WEBVTT -  Brennan’s Puppet - July 29th, Hour 3

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Stay right here for our final news roundup and information Overload.

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, News Roundup, Information Overload hour. Here's our toll

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 2>free telephone number if you want to be a part

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 2>of the program. It is eight hundred and ninety four

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>one Shawn if you would like to join us. We

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of developments as it relates to the declassification.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 2>If you remember the career senior intelligence officials, they did

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a determination, an audit if you will, of the twenty

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 2>sixteen election, and we read what their findings were. They

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't find any evidence of Trump Russia collusion at all whatsoever.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 2>And that was the case up until early December of

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen, and then all of a sudden, according to

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>the declassified documents, well then Barack Obama did not like

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>what they had to say and ordered another intelligent intelligence

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>community assessment that got taken over by the likes of

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Brennan and Clapper and others, and it came up with

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>a conclusion that completely contradicted what senior intelligence officials had concluded.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>As John Solomon says, it was polluted or corrupted, and

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>it was turned on its head. According to Tulci Gabbards

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>at the direct Orders of Barack Obama himself. There's a

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of speculation about who might be held accountable to

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>all of this, but it goes even further with this.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>The person responsible for the Second Intelligence Assessment ended up

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>being somebody that John Solomon now has done a deep

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>dive into, and I have ausinews dot com headline he's

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the founder, editor in chief and chief investigative reporter about

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>how social media posts unmasked an anti Trump sentiment of

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the CIA officer that helped draft the Second Intelligence Community

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Assessment report that they wanted the one that set in

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>motion a phony narrative about Donald Trump and Russia that

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>even career and senior Intel officials had said, this is

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>absolutely ridiculously wrong, and they didn't care because they wanted

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>their report to basically sabotage an incoming president. John Solomon

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 2>joins US Now, am I assessing that right?

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, listen, this is an important story, and I want

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to remind everybody back in the Reagan years forty years ago,

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 3>the Reagan administration used to always say people are policy.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 3>The people you pick and put into these positions end

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>up crafting and driving the policies. In the conclusion that

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>government makes and I think we now know something about

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>a woman named Susan Miller. She was the CIA counter

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 3>intelligence chief as Russia collusion was playing out in twenty

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 3>sixteen seventeen eighteen, and she has been on media the

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>last few days now that she retired, saying, I helped

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>lead the team that drafted this ICA, this Intelligence Community Assessment,

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>the one that brought the way.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>The ICA is the second ICA. They had the first

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 2>version of it, which got rejected for political reasons.

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and by the way, they had briefed it the

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Congress array, so Congress was told no, Vladimir Putin didn't

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 3>have a preferred candick, No, he didn't try to help

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. And then they do a one hundred and

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>eighty degree flip in December of twenty sixteen as Barack

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Obama's leading a leaving office, and then they released a

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>different conclusion. Well, this woman has said in numerous legacy

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>media interviews that she was the woman that led the

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>team that helped draft this Intelligence Community Assessment. What do

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>we know about this woman other than what role she

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>played in the CI And the answer is, since she

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>retired in the last year, she's been very active in

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>social media. We know this because of the great work

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>of my colleague here at justin News, Jerry Dunleavy, one

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of the great investigative reporters. He went through all her

0:03:55.480 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>social media, particularly well LinkedIn, where she's a pro poster.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a social media for business colleagues, and lots of

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>us who are professionals use it well. In her time there,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>she's referred to Donald Trump as a dictator. She's referred

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>to MAGA supporters as Nazis. She suggested that the Steele dossier,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>which John Dura's report Flatley said, didn't have any truthful

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>information or accurate information, and that it still might be true.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>This is a woman that clearly, at least now has

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>anti Trump sentiments of a massive level, very prolific in

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 3>how she writes. There's a point where she's talking on

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>social media, people sharing stories and they say, look Trump,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 3>there are parallels to Trump and Hitler, and she says,

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not lost on me the comparison. These are really

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>remarkable statements that she's making. That Jerry dug up. We've

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>also gone through some of her interviews and looked at

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 3>some of the things that she said. But when you

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 3>look at this woman, she clearly, at least today, is

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>very anti Trump. And this is the sort of woman

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that was helping John Brennan drive that second conclusion by

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>her own description, by what she says, this is what

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 3>she did.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's go through some of this, because this is

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing to me. All Right. So she's writing, you know,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 2>exhaustively on linked LinkedIn and recently retired CIA counterintelligence officer,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's doing these media interviews and apparently handpicked, allegedly

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>hand picked by former CIA director John Brennan himself. After

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 2>they didn't like the career senior analyst assessment, they decide

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to make another assessment. She gets chosen for this, and

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>she has repeatedly been out there suggesting Trump may be

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a Russian asset or a Kremlin asset, claiming that Christopher

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Steele's anti Trump dossier, which we know has been totally

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>completely debunked. It was debunked, correct me if I'm wrong

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>as early as twenty sixteen in December, and it was

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>even debunked before that. People were warned not to use

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>it because they knew it was bought and paid for

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>by Hillary Clinton. Is that correct?

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, they had concerned House. So here's

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 3>another reason beyond just who paid for it. When they

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 3>looked at it from an intelligence product standpoint, it didn't

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 3>rise to the level of trust, meaningful or meritorious intelligence.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 3>It actually using it in the ICA. The way they

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 3>did violate it the very intelligence roles that Obama's team

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 3>had put in place to govern these analysis. So they

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 3>break their own rules by putting it into the report.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 3>They knew it wasn't corroborated, and then it had multiple

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 3>things in it that were disprovable, falsely wrong, like Michael

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Cohen didn't go to Prague, remember that famous line home.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 3>We know that didn't happen. So that's why it wasn't

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be put in the report, and then they

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>shoehorned it in there anyways.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 2>All right, So let's look at some of the things.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>For example, she also was sending mixed messages that the

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>is the ICA team had found no collusion, So you know,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>how do you have it both ways when writing their

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 2>assessment and in late twenty sixteen and even claimed that

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>there's no collusion finding was made clear in the ICA.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>But he's singing a very different tune. And let's go

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>to the heart of this, which is why was this

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>ever questioned in the first place when you had seen

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 2>your career intelligence officials coming to a very different conclusion.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Why did Barack Obama direct a second assessment to take

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>place in the first place. There's no real reason. And

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>what role did Brennan, Clapper and call Me play in

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 2>all of this?

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, one thing we know for certain. One thing we

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>know for certain is that John Brennan wrote an email

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>to his team saying I want the DASS in after

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the team said we don't believe it. Belongeria will bring

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>shame on the Intelligence Committee. It's not the sort of

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 3>product that we should be basing analytical results, and in

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>John Brennan writes an email saying I want it in. Now.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 3>That's important for some reason, because his story has always

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>been the FBI wanted it, and we do know the

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>FBI wanted it in. But when he over rules his

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>own people, we know that he took that action. Right,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 3>there's an email John Radcliffe's report makes clear. And now

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>we know from last week's release, which is the House

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Committee's review of this matter, back when Devin Noons

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 3>were still in charge of it, that several people had

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 3>concerns about the way this analysis was done. It didn't

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>follow the rules, It shouldn't have used the Steele dow

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Say had given all the things they knew about it,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and John Brennan lets that go on. Barack Obama lets

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that go on. Why because he releases that report in

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 3>the aftermath he makes it public in January to dirty

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>up Donald Trump as Donald Trump's about to take the

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>oath of office for the first time. So and all

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 3>of this, all of this activity in December of January,

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>which we've been focusing on in the last couple of weeks,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>has to be looked at in light of what Barack

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Obama knew in July twenty sixteen, because in July twenty

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>sixteen there's an intelligence intercept. I think we're going to

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>learn a lot more about this in the next couple

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of days where they knew classification. But in July twenty sixteen,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>John Brennan goes over and personally briefs the President and

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>tells him there's intelligence Hillary Clinton has authorized a dirty

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>trick where she's going to try to make it look

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 3>like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are colluding to win

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the election. He knows that Barack Obama knows that. John

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Brennan knows that before the FBI opens up their investigation

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>called Crossfire Hurricane. In other words, they know what they

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>open up on is the likely fruits of a Hillary

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Clinton political dirty trick, not a real intelligence threat, a

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>security matter, a political dirt trick, and they bite on

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it and they legitimize it by going to the fis

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a court, getting a special counsel interviewing everybody, making Mike

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Flynn go through hell. Knowing that Barack Obama knew that

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning, at the top of the food chain,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and he doesn't stop. It tells you that Barack Obama

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>has some things he really needs to answer to you,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to the American public.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, quick break will come right back more with

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>with John Solomon, founder editor in chief and also chief

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 2>investigative reporter justinews dot com on the other side. Then

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to your calls eight hundred and nine for

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>one Sean if you want to be a part of

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the program as we continue, we continue, John Solomon, as

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>for US new developments as it relates to the declassified

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>documents involving Russia, Russia, Russia and what a real hoax

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 2>it was, far worse than we ever knew. John Solomon,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>editor in chief, founder of justinews dot com, also the

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>chief investigative reporter. Let's go to when did they know

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the dossier was political in nature? When was the first warning?

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>The one that I remember was Bruce Or, oddly enough,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 2>considering Nelly Or was working on the dossier, but Bruce

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Or warned that it was political in nature and shouldn't

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>be used. Now, that's just prior to it becoming the

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 2>bulk of information for what became four five applications, three

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of which James Colemy signed. Comy and the FBI director.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe had pushed in December of

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen to include Steele's debunk dossier in the twenty

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>sixteen ICA. But didn't they know by December? Didn't they

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>get rid of Christopher Steele by December of twenty sixteen?

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And didn't they take them off the payroll for a

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>period of time? Wasn't he discredited by that time? Wasn't

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the dossier discredited by December of twenty sixteen?

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 3>It has? And let me give you these precise time

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>frame in August of twenty sixteen is when Bruce Org

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 3>gives the first tip off that hey, this is probably

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>coming from politics. Now, there are other places where they're

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>learning that, but that was an important one because it

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 3>was a senior Justice Department official in November first excuse

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 3>me in the fall of twenty sixteen, based on information

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 3>that was he classified in twenty twenty by the first

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration, the CIA warned the FBI that Christopher Steele's

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>network of sources that he was allegedly basing this information

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 3>was infiltrated, potentially by Russian intelligence and that they needed

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 3>revalidate it. Don't rely on them. They didn't revalidate him.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>They kept them going. On November first, the FBI terminated

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Christopher still the source because he had gone to the

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>news media and leaked information from the dossier in the

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 3>existence of what the FBI was doing. So by December,

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>all that baggage, all of those red warnings are there.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 3>But there's one other thing that has happened. The FBI's

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>counterintelligence team has built a spreadsheet. You and I broke

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>this on your show many years ago. The spreadsheet went

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 3>line by line everything that Christopher Steele was a curt

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and came from his sources and they were ninety percent

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>of it they determined either wasn't corroborated or had been debunked.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 3>It was either uncorroboratable or debunked. That makes it a

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>very bad intelligence product, the sort of thing not supposed

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 3>to use to create an ICA for the President of

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 3>the United.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, but senior Intel officials that did the original ICA,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>we're screaming the same thing that this goes against all standards,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and rat clufs review of everything and post mortem on

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>this said the same thing. Last question, and it's about

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>two different subjects. Devin Newnez and the Intel board chairman

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>want security clearance is revoked over this and other abuses.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>And what do you make of former FBI agents Struck

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 2>deleting all of his posts on social media yesterday?

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he just decided to take a break from social media.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>He's not going to keep it from the Justice Department.

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>You can take him down, but obviously Twitter archives them,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>they're there for everybody to see. So I don't think

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a grand conspiracy with Pete Struck done. Maybe he

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>just decided, after all that's been exposed about him, he

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to stay in the town hall anymore and

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>keep talking about it because we now have the facts

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>to judge his behavior much differently than we did a

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>few years ago. But no one's going to get rid

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of those posts there in time machine. Twitter is going

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>to keep them. I think he's just gone silent on

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 3>social media, probably because the heat's turning up on him,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 3>like so many of the players. Now, people are beginning

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 3>to realize he trusted these FBI agents, but they may

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>have misled us. And I think that he's praising for

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 3>a moment. I think this next revelation that comes out,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the timing of Petees truck topping off is because there's

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be the classified annex of the Durham Report

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>being released. I asked President Trump in an interview ten

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>days ago, would you because if it he said yes,

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 3>he immediately went and started the process that's going to happen.

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>What that annex is going to show is that it

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>wasn't just Barack Obama and John Brennan that knew that

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Clinton was pulling a dirty trick, That the FBI

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 3>themselves knew that Hillary Clinton was doing this dirty trick,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and they continued to proceed down the line of crossfire.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Hurricane the fice of Warrens, all the things that we

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 3>now know about. I think that moment's going to be

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 3>a very difficult moment for people who worked in the

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Komi mckabe FBI, because it's going to show they were

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>legitimizing something they need to just simply be a dirty trick.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to see if this grand conspiracy has followed

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>through on I don't want to overpromise an underdeliver, but

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>it has all the markings of the biggest political scandal,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>far bigger than Watergate in the last one hundred years.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's see where it goes. We've been disappointed before. John

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>solomonsinews dot com. We appreciate your time and your hard

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>work as always, and thank you for sharing it with

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>us as always. Also, you know how I know I'm

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>getting old, Linda gray hair all right? Wise, Wisenheimer, are

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>you it's five thirty? It's allow Now, you're a wise

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Laura Wise It that's a wise ask comment. You're right,

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a wise ask, cimate.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Indeed it is. I mean there are other things that

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>are indicative of old age, you know, asking a lot

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 4>of questions. What did I tell you earlier? I can't

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 4>remember Why did I walk in this room? What did

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I come here? For all of those boys?

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I haven't gotten to that point in my life yet,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>but if I do, I'll let you know. What's that said?

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 4>God bless you, so I'll tell you.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm getting hold when I read the hard

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>copy of the New York Post every day, which I do,

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and I kind of that's the one thing I take

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>my time with. I've raced through.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Where do you get it from?

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>It's all over the place down here? Is there really

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>seven eleven? You get at CBS, you can get it

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>at public, so you can get anywhere.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 4>It really is New York with sand Okay, it's.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>New York with Sandon and better weather than the crap

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>weather you've been having in the Northeast all spring in

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>summer long, it's been horrible. So you know, you get

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>old when when I go to page six, which is

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 2>like the gossip page, and it's always interesting, and when

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I start seeing somebody over and over and over again,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>and I have no earthly idea who the person is.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And apparently this young woman, Sydney Sweeney, is very very popular.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you know about this girl?

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I know about her because of the news I have

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 4>never seen her before.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 2>No, Okay, she's all over page six almost on a

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>daily basis, or they have a picture of her in

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the like every day. She's like the IT person of

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>the hour, right, correct and anyway, So she starts this

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 2>ad campaign and now there's a backlash to it, and

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the ad campaign includes her wearing American Eagle gene products

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>modeling with a dog and a white Mustang. Okay, the

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>ads declared that Sweeney has great genes ge n ees.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Now I interpreted that to me, Oh, she's an attractive

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 2>young lady. Okay, That's how I interpreted it. The word

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>genes spell ge nes is replaced with genes, which is

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what they're selling. Now, these people on social media have

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 2>lost their mind and they're trying to tie the ad

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to Nazism and racism? Did you mean to include a

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>bunch of Nazi dog whistles in this?

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm pretty hip to anti semitism. I mean,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>there are people out there that are claiming and it's

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>gone more viral than I ever thought it wouldn't. We

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>talked about it a little bit yesterday. I talked about

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 2>it with Patrick bet David on his podcast. That are

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 2>trying to rewrite history as though Winston Churchill was not

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the most heroic and brave, you know people

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 2>in his time and battling back the forces of evil

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>with blood, oil and sweat. And what do we what

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 2>do I am Victory one of one of one of

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the great leaders of our time. During the bombing of

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Britain's guys walking among the people and he's standing up.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 2>He understood Hitler was evil and and thank god, you know,

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>he was able to lead the way and Europe was

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>saved and victory in Europe occurred. And and somehow they're arguing, well,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 2>he didn't save Western civilization, no, but he he saved

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 2>it for his time. And I'll go back to my

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>interview with Levin earlier, and it's like, well, Reagan said

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 2>it best. You know, we're but one generation away from freedom.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Every generation has their their moral obligation to preserve the

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>cause of liberty and freedom, and it lands on their shoulders.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't blame somebody from the forties that defeated Nazism

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>and fascism, and we defeated imperial Japan and expect that

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 2>they're responsible for every generation thereafter. And I know this

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 2>is a debate that apparently some people are buying into

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 2>this revisionism and I'm having a hard time understanding how

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>they are claiming to be conservative and believing that. But

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I do believe in freedom of speech. But I digress.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 2>And anyway, apparently MSDNC had an opinion piece arguing the

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>ad shows a cultural shift to whiteness, as well as

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 2>ABC's Good Morning America platforming the criticism with a report

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 2>on critics comparing the ad to Nazi propaganda and with

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>racial undertones. Whiteness is ugly. This is the ideology of

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>the left. Political consultant and Ryan James Dusky, writing on

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>x in response to the MSDNZ opinion post, I mean,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>this thing has gone super heavy viral here, and I'm

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>just I don't know this young girl. I don't know

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>much about it. I guess she's a movie star. I

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 2>have no idea.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 4>She's laying a lot of TV shows and stuff, all.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, so she's very popular. She's a pretty young woman. Fine,

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 2>that's why she's in the paper. Okay, she's doing a

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>gene ad and it's like, oh, okay, she's a pretty girl,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>so we'll spell Jens ge Nes. How does that have

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>anything to do with Nazis. Tell me what I might

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 2>be missing here. I could be missing something.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 4>You're just missing a liberal gene. We went from a

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 4>very long period of time where the ugliest and most

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 4>out of shape people were supposed to be the people

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 4>that we looked at and said, whoever you are, it's beautiful,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 4>instead of addressing the real issues of maybe that nose

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 4>ring is not for you, maybe you shouldn't dye your

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 4>hair eighteen colors, Maybe you should work out because you

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 4>might get diabetes and it's hard on your knees and

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 4>your joints, in your heart. We weren't allowed to talk

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 4>about these things. So they put a pretty girl in

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 4>jeans because guess what that sells jeans, and they did it.

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Guess what. They did the same thing years ago with

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Shields, and it was a huge controversy. You know

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 2>what comes between me and Mike Calvin's nothing right.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 4>But she was fourteen years old, so it was gross.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I wouldn't like my fourteen year old ugh

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 4>to do that, but you know, they have been.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I actually met her once. In fairness to her, she

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>was very lovely. She's a very nice, lovely, lovely woman.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't mean that she wasn't you know, manhandled and

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 4>manipulated as a childhood start fourteen.

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>That's a parent, parental decision. I'm not going to get

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 2>into a personal life, right. So leftists are melting down

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>after American Eagle dropped this ad with Sydney Sweeney over

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the blue jeans. Then the ad shows Sweety flaunting the

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 2>jeans in a provocative fashion. Okay, aka, I guess Brooks,

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Shields and Calvin's and it shows you know are doing

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>that with a voiceover of the actress talking about her genes.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And then he took the ad to employ wordplay in

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>order to imply that people with good genes was spelled

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>with a G are better than others. I mean, come on,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>stress from the real anti semitism we hear every day.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you what it is. It's an opportunity

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 4>to take a very popular story and make it woke

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>as a joke, in an effort to make people who

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 4>are looking at it and say, oh my gosh. For

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 4>a moment, I let go of my woke as a

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 4>joke isms and just read an article and thought, oh,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 4>she looks good, the jeans look good or whatever, or

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 4>for guys to look at that girl and go, oh,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 4>she looks pretty. Now we have to go back to

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 4>our woke as a joke is and say that everything

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 4>that is pretty, you know, it really isn't. The things

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>that they're saying are normal. The things that they're saying

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 4>are pretty. The things that they're saying are supposed to

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 4>be the every day. Now, it's all a bunch of

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 4>woke bs. And for once, they actually had an ad

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 4>that had a double Enton had a smart ad writer.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 4>The copy was good and we kept it moving. They

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 4>just want to make it ugly because it actually isn't.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Now, some people think she's very attractive. I think

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>she's moderately attractive as my home at the end of

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the day, you know, but Jean's. But apparently everybody thinks

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>she's super attractive, and then that that is the reason

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>why I this is my interpretation they're talking about Jean's meaning.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 4>So she looks she has a certain feature of her

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 4>body which I will not go into here, But anybody

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 4>who looks at the picture can see there's a part

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 4>of her body that theycentuate more than others.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>So I don't I'm looking at I have no idea

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 2>what he's talking.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, your second sign of aging is your inability to see.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 4>So we'll work on that.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of it, now I can't. I

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>have to text me the answer be an informed host.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 4>But the point of the matter is, well, I'm only.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Looking at a printed version here. It's not like it's

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>a big picture.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty big. It's pretty big print online, it's all.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>It's all big.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, I think I figured,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>good job.

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 4>The point of the matter is is that they're mad.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 2>It's very, very wrong of you to be talking about

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>people's body thoughts like that.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't talking about any particular body part.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I just feature, you know, there's one way to put it.

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure, we're features, you know what.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 2>Can everyone just take a deep breath and calm the

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 2>hell down? This girl for Adam, I don't, But she's

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 2>not a Nazi. I don't see anything Nazi related to

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>this much. Just like Calvin Klein and Brooke Shields back

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 2>in the day. That's what I see.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 4>The left is completely backwards. This girl is not a Nazi,

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 4>just like the shooter last night was not white. Everybody

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 4>on the left, like you think, we're looking at the picture.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh my guys, some things are just facts.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Sorry that it doesn't watching them and not me.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 4>I always watch the enemy That's what I do. I

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 4>watch all the channels I can't stand, so I know

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 4>exactly what they're saying, so I can WHOA.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>That means I'm not on the enemy list anymore. I

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>just stop watching me.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Look at that.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean in here for me. You know, if you

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>want to call people names, I'm going to tell you something.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 2>One of the worst things you can call people as

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a racist. One of the worst things you can say

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 2>is they're misogynists and sexist. You can say there are Nazi, homophobes,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>even the FOBE. I mean, it's like Chuck Schumer his

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>latest comments, Oh Americans don't want people of color to vote,

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 2>among other things. This is what he said.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Listen, It's been clear when we fight for democracy, when

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we protect democracy, we got to fight fire with fire.

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to stand idly by, as Maya said,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to let.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Them revert to Jim Crow.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't think they want to revert to

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Jim Crow, just look what they did in the Save Act,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>which went back to the Jim Crow for the whole

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>nation by so making it hard. They said, you need

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ID and they made it so hard to show ID

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that probably half the people in America couldn't vote. We

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't let it pass Democrats they needed our vote.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>They went to court.

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Many of us Durban, myself and others will lead plaintiffs,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and we beat them in court. But it shows why

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we need legislation because these guys are undoing everything in

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>every way they can. They don't want poor people to vote,

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't want people of color to vote, they don't

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>want Democrats to vote. They don't believe in democracy we do.

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 2>They don't want poor people to vote, they don't want

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of color to vote, they don't want Democrats to vote.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they just make this up. You're racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynists, xenophobic, islamophobic.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 2>You want dirty air and water and grandma and grandpa

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to be thrown over a cliff by a republic. It's

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the same crew.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Here's what's so funny. I always you know you and

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 4>I've talked about this for years, and it's so true.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 4>You never have to wonder what the left is doing

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>because they pretend and they projected on the other side

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 4>you want to know what a Nazi is, just look

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 4>at Antifa, Look at the people calling for the complete

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 4>and total elimination of the Jewish people.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>About the anti Semitism in the squad.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 4>About these are the Nazis.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not okay. Well, and let me add one other

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 2>point here. Chuck Schumer has to go harder and harder

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and more radical left. Let me tell you what Chuck

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Schumer's greatest fear right now is is that he's gonna

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>get primaried by AOC. And if he gets primaried by AOC,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 2>she wins by double digits, if not by twenty points

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>or more. He knows she would crush him. Knows it.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 2>And Chuck Schumer, that's why he can't stand up to

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Mom Donnie. He's never going to stand up to the squad.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Neither can Hakim Jeffries. And they are they are just

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>leaders in name only. They are impotent, they are weak,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 2>they are gutless, they are cowardly, and they have no

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 2>business even being in the house or sent it either

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 2>one of them, and they lie with abandonment. You know, look,

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>if if anybody has stood up against this Nazi talk

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and naziism and antiseme stood against anti Semitism. It's been me,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>it's been this show. We have been consistent. We find

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 2>anti semitism from anybody, virulent anti semitism, halls of Congress, worldwide,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>it's growing college campuses. We've been chronicling it. And for

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>those people you know that we played yesterday this podcast

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>which was repulsive in the comments that were being made

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>about about Jewish people and during the Holocaust and Hitler.

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 2>It was I can't even believe the level of depravity

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and the ignorance of these people on this podcast. I

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>don't even know who they are. I mean, it's it's scary,

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the lack of knowledge about Israel, its history, its homeland,

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>how it's been attacked again and again and again, and

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 2>that they get accused of atrocities. Meanwhile, they lost nearly

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 2>forty thousand people in a single day on October seven.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Nobody ever brings that part up. Eight hundred and nine

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>point one, Shawn is our number if you want to

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 2>be a part of the program.