WEBVTT - WorkBoard CEO on Corporate Board Diversity

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well, I've been

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to our next guest and entrepreneur has founded

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and let three tech startups, let a high growth business

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>at IBM, where she ran the high growth information life

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Cycle Governance business, one of her company's PSS systems that

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was acquired by IBM just about a decade ago. Let's

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>get to dadre pack No. She is CEO and co

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Enterprise sas Company Workboard. They work with Comcast, Cisco, Microsoft, GE,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>so many well known companies. She joins us on the

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>phone in Silicon Valley. Dadre, nice to have you here

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with us. I'm going to jump right in because Bloomberg

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>has done a lot of reporting on women and the

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>VC world, and I just kind of want to start

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there that just two and a half percent of all

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>venture capital back startups have an all female founding team.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so difficult still in the startup world

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for women to find funding? What was your experience? This

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is my third company where I thought funding and got

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>funding in CC world, And I'll say, you know, with

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>some embarrassment, that it hasn't improved much in a few

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>decades that I've been working on it. I think part

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>of it is, Um, we don't look like what the

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>prototypical founder should look like, right, the archetect that people

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have in their heads. Now, that's changing, I think now

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in very meaningful ways. And there's a lot of organizations

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>driving change, including for example, all rays And what you

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>see today which you just wouldn't have seen five years

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ago as much less ten years ago, is women partners

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>at really every quality firm has real women partners making

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>real investment decisions, uh and driving those investment decisions in

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the VC firm. So I think we well it

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>takes a bit of time. I think we actually finally

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>turned a corner on getting women partners in the venture

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>firms that actually fuel those startups. Well that that gives

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>me hope. Um. What about corporate boards though, and I

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>know this is something that you've certainly been keeping an

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>eye on. Corporate boards still mostly white? Uh white? Are

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>eight in ten directors at spmpanies at least in are

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>still male. What's going on with corporate boards? Why is

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it so slow? Especially when we you know, we know

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the research when it comes to diversity. Mackenzie's done it,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so many others have done it that when you've got

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a diverse board, when you've got a diverse senior leadership,

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you do better financially. Yea. I think there's a couple

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>of things that are shifting there and that will accelerate

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>some sense of sort of accelerate post. But a couple

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of those. One is, you know, I just added to

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>women independent directors to my board, Margot gr Judds who

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was a former CEO of Ancestor and Kathy Bengo, who

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is a former vice chair of Deloitte, both really senior

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>talented women, And as I was doing the search to

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>add them to the board, I used a search firm

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that was focused on women executives. And so what they've done,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>which is something I think hadn't been done in the past,

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually build the database of candidates, build the pool

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so that when you want to find talent, you're looking

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>at a pool that is enriched by women leaders and

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>women executives, versus the same old database of the same

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>old pool that looks the same old way it's always looked.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what people and that's what's going on to

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies. Right, everybody's going back to the

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>existing pools, the old ones exactly. But I do think

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that executive search firms are now quite mindful of opening

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the aperture. The other thing, and probably more interesting, is

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in my work with senior leaders. Most of them are

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>looking beyond their own sector for expertise, for insights for

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how other people are changing the game. And most of

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>them are acutely aware of the extreme disruptive opportunities and

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for the risks and face their business. And I think

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that what we'll see is this enormous generation of direct

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to consumer leaders, many of whom are women who created

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>fantastic companies grown them, have real go to market leadership

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>skills and are very disruptive thinkers. If I were the

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a mainstream company looking for diversity of thought,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>provocative ideas in a way to enrich the conversations I

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>was having at the board, I would look to those

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>disruptive leaders coming out of d C, DTC. What is

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for what forgive me? And what is it about d

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to see that you think really puts them out there

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of ahead of others. Their business models, the way

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they think about reaching their customers, the way they think

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about serving those customers. It's a a lot of it

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is just blank slate, right, not bogged down by the

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>way we've always done it, and started instead with what

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>would be awesome? Like what would what could we imagine?

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>And then that's a pool of many many women in

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>those organizations as co founders, as CEOs and clos and

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>CFOs right, women in different roles there. So I think

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it creates a pipeline of diverse talent that has the

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of disruptive thinking and phenomenal success that you'd want

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>around you in the boardroom. Because I do wonder too,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and you probably have a lot of experiences this are

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are a great person to talk to about this is

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>that you know, money always talks, and I do wonder

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if there's at some point somebody's going to be like, wow,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>look at this company, uh, the diversity that they've got,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and look at how well they're doing, and so what's

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the common denominator? What is it that's getting them to

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that point? And I know there's a lot of factors

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that play that make a successful venture or institution or company,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>but we but we know the research and I do

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder at some point is it just people are like,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the smart thing to do financially if you're

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>publicly held or anything. Yeah, I think until its leaders

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>perceive CEO is perceive it as the smart thing to

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>do financially. Until they perceive it as when I bring

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>those different voices on that different experience to my table,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm a smarter leader. When they think that, then they'll

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>make different choices, which I think that's actually more than money,

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which is which makes me feel better, Like I hope

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that that's what they were doing, to be quite honest

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>with you, right, because it's it's the right thing to

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do to represent more voices. What do you do specifically

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at work board when it comes to your own leadership,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like how are you getting them your you know, your

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>management to think about diversity and make sure that it's

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not just checking the boxes but it's really a productive

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>form of leadership. You know. We our first four people

0:06:55.760 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>in the company were incredibly diverse. So three women, one man,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and of the three women, one was from Central America,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>one's a native Hawaiian, I under I'm the other. Uh.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We started really as a diverse group of people and

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what is you know fabulous about that? Is you never

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go backwards and fix it. You never have

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to go backwards and clean it up or make it

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>an overt effort. It sort of spawns from there. And

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think we enjoy an incredibly diverse team in

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the level of experience in the age, which is another

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>enormous one, in ethnic backgrounds, in educational backgrounds, and gender diversity,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really broad spectrum, and I think that is something that

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we think of as to be celebrated, and we're try

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and put a fair bit of ritual around celebrating and

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>valuing it. And of course when you celebrate it and

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>value it, you get to build on it. Right, it

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>shifts forward Women in every layer and every level the

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>organ and people with diverse experiences and perspectives likewise, in

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>every layer and every aspect of the ward. Well what's

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting too, is um I mean California, right, I mean

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it was because of a lot of pressure among the

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>California public that really pushed them to pass a law

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>requiring diversity and public boards. But do we is that

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what we need? Because I feel like things are moving

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>so slowly. I talked about this, uh, just in the

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>last hour or so with the CFO of s. D.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Lawder and the executive VP of Finance at st. Lawder

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about how many conversations we've had about improving boards and

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so on, and yet here we are and people put

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out uh dates by when they're gonna have more parody,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's again several years from now. You know, is it?

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to have states with laws saying Okay,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time to do it, let's do it. Yeah, good question,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I don't know the answer, to be honest,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fan of regulating it. And I actually

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>find that that has the potential to hollow out the

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>value of the purpose of boards, and so I don't

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>love that. I would say, in um, if we we

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>look at i'll call the leading indicators, kind of we

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>measure the upstream progress rather than the downstream progress, and

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the downstream progresses. We've got diverse boards everywhere that that

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly takes time. Like there's not that many board seats.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't come up empty every year, right, Some people

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sit in the same board seat for quite a long time,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that there's goodness in that. So it's not that

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the number of chairs up at any one time is

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>so huge that we should dis measure how full they are, Right,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we might instead start to measure and focus on the

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>indicators of change and diversity of further upstream. So, for example,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in California in particular, how many venture company venture funds

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have diverse partnerships and who do they invest in? And

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>are they investing in founders and co founders that are

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>diverse themselves? Right? Because in California in particular, the number

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of companies created far exceeds the number of open board

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seats this year, right there. And so if we start

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>lay upstream, what's that look like? We might look at

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>how many co founders are women and how that's going.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We might look at how many executive leaders, right are

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not just the co founders, but of the executive teams

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of those young companies, how diverse are those? And those

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of what I think give us better headlights on are

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we going to see meaningful difference in the few board

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>seats available being allocated to the best candidate, including the

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>candidates with diversity. Well, if there is one piece of

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>advice you would give to leaders out there in terms

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about more women, more everything at your company,

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is it? How do you start? What

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>do you do. I think I would go back to

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the common I think about the drive real change, which

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is two CEOs. What is the breadth and depth and

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>diversity and disruptivelopment of thinking that leads to a smarter

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation about how your company serves as customers well. And so,

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to be a company that only serves men,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>then by all means you just keep going with the

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>boards you've got. If, on the other hand, you depend

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>on women talent in your organization to drive value, to

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>behalf of your customers as women, then you're probably not

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>serving either your talented team members nor your customers well

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>enough if you've got a board that doesn't reflect those

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>buyers and that talent. If you really focus on how

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>do I have the smartest conversations about building the best

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>business I can? And then diversity pools a day right right,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And increasingly we're seeing you know, customers, whether it's your

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>business customers or you know customers like me buying merchandise

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that increasingly, you know, you want to see what the

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>company stands for, what the diversity is, and that's you know,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be an element that really matters certainly going forward.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Um Ddri, thank you so much, really appreciate it, and

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can check in with you again in the future.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Dedri Pucknachiese, chief executive officer co founder of Workboard, on

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Silicon Fowl. As we mentioned, she has

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>started up three tech companies, including one that she sold

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>to IBM, so really great to get a gut check

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with her when it comes to VC and UH, the

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>investment world and the tech world.