WEBVTT - Sun, Wind and Pink Tides in Latin America

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bennif podcast. As with the rest of the world,

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last year, Latin America has been contending with

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>inflationary pressures and high energy prices. But what has been

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the region's reaction to the global crisis and how of

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>its nations gone about securing affordable domestic energy while also

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for new export opportunities. Earlier this month, BEANEF put

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>out our region's clean energy policy, supply and installations under

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a microscope when we released the Latin America Market Outlook

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of twenty twenty three. In addition

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to the market outlook, BENEF also has been researching something

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that has the potential for a huge impact on the region,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>green hydrogen. To find out more, I sat down with

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>beanef's head of Latin America Research, James Ellis, and a

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>member of benef's team from the saal Pallo office, Associate

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Natalia Cassillos Rebel. Together we discussed a range of topics,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>including key findings from the Latin America Market Outlook, digging

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>into the details, and assessing whether last year's record breaking

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>solar and winds installations could be surpassed in the future.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>We went into the opportunity for green hydrogen and ammonia

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>produced in South America and which countries are at the

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>forefront of the potential boom. We also discussed Brazil's small

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>scale photovoltaic revolution, Chile's continued clean energy drive, Columbia's renewables rise,

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and some of Mexico's recent failings in this space. If

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you like this podcast, make sure to subscribe to receive

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>updates on future episodes and consider giving us a review.

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But right now, let's speak with James and Atalia about

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Latin America. Natalia, thank you for joining.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Hi everyone, thank you so much.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Denna and James, thank you for coming back to the show.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Dana, it's a pleasure.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're here to talk about Latin America. And we

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just recently put out one of our regular Latin American

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Market outlooks. It's certainly a story of growth right now,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and James, can you give us some context around that,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>given that this report recently came out.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>The Latin America Market Outlook is really our flagship publication

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>in which we take stock capacity, generation, investment, energy transition

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>policy and all the sort of key trends that have

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 3>been happening in the region over the past six months.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>And if there's one thing I would just sort of

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 3>pull out for you as a main finding, it's a

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>story of wind and solar growth. As in much of

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the world, wind and solar really just continues to boom

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 3>in Latin America in often spectacular fashion, and really when

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 3>you look at it cumulatively as a region, it only grows.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 3>So individual markets and segments, of course fluctuate from year

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>to year with policy or project development cycles or financial conditions,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>but annual editions of renewal energy and wind and solar

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>specifically are getting bigger every year than the year before,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>including even in twenty twenty when the pandemic hit, and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 3>that of course means that every year is a record

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 3>year basically in terms of growth and wind and solar,

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and last year was no different. Latin America commissioned twenty

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 3>two gigabouts of new wind and solar capacity, which is

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>about twenty percent more than the year before. And maybe

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 3>spoiler alert here, we're on track for another record year

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three, so we'und track.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>For a record year. But I would say a lot

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of what I hear regarding any sort of global trends

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>pass to do with inflation. There's a lot of discussion

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>around inflation, and then many countries that have responded in

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>kind to cool inflation with high interest rates. Are we

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing the same issues in parts of Latin America or

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is this growth continued on despite inflationary pressure.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Well overall, it has very much continued on in spite

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>of inflationary pressure. There was interesting news this week, particularly

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil and Mexico, and I believe Chile as well,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>that inflation is starting to come down and analysts across

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the region are starting to expect central bank to lower rates.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>In central banks largely across the region have kept rates high. Brazil,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>according to many analysts, has had one of the more

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>aggressive central bank policies in the world. But this has

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>really done nothing to slow the growth of when it's

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>solar in the region, it's really just marched on.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So another thing that we've pointed out in previous podcasts

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>around supply chains had to do with the fact that

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexico really stands to benefit from changes to global supply

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>chains and this near shoring trend that is starting. When

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking specifically regarding wind and solar. Have we seen

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>those industries started to in some cases on shore in

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>let m some of the production and have supply chains

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>really changed And is that impacting these record breaking years

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about. Is it tied together?

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 3>The Mexican story is a really interesting story because there

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>are a number of factors that are pushing in opposite directions.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>On the one hand, there's a narrative that the country

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>stands to benefit disproportionately from changes in global trade and

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>near shoring, and that is largely true, particularly in the

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>automotive segment, or has been true. And the main data

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>point that you could kind of point to would be

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the announcement of Tesla's new factory that is planned in Monterey,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Mexico along the border, which will be its first in

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. But on the other hand, the current administration,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>which has been in power since twenty eighteen, has been

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 3>tremendously hostile to private investment in the energy sector, and

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>this is really stunted what had been previously one of

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the most exciting markets for wind at solar development in

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. So overall, net Mexico is actually not in

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a fantastic place in terms of in terms of energy

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>transition investment because of these conflict conflicting factors.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And really so in terms of the industries that we

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>cover in some respects in this automotive and batteries of

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>therefore storage space. But really we're not seeing the onshoring

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 1>of wind and solar manufacturing, but we are seeing deployment.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's go in into deployments part of things. What

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>countries are really standouts. You mentioned that we're going to

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be entering the year where we're probably going to continue

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to break records. Where are you seeing the most activity.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a story about Brazil now, and this is the

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>drivers of growth of clean energy growth in Latin America

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>have really changed from a couple of years ago. As

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>recently as twenty twenty, clean energy in the region was

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 3>a story for principal markets, all contributing pretty significantly, and

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 3>those being Argentina, Brazil, in Mexico. But as I mentioned,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 3>what we see today as a market that is much

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>much more concentrated, and that's really concentrated within Brazil, which

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>contributed about three quarters of regional new build and specifically

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about growth in solar in the sub five

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>megawat market that is the key driver of regional activity.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I sort of hesitate to call that small scale or

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 3>rooftop just because Brazil's net metering policy is quite generous

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and goes up to five megawats. So it's really growth

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 3>in this five megawats solar market that's the key driver

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>of regional activity. And just to kind of put some

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 3>numbers around that that I think will give much much

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>needed context, that segment added more capacity than total solar

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 3>additions in the rest of Latin America combined, and that's

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>including Brazil's own utility scale solar gains, and it provided

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>about a half of overall regional wind and solar capacity growth.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking about eleven gigawatts of solar that's all

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>under five megawat systems, and that's just completely crazy growth

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>because it also dwarfs Brazil's own utility scale solar editions,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>which were just about three and a half gigawatts. And

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the reason why that's sort of unusual is in most

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>markets around the world, it's really the other way around.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Utility scale is generally much more dominant in a much

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>larger share of the solar market. There are some other

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>exceptions like Australia, but in general, like in the inner market,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>like the US, utility scale is much bigger. So those

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>eleven gigawottes of small scale let's call it PV in

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Brazil is much bigger than about the eight and a

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>half that was installed in the US last year, and

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>many many times greater than the two and a half

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>gigawatts of a residential commercial solo that was installed in India.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking at this point about a very very

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>big market by global standards. Brazil installed the fourth most

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>solar in the world in twenty twenty two.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That you're hesitant to call it residential solar. These not

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>residential projects.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Well a lot of them are residential, a lot of

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>them are commercial as well, and that's largely because, as

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I said, you know, maybe a typical household system, we're

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>thinking of something in the high single digits or very

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>low double digits in the kilowatts. And in Brazil the

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>net metering benefit extends up to five megwats. So in

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>some countries, as our head of Solar Jenny Chase says,

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>in some countries that would be large scale solar, and

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 3>it can also be claimed either like locally like local

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 3>net metering i e. Located in the same location as

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the consumer, or remote net metering, that is, the plant

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>can be located in a completely different location from the consumer.

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 3>So this is sort of allowed consumers across Brazil, whether

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>residential or commercial, install pretty large sized solar systems all

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>over the country and benefit tremendously because power prices are

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 3>pretty high in Brazil and the country has great sun,

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 3>and those factors together have really helped kick off a

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>boom that has had an impact on the solar market

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>in the region. Who are financing these projects, well, you know,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 3>at this point the market's quite mature. So I mean,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't I couldn't pinpoint just one sort of subsector.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's buy in large private banks, but.

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It's largely diverse, and it's largely coming from utilities kicking

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>things off and then build or project developers kicking things off,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>even at this smaller scale, doing a number of small

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>projects in a number of different locations, and then either

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>operating them or selling them on.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's house it's businesses seeking to lower their power bills.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 3>That there are developers involved, there's community solar arrangements. There

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 3>really are a variety of different schemes. As I said,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 3>this was a market that was about Brazil. I think

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>at twenty nineteen sold about two gigattes of small scale TV,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and now it's eleven. So I think that point that

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of markets around the world have reached where

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>it's in headlong kind of solar growth. And I'll have

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 3>to say it came in quite a bit higher than

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 3>our forecast for this year, which originally were around nine

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>or ten gigaotts for twenty twenty two. So there's so

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>much solar being installed in Brazil in this segment that

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the regulator itself is having a hard time keeping track

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of all of them. So the historical numbers also keep

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>going up, which makes it kind of difficult to keep

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:37.239
<v Speaker 3>track of things.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So really fragmented, which is really exciting to see so

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>many things happening all at once, and then looking at

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this and we're seeing essentially a number of different projects

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>happening across the country. Really what it makes me think

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of is a number of different projects require a number

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of different permitting processes and a lot more paperwork because

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they're different projects. So surely there must be some very

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>strong government incentive to bring these sorts of things up online.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Why are things moving so quickly and so well in

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Brazil in particular.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, for a brief period under the past government, when

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>the debate over how to reform the net metering program

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>was underway, there was a brief window in which the

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 3>policy environment became quite contentious and the net metering program

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>became controversial and a little bit politicized. There was a

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 3>don't tax the sun A bit humorous, humorous to say that,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>but there.

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Was a don't tax side it was it works well,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and it did work.

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 3>The way that net metering was reformed was done in

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>a way that I would argue was pretty generous to

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 3>solar overall. It largely provided continuity to existing rules. So

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 3>the market continues to boom on. Existing systems are kind

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 3>of eligible for net metering through twenty forty five, and

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 3>those that are installed in this year are starting to

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 3>pay a very small, almost negligible part of the tariff

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 3>for use of the grid, and they're sort of phased

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>in over a six year period, and it's going up.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the grid fees usually are about thirty percent

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 3>of the total bill, and so customers who install solar

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 3>are going to start paying fifteen percent of thirty percent

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 3>of their bill, So overall, it's a very sort of

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>soft rule and it remains a very attractive thing to do.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>So that is part of the reason why overall wind

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and solar growth in Latin America we're looking at another

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>record year in twenty twenty three.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's pivot to another country that is definitely also

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>a solar powerhouse. Snowpun intended. What's happening in Chile.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 3>So Chile is very much it's important. I'm glad you

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 3>brought up Chile. It's really important Mark can talk about.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously a much smaller power market overall than Brazil.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 3>It's thirty two gigawatts total installed capacity versus one hundred

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 3>and ninety three for Brazil, so much much smaller in

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>terms of overall impact on the region. But as a market,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it's really out in front in the region in terms

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>of policy and even compared to the rest of the world.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Chile also had record wind and solar editions last year.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>It has nothing to do with small scale though, it's

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>almost completely utility scale winded solar editions that we're talking

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 3>about in terms of scale that's about three gigawats. But

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>more importantly, it's starting to hit some really cool milestones,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and a couple of those are so lar actually became

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the largest power generation technology by capacity in the country

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>last year with about twenty two percent of total capacity

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>in Chile is now solar, so that just sort of

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>edged out large hydro. And then the other thing that

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I think is very cool by regional and global standards

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 3>is that wind and solar combined provided a whopping twenty

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 3>eight percent of total generation in Chile last year, So

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that is really really high. And for context, in Brazil

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>that is about fifteen percent fifteen percent of generation comes

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 3>from wind and solar utility scale, and in Argentina and

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Mexico it's about eleven eleven twelve percent. So Chile is

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 3>also in many ways very much a regional leader.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow. And then speaking of regional leaders, Lynn the category

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of maybe biggest mover, where would you put Columbia.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Colombia is fascinating as a market because, as I mentioned

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>when we were talking about the top line winded solar

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 3>growth in the region, there are some important fluctuations in

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 3>other markets that have kind of lent Brazil outsize importance,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>And what I was alluding to really was the fact

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that Mexico and Argentina are both at a low for

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 3>very different reasons, at a low in terms of clean

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>energy deployment. And Colombia is a very interesting market to

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 3>look at right now because it's sort of filling in

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the gap and it's really just starting to get going

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and about to kick off a multi year what we

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 3>forecasted to be a multi year boom and wind and

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>solar installation. But one important data point to look at

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 3>here is that for the first time in twenty twenty two,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Columbia end of the year among the top three destinations

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 3>for new investment in the region for the very first time,

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 3>it's mostly tied to utility scale solar at this point.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>There have been some really significant delays tied to wind

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>just because the wind resource, as in most markets, it's

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>very geographically concentrated in a particular part of Columbia where

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 3>there have been significant delays tied to transmission interconnectivity. But yeah,

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Natalia, do you want to come in there? Yeah?

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Well, as you mentioned, there has been some of

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the delays in terms of transmission connection in this region,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>which is going to be the area where all the

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>wind farms are concentrated called Labajira, a region with very

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>poor infrastructure over.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 5>And also projects.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Both the wind developers and also transmission developers are facing

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 2>challenges in terms of negotiating with local communities to get

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the permits that they need in order to build their

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>assets in that region. And just to give some stats

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>on that, the company that is developing the transmission line

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.359
<v Speaker 2>had to negotiate with more than two hundred local communities

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and that is a process that took much much longer

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>than it was actually predicted, and it's causing delays of

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>this transmission line. And because of that, a lot of

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the wind farms that are planned for their region are

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>also going to be delayed. So that is a downsign

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 2>for Columbia as all of the wind farms is concentrated

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>in this region. But for the solar side, the good

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>news is that the resourcers are more spread out us

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the country, so the developer zone face the same challenge

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and we are seeing more deployment of solar projects. Year

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>by year, we're seeing growth on that.

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So, Natalia, let's go into a space that you've spent

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>some time looking at very recently, which is hydrogen, and

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this is intrinsically linked to this clean energy that we

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>are seeing installed. So with this wind and solar capacity

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>comes the potential for green hydrogen and hydrogen made from

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>renewable sources. Can you talk a little bit about some

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the countries that have been the leaders in this

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>space in terms of really looking at green hydrogen is

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a really big market opportunity.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to start saying why green hydrogen is so

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>relevant for the region, and that is because we have

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the best renewable resources in the world in many countries.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 5>So in Brazil we have.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>The best capacity factors for wind farms and in Chile

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>we have the best capacity factors for sol. So that

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>means these two countries they can produce very cheap renewable

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>power and that is a key element to produce cheap

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen as well. So according to our projections, we see

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Brazil and Chile having the lowest l COH the levelized

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>costs of hydrogen in the world today and in twenty

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty and in twenty and fifty, and that is basically

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>because of the great renewable resources that we have in

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 2>these two countries.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So We've got a lot being installed and it's incredibly efficient.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So countries and companies are looking at ways to better

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>use these high capacity factors for their wind and solar,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure is driving part of it. But then

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with hydrogen itself, so are the conditions right to store use.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>What's the domestic circumstances both physically and from a demand

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>standpoint for this.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 5>That's a very important question.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>So for now we are seeing most of the projects

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 2>being developed in the region mainly focused on exports, so

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>the domestic demand signs are not here yet. So basically

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Europe and Asia are giving the first concrete signs of demand,

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and the company is developing green hydrogen projects both in

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Brazil and Chile are mainly focusing on exporting for these

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>two areas of the world. But that actually imposes a

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>risk because it's actually a little bit uncertain how much

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 5>International demand for green hydrogen. So in my.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Opinion Blomberg's opinion, we think that these two countries Brazil

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and Chile, or whatever country that is actually planning to

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 2>produce green hydrogen, they need to start thinking about policystems

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>centervized local demand as well and there are some sectors

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 2>in the region in Brazil and Chile mainly that could

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 2>be a potential domestic demand, big potential demand, which.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Are still and fertilizers.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 2>So Brazil is a huge market for the agriculture sector

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>right and because of that, it consumes a lot of fertilizers,

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>but seventy six percent of the nitrogen fertilizers are important today,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>so there's a huge opportunity therefore Brazil start to producing

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>their own fertilizer and producing in a green way. So

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and especially if we see this green fertilizer market to

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>flourish in the future, Brazil could even start producing locally

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 2>and exporting to other markets.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Are the conditions right geologically speaking to store hydrogen?

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Not, Actually, we are not talking so much about storage

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>of hydrogen.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Mainly, all the.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Green hydrogen projects being developed they have some sort of

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>facility to transform convert the hydrogen into something else, a derivative.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>That could be ammonia, that could be methanol, and these

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>two materials that could be further use for other uses. Ammonia,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>for instance, would be applied mainly in the fertilizer markets,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>but it could also.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Be used as a fuel methanol.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>It could be used as a fuel or as a

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 2>raw material for other processes as well. So there's a

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>very interesting project in Chile, for instance, that they actually

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>already commission that they are producing methanol from green hydrogen

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>and capturing CO two from the atmosphere, producing methanol and

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>then transforming the methanol into synthetic gasoline, and that synthetic

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 2>gasoline is going to be exported to Europe. That's one

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>example of how the international demand is going to play out.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>For use cases like aviation for example.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Aviation as well, Yeah, and ship transportation. Both methanol and

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 2>ammonia could be applied.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's either user or ship it, which then brings

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>us all the way back to supply chains again and

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>seemingly a very hot topic this year. And my question

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is when it's being shipped, is it being shipped as methanol?

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it being shipped as ammonia? Are we actually shipping

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>tankers of hydrogen.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Now we're shipping as ammonia or methanol. It depends on

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>what the off taker is planning to do with the derivative.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 2>So this first case in Chile, they're shipping as a

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>synthetic gasoline already, so the product is already finalized and ready.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 5>To be used in Europe.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The many projects are aiming to ship as ammonia and

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 2>then in Europe first they would transform the pemonia into

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>other fertilizers and methanol the same case.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So what are the policies in place that are really

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>spurring hydrogen on in the region, and perhaps pick the

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>countries where you see the most favorable environments.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So for now, we see very little concrete policy in

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the region. We see hydrogen strategies, which are not actually policies.

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>They are they are a plan that the country put

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>out to give signs for the private sector and also for.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 5>Development banks for instance.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 2>But I see Chile as the more mature market in

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 2>the region, as they put the first green hydrogen strategy

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in Latin America in twenty twenty, and.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 5>It was a very well structured strategy.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>They have very well defined goals for electoralizer capacity and

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>very ambitions goes.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 5>It's actually the most ambitions goals if.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 2>We compare other strategies in the world. They aim to

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>have twenty five giga OTTs of electoralizers by thirty for instance,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and they also have other very well defined goals such

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>as the levelized costs of hydrogen at one point five

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>dollars per kilogram of hydrogen which occur into our projections

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>is realistic. And they also put up plans of what

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>the demand would be if it would be more focused

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>on domestic market or international market. According to their strategy,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 2>they would first focus on domestic demand and then in

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the midtime they would become a large exporter. But in reality,

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 2>what we are seeing is that projects are they are

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>planning more to be exported first, as a domestic demand

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 2>signs are not here yet.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So Natalia with these stated goals, that's great, but how

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>do they actually get translated into action in the region

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>without clearly defined policies.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a good question.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>What we see so far is that the strategy that

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>was established in Chilea was important to give concrete signs

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 2>for both the private markets and for development banks to

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 2>support these projects. And when we compare the capacity to

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>plan in Latin America overall, across all countries, we see

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the largest pipeline is in Chile, and I believe that

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>it's clearly linked with the fact that Chile positioned themselves

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty with well defined goals, and with that

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>we also saw multilateral development banks coming to support these

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 2>projects as well. So initially we saw a very symbolic

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>support with only fifty million dollars to support these projects,

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 2>which is actually nothing. But now we are seeing more

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 2>deals being revealed. IDB and the World Bank are going

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to follow up with more significant support for these projects.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So really development banks are providing a lot of the financing.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But then at the same time you're really seeing well,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially the countries making perhaps an easier permitting process and

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>moving things along. Is that fair to say, Yes and no.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Chile they plan to have two main hubs of hydrogen,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 2>one in the north and one in the south. The

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>north would be mainly powered by solar and in the

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>south it would be powered by wind, which could reach

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>up to seventy percent capacity factor, which would be the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>highest in the world.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 5>However, we haven't.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Seen like concrete wind farms actually being operating in the

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 2>area right now, and that is in Patagonia, so there

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 2>is a big debate right now if projects in the

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 2>area they're actually going to be able to acquire environmental

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>permit because it's a really protected area. There's no so

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 2>much infrastructure in the region, and the government wants to

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>both protect the area but also allow this industry to

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>flourish in the market. So it's a really a big

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>challenge for the current administration, and we still need to

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 2>see how it's going to be developed.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So there are goals without necessarily policy incentives. So my

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>question really is do you think, given that the goals

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are considered fairly ambitious, that they're going to reach them

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>or are they really more of a stated objective and

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a direction of travel for some of these countries.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the latter, definitely.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 2>We don't believe that Chile is going to achieve the

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty five gigawatts target because it's too ambitious.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 5>And even if all the support was put in.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Place, they don't have right now the planned capacity to

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 2>reach that goal. And they also don't have all the

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>environmental permit policies that they need, concrete signs and port infrastructure.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 5>And many many aspects are missaying.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Still, can I just bring in what I think is

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a relevant point just to kind of add to what

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Natalia is saying, which is that Chile's hydrogen strategy was amazing.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 3>It came early on, it was very ambitious. The electrilizer

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>target was like similar in scale to the EUS, so

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 3>it was ambitious and it came out in December twenty twenty. Brazil,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>for example, still doesn't have a fully elaborated national hydrogen strategy,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 3>although one is coming soon. But one thing I wanted

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to point out that I think is very optimistic and

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>positive for the region, which is that Chile's hydrogen strategy

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>came out under the past administration, which was of a

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 3>very different political orientation than the current one than Borich

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 3>who's currently president, you know, very kind of famous and

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of rock starish president of Chile, guys in his thirties.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 3>And similarly, there have been very significant sort of political

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 3>swings in much of the region. But the positive and

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 3>what I think is a key point here is that

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 3>although you know, this has been called a pink tide

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>in Latin America where the political pendulum has swung to

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the left, basically the energy transition policies and plans that

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 3>have been put in place under past administrations have seen continuity.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 3>There hasn't been like an abandonment of goals that were

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 3>put in place by by governments of different directions. Mexico

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>being an exception. So I just think that's sort of

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>like an important macro point about the region, and it's

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 3>relevant for hydrogen and Chile, as it is for wind

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 3>and solar in Brazil.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>And as much as I'd like to see domestic energy

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>production coming from some of these sources not being politicized,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly they do tend to fall on this left leaning

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>government space. So for those who are not familiar, can

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you just expand a little bit on what is the

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>pink tide?

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure you could argue that it began a couple of

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 3>years ago with the elections in Mexico, in Argentina of

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Amblo and Fernandez respectively, certainly sort of left leaning administrations

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 3>in those countries, and then more recently the election of

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Petro in Colombia, Borich and Chile, and then Lula most

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 3>recently in Brazil. So pink tide is I think a

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>funny way of putting it, but referring to leftists or

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 3>censor leftist governments across the major markets or major economies

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of the region. And there are a number of other examples.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 3>Those are just the big ones.

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually going to lead us to a last

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>section where I'm going to ask you a couple questions

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not we should keep watching something or

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of something that we shay ignore because we

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>be and ef we keep our eye on a number

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of different things across different regions around the world, and

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that can come from business all the way through to policy.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And so in the watch or ignore category, should we

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>be watching or ignoring? Voluntary carbon offsets.

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent watching and one hundred percent watching in Brazil.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 3>So Brazil accounted for just a few I think. I

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 3>think as recently as two years ago was like a

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>couple percentage share of the global voluntary carbon market. I

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 3>think last year was twelve or thirteen percent. It has

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 3>some of the largest potential globally to produce offsets, tied

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 3>to obviously being home to the largest rainforest in the world.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Also, in watching and ignore, any changes to the auction space.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Watching definitely, well, we're going to see auction auctions is

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 2>a very important thing for the region overall. I would

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>say Chill is going to be holding a very big

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>auction this year that we haven't seen since should tell

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>than fifteen And with that came as some important modifications

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>which is going to increase the competitiveness of renewables and starch.

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>So for now we have a touch on this. But

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Chile has a big problem in terms of transmission bottlenecks,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and advancing transmission lines and allowing more storage projects are

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>solutions to increase grit flexibility. So that is why these

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>next auctions in Chile are going to be very much

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>focused on that.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and so this last one something that we've been

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>globally watching that given what's rolling out in Latin America,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>watch or ignore? Should the region Maybe not US, because

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we certainly are looking at this, but is Latin America

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>closely watching or ignoring natural gas prices?

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's difficult to generalize, but in Mexico natural gas

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 3>is very cheap and abundant thanks to proximity to the US.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 3>In the case of Brazil, it's very important in years

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of low rainfall when hydrogeneration is down and then it

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 3>has a huge impact on the market. So right now

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 3>probably ignoring, but next year possibly watching, particularly in the

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 3>case of Brazil.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Natalia and James, thank you so much for joining

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>us today.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much.

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. Dana Bloomberg.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>N EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it be construed, as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg an

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ef should not be considered as information sufficient upon which

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP Nor

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this recording, and any liability as a result of this

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>recording is expressly disclaimed.