Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge. The mob turns on
Speaker 1: Portland's mayor a thousand dollars fine for no mask outdoors
Speaker 1: in DC, the Chinese consulate shut down in Houston, and
Speaker 1: our school POD's racist. Buck Sexton coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence? Make no mistake American Great,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Puma CIA analysts can speak to three hours without a
Speaker 1: phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No, welcome everybody to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. I want to jump right to it.
Speaker 1: Are you feeling that right now? There's so much happening.
Speaker 1: It's a presidential campaign, it's an election season that no
Speaker 1: one's really talking about the political candidates very much, or
Speaker 1: their platforms everything else. No, we're just in the midst
Speaker 1: of a fight for the future of America on the
Speaker 1: streets and across the country. That's what's happening right now.
Speaker 1: And Democrats have got a problem. They are now the
Speaker 1: riot party. They're firmly entrenched on the side of writers
Speaker 1: across America, and the media is working overtime, bending over backwards,
Speaker 1: doing everything they can to make it either seem like
Speaker 1: these protests are mostly peaceful when we know they're not,
Speaker 1: or they just don't cover this. We are now at
Speaker 1: almost two months of nightly mayhem in Portland, Oregon, almost
Speaker 1: two months every night, and the only thing you're hearing
Speaker 1: from the mainstream media from CNN and ABC and New
Speaker 1: York Times and all the rust about what's going on
Speaker 1: in Portland this hole scary. It is that Trump has
Speaker 1: sent federal law enforcement officers to assist because of the
Speaker 1: lawlessness on the streets of Portland. I'm I'm looking at
Speaker 1: this and saying, it's amazing that any honest person, any
Speaker 1: intelligent human being, could have a problem with what Trump
Speaker 1: is doing right now when you understand how federal law
Speaker 1: enforcement actually works where it is, how it works hand
Speaker 1: in glove with local law enforcement all across the country
Speaker 1: all the time. But no, the focus is on Trump
Speaker 1: sending in the STASI. These are probably the people that
Speaker 1: will help him not leave the Oval office if he
Speaker 1: wins again or if he doesn't lose, rather whatever, either way,
Speaker 1: they're going to help him not leave the Oval office.
Speaker 1: Mayor Ted Wheeler, I want to give him credit. Mayor
Speaker 1: Ted Wheeler, along with Mayor Lightfoot of Chicago Mayor Deblasio
Speaker 1: of New York, Mayor Durkin of Seattle. These world class
Speaker 1: morons serve an important purpose because they tell other world
Speaker 1: class morons all over all over the planet, Hey, you
Speaker 1: too could be the mayor of a major US city,
Speaker 1: because you could be a total idiot. Look at this.
Speaker 1: What a disaster. What a disaster. So Ted Wheeler last
Speaker 1: night and I was watching these clips as they were
Speaker 1: popping up on social media. Ted Wheeler decided to go
Speaker 1: down because you know, he's like, yeah, I'm gonna I'm
Speaker 1: a person of the people. I'm gonna go down. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna talk to them. I tell you him, with the man,
Speaker 1: we're gonna dismantle systemic racism together. Yeah. Sure, sure you are, buddy,
Speaker 1: Sure you are. The Portland mayor went down, mask of course,
Speaker 1: masked up. He went down, And one thing we know
Speaker 1: for sure, a cotton or fabric mask does not help
Speaker 1: you with tear gas. Really, So there's that. Uh. He
Speaker 1: went down to hang out and talk to the mob,
Speaker 1: the Antifa Democrat base. Remember these are Democrats. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: keep saying it. They're all going to vote for Biden,
Speaker 1: if they vote at all. They all support Democrat policies.
Speaker 1: They adhere to the beliefs of mainstream left wing American ideology. Right,
Speaker 1: that's where they are. And Ted Wheeler goes down there
Speaker 1: to have a conversation with of it. Here's some of
Speaker 1: how here's some of how it goes. Play a play
Speaker 1: clib nine things. It's hard to breathe, and UM, I
Speaker 1: can tell you I'm honesty. I sign nothing if Nassal starting,
Speaker 1: I'm not afraid that I am pissed off of dismality.
Speaker 1: This this, this is a a greedous over reaction on
Speaker 1: the part of the federal officers book. There is nothing
Speaker 1: that I find with the warranted reaction UM and all
Speaker 1: its students, if you can see, so has the stops
Speaker 1: that they quire minitance, they hired to all times, kissed everybody,
Speaker 1: offers and wars, made people angry. They come in and
Speaker 1: they clickto Harding's test. So this is not the the
Speaker 1: escalations forratitude. This is flat out urban worker urban warfare,
Speaker 1: he says, from not the lunatics with weapons and moving
Speaker 1: in paramilitary formation on the street to break laws in
Speaker 1: his city. He's the mayor. He's supposed to keep law
Speaker 1: in order in that city. Remember, the police force is
Speaker 1: under the supervision, under the direction of the mayor's office,
Speaker 1: so there's lawlessness in his city. And Ted Wheeler of
Speaker 1: Portland wants you to know that the overreaction of the
Speaker 1: federal government's the real problem here. Yeah, oh yeah, what
Speaker 1: a stunningly, grotesquely stupid, weasily dishonest moron. Why is he
Speaker 1: down there at all? Now? I wish I could play
Speaker 1: for you, but we really can't because there's so much
Speaker 1: There's all this video online of him down there in
Speaker 1: the heart of these protests, and he's really want and
Speaker 1: they're not a protest, they're riots. I'm sorry, we got
Speaker 1: to use the problem. These are Democrats who are rioting.
Speaker 1: They're not protesters who want a conversation. That's media spin.
Speaker 1: That's a lie. These are rioting democrats. It's not a
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful protest. It is explicitly, openly intended to cause
Speaker 1: fear and destruction and use the threat of force to
Speaker 1: get their way, like domestic terrorists. But I couldn't play
Speaker 1: for you, although it would be really fun. All of
Speaker 1: the all of the video, all the audio that's out
Speaker 1: there where Mayor Ted Wheeler shows up to his constituents right.
Speaker 1: These are all people who I'm sure voted for Ted
Speaker 1: Wheeler or would again if they do vote. And do
Speaker 1: you know what they were yelling? Blank you Ted Wheeler,
Speaker 1: shut the blank up. I mean, there's so much just
Speaker 1: scorn and humiliation. This guy's pummeled with it. And he's
Speaker 1: on their side, right, and you get his hear of
Speaker 1: his head. I'm on your side. Why don't you like
Speaker 1: me more? I'm on your side. But he can't really
Speaker 1: say that, although he says he's with them in solidarity
Speaker 1: on the issue of dismantling structural racism and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: Of course. I mean the mayor is such a buffoon.
Speaker 1: He's saying that he didn't he didn't. I didn't see
Speaker 1: anything that justifies this. They lit a federal courthouse on
Speaker 1: fire last night. BET's arson. People should go to prison
Speaker 1: for a very long time for that. The BLM protesters
Speaker 1: in Minnesota did this couple months ago and killed somebody.
Speaker 1: Arson is a serious crime. Destruction of property is a crime.
Speaker 1: I know Democrats like the bead Oh, it's just stuff,
Speaker 1: It's just stuff. No, No, the government has an obligation
Speaker 1: to protect safety and to protect property or else we
Speaker 1: should all take it into our own hands to do both.
Speaker 1: And we know the Libs don't want that. Heaven forbid
Speaker 1: the law abiding, the rational, the reasonable take up arms
Speaker 1: in their own defense. Well, we know what happens, what
Speaker 1: happened in Saint Louis. Then the prosecutors all of a
Speaker 1: sudden will bear their teeth. Then the prosecutors will come
Speaker 1: after you. They will try to make an example of you.
Speaker 1: This is true Democrat prosecutors across the country. Now, if
Speaker 1: you stand up against the mob, you're the problem. But
Speaker 1: I have to tell you it was just so amazing,
Speaker 1: really to watch the mayor of a pretty good sized
Speaker 1: city marching and walking alongside and pandering to the left.
Speaker 1: And they hate him. That's what he doesn't understand that
Speaker 1: you can bow to this mob. You could. It exists
Speaker 1: as a mob. There are no concessions you can make.
Speaker 1: There's nothing you can do to make them like you.
Speaker 1: They want him to resign. That's what they were calling
Speaker 1: for as well when they weren't cursing at him. They
Speaker 1: want him to resign. Are they going to get a
Speaker 1: more far left better mayor than this guy? You know,
Speaker 1: as I leftist, I'm saying, are they gonna get somebody
Speaker 1: who's even more progressive and insane. No, I don't think so.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't even know how that's possible. And
Speaker 1: this guy seems like he's to the left of AOC,
Speaker 1: if there's any space to the left, I don't know.
Speaker 1: They hate him though, They ridicule him, they mock him.
Speaker 1: They think he's a joke too, because he at least
Speaker 1: has to put on the appearance of being a politician
Speaker 1: who has some grounding in reality. But this is this
Speaker 1: is what I really want you to take from this.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are in a spasm of rage and craziness
Speaker 1: right now, the whole Democrat Party. They've got a pathetic
Speaker 1: candidate in Joe Biden. They know this, We all see it. Empathetic,
Speaker 1: not inspiring, not not skillful, not particularly intelligent, too old, boring,
Speaker 1: credibly accused of sexual assault too. We never talk about
Speaker 1: that anymore. Isn't that interesting? That's just that's never even
Speaker 1: brought up, is it. We have that guy on the
Speaker 1: Democrat side, and as long as that's who they put forward.
Speaker 1: I don't think that serious people have to treat the
Speaker 1: opinions of outraged Democrats seriously. This is absurd. But there
Speaker 1: is I think a growing recognition among the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: that now they've they've made there, They've made their bed.
Speaker 1: Now they have to sleep in it. They've made the
Speaker 1: decision here. They are the party of riots, they are
Speaker 1: the riot party. They have to back these up. They
Speaker 1: have to find justifications for this. They have to make
Speaker 1: sure that all of their politicians take the softest possible
Speaker 1: touch in keeping these riots from completely spilling out of
Speaker 1: control and causing even more widespread destruction and possibly even
Speaker 1: a body count at some point. That's real, that's the
Speaker 1: real concern that we're all worried about. But they've created
Speaker 1: a monster here, you see, and they're they're in the
Speaker 1: early stages of seeing it's not clear that in a
Speaker 1: general election year they're really going to be able to
Speaker 1: control this. They thought it was great BLM protests for
Speaker 1: George Floyd. Yeah, they thought it was great. Get everyone
Speaker 1: out in the streets. I forget about the pandemic. Everybody
Speaker 1: out of the streets, go for it. We got our people,
Speaker 1: We got our Democrats out there marching and making demands,
Speaker 1: and corporate America running scared and all this stuff. All
Speaker 1: this stuff. Now, what do they do Now? They are expecting.
Speaker 1: These mobs are expecting to get their way, and they're
Speaker 1: not going away. And the lockdowns feed into this too,
Speaker 1: because there's not enough normal life to drown out these
Speaker 1: lunatics and to give them something else to do. They
Speaker 1: have nothing else to do. They're not going away. The
Speaker 1: Democrat Party has to own this now. Chicago is a
Speaker 1: war zone, Portland is a riot zone. New York is
Speaker 1: falling apart. These are major nodes of Democrat power. These
Speaker 1: are large American cities, New York the largest, Chicago the
Speaker 1: third largest. And what are Democrats offering up to people.
Speaker 1: The only way that you could see this working out
Speaker 1: in their favor is in some ways the most breathtakingly
Speaker 1: cynical and disturbing one, and that is that the implied
Speaker 1: promise of the Democrat Party going into this election is
Speaker 1: vote for our guy, or the riots never stop. Vote
Speaker 1: for our guy, or we extend the lockdown so far
Speaker 1: you won't even remember normal life is like. Their plan
Speaker 1: is not to appeal to the American voter in the
Speaker 1: middle right. Forget about the crazy left and the Democrat base.
Speaker 1: Their plan is not to appeal to the voter in
Speaker 1: the middle. It's to terrify them. And the only way
Speaker 1: this stops is if you vote for Biden. That is
Speaker 1: their pitch. They are holding the American, the American people hostage.
Speaker 1: That's what you see in Portland. That's why the mayor
Speaker 1: goes down there. He knows the game, and they're practically
Speaker 1: spitting at the guy, curse at him and telling him
Speaker 1: to resign. Democrats better be careful how this goes for them.
Speaker 1: It all seemed great for them a month ago, six
Speaker 1: weeks ago. Not so much anymore. You're in the Freedom
Speaker 1: d This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Under
Speaker 1: Operation Legend. We will also soon send federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: to other cities that need help. Other cities need help,
Speaker 1: they needed badly. They should call, they should want it.
Speaker 1: They're too proud or they're too political to do that.
Speaker 1: One of them is Albuquerque, in New Mexico, where Less
Speaker 1: for All, fifty five year old Jackie Vee Hill was
Speaker 1: murdered as she was getting into her car to go
Speaker 1: to the gym. We're joined today by her husband Sam
Speaker 1: and her sons Raoul and Kevin, both New Mexico State
Speaker 1: Police officers. Operation Legend named for a young boy killed
Speaker 1: sleeping in his bed in Missouri. It has already been underway,
Speaker 1: this operation in Missouri for some weeks, but now Trump
Speaker 1: is expanding it, using federal law enforcement agencies to assist
Speaker 1: cities in areas where there is lawlessness and a spike
Speaker 1: in violent crime. How could any person, any person in authority,
Speaker 1: any person in the media, anyone paying attention, think that
Speaker 1: this is anything other than a good thing, right? Don't
Speaker 1: you want federal law enforcement to assist. Wouldn't you want
Speaker 1: there to be highly trained, reliable, well equipped federal officers
Speaker 1: acting completely within the law. All the stuff you're you're
Speaker 1: hearing from the lives is whining crap. Any Where the
Speaker 1: patches do we worked them to you he they're using
Speaker 1: an unmarked vehicle and federal law enforcement officers. You know,
Speaker 1: they were all in favor of the unobstructed power of
Speaker 1: the surveillance state when it came to Komey and the
Speaker 1: deep state hacks trying to help Hillary. But now when
Speaker 1: it comes to stopping either riots or stopping just unthinkable
Speaker 1: violent crime in Chicago, they're complaining about this. They're whining.
Speaker 1: There's no way that you could say that anyone is
Speaker 1: objecting to this in good faith. It's not possible to
Speaker 1: object in good faith. People are just looking for objections
Speaker 1: because Trump is doing it, and because think about what
Speaker 1: happens if these cities calm down after the deployment of
Speaker 1: federal police resources. What does it look like if in
Speaker 1: Chicago next month shootings are down twenty percent, thirty percent? Wow?
Speaker 1: It It would make people think, not only has Trump
Speaker 1: made a good decision, but what should we think of
Speaker 1: the decision that the Democrats have been pushing for for
Speaker 1: the last three months. Defund the cops. Blame the cops,
Speaker 1: they're racist, They're part of white sup premissy and a
Speaker 1: racist system. The stupidity of those statements, the stupidity of
Speaker 1: those claims is mind blowing, and it's worse than just
Speaker 1: being stupid. It's also a policy blunder. People are suffering
Speaker 1: because Democrats like to say things that make them and
Speaker 1: their political ideology feel righteous. And they're self righteous. They're sanctimonious.
Speaker 1: That is who they are. This was really all about
Speaker 1: their political mobilization and just a an orgy of virtue
Speaker 1: signaling from Democrats. Oh, we're just we care so much,
Speaker 1: yeah out on the streets, defund police, yeah, blm man. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Because people are pathetic. They're pathetic. They're not helping anyone.
Speaker 1: They're making everything worse. They don't have the ability to
Speaker 1: think critically about what's going on in these cities. They
Speaker 1: know nothing about law enforcement. They know nothing about the
Speaker 1: history of these cities and what has worked and what don't.
Speaker 1: But we suffer because of their stupidity and because of
Speaker 1: a just shockingly cowardly mainstream media. These people are so
Speaker 1: lucky to have the jobs that they do. They're overwhelmingly
Speaker 1: on the ones on TV in particular, are overpaid, entirely replaceable, unimpressive,
Speaker 1: narcissistic clowns, and they're hurting this country. They're actually hurting
Speaker 1: America by saying defaunt cops. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Buss and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. That
Speaker 1: is why we are here today to answer the please
Speaker 1: of those crying for justice and crying for help for
Speaker 1: those people in Chicago and other cities where will be.
Speaker 1: Help is on its way. Help is on the way.
Speaker 1: It is indeed, except the Democrats don't want help. Why
Speaker 1: is that? Are they? They should be asked this question.
Speaker 1: You will recall that the Democrats went through a period
Speaker 1: where they were saying, before defund the police became the
Speaker 1: rallying cry, it was abolish ice, Abolish ice, abolish ice.
Speaker 1: That's what they were saying. That's what we were being told.
Speaker 1: And then when enough Democrat politicians, one enough Democrat politicians
Speaker 1: had to be asked the question, so you want to
Speaker 1: abolish ice so we shouldn't have any enforcement of immigration law,
Speaker 1: that that should not exist anymore, because I remember it
Speaker 1: was abolish ice. It wasn't cut ice, is funding ten percent?
Speaker 1: Abolish ice? Okay, what are you going to replace it with?
Speaker 1: And the Sandernistas would go on TV. Bernie Sanders and
Speaker 1: his and his crew would go on TV and they
Speaker 1: would say, you know, they'd mumble something about a you know,
Speaker 1: kids and cages. Oh my gosh, you know, they'd say
Speaker 1: the stuff that they were the talking points. And then
Speaker 1: and then they would end up having to say, well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna like fold that responsibility into another federal agency
Speaker 1: or create a new create a new one. Oh, so
Speaker 1: you're gonna abolish ice to create you know, immigrations and
Speaker 1: customs enforce it? Right, abolished ice so you can create
Speaker 1: a new ICE that does the same thing that the
Speaker 1: old ICE did, because that is necessary. You utter buffoons.
Speaker 1: So they had to back away from that. They lost
Speaker 1: on that one. You don't hear them talking about abolish
Speaker 1: ICE anymore. Do That was two years ago, the summer
Speaker 1: of what was a twenty eighteen. Oh, that was a
Speaker 1: big one. Remember AOC went down there. Oh, border patrol
Speaker 1: was threatening me and all that stuff that was going on. Really,
Speaker 1: you're gonna you're gonna go after federal law enforcement like that.
Speaker 1: You're gonna claim that you were being threatened. I mean,
Speaker 1: the stuff that was happening from from the Democrats was
Speaker 1: just it was de scrayful. But you know that was
Speaker 1: their identity, politics, open borders all coming together. What's their
Speaker 1: position now going to be? Okay, so we've had all
Speaker 1: this conversation, how about police? Trump signed and it was
Speaker 1: a mistake, But hey, the Trumps, the Trumpster's back, baby,
Speaker 1: He's do what he needs to do. He signed any
Speaker 1: executive order on law enforcement reform to do transparency. Do
Speaker 1: you even hear about transparency anymore? And all this stuff? Now,
Speaker 1: what about statues? I thought we were supposed to be
Speaker 1: also worried about the statues that were a form of
Speaker 1: inanimate tyranny all across the country. Right. Oh no, we're
Speaker 1: not talking about that anymore. It's just every week it
Speaker 1: changes whatever the lives can get angry about. All change
Speaker 1: this team, this sports team's name. Oh, fire some people
Speaker 1: from the New York Times because they don't agree one
Speaker 1: hundred percent with the craziest left wing ideology, all this
Speaker 1: stuff that you see. What exactly is their argument against
Speaker 1: federal law enforcement officers in US cities enforcing the law
Speaker 1: That they're not telling you that they're not enforcing the law. Right,
Speaker 1: they're trying to say that they don't like their tactics,
Speaker 1: or oh, Ted Wheeler, they're kicking the hornets. Nest's what's
Speaker 1: the real answer. They need to be pushed. If we
Speaker 1: had a serious media, every Democrat, including Joe hiding down
Speaker 1: in the basement, every Democrat would have to answer the question,
Speaker 1: why do you think that you don't need federal law
Speaker 1: enforcement assistance for your city? You already have federal law
Speaker 1: enforcement operating in your city all the time and have
Speaker 1: for as long as you've been the mayor or you know,
Speaker 1: the governor of your state, whatever it may be. So
Speaker 1: what's the what is the real explanation here. Well, it
Speaker 1: turns out Mayor Lightfoot in Chicago has now agreed as
Speaker 1: of today to work with an additional federal deployment of troops.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, pardon me, of law enforcement. I know it's
Speaker 1: that's gonna happen sometimes because it's weird. We don't think
Speaker 1: of law enforcement as being deployed in that way because
Speaker 1: law enforcements all over the country already. So Chicago is
Speaker 1: going to have, Chicago is going to have additional federal assistance,
Speaker 1: and let's hope that they are able to bring down
Speaker 1: the violent crimes. I mean, this is exactly what you need.
Speaker 1: You need US marshals going after the worst gang bangers.
Speaker 1: You need d EA going after the cartel connections to
Speaker 1: these gangs, and you know, going after MS their team,
Speaker 1: going after the Bloods and the Crips and you know,
Speaker 1: Latin Kings and all these different national gang affiliations. Those
Speaker 1: law enforcement agencies do that all the time. You want
Speaker 1: to stop violent crime, stop the violent criminals. We know this,
Speaker 1: This has been established for a long time. Democrats, though,
Speaker 1: they're on the wrong side of this issue, and now
Speaker 1: they're scrambling. They're scrambling, and Trump has finally been able
Speaker 1: to and I've been saying, where's the CounterPunch where Trump
Speaker 1: is finally now on political offense and its political offense,
Speaker 1: where he's right, he's helping America. He is going to
Speaker 1: help save lives, save neighborhoods, save minority lives predominantly. And
Speaker 1: all of this is showing what the Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: really about, the relentless and ruthless pursuit of power at
Speaker 1: the expense of the very people they claim to care
Speaker 1: so much about. That's why you have these these complete
Speaker 1: morons like Deblasio. De Blasio is the worst mayor in America,
Speaker 1: but seems to think that he's not under the jurisdiction
Speaker 1: of America. These mayors are like, oh, well, we're going
Speaker 1: to stop them. They can't know the mayor has mayor
Speaker 1: has no no ability whatsoever in the law to tell
Speaker 1: the FBI that they can enforce laws in New York City.
Speaker 1: M not how our system works. In fact, if you
Speaker 1: look back at our history, really look at our history
Speaker 1: and why we have the system we do of federalism,
Speaker 1: of states in the federal government working together putting down
Speaker 1: insurrections and restoring law and order and preventing states from
Speaker 1: violating federal law as a function of policy. Go back
Speaker 1: to Eisenhower, go back to integrating the schools against the
Speaker 1: wishes of Democrats. By the way, you look at what
Speaker 1: has happened in the past, and you understand that of
Speaker 1: course presidents do this. These federal law enforcement agencies exist
Speaker 1: to enforce the laws in states that They're not just
Speaker 1: buildings in DC that have no mission, that have no mandate.
Speaker 1: They have personnel all over the country. Some might argue
Speaker 1: they have too many personnel and too many AIDS sees.
Speaker 1: There are dozens of federal law enforcing agents. I can't
Speaker 1: name them all. I can't even begin to dozens of
Speaker 1: federal law enforcement agencies. So there's a lot happening right now.
Speaker 1: This has been the first week I can think of
Speaker 1: in really, certainly since the you know, certainly since the pandemic,
Speaker 1: felt like it was breaking a bit where Trump has
Speaker 1: been able to be on political offense and also doing
Speaker 1: just the right thing for the country. This isn't just
Speaker 1: about messaging. It's about protecting people. Play clip three. Today,
Speaker 1: I'm announcing a surge of federal law enforcement into American
Speaker 1: communities plagued by violent crime, who will work every single
Speaker 1: day to restore public safety, protect our nation's children, and
Speaker 1: bring violent perpetrators to justice. We've been doing it, and
Speaker 1: you've been seeing what's happening all around the country. We've
Speaker 1: just started this process, and frankly, we have no choice
Speaker 1: but to get involved. What would be the alternative, what
Speaker 1: would be the other way to go? Allow these cities
Speaker 1: to continue with this mayhem. Look at Democrats. I understand
Speaker 1: they're not in an enviable position right now. It was
Speaker 1: it was all great when they could There was one
Speaker 1: incident of heinous police brutality that we all saw, we
Speaker 1: all condemned, but Democrats didn't care that we all saw
Speaker 1: and condemned, saw it, condemned it, and that there was
Speaker 1: going to be probably a life sentence handed to this.
Speaker 1: We'll see it handed to the hand of the officer involved. No,
Speaker 1: then it then it turned into this this huge, this
Speaker 1: movement and protests and protests around the world, the uprising
Speaker 1: of the left, that's what it was. That was the inciting,
Speaker 1: inciting issue used for a broad uprising of the left
Speaker 1: and the international left too. I mean, now now we're
Speaker 1: getting some real Marxist kind of stuff. But what have
Speaker 1: been the results of this, as I've been saying now
Speaker 1: for weeks, and I'm glad that others have been following
Speaker 1: me into the breach on this when Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: has made everything worse for everyone so far, except for
Speaker 1: some of the organizers who are getting lining their pockets
Speaker 1: and some of the people in the media who use
Speaker 1: this to grow their following and improve their reach and
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. This is disgraceful what they've done,
Speaker 1: what they've done to the country, and I'm happy to
Speaker 1: see that if you're paying attention, it could not be
Speaker 1: more clear that the Democrats are the party of riots,
Speaker 1: and that they have put themselves on that side. They
Speaker 1: think that rioting and destroying property and attacking police is
Speaker 1: a legitimate form of political expression. They do not condemn it.
Speaker 1: Find me condemnations, real condemnations, not you know, yeah, we
Speaker 1: need laws to be enforced, but no, I mean, hey,
Speaker 1: knock off all this crap in Portland, in Seattle, Hey,
Speaker 1: let's band together and go after the people who are
Speaker 1: shooting toddlers in Chicago. How could we not be entirely
Speaker 1: united on this. Democrats have other political goals, and they
Speaker 1: think that the problem is a lack of social services,
Speaker 1: or something that will stop people from shooting up a
Speaker 1: funeral and hitting fifteen individuals. That will stop it, if
Speaker 1: only we had less billionaires running around controlling things, or
Speaker 1: if we had just think of all the left wing
Speaker 1: talking points you can think of, if our police departments
Speaker 1: weren't all some way systemically racist, Just think about it.
Speaker 1: That's what they offer up to you. It's not going
Speaker 1: to solve anything. In fact, they intentionally do flecked responsibility
Speaker 1: away from where the real problems are and think that
Speaker 1: think that we should be listening to them. They won't
Speaker 1: even deal with the root causes, the root problems of
Speaker 1: issues of crime and lawlessness. I mean, don't even get
Speaker 1: me started on how many of these antifa idiots we
Speaker 1: see that that went to You know that I'm sure
Speaker 1: studied in incredibly liberal universities and spend tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of dollars to learn nothing, just to be indoctrinated into
Speaker 1: being fools, utter fools. We got. We had a lot
Speaker 1: of problems, we had a lot of things to clean up,
Speaker 1: but sending in federal law enforcement, that's a cleanup that
Speaker 1: needs to happen. Right now. You're in the freedom hud
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right,
Speaker 1: So what are the libs saying about all this? I've
Speaker 1: told you they're they're in a tough spot right now.
Speaker 1: They got really they were really having a field day,
Speaker 1: having a great time, pretend to care so much about racism. Yes,
Speaker 1: we're dismantling structural racism. Let's have a lot of white
Speaker 1: protesters scream in the face of black cops and call
Speaker 1: them horrible names. That's what democrats are all about. Okay,
Speaker 1: what are the Democrats actually saying? You got Chicago mayor Lightfoot.
Speaker 1: Remember she was the one who, quite famously during the
Speaker 1: pandemic lockdown, was like, no one's allowed to get haircuts.
Speaker 1: And then someone said, hold on a second, you just
Speaker 1: got a haircut. She goes, yeah, but I'm public facing.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, in that case, I guess it's not hypocritical.
Speaker 1: Here is what Lightfoot is is claiming, or she was
Speaker 1: as of this morning. I think it's had to change
Speaker 1: because now she's working with Trump or accepting federal law enforcement.
Speaker 1: It's not like she has a choice. Gonna just put
Speaker 1: that out there at play seven, and I'm calling on
Speaker 1: all chicagoans. Then if you see something that doesn't look right.
Speaker 1: Please don't hesitate to report it. Call nine one one
Speaker 1: three one one. We are going to remain diligent and
Speaker 1: if we see any steps out of line, particularly with
Speaker 1: DHS or border patrol, we're not going to hesitate to
Speaker 1: take the president to court and stop any unconstitutional actions.
Speaker 1: We're going to take them to court. Yeah. Yeah, let's
Speaker 1: take the FBI and the d EA and US marshals
Speaker 1: to court and DHS. Yeah what what? What? How is
Speaker 1: this sensible at all? In what world? Why is she
Speaker 1: assuming that federal law enforcement is going to be violating
Speaker 1: the constitution. They're operating in her city every day. Does
Speaker 1: she's Chicago Police Department. I can assure you could use
Speaker 1: US marshals taking some of the high risk warrants off
Speaker 1: their hands, for example, and saying, hey, no, we'll go
Speaker 1: get we'll go get that that gang leader. We'll take
Speaker 1: that one for you, guys. Don't worry about it. We
Speaker 1: got that in a normal world in this country usually
Speaker 1: and I've seen this, right, I've been a part of
Speaker 1: terrorism investigations where we had CVP, DHS, FBI, US marshals,
Speaker 1: you name it. They'll bring in fish and wildlife if
Speaker 1: they need to for some reason, right, But whatever it is,
Speaker 1: and we all work together. Yeah, there's little turf battles
Speaker 1: in this nonsense. At the end of the day, we
Speaker 1: want to get the bad guys, want to keep people safe.
Speaker 1: She's acting like federal These are law enforcement officers, just
Speaker 1: like her own cops in Chicago, and she's acting like
Speaker 1: they're an invading army or something. Oh, if you see
Speaker 1: anything bad from them, okay, sure we'll wait on that one.
Speaker 1: Good luck. It's amazing. You know, look at this. Whatever
Speaker 1: Trump is for there against this is it's more of
Speaker 1: the same. Whatever Trump wants to do, they oppose. Trump
Speaker 1: wants to use good cops who have federal training and
Speaker 1: resources to save lives. Nope, don't like that. Why Trump
Speaker 1: completely nuts, completely nuts. Let's have what do we have
Speaker 1: next year? Oh? Yes, de Blasio, he actually even blames
Speaker 1: his own cops in New York play eight. But let's
Speaker 1: face it, the entire society has been through just an
Speaker 1: epic dislocation. People don't have work, people don't go to school,
Speaker 1: they don't have anything. And we're going to fix it.
Speaker 1: We're going to deal with it. Remember, alson, this is
Speaker 1: a city twenty five years ago going through hell with crime,
Speaker 1: and we've fought our way back and we'll fight our
Speaker 1: way through this. But we have to do it the
Speaker 1: way that works for New York City. It can't be
Speaker 1: about someone else sending in folks not train the right
Speaker 1: way to be here, who only, unfortunately would make things
Speaker 1: worse and could lead to more violence. That's the great irony.
Speaker 1: You send in folks who are not meant for this work,
Speaker 1: and even worse things happen. What a complete and utter
Speaker 1: disgrace and just a moron. They're trained for this work. Honestly,
Speaker 1: it's gonna say it. I've worked at the federal level.
Speaker 1: I've worked at local level for the NYPD. They're generally
Speaker 1: better trained for the work. More federal, and that's not
Speaker 1: a knock on any local law enforce and but the
Speaker 1: federal resources you all know, a lot more extensive. What
Speaker 1: is de Blasio even talking about and complete? It's just lies, folks,
Speaker 1: It's just lies. Not now, we're just in the sea
Speaker 1: of Democrat lies, trying to make our way through it.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The bus Xton Show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Oh you know who we haven't
Speaker 1: heard from yet, Harry Helloa, she's still out there, still lurking,
Speaker 1: still waiting for that opportunity. I'm back. I know I'm
Speaker 1: gonna blast out your ears. I don't want you to
Speaker 1: fall in asleep while I listened to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: She's back. Okay, So what's the latest from her. Oh, well,
Speaker 1: she's trying to tell everybody, Yeah, go for it, be
Speaker 1: vicious to the other side, act like lunatics. Forget forget
Speaker 1: about any deference or respect or decency toward cops. Just
Speaker 1: just go be the most outrageous left wing agitators you
Speaker 1: can right now. Because Republicans are such a threat Blacklip five.
Speaker 1: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants
Speaker 1: to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.
Speaker 1: That's why I believe if we are fortunate enough to
Speaker 1: win back the House and or the Senate, that's when
Speaker 1: civility can start again. But until then, the only thing
Speaker 1: that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.
Speaker 1: So she's saying all basically all out political war. That's
Speaker 1: what she is calling for, and I think it's important
Speaker 1: to understand that's what we're in. That's the reality, all
Speaker 1: the situation, that the circumstances of this country right now.
Speaker 1: You know, this is Hillary There's gonna be present last
Speaker 1: time around. It's not like there are some Democrats who
Speaker 1: are really radical, but then there are the elder statesman
Speaker 1: Democrats who are saying, hold on, guys, we we got
Speaker 1: to bring everyone together. There no, there's no effort at unity.
Speaker 1: It's scored stirth against Trump and all of his supporters
Speaker 1: got ESPN analysts Jamil Hill saying that there's no leeway.
Speaker 1: If you vote for Trump, you're a racist. There's no leeway,
Speaker 1: no gray area. And this is an idea that is
Speaker 1: held by many people in the media. I mean you
Speaker 1: should see I had eight Trump retweets in a row
Speaker 1: this morning. Eight Trump retweets, and the stuff that's being
Speaker 1: said to me in my timeline on Twitter from libs
Speaker 1: of course. I mean, my conservatives are like, oh, nice tweets, Buck,
Speaker 1: and that's really nice that the president shares my thoughts
Speaker 1: with his eighty million followers. And you can check his Twitter.
Speaker 1: It was it was like eight in a row, I
Speaker 1: think was the number. I haven't seen the president take
Speaker 1: one person's Twitter account to do eight in a row
Speaker 1: in quite a while. So he likes he likes the
Speaker 1: Busters Twitter game, which is appreciated. But it's a reminder
Speaker 1: whenever that happens, because then the blue check Libs just,
Speaker 1: oh they all. I'm always amazed to how many, how
Speaker 1: many Blue check libs are like, you're named after a
Speaker 1: porn star. Oh, you're named after a portn star. That's
Speaker 1: a really ooh sick burn. Oh man, now I'm now
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stop doing what I do for a living
Speaker 1: because you have made the dumbest joke that I've ever heard.
Speaker 1: That's been made by every half wit I've ever met.
Speaker 1: So yeah, good job, A good job, Blue check libs.
Speaker 1: I love that one. It's it's a good it's good though.
Speaker 1: It's an intelligence test. People are because anyone ever told
Speaker 1: you you're a name like a porn star. That's brilliant. No,
Speaker 1: no one's ever told me that before. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know why. You know, my parents had a
Speaker 1: kind of an interesting sense of humor. So speaking about
Speaker 1: Hillary for a second, I want to bring to your attention,
Speaker 1: well we could consider to be something of an update
Speaker 1: on the Hillary Clinton email case. I know you're not
Speaker 1: seeing it talked about that way, but I'm going to
Speaker 1: tell you about it. I think it's very important because
Speaker 1: at a time when we're thinking so much as a
Speaker 1: country about law and order and what that means and
Speaker 1: why it's important that we're all held to the same standards.
Speaker 1: Here we see it took some time, but we see
Speaker 1: just iron cloud evidence of the double standard that exists
Speaker 1: for connected, politically important Democrats and leftists and everybody else,
Speaker 1: that there is a two tiered system of justice. One
Speaker 1: for people who the system, the establishment, the democrat left likes, needs,
Speaker 1: wants to wants to support, and then a system for
Speaker 1: everybody else. And I'm not saying this is the only
Speaker 1: two tier justice system. I'm even very clear about that.
Speaker 1: You know, yes, if you are very rich and connected,
Speaker 1: regardless of political party, you're likely to do much better
Speaker 1: in the justice system than somebody who's not. That's true.
Speaker 1: But we're talking about politicization of the justice department at
Speaker 1: the highest level. It could not be more clear that
Speaker 1: Democrats are allowed to play by a different just a
Speaker 1: different set of rules than the rest of us. That's
Speaker 1: where this is. That's the reality. And then that brings
Speaker 1: me to this story in ABC ABC News Raytheon employee
Speaker 1: sentenced for keeping classified documents at his home. Ahmed Sarah
Speaker 1: Geldin worked on a ballistic missile defense system. They say
Speaker 1: that he's a Raytheon engineer who endangered national security. He
Speaker 1: was sentenced to one and a half years in prison
Speaker 1: on Wednesday. He worked on a radar defense system used
Speaker 1: to defend against ballistic missiles, and had pleaded guilty to
Speaker 1: keeping classified national defense documents about that system at his
Speaker 1: home without authorization. Sarah gel then apologized for his behavior.
Speaker 1: I was sloppy, but I've always been loyal to my
Speaker 1: job and to the country. He said this before his
Speaker 1: sentence was handed down. He took over thirty one hundred
Speaker 1: digital documents, according to the assistant US attorney, adding that
Speaker 1: he took more than one hundred physical documents. More than
Speaker 1: five hundred of those documents were labeled classified and exposed
Speaker 1: to anyone who wanted to see them. Defendant deserves this
Speaker 1: serious sentence because he deliberately endangered national security at the
Speaker 1: very least by keeping national defense information where it was viewable.
Speaker 1: They asked for five years initially in the sentence from
Speaker 1: five years in federal prison. He got a year and
Speaker 1: a half, they the defense attorneys asked for probation because
Speaker 1: of the following. He didn't transfer secret documents anywhere. He
Speaker 1: just brought them home. He did not He did not
Speaker 1: sell them to anyone. He did not give them to anyone.
Speaker 1: He did not transfer them to anyone. He is not
Speaker 1: a traitor or a spy. That's very important, all right,
Speaker 1: that's all from the article. Well I am I telling
Speaker 1: you about this. This guy had possession, okay, on an
Speaker 1: unsecured computer of classified information. That's it. That is that
Speaker 1: is the crime. That is the full you know, documents
Speaker 1: and digital documents, right, but he had classified information in
Speaker 1: his possession. That's what he is going to prison for.
Speaker 1: And people, remember, they try to say a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff to try to men, you know, muddy up the waters.
Speaker 1: He no, no no, no, no, that's all. Did not commit espionage,
Speaker 1: did not sell this stuff. There's no reason to believe
Speaker 1: anyone ever saw or got any of these documents or information.
Speaker 1: No intrusions detected, nothing. He just had it. He kept
Speaker 1: it in the wrong place, okay, kept at the wrong place.
Speaker 1: Who else did that? Did you want to take a
Speaker 1: guess who else had over a hundred instances of classified information,
Speaker 1: including Special Access program information highly highly classified on a private,
Speaker 1: unsecured server. Oh, that's right, Hillary Clinton did, didn't she.
Speaker 1: We were told Hillary Clinton did not break the law
Speaker 1: by James Comey and by the Lauretta Lynch Democrat Justice Department.
Speaker 1: How can anyone see what's happened here and not understand
Speaker 1: that that was just that was a lie. And I've
Speaker 1: said this all along, you know, I've been consistent on this.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton broke the law. There's there's no debate over
Speaker 1: that she had classified on her private server, some of
Speaker 1: it marked, a lot of it she would have known
Speaker 1: was classified. As the sitting Secretary of State, she had
Speaker 1: an even greater responsibility. This guy's a Raytheon contractor. It's
Speaker 1: a contractor for the government, low level guy. She was
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State. And flagrantly and knowingly that was
Speaker 1: the biggest, the biggest lie of all was let's just
Speaker 1: pretend like Hillary Clinton has an IQ of fifteen and
Speaker 1: then she'll get you get away with this. That was
Speaker 1: what they did. Didn't know what see meant in the
Speaker 1: classification markings and the portion markings of a document. No,
Speaker 1: that means, that means that it's classified. That means confidential.
Speaker 1: Anybody who's ever worked with classified knows this. She lied
Speaker 1: what like what what a cloth square? You mean? Wipe
Speaker 1: it with a cloth. They lied to you about the law.
Speaker 1: The Obama Justice Department lied to you about the law.
Speaker 1: James Comey took the fall, not that it was a fall.
Speaker 1: It was really actually just adding zeros to his book.
Speaker 1: He's running another book. This guy. This guy's frightening and
Speaker 1: he's a real sociopath. But they made the whole thing
Speaker 1: go away. It was illegal. What she did was a crime.
Speaker 1: And now I'm not I'm never I was always honest
Speaker 1: with you. There are people all she should go in
Speaker 1: to prison for twenty years for treason. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: that's not she should have had to take In a
Speaker 1: realistic world, she should have had to take a guilty plea,
Speaker 1: a misdemeanor, most likely plead down. I know you don't
Speaker 1: want to hear that, but this is what would have happened.
Speaker 1: Probably a misdemeanor guilty plea for mishandling classified, get six
Speaker 1: months probation, and have her clearance pulled forever. Now you
Speaker 1: might say, Buck, that's not that severe. I know, but
Speaker 1: do you think that the would be president of the
Speaker 1: United States, the Democrat candidate pleading guilty to a crime
Speaker 1: of mishandling classified information right before the election happens. Do
Speaker 1: you think that might have hurt her chances a little bit? It? Yeah? Yeah,
Speaker 1: convicted criminal Hillary Clinton. Not not for like a tax
Speaker 1: fraud thing either, right, convicted criminal for mishandling classified even
Speaker 1: if it was very minor, that would have been That
Speaker 1: would have been it. They knew that she was gonna
Speaker 1: there's no way she's gonna win the election of that happens, right,
Speaker 1: So what they do? They line to you, this guy, this,
Speaker 1: this guy, Look, what he did is stupid and he
Speaker 1: shouldn't have done it. I'm not defending it. I'm just
Speaker 1: pointing out the obvious double standard. He takes classified home,
Speaker 1: he goes to prison. Hillary is trafficking classified on an
Speaker 1: open server on a regular basis, over a hundred, over
Speaker 1: one hundred counts. That is the fact of the case.
Speaker 1: Not even not even charges brought, not even an attempt
Speaker 1: to punish. Does anyone really think that they could win
Speaker 1: an argument with an intelligent person about whether there's a
Speaker 1: two tiered justice system for Democrats who are important to
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. Why do you think the left still
Speaker 1: lionizes James Comey an abject fraud And it's terrifying that
Speaker 1: that guy was as senior as he was in the
Speaker 1: United States government. But the United States government at the
Speaker 1: top level in these bureaucracies, has been full of losers
Speaker 1: for a long time. I'm just going to tell you
Speaker 1: that a lot of losers, the appointees and also the careerists,
Speaker 1: not impressive people, way too in love with themselves, think
Speaker 1: that they're so holier than thou and that they're they're
Speaker 1: doing all this amazing work all the time, and they
Speaker 1: get a little drunk with the power. For sure, Hillary
Speaker 1: got away with it, folks. It was a horrific injustice.
Speaker 1: So as we talk about law and order and law enforcement,
Speaker 1: let's not forget the Democrats will just pretend to laws
Speaker 1: don't exist when it suits them, whether it's writers in
Speaker 1: Portland or their presidential nominee violating classified protocols. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: America must be a sanctuary for law a boding citizens,
Speaker 1: nut criminal aliens. My vision for America cities could not
Speaker 1: be more different from the lawlessness being pushed by the
Speaker 1: extreme radical left. While others want to defund, defame, and
Speaker 1: abolish the police, I want to support and honor our
Speaker 1: great police. While the radicals want to abolish charter schools
Speaker 1: that eliminate school choice, I want to expand school choice,
Speaker 1: and every family in America should have that option. While
Speaker 1: others want to destroy opportunities, shut down businesses, and send
Speaker 1: our jobs overseas. We are hiring Americans, and we are
Speaker 1: buying American product. We want to build factories in Baltimore,
Speaker 1: not Beijing. We want to make our products in Chicago,
Speaker 1: nut Shanghai. We want the American dream for American children,
Speaker 1: and I will fight to deliver that dream. Every ounce,
Speaker 1: every single ounce of my strength. I will be fighting.
Speaker 1: Biden and Obama released a video focusing on Trump's response
Speaker 1: to COVID nineteen. Shouldn't be surprised by that at all,
Speaker 1: because they really don't want to get to into the
Speaker 1: law enforcement debate. Right now. It's not looking good for Democrats.
Speaker 1: They're on weak ground. They've embraced the lunatics, they've defended
Speaker 1: the lunatics, they've encouraged them, and now enough people are
Speaker 1: starting to see what the heck is going on in Portland,
Speaker 1: What was going on in Seattle with the autonomous zone?
Speaker 1: Why are there so many shootings and murders in Chicago
Speaker 1: all the time? Over two thousand shootings? Two thousand? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is when I heard that number yesterday, I was like,
Speaker 1: you gotta be that's just not possible. It is. It
Speaker 1: is the two thousand shootings about you know, between six
Speaker 1: and seven shootings a day in Chicago on an annual basis.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable, unbelievable what we see happening there. And I
Speaker 1: think that finally the wake up is happening and people
Speaker 1: are understanding what's really going on in a way that
Speaker 1: Democrats are not panic, but they realize, oh, this is
Speaker 1: a problem, this is a problem. I'm sorry, Yeah, over
Speaker 1: two thousand shootings so far this year. It's not so
Speaker 1: it's it's much more, actually, on an annualized basis than
Speaker 1: what I'd said, um, two thousand shooings. The Chicago Tribune
Speaker 1: says that Chicago has had forty oh my gosh, forty
Speaker 1: thousand homicides in sixty three years. That's unbelievable, really really
Speaker 1: violent city. But you know who's gonna fix it? You know?
Speaker 1: What they're telling you you gotta do. You've got to
Speaker 1: hood this guy in charge. You've got to put Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in the role of president. He's gonna fix everything
Speaker 1: for you. He's gonna make it all better. Um, here's
Speaker 1: Joe Biden play thirteen. And I had a nurse at
Speaker 1: at nurses at Walter Reed Hospital who had been down
Speaker 1: and whispering my year and go home and get me pillows.
Speaker 1: They would make sure they'd actually probably nothing ever taught
Speaker 1: in you can't do it in the COVID time, but
Speaker 1: they'd actually breathing my nostrils to make me move, to
Speaker 1: get get me moving. This is who they This is
Speaker 1: who they want to be the President United States. He's folks,
Speaker 1: he's too old for this. We all know this. He
Speaker 1: doesn't he doesn't have it, doesn't have it, And anybody
Speaker 1: who's telling you otherwise is just pretending that they don't
Speaker 1: see it when it couldn't be more clear. Here you go,
Speaker 1: here's Joe Biden play eleven. What he's doing now, He's
Speaker 1: blaming everything on China. He's blaming everything on the Chinese.
Speaker 1: He's blaming everything. And people don't make a distinction. As
Speaker 1: you will know, when a South Korean and someone from Beijing,
Speaker 1: they make no distinction. It's Asian and that's the way.
Speaker 1: And he's just using it as a wedge. What people
Speaker 1: no distinction. People will make a distinction between China and
Speaker 1: Asian America. What is I listened to Biden? I have
Speaker 1: to think sometimes I'm not clear. I don't even know
Speaker 1: how to criticize it, because it's not really clear what
Speaker 1: he thinks. He's trying to say, that's where they want
Speaker 1: to make president. It says he's going to do such
Speaker 1: a better job. And remember he was vice president under
Speaker 1: Obama and there were race riots that was happening, Baltimore,
Speaker 1: Saint Louis neighborhoods burned down, terrible stuff going on, terrible
Speaker 1: stuff happening. Well, what was that's supposed to accomplish? What
Speaker 1: were they doing to deal with that? Oh? You know
Speaker 1: they oh, let's let's have another Obama speech where we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to sit there and go, oh, Obama's so amazing,
Speaker 1: And he would say the most platitudinous stuff. You know, Well,
Speaker 1: you know, we need to have, you know, tough conversation sometimes,
Speaker 1: but we're not actually going to have that conversation We
Speaker 1: also need law enforcement to do a better job to
Speaker 1: overcome the you know, historical oppression of the past or whatever.
Speaker 1: Right I mean, didn't do anything, didn't do any didn't
Speaker 1: fix it, anything, didn't help anybody, didn't do anything. A
Speaker 1: lot of talk, I let a talk on these issues.
Speaker 1: The Obama administration was bad for law and order. The
Speaker 1: BLM movement started under the Obama administration, and yet Biden
Speaker 1: somehow offers himself up as the answer to all this.
Speaker 1: It's just my friends, sometimes it's too much to take.
Speaker 1: You sit around and you think, when when will they
Speaker 1: just give up lying so brazenly. But I don't know
Speaker 1: when that's going I don't know when that's going to happen.
Speaker 1: It's never going to happen. Actually, thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. This
Speaker 1: is what you see in countries where you have dictators,
Speaker 1: in third world countries with dictators who have military that
Speaker 1: they can call out against the people anytime we want.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, it has been suggested that
Speaker 1: this is a trial run of the President of the
Speaker 1: United States, who may be organizing to not accept what
Speaker 1: happens when we have the election if he's not elected.
Speaker 1: Is he going to pull out his military? Is he
Speaker 1: going to engage us? He is already alluded to there
Speaker 1: may be a civil war if he's not re elected.
Speaker 1: Is there anything that is too egregious, conspiratorial, and outrageous
Speaker 1: for a Democrat member of Congress to say about this president?
Speaker 1: I think we all have. The answer is no, but
Speaker 1: there is an They're a great example of what you
Speaker 1: can what you can get away with if you're a Democrat,
Speaker 1: what you're allowed to say. The president may be organizing
Speaker 1: his military. We're talking about federal law enforcement, which is
Speaker 1: not military. You would hope that members of Congress would
Speaker 1: understand that distinction. But this is what we're being told,
Speaker 1: My friends being told the president might not leave office.
Speaker 1: As if that's not poisoning the discourse even more in
Speaker 1: our politics. But the focus this week you've seen is
Speaker 1: going to be on the maximum amount, the maximum panic
Speaker 1: that we can see from the COVID right now. They're
Speaker 1: they're trying to not talk about the law enforcement issue
Speaker 1: because Trump has finally figured out the right approach deploying
Speaker 1: these federal law enforcement officers. So what are they doing.
Speaker 1: They're saying, well, let's talk about how terrible Trump is
Speaker 1: on on the COVID response. And one thing that has
Speaker 1: been clear to me all along is we keep refusing
Speaker 1: to learn the less since based on what's actually happened.
Speaker 1: And there are a lot of people who are very
Speaker 1: incentivized for a whole bunch of reasons to push policies,
Speaker 1: ideas and responses that are not rooted in the science,
Speaker 1: that are not rooted in the facts, in the data.
Speaker 1: You now have in Washington, DC, you now have a
Speaker 1: mask mandate, a mask mandate, A thousand dollars fine is
Speaker 1: what you face from this mask mandate. If outdoors, mind
Speaker 1: you you have, if you are outside, you could be
Speaker 1: fined a thousand dollars and you could even go to jail.
Speaker 1: It depends on how many offenses you've committed. If we're
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask outdoors. We've been through this, and
Speaker 1: even the scientists that are, you know, a little bit
Speaker 1: of a bunch of big libs, you know, even the
Speaker 1: public policy the hell doctor Fauci, even Fouch. You ask
Speaker 1: a Fouch, don't wear a mask outside of Fouch. You'll
Speaker 1: be like, hey, I don't mean, let's not be stupid.
Speaker 1: They don't got to wear a mask outside. I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, wear a mask all the red wear. I'm
Speaker 1: asking the shower in the bed, you know, wear a
Speaker 1: mask while you got the you're doing the horizontal mambo.
Speaker 1: Gott to wear a mask. But you gotta make sure
Speaker 1: that you don't necessarily wear a mask outside all the time,
Speaker 1: because that's nuts, right that the FOUCH has made this
Speaker 1: much clear mask wearing outdoors unnecessary. It is unnecessary. Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: let's look at where we are on now. I mean,
Speaker 1: and I would look when I said, he probably advises
Speaker 1: people to do it, but it's not rooted in data.
Speaker 1: This is where we're this is what we're told now.
Speaker 1: Oh maybe if it saves just one infection, right, it
Speaker 1: used to be with guns and gun control the Democrats,
Speaker 1: what I wou say, if it saves one life, there's
Speaker 1: no infringement upon your freedoms. That is too much. If
Speaker 1: it saves just one life, if it stops just one infection,
Speaker 1: has become the new standard. That has become the new
Speaker 1: declaration from the public health authorities that are out there,
Speaker 1: and it's just it's just disgusting, you know, what you've
Speaker 1: got Democrats that realize this is their single most effective
Speaker 1: line of attack against Trump. This is what they've got.
Speaker 1: Covids all his fault. He's done a terrible job. He
Speaker 1: doesn't care about it. And look, did the President say
Speaker 1: some things in the early days that, in retrospect were
Speaker 1: probably unwise about this issue? Yes, of course, of course,
Speaker 1: but everybody did. Everyone thought it wasn't going to be
Speaker 1: that bad, including Fauci, including Democrats, including de Blasio in
Speaker 1: New York and Cuomo. People who are saying, go out shop,
Speaker 1: don't worry about it. Go out and shop a little bit,
Speaker 1: Go buy yourself more things. Your governor's here to take
Speaker 1: care of you. Make sure you're all safe and sound.
Speaker 1: What do I mean by safe and sound? When you're
Speaker 1: safe and sound, you don't have to worry at night
Speaker 1: because I've brought you some woom milk, wool milk in
Speaker 1: a bottle. Why do you want wool milk in a bottle?
Speaker 1: Wom milk will often help you sleep because there's a
Speaker 1: biochemical thing that goes on. I can't really explain it,
Speaker 1: but it's very good for you. Cuomo was saying stupid
Speaker 1: stuff in the beginning Cuomo was all about, you know,
Speaker 1: don't worry about it. We're fun. The only person who
Speaker 1: is repeatedly and routinely lamb based did for what he
Speaker 1: said in the first month of the pandemic is Trump,
Speaker 1: which is unfair. Everyone was trying to you know, everyone
Speaker 1: in the political sphere was trying to calm things down.
Speaker 1: Didn't want to panic, didn't want to be seen as panicking,
Speaker 1: and we got hit much worse than we thought. Now
Speaker 1: what people don't want to accept. And Rampaul was on
Speaker 1: Fox this morning, and we don't have the audio for you,
Speaker 1: but I'll just tell you Rampaul has adopted exactly his belief. Now,
Speaker 1: this is a theory. I don't pretend that this is
Speaker 1: proven yet. But Rampaul, who's an MD. Okay, so he's
Speaker 1: a guy who does understand this stuff, has been a
Speaker 1: practicing MD for decades. He's saying, Look, it's most likely
Speaker 1: and based on what we've seen that it's not that
Speaker 1: New York wears masks so well now and is doing
Speaker 1: such a good job because you know, hashtag science, it's
Speaker 1: that New York has gotten was hit so badly by
Speaker 1: the virus that there is a herd immunity within the population,
Speaker 1: and that makes sense. It's exactly what I've been telling you.
Speaker 1: Twenty to twenty five percent of New York bisrology testing
Speaker 1: has antibodies, and there's a large poor we don't know
Speaker 1: what it is yet. But there's also because I think
Speaker 1: it's much more difficult to test for this. They don't
Speaker 1: they haven't been testing for this. We don't know what
Speaker 1: the T cell immunity is, which you put on top
Speaker 1: of that, imagine that every let's say it's up to
Speaker 1: forty or fifty percent. That means that the virus has
Speaker 1: half the ability to spread, so instead of the usual
Speaker 1: spread that would have. And this is where you get
Speaker 1: the R zero or R one, one person infects how
Speaker 1: many other people? This is how the epidemiologists measure the
Speaker 1: spread of this. If you cut that number in half
Speaker 1: right off the bat, because there are half as many
Speaker 1: people that are susceptible to be infected, you're obviously dramatically
Speaker 1: contracting an outbreak wave of this. And there are other
Speaker 1: states where they did not have the same kind of
Speaker 1: wave that New York did, so they may be having
Speaker 1: that now. But if they are having that wave predominantly
Speaker 1: among younger healthier people. That would explain why the mortality
Speaker 1: rate is so much lower, and that is actually a
Speaker 1: much more desirable outcome than what we had in New York.
Speaker 1: But no, what we're told is that New York got
Speaker 1: it right. Democrats know what they're doing. California is having
Speaker 1: the worst outbreak it's had yet in terms of cases,
Speaker 1: not in terms of well, I have to look at
Speaker 1: what the fatality specifically are for California. But Rampaul is
Speaker 1: saying what I was telling you about last week, it's
Speaker 1: very likely the case here that one we can't really
Speaker 1: we can't stop this virus. That was always a fiction,
Speaker 1: and that's why we've never tried this before. We are
Speaker 1: an uncharted territory with these kinds of lockdowns, uncharted, never
Speaker 1: been done like this before. Why there have been terrible
Speaker 1: flu outbreaks, You go back in the past. I'm not
Speaker 1: even just talking about nineteen eighteen. There have been other years.
Speaker 1: I think it was called the Hong Kong flu one year.
Speaker 1: There have been years where a lot of people were
Speaker 1: dying of flu. We've never tried this lockdown before, and
Speaker 1: we have tried masks before. They had cloth masks in
Speaker 1: nineteen eighteen during the Spanish influenzia. Just just to be
Speaker 1: big clear, people are covering their mouths. Still a lot
Speaker 1: of people getting sick. So this is the moment in
Speaker 1: time where we're either going to see I want to
Speaker 1: say this, I mean, in the month of July, we're
Speaker 1: going to see if the cases start dropping dramatically, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have this fighting again. Oh is it because of
Speaker 1: new restrictions or is it because the virus has gone
Speaker 1: through its course. You think about the human body, you
Speaker 1: get infected. What do they tell you when you get
Speaker 1: a common cold, Well, you can either wait seven days
Speaker 1: or treat it for a week, right, you know, wait
Speaker 1: for your body to fight it for seven days, or
Speaker 1: you can treat it every day for a week with
Speaker 1: whatever it is. You think basically you're going to be
Speaker 1: sick for about a week with a cold. I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about COVID nineteen. But these systems, these viruses that occur,
Speaker 1: they they have a natural progression. This virus seems to
Speaker 1: also have a progression that it goes through a population,
Speaker 1: and there are certain susceptible markers. We don't even know
Speaker 1: the full We keep focusing on age, which we know
Speaker 1: is certainly one characteristic that causes problems. But we focus
Speaker 1: on age, and we focus on comorbidities like diabetes. There
Speaker 1: could be blood type, there could be T cell immunity.
Speaker 1: There are these other things that we may find out
Speaker 1: play a big role in whether or not a popular
Speaker 1: or whether an individual within a broader population is susceptible
Speaker 1: to this disease. But lockdown or no, this virus tends
Speaker 1: to have its way. It goes through a population and
Speaker 1: then it moves on, and we are in a huge
Speaker 1: argument for the around the politics of this and the
Speaker 1: science of this. No one really knows, and that we're
Speaker 1: being told now that it's just because it's really a
Speaker 1: self like a self flagellation that we're going through as
Speaker 1: a society. We're being told, oh, if only we had
Speaker 1: listened more to the scientists and listen more to the experts,
Speaker 1: this wouldn't have happened. To With that, I just don't
Speaker 1: I don't believe that that's true. And I think it's
Speaker 1: a very strong case you could make that we did
Speaker 1: exactly what the experts told us to didn't really matter,
Speaker 1: and now we're being told to do things by experts
Speaker 1: that won't matter again, and they're claiming that if we
Speaker 1: don't do it, you know, whatever happens to us is
Speaker 1: our fault. And it's troubling to say the least. It's
Speaker 1: like we do we do not learn the right lessons.
Speaker 1: We just we learned the most politically convenient ones for
Speaker 1: one side and blaming Trump for all this. Okay, now
Speaker 1: he's wearing a mask. Now we're going to go through
Speaker 1: this whole mask thing. California has been has been a
Speaker 1: masked up state for months and it's gotten hit with
Speaker 1: a huge wave of this. I don't know people that
Speaker 1: believe so much in science. You have virus in the
Speaker 1: air that you can't see, that's moving through with it.
Speaker 1: That that's particles that you can't see, and viruses you know,
Speaker 1: you need an electron microscope to see one. And you
Speaker 1: have mesh on your mouth that has big big you know,
Speaker 1: not to our eyes, but if you looked in a
Speaker 1: microscope has big holes in it and you're breathing in
Speaker 1: and breathing out. So yeah, I do I think that
Speaker 1: it's useful for you if you know, so you don't
Speaker 1: spit out at somebody and maybe that has a lot
Speaker 1: more virus. That's that's possible, But if this is really
Speaker 1: about long, continuous contacting the virus being in the air,
Speaker 1: You're breathing in and out virus with this mask on
Speaker 1: the same way you'd be breathing. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't know why that's such a This is like a
Speaker 1: heretical concept now, But I'm just trying to think it through.
Speaker 1: And I've read peer reviewed medical journal studies that say
Speaker 1: exactly that. But I don't want to I don't want
Speaker 1: to get into the mask fight. I just I want
Speaker 1: to be very clear that locking people up or making
Speaker 1: finding them a thousand dollars because they don't want they
Speaker 1: don't wear a mask is is absurd. Is absurd outside,
Speaker 1: it's absurd. There's no basis for this. You're in. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. China back in the headlines.
Speaker 1: President Trump, his Department of State and Department of Justice
Speaker 1: taking action here the consulate in China, I'm sorry, in Houston,
Speaker 1: the Chinese consulate in Houston has been ordered to be closed. Now,
Speaker 1: why would that happen? You might, I'd ask, why is
Speaker 1: that something that's going to happen? Well, consulate may have
Speaker 1: been a hub of intelligence and espionage activity, specifically trying
Speaker 1: to steal intellectual property and trade secrets. And this is
Speaker 1: what the Chinese government has been doing to us for decades,
Speaker 1: and nobody until Trump was willing to do really much
Speaker 1: of anything about it. We just kept on sitting around saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: I guess we're getting I guess we're gonna keep getting
Speaker 1: ripped off by the Chinese. I guess we're gonna keep getting,
Speaker 1: you know, treated this way. What can you do? No,
Speaker 1: this is a huge problem, one that should be confronted.
Speaker 1: You have the closure of this consulate, the Chinese government
Speaker 1: saying that they may respond in kind and close a
Speaker 1: US consulate somewhere. But it's like we've woken up from
Speaker 1: our somnambulance and are finally in a place where we're
Speaker 1: seeing the Chinese Communist Party for what it really is.
Speaker 1: Now we understand that they're not looking they're not looking
Speaker 1: to make friends, they're not looking to play nice. They
Speaker 1: want to cheat, they want to steal, and they have
Speaker 1: doing this systematically for basically as long as I've been alive.
Speaker 1: And now we're finally saying enough, enough is enough. China
Speaker 1: is calling this, it's it's foreign ministries calling this an
Speaker 1: unprecedented escalation, and they say they're going to retaliate in kind.
Speaker 1: The US Departments of State has said that quote, they
Speaker 1: close this in order to protect American intellectual property and
Speaker 1: Americans private information. Did not immediately provide additional details of
Speaker 1: what prompted the closure the Chinese. Chinese media says the
Speaker 1: consulate has seventy two hours to close protect intellectual property
Speaker 1: from theft because what's going on is the Chinese are
Speaker 1: using their footholds in the United States to do everything
Speaker 1: they can to steal as much intellectual property from us
Speaker 1: as they can, and that is their move, that is
Speaker 1: the maneuver. So you also have reporting that in I
Speaker 1: think it's in San Francisco and the consulate there, there's
Speaker 1: someone that we think has been up to some bad
Speaker 1: stuff on behalf of China, and we're thinking they're hiding
Speaker 1: somebody in the consul in San Francisco. And this is
Speaker 1: this is old school. We're gonna wake up at some
Speaker 1: point were it's the early stage now and realize that
Speaker 1: we're in a Cold war with China. Folks, all right,
Speaker 1: this is the new Cold War. It's just being fought differently.
Speaker 1: It's much more cyber it's much more happening on the web.
Speaker 1: But this is China's biggest campaign. And remember they've got
Speaker 1: a much larger population than us, and you know that
Speaker 1: there are some advantages that they have in the long
Speaker 1: game against us. So our intellectual property is, you know,
Speaker 1: our technology and information advantage. That's our single most valuable
Speaker 1: economic and in many ways military as set to right.
Speaker 1: If China has you faster planes and better aircraft, carriers
Speaker 1: and submarines and you know, you name it, and we
Speaker 1: can't get into a conflict with them down the line,
Speaker 1: we're gonna be a really bad spot. They got a
Speaker 1: whole lot more people than us do so and I know,
Speaker 1: we haven't really been thinking about any near peer competitor
Speaker 1: in that way in a long time since the fall
Speaker 1: the Silvie Union. We're gonna have to start thinking about
Speaker 1: that again. China is not looking to be number two.
Speaker 1: They're not happy in the number two spots. China wants
Speaker 1: to be number one. They're challenging the United States, They're
Speaker 1: challenging our hegemony. And this is the execution of their
Speaker 1: plan that we're seeing, a long standing plan that they've
Speaker 1: unfortunately been allowed to be very successful in up to
Speaker 1: this point, people are Rubio is claiming the consulate was
Speaker 1: a central note of Communist Party spies. Yeah, you don't say,
Speaker 1: not a surprise at all. Democrats, of course, want to
Speaker 1: pretend this isn't a threat. They don't want to act
Speaker 1: like the Trump administration is doing the right thing because
Speaker 1: they've been completely you sleep at the wheel. And if
Speaker 1: it's a choice between helping Trump or allowing the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party to get away with this stuff, we all
Speaker 1: know they're gonna allow the Chinese Communist Party to get
Speaker 1: away with this stuff. That's the democrats preference. Shows shows
Speaker 1: you where their priorities lie. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's harsany time, everybody.
Speaker 1: David Harsani in the house, senior writer over at National Review,
Speaker 1: long time conservative thinker, thought leader. He's skillful with the
Speaker 1: pen or I guess with the key stroke. Mister Harsan,
Speaker 1: you good to have you back. Thank you for those
Speaker 1: kind words. Yeah, man, so tell me this. Yeah you're
Speaker 1: technically you are my first ever op ed editor at
Speaker 1: the Blaze. So you know, we we go, we go
Speaker 1: way back now almost the decade. David, you forget about
Speaker 1: this sometimes. Yeah, so so tell me this. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: you are in DC right now. How are you going
Speaker 1: to feel if you go outside in a relatively suburban
Speaker 1: area of DC, get some sunshine, no one near you,
Speaker 1: and DC Metro pulls up and says, where's your mask? Buddy,
Speaker 1: here's a thousand dollars. Fine. It's crazy. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think when we start going from suggesting that people do
Speaker 1: things for the common good, which incidentally most people I
Speaker 1: think basically do, to criminalizing their lack of an action,
Speaker 1: which you know somewhat proven. I mean, obviously it's probably
Speaker 1: you probably disagree, but it's I think it's helpful in
Speaker 1: mitigating it, especially inside if you're in places for a
Speaker 1: long time, et cetera. But outside, I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: think there's any science to say that, especially if I'm
Speaker 1: social distancing already, that I need to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: I can. I just I just want to hop in. David,
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't disagree, and I appreciate your the
Speaker 1: delica where you put that. I don't disagree that there
Speaker 1: are circumstances indoors where you know, even if a mask
Speaker 1: is gonna maybe mitigate spread five percent, Okay, Well, you know,
Speaker 1: if you're near your senior relatives or someone immunocompromise, you're
Speaker 1: going to be in close quarters for a long time.
Speaker 1: You know that maybe that five percent is worth it, right,
Speaker 1: and certainly in hospital settings and other situations. So I'm
Speaker 1: not an anti masker, but I do know that outside
Speaker 1: all that they have done studies, everyone has looked at
Speaker 1: this so far and said, outside in the open air,
Speaker 1: you're you're opposing effectively zero risk of transmission. And if
Speaker 1: we're going to start making serious mandates, I mean a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars possible jail time for things that are based
Speaker 1: on an outlandish possibility. I just don't know where that
Speaker 1: stops and starts. For the government, well, there's no end
Speaker 1: to it, I don't think. I mean, once you start jailing,
Speaker 1: people are fighting. You know, these are serious finds if
Speaker 1: you're not you know, for for a middle class or
Speaker 1: working class person, a thousand dollars is you know, rent
Speaker 1: or whatever. So these are serious fines. I think you know,
Speaker 1: and I think you're right. I mean, and also by
Speaker 1: the way, private places and indoor place has already put
Speaker 1: their own mandates on having to wear a mask. You
Speaker 1: can't come in my store if you don't wear a mask.
Speaker 1: I'm one hundred percent fine with that, But outdoors, it's
Speaker 1: it's nuts. And you know where does that lead? What
Speaker 1: does that say about other things? I mean, I'm not
Speaker 1: comparing it to the flu. I realize it's much worse,
Speaker 1: et cetera. But still forty to fifty thousand people die
Speaker 1: every year. That matters too, right, therese are a lot
Speaker 1: of lives. And if you can do that sort of thing, now,
Speaker 1: why couldn't you do it in other situations? I mean,
Speaker 1: that could save lives. Why don't we try it? You know?
Speaker 1: You know, you know? The why is the speed limit
Speaker 1: thirty miles an hour nationwide. I would say that would
Speaker 1: save a lot. I would save a lot of life.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, it would save a lot
Speaker 1: of lives. We all know that. And I would note
Speaker 1: that whenever someone brings up there's this this this visceral
Speaker 1: reaction to the flu comparison that you just made, and
Speaker 1: I've made it many times too, and when when libs
Speaker 1: do engage on it, it automatically turns into it's not
Speaker 1: the flu. And that's not the point. We're not saying
Speaker 1: it's the flu. We're not saying it's not worse than
Speaker 1: the flu. We're just saying, I mean, forty to fifty
Speaker 1: thousand or forty to sixty thousand lives separately from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: that's a lot alive. So why don't we why don't
Speaker 1: we have all these restrictions in places? Yeah, yeah, here's
Speaker 1: my problem. Where is this arbitrary line where something becomes
Speaker 1: an emergency where governors can act like dictators. Now people
Speaker 1: are going to be mad about that because they'll say
Speaker 1: they're only doing it, you know, to help people for
Speaker 1: the common good. But that's Listen, most emergencies, I mean,
Speaker 1: most uses of power come out of some real life crisis, right,
Speaker 1: so that people take power and they shouldn't. I made
Speaker 1: this point elsewhere, But the Hungarian prime minister took powers
Speaker 1: over society essentially during COVID. He's already given them back
Speaker 1: like a month ago, and the guy in California is
Speaker 1: still using them. Right, What is the arbitrary number of
Speaker 1: lives saved that gives the power that says the constitution
Speaker 1: doesn't matter, that says you can shut down churches that
Speaker 1: says you can throw people in jail from not putting
Speaker 1: a cloth over their mouth. I just want to know,
Speaker 1: let me know how many lives you know, what is
Speaker 1: the what is the number? Forty thirty thousand, hundred thousand.
Speaker 1: There has to be some sort of number. Otherwise we
Speaker 1: could just throw the Constitution to the side whenever we
Speaker 1: feel like, I mean that, then what is it worth?
Speaker 1: Not much? I have this this An example that comes
Speaker 1: to mind is you know there was this move that
Speaker 1: restaurants made where they were handing out what or they're
Speaker 1: selling what are called Cuomo chips. I'm sure you've seen
Speaker 1: this where because Cuomo just says, I don't want people
Speaker 1: just sitting outside even and drinking at a restaurant. They
Speaker 1: have to be eating food. So you can't serve them alcohol.
Speaker 1: You have to serve them food as well. So then
Speaker 1: the restaurants started selling one dollar potato chips or nuts
Speaker 1: a tiny and these restaurants are barely I know restaurants
Speaker 1: that are going through this right, they're barely hanging onto
Speaker 1: whatever they've got. They're way behind and rent, they're at
Speaker 1: half staff, they've had a furlower fire people, and so
Speaker 1: they say Okay, fine, we'll sell you know, a dollar
Speaker 1: potato chips. Now Cuomo has changed it. No, it has
Speaker 1: to be a sub antial meal with your And what
Speaker 1: I want to ask people is, okay, if that's now that,
Speaker 1: if that's now the rule. What about it has to
Speaker 1: be the three major food groups? You know? What about
Speaker 1: it has to be a nice mixture of protein, carb,
Speaker 1: and fat because there's a health issue there too. People
Speaker 1: look at me like I'm crazy. I say, no, I'm serious.
Speaker 1: There's no he's just making these determinations. There's no legislation,
Speaker 1: there's no content. They look yeah, they look at you
Speaker 1: like you're crazy. Now, but five months from now, you know,
Speaker 1: there'll be some so they'll ten years ago more than
Speaker 1: ten years ago, thirteen years are a ritable called nanny state,
Speaker 1: where you know, what happens is there's always a mission crew.
Speaker 1: You say that's you know, you'll say, well, if you
Speaker 1: can do this, there's a slippery slope, and they're like,
Speaker 1: you're just overreacting, that's just crazy, You're crazy. And then
Speaker 1: like five months later you're arguing about that and they
Speaker 1: move to the next thing. You know, and this has
Speaker 1: been happening. First it was flattened the curve, and now
Speaker 1: it's I'm going to throw you in jail if you
Speaker 1: don't wear a cloth on your face outside. I mean
Speaker 1: that's a pretty big jump in three months. If I
Speaker 1: would have told you that you were going to find
Speaker 1: people a thousand dollars and possibly throw them in jail
Speaker 1: in March, you would have you would have laughed. They
Speaker 1: would have laughed at you and said, you're crazy. That's
Speaker 1: never gonna happen. And here we are now an hour there, yeah,
Speaker 1: and and and we want a national mask mandate. Like
Speaker 1: what I always want to yell at the reporter, like
Speaker 1: what under what constitutional power does the president have power
Speaker 1: troops to have a mask mandate in the States. Who's
Speaker 1: gonna enforce it? Is the CDC? You're gonna drop a
Speaker 1: paratroopers into Wyoming. I mean, it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: It's insane. And people say this, no, dude, I'm getting
Speaker 1: fired a better two people say this on TV like
Speaker 1: it's intelligent. You know, Democrats are pushing this, even some Republicans.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is there's a there's a bi partisan
Speaker 1: statism that is just mind blowing right now. And whenever
Speaker 1: you try to ask whenever you try to engage the debate,
Speaker 1: people just respond with this shrill hysteria. You can't talk
Speaker 1: about anything anymore. I mean my point about the Cuomo chips,
Speaker 1: what's a substantial meal. And you might say, oh, Black,
Speaker 1: how big a deal is this. Well, he's gonna pull
Speaker 1: liquor licenses from restaurants that don't do what he says,
Speaker 1: which puts them immediately out of business. I mean this
Speaker 1: means and so you know, if you've spent a million
Speaker 1: dollars renovating a restaurant and you've put your life savings
Speaker 1: into it, Cuomo can come over and be like, you know,
Speaker 1: and you're already on the brink of collapse in bankruptcy
Speaker 1: because of the lockdowns for the pandemic. Now he can
Speaker 1: come along and be like, you know, you're not serving
Speaker 1: enough food with the booze you're serving. What this has
Speaker 1: to do with science is beyond anyone's comprehension. So I'm
Speaker 1: gonna pull your liquor license. Now they're done. Now they're finished.
Speaker 1: And I look at it, and then he's threatening to
Speaker 1: do that, right, that's what he says he's going to do.
Speaker 1: I'm not making this up. And everyone seems to walk Herlin,
Speaker 1: This is all okay, are we just in as a
Speaker 1: mass psychosis right now because of the real threat of
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. But that I do think has been greatly
Speaker 1: exaggerated is that where we are what's happening. Well, I
Speaker 1: think that we've moved from trying to go or maybe
Speaker 1: we never were there, but from governing with you know,
Speaker 1: you're judiciously and diligently deal with stuff. You think about science,
Speaker 1: but you also think about the economic trade offs involved,
Speaker 1: and you try to move forward. And now it's just
Speaker 1: turned into fear mongering. I mean, I you know, people,
Speaker 1: most of the folks who now pretend that New York
Speaker 1: did great and everyone else had done poorly are fear mongering.
Speaker 1: You know, they they en lying basically, but fear monitoring,
Speaker 1: and people are susceptible to that. It's susceptible today. It
Speaker 1: would be it would be like if we were talking
Speaker 1: and we're speaking to David Harsani of National Review, you
Speaker 1: should all be reading his stuff over at National Review.
Speaker 1: M David. It would to me it would be like
Speaker 1: if we were doing an assessment. I mean, the media
Speaker 1: is engaged in this game right now. If we were
Speaker 1: doing an assessment of natural disaster response, right, and and
Speaker 1: let's say we're focusing in on how you know New
Speaker 1: York has done in response to, you know, a hurricane
Speaker 1: and versus you know, how Florida doesn't response to hurricanes.
Speaker 1: And New York had just suffered, you know, thirty thousand
Speaker 1: dead as from a hurricane that ripped through and then
Speaker 1: Florida gets hit with a much lesser hurricane and has
Speaker 1: you know, four thousand dead this month as opposed to
Speaker 1: New York's thirty thousand dead back in March and April,
Speaker 1: and everyone saying, look at what a great job New
Speaker 1: York does with hurricanes. It's how you know, it's the
Speaker 1: most it's the most despicable gaslighting I've seen in political
Speaker 1: journalism in a long time. People like Paul Kargman are
Speaker 1: doing it. You know, this is how what we can
Speaker 1: accomplish zero deaths today. This is what we can accomplish
Speaker 1: if only we follow the lead of Mary O Cuomo
Speaker 1: who sents a bunch of people to die in nursing
Speaker 1: homes at whose state and city of New York? Andrew,
Speaker 1: but yeah, Marry is the dead. Yeah, I really we
Speaker 1: know who you may yeah? Maybe yeah, Um, so you know, David,
Speaker 1: I also want to ask you, I mean by your
Speaker 1: we're right about the nursing home thing. That's just it's
Speaker 1: it's a decision that was made that no intel person
Speaker 1: could have thought that was a good idea at the time,
Speaker 1: and it clearly led to a lot of people dying.
Speaker 1: And that they're pretending that Cuomo did a good job
Speaker 1: and that he's in a position to lecture anybody. This
Speaker 1: is what they look. This is why you look Democrats.
Speaker 1: I don't want to say can't trust them, tell people
Speaker 1: can't trust them, but I do want to get your
Speaker 1: take on what we see going on in poor LANDA
Speaker 1: now also Chicago, A number of cities have come up
Speaker 1: here where it has become the dominant narrative among the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party and the national media that federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: officers are an invading army in US cities. That's really
Speaker 1: what they're suggesting and saying with all this, they're not
Speaker 1: allowed to come here stuff. This is beyond stupid and reckless.
Speaker 1: What is that? What is the real game plan? Well,
Speaker 1: I just want to say it's a good segue that
Speaker 1: we can't trust Democrats. I mean, I for a few
Speaker 1: hours the other day fell for this idea that we
Speaker 1: had federal troops in Camo, which they were in Camo,
Speaker 1: but you know, in unmarked vans without their badge numbers,
Speaker 1: kidnapping Americans. And I didn't fall for it completely, but
Speaker 1: I was like, this is kind of out of line.
Speaker 1: We can't have militarized the police in cities dealing with protesters,
Speaker 1: even if they're somewhat violent like this, that's a local concern.
Speaker 1: And I still sort of believe that in general it's
Speaker 1: a local I would leave Portland to the anarchists and
Speaker 1: there are vetters in government and let them deal with it.
Speaker 1: But the idea that the federal government can show up
Speaker 1: to protect federal courthouse buildings and federal monuments is absurd.
Speaker 1: And it was one arrest. As far as I know,
Speaker 1: I could be wrong, and the guy was released an
Speaker 1: hour and a half later. He was read as Miranda
Speaker 1: right to want to speak without a lawyer, and they
Speaker 1: let him go. I mean to call that an invasion,
Speaker 1: as Michelle Goldberg did in the New York Times. It's
Speaker 1: demented right. These people want to be taken seriously, David,
Speaker 1: all these issues, and I know I sat in a
Speaker 1: Fusion Center for almost two years with NYPD, FBI, DHS, ICE, US, Marshall,
Speaker 1: you name it. This happens in cities all across the
Speaker 1: country every day, and they're helping each other on cases
Speaker 1: and backing each other up and going out on raids.
Speaker 1: It's it's like it's like our journalist it's like our
Speaker 1: journalist class knows nothing about zero about law enforcement. I
Speaker 1: mean the DA. When I lived in Denver, I used
Speaker 1: to cover the drug war stuff, and the DA was
Speaker 1: banging down doors and going into houses, and I'm not
Speaker 1: sure that the local police even knew about that. Sometimes
Speaker 1: they were undercover. Listen. I don't like the Camo. There
Speaker 1: was a symbolism there. I'm not crazy about military style
Speaker 1: things in cities, but we have to be honest here.
Speaker 1: These are rioters and terrorists quite often, not all of them,
Speaker 1: but plenty of them. They fire bombed the Portland Federal
Speaker 1: Courthouse or tried to. There's video of this stuff, and
Speaker 1: then they act like it's like some you know, Nazi
Speaker 1: armies showing up. It's just and they still pretend like
Speaker 1: it's nothing. I see reporters pretending like there's no violence,
Speaker 1: no one's doing anything there's a quality of life issue.
Speaker 1: I'm almost I'm an absolutist from free speech right, but
Speaker 1: the people who live in these cities also have rights.
Speaker 1: You can simply shut down entire parts of cities and
Speaker 1: not let businesses open, and not let people move around
Speaker 1: and have freedom of movement. It's just it's a disaster.
Speaker 1: Do you think the Democrats are finally, I've been saying
Speaker 1: today that I think that they've kind of bitten off
Speaker 1: more than they can chew right now with this whole movement,
Speaker 1: all the stuff going on. Do you think that they're
Speaker 1: on defense or am I Am I giving the American
Speaker 1: people too much credit? I think that because they have
Speaker 1: Trump always to just you know, call them a fascist
Speaker 1: and lean on Trump and Trump often giving them, you know,
Speaker 1: saying things that gives them some read, there's some reason
Speaker 1: to do. That makes it a little easier for them.
Speaker 1: But I mean, I don't know how long this can
Speaker 1: happen in cities where people don't start to say, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, Democrats. I mean, has has Joe Biden or
Speaker 1: anyone said anything about these writers in cities? I don't
Speaker 1: think so. The only nope, remember is Nancy Pelosi saying
Speaker 1: that sometimes statues have to come down, which is essentially,
Speaker 1: you know, for saying that the mob is okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: go for I the democratic, the recklessness and the intellectual dishonesty,
Speaker 1: just the dishonesty is pretty incredible every day. But anyway, man,
Speaker 1: stay safe, David, don't don't go challenge to the anti
Speaker 1: for mob to a one on one, Okay, make sure
Speaker 1: that you stay and stay indoors. You'll be hardened to know.
Speaker 1: I'm usually right here in this good spot. Safe, buddy,
Speaker 1: David Harsan everybody nash review dot com. Check out his
Speaker 1: latest also follow him on Twitter. Thanks so much, David,
Speaker 1: Thank you, You're in the freedom Heart. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. Today's for left is not
Speaker 1: interested in winning debates with better arguments. They prefer to
Speaker 1: shut down debate altogether. They don't try to win the contest.
Speaker 1: They just harun the referees to drop the game. If
Speaker 1: they don't like an op ed, they want to unpublished.
Speaker 1: If they don't like a tweak, they want to track
Speaker 1: down the author and get them fired. They don't like
Speaker 1: Kennard Professor, They throw around orwelly on the accusations that
Speaker 1: his or her ideas make them feel, make them feel unsafe.
Speaker 1: Marjory McConnell understairs, what's going on here? I agree? I agree.
Speaker 1: Or McConnell understands cancel culture. I think he's got it.
Speaker 1: I think he knows what's really going on, folks. I
Speaker 1: mentioned this top of the show. I just wanted to
Speaker 1: tell you all. You know. The New York Times has
Speaker 1: an op ed out speaking of cancel culture and what
Speaker 1: you're allowed to do, what you're not allowed to do,
Speaker 1: an op ed that takes the position that if you
Speaker 1: form a private a private pod, so you get bring
Speaker 1: kids together because schools aren't gonna be open because Democrats
Speaker 1: won't open them, even though the science is not with
Speaker 1: them on this, if you try to form a private
Speaker 1: essentially study group for your kids, you're, according to this
Speaker 1: New York Times op ed, you are engaged in systemic racism.
Speaker 1: That's and you're not keep in mind, you're not in
Speaker 1: any way. They call it the editorials the latest in segregation.
Speaker 1: That's what they're calling in school segregation, private pandemic pods.
Speaker 1: If they become the norm less privileged kids will suffer.
Speaker 1: So basically, this is an editorial written by an educator
Speaker 1: in the New York Times telling you make sure you
Speaker 1: feel a lot of guilt if you're white. Of course,
Speaker 1: white guilt if you respond to the shutdown of schools
Speaker 1: by having study groups that your kids will be in
Speaker 1: with other kids and having certain adults lead them and
Speaker 1: effectively organize on your own what would be like homeschooling,
Speaker 1: because that will disenfranchise predominantly minority students who won't have
Speaker 1: parents who, in this editorialist opinion, will take the same
Speaker 1: steps do the same things. So she doesn't have By
Speaker 1: the way, this is Clara Tottenberg Greene who wrote this
Speaker 1: oup ed on the latest in school segregation. Wow, that's
Speaker 1: what she calls it. Yeah, she doesn't have an answer
Speaker 1: for you as to what should be done, because what
Speaker 1: our parents supposed to do. They are trying to figure
Speaker 1: out ways to adapt to democrats shutting down schools. She
Speaker 1: just wants you to know, feel guilty about it, Feel
Speaker 1: guilty about your kids getting ahead. That's the whole purpose
Speaker 1: of the editorial. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Team Buck, It's time
Speaker 1: for roll Call I kind of like that old jazz,
Speaker 1: jazzy jazz. You know, is that would that being considered
Speaker 1: big band or no, that's yes, it's actually labeled a
Speaker 1: big band it is. Yeah, Well there you go. I
Speaker 1: like that stuff. That's it's kind of fun. Actually, what
Speaker 1: is producer marks least favorite type of music? I don't
Speaker 1: know if I have one. Maybe classical. Interesting if you
Speaker 1: saw the New York Times had a published that editorial
Speaker 1: and how to get rid of to get rid of
Speaker 1: discrimination in classical music auditions, get rid of the blind audition,
Speaker 1: meaning that they you know, it used to be that
Speaker 1: orchestras were almost entirely male, and so then they started
Speaker 1: putting up a partition and letting men and women compete
Speaker 1: just by virtue of the sound that they make with
Speaker 1: their instrument. And then women became a much bigger part
Speaker 1: of orchestra's percentage wise, basically close to fifty percent. I
Speaker 1: think now it might even be a little more. But
Speaker 1: there are not enough black and Latino members of a
Speaker 1: lead orchestras. So the New York Times editorial page wants
Speaker 1: to go back to Essentially, they found a way to
Speaker 1: not discriminate, and now they want to go back to
Speaker 1: positive discrimination. That's their view. So I don't think I
Speaker 1: talked about that on the show before. I just thought
Speaker 1: that was interesting because you know, what about what about
Speaker 1: different sports teams? You know? Or are we going to
Speaker 1: start saying are we going to eliminate uh, you know,
Speaker 1: athletic ability and and say we need we need a
Speaker 1: more diverse sports team when no one, no one ever
Speaker 1: advocates for that. It's interesting, isn't it. No one no
Speaker 1: one's tendant telling the NHL where where are all of
Speaker 1: your guys who are Asian American? Let's say you don't
Speaker 1: see that. Are there actually question for you more? Are
Speaker 1: there any Asian American NHL players just out of curiosity
Speaker 1: that you can think of off the top of my head? No?
Speaker 1: I mean, I remember Jeremy Lynn in the NBA. You
Speaker 1: know Lynn sanity. Everybody was talking about that guy who
Speaker 1: had a He had a huge period there of you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of media attention anyway, All right, all right,
Speaker 1: back to a roll call um Kevin for oh I remember,
Speaker 1: go to bucksexon dot com please posting stuff. Also the
Speaker 1: Hill dot com. I have an editorial going up there
Speaker 1: today on how the Democrats are the riot Party please
Speaker 1: read it, clickt like it all that good stuff, Kevin.
Speaker 1: I bought a gun in May and have not been
Speaker 1: cleared by the Colorado background check system, parts of which
Speaker 1: are suspended indefinitely for the pandemic. You see, they're already
Speaker 1: seizing our guns under the auspices of public health, and
Speaker 1: they're getting away with it, so they won't stop there.
Speaker 1: Today it is new guns. Soon it will be all guns.
Speaker 1: Could you clarify for me this wave of leftism? Isn't
Speaker 1: this a branch of communism? The left aren't socialists anymore.
Speaker 1: They've gone full commy from my perspective, and I think
Speaker 1: we should clearly identify them as such. Unfortunately, the commies
Speaker 1: took control of education decades ago. My sixteen year old
Speaker 1: daughter only knows the radical left agenda, despite my teaching
Speaker 1: her otherwise, and in her words, it is the job
Speaker 1: of her generation to educate the rest of us. I
Speaker 1: don't see how America will survive the next fifty years
Speaker 1: with millions of want to be revolutionaries, social justice warriors,
Speaker 1: and community organizers running a wrong Shields Rocky Mountain High,
Speaker 1: Kevin M. First of all, excellent, excellent note to us,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much and is today's leftism a branch
Speaker 1: of communism. There are similarities with communism, there are differences
Speaker 1: with communism. And it's worth always noting that the earliest
Speaker 1: communists thought of themselves and would write of themselves as
Speaker 1: socialists in the early days of the movement, So they
Speaker 1: they thought of and Marx would write of socialism often
Speaker 1: and that they would refer to themselves as socialists. So
Speaker 1: there's the distinctions can get very blurry. There's the clear
Speaker 1: academic the academic definition of communism. You have to have
Speaker 1: a revolutionary committee or a central committee. Really it's a
Speaker 1: revolution until it gets established long enough, but a central
Speaker 1: committee that makes all the determinations about the production and
Speaker 1: distribution of goods. That's a that's a pretty broad, pretty
Speaker 1: loose definition. But that's a distinction between just general socialism.
Speaker 1: So this is why people talk about democratic socialism versus communism.
Speaker 1: Is really just totalitarian socialism. That might be a good
Speaker 1: way of thinking about it. Uh yeah, So that's what
Speaker 1: I got for you on that. And as for your
Speaker 1: your sixteen year old daughter, I don't know. Hopefully she'll
Speaker 1: start paying taxes and realize that the world isn't what
Speaker 1: he's been led to believe it is by the Libs,
Speaker 1: But you know, I don't know. People are I know adults,
Speaker 1: I know people that knew me before I got into politics,
Speaker 1: and they've been occasionally reaching out to me in recent
Speaker 1: months and they're just like, I don't understand. I thought
Speaker 1: you were still nice and like smart and like you're
Speaker 1: you're so right wing, and was like, oh, well, I
Speaker 1: guess it's kind of a was kind of a compliment,
Speaker 1: but not really. I don't know. Lewis. Next up in
Speaker 1: the mix here, Bucking Mark. I'm in California. A fellow
Speaker 1: union worker turned me onto your show in the summer
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. I've not missed a show since. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for what you do. Well, Thank you, Lewis,
Speaker 1: and I really appreciate that. Thank you for the loyalty
Speaker 1: to the freedom. Hut Man honored to have you. About
Speaker 1: the mask mandate. I believe that the left is pushing
Speaker 1: this agenda to actually spread the virus. If you think
Speaker 1: about it, when you see your doctor prepping for surgery,
Speaker 1: he or she scrubs and puts on PPE. The general
Speaker 1: public donned their PPE, then touches a number of surfaces
Speaker 1: while in public. Then may touch, remove a just Ppe
Speaker 1: without having clean hands, just a thought. Once again, love
Speaker 1: the show and shields. Hie Lewis. First of all, thank
Speaker 1: you so much. As for your what you're saying about PPE,
Speaker 1: I agree in part and don't see it the same
Speaker 1: way in part on the touching of face masks and
Speaker 1: the using of face masks that may be contaminated. That
Speaker 1: originally was a major concern and one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why we were told not to wear masks, but that
Speaker 1: has since been abandoned because we're now in a mask
Speaker 1: mania and led to believe that if only we wear masks,
Speaker 1: all of this will go away. Because I think at
Speaker 1: some level also there's a deep psychological need that many
Speaker 1: people have in this country to think that it's in
Speaker 1: our hands and that if only we listen to the
Speaker 1: science will all be okay. When we'll be okay, But
Speaker 1: it has nothing to do really ultimately with listening to
Speaker 1: the science. The virus is doing what the virus does.
Speaker 1: People don't like to hear. Then I understand that I
Speaker 1: don't like to say it, but I think that's what
Speaker 1: an honest view of what has happened in the last
Speaker 1: few months would tell anybody. So yeah, Ppe getting contaminated
Speaker 1: and then becoming a source of possible transmission on its own.
Speaker 1: That's a real concern. People have been bringing that up,
Speaker 1: and it makes sense. Just think it through. That makes sense, right.
Speaker 1: And then for the next part of this that you
Speaker 1: think the Democrats might be doing this on purpose, I
Speaker 1: can't say that. I see that this would be I
Speaker 1: think they want lockdowns and they want masks because of
Speaker 1: the symbolism of it. I don't think that they're actively
Speaker 1: I do believe a lot of Democrats that think that
Speaker 1: masks will make everything better there. I think they believe it.
Speaker 1: I don't think that they're right, but I do think
Speaker 1: they believe it. So I don't think that they're doing
Speaker 1: it for the purpose that you laid out. But you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know everything, so we'll say that Ryan hey Buck,
Speaker 1: I work at a retirement community in Virginia. We have
Speaker 1: around two hundred residents and four hundred staff. Since the
Speaker 1: pandemic started, we've managed to not have any residents test
Speaker 1: positive for COVID and only five staff have tested positive.
Speaker 1: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and the Virginia Department
Speaker 1: of Health have put together guidelines for us to reopen
Speaker 1: our nursing home and assisted living facility, it's a phase reopening,
Speaker 1: and in order to get us to two, it was
Speaker 1: mandatory to test every resident and all staff. The National
Speaker 1: Guard came out and did all of our testing on site.
Speaker 1: The results took five days to get back, begging the
Speaker 1: question why do it in the first place. If positive
Speaker 1: results come back, what good are they when the resident
Speaker 1: or staff has been exposing others around them. Love your
Speaker 1: thoughts on this, shields high, brother, Ryan, You're you're at
Speaker 1: the you know that's that's kind of a ground zero
Speaker 1: for where the highest risk is for the residents in
Speaker 1: the retirement community. So I'm sure you have a view
Speaker 1: of this that would be very interesting for others to
Speaker 1: know about. And as for what you're telling me about
Speaker 1: the testing lag, yeah, of course, this is why I've
Speaker 1: been saying that you all know, if you listen to
Speaker 1: the show, I've been saying just think it through test
Speaker 1: and trace, which was a mantra repeated endlessly and mindlessly
Speaker 1: on TV almost entirely by Democrat politicians and assorted talking
Speaker 1: heads and medical experts that the left likes. That is absurd.
Speaker 1: We've got sixty thousand cases a day, which means probably
Speaker 1: sixty six hundred thousand new infections every day. So how
Speaker 1: are you going to trace that? Of course you're not
Speaker 1: going to trace that. I mean, it's it's it's a
Speaker 1: complete it's a joke. It's absurd. But the people that
Speaker 1: thought we would be able to trace that are still
Speaker 1: now telling you you're going to wear a mask, wear
Speaker 1: a mask, do this or else. H Where's no, we're
Speaker 1: not supposed to pay attention what they've been wrong about
Speaker 1: in the past. Of course. Yeah, So the lag in
Speaker 1: testing and also the inability to trace shows you that
Speaker 1: one of the one of the mantras of the left
Speaker 1: on this all along is forget about being rooted in
Speaker 1: the science. It's just not rooted in rational thought. It's
Speaker 1: not possible that you're going to trace all these cases,
Speaker 1: not even close. You can't even trace all these trace
Speaker 1: all these cases in one city. And even if you
Speaker 1: could trace them, what good would it do you? I
Speaker 1: think you're always going to be playing okay if you
Speaker 1: if you trace a thousand cases that a new case
Speaker 1: is on Monday in Miami, you trace them all, okay,
Speaker 1: But then the next day you're going to find out
Speaker 1: that those thousand people have infected another thousand people. You
Speaker 1: try to trace that, you know, you're always you're you're
Speaker 1: always chasing after it. You're not going to get to
Speaker 1: a point where you can contain. This disease moves too
Speaker 1: quickly and it's already too far throughout the community. So
Speaker 1: that's that's all you need to know with that. It really,
Speaker 1: it really is. Um okay. Next up here, Mike, hey
Speaker 1: Buck love the show, tinfoil hat stuff here, but one
Speaker 1: of the odds, the Deep Steak gets Geeland Maxwell to
Speaker 1: testify against Trump with some phony, egregious connection to Epstein
Speaker 1: November surprise. Maybe. Um, Mike, I, first of all, we
Speaker 1: love that you love the show, so thank you for that.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's gonna happen, but it is a
Speaker 1: certainly creative way to think about it. I don't think
Speaker 1: that that that that would be look because if she testified,
Speaker 1: let's just let's just play your theory out for a second.
Speaker 1: If she testified against Trump, you'd have to provide some
Speaker 1: some kind of evidence, and if and if she wasn't
Speaker 1: able to, I think it would be too clear that
Speaker 1: this was a setup, that it was a ruse a
Speaker 1: hoax all of that show. That's where it is and
Speaker 1: that's where we are. Thank you Mike for writing in
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast The Rowe Call f Continue with Todd. Where
Speaker 1: are the Republican fighters? Cruise, Paul Gouty Garret to Troy Garret, Cranshaw, Graham.
Speaker 1: Come on, guys, we need to be fighting every day.
Speaker 1: The election's only one hundred and five days away. It's
Speaker 1: the fourth quarter, and we are losing. We need a
Speaker 1: lot of offense right now, and it seems the Republicans
Speaker 1: aren't even playing defense. They're just forfeiting. Thank you for
Speaker 1: fighting for his brother Shields High. Todd endorsed Agree Coast nine.
Speaker 1: I feel like, you know, Cruise has been stepping up
Speaker 1: and saying some good stuff recently. Um, Graham, he's gonna
Speaker 1: get the answers for us. You know, he's gonna he's
Speaker 1: gonna go on Fox tonight and he's gonna get to
Speaker 1: the bottom. That's what we hear from the same We
Speaker 1: hear the same stuff from Lindsey Graham every day, every day,
Speaker 1: the same stuff. You know, I'm I've had enough, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna we're gonna get answers. Sure, he's been gonna get
Speaker 1: your answers for four years now. Trump here he doesn't
Speaker 1: not getting you any answers. But you know that the
Speaker 1: Senate Intelligence Committee has been a waste during the whole
Speaker 1: Russia thing. Just totally am I A on on all
Speaker 1: things Trump Russia collusion. So Lindsey Graham not exactly h
Speaker 1: exactly getting it getting it done. I know he's on Judiciary,
Speaker 1: but I'm just saying the Senate they could do the same.
Speaker 1: I think of the same kind of review. Uh, Chopper,
Speaker 1: as didn't get too the h Choppa, Hey Buck love
Speaker 1: the show. I'm old enough to remember when President Obama
Speaker 1: ordered drone strikes on American citizens and the Democrats loved it.
Speaker 1: This feigned outrage over d HS tactics in Portland is comical. Chopper,
Speaker 1: I understand, man, I get it. I'm with you. I
Speaker 1: think that there's a huge, there has always been a
Speaker 1: huge double standard in assessing anything from the Obama administration
Speaker 1: and what has been going on and the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: There was barely a peep from the media when Obama
Speaker 1: not only ordered the droning of and We're all Lockey,
Speaker 1: but also his sixteen year old son US citizens. Folks
Speaker 1: droned done, and everyone just was supposed to say, okay,
Speaker 1: well Obama thought they were really bad, and they were
Speaker 1: at least in a foreign country, so no one made
Speaker 1: too much noise about it. That is what happened. Erin
Speaker 1: This is so stupid. These democrats are going against the constitution.
Speaker 1: They need to be called all doubt for it, like
Speaker 1: you were doing. I've always loved listening when you talk
Speaker 1: very influential, Aaron. Thank you so much. That's really kind
Speaker 1: of you. And we do the best we can here
Speaker 1: every day. And the good news is because of folks
Speaker 1: like you, the show is constantly growing, audience is growing,
Speaker 1: and we have more and more influence, which is what
Speaker 1: I look. I make no secret of it. That's what
Speaker 1: I want. I want. I want every conservative in the
Speaker 1: country to be listening to this show, this radio show,
Speaker 1: and whatever your station is, and listening to our podcast
Speaker 1: BUCKSX and dot com. Remember Spotify, iHeart app. You can
Speaker 1: listen to it there. And yeah, that's that's my plan.
Speaker 1: That's what I hope. So thank you so much, Aaron.
Speaker 1: And yes, in terms of the constitutionality of what the
Speaker 1: Democrats are saying, what they're doing. They're horrible. How about that?
Speaker 1: They're just the worst. They are calling for national mask mandates,
Speaker 1: and I just I want to pull my hair out,
Speaker 1: which I won't do, of course, but I want to
Speaker 1: pull my hair out because where where is that authority?
Speaker 1: And if you can give everybody a national mask mandate,
Speaker 1: how long does that last? How do you enforce that?
Speaker 1: Are we gonna start locking people up or not wearing
Speaker 1: masks outside because there's some small chance that it might
Speaker 1: reduce maybe one transmission of a virus that has a
Speaker 1: ninety nine point seven percent survival rate. That's really the
Speaker 1: country we're gonna be living in. It's pretty crazy when
Speaker 1: you think about it. Uh, let's see, Brian, tell me
Speaker 1: it's I of the tiger you built out to producer
Speaker 1: Mark and producer Nick to rob them up for the
Speaker 1: work greatness. It's the tiger for a producer star Mark.
Speaker 1: I'm rising up to his challenge as the board up?
Speaker 1: What do you think I am? Not a board up? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I know, but you got to you gotta run the board.
Speaker 1: We don't really have a board anymore. Well, yeah, but
Speaker 1: that's under you, you know, you produce all of the things. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's executive producer Mark Team. Yeah, that's fair, executive producer Mark.
Speaker 1: He's I have the Tiger might become his new fight
Speaker 1: song in the morning, so that may end up happening,
Speaker 1: depends on how grumpy he is. Jenna Hagan, Buck Craven
Speaker 1: t Shirts PRER Conversation, do one with Commie Bear. I'm
Speaker 1: so in and Shield's High. You know, a warrior working
Speaker 1: on my whole wardrobe and anticipation. Shields High, Gina. We'll
Speaker 1: get it done. Producer Mark will be in charge of
Speaker 1: design and approval, and that's how we'll roll. Everybody. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being here. We'll talk more tomorrow. Shield's High.