WEBVTT - Tyreek Disses Chiefs, TNF Preview, & Nick’s Picks

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one ninety seven, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And this episode is brought to you by the McDonald's app.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I love the McDonald's app, particularly for McDelivery. I love

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>it because it's perfect for any situation. It's poorn rain,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to go out to go get your

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>mcdouble MC delivery. Your team's playing, you don't want to

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>miss a single second McDelivery. It's been a long day, Well,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 2>better way to fix that, and then getting a delicious

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>double quarter pounder with cheese and a large fry delivered

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>right to your door with McDelivery. I personally love mcdlivery

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>when I'm watching a game, spending time with my family,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and maybe doing both. And now, every time you order

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 2>McDelivery in the McDonald's app or earn a two points

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>towards free food. Who doesn't like free food? Everybody likes

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>free food. Come on, so there's always a reason to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>order in the McDonald's app. Down the McDonald's app today

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 2>at participating McDonald's delivery prices maybe higher than a restaurant's delivery,

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 2>and other fees may be like copyright twenty twenty three.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's all Right, Big Show, Big Day. It's our gambling

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>show four and one last week, even though we didn't

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>do a gambling show. I posted the picks to Twitter

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>before the kickoff of the Thanksgiving games. Won the first

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>four games with great ease, had an eight and a

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>half point dog. They won out right, we'll go through

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that later. Demons's teaser looked great until the last leg,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>which is progress and so Demon's great. The teaser you posted,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the Thanksgiving Day teaser that you you posted for the audience?

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>What post?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Confused? Yeah you did, Yes, you're sitting right next to me.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>You posted a teaser for the three Thanksgiving games, and

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>then Seattle screwed you because they got blown out. You

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't actually bet that teaser. The bets you made on

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving loss as well, but you didn't post. Speaking of gambling,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>sorry pal, Speaking of gambling. Oh, such a satisfying gambling

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 2>moment for me yesterday. So I played in my weekly

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 2>poker game and actually crushed. Shout out to Chip Bully,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>my shout out by the way to my guy Chip Bully. Uh,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>my guy Joe Black who no, it's public nowledge. He

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mind me saying this. He went down to Florida

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 2>this weekend played in a massive the WPT fifteen tournament,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty five hundre to enter, came in twentieth place. That shipped,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean the according to the website, shipped over like

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty grand like shout out to him. First place was

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 2>almost a million bucks, and the guy who knocked him

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>out in twentieth ended up winning the whole thing. But

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>coming in twentieth and a fifteen hundred person were a

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Poker Tour event. But that's not the gambling story. I

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>played poker and and did well, but that's again not

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the gambling story. The gambling story is that that more

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>before the poker game, we had our fox bowling party.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 2>The bosses are there, both Carton Show and My show,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and Wilde's fancies himself quite the bowler. He has a

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>little fancy form, he does a whole thing, and I

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>do not. I'm objectively a bad bowler. So I did

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the oldest trick in the book, the old you know

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>if yeah, it's just a hustle, which and it was

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>such a multi layered, brilliant hustle and the fact that

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I did it to Wilds was so glorious. So first

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>first match, I'm like, Wilds, lay me forty eight pens,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>so your score minus forty eight to forty seven and

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a half. And he was like, I'm not laying you

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>forty eight pins, blah blah blah blah. And so we

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 2>play and he beats me by fifty and we have

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>nothing on it. I'm like all right. And Wilds, by

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the way, does not like gambling, and if he does,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like for five or ten dollars. So I went

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to him, I was like, all right, how about this,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>lay me thirty four and a half for one hundred bucks.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>He's like, I'm not betting one hundred dollars, but I

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 2>knew it wasn't betting one hundred dollars. But once you

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>throw out one hundred, all of a sudden, fifty sounds reasonable.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And once you throw out forty seven and a half

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 2>is what you need to be laid and you lose

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>by fifty, thirty four and a half sounds like a deal.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>And I got wild to take the bet, easiest money

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I ever made in my life, easiest money I ever

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>made in my life. I mean, he beat me by

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty pins, but it doesn't matter. He had to beat

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 2>me by thirty five pins and it was fifty dollars,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and there is I've never had a more satisfying gambling victory.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Then hold on, let me find the rest of me

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>than this. CRISP twenty twenty ten, courtesy of Kevin Wilds.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Just like an old school pool hustler, just making someone

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>think you're bad, getting them over confident. And I am bad,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>by the way, but thirty five pins is a lot,

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>all right, Deman, say let's get to the actual show.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's what missed the cut. Lebron gets his first tech

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>for flopping. I assume it was unfair. Jimmy Butler files

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a trademark for Emo Jimbo and what's right in Spotify

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>rap shout out to all the people who we were

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>a big part of their year and Spotify rapped. I

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>appreciate each and every one of you. There's Michael Senz

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and Ryan Fooje. Pardon Frooge if I'm saying that wrong.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I apologize for a couple of people that tweeted about it.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, demons, let's get to the actual show.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, yo. So Tyreek tyer Kill had a spicy

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>quote or a spicy take, should we say, talking about

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>his current Dolphins team. Here's what he said. I feel

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 3>like this is probably the better team than when we

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 3>went than when we won a super Bowl back when

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I was on Kansas City. So Tyreek Hill is about

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to break the receiving record or maybe, but he can't

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 3>seem to keep the Chiefs names out of his mouth.

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I always see this as like blatant

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>mahomes disrespect. But who misses who more between Tyreek Hill

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and the Chiefs.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean that's not even a quite Like here's

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the thing unique take here. I don't think I either

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>misses either I think that it actually worked out really

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>well for all parties. Now we'll get to the Mahomes

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 2>disrespect part in the moment, because I understand what you're saying,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>but I look at a little bit differently. But Tyreek

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>already has a ring. By going to Kansas City or

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>by going to Miami, pardon me, he was able to

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>check off the following boxes, make way more money than

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>he was gonna make in Kansas City, still continue to

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>produce at a Hall of Fame level, and you not,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and his production actually went up a touch. And you

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>could argue it's for uh, for a lot of people,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>it's more impressive. Now it's not like, well, you're a

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>great player, but you have the best quarterback in the league.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Everybody believes he is the engine that makes that team go.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>And so he got all of those things and he

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 2>gets to live in Miami, which for Tyreek Hill is

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>probably better than living in Kansas City. Like and that's

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>no dispecting against my hometown, but particularly you know, for

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>not for everyone wouldn't choose Miami over Kansas City, depending

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>on the type you know, the environment you want to be,

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>or how much you value the weather, whatever it is.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think for Tyreek Kill, it's perfect. The Chiefs,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, have so many resources poured into

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the offense to be able to use Tyreek Hill, to

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>get Trent McDuffie, to free up salary cap space, to

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>build this young, dominant defense, and win the Super Bowl

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>with the first year without him, And if anybody not that,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>there were a lot of questions about Mahomes, but if

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 2>there were, the questions were only, well, he has Tyreek

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Kill and Andy Reid, and like what would he be

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>like if he didn't have all these weapons, And his

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>first year without him wins the MVP, highest scoring team

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>in the league, scores thirty eight in the Super Bowl,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>answers all those questions. So for right now, I think

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>it is a win win. I don't think it's gonna

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>feel that way in a year or so because I

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>don't think Tyreek's going to have these monster postseason moments

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's going to miss that to a degree.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think Miami is a good, not great team.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Miami is a team that is not, as

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it's currently constituted, built to go on a deep playoff run.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>And Tyreek Hill was building the resume of one of

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:21.119
<v Speaker 2>the greatest playoff performers ever. And now last year, obviously

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Skyler Thompson was their quarterback for the one playoff game,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>So what are you gonna do? But even this year,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs are back in the super Bowl and Tyreek

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Hill is home by the divisional round, then I think

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>they'll be a little angst if you will. But right now,

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 2>I think it's worked out great for both parties. And listen,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I love Tyreek Kill the player. He's one of the

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>greatest players, not only in Chiefs history, but he's one

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest players ever. I don't think that's an overstatement.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that he is building the case that he

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>should be in the discussion as the third greatest receiver ever.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>He's not there yet, but he's building the case that

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>after Jerry and Randy, it could be Tyreek Hill. What

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>were you gonna say to Monday? Go ahead?

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, nothing, No, the pictures are cute. Do you want

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>me to ask this next novel?

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Yeah, sure, go ahead. Oh wait, before you ask

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>the follow up, you said something about Mahomes. I'spect Mahomes disrespect.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really he has been and I give

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>him credit for this man since he got there. I

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>think he's been trying to build up to us. He

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>has said some over the top things, throws the prettiest

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>ball as most accurate, all these things, which I really

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>just if we remember when Tyreek got there, there were

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>real questions about whether I mean the Dolphins tried to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>get to Sean Watson. They were in the Aaron Rodgers discussions.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 2>They a year before I'm sorry, not Aaron party, the

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson discussion, and they, yeah, they lost a draft

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>pick tampering trying to get Tom Brady. So Toule was

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>on shaky ground and Tyreek really helped build him up.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So I don't have a problem with any of that.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>But all right, go ahead.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 3>The twenty nineteen Chiefs were seven and four heading into December.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Miami's eight and three. So should this be taken as

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>a warning to the rest of the league. Is what

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Tyrek kill is saying is kind of true.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I so I understand what he's saying. And they were

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 2>similarities in that that was a ben don't break Chiefs

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>defense that just got some big stops, wasn't a great defense.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 2>They had this dynamic offense. All of those things. The

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>distinction is the Chiefs knew unequivocally that the postseason. They're

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>even in twenty nineteen, they already knew that Mahomes was

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>an elite postseason performer because they had seen him in

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen win his first playoff game ever and then

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>have three separate or second half comebacks against Tom Brady

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and the Patriots in an all time performance by him,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and then losing overtime without touching the ball, which we

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 2>only talk about when it happens to poor Josh Allam

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 2>of the Buffalo Bills, probably cost the chief Super Bowl

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that year. They didn't changing any rules for us, but

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>set that aside. Two has never played in a playoff game,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and that is man. That is the other thing about

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>these NFL playoffs. That is just bananas right now, if

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 2>the playoff picture holds, Okay, I'm gonna go team by

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 2>team and I'm gonna do this off the top of

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>my head, but I think I'm gonna have it right.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Quarterback playoff experience, Okay, Kansas City Chiefs Patrick Mahomes has

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>played fourteen playoff games, has won eleven.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson four playoff games total, one victory. Trevor Lawrence

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>two playoff games total, one victory. Tua Tongue of Iailoa

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>has never played in the playoffs. Kenny Pickett has never

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 2>played in the play Dorian Thompson Robinson for Cleveland has

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>never played in the playoffs. Gardner Minshew for the Colts.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Has Gardener? Did did Gardner play this one? I got

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 2>to look up did Gardner play in the playoffs? Like

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 2>as a backup one? Like come into a game? No

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>he didn't. So right now, as the bracket is, every

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>other starting quarterback in the AFC combined combined has two

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>playoff victories, and then there's Mahomes with eleven. And by

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the way, you go to Phil you go to the NFC,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it's it's different, but it's still Jalen Hurts is what

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>is Jalen in the playoffs? Jalen Hurts is two and

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>two in the playoffs. Brock Purty is two and one

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and the one you can put an asterisk on if

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you want, Like he got knocked out of.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 3>That game like instantly there.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Jared Goff, what is golf in the playoffs? Is

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 2>he four and two? Let me, let me, I gotta

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>look at that, because golf obviously had all those playoff

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 2>games with with Detroit. So Golf is a starter is

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>two and three, but he came but he came in

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to a game that that they ended up losing. But

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Golf as a starter is two and three in the postseason,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 2>really only two wins. Yeah, I guess they had a

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>bye and went to the super Bowl, so that makes sense. Obviously,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Desmond Ritters never been in the postseason. Uh, Dak Prescott's

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>two and four, GENO zero and zero and Josh Dobbs

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>is zero and zero. So Mahomes right now, does Mahomes

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>have more playoff victories than every other quarterback combined? That

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>would make the postseason? I mean, that's bananas. And in

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the end, the guys with some experience are all on

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the NFC side of things, so that is an element

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>for this postseason. Oddly, this all changes if Klee Eland

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>sticks with Flacco. Flacco has got a lot of playoff experience,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>but he also hasn't played football in a year, and

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't played good football in six years.

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, the Cowboys have been making

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>easy work of all the light teams they play a

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 3>falling Seattle tonight, dag has cleaned up his game well up.

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 3>But Seattle's defense is forced to turnover in six of

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>their last seven games. Are you worried that this is

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be a trap game for Dak Prescott.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't. I also wonder typically Thursday night games

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>are sloppy games. I wonder how much that changes by

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that both of these teams played last Thursday,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>so both of these teams are on regular rest. One

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons Thursday night games are bad is because

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>teams played on Sunday, they play on Thursday, and on

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a full week of practice, they're beat up all those things.

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>But these teams all played Thursday, and or both these

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>teams played Thursday, so it's a regular week just in

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the days.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Seems really need this win. I feel like it's.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Well for very different reasons, but that's one hundred percent

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>correct Seattle. Seattle could fall out of the playoffs. Man,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Like I thought Seattle was pretty well locked as a

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>wild card. But Seattle all of a sudden, that Rams loss,

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>that one point Rams loss is such a killer for them.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>After this Cowboys game, demonse, their next two are Niners Eagles,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>So if they lose tonight, a five game losing streak

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely on the table, and all of a sudden,

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the team that was six and three can be six

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and eight. And the other reason that Rams loss is

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>so devastating is the Rams are one of the teams

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>chasing them for a wildcard spot. If they finished with

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the same record, the Rams go because well, you know

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 2>what I'm saying, I'm an idiot. They're gonna they play

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the Rams again because or they know actually they are. Oh,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 2>they lost the Rams twice this year because they played

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 2>them Week one, so I'm right about that. If they

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>finished with the same record the Rams, the Rams go

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 2>to the playoffs. They don't, so this could go left

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>on Seattle in a big way for the Cowboys. If

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't think the Cowboys can catch Philly, then this

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>game is really not that important. They're just gonna be

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the five seed whether they win ten games or thirteen games.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>If they're not gonna win the division, they're the five seed.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>The real question is can Dallas catch Philly. But that

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>is trickier than it sounds, because here's the deal on

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 2>that Dallas in order to catch in order to pass Philly,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>because Dallas has three conference losses. Unless you assume that

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Philly is going to gag a game against the Giants,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>which they're not going to. Not only do they have

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>to beat them Demons, they have to finish with a

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>better record Dallas is not going to. If they both

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>finish fourteen and three. If Dallas runs the table and

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>finishes with the same record as Philly, Philly wins on

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>conference record tiebreaker, so that Philly right now has zero

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>conference losses Dallas all of their losses are conference losses.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>So the first tiebreaker is head to head. If Dallas

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>beats Philly in a week and a half, that'll be split.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 2>The second record is divisional record, unless you think the

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Giants are gonna steal one from Philly, which they're not.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 2>They're both gonna finish the year five and one in

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the division if Dallas beats them, so that's tied. The

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>next tiebreaker is conference record, and Philly is not gonna

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 2>have three conference losses, and if they were to have

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>three conference losses, they're not gonna be tied with Dallas anyway.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Point I'm making is if Dallas runs the table, for

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Dallas to win the division, the following things I believe

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 2>have to happen. They have to run the table. Philly

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>has to lose this week to San Francisco and a

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>obviously next week to Dallas, and Philly has to lose

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>one of their final four games, which are at Seattle

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 2>home for the Giants, home for the Cardinals at the Giants.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there's a chance that the Eagles do

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 3>that We've got it locked up. We're gonna rest Jalen

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Hurts and our starters. I'm ready for the postseason?

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, so yes, I do. I Also, this is my

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>annual Galaxy brain plea, and this doesn't typically you don't

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>usually even have this opportunity. And Philly, let's just say,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>for the sake of argument, Philly beats the Niners this

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>week and beats Dallas. They do both of those things,

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>they could absolutely have the one seed locked up after

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 2>their fifteenth game in that very n nique scenario. I've

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>always thought the smarter thing would be to rest players

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in your second to last seaon and then play guys

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 2>in your last game because you're gonna have a bye anyway,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And all of a sudden, if you have the one

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 2>seed locked up and you rest guys in your final

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 2>week of the year, then all of a sudden. You

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 2>go three weeks without playing a game, and there's to

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>me a real risk of roster is something there. If

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you have the opportunity to rest guys with two games left,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't rest them for both, but I would do

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>it in week seventeen, not week eighteen. I don't think though,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna well, let me rephrase it. If Philly

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>beats the Niners, they could lock this up. With Detroit's

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>bad loss, the Niners would then have four losses. Philly

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 2>would have the head to head against San Francisco. I am.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping we get some late season intrigue. I don't know.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we will. In the AFC, I

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>think it will. I think it will be hard for

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs to lock up the one seed early because

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>they have the three losses, same as Baltimore, same as Jacksonville,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>same as Miami. And even though they're gonna have the

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>tiebreaker against all three of those teams, I don't see

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>they're being massive separation, all right, Next.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Forty nine ers a head in a Philly for America's

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Game of the Week in an NFC Championship rematch. Last year, obviously,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Rock pretty got injured at the beginning of the game.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Christian McCaffrey ended up being quarterback at one point. Actually,

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 3>but maybe if Rock pretty would have finished that game,

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you would have given him credit this year. So if

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 3>he wins that game, if he goes and he beats

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles, will you finally give him his credit or

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>will you need to see more in the police So again, guys,

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>he's if he's trailing to the Eagles.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Folks, just keep asking me the same. First of all,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I do not feel I hate to be a broken

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>record on this. We are on first things First, we

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 2>are promoting this football game. America's Game of the Week

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be one of the most watched games of

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the year. Do you know what I'm gonna say to Monsey? Okay,

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>So on TV when we have a big football game,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>they show you the games that are being played and

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>then the marquee game on the list, like here's the

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>one o'clock games, here's the four o'clock games, America's Game

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>of the week, Niners Eagles, And whenever we have that

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>like tonight, Amazon, if they're running promos, you're gonna see

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Dak and Gino and when the other you know last

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 2>week when it was Jaggs Texans, you saw Trevor and CJ.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Stroud and it's like, these are the stars. Come watch them.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 2>For the Niners game Niners Eagles, it's Jalen Hurts on

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>one side of the graphic and Christian McCaffrey on the other.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And you can say, Nick, that's ridiculous, you're being unfair.

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 2>That's a great. It is a data point that even

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the graphics producers like, hey, who's the star of the Niners,

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Who's who's the what's the We almost always put quarterbacks,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>never have the time telling you that's correct. I'm telling

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>you maybe maybe a Taylor Swift related one. I'm telling

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you when we that we when we promote Giants games

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>last year and it was Saquan or Daniel Jones, they

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>would put Daniel Jones on the graphic. You know why

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>tie goes to the quarterback, but this ain't a tie,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>so we would The point I'm trying to make is

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>we would put these graphics up and talk about Jalen

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Hurts and Christian McCaffery or the star, and then the

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>question we would ask on the TV show is is

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 2>brock Party the MVP of the entire league. Me not

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>wanting a guy who can't even make the sizzle real

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 2>praphic PRISTI.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>If he wins this game versus Philly, maybe they'll put

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 3>him on the graphic next time. Question is, if he

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 3>goes out there and he beats Philly, are you then

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>going to give him credit? Because Philly is clearly a

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 3>good team.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I've already given him credit, and I don't doubt that

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 2>he can beat good teams. That's the other thing. People

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 2>are are making my brock Party critique into what they

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 2>want it to be. Because my Brock Party critique was

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>so one hundred percent spot on that now people are

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to straw man against it. They're like, well, will

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you at least say he doesn't suck? I don't think

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>he sucks. Well will you? Will you admit he can

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 2>beat good teams? Never said they can't beat good teams?

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Nope.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 2>My brock Party critique is very very simple. I question

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>his ability to play at a high level if all

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Avengers are not there with him, and I

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>question his ability to play at a high level if

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the Niners are trailing and the defense is not First

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 2>and foremost worried about Christian McCaffrey. They are worried about

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 2>him throwing. That's what I question, and unfortunately for him,

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>he has had three games this year where those circumstances

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>have popped up and he's zero for three. I do

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 2>not question his ability to play great early in games

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 2>against just about anyone. He rolled Dallas. That was impressive.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 2>It didn't answer if I'm running out of analogies to

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>make for these things. It's like if my worry about

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the When demands moved to LA, I was like, man,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm really worried about him, and I wasn't. I'm just

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna I don't want to use another car analogy. I'm

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>really worried about him Monday mornings over sleeping for work,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and then Thursday he calls me. It's like, oh, you're

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 2>still worried. I got in on time to daim Like,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't worried about Thursdays. I was worried about Mondays.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And then in Sundays like, hey, in the office doing

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>extra work. You still worried about me? I was like,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't worried about you not showing doing extra work.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I was worried about a very specific thing. And then

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 2>if the first Monday he's got to be there early,

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 2>he sleeps, over sleeps, and the second time he oversleeps,

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and the third time he oversleeps. But then he doesn't

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>have to be in early Monday again for six weeks. Like, oh,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you still worried about that old shit? Yeah, I am,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>because the three times you had the opportunity, you failed

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 2>like that. That's just where we're at. So I don't

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>know what people want for me.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be I think the weather's gonna be bad

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>in Philly. I think it's gonna be raining, windy and

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. I know other quarterbacks in the league

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>struggle to play in the rain. It's it's hard I

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 3>keep control of the ball and stuff like that. Is

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 3>that does that add any extra incentive?

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that's the only thing that the weather

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>sloppy games. Typically, if you're an underdog, you would rather

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 2>the conditions the Oh oh that's yeah, Trevor does. By

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the way, that's a fair indictment with Trevor. Does I

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>want to one other thing? I don't even want to

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about the weather. I don't care. We'll see, Like,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>if you are a sizable underdog, you want bad conditions

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 2>because it adds variants. Neither one of these teams are

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 2>a sizeable underdog. They're both you know what I mean.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Hard on those teams, I find I don't think. I

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>think if either of these teams pass rush doesn't get home,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>they're in trouble because the Niners secondary with Hufanga injured,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 2>can get got and we know the Eagles secondary can

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 2>get got all year by just about anybody. What I

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 2>do want to say is for folks thinking that I'm

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 2>being picking on brock Purty, I want to be very clear.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel, not to the same level, but very similarly

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 2>about Tua that Tua's numbers tell me he is a

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>great player, and I do not know that that's true.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>He might be, but I have real questions about how

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>much of Tua is the system, Tyreek and the weapons.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>And so when I'm doing like MVP candidates, I think

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>it is very very difficult, almost impossible to have multiple

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>league MVP candidates on the same team on the same

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>side of the ball. So for the Niners, their MVP candidate,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, is Christian McCaffrey, and for the Dolphins,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>their NBA candidate is Tyreek Hill and If we want

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>to make it just a quarterback award, that's fine, but

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 2>then it has to go to the objectively no doubt

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>great quarterbacks. And I don't believe brock purty is that

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>we'll see. We will see. And again people are like,

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>so if they blow out the Eagles, that won't answer

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>your questions, No, because that's not the question I have.

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I do. My question is not are they talented enough

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to blow out really good teams? We know they are,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and guys, we'll I have been. You can say I'm stubborn.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I've been nothing if not consistent.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, that's that's that's not that's I didn't think

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 3>that was fair that if they blow out the Eagles.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not like they have the tendency, Like look at

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the look at their losses this year. If they blow

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>out the Eagles, that's huge, Like that's that's not just

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 3>something that they've just done all the time. It's the Eagles,

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>this type of season that they're having this year, Like,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>that's that's not it's not fair.

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I I no, no, no, I will you can say it's unfair.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Let me make sure we're understanding each other. Blowing out

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles would be a wildly impressive San Francisco forty

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>nine ers accomplishment blowing out the Eagles would not necessarily

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 2>answer my questions about Brock Purdy. I do, I do

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>not doubt that he can play almost perfect football when

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>everything is rolling right for them. But because and call

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>it the scars of Jimmy Garoppolo, because I saw that

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>exact same thing from a guy who now everyone agrees

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 2>with me, stinks that I have real questions. That's it.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Moving on next, all right.

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 3>The biggest question heading into the nd season tournament was

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>would the players care? At this point, it's clear that

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 3>they care. They're grinding hard to get the advantages of

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the point differential. So if the attorney is here to

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 3>stay and the Lakers win the first ever one, which

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 3>will be more important to Lebron's legacy the Ncason Tournament

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 3>win or the Mickey Mouse ring.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you don't even you didn't even want to read

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>that question, but the yeah, I know, I know you didn't.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>This is where the despite us doing one hundred and

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven shows, the producers and I have a fundamental

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>disagreement on what creates the best content. They are convinced

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that trying to irritate me with nonsense is great content.

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I am less convinced of that. So they are trying

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to have me rehash an old stupid Twitter take of

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 2>essentially the Lebron really, if you break it down's got

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 2>no rings. The you know, it's the I forgot even

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the reason.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 3>People discribe crazy argument.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 2>But the second one is like ray Allen. The third

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 2>one is Kyrie. The fourth one they put a Mickey

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>mouse head. They're like, really, what do you want? I

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>don't even know there's a way they discredit the first ring.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't even remember what the way they do it is.

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>But no, the here's what I will say. I am.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I think the nd season Tournament has been a fabulous success.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>People were like, ah, it's gonna be dumb, No one's

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna care. The players care, and as we know in

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 2>this league, if the players care, people buy in. And

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't know if this was done naturally

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>or if Adam Silver called in a favor to Lebron

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and Steph specifically, but Lebron and Steph both from the

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 2>very beginning bought in publicly talked about it, you know,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and Steph was someone asked that I was like Yeah,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>nobody understands it. And Steph was like, well, what's there

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 2>not to understand. It's very simple, take your thirty seconds,

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>read it and get it. Those fact that the Stars

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 2>bought in and now if we can throw that bracket

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>back up. Here is and Doc Rivers talked about this

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>on Simmons podcast. Here is what is going to be

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>fascinating and I am excited to see do the coaches

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of these teams, now that we are in single elimination

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>go to a playoff rotation? Do they risk the up?

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Doc Rivers talked about this, right. The benefit for the

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>coaches is, oh, okay, I get to kind of see

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 2>how some of let's say you're a the Pacers, you know,

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 2>have real playoff experience, and you want to see how

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 2>guys respond in the moment. It's different for the Celtics

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>or the Lakers or the Bucks who have been on

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>deep playoff runs, you know what I mean? With those guys.

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 2>How our guys respond to these moments. That's a benefit.

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>The potential downside is regular season game, you're gonna play

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 2>ten to eleven guys, postseason, postseason elimination game you're gonna

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 2>play seven. Is there a downstream effect if all of

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, a key piece of your regular season rotation

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 2>gets put on ice in these nd season tournament games.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I if that happens in the postseason and a

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>guy's pissed, you don't really care, Like, well, the season's ending.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>If you have a bad attitude, you know what I mean,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 2>we can move on from you after the year. We're

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to win. But if I'll use the Lakers for instance,

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 2>even though he had a great game last night, if

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 2>D'Angelo Russell were to get benched in the fourth quarter

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>of an nd season tournament game and then a week

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>later it's like, Okay, we're back to our regular rotation,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 2>does that have a negative impact. I'm interested in it,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think you're gonna see guys play big minutes.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be pretty cool. I don't think

0:34:55.480 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it's right now. Right now, like in season tournament championship

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>won't mean anything on a resume, on a like you

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 2>know when you're talking about them. But in twenty years,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>if it becomes, you know, a real thing people care about,

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely think it won't be anything like a championship

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>or even a finals appearance. But I do think people

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 2>will be like, oh, look, how about that? Like what,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets didn't make it this year, which is unfortunate,

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 2>this is the Jamal injury. But I do think this

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 2>could be a thing like, let let's use your Celtics

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 2>just like yes, and let's say let's say the Celtics

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 2>win the D season tournament, finish with the best record

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 2>in basketball, and win the championship. I do think that,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean? Years later people, yeah, people

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>will be like, oh, I mean they they won everything

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you could win that season, right, And so I think that.

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 2>And for a Pacers team that is a good team

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>and Halliburton's awesome, they don't I don't believe they can

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>win the title this year, but they can win this tournament.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And I do wonder if that is like a foundation,

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 2>just like I thought the Kings last year making the

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>playoffs going to seven with the Warriors was an important

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 2>foundational moment for the Kings or the Pacers, winning this

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 2>tournament would feel like something. And for the Suns, who

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 2>have so little experience with these guys playing together and

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 2>they still don't like, could that be a springboard. So

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 2>for all those reasons, I'm excited for it all right. Next,

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 2>let's just go to the next thing.

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So there's a few other stories and we couldn't

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>pack them into We're going to pack them into the

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 3>show before we get to the p block. Yeah. So,

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>first off, we got Mark Cuban. He's sell the majority

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 3>of his stake, his stake in MAVs for three and

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>a half billion while still leading basketball operations. Aaron Rodgers.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Rodgers was cleared to return to practice just out

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 3>of his fortieth birthday, and Caleb Williams said that his

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 3>decision to Claire for the draft is still a game

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 3>time decision. Which one of these surprises you the most?

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Cuban, for sure, Listen, Caleb's it doesn't matter he gets

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the number one pick. Caleb's going. He's going to the draft.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I there's to me a zero percent chance he doesn't.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers. I I I did something on TV yesterday

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 2>on Rogers that I thought was really clearly caked in

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 2>heavy sarcasm. But Demands and others were a little I

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 2>think thrown off by it and didn't necessarily pick up

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>on it. Some did, some didn't. I'm gonna talk. I

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 2>have a very strong opinion on what Aaron Rodgers is

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 2>doing it. It is. It is a bit of an

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 2>indictment of him, not a bit of it's a total

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 2>indictment of him. And it's so much so that I

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 2>am because it's my My opinion is I can't prove it.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>It's based, I think on a lot of circumstantial evidence.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 2>But circumstantial evidence. I'm debating internally whether I want to

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>publicly say it. I haven't come to a conclusion on

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 2>that yet. So the Rogers thing I'm going to set aside.

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 2>People maybe all come to a conclusion by the go ahead.

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Reckless speculation here. Okay, that's fine, that's not reckless speculation.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I was because people were saying other concerns about this,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and so I want to make sure I so the

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Cuban news broke when I was doing a pod with Colin,

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and Colin just threw at me he's running for president

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and I didn't even think of it. Now, Lebotard's people

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 2>throughout there that they think Cuban this is the canary

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 2>in the coal mine that maybe the NBA's next TV

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>deal isn't going to be as lucrative as people think.

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 2>And so the franchise values are going to drop, so

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Cuban's getting out now. The problem with that line of

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>reasoning is why would he also be quitting Shark Tank.

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know the Cuban quitting Shark Tank and

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>selling the MAVs isn't It's not nothing. It certainly surprised me,

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 2>but I don't that the running for president thing he

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 2>said he's not. I also I like Mark Cuban a lot.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing he's doing with cost plus drugs

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>is one of the coolest things anyone could do with

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 2>their money. If people like he basically opened his own

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 2>pharmacy where he charges people exactly what the prescriptions cost him,

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 2>plus ten percent and it saves a lot of people

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of dollars a month. It's suck, and for him,

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 2>he's like it's smart. He's like, it's an easy business model.

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Our overhead's very low. We still make a little bit

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of money and it's helpful. Collins theory was that is

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a great way to, you know, garner public support, garner

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 2>support with seniors who vote, all those things. I also

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 2>think Mark Cuban is a super sharp guy, and we

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in this in our culture, we in my opinion erroneously

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>assign brilliance to wealthy people. Sometimes it's true, but oftentimes

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not. Oftentimes someone either got incredibly lucky on timing

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 2>or is brilliant on a very specific thing, but it's

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you know it is their knowledge is a million miles

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 2>deep and two inches wide. Cuban's not one of those.

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Cuban is, I think, very sharp on a lot of things,

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and I do think Cuban could be I don't know

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 2>if he'd be a good president or not, but I

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 2>think his vision and leadership stuff. I let me put

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it like this, I'd listen to it with an open

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 2>mind on any ideas he had or whatever it is.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>But the fact of the matter is, if we do

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>politics just for a second, no matter how much people

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 2>wish this was not the case, the next president of

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States is either going to be Joe Biden

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>or Donald Trump. That that's we are too close or

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 2>too close to the next election. You have an incumbent

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and then you have a guy who is wildly popular

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>amongst his party. It's gonna be one of those two guys.

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of wish casting on Could

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a different Republican replace Trump. No, they're not gonna they're

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 2>not gonna beat him. Will Biden step down? No, he's

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>not going to like the And so it's gonna be

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 2>one of those two people. Even if a lot of

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 2>people wish there was a viable third option, whether your

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 2>viable third option would be Gavin newsommer Ron DeSantis or

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Nikki Haley or Mark Cuban, In my opinion, it's gonna

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 2>be one of those two.

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh, you know what?

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion that is what'd you say?

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 3>You know what I got from all that?

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 2>What? What's that?

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like shark Tank needs a new shark.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you think you could do it? Do you think

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 2>you could be one of those investors?

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe?

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. I think you'd actually you have pretty

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 2>good instincts. I think you'd actually be good in those roles.

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>The problem is you have no money. Here's about one

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred million. If you need one hundred million to be

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.959
<v Speaker 2>one of the sharks, you're about ninety nine million, nine

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ninety eight thousand short. So aside from that,

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you'd be great. Quick break right back to

0:42:54.200 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 2>our gamblers, Welcome back. What's Right with Nick Wright? Episode

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 2>one ninety seven holidays are upon us. Everyone's going to

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 2>start thinking about what gifts to buy their significant others.

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I know I already have, and I'm excited to share

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>a great holiday gift idea with you. Light Box light

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Box Lab grown diamonds are proudly grown from one hundred

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 2>percent renewable wind energy at the light Box Lab in Portland, Oregon.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Not only that, but they are simply priced. Light Boxes

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Lab grown diamond jewelry ranges from classic studs of the moment,

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 2>tennis bracelets, drop earrings, and so much more. More about

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 2>these the studs in just a moment and you can

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 2>see light Box Lab grown diamonds are perfect for family, friends,

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>even yourself. Make it easy for yourself and get everyone

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>something special with a discount we have for you. Shop

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 2>now at lightboxjewelry dot com and use promo code nick

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Wright for ten percent off site wide. That's light Boxjewelry

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 2>dot com promo code nick right for ten percent off

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 2>site wide. And when we say they have diamonds studs,

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we can put demand on camera,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.720
<v Speaker 2>but Demanse's rocking a brand new pair of the diamond

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 2>studs from our friends at Lightbox. I can't see him

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 2>right now, but I hope the audience can demanse your

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 2>You just got them a couple of days ago, your thoughts,

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 2>how they feel, how they look. I haven't seen him

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in person yet.

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so these are them? Yeah, just see. I love them.

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I think they're the perfect size. They do the little

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 3>uh when the light hits them. They have that little

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 3>cool aesthetic where it looks like they're dancing. Yeah.

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's great.

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 3>No, seriously, that's a really dope. I think they'd be

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>a perfect gift for girlfriend, boyfriend, mom, dad.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:45.760
<v Speaker 2>However, lightbox dot Com promo code nick right for Tempercon

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 2>off site wide. Uh, they look great on you, all right, demonse, sir? Uh,

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Gambling show, let's talk last week because your guy has

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 2>promised for the stretch. Run got hot stretch. Heia got

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 2>all the data, crunch to the numbers. Can we show

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the picks? So? Oh, looky there, Look who's above five

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred for the first time all year? Thirty twenty nine

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and one. Now, yes, with the VIG that means I'm

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 2>down one point nine units. I understand that. And because

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 2>we're real gamblers, we include the vig. We got it.

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>You gotta win at least fifty two and a half

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 2>percent against the spread. Thirty twenty nine and one is

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 2>not quite that. But to pull ourselves up out of

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the muck we were in to start the year to

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 2>right now before the calendar even hits December, to be

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>above five hundred gives us a great chance at our

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 2>fifth winning year in our last six years of doing

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 2>this on television and on podcast. So what were the winners?

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay plus eight and a half at Detroit? Was

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 2>that a sweat? Nope? They dominated the entire game. Dallas

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 2>minus thirteen and alfagants Washington was a sweat? Nope? They

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>won by thirty five points. Pittsburgh minus a point and

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 2>a half at Cincinnati against Jake Browning was that a sweat?

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not. They were up nine to late. That was

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.399
<v Speaker 2>a vintage, never a doubt, even if they had given

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>up a touchdown that had one by two. Jacksonville minus

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 2>one and a half at Houston. Bit of a sweat,

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 2>small sweat, but they covered it was no problem. We

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>believed in Trevor and Cleveland plus one and a half

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 2>at Denver. I gotta tell you this much right now.

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I know they ended up getting blown out. Dorian Thompson

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Robinson got knocked out of the game on a dirty

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 2>hit when it was a two point game. I was

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 2>right there. I was right where I needed to be.

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Quarterback got knocked out. We'll take a four and one

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna build on that. My friends. We still

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>don't have the highly coveted five and oh week yet

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>this week or this year. I don't know that this

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 2>week's gonna be a five and oh, but I know

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 2>it's coming at some point. So demon and by the way,

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>shout out to the Action Network in Evan Abrams for

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 2>helping us with some of these stats. We're gonna give you, demonsey.

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:56.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the first one.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Our first one or your first one? You got here?

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Is Houston min three and a half versus Denver?

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean your initial reaction is, ooh, three and

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a half like that that hook that could be a

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 2>painful hook. Counterpoint to that, Houston's good, Denver's not. You

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 2>think right now? Denver? Well, I think Houston's gonna win

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 2>the game by a lot. I think Houston's going to

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 2>win the game by more than a touchdown. Denver right

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 2>now is surviving on something that I believe to be

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 2>not sustainable, which is turnover margin. So let me give

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you the games they've played this year and not this year,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 2>but the turnover situation. So on this winning streak, they

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 2>have turned the ball over a total of three times.

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Credit to him, Credit to Russ not turning the ball over,

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.879
<v Speaker 2>not throwing picks, not fumbling like he was. They had

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 2>no turnovers in their first win against green Bay, one

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 2>against the Chiefs, one against Buffalo, none against Minnesota, one

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 2>against Cleveland. On the flip side, they have forced this

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 2>many turnovers on this winning streak. One against green Bay,

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 2>five against the Chiefs, four against the Bills, three against

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings, three against the Browns. So on this five

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 2>game winning streak, they are plus twelve in the giveaway

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 2>takeaway forced fifteen, allowed three or committed three. That is

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 2>not going to sustain against CJ. Stroud, who one of

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the things he's done the best this year is take

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 2>care of the football. So you have that going. You

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 2>have fact that Denver wants to play a low scoring

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 2>defensive game. You know what Houston wants to do, air

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 2>that sucker out. You add to it that the Texans

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.439
<v Speaker 2>this week. This isn't really a betting note, but it's

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 2>just interesting. With a win this week, they hit their

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 2>they're over for their preseason win total, which was set

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 2>at six and a half. And I understand CJ. Stroud

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 2>is zero to four as a favorite. I think Denver

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:16.240
<v Speaker 2>right now is wildly overvalued. I think Denver is going

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to end up being a seven or eight win team

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 2>even as they sit here at six and five. Denver

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 2>at Houston, at the Chargers, at the Lions their next three,

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 2>it feels like three straight losses. This feels to me

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty eight to thirteen Houston win. I'm laying

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the three and a half.

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Demontse Oh okay, I don't feel super strongly about I'd

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 3>stay away from this game if I were, okay, a

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 3>square better, But I'm a sharp one.

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So wait, I think you got that backwards go ahead?

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Next it backwards Tampa Bay minus five and a half

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 3>versus Carolina.

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 2>And evidently that that line's moved to five h So

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks, i'll be, are in a bit of a tailspin.

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 2>They've lost what six of seven after starting three and one.

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 2>That part's not good, and there is the slight concern

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of Carolina getting the new coach bounce but I am

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 2>here to tell you this Carolina Panthers team is painfully

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 2>bad on offense, and I'm not I'm not trying to uh.

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't take any happiness or joy or pride in

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Bryce's struggles.

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 3>The I might not even Be's fault at this point,

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 3>is what it looks like.

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, it's not all his fault. But and

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to sound like a broken record or

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like an old man on old NFL scout. The guy's

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>too small. He can't see the middle of the field.

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:57.839
<v Speaker 2>He has trouble seeing over his offensive lineman. He is

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 2>not accessing the part all parts of the field to

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 2>make throws, which makes this team incredibly easy to defend.

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 2>You add to it, they don't have any great receivers.

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 2>You add to it, they don't have a great offensive line,

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and you have a team that has scored the following

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:20.280
<v Speaker 2>points this season ten seventeen, twenty seven shout out thirteen

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to twenty one. Oh okay, the offense was

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 2>okay to start the year. Since then, fifteen thirteen, thirteen,

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 2>ten ten, Tampa Bay is in an absolute gotta have it,

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 2>must win spot. They are very alive for the division.

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Baker has played pretty decent. I think this

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 2>past week he got hurt, fought through it, came back in.

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And this just honestly feels like a seventeen ten or

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty one ten Tampa win. You don't love laying five

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 2>points with a bad team, and Tampa's a bad team.

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 2>But Carolina is the worst team in football, and they

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 2>just fired their coach. And there is your mom is

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 2>here now trying to make me laugh, distracting me from

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 2>this verge the important camp. So sometimes you get the

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 2>new coach bounce. So we saw it last year. The

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Broncos got it temporarily after firing Hackett. The Raiders got

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>it after firing Josh McDaniel. But that's when a coach.

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The Josh McDaniel thing was the players hated him. I

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think the players hated Frank Reich. I think the players,

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 2>if anything, see Frank Wright not even get eleven games

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 2>or get eleven games as the coach and is worried.

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's worried. This just feels like a Tampa spot.

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next Tennessee plus one and a half versus

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 3>versus the Colt All.

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, Listen, Mike Rabel as a dog. I understand the Titans,

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 2>prior to their recent win, had lost like fourteen of

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:03.359
<v Speaker 2>seventeen game. The Titans this year are four and two

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 2>against the spreading games with a spread of three or less.

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 2>The I like Will Levis. I don't love Will Levis,

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 2>but I like Will Levis. The Colts are gonna be

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:18.800
<v Speaker 2>without Jonathan Taylor. I'm getting to me the Titans and

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>the Colts. The Colts are better at full strength, but

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not at full strength. Jonathan Taylor's gone. Tennessee is

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to muck this up. It's a divisional game.

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting a home dog with the better coach. So

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 2>it just checks too many boxes as far as sharp betting,

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 2>better coach, home dog, better quarterback, divisional game. Give me

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the points, and so Gardner Minshew nine and eleven against

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the spreads the last twenty starts. That's not that bad, actually,

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'll take the home dog and Vrabel and I

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.800
<v Speaker 2>think the right now. When you look at the NFL

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 2>playoff picture, this is not a sharp betting note. It's

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 2>just the truth. When you look at the NFL playoff

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:09.439
<v Speaker 2>picture of both conferences, there's one thing that stands out

0:54:09.760 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that you're like that, that's not right. The Colts are

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 2>a playoff team. Of course they're not. Come on now,

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 2>of course they're not. And they're not even though they

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 2>are right now, because they're gonna lose this game. Give

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 2>me the Titans plus a point and a half next.

0:54:23.560 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, you got Philly plus three versus San Francisco.

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is this is very simple. I absolutely

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 2>demands a can see San Francisco winning this game. I

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 2>absolutely could see the Niners picking apart that bad Eagles secondary.

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:44.320
<v Speaker 2>If they can't get home, if they can't get a

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.879
<v Speaker 2>pass rush on party Perty, we're probably cooking this game.

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I can absolutely see the Chiefs were able to run

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.919
<v Speaker 2>on Philly Christian and nobody's been able to run Philly

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 2>other than can't see Christian mccaffort's great back. I could

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 2>see him running on Philly. Philly has been playing with

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 2>fire the last month and a half, you know what

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, almost daring a team to beat him, and

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:06.279
<v Speaker 2>no one's been able to do it. So all of

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 2>that is a case to take San Francisco. However, you

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 2>have a ten and one healthy team at home, and

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting a full field goal. That is just on

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 2>gambling fundamentals, this is a must pick Philly. It's just

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 2>a blind bet a ten and one. In the Super

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Bowl era, there has never been a team ten and

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>one are better at home with its healthy starting quarterback

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 2>getting three points or more. It's never happened. The only

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 2>times it has happened is when a team is resting

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 2>starters in week seventeen because they've clinched the buy and

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 2>so that's not their real team. Also, Eagles eight too

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 2>and one against the spread this season. Jalen Hurts in

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.919
<v Speaker 2>his career as Eagles quarterback at home seventeen to six

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and one. Brock Purty is a covering machine at home.

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 2>On the road, he's four and five against the spread.

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 2>And I just I I am not gonna put a

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:19.799
<v Speaker 2>ton of money on this, but it is just the

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 2>right side to be on. The Eagles, get it. I thought,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 2>when this game happened, I do the the same thing

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Bill Simmons and cousin sal do the guests the lines thing.

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I do it by myself essentially every Sunday night when

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the game, when the Sunday night football game ends, I

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 2>look at the slate, I open my gambling app I

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 2>cover up the point spreads with one hand and just

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:46.919
<v Speaker 2>look at the games and then scroll to I guess

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the line and scroll I was five and a half

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 2>points off. I thought it was gonna be Philly by

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. It was the Niners by well,

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 2>at the time, I wasn't five and a half points

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 2>off because it was the Niners by two. But now

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:04.280
<v Speaker 2>it's the Niners by three. Philly plus three is a must.

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just a must, all right.

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Next? Yeah, Kansas City minus six at Green Bay.

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the Chiefs are gonna win by more

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 2>than a touchdown. I listen Jordan Love credit to and

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 2>they are on extra rest are the Packers, So that's

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 2>good for them. They're at home, that's good for them.

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs started cooking again last week. The Packers are

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 2>a decent team. The Chiefs understand that if they want

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 2>to guarantee they get the one seed, they have to

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 2>win out. They probably can lose a game and still

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 2>get the one seed, but they control their own destiny

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:45.440
<v Speaker 2>by winning out. And I just this felt like it

0:57:45.520 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 2>should be Kansas City by seven and a half or eight.

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 2>It's Kansas City by six. I'm laying less than.

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:53.439
<v Speaker 3>A touchdown slinger on their team.

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Man, well, listen, that is true. However, and Jordan Love

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 2>played great on Thanksgiving. We have seen high highs and

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 2>some low lows from Jordan Love. I think this Chiefs

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 2>defense is gonna light them up, and the Detroit defense

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 2>was not able to do. I don't really have deep

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 2>level analysis on this other than and you guys know,

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't pick the Chiefs every week. The Chiefs actually

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 2>are rarely in the picks, and they're almost never in

0:58:23.720 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the picks if they're a big favorite. This is a

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 2>chief spot to me, this is a vintage Chiefs win.

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 2>This is a thirty one thirteen type of win. I'll

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 2>lay the six points happily. Uh all right, so Demonse,

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 2>let's do the recap. Recap of it was Houston minus

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 2>three and a half at home against Denver, Tampa minus

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 2>five at home against Carolina, Tennessee plus one and a

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 2>half at home against Indy Philly plus three at home

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 2>against San Francisco, and Casey minus six at Green Bay.

0:58:55.640 --> 0:59:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, pal, Yeah, you're you want to do your teasers.

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Your Yeah's show the recap of last week. So we're

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 4>going to show the last two weeks Okay, sweet, Yeah,

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 4>you're just gonna show my last week.

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 2>So two weeks ago, two weeks ago you won, Yeah, Dallas,

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh and Detroit. That was a great one, and we

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:20.960
<v Speaker 2>did weren't able to do a gambling show to celebrate you.

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 2>How did you build on that momentum?

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 3>Pal?

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And how did you out? Did you turn this all?

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Are you serious? Bro?

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 3>What? How did you build on that momentum? Yeah? So

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 3>we had Green Bay plus fifteen and a half in

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Detroit that was covering the entire game, Dallas minus eight

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:46.439
<v Speaker 3>and a half versus six, Wash six half versus Washington. Yeah,

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and then Seattle looked like they could have been covering

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 3>there at the end of the third quarter, I want

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 3>to say, but yeah, after the you.

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Had a little home All right, What are we doing

0:59:57.400 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 2>this week?

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Pal? This week's teasers at three three teams, seven and

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 3>a half point teaser at plus plus one oh five

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 3>of the odds. So we're teasing Arizona up to plus

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 3>thirteen at Pittsburgh, and then we're teasing Detroit up to

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 3>plus three at New Orleans, and then we're teasing Kansas

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>City up to plus one and a half at Green Bay.

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>That's the teaser. Tell you what a Detroit.

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And you're just teasing through the zero twice? Oh yeah,

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>what are we doing? What are we doing?

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh with the kid? What I trust? I trust the

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs to get the win? Is this not a.

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Just But you're just not getting teaser, You're not getting

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>enough value and you're.

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 3>The only thing zero. Okay, I'm gonna make another impromptu

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>thing because the last time I did this it actually

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>hit and the other one I think lost, the one

1:00:56.880 --> 1:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>that I took out. So I am gonna take I'm

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>taking Detroit out. I'm leaving Kansas City there, I'm taking

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking Detroit out, and I want I want to

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>put Philly in at plus ten and a half.

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, San Francisco ruined you last week. You remember

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that right by blowing someone out? You do remember that

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that San Francisco screwed you. And Okay, by the way,

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>at least that has real teaser value. That makes it better.

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>You were gonna get your first F teaser grade in weeks.

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Now you're to a solid seat.

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>This is a solid sea teaser at Kansas City with

1:01:34.480 --> 1:01:36.919
<v Speaker 3>a pick them. That's kind of crazy, Like it's because

1:01:36.960 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm that's the only ones I have a sea.

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, because you're you're not getting you have a

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>team that's favored by six and now you're teasing them

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>through the zero on a seven and a half point teaser.

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I just it's just bad teaser fundaments. But listen, what

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>do I know? What do I know?

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Is not? All right? So Daniel was just talking to

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>me about his dad going off of vibes with the

1:01:57.960 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>bets this morning. His dad's been hidden. Uh so it's like.

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>That's not but I want to know something. It's also

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>not solid fundamentals to go off of vibes.

1:02:11.000 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>That's not No, that's That's not the point that I

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>was making. I'm just saying that it's Kansas City playing

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:20.439
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay. Yeah, giving them? All right, one and a half,

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>let's one and a half, let's do it. I'm watching

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>that up. Chiefs are gonna win, all right?

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Can I just give you a better teaser? Can I

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>just give you know what?

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Come on?

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>They do two teasers? Since you like, can'tsity just do

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a two team six point teaser? The Chiefs to a

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>pick them and the Jags.

1:02:42.040 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You're just saying, oh, so you're saying the teasing through

1:02:44.720 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>there because of the odds, like it's the better.

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, you're paying, you're paying exactly, you're paying a

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 2>price for You're buying all seven and a half of

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>those points. But what you're telling is like that you

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>only right, that's what That's what I meant by teaser metals.

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>You're you're purchasing all seven and a half of those points.

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>But with Kansas City, you're like, I don't even fucking

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>want the last two of them. I just want them

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>as a pick them. Well, then then find a bet.

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So I see what you're saying.

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's not that it's that a losing bet, it's

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>that you're buying something and paying a premium for it.

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>So I a teaser. I like this week is a

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>two team six point teaser. The Chiefs to a pick

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>them and the Jags, who are eight and a half

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>point favorites against Jake Browning and the Bengals to minus

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. So we get through all the

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>key numbers. We need the Chiefs to win and the

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Jags to win by a field goal. That's a teaser.

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I like, I'm adding it to Demanse's card. All right, Uh,

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the offer this week.

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead pal the offer this week. We are heading

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to college for this one because I saw a line

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:56.320
<v Speaker 3>so goofy that I had to bring it up. Oh wait,

1:03:56.440 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing, yo. So Iowa team total for

1:04:00.720 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the first half against Michigan is point five and it's

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the same for the second half. I know you don't

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>love totals, but are you gonna turn down betting on

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a team scoring one?

1:04:11.640 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean you can't, So listen, here's the thing. I

1:04:16.160 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>absolutely think the under is gonna hit in one of

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>these halves. I just don't know which one. I absolutely

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>think Michigan will shut them out for at least a half.

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>The funniest thing about this this Iowa Michigan game is

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the spread versus the game total. So Iowa Michigan. Michigan

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is a twenty one and a half point favorite, okay,

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>but the total for the game is thirty four and

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a half. So what does that mean? They think Michigan's

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna win by at least twenty one, but there's not

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna be thirty five points scored. So what Vegas is

1:04:57.320 --> 1:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>telling you is they think this is either this is

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 2>basically a twenty eight to six game. That's the way

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>for Michigan to cover and the both numbers. If they

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>were to hit essentially on the number they're saying, it's

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna be twenty eight to six or twenty eight to seven.

1:05:15.360 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Is where Vegas lambs on this. I do think, uh,

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>my prediction for the game, I think was twenty four

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to three. That's what it feels like. It feels like

1:05:24.960 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>an under and it feels like Iowa goes scoreless and

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>at least one of the halves. We answer your questions next,

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>What's Right?

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>All right?

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back? What's Right?

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>We Think right?

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Episode one ninety seven. This episode of what is brought

1:05:39.440 --> 1:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to you by the McDonald's app. I love the McDonald's

1:05:42.840 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>app for mc delivery. I love it because it's perfect

1:05:45.440 --> 1:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>for any situation. Say it's pouring rain, you don't want

1:05:48.240 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 2>to go out to get your mcdouble boom McDelivery. Your

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:53.600
<v Speaker 2>team's playing, you don't want to miss a second mc

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>delivery been a long day. Better way to fix that

1:05:56.280 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and get in a delicious double quarter pounder with cheese

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and a large free I delivered right to your door.

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I personally love to order McDelivery when I'm watching a

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>game or spending time with my family. And now anytime

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you order McDelivery in the McDonald's app, it earns you

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:13.280
<v Speaker 2>points towards free food, and everybody loves free food, so

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>there's always a reason to order in the McDonald's app.

1:06:16.720 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Downald McDonald's app today. At participating in McDonald's delivery, prices

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>may be higher than at restaurants delivery, and other fees

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>may apply Copyright twenty twenty three McDonald's. All right, demons,

1:06:26.400 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>let's go through a couple of these seasons or a

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of these questions from the chat go.

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Ahead is Isaac Wave asked Nick, do you think the

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Bears are set up in a way going forward they

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>could make a leap going toward going towards similar to

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>the Texans depending on their quarterback coach Combo.

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>They decide absolutely now that it's a big depending on

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>But if you get Caleb, you've got the most important

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>part figured out now. Part so the Texans cj who

1:06:55.400 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is the most important part, But they also seem to

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>nail the coach higher. Demiko, that part's very very hard.

1:07:03.000 --> 1:07:05.280
<v Speaker 2>So you guys know what I've said the Bears should do,

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>which is off for Ben Johnson. The Lions OC buckets

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and buckets of money to come there and be with

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Caleb Williams as his head coach. It has the double

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>impact of then you know, weakening your the team that's

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna win your division. But yeah, they have a ton

1:07:22.280 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of money, they have a ton of draft picks if

1:07:24.360 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>they as long as the Panthers continue to be terrible,

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>they have I think the Bears are actually set up

1:07:29.680 --> 1:07:30.520
<v Speaker 2>quite well, all right.

1:07:30.600 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Next, Samuel goldass Nick, can you rank every Mahomes chief

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>season for most enjoyable to the least enjoyable? Sure?

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>His first year as a starter twenty eighteen, the five

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand yards, fifty touchdowns, Never see anything like it was

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the first time my lifetime the Chiefs had an amazing

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and he was just so clearly immediately the best

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in the league. And they were so high scoring.

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>That was the most fun the year. I'm not talking

1:07:56.560 --> 1:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>about the I'm not doing it based on how the

1:08:00.280 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>year ended, just over the course of the season watching it.

1:08:03.600 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Defending the championship twenty twenty a forgotten year when a

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>he had I think he had thirty eight touchdown, six picks.

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>He was fourteen and one as a starter, as the

1:08:15.120 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 2>defending champion should have won League MVP, and that team

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 2>was a game away from playing to be undefeated. It

1:08:22.520 --> 1:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously ended in tragedy the way the Super Bowl went.

1:08:25.600 --> 1:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>That was the second most fun The third most enjoyable,

1:08:29.280 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>uh was last year no Tyreek real questions. They had

1:08:34.400 --> 1:08:37.479
<v Speaker 2>lost to Burrow in the playoffs because Mahomes hadn't played

1:08:37.479 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>well and he just kicked ass and took names all year.

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:46.519
<v Speaker 2>The fourth most enjoyable would have been the twenty nineteen season,

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 2>where coming off twenty eighteen he was exceptional. They end

1:08:51.200 --> 1:08:53.680
<v Speaker 2>up obviously winning the Super Bowl. The least enjoyable was

1:08:53.680 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one when he had the six week slump

1:08:57.360 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the season and it was like,

1:08:59.160 --> 1:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with Chiefs? So that's how I'd rank them.

1:09:01.720 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>This one was up to this point is right in

1:09:06.040 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>line with twenty twenty one. But we'll see how this

1:09:09.520 --> 1:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>year ends.

1:09:10.160 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Elliott Henry said, Hey, Nick, watching since

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>episode one? We appreciate you. I'm going to Kansas I'm

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 3>going to Kansas City in the summer. What's the number

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:22.960
<v Speaker 3>one thing go I should check out there besides Arthur Bryant's.

1:09:24.360 --> 1:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>When you go to Arthur Bryant's, go to the Negro

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>League Baseball Museum. It's worth half an afternoon. It's unbelievable.

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the coolest places in the country in

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 2>my opinion. And it's the history there and the exhibits

1:09:36.400 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's just it's interactive. It's great. And also if

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>you're going in the summer, go to Kaufman. It is

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:44.839
<v Speaker 2>one of those beautiful ballparks in the country. The fountains

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>are great, it is a great, great place to watch

1:09:48.320 --> 1:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a game. And I mean food wise, yeah, it's Bryant's.

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>There's all the barbecue places are obviously unbelievable. And yeah,

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's there's not a ton to do in

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>my hometown, but it's a great it's a great place

1:10:05.040 --> 1:10:07.360
<v Speaker 2>to spend a long weekend. Those would be the number

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>one things I would say to check out, do some

1:10:09.280 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>shopping on the plaza. You can do all that type

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. All right, great show, great job, Demanda, I'll

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>see you guys on TV. I gotta run. What's right, Hey,

1:10:16.080 --> 1:10:18.639
<v Speaker 2>it's Nick right. Thank you so much for watching. Please

1:10:18.680 --> 1:10:21.719
<v Speaker 2>do us a favor click subscribe. It helps my ego

1:10:22.000 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and Demansey's got a financial bonus writing on a number

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of YouTube subscribers, so help him out. And also click

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the bell. I don't know what the bell does, but

1:10:29.840 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>they tell me to tell you to click the bell.

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>And you're audio listeners. People that have commutes, drives, whatever

1:10:35.320 --> 1:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>it is. Subscribe to the podcast as well. Wherever you

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>get the podcast, same show, just you know, just in

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>your ears instead of through your eyes. All that check

1:10:43.400 --> 1:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>it out, appreciate you.