WEBVTT - Micron HBM Sales Surge, Palantir’s Stock Keeps Climbing

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast, with Caroline

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and ev Lolow into San Francisco.

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Micron's high bandwidth memory business fuels a sales surge, more

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 3>in its earnings results.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Next, plus how young startup Expo backed by Ultimate Capital,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>developed an AI tool that does better than experienced hackers.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 3>And we dive into talents. Three hundred percent stock rallies

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>since October. This is defense tech comes increasingly into focus.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, and focus are the big benchmarks today. The S

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred ching in on its record high.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>All as the market focuses in on the federal Reserve

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>where we see more rate cups. Can we have three

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as soon as this year as we see economic data

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>come in mix Today, ed, we're looking at a five

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>tenths of a percent push higher actually on the nast

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that one hundred feeling of a risk on attitude, particularly

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>towards certain chipmakers.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 4>You're looking at.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Micron, America's biggest maker of memory chips, posted a

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>really strong forecast for the current period.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>The stock opened up almost two.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 3>Percent higher, it's now down one percent, and we can

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 3>get into the reasons right real quick. In Video, which

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 3>has had a sort of tepid morning, is now backed

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>continuing to hold at a fresh all time high in Micron.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's get into Bloomberg Intelligence Analysis with Jake Silverman and

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Jake I'm looking through.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>The transcripts as a call.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>The forecast shows demand in the AI context, but I

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>think pricing, Jake, is a really key conversation here.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely so, AI is a particularly strong tailwind for pricing.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 5>But you have to keep in mind that the consumer

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 5>market is still particularly important for Micron, at least think

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 5>of smartphones, but also PCs and other SSD products and

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 5>D round products. So we're going to have to see

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 5>some of those seasonal tailwinds, you know, smartphone PC upgrade,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 5>and those will beneficial pricing, but also structural limitations in

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 5>terms of capacity capacity.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically for many of these companies, it's been a supply issue,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't been a demand issue, Jake, We've also seen a

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>demand issue with the shares. You'll see they've out performed

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and about fifty percent of the course of year to date.

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Was it just that so much was already priced into

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the market here?

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>How high have expectations been.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean expectations have gotten pretty high. I think

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 5>as we've seen spot prices and contract prices increase over

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 5>the recent weeks and months, that built into some of

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 5>those expectations. Again, a high bandwidth memory is something that

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 5>continues to be considered fairly important for sentiment in Micron,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 5>but it's also a fairly small percentage of the company's

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 5>overall revenue. So there's just pretty high expectations across multiple

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 5>facets of the business, and so they're going to need

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 5>to continue to gain share in high band with memory.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 5>They're going to need to continue to execute in that regard,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 5>but also across their other AI products, while also managing

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 5>the rest of their business, which again drives a lot

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 5>of that pricing strength.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, the executives on the call were pretty clear, right, Jake,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the story simple data center growth sequentially in year on

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>year and that will continue to outperform, and some of

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the other businesses not as strong, but in the background,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 3>they're investing in and building out capacity. Just try and

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>help our audience understand how difficult it is to produce

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>HBM and what the bottle neck is right now for

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Micron and its customers.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so HBM is a little bit more complex, actually

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 5>maybe fairly more complex when we think about actually producing

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>relative to other memory products, especially in DRAM. So it's

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>stacked HBM. So we've talked about they've talked about twelve

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 5>high stack, eight high stack, so that that gives you

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 5>the dimensions of how high these DRAM stacks can go.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 5>And as you increase the height, it increases the complexity.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 5>And so the Micron and peers like s k Heinex

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>are able to charge a premium. And so yield is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 5>a very important topic of conversation when we bring up

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 5>complexity and their ability to execute in terms of both

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 5>improving the capacity but also improving the yield drives their

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 5>ability to increase their share and also increase their groups margin.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue meg Intelligence analyst Jake Silverman and all things Micron,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it. Let's keep talking AI and the broader

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tech market. J Jacobs black Rock, US head of Equity

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ETS is here and I'm looking in astonishment at really

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the enthusiasm around the I shares, AI innovation and tech

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>active ETF interesting in micrones not in there, but the

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>top holdings are in video and their broad com How

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>much the investors want to be in on the chip,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure names, but broadened.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Out perhaps well.

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 6>The portfolio manager for this fun, Tony Kim, is really

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 6>looking across the value chain for opportunities and artificial intelligence.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 6>But right now where he sees some of the biggest

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 6>opportunity is in those infrastructure and hardware names. If you

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 6>look at where the money is being spent on AI today,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 6>the almost quarter of a trillion dollars being spent by

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 6>the megagapp tech names. It's being concentrated in semiconductor names

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 6>and data centers and all the support compute that's going

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 6>around that, And so our fund is very much tilted

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 6>towards that exposure right.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, tilted towards in video, which is at a record

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>high as well. I'm just going to see where broad

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Comm stands today, but it too has been very close

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to record highs throughout.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 4>It is at a record high today.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>How much well juice is there to go on that

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure play? How much can you continue to sweat at

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>an ets?

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 6>It's still early. I mean, if we look at the

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 6>next several years, we're expecting about seven trillion dollars to

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 6>be spent on AI. Capex so we have a long

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 6>way to go. There's a lot of dollars to come

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 6>into the space. I still think we're in the early innings.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 6>Over time, the exposure will evolve, though. Well, this is

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 6>kind of the build out stage of building all that infrastructure.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 6>The next stage is going to be much more about

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 6>adaption of AI. Who's commercializing these AI products?

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Jay, your thesis or a part of it is this

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>overconcentration in megacaps, the fixation with the MAG seven. There's

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 3>an interesting side debate which is whether we should rethink

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the composition of the MAG seven broad com perhaps making

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the strongest case on fundamentals about joining or participating in

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that group. All of that to say, like, what should

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 3>we do if that's the case, if we have overconcentration.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Where else do you look?

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, whils Street always loves a good acronym for these things,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 6>and maybe it's time for any one. Look, I think

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 6>it's really about looking beyond just concentrated megacap tech names. Yes,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 6>they're important players in the AI space, but they don't

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 6>encapsulate all of it. You know, we've looked across twenty

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 6>thousand different financial advisor portfolios. When we found ninety five

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 6>percent of the AI exposure in their portfolios is coming

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 6>from megacap tech names, So people are very overweight megacap

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 6>tech just you know, largely a function of how the

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 6>S and P five hundred is today, but very underweight

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 6>the broader kind of long tail of artificial intelligence names

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 6>in digital infrastructure, in data in compute, et cetera. So

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 6>we really think it's about kind of reducing large cap

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 6>tech because there's a lot of concentration there and broadening

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 6>it out across the value chain with a fund like BAI.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>What about those non tech sectors that are most impacted

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>by AI or transformed by AI.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 6>Where do you want to look Well, I think one

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 6>of the more interesting areas is where there's a lot

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 6>of data that hasn't been harnessed by artificial intelligence. And

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 6>you have to look at the healthcare sector as being

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 6>just prime for using all that information around patient data,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 6>around hospital management, around the development of new drugs, around

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 6>protein research. There's just so much data that frankly has

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 6>been under utilized, and if you can apply artificial intelligence

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.679
<v Speaker 6>to it, you can get more efficient, you can reduce

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 6>the cost of drug development, you can improve performance, improve

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 6>outcomes for patients, which really would make this sector very

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 6>attractive one from an artificial intelligence perspective.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I go back to bai I go back to the

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Innovation and Tech Active ETF. Here, most of the top

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>holdings are US companies. You have to get to number

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to get a Japanese company, and then there's a

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sprinkling of the Japanese coming in.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Is it still US exceptionalism here?

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 6>It's a function of where we're seeing the best public

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 6>market opportunities and artificial intelligence. It is being led by

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 6>the United States. We have some of the lowest costs

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 6>of capital, we have some of the most innovative companies.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 6>We have a vibrant startup community that's kind of fueling

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 6>IPOs in this space as well. It is a global

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 6>trend and we do have global exposure, but right now

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 6>the US is very much leading.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And what about the investors who are piling in just

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>get us up to speed. It's what about two billion

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that's been coming in of late into the from client assets.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Where are they coming from?

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we've brought in two billion dollars over the

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 6>last nine months.

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 6>One of the major things that happened is black Rocks

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 6>target Allocation model ETF models has allocated to AI. Our

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 6>model portfolio managers like Michael Gates have looked at the

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 6>landscape and said, we want to reduce large cap tech

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 6>exposure and reduce some of our just tech sector exposure

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 6>and replace it with artificial intelligence because this is a

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 6>high conviction theme that we believe in over the long run,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 6>and so they've been shifting their exposures to get more

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 6>pure play in the AI theme.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Jay Humor May.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve Chair Pow was posed many questions on the

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 3>impact of AI labor markets in the future of the economy.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And FED policy.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>It was difficult for him to answer, But do you

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.599
<v Speaker 3>think about it in those terms? You basically say, I

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the economy of the United States and the world,

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 3>and I try and alculate how structurally things might change

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 3>going forward.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think this is an important area to look

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 6>at where AI can augment work right, How can it

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 6>make us more efficient? Can we accelerate productivity? Especially in

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 6>the context of aging populations around the world. So if

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 6>you look at developed markets, in many cases, the growth

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 6>of a labor market is slowing, and so you really

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 6>almost need AI and that productivity growth to maintain strong

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 6>GDP growth across these developed economies. So I think in

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 6>many ways, AI is going to be an incredible tool

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 6>to boost productivity and frankly a tool that develop markets

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 6>need to lead it. This is why we're seeing AI

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 6>at the crux of geopolitics, because people policymakers see it

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 6>as such an accelerant towards our economy over the long run.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Throughout the show in the day, actually we're going to

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 3>be talking about Patenteer and it makes me think about

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>not just software, but this kind of broader American effort

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to reindustrialize the country in a number of sectors, defense,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence, data centers. Is there some kind of big

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>picture effect that you're trying to jump on to on

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>this reindustrialization the manufacturing of stuff here in America.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is really at the intersection of several themes.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, We've looked at five mega forces around the

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 6>world that are kind of changing the long term trajectory

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 6>of economies, and one of them is aging populations, which

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 6>you've mentioned, one of them is artificial intelligence, and the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 6>third one is really geopolitical fragmentation. All of these are

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 6>combining to bring in you know, certain themes like infrastructure.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 6>How when we see that we want to build more

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 6>in the United States, we have to have better roads,

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 6>better highways, better waterways, better power to accelerate that. How

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 6>do we have the best technology in the world through

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence and leaning into that segment. So really, yes,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 6>all of these things are kind of colliding here to

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 6>really lead some of the best economic opportunities in the

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 6>United States.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 3>J Jacobs a black Rocket's great to have you back

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, China gives approval for more M and A

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>among its tech giants. It's a big story we're watching

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.239
<v Speaker 3>and that's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>This time now for Talking Tech.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Have verst up a growing number of Chinese AI startups

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>where they are looking to list in Hong Kong. That

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>could include Rikonover Technologies. It's a firm specializing in visual

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>perception look. According to sources, the company, which is backed

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>by Intel Capital, green Und Holdings, is looking to raise

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred million dollars from the listing that could

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>happen later this year. In more listing news, In fact,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>digital payments provider Pine Labs has filed to go public

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>in India, and the company, whose shareholders include PayPal, will

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>seek to raise as much as twenty six billion rupees

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that's around three hundred and.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Three million dollars.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Indian capital markets, of course, are seeing a resurgence in listings,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>fueled in part by the government's push to digitize the economy.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 4>And the president and CEO of Tokyo.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Electron well as shrugging off concerns about rising competition from China,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he spoke exclusively with Bloomberg's Cherryan in Tokyo.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 7>How got I think you possible to maintain the difference

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 7>in technology between China and our company. I'm sure that

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 7>Chinese vendors are trying to catch up with us, but

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 7>we must be faster. We can be faster than them

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 7>in technology innovation, and that's how we can maintain or

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 7>increase the difference. We are the spe manufacturer, but we

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 7>are not chip makers. So for us, it is key

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 7>to work with the world leading chip manufacturer to develop

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 7>the best in the world process and best in the

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 7>world equipment.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You can watch the full interview on Bloomberg Tech Asia

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>catch a premiere as tomorrow at eight thirty pm Eastern

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Time eight thirty am in Hong Kong.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Ed stay in Asia.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Jaomi says they've received more than two hundred thousand pre

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>orders for its first electric suv, the Yu seven, in

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 3>just three minutes.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>For more Bloombag.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Peter Elstrom joins us and on the live feed during

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the presentation, I noticed there were several million people tuned

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 3>in on x What do we know about this new

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 3>suv and the appetite here for Jaomi.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the excitement around show Me and its electric vehicles

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 8>is quite something. The founder late June, just did this

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 8>presentation in Beijing a little while ago, and he talked

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 8>about this new suv. It's going to be priced around

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 8>thirty five thousand dollars at the low end, it'll go

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 8>up to about forty six thousand dollars. And he took

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 8>aim directly at Tesla. Tesla's model why is the best

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 8>selling suv in China right now, And he's going directly

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 8>after them. He wants to be able to compete with

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 8>them on price and on features, and so far they've

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 8>been gaining a lot of ground. Now. Show Me, a course,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 8>is best known for its smartphones. They began by competing

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 8>against Apple with their smartphones. They did a lot of

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 8>innovative things with that company. Late June kind of modeled

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 8>himself after Steve Jobs for a even with black turtlenecks.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 8>But now they've been diversifying into a number of different areas,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 8>including appliances, even luggage. When I visited them in Beijing,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 8>they had all sorts of goods out there. But this

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 8>move into cars is really being something different. The stock

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 8>has taken off, the share are really soaring. They've tripled

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 8>over the past year, in fact, and I think you're

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 8>seeing this now reflected in the strong demand for their

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 8>new SUV.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean extraordinary two hundred thousand and three minutes. You've

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>got to undred eighty nine thousand in one hour. Peter,

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>there was a worry about almost innovation happening too quickly

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and a crash that happened with the S seven.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Is that sort of being shrugged.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Off right, Yeah, you're referring there was a there was

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 8>a crash in China with a Shami car where it

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 8>led to a fatality. They did put a they hit

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 8>the pause button on some of their sales at that

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 8>point to look at the technology within the car. But

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 8>now they're moving forward. They introduced this new vehicle. They

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 8>feel like they put them that behind them and now

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 8>they're you know, they're they're seeing strong customer demand for

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 8>these cars. As we're talking a little bit about before.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 8>They look very much like Porsches. You know, you can

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 8>get effectively a porstial looking car. It's an EV for

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 8>thirty five thousand dollars. Chinese consumers like that offer.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I find policy in China on tech companies so interesting.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 3>It's either restrictive, right you think about the video games

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>industry in the.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Last couple of years now allowing M and A.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Are you able to summarize, Peter, what the Chinese government's

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>attitude is towards the tech sector overall.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 8>Oh, that's a big ass, but I'll do what I

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 8>can anyways. Yeah, I mean, certainly, what you saw in

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 8>the twenty teens, in particular, was growing domination by a

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 8>couple of the biggest technology companies there, especially Ali Baba

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>and Tencent. They put tons of money into startups. They

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 8>had scores, probably hundreds of companies that they invested in,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 8>and they had these ecosystems that they kind of controlled,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 8>and that really lasted during the boom years after Ali

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 8>Baba went public and showed that you can make a

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 8>lot of money on some of these Chinese tech stocks.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 8>In particular, we had this big crackdown, the jackmar crackdown,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 8>after he spoke out against regulators. The ant group IPO

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 8>was pulled, and after that, essentially all this m and

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 8>A stopped. There was no more consolidation. In fact, the

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 8>companies had to roll back a lot of the plants

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 8>that they had. Ali Baba sold off a bunch of

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 8>its assets too. And now what we're seeing partly because

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 8>the Chinese economy is a little baracky at this point,

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 8>they need more support from the private sector. They've given

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 8>more support to the tech companies in particular, they've seen

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 8>some new breakthroughs truth too, like deep seekin Ai. Huawei

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 8>has made a lot of progress in different areas too.

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 8>So now Alibab and Tensen are able to go back

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 8>to doing some M and A. They're beginning to do

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 8>a little bit, and it's nothing like the scale that

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 8>they did in the past, but they are able to

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 8>make some acquisitions.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom answering the difficult question, thank you very much.

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>After receiving a tepid response for investors when it went

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 3>public back in March. Core We've stock has had a

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 3>meteoric rise around three hundred percent, has propelled the company's

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>CEO into the ranks for the world's richest with some

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 3>unusual speed. Bloomberg's Dillon Slow And joins us and has

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the profile. This is like key tech wealth coverage, right,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>a slow start on the ip but things change and

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>now a key figurehead has a pretty healthy net.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 9>Wealth exactly, Yes, just like you were saying, kind of

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 9>in some ways mirroring sort of the trajectory of the

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 9>IPO market more generally over the course of the year.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 9>So when this company debuted in mid March, they were

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 9>initially seeking to raise at about a thirty five billion

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 9>dollar valuation, ended up completing the offering about a twenty

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 9>three billion dollar valuation.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 2>So well below that.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 9>Actually, the ceo mic and Trader came on Bloomberg Television

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 9>and told us that without a big order from Nvidia,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 9>one of their largest investors, the deal might not even

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 9>have closed. So this stock traded pretty flat for about

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 9>two months after then, but it's off as again, as

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 9>you said, about three hundred percent in cent and that's

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 9>generated some really significant wealth gains, not just for the CEO,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 9>but for other co founders and early investors too.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I know he's now the three hundred and eleventh richest person.

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's ahead of Robert Craft I think of Magnetar and

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the other key companies that backed them early.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is he managed to go out there and

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>start to convince the market of the business model. Perhaps

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>got misunderstood or underrun appreciated when the IPO came out.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely, And you know, the stock really started picking

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 9>up after the report of their first court earnings. They

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 9>beat estimates there and Nvidia also disclosed it they'd increase

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 9>the size of their stake, and it's really been all

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 9>up from there. It's gotten a lot of retail interest too,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 9>so generated some sort of meme stocky comparisons from some commentators,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 9>but for in traders specifically, his networth right now standing

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 9>at about ten point three billion dollars, and it's not

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 9>just the size of that, but it's the speed as well.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 9>For the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, all of the billionaires we track,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 9>the average time it takes for someone to go from

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 9>a five billion to a ten billion dollar net worth

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 9>is just about three years and four months and trader

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 9>did it in twelve trading days, so far faster than

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 9>the average person.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Now do Circle founder Jeremy Lair. I'm sure you're on

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that one too, Dylan Sloan, appreciate your time.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. Now, let's talk about.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>A US district judge who has just ruled that Anthropics

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>use millions of books without payment to train its models,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's legal under copyright law, falling under the fair

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>use doctrine, a move that could actually kind of cripple

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a rights holder's ability to monetize.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 4>On AI as KOed Bloomberg Opinions. Dave Lee's take here.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a fascinating read, and you go into the intricacies

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>of how Anthropic first of all did it, And they

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>did it perhaps with a mixture of pirated book copies,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but then they actually started burning physical books, taking out

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the spine and copying them into the computer.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so they went out and they acquired pirated copies

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 10>of more than seven million books to.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Train into their models.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 10>After a short while, they thought, well, maybe there's a

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 10>better way to do this, and they bought the physical

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 10>used copies from distributors of used books and started chopping

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 10>off the spines. Cutting down the pages and ingesting those

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 10>into their research libraries.

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 2>They called it, which was.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 10>Then used to train the large language model. And they

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 10>were sued by three authors whose books were in both

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 10>the pirated copies but also the physical copies as well,

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 10>and they said, look, the fact that you're doing this

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 10>to create a model and we get no compensation for

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 10>that shouldn't be considered fair use, which is this sort

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 10>of carve out and copyright law that says, if what

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 10>you do is sufficiently transformative and doesn't harm the commercial

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 10>prospects of the original work, then you'll find to use

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 10>it in some degree. And the judge in this case,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 10>and it's one of the number of AI cases like

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 10>this currently active, the judge in this case said, yes,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 10>he writes, this is fair use in this.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 4>It not the pirated one, not the pirated one.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 10>Yes.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I think the main response at the time was that

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 3>an appeal is likely, but you're really interesting what you said.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>It's not the only thing happening in isolation. People were

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>trying to get the read through to others like Meta

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 3>for example, and kind of work out what happens next,

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 3>because on the face of it, it's good for generative

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 3>AI but the companies are going to struggle to navigate this.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>Yes, I mean, look, it really hinges on. If it

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 10>is fair use, then companies are free to ingest all

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 10>this information without paying anybody and do what they want

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 10>with it. And of course the AI industry is incredibly

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 10>clean on that many you know, respective commentations and copyright law.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 10>I think that is the case as well. The danger

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 10>is is that AI is unlike anything we've seen before

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 10>in terms of you know, finding knowledge and reading new information.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 10>And what if and this is the sort of doomsday

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 10>scenario from publishers. What if people stop buying books because

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 10>they can just get the information they need from AI.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And also, you.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 10>Know, where is the incentive of people to write new

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 10>books if when they do write it, they just get

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 10>sucked up into the machine and they don't see any

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 10>sort of commercial benefit that is able to write stay

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 10>in the practice of doing the hard work of writing

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 10>a book.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Daily of Bloomberg Opinion another great column.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Texts and Breaking News. I've just

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 3>reported with Bloomberg's Dana Hole that Omeed Afshar, who is

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 3>a key lieutenant and has been a key lieutenant of

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musket Tesla has left the company in recent days.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>This is somebody that was in charge of manufacturing in

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>sales for North America and Europe, and what sources are

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 3>telling us is that he has left. He's also no

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 3>longer in the directory at Tesla. There's a lot that

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 3>we don't know, Caro. I've emailed Elon Musk to ask

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>him what's going on and why Omeed left the company.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 3>You'll remember we've done some reporting on him in the

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>past and asked about some reporting that he's been involved

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>in about internal audits, internal reviews. But it's one of

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 3>many recent departures from Tesla's and the market was playing

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 3>attention with a move lower and.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, Asha had a tough job, right.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It was last year he was promoted into the office

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the CEO and he was overseeing some really significant

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>areas of sales and manufacturing in some pain point areas

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for Tesla, largely because perhaps a political backlash to.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 4>One Elon Musk.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Right, he'd been in the office of the CEO for

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>quite a while. He was kind of like Elon Musk's

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>chief of staff, so to speak. But then he got

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>more responsibility and he was very key on Austin getting

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Austin set up. You know, I'm interested to know what happened,

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 3>but it's one of several departures in recent months of

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 3>people that are kind of long standing in health senior roles.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>In a period of time where Elon was elsewhere.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>He's elsewhere politically, and also the sales focus has gone elsewhere.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>When I'm thinking about today's extraordinary numbers around Shaomi's latest

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>suv going straight for the Tesla buyer, this is really

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a difficult moment for Elon.

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 4>No wonder He's come back as CEO.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, so you know, like the big picture is that

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Tesla in the future is focused on Robotaxi and they

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>had a successful launch of a small reduced service in

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Austin and Optimist. But the reality is that Ben but

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Butter is still selling cars and in the first six

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>months of this year, lots of data in all markets

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>that Must's association with the.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Administration was hurting sales.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>But also like competition with hybrids, increased competition from other

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 3>model providers and other name brands in Europe for example.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>But in Omeid Avshah's case, and again to recap sources

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 3>of telling us. He's left the company with someone so

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>close to Elon Musk with a lot of responsibility. It's

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>one in a chain of high profile executives. For example,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Milan Kovac, who is leading the Optimist program, also left

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 3>that We reported listening. When we get more, we'll keep

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 3>an eye on it. I'm also looking at Palenteer. This

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 3>is a stock that since October is up three hundred

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 3>percent year to date, up ninety percent. One of the

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 3>best performers there is its performance as a company in

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>cordly earnings. But this kind of macro and geopolitical environment

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 3>that we're in right now, Caro, that speaks to the

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 3>core of this story. And right now, this emphasis on

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 3>defense technology, that's what we're hearing about on a weekly

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 3>basis right It.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Is because of the geopolitics that we currently confront escalating

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>US China rivalry, to conflicts in Europe and the Middle East,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical pressure. Said, they are driving a new way of

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>defense innovation. Let's talk about what that means to the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>markets for your tech investments. Ted Mortensen is with US

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Imagine director at BED. You yourself have a rich history

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in defense from an active of his perspective, Ted, but

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested is to therefore, what the active innovation play is.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 4>How do you invest into this moment.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 11>It's kind of fragmented right now, but Pallenteer is obviously

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 11>the purest play. And if if you look at the

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 11>latest conflicts on you know, coming out of Israel and

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 11>Iran and also Ukraine and Russia, these advanced technologies that

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 11>are being used are giving both Israel and Ukraine heads

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 11>up as it relates to their adversaries. Its number one,

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 11>number two. Just recently with NATO increasing their budgets up

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 11>to five percent GDP, the defense spend as well as

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 11>the US with a big beautiful bill is straight up.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 11>So you're going to see this pivot to JENNAI being

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 11>embedded in all weapons systems. And you know, right now,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 11>JENNYI is a national security discussion. If you look at Pallenteer,

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 11>they're the first mover, and I think there's a few

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 11>issues on the reason why it's up. They signed Israel,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 11>they signed the Ukraine, they signed NATO post DOGE. Also

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 11>their solution to all the federal agency problems also in

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 11>DoD spanding. So they're one of the purest production ready

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.719
<v Speaker 11>jen AI solutions where they can aggregate. I wish I

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 11>had it when I flew all this unbelievable Intel data

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 11>on a translation layer that you can see at real time.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>But like the mag seven in many ways, it's a

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>very concentrated defense tech play. I mean, we're at a

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>record high for palent here. It's been an extraordinary up

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>into the right move for the stock. Where else if

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for diversification, can you go?

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 2>You can go.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 11>Recently, we just had a report on aero environment AVAV.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 11>They just bought a real stunning private company called Blue Halo,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 11>which it gets aero environment way from their switchblade devices

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 11>on the drone side. But what blue Halo gives them

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 11>is an entry into cybersecurity, satellite and high energy weapons.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 11>That's that's another play. Unfortunately from the private perspective. I

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 11>know ed you've talked about angel In in other shows.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 11>Andrew is a private company that is almost a case

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 11>study and how the US military is re architecting their

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 11>defense budgets. These are high R o I C devices

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 11>that really go against you know, the traditional spend of

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 11>billion dollar programs that are under budget. They're very effective

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 11>and they're really changing the rules of the game.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Ted, what you just said traditional spend. When I look

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 3>at companies like Palanteer and how they behave, they do

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 3>behave like traditional primes, big contract manufacturers to the government

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 3>because they basically say, I serve the US and its

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 3>allies only.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>How does that help them? It helps them.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 11>I think if you look at the traditional primes like

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 11>Lockheat or Raytheon, for example, they're known for hardware, They're

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 11>not known for gen AI software. This is why pallunteers

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 11>being brought in as kind of a pseudo prime in

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 11>almost all these new next generation defense contracts. They are

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 11>the software layer. The other aspect of this. When you

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 11>look at the spend, you look at what drone technology

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 11>and I think in the future, when you really look

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 11>at this on andrel I would not be surprised if

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 11>you have self drones flying on each wing of an

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 11>F thirty five.

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 12>That changes the rules of the game.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 11>And when we talk about boots on the ground, I

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 11>mean you talked about Tesla early with Optimus. I think

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 11>you're going to see machines on the ground in the

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 11>next five to ten years. And that's a paradigm shift

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 11>from the defense budget standpoint.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Right Ted Mortenson of Bad Great conversation, Thank you very much.

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to stick with defense tech. Amid the conflicting

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 3>assessments from Washington about the effectiveness of the US strikes

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>on Iran. Let's stick into the supply chain resilience of

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the US government aimed to modernize US commercial and government

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 3>data with its ARC software streaming defense acquisitions for customers,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>includes the US Army, Navy. Let's get to Tara Murphy

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Dherty Gavini CEO. There's anywhere we could take this right,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 3>but let's just start with the basics. The US government

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 3>and its military industrial complex or the defense industrial base.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>How modern is it in the scheme of everything Ted

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 3>and we just discussed on the show.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 13>It's getting more modern, I would say, the reality is

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 13>that today the defense industrial base is still quite traditional.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 12>And you can look at the recent strikes on Iran

0:29:58.600 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 12>as a perfect.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 13>Example of Yes, we know that fifth generation fighters escorted

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 13>B two bombers to Iran to drop the bombs. Maybe

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 13>those were F thirty five's, but there were likely some

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 13>F twenty twos in there as well.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 12>Those F twenty two jets and the.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 13>B two bombers were operationally deployed first in nineteen ninety seven,

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 13>So a lot of American military capabilities actually.

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 12>Quite old, quite old.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking at what the DoD nine hundred and

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty one billion dollar budget for the fiscal year starting

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in October the first actually looks like I mean, I'm

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sure you've read through the seventy five page procurement request

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, but almost five billions cann be spent

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on B twenty one self bomber production. There's going to

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be thirty seven THOUD missiles, There's going to be twenty

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>four Air Force F thirty fives TARA. When you go

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>through that seventy five report page report, is there enough

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of the new tech that we're talking about the supply

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>chain that you'll.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 13>Analyze, there's definitely still not enough. This is one of

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 13>the major imperatives for US national security right now is

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 13>the need for modernizing these weapons, systems and platforms, these

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 13>major capabilities. And this is what so much of the

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 13>defense tech industry, the companies that you are just referring to, Gavini,

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 13>Palanteer Andral have been clamoring for in Washington, DC, which

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 13>is the Department is spending huge amounts of money trying

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 13>to sustain these legacy platforms. More than seventy percent of

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 13>the entire cost of a jet, for example, or a

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 13>submarine is spent during its sustainan phase. The United States

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 13>needs modern capabilities not just to effectively fight war, but

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 13>in order to be able to afford the wars.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 12>That we need to deter and win.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You just said you are going to the administration, You're

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>going into government and lobbying saying this needs to change.

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Just talk to us with the data with which you

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 4>were able to provide.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of fascinated with what ARC is doing Gavini's Defense.

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 4>Acquisition software platform. What does it tell you? What does

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 4>it show?

0:31:59.120 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 12>It shows quite a bit.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 13>So defense acquisition software is really designed to replace the

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 13>incredibly manual processes that the Department uses today to manage

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 13>the life cycle of these weapons systems. In platform, so

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 13>cradle to grave, how you design these systems through their

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 13>sustain and their modernization, managing parts and managing suppliers Today,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 13>Somewhat unbelievably, the United States DoD does that.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 12>Primarily in spreadsheets.

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 13>A lot of people are involved in what are very

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 13>slow processes, and software, and especially AI driven software like

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 13>arc is, can really accelerate those processes. The other really

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 13>important piece of ARC is the integrated data set that

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 13>exists in the software and this is Gavini's proprietary data

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 13>set which gives DoD visibility into these global supply chains

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 13>down to the part level, down to run materials and microelectronics.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 13>And this is essential in order to come up with

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 13>the modern kinds of systems that we need and make

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 13>them rest and available for the warfighter really quick.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>We just have thirty seconds.

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>On the other side of the table, is this government

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 3>and this Pentagon better on the procurement side.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 12>It's trying to be.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 13>We've seen executive orders on defense acquisition. We've seen calls

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 13>to enforce the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, which mandates that

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 13>government agencies by commercial first, especially software, instead of taking

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 13>on failed IT development projects.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 12>What we need to see now.

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 13>Is will those policy decisions, will those will that guidance

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 13>be implemented. If implementation can happen, we will see tremendously

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 13>positive results.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Tarfage Docs, we thank you of Gavini fascinating on all

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>things defense procurement. Meanwhile, coming up, we're going to talk

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to the CEO behind an AI hacking tool. His lead

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>investor is going to join us too about the proactive

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>defense against sliver attacks.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:33:59.959
<v Speaker 4>This is what we've got.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>A one year old startup has developed an aitol that

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is better at identifying many software vulnerabilities than experienced hackers.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>The startup, called Expo, has recently closed a seventy five

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollar funding round led by Ultimeter Capital. Exposed founder

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and CEO or her De Moor is with US. Ultimate

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>partner Appaul of Agowell.

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Is also with us as well. Or Her I start

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 4>with you.

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so important that you the AI version

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of a hacker is at the top of Hackerwe's US leaderboard.

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 14>Thank you very much for having us so it's the

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 14>first time ever that a machine and not a human

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 14>is at the top of the Hackerwom leaderboard for the US.

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 14>Hackerwom is a platform that connects Hackhouse with companies who

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 14>want their systems to be tested, and they maintained the

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 14>leaderboards ranking the hackers according to whose bugs have been

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 14>accepted by the customers of Hakawan, and currently the top

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 14>in the US is our AI.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>What's so interesting is that you are like the AI

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>guy among many, but really you're driving the portfolio allocations

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>for AI over at Altimeter, I'm thinking some of the

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>open AI investments that you made, some of the others.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we see such pedigree coming from a man

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who helped.

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 4>Develop GitHub copilot.

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that what attracted you to Expo or is it

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact of what it can achieve?

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 15>You know, before we even met, we've been studying the

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 15>space and very simply, cyber attacks are on the rise.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 15>Software is more vulnerable, a lot more engineers, a lot

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 15>more code developed with AI. And by the way, these

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 15>models are trained on open source software, which is more vulnerable.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 2>That's on one side.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 15>And then I met oohe which our first meeting felt

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 15>like the fifth meeting because of his ambition to build

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 15>the cybersecurity platform. In the age of AI, CIOs want less,

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 15>not more. They're fatigued in alert tonight right now, and

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 15>you know who has vision to build Expo, help you

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 15>find vulnerabilities, fix them automatically, and ultimately building the cybersecurity

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 15>platform is a big one. It's probably the most important

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 15>business being built right now, not because it'll be a

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 15>great opportunity, but because it must be built. If we

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 15>don't build it, the bad guys have the technology and

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 15>we've got to put it in the hands of the

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 15>good guys in the free world.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh thank you for joining us on the show.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I've been trying to think about what this represents, right,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the swarm is always on. It represents what an army,

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 3>if humans could do twenty four to seven to identify

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the vulnerability. But the question is what happens next for

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 3>your company? And I'm assuming that you're trying to engineer

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 3>towards the swarm, also reacting, putting into place fixes when

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 3>those vulnerabilities are identified.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 14>That's right. So even today, the AI is already identifying

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 14>vulnerabilities at some of the top company companies in the

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 14>country are companies like palle Alter Networks, are at and T, Disney, Sony,

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 14>and the list goes on and on. Now, of course

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 14>it finds these vulnerabilities, but they need to be fixed

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 14>as well. We're very lucky that all these companies that

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 14>we've been working with have been extremely pretty active immediately

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 14>fixing the problems as they were pointed out. It's a

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 14>natural evolution, but eventually an AI will be able to

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 14>do some of the fixes as well.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Paul, I know you as an operator, you know you're

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty handy with software. What are you going to do

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>to help this company grow and scale as a commercial entity.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 3>What do they need to focus on to convince the

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 3>marketplace that an AI swarm is a better then a

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 3>human team of hackers.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 15>And we are fighting against time. Time is our biggest competition. Really,

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 15>if you had three weeks ahead of the bad guys,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 15>you're saving.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Three weeks worth of vulnerabilities.

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 15>And cyber tends to be a game of cat and mouse.

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 15>Sometimes you've got the offensive teams ahead and other times

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 15>you've got the defensive teams ahead. And so the number

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 15>one thing we're focused on is speed. That's why we're

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 15>here today. That's why we're educating the world about what

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 15>we're doing. We work with a lot of companies, as

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 15>we have mentioned, helping them secure their perimeter before the

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 15>bad guys get in.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>What's so interesting is, of course, when Ed calls you

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>an operator, you came from Palenteer, you're leading the charge.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're looking at the AI investment opportunities, when we

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>think about open AI investment, when we also think about

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>clean When you think about this moment, because you're also

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>exposed to ANDREILSPACEX, is this the moment for defense tech,

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it comes in a cyber capacity, it comes in

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a hard tech capacity.

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 15>Look, I think at the highest abstraction, AI is having

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 15>great impact across fields. This is defense, cybersecurity, customer service,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 15>software engineering. These are large industries that are going through

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 15>reinvention and ultimately it's raising the ceiling for performance of

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 15>the best professionals in cybersecurity, like what we are doing

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 15>at EXPOU, and raising the floor for all the mundane tasks.

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 15>In the case of EXPOU, for example, you've got to

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 15>do reconnaissance, you've got to do scanning and.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Exploitation and report building.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 15>These a part of that is just mundane work, but

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 15>also the best hackers in the world now better off

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 15>with XPOW in your toolkit rather than without.

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, Oh, you are going from this point rate limited

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 3>by compute and tokens. Just explain the pathway for your

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 3>company and the bottlenecks that you might face.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 14>So currently it's we can we have no problems with

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 14>the amount of compute. It's actually not that intensive. We

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 14>can easily serve the customers that we're currently working with.

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 14>We are, however, very much focused on working with the

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 14>top companies that have the biggest our need for better security,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 14>financial services, healthcare, those types of those types of industries.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, that was that Paul vagaryle partner at Ultimated Capital,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:33.919
<v Speaker 3>and I'll hear the more.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 2>CEO and founder of X thank you both very much.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Salesforce is developing an AI product that can handle tasks

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 3>like customer service without human supervision. CEO Mark Benioff says

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 3>the tour has reached ninety three percent accuracy. He spoke

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 3>with Bloomberg's Emily Chang. Take a listen.

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 16>You founded the company now twenty five years ago, so

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 16>you've seen the rise of mobile and social and the

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 16>cloud and now AI. How has the CEO job changed

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 16>for you?

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 17>Well, the CEO chop is really changing fast, you know,

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 17>because it used to be I felt very alone at

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 17>the top, But now, like I just finished writing the

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 17>business plan for this year, and I always do that

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.919
<v Speaker 17>with someone else, like I take one of our executives.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 17>And for the last three years, I've also have found

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 17>a new partner in AI. So I have an AI partner,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 17>I have a human partner, and it's the three of

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 17>us who are writing the plan together. So it's a

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 17>little less lonely at the top of AI.

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 16>You said you won't hire any more coders at Salesforce,

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 16>and you've said today's CEOs will be the last to

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 16>manage all human workforces.

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 4>What does this mean for businesses?

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 17>Digital labor is going to be everything from AI agents

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 17>to robots, and I do think you know to your point,

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 17>you know, CEOs have to make sure their values are

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 17>in the right place and that values bring value.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 12>Could an agent replace you one day?

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 17>I hope so, you hope?

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 12>So?

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 17>I mean, of course I'm partially kidding. You know that

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 17>we're becoming more automated.

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You can see Emily Chang's full conversation with Salesforce CEO

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Mark Benioff. It's on the circuit Errington Knight in eight

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>pm Easton. Now that does it for this edition of

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech. What a whirlwind from your breaking scoop at Tesla.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Just remind us a couple of days of testimony, and

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 3>now we have breaking news from Tesla that Omi dash

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Shah has basically been fired by Elon Musk. Recap that

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 3>story and all the others on the podcast. You know

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 3>where to find it, the Bloomberg Tech Pod on the Terminal,

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 3>as well as online on Apple, Spotify and on iHeart

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 3>from New York City and San Francisco.

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech