WEBVTT - Elon Musk Bingo on Tesla’s Earnings Call

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, Elon Musk gives now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled by one man, starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate super genius, I mean legitimate.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>He says.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 3>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 3>be different. He'll vote Republican.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on him.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Anything he does is fascinating the people. Welcome to Elon, Inc.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Where we discuss Elon Musk's vast corporate empire, his latest

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 2>gambits and antics, and how to make sense of it all.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Webber, sitting in for David Papa Duplas for

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the first time on Eloni. We're gonna get you ready

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>for Tesla's earnings called this Wednesday, and we have a

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>little surprise to take the fun factor to ludicrous mode.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>To help us prep the popcorn will convene Dana Hole,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 2>who's covered more Tesla earnings call than any other reporter

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I know. Hi, Dana, Good morning. Sarah Fryar, who leads

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the Big Tech team here at Bloomberg News. Hello, and

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Max Chafkin, Senior reporter at Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Hey, but first,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>some recent topics we've discussed on elon ink have been

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>back in the news. A big one anti Semitism. Both

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>X and Musk have been accused of amplifying hate speech

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>on the platform. On Monday, Musk got a private tour

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Aschwitz concentration camp in southern Poland. Later he

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>participated in a discussion hosted by Ben Shapiro, a controversial

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>media pundit. Let's listen, why as.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Many Jewish friends as non Jewish friends. I'm like Jewish

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 4>by association, I'm aspirationally.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Jewish, Sarah, what do you make of this visit to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Aschwitz and sort of this Musk non apology apology.

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 4>It's extremely crn to go to a concentration camp to

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>try to launder your image and say that you are

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>aspirationally Jewish, basically like this happened to your people by association.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I can't believe it happened.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Just welcome to the tribe, brother, Thank you. As a

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Jewish American, I'm just so happy to have encountered another

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Jewish American. Elon Musk I also agree, why is doing

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this cringe? So our editor Naomi joke yesterday that you know, normally,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if you commit an anti Semitic faux pa, you have

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Holocaust Museum in Washington, d C.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>If you commit a world historical anti Semitic foe pa,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if you allow hundreds or maybe even thousands of crazy

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic accounts, if you buy into crazy conspiracy theories,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if you, as the world's richest man, promote all this nonsense,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>then you have to actually go to Ashwitz. And so yeah,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's like attempting to make things right, I guess,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but of course doesn't seem to be really addressing any

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the normal stuff, and is claiming Jewish identity in

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>an extremely depressing and cringe worthy way.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion, just struck me as like a very

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>political It's like all optics. It's like there's Elon Musk

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>looking somber with let us note his three year old

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>toddler on his shoulders.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>And an Auschwitz survivor standing next to him too, and an.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Oshwitz survivor standing next to him, and then like the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>images that were released, it very much struck me. It

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 3>looked like a political campaign.

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Stop.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, Musk is not running for any kind of office,

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>but it had all of the stage craft of a

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>political moment during the week when Tesla's reporting earnings and

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>so for him to sort of take the time to

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>fly to Poland and fly back. Why now it's all

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>because of X and advertising, right, Sarah, I mean, this

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 3>is still sort of an effort to lure the advertisers back.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>It's wild because this is the only thing that Elon

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Musk and Linda Yakarino are talking about. Linda's the CEO

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 4>when they speak publicly like they're just doubling down on

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 4>the how could you think we were ever anti semitic? Meanwhile,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 4>if you look at what Elon Musk is tweeting, there's

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 4>there it runs the gamut. There's there's all sorts of

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 4>anti immigrant sentiments, all sorts of of you know, other

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 4>race t stuff, and he's promoting a lot of these

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>accounts that are the worst of the worst. It is

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 4>not just anti semitism. It is a wholesale embrace of

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 4>people who were banned before were considered dangerous to have

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 4>on the platform in the name of his his free

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 4>speech initiative and So.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The funniest thing about this about this event was that

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and the European Jewish Association which hosted it,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>started with this kind of thought experiment like what if

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we had X during the late Weimar period in Germany,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe we would never have had the Holocaust? And Elon

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk claimed essentially that, yes, if we'd only had Twitter,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the late thirties, early nineteen forties,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a Holocaust never would have happened, which, like I guess,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, pay sign up for groc guys.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Elsewhere in current events, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis dropped

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the Republican presidential race ahead of the New

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Hampshire primary. One of our mini Elon in pilots was

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 2>all about DeSantis announcing his campaign on X with Elon,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 2>which was glitchy, shall we say, I.

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Think we've got.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 2>Just a massive number of people online, so it's serve

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>as as training somewhat so very glitchy, Sarah Fryar Howell history,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>remember that Musk DeSantis embrace just a you know.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 4>A bad bet, right, but you know, it wasn't the

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>only candidate that he has aligned himself with. He also

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>did one of those for RFK Junior, the known anti

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>vax conspiracy theorist. He's also been in spaces with the

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 4>vik Ramaswami. This is is all kind of wishful thinking

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 4>on his part, because he would really like it if

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>he didn't have to cozy up to either Trump or Biden.

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>But sounds like that's what he's going to have to do.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 4>And he's already We've already discussed on this podcast that

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>he has said he will not vote Biden. And so

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 4>we do see a lot more Trump aligned rhetoric these

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 4>days on X, including voting conspiracy theories.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Max if Runda Santis is out of the race. Who

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>is Elon's horse? Now?

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've we're already seeing I looked at Elon's

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>X page earlier today, and you know, he's he's tweeting

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about twenty twenty election stuff. We've talked about this on

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast before. He's been stopped to steal curious, you know,

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for some time, and he is, you know, reiterating those concerns,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of rebroadcasting or or promoting what essentially amount to

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like willful misreadings by Donald Trump and Donald Trump type

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>supporters of the twenty Tony voting results, among many other things.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is essentially, you know, moving towards Trump.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>As Sarah said, I mean, I think I think we're

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>already seeing it. I'm guessing we'll see it more like Frankly,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 1>like many billionaires who affiliate with the right right, where

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like there were other candidates that they might have preferred.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We have a new Hampshire primary today. It doesn't look

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>great for NICKI Haley, and I think we're gonna see

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this same evolution playing out among other people, not just Elon.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Musk, Max any Musk Trump predictions. Obviously, Trump was a

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>prolific tweeter before Musk purchased the platform. Trump obviously has

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 2>not been active on X but there's sets up this

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>dynamic where you've got Musk and Trump.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps another first of all, to me, Musk supporting Trump

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is like a four on conclusion. Basically, I think it's

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. I think you could argue it is,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it has already happened. The real question to me is

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like what happens. You know after twenty twenty, there were

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all of these right leaning social networks that launched, you know,

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>one of which was truth Social, Donald Trump's company, and

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>then another one of them is X essentially, and it

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>does seem like X has a chance of like claiming

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that market. You do sort of wonder, you know, this

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a deep cut. I mean, you really

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be the interested in sort of right wing

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>media and media landscape to care like what happens to

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>truth Social, parlor Getter, what's the right wing dating site

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of the right stuff?

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Like, they're all these sort of.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Media business media adjacent businesses that seem like their reason

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for being doesn't quite doesn't exist as much now that

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>now that Elon Musk has so firmly turned X to

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that market.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>So in that sense, you know, it's like all gravy

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 2>for Elon.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the consolidation of the Republican Party

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>probably allows, you know, X honestly to consolidate this sort

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of ecosystem.

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 4>But let's be clear, Trump does not need X the

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 4>way he needed Twitter in twenty twenty or twenty sixteen.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 4>It is a completely different platform now and Trump has

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 4>managed to build up his own network that he has

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 4>control over of email addresses, of phone numbers, of people

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>who will hand him those five dollars donations when he

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 4>sends a scary thought. I think that that's really how

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 4>we are seeing political fundraising evolve, and the idea that

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 4>a politician needs to use X in order to rally

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 4>their base may still be in Musk's mind, which is

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>why he rewarded the candidates that we're leaning into it.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 4>But as we've seen, that hasn't been successful for them.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think that what Trump is seeing with a

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 4>platform is the same thing we're all seeing. It is

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 4>not as effective anymore for driving results with an audience.

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 4>The followers that it shows you you have are not

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 4>all visiting the platform anymore. So I think in that sense,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe Musk needs Trump more than Trump needs Musk at

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 4>this point.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I one hundred percent agree with that, And I do

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's some question about whether Trump ever needed Twitter,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like I think there was a there has been a

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>tendency to kind of like overstate the impact of social media,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times media kind of chases like

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever people are into rather than like setting the agenda.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>But with Trump, it definitely is kind of has reached

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a different dynamic where he's basically been absent from this

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>platform for a very long time, and it hasn't seemed

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a huge difference.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>One more fallout of DeSantis exiting the race, there was

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a potential Few of the Week max from Elon Musk

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>trolling economist Paul Krugman, who's a commist at the New

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>York Times. What happened?

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I'm a little as an Elon feud connoisseur,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I am sad to report that Paul Krugman, the Nobel

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Prize winning economists Princeton University, New York Times columnist, well

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>known progressive liberal commentator, did not take the bait.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of a fake.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Krugman trolled DeSantis, essentially saying like, let's not forget how

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong Rondistances was on covid, pointing to long standing criticisms

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>among the left that Dessant has kind of ignored you know,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>basic CDC guidelines and so on, and Elon must responded like,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you are a disgrace to the economics profession, which Krugman

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sadly did not take the bait. And I'm mostly sad

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because it was sort of amusing to think of Elon

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>as a connoisseur of like academic economics, Like he's like, oh, man,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're just like disgracing canes or like like

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon has no idea who like it does not follow

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the deep nuances of economics, like he follows the Wait.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 3>He's starting university and he has an economics degree from

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>or business degree from Wharton. Come on, he has like

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>some grounding in business as a point, But.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean he's like some kind of connoisseur of

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>who you know, like academic economic academia. Yeah, he doesn't

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>know what whether Krugman's or disgraced anything. He's just responded

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to the vibes.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not a few if it's not what's below a feud?

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>Is it like a schoolyard scrap. It's like a it's like.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>A we have I think it's a big nothing burger.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's like.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>On the hurricue, you have the one to five on

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane scale, but below that it's like a tropical storm.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>This is like a tropical depression. Maybe I guess as

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>far as fews go.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe watch yeah Witchery mix And now for our main

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>event earnings. Okay. Publicly traded companies like Tesla get to

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>do these quarterly meetings where they reveal how much money

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 2>they made or lost. It's to face the music moment

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 2>that gives investors, analysts, and journalists a better look at

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in a given companies business. Dana, you are

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the Tesla pro here. How many earnings have you done?

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And can you give us a short history of Tesla's

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>earnings calls?

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So I've covered Tesla since two thousand and nine. They

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>went public in June of twenty ten, and I don't

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 3>think I've ever missed an earnings call. So that's what

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 3>ten years, four times year, I don't know, I've done

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 3>like over forty maybe fifty that rest in my life.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>And they're pretty wild because if you so, like, most

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 3>corporate earnings calls are pretty boring, frankly, like the CEO

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 3>reads scripted remarks, the CFO reads scripted remarks that basically

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 3>repeat what they've just put out in the shareholder letter,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and then they take questions from analysts that are like,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 3>congratulations on a good quarter, Bob, like can you give

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>us some color about the YadA YadA? And it's just like,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>very frankly, it's very boring. Like test Le earnings calls

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>are not like that at all, like Elon is not scripted.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>He gets really pissed off at the analysts. He gets

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>bored and like a big question like when this call

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 3>starts is like ooh, what kind of mood is dear

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 3>leader in? And we've had some really wild earnings calls

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>over the years. I mean, at one point in twenty

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 3>eighteen he called Tony Secanagi, who's like a great analyst

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>at Bernstein, like you know that his question he like

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't answer his question. He was like this is boring

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and boneheaded. At one point he went to YouTube and

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>took spent twenty five minutes talking to like a millennial

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>who has like a YouTube channel, and they're just really

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>they're very interesting calls, and so much of like how

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Stock reacts is to what does Elon say? And then

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 3>like what's the actual news from the call? Because it's

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 3>all about like what does he say about, you know,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>things going forward? And the January call is always really

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 3>important because it kind of sets out the expectations for

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>the year. So tomorrow the question is like are we

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 3>going to get embulent, expansive, like wonderful Elon or is

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>he going to be like morose Elon talking about how

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 3>they're digging their own grave, Like that's the big question

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>on everybody's mind.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Elon is such a fixture here, right, Like how many

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 2>of these has he missed in your time covering the company?

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 3>He's only missed one. He made this big show a

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>couple of years ago about how he's like not going

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to be in the earnings calls unless he has big

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>news to announce. And then there was one call that

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>he missed that the CFO led that was great, and

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>then Elon was back and he just can't stay out

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>of the limelight, like he's got to be the main character. Like,

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>so he's only he's been on every single call.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So because this is a January call, this one

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>is more year ahead leaning than a typical one, which

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>would typically look back at the previous quarter. Is that right? Yeah?

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, especially because Tesla has not given guidance for twenty

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. They have not said publicly how many vehicles

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>they expect to deliver in twenty twenty four. We know

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>that they delivered roughly one point eight million cars in

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three through so like what is the forecast?

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Like we're seeing kind of slowing growth in the EV sector.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Like evs are still growing as part of the overall

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>auto market, but it's not this like blockbuster fifty percent

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>year of year growth. So that's a big question for investors.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Are they going to say that they're going to deliver

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>two million or two point five? Like what is the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>growth trajectory? And then how much does Musk talk about

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 3>all the other aspects of the business. Is he going

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 3>to be like, we're an AI company, or is he

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about energy or insurance or you know,

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the optimist robot. I mean, there's all these different sort

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of aspects of the business that people are curious about.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>And and what do everybody who's watching the company, what

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 2>do we think about what the twenty twenty four numbers

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>could look like, especially after all the price cuts of

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>last year but also possibly this slowing demand.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Well did they tend to over promise? You know, because

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I know like a lot of companies have the opposite strategy,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 4>where they underpromise and then they try to beat that.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 4>But historically Tesla has said more good things are going

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 4>to happen than actually end up happening. So what do

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 4>we think?

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of weird they'll give like a range where

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 3>a Musk will be like, well, like there could be

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>a force measure and things that I can't control, like

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>earthquakes and pandemics and tsunamis, and like, I don't really

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>know how things are going to go. But he actually

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>tends to blame the macroeconomic environment quite a bit, like

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, on previous startings calls, he's he's really bashed

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>to FED and high interest rates and been like, look,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>you could sell more cars if interest rates were lower.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>The fact that interest rates are high is making the

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>cars too expensive for people, which is why they made

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 3>this big gambit to chase volume over profit margins. And

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 3>they could do that again. He could say we're going

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to continue to dominate and we're going to cut prices,

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 3>and I mean that would be one strategy. It's just

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 3>that then the margins are much smaller. But you know,

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Tesla has room to play with their margins, and we

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>could see that again in twenty twenty four.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It also seems like there's like a real guidance and

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>then an Elon Musk guidance. Elon will throw in hey,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like anything's possible, like full self drive. There's this whole

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>other category of stuff that doesn't relate to like number

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of units sold or like margins where the guidance is

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>whacked out, and kind of everyone agreed. Everyone understands that

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is like, these are not real timelines. These are

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk timelines. You know. I was reading an analyst

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>note that Dana sent me just before we went on,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're talking about the question of robotaxis as anywhere

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>from three years to a decade out like that. That's

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the timeline that this analyst was suggest which is like

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge range, and it reflects the fact that Elon

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Musk has essentially said robotaxis are just around the corner

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>basically every year for almost a decade. So it's like

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.959
<v Speaker 1>very confusing and analysts have just learned to, I think,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of ignore slash discount some of those wilder promises.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>And now for the really fun part. The brains behind

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Elon Inc. Have created a special bingo card which you

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>can download at Bloomberg dot com, slash Elon Inc. Or

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>on the Mini BusinessWeek social media accounts. Max, what is

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>earnings bingo and how do I play along? Okay, so

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>earnings bingo is this is a thing that exists.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>We did not invent this you know, all credit to

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Elon stands out there on Twitter as well as

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the Elon critics, the tesla Q army. Basically anyone who

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>has an opinion about this guy has been making these

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>bingo cards for years.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 2>And the idea is you.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Have a card the one that we have, which you

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can go to Bloomberg dot com slash Elon Inc. And

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>download and it's twenty four squares. It's plus I love it,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>plus the free space. I'll just tell you, so, some

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of these are are ones that I think are definitely

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen like these are. This is like easy money

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these. So so for instance, through the Okay,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so we've got B I n G G four that's

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>cyber truck.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>That's come on. That's a gimme. That's practically a free space.

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Now B one is definitely less likely, I would say,

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and that one's audibly puffs joint. So, as I understand it,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like my job at Bloomberg now, at least part of

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>my job anyway, is I'm gonna be listening to that

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast as the you know, person who has to listen

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for the audible joint puffing. By the way, sorry, B

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>two because It's not enough to just puff a joint.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It has to be it has to be audible.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Dan, do you have a favorite on here that you're

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna hopefully get to scratch out.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes. I think what's really interesting is, you know, Elon

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>just has this very peculiar way of speaking that all

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of his fans then adopt. And I am a big fan.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I forget what the square is, but reasonably optimistic, because

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, Elon will say I'm reasonably optimistic that we'll

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 3>have full self driving at the end of the year,

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 3>or I'm reasonably optimistic that we will, you know, sell

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand cyber trucks in twenty twenty four. And so

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the Bingo card is really about Musk and his language

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>and his very unique use of language and how he

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>invents all these words that then enter the lexicon, like

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 3>gigafactory is not a real word, but Elon started calling

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>his battery plant a gigafactory, and now every automaker in

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>every battery company on the planet talks about how they

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>have a gigafactory. Similarly, megapack like what the hell is

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a mega pack? It's Tesla's name for their like utility

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 3>scale battery products. So I mean, I would love to

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 3>get a like linguist on the phone someday to talk

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to us all about this. But his use of language

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is very unique and it is adopted by his life

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 3>regions of fans. And the other thing about the earnings

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 3>calls is that like tens of thousands of people listen

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to them, like employees listen to them, fans listen to them,

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of people dial in and listen. And

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>it's not just like Wall Street analysts. It's like hundreds

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>of thousands of people.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>We talk a lot about on this podcast about like

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>how to think about Elon, and I think on the

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>last episode Davey Alba compared him to Donald Trump right

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as as sort of a political influencer and so on.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>But I was thinking, like with the looking at this

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>BNGO card and thinking about the way, as Dana says,

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that Elon sort of remixes himself, like he has these

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>tropes that he repeats and reuses, And you know, I

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>think the sort of great oral poets, right, like the

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>way that I think linguists believe that oral poetry Homer

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and so on was consumed was you'd have these like

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>little like couplets or little bits of language that would

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>then be arranged in order. And it's almost like that

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>with Elon, where he's got these like catchphrases that just

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>get tossed in and it becomes like a part of

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the fandom. As Dana said, it's something that the that

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>his fans repeat and also that they look for, right

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's it is like the experience of like one

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of these Elon Musk Earnings calls. It's like not all

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that different from the Taylor Swift concert right where you

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>see the snake and you're like, oh, the snake, Like

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>here it is, except here, it's like it's like optimists

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>or dojo or the phrase, you know, digging our own

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>grave or whatever. My other favorite square here is not

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>many people understand this, which is just like a thing

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that he says all the time and just really speaks

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to like this sense of inn Elon fandom, of that

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you're given access to this truth or really it's like

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a set of truths that are not well understood, and

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>if you understand them, you are going to have You're

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get rich, you're gonna you're gonna be a part

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's not only gonna be a source of

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>cultural meaning, but it's gonna be a source of wealth.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, I was just gonna say, like, I love O

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 4>three refers to Earth as a market because that is

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>just so how he talks about everything, like are you

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 4>with humanity or against it? We're fighting for our consciousness,

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 4>We're fighting for the future of Earth, and referring to

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Earth as a market implies that there will be future

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 4>planetary markets, which is of course his worldview.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 3>And because he uses these tropes so often, part of

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 3>the challenge of listening to a Tesla earnings call as

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 3>a journalist or an analyst is that you almost get

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>like a focus hangover, because you have to listen very

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 3>carefully for any change in nuance because that's what the

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 3>news is like. Is he slightly altering these tropes in

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a way that's either positive or negative for the future

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of the company, And is he backing away from you know,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 3>dojo or is he talking down cyber truck. I mean,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>on the last call he very famously said that with

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the cyber truck we dug our own grave. And it

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 3>was like, ooh, like what is that about, man? So

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you have to listen very very carefully for any kind

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 3>of change in nuance or tone.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 4>We dug our own grave.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Every big things are gray better than themselves, and.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of it's just really wild and usually but

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm on the calls, I'm like blowug and I'm listening

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and I've got my Bingo card. But I'm also like texting,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 3>like employees and analysts and like fans, and everyone's like,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, did you catch when he said this? Did

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 3>you catch when he said that? And you if you've

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 3>never listened to an earnings call, we really encourage you

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 3>to join along.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And play and go to Bloomberg dot com slash elon

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and to download our first Bengo card. I think we'll

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>do this again, will we? Okay, well we.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Have to the great thing about the Bingo card is

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that everybody wins. We only made one card, so for

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 3>everyone loses.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, what happens if I win? Do I get

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 2>all that money that you were talking about? Max?

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just want to say, like it sounds kind

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of superficial to be Dana opened this conversation talking about

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>do we get dour elon? Do we get happy elon?

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But like that actually matters, and like that's what what

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan's kind of saying is that because he repeats these phrases,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like it sounds like we're just we're doing like theater

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>criticism or something. But like the fortunes of this company

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred it's of billions of dollars, you know, hundreds of

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of jobs sort of depend on like what Elon projects,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and like does he sound depressed, you know when he's

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to this audience of analysts and fans and like

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's such a weird It's just such a weird world

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we live in, and like you can kind of understand.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I doubt this is a cause for Elon to believe

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the simulation, but it kind of makes me like

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>question our reality when so much depends on you know,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>basically how Wall Street interprets Elon Musk's mood.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that's really fun fun to do if

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you have a terminal is while he's talking, watch gip

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 3>post and you can see the stock trade after hours

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 3>in real time. And if he gets like dark, and

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 3>if we get like dark Elon, you will just see

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the stock completely tank. And then if he's like embulent

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and like very confident, you'll see the stock go up.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 4>So that's like another trick of the trade that a

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 4>lot of people do. You all just learned to terminal function.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I love that Dan and I are going to be

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>live blogging on the terminal as well.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, get ready.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 3>People are also already criticizing our Bingo card. We don't

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 3>have a square that says the limiting factor. We don't

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 3>have a square that says, you know, talks about population collapse.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 3>But to be fair, like he doesn't really talk about

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 3>population collaps on the earnings calls. He talks about them

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>like all the rest of the time.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Listeners, tell us what's wrong with our

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Bingo card?

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what's missing?

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Make your own Bengo cards. We you know, yeah, we'll

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be back in qeqe Q one is only three months away, exactly.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, enough, let's call it. Thanks for listening to

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Elon Inc. And thanks to our panel Dana, Sarah and Max,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Thank you.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 3>Always a pleasure.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacey Wong me and We

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Shaven and Rayhan Hermanchi are our senior editors. The idea

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 2>for this very show came from Rayhan. Like Maple's handles

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>engineering and we get special editing assistants from Jeff crocott.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. The Elon Inc. Theme

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>is written and performed by Taka Yazazawa and Alex Sigira.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcast and our

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 2>executive producer. I'm Joe Webber covering for David pop Douglass.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 2>If you have a minute, please rate and review our show.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 2>It'll help other listeners find us. Also, let us know

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 2>what you think of Tesla Bingo. See you next week.