WEBVTT - Supply Chain, Housing, Tesla, and WWE (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. It's a cloud supply chain.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We haven't that was the thing in twenty twenty still

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty and I think part most of twenty twenty two.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if that's the thing anymore. I mean,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>our ships still sitting out there in the ports. I don't.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Let's go to the absolute source.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Gene Siroca. He's the executive director of the Port of

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. He is on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it making the trip just to see us.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure maybe look at some ships that are off

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the coast of Bayo, New Jersey. Maybe Gene talked to

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>us about LA. How are things there? How many ships

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are waiting off the coast? Are you getting stuff to

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the trains into the warehouses? How's it going? Yeah, good morning,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Paul and Matt. Things that the port look relatively normal.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>That backlog of ships that started at one hundred and

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>nine almost at this point last year was worked down

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to single digits by August, while breaking records in five

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of the first seven months, effectively worried about eighty percent

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of throughput capacity. Today the dwell times of how long

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>cargo sits before it moves out by truck or rail

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>back to pre pandemic points, not the whole supply chain though, right.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jean, you guys are doing your job and

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you've taken care of the mess. You've basically mocked it up. Nonetheless,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that the stuff coming in through your

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>ports is still completely full of all the chips that

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that stuff needs to be full of. Yeah, chips usually

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>take the air freight route. But to your point, Matt,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain has still got dislocations globally and here

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US, for example, the inventory sales ratio for

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>retailers is at about one point three seven from the

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last report of the Saint Louis FED. That's all all

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>time highs, but still much of a higher level than

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks would see. So if you're like me,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting email blasts and techs every day from retailers

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with deep discounts, And if you're like me, you're still

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>buying right. How about China reopening? I mean, you guys,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when the ships leave of China, they come right to

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>your port. Geane, what do you guys, how are you

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the reopening of China? You know, it's been

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty steady, Paul. Even when there were so many ships

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of the port of Shanghai back last summertime and

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>folks were saying it's going to be a deluge coming

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>across the Pacific, the central government and the Young Shaan

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Deep Seaport in Shanghai, along with Ningbo and other ports,

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>prioritized that long leg cargo. So while we may have

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a little bit of a dip, a little bit

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of a pickup, that was the extent of it, not

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>so much this crush or wave of cargo that's coming

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>across the Pacific, but it will ease pressures there domestically

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>as well, whether it's land, transport, barge, factory subassembly units.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, So in terms of we'res have you got

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody you need? And in terms of price pressures. Have

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you seen a lot of them? Do they continue? Yeah?

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>On the worker front, three big segments. As we've talked

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about before, Matt, the dock workers average six days a

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>week on the job during all of this import surge.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They continue to work and the productivity is great. The

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>dock worker contract with their employers, the Pacific Maritime Association,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is now being negotiated for the tenth month. We're at

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the outer edge of where this usually reads some level

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of agreement, but it's not quite there yet. We've got

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to get this contract done because the people that control

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the cargo importers and exporters have shifted their goods to

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>East and Gulf Coast ports. Some of that may stick

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>permanently on the truck driver's side, pretty good shape, but again,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you're only running at eighty percent of capacity. Warehouses are

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>still pretty full, and that's where a little bit of

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the challenge comes in getting workers. How do you so,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we did hear stories, and you told us stories over

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years about some of that cargo

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to East coast ports. How do you compete for that?

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I presume part of the reason you're in New York

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is talking to some customers and things like that. How

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>do you compete with the Norfolks, the Savannahs, the Baltimore

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course New York. Yeah, these ports have hired,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>switched on people, they've aligned with their policy makers, and

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing huge investments. We've got to stay ahead of

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the curve. And they have a different union, and they've

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>got a different union, that's correct. The International Longshore Association

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>covering the East and Gulf Coast has their contract coming

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>up for renegotiation next summertime. At this point right now,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>what we've got to do is continue to add value

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>where people continue to tell me your costs are too high,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got labor complications, and you're overly regulated in California.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a band together and continue to push

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the envelope on these issues because we've got to compete.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Before the pandemic, forty percent of the nation's imports came

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>through this gateway. Now it's down to thirty three percent.

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And the big number for the listeners to remember is

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two, eighty percent of the Transpacific

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>trade came through West Coast ports. Today that's fifty six percent.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>So what is the state government in California, for example.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>How do they respond because that's such a natural advantage

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>for West Coast ports with this, the Transpacific sounds like

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they respond with way too much regulation as usual. I

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you've been there for how many years as now

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast. I mean that's part of living

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in California, isn't it? You accept that bad if you

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>want to put it that way with the good, which

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is living in such a fantastic place, right. We've got

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to capture the moment here. Never in a generation have

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we seen a linement between the federal, state and local governments.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The Infrastructure Investment in Jobs Act, the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and the California Governor's budget all have investment ready for

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>us at the ports. On the regulatory side, we want

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to zero carbon or zero emissions. The technology

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>is just not there yet, So we've got to keep

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>working with regulators and private sector industry to make these

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>investments and encourage create a market maker concept that gets

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers enticed to us as a customer. Are the carbon

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>costs at your level or is that on a shippers level?

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>We asked today we saw carbon in Europe go to

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred euros, which is the highest price we've seen

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so far. Right, combination of all three things. So we've

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty big bucket of money out of Washington,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>another one out of Sacramento. We've put attacks on containers

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.239
<v Speaker 1>coming through to incent cleaner trucks. Yet we can't spend

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the money because the technology is not there yet. We've

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>collected about thirty five million dollars on that new container fee,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and we've only spent about one million. We've got a

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>long way to go, both on hydrogen fuel cell electric

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as battery electric trucks. They've got to be affordable.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Today the prices on those rigs are eight to ten

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>times more than what the average trucker pays for a

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>used diesel. But you've got a fantastic use case for

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>those kind of I mean, you've got a ship stuff

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ruck stuff, I should say, rather from the port to

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the warehouses. That's the first place you need to use trucks, right,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and so you don't need to worry about nationwide electric trucks.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You can use a number of other alternative sources. That's right.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>About two thirds of the trucks mat that move the

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>car will come in and out of the port by

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the third of the cargo goes by rail. But you've

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>got to have duty cycle, you got to have torque,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to run these trucks. You've got to

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sweat the assets. You cannot waste time charging. The biggest

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>bugaboo that we have is that a battery right now

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>weighs about sixteen thousand pounds, So you either haul the

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>battery or you haul the fright, you can't haul both.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And the hydrogen fuel cell electric, while really good performance wise,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>still very elevated in pre production stage pricing. So we've

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>got to work all this down to the middle. It's

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen overnight. Wow. And do the East

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Coast ports have the similar challenges. No, they're asking for

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the trucks that we no longer use, wow, as we

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>implement cleaner near zero and zero emissions because they don't

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have the same regulatory restraints. That's right. A federal standard

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>would be great. California wants to lead the way, they

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>want other states to follow. But we've got to bring

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these folks together. I want nothing more than

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>zero emissions at the port, but we got about be

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>smart about how our focus is on accelerating the technology

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and finding the funding streams. Do you have like the

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>coolest job in the world. It's always it's always great

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to see you guys, and so many things. I

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't keep all the balls in the year. I know

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this whole going green Wait, wait, wait a second. My

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>jobs to get stuff off its ships and get it,

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but now I have to do it in a green way.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>But you clearly care about going green as well. I mean,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously something that's top of mind for you, right

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and as you transition into this greener technology, that means

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>upskilling and reskilling workers for those new jobs. The mechanic

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>no longer works with a wrench sheer, he can work

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with a computer. Yeah, Geen Saroka, great stuff as always.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Jean Stroka, he's the executive director of the Port of

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. He has our go to source for all

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>things supply chain. He has been during the entire pandemic.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate him taking a few minutes and joining us

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Mixed day. Here,

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought we might get a little bit of a lift,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of mixed here. We got fed minutes

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up later today. Michael McKee from Bloomberg Television. He's

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>down at DC. He'll have all the details. Let's check

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it with Efan Devitt, chief investment officer of Moneta Group.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>She joins us talk about these markets here. If we're

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the end of the earning season, which

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>getting some of the retailers coming in here, let's kind

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of wrap it up here. What are your takeaways from earnings?

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I know the markets really focused on the FED, but

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let's put into context what we saw this earning season.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The really interesting thing about this earning season was that

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>markets were quite unwilling to punish disappointing earnings where they

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>fell shorts. We saw that with the big tech stalks,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with quite a bit of leniency in effect there, and

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that was surprising. It really reflects that overall, that sense

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of fomo, perhaps that sense of markets and participants were

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>willing themselves into risk assets and really back to the races,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>which is where they were for most of twenty twenty one.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's interesting. The other parallels that I think it's

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is that these warnings coming out of retail are

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly like the warnings we saw coming out at

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the first part of twenty twenty two. We remember Target

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart's coming out with some forecasts there where they

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>talked about building inventory. This is back in the post

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID era when we just had the Russian invasion of Ukraine,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>also building inventories, a slacker consumer, and them having all

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this garden furniture that they needed to sell off, and

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this was a trigger of a market weakness in twenty

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. So we're seeing almost exactly the same pattern

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>play out. Now. We're seeing that these retailers have actually

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>had pretty good results. The results are core positive, but

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>their forecast is negatives. Their expectations are more gloomy. I

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>suspect that is them getting some of this bad news

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the way first, telegraphing this an advance so

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that they can surprise on the upside later in the year.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Under promise over ever, always been a great strategy. Is

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the bad news, mostly inventory related. They're going

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to have to slash prices. We just heard from Gene Siroca,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>who runs the ports in Well, the biggest ports in

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the US and on the West Coast, saying that you

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>know he's seeing dip deep discounts from retailers all over

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the place, or is the bad news that they want

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the way. We're going to see

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>higher rates, business is going to slow down, the consumer

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>is going to be hurt. I think it's the ladder.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's around the consumer being slackered. For the most part,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>any supply chain issues have been resolved now, their inventory

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit around the shifting pattern of demand

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>around COVID, and certainly the home depot numbers may reflect

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that less money being spent on

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>home renovation because of maybe they're being simply more money

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend on services and getting out of the home.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's around the consumer. We've seen a really stark

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>disconnect between hard data and soft data in recent months.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The hard data has actually been somewhat positive. We've seen

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>positive direct direction of travel when it comes to inflation.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We've also seen quite a positive story and continuing unemployment.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's that soft data, that consumer sentiment that actually

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>been depressed for some time. It just hasn't manifested in sales.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And we saw January with positive retail tales much put

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more positive than November and December. So clearly the consumer

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is still standing, but they're not feeling great about it.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's where the retailers are trying to get ahead

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, even just kind of broadly on these markets here. Obviously,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two in hindsight just such a brutally year

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for both equity investors and maybe even more to the point,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fixed income investors going into twenty twenty three. How did

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of frame this year for your clients, maybe

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio managers or your analys and things like that,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>or do you see it differently now because it seems

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>like the market changed its mind yesterday. Yeah, well, there's

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly a flip flopping of the narrative that we taught

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was the case. We were actually quite interested to see

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>US market SIUs perform at the beginning of the year.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>That was something we expected to reverse to some time.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that narrative seems to have ever reversed again. We

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>saw a week er dollar. Now it's firming up, so

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>all of those things have certainly changed. So may coming

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>off a year like twenty two, which is clearly somewhat

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented in terms of the poor performance of bonds and equities,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that balanced portfolio was really on its knees at the

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty two. Clearly we don't see the same

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>negativity in the bond market. We're actually quite keen on

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>some of them where we can get those yields with

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting yields even net and inflation available in bonds where

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>encourage our clients not to have their cash set and

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sweet accounts. You want to see that invested at a

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>higher yield elsewhere, and because of that inverted yield curve,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get that in pretty short dated paper. So

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we're certainly not seeing the same leg down lightly in bonds.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>As all in all, we're not going to see that

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of massive rate hike that we saw on twenty two.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>The bonds are looking interesting. When it comes to equities,

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we've always had a very balanced allocation to equities in

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>core so not too much growth, not too much value,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just to balance allocation. It's been tough. We would have

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>underperformed when the growth was really strong in specially in

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and post COVID, But having that balanced allocation

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is really key today because when we see things like

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer safe will start to come through, we see those

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>real assets that the some of the infrastructure holdings start

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to come through because they're more defensive names. That's where

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>our balance comes in. So we're actually not making great changes.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>What we're thankful to see is fewer inquiries around some

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the more sizzle type, more volatile perhaps areas, which

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is cryptocurrency. We're definitely not seeing the same level of

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in that today. Well, no volatility there. I mean

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>yesterday the NASDAC tanked and bitcoin it's still twenty four

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. That correlation seems to have been broken. I

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know why, what's behind it, And maybe it's not

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as interesting to you just because it's not such a

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>huge asset anymore. Even the whole universe isn't as big

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as it one was a lot of the traditional investors

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in stocks and bonds seem like they are in kind

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of a waiting game. They expected a dip in the

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>first half. Now it looks like that's happening and then

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a recovery in the second half. Are you in that

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>camp as well in terms of the recession on the

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>economic athletes, in terms of in terms of asset prices, yeah,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>well we we actually were somewhat surprised by the resilience

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and markets and the strong performance in the first quarter.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't necessarily agree with JP Morgan that the best

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is in, that the highest levels are in. We think

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there will be ongoing strength throughout the year, particularly as

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the clarity emergence on the state of the

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer and on this recession, which you know, we said

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was widely forecast almost to the points where now it

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was so discounted in that positive news was well received,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so we were not We were a little surprised. So

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>there will be a bit of giveback in asset prices

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>now as we moved to the end of the first quarter,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but we're quite optimistic base something the year like twenty two.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We've been building in higher expectations for return across the

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>board and our asset class. Where do you go in

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fixed income here, even fixed income, as I've said, there

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are number of places you can go, and first of all,

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to go into the highest risk areas

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to get a decent yield. As far as cash,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>staying in cash makes sense today, as long as in

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the right kind of account and accounts that's actually earning

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>something closer to a short term yields, even a six

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>month treasury yield is interesting today, so that's you don't

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go into the highest end of the spectrum.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>High yield is interesting, and even high yields itself, higher

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>quality within high yield is still yielding quite meaningful returns today.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So we've been looking across the board. Investment grade itself

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>has also had deals that are interesting for the first time.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So we also in our clients accounts do advocate introducing

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>some private credit in there besides the public fixed income,

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>just to get that diversification. How do they get that?

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that used to be the realm of sophisticated investors.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Only can your average retail investor get that kind of

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>exposure now if if they are accredited usually that would

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>be that the key cutoff there. We are really enthused

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>by the greater selection we're seeing that are now suitable

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for credit investors. Obviously, there has to be a full

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>understanding of different liquidity terms that might be in place

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for something private. It might be quardally liquidity. Acquardally liquidity

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean easy access in and out. We've seen

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that with some of the reafs at the moment. But

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, as long as there is an

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding and is appropriately sized. We're quite excited by the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>different level of credit investor offerings today. Then, of course,

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if the clients has qualified purchase or status, they can

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>move up the spectrum. Again, what about non accredited investors

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>just looking you mentioned to move cash. You know, if

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>if Paul has one hundred grand of cash just sitting

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in his checking account, do you is there an easy

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>way for him to get at you know, four and

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a half five percent from that. Certainly, even something like

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a high grade if we're looking to say and say

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a mutual funds and the index funds, we can look

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at something in the short term government bombs or short

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>term investment grade credit, all of that and should be

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>yielding something that's closer to four or five percent. It may, obviously,

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we have to be health in order to see that,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't mean that there won't be some volatility

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>along that path, but any of those mutual sound options

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are quite suitable for that type of level. All right, Evan,

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Always appreciate getting

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, your thoughts there. Ifan Devitt, chief investment Officer

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>for Manetta Group c Suite conversation today, let's talk commercial

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>real estate, and we can do that today with the

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Hassam Naji. He is the president and CEO of Marcus

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and Millichap and a Hassam is in our Bloomberg Interactor

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio Live, which is good stuff, so it gets

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the gold star. It's a publicly traded company New York

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Stock Change. MMI is the ticker to put into your

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal there. Sam, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were just talking about I know you

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>guys are a real estate commercial real estate biz. Talk

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to us about kind of the commercial office real estate business.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about it? Because boy, the world

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed and we have some seven thirty one lex

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where we're located here. Fantastic building, one of the best

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>buildings in New York City, but it's tough to fill

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it up. And this used to be the hard of commerce,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>right We had the Gap downstairs and Jay Crew, and

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we had Victoria's Secret and H and M and all

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of that is gone. Well. First of all, it's great

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to be with you in person, yep at seven thirty one,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>even though those stores are not here. I love seeing

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I love being at Bloomberg it's great to

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be in person. There is no substitute for it. And

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that let me just jump start the conversation by saying,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is the reason I think the situation with office usage

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>will improve over time. People will come back in the

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>office more than they are today. But I don't believe

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we are headed for pre pandemic full occupancy anytime in

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the future. No, you just gave me my stat of

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the day when you walked in. You said, we're just

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>back to fifty percent, right, Yeah, Nationally, we just crossed

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifty percent daily occupancy rate across office space since

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. That's a national index, if you will see

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in some markets it's twenty twenty three, right, Yes, so

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>since the problem that erupted at the end of really

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. It's named for that COVID nineteen. This is

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the first time we've gotten back to fifty percent office

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>space occupas average. Correct. Now, let's let's take that apart

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. Places like Florida, Texas and other growth

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>oriented markets have a much higher daily occupancy rate and

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't fall as much. The urban markets New York, Chicago,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, Seattle, Downtown, LA are really skewing an average

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because their occupancies even less than fifty. Well, there's also

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a big political divide there, so you're what you're saying

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is the Red States are doing fine. They never left

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the office, and they're all back. I'd rather think of

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it more as an urban versus suburban. Okay, Well, you

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned Florida in Texas and Paul and I often

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about I wonder how well they did. Well. They

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't leave the office. That's right, they did just fine.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm a commercial I don't know a bunch

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of commercial real estate, what do I do? Particularly office space.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking around here in New York City and somebody

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>these amazing buildings they just opened up right before the pandemic,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Yards. I think spectacular office space. It is what

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>do I do? Great mixed use? Well, this is a

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>snapshot in time. Real estate is a long term investment vehicle,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as you well know, and if you really step back

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and look at commercial real estate is an alternate investment.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Office space is one of many seconds you have self storage, hospitality,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>retail of all forms, by the way, retail is the

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>comeback hit. Retail right now is the darling of our

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>industry and offices a new retail, which is really kind

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting shift. Apartments. Commercial apartments are a significant

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>part of commercial real estate investing, and they've also been

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the darling of the industry for the past ten plus years.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>They're having a little bit of a rough go of

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it right now because of interest rates. The FED, you know,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>answering your question of the overall view on the business,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>The FED has always been a solution when there's been

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a crisis. This time around, the FED became the crisis

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because we missed the window in twenty twenty one to

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gradually tighten financial conditions, get out of the post pandemic

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>recovery with an easing back to normal financial conditions with

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates going up gradually. That missed opportunity meant the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sledgehammer had to come out in twenty twenty two and

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>create a spike in interest rates, create a spike in

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>liquidity draw and shocked the industry. That's what industry is

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>absorbing right now, is that shock. And you know, I

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>always think of Jean claud Trichet was ahead of the

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ECB and twenty years ago he told somebody and I

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>was listening, it doesn't matter the level of the currency price.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>It just matters how quickly we get there. That's exactly right.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>And isn't it the same for real estate, Like, it

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter to you if it's six percent or six

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. But if we got there in less

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>than a year from zero, that's that's a problem, Matt.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>You just nailed it. Five percent interest rate on the

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>federal funds rate is normal, but going from zero to

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>five percent in less than a year is the shock,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and the market just didn't have time to adjust. A

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of lenders have pulled out of the market or

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>their underwriting has tightened so much. Lender spreads have gone

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>up so much because their risk averse to the point

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>where liquidity is there. The capital is there, but the

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>flow of capital is not so qualifying. For a loan

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>where you could get seventy percent leverage sixty percent leverage

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a year a year and a half ago is down

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to forty or fifty percent leverage, and you have to

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>put in much more equity and absorb at two D

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty basis point increase, and that cause

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to debt at a time when the economy is slowing

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and the buyers are worried about demand for space. Now.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>The reason I ask is that you know, there's not

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference in people's views on the terminal rate.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>The Fed may go to five percent or five and

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarter, or some people are saying five fifty, and

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much the upper end. The real struggle, the

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>real push and pull in the market has been are

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they going to cut at the end of the year

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four or are they going to hold

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>through the end of the year and into twenty twenty four.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And if they do hold, is that a killer for you?

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Or are you is that going to give you time

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to adjust to that terminal rate. Our view is that

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the catalyst for cuts later this year aren't there. Right now.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't see it. Unemployment is still at a record low,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>job creation still above the level of the FED wants it.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>We have five hundred thousand jobs in January versus consensus

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred and eighty seven, so we're still creating

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot more jobs than the Fed would like to see.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>From an inflation easing perspective, I don't see the catalyst

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for lowering interest rates, But what the market is looking

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for is three points of clarity one, the FED being done.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't, like you said, it doesn't even matter what

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the final rate really is. Is that a quarter point

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>higher or lower. It's being done so they can have

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that clarity. It's answering the question of a recession. Are

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we really going into a recession? Seems like the odds

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are less and less that there is a big recession

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>around the corner because of consumer strength, because of employment strength.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>So even if we just basically slow down to little

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>or no growth for a while, that's clarity. We should

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>know that in the next few months because of the

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>effect of the interest rates, that increases that have already

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>happened are showing up in the market. And lastly, for

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate, it's price adjustment. Sellers always take time to

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>come to reality. Buyers just need those two points of

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>clarity on interest rates and the recession question. The capital

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is there? Always at an industry event national the Housing

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Council with a couple of thousand large apartment owners in

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience, and I basically told them there is record capital,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>but there are a few buyers. We have liquidity, there's

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>plenty of demand for correctly priced assets. We get multiple

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>offers right now. On listenings we bring to market that

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>are appropriately priced. There's no shortage of buyers. You just

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have to price the asset correctly. All right, great stuff.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Hassam Naji joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive broker studio.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Hassam Naji. He's a president and CEO of Marcus and Millichap.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>They are commercial national brokerage firm on the commercial real

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>estate side. MMI is the ticker they are in New

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange traded company. So getting some good thoughts

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on kind of the commercial real estate business, all facets

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know, higher rates, kind of adjusting this market,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>both on the residential side and on the commercial side.

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we appreciate checking in with mister uh Nagi.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Looking at our good friends market cap six hundred and

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen billion as of today. Year to date, this bad

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>boy's up fifty eight percent um so the whole Twitter

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>hangar it's still down twenty eight percent trailing twelve month basis.

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, in the market where the Dow Jones

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Industrial average yesterday raised its games for the year to date,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>did it we had the biggest drop on the S

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and P and then Nazdak yesterday. This year, the SNP

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe is about four percent option year to date.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So so all right, Elon's getting it going. Uh. Matt

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Winkler joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio.

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That's always a good thing. He is the founder of

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News way back in the day. He's now our

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>editor emeritus. UM got a fascinating column out here on

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>mister Elon Musk and Tesla. UM that stock price performance

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of got my tension there, Matt, What are you

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at when you look at Tesla? Always great to

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be with you and Matt as well. Um. What we

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>look at is what we all should be looking at,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which is first thing is sales. And no car company

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>in the world over the past ten years has had

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the sales growth of Tesla, and more recently, no car

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>company in the world, particularly the top ten the ten

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>largest car companies, have been anything close to the gross

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>margin or profitability of Tesla. UM. And that's saying a lot,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>which means that, for example, Tesca can turn one hundred

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars of sales if you like, into twenty six dollars

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of profit at how much production cost. Matt just fresh.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember how much of that is that the credits

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they get for the you know, the BV versus the

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>actual profit per they those credits actually weren't there recently

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in the period that we're talking about. They will come back. Okay,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they are coming back because of the um Biden legislation.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, Tesla has become the most profitable company.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at those two things, sales growth

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>will say a decade, and then profitability over the same period,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you see something that is unique. It's it's it's absolutely insane.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, having covered the car industry for for you know,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ninon twenty years, here this is better than Porsche levels

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of profitability. And we used to always remember, right, Porsche

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the most profitable carmaker in the world. I'm looking on

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the FA page right now for Tesla, and if you

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>click into Ratiosum, Paul, look at the gross margins line,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it just climbs up. From twenty eighteen, we are at

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent, then sixteen percent in twenty nineteen, but now

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent, the twenty five percent, twenty six percent.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>What is happening here is this just because they've been

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>making the product for long enough that they know where

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut costs and they can raise prices in environment.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a combination of everything you just said, and it

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>should be said right now as we speak, that you're

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about a company that's worth more than Toyota, which

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sells more cars than any company in the world. It's

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>worth more than Mercedes Volkswagen, BMW, General Motors, Stellantis, which

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is Chrysler of course, in Pougeot, Citron, and then Ford

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Motor combined. Okay, all of them put together, all of

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>them put together, and you know, it's what the eight

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>times the value of Porsche which you referenced below. What

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have they done well? They started out with the models,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>which people forget maybe was the car of the year,

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Motor trend car of the Year in twenty thirteen. That

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was totally unexpected for an ev I remember when Consumer

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Reports tested it and they couldn't believe how good it was.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's you know, not just the S, but

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the Model three, the Model Y, which is an suv,

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Model X, all these models and more recently Tesla

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>has been able to or has decided to discount to

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the point where Bloomberg News reported it this week. It's

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>selling evs at a lower cost to the consumer than

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the internal combustion engine, you know, and the Model three,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Tesla Model three is out selling the

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>introductory BMW if you like, pretty much everywhere in the world.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So that gives you some example of how competitive it

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is and just how sticky the product is with the consumer.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So night you're you're a Tesla owner? Correct, almost ten

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>years now? Almost ten years now? How is the ev

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>aging versus an internal combustion auto? Well, the only thing

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I do every year is I switched to snow tires

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the winter, which I didn't have to do this

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>winter if we haven't had much snow. And then I

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to you know, regular tires because because I

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have one of the oldest models, which is a weird

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.719
<v Speaker 1>wheel drive vehicle. H And by the way, they do

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that in my driveway. I just I just go on

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the app and I say this is what I want,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and pick a day and somebody comes and switches my tires.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't do anything else. So the maintenance factor is

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just almost nine miles and it's the tires that's all

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I change. That's amazing. I don't do anything, you know,

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And so uh, we're talking about it, I said, almost

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a decade. Is there a concern that these sales figures

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in these margins take a hit after Elon musk Um,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, not only bought Twitter, but became almost like

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>an outspoken, you know, political activist, and a lot of

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>his values run counter to those of what I would

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>expect his his broader customer base feels Matt. So anyone

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>googling the phrase Tesla failed is immediately inundated with, you know,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>all these purported shortcomings of the company, whether it's you know,

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles themselves, the workplace culture, business practices, occupational safety,

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course the antics of the CEO himself, Elon

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>musk So my colleagueshouldn't pay And I thought, okay, that's

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>where we start. What does the data say that isn't

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>when you google Tesla failed, and the data on the

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg compiled by Bloomberg is overwhelmingly the opposite of what

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you read the prevailing narrative. It's all there in the numbers,

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, explains why last year, when you

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know Tesla lost something like sixty five of its market value,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still worth more than Toyota. After the climax of

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>short selling, but Anais, in an unprecedented move, upgraded Tesla.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>In that whole period, Analysts became more bullish about Tesla

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first time since the company went public in

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten last year, at a period when just about

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody was saying Tesla had failed. So I did at

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a trillion, you love it at three billion. Why did

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that happen? It happened because you know, they're looking at

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>those things that we're supposed to look at, which is

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sales growth, and nobody comes close to Tesla sales growth.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're also looking at profitability and profit margins, and

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>again this is where Tesla shines. So that's what makes

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it a leader. Yeah, you're talking about the analyst ratings

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that on a Bloomberg terminal with

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla A n R as a function and right

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>now there's thirty buys, twelve holds, and six cells. So

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, for me, what's different about Tesla today versus

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>prior to its anytime it's history is a competitive landscape.

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I now have major OEMs around the world going all

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in on electric vehicles, and that is a twenty twenty

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>two event. I wonder how Tesla's gonna fair in it.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think that Wall streets saying

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty comfortable with it, you know, Paul, You know,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to put it in perspective, if you go back to

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just two thousand and thirteen, or actually even more recently,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to twenty seventeen, Tesla's market share the market

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was thirteen percent. Today it's twenty percent, right, yea, And

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody is now selling evs and their market share is

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>greater than it was in two seventeen. Interesting. Yeah, that's

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the big change. I mean, I think to

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>see how they compete. You know, it's yeah for sure,

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because you have not only incumbents with a ton of

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>money to throw at the problem, which they're doing right.

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary Barrow was in here last week and she said

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that business is like a spring that's coiled and ready

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to But you know, here's the thing, and nobody talks

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about this. Tesla makes one thing, zero mission vehicles. Everybody

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla is focused on that one thing. Everybody else

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>who's competing safe for except for BYD and the Chinese companies,

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody else in Europe, the US is making the internal

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine as they always did ye and so that bifurcation,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that dichotomy is I think a very big obstacle to

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>catching Tesla. Yeah, because they have to do two things

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that are diametrically opposed every single day, sell the fossil

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>fuel vehicle and make our numbers for the quarter, and

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>try to come out with something for the future. It's

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>called the EV which is a cross purposes with the

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel machine. Yep. Absolutely, But interesting to see how

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this plays out of the next decade or so. When

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got Matt Miller right next to us, who was

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the car guide your head and he was gonna be

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>our peatree dish to see how this all plays out.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Winkler, thanks for joining us here. Matt Winkler is

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Bloomberg News editor emeritus as well joining

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>us here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Are you

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a wrestling fan like ww Absolutely not. I you know,

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when I was a kid, I

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was big time into a Bruno, Sammartino, all that kind

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of chief Ja strongbow. But it's savage. What was his name,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Randy Andy? I don't know. Randy macho man's right. Now

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just become huge. It's bigger than the movie business.

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just amazing how big this stuff is

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>has gotten WWE. I think they want to sell themselves

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or something. I don't know what's he's back and he

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>threw out his daughter, who was like the boss. Ye

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and now they want to sell it. I mean it was, uh,

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know, but Keith Rung and she's

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the media analyst. She knows this stuff. Keith, what do

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to know? Like, I don't view you Githa

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as a w w E. I'm just going to go

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb there, But I know you're a

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>world class analyst. So you know what's going on at

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Worldwide Wrestling Entertainment market cap six point four billion dollars,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>big company? What's going on there? Yeah? So Vince McMann,

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>as you just mentioned, a controlling shareholder, he has returned

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to kind of run the company in January, and he

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>basically the idea was to kind of oversee this strategic

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>review where he would explore options to sell the company.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And Bloomberg News Lukashaw just broke the story last week,

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that he is looking at a nine billion valuation

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for the company. Now that dollars, Yeah, nine billion dollars.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so we were just kind of crunching

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>some numbers in terms of what that translates to in

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of multiples. So it's a twenty two x multiple

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>EV to EBITDAM multiple. It's about twice the level of

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>media and media companies. So if you just look across

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the board across the media landscape, most media companies are

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>trading right now at about ten to eleven times forward EBITDA.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So this is obviously a pretty steep ask. Having said that,

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>though they do own some really valuable intellectual property. Um,

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you just look in general, and one

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of the areas intellectual I mean across the media landscape.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the areas that we're pretty bullish on,

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least most investors seem fairly bullish on, is

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>sports rights. Now, one could argue, I mean, this is

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:41.919
<v Speaker 1>really fake sports, right, It's it's scripted, but it's still

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty valuable. Um And and in general, we've seen about

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, seventy percent increase in these rights fees um

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so one could argue that any of

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the current media partners, which is you know, Fox and

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Comcast could potentially I mean, why would they want to

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rent the rent these uh content rights in perpetuity, right,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It would make just more sense to own it. UM.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>And so that's kind of you know, some of the

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking out there. But again with Vince McMahon, I mean,

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a fairly brash, outsized personalities. I'm not really

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sure how many people want to get involved here, and

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I never know, UM when I read stories about Vince

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and Stephanie, how much of is that is made up

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>drama and how much of that is real? Yeah, I

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know too much either. UM. So obviously, his son

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in law still pretty much runs the creative part of

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it UM and I think the the idea is that

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>he will continue to run the creative because what we've

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>seen is ever since you know, Triple H H has

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>been doing the creative process at the company, it's it's

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>done really, really well, UM and investors are extremely happy.

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Triple Edge. What what's Triple edge or Triple H Triple H. Yeah,

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's the Sun involved, that's the Sun law.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Triple H got it all right down with that. UM.

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So he you know, he's been in charge, um and

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I I think any any deal will be contingent on

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>him kind of pretty much staying on, you know, in

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the media space, one of the things that you when

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>investors in media space you're dealing with this is sole

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>transition to streaming. How has Worldwide Wrestling? How are they

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>positioned themselves for the streaming world. So that's a really

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. I mean, this was one of the companies

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that made its foray into streaming, way back before Disney

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or any of these other companies had even done it.

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And they created something called the ww E network, and

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they went out and they got about one to two

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.439
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers. However, they did hit a wall, and so

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they realized that after that you know, one and a

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>half million subscriber mark, they were really not able to

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>get much, you know, much more, and so they actually

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sold all of those streaming rights. They sold the entire

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>WWE network, or at least the rights to the ww

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>E network to Peacock, which is owned by Comcast. And

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so they have a one billion dollars deal with Comcast

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for that portion of the streaming business. So really, I mean, again,

0:41:58.040 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>if you kind of look at where they make most

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of their money. It is from media rights, both the

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming as well as the core TV rights. Oh that's

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about eighty percent of their revenue. Stream wow, and the library.

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ken Felio points out they have a massive library,

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>right They've They've still own everything that they've ever bought,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>everything that they've ever made. They have the video rights

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to all that, Yes, they do, so you know, basically

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>in a sale, all of that kind of comes into play.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder how they compete with I do love

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to watch MMA, and I will pay. However, however, much

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like the pay per view fight costs for UFC, I'll

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>pay it. Really it's awesome, dude. It is brutal and

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's real, which is what I like about it. Now.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I know that I've seen the Mickey Rouric movie, and

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>my brother is friends with the CULK and kids, and

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>they're all into this WWE. I know it's hard and

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>physically taxing, but it's just not to me at the

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>level of UFC. They have some big competition in those

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of leagues. So, I mean, so here's the big

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you bring up a great point for the UFCUM.

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So UFC is now owned by Endeavor, which actually has

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>been a big talent agency, right, Yeah, that's a big

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>talent agency, and that's that's just been such a home

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>run for them because you know, really the idea there

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>was our Emmanuel kind of bought UFC to kind of

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>increase the scope of the talent agency's business to live events,

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and so it would make sense. They obviously have a

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest in acquiring WWE as well, and I

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a great fit because if you

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just kind of look at McMahon, you look at his personality,

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at the relationship between the WWE brand and

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>his own brand, it really fits well with you know,

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>UFC and Dana White. Um. The problem there is, you know,

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you talked about competition with the UC. I don't I

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily think there's going to be competition as such

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for viewership. I think there could be in some nice synergies.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, I don't think Endeavor can actually afford

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the deal because they already have about six billion dollars

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in debt, you know, the nine billion dollars asking price,

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really really hard. So it's got

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>to be Fox or Comcast or Disney. So you know, yes,

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially that those are what makes most sense. I mean,

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Comcast makes the most sense just because they're already paying

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>them about four hundred and seventy million a year for

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the TV rights as well as the streaming right, and

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in a renewal, they'll probably end up paying them at

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>least six hundred and fifty million per year. So you know,

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>multiply that by five. They're paying them about three billion

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars over a span of about five six years. And

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>so it does it really make sense for them to,

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, rent that when they can just go and

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>buy it out right? But I'm not so sure what

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether Brian Roberts would want Vince McMahon to

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>actually continue on at the company. And I'm just not

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sure how those personalities will mash and with Comcast, one

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>always thinks of a much more kind of transformative deal, right,

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They're ambitious. So yeah, not really sure how that's going

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to play out. Well, I can tell I met Githa

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years ago. She's a data analyst at Bloomberg, one

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>of the best. Little did she know then that she

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>would be covering a wrestling company thirteen years later. Keithan,

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. For joining us. Keith at Ranganathan. She's

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the media anna slash wrestling analyst at Bloomberg. Can tell

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just one of the best out there on the street

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for all things media WWE. Maybe It's for sale. Thanks

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and I'm fall Sweeney. I'm

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.