WEBVTT - What next for Solana? and China's Scramble for Africa

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to the latest episode from the

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>midweek edition of the coin Bureau podcast. Every week, I

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pick out two of my favorite videos from coin Bureau's

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel to present to you in podcast form. The

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>audio you're about to hear is from those videos I've

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>chosen this week, and I hope you enjoy listening. The

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fallout from the collapse of f t X and Alameda

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Research continues to dominate the crypto headlines and is likely

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to do so for some time. There are well founded

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>concerns that the contagion from this disaster could spread to

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>other crypto companies and projects in due course. One project

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that could be most at risk is Slana, thanks to

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that f t X and Alameda were its

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest investors. Slana is, or rather was, f t x's

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>day facto exchange chain too. The project is therefore uncomfortably

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>exposed to the fallout, and Soul's price has already crashed

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>much harder than most other cryptos. It's not just Slana itself, though,

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the projects in its ecosystem are also at risk, which

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>means a lot more pain is coming for them. For

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Salana and for the crypto market as a whole. So

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>here's a breakdown of what Salana is all about, why

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so threatened by ft x IS collapse, and why

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>there may still be hope for the future. Next up,

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's mercifully time to move away from crypto for a

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>while and look at something happening in the wider world.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Aging populations in the West and elsewhere mean that Africa

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is projected to become increasingly influential in coming decades as

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>it reaps a demographic dividend from its higher birth rates

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as young working age people. The continent is

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>also rich in other resources too, and as such is

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>attracting increasing amounts of investment from countries looking to capitalize

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on its riches. One country has been more proactive than

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>any other in this regard, and that is China, which

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>has invested billions of dollars across Africa as part of

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>its Belt and Road initiative. An increasing amount of Africa's

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure has been built using Chinese money, and naturally, China's

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>influence across the continent has grown with every railway laid

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and airport terminal built. But as some nations have discovered

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>to their cost, Chinese money can come with some unpleasant

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>strings attached, and many are worried that the ultimate cost

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of China's largesse may be greater than what many in

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Africa bargained for. In the second part of today's episode,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear the story of China's own scramble for Africa,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>how it's gone down with Africans themselves, and what the

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>future might hold. Thanks for listening to today's episode, and

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>there'll be more coming your way soon. And if you

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>want even more content from coin Bureau, be sure to

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our YouTube channels and visit us on social

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>media too. And one more thing. This year at the

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>coin Bureau, we're celebrating Black Friday with up to fifty

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>off items in our merch store. There's a link in

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the description of the podcast, so please do check it

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>out and see if there's something you fancy. The collapse

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of f t X and Alameda Research has done serious

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>damage to the crypto market, and it seems that Slana

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of the most affected crypto projects. Now this

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>makes sense given that Salana was the day facto exchange

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>chain of f t X, and that both f t

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>X and Alameda were big investors and participants in Salana's ecosystem. Today,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you a quick recap of Salana,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you what's been going on with the project, and

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>examine whether Soul will survive the f t X Alameda meltdown.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with some transparency, and that's that

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I no longer hold Soul as part of my crypto portfolio.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're subscribed to my weekly newsletter, you'll know that

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Soul accounted for almost eight percent of my portfolio until

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>last weekend. Note that you can find the link to

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>my weekly newsletter in the description. Now, my decision to

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sell Soul was based on many factors, including the current

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>state of the crypto market, but there is no denying

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that the ft X Alameda situation was top of mind

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for me. Now, I must also stress that this is

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not financial advice. It's just my opinion, and you will

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously have yours. That said, I will give both a

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>bearish and a bullish case for Salana in today's video.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>That's because there does seem to be some hope for

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Soul on the horizon. It just looks very far away

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from where I'm standing. That's just my perspective, though, and

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I would love to get yours in the comments section now.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>As many of you will know, Slana was founded in

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen by former Qualcom engineer and a Toty Yakovenko.

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The Salana blockchain was built by Salana Labs, which is

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>based in the United States, and its ongoing development is

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>coordinated by the Salana Foundation, which is based in Switzerland.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Salana raised twenty five million dollars across various I c

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>o s between twenty eighteen and twenty, and raised an

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>additional three hundred and fourteen million dollars from crypto vcs

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. F t X and Alameda Research were two

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the largest investors in Salana and were two of

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the largest investors in Salana's ecosystem, that is, crypto projects

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>building on Salana. This is because Salana's original goal was

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to become a decentralized alternative to centralize stock exchanges like

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAK. Now this is a goal that f t

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>X and Alameda founder Sam Bankman Freed could get behind,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>given that his endgame was also to displace the existing

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>institutions with his own infrastructure. Salana's main net went live

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty and its blockchain is still technically in beta.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Recent comments by anatotally suggest that Salana may soon be

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>entering its alpha stage, which is surprising given that the

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Salana blockchain continues to experience issues. More about all that

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>later on. Under the hood, the Salana blockchain uses a

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>novel proof of state consensus mechanism that time stamps transactions

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>using a technology called proof of history. This consensus mechanism

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it possible for the Salana blockchain to process up

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to sixty five thousand transactions per second. Until recently, the

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Salana blockchain was secured by almost twenty two hundred validators.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Salana's validate account was just eighteen hundred and fifty when

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ft X and Alameda collapsed. This suggests that f t

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>X and a meda we're running lots of Salana validators.

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Note that Salana transactions are processed by clusters of up

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to one hu fifty validators now. Soul is the native

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency coin of the Salana blockchain. Like all cryptocurrency coins,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Soul is used to pay for transaction fees. Of every

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>transaction fee is burned, with the other half going to validators. Obviously,

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Soul is also used for staking staking rewards are currently

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>around eight percent for both validators and delegators with a

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>five day lock up. There is no minimum stake for

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>validators or delegators, though the hardware requirements for running of

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>validator are very high. Misbehaving validators are also slashed. Staking

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>soul as a delegator can be easily done using the

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Phantom Browser extension wallet, which also acts as a gateway

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to Salana's ecosystem. The Phantom extension has been downloaded over

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>two million times on Chrome and dab Radar's data suggests

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that Salana's DAPs have at least half a million monthly

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>active users. The focus of Slana's ecosystem was initially defy.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>This was in large part due to f t X,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which had its own defied project called projects Serum. What's

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy is that the order book based Serum decks lay

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of Salana's entire defy ecosystem, providing liquidity

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and pricing data to many other major DeFi protocols. To

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, most of Serum's liquidity came from f t

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>X and Lameter. Now, the massive draw down in the

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>total value locked in Salana's DeFi protocols following terrorist collapse

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in May. Therefore, suggests that this is when ft X

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Alameda started to experience the issues that ultimately lead

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to their collapse. You can learn more about the ft

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>X an Alameda situation using the in the description I

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>digress now. It's barely been three months since our last

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>covered Salana, but a lot has happened since then, and

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>not just stuff that's related to Alameda and f t X.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Shortly after our last update, a group of Salana projects

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>announced the creation of a cross chain messaging protocol. If

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you watched our Cosmos update from around that time, you'll

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>know the announcement seems to have been a not so

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>subtle response to cosmos announcement about its upcoming interchain security.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>To my mind, Salana's subsequent announcement underscored the multi chain

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>future of crypto. Institutional crypto custodian fire Blocks also announced

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that it had added support for Salana DeFi protocols and

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Salana n f t s in case you missed the memo,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Salana was becoming increasingly popular with institutions. This was in

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>large part due to Salana's close relationship with f t

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>X and Alameda. In early September, a crypto project called

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Sui announced that it had raised three hundred million dollars

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>from various crypto vcs. Now this is significant because suey

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>has its roots in Facebook's failed digital currency project d

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>M a k A. Libra, just like Aptos, and Aptos

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is considered by many to be a Salana killer. This

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>arguably makes Sue a Salana killer too. This is in

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>part because both Sue and Aptos are coded in Move,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a novel programming language developed by d MS developers. Move

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is based on the Rust programming language used by Salana,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but is much more developer friendly, or so I've heard.

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't know, Sue and Aptos are considered

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to be Salana killers because they're all backed by the

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>same entities. Ft X Ventures was a big investor in

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>both Aptos and Sue, and aptos co founder Mohammed Shake

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>confirmed in an interview that the project was working very

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>closely with fd X. Fortunately for Slana, Aptoss and Sue's

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>exposure to ft X so early on in their development

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>could set them back quite a bit. Unfortunately for Slana,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's even higher exposure to f t X could mean

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that it will be the crypto project that picks the

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>shortest straw. More on that in a moment anyways. Another

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Salana related announcement in early September came from coin base,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>whose cloud division spun up archival notes for the Salana blockchain.

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>This is significant because Salana's full transaction history was only

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>being stored on Google Big Table, which made it quite centralized.

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>In mid September, sec chairman Gary Gensler said that proof

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of state cryptocurrencies could be securities. Although Gary's comment was

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>likely about Ethereum's transition to proof of steak, Slana Labs

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was recently accused of selling securities that is soul, which

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>could put it at risk. At the end of September,

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Helium community voted to migrate it's peer to peer

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>networks from the Helium blockchain to the Salana blockchain. This

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is something we had predicted in one of our earlier

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Salana updates. Were it not for the f t X

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Alameda situation, this would have been bullish for h and However,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the ft X Alameda situation wherein has made Helium Salana

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>integration incredibly bearish for h n T, and not just

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's a part of Salana's ecosystem. Back in February,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Helium raised two d million dollars in a funding round

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>co led by you guessed it, f t x Ventures.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>At the end of September, Circle also announced that it

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>would be expanding its USDC stable coin to five additional

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>smart contract cryptocurrencies and introducing its own cross chain interoperability protocol.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Now this is evidence that Circle is moving away from Salana,

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>which is apparently the official chain for USDC. In early October,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the Salana blockchain experienced yet another outage. This time it

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was due to a misconfigured validator node. For context, most

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of Slana's outages have been due to spam transactions facilitated

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>by its block chains fixed transaction fees, which are extremely low.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>In mid October, app toss announced its main net launch,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and if you watched our video about the project, you'll

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>know that the launch was pretty badly botched. It's still

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>boggles my mind that a project with so much funding

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and backing managed to make so many mistakes, but hey,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>let's not go there. At the end of October, a

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto project called trip Protocol announced it would be creating

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized alternative to right sharing apps like Uber built

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on Salana Now, this is the kind of DAP that

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>could reach serious mass adoption, and it's such a damn

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shame that it's been set back by recent events. In

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>early November, almost half of Salana's validators went offline after

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a German cloud service provider called Hetzner banned all crypto

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>companies and projects from using its services. The huge impact

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this had on the Salana blockchain raised even more questions

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about Salana's supposed decentralization. Luckily, for Solana, this bearish news

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was quickly overshadowed by all the bullish news that came

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Salana's annual Breakpoint conference in Lisbon. The biggest

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>news was that Google Cloud had begun running a validator

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on Salana, which logically means that Google had purchased lots

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of soul. Google Cloud also announced that it had released

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>software too, in decks. Slana's transaction history, which your recall,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is being stored on Google Big Table. Now. This is

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>significant because Anatole had mentioned in earlier interviews that it

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was extremely difficult for developers to analyze Salana's transaction history.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Helium also announced that it was building out a mobile

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>network and would be giving out simcards with a free

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty day trial to everyone who purchased Salana's upcoming Saga phone.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Helium also recently partnered with telecoms Giant T Mobile to

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>increase five G coverage in rural areas, another great initiative

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>now under threat now. The announcement that everyone seemed to

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>miss was that Salana's Neon layer would be launching sometime

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in December. If you've been keeping up with our Salana updates,

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll know Neon supports the Ethereum Virtual Machine or e

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>v M. E v M compatibility could supercharge Salana's adoption.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>As a cherry on top, Circle announced that it would

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be bringing it's recently released eurostable coin to the Salana

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>blockchain next year, making Salana the second smart contract cryptocurrency

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to support euroc after Ethereum. This suggests that Circle hasn't

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>given up on Salana just yet. And then f t

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>X and Alameda blew up. Not surprisingly, the price of

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>every single cryptocurrency that f t X and Alameda had

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>invested in instantly plummeted. As ft X is day facto

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>exchange chain, Soul was at the top of the list.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Souls price was only the tip of the Iceberg, However,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as its entire ecosystem also went into crisis mode, loans

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>were liquidated, wrapped tokens issued or backed by f t

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>X and Alameda d pegged. The total value locked in

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Slana's DFI protocols fell off a cliff. The upgrade keys

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>for Project Serum and the Serum DECKX were revealed to

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be in the hands of f t X, causing the

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>community to fork what was left of the protocol. Soul

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>holders also feared that nearly a billion dollars of Soul

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>set to be unlocked would be sold now. Their fears

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>were calmed after the Salana Foundation announced it would be

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>postponing the unlock of the thirty or so million Soul

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>once again, though calling Salana's decentralization into question. To add

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>insult to injury, Google Cloud announced that it will also

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>run validator notes for the ap toss blockchain, and that

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it had partnered with the project for a developer accelerator program.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:44.239
<v Speaker 1>The timing couldn't have been worse given the circumstances. So

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>as you can see, Soul's price was holding up quite

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>well until the FTX Alameter situation. Now this is impressive

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>considering that Soul's supply has increased by around fifteen millions

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 1>since August. Assuming an average price of around thirty dollars

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>per soul, this means Soul experience up to five hundred

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of cell pressure. On the demand side, it

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>seems that Solana's n f T marketplaces were absorbing most

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of this supply shock. Institutional investment vehicles for Soul also

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still have more than one hundred million dollars invested at

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Soul's current prices. This is scary considering some of these

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>et f s were seemingly issued with the help of

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>f t X. What's even scarier is that analytics on

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Salana Explorer show that transactions on Salana have fallen

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff over the last week. The silver lining

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the analytics also suggests the drop in Salana's

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>validate account was due primarily to Hetzner's crypto ban and

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>not the f t X Alameda situation. In any case,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that the demand for Soul is down, and

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to understand why some have begun to question

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Solana's future. And this is in large part due to

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the massive amount of Soul that f t X and

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Alameda will be forced to sell when the time comes

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to compensate their creditors. According to the coindesk article that

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>kick started the concerns about f t X and alamedas

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets, Alameda held roughly one point to billion dollars

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of soul in June. Assuming the price was around forty

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars per soul at the time, This works out to

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>around thirty million soul held by the market maker. As

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>for f t X, recent leaks suggests the exchange held

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>around one billion dollars of soul as of a few

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Assuming an average price of around thirty three

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars per soul, this means that f t X held

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>an additional thirty or so million soul now. It's not

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>clear how much soul f t X and Alameda currently

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>hold for what it's worth, these numbers are consistent with

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the recent disc closures by Solana Labs and the Salana

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Foundation about their exposure to f t X and Lameter.

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Slana Labs and the Salana Foundation sold a total of

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight million soul to f t X and Alameda

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>over the course of more than two years. At current prices,

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>this soul is worth roughly nine million dollars and accounts

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for more than fifteen percent of souls total supply. While

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>not all the Soul held by f t X and

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Alameda is liquid, the fact of the matter is that

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it will inevitably be sold at some point as part

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of their bankruptcy proceedings. As I mentioned a few moments ago,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Soul managed to survive half a billion dollars of cell

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>pressure over the last three months. However, this assumes that

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourteen million Soul that entered circulation were sold, which

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely. This means that Soul may not be nearly

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>as resilient to sell pressure as it seems. More importantly,

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the demand for Soul is not nearly what it was

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>even just two weeks ago. This could make it difficult

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to absorb the hundreds of millions of dollars of cell

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>pressure that's coming. And that's just from f t X

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and Lameter. There are certainly other institutions and retail investors

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>who will sell their Soul, never mind all the promising

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Salana projects that will die because of their exposure to

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>f t X and Lameter. To make matters worse, the

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the cryptobar market probably isn't in yet. This

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>means that Soul will go lower even without all the

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cell pressure from these entities. It's long term price charts

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>suggests Soul could fall to eight dollars. This would be

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the estimated percentage loss in other large alts. Now,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering how long this cryptobear market will last,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out our video about that from

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a few months back. I reckon it still holds true

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and be doing another video about the potential catalyst that

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>could take us out of the crypto bear market lows

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the next week or two, so stay tuned. Now.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Whether Soul will ever rally back to its all time

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>highs and beyond depends on the project's upcoming milestones. These

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>can be found in an October blog post on the

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Salana GitHub and in interviews with Salana founder Anatoly Yakovenko.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>The October blog post in question is called quote Salana

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Network Upgrades, and it appears to have been published in

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>response to the outages Solana had experienced earlier that month.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>The next milestone on the list is the introduction of

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>different fee markets for different types of transactions. After that,

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Solana will be increasing the size of the blocks on

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>its blockchain. This should make Salana even faster, but it

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>will likely make its blockchain even more centralized and could

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>further compromise its security. As a alt more about the

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tradeoffs of tps using the link in the description. The

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>third milestone noted in the blog post is compact vote state,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which can be simply understood as reducing the size of

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>certain transactions. This could further increase Salana's TPS while protecting

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>against some of the centralization and security issues that could

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>arise from the block size increase. Now, what's funny about

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>these milestones is that they're eerily similar to aptosses milestones.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Ap toss is currently working on implementing different fee markets

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for different types of transactions. Salana's inspiration doesn't stop at

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>transactions either. That's because a repository on the Salana gitub

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>suggests that it's looking to make it possible to build

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>on its blockchain using the move programming language. This is

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>significant because the difficulty of building on Salana has been

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the project's biggest drawbacks. The Salana gitub also

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>contains many repositi trees related to on chain governance, something

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that's been in the works for a while now. I

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>don't imagine Solana is in a rush to roll out

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>its on chain governance now that a significant chunk of

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Soul's supply is in limbo via f t X Alameda

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and other affected crypto vcs. Speaking of which, anatotally dropped

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a bombshell about Salana's development during a panel discussion at

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the project's aforementioned Breakpoint conference earlier this month. He basically

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>said that he will consider Solana to be out of

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>beta once a second validator client has been completed. Now,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this is huge news that seems to have flown under

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone's radar because of the ft X Alameda situation. To

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be fair, and it's only only said that he would

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>consider Salana to be out of beta at that point,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>not that it necessarily would be. Even so, it's the

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>closest thing we've got to an alpha timeline thus far.

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>The thing is that Salana still seems to be unreliable,

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and its block chain and especially its ecosystem seem to

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be in a more vulnerable position than ever. This makes

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it hard to understand how Salana could be considered complete

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>when it's still experiencing so many issues. This brings me

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to my concerns about Salana, and my first concern has

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>to do with Salana Labs and the Salana Foundation, specifically

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheets. The blog post detailing their exposure to

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>f t X and Alameda suggests that the Salana Foundation

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>only has around one hundred million dollars of cash on hand.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>In case you're wondering, the foundation only had around one

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of cash on ft X when it collapsed. However,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it had two hundred million dollars worth of f t

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>T and s r M sitting there. These tokens are

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>now essentially worth nothing, along with the three point two

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>million shares of ft X the foundation also holds. Frustratingly,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the blog post didn't reveal how much runway Salana Labs has,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but Anna Totally mentioned on Twitter that it has enough

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>money in the war chest for another thirty months or so.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Anna Totally specified that this runway is in dollars, which

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>begs the question of how much soul Salana Labs holds,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and a Totally also confirmed that Salana Labs had no

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>assets on ft X, which is certainly good news. The

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>bad news is that f t X and Alameda were

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the primary money funnel for the Salana ecosystem. What's more

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is that Salana's association with ft X and Alameda could

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>make its ecosystem unattractive to other vcs. What this means

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the Salana Foundation and Slana Labs might be

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the only entities willing to invest in Salana's ecosystem for

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a while, and the cash they currently have on hand

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>won't be nearly enough. This means they might have to

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>start selling Soul, which would cause its price to fall

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even further. This relates to my second concern, and that's regulation.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier, the SEC is watching proof of

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>state cryptocurrencies very closely, and Salana Labs is already involved

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in a security suit. The fact that the SEC and

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>others are now investigating FTX means that Salana could come

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>under additional scrutiny. Now, my final concern about Salana is straightforward,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and that is competition. Anatoly admitted in an interview that

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Salana team is anxious about Aptos and Suey because

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of how developer friendly they are. Aptos and Suey also

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have an absurd amount of big tech backing due to

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>their d M origins. There are also other smart contract

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies like Polka Dot, Near Protocol, Avalanche, Cardana, and Ethereum,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which are fundamentally fighting for dominance of the same critical

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto niche. These crypto projects aren't nearly as exposed to

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>f t X and Alameda as Salana was and continues

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to be. In the race for superpower dominance, resources and

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>influence are the currency's worth accumulating, and this is something

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that China has been doing for years in a continent

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>many in the West seem to have forgotten about. I am,

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of course talking about Africa, home to some of the

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>largest deposits of natural resources in the world, a continent

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that contains sixty of the world's arable land, a continent

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that by twenty fifty will have a quarter of the

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>world's population. Today. I'm going to tell you exactly what

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>China has been up to in Africa and what it

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>could mean for the balance of global power. Before we

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>dive into China's strategy in Africa, it's important to appreciate

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how important the continent will be in the next few decades.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, it's a vast and largely untapped resource

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for all types of minerals and commodities, everything from copper

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to cobalt, gold to diamonds, and aluminium to titanium. For example,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>according to estimates from the United Nations, Africa is home

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to thirty percent of the world's mineral reserves of the gold,

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent of its oil, and nine of its chromium

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and platinum. This map over here is pretty handy, and

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it shows exactly how resource rich Africa is. It's color

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>coded by those countries with the most abundant minerals. All

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of these resources are important for any country that is

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>looking to continue growing economically. They're even more important at

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a time when older minds are starting to become exhausted

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and older wells are running empty. What's perhaps most surprising

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about this is the fact that Africa only accounted for

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about five point five percent of the world's total mind

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>minerals in twenty nineteen. Those deposits are sitting there waiting

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to be extracted, and it's not only the mineral wealth

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that much of Africa is sitting on. Those vast tracts

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of arable land mean that the continent could become a

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>bread basket for the world. This is particularly relevant now

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>when you realize how dependent we've become on farmland in

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>regions such as Ukraine and Russia. And finally, we also

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have to consider African's human capital potential. The continent has

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing population in the world. Sub Saharan Africa's

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>population is expected to double by twenty fifty. This is

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 1>important because of the fact that population decline is one

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest threats the world faces. It's something that

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is most concerned about and it's the subject

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of a video I did recently that is in the

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>description for you. The point is that countries cannot continue

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to grow economically if they have declining populations. Hence, as

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Africa is going to have plenty of new young people

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>entering the workforce in the coming decades, it can continue

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>its rapid economic growth. By some estimates, Africa is well

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on its way to becoming a five trillion dollar economy,

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>as household consumption is expected to increase at a three

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent yearly clip. This growing population also presents

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>economic advantages for key trading partners. All of these African

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>citizens will be important consumers of products and services and

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>hence will offer strong export demand for countries that have

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>tapped out Western markets. Not only that, but all these

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>people could be potential allies or adversaries based on how

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they view other countries. In a game of international influence,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the more people and country that you have on your side,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the more geopolitical clouds you have. So it's quite clear

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are a number of reasons why Africa is

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a continent which cannot be ignored and China is now

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>involved in a modern day quote scramble for Africa. Take

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a look at this chart over here. This is the

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>total amount of f d I, or foreign direct investment

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that China has been sending to Africa over the past

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years. As you can see, it has gone from

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a mere seventy four million dollars in two thousand and

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>three to over forty five billion in two thousand and eighteen,

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>although it shrunk slightly during COVID. All of this makes

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>China Africa's fourth largest investor and places it ahead of

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States in this regard. Not only that, but

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Chinese loans to African countries have totaled one hundred and

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty three billion dollars between two thousand and two thousand

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen. More about that, in a bit. The vast

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>majority of this investment in and loans to Africa has

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>gone into the development of infrastructure. This is all part

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of China's so called Belt and Road Initiative or b

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>r I for those unfamiliar. This is a global infrastructure

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>initiative unveiled by the Chinese government in twenty thirteen. It

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>forms the centerpiece of Zijimping's foreign policy and calls for

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>China to play a greater role in world diplomacy. Essentially,

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a strategy to win the hearts and minds of

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>foreign populations. Of course, this is all infrastructure that the

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese could also eventually use themselves. Now. As of August

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, one hundred and forty nine countries were listed

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as having signed up to the b r I. Chinese

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>investments in infrastructure for African countries have been particularly outsized, however.

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, according to this report in twenty eighteen, China

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>provided over twenty of the overall funding contributed towards infrastructure

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:09.720
<v Speaker 1>development projects in Africa, and in this seventeen McKinsey report,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese firms and construction companies one almost half of all

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>engineering and procurement projects continent wide. However, while China has

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>been ramping up its infrastructure development on the continent under

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>z it's not in fact a new phenomenon. That's because

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>China first entered Africa back in the nineteen seventies and

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one of its first projects was a railway that connected

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ports in Tanzania to towns in Zambia. This was done

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>under the leadership of Chairman Mao and it was the

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>most expensive infrastructure project that China had ever attempted. It

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was also a godsend to Zambia, which was effectively cut

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>off from seaports further south thanks to the actions of

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Zimbabwean government. With this new railway, Zambia could export

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>its copper to world markets, including co incidentally enough, a

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fast growing China. I'll leave a link to the story

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Tazara railroad in the description for you. It

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is truly fascinating now. Of course, infrastructure developments like this

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and many subsequent ones mean that China has strong ties

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>with politicians and business leaders in the African countries it

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>has been built in. This means that they can enter

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>into mutually beneficial trade agreements which shake up the status quo.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>According to data from China's Customs Agency. Trade between China

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and Africa rose to its highest level last year. It

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>increased by thirty five percent from twenty to two hundred

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and fifty four billion dollars last year. You can see

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what that looks like here. Not only that, but China

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>looks set to overtake the EU as Africa's biggest trading

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>partner by This will be a symbolic moment given that

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>many European nations are viewed by any in Africa as

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the colonizers of yesteryear now being overtaken by new colonizers

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. What do I mean by that, Well,

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it all really depends on the terms that China has

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>attached to much of its infrastructure spending. While f DI

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is great loans for bridges eight and Africa has been

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>racking up quite a number of loans over the past

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>few years. If you take a look at this infographic here,

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see those countries that are most in debt

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to China. African ones stick out like a sore thumb.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Those countries with the highest debt loads were Jibooty and Angola,

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>where the aggregate Chinese debt exceeded forty of their gross

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>national income. In the case of Jibouti, China holds seventy

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of its total debt. According to the World Bank and

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the i m F, these loans are structured more like

0:36:55.719 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>commercial loans, and they have shorter repayment windows. Their conditions

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are also confidential, and they're usually used for the purpose

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of building infrastructure rather than broader humanitarian goals. Now, of course,

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that the i m F and World

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Bank don't exactly have much right to opine on the matter,

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps that's just me. Either way, the point is

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that when someone owes you money, you have a great

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>deal of sway over them. That's why people have accused

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>China of engaging in what is termed quote debt trap diplomacy. Essentially,

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if you owe China money, you're more likely to dance

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to its tune, not only when it comes to concessions

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>within your own country, but also on the international stage.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>For the clearest example of this, you only need to

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>look at how countries in Africa tend to vote on

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>u N resolutions. For example, in fifty countries issued a

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>statement supporting China's crackdown in Hong Kong, more than half

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>were African Some African countries have also been silent on

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>China's human rights record in places like Sinjang. The president

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of Burkina FASO has stated, quote, some Western forces hyping

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>up the so called Sinjang related issues are actually launching

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>unprovoked attacks on China to serve their own ulterior motives.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That same meeting was attended by the presidents of Sudan

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Republic of the Congo. Or if you want

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at a much more sensitive issue

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 1>with China, you can see how support for Taiwan has

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>almost completely evaporated across Africa. This wasn't always the case.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen sixties, Taiwan outpaced China in its

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>efforts to cement diplomatic ties with African nations. However, ever,

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>since a ninety one vote that denied Taiwan a seat

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at the UN table, African countries have been switching their

0:38:54.640 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>allegiances in Burkina FASO officially cut ties with Taiwan, and

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>now there is only one African country that retains ties

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with the island. That's the Kingdom of es Swatini, one

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which has been under represented in Chinese investments and wasn't

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>invited to numerous Africa China summits. It does make me

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder how long they can hold out. The point is

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that China knows that these investments, as well as debts,

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>give it a great deal of clout with these countries.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But what happens if a country finds itself in a

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>position where it can no longer service its debts. Well,

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>like any hard up individual debtor, it could lose some

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of its collateral. Up until a few years ago, the

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>notion that a nation state would seize another country's key

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure over a bad debt was laughable. However, this happened

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago when China took over the hambn

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Tota Port in Sri Lanka. This was a port built

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese with debt financed by Chinese banks. When

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka struggled to repay its debt, it was forced

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to hand over the port on a nine year lease.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>More about Sri Lanka's economic woes in the description. So

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>given Sri Lanka's experience with bad Chinese debt, African countries

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are naturally beginning to worry too. You only need to

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the number of Chinese built ports

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world and where they are concentrated. The alarm

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>over this was raised three years ago in Kenya, for example,

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>by the country's Order to General. He said that Kenya

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>could be made to surrender control of its port in

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Mombassa if it defaulted on a three point six billion

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>dollar loan from China used to build a railway. It's

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not just ports either. Quite recently, there were concerns that

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>China may attempt to grab Uganda's sole international airport. This

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was due to the fact that China had extended a

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollar loan to expand the facilities there.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>A parliamentary probe in Uganda concluded that China had imposed

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>onerous conditions on the loan, including potential forfeiture of the

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>airport in case of default. The Ugandan finance minister was

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hauled before parliament and grilled about the loan. He apologized

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>profusely and said, we shouldn't have accepted some of the clauses,

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but they told us you either take it or leave it.

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Whether that is indeed the case is hard to tell.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese, for their part, have adamantly denied the claim

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that they were attempting to seize the airport. Moreover, the

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>concerns that were raised about the Mombassa port appeared to

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>be as a result of a misunderstanding over a key

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>clause in the contract, and as of yet, China still

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>hasn't seized any African infrastructure. However, concerns do remain. Now

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 1>remember that chart I showed you about how in debt

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Djibouty was to China. Well, it turns out that China

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>has been investing heavily in the country. This has been

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>happening ever since China's People's Liberation Army or p l

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>A established its first and only overseas military base. China

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is said to have spent five hundred and ninety million

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars on both this military facility and the door Allah

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Multi Purpose Port, the deepest port in East Africa. The

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>port is also of great strategic importance given its location.

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It sits on the Horn of Africa and near key

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>shipping routes. More recently, a Chinese company agreed to finance

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Djibouty's port revamp in a three hundred and fifty million

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar investment deal. The company already owned twenty three and

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a half percent of the port, so this could be

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a further ploy to embed its influence. Given the parallels

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that this shares with the Sri Lankan port prior to

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>its seizure, you have to worry. Let's also not forget

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that military base near the port, one that the Chinese

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>seem dead set on keeping in place. Either way, the

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>prospect of infrastructure seizures or more onerous concessions will always

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>dog those African countries that have taken on Chinese debt. Okay,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's a concern that many have with Chinese engagement

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in Africa. But what do Africans themselves think of this?

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And are these characterizations by the Western media fair. Most

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Africans view China in a positive light. For example, a

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>survey last year of thirty four African countries by Afro Barometer,

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a research group, found that six of the respondents thought

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>China had a very or somewhat positive influence. The US meanwhile,

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 1>only scored Quite surprisingly, the African Union has a lower

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>rating than both countries. The Economist magazine also conducted a

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>similar survey earlier this year, where the majority of the

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>respondents thought China had a good rather than a bad influence,

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and in another survey by the Ichi Kowitz Family Foundation,

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of African youth see China as the

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>most influential player on the continent. This survey targeted four

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half thousand younger Africans between the ages of

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and twenty four. It's also important to note that

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>US influence in the minds of these citizens has also

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>dropped over the years. China's impact on the continent was

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>also seen as more positive than that of the US.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>According to the survey's authors, quote, young Africans are telling

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 1>us that they are seeing tangible, visible and very impactful

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>signs of the role that China has played in the

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>development of Africa. This is all quite telling. It shows

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that despite the concerns in the Western media about China's

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>intentions in Africa, African people themselves still view China as

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a end rather than a foe. That is interesting in itself,

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but it also shows that mistrust of the West runs

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>deep in Africa. China is definitely not making these investments

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for charitable purposes, but as long as local citizens see

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the returns from said investments, it's an improvement

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on the status quo. So what if China is funding

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the construction of an airport or a road. It's better,

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>surely than not having them at all. Let's also not

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>forget that the i m F and World Bank have

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a really shoddy record when it comes to growth and development.

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this in my video on the I

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>m F, which I'll leave in the description for you. Moreover,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I happen to think that the often patronizing way in

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which Western governments, media and other organizations portray Africa could

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>play a factor in these surveys. Africa is sometimes made

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>out to be a somewhat hapless place that's unwittingly being

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>taken advantage of by ruthless foreign governments, an image that

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>many Africans doubtless take issue with. African leaders also want

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it clear to Western governments that they have

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>no option but to deal with China on account of

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the lack of engagement from the West, and they have

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a point. Despite this, though, it's encouraging to see that

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>many Africans do also have a healthy dose of skepticism

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to China. According to that aforementioned Afrobarometer survey,

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the respondents are concerned about being heavily

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>indebted to China and say that their governments have borrowed

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>too much money. The respondents also think that China's influence

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is on the decline. The proportion of Africans who said

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>China's economic activities in their countries have some or a

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of influence on their economies has declined over the

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>past five years from se to But if China can

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in us to be viewed more favorably by Africans than

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the West, then it will be well positioned to take

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>advantage of a continent that is poised to become a

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>global powerhouse in a few decades time. Okay, time for

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a few of my thoughts on China's scramble for Africa.

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It's quite clear that Africa is going to become one

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of the most important, if not the most important, continent

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the not too distant future. Therefore, it makes logical

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>sense for China to be positioning itself to make the

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:39.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the opportunities there. China cannot continue to power

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>its economic engine unless it has the resources to buy

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>goods as well as the buyers to consume them. It

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>also needs to curry favor with countries around the world,

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>especially at a time when it's vying for allies against Taiwan,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and its initiatives on the continent have had a great

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>deal of success. This is affected in the growth of

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese trade and the favorable perceptions the citizens of Africa

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have of China's influence. However, practices that threatened to entrap

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>countries into debts they cannot pay back threatened to sustain

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that reputation. This is something that China seems to have

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciated more recently, and it has in fact forgiven the

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>debt of a number of African countries. I also think

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that African countries have a healthy skepticism about these loans

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese involvement more generally from the era of European

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>colonialism to the I m F, World Bank and USSR

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties, seventies and eighties. They know that

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:43.240
<v Speaker 1>other countries have long been eager to feed at their trough.

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But if they're able to craft deals and agreements with

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese that give them infrastructure and trade that they

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have with the West, then they are in a

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>strong position. It doesn't have to be a zero sum game,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and for the West's part, he should also try and

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>engage more with Africa, but it shouldn't be with the

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.800
<v Speaker 1>same playbook that many Western countries used in the past. Moreover,

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>viewing Africa as a victim of exploitation isn't flattering, and

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to present yourself as the white knight who can

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>save it is insulting. Quite simply, global superpowers should treat

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Africa as they would like to be treated. They should

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 1>show its leaders respect on the world stage and foster

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>mutually beneficial relationships that can take advantage of its growth.

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It could be an investment that pays off handsomely in

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty years time. Thank you so much for listening to

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the coin Bureau podcast. If you'd like to learn more

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about cryptocurrency, you can visit our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com forward slash coin Bureau. You can also go

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to coin bureau dot com for loads more information about

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all things crypto. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at coin bureau or one word, and I'm also active

0:49:56.360 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok and Instagram too. You ll known call Cong

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Kong Kong