WEBVTT - Mr. and Mrs. Smith (2005)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello listeners, Caitlin here dropping in at the top of

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the episode to give you one final reminder about the

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Shrek Tannek tour which starts next week. And you're also

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about to find out that this is my birthday episode.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you would like to give me the most

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>wonderful birthday gift of all, you can do so by

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>buying tickets to the shows on this tour, which are

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>two shows in London on May twenty second, followed by

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a show in Oxford with the Saint Audio Podcast Festival

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on May twenty fourth, then Edinburgh on May twenty sixth,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Manchester on May twenty eighth, and Dublin on May twenty ninth.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, there are still a few tickets available for

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these shows, and it would just really mean

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the world if you came out to see us live.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>We have so much fun, goofy stuff planned, stuff you've

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>never seen or heard before. So do yourself a favor.

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Do not miss these shows, which you can buy tickets

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to at link tree slash Bechdel Cast. We will see

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you there. We are so freaking excited. The other thing

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>switching gears here, but the other thing that we want

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to do at the top of the episode is to

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>place a content warning for domestic abuse and violence, as

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that is a component of our discussion on this episode.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the episode.

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>On the Bechdelcast, the questions ask if movies have women

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and them, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 2>or do they have individualism? It's the patriarchy? Zeff and

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>vest start changing with the Bechdel Cast.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey Caitlin, Hey Jamie, are you telling me that for

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the last six or seven years you've also been podcasting

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>in secret? Well?

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Gee, I don't know. I'm gonna be really secretive about it.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess the only way to get to the bottom

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Is to kill each other, or to join forces and

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>do a podcast together.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Wow, and revitalize our relationship by hot started. God, wouldn't

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:18.839
<v Speaker 3>that be I haven't seen the reboot, but what if

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>that is what happens, mister and missus Smith just start

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a podcast. That would be such a bummer. I really

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>hope that that doesn't happen. Did you watch the show?

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch the whole thing, but I saw the pilot,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>so I can describe the premise based on that.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I read about it, but I feel like that's

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>sometimes what happens now on shows where they're just like

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 3>they're under thirty five. Should they have a podcast? Unclear?

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe anyways, do do do? Happy birthday to Caitlin. Maybe

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly who.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh happy thank you today, Thank you so much. It's

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>true as my birthday. And that's why I picked this movie,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Mister and Missus Smith, two thousand and five, because it

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be a movie I really liked and now

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so much.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited and if this happens to be your first

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 3>time around here, because you're a huge mister and Missus Smith,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and five fan, Welcome to the Bechdel Cast.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>My name's Jamie Loftus.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>My name is Caitlin Drante, and this is our podcast

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>where we examine movies through an intersectional feminist lens using

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel Test just to get the dang conversation going,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>except we wait till the very end of the episode

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Yeah, it makes sense.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It really does, it really does. The Bechdel Test is,

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of course, a media metric created by cartoonist Alison Bechdel,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 3>sometimes called the Bechdel Wallace Test because she co created

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>it with her friend Liz Wallace. Lots of different versions

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of this test. The one we use.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>For our purposes requires that two people, two characters of

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 4>a marginalized gender, speak to each other about something other

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 4>than a man for more than two lines.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Of dialogue, and it should be a meaningful exchange and

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>then we just sort of start the conversation from there.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>It's thrilling.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So today's movie is, like I said, mister missus Smith, Jamie,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what is your relationship, if any, with the dang movie?

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Easy? Nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. I had never seen this movie.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'm coming in completely cold because not

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>only have I never seen this, I had no interest

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>in the reboot because I had never seen this. I

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>really have never had much of an I mean, especially

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>as time goes on, as we'll talk about, I've never

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>really had much of an interest in Brad Pitt or

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Angelina jo Lee action movies. So this was just never

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be a movie I was good to see. Yeah, fair,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>even though I think that, Like, I mean, when this

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 3>movie came out, he was like eleven or twelve, so

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I should have been I feel like

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 3>that's a very like gossip magazine age, but I was

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>also not very invested in the media narrative. I don't know.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess this one just missed me. I just didn't care. Yeah,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and I have to say not to be a downer

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>at the top of the episode. I watched the movie

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 3>and I care less than ever. Yeah, I didn't like

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>it very much. Although I do get like watching it now,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I do get why people liked it at the time.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I get it. It's a sexy little movie, yeah, and

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 3>it has its moments. But yeah, just really was not

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 3>doing very much for me. Caitlin, what is your history

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 3>with mister and Missus Smith.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw in theaters in two thousand and five. I

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>was either a freshman or sophomore in college, so you know,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have the most refined taste, and I thought

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this movie was awesome. I was like, Wow, look at

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>these hot people being so hot, and they're hot near

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>each other, and they're hot on top of each other,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're fighting and then they're kissing and WOWI wow.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>These are all the very nuanced thoughts going through my head.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it was a fun movie. And then

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I bought it on DVD and I watched it a

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>lot on DVD, and I still have the DVD brag

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Your DVD collection is a thing of beauty.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I really don't stand by a lot of it, but

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it is there.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 3>That's growth. That's growth.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, thank you.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 3>It's very alarming when someone's taste never changes. Yeah, if

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>everyone can vouch for their DVD collection from twenty years ago, folks,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>we've got a problem. You've got to look in word. Yeah,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, there has to be certain things that you

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 3>cannot answer for.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>M hm.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 3>What was it like rewatching?

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the storytelling was sloppy and the pacing

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was really bad. Yeah, because since I first saw this movie,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I of course went on to get a master's degree

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in screenwriting from Boston University, something I would never mention,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but I have a far better understanding of, you know,

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>narrative structure and pacing. And I was like, oh, this

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>movie like lags. There's a lot of like unnecessary repetition

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the exposition, Like this could have been streamlined significantly.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought the storytelling was just like not very well done,

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in Act one.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was sort of those movies where I couldn't

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 3>tell if it was the writing or if I was

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>just bored. But I did find like a lot of

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the establishing information confusing, right, I mean, this is just

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>movie logic. But I'm like, they didn't know, right then,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you guys are a joke. You're bad at your job

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>because you're not being very subtle.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>They are pretty bad at their jobs. The other thing

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about this movie is that so I teach screenwriting classes

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>using aforementioned degree that I would never mention.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 5>Plus plus plugs, and the main assignment in my intro

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 5>level class is for students to write a film treatment.

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And I send them various treatments as an example of

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>what to do and how to write a treatment. And

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say the best one I have found after

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>scouring the internet is the treatment for mister and Missus Smith. Really,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the treatments are either that are available

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>online at least that I have access to. They're either

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a James Cameron's script Mint, so it's like seventy pages

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>long and he basically just wrote the script but kind

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of summarized it also, so those aren't useful, or their

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>treatments that just like aren't very good at encapsulating like

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what the story of the movie is. So even though

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this is like not a masterpiece of cinema, the treatment

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for it is at least effective at being a treatment

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and serving the purpose that a treatment is supposed to serve.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So I send this to all my students, and this

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like the main one that we study,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm constantly rereading the treatment for this movie.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Yeah, So, like you actually have a consistent and

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>like rather intimate relationship with this movie.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>This is wild, right, But I hadn't rewatched the movie

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>probably since like twenty ten, twenty eleven, Like it definitely

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>fell off for me, and it wasn't something I was

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>consistently watching after the first few years of enjoying it.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do have this kind of like intimate relationship

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with at least the premise of the movie, and so

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to go back and rewatch it to

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>see if it held up at all. And I would say,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>generally the answer is no, although I don't know if

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just the nostalgia, but I was like, I'm

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>still having fun. There's still some fun set pieces and sequences.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, and also I mean like there's certain like images

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>where well, I don't even know if this is necessarily true,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 3>but there are a few images in this movie that

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, they don't make shots like that anymore. And

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking of Angelina Joe snapping someone's neck basically as Catwoman,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>then jumping off a building with an umbrella and getting

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>into a cab all in the space of twenty seconds.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, yes, now that was cinema. That was cinema.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 3>That was pretty amazing.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>The movie feels like a movie in that moment.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>The movie was really feeling like a movie, because this

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>is not a movie in which magic is a factor.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>But like Catwoman, Mary Poppins, I know there was some

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of gadget, but I was like, no way, no way.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I know, wow, that's passive. Well, I'm excited to talk

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>about the story. I also did a fairly deep dive

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>on the meat because I mean that to me, when

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I think of mister and Missus Smith, I think of

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 3>the media cycles around it more so than the movie

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>that I didn't care about, never saw. So we're firing

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 3>on all cylinders today because it was. I mean, it's

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 3>probably one of the most famous tabloid sagas of our

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 3>lifetime that has oh boy been, I think thoughtfully reappraised

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>many times in the last couple of years. And also

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Brad Pitt is a domestic abuser. We simply have to

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 3>say it at the top of the show. Whose children

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 3>hate him? So you know, so much to talk about today,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>a rich church uterie of discourse.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, shall we make a quick break and then come

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>back for the recap. Let's do that, Okay, and we're back.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 3>We're back. It's still Caitlin's birthday and we are mister

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and missus Smith. Can I just say before we even start,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>how I've never like because I didn't outside of Brad

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Pitt and Angelina Joliet, had no idea who is in

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>this movie. I haven't experienced this in a long time,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 3>But when Vince Vaughn came on the screen, I experienced

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>a full body shutter. And I don't even like hate him,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>but I just like, for whatever headspace I was in

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>when I was watching this yesterday, I was like, not today, No,

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I can't do Vince Vaughan today. And of course he's

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 3>the worst character.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>In the movie, Oh my gosh.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 3>And you're like, why is he here? And then you

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 3>do a little research and you're like, well, it's the

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 3>same director as Swingers. That's why he's here.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that is why he's here. And he's playing a

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>character that was his like bread and butter during this time,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and also in Swingers era.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Misogynists, Piece of Shit, Loser.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Wedding Crashers, he plays basically the same character. Oh really Yeah,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he's just like spewing hatred toward women in every line

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue, and that is his character.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Also on top of that, it seems like, I don't know,

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you see misogynist characters who are meant

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to look very like smooth, and then you see misogynist

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>characters and I'm just talking about this era of movies

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>who it's clear that they're being hateful out of rejection.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't like to see either. But right you know,

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the very like he lives with his mom, which are like,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just all so lazily written.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like this movie falls somewhere in the

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>middle because we're not supposed to be like, Wow, he's

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>awesome and hilarious, but we're also like, he's still an

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ally to the characters we're meant to be rooting for,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and no one ever calls him out on his behavior.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's just sort of presented uncritically and where I

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think meant to laugh along at what he's saying.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I think in two thousand and five seems likely. I

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I haven't seen wedding crashers, and I'm God

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>willing I'll never have to. If you're a mad trend,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and I hope you are, please never vote for wedding crashers.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 3>But it's on the poll. I never want to watch it.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>If I can get through my whole life with never

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 3>seeing wedding crashers, that'll be all right.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Anyways, mister and Missus Smith, what happens to this damn movie?

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So we open on a couple's counseling session where we

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>meet a married couple mister and Missus Smith, that's the

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>name of them, who are John and Jane played by

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. And we see them talking

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to the therapist and they are not on the same

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>page maritally, and they then start to tell the story

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of how they met. So five or six years ago,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they were both in Columbia during a flurry of police activity,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so they kind of come together to keep each other

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>safe and they hit it off and have a whirlwind romance.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks past, John is talking to his friend

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>slash colleague Eddie that's Vince Vaughn, saying how he proposed

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jane. They're getting married. Meanwhile, Jane is talking to

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>her friend Jasmine played by Carrie Washington, who is too

0:15:58.120 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>good for this movie.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Kerry Washington is too good for so many of her

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 3>early roles. I just hope that this is the kind

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>of movie where you look at the budget and you're like,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I certainly hope she got a good paycheck.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope, but I also doubt.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean I also have such doubts.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>We have such doubts, much like Meryl, Much like Merrill.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I have such doubts.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So they are talking about John aka they're not

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>passing the Bechdel test, and Jane thinks that John is

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a construction contractor. John thinks Jane works in tech. What

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't know is that actually they're both assassins.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 3>WHOA. Yeah, I mean so much of this movie plays

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>on I think very tropey views of what hetero marriage is,

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 3>which is you secretly hate each other, uh huh. But

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>also like this movie just takes it to such a

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>far flung extent where I'm just like, oh my god,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 3>what is this writer's marriage. Like, we're like, obviously it's

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 3>not autobiographical, because then he would be cool. But the

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>fact that they're like they don't even know really what

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 3>each other does, I don't know, it's funny. It's weird, right.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So I have a little bit of information on this, pulling,

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, from scholarly journal Wikipedia once again hit me.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>The movie was written by Simon Kinberg.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Who's written I think some of the most hated X

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Men movies.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Also, oh, I didn't even realize that.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Throughout Dark Phoenix, I believe or produce Dark Phoenix.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Ooof well, he wrote and sold the script while he

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>was a grad student, and he had the idea for

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the movie after listening to a couple of his friends

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>who went to marriage therapy, and he thought that it

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sounded aggressive and mercenary, and he's like, hmm, this would

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 1>make an interesting template for a relationship inside of an

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>action movie. So he just like took his friend's marital

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>problems and then put that in an action movie.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Question mark, So I mean, I don't hate that, Like

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I get what he's saying, but also I don't know,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 3>it's weird. I sort of thought that, like, the therapy

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>was presented less hatefully than therapy often is in movies

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>of this era, So it's interesting to think that he

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 3>actually didn't feel that way. Well, who knows, but it

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't read to be as like outwardly like I thought.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>It was like a fun framing device that makes it

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 3>clear that he's a piece of shit, which I know

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the movie isn't really capable of showing, but I had

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 3>no issue with the actual framing device.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it works for me. So then we cut

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to five or six years later, and again their marriage

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is rocky and unaffectionate. They are not open with each other.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>They still don't know what the other one actually does

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for a living. Then we see Jane leave one evening

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>on an assignment. She goes to see an arms dealer

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be a dominatrix, then kills him. Meanwhile, John

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>assassinates a few guys at a poker game. They both

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>make swift escapes, and they reconvene at their suburban neighbors

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>holiday party, and we're like, Wow, what a contrast between

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>their sexy lives as assassins and suburban life.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of these coming out. I was thinking

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 3>about the bad sorry frank Oz, but the bad Stepford

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 3>Wives adaptation that came out like the year before or

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>after this. Like there's a lot of oh yeah, weird attempts.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, with like summery blockbusters to comment on

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 3>suburban life. And I'm sure there was a good one.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I've seen it. Anyways, this is

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>another one where you're just like, sure, they're not like

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 3>other suburbanites, but like, that doesn't mean that we like that.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, Stepford Wives was the reason that Nicole Kidman, who

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>was originally considered for Jane Smith oh right, yes, couldn't

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do the movie because she was too busy filming Stepford Wives.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Well, I guess this movie was technically more successful.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, I feel like there would be a

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 3>rift in the space time continuum if this movie's casting

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>went differently.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh my gosh, yeah, because I mean, I mean,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you would probably never have the Branjelina of it all.

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Which might be for the best for all parties, but

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 3>also like, yeah, if the casting for this movie's leads

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>went different, America, as we know it would crumble, like

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 3>what would people have talked about?

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>True? In any case, So John and Jane then both

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>head off to work at their respective assassin offices, and

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they both get the same assignment to kill Benjamin Dance

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>played by Adam Brody, who we've already seen receive an

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>assignment of his own, although we don't know what it is.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 5>See.

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 3>That was my pleasant jump scare was Adam Brodie's appearance

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 3>in this movie had.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>No idea good for him, good for him for.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 3>A second when I think you first see him from

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the back, and I was like, if that is justin Bartha,

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna lose it. But regrettably it was not just.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm happy either way. I'm happy either way.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now it's Adam Brody, and he's also being a

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>misogynist because he's like ordering a woman to bring him

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a cup of coffee and that's not her job and

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>he sucks.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And if there's one thing Adam Brody's gonna do

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's typecast, it's be a piece of shit.

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>True.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>I was like, Wow, it's really been twenty years of

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Adam Brody being type cast as a piece of shit.

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what He's like, in real life, we're seeing

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a pattern, aren't we of male actors being type cast

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>as misogynists? Hmm, wonder what's up with that?

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 3>But the twist is, in this movie, we're supposed to

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>be rooting for at least one of them. Yeah, we're

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be laughing, laughing, laughing. Yeah.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, So John and Jane separately go to a location

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the desert near the US Mexico border where they

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>know Benjamin is going to be, and they're planning their attack,

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they both realize another assassin is there, and

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>they try to sabotage the other one because they don't

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>realize it's their spouse whoa Neither are successful in their

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>mission to kill Adam Brody. Jane flees the scene. Great, Yeah,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I just started calling him Adam Brody like

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>from this point on.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what the hell are we supposed to call?

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, Benjamin, you're right now, get a grip.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So Jane flees the scene and John takes her laptop

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to try to figure out who that was. Meanwhile, Jane

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is at Lady Assassin Headquarters Industries because everyone she works

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>with is a woman whoa feminism alert.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's a fun idea. It's a fun idea.

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Although her boss, who they call Father played by Keith David,

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is I think the only man and he's like, you

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have forty eight hours to clean the scene, aka find

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the other guy and kill him, or else she will

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>become the next target. So we cut back to John,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>who finds out an address for the left and goes

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>there discovers that it's the office of his wife wa Meanwhile,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Jane is looking at footage of the other Assassin in

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the desert and she realizes it's her husband. So they

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>both go home, pretending like everything is normal, but dinner

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is very tense, and then some wine gets spilled and

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they both leave under the pretense of they're going to

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>clean it up, but actually John grabs a gun, Jane

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>speeds off in the car and they part ways. So

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>then John goes to Vince Vaughn's.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 3>House mistake number one.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, Jane goes to Lady Assassin headquarters and talks to

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Kerry Washington. Both John and Jane are relaying that their

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>spouse is the other assassin and that they have to

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>kill them. Although they seem to be contemplating whether or

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>not they can go through with it. The idea is

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they claim to not love each other, but you can

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>see that they seem to actually have feelings for each

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>other that they're not willing to admit. So John goes

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to Jane's office to try to kill her, although he

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can't go through with it, and she escapes. Then he

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to her backup.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Office question mark, I don't.

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I was also confused, And then she explodes the elevator

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's in, except she didn't really mean to, and

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>now she's sad, and she goes to a fancy dinner

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>by herself and she's having a little tear falling down

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>her face. But surprise, John shows up because he was

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in a different elevator I guess.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>And I also was like the writing on that was

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>also so confusing. I was like, how did he get?

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I also did. My favorite character in the movie is

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 3>the person that Angelina Jolly works with who kills Brad Pitton,

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and then Angelina Jolly is like, wait, what which First

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 3>of all, you have to brief the room if you're bluffing. Yes,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 3>So another example of just both of these assassins are

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>not very good at being assassins. I don't know why

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 3>they're so high up in assassining. Assassinating.

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I think the first one was good.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>But just that there's like an unnamed character who's like,

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 3>what you said, you said goodbye? Yeah, it's like good

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for her, she's good at her job. Promote her, right.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, John shows up to this dinner and they're

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting together, guns pointed at each other, trying to figure

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out how to proceed. They dance a violent but also

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>jornie tango, but then she tries to kill him again

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>by planting a bomb on him. Oops, and she escapes

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and he takes the bomb off or whatever. They both

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>race home, but they're talking to each other on the

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>phone on the way, and John is trying to be sentimental.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that there are feelings between them, but they're

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not really willing to fully admit it. They get home,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>they're sneaking around, they're gathering weapons, and then there's a

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>big shootout. Then it turns into hand to hand combat,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but in so doing they realize that they can't kill

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>each other. And then suddenly they're making out and then

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they have sex, and the passion is reignited. In their

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship and for the first time, they're honest with each

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>other about their lives and their pasts, and they're telling

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>each other all of this stuff about who they really are.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But oh no, now there's a hit out for both

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>John and Jane and Vince Fawn gets notification to kill them,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and other assassins come after them also, So Jane and

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>John steal their neighbor's car and escape. There's a whole

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>car chase. They kill the people chasing them. Then they

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>go to see Vince Vaughn to get some intel on

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>who's after them and how many people, and he's like, basically,

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone from both of your agencies are going to try

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to kill you. If you separate, you have a shot,

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but if you stay together, you're dead unless you can

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>find something that they want more than you. So John

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and Jane kidnap the original target, Adam Brody, and he

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>reveals he was never actually the target that they were

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're agencies found out that they were married, so

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they set up a sting to get them to kill

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>each other, and Adam Brody was just the bait.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It's the classic I'm just an intern, I'm just a

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 3>little stinker and sure.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so he was the bait and he still is.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The flock of assassins are approaching, so John and Jane

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do contemplate splitting up and going their separate ways, but

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they decide to stay together and fight, and they end

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>up in this like big box store for home goods

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or something. It's like an Ikea.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Again, some attempt to like be better than the mall

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. They're like, we're built different, screw the mall.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 3>You're like, sure, whatever.

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So they're in this store and assassins surround them, but

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>mister and missus Smith take out all of the enemies

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and they win, and we cut back to them a

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>couple's therapy. Their marriage is in a better place because

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>now they're honest with each other and they fuck all

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of the time.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 5>The end.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's the movie. Let's take another quick break and

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back to discuss. Yay, we're back.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, where should we begin.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to briefly go through the various

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>other renditions of this narrative. Yeah, because there are a few. Yeah,

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of relevant. I suppose I was more just

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of interested in them. So there's a Hitchcock movie

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen four forty one, a rare Hitchcock comedy. Fun fact,

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I watched this movie back in probably like two thousand

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and seven or something because I was like, I like

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>mister and missus Smith from two thousand and five, I

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder what the Hitchcock one is like, and it basically

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with really. So the story is

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that there's a married couple where the woman finds out

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that their marriage was never actually valid, and so they

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have various arguments and eventually split up and she starts

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>dating another man, but her husband, David keeps following her,

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just stalking her, and she keeps being like, no, I

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get back together with you, and he's like, well,

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what about if we do? And that's basically the story.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And then they realize that actually they are meant for

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>each other, and then they kiss at the end, and

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess they get back together. So it's about like

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a marriage that isn't valid and then they have to

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>decide if they want to actually be together as a

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>married couple or not.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 3>So very little to do, Okay, a lot of logistics

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I thought the movie was pretty bad. I didn't

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it at all when I watched it, and so

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>great that is that version. Apparently, there is an American

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>crime drama TV series that aired for like two months

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety six before it got canceled, oh, called

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Mister and Missus Smith. It stars Scott Bacula and Maria Below. Okay, minion, Oh, okay.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>First, that better be how she pronounces it, Maria below, Bello,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>That one I didn't come across. I mean I came

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>across the original, but we interesting.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So the premise for this one, and I think it again,

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>only aired for like a dozen or so episodes, But

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the premise is a spy known only as mister Smith.

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>That's Scott Bakula works for a private security organization known

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as the Factory, and in the pilot a rival named

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Missus Smith Maria below it comes entangled in a case

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with mister Smith, and then after losing her job when

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the mission fails, the Factory hires her and assigns them

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to work together. And even though they often bicker and

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they know nothing about each other's personal lives, including their

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>real names, they make a good team. So this one's closer.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, inching toward what we have?

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then as I said, I watched the pilot

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty twenty four TV series starring Donald Glover

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and Maya Erskin, where two strangers independently agree to become

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>secret agents for a mysterious organization undercover as a married couple.

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So in this series, they know that the other one

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>is a spy from the very beginning. It's just that

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the marriage is a sham. They are not actually married.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the rest of the episodes pan out,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but I do know that they like start to get

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to know each other a little bit better. I don't

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>know if a romance develops or not. I didn't watch

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that far into it.

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I've heard good things about it. I think it's probably

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>worth watching, but this is famously not a TV or

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 3>reading podcast, and so we simply can't speak to it.

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I missed the media cycle for that series,

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and I am kind of intrigued. I think I will

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>watch it.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I liked the first episode. I would keep going, and.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I guess time will sort of tell. With the most

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 3>recent adaptation, I feel like, at least at the time

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of this recording, this render of Mister and Missus Smith

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 3>is the best known yes because it was a really

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 3>really really successful movie, like kind of more successful than

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I remembered. It almost made half a billion dollars twenty

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 3>years ago, which is just I guess everybody saw this

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 3>movie except for me. Like pretty wild, pretty impressive and

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the kind of I think broiest creative teams

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I've come across in a movie we've covered in a while.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's sort of saying something. We've got the director

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 3>of Swingers and Bourne Identity One, We've got the writer of.

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually I did like this movie, but it is I

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 3>think bro Cannon guy Ritchie Sherlock Holmes.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I also like the movie.

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 3>He directed what I think is considered the worst X

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Men movie of all time. You know, he's just kind

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 3>of slaying no. But it just took a really interesting

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Broie Missus Smith never stood a chance, is what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 3>in terms of there being any sort of nuance there,

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I kind of want to talk about the characters first

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.479
<v Speaker 3>and then get into the media thing because I feel

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 3>like that's just like almost a whole other podcast. So

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to forget to talk about the characters. Yeah, Kiten,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 3>what do you what do you think that mister and

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 3>missus Smith. I don't care for them, and I really

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 3>don't care for mister Smith. I fucking hate the guy.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he is awful.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 3>To me.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>What I was getting was like mister Smith, I mean,

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's way worse at his job. I think

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that Jane is a more competent spy and you know,

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a woman in an action movie. I appreciate that she

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is the better one at her job, and that's a

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>job that in I'm sure real life and in movies

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is commonly associated with a man doing that job. So

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I appreciated that she was at least shown as being

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>competent at her job.

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 1>However, I think that as far as characterization goes, like

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>what even is her personality? I feel like she's so underwritten.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that for every woman we see, really

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 3>because I think it's like even more intensely contrasted between

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Kerrie Washington and Vince Vaughn where they're playing for sure,

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 3>mister and missus Smith's respective best friends. And you can

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 3>just tell that the writer, I mean, Simon Kimberg very well,

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe a nice guy, but I don't think he has

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 3>any grip on what women would say to each other

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 3>if left in a room, and it felt clear every

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 3>time that happened, which was almost.

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Never, it was not very much. But even if she's

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>interacting with her husband, I feel like she just like

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is a blah nothing like there's no personality there. At

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>least John gets.

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Jokes, Yeah, John and Vaughn.

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>John and Vaughn. Whether or not you laugh at them

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of beside the point. But they're written in

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>such a way that you know they're the funny ones.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:23.359
<v Speaker 1>They get the jokes. And meanwhile, Jane is humorless and

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>she isn't generating any of the comedy in this action

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>comedy aside from maybe one or two punchlines that they

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>give her, but generally speaking, like she's sort of a

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing character, no personality, She's humorless. Meanwhile, the men get

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to have fun. We were talking about this a lot

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Knocked Up episode, where the men are written

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to be funny and goofy and the women are like

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>humorless shrews, and I found that to be the case

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for this movie as well.

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I didn't find them to be I guess as like

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 3>shrewy in this movie as they certainly as they are

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 3>in like jud Apatow movies of the same era, I

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 3>guess I more found them to just be nothing right,

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 3>like nothing, which is really frustrated because you consider, like

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Angelaine and jo Lee had an oscar like why didn't

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 3>you write her a part? Which I know happens to

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 3>successful actresses in particular all the time, but it's just like,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 3>come on, yeah, and I think that you know, she

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and Carrie Washington do everything with what they're given, but

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 3>they're not given very much. And I think that the

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 3>best moments for Angelina and Jolie, I feel like there's

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>references to her. I guess what her persona would have

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 3>been at the time, where like she's like this famous,

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 3>gorgeous woman with a history of like publicly being into kink,

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 3>so I feel like there are like references to that

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 3>throughout the day. It's like fun, I don't know, I mean,

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and this happened all the time still, but like you've

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 3>been given this tremendously talented actor and she's just traded

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 3>like a body right and totally, which I feel like

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 3>early on in us doing this show, I like, I

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 3>feel like I had kind of like an undercooked like

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 3>she's being objectified and like, which is very, very often true,

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and I think is often true in this movie. But

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't an inherently bad thing to be sexy in a movie?

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Like that's yeah, technically right. Part of the appeal of

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 3>this movie is two hot people fighting. Fine, great, Like

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm seated for that, but it's just you also have

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to be able to like do other things, or it

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 3>starts to feel like, well, you're just a body if

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.439
<v Speaker 3>you're not given any sort of like if you don't

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 3>have a character, right, and so yeah, like Brad Pitt

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 3>is hot with a character, and Angelina Jilly is hot

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 3>without a character, and so you're just like, well, yeah,

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 3>that's they did the thing.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>That's men writing a movie for you. I am speculating here,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but it feels so much to me as I watched

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this movie that the direction that director Doug Lyman was

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>giving to Angelina Jolie and every scene was be sexier,

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>flutter your eyelashes, do something with your posture.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Do you know?

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It was like the note was always like be sexier,

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as if like that's a replacement for having a personality,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because that's what you're seeing in every scene. It's him

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>being funny, cracking a joke, being goofy whatever, and then

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>her just sort of like pursing her lips or fluttering

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:47.479
<v Speaker 1>her eyelashes or something like.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 3>That, which it's like she's great at for sure, but

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 3>also she has a fucking oscar. Like I think that

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 3>you see a lot of the same stuff like we

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 3>talked about truly, like probably over seven years ago now

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 3>the turmb Raider movies, where I think that she is

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 3>objectively less objectified in this movie than she is in

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 3>the turmb Raider movies. But that is not really a

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 3>yardstick that anyone should have to use. Yeah, So, I

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 3>mean it just feels like a classic example of especially

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 3>because while Brad Pitt is a piece of shit domestic abuser,

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 3>he's a good actor. Right, So you have two famously

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 3>talented actors at this time, the more decorated actor is

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 3>being given absolutely nothing, and you know, no one really

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 3>said much about it. And while this movie's coming out,

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Angelina Jolie specifically is getting pummeled in the media, and.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's just almost like society hates women.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 3>What it's misogyny and soost like everyone hates women. You know,

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 3>the show is about very obvious in this movie, this movie,

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean if nothing else. It just feels like lazy

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's characterization of women. It's just like neither director

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 3>nor writer talked to any women that they knew to

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 3>see this. I mean, I feel like that's also reflected

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 3>in how lazy the uh attempted, like Upper Crest suburban

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 3>commentary is in this movie where you know, Frank Oztepford

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Wives isn't great, but it's at least specific in like

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 3>what it's trying to do. It doesn't do a great job,

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>but you can see the attempt. But it's just like

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 3>men be doing business, women be holding babies and wearing

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 3>ugly sweaters, and you're like, certainly like the rich upstate

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 3>New York white upper class like fair game, but like

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not saying anything. I don't know, it was just bizarre.

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I think one positive thing or maybe just one thing,

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 3>let's let's see, let's see this that I was surprised.

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 3>I guess that this wasn't present because I feel like,

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, like there are a couple in their thirties

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 3>and their homeowners and blah blah blah, there is not

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 3>any baby storyline between the two of them. I was

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 3>sort of expecting that just because of what I am

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 3>trained to expect from movies about heterosexual couples that are

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 3>thirty or over. And there is like one scene where

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 3>like missus Smith is holding a baby and she's sort

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 3>of like I liked that, and I liked that it

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 3>never came back and you were just like, Okay, they

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 3>don't want kids, and I think that, given the fact

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 3>that their assassins and bad at it, that's probably for

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the best. But that's like, yeah, one of the only

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 3>nice things I can say about this movie is I

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:52.720
<v Speaker 3>kept expecting that to become a thing and it never did. However,

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 3>so many of the one liners, because like you're saying,

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 3>like he is supposed to be funny, and maybe in

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 3>two thousand five people, I mean people seem to be

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 3>laughing to the tune of half a billion dollars.

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, but.

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Like any like little comment, any quip that he'd throw

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to her would be like I don't like your cooking,

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't like you. Like they're also his wife codd

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 3>in a way that like it was annoying because it

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 3>was sexist and annoying, but it was also annoying because

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 3>it just was like bad writing, where like he's talking

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to her, like the quality of her cooking was something

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that we know is very important to her, when we

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 3>have no real reason to believe that that's true. Like

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.919
<v Speaker 3>it just seems like again like the writers being like, well,

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 3>what would hurt a woman's feelings? And I don't know,

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 3>it's just so lazy and felt like dated for two

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand and five, like it just sucked.

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and he's just mean to her.

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 3>He's just mean to her, and then he's slutshames her

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.280
<v Speaker 3>at the end, you know, just anything you could possibly

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 3>imagine that you wouldn't want. It's kind of the murderer's row.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's all these examples of him. He like comments

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>on our cooking three times, like why, and then it's

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>revealed that like she doesn't cook, like the women at

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Lady Assassin Headquarters cook for her or something. But you

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>also like see her preparing food. So I'm like, but

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing her I don't know anyway.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so like more bad writing and like inconsistent writing,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 3>but also just like counting on your assumption that any

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 3>woman would be so hurt if her husband didn't like

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:42.919
<v Speaker 3>her cooking, and you're just like.

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, at least she's like I don't care what

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about my cooking. Stopped talking about it. Right,

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>There are a few things that I don't hate, and

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I think are probably why I connected to this movie

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 1>as much as I did in two thousand five. One

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of them is her participation in the action where and

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had this conversation many times at this point as

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>far as like, if a woman is allowed to be

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in an action movie, is she allowed to fight? And

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if so, what does that look like? And in this case,

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>again we see her being competent at her job. She

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 1>gets to do stuff. She's doing action movie things. She's

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 1>shooting guns, she's driving in the chase scene.

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 3>She's allowed to fight her husband.

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, that's an almost like separate conversation as far

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as like men and women can they fight each other?

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But before I kind of dive more into that, there's

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just like things that she's allowed to do that often

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't afforded to women in action movies. You know, there's

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a scene during that chase scene where they're in the minivan.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 1>John isn't able to take out the last two cars

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>chasing them, and so she takes charge and she's the

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>one to take out those cars, and there might be

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>some like possibly gendered things attached to this, But she's

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the more sort of like meticulous planner assassin. That's her

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>approach to her job, whereas John is the more like,

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>oh I'll improvise. Oh I'm just gonna wing it. And

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>then that manifests and.

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 3>He is very often wrong.

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>He's often wrong, and she's usually right. But when she

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>calls him out for it, I feel like the movie

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is framing those moments as like she's nagging him and

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he got the job done, so what's the big deal.

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 1>So I was feeling notes of that.

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I kept going back and forth on that, yeah, because

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I think that you can read it both ways,

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 3>but I just don't see any reason to give a

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 3>generous read to this rider or director, right right.

0:48:55.480 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate her involvement in the action. It's something

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of action movies before and since this

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>movie wouldn't afford even like a lady assassin to be

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as involved in the action as she is. And then

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like we were saying, yes, she and a man are

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fighting each other, and this is another discussion we've had

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>many times, I think, most recently on maybe the John

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Wick episode. But it's always been like, should we see

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a man punching a woman in a movie? Can a

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 1>woman and a man fight each other? And I think

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>our conversation has evolved over the years, but at least

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:48.439
<v Speaker 1>in this context, when they are both trained assassins and

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>their mission is to kill each other, it stands to

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>reason that they would be fighting, and the movie doesn't

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>shy away from that. Again, it shows her just as

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 1>competent of a fighter ye as him and their equals

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as like hand to hand combat and gun stuff.

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 3>So and gun no, I agree with you. I think

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that that's something that, like, I wonder, I meant to

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 3>look more into this because I feel like for years

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and years, whenever men and women would fight on screen,

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 3>it would launch a bunch of op eds about like

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 3>should this have happened? I will say for this one,

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 3>and I'm wondering. I think that maybe it also has

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 3>to do with how much I was reading about Brad

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Pitt and Angelina Jolie's relationship. It's only in one sequence,

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 3>but let me know what you think. It was bothering me,

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 3>and it could be a personal thing. But in the

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 3>scene where they're fighting in their house, I get it

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 3>like their assassins. I do feel like there's like erotic fighting,

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 3>there's wish fulfillment stuff. It's blah blah blah. They're basically

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 3>b dsming each other with any consent rules because it's

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah. Yah, I get it. I do feel

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 3>as if though, that like all of her moves or

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 3>the majority of her moves to me, looked like fight moves,

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 3>looked like martial arts right training, and I felt like

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 3>his moves often looked more just like domestic abuse and

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 3>shoving her against a wall and just throwing her over

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 3>a table, and like, I don't know, it bugged me, Yeah,

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the fight choreography, like he did do martial arts stuff,

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and she didn't break shit over his head. So maybe

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I was reading into it a little too hard, but

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 3>there were like several things, especially because it's Brad Pitt

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 3>and we know he's a domestic abuser, right like that,

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 3>just like I don't know, Yeah, But then in any

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 3>other fight sequence they're in together, it's just that long

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 3>fight sequence where they're fighting each other where it just

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 3>felt like she was almost always doing clear martial arts stuff.

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I felt like he was like half and half he

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 3>was very often just pushing her. I didn't like that

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 3>fight sequence very much.

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That didn't ping for me because I didn't super notice it.

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it didn't happen. I would just have

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to like rewatch and look more closely at that. But

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine it's because of the whole Oh, he's the

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fly by the seat of his pants assassin and she's

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the meticulous one, and so maybe that also manifested in

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the fight choreography. But then if you're a filmmaker making

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that choice for the characters and for the actors, you

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have to understand the implications of what that actually looks

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>like and like, what are the optics of a man

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>fighting that way?

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 3>I know, I felt like I was writing the op

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 3>ed into that as the time I'm I think, but

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 3>because I do think it is like if they didn't

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:59.240
<v Speaker 3>they have to fight each other, like, it's also besogae

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 3>if they if they don't let her fight, like that's ridiculous.

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 3>It was just the way there was just like a

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 3>few choices that just felt yeah, I mean not even

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>necessarily unrealistic if you're fighting somewhat, but like, I just

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 3>didn't like it. I didn't like it fair, I don't

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 3>like this spuffee. Let's see what else I will say.

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The one other thing that I appreciate on this watch,

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>although it's perhaps open to interpretation, but I thought it

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was interesting that of the two of them, the man

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the more sentimental one, or at least

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who's more willing to express his feelings. Because there

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.720
<v Speaker 1>are different scenes, such as when they're doing the tango

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in the restaurant or when they're on the phone with

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 1>each other as they're both driving back home. He's sort

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of like probing to see if she does have feelings

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for him, and he's being a bit more open about

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how he does have feelings for her, and he says

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>something like I thought you looked like Christmas morning, right,

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And she's like, no, it was only ever just work.

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And so she's like kind of the cold, calculated one,

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's the one more willing to be warm and

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like try to coax emotion out of her, which is

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>something you don't often see in totally hetero relationships, you know,

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's obviously because of social conditioning, where men are

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>conditioned to be the more kind of closed off ones

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 1>emotionally generally speaking men are not taught how to regulate

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>or express their emotions very well. So I thought that

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that was an interesting subversion at the very least.

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree, And then now I'm gonna be hate again.

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 3>And I was surprised that, you know, she like she

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:03.280
<v Speaker 3>and Carrie Washington very frankly of like Carrie Washington's character

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 3>is like, well, you don't love him, so that's great,

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 3>and She's like, I know, I don't.

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But then she like kind of like has a moment

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to herself where she's like, but do I love him?

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, which is like, I guess this goes back to

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 3>the fact that a character was not necessarily written for

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Miss Jane Smith as being a core issue because outside

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 3>of them both being hot and obviously they have chemistry,

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 3>they like got together because of this movie. But if

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 3>you're just reading they like, I don't understand what she

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 3>gained by staying with him. I don't know. I mean,

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 3>we think this about couples all the time. I just like,

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 3>he's such a fucking asshole. She's better at what they're

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 3>doing than he is. And I understand that logistically, like

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.759
<v Speaker 3>now it's them versus the world, but it almost felt

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 3>like a prison sentence for her where it's like good

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:58.439
<v Speaker 3>that she wanted to stay with him, because it didn't

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:01.479
<v Speaker 3>seem like the movie gave her room to leave him

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 3>really because of what their circumstances, and I just it

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 3>was weird, and also just the obsession that this movie

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 3>had with how much the amount of time that he

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:18.959
<v Speaker 3>brought up how much they were or weren't fucking was incessant.

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And then like literally the last line in the movie

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 3>is like, everything's great now because we fuck every day,

0:56:24.360 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 3>You're like great. I don't know. I just think if

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 3>it was in a different movie, I would be like whoo,

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 3>But this one just didn't hit for me. I did

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 3>like when Adam Brody wore the Fight Club T shirt

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 3>that was.

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Finn I mean, haha, funny joke, get it. Yeah, I

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have a few more things to say about the characters themselves,

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and then we can sure move on. There were a

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>few other things that I didn't like and just felt

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like it was leaning into gendered stereotypes and yeah stuff

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you brought up him slut shaming her towards the end

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're having a conversation where they're both saying a

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>number of people it's not clear, and I think this

0:57:10.840 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is the joke. It's not clear if it's the number

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:15.479
<v Speaker 1>of people they've had sex with or it's the number

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of people they've killed. I think you can interpret it

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>either way, and like the uncertainty is the joke in

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this situation. But either way, you can interpret it as

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>she's fucked three hundred and seventeen people or whatever, and

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he's threatened by that because it's a lot more than

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he has, and he's then making slut shamey comments about

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>her ear things that can be interpreted as slut shamey comments,

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and and this is just not a funny joke. Conversely,

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene where he as they're sort of divulging

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 1>new information to each other that they've kept from each

0:57:56.920 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other all these years. He says something like I was

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 1>made before, and she gets very pissed.

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, because that's what's supposed to matter to her, and

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.480
<v Speaker 3>sextual partners is what's supposed to have matter to him.

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, her being jealous of another woman and another romantic

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship he's had in the past, and she gets so

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mad about it, and it just felt like a very tropy,

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like pitting women against each other kind of thing. That

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>men do in their writing. There's that there's similar to

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the he's obsessed with hating her cooking. There's another like

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 1>runner about curtains, where she's like, look, I got new curtains,

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's.

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Also which to me, says I wrote that that like

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Simon Kinberg has never done a chore, because it's like

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 3>also like he doesn't even know how to write about,

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 3>like if you were a homemaker, what would be important?

0:58:57.120 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 3>He's just like a.

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Curtain Like what do women do curtains?

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, Like being a homemaker is and doing domestic work

0:59:04.800 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in general is a very legitimate way to spend one's life.

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 3>But the job isn't curtain like. It's just so brain

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 3>was not on when writing any of the missus parts.

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Down, certainly not. Also the trope of like her guns

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are in the kitchen because women spend time in the kitchen,

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and his guns are in a garage because men like

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>cars and they go into the garage.

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's just like so much of like

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 3>their relationship is predicated on the fact that it is

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 3>safe to assume that every married couple hates each other,

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 3>which obviously isn't to say that like all marriages should

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 3>be presented as happy and easy.

0:59:55.680 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Because that's not realistic either.

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, most people get divorced. But like just that, I

1:00:01.880 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>find it so depressing just to be like, they've been

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:07.920
<v Speaker 3>married for five years and they're that miserable, they should

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 3>get divorced. Like if I was married to Simon Kinberg,

1:00:12.200 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I'd be like, are you fucking kidding me? Yeah, fucking

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 3>kidding me?

1:00:17.400 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Do then hate me? Yeah? I guess I appreciate that.

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The I suppose moral of the story is if you

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are open and honest with your romantic partner, it will

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lead to a healthier relationship.

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 3>That's true. That is true. And I think, even in

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 3>spite of the Kinberg comment that like, the movie is

1:00:39.560 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 3>not against couples counseling, and that it seems like it

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 3>actually amongst other things, like, yeah, the more honest they

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>were with each other, the more deeply they fell in love.

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's a nice precedent. It's all over the place.

1:00:54.120 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Also, I mean, speaking about the guns again, there's

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a part where after they've decided to like team up

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and collaborate and their allies, John hands Jane a gun

1:01:08.160 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, why do I get the girl gun?

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And then he like hands her a different gun, and

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure in two thousand and five they thought that

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was like feminism or something lazy. Yeah, yeah, I didn't

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>really know what to make of that. But yeah, the

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>movie's full of different moments where you're just like, I

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're trying something, or I think they're trying to

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>comment on something or challenge a trope. But for the

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>most part, it's just leaning into pretty gendered tropes over all.

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Ultimately, if you're looking for a commentary, she's just

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>not the movie to watch. I wanted to say, because

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I felt like I was losing my mind because she

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>was then not credited and I didn't have the Wikipedia

1:01:57.080 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>page in front of me. I just watched the movie

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>straight through. Well, Bassett is in fact the voice of

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>mister Smith's boss, because I was like, oh, so weird.

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like Angela Bassett, and it is because I

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>think you just hear her on the phone, right and

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>you're just like, whoa, And then who knows. I'm assuming

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>that she knew the director or something. But there's that.

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the other characters in this movie, we

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>don't really have much to talk about, I mean, other

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>than the respective best friend characters, which, as we were

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 3>hinting at earlier on, Vince Vaughn's character is just obnoxious.

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Every word that comes out of his mouth is misogynist.

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about characters like this in the past. He

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>fucking sucks, and like you were saying earlier, Caitlin, like him,

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:50.439
<v Speaker 3>sucking is his personality. But he has a personality which

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>we cannot say a Kerry Washington's character, Jasmine, who is

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>playing a very stock best friend character and I think

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>like also very much plays into the black best friend

1:03:00.240 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>trope where we know nothing about her other than she

1:03:04.480 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>is Jane Smith's friend and co worker and is there

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to ask her questions and to ask her like plot

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>questions that set up Jane's also poorly written emotional arc. Yeah, so,

1:03:20.880 --> 1:03:24.960
<v Speaker 3>like you said earlier, like Kerry Washington, obviously, I mean

1:03:25.280 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>not only deserves better, but like Angelina, Julie very much

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>proven that she's way too good for this movie. Other

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>than that, I mean, this movie really does sort of

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>stay locked on mister and missus Smith. I don't really

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>know if I have much to say about any other

1:03:42.240 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>characters besides them, and they're best friends.

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Vince Vaughn gets more screen time than Carrie Washington does,

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>which is also telling easily. I think Adam Brody also

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>gets more screen time than Carrie Washington. I do like

1:03:55.200 --> 1:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of an old lady assassin agency, but we

1:04:00.480 --> 1:04:04.959
<v Speaker 1>don't really know anything about it or what the deal

1:04:05.080 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is there.

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>So a strong idea to introduce. Yeah, that was the

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing. My note there was like I really

1:04:11.280 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>love that, and I wish there was more of it.

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>But also it's not like I want to know what

1:04:16.600 --> 1:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>this creative team things happens there, and all women's Assassin

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Squad would look like you know, there's better movies about it,

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and some of them written by other misogynists. I'm thinking

1:04:29.000 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>about kill Bill, great movie about I guess majority women's

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the Deadly Viper. Yeah, assassination Squad.

1:04:37.800 --> 1:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Four of the five of them are women.

1:04:40.160 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Should we talk about the brandolina of it all?

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. I think you probably have more research

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on this than I do. I just mostly remember like

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the anecdotal stuff as it was happening in real time.

1:04:53.160 --> 1:04:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I wanted to start with that before getting into

1:04:56.640 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the specifics. This is a sort of a detour into

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a tiny you're wrong about episode I wanted to know

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>what your recollection was of that media cycle before I

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>talked about it.

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's my recollection. I don't know how reliable this information is.

1:05:13.840 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 3>It's your recollection. So that's the thing. I feel like,

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>probably it's wrong, and that's interesting.

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So I remember Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston being this

1:05:24.360 --> 1:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>power couple that everyone was obsessed with and oh my gosh,

1:05:28.000 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna make it and everyone loves them as a

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>celebrity couple. And then Angelina and Jolie enters the picture

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>by way of this movie, because this set is where

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie met, and I remember the

1:05:45.440 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of media attention around this being that, oh, Angelina

1:05:48.640 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Jolie is a home wrecker and she broke up this

1:05:51.400 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>amazing couple. I also remember something to the effect of

1:05:55.840 --> 1:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason that Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston cited as

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>splitting up had something to do with the fact that

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to have children and he did, so

1:06:10.440 --> 1:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I vaguely remember something about that being part of the

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>reason that they split up, but everyone was like, well,

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously actually because he fell in love with Angelina

1:06:22.640 --> 1:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jolly instead yeah, I just remember that part of

1:06:25.960 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it and Angelina and Jolie getting a lot of guff

1:06:29.080 --> 1:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for being a home wrecker. I didn't feel really one

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>way about it or the other because I've never been

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity gossip person. I just like let it wash

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>over me and I don't pay attention and like, honestly,

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>until the news broke pretty recently, was it in the

1:06:49.040 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>past year that Brad Pitt was outed as an abuser?

1:06:56.160 --> 1:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The past year or two, I think.

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>In a major way. Yeah, in the celebrity gossip world

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>it was, which is a part of this story. And again,

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>like I'll say, for anyone listening for a comprehensive version

1:07:10.440 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of this story, this is not the place. But I

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>think it became more commonly reported in the last couple

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of years, but the story has been out there for

1:07:22.280 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a long time. I believe that the assault.

1:07:25.720 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That is think twenty sixteen.

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the like as long as this show has

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>been like eight years ago, essentially, like I mean, and

1:07:33.440 --> 1:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>who knows what a marriage ending, but that was sort

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of the final straw. And when I think it's presented

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>that Angelina Jolie was like, this is not safe for

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:45.000
<v Speaker 3>me or the kids, and we've got to get the

1:07:45.040 --> 1:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>fuck out of here, right. Yeah.

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So my point is I didn't know about that story

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>when it happened in twenty sixteen. I didn't either, and

1:07:55.640 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>until it was like sort of re reported post me two,

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were still married. Like, I didn't even

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>know they got divorced. Like that's the level at which

1:08:07.280 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm paying attention to celebrity gossip, so it's almost none.

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I rarely care about it like that, It's just not

1:08:13.640 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>my thing.

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why I was curious, like what your memory

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:19.280
<v Speaker 3>of the time was, because it was like, whether you

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 3>were interested in the story or not, you couldn't avoid it, really, Okay,

1:08:23.360 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>So yes, the truth thing is that these two met

1:08:27.040 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>on the set of this movie, began having an affair

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>while brad Pitt was still married to Jennifer Aniston, and

1:08:34.360 --> 1:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>that he then left Jennifer Aniston and in quick order

1:08:39.600 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 3>was with Angelae Jullie. They didn't get married for years,

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:45.559
<v Speaker 3>but there was also and I won't get too deep

1:08:45.600 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>into this, but there was pretty soon after they were

1:08:50.120 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>together they started having children and adopting children, and ultimately

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that they have five or six children together,

1:08:59.080 --> 1:09:03.839
<v Speaker 3>either biological or adopted, and from what I have gathered,

1:09:04.320 --> 1:09:06.559
<v Speaker 3>none of these children want anything to do with brad Pitt,

1:09:06.600 --> 1:09:10.720
<v Speaker 3>and that's just the truth anyways, But just trying to

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:13.280
<v Speaker 3>keep stuff in order. At the time, I feel like

1:09:13.320 --> 1:09:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you sort of got this very classic Madonna horror tabloid

1:09:17.720 --> 1:09:21.639
<v Speaker 3>story with Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Joe Lee. The two

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:25.759
<v Speaker 3>essays that I'm pulling from here. The first was published

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 3>last year in Vox by Constance Grady. Brad Pitt was

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the only winner of the Aniston Jolie tabloid battle. The

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>other is an older piece by a writer I really

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:40.519
<v Speaker 3>really like, Anne Helen Peterson in BuzzFeed. Amember that from

1:09:40.760 --> 1:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteenth's almost ten years ago, and that piece is

1:09:44.439 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 3>more of a deep dive on how Angelina Joe Lee

1:09:49.040 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>essentially had to like pr maneuver her way out of

1:09:51.760 --> 1:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>this fucking nightmare yea, and eventually, at least at the

1:09:55.720 --> 1:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>time it was published, seemed to have successfully done. So

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>both are really good pieces. I'd recommend checking both out,

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly the more recent one. But essentially, I mean, and

1:10:04.720 --> 1:10:09.599
<v Speaker 3>I remember this even though I was eleven and should

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>not have known any of this, even though I wasn't

1:10:12.160 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 3>interested in it. Just you couldn't go to a grocery

1:10:14.520 --> 1:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>store without being confronted with this story.

1:10:18.240 --> 1:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The cover of every magazine.

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know, I feel like the story evolved

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 3>over time, and it started as you know, Angelina Jolie

1:10:28.160 --> 1:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>is a man stealer, Jennifer Aniston is the sweet girl

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 3>next door. Angelina Jolie is this like vampy man stealer,

1:10:37.320 --> 1:10:41.839
<v Speaker 3>home wrecker essentially, which media of the time really played

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:45.639
<v Speaker 3>into ways that she had either presented herself or been

1:10:45.720 --> 1:10:49.799
<v Speaker 3>framed in the past of like, you know, early Angelina

1:10:49.880 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 3>jo Lee kissed her brother and like wore Billy Bob

1:10:53.840 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Thornton's blood around her neck, and like she was a

1:10:57.000 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>weird lady like and I think that anything she did

1:11:01.160 --> 1:11:03.560
<v Speaker 3>in her twenties, and she also had I don't know

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a ton about her early life except that she is

1:11:06.400 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the daughter of John Voight, who's famously a piece of

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:12.680
<v Speaker 3>fucking garbage, and like, I believe they don't have a

1:11:12.680 --> 1:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>relationship anyways. Sounds like a difficult upbringing, a kind of

1:11:18.080 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>like tumultuous twenties that she had, but also very successful.

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>She wanted to oscar for girl interrupted. But either way,

1:11:25.800 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>they're like okay, Jennifer Anison good, Angelina Jolee bad. However,

1:11:31.360 --> 1:11:36.559
<v Speaker 3>as time went on, that narrative didn't flip, but it

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>did change where once Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt had

1:11:41.840 --> 1:11:47.600
<v Speaker 3>a family and Angelina Joe which had already begun. And

1:11:47.640 --> 1:11:50.759
<v Speaker 3>I want to be careful not to like position any

1:11:51.360 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 3>humanitarian work that she's done as disingenuous, Like I don't

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>think that that is true. We don't need to get

1:11:59.080 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>into the weeds of like, well, what is it, you

1:12:00.760 --> 1:12:04.639
<v Speaker 3>know whatever. I do believe that the convictions that she's presented,

1:12:04.720 --> 1:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>it's been at least on a long enough timeline that

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>whether you agree with the particulars or not, it seems

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 3>to be a big part of her life. But as

1:12:14.240 --> 1:12:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that became a bigger part of her life, and she

1:12:16.640 --> 1:12:20.559
<v Speaker 3>sort of was presented as less of a home wrecking

1:12:20.640 --> 1:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>vamp and more of a mother of five who did

1:12:25.479 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>all of this work, you see the narrative flip. And

1:12:29.560 --> 1:12:34.639
<v Speaker 3>like all, Angelina Julie is not bad anymore. The more

1:12:34.720 --> 1:12:37.559
<v Speaker 3>she leans into motherhood, or the more the media leads

1:12:37.600 --> 1:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>into the image of motherhood, she's presented better and better.

1:12:41.680 --> 1:12:45.719
<v Speaker 3>And meanwhile, Jennifer Aniston does not end up having children,

1:12:46.280 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 3>and she's presented as pathetic on a longer timeline. Yeah,

1:12:51.520 --> 1:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>you're totally right that at the time, it was presented

1:12:54.080 --> 1:12:58.599
<v Speaker 3>that Jennifer Anison didn't want children and Brady Pitt did

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>so he found a woman who can give him children.

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>It turns out that this is also not true. She

1:13:06.000 --> 1:13:10.120
<v Speaker 3>had fertility issues and had them. I mean, I don't

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:14.639
<v Speaker 3>cannot speak to the timeline that she but it wasn't

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:18.439
<v Speaker 3>until like twenty nineteen where she gave an interview that

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>was like, there was this popular narrative about me that

1:13:22.240 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>like I didn't want to comment on because it's just

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:27.559
<v Speaker 3>like fucked up and weird, because whether you want children

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:30.799
<v Speaker 3>or not is a very personal decision and has nothing

1:13:30.840 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>to do with anything. And also it shouldn't have been

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>criticized if she didn't want children, but as it turns out,

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:41.840
<v Speaker 3>she did, and it was also just this like big

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:46.559
<v Speaker 3>traumatic lie. So it's, you know, one of the more

1:13:46.640 --> 1:13:51.559
<v Speaker 3>I think famous and fucked up media narratives. Because of

1:13:51.560 --> 1:13:56.320
<v Speaker 3>course in all of these, Brad Pitt is never presented

1:13:56.479 --> 1:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>as bad. It's he was tempted or he was not

1:14:00.760 --> 1:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>given the babies that he wanted, so who could blame him,

1:14:04.360 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>which is a lot of what the vox essay is

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:11.080
<v Speaker 3>about of just like it was never even floated or

1:14:11.160 --> 1:14:14.719
<v Speaker 3>presented that he could be at fault for anything. It

1:14:14.760 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 3>has to be the fault of one woman or the other.

1:14:17.160 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And there were t shirts sold and all this shit.

1:14:19.840 --> 1:14:23.919
<v Speaker 3>So I think, you know, Angelina and Jolie and Jennifery

1:14:23.920 --> 1:14:29.959
<v Speaker 3>Addison's career, you have to imagine mental health are affected

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:35.080
<v Speaker 3>by that. And then on a longer timeline, Brad Pitt

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>and Angelina and Jolie have a family together. They get

1:14:38.240 --> 1:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>married at some point, and he was an abusive alcoholic

1:14:44.760 --> 1:14:47.720
<v Speaker 3>person to her, and without getting into I think we

1:14:47.800 --> 1:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>have referenced it on the show before and other Brad

1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Pitt vehicles. I don't remember which episode off the top

1:14:53.760 --> 1:14:58.120
<v Speaker 3>of my head, but essentially, he assaulted his wife and

1:14:58.120 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 3>berated one of his children in front of the whole

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:05.759
<v Speaker 3>family on a plane in twenty sixteen, which resulted in

1:15:05.840 --> 1:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>an investigation. It resulted in police reports, and ultimately it

1:15:10.720 --> 1:15:15.479
<v Speaker 3>was at least a contributing factor to their eventual divorce.

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>What that looks like now, It was actually in the

1:15:20.200 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 3>news as recently as four days before. We're recording this.

1:15:24.720 --> 1:15:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of the reason even though post

1:15:27.880 --> 1:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>me to, and I can't say exactly when I remember

1:15:30.360 --> 1:15:32.759
<v Speaker 3>first hearing this story for the first time, but post

1:15:32.800 --> 1:15:38.519
<v Speaker 3>me to this story was brought up again because I

1:15:38.520 --> 1:15:41.559
<v Speaker 3>think that it was reported at the time, but no

1:15:41.600 --> 1:15:42.880
<v Speaker 3>one took an.

1:15:42.880 --> 1:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Interest culturally, we simply didn't yeah, post me to.

1:15:49.479 --> 1:15:53.240
<v Speaker 3>So I guess anytime after late twenty seventeen, this story

1:15:53.600 --> 1:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>comes back, but it does keep kind of disappearing like

1:15:58.000 --> 1:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>it never stayed. It appears that the reason that is

1:16:01.960 --> 1:16:07.719
<v Speaker 3>is because Brad Pitt has been repeatedly suing Angelina Jolie

1:16:08.240 --> 1:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to get her to say less about this. Essentially, so

1:16:12.760 --> 1:16:15.679
<v Speaker 3>the story I'm pulling from Angelina Jolie's lawyers call Brad

1:16:15.680 --> 1:16:19.519
<v Speaker 3>Pitt's NDA request abusive in winery case, there's also this

1:16:19.560 --> 1:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>whole business like they're rich and so they had a

1:16:22.080 --> 1:16:26.439
<v Speaker 3>winery business and they're in a fight with that. But

1:16:27.040 --> 1:16:30.200
<v Speaker 3>basically like he's finding all of these reasons to sue her.

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Because I want to make sure I'm getting this correct.

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>A quote from a Vulture article by Zoe Guy from

1:16:38.160 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 3>a few days ago. Jolie's attorneys previously claimed Pitt wanted

1:16:41.840 --> 1:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>her to sign an onerous and expansive NDA that would

1:16:45.000 --> 1:16:48.880
<v Speaker 3>quote cover Pit's personal misconduct, whether related to a Miraval,

1:16:49.120 --> 1:16:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the winery, or not, including the abuse allegations related to

1:16:53.360 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 3>an incident on a plane in twenty sixteen, in order

1:16:56.520 --> 1:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>for Jolee to agree to sell her stake in Miraval

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to Pit. When the deal fell apart over the matter,

1:17:02.120 --> 1:17:05.479
<v Speaker 3>she sold her shares elsewhere, So essentially he's suing her

1:17:06.120 --> 1:17:09.519
<v Speaker 3>for selling her shares to this winery she no longer

1:17:09.560 --> 1:17:11.759
<v Speaker 3>wants anything to do with because she doesn't want to

1:17:11.880 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 3>be involved in his life, and he attempted to make

1:17:15.479 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 3>it impossible for her to extract herself from their co

1:17:18.680 --> 1:17:22.160
<v Speaker 3>owned business unless she signed an NDA saying she could

1:17:22.200 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>never publicly speak about him being a domestic abuser, Which

1:17:26.680 --> 1:17:29.760
<v Speaker 3>how is that fucking legal? I couldn't tell you. But

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:32.400
<v Speaker 3>she just sort of was like It appears that she

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:34.599
<v Speaker 3>was sort of like fuck you and sold her shares

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:37.599
<v Speaker 3>off anyways, and now he's trying to sue her again.

1:17:38.680 --> 1:17:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the Brad Pitt obviously has a very vested

1:17:41.240 --> 1:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>interest in his image and does not care about anybody,

1:17:48.720 --> 1:17:52.280
<v Speaker 3>perhaps accept himself. Yeah, he is a bitch. I hate

1:17:52.320 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 3>him in the bad way. We talked about this. I'm sorry,

1:17:54.960 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 3>we talked about this our episode yesterday.

1:17:56.400 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I want Monsters Inc.

1:17:57.479 --> 1:17:59.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in Munsters Inc. Go to the Matreon.

1:18:00.200 --> 1:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Bitch in a bad way, bitch in a bad way,

1:18:02.560 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>or bitch is in a good way exactly.

1:18:05.439 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>So, while there are you know, I'm sure plenty of

1:18:08.120 --> 1:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>criticisms of Angelina Julie that have nothing to do with

1:18:12.680 --> 1:18:15.200
<v Speaker 3>this marriage. Brad Pitt very much the villain of this

1:18:15.280 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 3>marriage and still actively the villain of this marriage. I

1:18:19.439 --> 1:18:26.160
<v Speaker 3>want to just finally close by reading what their son

1:18:26.600 --> 1:18:32.759
<v Speaker 3>Packs posted on Father's Day to his Instagram story. He said,

1:18:33.680 --> 1:18:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Happy Father's Day to this world class asshole. You time

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>and time again prove yourself to be a terrible and

1:18:39.280 --> 1:18:42.320
<v Speaker 3>despicable person. You have no consideration or empathy towards your

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>four youngest children, who tremble in fear when in your presence.

1:18:45.680 --> 1:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You will never understand the damage you have done to

1:18:47.600 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 3>my family because you are incapable of doing so. You

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>have made the lives of those closest to me a

1:18:52.360 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>constant hell. You may tell yourself in the world whatever

1:18:55.240 --> 1:18:57.320
<v Speaker 3>you want, but the truth will come to light someday.

1:18:57.479 --> 1:19:01.599
<v Speaker 3>So Happy Father's Day, you fucking awful human being, and

1:19:01.920 --> 1:19:06.679
<v Speaker 3>so I see no reason not to go with him there. Yeah,

1:19:06.720 --> 1:19:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and to believe children of abusive parents. It appears, at

1:19:12.120 --> 1:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>least at the time of this recording, it seems like

1:19:13.920 --> 1:19:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Angelina Jolie has a good relationship with all of her children.

1:19:18.439 --> 1:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They have six, By the way, I know that we

1:19:20.160 --> 1:19:21.559
<v Speaker 1>were not sure if it's five or six.

1:19:21.640 --> 1:19:24.439
<v Speaker 3>I was literally doing the mister and missus Smiths five.

1:19:24.400 --> 1:19:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Or children, It's yeah, it's six, because.

1:19:28.360 --> 1:19:30.599
<v Speaker 3>I think they had twins, And then I kept counting

1:19:30.640 --> 1:19:34.960
<v Speaker 3>twins as one, which is twin discrimination. And I apologize

1:19:34.960 --> 1:19:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to the twin community. But yes, it seems like Angelina,

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:42.840
<v Speaker 3>or at least their children publicly have a good relationship

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:46.599
<v Speaker 3>with her, and they also publicly fucking hate Brad Pitt.

1:19:46.800 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 3>So fuck Brad Pitt. I guess is the little bow

1:19:50.280 --> 1:19:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I want to put on that second.

1:19:51.520 --> 1:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are a number of movies that he is

1:19:56.400 --> 1:20:01.519
<v Speaker 1>the star of that I really like, and I don't

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>consume those movies anymore, or at least not to the

1:20:04.439 --> 1:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>same extent that I was. But like you know, and

1:20:08.920 --> 1:20:11.559
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about, I'm never gonna be someone who like

1:20:11.600 --> 1:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>separates the art from the artists. It doesn't necessarily mean

1:20:16.400 --> 1:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that I will refuse to watch certain things. I will

1:20:19.520 --> 1:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>just be mindful of horrible people involved in the project. Yeah,

1:20:24.520 --> 1:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it varies project a project or you know, actor or

1:20:27.439 --> 1:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>actor what you know. It's very much on a case

1:20:30.160 --> 1:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>by case basis.

1:20:31.360 --> 1:20:34.759
<v Speaker 3>But and everyone's on like sort of a personal journey

1:20:35.479 --> 1:20:37.920
<v Speaker 3>right with that, Like, I certainly don't think anyone who

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:41.960
<v Speaker 3>like would watch a movie with Brad Pittknitt is a

1:20:42.040 --> 1:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>bad person. I think he's just personally Yeah, I think

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:48.879
<v Speaker 3>as time goes on, I find him harder and harder

1:20:48.960 --> 1:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to stummitch.

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure, And it's been a journey for me because like,

1:20:53.439 --> 1:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a long time where he was someone I

1:20:57.240 --> 1:20:59.559
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed very much watching on screen.

1:20:59.840 --> 1:21:01.679
<v Speaker 3>And he's a good actor.

1:21:01.800 --> 1:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunate he's a good actor, he is, and he's charismatic

1:21:06.240 --> 1:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and charming the way that a lot of scary bad

1:21:09.280 --> 1:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>people are. And this was one of the harder ones

1:21:13.320 --> 1:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for me to be like, oh, I don't fuck with

1:21:15.320 --> 1:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>him anymore. Fuck Brad Pitt.

1:21:18.680 --> 1:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>The end, this movie passes the Bechdel testing.

1:21:23.000 --> 1:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are a few scenes in Lady Assassin Headquarters

1:21:27.560 --> 1:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Industries where but although are they ever not talking about

1:21:33.640 --> 1:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>John Smith.

1:21:35.120 --> 1:21:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Let me triple check, but I think I clocked a

1:21:38.439 --> 1:21:43.519
<v Speaker 3>few like barely passes. I did technically pass, I would

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:49.200
<v Speaker 3>say spiritually definitely not. So whoever's editing the Wikipedia page

1:21:49.200 --> 1:21:51.760
<v Speaker 3>these days sort of go with God. I would say,

1:21:53.320 --> 1:21:58.600
<v Speaker 3>yeah it technically I think may pass between Jane and Jasmine,

1:21:59.080 --> 1:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>but spiritually know because neither of them are really characters that.

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Were written true.

1:22:05.800 --> 1:22:09.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's challenging. Actually there's oh, this is one of

1:22:09.960 --> 1:22:14.640
<v Speaker 3>my favorites because there is a like old website that

1:22:14.680 --> 1:22:18.360
<v Speaker 3>we consult sometimes to check our own work Bectel test Dott.

1:22:19.560 --> 1:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And every once in a while you find a movie

1:22:21.280 --> 1:22:24.880
<v Speaker 3>where there is just a rich comment section where they're like, well,

1:22:25.000 --> 1:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of and then other people are like, it doesn't.

1:22:27.600 --> 1:22:31.080
<v Speaker 3>So jury's kind of out on this one that like

1:22:31.400 --> 1:22:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the official ruling of the website is no. There's a

1:22:33.920 --> 1:22:36.679
<v Speaker 3>lot of comments you're saying technically yes, I'd say, let's

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>just go with no.

1:22:37.960 --> 1:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that because either it's Kerry Washington's character

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and Jane Smith talking about killing a man that's better

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>than nothing, but they are mostly talking about John Smith,

1:22:55.040 --> 1:22:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe, And then there might be an interaction between

1:22:58.240 --> 1:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Jane Smith and her neighbor, Missus Coleman. They're always talking

1:23:02.080 --> 1:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>about the Colemans, and maybe something there passes. But again,

1:23:07.800 --> 1:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a very fleeting moment, a fleeting character, not plot impactful.

1:23:13.520 --> 1:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would say spiritually know the movie does not

1:23:16.560 --> 1:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pass the Bechdel.

1:23:17.479 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Test, and possibly technically now yes, but what about the

1:23:21.479 --> 1:23:24.760
<v Speaker 3>most important media metric of all, Oh, do you.

1:23:24.680 --> 1:23:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Mean the Bechdel cast nipple scale, where we rate the

1:23:29.680 --> 1:23:33.599
<v Speaker 1>movie zero to five nipples based on examining it through

1:23:33.640 --> 1:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>an intersectional feminist lens. I'll give this movie one nipple.

1:23:37.640 --> 1:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>There are some things I did appreciate more at the time,

1:23:42.280 --> 1:23:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and still to some degree appreciate, which is the woman's

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>involvement in the action. I think a lot of other

1:23:50.640 --> 1:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>movies that would have an assassin who's a woman would

1:23:54.080 --> 1:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>still not let her do much. So I appreciate that

1:23:57.600 --> 1:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>she's a far more active participant in the action than

1:24:02.120 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we're accustomed to seeing, especially of movies from this era.

1:24:07.040 --> 1:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And there are a couple other slight subversions that I appreciated,

1:24:11.800 --> 1:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>like the man being the more emotionally expressive, sentimental one

1:24:18.400 --> 1:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and not that like I'm advocating for women to be

1:24:21.880 --> 1:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>closed off emotionally, it's more that a trope is present.

1:24:25.960 --> 1:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But it does happen and you never see it.

1:24:27.960 --> 1:24:31.559
<v Speaker 1>And you don't see it, and so I appreciate the

1:24:31.600 --> 1:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>subversion of that trope. But by and large, it's a

1:24:35.479 --> 1:24:40.599
<v Speaker 1>movie leaning into gendered tropes and it's not as good

1:24:40.960 --> 1:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as I once thought. The movie was so one nipple

1:24:45.439 --> 1:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for the few things that I appreciate, and it goes

1:24:48.400 --> 1:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>to Carrie Washington. Justice for Carrie Washington.

1:24:53.640 --> 1:24:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I am going to go half a nipple because I

1:24:56.120 --> 1:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>don't really I don't have a nostalgia for it. The

1:24:59.120 --> 1:25:02.280
<v Speaker 3>more I read about it, the BRANDOLINASAKA, the more just

1:25:02.560 --> 1:25:04.680
<v Speaker 3>like a hostile agridge with it. It's not you know,

1:25:04.880 --> 1:25:09.599
<v Speaker 3>you cannot blame the movie itself, but spiritually I do.

1:25:10.600 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm gonna give it a half nipple, and

1:25:14.439 --> 1:25:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna give the half nipple to.

1:25:18.640 --> 1:25:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Know.

1:25:18.680 --> 1:25:23.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna give it to Angelina Jolie. And with that, Caitlin,

1:25:23.400 --> 1:25:24.559
<v Speaker 3>Happy freaking birthday.

1:25:25.080 --> 1:25:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. If listeners want to do something

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>nice for me on my birthday, g me. You can

1:25:34.640 --> 1:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Instagram. I was just talking about this

1:25:38.280 --> 1:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Monsters, Inc. Episode, which may have already come

1:25:42.880 --> 1:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>out or maybe it comes out very soon, but either way,

1:25:46.080 --> 1:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Matreon, right on the Matreon. Either way. I

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>am trying to do more stand up in LA and elsewhere,

1:25:55.120 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and it helps to get booked on shows the more

1:26:00.560 --> 1:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>followers you have. I don't necessarily like that that's the case,

1:26:04.920 --> 1:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but it is. But we live the fact of the matter.

1:26:08.360 --> 1:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We live in a society, So just follow me on

1:26:11.360 --> 1:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Instagram so that I can appear to be a legitimate comedian.

1:26:16.080 --> 1:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>You are dufest wow thing.

1:26:19.360 --> 1:26:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that, but bookers don't. Anyway, Listeners,

1:26:26.720 --> 1:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for listening to the show. And

1:26:33.160 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just feel extra sentimental on my birthday

1:26:38.600 --> 1:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and finally free Palestine.

1:26:42.439 --> 1:26:43.759
<v Speaker 3>The Happy Birthday Kitlin.

1:26:44.080 --> 1:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Follow us also on Instagram at Bechdel Cast.

1:26:51.680 --> 1:26:54.519
<v Speaker 1>There's our Patreon. Ooh, another little gift you could give

1:26:54.520 --> 1:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>me for my birthday. If you're not already a Matreon subscriber,

1:26:57.680 --> 1:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>go over to patreon dot com spetl Cast, where you

1:27:01.760 --> 1:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>can get two bonus episodes every single month, plus access

1:27:04.720 --> 1:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to the one hundred and fifty bonus episodes on the

1:27:09.240 --> 1:27:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Matreon for five dollars a mom mentioned and our tour

1:27:15.080 --> 1:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>kicks off very soon, so grab tickets to that if

1:27:17.960 --> 1:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't already have it at link tree slash Spectel Cast.

1:27:21.479 --> 1:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>We're in various cities in the UK as well as Dublin.

1:27:25.600 --> 1:27:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I'm not gonna plug anything because

1:27:27.800 --> 1:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>it's your damn birthday, Happy birthday.

1:27:31.120 --> 1:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But people should listen to your new show, your new podcast,

1:27:35.000 --> 1:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>say something about it.

1:27:36.880 --> 1:27:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Wow, only because you ask in your birthday. Yeah, please

1:27:41.479 --> 1:27:43.360
<v Speaker 3>check out if you haven't checked it out already, we

1:27:43.400 --> 1:27:45.800
<v Speaker 3>should be a few I guess two episodes deep when

1:27:45.800 --> 1:27:49.639
<v Speaker 3>this comes out. Sixteenth Minute is a new weekly show

1:27:49.760 --> 1:27:52.679
<v Speaker 3>doing that comes out every Tuesday. That's a different profile

1:27:52.760 --> 1:27:55.479
<v Speaker 3>every week of a different Internet character of the day.

1:27:55.640 --> 1:27:59.679
<v Speaker 3>So I believe this week our episode on the dress

1:27:59.840 --> 1:28:02.120
<v Speaker 3>just came out. Member, that was it the.

1:28:02.160 --> 1:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Dress that people either saw? Was it like white and

1:28:07.240 --> 1:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wet and gold or black and blue?

1:28:09.280 --> 1:28:09.479
<v Speaker 5>Right?

1:28:09.800 --> 1:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

1:28:10.280 --> 1:28:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I'll never forget.

1:28:12.800 --> 1:28:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Never forget. Yeah. So every episode is like that, just

1:28:15.680 --> 1:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Internet things that have been ingrained in your brain against

1:28:18.240 --> 1:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>your will. Every episode's about that, So check it out.

1:28:21.360 --> 1:28:23.400
<v Speaker 3>We're having a fun time over there, and it's also

1:28:23.439 --> 1:28:27.719
<v Speaker 3>produced by Bechdel Cast producer Sophie Lichterman, so very nice.

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy your birthday, Kaitlin, thank you so much. Enjoy your day, listeners.

1:28:33.000 --> 1:28:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, happy birthday to you also, and we'll be back

1:28:38.640 --> 1:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>next week for more episode Bye bye. The Bechdel Cast

1:28:49.479 --> 1:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartMedia, hosted by Caitlin Derante and

1:28:52.920 --> 1:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Loftus, produced by Sophie Lickterman, edited by Mola Board.

1:28:57.280 --> 1:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song was composed by Mike Kaplan with vocals

1:29:00.479 --> 1:29:04.439
<v Speaker 1>by Katherine Voskresenski. Our logo and merch is designed by

1:29:04.520 --> 1:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Loftus and a special thanks to Aristotle Assevedo. For

1:29:08.720 --> 1:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>more information about the podcast, please visit linktree slash Bechtelcast