WEBVTT - Could some particles have tiny electric charges?

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, you have an electric car, right, Yeah, I

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>drive a Nissan Leaf these days, and last time I

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>had a Chevy bolt, so you bolted from the bolt

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and to turn over a new leaf, I left it behind. Now,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>how much does it cost to charge up with one

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of those electric cars? Well, that's kind of a charged question,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but usually less than ten dollars. Actually, oh wow, you

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>only charge you ten bucks to charge your car? You

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>go to one of those charging stations. No, I usually

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>charge it at home where I'm in charge. You can

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>charge ten bucks to charge your car where you're in charge,

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and charge it on my credit card. You should charge them.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm positive that won't work. Hi'm for Hammo cartoonists and

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the creator of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, and I

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>actually do sell charges back to the electric company. Nice

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>solar panels. I do have solar panels, but unfortunately the

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>electrons I produced don't end up in my car. They

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to the company and then I

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>buy fresh electrons from them. I don't have one of

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>those massive home batteries yet. Yeah, you don't want old electrons?

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The cool kind of stale, right. The thing, I don't know.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I've had some really vintage electrons created during the Big Bang,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were pretty tasty. Aren't all electrons created in

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang? Some of them might have been, but

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>also electrons are being created all the time, and so

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some electrons might be very, very fresh, and some of

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>them might have had many, many lives before you. Do

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you have like an electron summerlier that tells you the

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>vintage of electrons? And how do you taste electrons? Do

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you just stick your tongue in the electrical outlet or what?

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>What advice are we giving the public here? That's a

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>shocking suggestion, Jorge, sticking your tongue in the outlet. I'm

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>positive that's not a good idea. But it is an

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting philosophical question of whether you could taste the age

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of an electron or even somehow tell its age. We

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think so, because they're quantum particles, so they're all identical.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Every electron is the same as every other electron, and

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so there's no way to tell if an electron is

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen billion years old or fourteen billiseconds old. Yeah, it

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of rude. To ask anyways, But welcome

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio, in which we try to be positive

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about all the charged questions there are about the age

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, how big it's been getting, and what

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been eating. We like to think about everything involved

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in understanding the universe, from the deep nature of the

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>fabric of space itself, all the way up to the

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>shape and size of the universe, and everything fascinating in between.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We want to tickle the curiosity that we know is

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>inside your mind and make you wonder at this marvelous universe.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is it this way and not some other way.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right because it is an electrifying universe, full of

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing things happening in it, things coming together, things being

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>pushed apart, And we like to zap all of that

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>knowledge into your brain so that you get a small buzz.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And the electricity is one of the oldest topics that

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>humans have been thinking about. After all, it's obviously out

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there in the world. You don't need a superconducting super

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>collider in order to study electricity and magnetism. You just

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>need to watch a rainstorm and look at lightning or

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>zap yourself as you walk across a carpet. So humans

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have been aware of this strange phenomena of electricity for

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a long long time. And wait, wait, wait, wait, they

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>had electricity back in the steam age. How did they

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>power their light bulbs? You know, almost all electrical generations

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>still uses steam. It's incredible how versatile the steam engine

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>really is. That what the electrons are always wet. I

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on with the plumbing in your

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>house that your electrons are wet. But that does not

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sound like a good combination. You know, not so much

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>wet as steamy. I get steamy electron. Well, electricity has

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>been something that's been tickling the minds of humans and

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>physicists and proto physicists for a long long time, you know,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>watching a rainstorm and wondering like wow, what is that crazy?

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Zapping all the way up to Benjamin Franklin trying to understand,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 1>like what's going on. It's been something we've been working

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>on for a long time. We've made a lot of progress,

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and yet there's still really basic questions about how it works.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, the origin of the word electricity, Like I

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder when humans started to think of electricity as electricity

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>because I imagine, you know, for millions of years we

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>saw lightning, but we didn't think it was anything different

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>other than light or you know, strips of light. Yeah.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a long history of crazy ideas to

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>explain what we see out there, and it wasn't until

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred years ago that people trying to be

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of systematic about it and come up with like

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>something you could describe as a theory to explain what

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was going on. You know, before that we had basically

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>mythology zoos throwing lightning bolts and this kind of stuff.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I see, so Zoos was the first electric company. I

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder if zeus charge for lightning bolts, right, I don't know.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>They are pretty spectacular to look at. But anyways, electricity

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of those old subjects that humans have been

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 1>thinking about and wondering about, and apparently it's still something

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that we wonder about today. That's right. We have graduated

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from thinking about electricity as the product of an angry

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>god to thinking about it as a strange, invisible fluid

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that flows through matter, to modern ideas that electricity is

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>carried by tiny, little discrete charged particles, each of which

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 1>carry this strange quantum label of electric charge. It doesn't

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sound like we've progressed much there from saying electricity is

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.559
<v Speaker 1>something that God throws down from the sky to something

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that little tiny particles have. Well, maybe emotionally we've progressed.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't think electrons are angry as Zeus was.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>So you know, maybe it's just a calmer theory of

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe, or maybe you just don't know if your

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>electrons are mad at you. It could be, especially if

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>you ask them their age. But that means that all

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>electrons in the universe would have to be mad at you.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>That's like a whole universe filled with screaming, mad electrons.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of terrifying. Maybe it's only the ones that

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you use for your car. They don't like where you're going.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The ones we put to work, Yeah, exactly, just because

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to walk, Daniel, even if I'm walking,

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that uses electrons. Right, there's electrons in everything. Anytime you

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>do some work, that's going to be electrons involved. So

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that's why the electron labor union is so powerful. I

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder how they hold together. But there is a lot

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand about the universe. And it's kind of

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>surprising to think about the idea that there are things

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand about electricity. I feel like the electricity

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is something that we use every day. I mean, we're

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>using it right now to record this, and also everyone

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is using this to listen to this podcast, and yet

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there are things we still don't know about it. Yeah. Well,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't actually have to understand the universe in order

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to use it, right. You took advantage of gravity holding

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you under the earth surface long before anybody had any

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>understanding of gravity, and even four hundreds of years when

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we had a pretty deep misunderstanding of gravity. So it's

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just sort of part of the process of science to

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>develop these descriptions of what we see, try to explain them,

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and then refine them as time goes on. There will

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>always be open questions things we don't understand. What I

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>hope that listeners appreciate is that some of these questions,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these things we still don't understand, are really

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty basic and have to do fundamentally with the nature

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. What is it anyway? Yeah, And so today

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on the program, we'll be tackling Could there be particles

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with different electric charges? That's right. We know about a

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>few different kinds of particles with a few different kinds

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of electric charges. But the curious person always wonders, like, well,

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>why is that? It? Is there more on the list?

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Is the universe capable of doing other things? And it

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just isn't? Or are there other particles out there with

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>really weird electric charges? Yeah? I guess when we say

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>different electric charges, we mean different charges than the electron, right, Like,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>could there be a particle out there with a charge

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not the same as the electron? Yeah, we actually

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>do have a few examples of that, right, Like quarks

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have strange charges like two thirds and minus one third,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and the electron is this charge negative one. But it's

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think about, like could there be particle with

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>charges of like one millionth or one billionth or like

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pi or other strange numbers. There seems to be like

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a pattern to the electric charges, or they seem to

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>prefer these sort of discrete units, But we don't really

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>understand why that is. Oh, I mean we're asking today

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>whether you can have a particle with like point zero

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>zero zero one of the charge of the electron. Yeah,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is that possible to do those particles exist? What would

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it mean for the universe if they did or they didn't?

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But you said that, we know about particles that have

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>one third of the charge of the electron. That's a

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>quart or some of the courts. That's right, Some of

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarks have charged one third, and some of the

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>quirks have charged two third. Basically, every particle we've ever

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>seen either has zero charge or some multiple of one

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>third of the electrons charge. Nicee. So today we're asking

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you can go smaller than that? Could there be

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>particles with less than a third of the electron charge? Yeah?

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>One fifth, one ninth, one billionth even are there limits?

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there a rule that prevents a particle from having

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>some super tiny electric charge but not zero? And I

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>assume that's not a question with a small answer, and

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe even answer that will shock us. That's right, it's

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a small question with big consequences for the philosophy of

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>electric charges. Was usual. We were wondering how many people

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>out there had thought about this question or wondered whether

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>particles can have tiny electric charges. Thank you very much

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to our list of volunteers who answer these questions for

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody else's enjoyment and education. If you would like to

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>contribute to your voice to this segment, please don't be shy.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't describe. We let everybody participate. Right to me

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com. So think

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>about it for a second. Have you heard or think

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that electron can have tiny electric charges? Here's what people

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>had to say. Yep, why not. I will accept particles

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of any coolure. I'm sure there's no discriminating against fractional

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>electric charges. I would guess that particles with fractional electrical

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>charges would be possible, given that in chemistry they have certeometry,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>and so it maybe does not real out the fact

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that this could be the same for sometime a particles.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I have heard health spin as a quantum property, but

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>never health electrical charge. So I will say no, But

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>since you are asking it, maybe yes, my guess would

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be probably. I'm sure there's a law physics it says no,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to be a plus or minus or no charge.

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see why you couldn't have a fractional charge.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, so, yeah, I think that is the case. Today.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we have quarks with like one third charge

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>or two thirds charge, And I think the actual charge

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of an electron is some crazy fractional number and we've

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>just chosen to assign it the value of one for convenience.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think that's possible. Well, isn't charges caused

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>by particles like electrons considered particles? Am I getting that wrong?

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing no. Well, I'm going to walk into the

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>obvious trap here and say that I think no particles

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot have tiny fractional electric charges. I think that an

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>electric charge is either present, positive or negative or absent,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and is an indivisible quality. I'm hoping, of course, that,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>true to the nature of this podcast, this obvious trap

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>will turn out by the end of the podcast to

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have been an a double bluff and vindicate mind ignorance.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, A lot of people said yes, because, of course,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe we asked the question wrong. I think that most

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>people don't even imagine the existence of like particles with

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>one millions of the electric charge. Yeah, that's not something

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>nice they open night usually wondering about. I mean, maybe

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one thousands, but not a million. There's some limit there.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>You're like, one thousands is reasonable. One millions. This crazy. Yeah, yes,

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that is what I think about at night. Well, you know,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a way to explore the universe is just to try

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be creative, to think about, like what assumptions are

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we making because we've only seen certain examples, what conclusions

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are we drawing because we've only seen a subset of

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>what the universe can actually do. So sometimes it takes

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of creativity to like break out of

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the box we've been living in and wonder what could

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be outside that box. Sometimes we don't even realize the

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>boxes that we are in. So I love this question

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>precisely because a lot of people are like, huh, that's interesting.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I never even consider that there could be other kinds

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of particles with weird electric charges in them. And that's

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what makes it exciting, because that's the best moment in physics,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when we realize we've been overlooking something and maybe it

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>shows us something new about the real universe out there.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if maybe what we're asking here really is like,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are there maybe particles with weird electric charges that we

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't know how weird electric charges? Is that kind of

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're asking, like, maybe there are things there are

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>particles out there which just haven't seen them or known

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about them, that actually have these weird charges we just

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't noticed. Yeah, exactly. One possibility is that there's a

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>new kind of particle out there with weird electric charges

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't noticed yet. The other possibility is that

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of the particles we do know don't actually

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have zero electric charge, they have very very very very

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>small electric charges. All right, well, let's jump into this topic, Daniel.

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the basics. What is an electric charge? Well,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know. All thanks for joining us. See

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you next time. It's fun to joke about that, because

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that really is the answer. We don't actually know what

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an electric charge is physically. It's part of our description

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of what we see happen in the universe. So we

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>notice that some particles that accelerated if you put them

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in an electric field, and other particles don't. Right, And

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we even have an equation that describes it. Right. Force

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is equal to charge times the field strength. So if

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a particle is accelerated when you put it in an

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>electric field, we say that particle has charge. If a

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>particle ignores the electric field, we say the particle has

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>no charge. And the bigger the charge of the particle,

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the greater the force that it feels. But it's just

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like our description of what we see. We

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>put this into our mathematical story about the universe. That

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean we know like what it is, right, But

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's even more confusing than that, because it's kind of like,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you define an electric field? Isn't an electric

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>field defined as how the or this change on a

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>particle that has charge? Yeah, exactly right. We say the

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>fields are generated by charged particles. We don't ever even

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>see the fields themselves, right, you can't observe a field.

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>The only thing you can observe is the field pushing

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on particles. So if you want to get down to

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the nitty gritty, what do we actually see is that

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>some particles push on each other, and we have this

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>intermediate thing we call a field, which allows particles that

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>are far away from each other to push on each other.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But fundamentally, we say, some particles push on each other

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and some particles pull on each other, and the charges

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fields. It's just sort of like our mathematical

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>story of what's happening there that to describe what we see.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you would define a charge more accurately. As

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have an electron here and an

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>electron there, they're going to push against each other, and

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that push sort of depends on this thing that you

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>call a charge. Yeah, you can put a label on

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>every kind of particle and that label tells you how

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to predict whether the particle will be pushed by another

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>particle or it's field equivalently, and that works, and it

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>works really, really really well. It works incredibly well. It's

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the best tested theories we have in physics.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We can do pages and pages of calculations to predict

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>how electrons will push on each other and how they

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>will shoot photons at each other, and we can do

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>experiments to test those predictions, and the experiment and the

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>prediction agree to like eight or nine decimal places. It's

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really extraordinary how accurate it is. And so you look

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at that theory and you're like, hm, well, if it's

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>so accurate, maybe it's really describing what happens in the universe.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this thing we invented, this idea of charge, is

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a property of the particle itself, not just part of

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>our story about the particle. Right, it's sort of like

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>mass is for gravity, Right Like, if you have two

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>particles out there in space, they're going to attract each

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>other depending on this thing about them called mass, And

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the same for charge, right Like, if

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you have two particles, they're going to either attract each

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>other or repel each other by a certain amount, pending

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>on whether they have this thing called charge. Yes, excellent, exactly,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And in particle physics we generalize this concept of charge.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Do not just refer to electromagnetism, as you say. You

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>can think about gravity in terms of gravitational charges or masses,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can think about the strong force in terms

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of strong nuclear charges on quarks. Those are even more

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated because instead of having two values like plus or minus,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have three values red, green, and blue. The weak force

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>also has a kind of charge that we call weak hypercharge.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So in a more general sense, charge tells you whether

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a particle feels a force. Like the electron has an

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, but it has no strong nuclear charge. It

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel the strong nuclear force. A quark has both

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>an electric charge and a strong nuclear charge, and so

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it feels both forces. So really, charge in general is

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a label about saying whether or not a particle feels

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that force, and it's something philosophically we like attached to

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the particle. We say, this is a property of this particle.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>The electron has the charge physically, I don't really know

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what that means, like where in the electron is it.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>It's just sort of this like ineffable quantum label we

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>attached to it. We don't really know where it comes from,

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>like what generates the actual charge itself? Well, I think

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in quantum theory and correct me if I'm wrong. But

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it also because it sort of has to do whether

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a particle interacts with certain quantum fields or done right,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe that's another way to define it. If the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>electron doesn't interact with the strong force field, then it

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't have a strong charge. Yeah, I think that's

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>another way of saying the same thing. You can think

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>about all these quantum pictures of the world either in

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of particles that are pushing on each other or

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of fields, because remember, these particles are actually

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>just little wiggles in quantum fields, and those fields can

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes talk to each other. So, for example, the electromagnetic

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>field for which the photon is a particle can interact

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with or talk to any field that has charges. So

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the electron field of which the electron is the wiggle

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is the particle, right, that will interact with the electromagnetic field,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and so will the field of the w boson because

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it has electric charge. So as you say, the fields

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that interact with a certain force, we say their particles

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have that charge, and the fields that don't, we say

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the particles don't have that charge. So, for example, the

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>neutrino field, neutrinos have no electric charge. Neutrino fields and

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic fields totally ignore each other. Right, So then maybe

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you can define charges being like whether or not auto

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>particle interacts with the electromagnetic field. Yeah, for the electric charge,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of like particle theory, they often talk

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about it as coupling. The electric charge is the way

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>that the photon field couples to the electron field. How

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>those two fields sort of like let energy slide back

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth between them. I feel like we're getting a

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>little steaming out there. Are we back to talking about

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>steamia not steaming a not safe for workway? You know,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we're just talking about connections. We're just talking about energy

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>sliding from one kind of feel to the other. All right, well,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what sounds like we kind of have a definition of

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what charge is. We just don't know where it comes

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>from kind of right, That's the thing, like, we don't

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>know why some particles interact with the electropicnet feels and

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>why some don't. That's right. We have a very effective

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>description of it, but we don't know why some particles

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have it, what the rules are for what charges you

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to have, and where it comes from at all. Yeah,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess some particles just have that spark and others

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>some particles just have a positive attitude. All right, Well,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>let's get into a little bit of the history of

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea of an electric charge. Where did it come from?

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>How did humans start to figure this out? And then

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the bigger question of whether electrons or

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>things with electrical charge can have tiny, almost imperceptible charges.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break or I we're

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about charges, and we're charging ahead here with this topic,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about whether electrons or charged particles that have the

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fuel electricity can have electrical charges that maybe have been

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>escaping our notice for thousands of years. So Daniel, maybe

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>step us through here a little bit on the history

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of charges. When did we start noticing that some things

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have electrical charge? So we certainly had noticed the properties

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of electricity for a long long time, right, static electricity

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and lightning, these are things everybody was aware of, and

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>until around the mid seventeen hundreds, the idea to explain

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>these things was dominated by concepts like effluvium or this

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>basically this two fluid theory of electricity and magnetism. It

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>was like this invisible fluid that flowed through objects, two

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of invisible liquids flowing through objects, one positive,

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>one negative, that could cancel each other out right, Because

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>as you said, I imagine that this is something we've

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>noticed for maybe hundreds of thousands of years. Imagine, you know,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>even caveman would get you know, static electricity in their

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>hair would stand up right, But for them it was

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>probably just you know, magic, or they had no way

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to grant that there would be a reason for that exactly.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>And the process of science is want to try and

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>develop like an explanation for these things. How can we

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>unify different phenomena that we see, the static electricity in

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>your hair and the lightning in the sky, Which of

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>these things are related and which of these are totally

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>different phenomena. So that's the process of physics, right sorting

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>out all the phenomena we see and trying to coalesce them,

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>boil them down into a few simple explanations, and try

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to find the relationship between those to give, like, you know,

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a single description of everything that's happening. And so this

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really is an ancient process. It's a great example of

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole process of physics of trying to coalesce many

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>different things down into one explanation. But I think you're

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that maybe we did have sort of some idea

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that it was something that flowed between things, right, Yeah,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of considered to be a liquid. We

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the idea of particles yet. It wasn't until

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the late eighteen hundreds when J. J. Thompson

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.479
<v Speaker 1>discovered the electron that we thought of it is like

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>isolated to a little particle. It was sort of more

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>similar to early concepts of heat. You know, this liquid

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that flowed between things. And it's really fascinating because the

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>original idea was of two liquids, one positive and one negative,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>which could flow between things, and they could cancel each

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>other out. It was mostly trying to explain like electrical

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>attraction and repulsion and that theory. You know, it sounds

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>right because we know that there are protons and there

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>are electrons, which is actually not quite right because the

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>protons don't really flow. Right. What happens with electricity in objects,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It say it's the electrons that are moving. And so

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it was actually in the mid seventeen hundreds with Ben Franklin,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>came up with the one fluid theory of electricity. Basically,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there's just one kind of thing that's moving around. Now

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we know, of course those are electrons, and that's a

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more accurate description of what's actually happening, but it sort

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of ignores the protons and the positive charge. So it's

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of fascinating from that point of view. Historically, I

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're saying that maybe like our early ideas about

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>electricity was that it was sort of like a fluid.

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm sort of like magical fluid in a way,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe at first we thought there were positive

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>fluids negative fluids, but more actually, when you see electricity

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on an everyday basis, it's usually the negative electric charges

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that are flowing around exactly in immaterial it's the electrons

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that are moving. The protons are usually in the crystal

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and can't really move very well. The nuclei don't flow,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>so it really is the electrons that are moving. And

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Ben Franklin did all these experiments with cloths and glass rods,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course his famous experiments with lightning. He's one

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the first people to try to explain all these

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>things in terms of a single phenomena. Did he use

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars bills? Also? He was all about the Benjamin's

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But then it was in the late eighteen

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds that J. Thompson did his experiments with cathode ray

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tubes and he showed that there were these tiny little

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>dots of matter that carried charge with them. He showed

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>they could be deflected by electric fields. We have a

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>whole episode about the discovery of the electron which want

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>to dig into the details of that one. But it

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>was a really interesting moment because he showed where the

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>charge was. It went from being like this weird invisible

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>not quite magic but imperceptible fluid, to being isolated to

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>these little bits. There was something out there that was

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>carrying these charges. We'd like identified a little bit of matter.

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It had mass and it had electric charge to it,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So that made it like concrete in a new way.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So wait, he could actually see individual electrons. How do

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you see an electron? Well, he couldn't see an individual electron,

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but he could see them land on a screen in

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>his cathode ray You know, cathode ray tube is basically

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the way TVs used to work. They have a little

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>gun of electrons that would shoot at the screen, and

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you would have fields that bend them, so they would

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>shoot at different places at the screen it would scan across.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's not very different from his original setup where

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he had a little hot bit of metal that boiled

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>off electrons and then they were accelerated by a field

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and then bent by another field. So what he showed

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was that you could bend their path using fields, which

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>meant that they were carrying the charge, and he could

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>change where they landed by changing those fields. A really

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>clever set of experiments. Right, But I wonder if he

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe there were just droplets of this fluid right,

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Like he maybe didn't think of them as particles necessarily,

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>did he? Because the quantum idea wasn't around yet, that's right.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>But he actually is the one who came up with

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this concept that these things were all isolated on these

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>tiny little dots. He didn't use the word particle. He

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>invented this other word called the corpuscule, which he hoped

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>was going to take off and that we'd all be

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>corpuscular physicists by now. But fortunately that name was dropped

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>later by other people. But he definitely identified these things

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as tiny little dots with mass and with charge bundled

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>together into the same physical location. It's really the first

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>moment where we started putting these labels on tiny dots

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of matter, sort of the invention of the concept of

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a particle. There. Did he call it an electron or

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>when did the name come into use? He definitely called

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>them corpuscules. The name electron came later, which I don't know.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd prefer the word electron two corpuscule. It's really amountable.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was Milliken a few decades later who did

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>his famous oil drop experiments where he showed that the

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>charge is discreete that you couldn't have like one and

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a half charges or two point seven charges but you

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>could have like one, two, or three these very precise

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>experiments that were balancing various forces and showing that they

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>were integer quantities of them. So at that point we

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>knew that charge was a thing, that it was attached

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to these tiny little particles, and that their charges were discrete.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You didn't have like some particles running around with one

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>point two seven charges and other ones with zero point

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>eight nine. You either had one electron or two electrons

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>or three electrons. You know, this is around the same

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>time that quantum mechanics was being developed, when we had

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the understanding that light was packets of photons. You couldn't

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have like one point two of them. So the whole

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>idea of discretization was sort of taking over physics. Sounds indiscreet,

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but I guess my question is how did Milliken figure

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this out? I mean, you're talking about the early nineteen hundreds.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>How did they have experiments that can measure things down

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to the one electron level? This is a really hard

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>experiment to do. He took little drops of oil and

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he sprayed them out of a little sprayer, which basically

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>strips them of some electrons, which basically ionizes them, and

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>so now they have electric charge, and let them fall

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>through this little chamber until they reached terminal velocity, and

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>then he turned on electric field to try to make

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>them levitate, and by tweaking the electric field, he could

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>find exactly the right force he needed to balance the

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>downward going velocity. You could make these particles float. Essentially,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and what he noticed was needed a certain field or

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like twice that field or three times that field, which

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he hypothesized told him like how much each drop had

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been ionized. So essentially he was measuring like how much

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>electric force you needed to levitate these drops, and he

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>noticed that it always came intoger quantities, So he wasn't

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>studying individual electrons. You couldn't see individual electrons, but he

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 1>was studying the overall electric charge of these little drops

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of oil. But that sort of only works if the

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>each drop is the size of one electron, right, Like

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have a whole cluster of things with electrons,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>would you still notice that kind of discrete electric field. Yeah,

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you can have a whole oil drop. But what he's

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>measuring is the ionization of that drop, like essentially, how

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>many non neutral particles are in that drop, Because that's

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going to affect the force that the drop feels

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>when you put it in an electric field. So he

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was noticing that you could ionize these drops by one unit,

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or two units, or seven units, but not by three

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>point two units. Interesting. All right, well, I think that's

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of the general history of electrons, right, And that's

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>where the idea of the electron took off, right as

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a discrete thing. And then the rest is history. The

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>rest is history. And now we regularly produce electrons and

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ar collider and study them in gory detail. In the

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen fifties, we had quantum electrodynamics, this theory of

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>photons and electrons as oscillating quantum fields, which is basically

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the modern story of electromagnetism. All right, well, let's get

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to our question of whether electrons or other particles can

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>have charges that are smaller than one third of the

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>charge of an electron. I guess, Daniel, why are we

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>asking this question? Or I guess what do we know

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about charge in general? So what we know is that

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>electrons have charged minus one, which is just something we assigned, right,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>We could have given electrons any charge. It's really just

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>totally arbitrary, and that protons have the opposite charge. Protons,

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, are made of quarks, and those quarks have

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest charges we know. They have charges like plus

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or minus two thirds or plus or minus one third.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>There are also particles out there neutrinos that have charged zero.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So all the fundamental particles that we know about have

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>charges zero one thirds, two thirds, or like the electron,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they have effectively charge one. These units are arbitrary, but

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>everything seems to have a charge that a multiple of

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>one third of the electric charge. That seems to be

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the minimum charge out there. Of the zero, of course,

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>which you can consider still a multiple of one third.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no particles out there that we've seen that have

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>charged like two sevenths or fourteen ninety firsts or you know,

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>pie times the electron. I guess, just to be clear,

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there's only four particles that we know about that have

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. Is that true? Well, there are the four

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fermions, right, electrons, neutrinos, of quarks, and down quirks.

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There are also the other generations like the charm, the top,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the muon the towel. Those all have the same electric

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>charges as the base particles. So yeah, there are four

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fermions, and each one has a different charge. Right,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what I mean is that we haven't

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>found any other particles other than these four and their

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>generational cousins that have electric charge, right that we The

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>only other particle with electric charge is the W. The

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>W is one of the first particles of the weak force,

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and interestingly, it also has electric chart. So there's two

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of those. There's the W plus and the W minus,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So those sub charges plus one and minus one. Those

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are the only other charge particles out there. The other

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>particles like the Higgs boson and the photon and the

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>gluon and the z boson, all of those have zero

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. Wait, the W particle also has electric chart,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's exactly the same as the electron. It's exactly

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the same or opposite of the electron. And that's important

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because the W and the electron interact with each other.

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, a W can decay to an electron and

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a neutrino, and that conserves electric charge. You start out

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with charge minus one, you end up with an electron

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with charge minus one and a neutrino with charge zero.

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So electric chart starts at minus one ends at minus one.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's conserved. That's something else really fascinating that we know

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>about electric charge is that it can't be created or destroyed.

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's always conserved in the universe. Now, is that a

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>cool incidence that the W happens to have the exact

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>same charges the electron? I don't think we know the

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. But if it didn't have exactly the

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>same charges the electron, then it wouldn't be able to

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>interact with the electron. Like the W had a charge

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of one point two, then it couldn't decay to an

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>electron and a neutrino because charge is conserved. And so

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>basically it would mean that it couldn't interact with our

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of matter, and then it wouldn't participate in anything

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that we knew about, And so it might exist in

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe but not be something we could see or

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>interact with. Right, And so the fact that the W

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>has the same charge as the electron is what allows

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it to participate in our part of the universe, and

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>so that's the reason we know about it. So it

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>might be that there are particles out there with weird

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>charges that don't interact in the same way as our particles,

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what people are looking for. M I see.

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That's I think this gets into kind of the heart

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of what we're asking here today and why maybe we

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>may have observed other particles that have different terms. Because

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I know we talked about before, how the idea that

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the proton has exactly the opposite charge of an electron.

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of a coincidence in the universe, and if

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that was any different, we wouldn't have all those things

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>we have today like us. That's right. It's sort of

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>explained and sort of not explained. Right, It's not explained

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that, in principle it could have been

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>something else. Right. It could have been that the quarks

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have exactly one third and two thirds the charge

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the electron, so when you put them together you

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>get a proton that's not exactly the opposite charge of

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the electron. That could work in physics, but it's explained

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that that universe would be so different

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>from ours that it's sort of impossible to even imagine

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 1>what that would be like. Would be very different from

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe we experience. So to have a universe like ours,

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>requires that balance. That doesn't mean we know why that

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>balance exists, right, So it's a really fascinating question philosophically. Yeah,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, let's get into this question of whether

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>charges can be different than the ones from the electron,

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and specifically much smaller than one third the charge of

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>an electron, Like maybe there are particles out there with

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of charge, we just haven't seen them. So

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get into that question. But first, let's take another

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>quick break. All right, we're talking about charges in the universe,

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel were saying that, you know, the electron has

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a charge of negative one because that's what we gave it,

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know that the proton, which is made out

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of quarks, has an overall charge of plus one, and

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're exactly the opposite is sort of

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the reason that we can't have atoms and things like that. Right,

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>if it was any different, what would happen If it

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was any different, then you couldn't get neutral hydrogen, for example. Right,

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 1>there was this moment in the universe very early on,

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>when electrons and protons cooled down. They slowed down enough

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that their mutual electrical attraction action could make them warm

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>neutral hydrogen, and the universe suddenly became transparent. Right, this

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is the moment when the cosmic microwave background radiation was

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>created and flew through the universe. And neutral hydrogen is

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>essential for basically the formation of the whole universe. It's

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>basically what makes up the universe, neutral hydrogen. Wait, wait,

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>why is that important? I guess if let's say the

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>proton had like one point one the charge of an

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>electron plus one point one, you would still get hydrogen,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but the hydrogen would just have an overall charge of

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>plus point one, wouldn't it. Yeah, you could get hydrogen,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be neutral hydrogen. And I think that has

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of downstream effects for how chemistry happens and

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>how life is formed and everything else that we rely on.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm not an expert on chemistry and biochemistry.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But you could still have a universe way with suns

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and planets and stuff, couldn't you. You could have a universe.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And I imagine that fusion could still happen because fusion

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally is really just a process between proton You don't

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>really need the electrons. Like inside the heart of stars,

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>protons are anyway ionized to you don't really have the

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.959
<v Speaker 1>electrons around when you do fusion, So you can still

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>have fusion if protons don't have exactly the opposite charge

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of electrons, so you can still have light in the universe. Right,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Remember that electromagnetism is much stronger than gravity,

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So for gravity to take over and to tug things

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>together into dense objects probably requires everything to be electrically neutral.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Nothing is electrically neutral, and everything is repelling each other.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Gravity might not be able to overcome that and form

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>dense objects like planets and stars and ice cream. Well,

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's true. One you could still form them,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they would just maybe be different proportions of the different elements, right,

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, if hydrogen was like plus point one,

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you could have other materials that are like

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>negative point eight, and then you could have you know,

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>two of these and one of these. Yeah, it might

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be possible to still form neutral objects. But for that

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to work, then the charge can't just be arbitrary. They

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>have to be like some rational fraction of each other.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the proton is charged pi and the electrons

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>charged negative one, then no, arrangement of protons and electrons

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>will give you a neutral object. It's just impossible. But

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>if they are a rational fraction of each other, if

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the proton is like five fourths or nine eighths or something,

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, you can have a certain relationship. You can

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>make weird atoms out of eight protons and nine electrons

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, Right, And I wonder if that

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>would be okay, right, Like, like we can have molecules

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in our body that have an overall charge, right, we

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>certainly could, Like a molecule in our body can lose

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>an electron in one of its atoms and it would

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>still be a molecule. Like maybe I wonder if biology

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or nature needs neutral particles. I know that a lot

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of our biological processes rely on charges, right, Like our

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>entire nervous system is basically electrically charged and uses ions.

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So probably things like that could function. But I think

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole structure of the universe would be very different

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if you had these different kind of chemicals. But even

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this is relying on an assumption, right, It's an assuming

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that you could still build something neutral so that gravity

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 1>could take over. If instead charges could have any value,

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>then there's no guarantee you could put particles together to

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>make things that are neutral. And I think that's one

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the deepest questions, like why are these particles rational

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fractions of each other's charge one third, two thirds, five

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fourths even, you know, these kinds of things instead of

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>zero point eight seven two or irrational numbers. Yeah, I

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>guess that's the main question we're asking today, is like,

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>why can't that be because as far as we know,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the particles that we do know about have these multiple

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>charges of each other. Right, that's kind of the idea exactly.

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And so if you ask theoretical physics, like what prevents

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>us from having particles with charge zero point oh one

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>or zero point one seven nine two, or you know,

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just keep going, and the answer is nothing, like there

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is no theoretical prohibition against it. But that's mostly because

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't really understand where charge comes from and how

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>these labels get us signed, and so we haven't invented

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>rules that say you can't do it. We just haven't

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>seen any particles like that in the universe. Right. And

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the weird thing I guess is that you know, an electron,

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it comes from the electric quantum field and a quark

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>comes from the quantum quark field, and yet they seem

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to have charges that are kind of multiples of each other.

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the weird thing too about the universe, right, Yeah,

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely a weird thing because as far as

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we know, those fields are not that closely related, Like

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>there are similarities there between the electron, the neutrino, and

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarks are either paired together in similar ways, Like

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the W for example, can decay to an electron and

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a neutrino. It can also decay to a pair of

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>quarks because that pair of quarks have a charge difference

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of plus or minus one. So there's definitely relationships between them,

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really understand all those relationships. What this

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>suggests is that there's some deeper relationship between the electron

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and the quarks than we even understand. Like maybe the

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>electron and the quarks are all made out of some

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>tinier little particle, and some arrangement of those little tiny particles,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>which each have their own electric charge, is what gives

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you the electron with charge one or the quark with

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>charge minus one third, the same way that like atoms

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are built out of the same building blocks and you

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 1>get all sorts of different behavior and overall charges and whatever.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe electrons and quarks and neutrinos are all built out

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of the same tiny little building blocks, and that would

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>explain all the relationships between them, including this strangely fortuitous

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship of their electric charges. Maybe there are puscals out

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe, and maybe you are corpuscular particle,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, opuscular physicist. It's so much fun to say.

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>But there are theories out there about these so called

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>milly charged particles, particles that have really really tiny electric charges.

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about things down to like a thousands or

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>less of the charge of the electron, and there are

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>experiments out there searching for them as well. Well. I

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's maybe two possibilities, right, Like, there's a

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>possibility that there is a whole new kind of particle

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know about that has a charge that's

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one thousands of the electron or you know, a point

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>nine to infinity charge. That's one possibility, is that you

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have a whole new kind of particle that we hadn't

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>seen before. And then there's the other possibility. Then maybe

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there are electrons out there with one point one electrical charge.

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So which which one are we talking about here? We're

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about both of those possibilities, but we're also talking

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about a third possibility. Maybe there's another kind of particle

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. They call it a para electron, and it's

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>got plus or minus para charge. So like some whole

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>new kind of charge the way we were talking about,

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like the strong force has its own charge. Now I'm

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>badge in a new force with a new charge and

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a new particle with that force, and it has its

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>own new particle, like the photon. So you have a

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>para electron with its para charge and its para photon. If, however,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that new photon and the paraphoton talk to each other

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, if they mix a little bit, that

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can exchange information a tiny bit, then that para electron

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>would look to us as if it had a tiny

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. So it would really have its own parrot

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>charge of plus or minus one, but we would see

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it as having a tiny electric charge because we would

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>only capture a little bit of it through this photon

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>para photon mixing. Wait, I don't get it. So we're

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>imagining a whole new particle a whole new kind of force,

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying that maybe that new fours leaks a

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit or interacts a little bit with ours in

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's its own force. But it's sort of to us,

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's like it overlaps with the electromagnetic

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>forces that we're saying a little bit. Yeah, you've got

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it exactly, that's exactly right. So it has the same

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>strength as electromagnetism, but we mostly can't see it. So

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we see it as if it was a tiny little

0:43:56.120 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>version of electromagnetism, like electrons with a tiny charge. Now,

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>why do you need this whole setup to imagine a

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>particle with point o one charge? Can I just imagine

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a particle with point on one charge? You can? Theorists

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I was reading some papers about that,

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and theorists always just dismissed that possibility as not very esthetic.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that they want a reason why a particle

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>would have some arbitrary, tiny little chart rather than just

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like putting the number in by hand. You know, often

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicists don't like to add parameters to the universe

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>that don't have an explanation, and so they look for

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a reason why it would have to be this way,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit more indirect. But theoretical physicists

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>preferred like sits better in their minds for reasons. Honestly,

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't totally understand. I see they prefer to think

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>about it coming up with a whole new fours in

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a whole new particle that has a little bit of

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>coupling with the electromagnetic force, rather than just coming up

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 1>with a whole new particle that has a little bit

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of an electromagnetic Yeah, that's exactly right, you know. And

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that happen in theoretical physics are

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>guided by a sense of aesthetics, like what would be

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty way for this to work mathematically? What would

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>give us a beautiful description of the universe? And that

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in the end is subjective, you know. We like to

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>think about science as objective and based in fact and

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>making progress in lockstep as we approach the truth. But

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it really is also a search for

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>beauty and elegance in the universe, and that's kind of controversial.

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>There are some folks out there who think that's misguided.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The universe doesn't have to be beautiful and other folks

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that think that the search for elegance and beauty in

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 1>our theoretical description of the universe has led to great discoveries.

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very controversial approach, but anyway, it's part

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of the literature of milli charged particles. Now, you said

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>this is one kind of possible millicharged particle, having this

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>whole new particle with whole new force. But then they're

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the other two that I mentioned, which is like, maybe

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there are particles with just a little tiny bit of

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, or maybe like the electrons we know sometimes

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit or a little bit more or

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>less electric charge. And you're saying we're looking for all

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of these things, or just we're only looking for the

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>new force, new particle model, we're looking for all these things.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Is a lot of different experiments searching for these things.

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Some people are looking for these para electrons. Other people

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are looking to see if maybe the neutrino doesn't have

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>zero charge, maybe it has a tiny, tiny, tiny charge. Remember,

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>whenever we measure something in physics, it's never exact right.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't measure something to be exactly zero. You know,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>we've just set a limit on it, you can say, well,

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>if neutrinos had a charge, it would be less than

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some tiny value, or we would have seen it. So

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to like nail that down. Is it

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>possible that the neutrino might have a tiny little charge.

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole broad set of experiments looking for these things. No,

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess, maybe walk us through how do you even

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>look for these things? So first of all, to discover

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 1>one of these particles, you have to see it by itself.

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You need to isolate it and demonstrate that it really

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>has its own electric charge, sort of like the way

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we have seen quarks inside the proton. Right, you can say, oh,

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe quarks have a charge two thirds, but until you

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>see them operating on their own, you can't really say

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that you have found it. And so we try to

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>do this in accelerators. For example, we smash protons together

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and we see new stuff that comes out. And everything

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's created in the accelerator is immersed in a magnetic

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>field that bends its path. So electrons fly out of

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the collision and they curve, and how much they curve

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>depends on their charge. So one thing you can do

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty easily is look for particles that bend weirdly in

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>your magnetic field because they have a tiny electric charge,

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll bend a tiny little bit. If they have some

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>huge electric charge, they'll bend a lot. And so that's

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>one quick thing that you can do is just like

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>look for weirdly bending particles created in accelerators. But I

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>guess the hard thing is, like we mentioned earlier, is

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is quantum, right, Like, if something has

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>point o one electric charge, that doesn't mean it's going

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to interact with something that has one electric charge, right

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe only likes to make exchange. It if

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you have exact change, that's right, But some of those

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>interactions are still allowed. Like if you have a particle

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>flying by with zero point zero one electric charge, it

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>can radiate a photon that doesn't violate conservation of charge,

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and then that photon can knock off an electron in

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your material can it can it generate a photon, but

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>they aren't photons also quantized. Photons are quantized, but they're

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not electrically charged. So an electron can generate a photon

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>or this para electron could also generate a photon, wouldn't

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>break any of the rules. Yes, you have to quantize them.

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to generate one electron or two electrons. But

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 1>having a tiny electric charge doesn't prevent you from generating

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>an integer number of photons. But they would have to

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be really tiny photons, right like point or one of

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a photon. Kind of Now, you would still generate one photon,

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you just have a smaller probability of generating photons. So

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>particles with smaller electric charge generate basically fewer photons, so

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they ionize material less. This is actually another way people

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>are looking for these things. It might be that we

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>are generating these millicharged particles in our accelerators, but we're

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not seeing them because they just don't leave a trace

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in our detectors, which mostly require particles to ionize the

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>material to knock things out of the way as they

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fly through with their electric charge. So some folks have

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>set up dedicated experiments far away from the collider, like

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>near the collider, but through like meters and meters of rock.

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:31.720
<v Speaker 1>They stead of special detectors, hoping that a millicharged particle

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>will fly all the way through that rock, not ionize

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.720
<v Speaker 1>anything because of it's low electric charge, and then suddenly

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.720
<v Speaker 1>decay in their detector, and nothing else basically could survive

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>all of that rock. So if they see something there,

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll be pretty convinced they see something that can survive

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all that rock and also decay into photons, and so

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>probably a particle with very low electric charge. I feel

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>like this gets a little bit into the idea that

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe charge is really or of a probability which we

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>probably can't deep too deep into, but maybe talk to

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>us a little about the other ways that we're looking

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for these particles. Another way to look for these things

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is in cosmic rays. A lot of discoveries have been

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>made just by looking at the particles that come from

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>space because they smash into our atmosphere and are basically

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like little particle collisions that can produce all sorts of

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff and so muans, for example, we're discovered by

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at particles coming from the upper atmosphere. And if

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you use a cloud chamber, this is just a chamber

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>where the air is super saturated with water, so charge

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>particles flying through it will tend to create droplets, so

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see the path of particles. You might have

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>seen one in a museum sometime. You can see muons

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.280
<v Speaker 1>flying through it. Well, the drop density, like how many

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>drops you make per centimeter, for example, depends on the

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>charge because it depends on how often you're shooting out photons.

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 1>And so if you saw a particle flying through there

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with very low drop density, that would tell you that

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you have a particle with low electric charge. So people

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>are using cloud chambers to study cosmic rays and see

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if they can spot some of these very low electrically

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>charged particles cool and how else are we looking for these?

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>There's really fun experiments that are basically the successors of

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Milican's oil job experiment. They're taking a blob of matter

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and they're looking to see if there's basically the kind

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of atom that you were talking about earlier somewhere inside

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>this blob of matter. Like imagine some other particle with

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a tiny charge orbiting a proton right bound to the nucleus,

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>making some new kind of atom. And if it's also

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>very massive, if this low charged particle has a high mass,

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be like bound to the nucleus and very

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>very close to the nucleus. So people are looking for

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>this like weird kind of stuff embedded in matter, and

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they theorize that it might have been formed early in

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe. But because these things would be very heavy,

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>they were on Earth, they might have sunk down through

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's crust and all have pooled up near the

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 1>center of the Earth. So you can't just like scoop

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:00.320
<v Speaker 1>up a chunk of dirt and look for these weird

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>objects inside of them because they probably aren't any So

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is they're looking for asteroids. They take

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like a slice of an asteroid and they see if

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they can find these weirdly charged heavy objects inside an

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>asteroid slice. And they use an experiment similar to Milligans.

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's called a leavetometer, where they have like a blob

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff magnetically suspended in this oscillating an eclectric field,

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and they watch the motion of it to see if

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they can detect something which can't be explained by an

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>integer number of charges, very similar to the oil job experiment.

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe there is this kind of new kind of

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>material here on Earth. Is that what you're saying with

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the new forest and the new particles, is that what

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for, You're looking for like regular asteroid rocks

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that somehow have this new kind of matter somehow stuck

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah, exactly, maybe deep within it there's one

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of these things. And they can try to figure out

0:52:53.560 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if a huge blob of matter has one or maybe

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>two of these things by oscillating in an electric field

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and seeing it behaves strangely. It's a lot of details

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there we don't have time to get into, but the

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>basic version is that you can take a chunk of

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>matter and study its behavior in electric fields to see

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>if it has any of these new weird atoms in

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it that might have milli charged particles within them. So

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you're you're basically looking for a new kind of matter, right, yeah,

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly that we had never seen before. And you're wondering,

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's in this rock or this rock,

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 1>or how about that rock? Is it in this rock? No?

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>How about there? Yeah that's exactly right, And that seems crazy,

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it could be that it's everywhere, that

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's in all the rocks, and so might as well check.

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>And so what they can do is they can say, look, oh,

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>well we didn't find it, and so maybe it's just rare,

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and that they can do bigger and bigger experiments and

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>check more and more rocks. You know, but imagine the

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>universe where they're in every rock and nobody bothered to check. Right,

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 1>What a crazy discovery that would be. All right, well,

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:56.439
<v Speaker 1>good luck finding this magical kind of matter in every

0:53:56.520 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>rock out there in the universe. I guess we give

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of you know, why we're looking for

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. I mean, it sounds kind of impossible because

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:07.239
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen it doesn't need to affect the rest

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of the universe in any strong way, otherwise we would

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have discovered this new kind of matter. Are we just

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:14.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to check the box that it doesn't exist. We're

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:16.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to check the box that it doesn't exist, but

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>also we're trying to get a little bit of an

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 1>answer to the question like why is there charge? And

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>why does it have these properties? Why does it all

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>seem to come in these rational fractions of each other.

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just not something that we understand, and so if

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we could find this thing, it would be a huge clue.

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Tell us, Oh, that's not a rule in the universe.

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not required to have that. That's just the examples

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you happen to discover early on. You know, there's lots

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of times in the universe when we drew big conclusions

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:46.800
<v Speaker 1>based on incomplete information. All of Newtonian physics, for example,

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is based on not ever seeing things go really fast

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or not ever seeing space get bent really really hard.

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So we want to be careful not to jump to

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>conclusions based on the small amount of information we have.

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>We want to check and see if it's possible well

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to do other things, and that'll tell us like, oh,

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a rule in the universe, or Nope, that's

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 1>not a rule in the universe. Don't worry about it.

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel that this idea wouldn't really help you, right,

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Like if there is a new kind of matter with

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>its own force and its own particle and field and everything,

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and that only sort of tinggently interacts with our that

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>only looks like it has a small electric charge, that

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>still wouldn't help you understand why electrical charges are the

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>way they are, right, It would just open up a

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>new question, like why does it only interact a little

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bit with this new magical field. But if that other

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>field exists and it does interact with the photon, that

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>means it has some connection to charge itself, and so

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it would shed some light on the nature of charge.

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, absolutely would opened up a whole bunch of

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:47.240
<v Speaker 1>other questions. All right, well, stay tuned, and in the meantime,

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess keep driving those electric cards because it's putting

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 1>those electrons to work. And don't overcharge your credit card.

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>All right. We hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us,

0:55:56.880 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>For more podcast from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.