he like he doesn't hear you going into work.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Now he has to play you in a podcast as motive.

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>When can people hear you? Right now? We are on

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at one eastern on Serious x M Fantasy Sports Radio.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's to ten on sirius and x M A

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 1>D seven And hey to my friend in the Mountain

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>time zone. I I wish I had to stay I'm

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on the air, but we know it doesn't work that way. Yeah,

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we do. Well. He well, he'll appreciate the person to

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>person Uh message back, that's for sure, all right. So, Jeff,

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so much I want to ask you here, so

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>much and maybe even trying to coax the player prop

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out of you or two. Uh, after all this is done,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But first thing is, I'm just curious how does one

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>get into being the fantasy guy? Like, how was it?

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>What were you doing before this? And then how did

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you finagle your way into being expert in this subject?

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So I actually have a PhD in anthropology and so too.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I've had two jobs in my lifetime that people have

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>no idea what I do because fantasy certainly, Uh, that

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of people for a loop initially, but

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was back I received that in two

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, and uh, it was back at two thousand

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>ten when I was really just looking for ways to procrastinate.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna lie. And uh, Unfortunately at the time

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it was right before you know, the the industry kind

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of grew and developed into what it is today. And

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to the right person at the right time.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Happened to be Mike Clay who's now at ESPN, and um,

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, fortunately for me, Mike saw something and said, hey,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you can write. I'm not gonna pay you, but you

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 1>can write. Uh. So, um, you know, we started from

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there and honestly, nobody was paying attention and and and

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>really for me, it wasn't about uh, you know, getting

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>any accolades or anything. I just wanted to talk about

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>football because I love this game, and fantasy has been

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>an outlet for that. Gambling has been an outlet for

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that as well. And you know, over enough time, if

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you work hard at something, you can you can kind

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of get your way in there. So you know, timing,

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of course everything in life. Uh. And of course it

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was right before the big DFS boom that we saw

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen and fifteen. But yeah, that's that's the story.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird story. It's not what I expected to

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>do with myself. No. I love it though because some

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be like, oh, it's the old cliche,

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it really is true, Like I mean, you you work

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for nothing. I mean so many of us have that

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>similar story where I used to say, by my podcast,

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky. If I was wearing pants, right, I wasn't

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>making any money doing the podcast, but you just you

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>had a passion you went for it. Yeah, a little

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>timing perhaps, but you know what's the saying. Uh, you know,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>luck is where preparation meets opportunity and Mike Clay, who

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had on this show and on the podcast before.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>UH saw what he saw in you, and you have

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>made the most of it. So let so let me

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>ask you this. Jeff again, talking to Jeff Ratcliffe, who

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you can find on Twitter at Jeff Ratcliffe r A

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>T C L I F E on Twitter, the director

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of Pro Football Focus Fantasy. UM, I'm curious when you're

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 1>making your rankings, and we'll dive into some of these,

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but your top sixty rankings, which you're a proponent for

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody to make their own top sixty rankings, but you

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>provide it will actually show it up on the screen.

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>What Jeff has his top sixty? How much of this

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is based on your own proprietary stats, how much of

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is Pro Football Focus stats per se? And then

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to what extent are you incorporating day to day NFL

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>news into this? So I won't take like an obvious

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thing like an injury like Tyrek the other day, what

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was was reheeled off the practice squad and then he

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>came back. I'm talking more like a Redskins Trent Williams

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>thing as it applies to say, Darius, guys, are you

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>watching that kind of thing very actively to monitor how

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you would put a guy like guys up and down

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the board. Yes, Now there's a lot of a lot

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of inputs in football. That's the that's the challenge. So

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I am fortunate enough to have a lot

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of cool stats at my disposal from working for PFF.

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I have my own model that I

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>used to to really establish a baseline. So I always

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>say projections. A lot of people take projections at gospel,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but really what they are is averages, right, so there

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>are a good starting spot, they're really not the end

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>point because they don't show you ceiling and floor, uh

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. Whereas with with like gambling, for example, I

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's great to use projections. Sometimes with fantasy it

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>can be a little it can be a little uh off,

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially when you're looking at season long I

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>much rather prefer weekly projections to season long projections because

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the season long don't show you the ups and downs

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the course of the season. Like you get a

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>guy like DeShawn Jackson who any week he could go

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>for a buck fifty and two scores and he could

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>also go for fifteen yards right for weeks on end, Yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't show up in the season long projection,

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so I start there. But then there's there's an art

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to it. There's subjectivity to all of this, and and

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that the aspect of news is very important. You know,

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, used to work for Rhoto World,

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so I know what you know goes into creating the

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>news feed at Rhoto World. And the biggest lesson I

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>learned was to react and not overreact. You know, I've

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seen people already moving Ezekiel Elliott down the board. We're

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>not at August six yet. You know, August six is

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a date. If he's not there, if he's hanging out

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico in August six, yes, now we need to react.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But right now moving him down our board isn't really

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>doing anything because I think it's just posturing. I think

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we do see him get paid. But then again,

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think Leviian Bell was gonna sit out the

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>entire season last year. So we got to get to

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>August six first. If Zeke is not in camp, then

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we adjust. So that's the sort of the the art

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to it, not overreacting to news. Pre August six, you've

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>got Zeke is your number one player on your top

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>six ranking, se Kwon, Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, no surprise

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to three four there um. But as far as you

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>have your status or is it PF stats, like, what's

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what's in this mix? Well, it's it's a lot of

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I use from PFF. So over the years

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 1>now I'm I'm this is my tenth NFL season with PFF.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been able to kind of work through all the

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>data and that was the beautiful thing. In the beginning.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>We have all these numbers and nobody knew what had

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to do with them. So, you know, when Mike Clay

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>worked for us and I was working with him, we

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>were tinkering with things and figuring out what what meant

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>something and what was just you know, noise, and uh

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>so I use a lot of that stuff. It's nothing,

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not compiling anything necessarily on my own,

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just from a time standpoint, but I do have a

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of sheets that I can input data into

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and then start to make sense of it pretty quickly.

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>People loving these rankings on the screen. I'm sure fantasy heads,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all right. So there's a couple of Jeff Radcliffe tenants

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that I love to pass along as sort of fantasy

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>one on one to people. Um, one of which is,

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>let's start here. The difference between PPR and non PPR

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't often as significant as many make it out to be.

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We all have our friends, they're always the PPR. Is

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it not PPR and you're saying, you know, not the

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>most important thing in the world, exactly exactly. I think

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we get bogged down by the microcosm and and

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality is we just want to make the best

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>decisions possible. And you know, I get it, because hey,

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody's ramped up for fantasy, especially right now. If you're

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 1>drafting like three weeks, you're thinking about that thing every day,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and second is thinking about that thing. He's gonna get

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the paralysis by over analysis. And the reality is like

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a running back like James White, is he more valuable

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in PPR than he is in non PPR. Yes, but

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>not as significantly as as a lot of people think.

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He was seventh in PPR last year he was eleventh

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and non PPR. So that's the difference of only a

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>few spots. The thing about it is a back like

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>James White, I don't think we should be looking at

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>him as like, oh, well, we can't draft him in

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>PPR or not or in non PPR. That is the

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>thing we have to realize is his his fantasy production

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>comes from catches. You know, he's not a high floor

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>running back. He may have a high feeling on a

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>weekly basis, but he also has a low floor given

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the volatility of touches. It's all about touches in fantasy football,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and James White, you can't guarantee that he's going to

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>go out and have like a seven, eight, nine catch

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>game every week. It's just not gonna happen. So you know,

0:39:58.080 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little bit of a bump your ride

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with those sorts of backs, and I tend to fade

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>them even across the board, even if PPR. I tend

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, guys like that, Jeff, two of your big tenants,

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think these are the macro ones draft for value,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't reach, don't overlook the importance of roster construction though

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>as well early in your draft. So I put those

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>two together. M my oldest friend in the world, My

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>best friend in the world, Tommy back in d C.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got the old Booby Prize he's got twelve in

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team Snake draft, So he's got twelve and thirteen.

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So what do you say to someone like him if

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the running backs are off the board

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's staring at say, I don't know, looking at

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>your rankings. Let's say Tyreek Hill and Travis Kelsey, who

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>many would say is head and shoulders above any other

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end in football, they're on the board. Do you

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>say to someone like him, you know what, grab those

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>two guys, Kelsey being the best tight end, Hill being

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate game changer in fantasy? Or are running backs?

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>You know? And again you've got to watch what your

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>opponents are doing. What would you tell someone who's got

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>number twelve right now? In that case? Well, I think

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>my number one objective here this season is to get

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the top ten running backs. I was saying

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>top eleven, but Melvin Gordon situation bumps him out of there.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Right now. It could change, we could go back to

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>top eleven, but I want to get at least one

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of those guys, because I'm telling you, if you went

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey Hill, you feel really good. You you know, you

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>put those stickers on the board, you get the ooze

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and odds you get the all man tight ends off

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the board already. But then in round three when it

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>rolls back to you, and that's a long wait, who

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is on the board at running back? Now you're looking

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at probably like the twentieth running back on the board,

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't feel that comfortable there because running back

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna spin out really quickly. So in an optimal world,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and I do not think at twelve that you're gonna

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have all of the top ten running backs taken already

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>an ossible world, what I would do, It's very likely

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 1>take one of those top ten, fade Kelsey and take

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Hill because you can get a good tight end. I'm

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>drafting Jared Cook in the seventh round and twelve team

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>leagues every draft I can this year, you can get

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a good tight end between rounds five and seven. You

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>get Hunter Henry, get O J. Howard, you get Evan Ingram,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you get Jared Cook, you can get Dance McDonald, you

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>get Eric Ebron. And I like that roster construction a

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more having that top end running back than having Kelsey.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So fade Kelsey in that case, fade Kelsey because there

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>are so many tight ends available. You can get great

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>value laid. Perhaps take hill and perhaps take a running back.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>That is probably very sound advice. And that is sort

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the corollary to the whole quarterback thing. And I

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is like, this is a massive thing, right

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>because people are so tempted by a Patrick Mahomes early, um,

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>by a you know, I don't know, pick your quarterback

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>by an Aaron Rodgers early, but quarterbacks, that's the key

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to all these drafts. In your opinion, just wait, just

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>wait as long as you can. Absolutely, there is so

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>much value nited in mock draft yesterday for CBS, and

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you're talking industry. People are gonna wait very long. But

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>this got out of control. I had Russell Wilson in

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth round and Ben Rowl the Spurker in the

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth round. And I know people are kind of running

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>away from Ben and because of no way B. But

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's just crazy, doll. And it just shures you the

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>depth of the position. I mean, Mahomes went relatively early,

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking you can get guys who are legit

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>fantasy starters as the twentie quarterback off the board. Kirk

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Cousins is going twenty. He had another four thousand yard

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>season and its first third touchdown past season, you know

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of his career, and people are acting like, you know,

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the plague at this point. I love the value.

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>You could just totally wait, and if you're in a

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ten team league, you could legitimately not draft a quarterback

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and still be fine. You could stream all season long

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and still be fine. If you're an eight team league,

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to drag quarterback. So it's just so

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>much depth the position in this past happy NFL that

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>we have right now just makes more sense to wait.

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So many great fantasy tenants that might be the greatest

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of them all. I got Jared Golf in the twelfth

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>round last year, Jeff twelfth round. You know, so it's

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so true, Yeah, so true, beautiful number two quarterbacks through

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the first eleven weeks of the season. Yeah, and you know,

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't recommended. We just flashed on screen about

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ninth tenth round this year. Kind of thing for Jared

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>goff Um. So many things to ask you about fantasy Um,

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll save them for another time. Will you hang out

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>right here after the break, real quick segment. I want

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about a few NFL player props if

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you would, Jeff Sure, Jeff Radcliffe, Pro Football Focus coming

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>back on a Numbers game at Visa. It's a Numbers

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Games live from the Tip of the Strip in Las Vegas.

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Gets your films Numbers even after the show is over

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>by following the crew on Twitter at Beating the Book

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and at beast in Live this week, here's some of

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what you missed. We have to wait to the end

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of these fights to see these scorecards. Why please tell

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>me why we don't get to see this after every round?

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think about how how much better as betters first

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, as as people who wager on these, and

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>as just viewers and fans of boxing, if we could

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>see the scorecard after every single round, how much more

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fair all of this would seem, how much more exciting

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it would be because and the boxers would know. I

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>heard somebody And when I said that on the air

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the other day, somebody on Twitter at Beating the Book said, well,

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>they're worried that one of the boxers that if he's

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>way up, he wouldn't have to go all out and fight.

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll go book. That's the case in every other sport.

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>If a team's up seventeen points, they can alter their

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>strategy accordingly, Why don't we have that for boxing? You're

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the cowboys here with guy. I want to

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>get paid all I want to get paid. I want

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>my money cash. Zeke wants it, but they have the

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>fifth year option for him. They don't have a fifth

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>year option of Deck because he was in the first round.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna have to get his money too. So

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Kellen Moore calling the place about

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that first year off and coordinator will help from John

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Kitna apparently Lenahan was not well, like he's out the door.

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of changes in the dells. Are

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you going to fall up your chair when they give Deck?

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>How much every money they're gonna give him, because you

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know Paulie, it's gonna be pushing probably what thirty million

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. I'll tell you I know this. His

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>stats stink. When Zeke's not on the field, they're horrible.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Talk about a running back that's worth a point or

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 1>two to line. It's seek, it's night and day. His

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers was was Zeke on and off the field? It's crazy.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So I know Jerry got him some new toys at

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>least with the uh he lost Beasley, though he gets

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Witten back, and then they made the big trade last

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>year to which I didn't like, but it worked out

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for the short term. We'll see Cooper does again this year.

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I will ask you this in a day and age

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>where running backs are inevitably replaceable almost on every single team,

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and quarterbacks are supposed to be, you know, the crown

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>jewel for every team, not this guy. If you could pay,

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 1>if you could, if they could only pay one guy

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the money, Dad Prescott, Zeke, who do you give it to?

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to go Zeke, and on have to uh

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe sign like a case Cam or somebody like that.

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd go Zeke and I try to replace dat. I

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't WoT. You can't. You can't beat your chest

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and say how great ye are, but then you have

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>horrific numbers when the guy's not on the field, and

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>then when he was just spended, how bad it was.

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't do it. Now, back to a numbers game

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with your host, Gil Alexander, broadcasting live from our VS

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>IN studios in Las Vegas. We've got a few good

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>minutes left here. With Jeff Ratcliffe from Pro Football Focus again,

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you can follow him on Twitter at Jeff Ratcliff. That's

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>r A T C L I F F E. Just

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple other tenants of drafting at your fantasy drafts.

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Ceiling more important than floor. So, in other words, what

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was the comparison used, Jeff, between the two wideouts that

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 1>you cited in your last article. Do you remember to

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>give a good example of that? Oh, man, off the

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, I'm not really it was the

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Tyler Lockett versus somebody versus Larry Fitzgerald. That was it? There,

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you go, yeah, yeah, So it's Larry Fitzgerald is obviously

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those name brand guys, and we see this

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>year in and year out. Everybody knows him. It's sort

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of comfortable, you like, you know he's older, but you

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 1>still draft him anyway. But there's almost no ceiling with

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald at this point. Hall of famer, you know,

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>future Hall of famer, one of the best fantasy options

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time at the position. But Tyler Lockett has juice.

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has major upside. Now granted it's a

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>run heavy offense, but he still scored ten touchdowns. I

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 1>expect that that, you know, efficiency to regress this year

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because he took that on fifty seven catches. But you

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>know he's got so much more upside, especially you know,

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>figuring to be the number one target now with Doug

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Ball went out in the mix. So if you might

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have him ranked closely, well, the reality is you should

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lean towards a guy with the higher ceiling all right now,

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as you select players from the top sixty, don't worry

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about bye weeks or players on the same team, at

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>least not that high in the draft. So again, great

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff from Jeff. Check out the articles Pro Football Focus, Um.

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Such great work and there's so many fantasy questions I

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>could ask you, but our raining time here, let me

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:02.799
<v Speaker 1>just throw a player proper to it you or maybe

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you have one that you want to throw out. This

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is from DraftKings Jeff about Lamar Jackson specifically. I'm curious

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have any thoughts on this total rushing attempts

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on the regular season for Lamar Jackson of the Ravens.

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It set a one ninety and a half. The over

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is the dog at plus one ten, the under juiced

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as the favorite about minus one thirty four on that one.

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts there? I mean, I can't see him getting

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>close to that number. I know a lot of people

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are looking at at the over seventeen it was just

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>over seventeen attempts per game for week eleven on. We're

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get close to that at all. And we

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>actually currently haven't projected a hundred and sixty four rushing attempts,

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so that'd be a big time under. I just you know,

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the team wants if they want to make it through

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the season, uh, you know, with him under center, they

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can't be given him that sort of volume as a

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the runner. So I think that I would take the

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>under on that one, and that that's what I'm comfortable on.

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Like with player props. And by the way, like if

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to this, you're a fantasy player, player props

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is the natural. Like for me, I always was a

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>little intimidated by by going, you know, picking games against

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread or or money line or or over under.

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But player props, I mean, we're studying these players anyway,

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's one of the bigger advantages that

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have over sports books. So I like, you know,

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>when I'm not right on that line, when I'm you know,

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>way under like this. I'm like with Lamar, I am gonna,

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, take that action real quick here, Jeff, And

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in our remaining few seconds, is there a player or

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a player that you think is overrated or underrated by

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the market, whether it's a quarterback, running back, or receiver

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>yardage wise, you know, I haven't really seen much that

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>would be too overrated. Uh, there are some that I

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think are a little underrated. I keep seeing Antonio Brown's

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>yardage total just feels a little little under and I

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>know people are are you know, downgrading him because Derek

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Carr from Ben Roethlisberger thing. But the reality is he's

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:08.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna see volume in that offense and a b could

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 1>still go out and put up a fourteen hundred yards season.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 1>So I've seen that. I've seen that over unto around

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 1>about twelve hundred yards for much of the off season. Yeah, twelve, yeah,

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>twelve twenty five over at draft King, So big over

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>for you on that, Jeff. We've gotta get you back

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because we're running out of time. But this is great

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff again at Jeff Radcliffe on Twitter. Jeff, good luck

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with all your drafts and uh, we'll be watching you

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at Pro Football Focus. My friend. Thank you appreciate it.

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jeff Radcliffe debut performance here on a Numbers game

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and visit welcome back to a Numbers game with Jill

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Alexander and more about that golf we just before, we'll

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>get the Todd Right here because you make a good

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>point also, Jeff all fair, which is you might want

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to take a flyer one of the long shots. It

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:58.320
<v Speaker 1>should be pointing out that if it wasn't kept us specifically,

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I probably wouldn't go plus two hundred, right, But it's

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Kepka talking to Todd Right. By the way, the greatest

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:07.439
<v Speaker 1>radio host there ever was ladies and gentlemen. By my money,

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I will not be debated on this. Uh. Former host

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of the All Night with Todd Right showed ESPN Radio

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:13.879
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, and as I mentioned, the Todd

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Right Fantasy Football podcast and the Todd Right Toddcast. Uh

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>these days, so um, Todd, before we get into specific

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:25.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football questions, you are a noted commissioner who runs

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>his his leagues with an iron fist. I'm playing with that,

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe maybe you do this of the extent you

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say something about those who are setting up leagues.

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You had something to say, Well, what I've been doing

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Football podcast since we came back for

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the season for the first time in four years. We

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>took a little bit of a hiatus with a fantasy podcast,

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>so I wasn't talking fantasy football from say February until June.

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Is set up your league's properally, and I've I've you've

0:52:57.200 --> 0:52:59.400
<v Speaker 1>given me a forum deal to talk to a lot

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy the owners about this. I've even had some

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of your listeners say, hey, we want to adopt some

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you talk about, but we're having

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a tough time convincing our commissioner. So many commissioners are

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>stuck in the past. They haven't evolved their leagues. And

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I get help now when I even see some other

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fantasy people writing columns on major website saying time to

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fix fantasy football now, they don't do enough. So just

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a few of the things I say. First of all,

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I say PPRS outdated. Now I'm not expecting everyone to

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>drop PPR, but here is the simple argument. Running backs

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, when you had Emmett Smith and Thurman

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Thomas and Barry Sanders and Chris Warren, and they dominated

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the game they touched the ball so much. Now you

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have. I mean, really, Ezekiel Elliott. And that's a

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whole other issue again. Right now I feel like I'm

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>covering Hivin Smith again. Um, running backs don't dominate the

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>game like they used to, so so they don't dominate

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football like they used to. If you use a

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>yardage base league, and you use fractions where every game

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of yardage by every player ultimately produces points, I don't

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>understand why, say, uh, anyone who catches a ball and

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't gain yards should earn a point. The running back

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't earn a point for handing him the ball. In

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>most leagues, the quarterback doesn't earn anything for simply throwing

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball or having it caught. So I've never understood that.

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So again I'm losing this battle. But I think overturing

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people will see PPR is too much of a reward

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for just catching a ball and doing nothing with it.

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 1>If the player does something with it in a yardage

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>base league, you are rewarded with the yards. Just as

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the player helps his team game yardage, he helps your

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy team. Why should any player receive a point for

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>reception that gains no yards. And it's not just those

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 1>zero yards, just in general the other things that I've

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>talked to you about very quickly. There aren't enough tight

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>ends to go around, and once the bye week start hitting,

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it's almost an every week thing. I got sick of

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>answering all these well, I need a tight end this week. No,

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't change your lead. Make the tight end voluntary,

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not mandatory. You simply use a wide receiver slash

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end flex. You replace the tight end position with

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver or a tight end. So if you

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>do have, say Zach Ertz, or you have Travis Kelsey,

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you can play him, or you have or you're big

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on Evan Ingram, that's fine. But you could go the

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>entire year not touch the tight end position and doesn't matter.

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You just play a third wide receiver in that spot.

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It impacts your league, not at all negatively, unless you're

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>forcing tight ends down people's throats, which you shouldn't do

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.399
<v Speaker 1>because there aren't enough to go around. The Other thing

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that I really really wish more leagues would do is

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:22.840
<v Speaker 1>modify kicker scoring, because, let's say, in a standard scoring league,

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>even with the yardage incentives. I've never understood why a

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty yard field goal should be worth five points and

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a forty nine yard touchdown isn't worth I'm sorry, a

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:41.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty four yard touchdown pass isn't worth five points. Uh

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:46.439
<v Speaker 1>So I eliminate any field goal being worth more than three.

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think your kicker should be able to roll

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>up twenty points in a week, so you make every

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>field goal worth three. And for those who say, well, wait,

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that, what about the incentive for anything from

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of forty while you put in a penalty for

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anything inside of forty. So it's basically this simple. If

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your kicker makes any field goal, just like in an

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL game, it's worth three points. But if he misses

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>anything from thirty nine and in, you lose one point,

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and the same on extra points. You get one if

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he makes it, minus one if he misses it. This

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>curbs kicker scoring, and I think then falls more in

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>line with the actual game itself. Those are my biggest ones.

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Another one I'm on is the dropping of dst Entirely.

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I've never played the I d P, but by dropping

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>D S T Gill is just two random it is.

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just so random how the points are accumulated, and

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>so many smart owners can just throw a dart each

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>week and mix and match and look for matchups, And

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, that takes away from the value of building

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a season long team. So in my podcast league and

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in my personal league, I've eliminated defense special teams altogether.

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>None of us stare up there who are fantasy football fans.

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>You're not staring up there rooting for your defense, and

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 1>if you are, to me, it's pretty pathetic. So I

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think you're eliminated as the most random element of fantasy football.

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's a great point about that. One Todd though,

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is there's always a guy in everybody's league who makes

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>hay on the waiver wire defensive pickup based on the

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup every every week. And it occurs to me that

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it penalizes people who have lives, you know what I mean,

0:58:35.600 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>who aren't as sharp on the waiver while it's just

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there's that. And the last one about the PPR non

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>PPR thing. Jeff Radcliffe from ProFootball Focus. I'm not sure

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're familiar with him. He was on the show

0:58:45.440 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 1>last week talking about this. He said he's actually run

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the numbers on that stuff. He goes, even if you

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have that distinction, it ultimately doesn't really matter that much

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the end. That's what his point was. So that

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>would just sort of Butcher's your point from his perspective

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um, I have so many questions about individual

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 1>players before we go to break though, let me just

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>actually one generally. Let's let's talk about just mistakes. General

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that people make that you just want people to

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>stop doing. Give me those. Well, well, first of all,

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is don't be a homer in your fantasy league. Generally,

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna work. Now, there are examples where it can.

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a Philadelphia Eagle homer. I don't know Gil.

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, well, he's the assistant pro at a private club,

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so I let him in the league so I can

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 1>play there. That's a cowboy fan talking to a red

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>skin fair right there by the way right, and he's

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 1>an Eagles fan. So two years ago he went all

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in on the Eagles. It actually were the only Eagles

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't known were the two eye drafted arts and foals.

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But he had other ones and it did work out

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for him because they won the Super Bowl and they

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>were good all year and he didn't lose Wentz until

0:59:47.440 --> 0:59:50.360
<v Speaker 1>right about the time the fantasy playoffs began, but he

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>got by because he had somebody named Homes on his

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>bench that all said, don't be at Homer. I don't

0:59:55.400 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>know about you, Gil, I mean, we've all been there,

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>whether whether we're losing against the spread or we're losing

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>our favorite team is losing. I like to separate. So

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Cowboys fan. If the Cowboys blank the bed

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one week, I want to bounce back with my fantasy team.

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that if I have a bunch of

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys on my fantasy team. So I think you split

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>your loyalties and you limit yourself to one player, one

1:00:19.560 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>player where you didn't overdraft for that player off your

1:00:23.760 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite team, and that's it. I also think you're a

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>smarter football fan and you know more about the thirty

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two team NFL for gaming purposes, betting purposes, and overall knowledge.

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>If you force yourself to combine a fantasy football team

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>from around the league and not just your favorite team,

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I like it. That's your a number one. That's the

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the number one mistake to avoid. That's the biggest,

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest one. Because everybody plays in a league where

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an obvious homer or two, and when they make

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a pick like that, they'll say homer. But what it

1:00:57.760 --> 1:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>does is you let those homers be homers because that

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>elevates the value of the player they should have picked,

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps them in the draft pool for uh,

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners who aren't homers and aren't filling their team

1:01:09.120 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with their their players on their favorite team. Makes sense

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, makes sense to me. And thank you for

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>using the word blank as well, Todd. I appreciate that

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in that uh. Uh. So we'll come back hanging height

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>because I want to ask you about specific things. One, uh,

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your take on drafting quarterbacks high that some people seem

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to want to do this year. Um, and specifically you

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Ezekiel Elli. We'll talk about him, Antonio Brown, Melvin

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Gordon uh and then the Travis Kelsey conundum A conundrum

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>rather for those who are having tight ends rammed down

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>their throats. As you say, Todd, I want to ask

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you all these questions. It's Fantasy Football with Todd Wright,

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, host of the Todd Right Fantasy Football podcast.

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, UH answers all your fantasy football questions

1:01:51.240 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at Todd Wright Fantasy Football at gmail dot com. Coming

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right back all those questions and more on a numbers

1:01:56.360 --> 1:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>game at Visa. Welcome back to a Numbers game with

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Jill Alexander. Thank you. Ron flatter Ban is back on

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Numbers Game, Gil Alexander, Jeff Parls is here and

1:02:06.880 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wright from the Todd Right Fantasy Football podcast, and

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd writes, toddcast kind enough to join us once again.

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Todd, you're ready for some fantasy football speed

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>round sir? Ready for that? Yes? And also at the end,

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>asked me about the FedEx Cup Final again. I misunderstood

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your question about changes. I want to address that again

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end, I apologize I misunderstood the question. No problem,

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>no problem, we would do that. Uh. Let's take someone

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned from your beloved Dallas Cowboys, Ezekiel Elliott.

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I am still of the mindset that he that they

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>get this worked out. He's Zeke after all, and he's

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the engine for the Cowboys. But you know, people's fantasy

1:02:44.200 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>drafts are starting to come now, Um, what do you do?

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>We had this, you know on Draft Eve with Levian

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Bell last year. How how do you handle this with

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott with the sort of the question mark that

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he is. The way I would handle it is here

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how I handled it two years ago, and also employing

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>my Homer theory. When there was this thought he'd be

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>suspended for the first six games, and when that was pending, UM,

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I went out in the first round. Uh, and I

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>drafted then a solid RB one middle of the first round,

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Shady McCoy, and then we wrapped around snake draft too,

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and ironically I took Melvin Gordon. By the time it

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>got around to me in the third round, Elliott was

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>still on the board because he had scared so many

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>owners away. I took him then, um, because now he's

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a bonus to me. I already have my RB one

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and I have my RB two. So even if Elliott

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>missed the first six games, if I've drafted properly at

1:03:43.240 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>one and two, I didn't need him anyway because none

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of those by weeks came into play. Now. That ironically

1:03:49.960 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>was a season also where I picked up Alvin Kamara

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on waivers. I think after week one it might have

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>been weak two. So even when Elliott hit his six

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>week suspension, I was prepared so I think you have

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to treat an Elliott, and you have to treat a

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Gordon that way if you're drafting before their holdouts ultimately end. Uh. Look,

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>other owners are probably going to jump in front of you,

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but that's the way I would treat it is, don't

1:04:14.680 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>treat them like a starter. But if they fall into

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>their lap and you can put them on your bench,

1:04:19.480 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they have great value the minute this is all resolved.

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise, let somebody else draft him. In other words,

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>if somebody wants to overdraft him by your standards there,

1:04:28.800 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>let him, let him do it. So Melvin Gordon, who

1:04:32.240 --> 1:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you brought up there, ironically you went with the last

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>time this this uh happened in one of, if not

1:04:38.600 --> 1:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the most ill conceived holdout in my opinion, of of

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all time. I guess you just completely ignore him for

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a while. Let someone else deal with that headache, because

1:04:47.720 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got backups in in in Los Angeles, Austin Ekeler

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>being the biggest example of that. Melvin Gordon may never

1:04:54.840 --> 1:04:58.439
<v Speaker 1>be the Melvin Gordon this year that last too long. Yeah,

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's not very pensible to me. I understand

1:05:01.600 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what he's personally trying to do. There is no trade

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>market for him unless, say, within this week, in a

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>non contact injury or a scrimmage or a week two

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>exhibition game, some Super Bowl contenders running back goes down

1:05:16.120 --> 1:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and they feel the need to make that deal. Ultimately,

1:05:18.880 --> 1:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Gordon will be in for the Chargers. It

1:05:21.360 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>does help Gordon's case that here we go again with

1:05:24.000 --> 1:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler, who had some nice touches on the opening

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>drive of the exhibition game against the Cardinals, and then

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line the ball gets yanked out

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of his hands. That's why Eckler didn't get more touches

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, because he can't keep the football off the ground.

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So that helped Gordon a little bit. But yes, I

1:05:43.400 --> 1:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would ultimately treat that the same way, although I think

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Gordon gets in before Elliott. Okay, what about Antonio Brown.

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a developing situation, Todd. Uh. First, it's the foot.

1:05:54.320 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's listen. I'm not playing football, per Antonio Brown,

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>he says, until I am allowed to use my old helmet,

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>which the NFL has now banned. And so he didn't

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>show up for the first preseason game, and we don't

1:06:07.800 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>know really what the story is with him, given that

1:06:10.200 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are the Raiders and that there is at

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>least some question mark as do how well their offense

1:06:15.920 --> 1:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>will do? Do you also let somebody else in fantasy

1:06:19.320 --> 1:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>deal with that headache? Yeah? I do. Yeah. Where Antonio

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Brown for the last on three four years has been

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the first wide receiver on the board, and even last

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>year I talked to you at this time about the

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown dilemma. How do you are you that owner

1:06:34.400 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first round that selects Antonio Brown but by

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the time it wraps around to you in the second round?

1:06:39.840 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Are there any RB one's left? Are you chasing RB

1:06:43.560 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>one points the whole season because you took Antonio Brown

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where everybody else was taking RB one. Look, I try

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to stay away from rookies and I stay away from

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>free agents because we we just there's the unknown. I

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to use a common term, I like to draft chalk

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy. I think later rounds or waivers are where

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you ultimately start taking some chances because there's less downside.

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I take the established the sample size and once played.

1:07:15.840 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Look Levy on bells in this category to me too,

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know where he's going to be on

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>third down? Until I'll know maybe by week three, week four.

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Where when he was in Pittsburgh, we knew where he'd

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be on third down, he'd be split out as a

1:07:30.920 --> 1:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver on third down. With the Jets, I don't

1:07:34.160 --> 1:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>know where he's going to be, So how does that

1:07:36.280 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>impact his value? And with Antonio Brown, there are at

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>least four, if not five, other wide receivers that right

1:07:44.600 --> 1:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>now look like they're worth more of a wide receiver

1:07:47.880 --> 1:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>one investment than Antonio Brown. Who correct me if I'm

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong you It seems like Antonio Brown is just making

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>up any excuse he can to not play football anymore,

1:07:57.680 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>totally totally for training camp at the very minimum, right,

1:08:01.720 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>but I mean maybe maybe even more. Um, all right,

1:08:04.680 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we close out with two more broad ones here. If

1:08:07.280 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I have if if I'm gonna snake draft twelve thirteen

1:08:10.440 --> 1:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is let's say I'm somewhere in that area. Let's say

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got twelve thirteen or I've got eleven fourteen, whatever

1:08:14.400 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 1>it is in a twelve team league. Uh, and then

1:08:16.560 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey is available. I know that the tears of

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>tight ends is probably there's probably Kelsey, two others and

1:08:23.320 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>then everybody else. Um, are you a guy that believes

1:08:27.120 --> 1:08:30.759
<v Speaker 1>because he's that. And again, I know your general philosophy

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:32.519
<v Speaker 1>on tight ends, but in leagues where tight ends are

1:08:32.520 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>still happening, uh, do you grab Travis Kelsey or do

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you or do you just not care about Titan at

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that point? Just wait for the masses of them. I

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>owned him last year and I loved him, and I

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was in a non mandatory tight end league and I

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>love him. I mean, everything sort of fits here that

1:08:52.439 --> 1:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he's on a big time offense without Drownk, he's a

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>big time tight end um and you know it basically

1:08:59.320 --> 1:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>plays like he basically plays like a wide receiver. We've

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:04.759
<v Speaker 1>talked about that before in your show. Look, I wouldn't

1:09:04.760 --> 1:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be drafting him in the second round, but I think

1:09:07.040 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some will overdraft him this year, probably more so him

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>than Arts, because basically, as Gronk used to be overdrafted,

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey will now be overdrafted. And honestly, Gil Kelsey will

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>probably give you more on the investment because Gronk didn't

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>play sixteen games. He you know, was kind of a

1:09:26.640 --> 1:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he played two and then miss one or play having

1:09:29.360 --> 1:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one big game and one as game. With Kelsey, it's

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>more consistent. Although I've talked to you about this too.

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:38.519
<v Speaker 1>You sort of analyze each Chief's game. Is it a

1:09:38.560 --> 1:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>big Kelsey game? Or is a big Tyree Kill game?

1:09:41.520 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>If Hill had been suspended, then Kelsey's value probably is

1:09:46.240 --> 1:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in the second round and up with some of those

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>top five, top six wide receivers. Hill wasn't suspended, But yes, uh,

1:09:53.880 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey is likely worth the investment because he's attached to

1:09:57.400 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and he stays healthier than gronked It Kelsey, Earth's

1:10:01.080 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Kittle probably the top three tight ends that I was

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>referring to, probably probably, although Evan Angraham has a lot

1:10:06.400 --> 1:10:08.599
<v Speaker 1>of value all of a sudden because the Giants lose

1:10:08.640 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver every ten minutes. That's very, very true,

1:10:12.280 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>every ten minutes, exactly on the clock. All right. Last thing,

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>then quarterbacks. And I've talked about this with previous guests,

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:21.759
<v Speaker 1>um the very few that I have talking about fantasy football,

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>But yours is an opinion that that I value perhaps

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone's quarterback. There's so many of them. I

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>drafted Jared Golf in the twelfth round for God's sakes

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, Todd, But there's Patrick Mahomes. You let somebody

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>else have him, and you just wait for quarterback. Yeah,

1:10:39.320 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you do, Um, if you're in a one quarterback league,

1:10:42.840 --> 1:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and what I mean by that is you only start

1:10:44.760 --> 1:10:48.759
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback. More and more leagues, even my personal league,

1:10:49.120 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>use two quarterbacks or the super flex, which allows you

1:10:53.280 --> 1:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to play a second quarterback or a running back, or

1:10:56.080 --> 1:10:58.599
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver or a tight end. That's why it's

1:10:58.640 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>called super flex. You can play anything you want in

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that spot. In two quarterback leagues or leagues with a

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>super flex, the value of the quarterbacks in the draft

1:11:08.280 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are elevated. You can get Patrick Mahomes going in the

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>first round. You can get Aaron Rodgers going in the

1:11:13.800 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>second round. You get Drew Brees going maybe third round.

1:11:17.720 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 1>That's going to happen. But in single quarterback leagues, UM,

1:11:21.720 --> 1:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And I recently did a television feature with a friend

1:11:24.080 --> 1:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>down here for a station that I'm on in the

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>greater Tampa Bay area. He did a mock draft and

1:11:29.640 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I kept telling him wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:35.639
<v Speaker 1>until all the other teams in the league picked a quarterback.

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You will still have value there. And then you take two.

1:11:38.880 --> 1:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And he took back to back after everyone else had

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback. Big Ben and Philip Rivers. The downside is

1:11:45.520 --> 1:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>those guys give you no rushing yards or no rushing touchdowns.

1:11:48.960 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But we both know any week Roethlisberger and Rivers can

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>put up four hundred yards, so the value is there.

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Later in the single Quarterback League Todd Right from the

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Top Right Fantasy Ball podcast. In the Tod Right podcast,

1:12:11.920 --> 1:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>m