WEBVTT - Ex-FTX Exec Near Plea Deal, Tesla Mulls Metal Miner Bid

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some breaking news. At the top of this our signa

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lithium surges and after ours trading on its U s

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>A d r S after Tesla is said to have

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been in talks and weighing a bid for the metals minor.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Will bring you that exclusive news from Bloomberg. Plus another

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>former member of sam bankman Freed's in a circle planning

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to plead guilty to US criminal charges. We bring you

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>the latest development of the f t X fallout, and

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we continue our deep dive into the world of artificial

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and speak with someone investing in the space. Kevin Dunlap,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Calibrate Ventures co founder and managing partner, joins us later

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this hour. All that and more that stick in the

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>world of crypto. Binance, which operates the world's largest crypto exchange,

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is now considering ending relationships with US business partners as

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>regulators turn up the heat. I want to bring in

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>bloombergs Uchi Yang, who broke this story earlier today, Ugly,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. What are the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>latest details from your reporting? Thanks for having me so

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we're learning that buiness the global exchange is starting to

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have to think about a plan to retreat from the US,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>especially it's remaining business relationships in the US. We're reporting

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that Biness is considering pulling back its vent investments in

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the country, is looking at potentially cutting ties with some

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the intermediary firms such as banks and other services firms.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's also in assessment of delisting some of the

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>US based tokens, potentially including a major stable one. And

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to add that these are preliminary considerations, no

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>firm decisions have been made, but that these are assessment

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that the company now has to deliberate given the ongoing

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>regulatory crackdown in the US, as we've seen from a

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>flurry of reenforcement actions in recent days. You know, our

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sources giving us a pretty good sense of what the

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>company is considering and why we should point out that

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Binance did issue a statement or comment in response to

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the story. We'll bring it up on the screen now

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>utually just to show our audience. Like every other blockchain company,

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we're conducting a careful cost benefit analysis and will pivot

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>our business as necessary to protect our global user base.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>That according to a Binance spokesperson, I guess the easy

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>question now utually is what happens next while we're looking

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to see what exacts that finance will be taking where

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we also understand that Biness is in settlement talks with

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>US regulators over some of the investigations that have previously

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>been reported by US and other press, and there's no

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>clear details on either the timeline of the settlement or

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the minetor amount of the settlement. And we also know

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that more Brady other cryptal companies are starting to look

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>into plans of potentially moving offshore as well. We know

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that Naxos, for example, a crypto leander, had already made

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>announcement too to pull out from the market after receiving

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>orders from other states. So Buyinice wouldn't be the first

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>one to to start considering how a retreet will look

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like UM and I had to mention that Bynese US,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>which is set up as a separate platform design for

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>US UM users, currently said that they have no plan

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to acceed the US. Alright, blood g Yang, thank you.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>In Washington to U S senators are urging a key

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>national security panel to quote impose strict structural restrictions between

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok's American operations and its Chinese parent company, bike Dance,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And in other news, the CEOs of Meta, Amazon, Might

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Soft and others have been subpoenaed by the GOP. For

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a deeper dive on what's happening on tech regulation out

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Hill, we're joined by Bloomberg's and editing in

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>d C, and of course our big Tech correspondent Alex Brinka,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who's in Los Angeles. And let's start with you on

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this issue of TikTok. We've covered all week, um the

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>strange relations between the US and China, We've covered your

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>reporting on TikTok. What is the mood right now in

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>d C about how to act with TikTok? Yeah, I'd

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>really summarize it as one of distrust. And what was

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just striking about this letter that we saw, I believe

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>it was just yesterday, so a letter from Richard Bloomenthal,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut Democrat and Jerry Moran, a Republican from Kansas, is

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that they said, we just don't believe what we're hearing

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>from TikTok when it comes to assurances that their Chinese

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>parent company, by Dance doesn't have access to user data

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and a thumb on the scale of the algorithm. They said,

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't trust the security arrangements that we're

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing described from the company and even you know, assurances

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>from their lead lobbyist here in Washington, even the CEO himself.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't trust that there's going to be enough to

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>protect US users from Chinese interference. You know, TikTok CEO

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is due to go to the hill, you know, attend hearings.

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about that? And I guess in

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the corridors of lawmaking center of our world, what's the

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>attitude towards TikTok going into it. Yeah, it's striking how

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan this is. That there's a lot of mistrust from

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>both Democrats and Republicans about really what TikTok's interests is

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in growing the influence here in the US. You know,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they're saying things like, why would you spend one point

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars on lobbying when you can invest that

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the product, you know, if if you weren't doing

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>something nefarious. So, you know, there's a lot of kind

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of disconnect between the popularity of the app among normal

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>users and kind of the national security concerns. So we

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hear echo here in Congress, and that's part of kind

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the broader uh discomfort with Chinese relations right now.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, things like this balloon that was shot down

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>allegedly for Chinese surveillance was um something that just kind

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of ramped up tensions even further and made it even

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>more likely that that both Republicans and Democrats are going

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to feel pressure to push back on a company, you

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>know that's part of a Chinese parent company. I think, Sprinka,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring you in from Los Angeles and let's get

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the company side of this story. Because TikTok has a

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>massive user footprint in the United States. You and I

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have discussed a number of times that the user base

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get it. They feel like the risk hasn't been

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>communicated to them from lawmakers those that represent them. What

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are the company actually doing to kind of address some

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of those concerns. Well, if you've been following this closely,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>then I'm sure you've heard of something called Project Taxes.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a big effort for the company to bring in

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>additional people to help with security, to migrate all the

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>data onto Oracle servers, and to basically make sure that

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is nothing of of user's data or

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>influence on the algorithm that will get kind of nefarious. Now,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the exact plan that, as Anna said, lawmakers

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be very skeptical of. But at the same time,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is continuing to push forward on its user efforts.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I was on the app just today and they've launched

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a new trivia tool where you could go in and

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and answer questions. So it seems like they're they're moving

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>full steam ahead in terms of making sure that people

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>find a lot of delight in the app, and folks

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are I think that the latest numbers, folks are spending

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred minutes in the US on the app

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>every single day. So there is this kind of like

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting divide where there is big concern in DC and

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly just big concern about being entertained from users here

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Right, But also, Alex, you know

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>what you notice not just for TikTok. I know this

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to be true of course, of Meta previously of Twitter

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is the huge lobbying effort that's going behind the scenes.

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>How much energy is the company putting in, how aggressive

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are they into winning our coolmakers? Yeah, it's interesting. So

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>last fall UM. We wrote this kind of big take

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>out on their lobbying efforts. They were basically talking to

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>friendly parties down in DC. They weren't giving a lot

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of love to the Josh Hollies of the world, the

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>mark of Rubio's of the world. The folks were the

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>loudest in the room bringing up concerns against them. It

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like that strategy has not worked in their favor.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>We have heard and there's been reporting from elsewhere that

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they've changed cats to start the year. They've been a

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more aggressive and getting in front of some of

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>their detractors. So the company is making moves. Definitely, those

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars are going toward UM these kind of behind the

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>scenes conversations. But again, skesticism abound from the folks in

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>DC and all of those big tech CEOs have been

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>subpoena and what are you we hearing from sources about

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what could come out of that. Yeah, so this is

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>really what we're expecting from House Republicans this year. You know,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>with Senate Democrats having the majority and House Republicans having

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the majority on the other side of the capital, there's

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>not much chance that there's going to be UM tech

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>focus legislation that's going to get through the House. Republicans

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are really using their majority for this investigation, and their

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>main concern is getting to the bottom of stories like

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hunter Biden laptop. Why was that story, um, they

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:29.239
<v Speaker 1>would say, suppressed before the last presidential election. The cooperation

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>between the Biden White House and these big tech platforms

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on addressing misinformation around things like COVID. Now Republicans will

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>say that this is a free speech issue that they're

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about the government kind of putting its thumb on

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the scale of speech in the United States using these

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>very important tech platforms. And this is going to be

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the opening salvo and demanding documents from

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>these CEOs to make sure that they are getting the

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of transparency that House Republicans believe they deserve. Bloom

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Bugs and Edgison and Alex Brinka, thank you. Now coming up,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia's public Investment Fund just became the largest outside

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>shareholder of Nintendo. Will explain why. In talking tech. That's next,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Nintendo has taken the scalp of its

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>great Japanese rival Sony. Sales of Nintendo Switch, its flagship

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>console have overtaken those of the PlayStation four. You can

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>see in this chart it's gradually hauled in the mighty

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>PS four. Interestingly, though, look at this a slight slackening

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of growth in the most recent months, of which a

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>bit more later you say that's not a fair comparison.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Sony has since released the PlayStation five. Even taking that

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>into account, you can see Nintendo is out selling the

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>total unit sales of PlayStations from across the board. The

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wrinkle when it comes to nintend though, it is not

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>expecting to sell as much this year as people had expected,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and see these pace of sales for Nintennis, which is

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not as bullish. As a consequence, the share price is

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>being punished. Hm. Hm, Time now for talking tech, and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>let's stick with Nintendo for a second, because Saudi Arabia's

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>public investment fund just became the largest outside shareholder of

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the video game company. This the latest move by the

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Gulf state to lower its reliance on oil. The sovereign

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>web fund now owns eight point three percent of the

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Kyoto based games company, according to a filing, up from

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about six percent at the start of the year. That

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>puts it ahead of Japan's government pension investment fund and

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>behind only Nintendo Zone holdings, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Now moving onto the world of PC makers, Lenovo's profit

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fell for the first time in almost three years on

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>waning demand for personal computers, forcing the company to warn

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of job cuts. The company has been struggling with a

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tumble in global demand following that pandemic error work from

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>home boom, but the company also saying the PC market

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>may stabilize quote sooner than expected. And back to Krypto,

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC saying crypto fugitive Do Quan and the

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>firm he founded, Terraform Labs, transferring ten thousand bitcoin out

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of their doomed projects and turned some of that token

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>into cash virus. Swiss Bank j one has previously denied

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong doing in South Korean authorities are still seeking help

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt to find him alright. Turning to Tesla

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and reaction to that news Thursday that Tesla is recalling

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty three thousand vehicles over an issue

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with its self driving technology, Wells Fargo analyst Colin Langard

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>says the recall has little financial impacts, but the risk

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly remains as other investigations are ongoing at the National

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Highway Traffic Safety Administration and delighted to say Colin joins

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>US now you have an equal weight recommendation, a hundred

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollar price target on Tesla, and Collin, you're

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>basically pointing out that the recall happening and over the

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>air update fix doesn't kind of do away with longer

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>term concerns. In other words, is still looking and asking

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>questions of Tesla. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean, financially it's an

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>over the air update. It's going to be you know,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really at no cost to Tesla. Um, but I think

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it does show that the ns is willing to take action.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>There are I think reportedly you know, over three dozen

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>investigations that's been ongoing. And it's really not just NITZA.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a reportedly a Department of Justice investigation. There is

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>an indication that ten K that they're asking for information,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so it seems like that's very likely. Uh, and there's

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the SEC reportedly might be investigating again. So UM, there's

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of those risks out there, and I

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>think Tesla investors need to keep that in mind. I mean,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>autopilot is extremely important feature that's a competitive advantage for Tesla,

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and if there's regulations that limit its use or or

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>pullback functionality, that's clearly going to be a concern for

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the stock. Elon must get this interview in June where

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>he basically described the overwhelming focus for Tesla being to

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>crack full self driving, and he said it's essential because

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>money and being worth zero is their success on FSD Beta.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you model that into your price targets? Do you

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with kind of that thesis on how Tesla should

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be valued? Uh? Not really. I mean I think he's

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of already walked back some of those targets. Right.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's become very clear across the board, I mean

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>across all the different autonomous startups that to get to

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>full autonomy is very challenging. UM and you know, full

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>self driving is you know, as now indicated is not

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>full self driving level four, level five. It's going to

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be an advanced level to eight as type system at

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>least at this point. So I don't see, you know,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>from most of the experts that I talked to an

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>autonomy you know, the strategies like it's going to take

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a very long time if it's ever all possible, particularly

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>without lighter. So I actually don't put a high probability

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of anything near term on on true full self driving

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the way people are thinking about, you know, could that

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, massively change the valuation, absolutely if they could

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deliver it. I just don't think the technology is there young.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>As you heard at the top of the show, Tesla

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is considering a bid for battery metals minus signor lithium.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, a source told me earlier it's just one

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>name that Tessa is looking at. So clearly test is

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at supply chain right on the battery side. On March,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the first we will get master Plan Part three, which

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a part of we understand will be how

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to scale beyond Tesla's current level. What are your expectations

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for what we'll learn from Elon Musk and co. Yeah,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you look at what's happening

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with Tesla, right, I mean, we've had it seems like

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there were clear signs that demand was softening. We've had

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this massive price cut that spurred the demand. The question

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>comes as how long does that price cut keep demand going?

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you actually need to kind of start to

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>get line of sight to what's the next driver. And

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think at the investor day of the key

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>event is going to be focused around, you know, understanding.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, what I think they've talked about is the

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of Gen three model. I'm guessing and I think

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>most people are guessing that's going to be a lower

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>price model that will actually give them coverage for the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the price points in the auto segment

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if you get it to thirty thousand or below UM

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and that obviously widens the TAM and the addressable market

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and could get people excited if you could do that economically.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what people are expecting, is, you know,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a discussion of cheaper price model with strong economics behind it. Colin,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I noticed a Friday night. I know that maybe Elon

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>musk Tesla, it's not how you want to end your day,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But you tolds about regulatory risk being a damage to credibility.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>What are the other risk tests facing right now? Real quick?

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, you know, expectations are high after the

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>recent run. I think we have to see what happens

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>April one, when you know the you know, the full

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>iary credits come in the seven thousand, five hundred may

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>go down. We'll see if demand is impacted there. I

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think there's high expectations into the investor day and yeah,

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's probably gonna be longer term

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for your seeing some sort of regulatory action that might

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be more aggressive than what we saw yesterday, but still

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>remains a long term risk that investors shouldn't forget about.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe it'll all blow over, but it's still

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>something to consider. All right. Well, as fagoys called it, Langon,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Happy Friday, have a great long weekend opening.

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I deserves a ton of credit for taking what happened

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with transformers and large language models and taking it out

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the research labs of these big tech companies. They're

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>really at the front lines of bringing these technology to

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of application developers and users. So to give up

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>any credit they when they released chat GPT, they were

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>very careful to put in place safeguards to prevent certain

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>types of toxic or harmful content or dangerous content from

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>being I wouldn't be surprised if in the next six

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to twelve months we have models that are actually capable

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of truthfulness. I think every company is going to be

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>an AI company, and everything we do at work and

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>how we live is going to be transformed by AI.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Those were just some of Bloomberg Technologies guests sharing their

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>recent thoughts on the booming generative AI sector and open

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Aies contribution in particular. So for more on what's going

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on and the impact to tech moving forward, I want

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Bloomberg Intelligence is Man Deep Seeing and Mandy,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you have this note out this Friday about actually where

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the real impact you think chat g people t will come.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So much focus on what it will do in the

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>search wars right being revival versus Google. But for you,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a story about cloud. Explain your thesis. Sure,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So look, I think what you're gonna see is everything

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>around us when it comes to apps, website, software will

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>become more intelligent. And what you need to drive that

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>is cloud infrastructure. So think of you know how our

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>data centers are set up right now, it's essentially you know,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>work certain kind of workloads which are mostly CPU driven.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that we have power of these you know, custom

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>chips that can run AI workloads, that can run these

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>large language models, it allows us to leverage all of

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that in our day to day experience of accessing the Internet,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and which is why I think cloud growth was extremely

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>strong even before they slowdown. And I think this even

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>accelerates that on the server side, and I wouldn't be

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised if it drives up the refresh cycle on the

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>edge or the you know, the consumer devices as well. Yeah,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation we've had certainly in Cilicon Valley, right,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, AWS dominates this market. The AWS hasn't even

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>shown his hand yet really when it comes to their

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>their AI or at least sort of there out there

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>consumer facing AI competence. There's a piece of data analysis

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that you do in your debt that you've published about

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>how much search is actually going to be connected to

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>large language models. I think you say that somewhere between

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and search queries or images will be linked to

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>l l ns. Why did you point that out? Yeah,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so think of you know, how many types of searches

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>actually require that large language context. I mean some of

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>these searches are essentially looking for a website you are

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>l or just some basic information we're a large language

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>model can add value is if you want to summarize

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a large corpus of text or you know, drive some

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>intelligence around the type of query where you just don't

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>want to access the u r L but actually make

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it intelligent in terms of saving the time and driving productivity.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at all the queries, the type

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of queries people do on Google, we kind of narrowed

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it down to fifteen over the next two to three years.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Obvious see this sort of big gradual, but you can

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>see you know, education and a lot of that A

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>use case right now is using a negative context around

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, copying essays or that kind of stuff. But

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a real use case around education as well

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>as you know, queries where you can do a lot

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of things in terms of summarizing things quickly. And I

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's where we get through that number, all right,

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligent Senior Technology analyst, mandyat Singh thank you. Kevin Dunlap,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Calibrate Ventures co founder and managing partner, is with me

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>now this Friday. Calibrate which announced their second fund of

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven million dollars back in December one, specifically to

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>invest in early stage AI and automation startups across healthcare, logistics, education,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>financial services. Kevin, let's get the big picture from you. First,

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you heard Mandy eat there, you've heard all the data points,

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just some up what you're seeing right now as the

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>moment in AI, what is it that is before us?

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>When we started calibrate first and two thousand seventeen, we

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>believe that there was a large economic unlock that was

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>going to occur, similar to what happened in sas in

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousand's. And now we're seeing that the

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ability for companies to build quickly on top of these

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>large language models, as well as thinking about the middle

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>where middle layer to actually take and implement these actions

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>into realities in the real world is what's exciting to

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>us to calibrate. The chronology or the timeline here for

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>me is so interesting. You started or launch your fund

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in December one. I don't know how much of the

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>capitol you've you've committed yet, but really this took off

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in November, right And I just wonder how you feel

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about how much open ai has dominated the headlines, because

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the names you're looking at have nothing to

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do with open AI. At this moment in time, everyone's

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>all of our companies are looking at how to use

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>generative I. UM some have looked at using open AI,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>others are looking at using other types of models, are

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually implementing other own models into that. But the timing

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and the pro press it's receives about open AI, I

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think is actually great. Um. It actually highlights the opportunity

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's out there and even some of the things that

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing, even some of the potentially negative things you're

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing around open ay and the chat I think also

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>highlight where we are in a cycle. Right. We're at

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the very early cycle of this, and there needs to

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of moderation, content filtering, UM and honing

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of these models to actually understand and take them into

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>full enterprise A complications were we were discussing the potential

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for cloud and enterprise at a generative AI. But the

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer facing excitement is about search and we will ask

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>our own audience all the developments in AI enough to

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>view the consumer to jump from Google to another search engine.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>These are the results, will bring them up for you. UM.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how surprising it is, Kevin see respondent

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>saying it's too early to tell, of respondents saying, yes,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>being is now more exciting. Is that really true? Is

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>this a game changer? In the search engine competition. I

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's a game changer in bing stability to catching

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>partner share. And if I was joking about this the

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>other day, you know, if you'd asked me a year ago,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances that I would download thing? They

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>were probably zero. But I actually downloaded it and I

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>let it keep its notifications on it simply so I

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know when i'd be able to get full access to it.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think it is a ga game changer for

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and the ability to actually catch the market share

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>around search. So I go back to my last question

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about open ai. Should we be thanking open ai for

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>what they've done to give momentum around generative AI. I

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think we should be. I think that what it's doing

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>is it's opening up opportunities. It's allowing startups to be

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>more cost effective how they deploy solutions to actually get

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>products to market sooner and allow scale faster. So I

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think the attention that's been brought on by open i

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is actually a positive um. But with everything every

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>early product launched, there's always a balance of the perfect

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>product versus speed to market and first mover, and I

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen a little bit of that here, but

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the honing that's going to be having the ability to

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>actually customize that they just had an announcement on last night.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think those will do wonders for the products and

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>offering and the way that people interact with it. You've

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>been doing this since two thousand sev and ninety seven

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollar fund at the end of one How are

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you valuing your portfolio companies? There's a lot of froth

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the public markets, and of course looking to public

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>peers is one way of benchmarking your private portfolio, right,

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but gains for Big Bear AI more than a hundred

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>percent year to date for uh C three AI must

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be a nightmare. Yeah. And the benefit of being an

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>early stage venture investors that we have a very long

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>term horizon and that although we've seen a rise in

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the seed in Series eight prices for companies um that's

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to come off a little bit and we're seeing

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of return to normal. I think

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the hardest place to play right now is in the

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>later stage financing of these pre I p O companies.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where I'd be the most cautiousness an investor,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's where it's a hard time actually understanding what

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the public markets will ultimately evaluate the set in the future.

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>At the earlier stage of the curve, are you having

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to write bigger checks? I guess there's a proxy for

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it being more competitive to get into promising companies in

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. I think the round sizes have increased of somewhat.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's buying companies more more runway to actually

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>execute on their offerings in their platforms. We've been fortunately,

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing this a long time, and so our

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>expertise and the cross product pollinations between our companies has

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>been most benefit for us to lead in win deals

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>even when they're over subscribed. Kevin, what is your personal

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship like with artificial intelligence? Bear with me on that one,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know you're an investor in the space. I'm

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to get in on the chat GPT waitlist, right.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to understand better how it works. Do you

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sit at your desk every day and communicate with AI

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and all the different A p I s and tools

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that are available to you? In general, I think we're

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>interacting with AI and lots of ways without even knowing it. Right,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>We've got robotics companies that use AI to decide what

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>motions have taken the real world we're being delivered ads

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in our web search is probably using all some forms

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of generative AI now without us knowing. I love playing

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with uh GPT chat and asking questions and seeing out

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how it responds. But I also take every response that

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I get with a grain of salt. Right, I know

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this is an early language, large language model. I know

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that the answers were getting need to be verified and

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 1>need to be understood in the appropriate way, And so

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think people all also need to take that same

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>approach and understand that this is the very beginning, and

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you also need to verify the information from getting Kevin

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>done that. Calibrate Ventures co founder and managing partner will

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have you on later in the cycle and see how

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it went. Now, coming up, Draft Kings soaring after a

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter revenue beating estimates, an analysts responding positively to

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that be we'll have more on the quarternex and here

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from DraftKings CEO Jason Robbins, Mr Bloomberg, we've teed up

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>over one one point three trillion dollars worth of different

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>investment in areas like semiconductors, green technology, green grid. You know,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they're very smart workers being laid off from a lot

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the tech companies. Hopefully they find other homes and

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>helped generate that productive capacity that was bmos Carol Schlife.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about how investing in companies that are going

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from the investment in EV charging infrastructure, also

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how there's opportunity in tech layoffs, and how companies might

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit from those that are seeking a job, especially those

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>much bagloged industries looking for a bit of a boost.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of evs, General Motors CEO Mary Barraw says,

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this year is the year the GM moves past it's

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional rivals and starts its attempt to close the gap

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla in the EV race. It's along away to

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>push and GM has talked for four years about thirty

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>new evs that will use its old tim battery, but

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only has recently stided production. Have a listened. It's critically

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>important if we want to achieve goals to get to

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>forty fifty and beyond a percentage of all new vehicles

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sold to be electric vehicles, you have to get into

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that thirty range because that's where the bulk of the

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>market is. And so that's why I'm so proud of

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chevrolet Equinox and the Chevrolet Blazer, both evs that

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are coming out this year. You know that the Equinox

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>will be around thirty thousand dollars and the Blazer will

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be in the You know that, and those are very

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>affordable vehicles. And draft King shares close higher at the

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the trading day in New York, reaching their

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>highest level since August. This after the sports Bedding Company

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>reported fourth court of revenue that was better than expected

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and raised guidance as well for the four year in three.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jason Robbins join my colleagues Shinali Basset and remained

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Bostick earlier today, and here's what he had to say

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about whether the company can be profitable by the fourth

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter of this year. Really feel good about the trajectory

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of the business. Center on really great track to to

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have Q four be a big quarter for us, a

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>big quarter. And I think a lot of people sort

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of looking at this idea here sort of what drives

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the growth going forward here, Jason, I mean, this is

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a business that I think to a certain degree was

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of out in front. You know, it was kind

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of early, I think to the big sort of shift

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to more of these UH gaining platforms here, and a

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people sort of want to know, is this

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>growth story one of additional users or is it maybe

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to monetize a user base that you already have.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all the above. We're really in a

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>very the very infancy stage of the industry. There's still

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>tons of new users coming in. States are passing legislation,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and new markets are opening up, and you're finding customers

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, adopting new sports, new products UH

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and growing their spend with us too. So if you

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it, we've had very consistent growth both in

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>our monthly users and in our average revenue per user,

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and we expect that to continue. UM. We have Massachusetts

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>opening up hopefully in March. That will be another big

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>growth spurt for US. So lots of great stuff on

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. What about M and A of Jason, Do

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you see yourself entertaining another large deal after the environment

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>has frankly changed? You know, obviously right now we're very

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>focused on our internal operations, on becoming more efficient, on

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>finding ways to cut costs, finding ways to grow revenue. UM.

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That's been a huge plus for us that we really

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the environment is transition, really it's afforded

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>us the opportunity to look internally and spend a lot

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of time asking ourselves, how can we be more efficient?

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>How can we be more cost effective? Um. So that's

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>been the theme for the last year, and I expect

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that to continue through twenty three. Jason talked us a

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about partnerships. One thing that struck me was,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a couple of weeks ago, I

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>happened to notice in one of your competitors, I think

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it was Fanatics, actually had set up a whole sports

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>book operation, uh in one of the main NFL stadiums

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>down in Washington. And I'm curious, are these types of

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>deals necessary? I guess to continue to sort of capture

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>market share, and I guess to keep people tether to

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your specific brand. Well, you know, we have a handful

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of retail sports books across the country. I think they

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>serve a great purpose. We're building a really big one

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at Wrigley Field, another one at UM the side of

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the TPC Scottsdale, the WM Phoenix open Um, so you know,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they do have a place. I think that it really

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on the deal. If there's a good deal to

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>be done that we feel it is going to be

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a profitable one for the company's cost efficient. Um, you know,

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something we pursue. We're mostly focused online,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously the vast majority of our business, but there

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is a place for retail where it makes sense. That

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was DraftKings CEO Jason Robots. So let's take a look

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at the chase again. Actually closing fifteen percent higher, short

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>change them a little bit, but still the biggest jump

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>since November in the stock closing at this highest level

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>since August. There for Draft Kings want to watch for sure,

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going viral. Ben Sigmahan is looking to get as

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>much as nine billion dollars in a potential sale of

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>w w E, the company he returned to this year.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>The asking price thirty seven percent above the company's current

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>market value for around six point five billion dollars. Bloomberg's

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Shore broke that story and joins me. Now, so,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Lucas is anyone buying any office come in yet? According

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to the people familiar with the conversation, has there have

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>been at least a couple of offers for the whole company.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a story about a month ago

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that that Saudi Arabia already had a deal to buy it.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh that was dismissed by Nik Cohn, who's the CEO

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and a former agent at Creative Artist Agency. But we

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>know that there's interest from Middle Eastern investors. We know

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's interest from Endeavor, which already owns the Ultimate

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Fighting Championship. You know, the big question in this is

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>whether there's a lot of interest from what would be

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>considered the strategic partners, the big media companies Comcast, which

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>already airs some of the w W, Fox, which are

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the Www, Netflix, Disney and its peers. So far,

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the interest is more from the Saudias

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and Endeavor, But there are folks who say that they've

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>gotten offers from people beyond kind of the the expected list.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at w W SHA is really jumping actually

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>after the headlines and you're reporting dropped. Why such a

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>high valuation? What justifies it, I guess to Vince Mmon's mind, Well,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the company right now, it's it's market cap is about

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. Now, that's up a lot, in

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>part because people expect there to be a deal. But

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>anytime you sell you know, you aim for a premium,

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so you add at least a you know, a billion

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>or two on top of it, and that puts it

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in the eight to nine billion range. It doesn't seem

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that crazy, you know, in terms of why the company

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is worth that much. It is able to deliver, you know,

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a very consistent audience. It delivers at least most of

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the time alive audience. And there are already companies paying

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of dollars a year for the rights

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to show this programming. If you already or to own it,

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could then have a lot more control

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>over it. You can advertise the cost over more time.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's been sort of ongoing efforts or desires at

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>least to take some of those characters from the regular

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 1>shows and turn them into film, television something like that.

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Any owner can do that as well. Bloomberg's Lucas sure

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping eyes on that deal, will continue to track it.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I want to get back to

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>those breaking headlines on Tesla. According to sources, Tesla weighing

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>up a bid for the lithium minor Sigma Lithium, a

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Canadian firm. You can see the market reaction Sigma's U

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>s A d r s jumping in after hours, even

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday, I'm sure, amid thin volumes. According to sources,

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Tesla speaking with advisors and has been considering this. Of course,

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>no deal is certain, but one deal will continue to track.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That does it know. For this edition of Bloomberg Technology,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what a week. Don't forget to recap on our podcast

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts on Spotify, iHeart or Apple podcasts.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot more to discuss around the world of techn ology.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg