WEBVTT - The First GOP Debate vs. The Guy Who Wasn’t There

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course, the first GOP debate versus

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the Guy who wasn't there. I've said it before and

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again. Anytime I see a Republican presidential

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>candidate other than Donald Trump on television, I'm reminded that

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they and their party look like they're in a hostage video.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>They are all trapped by Trump, and none of them

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>have convinced me that they can escape his. Republican Challengers

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>held their first national debate recently, offering an array of

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>paul's trying to make a case for themselves and the

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>GOP's future. The group included Ron DeSantis, Nikki Hailey, Mike Pence,

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Christy, Tim Scott, Asia Hutchinson, Doug Burgham, and the

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>one and only Vivek Ramaswami. Ramaswami offered the most transparent approach,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>contending with Trump. Recast yourself as a chat ter, grinning

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>alternate version of Donald Trump light. The others followed different

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>paths to making cases for themselves. Meanwhile, Trump counterprogrammed he

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>sat down with former Fox News propagandist and conspiracy theorist

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson to chat about election fraud and, among other things,

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>his unfounded belief that China controls the Panama Canal. The

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>interview aired on social media and was timed to distract

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>voters from the Republican debate, which Trump chose not to attend.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Joining me to make sense of this Carnival is Susan

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>del Percio, a Republican political strategist and an advisor to

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a variety of political and corporate campaigns. She also once

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>worked in former New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani's administration. Susan

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is savvy and insightful and always a treat to talk to.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Susan hate tim It's great to be with you today.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really great to be with you. So let's do

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the big picture. What's your big takeaway from the first

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican debate?

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>My first big takeaway is, boy, the Republicans blew it.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>They had an opportunity to present a platform of ideas,

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a vision for the country where they want to take it,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 2>which would obviously stand and start contrast to Donald Trump

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>because he is only about Donald Trump. As we know

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and is just doing grievance. But all eight of these candidates,

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 2>I was waiting for them to be whatever they are,

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>not trying to deal with the man not in the room.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 2>And that was so disappointing because there are a lot

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>of Republicans out there that want to move on from Trump,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 2>even those who voted for Trump twice want to move

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>on from Trump. And I just I feel like the

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 2>ideas and even the way it was moderated just did

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 2>not bring that forward.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you could have waived your magic

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>wand across the event, what would you have done differently?

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Then I probably would have said it up first of all,

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 2>in issue format in a pretty tight way, and also

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>not let the candidates get too out of control, if

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>you will, because they were all over the place, and

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I know we're going to talk about the Ramasami, but

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>he was like a fly that just gets swattered around.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everyone was taking their shot at of Nikki Hally,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Chris Chrissy. He just buzzed around, and really they should

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>have stopped.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>It, especially because I mean, we'll get into him later,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but he just backed actually, I think in the attention

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even while he was getting squatted.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>At exactly other than him.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You know who stood out to you and why among

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole collection of people up on that stage.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I would say the two standouts, the three standouts, two

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>for good, one not good for me were on the

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>positive side. Nikki Halley, she at least really tried to

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>talk about foreign policy and you know her credentials. And

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Mike Pence. I didn't agree with some of what he said,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>but he was pretty aggressive in getting his comments out there.

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>He's also the most experienced in this form of debate.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>The person who was so disappointing to me was Senator

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Tim Scott from South Carolina. A lot of people recognize

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that Ron DeSantis, the governor from Florida, is on his

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>way out. He's been, in my opinion, he's done, and

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>they're giving Tim Scott another look. They want to give

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>someone a look and see what they have, and all

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>eyes have been on Tim Scott. This was his time

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 2>to shine.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Particularly the Republican establishment. I think you saw this sort

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of movement after Desantists stumbled so badly out of the gates.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>People were attuned to that in the GOP. I think

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>both among powerbrokers in the party and big money donors.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>And then there was this movement towards Tim Scott, and

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk more about him in a minute, but I

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>agree with you he was essentially on her from on

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that stage, and I don't think that's how he needed

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to position himself during that debate exactly. Let's focus on

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Haley for a minute only because I found her

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>to be the most substantive of the contenders up there,

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>even if Pole suggests she's least likely to get the nomination.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I like how we got into this

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of you expressing your disappointment. You're a Republican. You want

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it to be a party of ideas. You want it

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a party of policy, party of solution. I

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think in an ideal world democrats want that for the

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party too. That they may get to there in

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>different ways, but people want politicians to be serious actors

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and not just buffoons.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But they also want I'm sorry to interrupt, but this

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>was in particularly important because of Donald Trump. These Republicans

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 2>seem to be a stark difference from Donald Trump, not

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>from the Democrats. The Democrats have never had to deal

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 2>with what the Republicans are dealing with, so.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Why can't Nicki Haley break out. You know, She's interesting

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>to me in the way that Chris Christie is, but

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>interesting solely because both of them I think, sold a

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of their soul to join the Trump administration

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>after Trump emerged in twenty sixteen as the obvious front runner.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Hailey was the UN ambassador, Christy was an advisor. They

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>both had been vocal about being critical of him prior

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to Trump getting out in front of twenty sixteen, and

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>now they're both pretty vocal about trying to carve out

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a position apart from him. But she

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't broken out with Republican voters. And what do

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you attribute that to?

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>A few things? One is, in politics, there is is,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and was is. And Ron DeSantis is the governor. He

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't was the governor. And so it's very hard to

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>do things and get the press attention because you're not

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>an elective office. All you can do is try and

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>get earned media. That's the first thing in general. But

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>for Nick Haley specifically, and it applies to a couple

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of others. For folks who came out early in this primary,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>you had to come out swinging against Trump. I mean,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that all of these candidates wasted

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>was looking at Trump and taking them on in January,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>February up to March actually probably up to that first indictment,

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>that's when he was the weakest. Ron DeSantis was pretty

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>strong at that point too, coming out of an election

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>before he did some really bad legislative stuff. But Nikki Haley,

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, her line was, I don't kick sideways, so

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 2>that's stuck with me. But I don't know what else

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>she's done now apparently she had her.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>For a second. Do you think voters tune in to

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that exact phenomenon you just identified that a candidate who

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't currently holding an office is less attractive than one who.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Is, only because they don't have the press corps of

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>their home state. For example, people aren't writing about you

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 2>can't see what legislation they're doing. It's not that the

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>people actually care so much, it's what comes with being

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a current office holder.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The power of the incumbency exactly.

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think with Nikki Haley, she could have come out,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>she could have gone after Trump. She has a really

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>good line in the debate is we have to be

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>honest with the American people, and she should have been

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>using that to go after Donald Trump the way she

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>did on debate night. By the way, that debate was

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the single largest fundraising night for Governor Halley, so there.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Are people paying attention. Do you think she has a

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>chance to break out or do you think this is

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just a sideshow given how far Trump is ahead in

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the polls right now.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I think there's always a chance to break out, But

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>it's what she does. You need a combination for someone

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>to beat Trump. You need them to look good and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>be a strong, viable alternative. And even if you have that,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that's not going to help you a lot in the polls.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>But what you really need is to have Chris Christy

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>keep banging away at Donald Trump, because when you start

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 2>looking at the poll numbers and those numbers spread Joe

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Biden to Donald Trump go from it. Now they're pretty

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>close to three four points, but what happens if they

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>go to five, six, seven, eight points, then there's a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>hard electability fact there that people can't ignore.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that DeSantis stumbled because of poor legislative judgment,

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but one of the things I feel that he stumbled

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>around on was he tried to nationalize what had worked

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for him in Florida, which was to pursue this quote

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>unquote woke agenda on education, on public health, on any

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>number of issues where it was easy for him to

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>sell that relatively easy for him to sell that to

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Florida voters because he was doing it in very programmatic

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>public settings that were very controlled. He wasn't giving himself

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>access to the press. He had the state legislature behind him,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>He was in tune with the mood in Florida. But

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>none of that necessarily transports into a national campaign. And

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think to me, once he began campaigning nationally, it

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>was like the Emperor has no clothes.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And usually you use the chance to have a

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 2>legislative agenda passed for what would help you in a

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>general election you want to become That's how I govern

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and use the rhetoric during the primary, and he just

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>blew it. I'll tell you. Everyone makes a big deal

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>about how many points DeSantis won by. He won by nineteen.

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Huge win, absolutely huge. But it's not that he got

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 2>so many more Republican votes. It's at nine hundred thousand

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 2>fewer Democrats showed up to vote on that line, and

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>that was what made the difference. Now I'm not saying

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't have won. But the other thing is I

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 2>saw an Emerson College poll in February March with Florida

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>voters independent women gave him a disapproval of sixty one percent.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>That's sky high, especially coming after a win. And that's

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>because one of the reasons is he moved from saying oh,

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I passed a fifteen week abortion ban, which could fall

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>in line with the conservative Republicans, to an extremist position

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>of a six week abortion ban, which is basically banning

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>abortion in his state. Oh and by the way, he

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 2>did make an exception for rape and incests, but only

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>if you file the police report. Who does that.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Hold rape and incest exception to your draconian view of

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>women's access to reproductive health. I think Pence is the

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>only other person sort of charting that out on abortion

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>among the current Republican I think most of the other

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are at fifteen weeks, but the Santis and Pencer,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think at this very extreme edge of that policy debate.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>He's also just not a great public speaker. He's a

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>tree stump. I think he's odd with people. He doesn't

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>make eye contact, he's not a buncular I don't think

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he enjoys being with other people too much.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what happens if when you're governing, you put

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 2>yourself in a bubble and you only speak to Fox News.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You have a press conference and you only let one

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 2>media outlet in. You don't speak to the reporters in Tallahassee,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>where the capital is for legislative needs. He also just

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>ticked off a lot of people, and you didn't hear

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the glowing endorsements that you typically do. People were off

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the bat, even if they were off the record going

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>after him. But even in the debate, did you notice

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>he gave his answer. He kind of had a scowl

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 2>most of the time, but when he was done with

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 2>his answer, you could see his teeth. I mean he

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>was smiling like Okay, oh I'm done. Huh pause, smile.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I just kept looking at him and thinking tree stump,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the entire time he was up there. I

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>think Pence is a more outgoing person than DeSantis. I

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>think Penn enjoys talking to other people. But I also

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>think he exists in a charisma free zone, which is

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>an obvious factor dealing with Donald Trump. Trump has a

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>million flaws. I think he's a dangerous figure on our

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>public landscape. But for the people who adhere to his

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>vision and support him, he's got authentic charisma and he's

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had it. He had it in television, charisma for a

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>certain kind of thing, and Pence lacks that. Where do

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you see Pence breaking out of the pack after watching

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>these debates?

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, first, that's why I think Trump picked Mike Pence

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 2>because he was never going to be someone who is

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>going to upstage him in any shape or form, not

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 2>just with his words, but like you said, with the charisma.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 2>People weren't going to talk about Mike Pence with excitement.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>He's gradually going after Donald Trump. Very little, not enough.

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 2>He did a great job of setting up the question,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>well who here doesn't think I did the right thing

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 2>on January sixth, I mean, he basically threw it out there.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 2>But then something I just can't forget, and it's been

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>with me and I think it's one of the legacies

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>of trump Ism within the party. When it comes to

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>being elected and serving in government, I can't use governance

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>because the Republicans elective office have shown no interest in

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 2>governance except for very, very few so Nikki Halen had

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>given her answer on abortion, and she said, we have

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>to agree on this, and so forth she went through

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>her steps and she said, because we have to get

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>a consensus, there's no way you're going to get sixty

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>senators to ban abortion, and Mike Pence fire back saying

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:53.359
<v Speaker 2>consensus is the opposite of leadership. That is a mindset.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>That is a Donald Trump mindset. I will lead, I

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>will lead you, I will lead you into so we

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>fall off the cliff because he won't make the term

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>because he wants to look like a leader. And it

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't get a lot of pick up in the media coverage,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's something that's stuck with me because if that's

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>where we are, if that's where the Republican Party is,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to be governing for a very very

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>long time.

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was clearly one thing I thought about that

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>line was it was rehearsed before the debates. They gave

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>him that line, They maybe gave him some thoughts about

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>when he should deploy it, and the fact that he

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>chose to deploy it then after having practiced in debate

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>prep with it was very telling to me too. Yeah,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>especially because you know his former boss tried to have

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>him murdered, so you would think that he'd be a

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>little more strident in criticizing some of the decisions Donald

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump makes.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>And he has the record. Well that's the thing. Just

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>take on Donald Trump. You're never going to get those

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump people, So just put him away, don't even try

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and use your record and go forward because otherwise Pence

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is nothing there because he has nothing to do and.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>To reach out to that other seventy percent of Republicans

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who want something other than Donald Trump. M that Ramaswami.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just sort of see him as a

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tireless cartoon figure who's basking in the attention presidential candidates

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>get when they have no experience, but by virtue of

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>quirks in our system and their own odd magnetism or

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>points of view, they get a moment in the sun

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens with both parties. What do you make of

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>him and the fact that they gave him a pole

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>position essentially almost directly at center stage during the debate,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi wil.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Tim, we're both old enough to remember that. In twenty twelve,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Michelle Bachman won the Iowas straw pol when she was

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>running in twenty eleven. I remember when Ben Carson was

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>at the head of the polls back in twenty fifteen.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>These things happen. If Ramaswami makes it to the third debate,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>he will probably be the very end of the stage.

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>This is his time in the sun. He's entertaining for

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>no other reason. I think people talk about him because

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>he was entertaining his debate prep was apparently playing tennis shirtless.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how anyone could take him seriously. He

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is just a cartoon figure to me.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's trying out to be Trump's VP. I

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's his agenda.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Which we just discussed that. One of the reasons why

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Penn Scott it was because he had no personality and

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the last thing Donald Trump wants is someone who could

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 2>out charisma him.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this guy clearly does not understand who Donald Trump is.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>He actually wants tree stumps in the White House. He

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want people who've got magnetism at all. Lastly, Chris Christy,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I get you know, he played the role of flamethrower.

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I have been happy to see him be willing to

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>speak his mind about Trump and trump Ism, but he

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really carved out much on a policy path beyond

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>being the most open Trump critic. I guess during the

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>campaign season thus far, what do you think of his

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>performance on the debate stage and his possibilities.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I think you laid it out perfectly, and with Chris Christie.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 2>He can't be the prosecutor going after Donald Trump without

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump there, so he made the lines he had to.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>He did play some good defense at points, like when

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>ran Assami was going after him. I just think that

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 2>there's no way the Republicans are going to give him

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the nomination. He could come in though in New Hampshire

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>he could come in second or third. It wouldn't surprise me,

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 2>mostly because in New Hampshire they have an open primary

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 2>where Republicans vote in the Republican primary, but independents can

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>vote in the Democrat or Republican primary. And since there's

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>no real Democratic party in New Hampshire, because they're changing

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>when the elections are being held, you may see a

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 2>flood of independence, which is about thirty eight in the state,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>come into that and that could help Christy, but I

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think it gets into where he needs to go.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to dwell on Hutchinson and Bergham. I'm

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>sorry our show's short and no one really seems to

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>care enough about them, But I think we've zeroed in

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the people who may or may not mount a

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge to Trump. I want to ask you to focus

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.959
<v Speaker 1>on that moment during the debate when all of the

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>candidates were asked if they would support the indicted former

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>president if he was the Republican nominee. Everyone raised their hands,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but Hutchinson, bless his law abiding soul, Chris Christy did

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a weird like half hand raised, and DeSantis actually looked

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>around to see what everyone else was doing before he

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>raised his hand, which I just thought was a pathetic

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>lack of courage, especially given how he's been trying to

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>carve out this place as the guy who's strong and wilful.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But what did that moment tell you about what you

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>were seeing on the debate stage.

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't vote for any of those candidates, huh, by

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the way him. I want to be able to vote

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>for a Republican I just haven't been able to because

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I haven't found any that are credible and running serious

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 2>campaigns and doing serious things. They all are following Trump

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and if you follow Trump. In my world, I consider

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>that disqualifying.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I admire you, Susan, in this crazy age we're in

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because the primary voter in the Republican Party writ large

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care if Donald Trump is burning the Constitution or

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>targeting the vulnerable. They just wanted to be present again regardless. Obviously,

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there's I think a majority of other Americans who think

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>differently about it. But my thesis of the case has

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>been that this works for him in the primary. It's

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be tested sorely in the national election, and

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are and that's why I keep calling it

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a hostage video, because they're not taking the steps they

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>need to break out of his grip, and they're going

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to pay a price, I think at the netal level

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats are smart about how they campaign.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Great point on that note.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break, and then I want to come

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>back and talk with you about Donald Trump's vaudeville act.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>With Tucker Carlson on Debate Night, We're back with the

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>wonderful Susan del Percio, a Republican strategist and always a

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>treat to talk to. We've been talking about the first

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Republican debate, Susan, I now want to turn to the

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump Carlson gabfest that was meant to bigfoot the Republican debate.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But just to get us off theme for one second,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about Rudy Giuliani, who's now

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>been indicted along with Trump, was a mastermind of the

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and Bonker's effort to steal the twenty twenty election

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. As someone who once worked closely with America's

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>mayor saw him become a fixture in the American imagination

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>after nine to eleven. What do you make of what's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>happened to him?

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've consistently just felt like, what a shame, what

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a downfall. He has changed so much, I can't describe it.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 2>It's every aspect of him. It's not just that he

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 2>defended Trump, it's how he defended Trump. It's the nastiness.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 2>He now goes around with just a mean scowl all

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the time. He's stuck in Trump World. And I've got

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 2>to tell you, I know people disagreed with Rudy Giuliani

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 2>when he was mayor, but most people I know this

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>because he got elected with sixty percent of the vote reelected.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>They thought he was doing a good job and making

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the city manageable. He did clean up New York City,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 2>and on nine to eleven, he was there as a

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>true leader should be. And it was a result, I believe,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>of Trump giving him a little hat on the back

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fifteen when he said something really nasty about

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton and then he invited Rudy to be on

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the plane. And then Rudy's like, oh, relevant again, and

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 2>that's what started to turn him.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's sad, so that deep neediness to be in the spotlight,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to be needed, to be seen as a player. He's

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that insecure.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>And that being said, I think if it wasn't enough

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that Donald Trump has spent twenty million dollars on lawyers

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and still hasn't paid Rudy Giuliani, I think going through

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 2>that jail the other day for Rudy was devastating. And

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I do believe. I believe this before he went to

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the jail to get booked. I think he's a perfect

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 2>case for flipping. He does not want to go to prison.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And you know there's even talk among like inner circle

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>people like he remembers who he put.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Away and how he went about it, which was to

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>squeeze the people at the bottom to go after the

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>people at the top. So he knows he's going to

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>get squeezed.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 2>And he also knows who's in the prison system and

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that he's vulnerable.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that Trump's really not going to help him.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump has an helping him with his legal bills. Trump

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>will cut him loose as soon as he can.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Trump, he's been indicted four times ninety one

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>felony counts, including trying to sabotage the election. He decides

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not to attend the first Republican debate. Fox courts him

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>mightily to become part of the political process. He ignores

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it and instead does a little sit down in a

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>cabin with Tucker Carlson. And it was about forty five

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes long. I'm sorry to say I watched the whole

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>thing because I had to. But I'd really love to

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>know what your big takeaway was from the Trump Carlson

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>puppet show.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there's so many And again, I like, you had

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 2>to watch it, so it was not something I enjoyed

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 2>in any shape or measure. But first of all, originally

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was going to be true counterprogramming, meaning

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it would be live so he can respond to what's

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>going on in the debate. Now, that could have had

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fireworks. But I think one of the

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>reasons he had to tape it and also wipe on

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump was not on that debate stage is his lawyers.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Just like the lawyers prevented him from doing a big

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>press conference on Monday to reveal all that was canceled,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>that was him listening to his lawyers. I think he's

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 2>got to be surrounded all the time. And that interview,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's an interview, that discussion that war.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Comody had come.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my guess is that the lawyers were like right

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>next to him, like, don't say that, don't say.

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>That, especially because also he's gotten in trouble because of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his offhand remarks on TV and the EG and Carol

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>case and in the federal prosecutions around nine to eleven

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and the classifyed documents. So he's already created defense problem

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for himself by being on TV.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>So if we would have seen that conversation ten years

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 2>ago among two people maybe of some prominence, but not

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the level of Tucker and Trump, we would have said,

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, right room, conspiracy what rabbit hole did

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you go down to find that wacky video?

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you know? I was talking to someone in the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>office about old Saturday Night Live skits, and I remember

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one like right after Henry Kissinger's memoir came out of

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>his time in the White House with Nixon, and he

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>revealed that Nixon was drinking too much during the Watergate

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis and at one point asked him to kneel and

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>pray with him, and Saturday Night Live did just this

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>spoof of that of you know, I think it was

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ackroyd as Richard Nixon going, you know, Henry kneel

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>down next to me and pray, and they're in front

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of a Abraham Lincoln portrait that begins talking to them,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and everyone was like, gosh, this is so crazy. Look

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in the White House and that era,

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so quaint and silly, because in the Trump era,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>these looney bizarre things happened publicly all the time, including

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>during the Carlson Trump conversation.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeahs Luoneyton. And again, I think a conversation is just

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I wish there was a better word I could use,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>because a conversation means an exchange of ideas of some sort.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.239
<v Speaker 2>But this was just full of hate and anger. And

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I will say this, There's one thing that I'm always

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>aware of, and it really irks me, or I shouldn't

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>say it's beyond irks me, it concerns me. Is the

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>talk of violence that was used. You know, we're talking

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>about elections. We know what happens when we talk about violence.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>We've seen you know, Ruby the election worker in Georgia,

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>like people going after we know what it is to

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>see people showing up with guns in front of Supreme

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Court justices home. These are things that truly concern me

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>because they're right at that pillar of like shaking the

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>foundation of our democracy.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you focused on that because I think

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that is the core takeaway from their exchange, because Carlson

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>came at it in three different ways. You know, he said,

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>early on the left protested against you, and then they

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>impeached you, and now they've indicted you. It's not gonna work.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>They're probably just going to kill you, right, And Trump

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't really bite fully, he went off into one of

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>his weird meandering in the forest thoughts, and then Carlson

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>came back to it again and said, you know, don't

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you think they really want to kill you? And Trump

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of well, they're all animals, and then he moved on.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And then towards the very end of the interview, he

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>asked Trump if he thought there'd be a civil war,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Trump finally bit and he engaged with him, and

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that gave him a moment to reflect on January sixth,

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, which Trump called a sort of a loving,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>beautiful moment, which it was certainly not. But then went

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on to say that among his supporters he sees both

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>passion and hatred and he thinks that's a bad combination.

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And Tucker Carlson agrees and said, you're right, that is

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a bad combination. But of course, Tucker Carlson and Donald

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump jointly have fattened their wallets, their egos, and their

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>influence by stoking hatred and passion among viewers and listeners.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we're headed for.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Violent Well, let me give you this number. Thirty three percent.

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>That number is the amount of people who believe it

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>is okay to sometimes engage in violence political violence. That

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>came from the Common Good. It's a nonprofit, nonpartisan group

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>that looks for solutions to problems, works with independence.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's a survey of voters recently of Bipartisan survey.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>What was the sample group.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 2>So here's what I can tell you. It was their

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>first annual index. They did it in October and it

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>was basically starting to quantify and track levels of division

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>in our country. It was conducted by Emerson College of

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a national multi model survey of one thousand people. Data

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>was collected October eighth through eleventh, twenty twenty two. But

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty three percent like that was jarring to me. By

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the way, forty three percent believe a civil war is likely.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the thinking. Yeah, that's why it so dangerous to

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>keep lighting these matches. It's going to cause a wildfire

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>at some point. And it may not be a huge

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>group this time, but there are going to be a

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>lot along Wilfs out there and people thinking about crazy stuff.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We should remember that there are more weapons in the

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hands of individuals in the United States than the police

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>force has.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just go back to Gretchen Whitmore and

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 2>how there was an assassination tempt basically being plotted away

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>and it was stopped, thankfully, But they were moving along

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 2>with that plan, and in Michigan you can carry long

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>guns to the.

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Capitol, which in fact they did exactly.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>So the potential for violence in this country is just

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>right there every time. But more importantly, going back to

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the conversation, the fact that that's how they think. I

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they do it for ratings or just

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to excite people, but they both care about what sells,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and they believe that violence sells also.

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they believe that creating the idea that Trump

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is somehow a martyr right and the possible victim of

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a legal system that's holding him accountable, because by all accounts,

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he looks like a serial criminal and he's an insurrectionist,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and the system has finally come around to holding him

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>into account. Carlson and Trump have an interest in saying, oh,

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he's just a martyr for the cause, the MAGA cause.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Can you do me a favor please. As I was

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 2>listening to it, I was kind of doing a few

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>other things, cleaning up whatever. And this whole thing with

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the Panama Canal and China is so bewildering to me

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>because I just know it, like in my sense of

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 2>living in this world that it's not true. But what

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of craziness is this?

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Well again, you know you were talking about how smart

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and shrewd and important is Carlson and Trump to sell things.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And Trump came back to that in this conversation in

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. Well, actually in twenty fifteen when he rolled

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>down the escalator at Trump Tower, Remember he sort of

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>laid out this very racist and dark vision about immigrants,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>their criminals, their rapists, some of them might be nice people.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And during the Carlson conversation he said his primary issue

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was border. He didn't call it the border or immigration,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he just said border, said that it basically everyone coming

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>from Latin America, primarily Guatemala, were criminals. So he was

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ringing that bell again. And I think he got a

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of traction at twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen around

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Yellow Menace scare with China, as well as the

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that a lot of working class jobs did go overseas.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think working class Americans feel deeply aggrieved that

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>neither Republicans nor Democrats have authentically provided solutions to folks

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>who are in industries that have gotten chewed up amid

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the technological revolution. And so I think Trump came back

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to that on China, but only as Trump could to

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 1>say that China controls the panelm Canal. That is not true.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>China runs a couple of businesses that handle services at

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>either end of the canal itself, but Panama itself, the

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>country where the canal is, controls the Panama Canal. And

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just untrue. But I think Trump doesn't count on

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>his closest supporters getting to the facts. He counts in

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>them being alarming. The idea that China controls a transit point,

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was shocking to me. It was very shocking.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And in the same way that they started, the departure

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>point for their conversation was talking about Jeffrey Epstein, And

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>as Tucker Carlson said, you know, I'm not someone who

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>traffics and conspiracy theories, but boy, don't you think Jeffrey

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Epstein was murdered in jail? And that's a nuts way

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to begin a conversation with someone running for president?

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think while it was leading to

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the bigger question, do you think they'll come after you.

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Susan, I want to take another quick break and then

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll come right back. We're back with Susan del Percio,

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a veteran Republican strategist. We've been talking about the First

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican Debate, the Trump Carlson Vaudeville Act, and Trump's firm

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hold on the GOP's primary voters. So Sudan, how do

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you think this is all going to shake out for

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party short.

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Term twenty twenty four. If Trump's the nominee, he loses,

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it could be so bad. Between trumping at

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the top of the ticket and the issue of women's

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 2>healthcare and their right to control their body is the

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.720
<v Speaker 2>only issue that can turn Mitch McConnell from potentially being

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>majority leader, which is thought quite possible because of the

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 2>way the map works. The Democrats need to win six seats,

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>is basically what they're fighting for, and the Republican should

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>take control of the Senate. But under these circumstances, I

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 2>think it's possible that the Democrats sweep immediately all three House,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Senate and White House. Because Donald Trump is a problem

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 2>for every rept Republican running. And it doesn't matter if

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you say I don't believe in conspiracy theories, I believe

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that Biden won. If you go against Trump on every issue,

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But you're running down ticket from him, You're still lassoed

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>with Trump, and you're still talking about it because people

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>are going to always ask you, oh, Trump said this,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 2>do you agree? Because you're a Republican now Looking a

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>little long term, I used to say twenty twenty eight

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>was going to be the year we'd see a lot

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to shake out. But I also back then didn't see

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump running for president again. So Donald Trump, when

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 2>he was elected did something very smart. He reached out

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to all the Republican state committees. And it didn't matter

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>if it was an important state or New York or California,

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>places where Republicans have no chance of winning any statewide races.

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But he reached out to the Republican committee members and

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 2>the chairman, chair members and base. He got them to

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>stack because he had the support, you know, or they

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>supported him. I should say that's who's running state government,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that's who's choosing local candidates, that's who's getting you know,

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 2>whether it's congress or city council. I thought enough losses

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 2>would cycle those people out because people are going to

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 2>screen for better candidates and stronger leadership. But they're still

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 2>there and they're going to be there in twenty twenty six.

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>They're just runing twenty twenty four out. So I think

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take another eight years to really flush

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 2>out the system. But it doesn't mean incremental changes can't

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 2>happen and certain states can't change, you know, maybe a

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Senate seat here or there, and maybe get someone with

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 2>some common sense. It's okay to be super conservative as

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 2>long as you're not, you know, in the steps.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Of just principled and law abiding about it.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Imagine that be lawbin. But so I think that's where

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it's possible. But like people always say, Susan, you always

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>trust the Republican Party, and yet you call yourself a

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Republican strategist. Why aren't you a Democrat or at least

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 2>an independent. I'm like, because this is a two party

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 2>system country, whether you want it to be or not.

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I understand the independent and third party candidates, but really

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it's run by Democrats and Republicans. And if there are

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 2>no Republicans talking about governance, at least speaking up and

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.919
<v Speaker 2>having a voice out there, then we all lay down.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 2>And what's the point of that?

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>And presumably some of the values you hold we've never

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten specifically into sort of the laundry list of why

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you consider yourself a Republican. But if it's classic Republican

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>values lower taxes, less regulation, a strong foreign policy, tilting

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>towards conservative uncertain social issues, or a plurality of them,

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe not.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, maybe not. But I actually think like.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, so you're maybe a Rockefeller Republican.

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, but I would argue that for example, gay marriage

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 2>or abortion. I'll take the libertarians stand on that, saying

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 2>it's actually conservative to say stay out of my bedroom

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.959
<v Speaker 2>and stay out of my body. That's actually a very

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>conservative point of view. I know, it's not what the.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Last conservatism, yea, not contemporary conservative. What are Republican voters

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get from the GOP that they aren't getting from Democrats?

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's something that Democrats could do without

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>giving up their core value to court Republicans or is

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that just always going to be a bridge too far

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on both sides.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>No. I think you could see democrats moderate Democrats start

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>making inroads, but it has to be in a way

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>where frankly, the top of the tickets not Joe Biden.

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean right now, the leadership there with Biden at

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the top is something that is going to hurt turnout

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four. And I'm so who did Republicans

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>and independence for Biden in the Lincoln Project. So I

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 2>was trying to get those Republicans to say, like, I

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 2>know you voted fir him twenty sixteen, but you can't

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>do it again. You know what he is, vote for Biden.

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 2>That was the difference in the election. I'm not say

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 2>my effort like there were a lot of groups doing.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>When I'm getting theme that I that theme.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, now what concerns me is that those people

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to show up in twenty twenty four because

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>they really can't stand Biden. They really can't. They said,

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him four years. I don't like him, but

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him my vote. There's no way I could

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 2>vote for Donald Trump.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And they can't stand him. Why.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question. I think they take the most

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 2>liberal policies he has and amplifies them. I don't think

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they realize that Joe Biden has been one of the

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 2>most bipartisan presidents.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And a moderate, a moderate certainly with his own party.

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I do think age is a problem for him.

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But I also could say.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lack of confidence Kamala Harris as his potential successor.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's also a problem they're dealing with.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 2>And ask Democrats why they're not excited to go out

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 2>and vote for them. I mean, if you can't get

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Democrats excited, it's gonna be a lot

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>harder to get a couple of Republicans now.

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Having said all that, it wasn't like Joe Biden in

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty was a young man ball of fire tyro

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing across the political landscape, and people still voted for

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>him for the reason. I think one of the reasons

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they voted for him was what you just identified that

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it also was a vote against another Trump term. Why

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>should we think that voted are any less alarmed by

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump now than they were in twenty twenty If they

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>were willing to sort of hold their noses and vote

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for someone they didn't have complete confidence in II Joe

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Biden in twenty twenty, Why isn't it incredible argument to

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>be made that the House is burning justice ferociously right now.

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Plus Trump's been indicted, his methods and his predilections have

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>all been made very public again. Why wouldn't that message

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>work now?

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, is it enough to get people to turn out? No,

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem.

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Why not?

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Some of it is going after Trump is but I

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 2>actually think the abortion issue will be the factor that

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 2>helps Democrats get over the line. That will be the

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 2>primary issue and democracy. But the other thing was people said,

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 2>all right, we need to change this. Joe Biden will

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 2>basically be the pivot to normalcy. Not Joe Biden's fault.

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 2>But we are not in normalcy. So then you give

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 2>up on it. So you say, you know what, maybe

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 2>this whole system has gone to hell in a handbasket

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's it, Like I give up, or I just

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:46.879
<v Speaker 2>can't vote for Biden. It in no way I'm voting

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 2>for Trump. But I'm just gonna sit this one out.

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Biden's messengers have been focusing properly

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>on where the economy is. You know, job growth has

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>been great, Inflation has been a nightmare, but that is cooling.

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And the US has proved to be the most resilient

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>global post COVID economy of any And I think they've

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>run good foreign policy in Ukraine, et cetera, et cetera.

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but I think Republicans have successfully weaponized wokeism,

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and some of that gets I think, ruthlessly and inaccurately

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 1>deployed nationally, and Biden suffers from some of that.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 2>And another thing that I believe you're going to see

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 2>happen and it's going to hurt turnout for Democrats is

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.240
<v Speaker 2>the mortgage rates. They're the highest they've been in twenty

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>four years, and that means people can't buy a home.

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 2>That to them is the sense of am I doing well?

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:42.959
<v Speaker 2>And it's not because for the price of the house,

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 2>but with the mortgage, it's just too much of a

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 2>heavy lift. And when I did a lot of polling

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two, I was surprised to see affordable

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 2>housing creeping up there. And then we broke it out

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 2>and saw home ownership, and then we focus groups on it,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and when you saw people frustrated they can't afford a home,

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>like they're working two jobs and I can't like it's

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 2>what breaks them, and it's what says, like the system,

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 2>who cares? They're all bad.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We could do a whole show on housing. I will

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.240
<v Speaker 1>point out that even with these escalated interest rates on houses,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the rates twenty years ago were considered historically low at

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the time. We've just been through this era of such

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>rock bottom rates that everyone could get mortgages. I mean,

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we would go down a rabbit hole on that as

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a topic, but it's a great one for you to

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>bring up. I want to ask you one last question.

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I always like to ask people at the end of

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the show what they've learned, and I wanted to ask

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you what you've learned from this recent round of Republican

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>debates and Trump's side show that you didn't know prior

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to that occurring.

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I know now that the Republicans, other than Trump running

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 2>will not offer a vision of their own or for

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the country's future. Sure, I was really hoping to see

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 2>that in the debate. I really thought that was a

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 2>great opportunity, and I realized they just aren't the caliber

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of people we need running this country. When it comes

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to that Tucker Carlson interview with Donald Trump, the violence,

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't expect it to be so violent. Like the

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 2>talk it was threaded throughout, and even Trump's responses, you know,

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the way he spoke, I knew it would be him

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 2>just spouting off and saying, you know, I did everything perfectly.

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't quite expect.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 1>That, Susan. We are out of time and I could

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have kept talking to you for at least another hour.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm grateful that you came and spent a little

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of time with me today.

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh great to be with you, Tim, Thank you for

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 2>having me.

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Susan Delpercio is a Republican political strategist and an advisor

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to a variety of political and corporate campaigns. You can

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>find her on LinkedIn and on Twitter at del Percio

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>s Here at Crash Course, we believe the collisions can

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising, and always instructive. In today's

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Crash Course, I learned that at least six of the

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>seven Republican challengers to Donald Trump for the presidential nomination

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lack the courage to stand up for their own convictions

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and condemn Donald Trump for being a serial lawbreaker. What

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>did you learn? We'd love to hear from you. You

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>can tweet at the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion or

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 1>me at Tim O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course.

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>right now, and please leave us a review, it helps

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>more people find the show. This episode was produced by

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the indispensable Anna Maserakas, Moses Ondem and me. Our supervising

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>producer is Magnus Henrickson, and we had editing help from Sagebauman,

0:45:56.120 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Katie Boyce, Jeff Grocott, Mike Nize, and Christine Dandon by Lart.

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Blake Maples does our sound engineering and our original theme

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>song was composed by Luis Garra. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>be back next week with another Crash course