Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of My
Speaker 1: Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.
Speaker 1: A listener mail This is Robert Lamp and this is
Speaker 1: Joe McCormick, and it's Monday, the day of the week.
Speaker 1: We read back some messages from the mail bag. Oh
Speaker 1: and hey, if you ever want to get in touch
Speaker 1: with the show, and you've never done so before, you
Speaker 1: can do that by writing to contact at Stuff to
Speaker 1: Blow your Mind dot com. Whatever email you want to
Speaker 1: send this fair game, of course, we're always open to
Speaker 1: uh two, feedback, to corrections if necessary, to just interesting
Speaker 1: things you want to share with us, or if you
Speaker 1: just want to say hi, that's always cool. Contact at
Speaker 1: stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Rob, if it's
Speaker 1: cool with you. I want to kick things off by
Speaker 1: reading this message from Josh about our episodes on fun.
Speaker 1: Go for it all right. So we asked people from
Speaker 1: other language cultures to share equivalence of the English word
Speaker 1: fun and any differences in connotation and so forth. And
Speaker 1: we heard from Josh about a word from Dutch. So
Speaker 1: Josh says, Hey, Joe, Rob Seth, I'm an American living
Speaker 1: in the Netherlands, and I wanted to pitch in on
Speaker 1: the word fun. In Dutch, the word is leuke. It
Speaker 1: has a wonderfully difficult pronunciation for an English speaker, something
Speaker 1: like the way he spells it as l e h
Speaker 1: dash o dash k. So luke, that's what I'm trying. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll see, um, Josh says. It is used frequently as
Speaker 1: what I would call a throwaway word, something you might
Speaker 1: use several times as an encouragement while being told a
Speaker 1: positive story, like nice might be used in English. Oh
Speaker 1: so somebody's saying, Hey, I did this cool thing, or
Speaker 1: I'm you know, I have plans to do this cool
Speaker 1: thing or whatever, and you you sort of encourage the
Speaker 1: anecdote to continue by saying nice. Nice. At least that's
Speaker 1: how interpret yeah, or or indeed, cool could be used
Speaker 1: in the in the sensense as well. Yeah, Josh goes on.
Speaker 1: It is also used to describe something particularly colorful or
Speaker 1: with an interesting or new design. I find it indicative
Speaker 1: of my observation that Dutch people tend to be neophilic,
Speaker 1: finding new and different things fun and not threatening. Thanks
Speaker 1: for the Luke podcast, Josh, excellent. Yeah, well, this is
Speaker 1: exactly the sort of thing we're asking for. Examples from
Speaker 1: from other languages related to the linguistics of fun alright.
Speaker 1: This next one comes to us from Cat. It is
Speaker 1: a response to our episodes on incense Cat Rights. I
Speaker 1: was taken aback when Rob mentioned it is more common
Speaker 1: for bad smell hallucinations. From my own personal experience as
Speaker 1: well as experiences from a few of my family members,
Speaker 1: a good sometimes floral smell is typical for us. For
Speaker 1: the occasional smell hallucination, the floral smell usually does have
Speaker 1: a sort of associations with past loved ones, which in
Speaker 1: turn does have a spiritual religious connotation. I have search
Speaker 1: and low for a source during these hallucinations to see
Speaker 1: if there's a real life cause with no luck, which
Speaker 1: strengthens the spiritual connection angle. So Rob, I think you're
Speaker 1: right about that. I absolutely love the podcast. You guys
Speaker 1: are my all time favorite and always look forward each
Speaker 1: week to learning from any new topic you cover, however
Speaker 1: random it may seem. It always makes me think and
Speaker 1: I appreciate how you look at it from every possible
Speaker 1: angle and with an open mind. All the best and
Speaker 1: keep it up. Cat. Oh thanks Cat, Now I do
Speaker 1: want to see Yeah. First of all, yeah, thanks for
Speaker 1: writing in. But but I do want to say that
Speaker 1: I don't mean to imply that that positive aroma hallucinations
Speaker 1: are necessarily less common in general, just that I had
Speaker 1: seen or remembered fewer mentions of of the phenomenon or
Speaker 1: or at least, you know, recollections of it. Um. I
Speaker 1: so so don't tank to that to the bank just yet.
Speaker 1: I did pick up my copy of Oliver sacks Is Hallucinations,
Speaker 1: which is a great book on this very topic. And
Speaker 1: he gets into he does get into into uh these
Speaker 1: sorts of hallucinations, smell hallucinations, m old factory hallucinations, and
Speaker 1: it looks like at least with cases of parasomnia and
Speaker 1: uh disomnia, unpleasant odors are more common. But yeah, this
Speaker 1: is I think a topic we could potentially look into
Speaker 1: more in the future. Uh do a give give old
Speaker 1: factory hallucinations a proper episode? So anyway, greatly appreciate the
Speaker 1: feedback and perspective on this topic. Alright. This next message
Speaker 1: us in response to Rob's squid interview. Uh, and this
Speaker 1: is from Ian Ian says, Dear Rob and Joe, as
Speaker 1: seems to be my eternal condition. I'm several months behind
Speaker 1: on podcast episodes. I just finished the episode in which
Speaker 1: Rob interviews Martin Walland about his recent book Squid. I
Speaker 1: love the discussion revolving around squid intelligence and wanted to
Speaker 1: share a recommendation for some science fiction reading in the
Speaker 1: same vein Children of Ruin by Adrian Tchaikovsky, the second
Speaker 1: book in the Children of Time series. I will try
Speaker 1: to keep this as spoiler free as possible, but arguably
Speaker 1: even describing the premise is somewhat of a spoiler, so
Speaker 1: be warned. The book isn't technically about squid, but does
Speaker 1: heavily involve they're quite intelligent cephalopod cousins octopuses slash octopi
Speaker 1: slash octopodes slash octo whatever's The basic premise involves far
Speaker 1: future human space explorers who encounter a long lost colony
Speaker 1: that has been taken over by accidentally uplifted oct to podes.
Speaker 1: I'm going to use this version of the word because
Speaker 1: it's my favorite. Tchaikovsky clearly put great effort into trying
Speaker 1: to keep the octopussy nous of their intelligence and not
Speaker 1: fall in the common sci fi trope of having everything
Speaker 1: think basically like a human. It's a very interesting exploration
Speaker 1: of the concept of human level intelligence and something that
Speaker 1: is probably as alien to us as it is possible
Speaker 1: to be without being literally extraterrestrial. And I recommend it
Speaker 1: to anyone who enjoys speculative fiction, which I imagine is
Speaker 1: a large proportion of your audience. I would also recommend
Speaker 1: the first book which gives the series its name, Children
Speaker 1: of Time, And in fact, you would likely be quite
Speaker 1: lost in Children of Ruin if you did not read
Speaker 1: Children of Time first, but it explores similar ideas, though
Speaker 1: in its case there are no molluscs insight. As always,
Speaker 1: thank you for your wonderful content. Cheers in ah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Back to an old favorite speculative topic of ours, the
Speaker 1: the supposed Minds of Cephalopods. I have not read the
Speaker 1: books you're talking about, Ian, but there is a great
Speaker 1: nonfiction book I've recommended on the podcast before by Si
Speaker 1: Montgomery called The Soul of an Octopus, which I really
Speaker 1: liked because it just has some wonderful, very surprisingly emotional
Speaker 1: observations about octopus minds, about the kind of baffling otherness
Speaker 1: of octopus intelligence, but also some moving thoughts about octopus
Speaker 1: emotions and connection to human handlers and uh, continuing on
Speaker 1: the subject, I think we may have talked about this
Speaker 1: on the show before, so I apologize to the extent
Speaker 1: that I'm repeating myself. But uh, to whatever extent I haven't,
Speaker 1: I have done the intelligent octopus thought experiment before, you know,
Speaker 1: meaning like, if an octopus were to possess a capacity
Speaker 1: for language and human level technology, that sort of thing,
Speaker 1: And I recall thinking that a major ecological influence on
Speaker 1: the nature of that intelligence would be the comparatively solitary
Speaker 1: intelligence of the octopus contrasted with the deeply social intelligence
Speaker 1: of the human. I'm I'm very much of the opinion
Speaker 1: that one of the most profound influences on the character
Speaker 1: of human intelligence and human thought is the fact that
Speaker 1: we evolve to live in groups and to survive by
Speaker 1: working together, and so the human brain is formed for
Speaker 1: maintaining and manipulating social relationships, and this fact colors basically
Speaker 1: every aspect of our intelligence. I'd argue that even when
Speaker 1: we're alone, even in the case of people who like
Speaker 1: spending a lot of time alone, our thoughts are very
Speaker 1: social in character. So how would an octopus be different? Like,
Speaker 1: I wonder if the human brain's obsession with a sense
Speaker 1: of belonging would be replaced with a need for something
Speaker 1: else in the case of an intelligent octopus, maybe something
Speaker 1: like like a sense of sheltered nous or hiddenness or something. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's yeah, it's such a a fascinating thing to try
Speaker 1: and comprehend. Um. I was just looking here at uh
Speaker 1: Adrian Chukovsky's um various writings. This is not an author
Speaker 1: I've read before, but I knew the name. I knew
Speaker 1: I'd heard the name before. I was trying to figure
Speaker 1: out what it was, and I have found it. So
Speaker 1: he's seems fairly prolific. Has written a number of different
Speaker 1: science fiction and fantasy books, many of which seem to
Speaker 1: have some sort of an animal theme in there. I
Speaker 1: believe there's one that involves with genetically augmented dog. But
Speaker 1: where I had heard of him is that he has
Speaker 1: written one Warhammer forty Thou novel, Day of Ascension, which
Speaker 1: has to do with the gene Steeler hybrids, which this is.
Speaker 1: This is a this is a fascinating faction in the
Speaker 1: Warhammer forty Thou universe. These are like there's they're the Tyrannids,
Speaker 1: this threat from another galaxy. Uh, that is entering into
Speaker 1: our galaxy, and they're, you know, just a big biomass
Speaker 1: that wants to consume everything. But they kind of seed
Speaker 1: worlds ahead of time with these gene Steeler colts, with
Speaker 1: these uh these partially mutated factions that are sort of
Speaker 1: vying to um to control the population and destabilize things
Speaker 1: ahead of the arrival. Uh So anyway, Uh, fascinating faction.
Speaker 1: And I'd heard good things about that book when I
Speaker 1: was coming out, but I wasn't familiar with the author here,
Speaker 1: so it sounds sounds like something I might want to
Speaker 1: check out. Yeah, either way, Thank thank you. Ian. Alright,
Speaker 1: let's get into a little weird house cinema listener. Mailison
Speaker 1: comes to us from Bruce. Bruce says, Hello, Robert, Joe,
Speaker 1: and Seth. Some of the recent weird houses have been
Speaker 1: right in my wheelhouse. That's a that's a that's that's
Speaker 1: suddenly a mouthful. Uh, the weird house wheelhouse. That'll be
Speaker 1: our wheelhouse anyway. Bruce says, I had a job in
Speaker 1: a movie theater to help pay for college during the eighties.
Speaker 1: It was a great job at the time for a student.
Speaker 1: Once the movies were playing, the lobby had been cleaned up,
Speaker 1: was plenty of time to study. The theater i was
Speaker 1: a manager at played both Krawl and The Last Starfighter.
Speaker 1: My memory of Kroll that makes it distinct was when
Speaker 1: people would call to ask what we were showing. This
Speaker 1: was before the days of movie phone and other automated services,
Speaker 1: so typically the cashier or one of the ushers would
Speaker 1: answer the phone. When they'd say Krawl, they invariably had
Speaker 1: to repeat themselves as the person on the other end
Speaker 1: of the line would misinterpret the title as our employee
Speaker 1: clearing their throat or some other vocalization unrelated to a word. Yes,
Speaker 1: that's so good. It's It's not like the movie was
Speaker 1: called The Adventures of Kraal or like The Tyranny of Krall.
Speaker 1: It's just Krall that clearly. It's almost it seems perverse.
Speaker 1: It was like it was intended to cause problems. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Kral Kral, because yeah, it sounds like there's some sort
Speaker 1: of an issue going on. Um they continue. Last Starfighter
Speaker 1: was one of my favorites to show at the time. Yes,
Speaker 1: the computer graphics were not quite up to resembling anything
Speaker 1: close to realistic even at the time, but they were
Speaker 1: still impressive as being a relatively new application of this
Speaker 1: type of special effects technique. They seem to add to
Speaker 1: the lighthearted overall tone of the film. One scene I
Speaker 1: always enjoy recalling when describing the movie to neophytes that
Speaker 1: I was looking forward to hearing your take on was
Speaker 1: the scene in which Grigg and Alex are hiding in
Speaker 1: an asteroid cave and then, uh, Bruce, here includes some dialogue.
Speaker 1: Uh we should we read this in character? Joe? Do
Speaker 1: you want to be Alex? Who's who? Who's Alex? And
Speaker 1: who's Gregg? I don't know. Do you feel like you
Speaker 1: have a Greg voice in you? I? I can be Greg?
Speaker 1: All right, all right, I'll be Alex. Uh this reminds
Speaker 1: you of home? Ah? Yes, I live below ground with
Speaker 1: my wife Oyd and six thousand little grigglings, at least
Speaker 1: until Zoor turns them into slaves. Where does your kind
Speaker 1: live in houses? Mostly that's caves above ground. I live
Speaker 1: in a mobile home. What is that? It's like a
Speaker 1: cave that goes places, only we never went anywhere, a
Speaker 1: mobile cave that never went anywhere. Fascinating, Bruce finishing my Greg.
Speaker 1: Come on, it's pretty good. It was a good grig.
Speaker 1: It was a good grig solid Dano, Harla, hey vibes
Speaker 1: there anyway. Bruce finishes out by saying, never fails to
Speaker 1: elicit a smile whenever I recall it. Thanks for the
Speaker 1: fun podcast now, Joe. This is also the scene, isn't
Speaker 1: where Greg is showing family photos of yes, yes, the
Speaker 1: children and the wife boyd Yes. He's got like a
Speaker 1: grig little wallet full of pictures and uh, how do wait,
Speaker 1: what form do the pictures take? Does he literally have
Speaker 1: a print out? I don't recall, I don't look. I
Speaker 1: just remember them splashing on the screen. There, So Gregg
Speaker 1: has six thousand children. That's that sounds stressful. It's probably
Speaker 1: also pretty hands free. It's pretty hands off when it
Speaker 1: comes to parenting. I'm guessing yeah, okay. We also got
Speaker 1: another message about The Last Starfighter, this one from Brad.
Speaker 1: Brad says, Hello, gentleman, what a treat this episode was
Speaker 1: for me. I'm a huge fan of your various shows,
Speaker 1: Weird House Cinema included. However, I'm ashamed to admit I've
Speaker 1: only seen a few of the movies you've covered. It's
Speaker 1: nothing to be ashamed about, Brad. Brad says, I'm a
Speaker 1: huge movie fan, but unfortunately never had anyone introduced me
Speaker 1: to the weirder side of cinema. You guys do such
Speaker 1: a great job of covering the films. It has prompted
Speaker 1: me to check out a couple of the ones I
Speaker 1: was previously unaware of. The Last Starfighter, on the other hand,
Speaker 1: was one of my favorite movies as a child. In fact,
Speaker 1: I have plans this November to swing by the place
Speaker 1: quote where it happened on our way to Disneyland. The
Speaker 1: mobile home park has since closed in the general store
Speaker 1: has gotten a huge facelift, but I know I know
Speaker 1: what happened there. Anyway. My tidbit is, you guys may
Speaker 1: have noticed Beta Alex's hair in the film look fake.
Speaker 1: Remember that there's a side plot in the movie where
Speaker 1: uh Lance guests character while he goes up into space,
Speaker 1: is replaced by a robot that looks exactly like him,
Speaker 1: named Beta, and he's there to take his place on Earth.
Speaker 1: Um so they say a Beta Alex's hair in the
Speaker 1: film looked fake. Yes, I did notice that, Brad. Brad continues,
Speaker 1: that's because it was. They originally only had a couple
Speaker 1: of Beta scenes, but test audiences loved them so much
Speaker 1: they went back and filmed more weeks after Lance Guest
Speaker 1: had cut his hair all already, so they had to
Speaker 1: have him wear a wig. Love all your shows. Thank
Speaker 1: you for providing me with knowledge and entertainment. Brad Ah.
Speaker 1: That's that's fascinating and that is that is something. The
Speaker 1: films we cover on Weird House, they cover a wide range,
Speaker 1: so I sometimes I forget that. Yeah, when we start
Speaker 1: looking at films off the caliber of The Last Starfighter,
Speaker 1: you are dealing with test audiences. You are going in
Speaker 1: situations where where people are saying, we love Beta and
Speaker 1: we want to see more of Beta, and then they
Speaker 1: go back and feel more scenes. You're not finding that
Speaker 1: that level of a forethought going into to some of
Speaker 1: the flicks that we're talking about. Yeah, Last star Fighter
Speaker 1: is definitely one of the bigger to do is we
Speaker 1: have covered on. Yeah. I don't think Horror Arises from
Speaker 1: the Tomb was really benefiting from any test audiences where
Speaker 1: they're like, you know, we we wanted to see more
Speaker 1: beheadings and they're like, well let's shoot it again. Like
Speaker 1: you know, now many of these films is like it's
Speaker 1: kind of a miracle they finished some of these films.
Speaker 1: They're not going to go back and shoot more for them.
Speaker 1: What if they did test audiences for the brain Eaters,
Speaker 1: but they'd be like, I don't understand the glowing globes?
Speaker 1: What's with the globes? Test audiences wanted to know did
Speaker 1: literarymoy get paid at any rate? Thanks for the tidbit,
Speaker 1: and best of luck on your pilgrimage to the place
Speaker 1: where it happened? All right? This next one comes to
Speaker 1: us from Dan subject w HC. Colin The Apple. Dan says, Hello,
Speaker 1: Robert and Joe. I recently listened to your Weird House
Speaker 1: Cinema episode on The Last Starfighter, and I have a
Speaker 1: personal story that I have to share with you regarding
Speaker 1: The Apple. Several years ago, I used to work at
Speaker 1: a movie theater in New York City that often held
Speaker 1: um repertory series devoted to a particular director, actor, or country.
Speaker 1: One year we had a cannon film series and one
Speaker 1: of the movies we screened was The Apple. It was
Speaker 1: a one night only showing with an introduction by Catherine
Speaker 1: Mary Stewart, your m Globus and mena him Golon. Miss Stewart,
Speaker 1: as I recall, was very lovely happy to be there.
Speaker 1: And even thanked Mena him during the introduction for giving
Speaker 1: her her start in the movie industry. The show was
Speaker 1: close to, if not sold out, and ended up being
Speaker 1: more of a cess than predicted. Nearly everyone in attendance
Speaker 1: was quite young college age and came wearing little triangle
Speaker 1: stickers like the characters in the movie. This confused myself
Speaker 1: and many of my co workers, as we had never
Speaker 1: seen the movie and didn't know why people had triangles
Speaker 1: all over their bodies. Some of them also came under
Speaker 1: the influence of certain substances, but they were very nice
Speaker 1: and enthusiastic about watching the Apple. Since I was working,
Speaker 1: I didn't get a chance to watch the movie, but
Speaker 1: I did sneak a peek early on during one of
Speaker 1: the musical numbers with a couple of coworkers. We were
Speaker 1: left speechless, bewildered even by what little we had witnessed.
Speaker 1: As we came out of the screening room, one person
Speaker 1: I remember saying, well, their costumes are very nice. All
Speaker 1: in all, it was a very odd night and one
Speaker 1: of the more memorable experiences I had working there, Probably
Speaker 1: as close as I've come to being at a midnight
Speaker 1: screening of Rocky Horror Picture Show. Also regarding Robert Preston
Speaker 1: being in the Last Starfighter, did you know that Brian
Speaker 1: Cox played Harold Hill in a run of the Music Man.
Speaker 1: Does this add more credence to Joe's theory that anything
Speaker 1: could be made better simply by adding Brian Cox? Wow,
Speaker 1: I had no idea. Dan attaches a link to a
Speaker 1: version of You Got Trouble right here in River City,
Speaker 1: the song about the pool table where Brian Cox is
Speaker 1: playing Harold Hill. Wonderful, Absolutely wonderful. I notice one major
Speaker 1: difference in the way the character comes across. The version
Speaker 1: I'm familiar with is, of course the one with Robert
Speaker 1: Preston as as Harold Hill. And either way, this song Trouble,
Speaker 1: You Got Trouble you know, uh is? It has so
Speaker 1: much fast talk crammed in, and Preston delivers it so smoothly.
Speaker 1: The the impression he gives is that he is the
Speaker 1: slickst con man in the world, and he's done this
Speaker 1: a million times. He's five steps ahead of the locals.
Speaker 1: They're never going to figure him out. He's he's just
Speaker 1: like he's a machine. But with Brian Cox, you actually
Speaker 1: feel how much of a mouth full all the fast
Speaker 1: talk in the song is and you can hear him
Speaker 1: kind of scrambling to keep up with the tempo of
Speaker 1: the song, and it creates a very different impression, a
Speaker 1: really cool one too. In the Brian Cox version, there's
Speaker 1: more of a precarious feeling to the con like Harold
Speaker 1: Hill is talking fast enough to scam the town's folk,
Speaker 1: but instead of being five steps ahead, he's only one
Speaker 1: step ahead. He's constantly on the edge, struggling to make
Speaker 1: up everything as he goes, and it feels like any
Speaker 1: minute he might finally draw a blank where somebody might
Speaker 1: be like, hey, wait a second there, And both approaches
Speaker 1: to Harold Hill really work. It just creates a very
Speaker 1: different vibe about the story. Interesting. Uh yeah, there there
Speaker 1: is a lot of fast talking in the music Man.
Speaker 1: In fact, if memory serves, I think I had a
Speaker 1: drama teacher once who was a great drama teacher, and
Speaker 1: I think he was, but he was also trying to
Speaker 1: like connect with with the kids, and he was like,
Speaker 1: you got your rap, Well, let me tell you about
Speaker 1: the music man. Um So I don't. I don't remember
Speaker 1: the finer points of the argument, but h but I
Speaker 1: think it was just an excuse to show us a
Speaker 1: scene from The Music Man Trouble with the capital T
Speaker 1: and that rhymes with P and that stands for pool.
Speaker 1: All right, dad. Dan ends it up out here by saying,
Speaker 1: apologies for the lengthy email, but I just thought I
Speaker 1: would share since you've mentioned this intensely weird movie now
Speaker 1: twice referring to the Apple. Um when it came up
Speaker 1: in our h let's the Last Starfighter because there was
Speaker 1: a direct reference to it, and then um Athor and
Speaker 1: Mary Stewart was in it. Yeah, yeah, and then we
Speaker 1: were we were talking about Adam and Eve pictures. Oh
Speaker 1: it was the check film. Oh yeah, Furtive Paradise by
Speaker 1: very Chalova. Yes, yes, that was it. Yeah, yeah, the
Speaker 1: Surreal Garden of Eden movie. Yeah. Because The Apple, for
Speaker 1: anyone who doesn't remember, is essentially an Adam and Eve
Speaker 1: and the Devil kind of tale, except lavishly told as
Speaker 1: a big New York Ork City sort of sci fi
Speaker 1: musical piece. Anyway, Dan says, looking forward to what you
Speaker 1: have planned in October, can we expect the return of
Speaker 1: Dr Anton Jessop all the best? Dan Um? Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, no, Dr Anton Jessop is dead. He died
Speaker 1: Um during an expedition in Antarctica. But I know I
Speaker 1: just found it out too. I'm heartbroken. But but as
Speaker 1: far as the Apple goes, yeah, the Apple is super
Speaker 1: weird and super fun. And I did not know it
Speaker 1: had such a following enough to fill up a whole
Speaker 1: uh theater like this. I'm basically I don't think i'd
Speaker 1: heard of it until Riff Tracks did a riff off it,
Speaker 1: and that's that was my introduction to the Apple. I
Speaker 1: still haven't seen it. No, it's well, it's out there.
Speaker 1: It's wait ninety next time you're in the mood for
Speaker 1: a crazy musical. I don't know. Maybe we'll do it
Speaker 1: on the show at some point. We uh, we haven't.
Speaker 1: We haven't. We haven't. We haven't done a lot of musicals. Um,
Speaker 1: but there's always room. Okay, should we call it there?
Speaker 1: We should? We should go ahead and call it there.
Speaker 1: But we'll be back with more listener mail in the future.
Speaker 1: Um when in the future, Well, Monday's Monday's in the future,
Speaker 1: Monday's or when we do listener mail in the Stuff
Speaker 1: to Blow Your Mind podcast feed on Tuesdays and Thursdays
Speaker 1: in the future. We do core episodes on Wednesdays, in
Speaker 1: the future we do artifact or monster fact episodes. And
Speaker 1: on Fridays in the future, well that is when we
Speaker 1: do Weird how Cinema our time to set aside most
Speaker 1: serious concerns and just talk about a weird film. And
Speaker 1: on Saturdays in the future we do vault episodes from
Speaker 1: the past. But future vault episodes from the past will
Speaker 1: still affect you in the future. Exactly. Huge thanks as
Speaker 1: always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If
Speaker 1: you would like to get in touch with us with
Speaker 1: feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest topic
Speaker 1: for the future, or just to say hello, you can
Speaker 1: email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind
Speaker 1: dot com. St Have to Blow Your Mind is a
Speaker 1: production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my
Speaker 1: Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or
Speaker 1: wherever you listen to your favorite shows.