WEBVTT - Pop the Champagne Corks. 2020 Is Finally Ending.

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEO, market pros and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Lisa, you know, as we

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>make our way towards New Year's Eve, I'm gonna make

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a call here. I'm gonna say that people are going

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to drink a little bit more champagne than they typically do.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that they typically do in quarantine

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or just general? And I think just I think this

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a big here for champagne. As we

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>get the New Year's Eve, let's talk champagne. There's nobody

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>better to do that with than champagne. There you go.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Ashley, founder New York Champagne Week and the Fizz

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Is female platform and website, joining us on the phone

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>from New York. Blaine, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at a beautiful bottle of champagne right here.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>My question is what is champagne? Are people drinking more

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>champagne and a pandemic and a quarantine then typically, well,

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>first off, thank you both for having me. I really

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. And yes, the answer is yes, people are

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>drinking a lot more champagne, are actually spending more money

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.279
<v Speaker 1>on wine in general. UM sales have been a thirty

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>percent for champagne since June. Since mid June, so usually

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the revenue for the champagne industry comes in October, November, December.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We call it O n D. But we've been doing

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>those numbers of our sales come from that time frame.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We've been doing those numbers since June. Okay, Virtual tastings, yeah,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a real thing. I mean do people actually do that

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and feel satisfied with that? Um it is such a

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>real thing because as you know, as I'm the founder

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of New York Champagne Week, which has been the live

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>event for the last seven years, we transitioned the web

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. In one week, we did ten events. We

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>shift the Champagne experiences to thirty nine states, and we

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>had over two people per just tickets across the country

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to attend events like the Fried Chicken and Champagne Bash,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>which we did with Marcus Danielson of of the Red

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Rooster in your backyard LISTA and Harlem, I know where

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I live, my God, and then we we also we

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>paired him up with a Champagne brand. Owner is also

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>based on Harlem Rito Jam for walk Hard All Champagne.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I have actually done forty three virtual peastings since May

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>through December. And that's why I love half bottles because

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>they're keeping the waist line and check pennies in my pocket,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>all of that jobs, and they're they're much healthier for

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you all around. Right, So that's why I'm loving half

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bottles of Champagne. Which that business is way up, like

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so Blaine, So people are drinking more. We've heard that

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from different parts of the spirits industry. Are you finding

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>new champagne drinkers? Are you attracting new people to champagne?

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think that people are really looking

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for those little affordable luxuries in life, and so through

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the events and the tastings we're doing,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to make it very approachable. Like right now,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I have my bottle of Charles hid stuck open with

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some popcorn. And the newest craze with caviare is instead

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of it's ditching the balinis but putting it on a

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>potato chip. So it's kind of like all about like

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the approachable um and the diversity that champagne has to

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>offer a diversification. But also champagne is the most food

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>friendly wine out there. It really pairs from everything really

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can find. And then also um, champagne is

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lower than lower and alcohol. Uh, so it generally falls

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve percent category, whereas a standard still line

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>will be around fourteen. I gotta say, I'm not sure

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that you want to reduce alcohol. Actually I shouldn't have

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a joke about that, but I'm wondering going full were

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this concept of virtual paired with actual how do you

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>see this evolving in a world that isn't necessarily beset

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic woes? Right, So, after Champagne Week, and

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this is something I never saw coming as a total

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>small business in One Woman's show, I started having financial

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>firms and banks, um uh companies reach out to me

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to do virtual tastings for their clients. So I actually

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a few Champagne and caveat experiences with Google. I've

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>done some um from age and fays, so like cheese

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and champagne tastings for banks like JP Morgan. Um. I

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>never saw that coming. I actually booked that. We booked

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>about ten events between December eight and eighteen. Um uh

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>four people that are are switching up there. You know,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't do traditional client entertaining, so they're looking to

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>do this instead. Another great uh way that we're getting

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these virtual tastings out there and giving back to the

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>food and bridge industry, which is obviously hurting majorly right now,

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is doing a lot of chefs collaborations. A lot of

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>these chefs are offering items on sites like gold Belly,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which can ship to fifty states, and they're offering their

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like signature dish and delivering people's doorstep the day before

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so they can prepare it at home and have these

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>great experiences. Blaine, what are some of the champagne's that

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you like right now that you're really suggesting people that

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>they take some time in experiment with, right so I

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>selected some today to chat about. Um. We have the

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Charles types like Group Reserve that is a great champagne

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to start off your festivities for the holidays with, like

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>cheese and charcooterie boards something like that. Um. It is

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a blend of the three traditional grapes and champagne so

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Pino noir, Chardonnay, pinomnier, and it's eleven grams of dosage,

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the sugar. And that's another great thing about champagne.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It actually has a lower sugar content that people realize.

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Most groups Champagne's fall between six and twelve grams per leader. Um.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So that is an excellent um talking point about champagne,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>reason you should be drinking it. And then moving on, um,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we have billa carsmon blanc to blanc now Blanc to

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>blanc is a d percent chardoni and Chardonnay is great

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with fish. So I would pair that with a feast

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of seven fishes Christmas Eve dinner and down maybe also

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to up the antie again, we love

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>caviar and champagne. That's the great pairing. And then you

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have the su boi. I believe Paul correct and that

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is excellent with your classic Christmas dinner traditional holiday foods

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>like you know, turkey, uh, mushrooms, stuffing. I love duck,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>so I love it with duck. And then I believe

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that Lisa has the Laurent Perier kube rouse and we

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>love to pair rose with dessert around here, so um,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a great pairing with apple pie, of pecan pie,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>any sort of like fruit tart. Also, if you're not

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>into like sweets, I'm kind of a more of a

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cheese person, so you could do creamy cheeses, citrusly jams

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and figs um something like that would be perfect with

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that rose. And it's also it's stunning bottle, right, it's beautiful.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I've actually tasting another one that you sent over currently,

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so that that's what I believe. Are you having the

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Child's type or the lacara velve I'm doing yes, so

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the lacr vel cub Minia and that's what I set

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>off the top um. That has been my good I

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>had too much of it. No, that has been my

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>go to zoom line of this season. And because the

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>brand owner lives in New York and it's been really

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>great for collaboration Steak, She's able to kind of hop

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>onto a lot of these events. So everything we're offering

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on our website right now for virtual any time booking,

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we do with Rita, the owner of Laka of All,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because she's there and who better to speak to her

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Champagne for these zoom experiences than than the founder herself.

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And what's great as Rita used to own a iconic

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurant in Midtown called La Carvell. It closed in two

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three, but it was like Kennedy's hot Spot

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or the Stewart, like tons of glow, Julia Child, tons

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of g Literatti went there and she is like best

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>friends to every single chef in New York. We have

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>access to the chefs because of the founder of Lacarravel,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Rita Jamai Champagne Blaine, you made my Thursday afternoon absolutely fantastic.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>You made it a little bit harry for Paul, who's

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned. I haven't drug that much. I just

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>opened at the beginning of the segment. Champagne Blaine, thank

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. That was fantastic and I look forward

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to a very, very fun evening. Champagne Blaine. Ashley, founder

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Champagne Week and the phizz is

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>female platform website, joining us on the phone. Uh, it

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is nice way to end the week. I've got to say, Paul,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely and the bottles are beautiful, and you know I'm

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not a huge champagne person. I know a lot of

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>folks are, but get started. I get started. Champagne Blane

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely got me fired up to open this bottle probably

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this evening, Yeah, opened up a bottle anything radio. What

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a year we're all looking forward exactly. Just unbelievable, and

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's amazing how these financial markets have reacted.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>We think, Lisa, back to uh, the depths in that

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>march in April and just the panic in the marketplace.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But then the Federal Reserve comes to the rescue, fiscal

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus comes to the rescue, and we have this major

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>turnaround in the markets. Now Here, we are a couple

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of days left in the year. The question is what

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do we do next year? Alan Zafyn founding partner and

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>co CEO of I e Q Capital, based in Foster

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>City and Los Angeles, California. He joins us now, Alan,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate it.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>On Christmas Eve, again, what a year. I'd love to

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:13.119
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts one, how are you positioning your portfolio?

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Lisa and Paul happy, alidays, Thank goodness, We're going to

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>get through this year. Absolutely, there's still a couple of

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>days left, though, let's not take sick. Carry on all right. Uh,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the longest short of it. If you talk to

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>almost any analysts, they'll tell you we're going to go

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>up in the U S stock market next year. And

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason is you're going to see US economic growth

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the fastest it's been since the mid eighties. And that's

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>because when you pump literally nearly fifty worth of g

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>d P in the form of monetary and fiscal stimulus,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what we have done this year, you're setting

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself for a boom on the back end of that.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>So again, with all due respect to the horrific, horrific

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>elements of oalth crises and literally social and economic crisis,

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and we clearly have problems with inequality as it relates

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market. The money has got to go somewhere.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And when cash is giving you nothing, and when bonds

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>give you so little, risk appetites perk up. And with

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that massive amount of money, equities move higher and other

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>risk assets moved higher. All things equal, there's plenty of

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>risks and bumps, but the base cases we keep grinding higher,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>largely because the money has got to go somewhere. That's

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your story for two. So another way of putting this

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is that in two it will sort of be

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like what we saw in the second half of two.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Nothing really matters except for the money keeps keeps flowing,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so you might as well buy stocks. Is that the

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing here with luck? Yes? With let me give

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit of nuance. So please give an example.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know this, but Brexit finally passed.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard about that. Nobody can't the markets that move right?

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>How many years have we obsessed about that darn thing? Uh? Frankly,

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a modest positive. It's not a not actually that

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal, but it's a modest positive. But

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing that is um a good and

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>about is if the economy really improves and broadens out,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you will finally see this rotation to a degree anyway

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>where you start to see the smaller companies perform as

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>well as the larger stocks, and you start to see

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the value industries do as well as the technology and

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>growth related related stock. And so it may actually be

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a year where it's a little deceptive. And what I

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is our indexes in the US are

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>now dominated by technology companies. It's possible we'll see a

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>year where the average stock is doing better than that index.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The index being market cap weighted, so the big technology

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>companies comprise a big part of that index. It could

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be oddly enough, a year the index doesn't go up

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>too much in actually a bunch of individual stocks do

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>modestly better because as the economy picks up, businesses that

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are a lower quality and need economic growth, they're gonna

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit of a pickup next year. So

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>industrial stocks, financial stocks, selective consumer oriented stocks might actually

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>do a little better than the apples and facebooks and

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's of the world. Um, that's sort of the other

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>element of two thousand twenty one is maybe we'll get

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a broadening of market stock market recovery and that will

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of help everybody a little bit. Do you embrace

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that rotation trade there? Allan It's it's certainly been successful here,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the last several months, I guess a

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are just saying, how much legs does

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that cyclical trade, that rotation trade have in How do

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Coming from a guy right here

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley, I'm gonna be a heretic. I can

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you I think there's an element of truth, So

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I embrace it, but only, but you know, only to

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a modest degree. It's like, you know, bulls and bear

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>make goals, and bears make money and pigs don't. Um,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I think you're crazy to just think I'm going to

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rotate entirely out of the large cap tech names and

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>go into small caps, low value companies. That's not the trade.

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You still want to be in strong balance sheet businesses

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that generate consistent growth, and so you can find again financials, industrials,

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples that meet that description without being a technology company.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And I still think you've got to be balanced, um

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>between putting all your eggs and ones ask. But it's

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just a reckless strategy, and it also drives a lot

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of transactional activity and taxes. So you know, just be

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>prudent about it, don't You know. You don't have to

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>find the next test one, just keep balanced. But yeah,

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I do embrace the fact the economy is going to strengthen,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and I do think the market will broaden out the participation,

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will end up being a good year,

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not not an amazing year, but a good year, and

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the risks um include the outcome of the Georgia election

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and that the market doesn't want to see corporate tax

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>rates higher. So if it's both seats on January fifth

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>go to a Democrat, it's possible the market won't react

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>well because there will be a perception corporate tax rates

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>might ultimately hike as a result, we certainly need to

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>see the distribution of the vaccines working. And then, lastly, ironically,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>even though you want great economic growth, you don't want

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the economic growth to be so strong as to create

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an inflation scare. So if you see interest rates spiking

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>spiking up towards two percent on an tender treasure bond

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>too quickly, we'll get some hiccup in the stock market,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because this market is built on low interest rates supporting

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the current higher than average valuation. Once rates get high enough,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it gets to the point where they compete with taking stocks.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we're going to be in a

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>protracted inflationary environment for at least another couple of years,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for all sorts of reasons, including our aging population. Older

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>individuals tend to spend less, and we still have some

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>elements of benefit of technology and product the UH preventing

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation from coming to play. So that's two thousand twenty one.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a good environment, not a great environment for stocks

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and a broadening economic outlook. We're speaking with Alan Zaffron,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>founding partner and co CEO of I e Q Capital.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You said a lot there. Let's unpack one aspect. We're

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Georgia elections and how a democratic outcome.

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If the Democrats ended up taking leadership in the Senate,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that could be a negative for the market because of

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a higher regulation and taxes. This actually is a bit

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>contrarian because some people think it's a positive for the

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>market due to more fiscal support. Can you sort of

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the balance between those two risk factors. Yeah,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so, UM various amost the Communists have projected that

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if corporate tax rates, as stated initially by the Biden

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>platform in the campaign, and of course it could all change. Um,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if those corporate tax rates arose from it would reduce

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the earnings per share of the SMP five by anywhere

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from nine to fifteen percent. So in a vacuum that

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>all we're going to do is raise corporate tax rates.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I could argue that if the multiple stay the same,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I could argue that the market is going to take

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a nine to hit. You could also give me the

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>argument that a democratic administration, all things equal, might be

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>slightly more regulatory on technology companies which comprise part of

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the index, which could even worsen stock market reactions as well.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, there is absolutely belief that such

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>an administration will imediately increase infrastructure spending, that which has

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>desperately needed in other forms of fiscal spending, which will

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly amplifies consumer spending in US directed corporate spending. And

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>again now talking about analysts uh an economists of ranges

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>arguing that that could actually increase uh earnings pretty sure

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>on a magnitude of anywhere from seven to twelve percent.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue it's a modest negative. Ultimately, I

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's got more headline risk than ultimate economic impact,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and it shifts where the winners and losers are. It

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>actually amplifies what we just talked about in a broadening economy,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>all things equal, those perspective target technology companies which historically

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have not paid high taxes. It's going to force them

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>pay higher taxes, and they might be under greater regulation.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>The businesses that benefit from greater infrastructure spending tend to

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>be more cursory, basic industry economically sensitive companies. So it's

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>another argument towards the rotation. I'd argue you would get

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>ahead if both seats go to Democrats in Georgia. I

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>think you'll get a knee jerked reaction down. You know,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>pick your number, will take a week or two, maybe

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the market goes down. Kick a number five to ten percent.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a knee jerk reaction, and it's the

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>proverbial buying opportunity. In the long run, companies will do

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just find profits will be made, and those that are

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to have savings in an IRA or you know,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in their own personal accounts, I think they will benefit

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>by own stocks. So you get a need jerk reaction down.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not a permanent erosion of someone's well. Alan, you

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you're in Silicon Valley. One of the stories

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, maybe starting in nineteen, was the increased

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory oversight from US US officials, not just European officials,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but UH regulators Congress. What's the feeling in the valley

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>right now about kind of the regulatory environment as it

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>relates to tech, it's historically been a very light touch.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Are they concerned it's gonna get a little heavier, Yes,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But I would tell you everyone around here is always paranoid,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and so that doesn't change anything. You always hope for

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the best and planned for the worst. Another story we're

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>not covering much today is take a look at Ali

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Baba stock Alibaba stock, and it's down from its peak.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Why because the Chinese regulators have said, we don't like

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba's anti um you know, it's it's monopolistic policies

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to go after them. And that's exactly

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with these large cap, largest tech companies fear by the way,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of the small entrepreneurs, smaller companies of entrepreneurs around here,

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>they love that because they want to be able to

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have a more competitive or fair marketplace. So there's two

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sides of that coin. There's absolutely concerned that there will

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be greater elements of regulation, but usually the bark is

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>worse than the bike, so there's a belief that the

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>regulation probably won't get to the point that it's demonstrably

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>punitive to the business. Business models, again, modestly negative impacts

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and probably the headlines will actually be worse than the

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actual damage to the business model in the long run.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be hard for you to convince me that

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>companies like Amazon and Microsoft and Google are going to

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>lose permanent competitive advantages given their scale and first mover

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>advantage and their respective businesses they've entered into before we

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>let go, Allen, what are you doing for the new year?

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>In the holidays, I'm going to be doing from reading

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a few books I think big essentialism. I'm going to

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>take a few walks in the Redwoods and clear my

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>mind and hope and pray for a much better two

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one for everyone at every socio economic level.

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>This has been a really tough year, so I had

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gratitude and I'm counting my blessings. That's

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing. A wonderful message, Thank you, Alan Saffron.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing probably about half of that, maybe a quarter,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe an eighth. Definitely less ambitious, that's for sure. No reading,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not a walk in the redwoods, trying to wrangle kids.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Alan's after in Central Park. That's that's that's sure. Sure. Yeah,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll check out the mud from the snow and the rain.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Alan Zaffred, founding partner and co chief executive officer at

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I e Q Capital, talking about the Redwoods and some

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>lofty goals and really really wonderful market calls. Thank you

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for everything, Allen. I will say in all seriousness, Paul,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it actually has been beautiful because after it snowed, it

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>was great. It was going sledding, it was going out

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and enjoying the city. And now we're facing down with

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a very wet Christmas Eve, and yes, it's gonna be windy,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be tough out there for Santa and

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the sled but hopefully he'll be okay. Yeah, I know

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're worried about him. He'll make it through. I promise.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Markets with Lisa Rama, Weds and Paul's

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Wheeney on Bloomberg Radio, twelve minutes left before the end

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of the shortened trading day. Here ahead of Christmas, we're

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about all of the things to come that would

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be nice and bubbly, just like the champagne that we

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about and now drinking. Joining us now

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the outlook for perhaps an area that needs

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to see brighter days if you look in some of

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the bigger cities, but certainly is seeing brighter days if

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at the likes of Florida. Is Bonnie Stone

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Sellers and Jeff Highland, co founders of Forbes Global Properties,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at the Luxury Outlook, I just to

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>give you a sense of what Forbes Global Properties is.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a luxury portal membership only for elite real estate

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>firms showing high end residences across the world. So, Bonnie,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you could just start by giving us a sense of

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what you do and how much interest you have seen

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at a time of such bifurcated fortunes. It's it's an

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>incredibly interesting time to be launching a consumer marketplace and

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>an elite brokerage network. Was clearly the year of the home,

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and although there are a few cities that didn't do

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as well in the luxury real estate world, nearly every

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>place around the world in luxury was reflective of people

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>wanting bigger homes, people wanting second homes, people wanting vacation homes,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and accordingly, home sale prices doubled in the past home

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>sales doubled in the past year. But we see as

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>being even better for the luxury housing market. There's so

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>much pent up demand and foreign buyers will then be

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going back after the vaccine into lots of markets. And

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we also see, um, what a great time for a

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>digital platform. If if nothing else, Uh, the COVID gear

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>has taught us that everyone buys things online, looks at

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>things online, and um, doesn't matter what the price of

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the home is, it'll start with digital. So we're pretty

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>upbeat about the luxury market and our platform. Hey, Jeff,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of kind of the geographic strengths

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and weaknesses. It's just you know, around the world wherever

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing kind of the real demand. Because here in

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>New York City it seems like everybody's leaving for Florida.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us, Well, you know that's a

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>momentary thing. We all hope everyone comes back to New York.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>But then you look at everything's like the Hampton's and

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Florida maybe for taxes, Austin again, for taxes Southern California.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a boom time again. Uh. And I hate

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that COVID had something to do with it,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but I had a client whose house we ever sale

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or nine digits who who was asked the question do

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you know it caused the Roaring twenties? And he said, no,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't, And the person answered him it was the

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Spanish flu. He said, what do you mean? He said, well,

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>all that pent up demand from two years and deaths

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and no one doing anything just got everybody out. They

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted the party, they wanted to spend money, they wanted

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to play. So he said, he feels the same thing

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen in four and uh, we could

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have a whole another boom time. Uh. And unfortunately, the

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>way that we're going with um you know, the rich

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>getting richer and the poor getting poorer. Uh, it is

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>affecting the high end of the market. And what bye

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not created here with Forbs Global Properties is a luxury portal.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It's basically going to be the zello of high net

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>worth individuals. And we'll be able to attract as we've

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>already had. We're like twelve days out now since we

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>launched our website, UH, to really attract and direct the

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>high net worth individual to the site, and then we'll

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>have them contact directly with our individual agents on the portal.

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And we're just terribly excited about it the Roaring twenties.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, Paul, this is what you buy into, right,

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to be the Roaring twenties? Do

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, I absolutely do. I think it's the similarities

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are pretty telling. So body, I mean, one of the

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>things driving real estate in general and certainly the high

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>end are just these record low interest rates here. What

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are your buyers of luxury properties? How sensitive are they

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to interest rates? Yeah? I don't think that UM buyers

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of high end properties are particularly sensitive to interest rates.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, low interest money is available and that helps

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on any purchase, but the luxury market is also in

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>an old cash market, and it's more or less a

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>global phenomena. Having said that, I think that the the

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>UH real estate markets overall will definitely benefit from the

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates. There's a question, Jeff, going back to

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what you were talking about the Roaring twenties I find

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>really compelling, which is I think about the Great Gatsby

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Hampton's and the scene there. Is that what

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do a repeat of or is it

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going to take place in Austin, in Florida? Is it

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take place in new places? Because of tax

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons because of other reasons. Well, you know the whole

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>thing about East Dag it was one big mansion on

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the north shore. What we're talking about now are people

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with multiple homes around the world. And almost every home

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that we sell in Beverly Hills it's fifty million dollars

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in up. It's not the primary residence. It could be

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth, the fifth, the sixth home. So it's such

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>such it's so well spread out. And one of the

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>things that attracted Body and me to create forms global

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>properties is that we now have people from all over

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the world. We're already in seventy markets, and they come

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>from everywhere. There were waves when maybe you had a

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>certain group who would let's say, uh, Middle Easterners would

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>come to the United States, or then you had had

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan's going to Florida, etcetera, etcetera. We've had that whole cycle.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So now it's a little of everything coming from everywhere,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and it no longer has a distinction of well, this

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is the year of the Chinese uh getting their money

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>out of China. It's it's it's coming from everywhere, and

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see throughout the United States people from

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>every portion UH going. Whether it's for business, or it's

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for pleasure, or it's even tax avoidance, but we're going

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to see a boom in the high end luxury market continue.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I jump in. Our portal is not just for ultra

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>high net worth individual it's a consumer marketplace. Forbes is

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>UH an incredibly well respected business brand with a hundred

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>years history and a hundred forty million unique visitors every

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>month who you know will be chaperone to our website,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know there will be lots of people. All

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of your audience comes from many industries. They all have

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing in common, and that's that they all have homes.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So we think there's a very broad spectrum of of

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of consumers who would love to come to our marketplace

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and see the homes. Hey, Bonnie and Jeff, thank you

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so much. We really appreciate a Bonnie Stone Sellers and

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Highland, co founders of Forbes Global Properties, joining us

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>talks about the luxury market here. It's like everything else

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in this pandemic has taken a pause, but there's certainly

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a bullish call out there for UH luxury properties going

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>forward least, and I think UH, you know, there's will

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how New York fares, for example. Yeah,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>well it's not as desolate as you might think, Paul,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that good. It's good to hear.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, I missed coming in and look forward

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to doing it very soon. And uh so, Lisa, have

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a great couple of days weekends, Christmas and we get

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>into the new year. We'll have more for you on

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg radio coming up. Here's a question heading into

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>year end of whether this deal that was passed with

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support by by Congress to give nillion dollars to

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>help support and plug the gap in people's finances as

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a result of the pandemic of where there was President

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump will now veto it and what the implications are

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us now Jeanne's you know, Bloomberg opinion contributor and

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>professor at political of political science at i own a College.

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>G what's the thinking that President Trump has in videoing

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this bill, vidoing the defense bill like he did last night?

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>What's he going for? You know it? Really? I mean,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been a whild cool days in Washington, and I

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think you know the answer is, we don't quite know.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that he has expressed reservations about the stimulus package.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>We know he's a reservations obviously that led to a

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>vito of the Defense bill. UM. There's a lot of

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>speculation as to what his motives are UM and I

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>would not question those. But what we do know is

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that we have a Congress that could a federal government

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that could shut down. UM. We have a Congress with

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a bill that hasn't quite reached the president's desk yet,

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but he could either sign that or veto it, or

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do nothing. And if he either vetos that or does nothing,

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it really not only puts Congress UM in a strange position,

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but it puts the American public in a strange position,

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as we will have UM. Ten days before a pocket

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Vito would go through, which would be in the Congress'

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>session would end, a new Congress would come in, and

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this entire bill would be blown up, so we wouldn't

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get the COVID relief that people are seeking. So it's

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a really sort of tumultuous point that we're at at

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this point, and we really don't know where he's going

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to go. He's now down in Florida and we don't

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>know again whether he'll veto sign or simply do nothing. So, Genie,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what's striking or there's many things that are striking about

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the less several days as it relates to the stimulus discussions,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but the lack of coordination or even communication, it seems

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>between the White House and the Republicans in Congress. What

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that? Yeah, I think that's the

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>strangest part of this. I think for so many Republicans

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>who said they not only had the cooperation, they had

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the administration in there as part of the negotiations. Seed Minuchin,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>who Mitch McConnell and others praised on the Senate floor

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for getting this bill done. You had poor David Purdue,

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>who is facing a runoff in January fifth in Georgia,

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>saying tweeting out that they had done the work that

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was needed for Georgians and he was going home to

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>fight for his elections. All of them assuming and thinking

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they had the support of the White House. And then

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>at the eleventh hour, the President came in with this

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>video and you know, just back to what Lisa was asking,

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, because some of the speculation is the President

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is frustrated because Mitch McConnell, Johnson and other leaders in

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Senate have said, is Enohings enough about fighting for

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this election to be overturned? And it's his frustration that

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they no longer want to fight the electoral college that

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>led him to this path to blow that up. And

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's purely speculation, but at your point, he certainly put

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>his own Republican Party in a very difficult position, as

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they were led to believe he was supportive, and then

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end hour he has come in with this

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>massive that his criticism what is this do for the

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia election? Makes it very difficult for Republicans. I mean,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 1>if anything, this is a gift to Democrats who, as

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Nancy Pelosi tweeting, great, you know we're going

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to move forward. We can try to get the two

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars you want. It puts you know, the Lessler

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and Perdue who are in these runoffs in Georgian a

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>very strange position. Remember, one of the reasons Mitch McConnell

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pushed Republican to make this deal in in the end

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was because of Georgia, saying we can't keep the Senate

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have a deal that these senators can

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bring home to their constituents. They thought they had that

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and now that's been blown up. It really were in

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of unturned territory. Are Republicans really gonna come out

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>now and support Leffler and Purdue given that they may

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not get the release they were seeking. On top of which,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they have a president who has gone back and forth

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on whether they can even trust the electoral system in

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>which they're supposed to be voting. So it really puts

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in a very difficult position for this runoff. And

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of course, if they lose both of these seats, then

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell is no longer going to be a majority

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>leader and they will lose Washington because they will lose

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. What are the polls saying about Georgia right now?

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And can we believe those polls? Yeah, we've seen. One

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the fascinating um sort of undertold stories about this

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>race is that many of the public posters have pulled

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>out of Georgia after the general election, in part because

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they were criticized for polling in a way that didn't

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>turn out the way the results did. In part because

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the timing, and a lot of posters don't want

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to pull over the holidays, So we have very limited

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>polling coming out of Georgia, and the polling we have

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>shows it is too tight to call. Most of these

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>polls that I've seen that are again the public polls

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are within the margin of error, meaning this thing could

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>go either way. And I know people hate to hear this,

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but this really is a case of turnout and Democrats

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>seemed had be turning out people in record numbers, but

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans usually have an advantage historically and runoff in a

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>state like Georgia. So again, this thing could go either way.

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of investment managers have been watching the Georgia

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>race and actually saying it could be a game changer

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for them because if Democrats do take the majority in Senate,

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we could see a bigger fiscal support package or fiscal stimulus,

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even actual true stimulus that we could call it that.

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that people are a little ahead of

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves and that given the moderate tilt of a lot

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Democo hats that have gotten in, Yeah, I

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do think. I think it's the right way to be

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. But I do think they're a little

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>bit ahead of themselves. As you mentioned, not only the

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>moderate tilt of the Democrats who have gotten in, but

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that the House, the new Congress, will

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>be more Republican than it was or is now, and

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that even if Democrats take the Senate,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it is by the narrowest of margins. So I think

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>any idea that we are going to see if we

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had a Democratic Senate, that we would see a massive

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package, I think is not going to happen. And

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look back at the two two thousand and

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>nine what Barack Obama faced, he faced something very similar.

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>He was never able to get the deal that most

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>economists said he should because he couldn't get the moderate

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and enough of the Republicans go along with him.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be even a narrower Senate.

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think the idea of a massive bill is

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>something that we won't see, but I do think it's

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the right way to be thinking about it within the margins.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>If Democrats take the Senate, they obviously do have the

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>upper hand on these things. The other prospect is this

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Biden, is that he isn't going to be

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>even more pressured by the liberal the liver more and

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be hard given the numbers are so slim,

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's also the flip side of it, if you will,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Biden, if they take the sentence, Genie twenty seconds.

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your thoughts on just the of

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>all the pardons we're seeing from President Trump. Yeah, not surprising,

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think really devastating to the part in um,

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the parted power that the president has, and I think

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the black Water ones, the ones that have to do

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with what happened in the Rock, particularly devastating for the

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>U S Military and US justice overseas. Genie, thank you

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. As always, we appreciate your perspective.

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Gene Xano, political contributor to Bloomberg News. She's also a

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>professor of political science at i own, a college based

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in New Rochelle, New York. Just getting us her thoughts

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>here on the stimulus. Seems to be bogged down a

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit here obviously the last days, and it really

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is a time crunch, a cliff, if you will. Hopefully

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>progress can be made over the next several days. Thanks

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts. Or whatever podcast platform

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at bonnie Quinn.

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio