WEBVTT - From the Vault: Anthology of Horror, Volume 5

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and today

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a vault episode. This is another one of our

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>older Anthology of Horror episodes. I believe this was volume six,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which originally published on October twenty nine. Wait, or is

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it volume five? Honestly I lose track of the volumes.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It's another one, volume five. I don't know how many

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>volumes there are at this point. Yeah, maybe it's five. Okay.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we started out doing like one a year,

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we did like two in one year. So, um,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the numbering system, it becomes less important.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>As with any like horror franchise, the long grade goes,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the numbers just become redundant. Right, Welcome to Stuff to

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind? Production of My Heart Radio. Hey are

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind? My name

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with the second installment this year of our anthology horror series. Uh,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this I guess is going to be the fifth anthology

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>episode overall. Yeah, I believest so this should be episode

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, volume five however you want to look at it. Um, Yes,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. If it's a volume you have, it's a volume. Yeah.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So basically this is just a continuing experiment we've been

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>doing where we look to the wonderful world of horror

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and sci fi UH TV anthologies and UH and cinematic

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>anthologies and pick out little episodes, little UH audio visual

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>short stories. They generally have some horror or sci fi

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of uh in, some sort of weird

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>h and perhaps grotesque twist in them, and we use

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that as a focal point for a discussion of science

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and culture. Sometimes we're having to really um read into

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the episode a lot more than the creators anticipated. Other

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>times it's just it's really baked into an already intelligent script. Um.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It just kind of varies from piece to piece. Well,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I got one to talk about first that is definitely

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>baked in some way. Okay, what what have you got

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for us, Joe? Okay, today I wanted to start by

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about a classic episode of Are You Afraid of

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the Dark? Rob Did you watch Are You Afraid of

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dark? Because I I did. I I can't remember

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what channel came on. Maybe it was a Nickelodeon thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember catching episodes of it, and I remember it

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as being occasionally like really creepy, like it was effective.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It was not uh, you know, it wasn't. I mean,

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a kid show, but it could really creepy

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. It was it was well done,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>is our call. Yeah. A lot of the episodes really

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are and I would say even the bad episodes, going

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>back and watching them as an adult, it is an

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>extremely fun, nostalgic rewatch. Uh. A lot of the episodes

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that I found very scary when I was young. You know,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a kid's show, so they don't quite have

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the punch they did when I when I was eight

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but a few of them are are still

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of surprising. And one of my favorite things about

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the show is that it is just egregiously adorably Canadian.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the fun things about going back and watching

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it now is that you frequently encounter child versions of

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Gosling or Nev Campbell or somebody else you recognize

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>from later work. And when it comes to the older actors,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they weren't usually people who you'd recognize from big movies

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but a lot of them have this powerful

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>energy of like a local character beloved in some town.

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you often get the sense that when you meet

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Dr Vink or somebody like that, it's like you're you're

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the rc Bates of Toronto. Yeah. I think

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the episode I mostly remember from this show is, if

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I if I'm remembering it correctly, is the Tale of

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the dead Man's Float, which has to do with like

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a haunted high school swimming pool that remember, I'm I

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm remembering correctly. I may be misremembering

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's somehow in the in the basement of the school,

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not. Yeah, there's a swimming pool in the

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a cursed swimming pool that was on a

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>cemetery or something. Yeah. And I think this is the

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>one where, like when I when It Follows came out,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a sequence in it it follows swimming pool and

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it it made me think back to this episode. You

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are a thousand percent correct. I I think I made

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that connection at a subconscious level. But the moment you

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>said that, you're you're totally right. But the episode I

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about today is one I don't remember

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>actually which season it's from. I should have looked that up.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it's called The Tale of the Super Specs,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's notable for being, I think one of the

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>episodes with some legitimately scary imagery which is achieved via

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>very low tech means. It's just it has some very

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>creepy images of people draped in black cloth. But it also,

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, is the episode that introduces the fan favorite

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>recurring character Mr. Sardo, who is a en uh sort

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of scheming magic and novelty shop owner who gets angry

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>when people call him Mr sar Do and he always

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>says his catchphrase that's sar dough, no Mr accent on

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the dough. That seems that seems very particular, like he's

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not an added to calling him sar Do. Right, it's

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more than that. Yeah, he's been he's been a little

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fussy about this point, I think. I mean, you invite

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>these problems when you decide to be a single name guy. Yeah,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but okay, So the premise of this episode is that

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a young man named Weeds who is kind of

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a prankster, and he's browsing in Sardo's magic and Novelty shop.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of place that's got masked and fake vomit,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's also got apparently legitimate spell books and referenced

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>homes on the occult, and real magical artifacts and objects.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why they're all crammed together in this

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>one shop, but so he's sort of looking around for things,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and he comes across a bag of magic dust, which

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>while simultaneously reading a spell out of an ancient tome,

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he accidentally spills this magic dust over some plastic glasses

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that are being sold as super Specs, which are supposed

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to grant X ray vision. I think I think the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>original understanding is these are just novelty glasses, but they

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>get imbued with magic power when he says the spell.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Also there in the magic shop is Weeds, his girlfriend

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Mary Beth, and she decides to try out the super specs,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but when she does, she sees shadowy figures who are

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>draped in in black cloth from head to toe, and

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they're following her everywhere. And there are multiple occasions, you know,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like they go to school and she puts on the

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>glasses again and she sees the figures, and then she

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>goes home and she puts on the glasses again and

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sees them another time. She also sees um elements of

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>alternative reality, so like she'll look at her fireplace and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>without the glasses there's no fire and it, but with

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the glasses there's there's a fire burning, so it's very

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they live in a way. Now. Eventually, what happens is

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that Weeds and Marybeth get convinced that there are invisible

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>people from another dimension who are stalking them, and they

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>consult with Sard to try to figure out how to

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get rid of these shadow people. And I won't spoil

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the ending to this one, because I gotta admit the

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ending is pretty good, But the basic premise is what

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about. It's the premise that there

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is a realm of life that actually occupies the same

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>general space as us, but that we go about our

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lives completely unaware of. And it's it's a take on

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea popular in some like alien conspiracy theory architecture,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that aliens are somehow already here. They're here on Earth,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're invisible to us for some reason, or they're

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>hiding in plain sight. Yeah. I think I think I

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>recorded an older episode of the show with um Ben

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Belling and that Frederick uh guesting where we talked about

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>shadow people and uh particular study that linked some of

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this phenomenon too disruptions of the body schema. So so

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>basically like like a situation where um, you know, neurologically

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>your idea of where your body is and what your

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>body is doing would be skewed in a way that

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it would be perceived as some sort of a shadow

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>being that was close by. Oh, I see. Not to

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>say that's a definitive answer for for all of this,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but it was. It was one idea that was put

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>forth by some researchers. Well, I mean, I think we

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can be pretty safe in assuming that they are not

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>actually like people sized organisms that are walking around unnoticed

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on Earth and our aliens of some guy. I mean,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can't rule it out, but I'm not

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>aware of any kind of evidence that something like that

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is possible. But I wanted to explore a maybe more plausible,

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>still unproven, but more plausible and very interesting sort of

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>parallel idea. And the place I want to start here

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is I was reading the British astronaut and chemist Helen Sharman.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It was actually the first British astronaut. Ever, uh, she

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was talking to the observer I think earlier this year

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and saying that, you know, it was her opinion, and

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that just given the size of the universe, the number

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of planets out there, the number of opportunities for biochemistry

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to arise, that she's pretty convinced that there must be

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>aliens out there somewhere in the universe. And then she adds, quote,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>will they be like you and me, made up of

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon and nitrogen? Maybe not. It's possible they're here right

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>now and we simply can't see them now. I want

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to be clear that I'm not aware of any evidence

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever this is actually the case, and I don't think

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Sharman was suggesting that we have evidence of this being true.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But it does raise the very intriguing question of how

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>would we know if aliens, in some sense or some

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of alternate organism, we're already here, already somehow within

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>range of our senses. Well, first, is there any conceivable

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>way that something like that could be true? And second,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if it were true, would there be any way to

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of put on the superspects, any way to figure

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it out? So further investigate this idea. I was reading

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a great article from Astrobiology magazine from two thousand six.

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is a little bit older, and some of

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the science, the underlying science, might have changed somewhat since then,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think the basic question still stands as posed.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is by the UC Boulder philosophy professor Carol Cleland,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>and the article is called a shadow biosphere. Now, by

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a shadow biosphere she means a rarely considered form of

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative life, not aliens from another planet, but aliens from Earth,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>an unrecognized alternative biology that may exist parallel to us,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>invisibly here on this planet. And she asked the question,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if something like that existed, what would these alternative biologies

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>entail in order to have escaped our notice? So they

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>could possibly include alternative forms of information coding, so forms

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>other than DNA or RNA, or they could include different

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>amino acids to build their pro teens, or quote any

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>other means by which the chemistry of early Earth could

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have combined to form life we are not familiar with.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And so there are there are a few things we

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>can probably rule out from you know, any reasonable question,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The first of which is the superspect you know, the

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>literal superspect scenario where there are like human sized organisms

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that are going unnoticed. She says, probably if these shadow

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>biological organisms were on the scale of familiar plants or animals,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we would have already noticed and detected them, right, Yes,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we would. Somebody would have figured it out by now.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we're probably talking about, if there were such

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing, would be microscopic organisms. But microscopic organisms can

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have big impacts. They do a lot, and so the

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>impact of a microscopic shadow biosphere could be enormous, and

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be very interesting to discover that it had

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>gone unnoticed this long. You know, I can't help but

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be reminded of a a great great end quotation marks

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>here uh Saturday Night Live parody commercial from I guess

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineties. But for the fecal vision glasses.

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever see this one? No? I didn't. Where

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody puts on the fecal vision glasses and then like

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>fecal matter glows bright green, and of course they just

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they just show a ridiculous amount of it, Like the

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>entire room is basically covered in it, there's a baby

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>covered in it, that sort of thing. Um, But in

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a way, you know, seeing the unseen um world of

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>life forms around us. I think that's an excellent point

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in comparison. Keep keep that, keep that image in mind

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>as we move on. So one of the first things,

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, you'd have to consider if you're addressing this

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>question of could there could there in fact be a

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>shadow biosphere is um? What counts is life? You want

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you're defining your terms properly, because you're

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if your definition of life is overly inclusive, it could

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>lose all meaning. Right, you don't want to end up

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with the definition of life that includes like volcanoes and

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>waterfalls as life. But obviously there are lots of different

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>definitions of life that are in competition with each other.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I was reading an article by an astrobiologist named Samantha Rolf,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and she points out there are probably more than a

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred legit definitions of what constitutes a life form. Most

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of them encounter some potential objections here or they're just

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>As one example, she points out that that if you

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>zero in on the definition of life that centered on

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the ability to reproduce, you arrive at a strange conclusion

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that like a three D printer that can print and

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a symbol copies of itself is alive, but a mule

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>which is sterile is not alive, and that doesn't quite

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>seem right. Yeah. I think we've discussed in the show

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>before some arguments about viruses, but also about fire that

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>agrees to which fire can be classified up to a

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>point as a as an organism. It's not an organism,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but but you can make an impassioned argument of your

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling argumentative about it totally, or like forms of crystals,

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>things like that. I mean, you run into a lot

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty is actually if you're trying to come up

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with the definition of life that rules in everything we

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>want to think of his life and rules out everything

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't. So in this two thousand six article, Carol

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland zeros in on the following distinctions. What what she

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>thinks is important is, first quote, the capacity of a

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>system to maintain itself as a self organized unit against

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>both internal and external perturbations. So basically that means a

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>life form has has some type of structural resiliency, It

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of protects its own integrity and has some form

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of resistance against just dissolution by external and internal forces.

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the second thing she says, is the ability

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to reproduce and transmit to its descendants adaptive heritable modifications. Now,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all the life that we know of on Earth, uh

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that meets those two criteria is defined by a common chemistry.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>We know what the primary types of molecules involved are,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and those molecules are proteins and nucleic gas. Sid's Nucleic acids,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, would include DNA and RNA, and they store

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>hereditary information and they produce proteins. Proteins then make up

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the structure and the machinery of cells and of the

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>life form as a whole. And the interface between these

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>two functions the hereditary function and the structural or mechanical

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>function of the of the protein. This is handled by

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a very important structure known as the ribosome, which is

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>made of both proteins and RNA, and which translate the

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hereditary information stored in nucleic acids into usable proteins. This

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is how all the life we know of on Earth works,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and yet Cleveland says, we just don't know how different

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>life could be. Maybe that's the only chemistry in the

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>universe capable of producing the functions we usually attribute to life,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not she writes, quote Moreover, we can't rule

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>out the possibility that the most important characteristics of life

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>have yet to be discovered. The functions traditionally attributed to

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>life maybe little more than symptoms of more fundamental but

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as yet unknown properties. So, for example, at the time

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>she was writing this, all life on Earth built its

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>proteins out of the same twenty amino acids, which which

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these amino acids in life forms share the

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>same chirality. Chirality is something we talked about, I think

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>actually in a previous Horror Anthology episode when we were

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about to serve Man. Oh, yes, yes we did.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a really fun one about like how would

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you the dangers of constructing, say, food for an alien

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>being exactly, and and the idea that aliens would want

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat us. We might be poisonous to them if

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>their molecular biology is somewhat different than ours. But just

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as a brief refresher, chirality or the handedness of molecules,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>refers to like which way they're oriented in terms of

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like a mirror image of each other. And Earth life

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>uses left handed molecules, but it maybe could use right

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>handed molecules. A biotic processes, like processes not associated with life,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are known to create all kinds of amino acids that

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>are not found in life forms. Cleveland references more than

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred known amino acids that are created by a

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>biotic processes. So why does life as we know it

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>not employ more of these amino acids or different chirality

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of amino acids. Lab experiments show that you can build

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>proteins out of alternative amino acids and molecules with right

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>handed chirality. Likewise, with the exception of RNA viruses, all

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>life on Earth stores its genetic information in DNA, but

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's possible DNA could use different combinations of bases and

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>amino acids. So she's sort of asking the question in general,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>why all these particulars, Why why all these particularities of

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of Earth life that, as far as we can tell,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are totally contingent. And Cleveland thinks that the best explanation is, well,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this is just how it happened in the conditions of

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the young Earth when life first arose, and these contingencies

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of molecular biology have been recopied down the ages since then.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Ever since, these life forms have been reproducing quote. So

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it is unlikely that the ribosomes found in the cells

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of familiar life represent the only possibility for translating hereditary

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>information stored on nucleic acids into proteins, let alone, the

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>original mechanism utilized by the first protocells. Had circumstances on

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the early Earth been different, familiar life would also have

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>been different. But this raises a really interesting question if

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these features of molecular biology as we know it are

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really just contingencies. In other words, if it's just chemically

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>how things happen to shake out when the first life

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>forms were coming together, how do we know that other

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>life forms, other forms of molecular biology did not arise

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at different times in places on Earth in the history

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of Earth, with their own contingent chemical quirks, making them

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hard for us to recognize with tools that are honed

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in the search for familiar forms of life, I mean,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in a way, what you can discover is sort of

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>determined or bounded by what kind of tools you use

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and what you expect to be looking for. Yeah, I

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>mean it reminds me a bit of recent discussions we've

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>had about um, how you would just how you would

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>describe a sense that you have to a being that

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is lacking that sense, you know, like it's it's it's

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to to to to explain that, and like that

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>works in reverse, like looking for the thing that you

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>can't experience. Now, from here, Cleveland goes on to address

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>some objections that are usually raised to the idea that

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>there could be alternative forms of molecular biology on Earth. So,

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there is the claim that quote, any

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>variations in the earliest forms of life would have been

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>combined by lateral gene transfer into a single form of life. Right,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>so that we've talked about horizontal gene transfer on the

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>show before, and the idea is that, you know, there

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just would have been like sort of a cross fertilization

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of genes that way, and they kind of would have

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>been absorbed into the dominant biosphere. But she argues against

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this by saying, you know, we can't assume compatibility and

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for lateral gene transfer between our ancestral microbes, the

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>microbes that became us, and whatever these alternative critters are.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>There could be chemical and compatibility, there could be geographic

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>isolation and so forth. And then there is a second argument,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that well, our single celled ancestors would have

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wiped out these alternative biological organisms in the competition for resources,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and she argues against this by saying, well, rare microbes

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that we know of tend to occupy unique ecological niches,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>so they're not necessarily in deadly competition for the same resources.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>They might just kind of have different needs, have established

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>different niches, and they're just riding it out as as

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of rare, unique and isolated communities of organisms, or

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>even within communities of of conventional organisms. And then finally

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>she talks about the argument that if these things are

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>still here, we should have found evidence of them by now,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and so against the we should have found it by now,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>she argues that given the tools we possessed at the

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>time she was writing this, it was very possible to

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>miss things like, Okay, you can look at microbes under

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a microscope, but that can only take you so far,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>because convergent evolution means that a lot of different microbes

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>will kind of look superficially similar in structure, like our

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>chea kind of look like bacteria. And then we have

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>other tools like lab cultures, but lab cultures just might

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fail to grow them. Uh. And then another option we

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have for detecting microbial life that's difficult to culture is

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>known as pcr amplification. That stands for polymerase chain reaction.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's chemical process for multiplying genetic material so that can

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>be detected. And PCR amplification that relies on ribosomeal rn

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>A would not be able to detect a microbe that

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't have ribosomes or that had a different form of

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>ribosomel RNA. So basically Cleland's case here is that our

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>best tools for looking for chemical signs of life, at

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>least at the time she was writing, are kind of

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tuned to the kinds of life that we know about,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and they might completely pass over a potential shadow biosphere

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>if it existed. Now there's another possible objection, which is

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't we have observed these microbes, the shadow microbes,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>by the effect they have on their environment. Of course,

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we observe the effects of common known microbes on the

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>environment all the time. She says, quote life invariably modifies

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>its environment, extracting energy, building structures, producing waste products. So

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of the oxygen in the atmosphere is

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a product of of microscopic life, or at least was originally.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I guess it's also the product of macroscopic life.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But she says, actually, you know, this is a really

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>good way to look for these things, to look for

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the effects they have on their environments. And Cleveland argues

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible that up until now their effects have

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>always blended in with the background noise of effects produced

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>by other microbes. So it's possible we just haven't looked

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>closely enough in the right places, or we've been hindered

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 1>by the bounds of an existing paradigm of molecular biology,

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>she writes, quote. Similar cases can be found in biology,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>such as the discovery of Archaea, a new variety of

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar microbial life that revolutionized biological taxonomy. And so it's

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>background our Archaea is now considered one of the three

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>main domains or super kingdoms of life. You've got eukaryotes,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>which includes all multicellular life bacteria, and then Archaea and

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Archaia used to be thought of as just a type

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of bacteria. It's now recognized has been recognized since the

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies, I think nineteen seventy seven that archias is

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a totally different domain, a different evolutionary history. But she

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>goes on, in hindsight, it's clear there were signs that

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>some prokaryotes are fundamentally different from others, despite their remarkable

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>similarities and sell morphology. But because biologists were working under

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the prokaryot you carry a paradigm which use cellular morphology

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as the guiding principle for understanding taxonomic relations, these signs

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>went unrecognized. So we were just looking at the shapes

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of cells and thinking that would tell us everything we

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>needed to know, and it didn't. Actually, and then finally,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as she ends the article by calling out a possible

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>example of a place to look for alternative microbiology or

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>alternative molecular biology. Sorry, she singles out an example known

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>as desert varnish. And this is a thin coating of discoloration,

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>usually kind of a red or dark discoloration that you

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>see on exposed rock faces in deserts and other dry areas.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You've probably seen it before if you looked at some

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>desert rocks that had a kind of dark red or

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>black shiny surface. And I've read that since this two

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand six s a new discoveries have made desert varnish

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>appear to be very unlikely as a result of shadow

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>biological processes. But that doesn't mean the question has gone away.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the questions about a possible shadow biosphere remain.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>More recently, I was reading an article about this in

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Science by Emily Conover. This was in and Conover points

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out developments since the the original idea of a shadow

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>biosphere have have continually been introduced. They make it more

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and more interesting. For example, discoveries that make clear how

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>our traditional definitions of Earth life are just not quite

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>inclusive enough. They don't necessarily capture all the possibilities. For example,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>quote recently discovered giant amiba infecting viruses blur the line

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>between life and non life, although they rely on their

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hosts for essential biological functions, meaning you know, they're not

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>self sustaining. The bacteria sized viruses have complex genomes. So

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the question would be, then, how are scientists currently looking

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for signs of possible alternative biochemistry if there's a shadow

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>biosphere on Earth? Uh? And she quotes the planetary scientist

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Carolyn Porco of the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>who says, you know, a really good way to look

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for these things is to go back to the last

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>point that Cleveland raised in the article, look for disequilibriums

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in nature. Look for environments that are sort of out

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of balance or out of whack. Quote. Life takes in

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and uses energy, altering its environment in the process. Without life,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 1>for example, our planet would not have an oxygen rich atmosphere,

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as chemical reactions tend to deplete oxygen. She also mentions

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>some other interesting possibilities, such as the idea that this

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>one is raised by David Lynn of Emory University, who

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>draws attention to the idea of misfolded proteins representing a

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>possible type of alternative life. Says quote, they show some

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>similarities to life, namely that they can generate diversity in

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the different ways that they fold, can undergo chemical evolution

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in which those folded proteins are selected not genetically but chemically.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And this could be a kind of precursor to some

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of of chemical network that would be very different

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>than what we're familiar with. Uh And I was also

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>reading an article this is the one I mentioned earlier

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>by Samantha Rolf, which is about the hypothetical option of

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of a shadow biosphere based on silicon molecules instead of

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>carbon molecules, and silicon, of course is not nearly as

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>good at as as carbon doing the kinds of things

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>molecules need to do inside a cell. But there have

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>been experiments that created silicon bonds in bacteria that make

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it seem at least possible that some kind of silicon

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>based life form could exist. So in the end, I

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 1>want to be very clear that we don't know that

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a shadow biosphere of some kind on Earth.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>We don't have any strong evidence that there is, but

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we do know at least that if it exists, it

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>probably consists of microorganisms, if it exists at all. But

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>some some science fiction I want to see exploring that

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is like the idea of big sort of network effects

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>create it on the Earth by micro organisms within a

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>shadow microbial ecosystem, you know, if memory serves me correctly. Uh.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It's been several years since I read these, but Peter

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Watts's book Starfish involves a plot element that it that

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it entails this uh, an ancient apocalyptic microbe called Behemoth

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that gets unleashed on the Earth. It's been like hiding

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out in the bottom of the ocean. That sounds good. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's quite good. I don't know why

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read Starfish yet. Maybe they'll be next on

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my list. But you know, Peter Watts aside, what does

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what does sar Do have to say about this? You

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know Sardo unfortunately as a Charlatan. And this raises a

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>question that is true of I think many sort of

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, okay, kind of fast and loose horror

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or or or supernatural properties, which is that it often

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>appears that you are able to buy real magical artifacts

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and sears tomes on the occult within, just like crank

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>magic shops that have fake vomit in them. Why why

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is that so common? I mean, part of it's the

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hunter gatherer instinct, right, the idea that we could go

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>into a junk store and find something of value, you know,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's why I will go into a thrift store

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'll see if I can find a copy of

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Jerry McGuire and VHS like It's it seems unlikely that

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>such treasures are still available, but I'm still gonna look

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and occasionally I find one that's true magic though Sardo

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is also contributing to the pyramid in the desert. Yeah,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so better than I also think. Another big part of

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it is the kind of like small town magic shop

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and and God bless them where you can still find them. Uh,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, anytime I see one, I have to I

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have to check it out. But but shops like that too.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>We like the idea that they could have genuine occult

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>things in them because that means we have access to them.

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>That means there is a a possibly there a possible

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>connection between ourselves and the supernatural and the fantastic. I

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>guess for some reason, at a gut level, I find

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it much more plausible to find the occult tome or

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the real magical artifact in a thrift shop or something

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that I do in the in the novelty magic shop.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe that's just me. Well, you know,

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>strange sudden deaths are always happening to legitimate wizards, and

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>then who's going to sell their stuff? And where are

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they going to sell their stuff? It's gonna get pawned

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>off to the local magic shop. I guess that's it.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You you combine them the thrift shop, and that they've

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>got a second hand element, and that can then anything

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Yeah, now it's probably eBay. It's the most

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of your monkey pods are being bought on eBay these days.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you get it and you're like, all the

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fingers are still are folded on this thing. I don't

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>even get all the wishes. Here's something I want to

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>hear from listeners. What is the creepiest like most cursed

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>antique or artifact object you've ever bought her or or

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>somehow acquired. Yeah, I'd love to hear that too. All right,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're going to take a break, but

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when we come back more horror anthology. Thank alright for

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>our next uh anthology selection this year, I'd like to

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>return to the crypt Tales from the crypt Uh, The

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The the the awesome HBO series that that was was

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It was an adaptation of these older pre code horror

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>comic books and as we said before, just does it

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>generally does a great job of creating these, at times

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of trashy uh in nasty tales of often bad

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>things happening to be happening to bad people, bad people

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>getting their come uppance in some sort of grizzly twisted manner.

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>This one that you picked for for today's episode. I

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>watched last night and it has a spectacular intro full

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of puns by the crypt Keeper. Can we share some

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of these puns or do you already have them written down?

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I do not have them written down, but if you,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if you have them just floating around your head, let's

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>see what were they? So? I can't do crypt Keeper voice,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but it has something to do with getting a house,

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a little house on the scary a tomb with

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the view, what are you afraid you can't get a mortgage? Yes? So,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the the intro to the show was amazing, The crypt

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Keeper segments were amazing, and then the the episodes themselves

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are often. Um I mean it's rare that there's not

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>something notable about them, either a major star or someone

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>who would become a major star, just a great character.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Actors present, oftentimes big league directors, uh you know, slummed

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it up for Tales in the Crypt or or likely

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just had like a really good time with the series,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And um, yeah, I find myself returning to them time

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and time again. Um it's I remember watching it often

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>half scrambled on HBO when I was like a middle schooler,

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was you know, this perfect cable TV nether

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>world of titilation and gore to immerse yourself in. Uh. Um,

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's interesting that you know the back

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then that that that was the way to watch it,

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like sort of like pirated half scrambled format. Uh And nowadays,

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>as of October, it looks like the rights to the

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>series are contested or something. I don't know. I don't

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the precise legal prison that it finds

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>itself in. But you cannot stream it anywhere. Um, you

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>can't buy it digitally. Uh So as of right now,

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the only place you can watch these episodes are like

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and daily motion unless you have like pre

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>existing digital purchases, which I have on some of the

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>episodes but not all of them. Well, I think what

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you're getting at is that it actually feels appropriate with

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the low quality, because it's like watching it through like

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a scrambled cable saying yeah, yeah, it's actually better quality

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>than uh than most of the time when I was

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>watching it when I was younger. Um. But yeah, I

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 1>keep hoping that it will come back because you know,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there's still other tales to tell. And they could retell

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>others and create new ones in the same vibe. I mean,

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly people have been doing that over and over again

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>across the decades. And also John Cassiar the the voice

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the of the crypt Keeper. He is very much alive.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Not only is he alive, but he is on cameo.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I found out I was I was talking with my

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>wife about a friend of ours getting cameo videos for

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>their their spouse for their birthday, and I was like, yeah,

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cameo just doesn't really interest me unless it was the

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>crypt Keeper. Maybe if it was the crypt Keeper, I'd

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be interested. And sure enough, Uh, he's on there, seventy

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars a pop. Um. He holds the crypt Keeper like

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>mask over his face when he does he so you

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>don't get the full puppet performance, but still you get

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the voice. After you brought this to my attention, I

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was investigating and I found out you can get cameo

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>messages from Zordon from Power Rangers, but not about Sardo.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Sardo on there. Oh, I didn't look for sar Dough.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I should have. All right, we'll have to look for

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Sarto later. Um. Anyway, like I said, a lot of

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>these episodes of Tales from the Crypt are ghastly and

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>dizzily and there's a lot of blood in them. Um.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>But this one that we're going to discuss here is

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>is a bit different. Uh. This one is titled Maniac

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>at Large and it's uh, it's really a rather tasteful

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>affair as far as Tales from the Crypt goes. And

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's directed by John Frankenheimer, famous for such films as

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The Manurian Candidate. And it stars Blithe Danner, a veteran

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of stage and screen that you've probably you've almost certainly

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>seen her in something before because she's been in everything.

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It also has Salomi Jen's who I found out was

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in a movie called Terror from the year five thousand,

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>which was a i think a double feature drive in

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>double feature from the late fifties with the Brain Eaters,

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>which is one of my favorite movie posters of all time.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That is a great movie poster. Yeah, that's I've never

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>seen it, but I've seen the movie poster time and

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>time again. I think I've had it as a desktop

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>wallpaper before. Um. It has a couple of other notable

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>character actors in it. Well, one character actor in one

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of rock star celebrity Clarence Williams the Third is

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in it. He plays a security guard. He's another actor.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>You look him up. You've definitely seen something with Clarence.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Williams the Third in it, and he gets He

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>gets a fun role that it is at times kind

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of creepy. But then Adam Aunt himself shows up as

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a mega creepy library patron. Adam Aunt has strong ted

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Ramie vibes in this. Yeah so again this this episode

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is extremely solid, quite reserved for a crip episode, but

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 1>with some satisfying twists and turns. The basic plot here

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is that Danner's character, Margaret has just started a job

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at a library in the big city. She's trying to

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>navigate the environment, figure out, you know, who she can trust,

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who she doesn't, What are the clientele like, what's this

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>creepy Adam at dude all about um uh and getting

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You're just getting used to the new job, all while

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer remains at large in the city. I

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>would say this is very much part of the early

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties urban hell subgenre, which is the I don't know

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's a genre, really is just sort of a

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>set of assumptions shared by it seems like every movie

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>made in like the late eighties early nineties, which is

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just that like cities in general and New York in particular,

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>our Hell on Earth and and uh, that you just

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be in the city, and that it's

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>associated with just like littering and crime and traffic and

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and misery. But but anyway, yeah, it's very much the

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that this is the city is a bad place,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and the library is is not a great place within

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the city. But she's doing the best you can. Now,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say there's some there's some twist and turns

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that occur that turn some of these elements on their head.

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But this one's got a good twist. I think this

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is a good twist. We're not gonna ruin it. Go

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>check it out again. As of this recording, you can

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>probably just find it on YouTube, which is that you

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>should be able to watch this in a more pristine quality.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, several elements worth pulling out for

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>our discussion here. Adam Ant's character Pipkin, is obsessed with

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>serial killers, so he keeps coming up to Margaret and

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>just chat in her up about serial killer, saying just

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of creepy things, just an overload of creepy

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 1>serial killer obsession things. I just remembered something. It was

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at the back of my mind and then I pulled

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it up. There was a movie from nine that I

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>watched in a terrible VHS copy many years ago called

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>spell Caster that also has Adam Aunt in it. And

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Adam Aunt had a fairly extensive film career. In this movie,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he plays an evil wizard. Well, he's good

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in this. I have to say. His name is Dia Blow.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>All right. So you have Adam as character Pipkin, just

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>being obsessed with serial killers and being very creepy and suspect. Also,

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Margaret herself has become increasingly obsessed with the idea that

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 1>she will be the killer's next victim. Creepy things keep happening,

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>people keep bacting creepy um, and she keeps and she's

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly obsessing over the fact that she could and perhaps

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>will be next. And it's this is sort of spurred

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>on by Adam as character because he's like, who's the

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>next victim going to be? I think it'll be a

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>woman this time. Yes, yes, yeah, he said, slimy. It's wonderful.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>But then also she keeps she's bringing some of this

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>up to the head librarian Mrs Pritchard, and Miss Pritchard

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>she tries to like stamp this down a bit. She

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>just largely dismisses the serial killer as being this inflated

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>news story and a matter of mass hysteria. So I

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>thought all of this would be a perfect reason to

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>explore the question why are we so obsessed with serial

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>killers and true crime? You've you've probably noticed this already,

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but murder podcasts are big business. I feel like barely

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a week goes by without a new announcement about some

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>new ghoulish podcast either it's either at least true crime,

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if not a serial killer podcast as well, Robert, I

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>hate to break it to you, but the call is

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>coming from inside the house because so we we we

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>got quite a number of these within our own family here.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, I mean it's a big it's an

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>ever growing family, so it encompasses all sorts of types

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of podcast even sports podcasts are around. Uh. So you know,

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to be judging on that that fact,

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or just judge you about true crime enthusiasm to begin with,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because I can I can easily think of some great

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>reads I've enjoyed that are about serial killers. I've enjoyed

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>some true crime content in the past, and and heck,

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a great episode of Tales from the

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Crypt that conciderned serial killers. Um. And as far as

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just more general true crime goes, I like a lot

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of people grew up watching Unsolved mysteries and scaring you know,

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the pants off of myself, not only about ghosts and aliens,

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but also about just random acts of crime and madness.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the most powerful sounds in

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the entire world in terms of unlocking just a host

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of creepy associations in my brain is the Unsolved Mysteries

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>theme music. The moment that plays the trapdoor in my

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>brain opens and everything comes out. Now. Obviously, when we're

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about true time, there's a broad spectrum of good

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and bad uh taste within within the genre, and it

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>ranges greatly. I mean, there's the whole domain of police

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>procedural true crime, which of course entails say that the

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>work of David Simon and others. There's also the grizzlier

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that can border on just sort of creepy serial

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>killer obsession. And then there's there's the psychologically minded stuff,

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mind of a killer type approach, which

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess can be a little on the creepy side

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 1>at times, but also can just be very well put

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>together and formulated and and and in many cases based

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on actual psychology and the actual um uh you know,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>actual studies into the minds of serial killers. There's also

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>highly journalistic stuff as well as the kind of sort

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of citizen journalist and citizen investigator uh fair that has

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>also proven highly popular. But it really does seem at

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>times like our our appetite is just insatiable and uh,

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and it leads us times to wonder, like, what does

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it all means? Where does this where is this coming from?

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the the itch that it is scratching? Uh,

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and is it some sort of modern

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon or is it just an aspect of of of

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the human experience. I'm interested in what creates the difference

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>between the tolerance for uh, fictional violence versus the tolerance

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for true crime. Like just personally, I like a lot

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, violent scary fictional horror stuff, but

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have much of an appetite for true crime,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and there are people who are totally the opposite, you know,

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like a monster movie to them would seem like gross

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and overwhelming and unpleasant, but they will just devour true crime.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there's some kind of difference at play there,

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure exactly what it is. What would

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Ericson have said about it? Didn't he have an

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>insightful quote about the different types of horror I think

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you might be thinking of where he says that today's

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 1>movies prey on your inner fees and steady your outer fears.

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I wrote the line don't slip in

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 1>mud or you'll slip in blood. Tonight is the Night

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Vampire. Doesn't necessarily clarify a lot, but there

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some kind of obscure wisdom. Yeah, yeah, I agree,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it's worth keeping in mind as we move forward. And

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>even though again he's referring to just a division within

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>horror fiction as opposed to UH fiction versus reality. So

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing to get out of the way

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is that I think we can we can safely dismiss

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the idea that this is a new phenomenon because we've

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty much always had crime stories of one sort or

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the other, and our fascination with it is to a

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>large extent fueled by our fear of real crime. But

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look back to a lot of of myths, uh,

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you find something interesting. You know, these are

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>stories of people who commit crimes. Often now they're committing

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>crimes against the gods or some sort of you know,

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>celestial or infernal order in the world. Um. But then likewise,

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what are modern laws and social norms but modern gods

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of a sort? I think a lot of anthropologists of

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>religion would probably argue that what the gods were with

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind of embodiment of laws or norms. Yeah, and uh,

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen it. It argued that if you want

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>something more in line with a pure crime story, you

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>can look to the the the Arabic go one thousand

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and one Night's Tales and that tradition uh to provide

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>some great examples of of what is essentially early crime fiction, uh,

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the exploits of criminals, the come upance of criminals, etcetera.

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So on one hand, perhaps we're just exaggerating to try

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and make anything out of modern true crime interest, as

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's something new, but there is a lot of

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting insight out there into like what it means, where

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>where does this interest in crime fiction uh and and

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and and true crime come from? And one particular expert

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that I was I've heard an NPR story UH featuring

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this is from two thousand nine and they were talking

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>with clinical and corporate psychologist Michael mantell Um and UH.

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 1>They pointed out that there are several key elements involved

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in our enjoyment of true crime. First of all, there's

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the not me elephant combined with psychological voyeurism. So it's

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're not watching a crime or you know, a

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>murder or what have you that is affecting you, you're

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>watching something that affects somebody else, and we are engaging

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in a certain amount of psychological voyeurism in that case.

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, there's a catharsis in identifying with

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the victim uh. And this is UH and we have

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like rehearsed anxiety in these cases over terrible occurrences. So

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like um uh, via our our our empathy,

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we're able to simulate these horrible things without them actually

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>happening to us. Now, the other the flip side, of that,

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that you can also engage in compassion

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and empathy with the perpetrator, not necessarily to the level

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of saying like, oh, man, I wish I was I

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>wish I was like Charlie, but but more like, you know,

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>what if I was like trying? You know, I think,

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all. That's key to a lot of

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>our psychological fascination with serial murders, for instance, is that

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>we know that, Okay, this individual, their brain is not

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly like our brain, but but a lot of things

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>are the same, and therefore it's tempting to analyze that

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>those comparisons and think, what if I, you know, it

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was just a few degrees to the laft free to

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the right. Could I find myself in this kind of mindset?

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Could I find myself having committed acts like this, not

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>only as far as nature goes, but also as far

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>as nurture goes as well. You know, if my life

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>conditions had been a little different, would I be you know,

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the figure on the television right now? Would I be

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the subject of this podcast episode? Yeah? I'd say. A

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>variation on that is that people might sometimes just want

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to feel like they're getting a better idea of what

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to look out for in other people, because you know,

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a cliche at this point that somebody commits

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a horrible act, doesn't mass murderer turns out to be

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer or something, and you know, the the

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>news camera interviews their their neighbor, and it's like, oh,

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he seemed like a really nice guy. I wouldn't have

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>known it. And you know, sometimes that is the case.

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>People want to be able to think like I could

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out I could figure out who was the sick. Oh,

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I could figure out who was the bad guy. And

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a sort of feeling, at least a subconscious

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>level that by consuming a lot of true crime, you

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>could somehow you can discern a pattern, you can figure out. Okay,

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>here's how I could sniff out the Jeffrey Dahmer. Yes, yeah, absolutely,

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>And I want to come back to to some of

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute. But but it's also worth keeping

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in mind all of this in considering the essential Essentially,

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>there are two types of crime stories, right, there's the

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 1>case closed crime story, uh, and then there's also, uh,

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the the open case. So on one hand, we love

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>a good uh, you know, structurally complete tale. We love

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a story in which the bad guy is apprehended, the

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>right bad guy is apprehended, and in the case is closed.

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And you see a lot of that in um in

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 1>true crime, you know, people, especially if it's you know,

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>very oh, you know, a lot of the police procedural stuff,

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, is about that, like how do they catch

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the batties? What can I remember the series the New Detectives.

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>What kind of really cool technology are they using to

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>catch the batties? But on the other hand, the open cases,

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the unsolved mysteries, like that sitantalizing as well, because, uh,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, on some level, even if it's it's just

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a slim chance, you could you could watch that and

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think I might be the next victim, or I might

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>be the one to solve this, you know, I could,

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I could be the one. I could notice this thing,

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I could learn, I know what to look for, and

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if this fellow comes limping up to me with a

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>fake cast, I can call him on it and I'll

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be the hero. I think that's right. But actually another

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>thing just occurred to me. And this is based on

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your earlier point about psychological voyeurism, which is the idea

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of in a way, watching like a serial killer story

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>where they ultimately get caught is kind of like just

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>another form of the watching somebody fail spectacularly thing where

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>you like to see somebody who you know, who's in

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.959
<v Speaker 1>control of things like lose control and and spiral out

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and all that. Uh, the just a morbid version of

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it might be Okay, here's the serial killer. They've got

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a system, they've got a method for not getting caught,

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but then they get sloppy and it all spirals out

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of control and they fail and they go to jail. Yeah,

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of I would say. The lesson is

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of committing crime is hard, and it's it can

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be a weird positive experience too to encounter that, because

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it can make you feel comfortable and the fact that like, oh, well,

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you commit a crime, you're probably gonna

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get caught. It can give you, at times even an

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>inflated sense of of of the competency of of police investigations. UM.

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, it can be kind of like, uh, like, who,

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm not going to commit crime because it

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>looks really hard. You know, if it were easy, I

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>guess I'd give it a shot. But I'd probably get caught,

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so I better not. I wasn't gonna do it anyway,

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>but now I know that I'm definitely not going to

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do it. Actually, now that I think about it, this

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>might be even more the case in I don't know

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 1>less grizzly true crime, not just in serial killers, but

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>really in stuff where like there's a con artist or

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 1>somebody executing massive financial crime or something like that, where

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>there's an element of the hot mess allure that you

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it's really exciting to to see somebody

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on social media who's just like a hot mess and

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they're flaming out and really making things bad for themselves.

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a there's a strong element of that

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these things, like you're reading about

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Bernie made Off or something. Yeah, and and again it's

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>also yeah, it's it's about bad people getting their come uppings. Right, Alright,

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>time for a quick break. We'll be right back with

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 1>more than and we're back now. One thing that when

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and Mentel was asked in this NPR piece about about

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about different gender demographics in the consumption of true crime now,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Mantell said that that he didn't see any kind of

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, notable demographic differences. Uh, and he he suspected

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that there was still likely there's still likely differences in

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of crime stories that interested different demographics. However,

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think most of me listening out there, you've probably

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:28.879
<v Speaker 1>heard quite the opposite. And I know that I've heard

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this multiple times in meetings about podcast listener demographics, that

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the true crime audience use female. And I have to

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I don't think I was really aware of

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this until it started coming up in podcast meetings. I just,

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe I can look back and find some

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh, some memories and be like, oh, well,

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that kind of lines up with this alleged statistic, But

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I had really thought about it before then.

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's any evidence to that gender

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>divide or not. I assume you'll tell me in a minute.

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But but one thing I would suspect is, even if

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>there is, it probably depends on what you define as crime.

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, um, And I'm not sure there is a

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>true definitive answer on that. Like I said, the podcast

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>number of crunchers seemed pretty sure about it. They're certainly

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to, you know, to invest money behind the idea.

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But one paper I did look at was one title

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.240
<v Speaker 1>captured by true crime. Why Are Women Drawn to Tales

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of Rape, Murder and Serial Killers? By Amanda M. Vickery

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and are Chris Freeley, published in two thousand ten by

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Social Psychological and Personality Science. So exploring this reported demographic

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:38.319
<v Speaker 1>divide here, the authors looked at Amazon book reviews and

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>found that men seemed more likely to review war books

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and women were more likely to review crime books. Uh,

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they had research subjects than read crime fiction synopsises and

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>report and they found that women were more drawn to

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the psychological content of true crime, and they were more

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:59.720
<v Speaker 1>likely to read true crime books if the victim was female. Okay,

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not a perfect measure of actual reading habits

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 1>in the wild, but that is. But it's at least

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting datum to begin with, right, Yeah, if you're

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna start somewhere. Again, it's not the most robust um study.

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't thin they're putting it up is that, but

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a good place to start. So um Vicari's take is,

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:23.399
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is that it all comes down to survival, kind

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of touching on what we were discussing earlier. True crime

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>tends to revolve in some way around the challenges of

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>surviving a crime. It's either just an obvious survival story,

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or it's a tale from which one might draw survival ideas.

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>What did the doomed character do that that doomed them?

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, what can I do differently to avoid said doom?

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And so even on a subconscious level, it's about learning

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>how to avoid and survive crimes. And this makes sense

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to us, the author's point out, because women tend to

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>fear crime more than men, and our statistically more likely

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the victim of crime. According to the U

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>s Department of Justice, in two thousand eight, females aged

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:07.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve or older were five times more likely than males

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>aged twelve or older to be victims of intimate partner violence.

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>And additionally, in two thousand seven, intimate partners committed fourteen

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of all homicides in the US. And those are

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:22.439
<v Speaker 1>some pretty sobering statistics. By the way, October is also

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>National Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the US. Just a reminder,

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Domestic Violence Hotline is one eight hundred seven

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>nine nine Safe or one eight hundred seven nine nine

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>seven to three three. But let's get back to this

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:40.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of of survival. Um. Uh. So as engaging with

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 1>these crime stories is kind of like a rehearsal for survival,

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>learning experience for the survival of crime. Uh, it seems

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>implied that the reverse would be the same for these uh,

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the these male readers who are then reading all of

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this war that it's also about survival, uh, you know,

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>processing the riddle of survival in the brain. And I

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>feel that makes sense Without getting into the the idea

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the gender divide, I know that that I've personally

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 1>dealt with the stresses of twenty by in part thinking

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot about say, war games, clone wars, the galactic

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>civil war, the wars of ants, that sort of thing.

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And and but then likewise, I can think back to

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>times in my life where I found similar solace in

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>crime fiction, where um, you know, I distinctly remember a

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 1>time where there's a fair amount of stress in my

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>life and I was watching some um these were these

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>were fictional accounts, but they're basically like slasher films, And

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I remember even thinking at the time, like this is

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a weird way to feel chilled out by watching a

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:40.240
<v Speaker 1>film about a slasher, Like this should be this should

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on some level be making me more anxious or making

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 1>me feel you know, you know, more nervous, but it's not.

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 1>It's somehow making me feel better. Yeah. My hunch is

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that there are two different ways that can work. One

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is that if it's an effective slasher movie, then there

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>is actually sort of an endorphin you know, emotional catharsis

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:00.120
<v Speaker 1>thing of like being afraid but then not actually being

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and a threat. You know, once the once the fear passes,

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you kind of get an endorphin release and you're like,

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>oh okay, and that can be kind of calming. Um.

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 1>It can give you a sense of control to have

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the ironic distance and like watch something that is actually

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:18.359
<v Speaker 1>scary but then know that it's not real. And then

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other end, if you're watching like a bad

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>slasher movie, I think there's a different there's a similar

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and simultaneously different thing at work, which is there's still

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the ironic difference, but the ironic difference element is played

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 1>up to the point where like watching something that is

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be scary but is in fact funny is

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>very reassuring. You know, it makes you feel like there's

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not that much to worry about well, just thinking

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of bad slasher films, Like how many of us have

0:56:43.600 --> 0:56:47.880
<v Speaker 1>watched the slasher films and really harped on on the

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea of what to do when you get this

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the killer down right, Like, obviously the thing to do

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:55.439
<v Speaker 1>within the context of the films is if you knock

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the killer out, you slowly approach them and take their

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>mask off. You don't a grab their weapon and stab

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>them a million times in the torso to make sure

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they're debt um. But we love so at times even

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 1>just yelling at the screen because they are doing the

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong thing. You are not practicing good survival. But I

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at the same time and contemplating survival, and to some

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>degree I feel like you feel like you're learning about survival. Yeah,

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a good point. A lot of slasher movies,

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think could could be effective and could be enjoyable

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to people because there are at least implied rules, like

0:57:29.680 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a system of rules that you can

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>suss out, and the fact that they're not announced explicitly

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it seem a little bit more interesting and fun

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that you have figured them out. You kind of know

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of the you know, the mistakes the

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>characters are going to make ahead of time, and you

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>can think that, uh, you know, uh, Dewey here is

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>very stupid for having done that. I would have not

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 1>done that. I know better by the way of that

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>vicary and freely paper. Uh. They also point out that

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>neither female nor may all subjects in their study were

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 1>drawn to stories with explicitly emotional or sexual content, but

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it was the psychological content that interested female test subjects.

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I guess I suppose the idea there is

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's coming down to um uh again survival, but but

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on a psychological level, like how do you tell which

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>character is the creepy killer? Kind of coming back to

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>our tales from the crypt episode, like is it is

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it adam Ant? Is it his character? He's sure is

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>acting creepy? Uh? Am I able to psychologically analyze him

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way where I can guess that he's the killer?

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Or is it Clance Williams the third or is it

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Salome Gen's. Yeah, I mean it's it's one of those

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes where all possibilities are on the table. Now A

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of a couple other just short references to to

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>uh some write ups that I found insightful and all

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, As Sarah Watts points out in her Forbes

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the aforementioned study, all of this lines up

0:58:55.600 --> 0:59:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with psycholopsychologist Dr John Mayer's view that perfectly purposely exposing

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>oneself to violence in these um uh these forms can

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 1>serve as an inoculation against fear. But we also have

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to consider individual differences in all of this. So some

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of us are drawn uh into into say true crime

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>or horror movies because of thrill seeking personalities, but it

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>could be more about interest in the taboo or an

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>interest in dark subject matter. Uh So it's it's ultimately

0:59:26.560 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to create like a one size fits all

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 1>rule for why people like true crime or horror, whatever

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the particular piece of media. Maybe you know it's funny.

0:59:37.240 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I still haven't even in this discussion

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>figured out the answer to that question. I was asking

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about true crime versus fictional horror, like both both deal

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>with violence and fear and threats, but people have extremely

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>different reactions to them. I noticed that usually, like horror

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>movies are fun they make me feel good, and true

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>crime just kind of usually makes me feel bad. But

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there are people for whom it's entirely the reverse, and

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not sure why. Yeah, um, And and then

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Sometimes it's about how it's presented, right,

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I instantly think to how both the Texas Chainsaw

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>massacre and Fargo both have the introductions at the beginning

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to try and cast them as legitimate occurrences. You know,

1:00:20.440 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this really happened, even though both are pure fiction. Um uh.

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But but yet I guess a lot of it comes

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>down to the fact that I often find that the

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>true crime, like that's definitely true and not you know,

1:00:35.160 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fictionalized to a large degree, has a tendency to feel yeah,

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just more just feel sadder, feel like more of a

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>tragedy as opposed to a you know, violent romp. But

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>one area where we see, um this this is interesting

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and talking about where the fiction meets the reality. UM.

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I was reading from a book titled Blood Obsession, Vampire,

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Serial Murder, and the Popular Imagination by Yourgo Walch, a

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Sistant Professor of Modern Languages and director of the Language

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Resource Center and at Ohio University and Athens UM. In

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this book, one of the many points that they're making

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they draw this connection between serial murderers, uh,

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the modern sense, and the vampire myths of

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>old uh, seeing the modern serial murder as the vampire

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>myth uh in real life. So you could you could

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>argue that the modern serial murder um either in their

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>their stark reality or they're sort of presumed reality. You know,

1:01:32.600 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>they're slightly fictionalized. Uh, you know, the view of their

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>being one around every corner, that we're still dealing with

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a solitary humanoid hunter of other human beings that we

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>can obsess over, and the vampire is kind of the

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the purely supernatural reflection of that same idea. And I

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think part of this comes back to what you said

1:01:50.800 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier about rules. We like that there are rules, and

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in both vampire fiction and it's certainly serial killer fiction,

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and to a certain extent, true crime is often about

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the rules that they will by by. Anyway, I think

1:02:03.840 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the distinction is not not only you know, fascinating,

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but also it's worth keeping in mind, especially during Halloween.

1:02:09.640 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can't you can't really go all in on

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Halloween and vampires and all and say that you don't

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>get true crime fascination, because I think ultimately there's a

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of crossover between the two. Uh, it's just yeah. Ultimately,

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:23.439
<v Speaker 1>do you want your you know, the bad guy turning

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>into a bat or do you want the bad guy,

1:02:26.040 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, limping around with a fake cast or what

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have you? Do you want to set to Swan Lake

1:02:30.120 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or do you want to set to the Unsolved Mysteries theme?

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I I would take Swan Lake Uh anytime. Yeah, I'm

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. That that Unsolved Mystery theme song kind

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of stirs, uh, just an innate feeling of fear in me,

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>much like the Tales from the dark Side theme song.

1:02:47.360 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But the man that Unsolved Mystery song, it's that, it's

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that one like expansive bending note, you know, the Brady

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>before the before the beat kicks in. It's so powerful.

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And then here comes Robert Stack walking out of the

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>missed the light behind him. Ghosts Do they exist? Or

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is this another hoax? Let's watch a recreation starring Matthew McConaughey.

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Unsolved Mysteries gets a lot funnier after you've

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>recently rewatched Bavis and butt Head do America. Because Robert

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Staff agent on that. Yes, yes, that was that was good.

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember that now, all right, well, we're gonna go

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead and close it up for now, but I think

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we're coming back for a third episode this year. What

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it will be volume six seven six, I think so

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe volume six six six be on the lookout. Basically,

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the situation is going to be, uh, we will We're

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be recording episodes during the week of Halloween for

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the week after Halloween, and we don't really want to

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>record non Halloween episodes during the week of Halloween, so

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a little extra Halloween this year. Um,

1:03:56.920 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully you're okay with that, But then then we'll

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>move on to some other topics if we feel like it. Yes,

1:04:06.440 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, if you want to check out other episodes

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow your Mind, you know where to

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>find us, and that's everywhere anywhere you get a podcast,

1:04:12.720 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you can find us. And if they let you leave

1:04:16.600 --> 1:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>feedback and stars and so forth, if they let you subscribe,

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we ask that that you do that because that that

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>helps the show out. We're told. Likewise, if you want

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to find us really quickly, you can go to stuff

1:04:27.680 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. That will shoot you

1:04:29.200 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>over to the I heart listing for this show, and hey,

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a little store um listing there. You can click

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on that that I'll take us to the t public

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>store for our show. You can get something with our

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>logo on it, and get a face mask with our

1:04:40.560 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>logo on it, or various monster shirts that we've put

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>out over the years. Huge thanks as always to our

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like

1:04:49.440 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact.

1:04:56.560 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts, my heart Radio. This is the I heart

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to your

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.