WEBVTT - Bitcoin in Politics and Beyond: A Conversation with Dennis Porter

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark mass Show,

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>where we talk about, of course, the decentralized revolution, the

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>way the world is changing right before very eyes, and

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and technology. And of course that technology that changes the

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>world is bitcoin, the decentralized technology. And you know, I

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 1>like to bring to you some late breaking news and

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>some education to change your the way that you think

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about things, but also some some guests so you don't

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>have to listen to me all the time. And I

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have a returning guest. I have Dennis Porter in the

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>studio with me today. He is the CEO and co

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Satoshi Action Fund. He's the president and

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>founder of Satoshi Action Education as well, which of course

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>are two things that I like.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I like.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I like education and specifically education that leads into action.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Dennis, thanks so much for joining me today.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mark, glad to be back on the show. And

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to have to use your line more often.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll be like education that leads to action. That's our

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that's our new slogan.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It should be, you know, I talk about all the time.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually I said it on an earlier segment, I

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, we've been told that knowledge is power,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's not true. Only knowledge put into action is power.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise I think ignorance is bliss. Rather just take the

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>blue pill and not even know, right, So, yeah, only

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>only only actionable knowledge, knowledge put into action is power. Right.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, you know, Dennis, I know, you know, we've

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>had you on before and you were involved on the

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on the politics side for any number of things, and

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then you kind of put together this action fund really

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of helping to educate and and and take you know,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>action into the you know, kind of political realm. And

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of at this point where, you know, specifically

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically around bitcoin, kind of like left it alone for

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a decade, you know, until it started kind of getting

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>big enough and starting to show up on people's radars,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and then politicians were trying to kind of figure out

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do about this, and now it

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to like really escalate where it really seems to

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>me like the Biden regime that we have in place today,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which would include you know, Elizabeth Warren and Gary Gensler

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>are really anti bitcoin, anti crypto, and almost even anti

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>tech overall. Do you see that like really coming from

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from you know, kind of that group, like there's really

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like this anti innovation, anti tech movement.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you definitely do see some components of that

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>taking place. I would say the majority of the anti

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>digital asset let's say broadly, because it really is kind

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of the way that they view the space. The anti

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 2>digital asset bent is coming from the Council of Economic Advisors,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 2>but also from Liz Warren campaign, where she has a

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 2>lot of ties. And I do believe that the Biden

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 2>administration broadly does have a very negative tone towards bitcoin.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We have seen though, I will say with Gary Gensler,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>although he is very anti crypto at this point, seemingly

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>going after exchanges with no sort of restriction on what

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>he's willing to do, willing to go after you know,

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>XRP and various crypto assets, but has pretty much left

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin alone. And you know, some of a crypto side

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of dial will say, well, you know, just you wait

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>till Gary Ginsler comes for you. But he's been pretty

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 2>clear about his viewpoint that he believes that bitcoin is

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a commodity. And the CFTC I believe is also in

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>alignment with that, so we might be narrow as narrowly

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>escaping that bullet. The biggest area where I do see

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the most concern is not necessarily on the sec CFTC

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>front for bitcoin. It is actually, in fact for the

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>majority of bitcoin businesses and prolific individuals within the bitcoin

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 2>space that are getting limited in their ability to access banking.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>We've seen banks all across this country not only prevent

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>bitcoiners and bitcoin based companies from having access to financial

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>services and we're just talking about basic banking services at

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>this point, but they've also kicked them out on top

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of that. I was just talking to a gentleman today

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>who said he went through thirty different banks before he

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>was finally accepted. I spoke to one of the largest

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining companies in the entire world, and they said

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>they were at a bank for six years and then

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>they got kicked out. So this is the air where

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to have the most focused and

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>not be so concerned. If you're a bitcoiner, if you're

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a crypto person, you should care a lot about Gary Gensler.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>But as someone who's focused on bitcoin, I'm more so

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>worried about this banking issue, and I think it's something

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>that we should pay a lot of attention to.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I can. I can give first on

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>account of that. You know, we've launched the Bitcoin Opportunity

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Fund and we we've we've successfully completed our first round

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of financing, which is which went pretty well. Shout out

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to Bigcoin Opportunity Fund. If you're interested investing through the

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin ecosystem, check it out Bitcoin Opportunity Dot Fund and

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>get more info there. But you know, because we have

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in the name, we were having problems get ban accounts

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and like we had commitments of people ready to wire

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>money over and all of a sudden we can't get

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the bank. And we're like, dang, why didn't we just

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>why did we have to put bitcoin in the name?

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We should have put We're just a we're just an

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>investment fund, right, But because bitcoin was in the name,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we had a big problem. We finally found a bank,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was we had to go through

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>quite a few it was difficult. So I definitely see that.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you talked about you know, Gary Gensler specifically,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>which of course I did as well, But so so

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do you see it really as like this, I guess

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>what I was trying to ask, is it really like

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this attack on digital assets? Are they trying to protect money,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect the digital dollar or the dollar or

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's also hostile to tech in general?

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And I say that because of what we see happening

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like with a restrict Act and you know, TikTok bill

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and things like that.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>To your point there, I think just broadly we see

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>anti tech bent not only in the Democrat Party, we

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>also see it happening in the Republican Party. I mean,

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>there are at the state level, which is where we

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>spend a very large majority of our time, there are

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 2>several states which have moved to ban government officials from

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 2>accessing TikTok, from using TikTok, and I think that you're

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>going to see that sort of activity pick up. It's

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>really become one of those things where it's viewed as

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>somewhat of a national security threat. And generally speaking on

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 2>national security threats, not always, but generally you do see

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Republicans and Democrats working across the aisle on these issues.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, in this sort of situation, that national security

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>threat is in a position now where it seems like

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be limiting the access to innovation, limiting

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the access to tech. But ultimately, you know, we do

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>need to be careful. We do need to be careful

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>about apps that are wholly controlled by the CCP, like TikTok,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and making sure that we are paying attention to what's

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>going on, because we also know that TikTok collects a

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of information that's on its users, so something to

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 2>be cautious of. I don't like necessarily that in kind

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of the effort to go after things like TikTok through

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the restrict Act, that we are kind of ultimately broadly

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 2>hurting other things, other types of innovation, other types of technology.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>So we have to be very careful in the way

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that we go after bad actors in the space. We

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>can't just take, you know, throw the baby out with

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 2>the bathwater. I don't know the specific in the details

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of how this would directly hurt Bitcoin. I have heard

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>some good arguments on it, but I don't think it's

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 2>the thing that we should be the most focused on

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>right now within the space.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't think back to this quote from Christine Leguard,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>who said that innovation is a threat to our financial stability,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw that a couple of years ago. It is

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just always stuck with me and and and I guess

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Innovation is a threat to the financial stability,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but the it's really not the financial stabilities financial monopoly

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that they control, right, So innovation is disruptive and and

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and innovation is always inherently disruptive. I want to go

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>back to, you know, back to Social Action Fund and

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you guys help put forward the right to

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mind bill. Give me, give me a minute, minute a

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>half summary of what that right to my bill is,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to do with that.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Mark. So what was happening across the country

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>is we saw varying types of discrimination against bitcoin miners,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>generally rooted in a misunderstanding of the technology. People often

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>hear about bitcoin mining and they either think, you know,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>one of two things or both that this is a scam,

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>that this is a you know, Ponzi scheme, why are

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>we letting this thing use up all of our energy,

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>or the other one is that they have been misinformed

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>to believe that bitcoin mining is bad for the environment,

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>which is an argument in fact that we are doing

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a much better job of winning these days but unfortunately,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>there are still a lot of individuals out there who

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>still believe that bitcoin is a scam or that it's

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>bad for the environment. And so at the local level,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing attacks on bitcoin mining, everything ranging from changing

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 2>calling emergency meetings and changing zoning rules and zoning laws,

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 2>which led in the County of Missoula to a twenty

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 2>million dollars bitcoin mining operation going completely bankrupt. We also

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>see in the state of Idaho they regulators they're agreed

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>with an increase in power pricing for bitcoin miners, which

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is fairly unheard of generally speaking, in the world of

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>energy in the United States, you are not allowed through

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the public Utility Commissions, which are the state regulators when

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it comes to energy, you're not allowed to discriminate against

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>different groups. But they did the attempt by Idaho Power.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>They were trying to raise rates on all the miners

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>broadly within their footprint. It was much more aggressive and

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>so fortunately it got tampered down and it was much

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 2>more of a reasonable increase, but still we did see

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>that type of discrimination. We also see frivolous noise complaints

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>taking place all across the country, and and so the

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>bill that we created it just protects in law bitcoiners

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and bitcoin minors from those sorts of attacks. And also

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>with it just so happened in the state of Montana,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>we did pass a law.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want that bill. I want to hear more

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>about that way specifically, but I want to come back

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to that in a second. But if you're just tune

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in listening to the markmas Show, I'm sitting down with

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Porter and studio from Satoshi Action Fund to find

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>out what's going on in the political world in regards

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to money and bitcoin and technology. We're back with more

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. Don't go away, We're back, all right,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Moss Show. I'm in studio with Dennis Porter

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from Satoshi Action Fund and we're discussing what's going on

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the political landscape in regards to bitcoin and technology

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and journal you know, Dennis, before that break, you were

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just talking about, you know, some of the things that

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys have been doing, and specifically you were talking about,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the education that you've been doing

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to counteract some misinformation that's out there. And

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>then you're kind of going into an actual bill, So

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not just the education, but the action of what you're

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>doing and submitting the bill. I want to I want

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to find out about the bill, and I have some

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>questions about that, but before we do, just kind of

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to the education side for a second. You know,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of miss I mean, they they,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they the mainstream media accuses everyone else of misinformation.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like they're the ones putting out the misinformation

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>when they constantly put out misleading stories sort of like

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what the New York Times have have done in Texas

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and so is that kind of what you're trying to counteract,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, right, kind of going to these politicians

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>who are kind of getting this misinformation and trying to

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of educate them on you know, what's really going

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>on there.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, and you're right, we do see sort of

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 2>misinformation campaigns taking place across the country. When it comes

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to bitcoin mining, it is the you know, unfortunately, there

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>is somewhat of an incentive in the media to attack

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin and bitcoin mining. You can get a lot of

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 2>clicks and a lot of views, but unfortunately, oftentimes we

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 2>see just flat out total misinformation with regards to how

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining works and the amount of energy that it

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>is consuming. So we are educating on a regular basis.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But one of the other components that I think is

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>really critical to changing hearts and minds on this issue

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>is not just going out and saying, hey, well, actually

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining does this for the environment, or it's really

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>good at balancing the grid, but turning around and also

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>providing research for the space. You know, we talked about

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 2>Satotia Action Fund, but we also have satoti Action Education

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned earlier in the show, and that entity

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>is wholly focused on providing better research for the bitcoin

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>mining industry and not just some white papers. We're also

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about peer reviewed research, which some people might have

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a problem with, but it is the best system that

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>we have, you know, It's the good line for it

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>is it's the worst system except for all the other ones. Yeah,

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 2>but the peer review process what it does is it

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>puts it puts the people that are on the fence

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>or might be opposed to bitcoin mining back into the

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>thinking cabinet and having to think about what are they

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>going to do with this issue and is it something

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>that actually can provide value because right now they're sitting

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>around saying this thing is destroying the environment, it's bad

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 2>for the grid, it's hurting the planet, it's soaking up

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>all the energy. What are we going to do about it?

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 2>We want them to go back to the drawing board

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and start thinking about how maybe there are some things

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that they don't like about bitcoin mining. Let's say that

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>you're like on the fringes when it comes to the

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>environmental issue, and you're very very very staunchly opposed to

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 2>using fossil fuels. Well, great, you can use bitcoin mining

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to advance renewable energy across this country. In fact, it

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>may very well be one of the most important technologies

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>for that, and we want to provide the research to

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>be able to back up those claims.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's a great point, and it's something

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that I've been thinking a lot about lately, Dennis, you know,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>where like it's and to be honest, it's maybe the

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>first time I've publicly been talking about this on any

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of my outlets, but it's really been making me rethink

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>even my content right where like I was, I think

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it might have been. You know, it's just like in life,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we go where our focus is, like where focuses our

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>energy goes kind of thing, right, and like are we

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>focused on fighting or are we focused on building? Right?

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we focused on holding back or where we want

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to go? And like, you know, I think when I

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was listening to you talk, it was kind of making

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>me think through that on my own, where like are

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>we trying to like constantly fight against the government to

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>prevent them or could we just focus on building these

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>brand new renewable energy grids? Like can we go and

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>help them accomplish what they want with this technology? And

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just the difference of that that focus, right, Like

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a positive focus where we're building out competing, Right,

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>good ideas typically win because they're better, right, And so

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you can say, hey, look here's how you

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can scale a renewable energy grid. You can offset some

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the costs with some bitcoin mining, and they look

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at it more as like a tool as opposed to

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoins specifically. I don't know, is that maybe how

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you sort of present it.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, we definitely talk about bitcoin mining as a tool.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>We talk about it as a piece of energy infrastructure.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>And I do agree with your statement about the fact

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that we need to be able to go in and

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>build these things is just as important, if not more important,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>than trying to win the argument. You know, if we

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>just sit around on Twitter and we just submit, you know,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>new blog posts to our blog and talking about how

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>great bitcoin is and bitcoin mining is, that's good, that's great.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>We need that sort of education out there for the public.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.119
<v Speaker 2>But as it pertains to policy makers, it's really important

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>that we build the things that we're talking about so

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that we have evidence to show that these things are

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 2>taking place. And that's happening at a rapid pace. You know,

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in the last five years, we went from oh, maybe

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining could be good to balancing the grid to

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining is actually balancing in the grid all over

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the country, particularly in Texas where during a winter storm there,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin miners were able to deliver up to fifteen hundred

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>megawatts of power back to the grid in the middle

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>of an emergency. And just to put it in a context,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>fifteen hundred megawats of power is enough power to heat

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>one point five million small homes, and that's in the

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>middle of an emergency when no one else is wanting

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to get up their power. So we just need to

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>keep building, keep proving, and eventually that also helps us

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>in our arguments when it comes to convincing our world

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>leaders to adopt bitcoin and bitcoin mining.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I want to go back, you know, I

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to the bill, the bill that

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you submitted, because I think about like kind of going

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>back to like focus on the good, right, and like

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the power that you know, money has

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in this realm.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So for example, if these big energy companies, these big

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>power companies can go dang, you know, using this technology,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not even thinking about any of ours a bitcoin, but

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>using this technology, we can not lose billions of dollars

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>now right now we have a new revenue source. Then

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like they would be motivate to then go push it

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the political front themselves, like hey we need this.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And then like I think back to like the bill,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is where maybe you can kind of correct

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit. But it seems like most lawmakers,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the legislators that go into office don't actually create any bills.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't create the laws, right, Like they co sponsor bills, right,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they co sponsor the bills. But where do the bills

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>come from? The bills come from like the lobby groups,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing, right, So like maybe one correct me on that,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but too, if we can get those paragrades companies to

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>go like, dang, this is a tool that we really want.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It can help off set extra revenue, then they might

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be the ones actually pushing for that themselves.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's very insightful. Actually, Mark, I'll get to the

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>policy you've component in a moment here, but you know,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you really tapped into one of the major reasons why

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>SATUCI Action Fund exists and why we're so focused on

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the state level. If you can get energy companies to

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>adopt bitcoin and bitcoin mining as a technology and they

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 2>see it as a positive and in fact they are

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>willing to fight for it, you have now put bitcoin

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>mining into a very, very very positive political position. Because

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>at the state level in the United States is where

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the majority of energy policy takes place. And because every

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>single almost every single one of these utility companies and

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 2>energy companies are highly regulated at the state level. In fact,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, most utilities in the United States are you know,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>regulated monopoly so to speak. So in order for them

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that they don't get abused by the

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>state legislator or that they don't lose out on their

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>current sort of protections that they have because that with

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the with the monopoly comes a lot of regulation. Like there,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>it's a trade off. They are monopoly, but they get

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>they are very restricted and they want to make sure

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the restrictions don't get worse. But they also want to

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 2>make sure that their monopoly doesn't get you know, taken

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>away from them as well. So they care. I'll give

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 2>you enough story here just as a quick example that

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>we can move on to the policy quipment before you do.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>That, before you go into that, I want to hear

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the story, and everybody else listening does too, But we've

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>got to take just a quick break. If you're just

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>tuning and you're listening to the Mark mass Show, and

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting down with Dennis Porter from the Satoshi Action

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Fund talking about the way that he's helping to change,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>educate people, and change and push action in the policy

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and the bitcoin space specifically. And he's got a great

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>story to illustrate that, and he's going to tell you

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. But we're going to take a

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>quick break, so don't go away. We'll be right back,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. Welcome back. If you're just tuning in and

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Maas show. We're talking about

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin mining space and the policies and regulations around that.

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting down with Dennis Porter from the Satoshi Action Fund,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and Dennis I had to kind of cut you off

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and we left everybody hanging. So you're going to kind

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of give like a little illustrative story there for seconds,

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So go ahead, Yeah, definitely.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>You know you had mentioned how important it would be

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to get energy companies and utilities on board because of

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the impact it would have if they were on our team. Well,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>just as an example, in a state of Mississippi, when

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>we went there to try to pass policy, you know,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 2>we had some sort of kind of myth communication breakdown

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 2>is what I would call it, with some of the

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 2>energy companies there, and we ended up having to sit

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>down with all the different lobbyists to be able to

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about what we were doing. Well, ultimately, it just

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't end very well for us, right because they didn't

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>see us as a friend in the fight. They saw

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>us as someone that might be a threat to what's

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>going on there in that state. So ultimately we weren't

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>able to get anything done in Mississippi. But imagine the inverse.

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if all of the utility companies and all the

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>people in the state of Mississippi that are working within

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the energy sector see the value of this technology all

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, instead of them fighting us at the

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>state legislator to pass this policy, they are working with

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>us as a partner in tandem to help make sure

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 2>that the state of Mississippi is a leader on bitcoin mining.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>And so I think ultimately we'll come around. We're going

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>to come around this next cycle. We might have a

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 2>little bit better work with us to do in that state.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 2>But we had to sit down with all these lobbyists

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>from all the other energy companies and they were talent,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 2>like you're worried about what we were going to do.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So the goal ultimately would be to get all the utilities,

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>not just in Mississippi, but across the entire country to

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>see the value of bitcoin mining for balancing the grid

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and for enhancing energy projects, and get them to fight

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>for it at the state legislators, where the vast majority

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of energy policy is taking place, either through the state

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>legislator or through the public utility commissions there as well.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now let's get back into that bill. You were

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about the bill and we were talking about where

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about how it's not really the legislators

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that write the bills. They kind of cosponsor the bills,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you've submitted a bill, so like that seems

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the kind of way it works.

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>So just yeah, let's take a step back really quickly.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>There's a vast difference between what happens at the state

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>level and what happens at the federal level. At the

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 2>federal level, there's quite a bit more involvement from the

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>legislator and the legislator's staff on the process. But the

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>difference between that and the states is that the federal

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>level has a vast budget to be able to hire

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 2>well qualified staffers to focus on these issues and to

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>come up with great policy solutions. So generally you're not

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 2>really like, you know, they say the term is like

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>handing policy to them, which is not something that we

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 2>do either. Generally, what you do is you have bullet

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>points and you just say, hey, these are some things

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that we think would be important, and you're going to

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 2>take it and if you like what we're trying to do,

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna take it and move on it. So, for instance,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the state of Montana you say, hey, you like bitcoin mining,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>we like bitcoin mining. Here's some things that we know

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>should probably take pay place if you want to see

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the adoption of bitcoin mining in the states. So then

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the policymaker takes that bill, sends it to the drafters

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>who put it into Montana state Code, design it all out,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and then the policy maker works and fights to make

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>sure that that bill makes it through committee, through the

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>House and Senate, and then passes it and hopefully signs

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>it by the governor. So, you know, handing them policy

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>directly is not exactly the right way to say it.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Although it does kind of take place, it's not the

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>best way to describe what's going on. And if it

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>does play take place, it's usually happening mostly at the

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>state level.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Got it, Okay, that makes sense. That makes sense. Now,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know one thing that I know, you know, I

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think I forget the last time, the first time I

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>had you on, but I remember it was kind of

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point. It seems like I remember at this

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>point where bitcoin was kind of becoming like this political tool,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>where like it seemed like maybe just like the conservative

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe right side of the aisle was kind of picking

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it up. And then like maybe the left kind of

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrat side was kind of now saying, oh, it's like

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this political tool, and now it seems to be embraced

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>by both sides of the AIS. As a matter of fact,

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm here speaking at the Freedom Fest in Memphis, Tennessee

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this week. There's several presidential candidates here, including RFK Junior

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>on the left and Vivic Garamaswami on the right, and

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Tulca Gabbard was speaking this morning and she's not running

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for president, but she's in the middle, and they're all

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>proponent for bitcoin. Do you think that bitcoin has sort of,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess jumped. It's kind of scaled to that level

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's no longer left or right, it's no longer

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>like a political tool. I mean, both sides are for it.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Or how do you view that now?

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, I really is a pretty complex situation, complex question.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 2>You definitely do see quite a bit more uptake early

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 2>uptake from those on the right, especially those that have

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 2>libertarian leanings on the right. On the left, you are

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>starting to see some movement though we do see RFK

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 2>coming out in supportive of this. We also do have

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, in Congress, we have a blockchain Caucus and

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>there are dozens of members there and many of them

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>are Democrats, So you know, Richie Trus, You've got Darren

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Soto among many others like Rocana, who are very supportive

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>of the digital asset space broadly. So although the I

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>would say it's more of a narrative war than it

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 2>is an actual conversation about who is for and against bitcoin. Yes,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 2>right now, currently you do have an administration on the

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 2>left with Democrats, Biden administration with folks like Elizabeth Warren

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 2>who seemingly are you know, kind of charging forward with

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 2>this narrative that we need to oppose the digital asset

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 2>space by creating an anti crypto army. But that's not

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>really the tone of the entire Democrat part party. In fact,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you have senators like Ron Wyden who are being supportive

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of the industry, who see the value of bitcoin mining

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 2>as as something that can use green energy. We also

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>recently were meeting with various other folks in the Senate

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to be going back here again soon

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and we're having a ton of great conversations where people

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>do see the value of bitcoin mining as it as

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>an environmental cleanup tool, but also as something that could

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>balance the grid and advance renewables in this country, and

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that's something that all Democrats love.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think I'm hearing two different things there, right. So, Like,

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for sure, like I hear like some of the senators

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that really care about their states and want to increase

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the grid dependent the grid independence, or even

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the energy sectors in their states, and

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so they see the benefits of having bitcoin for that perspective.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, when I listened to RFK Junior,

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's really saying that, like, you should just

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>have the right to choose what you want, you should

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have the freedom to use money. So I think I

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're kind of getting at from both sides.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I love what RFK is saying. I

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 2>think if the you know, one of his best traits

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>has to be that he's very much a free market individual,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 2>and I think that that's where he derives his belief

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that people should have open and access to bitcoin. And

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>he also cares a lot about the environment, and fortunately

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>people have been able to get in and share with

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>him about the potential positive impact of bitcoin mining for

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the environment. But RFK is not the president you know,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>he is a candidate running for office. He's never held office,

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 2>he's never been an elected official, although he's seemingly kind

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 2>of rising in the polls and definitely rising in his

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>media attention. I mean, whoever the guy's media manager is

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 2>needs to be getting paid top dollar once he exits

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>this campaign, because he's doing an incredible job of getting

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 2>RFK into these sorts of media positions to get out

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the word on what his positions are on a variety

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of issues, and he has strong issues on a variety

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of issues that Americans care about. So currently, like I said,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, Biden current administration kind of negative towards bitcoin,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining, but there are plenty of Democrats RFK, Darren Soto, Widen,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 2>many others who are supportive of the industry, and I

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>hope that we get a chance to see that more

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>of that take place as time goes on.

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you be concerned with Rfk's, you know, kind of

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>long standing environmental positions in regards to that.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>He would be a massive upgrade over the current position

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of what's taking place with the current Biden administration. He's

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>partly because he has been educated on the potential for

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining to be good, a good tool for the environment,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 2>but also because he believes a lot more in free

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 2>market economics, and I don't think he would go out

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 2>of his way to ban bitcoin mining. You know, he

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 2>has said that he likes the idea of a free

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>market environment for energy. Multiple times. He's been asked about

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>it as it pertains to nuclear energy and to wind

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 2>at solar, and he's come on the record multiple times

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>saying that he believes in a free market for energy,

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think that that's really what bitcoin mining needs

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>at this point.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I did get a chance to speak with him

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>personally at Michael Sailor's house when we were in Miami,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and I had a chance to actually have that exact

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation with him about nuclear energy, and to be honest,

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I was a little disappointed with his answer and stance

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. And he's very educated, but it just seemed

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit misplaced in my opinion. And ultimately where

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it came down to was he believes that nuclear power

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is not safe and it's not cost effective, and we've had,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on how you want to look at

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the data, we've had maybe a few hundred people die

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>total in the history of nuclear power. None had died

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in the last you know, nuclear problem in Fukushima. Yet

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>who knows how many people die in creation of solar panels,

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>digging out minerals out of the ground and all that

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>installing and probably falling off of the list whatever. So

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we've had you know, nuclear subs since the sixties, never

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>had a problem with it. So anyway, I was a

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit a little bit taken back by that stance.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we'll see. Now, if you're just tune in,

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Markomas Show. I got to take

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, but I'm going to be right back,

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>so don't go away, you don't want to miss it.

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just tune in, you're listening to the markma Show. I'm

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with Dennis Porter from Soatoci Action Fund. We're

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about his work and the fun so Social Action

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Funds work on educating in the political space and taking

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>action on that. Now, you know one thing, Dennis is

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. Obviously, you guys have been doing this for

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a while, and I'm sure some of it has been

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>some of your impact, but I think there's also a

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger impact just happened in the mainstream, And I'm curious

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen maybe a little bit of a shift

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>in the rhetoric around bitcoin specifically and maybe bitcoin mining

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit even more specifically, around some of the rhetoric.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, obviously we know some of the

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>hit pieces that have been done. You know, bitcoin is

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>going to consume more energy than the you know, the

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 1>entire earth and things like that. We've seen stuff like that.

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw the hit piece I referenced earlier, like New

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>York Times did and you know, the right bitcoin space

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>mining space. But then, you know, I'm curious, you know

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>now that we're starting to see you know, black Rock

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>coming in and like, hey, we're going to launch a

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>fund atf Right and Fidelity and even Fidelity you know,

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>doing some mining and things like that, do you think

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that will start to shift the mainstream media's portrayal of

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is. I mean, Blackrock potentially is gonna have

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to spend towards getting people into

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>their edf do you you know, Blackrock is probably a

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>big sponsor of some of those mainstream media Do you

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think are you starting to see it shift or do

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that will start to shift.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 2>It Absolutely, it will. You know, I've said for a

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>long time that you know, as bitcoin advances in the

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>United States and as the organizations with all the money

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 2>organizations like you know, black Rock start to come on

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>board and start to see the value of this technology,

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 2>that once they start to see that it's something that

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>they want to push to the folks within their fund

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>that they will actually turn around and use their political

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 2>power to protect bitcoin. So I think, you know, there's

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 2>something to be said about that, the fact that bitcoin

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>is very permissionless and it has a very strong incentive structure,

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and so anybody can gain access to it, and it

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to use its in strong incentive structure to

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 2>encourage everyone to be a part of it. And once

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you're a part of it, you know, Mark like just

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 2>like myself, you know, all of a sudden, I've been

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>too bitcoin and five years later, I'm fighting at the

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>front lines trying to make sure that folks are educated

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>on this issue. I could probably get paid way better

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 2>to go do something else, but you know, I'm out

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>here trying to make sure that this technology is advocated

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>for and that Americans have access to it. So, yeah,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I do agree that that black Rock coming in will

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>be good in the sense that it will provide additional

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>resources and another voice kind of in the voids, so

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>to speak, a very large voice, one of the largest

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>or if not the largest fund in the entire world

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>coming in and supporting the industry. But also I do

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>see there is a churn or a shift in a

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 2>narrative taking place. We do see a lot of bad

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>articles coming out about bitcoin bitcoin wrining, but in the

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>last six months there has been a rapid uptick in

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>positive coverage. In fact, in the last month or two

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>we have seen Forbes just come out with positive article

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>after positive article around bitcoin mining. That means that, you know,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the folks at the top at Forbes are starting to

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>think that maybe that this is something that they had

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 2>gotten wrong in the past, and that now they are

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>starting to see the value of it. I think that

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Forbes is just the beginning, and that you'll see more

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of this take place. We should be giving a very

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 2>large shout out to people like Pierre Rashard, Daniel Batten,

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and others who have done a lot of work to

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>try to convince folks that we need to be getting

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>behind bitcoin and that America needs to be leading on

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>this technology.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>In regards to that. With America leading this technology, I

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>mean it is American technology, It was developed in America.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It has the American ethos built in right, strong private

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 1>property rights, rule of law, et cetera, et cetera. And

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw, you know, China had over sixty

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of the network capacity of the mining network capacity

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in China, and then China took a very aggressive stance

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and kicked it all out of the country and the

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>United States became a big beneficiary of that. You know,

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure. I don't know if the United

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>States is about thirty percent of that. Now you can

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong on that, but you know,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw that the United States was sort of given

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that role, handed handed that role almost by default. I'm

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>curious what you think the future is. I mean, if

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States continues on the you know, restrictive warpath,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, does America lose its place with this technology?

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And do you see other countries potentially stepping up to

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>challenge that role, like for example, Georgia we saw which

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a very small country, but stepping in to

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>start mining it directly. Of course, you know El Salvador

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>has been talking about mind it directly. So do you think,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like a is it ours to lose? Do you think

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, if they don't quickly change, another country

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>could take the lead on this. What's your viewpoint on that?

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>There's always opportunities for other countries to attract the bitcoin

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>digital asset space, bitcoin mining to their shores. And that's

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the great thing about this technology is that it can

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 2>really be anywhere, anywhere that there's energy. However, that being said,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 2>I will say that the United States is in an

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 2>incredible position to keep a vast majority of the hash

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 2>rate inside of its orders, simply for the fact that

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>we have a lot of inefficiencies where bitcoin miners can

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>take place over a vast area where they can start

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>to benefit from the lack of inefficiencies that are created

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 2>by wind and solar on the grid. But also we

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 2>have one of the most stable political systems in the

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>entire world. Now, you know, you go and you set

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>up in somewhere in Africa, somewhere in China, you name it,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you might go there. They might have cheaper power. But

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of things could take place. One is you

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>might end up having to pay corruption charges. Like there

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>are people that will just charge you money just saying hey,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you got to pay me money, or we're gonna we're

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna mess up your business, or you have to worry

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 2>about you know, for instance, Kazakhstan on the Internet going

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>down completely, or China designed to ban bitcoin mining. So

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>those things are not taking place in the United States.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 2>So far, we have not seen any sort of really

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 2>aggressive anti bitcoin mining policy take place other than just

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 2>solely in the state of New York where it's kind

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of a one off situation. What about like.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Trial, what about like the whole Biden like thirty percent

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>tax and all that.

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, sure the president can suggest whatever he wants,

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>but it never really had a chance of passing through Congress,

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and in fact was completely shut down during the deal

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 2>trading that happened for the budget limit trade I wish

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>you called trade and good.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 1>But if that were to go through, then that would

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>qualify as very restrictive sort of like what these other

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>countries have done potentially, right.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, I mean a thirty percent tax would have

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>virtually destroyed the industry overnight in the United States.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But you think there was really never a really strong

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>chance of that ever happening. It was more just like

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some rhetoric.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely rhetoric, very very very low chance of it happening.

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Like the thing is with bills, this is kind of

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the way that you need to think about them, is

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 2>that you can introduce a bill for free, but it

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 2>takes a lot of work to get it passed. And yes,

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>if the Biden administration was wholly invested in a thirty

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 2>percent tax on bitcoin mining, they might have been able

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to squeak it out, but you have to remember there

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>are many other much more important topics and issues to

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 2>the administration then screwing bitcoin miners over with a thirty

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 2>percent tax. I mean, you're talking about the war in Ukraine,

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the border, you're talking about health, you're

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about homelessness. This is not an issue that is worth,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, even negotiating over. Fortunately, in a situation where

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>we had the debt limit increase, where they were negotiating

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>over that, Republicans had negotiated that they wanted no new

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 2>additional taxes and that in that debt limit bill, which

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 2>ultimately resulted in there not being any new taxes on

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining. So kind of Fortunately we were swept up

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in that. But that's kind of how DC operates. Like

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you don't ever go to DC and just say I

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 2>want this one bill to pass and it passed because

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 2>it was such a good idea. Generally, it's like a

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>movement or a wave of policy. Like you did you

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>know that the healthcare bill was thousands of pages with

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of different types of policies in there. It's not

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>just one little policy that passes. They oftentimes get grouped

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 2>up into larger bills and passed or not passed. That's

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>generally the way it works in DC. And again, fortunate

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that for some reason within the Republican Party they were

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 2>able to negotiate that they want to know new additional taxes.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're generally anti tax so that's part that's why.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 2>But for some reason that was a big part of

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 2>their negotiation package.

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Well, like you said, I mean a lot

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of times they pass these giant omnibus bills that have

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>all types of things stuffed in there that most people

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 1>have no chance to even read.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And so for example, one of the things they do,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>which unfortunately seems like they're going to continue to spend

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.479
<v Speaker 1>more money We just saw how that debt ceiling debate

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>went down. And when they want to pass these new

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>spending bills, they have to figure ou how to get

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the money from somewhere a lot of times, so take

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>into attack, you know, new taxes into account or something

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, they figure out how to pay for that. So,

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a matter of staying vigilant. Right, It's

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>my fear is that they My fear is that they

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do these things and then you know, they kind of

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>throw it out against the wall. It's kind of outrageous.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like a it's what you'd call like a drop

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>cell technique. Right, they throw something out outrageous that people

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>object to, they take it away, and then they bring

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it back a little bit more tame, and then people

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of just like let it go through. So we

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to stay vigilant. So I love what you're

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>doing with Toshi Action Fund. If you're just tuned in

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Mos Show. I've been sitting

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>down with Dennis Porter from the Satoshi Action Fund, and

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely check them out. Dennis anywhere else, anyone

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>should follow along.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you want to follow us, you can sign

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 2>up for our newsletter by going to Satoshi Action dot io.

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 2>If you want to reach out to me personally, you

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>can email me at Dennis at Satoshi action dot io.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 2>And we also, you know, have all of our Twitter

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 2>accounts up and running if you if you look us up,

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, we'll show up right at.

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>The top yep. And we're gonna make sure that we

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>link all that in the show notes down below. Definitely

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>give Dennis a follow and check them out. And that's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>all we got. Thanks so much for listening today. Until

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>next time,