WEBVTT - Selects: How Stuttering Works

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, it's Chuck here. I'm going back in time.

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's all go back in time together. In fact, this

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Saturday for our select episode to Summertime, August fifteenth, twenty seventeen.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And this one is about stuttering, how stuttering works. It

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting, actually, so check it out. Welcome to

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Charles W Chuck Bryant, and there's no our guest producer today,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>which means it's still Stuff you should Know.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, the Jerry Free edition.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it feels weird. Eh. She was like, I can't

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 2>do this today. I'm going to the mall. She's always

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>leaving us for the mall.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, that's weird. Ever since we did that mall

0:00:58.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>episode and she learned it was a thing.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, you know, She's like, this sounds like my kind

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of place.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing pretty good. I'm been wanting to do this

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>one for a long time. Yeah, And I think I

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>started to research it and I was like, oh man,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe we went on tour or something like that. I

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>got pulled away from it and never went back to it,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad we're doing it finally.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So stuttering if you're in North America or Australia and

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>stammering if you're in the UK. Perhaps is that how

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it works?

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I know that stammering is what they

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 2>call it in the UK. Do they call it stuttering

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>in Australia as well?

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? This thing I pulled up just said. In general,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's North America and Australia say stutter. In UK they

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>say stammer But it's the same thing.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's basically I think the way that they get

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>around that is calling it disfluency. No one calls it that,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the scientists do.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I never heard that word.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure, disfluence, So I think that's actually the clinical name

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>for what we call startering or stammering, depending on where

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you are.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And wasn't that Colin Firth movie called The Disfluent

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Prince Who Would Be King?

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep? I think that was the working title what they

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 2>call it, The King's Speech?

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty good movie. That was cute, cute it was.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Anytime you get Jeffrey right in there in an inspirational role,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be a cute movie. No, not Jeffrey right,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Rush Yeah, I agreed. Jeffrey Wright always plays like

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the super smart, like kind of like a deep state guy.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Wright. He was Baskeocht right, I'm not thinking of

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the right guy.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Did he play basket Yacht?

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so in the movie Baskeocht.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Isn't Jeffrey Wright.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Jeffrey Wright.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Wright has been in tons of stuff. Just look

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>him up. You'll be like, oh, that's Jeffrey right.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Going terribly already. This is basically like the podcast equivalent

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of stuttering, because Chuck stuttering, also known as stammering better

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>known as disfluency, is an interrupted flow of speech. Okay,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>but what when it starts to qualify for what we

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>would call like stuttering or stammering, it is it's really noticeable.

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>It's it has an interrupting effect, typically on the conversation

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>or the communication that's meant to be going on, the

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>speaking that's going on that's on the far end of

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum, on the on the other end of the spectrum.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Apparently just about everybody engages in disfluent speech. I'm particularly

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>guilty because I say a lot, and that's a form

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of disfluency. And disfluency Chuck comes from the idea that

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 2>that when you speak fluently, you're speaking in a flowing

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>manner that is easy to follow typically and is uninterrupted.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>But when you start adding things like or pauses or

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing like that, that's disfluency. And again,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>disfluency is a normal part of communication if it occurs

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>about less than ten percent of the time. After that

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you start to get into the stuttering slash stammering spectrum

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>or side of the disfluent spectrum.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and one thing I learned, You know, you and

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I both QA quality assure each episode, which means it's

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a little behind the curtain peak. But Jerry will send

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>them back to us and you listen to it once

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and then give her any like edit notes or whatever

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and thoughts, and then I will listen to it and

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>generally I have no edit notes.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Found that I know we're both gonna be so self

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 2>conscious about that.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's where I was getting to though. I found

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>early on when listening to these episodes of ourselves that

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it doesn't pay to focus on dysfluency in our

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>own language because it can.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 2>Drive you nuts, it really can.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>And so we have a conversational podcast, so we're not

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to you know, we're not Churchill or Henry or

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was it Henry the six now.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it was, I don't remember. Just Calin Firth, how

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>about that.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're not Colin Firth addressing the country on the airwaves,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>where it was very important that he come across as

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a certain had a certain fluency. But when

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stuff like this, I think people are

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>used to the fact, like occasionally we'll get emails that

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>go you go to say like an am a lot right, and.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>We're just like response, is better luck finding a different podcast?

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah this is not for you. No, So anyway, I

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>learned to not drive myself crazy with that stuff. No.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 2>But it's funny you bring that up because I was

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>just yesterday listening to the Stockholm Syndrome episode for stuff

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 2>you should know selects right, and I must have said

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>like five times over the span of ten words.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>You can't even listen to that, But.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Even I noticed it. I normally have I'm pretty good

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>about tuning it out, but even I noticed at that time,

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 2>and it really kind of raises this issue that the

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 2>whole thing about starting or stammering is not that it's

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a it's a disorder or disease, or the sign of

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>an unintelligent person, or that the person can't think of

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>what they mean to say. It's absolutely none of those things.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 2>It is strictly an interruption in what we would consider

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>normal communication, and so attention is drawn to it, and

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that that just makes the problem worse

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and worse, so it it turns into this vicious cycle

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to where but that's all that, That's all it is.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>That's it, that's really it. And I mean, like there's

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>there's different theories about what's behind it or what could

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>make it worse and what could possibly make it better,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>but really all it is is just interrupted communication between

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>two people. Because it's not like the person who's who's

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>stuttering stutters in their head, like it's strictly when they're

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>speaking and communicating with other people. So it's it's pretty

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a unique. It's a unique condition.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they're they're generally three ways in which that

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>flow can be interrupted. One is repetition. So if you

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>say the first few like the beginning of a word,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if you repeat it a few times in a row

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and then say the word, another would be prolongation. So

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if the word is like you would, you would roll

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that l out by itself for a long time, and

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then the last would be an abnormal stoppage, which is

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just no sound at all coming out. Yeah, block, yeah,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a complete block. Have you you know anyone with a

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>severe stutter?

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Sure? Yeah, I've known people with stutters before.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know somebody with a very severe stutter. And

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's always interesting because I think, and we'll get to

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like what you should and shouldn't do as a participant

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in a conversation with someone who stutters. But before I

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>read this, I knew that just as a courtesy, what

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you probably shouldn't do, which is correct, is try and

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>complete someone's sentence for them, even though that urge is there.

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just a natural instinct because people do that,

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, when speaking all the time if someone can't

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think of a word or something. But like you said,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's going on.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>No, no, And I mean that, And I think that

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>urge also comes from a a good place typically like

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>you're not You're not saying like, uh, pitch is the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 2>word stupid. That's not what you're saying when you when

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>you when you finish their sentence, you're helping them along, right,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to keep the conversation on track, right, But what you're

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>also doing is saying you're not communicating effectively. I'm jumping

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>in and taking over on your behalf. Just sit there

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and be quiet. So, yeah, we'll talk more about what

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 2>to do or what to what not to do when

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you're in a conversation with somebody with a stutter and I.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't know what you mean. You're trying, you're trying to help.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not trying to like be a jerk. Yeah, but

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a help.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>But I imagine they also understand to a certain degree.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Too well, probably just from being exposed to it so much, Yeah,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>for so.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Long, and some people feel, you know, like with anything

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like this, some people might be used to it and

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have been like, well, you know, that's how I talk.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to uh correct it, and I've kind of

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>learned to live with it, and people might still feel

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>really bad about it.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I read a a I guess an essay a

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>blog post basically by a guy named man I can't

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>find it anywhere, great great blog posts where he said

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I recognize and accept my stutter, and it was on

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>say dot org. His name is Danny Litwack l I

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>t w A c K Litwack. Maybe I embrace and

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>accept my stutter. It's great. He talks about his his

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>experience with growing up with a stutter his whole life

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and just what a negative impact it had on him

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for a very long time. And I saw this elsewhere.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>But the first step toward either either getting past your

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>stutter or just getting over the fact that you have

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>a stutter, is accepting that you have a stutter. And

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>that's a that's from what I can gather, a really

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>big first step, because I think people recognize that they

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>have a stutter to themselves, but there's also are they

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>take measures to protect against sharing that with other people.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So I read another story about another person who grew

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>up with a stutter and when they got to I

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>think college or something. On the first day of this

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>one class, everybody went around and said where they were from,

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and this person said that they forgot where they were from,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 2>rather than having to say Wilmington, Delaware because of the

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 2>W and the D. So instead they told the class

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>they forgot where they were they were born and grew.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Up because in that case there were certain triggers.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the W and the D, the W and Wilmington

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and the D in Delaware. So there's like a lot

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of obfuscation that people with stutters engage in. People with

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>stutters are not to be trusted in other words, but

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>they have to they have to basically just take steps

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to make it seem like they don't have a stutter.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think what this guy Danny Litwack was saying.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>And then, like I said, I saw elsewhere people saying,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>like I have a stutter, like this is how I talk.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna have to like either just walk away during

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the conversation or just let me finish on my own time.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>But this is me and this is how I talk,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm accepting it or learning to and you're gonna

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 2>have to as well. And that's the first step, as

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I understand it. Once you're an adult, I should say.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are so many things in life where

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. Oh yeah, man, Instead of like at

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a certain point at a certain age, you, I think,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least I got to a point where like, well,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I can really continue to work to try and change

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing, or I can just accept that this is

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of who I am, right and be happy.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't worry, be happy now.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So don't ever strive to be better people. Just accept

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>how messed up you are.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, and force everyone else around you to accept it.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Should we take a little break here, All right, We'll

0:12:58.280 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>take a break and we'll come back and get into

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the stats, and house stutters can develop right after this,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, so we're back. I promise stats. Yeah, the stats,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you shall receive one percent roughly of adults in the

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>world stutter. Yeah, but that is not one percent of children,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>because many times have in fact, about seventy five percent

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the time, well five percent of children stutter, and

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about seventy five percent of time they will lose that

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>disfluence as they grow older, right, leaving that at a

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent number as adults.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so in the US there's that means there's

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 2>about three million or so, maybe three and a half

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>million people adults that stutter. Right, More women, is it?

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 2>More women, and more men and more men more men,

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's like four to five in childhood and then

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>it goes to like three or four in adulthood. So

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>by far, men stutter more than women. And although in

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>strangely boys tend to naturally lose their stutter if they're

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>going to lose their stutter in childhood more than girls.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I don't think they found any rhyme or

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>reason to that at all.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, man, there's there's like a lot of lack

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of understanding as far as stuttering goes scientifically socially, there's

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>just we just don't know that much about it, which

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>is surprising because apparently as far back as Moses, people

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 2>have been stuttering on record.

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell that story later. Oh, okay, about sixty There

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>could be a genetic basis because about sixty percent of

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people who stutter have a family member who stutters.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I also saw that among monozygotic also known

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>as identical twins, if one twin stutters, there's a ninety

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>percent chance that the other one does as well. Oh interesting,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>But for die zygotic, like fraternal twins, there's only a

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent chance. So there's clearly a genetic basis to stuttering.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Somehow, right, But it's also one of those things where

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it can be genetic, doesn't have to be. Sometimes if

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you like suffer a head trauma, you might develop a stutter. Right.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's developmental. Sometimes it could be obviously with something

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like Parkinson's disease, that could be a symptom. But those

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are to me, I think, probably different kinds of stuttering,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>but still shuttering.

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Right. So there's basically two main categories. Developmental, which is

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>by far the more the one that accounts for the

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>most cases of stuttering. Yeah, and then the others acquired,

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>like you said, say from like Parkinson's or they put

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you on a prescription that like suddenly is making you stutter.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>There's also psychogenic, which is supposedly an emotional trauma can

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 2>give you a stutter. I don't know if that's just

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>leftover lore, because apparently they used to think all stutters

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>were the result of some psychology.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Just say, well, no, it's possible, or some people have

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>it and just haven't figured out that it's not the

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>case at all, or if there really is a small

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>section of people who do have psychogenic stutters, but all

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of those would fall under acquired and then the other

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>one is developmental boy.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>How about that guy that took mushrooms and quit stuttering? Yeah,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so interesting.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw a Ted talk at his once.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's like all about mushroom saving the world.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul's dammit.

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. He he leads off our article on how stuff

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>works and he had a severe stutter. Was very affected

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>by it, kind of Withdrew socially. Went camping one time,

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>took a bunch of psychedelic mushrooms and climbed a tree,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>got up there, decided he could not climb down, and

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>then the storm came in and got really intense, and

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he he said he sort of felt one with the world,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which sounds about right. And eventually the storm passed. He

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>came down and while he was up there during this

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>intense experience, he was like, I will not stutter anymore,

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and he just kept saying that. Came down and he

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>had lost his stutter.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and apparently he didn't relapse, which is pretty unusual,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So he started studying mushrooms for a living.

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he became a mycologist. Yeah, man, and I gotta

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>I've said this before, I'll say it again. One of

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the best articles I've ever read my life was called

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>blood Spore, Yeah, and I think it was in Harper's

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and it was about a murder in the world of mycologists.

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>It was just so interesting.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Blood Spore coming soon to a theaternew I hope so

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you should write the script.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So Stamids was remarkably lucky in that he just

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>basically decided not to stutter anymore and stop stuttering. Apparently

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he didn't relapse is probably what's most remarkable,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 2>because I think relapsing among stuttering treatments is actually pretty common.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, but again, this is once you get

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>out of childhood. It's fairly common to have to develop

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a stutter as you're a child, as you're learning to talk,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and then it's equally common to lose that that stutter

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>as you age, usually within eighteen months of developing the

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>onset of the stutter. But then as you acquire this

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>or develop this stutter as you get older, it apparently

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 2>becomes more and more set in. And that seems to

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>be because of the plasticity of your brain when you're

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>a kid.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Start, it's almost like, from what I can gather, it's

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 2>like if you have a stutter past a certain point,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>it almost gets locked into your brain as your neural

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>pathways solidify and cement. Yeah, like you learned to have

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>a stutter after a while.

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think they say to wait. I think

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they wait like three months before they even start looking

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>into it, because that's how fleeting a stutter can be

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're a little kid. Right after three months, they'll say,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>all right, maybe we should start looking into this.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, you would want to go to a speech pathologist

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to be able to diagnose it. Yeah, And usually what

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>they're looking for and you take your child who's developed

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a stutter to a speech pathologist is how pronounced it is.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a guy in I think the late nineties named

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Barry Guitar. He sounds like he played, you know, guitar

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 2>for the band Boston.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He knows all the chords. No, wait, that's guitar George.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, Sorry, what's that from?

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Come on, guitar George? Is that a Ray Stevens song?

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>No, it's from Dire Straits Sultan's of Swing.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh gotcha. That's a good song. Yeah, it is a

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>good song. I love it so very Guitar came with

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>five levels of stuttering development. And I already referenced the

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 2>first I know his name's all that. I already referenced

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the first level, which is you you have less than

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of your speech is disfluent. That's that's anybody

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 2>walking around like that, right, Yeah, unless you're like the

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>King of England or something. And then ironically unless you're

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>that one king who had a stutter. Yeah, and then

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it goes on the from there and just gets worse

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and worse. But one of the things that's attendant with

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 2>these different stages of development of a stutter are like

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 2>emotional problems or symptoms like comorbid symptoms along with the stutter.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 2>So there can be things like blinking, like like pursing

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>your lips, where you're frustrated, where you're angry, where you're fearful,

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 2>where you're anxious, in conjunction with stuttering. And so this

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of thing that the speech pathologists will

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>be looking for to kind of diagnose your kid like, no,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 2>this is just normal kid stuff. Or actually the stutters

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 2>developing faster than we'd like it too, so we need

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to start treating it now.

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, that makes sense because dopamine. We talked a lot

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about dopamine on the show The neud Transmitter. If you

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>have an overabundance of dopamine we talked about in the

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Tourette's episode, Right, is that one of the things that

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can be comorbid with stuttering because I know too much

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>dopamine can lead to a stutter as well.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, supposedly, so Dopamine controls movement, right, Yeah, and if

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 2>you have too much, it makes you have ticks like

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Tourette you're.

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Saying, well, it can.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So I noticed this that Parkinson's and dopamine are I

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>think they're like Parkinson's has to do with too much dopamine. Yeah,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and Parkinson's is one of the ways that you could

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 2>acquire neurogenically a stutter. Yeah, So that makes total sense

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>that there's something in your brain with dopamine transmission to

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>where you have maybe too much of it, and so

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to you're having trouble but getting the thoughts

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 2>in your head into the movements that it takes to

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>create the speech.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean it's a little clumsy the way the

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>brain does this. It would be a lot easier if

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it was streamlined in one part of the brain, but

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>there are two distinct parts of the brain that deal

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 1>with language processing, and one is the one that processes

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it and one articulates it with in a motor skill way.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And when those two things have done brain imaging mapping

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and they found that there's some sort of discontinuity between

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>those two processes going on. Right, Well, there's a stutter.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>That's stuttering, right, so it could be too much dopamine.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>That's one thing again, the research into stuttering is so

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>basic at the moment, it's it's really surprising. What they're

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out, though, is are you born with

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 2>the stutter like you when you're born, You're you're going

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>to have this problem because your your brain isn't using

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 2>dopamine properly or overproducing dopamine, or are you as your

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 2>brain's developing, something goes a little off to the side

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 2>to the left and your brain has trouble with dopamine

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>from that point on. So they're trying to figure out

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the etiology of it.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>In other words, did you look into this the genes

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the four genes?

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a little bit.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Did do you find names for those?

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I did not?

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>That isn't either.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>That is how basic the research is right now. Yeah,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>they're not even saying what genes they're finding.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, apparently they did discover four different genes that are

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>linked to these proteins. And these proteins are sort of

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like they're responsible for what's called cellular trafficking, so they

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of make sure that the elements of the cell

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>end up where they need to be within that cell. Right,

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And they said that more than one neurological disorder can

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be linked to this trafficking process, So I guess it's

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>related to those proteins in those genes.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they're like, who knows, Well, just like they've

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>gotten to the point where they have identified there's something

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>up with these proteins in the cells and it's linked

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to stuttering somehow. Now just give us like ten years

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>to go figure out how, right, But yeah, they're starting

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 2>to realize now there's some sort of genetic basis to

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 2>this to stuttering.

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I think the twin study that says

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot right there for sure. You know, yep, can

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Moses.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's high time we talked about Moses. We've

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 2>been dancing around the burning bush for a while now.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that guy will laugh.

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was laughing because every time I think of

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>burning Bush, I think of three Amigos and how funny

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that singing Bush was.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I never saw that one.

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Three Amigos.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I could do the three amigo salute, but I

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>never saw it.

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, that's a classic. Really yeah?

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 2>Really?

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure? Why is that surprising? I don't know.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I would have seen it if free

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>comedic icons.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You're right, funny movie.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh I know why I never saw because chevy Chase

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>is in it. Oh, I'm sure, I'm sure.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I remember my dad raised me a really dislike chill

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.959
<v Speaker 2>That's right, so I probably wasn't allowed to see it.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 2>You see Fletch, right, I think I stopped watching Fletch

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>like part way through. My dad had a real influence

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>on me. And why didn't he like chevy Chase.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Though, I have no idea you had a bone to pick.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess I think he thought he was a jerk

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Well he was all right.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It turns out dad was right, all right.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>So Moses, I know a lot about the Bible, because,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>as listeners know, I was raised in the church. But

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this. I don't remember this story at all.

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hadn't heard it either.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So apparently Moses uh was a little baby at one point,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Pharaoh said was warned, you know that Moses

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>was was gonna not be his friend when he grew up.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So he said, all right, let me try something out.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give this little baby, Moses, a choice

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>between a bowlful of gold and a bowlful of hot coals.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what you do with babies.

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Jesus the gold, then I'm going to kill him.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, typical typical Egyptian stuff.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so of course with a baby, Moses is going

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to reach for the gold. And then apparently an angel

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>intervened Todd Todd the angel and directed little Moses' hand

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to the hot coals instead.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 2>A little gruffly, if you ask Moses.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Moses grabbed a hot coal put it in his mouth,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's how he got to the stutter.

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 2>And he's blamed Todd ever since.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And here's what I don't get is that Moses went

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to God and was like, hey, man, I'm supposed to

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>lead the people out of Egypt. I have a bad stutter.

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Can you you know, can you do something for me

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>for God?

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And God said no sweat.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he said God, mister ed.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 2>You didn't know that, yeah, because he was God.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So God said, yeah, sure I can help you out.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Just have your brother Aaron take the mic.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, And Moses was like, I was more thinking like

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you'd perform a miracle on me, but yeah, I probably

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>could have thought of having Aaron speak for me as well. God,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 2>thanks for that, though.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I missed that story.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>He apparently there's a quote I am heavy of mouth

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and heavy of tongue, and I saw some Bible sight

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>where they were debating whether or not what they were

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about was a stutter. Apparently, some later Hebraic text

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>said that Moses had trouble pronouncing th h's thorn sounds

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>it sounds more like he had a lisp than a stutter.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Who knows. Let's go as stuttering though, because lot of

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 2>people do say that Moses had a stutter, but he

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 2>over king. Yeah, it's pretty thick. It's I've gotten used

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to it, but I remember at first when we first

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>started doing this, like, man, I should not be speaking

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>for a living like this is I have a speech impediment,

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 2>pure and simple.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just everyone now, just thinks, Hey, that's Josh's voice.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's so grating, smooth and silky.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>M hm. Who else in history.

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Josh, let's see the emperor Justinian apparently, or no, I'm

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>sorry I was wrong. It was Demosthenes. He was a

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Greek statesman. He apparently was smart enough to say, who

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 2>could help me with a stutter? Oh? How about an actor?

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Somebody who speaks broadcasts their voice for a living. So

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>he hired an actor to help him, and that actor

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>had him do things like chew on pebbles and try

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to talk.

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Smart, he's He did his speeches while he's walking uphill.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess to control his breathing. This is actually pretty

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>sharp stuff. I think out of all the historical treatments

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to cover, this one might most closely resemble,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 2>aside from the mouthful of pebbles, modern treatment for stuttering.

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is to say speaking exercises.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you did say Justinian. I don't know if Justinian

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>had the stutter, but his at the very least his physician,

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Atis of Amita, was one of the first people to say, Hey,

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe that the frenulum, you know, that little flap of

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>skin under your tongue right the connector to the bottom

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of your mouth. He was the first one that said,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>why don't we start slicing that thing up and just

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the tongue in general. Over the years there have been

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of surgeon that tried variations of slicing the

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>friend or cutting down of the tongue itself.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, I could probably use that one by HD Chiguine chegouine.

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that's how you say it the second way. Yeah,

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 2>he basically said, stuttering as a result of an oversized tongue,

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>which I have. Let's just slice and dice a little

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 2>off the sides. But no, of course it didn't work.

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just horrific apparently. Though at the same time there

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>were these surgeons who get all the press because their

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff is so horrific. But there are also other people

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 2>who were kind of on the right track a little

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 2>more like Moses Mendelssohn in the eighteenth century. He thought

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that there were too many ideas or thoughts that were

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>flowing at once, and that it was basically it was

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>blocking speech. There's too much trying to get out, basically

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>like the three Stooges model of stuttering. Remember they're all

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to go through the door.

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, so you've got too much to say

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and you want to just get it right. Interesting, that

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>makes a little sense.

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Erasmus Darwin. He said that it was bashfulness, emotions like

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 2>bashfulness that messed up the process of speaking, right, okay,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely onto something there as well. And then a psychologist

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 2>named Sandow said that it was brought on by either

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a dread of speaking or an over eagerness to speak,

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of like what Moses Mendelssohn was saying in the

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>latter example.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Can they brought out by two completely opposite things?

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, So a lot of this actually is kind

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of in step with our current thought about stuttering. And

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>so either that means that these guys in the eighteenth

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 2>century were prescient, or our understanding of stuttering is stuck

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>in the eighteenth century, right, I'm very curious to know

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>which one it is.

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Shall we take a break? Yeah, all right, We're going

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to come back after this final break and talk about

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>therapies that don't involve cutting your tongue apart. All right. So,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>now we're in the modern days and we're not taking

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>scalpels to the frenulum any longer because they've realized that

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a physical affliction of the tongue. It's somewhere

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>inside the brain most likely. Yeah, and they have a

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of recommendations for when a child starts to stutter

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in it and it sticks. And you found some other

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>tips too, which are great for parents, and kind of

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the main ones is is give your kid

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>plenty of room to talk, plenty of time to talk,

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure they express themselves fully, because one of the

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>side effects of having a stutter is your child may

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just end up retreating and being super quiet.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I got from this these tips for parents that

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 2>there's kind of this maybe not fully spoken idea that

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you can actually cement your child's stutter if you handle

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it poorly. Yeah, when they start to develop it, which

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 2>knowing that just makes you even more tense about dealing

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.879
<v Speaker 2>with it correctly, I guess, which could make the whole

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>process even even harder. But there are some pretty brainless

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 2>things to do. This one almost killed me when I

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>saw it. Chuck the site I think Kid's Health is

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 2>where I got this one, but it said maintain natural

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>eye contact with your child. Try not to look away

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>or show signs of being upset. Yeah, get like just

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 2>break the arrow off in my heart.

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's pretty sad.

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, don't look away and disgust when your child is stuttering,

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you monster, Go look in the mirror and take a

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.959
<v Speaker 2>bamboo shoot and put it underneath your fingernail and think

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>about what you've done.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Another good one is and this feels like something that

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>would be easy to do because it seems well intentioned

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, you know, slow down, son, take your time,

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taking your breath. They say to not do that, yeah,

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>because you know, might make things worse.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because what you're doing then is you're drawing attention

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to the idea that your child is not speaking correctly

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and rather than just apparently letting them communicate at their

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 2>own pace. Right. Yeah, there's also seems to be a

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 2>suggestion that the child has learned the child, your kid

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 2>has learned to speak to stutter because they're trying to

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>get too much out at once. Yeah, and they may

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 2>have picked that up from you if you have like

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a rush rush rush pace in your household. Yeah, one

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>of the things that they suggest is it just kind

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 2>of slow things down at home. And in addition to

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 2>like like schedule wise, and like just taking time and

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>just like letting everybody breathe, maybe a little more than you.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Guys are also speaking more slowly, not just to your kid,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 2>but also to other people when your kid's around. Yeah,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 2>speaking slowly, setting an example. It's called modeling your own

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>speech so that your kid feels like they don't have

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to blurt everything out at once to get their point across.

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>They they're going to be heard no matter how long

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 2>it takes. You're going to sit there and just listen

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to them speak.

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like really listen. Another thing that seems like

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer, but really just try and focus on

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying and not the fact that they're stuttering

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>those words out. But you know, when your kid tells

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you a story about something that happened at school, right,

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>don't concentrate or even bring attention to the fact that

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it's being said with a stutter, but just take take

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in their story and if it takes a little while longer,

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>then just respond accordingly.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And in that same vein, like, don't tell your

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>kid to stop and start over when they start stuttering. Yeah,

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Like like they have to get the sentence just perfect

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 2>or else you're not going to hear them out, and

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 2>don't tell them to think before speaking. That's not helping

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>anything at all.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Be honest. Yeah, like, don't try and mask it and

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>say that, well, you don't have a stutter, like this

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>is just you know, you're just in a hurry or

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>something like. They just say to be really honest and say,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you have a stutter and it's a

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>disfluence and it's nothing to worry about and if you'd like,

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can talk to someone that can do some

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>exercises with you. And you know, just like all this

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like no brainer, not being a monster parent.

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but again some of it does like telling your

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 2>kid like, okay, slow down, take a breath. Now, what

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>are you saying? Like you think you're helping your kid,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you're not so so not all some of it is monstrosity.

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Others is just like this is this is what people

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>would naturally do, but it's and it seems intuitive, but

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you're wrong. Your intuition is dead wrong. Just let your

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.439
<v Speaker 2>kid talk and listen to what they're saying, not how

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>they're saying it. Right, and apparently this is this is

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a good These are good, This is good advice. Wow,

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it took me a second to get out. Thank you, though,

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Chuck for patiently hearing it. Then sure, this is good

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 2>advice to helping your kid just naturally shed the stutter,

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 2>the developmental stutter. We should say, all of this we've

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>been talking about is is dealing with a developmental stutter,

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>although a lot of it just applies to people with

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.959
<v Speaker 2>with adult stutters out in the real world as well.

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Like you can you can take just about all of

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 2>this and apply it to a business conversation if you

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 2>have a coworker who has a stutter, like, don't look

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 2>away in disgust. There's there's good advice right there all

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 2>throughout your life when you're when you're watching or listening

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to somebody with the stutter.

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean maybe don't do that at all, and like, yeah,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, life advice.

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's a good point is if you're sitting

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 2>there and you're and you don't look like you're hurrying

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 2>somebody with the stutter along, You're just engage, You're you're

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 2>into the conversation no matter how long it takes. I

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 2>can't imagine how much that must help. And one thing

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that we didn't really, I think point out that that

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 2>bears pointing out is that people who stutter do not

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 2>necessarily stutter in this same frequency throughout like their day.

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's definitely situations that are that are going to

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 2>make the stutter way more pronounced. They're almost exclusively associated

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 2>with higher anxiety situations. I think the National Stuttering Association

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>says that the number one situation where a stutter is

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be about as bad as it gets is

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 2>during a job interview. And so employers, please don't think

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that this is how this person talks. This is probably

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 2>as bad as their stutter gets. However, they're stuttering in

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the in the job interview. So if they're say at

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 2>home and they're just talking to their wife or their

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 2>kid or something, this stutter's probably going to be far

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>less pronounced than it would be if they were having

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to give a speech at their friend's wedding, you know.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I found that with this person, Emily, and

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I know that it's it can vary a lot within

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>a conversation. It's a very severe stutter. And then they

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>will say like a couple of sentences straight through with nothing,

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and then I think, oh man, ok, it catches me

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>off guard because I'm so used to the stutter, and

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, you know, that's super interesting to me.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You just like blurted out a couple of two or

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>three long sentences with zero stutter or stammer on the

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I know, but they're fun to say together, aren't they

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 2>They are?

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just find it really fascinating. You know,

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>speech pathology can come a long way. I know that

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>there are Well, it's funny. I looked online about curing stuttering,

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course there is no like patented cure. But

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Tony Robbins after listening to our or recording our motivational

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>speaker thing, I saw a video. I didn't watch it.

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I just saw the title. It said Tony Robbins cure's

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a man of a stutter in seven minutes.

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 2>So I was like, oh, come on, Yeah, yeah, I

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't see anything that said stutter stuttering cures. There's basically none.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I did not look into I didn't have time

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to look into this new device though, did you.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh, yeah, a little bit. It seems pretty untested as

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 2>far as real world application goes, but it makes sense intuitively,

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and apparently it does help in a clinical setting.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So basically it's like an ear like a hearing aid, right,

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>but it changes the person who's speaking's voice and a

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit does it replay it? Yeah, out loud for everybody.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 2>No, just for the person in their ear right. Because

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the one of the ways that somebody who stutters will

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>be able to talk perfectly well is speaking in unison

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>or singing. Oh okay, so like you, you can be

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting there talking to somebody just one on one, and

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 2>your stutter could be quite severe. But then if you

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and the person agree to sing together, you may not

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>stutter at all the whole time you're singing. And I

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 2>have no one has any idea why that's the case.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 2>They just know. And this device is based on that

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 2>that when we're talking in unison, or someone who has

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a stutter's talking in unison with somebody else, their stutter

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>tends to go away. So what this does is it

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 2>creates an echo. There's a bit of a lag with

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 2>their own voice, so they feel like they're talking in unice.

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>With themselves, and.

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 2>So it helps the stutter again, at least in a

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 2>clinical setting. I don't know if it would just be

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 2>too distracting in a conversation or what. But I got

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the impression that they haven't tested it fully or proven

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 2>it fully outside of the lab.

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the singing makes sense because remember mel Tillis, the

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>name sounds familiar. He was a country singer who had

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a really pronounced stutter, kind of around like the fifties,

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies. Seventies is when he was biggest. But yeah,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know he was on like Hehaw and stuff,

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>randall aupry Bird and then has has had a tough

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>stutter when he was talking to the audience and that's

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what he was known for. Oh yeah, yeah, it was

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, obviously wouldn't act, but.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It was his stick.

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of so another famous stutter chuck, are we there?

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, Porky Pig. Yeah yeah, so I was I

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 2>was looking up Porky Pig, right, because you know, that's

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 2>an unusual choice to have a cartoon character who stutters

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 2>U And it turns out that Porky Pig has a

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 2>stutter because the guy who originally did Porky Pig, Joe Doherty,

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 2>had a stutter in real life. Oh really yeah pretty sweet? Huh?

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Pretty heartwarming? Well wait there's more. Yeah, he did Porky

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Pick for the first two years, and then they fired

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 2>him because he kept missing the cues because of his stutter,

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and they brought in a guy who didn't have a

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 2>starter to do Porky Pig from that point on.

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But he did it with a stutter, Yeah, because it

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was established right, Well, that's creddy and that's sad. That

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is sad. Yeah, except Porky Pig's trick was to go

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to a different word.

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is a fairly common technique though.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I imagine. So yeah, like if you get hung

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up on something, just say something else that means the

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good one. Or I think people will say, oh,

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember and just act like they can't remember

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>the word when they know full well what word they're

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 2>going for. They just can't they can't say it, so

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 2>they just pretend like they couldn't or they forgot what

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>they were talking about.

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Should we name off some of these other famous stutters,

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think if you're an adult stutter, you probably

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>know these people. Sure you may have looked it up

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to feel a kinship, but maybe if you're a little

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>kid out there, it might make you feel better to

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 1>know that Darth Vader himself, James Earl Jones was a stutter, yeah,

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>big time. Emily Blunt, Yep, she's terrific. Samuel Jackson surprising

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 1>right there. Yeah, because the F bombs flow from his mouth.

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>He was born with that talent. Who else from pulp fiction,

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Kayitel.

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't see Harvey Kytel stuttering.

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>No, And I guess all of these people just went

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>through speech therapy. Huh.

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I would guess so, or else they all took.

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Mushrooms because it doesn't say whether or not they were

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like stuttered as a child or when they overcame it.

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But Nicole Kidman, Albert Einstein, Oh really, Carly Simon, and.

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 2>You said Winston Churchill earlier too, he had a stutter

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Bruce Willis.

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's kysing too. Huh. Shack I could see. I

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>think I've actually seen Shack stutter before on TV.

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Really see Bill Walton, Tiger Woods, Charles Darwin, Jane Seymour,

0:46:59.880 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>doctor Quinn herself. Yeah, Joe Biden, who will hopefully run

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for president, right, you became his stutter?

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well all of them did, which is great. But

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, there are people out there who

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>have accepted that they have a stutter. They probably spend

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time and money trying to get rid

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of it and it hasn't gone anywhere, so they've kind

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 2>of embraced it. So I mean, if you've gotten rid

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 2>of your stutter and you've overcome it, that's great. But

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 2>if you've also embraced it, good for you as well.

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, how about this one? You want to talk

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>about overcoming a stutter Kendrick Lamar?

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, wow.

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:39.720
<v Speaker 1>If you can overcome a stutter and then become Kendrick Lamar, right,

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>then that should be a shining example people that you

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>can do anything.

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or if you embrace your stutter, good for you

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Agreed, because you could be Mel Tillis, who was the

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Lamar of country music, or Porky Pig, the Kendrick

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Lamar of cartoon.

0:47:58.360 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 2>You got anything else about stuttering?

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I got nothing else. We'd love to hear from people, though, huh.

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. Get in touch with us. And in

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, you can find more stuff about stuttering, including

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot of support and resources for parents all over

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the web, and there's things like say dot org and

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the National Stuttering Association and all sorts of great resources

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 2>if you are looking for some information. And since I said, uh,

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it's time for the listener mail, all right, I'll.

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Call this coming to see you in Chicago, but by

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this point we'll be I went to see you in Chicago.

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Right and was disappointed.

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, want to write in and say what a

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>great show I just saw? NOD. I want to write

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and say thank you for putting together a really great podcast,

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener and fan and not even mentioning you in

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>my work bio and I checked it out and you did.

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate that. Stuff you should know is informative, funny,

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and family all at the same time. This was especially

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable when my fiance and I took his ten year

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>old brother on a road trip from Chicago to Wisconsin Dell's.

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>In the car, we listened to a playlist of SYSK

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>episodes that I put together to suit his ten year

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>old taste. How spiders work, how ice cream works, and,

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, because we were going to Wisconsin, Dell's self

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>proclaimed water park capital of the World, how water slides

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>work nice, which oddly is one of our highest performing

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>shows ever.

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 2>People love water Slides, man, they love hearing about them,

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 2>they love looking at pictures of them.

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>It got shared or something. It was so weird. I

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 1>can't remember, but I went to look at our download

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>numbers one time and I was like.

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Water Slides is the top? Huh higher than marijuana?

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well higher than marijuana.

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Hilarious.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Those episodes really entertained him and introduced him to the

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>concept of podcasts for the very first time. Thanks for

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>everything you do, and she said, they're going to see

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the fiance and Mara or Mara are going to see

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago show. So I hope you had a good time.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and thank you very much for supporting us in

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>our live shows. We appreciate that tremendously for sure. If

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you want to get in touch with us, like Mara did,

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:16.919
<v Speaker 2>or Mara We're gonna go with Mara, you can send

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 2>us all an email, including Noel and including Jerry and

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Frank the chair to Stuff podcast at HowStuffWorks dot com,

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 2>as always joined us at our home on the web,

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Stuff Youshould Know dot com.

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.