WEBVTT - Gary Cohn

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, I'm Emily Chang and this is Bloomberg Studio

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>one point out. As one of Wall Street's biggest players

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for the better part of the last three decades, Gary

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Khan spent years as president and CEO of Goldman Sachs,

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly getting the top job. Then he made a big

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>career change, joining the Trump administration as Director of the

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>National Economic Council. He spearheaded the effort on tax reform

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and stuck with the president before resigning after fourteen months

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>following a battle over tariffs with other factions of the

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump team. What's his time with the White House worth it?

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Where is he spending his time and money now? The

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>answer is in part technology. Joining me on this edition

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Studio one point, oh, former head of the

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>National Economic Council, Gary con I'd like to start with

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 1>your big picture mid pandemic view. We're in a very

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>different place than when you left the White House a

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. How would you characterize the state

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the U. S economy right now? So one thing

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is we have to remember how resilient the United States

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>economy is. If we all think of what we've been

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>through since March of this year and where we are

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>now in December. I think it's nothing short of extraordinary

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to how resilient we've been, how well the consumer has

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>held up, and how well the economy has held up,

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in spite of the fact that we've gone through almost

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>every negative iteration we could go through, from completely shutting

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>down the economy at one point, which we now understand

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the ills both for the economy as well

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>as the emotional and psychological well being of the country,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>having all these little micro events in different parts of

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the country go on one by one. In spite of

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>all that, the U. S economy continues to recover, It

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>continues to find ways to find a path forward. Since

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you left government, you have explored new territory, You have

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a spack of course, you are on some tech startup boards.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Tech has cushioned the blow of the pandemic and also

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>accelerated huge changes in human behavior. What COVID borne technologies

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think are here to stay? So Emily, we've

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot in the last eight months, and we'll

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to learn, And I think the covi IS has

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>accelerated a lot of the technologies that were coming naturally.

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>If it's payment or fintech today. We didn't invent fintech

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>eight months ago, but we're using more and more of

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the payment apps and we all want to be uh

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>touchless or hands free. We don't want to be touching

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>pens or writing or signing pieces of paper, so we're

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>using touchless what touch us payment systems? I think the

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest question coming out COVID for me is going to

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be this data and freedom of data issue because we've

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of the problems. Think about the whole issue.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>When we went through the Cares Act. One of the

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>big cornerstones of the Cares Act is that we sent

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>money out to individuals, well deserving individuals in the United States.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It took the federal government, using all of their powers,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>months to find people and and to actually be able

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to disseminate cash to them, cash that they wanted and

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>cash for the government was trying to get to help.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We have technology solutions that would solve that. I'm just

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure people are willing to give up the freedom

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to have technology solve that problem. We just went through

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>an election. Think of the the the the maybe controversy

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not controversy around the election, um and all

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the discussion around standing in line to vote, UM, and

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>all the discomfort that that created. We have the technology

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to create your real biometrically enhanced voting where you literally

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>could vote anywhere biometrically, whether it's voting from your iPhone

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>or go into a polling place and using your biometrics

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to vote. We would have a accuracy on knowing who voted,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>when they voted, where they voted from, not who they

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>voted from. But there are a lot of technology solutions

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that we could be using, and maybe we should be using.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to run into this natural antibody of

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>what information people are comfortable having out in the system

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and what information people are are free having are comfortable

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with the government having. And I know you're investing across

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>biometrics and cybersecurity. What about the security concerns and the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>risks associated with incorporating more biometrics, more of us giving

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>our own data into these solutions. Well you you you've said,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I am a huge fan of biometrics. UM. I think

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that biometrics are going to play a bigger and bigger

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>role in our lives. Um. We we only have one

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>set of the biometrics. You only have one handprint. You

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>only have one retina scan and you were born with it,

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and you die with it, and you carry it with

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you for life. Now, when I went to vote, and

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not criticizing my voting system, you know, I literally

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>went in there and said, hey, I'm Gary Cone. They

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>looked me up and I signed, and as long as

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>my signature looked like the signature before I got to

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>go vote, if I said hey, I'm Gary Cone, I

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>put my hand on a biometric hand reader, there would

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>be no way I wasn't Gary Cone. They would know

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly who I was. I wouldn't even have to tell

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>my name. I could just put my hand down on

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the scanner and it would come up life. How bullish

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>are you on bitcoin and cryptocurrency and how much do

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you believe they will fundamentally transform our economy? So when

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>we talk about blockchain, and we can come back and

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about the infrastructure, that's the highways and the pipes

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary for bitcoin, but they're necessary for many

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>other applications, and I think they're very useful and I'm

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>very bullish on that. When you talk about bitcoin in itself,

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a strong opinion on bitcoin I'm in

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>asens I'm not a strong believer in bitcoin. Why not it?

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it developing assets potentially, and for all the reasons

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>it's a strong developing asset class, it may fail. Remember,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the integrity of an asset class, or part

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of the integrity of a system, is knowing who owns

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it and knowing who has it, and knowing why it's

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>being transferred and is it being used for legitimate causes?

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it being used for good or is it being

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>used for illegitimate causes? Is it being used in corrupt

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>practices and corrupt way is the big coin system today

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has no transparency to it. So there are a lot

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of people that question, why would you need a system

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that does not have an audit trail, does not have integrity.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't know who owns it, You don't know exactly

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>how much exists today, how much has been mine, how

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>much has been lost, how much has been thrown away

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on hard drives because they don't exist anymore. So it

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>lacks some of the basic integrityes of a real market.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you have to get into the idea or

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the concept that it's a theoretical value. It's a theoretical value,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of other things that happens. It's

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical value because someone is willing to buy it

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>or someone is willing to sell it at that price today,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing tangible behind it. At least, when you

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>buy announce of gold, you can deliver announce of gold

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>isign Someone may think it's worth two thousand dollars today.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>In six months from now, it maybe where but at

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>least you know you're getting announced a goal which is

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>no different than a house, or no different than a

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>piece of art, or no difference than something else. It's tangible.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>At no point in time are you ever going to

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to take tangible delivery of a bitcoint? How

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>should the FED in a new administration be approaching alternative assets?

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think as bitcoin continues to evolve, it will

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>get more and more regulatory scrutiny, because at the end

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day, the regulatory community always is looking out

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that no one gets hurt, and they

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that there's no unsuspecting investor that

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>ends up owning something that they didn't know what they

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>own and they lost a lot of money because they

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand it. So how does the payments landscape look

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>different than and let's say a decade. Does cash disappear

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in this unprecedented economy and new economic activity that we're seeing, Well,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I think can easily disappear. I mean, the idea of

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>paper currency in the legitimate world is becoming more and

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more obsolete and and I believe it can become totally obsolete.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But the fintech payment systems are also not going to

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>replace the banks. There's a big difference between a fintech

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>payment system and a fintech ability to move cash and

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the banking systems. And remember, the banking systems are big,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:38.119
<v Speaker 1>they're highly regulated, and they're regulated again to protect investors.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're regulated and protect depositories. So when someone

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>puts money into a bank that is highly regulated, they

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are a hundred percent confident that they can get their

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>money out at and moments notice. And there's an enormous

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of very expensive and very costly regulation that goes

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>around owned that concept that if I put a dollar in,

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>or I put fifty cents in, or I put a

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in, whenever I want to withdraw it, it

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>will be there for me and therefore to take deposits

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and pay interest on them. When you agree to be

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in that business, you agree to have an enormous amount

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of regulatory birth. If you're just in the money movement business,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot less regulatory for burden on you.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But the question is how does the money get into

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the money movement system. So today, if you want to

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>put your money into a money movement system, you can

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>either charge your credit card and put it into the system,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which is going back into the traditional banking system. You

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>can do a money movement from a traditional bank into

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>one of these bind tech platforms, but you're still relying

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>upon the regulated part of the system to initiate the

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>cash flow into the unregulated part of the system. This

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is my conversation with the former director of the National

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Economic Council, Gary com Up Next. Much like big banks

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have faced regulation, what are his thoughts on big tech

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>regulation now and his outlook on the public markets. I'm

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang, this is Bloomberg Studio. At one point, oh now,

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you said that Janet Yellen will make an excellent Treasury Secretary.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden's economic team is now shaping up. What is your

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>advice for them? My advice overall is the growth and

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>stability and statements in the economy has to be their

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>number one objective. So when you look at where we

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are in COVID, you look at where the economy is

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, and you look at the danger we have

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of still fairly massive unemployment, especially unemployment in the unskilled

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the labor sector. The fact that we've lost

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>over fifty small businesses in America. And we all know

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that small businesses are the drivers of jobs and and

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of job growth. And I always remind people every large

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>business in America started as a small business. So if

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to get new larger businesses, we have to

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>stimulate small businesses. I would say, look, the first thing

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is figure out how to get

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>more stimulus into this system. As we evolve into the

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration, the key job for a lot of these

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>people is to make sure that we build sound fundamental

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>economic growth into the United States. We have to become

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a doctor. We have to stay, not become We have

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to stay a dominant economic power. I remind people where

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we were in the in the early part of this year,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>which is not that long ago, in January and February

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we basically had an economy growing in three percent. We

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>had three percent wage growth, and we had three percent

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth. Those were good numbers. Those are numbers that

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we were striving for. I think the new administration would

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be ecstatic to get back to those numbers over the

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>next four years. Biden's nomination of Yellen is now official.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>She has said she will work towards rebuilding. What are

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on her in particular? I know that you've

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>worked with her and the leadership you expect her to bring.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We worked extremely well together when I was in the

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>White House. We had a very good working relationship. I

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>find her to be very practical, very pragmatic, have a

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>very deep and broad understanding of the U. S economy,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm very confident that she's going to step in

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and do a very good job. She needs the help though,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>she needs help of Congress to get stimulus going. She

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>can't do this by herself. You know, every in Washington

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is a team effort. She can be a leader and

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>she can show real leadership, but other people are going

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>to have to show followship. Now. I want to talk

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the public markets, because they have

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>been on a tear. Can this keep up? We've got

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to complete disconnect in some respects between the largest companies

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in America, which are the companies we talk about every

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>day when we're talking about the stock market and what's

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>going on in the real economy, and when we look

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>back at what happened during covid in, one of the

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>big takeaways should be and I pray that this is

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the big takeaways, is that when we made

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a decision and I'm not criticizing this, this decision at

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the time to shut down the US economy and deem

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>certain businesses as essential and other businesses non essential. We

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately deem the largest companies in America as essential. So

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we allowed the big companies to stay in business, but

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the local neighborhood business that sold the identical products

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we deem to be not essential and we shut them down.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And so what ended up happening is the largest companies

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in America got a market share, and they got that

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>market share for zero costs. We would force as consumers

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the United States to go to the largest companies

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>because they were the only ones open. So we needed food,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or we needed prescriptions, we were forced to go to

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the big box retailers. But when we were in those

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>big box retailers, we were able to buy clothes, We

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>were able to buy shoes, we were able to buy appliances,

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>things that the smaller companies on main street all over

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>America's soul. So the stock market right now is representing

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the largest companies in America got substantially

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger during this crisis because they were the ones that

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were open well. And some of those are tech companies Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon?

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Has big tech gotten too big? Do tech companies need

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>regulation like uh Dodd Frank legislation, which some in Silicon

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Valley has been have been advocating. So look, I think

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't generalize on big needing regulation. Sometimes you can

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be very big and not need regulations. Sometimes you cannot

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>be huge and need regulation. You know, it really depends

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on what are the barriers to entry? Can people come

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in and compete with you? Are you horizontally and vertically integrated?

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So therefore, do you have a huge competitive advantage because

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not only are you providing you know, one product, but

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the one product you provide leads you to another product,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and another product and another product. So therefore a new

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>startup couldn't get there and could compete with you initially.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And also are you competing against other businesses that are

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>regulated now? So are you therefore on a unfair or

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not a level playing field? And if you started seeing

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>those questions, yes, then you're going to or you should

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be regulated to look like you're on a on a

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fairly level playing field with the existing companies that are

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>regulated today. You're listening to my conversation with Gary Khane,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>former director of the National Economic Council. Up next, the

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of Goldman Sachs shares his thoughts on the

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>spac crates and was his time with Trump worth it.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Chang and this is Bloomberg Studio. At one point, Oh,

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>stay with us. Let's talk about your spack. What is

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the latest on your SPACK efforts. In the kind of

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>companies you're looking for. We're looking for goods, sound companies

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that are going going to be around for the next

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. So I want to buy a company that

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to own for the next twenty or thirty years.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And do you think this BAC process will change the

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>traditional I P O process fundamentally? Like, is this the

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a sea change and how companies get to

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the public markets. So I've been in the financial services

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>long enough to know that I've seen new products coming.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen new products go, I've seen new opportunities. I

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>do think we are at a watershed moment in the

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>SPAC world, and the spacts are now here to stay.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The general acceptance of spects, both on the cell side

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and the buy side for companies, companies being willing to

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sell themselves the spects and spects being more better buyers

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of assets. That has changed dramatically. The management teams and

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the spacts have gotten better and better. It's not gonna

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>look in the future like it looks today. The SPAC

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>world will will it more mature, it will define itself.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That will redefine itself. But I think the product, the

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>back product, is here to stay as a mechanism for

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>existing companies to merge into pre existing publicly listed blank

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>check companies. The challenges of the time are unprecedented, but

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>returns have also been phenomenal. If you were running a

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>big bank today, would you be giving big bonuses this year?

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Bonuses in line with the enormity of the returns. So

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that. Remember, banks are very competitive beasts and beings,

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and banks not only compete with other banks, they compete

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with asset managers, they compete with private equity firms, they

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>compete with hedge funds. And remember the bank's asset base

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is its human capital. So bank is only as good

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as the people that they can attract and they can retain.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So banks therefore need to pay competitively in line with

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>what their competitors are paying paying. And their competitive universe

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is fairly wide. It includes all of the other different

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>financial intermediaries as well. As you point out technology companies.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these financial institutions today, a big majority

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of what they're doing is tech and tech related. So

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>when they're going out to hire the best people today,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>they're competing with the technology firms, so they have to

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be competitive. So banks are gonna look at what makes

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>them competitive to attract and retain the best people in

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they'll pay commensurate with that. What would

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you do? I would make sure I'm competitive. I would

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure that I'm competitive with all of my natural

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>competitors and my new found competitors, which is the technology world.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And I would make sure that I'm attracting the best people,

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm retaining the best people because the cost of

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>losing great people is really high. Not only do lose

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>great people in their production, but then you lose the

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>momentum of the organization. You have to spend money to

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>go out and hire a new person, and then you

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have downtime while you train the new person. So it's

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>very important for financial institutions and other institutions, not a

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>financial services entery. It's important for technology companies to stay

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>competitive and make sure that they can they can retain

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>their best peak. Now you've worked a long time in banking,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you spent some time in the administration, You've spent some

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>time exploring since then, would you be open to public

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>service again. I thought my time in the government was

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>literally the most amazing couple of years of my life,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and the ability for me to give back to the

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>country was extraordinary. I was very happy doing it. If

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a if a great opportunity comes along again, of course

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll consider it. I'm curious how you reflect on where

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is leaving this country right now and

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>how you separate your time from that. You know, it

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it was worth it to you. But do

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you feel that President Trump is leaving the United States

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>in a good place? Look, I think it's worth it

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from any individual who gets the opportunity to serve their

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>country and give back to the country. I feel like

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we all owe it to the country if we're in

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a position where we can leave our normal life, get

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out of our our our normal job, and get back

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to the country. And I think that's important, and I

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think more and more people need to do that, and

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's important for the country. I think the president, you know,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is leaving the country in an interesting place. You know,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for COVID, and and that's a big

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for and I understand it, but weren't

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for COVID, you know. I always remind myself where we

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were in February and March of this year, where we

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>were from an economic standpoint, where we were going economically,

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>where we were going wage growth, where we were going

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with minority and underprivileged wage growth, wage growth, how many

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>people we were bringing back into the into the workforce,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>What the GDP was doing, what the economy was doing. Uh,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>how we how we got through smart deregulation. I'm not

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>an antiregulation person. I'm a smart regulation How we deregulated

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the medium and smaller banks in the United

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>States to make them more competitive so they could lend

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more money into the economy and stop spending that money

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on regulation that didn't make them safer and didn't make

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>them sounder. When I think of the things that were achieved,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a pretty good track record. Um, Look, COVID

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>has been devastating. COVID has been devastating to every individual

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in this country. I don't care who you are, COVID

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>has had a dramatic effect on you, and it will

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have a dramatic effect on the legacy of any president

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>who would have been in office during this time. So

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>where are we going to see you? Digging? Like? What? What?

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>What are we going to see Gary Kny next? I

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>still think there's enormous opportunities in the technology world. I'm

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>one of those that does agree that we're still in

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>very very early innings of what's going on in technology

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on in the world and how technology

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and the cloud is going to affect our lives. So

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>as I keep looking at opportunities, and I keep looking

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at companies, and I look at places where I'm spending

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>more and more of my time. They all revolve around technology,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cloud and how our lives are going to change because

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of further, I would say revolution or evolution of technology.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Garry Come, former Director of the National Economic Council,

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us today on Studio

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one Point. Oh, it has been great to have you.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloom Book Studio one Point was produced and edited by

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Hines. Our executive producer is Alison Weiss. Our managing

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>editor is Daniel Culbertson, with production assistance from Mallory Abelhausen

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and editing assistance from Daniel Wallenstein. I'm Emily changing your

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>host and executive producer. This is Bloomberg