WEBVTT - Barry Ritholtz's Masters in Business: Bethany McLean Interview

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I sit down with a

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>delightful and really incredibly knowledgeable journalist, Bethany McClain. You may

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not be familiar with the name unless you read bylines

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like I do. Bethany wrote one of the best selling

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>books on finance. Um it was about Enron, The smartest

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>guys in the Room, the spectacular rise and scandalous fall

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of Enron. And you may be familiar with her if

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>you're a little older, maybe you were a traitor in

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties early two thousand's Bethany was. Her background

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is really fascinating. She graduates with a degree in both

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>English and mathematics, ends up at Goldman sachs Uh as

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>an m and a analyst, before she decides that's not

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>what her future is going to be and she becomes

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a journalist. She's writing a fortune and in two thousand

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one publishes a article that at the time Enron was

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>a skyrocket, a moon, a moonshot, really questions the valuation

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of Enron. She never alleges fraud. She points out how

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>challenging it is to actually find out anything about about

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the company. Itself and really just raises a lot of

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>questions as to how can this company that's essentially positioning

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>itself as a utility be such a fast grower and

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>yet not reveal much to the investing public. And and

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>really that's where you start pulling the string on the

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sweater and eventually the entire Enron house of cards collapses. Uh.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that's a hell of a way for a journalist

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to make a name for herself bring down Enron. She

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is rather humble about this. She said it would have

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>collapsed eventually. Anyway. You can't have that my fraud and

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get away with it forever. But her book is really

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>well regarded. She's subsequently written a number of books, one

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonah Sarah about uh, Fannie May and Freddy Mack,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>which is really quite fascinating. She wrote another book on

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. UM. I find her to be tremendously

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>insightful and really just a pleasure to chat. Without a

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>delightful time talking with her about all these things. And

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll hear that in the interview. I wish

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we had more more time. The hour flew by really quickly,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So without any further ado, here is my Conversation with

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Bethany McClain. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholds

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Bethany McClain.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>She is currently a contributing editor at Vanity Fair, but

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>she is also the author of a number of fascinating books.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say she's probably best known for Smartest Guys

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Room, The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and Ron No. Not only was it a award winning book,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but it also became a documentary that was nominated for

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the Academy Awards in two thousand and six. She graduated

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Williams College and was a double major in math and English.

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Spent three years at Goldman Sachs as an investment banking

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>m and a analyst before joining Fortune Uh, where she

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>pens a very famous article called is in Run over

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Priced that ultimately pre sage the collapse of that company

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and a huge scandal. She's also the author of Shaky Ground,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>The Strange Saga of US Mortgage Giants, and All the

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Devils Are Here, The Hidden History of the Financial Crisis.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bethany McClain, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thanks for having me. So

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's quite a fast, sedating background, and there's so

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>many places to go. I have to start with double

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>major English and math, which a lot of people are

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>either word people or number of people. You're both sign

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of a confused mind. But no, seriously, I don't think

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you should be one or the other. Somebody asked me

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>recently random question, what what influenced me more being an

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>English major being a math major? And I actually think

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>my math major influences my writing in some ways more

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>because math, particularly theoretical upper level math where it's proofs,

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is very logical. And I was thinking, I don't have

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a very aggressive personality, but what makes me aggress But

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what makes me aggressive is when a doesn't lead to be,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't lead to see, And I think that's my training

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as a math major. And then I can't stand it

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because I'm looking for the proof right or I'm looking

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for the logic the logic, and when the logic doesn't

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>add up, that's what will make me dig in and

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and ask aggressive questions in a way that perhaps isn't

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't my natural personality. I suffer from the same condition.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a confused state of mind. Because people are

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>usually left the right brain and if you're English and math,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it means you're a little of both, and it certainly

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is confusing. So let's talk a little bit about that

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>takes you to Goldman Sachs in the early nineties, a

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>really tough place to break in. How do you go

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>straight from college to Goldman Sachs's banking division. Well, at

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that time, Goldman Sachs had an analyst program where they

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hired people right out of college into their two year

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst program, So there was a pretty established track for

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for doing that. I don't think I was a natural

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>candidate to be on that track. I think that's true.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I didn't know what investment banking was. Quite frankly,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I got a job because I was a

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>female math major, and that was rare enough in one

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of those days that they thought, oh, she must be suitable.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's still relatively rare today, and less so than it was.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Um I think I was not very suitable. I think

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Goldman was a tough place, and I think I made

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>it tougher on myself. I came unprepared. I would say,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you knew when you were going in that you were

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>going to work a hundred hour weeks and that the

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>environment was going to be tough. But I don't think

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I expected it to be quite as as as tough

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>as it was. Um. And you you subsequently called something

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from that era of the Goldman Sachs post traumatic stress

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>disorder condition? Is that a function of how difficult and

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>challenging a place which I got roundly and perhaps rightly

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>criticized by veterans for for appropriating a term military military veterans,

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not not not Goldman veterans. But it was. It was.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was a tough environment, yes, but but

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>look I learned a lot. I'm grateful to the place

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>In some ways. I think I grew up quickly there.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine. So you're there for all of three

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>years and you say, hey, this is interesting, but I'm

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>going to give this writing thing a shot, and you

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>end up at Fortune. I actually said, I was out

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on my way to business school. I was in I

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>had a roommate UM, and I thought, you know, I'm

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>going to graduate from business school with a lot of debt,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to be right back where I started

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because I'm gonna need to get a high paying job

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to pay off the deck. So if there's

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>if I want to do something else, now's the time.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't grow up in a family that necessarily

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>encouraged artsy things like journalism. But I thought, now is

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>my time to give it a try, and if I

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like it, I'll go to business school. So I

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>took a huge pay cut and got a job at

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Fortune as a fact checker. And they were willing to

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>hire me back in those days of well funded, glossy

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>magazines with lots of time to fact check stories before

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they went out the door, because I had my experience

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman, and they thought, well, she may not be

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>able to write, and she may not even be smart,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>but she at least understands what we're writing about. And

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 1>this was really little bit pre inter internet, not quite

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the same cost squeeze that we see today. It was

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the last golden age of journalism. And so you're there

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for five or so years. When did you before this

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>story comes out, when did they move you to say,

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, kid, let's see if you can write sort

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of slowly, but I still definitely I did writing for

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Personal Finance section, which at that time was sort

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of a backwater where nobody wanted to write right for

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so you could get in the door writing wise if

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you were willing to do it. And I did this

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>column called Companies to Watch, where I was supposed to

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pick two stocks every three stocks every two weeks, which

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is unfortune was published that We're gonna double or triple

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>or quadruple and value. But it was It was easy

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>because of all the people who come by and pitch

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you right, the analysts and the portfolio managers and the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and the company executives, and you can write up these

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>really charming little stories that are great and then you

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>watch the stock goes in the opposite direction. So I

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>began to realize that there was this whole Wall Street

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>by machine that I was inadvertently becoming part of, and

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be part of it. So in

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the last minute we have in this segment, you put

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>out the piece is and run over priced. And you've

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>worked with very famous short seller Jim Chanos, a previous

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>guest on the show. How how did he approach you

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, you're probably hearing a lot of positive stuff.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Use a story that might not be quite as savory

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as the others. So I met a guy named Doug Millette,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>who has since passed away, who worked for Jim Um

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and I hounded Doug mercilessly to talk to me and

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>help me come up with ideas, and um, finally Doug said, Hey,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're looking at this company called Enron. If

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you can tell us how it makes money, what would

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>love to hear it? And so that was that was

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>actually how it came about. I'm Barry Ridhults. You're listening

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>today is Bethanie McClean. She is a journalist and author

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of Smartest Guys in the Room, Amazing Rise and Scandalous

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Fall of Enron. And we were talking um earlier about

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>when the book came out. It kind of came out

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in two way dot com implosion void And despite how

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>well regarded the book is today, not a lot of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people really saluted when that came out. No, the book

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>came out into a weird vacuum. I would say people

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>were really interest didn't end round when it went bankrupt, right,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was all over the front page of every paper.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Fastest Bankruptcy in American His Your Biggest Bankruptcy, just all

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sorts of it on the front page of the paper

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for a year. Everybody was covering by the by the

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>time our book came out in the fall of two

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three, I think people had end round fatigue,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think she had scandal fatigue. And I think

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we were all in that awful period after the dot

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>com implosion where the last thing you wanted was more

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>bad news. Plus you had the world com collapse, and

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you had the analyst scandal, and there was all these

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>other things, and people might have been really like right,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So the book barely cracked the best seller list and

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>then it it sort of disappeared, but it continued to

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>sell over the years, and actually, because it sold so

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>well over the years, it ended up doing really well.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But it was a slow thing, not a not an

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>immediate explosion of interest. It ultimately ended up on a

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>number of either college or business school reading lists. So

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a regular, literally required reading for certain students, I hope.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So so, so let's talk a little bit about the

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>initial article. Was it a function when you were reading

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it of overvaluation or did you think fraud? I was

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>too naive to think fraud, I think, but if you

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if you try to put yourself back at that point

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in time. We hadn't had fraud in a major American

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>business for such a long time. The idea that a

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>company could be fraudulent, that the accountants and lawyers could

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>have signed off on things, I just I wouldn't have

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>believed it. I remember reading through the description of the

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>transactions that the CFO, Andy Fasta, was doing with with

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the company and thinking, Yeah, but the accountants and lawyers

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>signed off on this, I must I must just not

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>get it. So these weird disclosures about these transactions that

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ended up being very central to the end Roun story,

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even write about in my story. I instead

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>focused on end Roun's price and it's pe ratio relative

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that people didn't understand its business, didn't

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>understand how it made money, and that although the company

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>said it wasn't a trading business because Jeff Skilling, the

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>then CEO, wanted it to have a higher stock price,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it was very much a trading business. So I focused

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>on that fraud. I think it would have I think

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have surprised me. Well, it's certainly surprised a

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, especially those who were long the stock.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And we mentioned the previous segment, um uh, folks from

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chainos's funds, can A Coast Partners? Had you had

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>reached out to them? This wasn't them shopping and around

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you had tag them? What made you go to them

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of all people? Well, I think going back to this column,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I did companies to watch where I was selecting these

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks to write about. I felt burned. I felt like

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I was inadvertently becoming part of this buy machine that

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was succoring the American public by writing these positive stories

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>about companies that were soon to implode. So I began

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to seek out short sellers and try to get to

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>know them because I thought I need another source of information.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm tired of writing this glowing story about

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this company, not hearing another point of view, only to

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have my phone ring and somebody start, you know, swearing

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>at me on the other end, being like you stupid whatever,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>How could you not have known that this is? Did

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that really? Have? It did a couple of times, and

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, I need to at least understand

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the story, even if they're wrong.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to know it and then I can do

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>my own thinking to figure out if they're right or wrong.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So trying to get to know Jim was part of

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>a broader effort on my part of trying to get

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to know people who are skeptics so that I could

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>doom with things that were more accurate. So with with

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of hindsight, it seems kind of ridiculous that

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a company. They make money in ways that no

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one really knows. Their books are completely forget transparent, they're impenetrable.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has any idea what's going on with that? How

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>did the best and brightest of corporate America, of Wall Street,

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the investment community not stop to think, Hey, what's

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>really going on here? How did everybody buying into the

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>story which turns out to just be complete and total fraud.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a bunch of answers to that.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing is that we like the story, right.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We all want to believe in the story of this

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>company that's revolutionizing markets and that's going to make everybody

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a fortune. What could possibly be wrong with that? But

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think underneath it there are some things that are

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>specific to end Run. I think Jeff Skilling was a

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>really powerful personality and the biggest a very intellectually convincing personality,

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and charismatic personality and intimidating personality, and the most the

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>greatest compliment he could give you was that you got it,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was that you you were part of the team. You

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>got it, you understood what they were doing. The biggest

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>insult he could give was that you didn't get it.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You're too stupid. You're too stupid. And so people, because

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we get it, we're the smartest guys in the room,

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't write. And he would say this to people

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>who were Harvard, M. I. T. Wharton, like really the

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>best and brightest, and literally intimidate them into thinking, you're

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>not smart enough to understand what we do, right, And

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>so people were afraid of feeling like that, are being

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>made to look like that in a crowd, and so

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people pretended to get it

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>when they really didn't get it because they wanted to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>bask in Jeff Skillings admiration. I think it happens far

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>more frequently than you would think, even today, though I

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a common phenomenon. It's the Emperor's new clothes

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>right when we live with it today, that is um

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely stun so. Someone I mentioned I was interviewing you,

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and someone said to me and we talked about the article,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and the question that this person asked was interesting enough

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna pass it along. Assume your article never

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>came out. Is en run over priced? How long could

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this have continued before someone would have noticed that the

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>emperor was not wearing any clothes. I actually don't think

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that my article influenced en Roun's trajectory at all. I

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think what my article did was pick up on the

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>underlying skepticism about en Ron that was growing in the marketplace.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, what brought en run down was

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a funding crisis, right, they couldn't roll their debt, and

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>then the rating agencies rating agencies downgraded them, and that

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was the final nail in the coffin um. But I

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think my article highlighted because it was at that that

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>time where it was becoming undeniable that the broadband business,

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for instance, was collapsing, and Jeff Skilling was continuing to say,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a great business for en Ron. We're defying

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry, and it was becoming more and more apparent

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>than what he was saying was at odds with what

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the industry was was was saying. So I

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>guess I believe it probably didn't. My article probably didn't

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>influence the trajectory of events at all. I think it.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it explained what was starting to happen. So

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time he was saying that you already had Metromedia,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Fiber Go belly up, you had Global Cross and go

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>belly up. They were spending thousands of dollars per mile

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to lay this dark cable that will eventually light up

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with all this content, which turned out to be true

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and YouTube and all these things a decade later.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But that was brought up for pennies on the dollar later.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>How can someone be so brazen as to make that

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>claim in the face of collapse. Was it just oh,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>those were poorly run companies and people brought into that.

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Jeff Jeff was the ultimate stock salesman.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>He could sell and run better than anybody else, and

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he desperately needed to keep the stock price high or

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>high because all these complicated financial things Andi Fasto the

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>CFO had built depended on keeping the stock price above

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain level, and if the stock price started to decline,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all these losses would come back on and Ron's balance sheet.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think Jeff was very aware of the need

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep Enron's and Roun stock price high UM, and

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that was part of it. Just share desperation

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>UM to en Ron was is a great example of

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the famous quote is a Pendiman Graham that

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a stock in a company are two different things. And

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Enron's case, the company became the stock to say the least.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Bethany McClain. She

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is a former Goldman Sachs analyst and Fortune magazine reporter

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who broke the big story on en Ron, ultimately writing

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of really well regarded books. And let's talk

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about a different book of yours, which is shaky ground.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The strange saga of the US mortgage giants. Now, I've

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>covered subprime, and I've covered mortgages, and whenever I talked

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 1>about Fannie or Freddie, the two government sponsored enterprises that

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>handle most of the mortgages in the country, they are

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>one of two reactions. Either people are furious and they

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want to shut them down, and let's turn this over

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the free market or their eyes glaze over and they

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>lovingly slip into a coma never to be seen again.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But nothing in the middle. What do you find when

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk about mortgages? I went to a housing finance conference,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Goldman Sachs speaking of which hosted um when in

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the winter, when I was working on the book, I

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>guess it was last winter, and the Goldman Pierre guy

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>said what are you doing here? And I said, well,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing a book about Fanny and Freddie. And he

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at me and he said, well, no one's going

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to read that, and just how book sales going, you

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know what? For what it is, so I published it

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>through this upstart publishing press called Columbia Global Reports, which

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>seeks to write mini books. So it's not a long book.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But many books on topics of global importance that are

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there are meant to be walkier. So for what it is,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>it's actually done quite well. Okay, that's great. It's every

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>time the conversation comes up, it's just so difficult, and

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing because mortgages. Look, anybody should care about Fannie

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie. I don't care who you are, if you

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have a mortgage or if you want to buy a

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ho If you want to buy a house, you should care.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>If you just own a house, you should care about

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>what the government's going to do with mortgage finance because

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the availability of financing determines the value of your house.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you're in none and homes are still, by

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the way, the most important asset to most Americans for

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority. And if you are in neither of

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>those camps, but you care about the economy, you should

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>still care about housing because it's still fift our g

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>d P and so whatever the government does full fifth.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So whatever the government does to resolve we are still

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>housing is still There was a great quote Mariner Mariner

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Echoes back in the nineteen thirties who said housing is

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the wheel within the wheel of our economy. And it

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and it still is. And so even if you care

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>about the just care about the economy, you should care

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>about what the government does with Fannie and Freddie. Ultimately,

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that's it's it's a big topic. I did a column

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>don't care here right. I did a column not too

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>long ago. I moved a year ago. We bought a

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>new house, and the experience with that house, the hoops

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you had to jump through in versus the experience with

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the prior house we did. I recalled doing the refinancing

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in OH five or oh four, where literally the guy

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>would pull up in the driveway, you left the engine running,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>flung open the door, ran in with papers here initial

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>initial sign sign I apologize, I have a closing around

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the corner. I disappeared, left us with the check for

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars was gone, and I looked at my wife.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Did that really happen? Contrast eight years later, where you know,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I've had colonoscopies that were gentler and easier and less

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>intrusive than than these sort of um experiences. So that

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>raises the question, why has financing, the most important purchase

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>most Americans make, become so insane? Well, there are a

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of answers to that. The fate of Fannie and Freddie,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as most people know, it's unresolved. They were put into

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a state called conservatorship during the dark depths of the

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. It was supposed to be temporary. There they

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>still said, they're making lots of government money. The government

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is using their money to reduce the overall budget deficit.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a huge scandal, But that's but and

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been reported that, but that's out there. But the

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>big problem is that the government's been schizophrenic and what

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it wants out of the mortgage market. So politicians, including

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>President Obama have said repeatedly, we want more private capital

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>in the market. At the same time they've done everything

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>possible to discourage private capital from getting involved in the market. Again,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>witnessed the huge fines the big banks have paid, um so,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and so what are the big banks paying fines? Well

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for for behavior for which they should pay fines. But nonetheless,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if you realize suddenly that you Mr. Bank may have

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to pay billions of dollars in fines because you screwed

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>up on some lending to subprime customers, you're probably gonna say,

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think I'm gonna do that. Len,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Let let me push back on that a little bit,

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>because I know you've written about foreclosure gate, which is

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>one of my big pet peeves. Yes, as it turns out,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if you actually commit fraud and take these signed documents

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and present them to a court, they're usually a penalty

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for for lying under oath that way. And yet it

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>seems there has been no one woman one mid level

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>executive who was just a irrelevant to the whole story

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>got prosecuted. But the vast majority of people who said,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just make up documents, throw people out of the house.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably get the right people agreed. Agreed. I'm not

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>defending the big banks. Nonetheless, if you say, if you

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>penalize something for doing something bad, they're probably going to say,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going anywhere near that bad thing in the future.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe we'll get there, But before we get there,

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the government has to figure out what it's for. All

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market is going to be right and right now,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>there's no resolve about what the government's going to do

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with Fannie and Freddie. So the present political function, or

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a political malfunction, is that what it is. It's not economic,

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's basically nobody in Washington knows what to do

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with these two companies, and so we have complete and

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>total stalemate. Everybody knows we need Fannie and Freddie to

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>keep providing a thirty or fixed rate mortgage to the

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>majority of Americans. Nobody really seriously wants to risk ripping

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that underpinning out from under the mortgage market and see

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And yet nobody can say, actually, we probably

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>need Fannie and Freddie either. So we sit in the

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>state of dysfunction, made worse by the fact that the

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>government has gotten two hundred plus billion dollars in profits

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from Fannie and Freddie because they're seizing all the profits,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and so what politician wants to get rid of that

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>source of money. So I think it's it's it's not

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a great situation. I'm Barry rid Halts. You're listening to

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bethany McLean. She is a contributing editor at Vanity

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Fair and uh well regarded journalist and author. Let's talk

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about one more book of yours, which I happened to

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have pulled off my bookshelf. All the Devils Are Here,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The Hidden History of the Financial Crisis, which you actually

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote with the Jonah Sarah. He's a really interesting Uh.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe was my longtime editor at Fortune and he actually

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>edited the End Round book. Oh really, I didn't know that.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan of his only because I have big

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>issues with the n c a A. And he's been

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>well for many reasons, but most recently he's been torching

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>them read his new book in Denschard. It just came out,

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>just came out presolutely. He's absolutely I love the fact

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that these guys have gotten away with so much for

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>so long, and suddenly one person comes along and completely changes,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the narrative. The story is something wholly different,

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's it's nice having a free press. So let's

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about this book because it's really interesting,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and we could talk about a number of other columns

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that you've released following the financial crisis, some of which

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I find endlessly fascinating. Let's just jump right to this.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>What was the hidden history within the financial crisis? What

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think most people just don't realize that took

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>place in that whole collapse. I think one of the

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most surprising things, okay, two of the most surprising things

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to me where the whole history of subprime lending, how

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it developed. So even sophisticated people tend to think of

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>subprime lending as a phenomenon in the mid tooth, but

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it really wasn't. There was the first wave of subprime

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>lending in the nine in the nineties, and then the

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>second wave in the two thousands, which was run by

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the executives of the companies that that first proliferated in

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. So understanding how that happened and the regulatory

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>response to it that made it, that made subprime lending

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>something that nobody in Washington would would rain in, I

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think to me is a really important part of part

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of this story. It's funny you said one or two

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>things that people don't know. I have like listen list

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of things that people are always surprised at. One of

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that came up recently, Hey, how come it

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was that all Wall Street banks got killed in subprime

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>except one JP Morgan? Why Why is that? Because they

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>had their subpront crisis in the early two thousands and

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>when they went to get out of it, it was

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>actually buyers for their paper. Very interesting. Yeah, a huge

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>difference from everybody else, right, But that's a really it's

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a really important part of the story for a bunch

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. One is because consumer advocates were going to

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Alan Green's fan then the chairman of the FED in

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the nineties and saying basically, look, people are getting loans

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>they can't pay back. Something's going wrong in the system.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And greens Band would say, what a lot of regulators

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and politicians thought, which is that the market doesn't work

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that way. People banks, lenders won't make loans. Banks certainly

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>won't buy up loans and securitize them. Investors won't buy

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the resulting securities if the underlying loans aren't sound. A

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>market economy doesn't work that way. And so I think

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he let his ideology get in the way of the facts,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think about that a lot is a good

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>as a good as a good life lesson. But I

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people did not Not only did

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>consumer advocates, but on the Federal Reserve Board was a

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>gentleman named um was Bill Pool. I thought it was

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Ed Graham Graham. That's right. Bill Pool is still around

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and grahamar unfortunately passed away and Ed grahamlock. I think

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe Billpool did the intro to his book. That's why

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's on my head. Ed Graham look was saying, hey,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>none of these things makes sense. I understand what you're saying,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but look, here's all of your predatory, predatory owns that

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>are defaulting in these huge numbers, and amongst the many

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>things that people don't realize in oh five, uh, I

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think it was the o c C issued an edict

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to the States that said, you cannot enforce predatory lending

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>laws against banks. That's our it was. It was preemption

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and and the o c C thought that subprime lending

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>was contained outside the banking system. And I think that's

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>another huge lesson for the modern world. You know, our market,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the global markets are very complex place, and people don't

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>see all the interdependencies and interconnectedness until it's too late.

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's one reason why the financial crisis is still

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so relevant because people said, oh, the subprime lending thing, Well,

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all these lenders, these little shops out in California,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and so it really cares. It's not infiltrating our precious

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>banking system. But oh yes it was. That's right on

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>one another. One of the many things that people probably

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't know when they were selling these thirty year mortgages

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street to securitize into a new new paper,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>um came with a warranty like a toaster. Wait, I'm

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>warranting that this thirty year loan against a house that

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>could last a hundred years at the last three months,

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so we promised they'll make the first three payments. How

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy is that it's astonishing. It's completely astonishing. And it's

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting in light of Fannie and Freddie, as we discussed,

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know, there's been a whole political movement to

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>blame Fanny and Freddie, blame low income and lending to

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>low income borrowers and home ownership for the financial crisis,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and when you actually look at the history of it,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I might have gone into my book thinking that was true.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the history of it, then you see, oh, no, no, no.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>This whole subprime lending thing that started in the ninety

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>nineties was enabled by Wall Street, had nothing to do

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with Fanny and Freddie. It started outside Fanny and Freddie.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The other fascinating thing to me that I think most

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>people don't realize about the subprime crisis was that it

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was not about home ownership. If risky loans had been

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>limited to first time homebuyers, we never would have had

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a crisis. It was cash out refies. So this so

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this the crisis doesn't prove that giving mortgages to poor

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>people as a bad idea, as a lot of people

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to think. It doesn't prove home ownership one way

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or the other. What it proves is that extending credit

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to people of any income level who can't afford to

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pay it back. It's a really bad idea. So I

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's another huge misconception and kind of an evil

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>misconception about the crisis. Right, So there's so many components

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. One is, you have a population that's not

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing their wages go up, especially in the two thousands

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when there's really high inflation. So flat wage is high

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation means your standard of living is falling unless you

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have a way to get more money. And the cash

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>out reflies, which, like Endron, it works as long as

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this price keeps going up. Once that stops, well, when

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the music stops, that's where the real trouble comes. And

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you drive through Chicago streets and you see in the

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>dirty snow, flat flapping banner from Chase that says let

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>your home, take you on vacation, and you say, not

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>so much. Take you on vacation, get you a big

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>screen TV, buy you a new car, all standard of

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>living things, and that's really eating your sat coorn. But

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. The underlying stories of the stagnation and

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>American incomes, right, that was masked for a while by

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the creation of credit, and I think that's a huge

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>underlying story that we have yet to see play out.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Creation of credit, flat wages, and when people are talking

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about income inequality, there are two sides. Yeah, the top

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one tenth doing great with stock market and all sorts

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of other things, but there's a huge swath of the

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>country that's just seeing stagnant wages. And when you say

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to people who aren't used to having free money, hey,

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>here's free money, I mean that story I mentioned about

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>us doing the cash out refly, so we got starter house,

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>replaced a kitchen, and I know neighbors who were why

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is there a portion your little starter house driveway? Well,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because I can't. And it gets to another huge issue

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about our society too, which is that a lot of

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>people aren't financially sophisticated enough to understand these products. So

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they assume if the lender is giving them the money,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>then the lenders that and the lender knows that they

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>can pay it back and the lender has done the work.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's obviously a really bad assumption. But lenders, especially

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mortgage brokers, are trained to be your friend and say

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all going to be okay in the end. So

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big believer in personal responsibility, but I think

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>responsibility has to go two ways. And you can't put

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it all on people and then have financial services institutions

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>out there selling bad products that they're trying it just

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work that way. Responsibility is a two way story.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to the Consumer Finance Protection Board, is a direct

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>result of the exact sentiment you mentioned the other the

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing that people forget when we talk about or

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or don't know. You know, Fannie and Freddie they got

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>into subprime. Yeah, they got into subprime. They petition o

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>FAIO later oh five because they were losing so much

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>market share to Wall Street. Hey, the subprime is where

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the growth is. All our business is going away. If

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't let us compete with them in the subprime space,

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna have any business. So they jumped in

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>around oh six just as the market was topping the

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>time and couldn't have been better. And that's why their

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>losses were so bad. But that's actually fascinating because you know,

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there are forces in the government that wanted to see

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the private label Wall Street market take over Fanny and

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Freddy's market share, and there was a big change in

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>around I think it went into effect around O one

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>or O two that allowed these Wall Street created mortgage

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>backed securities that got triple A ratings to be treated

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the same way for capital purposes as Fanny and Freddy

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>back securities. The two things are obviously totally different. One

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is a creation of the credit rating agency process. The

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>other actually had two companies standing behind them saying we'll

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>pay if the homeowner can't. Plus the United States government

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>behind those two, right, But the banking lobby got them

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>treated the same way for capital purposes. And that's what

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>unleash the crave of craze of some prime lending. So

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>let's use that as a leaping off point to look

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at some of the columns you have written and on

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the rating agencies UM subject you wrote, if everyone hates

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the creating credit rating agencies, why won't anyone enforced dot

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>frank provisions to dethrone them? So I have to ask

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you what are the provisions and why has that not happened? Well,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>some of it has in limited ways. The SEC is trying, um,

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but very ineffectively. Um. The main thing that was supposed

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and the big issue is the way credit

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>rating agencies have been enshrined in regulations, making them making

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>them critical arbiters. And the idea and Dodd Frank was

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we were going to take them out of all the

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework, and that is not happening. People have basically

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>admitted it's really difficult. It's really hard to do. And

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem is that institutional investors love being

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>able to blame the credit rating agencies when it all

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>goes wrong, and so they don't necessarily they kind of

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like being able to say, but the credit rating agencies

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>said it was so um. So there are a lot

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of forces against any any reform. And the clearest way

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see that is if you remember that the

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>credit rating agencies were already reformed before the financial crisis.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>In the wake of en Run, when they famously rated

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>en Run's debt investment grade up until two days before

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's collapsed, there was a huge outcry about the credit

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>rating agencies, and in two thousand and set Congress past

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the credit rating agency reformat. So did you know that

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>heading into the financial crisis, the credit rating agencies has

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>had already been reformed. And once once you know that,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you realize why nothing is happening. If people want to

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>find your work, where would they track you down? Mainly

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>through Vanity Fair, but I guess you can google me.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You can buy my books on Amazon if you're interested.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>If you've enjoyed this conversation, be sure and hang around

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for the podcast extras, where we keep the tape rolling

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and continue chatting. Be sure and check out my daily

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>column on Bloomberg View dot com or follow me on

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at rid Halts, where I tweet a little more

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>than once a week or so. I'm Barry rid Halts.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast portion of the show. This is

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>where we take off our shoes and kick back a

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I'm literally taking my shoes off, Bethany. Thank

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much for doing this. This is really quite

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. You and I have an interest in a

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of similar wonky, tedious, boring stuff. That's true. The

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Dick Fold thing, So did you know that about it?

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that story. There was a Bloomberg

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>article on it, and I've had this conversation with countless people.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>They're like, no, no, if he was offered money by Buffett,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he would have had to take it. Not only was

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he offered money by Buffett, he was offered more money

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>then a better deal than what ultimately now six months

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>later obviously was a much uglier situation after following the

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>collapse of Lehman Brothers. But um talk talk about reality

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>distortion field and being a salesman and surrounding yourself with

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are afraid to say no to you. That's

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a This is a not uncommon set of circums now

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>except now, which I think is almost worse. If you

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>talk to any leader, they're going to tell you that

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they surround themselves with people who challenge them and that

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they really like being challenged. And as soon as I

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hear that, my bsmter goes off because I know it's

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not true. Nobody likes being challenged. The trick is to

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do it anyway. So if I hear an honest leader,

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they say, I really hate being challenged, but I make

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>myself undergo it anyway. Now that's honesty. The other if you,

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if you've read some of the Bridgewater stuff, what what

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Dahio has created in terms of some people have called

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it a cult. I think that goes too far, but

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting culture. Where so there's another book

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Um Originals by Adam Grant that I'm just starting, where

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he references how like a junior analyst sends an email

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to Dahio like screaming in him, essentially saying, we told

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you this was a really important presentation, and you muffed

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it and you came in unprepared and you were unfocused.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Then that's the culture, and it makes them it's not

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence that they've become the biggest hedge fund in

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. It would be very hard to execute, but

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a powerful idea. Yeah, very hard to execute. So

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about some other things that are a

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>little hard to execute or easy to execute. What one

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the columns of yours that I really liked, just

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>want to buy the new Jersey Turnpike privatization and it's

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.439
<v Speaker 1>discontent And I don't know if that's your subhead or mine,

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but I just remember that column being fascinated. And you

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>see this for cash strapped states, municipalities around the country

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>selling these really impossible to replace things to the private sector,

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and these are disasters, aren't they. Well, we did it

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, right, And the problem is if you really

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actually did take the money and invest it as a

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>city and do what you were supposed to do with it,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe at least financially for the city, it wouldn't

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be such a problem. But all you're doing is getting

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>rid of your long term assets in exchange for a

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>quick cash infusion, right, And so it ends up being

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a complete disaster because then the assets are gone and

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the money's gone, and all it does is bridge a

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>short term gap instead of funding anything for the future.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there are a lot of questions about how

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 1>well the private owners actually do. Horror stories with enforcements

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of traffic tickets and and parking tickets and raising rates

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Real real horror stories about about how it works. Um.

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And there was quite a push a few years ago

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for the banks to get more into this business, and

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody was talking about setting up an infrastructure fund. So

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see how it pans out. If

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>we've got another economic downturn, it won't do well. The

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other title I really liked squid Love, Why Aren't Clients

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Fleeing Goldman Sacks. It's a great title, but the point

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it raises, why didn't clients fleet Goldman Sacks? Well, you

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>could have two different interpretations. One could be that clients

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't care even though the rest of us did. When

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you say didn't care, didn't care about them taking the

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>other side of the trades, didn't care about how Goldman

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>behaved in the financial crisis. When I think by any characterization,

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they looked out for their own interest and didn't look

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>out for their client interests. That a given is and

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone assume, hey, that's what they're doing. I know who

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm in bed with. Well, look in Goldman and Goldman's defense,

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they say that's the trading business, and the clients knew

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing. But Goldman has always said is

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one of its ten principles. I think the number one

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>principle is our client's interests come first. They don't say

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>our client's interests come first in our investment banking business.

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They come way down the list in every other business.

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's hypocrisy, right, I think they mean their

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>client's interest in principal payment. Until we get those payments,

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we just can't even chut it. That's really funny. But

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>but but Goldman has done fine in the years since

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the cis there still at the time, still at the

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the M and A leagues, they haven't lost

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>client business at all. And I think if my there's

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>no way to know what the answer to that is,

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 1>my guests would be that clients still want what they

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>perceive as the best advice. They still think Goldman is

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the best, and they're willing to take the whatever risks

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>come with that. I think the other part of it

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it's not like any investment bank came out

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the crisis well, right, So it's not like you

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have the super Goldman who did perfectly and behave beautifully

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>during the crisis. Don't everybody you have Wells Fargo as

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>as a survivor did really well, and you had JP Morgan,

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but not among the top investment banks. So Morgan, Stanley, Maryland,

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean far worse behavior, right, can you go down

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.959
<v Speaker 1>that hole? List Ubs and Credit Swiss Following shortly after

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, the Buffett quote that when the Todd goes out,

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you see who swimming naked. Suddenly a lot of warts

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that were not seen previously to the crisis, we're all revealed.

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And you have to think no one would have noticed

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but for the crisis. Right. So if a client were

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>going to leave Goldman SAX after the crisis, they would

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>have had to go somewhere else. Where is that somewhere else?

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, they do great work.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's well so. In other words, there there are

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>no options. And as long as you're dealing with the sharpie,

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they might as well be your sharp right. And you

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do have um a bunch of independent investment banks, boutique

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>investment banks that have been set up, particularly in recent years,

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>some of them populated by ex Golmen bankers. It will

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how that plays out, but there is,

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is some truth to the idea that

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a global client base they want financing when they come

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to you for adeal. They want the whole package that

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a big bank like Goldman can offer. They don't want

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a boutique and you can't get that with a potique.

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I've also noticed that there have been a number of

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>companies seeded, but it's it's like when there's a super

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>over in a star, all that star dust eventually becomes

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>another star. When AI g blew up, there's a whole

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other little companies, including I think it's called

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Pure Coincidentally, an insurance company that's trying to compete with

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>chub on the high end for residential real estate insurance

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>x A I G. Guy so following, and I think

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that began long before the crisis. But it's fascinating how

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>every time there's a disaster, you have good people, you

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have less than good people when some of the good

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>people ultimately end up. There've been a couple of stories

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that have been interesting, one tracking former Drexel people, another

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>tracking former end Round people, a lot of whom have

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 1>gone on to do really interesting things. I mean circling

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back to end Round to me that the that company

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is just such a tragedy. There are a lot of

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>good ideas and a lot of brilliant people. They just

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't wait for the ideas to actually produce revenue, so

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they accelerated the revenue through ways both legitimate but sketchy

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and totally illegitimate. And that's why I understanding you correctly.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You're saying there were a lot of really good ideas.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just a shame it was all a fraud. Is

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that what you're actually saying. I'm sort of saying that

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>except Ron, you know, it was a fraud and very

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>it was a legal fraud. A lot of what they

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>did technically met the letter of the law. It was legal,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>so it's still a very complicated scam. But but yes,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>there were the ideas were good. It's just that they

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't wait to show revenue and profits that they came

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up with scammy ways to make it look like they

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>were producing more profits than they were. But the ideas

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and the people who were there, there are a lot

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of good people. I'm fond of saying one of the

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest problems in finance is that no one's willing to

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>wait to get rich slowly. And it's really Oh, I

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>love that life. Every time people run into trouble, I've

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I've met and worked with and been on the other

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>sides of discussions with people who are just incredibly talented salespeople,

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and invariably some of these guys end up getting into trouble.

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's almost always guys, and it's the question is

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>always all you have to do is put your head

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>down and be a reasonable human and not do really stupid,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ethically dubious, legally questionable things, and eventually you become very wealthy.

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>What what is so challenging about that? I don't know.

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking a lot lately about the difference between

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:36.439
<v Speaker 1>being smart and why being wise. And I think there's

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of smarts out there, but there's not a

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of wisdom. So how many how much time do

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we have left? So in the last few minutes we

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have let me get to some of my favorite questions

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that I asked for of all my guests. UM, and

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I have I have us with Oh, you're right about

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. UM, So let's talk a little bit about mentors.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Any mentors stand out in your mind? I think i'd

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>have to say Joe No, Sarah is the the is

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>probably and John Huey too, who ran Fortune magazine when

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I got there. I still remember John Pulling calling a

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>big meeting of Fortune right when I started and basically saying,

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know what you're doing, there's no place

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for you here at this magazine. And I was like,

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a clue. I'm not gonna last long here,

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and this this is my my new job. But Joe

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>too has always been really good both on the big

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>picture He's the one who encouraged me to write the

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>un Run book, but also really good at sorting through

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 1>ideas because I have a lot of ideas and I

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>need someone to say this one sucks. Go for this one.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about books. Since you mentioned what are

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite books, fiction or nonfiction? Let's see. Um. Okay,

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a total sucker for The Lord of the Rings. Okay,

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the one of the best,

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about it again and I actually am Now

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I have enough distance between the movies and I'm willing

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch the first three movies again. The Hobbit. Hobbit

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not as not as great as the first three. Lord

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Ring now, no, no, no, But the Lord

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings is absolutely amazing. Game of Thrones is awesome.

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been able to watch the TV show because

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I found I found the book so stressful. Um on

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a on a more series friend, Um Middle March obviously amazing.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I love biographies. There's a great biography of Collette that

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>really made me think about called Secrets of the Fresh

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Flesh, that really made me think differently about

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>how biographies can be done. But I think life stories.

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Secrets of the Flesh, yes, but I think I think

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>stories about fascinating people that explore the nuances of their lives,

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly fascinating, controversial people are are just great. And then

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I loved UM recently All the Light We Cannot See.

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the most beautiful books, although

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>deeply sad, books, that I've read in a long time.

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I gave one of the people in my office The

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Right Brothers book for the holidays, and he raved about

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So now I have to everything. All rights is great,

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but now I have to I gave it as a gift.

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I actually have to wait. Now you have to

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>go read it. UM. So, millennials, you've been doing this

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years. If a millennial comes to

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you and says, hey, I want to get into your field,

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>what sort of advice would you give, either a recent

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>college graduate or a millennial. Seriously, now what what I

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>What I actually say is that you have to be

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>really committed to this, and you can't expect it to

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be something where there's a set career path, and there

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>never really has been. Right, You've found your way into

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>showing this in a totally different way I did. Some

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people go to journalism school and train to be journalists

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all their life, so it always has been a flexible

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>career path, but now so that more than ever right,

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where our industry is going. It's not

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like there's while you start on the bottom run here

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>and then you get a job here. It's it's all

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>made up, All bets are off. So I think you

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:47.839
<v Speaker 1>have to have a real passion to want to tell

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>stories and learn things and be curious and and not

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to and to be willing to work hard, to say

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the least. And our final question that I ask everybody,

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you wish you knew about investing companies, journalism?

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you wish you knew twenty years

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>ago that you know today? I think I had wish

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I had known. I think I wish I had known

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>how to be more skeptical. And I still sometimes think

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I should be more skeptical even than I am. Not

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>only do people not always tell the truth, but sometimes

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>people don't even know that they're not telling the truth.

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>And so I wish I knew to listen more and

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.320
<v Speaker 1>really challenge things that don't appear to that don't make sense.

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, sometimes you're an idiot because you

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>just missed something somebody said and you didn't understand and

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:39.959
<v Speaker 1>you actually didn't get it. But sometimes if you're really

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to say that doesn't make sense to me, can

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you repeat that you'll really learn something? And I wish

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I were better at that than I am. That's quite fascinating.

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>For those of you who have enjoyed this conversation, be

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out Bethany's various books. You can look

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Up an Inch or Down an Inch on Apple iTunes

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and see the other eighty or so conversations we've had.

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>H be sure and check out my daily column. I

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 1>already said that, so I don't need to say that again. UM.

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Mike bat Nick, my head of research,

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for helping me um do the deep dive into this,

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as Charlie Vollmer, who is about to kick

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>me out of the studio. I'm Barry Ridholts. You're listening

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.