WEBVTT - Bonds, Markets, And ETFs (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Matt was just calling

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>out here in an I end screen the Bloomberg Index

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>browser Bloomberg US corporate total return value year to date

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>minus fourteen points six treasuries to minus fourteen point eight.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's going on? And that does inlets total

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>return So not that it would have mattered because the

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>coupons are so low. Yes, um, but it's harsh. And look,

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>my mom and dad just retired this like month, and uh,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel for them. I guess I'm gonna have to

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>step up because they're broke now, you know, all right,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Liz McCormick, Global Fixed Income and far In Exchange reporter

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>joins us live here in a Bloomberg and after Broker studio.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So Liz, again, these are numbers, these are performance numbers.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You know your friends in the fixed income market have

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, never seen. Yeah, I mean some of the

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>data how you splice and dice it is like at

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>least the worst first half and kind of modern times

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>call it. I was mentioning to Matt that Deutsche Bank

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>had some great data back to the seventeen hundreds, like

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>how bad it was. I mean, people just aren't Most

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>people aren't used to this kind of beating up in bonds.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do people in fixtion come to they try

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to call the bottom, like we hear equity trying to

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>call the Yeah. And this is where I feel like

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I see the same dichotomy going on as you guys

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are talking all about in stocks. You know, is this

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like a bear rally? Is it over? The same thing

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in bonds? People saying, oh, we've seen the peak and yields,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the FED pricing for hikes is in there.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The worst is over. And then other people saying, wait

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute. You know, like three point five on the

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tenure was the highest we've seen. But like listen, you know,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I've been around for a while. Like the folks of

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater said to me a few times, we think rates

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>can go a lot higher. Ten years, could go to

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>four percent or more. You know, FED has just got

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more tightening to do. So there is these battles,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I think in both asset classes. You know, we'll see

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>who wins in the end, right, maybe next year or sometime.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I met a guy over the weekend, eighty three years old,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating guy, and he watches and listens to us every day.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>He trades bonds every night. So at the end of

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the day he'll make a trade, put on a position,

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and then the next day. No one nobody does that, right,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody does that. My father, who I've been doing this

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for so long, still says to me, can you explain

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to me again what a bond is? You know what

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean? All the bond traders I know, all the

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>guys I know who worked in firms on the street

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have long since retired or quit, right exactly. I remember

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>my old boss, Ward McCarthy saying, years back when there

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>was yield, saying, I bought you know, zero coupons ages

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ago and that put my kids through college, you know,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like it used to be such great rates and those

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are just gone. Well. Actually, Scott Miner did say he's

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>buying the strips right twenty years, which is um kind

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of jargony. But I guess that's when you strip out

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the coupon, you can trade the maturities and then you

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can also trade the each due date of the coupon.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like a bullet, you know, it's it's just like

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a single coupon in a sense, just what you get

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end. But yeah, they're stripping and I saw that,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see. I mean, if we're in this era

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're never going to get rates too high again,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not sure I buy into yet. People who

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bought strips are locked in tansit over three percent are

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty happy if you know here we are.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, in a couple of years, the Feds fighting

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in a recession cutting rates again. Is that, by the way,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a consensus that the Fed is gonna raise

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>rates high enough to fight inflation because they now they

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>have to. That's they're locked in. And not only is

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it one of their actual mandates, but and then we're

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a recession in three and they're gonna have

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>to cut right back down again. Well, I would say,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like the timing of the recession gets nebulous. A lot

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of people say late I've heard a few say maybe

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there's enough cash in the system. Corporations are much better

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be. But I think in general, Matt, you're

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>right that it's fast, up front loaded quick, and then

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED is going to have to eventually not too

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>long be cutting rates again because they're trying to manage.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And like Pal said, he's gone from you know, like

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>soft landing soft dish to saying, well, you know, we

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>could have a slowd You know, he's trying, but you know,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you raise rates this fast. And I know there's not

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of floating rate debt out there, but I

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have a home equity line of credit and I was like, oh,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they raised that rate pretty darned fast, you know, to me.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So not only that, um Joel Levington wrote a piece

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about the automakers. Now they're facing a one hundred and

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>forty five billion dollar wall of debt and it's not like, uh,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can just hold it right, They're they're

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>constantly rolling over. So now they're going to look at

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>two d fifty three hundred basis points of increased costs. This,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, adds to inflation because they've got to

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>pass that along to the customer. But Uh, it's it's

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>tough for for companies as well. Yeah, I think everyone

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to feel this very quickly. Now. The Fed said,

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we're really watching financial conditions, which is kind of nebulous.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, how tight do they have to get? You know,

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not just what's the hard rate the Fed funds has

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to, but that's what they're watching. How does

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this filter through? Look at mortgage rates over six percent?

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, they seem like so low for so long.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>The housing market hasn't imploded yet, but for once, not

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking to buy, but you see on Zeala

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>finally price reduction. We didn't see that forever, So I

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna sale. I know people who wanted to

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sell and now they can't, so they got to rent. Yeah, well,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>you know what, rents are crazy right, going up in price,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, leases up. I've heard so many people complaining,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>oh the language putting up my rent is too damn high.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The rent is too damn hon So if you move,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is that another reason to move to Austin, Texas? Or

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think pricing is good in Austin time. I

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it is either, especially you don't get a

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>special rates because it's Texas. So where do you have

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to go? What we could go Columbus, Ohio. It's a

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>great place to live in, very affordable and people are

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just wonderful and no accent, so it's the only place

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the country where there's absolutely no regional accents. They

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>use people from the great state of Ohio often for

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>newscasters and Matt Miller case in point. All right, Liz McCormack,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Lis mccormer. She covers

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all things global fixed income, foreign exchange reporter. She does

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it all for Bloomberg News, and most important, she is

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio today, So we appreciate that.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt Our next guest is all in the state of Wisconsin.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>PhD in Economics from the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, j

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>d from Marquette, and an undergrad and finance from the

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>University of Wisconsin and Madison. We're gonna get this guy

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>out of state once in a while. I mean, he's

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>all in. It's also part time instructor at Marquette. Uh

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>DR Brian Jakebison's senior investment strategist Offspring Global investments. So, Brian,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind the winters in Wisconsin, you know what

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Life is all about trade off. I guess

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just the tradeoff you have to make for living

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the land of milk and honey, or I guess

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>milk and sausage or milk and cheese. I wish this

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>market was all about trade offs. Yes, it seems like

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you own, your down I mean, I

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>guess if you if you if you just had oil modity,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have some commodities, you're okay. So, Brian, you know,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people start talking about, well,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm we're just hearing a little bit more of

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks is trying to find a bottom,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>uh in these markets? Is that an exercise you go through?

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And if so, kind of what do you look for?

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>How are you trading this market here? Well? You know,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it feels like my workouts, you know, an exercise

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and utility. Um. And I think that, you know, trying

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to find the bottom is always going to be difficult

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because the market seems to be there to frustrate the

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>expectations and ambitions of everybody. Um. But it does feel

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like we're trying to find a bottom, and since you

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>know we can't pick one, we just have to I think,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the broad thrust of the market,

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like some of the indicators are suggesting

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to find one here. Now who knows is

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it is it even lower than that? But all we

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>know is that things look cheaper now than what they

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>did back in u on January three, when we're at

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the peak. And so I think for longer term investors,

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of structural part of your portfolio, the

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>strategic part um, that does suggest to us that there's

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>some long term opportunities even if there could be some

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>short term pain here. It's all about those trade offs, right,

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that long term gain maybe a little bit more short

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>term pain. Do you go h do you go in

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for the traditional defensive um? You know, can't imagine you're

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>buying utilities but consumer staples or healthcare? Healthcare? Yeah? You know.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>So we just published are the all Spring mid year

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Outlook and the theme was rolling with change, and I

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think that what is defensive now you need to really

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of change the way you think about it because

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of that interest rate sensitivity, Right, utilities do tend to

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be much more interest rate sensitive than say, consumer staples.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Both are traditionally viewed as being more defensive. It's just

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>one has a higher loading on rate risk than the other.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And so actually we are overweight consumer staples as somewhat

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of uh not necessarily a barish view, but as a

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a defensive view on the markets, at

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>least here in the short term. I do have to say, though,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we are warming up to areas like financials or home builders,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>those parts that have sold off pretty substantially here or

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't performed as you would have expected just given the

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>FEDS change and stamps. You know, looking at this upcoming

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>earning season, so I think July fifteen fishes when it

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>kicks off. You know, we look at inflation x food

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and energy, Well, what's earnings x energy um is possible

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that it would be a negative three You're a year

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just excluding that one sector. So you know that it

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's a lot of areas that there's some

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>decent opportunities if you focus on looking for maybe the

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>parts that have been beaten down the most but still

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>have decent fundamentals that can pull you through this. Yeah,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Bron I'm glad you mentioned earnings because we're going to

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>switch into that earnings mode very soon. Give us a

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of how you're thinking about evaluation for

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>these markets. Some people are suggesting that it's obviously a

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more tracted than it was at the beginning of

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the year from evaluation perspective, But is it cheap? How

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? And no one's really pulled

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings forecast down, at least not dramatically. Yeah, that's been

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a puzzling thing as to why we haven't seen the

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ear and forecasts come down. And I think that's why

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>people can make the argument that, well, just the price decline,

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just that things are cheaper now. The problem is

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is I think the market is saying that the fundamentals

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>has also declined. Right, So it's yes, things are cheaper

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>based on price, but maybe it's also cheaper based on

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>value if the value has declined in tandem. And when

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we like interest rate in just some of your typical

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>market multiples, you know, we've seen the pe come down,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, yields have gone up, and

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's been almost a bit of a wash from

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the pure market multiple perspective, and as a result, the

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>way that we're trying to position things is be a

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more just broadly diversified, and then within each

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the sectors, work with some of our tremendous

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>teams like and Miletti. She's the head of our fundamental

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>equity teams. They're the ones who are trying to identify

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>value there. Yeah, and so here it all springs. You know,

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We're very fortunate to have her and her teams here

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to try to identify some of those areas within each

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sector about who might have that quality of earnings to

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of cut through some of these cyclical headwinds that

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we might be facing. By the way, Uh, Brian just

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>got about thirty seconds here, But I see you like China,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and it strikes me that they're kind of going in

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the other direction or they haven't, you know, been in

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a situation where inflation is high and they're raising rates.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They've still got to come out of lockdown. Is that

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a reopening play? It really is. Yeah. I

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think sentiments shifted so much so negatively against them. Who

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>knows how long will hold on to it. But we

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>do like China road to to the US. They got

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal impulse, monetary stimulus, and now the reopening. We

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think that could bode well for them. All right, Brian,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>great great stuff. I always appreciate getting some of your

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here. Dr Brian Jacobson's senior investment strategists off Spring

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Global Investments. Uh, they are all in Wisconsin. I mean,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about it, Marquette, that's a Milwaukee is an

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin is Yeah. They they all started. A lot

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of them started there at Strong Funds, which is a

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>big was a big mutual fund out there in suburban Milwaukee.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a must go to visit if you were

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sell side equity analyst. He had to go out se

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a million times, a million times. It's a it's a

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>great money town, great money market town. There's lots of

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>good folks. They're managing institutional money. Well. When you think

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about one of the great success stories in the US

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the growth of you know, certain cities,

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>certain metroplexes around the country, Atlanta's got to be at

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the top of your list. It's just been such a

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>great growth story for so long. So many great companies

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like Delta Airlines and home Depot and so on, and

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so forth, they hosted the Olympics. UH, just a great

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>success story. And so of course we need to put

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>some numbers around that. And when you want to do that,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you go to Chinpey a Bloomberg News and Matt Winkler,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who is editor in chief emeritus and founder of Bloomberg News,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of put some numbers around that, put some

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>context around that. And they certainly have Matt include joint

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So, Matt, Atlanta, Georgia,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the key one of the key takeaways from your

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>perspectives as you looked at the data as to why

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta has been such a good success story. So it

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>goes back to Maynard Jackson became the first black mayor

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of any city, major city in the South, and he

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>had two very big initiatives that stand the test of time.

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>One was massive public works, which included the renovation of

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the airport that is the busiest in the world uh

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and has been renamed with his name on it because

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of that renovation. UH. He also initiated a rail line

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that goes from one into the city to the other,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>so everybody can get from here to there without any difficulty.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But the other major thing was he wanted to make

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>sure Atlanta would be forever diverse. And with Atlanta being

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>today uh the second largest black majority UM city in

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States. UM, he initiated a it was persuasion

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>really requirement that everybody hire at least thirty of their

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>workforce from the black local community. And that also stood

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the test of time. So today when you look at

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>business in Atlanta, it is diverse, UH. And in fact,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is really more diverse than any other city that way.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And so those two things, if you like, UH, infrastructure,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>public works, and diversity have combined to make Atlanta, UM

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the best performing city right now in the United States.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And we know that because we have these credit measures

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that show that Atlanta liabilities are falling, personal incomes going up,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and UH and so UM are so many other measures

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of performance for the city. So it's going in the

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>right direction. Is anyone else UM taking note or other

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>mayors looking at this as a template for what they

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can do in their cities, especially in you know, cities

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that have historically have had problems like Chicago or Baltimore. Well, UM,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't say I've done the Grand City tour of

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>late partly because of covid um you know, impediments. But um,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was in Boston last week catching up

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with another new mayor, uh Michelle wou and mentioned Atlanta,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and she got excited and she said, we like what

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we see down there. So, um it is. It is

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>an exemplar, There's no question about it. It's interesting, Matt,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about the success story of Atlanta, which has

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>been generations into making you think about just in the pandemic,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>how we've seen, you know, a migration of people in

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this country to other similar type cities, whether it's a

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Nashville or or Charlotte or certainly Miami in on a

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>greater scale. How did Atlanta deal with the pandemic That

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>does anything unique there? Or were they hit as well

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as anybody and they're trying to recover as well as anybody.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>They had the same issues of every other city. Um,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and they also had you know, the if you like

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the polarized politics, because as you know, Georgia is in

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>fact politically led by Republican legislature and governor. In Atlanta,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>um is as I said, it's been Democrats since uh well,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going all the way back in time. Really, but it's

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been black Democrat and uh, they don't agree on a

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of big issues. And they certainly had difficulty dealing

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic having to do with things like masking

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when businesses were going to be open

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in schools and everything else. So every city has had

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>those issues. Uh, probably Atlanta I had to contend with

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a much more difficult political um agenda. But Atlanta being Atlanta,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>it managed to, you know, deal with these difficulties and

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with them successfully to the extent that you know,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it's a uh, a bastion of diversity and will probably

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>continue to be so. I couldn't believe it when, uh

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they tried to make it illegal to pass out bottles

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of water to like single mothers and lines to vote.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>What what a mean spirited thing to do. Uh, they

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>generate I think you said two thirds of the GDP

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for Georgia. Is it possible that Atlantic could pick two

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the congressional representatives. No, we're not there yet.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not there yet. But look, Atlanta was the reason

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that Georgia for the first time in thirty years went

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for a Democrat in the White House. Um, that's Faulton

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and Dekalp County, those two counties to account for Atlanta,

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, it's the reason that the senators

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>from Georgia are also Democrat and it's the reason that

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see all these stories of companies leaving

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Illinois to go, um to Texas and other states. But

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>companies headquartered in Atlanta are very happy. I know from um,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the companies I cover. Porscha absolutely loves being there.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But then they have much bigger, famous corporations that are

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>happy and not leaving, right correct. Um. You know, In

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>fact you mentioned at the outset Delta and home Depot,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>those are the two. Those two companies are the best

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>performing in their global industries. You know, if you look

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 1>at Delta every which way you look at it, Delta

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is the best airline from a market perspective or investment

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective in the world. And if you look at home Depot, uh,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at their sales performance, it's it's really

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Home Depot does better than any other company.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they're very happy. Where they are happy is

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a relative term, but um, yeah, where they're situated is

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>is uh is good for them, particularly because the airport. Um.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's really probably the best part of this is

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Atlanta Airport has come out of COVID nineteen

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>UM performing better than any other airport in the world.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's and the biggest airport in the world. I didn't

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>know that before I read this. I figured in terms

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of traffic. Yeah, oh, hair or Charles de gaul Um,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want to quickly get your take on or

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>point out that Georgia Shirley must be one of the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>trigger states, right, and we had this the uh, you know,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to really emotional days I think for the whole country

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday and Friday because of the Supreme Court. Um.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>What are we hearing from companies about how they're going

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal deal with this? Well, what you've heard so far,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've reported this at Bloomberg pretty extensively, which is that, uh,

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>while companies have not for the most part, been explicit

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in condemning the Supreme Court decision, what they have done

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>instead is say publicly that they will do whatever it

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>takes to pay for the reproductive care of their employees.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they will do whatever it takes to

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>enable employees wherever they are in any of these states

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>where um, you know, abortion is suddenly impossible or legal

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>or both. Yep, they'll take care of it all right, Matt,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. We appreciate Matt Winkler, Bloomberg News. Here's

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>some data for you. Since the US alone has sustained

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>three weather and climate disasters, and by the end of

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this century, the US government predicts two trillion dollars per

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>year in damages from hurricanes, wildfire's, flood, drought, severe storms,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or earthquakes. Question is is there a way to take

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the disaster recovery efforts out there where you

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>guessed it? There's an e t F for that. Andrew

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Chain and CEO of procure A m joins us UH.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Andrew talked to us about an e t F that

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>may benefit from, you know, recovery efforts for our disasters.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thanks for having me. It's great to

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>be back. And yeah, we're thrilled to talk about FEMA.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's our latest ETF from procure We launched this just

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on June one, and realizing the various trends and climate

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>change and the devastating and financial devastation that many of

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>these natural disasters and even man made and man enhanced

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>disasters can cause. To us, it made sense to create

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a fund that focused on these companies that are helping

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>us with recovery, mitigation, prevention, and the companies that help

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>us in our in our times when we need them

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the most. It's one of those ideas where when you

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hear you're like, yeah, yeah, of course about time. Why

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>did it take so long? So talk to us about

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the holdings that are in it. Yeah. So it's it's

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a wide range, it's a global basket. We have currently

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty two companies from around the world. And the SPUND

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So you look back at the Texas UH freeze that

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we had a little over a year ago, and when

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the system went down, people were scrambling for generators. So

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a company like Jenerac is where respund and they help

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with you know, remote power generation absolutely. And you look

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at UH. You know, when you have Hurricane Sandy or

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>events like the Horizon oil spill down on the Gulf,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, typically dredging or the rebuilding of dunes

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and protective barriers are extremely important. You have a company

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>like Great Lake Dredging DOC that you know, repaired I

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>believe twelve or more miles of the New Jersey coastline

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and helped build up sand level sands heights in

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Gulf during the oil spill. So you have companies

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to help with that. You have construction of engineering firms,

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you have waste management treatment, water management, water treatment, UM

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and so many other influential companies that help us in

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>events like wildfires, floods, earthquakes, even droughts. And this is

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>something that is a global phenomenon. You mentioned that two

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar figure that the US government expects by the

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>end of this century to the US budget alone. That's

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>probably five and a half billion dollars per day from

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the US budget alone. That doesn't include what global efforts

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>are occurring overseas. That doesn't include what companies and individuals

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>will have to pay to protect and recover. So this

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is truly a remarkable industry and one that we believe

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>we helped quantify by developing FEMA. But by the way,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take us too far off base.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you see like Generac is one of those

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>products when when a guy like looks over the fence

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and sees that has never got one, you're like super jealous.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And the new GENERAC I think are these bi directional

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>e V s. You just test of the four F

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>one which will essentially do the same thing. Right, it's

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna power your house if and when the power goes down.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>We got our generact three weeks before Superstar Sandy Horse.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>We had people in our house. I didn't even know

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they were staying with us for days. I found myself

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>walking a crying baby at like three o'clock in the

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>morning around my house and try to comment. I'm like,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who this who this kid is,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But they work those generat work. Andrew, Uh, talk to

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me quickly about the E t F business At a

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>broader level, you offer other products obviously. I I usually

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about space and stuff like that. Um,

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>as we see this market downturn, it has been brutal, Um,

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>how does that affect E t F trading? Yeah? You know,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know sometimes volatility, you know, brings a lot of

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>volume to the market. Sometimes people are in a wait

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and see position and aren't ready to allocate new capital

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to either new ideas or existing ideas, and they're trying

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, Um, you're where the next trade maybe

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or where they want to be overweighted and so UM.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've had some pretty violent moves in the

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>market over these last you know, many weeks, and you know,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for for the bulk of UM. You know, sometimes you

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>see those big moves and people use those as times

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to reposition or reallocate, and you see volumes you know,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>really surge. Sometimes people say, you know what, I'm gonna

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>take a step back, and certainly in the summer the

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>old adage and sell them ay and go away. UM.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, not always the case, but you know, some

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>volumes have been have been depressed, but there's always some

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>interest in certain areas in the market where you'll see

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>those volumes pick up. So typically those could be good

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>indicators for for what people are looking at. So is

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>this Uh? Is this the second e t F you're launching?

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You have UFO right? UM? Is FEMA the second one

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>under the procure brand? Exactly what's next? You know, it's

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a question we we always receive, UM. You know,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of times it's industries or themes that are near

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and dear to me. UM. You know, I I was

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>down in New Orleans at University during Hurricane Katrina. Uh.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>How is uh? You know in New York city during

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>sandy and the storms that we just had last year. Um,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of ideas that I bring out

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are things that you've played to some of my own

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fears and looking for exposures and ways to potentially protect myself.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're always looking for first to market concepts. Typically

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>thematic global equity is how we how we bring the

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>strategies out and FEMA was, uh, you know, an area

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that seemed completely underserved and one that you know could

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>give interest to many investors. Totally makes sense. Net look

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for innovation. Now, UFO, you've been I assume you've been

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hit by the whole um. Well, the FED raising rates

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>take some frothiness out of the market. Everybody looks at

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ARC and they're like, why did we ever buy that?

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, Um, but but you're investing in space and

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that we're gonna need to use in space,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>make in space, get from space. I have to assume

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that is not going away just because the FED starts

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. Well, you can even look at just in

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks various government contracts that have been

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a ordered to numerous space companies and you know, historically

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in the early days, space is almost entirely funded by

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>governments and government agencies. That numbers dropped to roughly twenty

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>percent in recent years, with commercial space really being the driver.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a ton of demand with the Ukraine invasion,

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we're learning how important space is and to be able

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>to have redundancies, capabilities, defensive and offensive capabilities from a

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>government from a military standpoint, And these are things that

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are in real time driving the space industry. So while

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe people not as many people can afford space tourism,

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a really small part of the space economy. The

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 1>other parts, the main drivers like communications, draw band, internet, connectivity, um,

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the things that benefit our lives here on

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Earth are things that are still seeing some tremendous demands.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's an unaccompanied by company basis. Not necessarily every

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>company is going to be a winner, but using diversification

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can hopefully provide you to too many of those companies

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that are generating space revenues from around the world. All right, Andrew,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>good stuff as always entertained and CEO of procure a M.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>They've got a new e T f out f e

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>M a FEMA. It's uh to try to invest to

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of some opportunities in the disaster recovery effort.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>That's their second e t F after the first one

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was u f O as Andrews just explaining kind of

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of all the investment that is going on

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in space of some cool thematic e t f s

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 1>out there. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put on false Sweeney.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio