1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:01,639 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, Saga and Crystal here. 2 00:00:01,720 --> 00:00:05,280 Speaker 2: Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, 3 00:00:05,400 --> 00:00:07,880 Speaker 2: and we are so excited about what that means for 4 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:08,800 Speaker 2: the future of this show. 5 00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 1: This is the only place where you can find honest 6 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:13,320 Speaker 1: perspectives from the left and the right that simply does 7 00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:14,680 Speaker 1: not exist anywhere else. 8 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:17,120 Speaker 2: So if that is something that's important to you, please 9 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:19,680 Speaker 2: go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and 10 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:22,840 Speaker 2: you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free, 11 00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:25,640 Speaker 2: and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. 12 00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:27,600 Speaker 1: We need your help to build the future of independent 13 00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 1: news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints 14 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 1: dot com. 15 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 2: Hi, Ryan Grim, how's it going? 16 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 3: It goes? Got my earbuds figured out? 17 00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:37,200 Speaker 4: Nice. 18 00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:40,520 Speaker 3: The phone kept insisting that it was going to take 19 00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:42,800 Speaker 3: the earbuds, So yeah, I told the phone, guess what, 20 00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:43,879 Speaker 3: no bluetooth for you. 21 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:44,680 Speaker 2: So yeah, that's it. 22 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:47,280 Speaker 3: You cut off now that earbuds have no choice. 23 00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 2: When you learn your lesson, they can get a bluetooth back. Yeah, 24 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:52,480 Speaker 2: that's well, I was just recounting the travails of my face. 25 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 2: That's all you missed so far. 26 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 3: I know that story. 27 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:00,720 Speaker 2: So anyway, there's a lot to get to you this morning. 28 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 2: I think what we're probably going to do. We're going 29 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 2: to go through the LEAs with the terraces, which are 30 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 2: like on and off again, and who knows what's going 31 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:10,760 Speaker 2: to happen there. Ryan, have you just give it exactly exactly. 32 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:14,480 Speaker 2: We'll have Ryan give us big updates on Israel and 33 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 2: ceasefire negotiations and what's going on there. We've got some 34 00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 2: new Zorah and Mondani pulling out of New York that 35 00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:23,960 Speaker 2: is looking interesting. I'm starting to I'm starting to believe 36 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:25,440 Speaker 2: he could pull it off. What do you guys think. 37 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 3: I'll never believe it until it happens. 38 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:30,520 Speaker 5: I believe it. 39 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:33,800 Speaker 3: And then and Cuomo will run like buffalo style in 40 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:35,640 Speaker 3: the general election against him, So he's gonna have to 41 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:36,319 Speaker 3: beat him twice. 42 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 2: If what's the name of the woman, what's the name 43 00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 2: of the woman? Forgetting her name? 44 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:41,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a buffalo mayor, that's right. 45 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,440 Speaker 2: I covered that so closely too. But in any case, 46 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 2: she beats the like corrupt incumbent, major underdog victory, grassroots 47 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 2: like people powered victory, and then they just turn around 48 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 2: and run this dude in the general elect Did he 49 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 2: run as a Republican or an independent, I don't remember. 50 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:04,440 Speaker 3: I think even a Republican. 51 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 2: I think he did, and he's able to win in 52 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:08,480 Speaker 2: the general. So I could see Quomo Pole in the 53 00:02:08,520 --> 00:02:10,760 Speaker 2: same and I think there's a good possibility it would work. 54 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 2: There's no laws in New York City that would prevent that. 55 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:16,119 Speaker 3: Well, he already has a ballot line because New York 56 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 3: has like a hundred different parties and the Constitution Party 57 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:22,400 Speaker 3: in this party, so he actually he doesn't even have 58 00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:24,520 Speaker 3: to do anything. He's and he's already on the ballot 59 00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 3: for the general if he wants it. 60 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:27,239 Speaker 2: Damn, that's correct. 61 00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:30,280 Speaker 6: Way a star is born was so wrong. But yes, 62 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 6: he's been launched. 63 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:35,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, his first campaign when he ran for. 64 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:38,360 Speaker 2: Oh did you really? He was on my radar. 65 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 3: He was part of this wave of DSA candidates who 66 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 3: won in the cycle after like AOC and the squad 67 00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:47,080 Speaker 3: one in twenty eighteen, and then this whole wave of 68 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 3: DSA candidates won state, Senate and state. 69 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 2: I remember that council seats in twenty Yeah, I remember that, 70 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:53,160 Speaker 2: and he was. 71 00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:53,919 Speaker 3: One of them. 72 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:58,639 Speaker 2: DSA and also I'm sure Working Families Party back they had. Yeah, 73 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 2: they had a great a great eight track record, a 74 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:04,760 Speaker 2: great like election season right in that in that era. 75 00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 2: So we'll do all that, I think probably then for 76 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 2: premiums we're going to do You've got the polster who 77 00:03:11,840 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 2: did the like Abundance Versus Populism poll. Yeah, we're going 78 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 2: to talk to you, which I'm excited about. I need 79 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:19,520 Speaker 2: to take a look. Have you guys seen the Abundance 80 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:21,519 Speaker 2: world criticisms of this poll, because I do want to 81 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 2: ask him about some of those, so I've got to 82 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:23,480 Speaker 2: take a look. 83 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, so smart. Basically the criticisms are hilarious. One is that, well, 84 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:30,839 Speaker 3: this is not electoral, it's not supposed to poll. 85 00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 2: Well, but they explicitly say like a political project. I mean, 86 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 2: we've all I've asked Eric about that. I mean they're 87 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 2: you know, say that quite explicitly. So that's fine. 88 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 3: And then they say whenever a somebody with an agenda 89 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:45,480 Speaker 3: designs a poll, you can't trust it. And so what 90 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 3: they have the people who organized the poll said, okay, 91 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 3: you like, look at the wording, like it's your wording. 92 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 3: Tell us precisely how you'd like to do it, and 93 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 3: we'll redo it so we can talk to tell and 94 00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 3: the polster about that, because they said, give us your words, 95 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:04,080 Speaker 3: you write another poll that is the most lopsided pro 96 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 3: abundance poll that you can think of, and we'll test it. 97 00:04:08,800 --> 00:04:09,200 Speaker 3: Let's see. 98 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:12,200 Speaker 2: I feel that confident, Yeah, in the results, I mean, 99 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 2: I think fairly so. And then this I've I've been 100 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 2: excited to have this conversation with the two of you guys, 101 00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro taking shots at the OVONN, I mean, listen, 102 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 2: obviously it's because he's not happy with the OVONN being like, 103 00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 2: this is a genocide in Kaza and I have a 104 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 2: problem with it. But I do think some of the content, 105 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 2: like putting that aside, some of the content of what 106 00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:35,599 Speaker 2: Shapiro said about the number of grown adults who aren't 107 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,520 Speaker 2: acting their age, I thought that was kind of interesting, 108 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 2: and I wanted to get your thoughts on if there's 109 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,040 Speaker 2: any there there putting aside the like, you know, the 110 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,839 Speaker 2: Israel bias, like that piece of it. So wanted to 111 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 2: get to that as well. But let's go ahead and 112 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 2: start with what's going on with the tariffs. So last 113 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:55,799 Speaker 2: week left off, the tariffs were off because the court 114 00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,239 Speaker 2: ruled this this what is it Court of International Trade 115 00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 2: rule that the tariffs exceeded the powers of AIPA the 116 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:07,640 Speaker 2: authority they were using to do the across the board 117 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 2: Liberation Day tariffs. Now we have another court that has 118 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 2: weighed that has said, listen, there's an appeal process that 119 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 2: is going to play out, and in the meantime, we 120 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 2: are going to reinstate those tariffs for now. So they say. 121 00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 2: A federal appeals court on Thursday granted the Trump administration's 122 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:30,400 Speaker 2: request to temporarily pause a lower court ruling that struck 123 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 2: down most of President Trump's terariffs. Trump administration and early 124 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 2: told the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 125 00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:38,480 Speaker 2: it would seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court as 126 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:41,719 Speaker 2: soon as Friday if the tariff ruling was not quickly 127 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:45,080 Speaker 2: put on pause. So they are headed to the Supreme Court. 128 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 2: There's one other piece of this I want to put 129 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 2: up before I get to start with Emily's reaction, because 130 00:05:50,440 --> 00:05:52,359 Speaker 2: I'm very interested in what you have to say about this. 131 00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:55,760 Speaker 2: So Trump, in response to this starts tearing into the 132 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 2: Federalist Society, which is involved in vetting all of these judges, 133 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:05,200 Speaker 2: and specifically tears into Leonard Leo, the head of the 134 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:09,359 Speaker 2: Federal Society, who is so influential in conservative circles and Emily, 135 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 2: I know you'll be able to speak to that better 136 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:14,240 Speaker 2: than anyone. Here's Snania's like commentary on this, which I 137 00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 2: also think is sort of a stude. He says, Trump 138 00:06:15,880 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 2: now denouncing the Federalist Society, saying he doesn't want their 139 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,480 Speaker 2: judges anymore, pretty much the last tie to conservatism as 140 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:23,520 Speaker 2: an ideology. We're getting judges from now on who act 141 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:26,599 Speaker 2: like sickophants in the administration. But anyway, I won't read 142 00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:29,000 Speaker 2: this whole thing, but this is just him like really 143 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 2: going after Leonard Leo and calling them back room hustlers 144 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 2: and all these sorts of things. So Emily, tell us, 145 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:41,120 Speaker 2: you know, how is this being received in conservative world 146 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 2: and what is your view of the import here? 147 00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:46,640 Speaker 6: This is how a lot of conservatives actually feel about 148 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,920 Speaker 6: Leonard leon now and I shall, oh, really maga conservatives. 149 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 6: There's a difference between the sort of old conservative movement 150 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:57,200 Speaker 6: that is still really loyal to the Reagan crew and 151 00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:59,799 Speaker 6: the Reagan years and the Reagan legacy, and then there's 152 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 6: Maga world, which has been frustrated, particularly by Amy Coney Barrett, 153 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 6: sometimes by Brett Kavanaugh, and then also by some of 154 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:11,360 Speaker 6: these lower judges, these lower court judges, and so it's 155 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 6: not really surprising that Donald Trump has had that planted 156 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,320 Speaker 6: in his ear and that he would even like kind 157 00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:19,720 Speaker 6: of organically feel frustrated by that. It's just a matter 158 00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:22,280 Speaker 6: of time before that, you know, even boils over further. 159 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 6: But it was interesting in that true Social Post because 160 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 6: he also says he doesn't even really think it's Leonard Leo's. 161 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 4: Fault, So like he spends the first half of the 162 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 4: truth Social Post. 163 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 6: Unloading on Leonard Leo and then being like, but actually, 164 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:39,880 Speaker 6: like these judges, it's these these judges are just a 165 00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 6: complete and total disaster. 166 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 4: So it was weird because. 167 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:45,680 Speaker 2: Nilla says they're communist judges. 168 00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 6: Communist judges, right, which certainly would have nothing to do 169 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 6: with Leonard Leo. So anyway, all that is say, it's 170 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 6: pretty like, I wonder where this goes from here in 171 00:07:58,320 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 6: conservative world because the Supreme Court all day the White 172 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 6: House yesterday was saying we're going to take this up 173 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,440 Speaker 6: to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court we are utterly confident 174 00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:07,559 Speaker 6: will decide in our favor. 175 00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:08,720 Speaker 4: Well, the Supreme Court. 176 00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:11,480 Speaker 6: Donald Trump, when he says Leonard Leo helped him pick judges, 177 00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:14,000 Speaker 6: he's talking about dozens and dozens of people in lower courts, 178 00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 6: but also the Supreme Court. Right, every single person on 179 00:08:17,280 --> 00:08:19,760 Speaker 6: the Supreme Court that is a Trump appointee or Trump 180 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 6: nominee was picked from the list that Leonard Leo gave 181 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 6: him in twenty sixteen in order to get conservative votes. 182 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:29,239 Speaker 6: That's the lore we go back to twenty sixteen. Trump 183 00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:31,280 Speaker 6: needs to get the support of the conservative movement before 184 00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 6: the election, and so Leonard Leo gives him a list 185 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,680 Speaker 6: of judges that he will pick, and Trump picks every 186 00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:40,560 Speaker 6: single judge and justice from that list. And so now 187 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:44,880 Speaker 6: most of the Conservative majority is Leonard Leo Trump picked, 188 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,120 Speaker 6: and the White House is saying they have every bit 189 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 6: of confidence in them. 190 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:50,679 Speaker 4: So it's contradict it's a self contradiction. 191 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 2: Of course, it's wild to think too. So first of all, 192 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 2: I mean, I certainly would not surprise me it's a 193 00:08:56,160 --> 00:09:00,320 Speaker 2: Supreme Court upholds the decision that the tariffs exceed the 194 00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:05,079 Speaker 2: statutory authority. Because part of the federalist society was cultural 195 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:07,760 Speaker 2: issues and part of it is being very pro business 196 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,319 Speaker 2: and business is not excited about this terror regime. Would 197 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,480 Speaker 2: not surprise me at all if that was the finding. 198 00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 2: I don't know. And also I just I mean, I 199 00:09:14,520 --> 00:09:17,560 Speaker 2: think on its face, it is a preposterate. It is 200 00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 2: preposterous to imagine that you can as a executive claim 201 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:24,760 Speaker 2: this much unilateral power for yourself when the power of 202 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 2: the person is so clearly busted in the Constitution with 203 00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:32,200 Speaker 2: the UH with the Congress. So putting that aside, it's 204 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 2: also ironic that, you know, back in twenty sixteen, right 205 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 2: after the grabber by the pussy fallout is happening, and 206 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:43,439 Speaker 2: he's at risk of losing the evangelical right and there's 207 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:46,040 Speaker 2: like a real, you know, potential split in the foundation 208 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:48,920 Speaker 2: of his coalition. The way he shorees that up is 209 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 2: by putting out this list of like federalist society, like 210 00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:55,440 Speaker 2: here are the Supreme Court justices I will consider, like 211 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:57,760 Speaker 2: I'm locking it in now. These are the people, and 212 00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:01,240 Speaker 2: they're your people. And that's a important part of how 213 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,640 Speaker 2: he's able to keep his coalition together and secure victory. 214 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,240 Speaker 2: So it's wild to now fast forward to now and 215 00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:10,240 Speaker 2: see him going after them because they're not just doing 216 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:14,520 Speaker 2: everything he wants them to do, you know. To Hanania's 217 00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 2: commentary there, I agree and I disagree, because obviously Trump 218 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:21,200 Speaker 2: is his own animal and is just like the cult 219 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 2: of Trump. But when you look at the primary accomplishments 220 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:28,440 Speaker 2: that he has you know, effectuated an office, it's like 221 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:30,760 Speaker 2: destroying the administrative state. That is a big you know, 222 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 2: traditional Reagan type conservative goal. 223 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 4: It was a big Leonard Leo goal. 224 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:39,840 Speaker 2: Actually, yeah, absolutely, you know russ vote is deeply steeped 225 00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:42,040 Speaker 2: in the conservative movement. Like this is not some rando 226 00:10:42,160 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 2: who hasn't been in Washington before. 227 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 5: Right. 228 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 2: And then the tax cut from the first administration, which 229 00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 2: is the number one priority right now of the second administration. 230 00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:52,679 Speaker 2: It was literally written by like Paul Ryan and the 231 00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 2: Heritage Foundation, so it's always with him. It's like, well, 232 00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 2: there is there are differences, but also I don't want 233 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:03,200 Speaker 2: to overstay the amount of break that Trump is that 234 00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:07,719 Speaker 2: Trump's administration in practice has represented from Republican administrations of 235 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 2: the past. Ryan, what do you think about that sort 236 00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:09,720 Speaker 2: of thing? 237 00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:17,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, this, like Trump is really going for a basically 238 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:21,440 Speaker 3: a clean break, not a clean break from, but complete 239 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:25,560 Speaker 3: domination over you know, all factions of Conservatism. 240 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 2: Yes, that's the way to put it. So it's not 241 00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 2: before necessarily an ideological break, but he wants complete domination over. 242 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:34,760 Speaker 2: I think that's the way the way to put it right, it's. 243 00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 3: Like, Okay, you evangelicals have this these politics, You fed 244 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:42,920 Speaker 3: SoC people have these politics. You Chamber of Commerce people 245 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 3: have these politics. You America First or Jendie Vance types 246 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,680 Speaker 3: have this going on. It's like you all serve me. 247 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:52,840 Speaker 3: And this is and trump Ism is what I say 248 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 3: it is, and that's that's how it's going to be. 249 00:11:55,720 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 3: And so yeah, this because if if he gets his 250 00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 3: tariffs shut down by the Supreme Court, that's a pretty 251 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:09,600 Speaker 3: radical rebuke to him his policy and his domination over 252 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 3: the entire coalition. So he seems to be you really going. 253 00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 2: For it here, Emily. 254 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 6: Oh sorry, I was just gonna say, I forget who 255 00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:20,840 Speaker 6: posted this this week, but someone posted like this is 256 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:24,440 Speaker 6: Auderborough mob shit. And it's a really good way to 257 00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:26,400 Speaker 6: put it, because I think a lot of people try 258 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 6: to shoehorn what Trump is doing into an ideology, but 259 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:33,040 Speaker 6: it's actually Trump is trying to sort of shoehorn. Trump 260 00:12:33,080 --> 00:12:35,440 Speaker 6: is trying to force the ideology of the right to 261 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:38,280 Speaker 6: be deference to Trump and there are times where it 262 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 6: overlaps with the goal of russ vote or the goal 263 00:12:41,160 --> 00:12:43,560 Speaker 6: of lear Lee or whatever, but particularly Russ and you know, 264 00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 6: creating the unitary executive and restoring executive power and all 265 00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 6: of that. But there are times when it's also just 266 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:52,559 Speaker 6: like Donald Trump isn't overlapping with the ideological goal. Donald 267 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 6: Trump is just Roy Kohane as president of the United States. 268 00:12:55,679 --> 00:13:00,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, Emily. You had pool duty yesterday and 269 00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 2: so you were there for all of you know, everything 270 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:04,719 Speaker 2: there was to get out of this administration in terms 271 00:13:04,720 --> 00:13:06,880 Speaker 2: of the response to this court decision. Let me go 272 00:13:06,920 --> 00:13:09,960 Speaker 2: ahead and play a little bit here of Peter Navarro saying, listen, 273 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:12,440 Speaker 2: this pause and terrorists doesn't really change anything at all. 274 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 7: These will not affect the negotiations in any way. You 275 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,559 Speaker 7: have people out there in the world. Since we look 276 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 7: at the court decisions, the court was clear, as I said, 277 00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:30,200 Speaker 7: that President has brought it forward the post hariffs. They 278 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:35,360 Speaker 7: took issue with the particular statues be used. 279 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,800 Speaker 2: So there have been other indications too that they're going 280 00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:44,280 Speaker 2: to try to move forward in some way. You know, 281 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:46,320 Speaker 2: what did you make of those comments from Navarro and 282 00:13:46,320 --> 00:13:48,120 Speaker 2: from other administration officials as well. 283 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:48,640 Speaker 5: Well? 284 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,720 Speaker 6: And that last part there about the particulars of the 285 00:13:50,720 --> 00:13:53,920 Speaker 6: statute from Peter Navarro is why the administration is projecting 286 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:56,840 Speaker 6: utter confidence going into the Supreme Court. They feel like 287 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 6: they can, they feel like they're coitutional argument will be 288 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:06,320 Speaker 6: like met with agreement from conservative Supreme Court justices, because 289 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 6: it's not quite as simple as just oh, you know, 290 00:14:09,679 --> 00:14:11,920 Speaker 6: President doesn't have the ability to do this. But the 291 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:13,920 Speaker 6: question that I kept trying to get in both at 292 00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:17,439 Speaker 6: the briefing and to Navarro, and it's just some kind 293 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:19,760 Speaker 6: of luck thing. Some people are very skilled at getting 294 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 6: their questions asked, like their hands super loud, or they 295 00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:25,280 Speaker 6: if you talk to White House reporters about their tricks, 296 00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:27,640 Speaker 6: it comes down to like how they smile and make. 297 00:14:27,880 --> 00:14:29,920 Speaker 3: Real craft trying to get a drink. 298 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:39,520 Speaker 6: Yeah, exactly, Yeah, Ingram knows what's up. So anyway, it 299 00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:43,840 Speaker 6: was the question is just if part of the problem 300 00:14:44,040 --> 00:14:46,960 Speaker 6: from this kicking through the court system is that it 301 00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 6: creates complete uncertainty. Again, you can kill two birds with 302 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:54,360 Speaker 6: one stone here and go through Congress, why would the 303 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 6: administration not pass the slate of tariffs or even like 304 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:02,000 Speaker 6: a slightly reduced slate of tariffs through Congress, because then 305 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 6: that brings certainty to investors and it removes the problem 306 00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:08,520 Speaker 6: of the courts. But of course they know that they 307 00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 6: can't pass these through Congress, they have no confidence that 308 00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 6: they would be able to get you know, Ron Johnson 309 00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 6: and the Susan Collins, they sort of hardcore fiscal conservatives, 310 00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:19,920 Speaker 6: but also moderate conservatives. 311 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,960 Speaker 4: Even this is a perfect continuation what we were just 312 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 4: talking about. 313 00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:27,080 Speaker 6: Even in the kind of cult of Trump era of 314 00:15:27,120 --> 00:15:30,760 Speaker 6: the Republican Party, tariffs are aligned too far for a 315 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:34,280 Speaker 6: lot of traditional Republicans and moderate Republicans. So they're stuck 316 00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:37,040 Speaker 6: with having to as you have pointed out many times, Crystal, 317 00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:40,040 Speaker 6: rely on Trump kind of waving his magic wand which 318 00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:43,880 Speaker 6: he definitely enjoys. But that's because it's actually this is 319 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:47,920 Speaker 6: why Congress, why the founders delegated the power to Congress, 320 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:52,600 Speaker 6: because it's not supported by the representatives of the public. 321 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 6: It's just supported by the president. And so it's a 322 00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 6: huge problem. 323 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:59,240 Speaker 2: And the other reason why this is delegated to Congress 324 00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 2: is the exact reason Trump doesn't want to have to 325 00:16:02,080 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 2: go through Congress, which is he wants people to have 326 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:06,840 Speaker 2: to go and petition the king. And so if you 327 00:16:06,960 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 2: have some stable regime that has to be subject to 328 00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 2: legislative branch scrutiny, then you take all the fun of it. 329 00:16:15,400 --> 00:16:17,560 Speaker 2: In terms of what he actually wants to achieve or 330 00:16:17,640 --> 00:16:20,280 Speaker 2: not to mention, you know, all the like, oh, potential 331 00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:22,720 Speaker 2: development deals that can be thrown his way, or if 332 00:16:22,720 --> 00:16:24,440 Speaker 2: he wants to do a favor for Elon and make 333 00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:27,080 Speaker 2: sure they get Starlink or they're partnering with Palenteer or 334 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:30,360 Speaker 2: whatever it is that's in his basket, you know, of 335 00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 2: Goodie's wish list, then that becomes more much more difficult 336 00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 2: to effectuate. If you're actually going through the legislative branch. 337 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:40,400 Speaker 6: And just ran you can respond to this, because I 338 00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:42,240 Speaker 6: think you might have thought. It's one of the questions 339 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:46,040 Speaker 6: people were asking throughout the day is doesn't this destroy 340 00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:48,800 Speaker 6: your leverage? I mean, doesn't going through the courts destroy 341 00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 6: your leverage when you're going to other countries. I mean, 342 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:53,960 Speaker 6: just yesterday Kevin Hassett was saying, they expect many, many 343 00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:56,520 Speaker 6: deals to be coming in the next few weeks. But 344 00:16:56,800 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 6: who's going to make a deal with you when they 345 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:01,440 Speaker 6: don't even know whether the courts are going to block 346 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 6: your tariffs from being imp Absolutely so, right, I feel 347 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:07,280 Speaker 6: like what leverage India? 348 00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 3: I don't. I don't actually think that that's that's significant, 349 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:12,240 Speaker 3: that plays that significant of a role, because I think 350 00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:17,560 Speaker 3: the US has leverage because it's it's an economic superpower. 351 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:22,080 Speaker 3: At the same time, countries that were already reluctant to 352 00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 3: strike deals with US because we just Trump just renegotiated 353 00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 3: US MCA with Canada and Mexico just a couple of years. 354 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:34,360 Speaker 2: Ago, right, and then just already tearing it up and. 355 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:37,280 Speaker 3: Completely abrogates it. The United States cuts an around deal, 356 00:17:37,320 --> 00:17:39,399 Speaker 3: they abrogate it, then they're talking about going back into it. 357 00:17:39,480 --> 00:17:41,960 Speaker 3: Like so the idea. 358 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:45,320 Speaker 2: Ties into Israel and Moss as well, Yeah, make some 359 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:48,040 Speaker 2: you know, claims with a mass and then totally turns around, 360 00:17:48,040 --> 00:17:49,520 Speaker 2: does something different when they talk to Israel. 361 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 3: So the courts are like the seventieth wild card thrown 362 00:17:53,800 --> 00:17:55,919 Speaker 3: into a deal with the United States, which is just 363 00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:59,640 Speaker 3: becoming like a completely arbitrary and capricious country, and other 364 00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:04,119 Speaker 3: countries are trying to move move away from it, you know, 365 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:08,399 Speaker 3: just real quickly on the Yeah, my take on the founders, 366 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:11,480 Speaker 3: it's like they never really even thought of the president 367 00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 3: as making policy at all, Like that was supposed to 368 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 3: come from Congress, and tariffs for the first hundred plus 369 00:18:17,640 --> 00:18:21,280 Speaker 3: years of the US were a were major policy. It's 370 00:18:21,320 --> 00:18:26,760 Speaker 3: like where huge portions of our federal revenue came from 371 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:30,919 Speaker 3: once we once we kicked in an income tax, and 372 00:18:31,160 --> 00:18:33,600 Speaker 3: we had a federal reserve, like the economy and the 373 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 3: and the treasury were run, you know, with tariffs as 374 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:39,560 Speaker 3: a real kind of side show. And so that's why 375 00:18:40,160 --> 00:18:43,159 Speaker 3: Congress then delegated, you know, the kind of moving of 376 00:18:43,160 --> 00:18:45,920 Speaker 3: the dial to the executive because the policy was already 377 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 3: set in place. What Trump's doing is a brand new policy. 378 00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:55,000 Speaker 3: It's like, it's like bringing tariffs back to a central 379 00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:57,879 Speaker 3: place in our economic policy making like they were in 380 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:03,120 Speaker 3: the nineteenth century, and that you can't do unless Congress 381 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,480 Speaker 3: allows you to do it, would be the argument. It's 382 00:19:05,480 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 3: just all power though, So. 383 00:19:07,119 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, no, that's right. I wanted to highlight this just 384 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:12,959 Speaker 2: to kind of put it on all of our radar. 385 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:16,399 Speaker 2: Arnot Bertrand was highlighting these deals that are being struck 386 00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:19,040 Speaker 2: outside of the US to your point, Ryan about how 387 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:20,800 Speaker 2: we're just like this rogue nation at this point and 388 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:23,480 Speaker 2: every other country is just figuring out how to adapt. 389 00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:26,919 Speaker 2: And he says, this is bizarrely received almost zero coverage 390 00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 2: in Western media, but it is actually massive deal. China, 391 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,800 Speaker 2: the countries of Southeast Asia, assion and the Arab States. 392 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 2: GCC just held a summit in Kuala Lumpur to forge 393 00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:38,800 Speaker 2: what could become the world's largest economic block, covering everything 394 00:19:38,840 --> 00:19:42,840 Speaker 2: from free trade agreements and dedollarrization to Belton Road connectivity. Together, 395 00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:45,440 Speaker 2: these countries have over two billion people, thirty percent of 396 00:19:45,480 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 2: the world's GDP, and crucially about fifty five percent of 397 00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 2: world GDP growth in PPP terms. Here's their joint statement. 398 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:56,399 Speaker 2: They agree to massively develop free trade bypass the dollar. 399 00:19:56,600 --> 00:20:00,000 Speaker 2: That's an important one. Belton Road expansion, develop across region 400 00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:04,719 Speaker 2: digital economy framework including an AI and energy markets coordination. 401 00:20:05,160 --> 00:20:07,119 Speaker 2: So one more sign that the rest of the world 402 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:11,879 Speaker 2: is trying to adapt to you know, the US ye 403 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:13,280 Speaker 2: rogue actions. 404 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:15,000 Speaker 3: And like I would saying maybe this is a good 405 00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:18,840 Speaker 3: thing for everybody. It in a world where the US 406 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:23,520 Speaker 3: is still the loan superpower and also sees the rapid 407 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:27,280 Speaker 3: development of AI, Like we know how that world ends, 408 00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 3: like with a like just plutocracy of like a few 409 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:36,680 Speaker 3: trillionaires controlling everything. That's yeah, that like i'd love to 410 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:39,439 Speaker 3: say that DSA and and the remnants of Bernie are 411 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:42,400 Speaker 3: going to like put the brakes on that I don't. 412 00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:44,520 Speaker 3: I don't see it happening. And so it has to 413 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:48,800 Speaker 3: be the US like committing suicide and handing over power 414 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:52,200 Speaker 3: to these other countries who who at least they might 415 00:20:53,000 --> 00:20:57,600 Speaker 3: have a better shot at making a slightly more egalitarian 416 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:00,440 Speaker 3: world out of this, out of on the other side 417 00:21:00,480 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 3: of this, whatever this AI development is. 418 00:21:03,080 --> 00:21:06,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, we need to have Janis fair Faucus back on 419 00:21:07,160 --> 00:21:10,320 Speaker 2: because he also is tracking both, you know, the de 420 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:13,360 Speaker 2: dollarization that ties into this, the deals that are being 421 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 2: struck here that Arno is high landing along with the 422 00:21:16,680 --> 00:21:21,280 Speaker 2: US's embrace of quote unquote stable coins, and so he 423 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:25,160 Speaker 2: sees a world in which you have two competing monetary systems. 424 00:21:25,640 --> 00:21:28,119 Speaker 2: One that is sort of more you know, traditionally im 425 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:31,960 Speaker 2: backed by governmental central banks like public you know, currencies 426 00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:35,879 Speaker 2: that would be emblematic of like the bricks arrangements and 427 00:21:35,920 --> 00:21:39,600 Speaker 2: what's happening with Asian and China and the Arab nations. 428 00:21:40,040 --> 00:21:44,719 Speaker 2: And then one that is this private digital currency, you know, 429 00:21:44,920 --> 00:21:48,240 Speaker 2: and with the quote unquote Genius Act and these stable 430 00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:51,080 Speaker 2: coins which are not stable. Actually, then the trick the 431 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:52,960 Speaker 2: dollar as the alternative. 432 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:56,000 Speaker 3: The trick there if people aren't connecting the dots, is 433 00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,080 Speaker 3: it buys you say, another ten or twenty years of 434 00:21:59,080 --> 00:22:02,480 Speaker 3: being able to kind of float endless amounts of treasuries 435 00:22:02,560 --> 00:22:07,119 Speaker 3: into into circulation because that the bitcoin people, the crypto people, 436 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:11,560 Speaker 3: will have to buy the treasuries as the collateral for 437 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:15,359 Speaker 3: their stable coin. So it's it's basically a way to 438 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:17,560 Speaker 3: it's it's a it's kind of a pump and dump 439 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 3: for like the entire United States. 440 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,840 Speaker 2: That's cool. Yeah, that sounds like it's going to work 441 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:23,440 Speaker 2: out really great. 442 00:22:23,640 --> 00:22:25,600 Speaker 3: It'll be good for ten or twenty years and that 443 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 3: that's that that's longer term thinking than our economic planners 444 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:32,040 Speaker 3: are usually getting into. So let's give them at least 445 00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:32,600 Speaker 3: credit for that. 446 00:22:32,920 --> 00:22:33,120 Speaker 5: Yeah. 447 00:22:33,119 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, Trump and the other gerontocracy people 448 00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:39,320 Speaker 2: will be dead I guess by the time it collapses, 449 00:22:39,359 --> 00:22:40,080 Speaker 2: So what do they care. 450 00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:42,520 Speaker 6: Yes, this was a good piece from from you honest 451 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:46,480 Speaker 6: that people should check out that he wrote on this recently. 452 00:22:46,520 --> 00:22:49,159 Speaker 4: We should definitely have it. Just closed it. 453 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:52,119 Speaker 6: Sorry, it was called Trump wants a big tech to 454 00:22:52,160 --> 00:22:52,800 Speaker 6: own the dollar. 455 00:22:53,960 --> 00:22:54,840 Speaker 4: It was really perfect. 456 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:57,200 Speaker 3: Yep, that sounds right. 457 00:22:57,520 --> 00:23:00,680 Speaker 2: One more one more piece on this, again highlighted by 458 00:23:00,800 --> 00:23:03,280 Speaker 2: r no So Marco Ruby announce they're going to start 459 00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:06,359 Speaker 2: revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections the 460 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:10,199 Speaker 2: Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields any place 461 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:13,359 Speaker 2: as rip American AI industry. According to recent study by 462 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:15,640 Speaker 2: the Paulson Institute, thirty eight percent of the top tier 463 00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:17,760 Speaker 2: AI talent work in the US are Chinese, more than 464 00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:22,400 Speaker 2: Americans themselves. So again, I guess right, that's for those 465 00:23:22,680 --> 00:23:25,880 Speaker 2: they were very concerned by a development. We should be like, yeah, 466 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 2: I guess good work. 467 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 3: Crazy times. 468 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:32,879 Speaker 4: This is Trump's real plan. We didn't even see it coming. 469 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:35,760 Speaker 4: This is the five D chess. Be right, I see 470 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:38,560 Speaker 4: it coming. This is all a plan to topple. 471 00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:43,600 Speaker 6: The Empire's ability to thrust us into AI, into the 472 00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:45,000 Speaker 6: dystopia of AI. 473 00:23:45,480 --> 00:23:46,679 Speaker 4: So well done, mister president. 474 00:23:49,920 --> 00:23:52,360 Speaker 2: It is it is wild. It is wild to see 475 00:23:52,560 --> 00:23:55,880 Speaker 2: the very obvious consequences of these actions. In any case, 476 00:23:56,480 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 2: anything else there, guys, Are you ready to move on 477 00:23:58,160 --> 00:23:58,600 Speaker 2: to Israel? 478 00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:00,880 Speaker 5: Yep? 479 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:06,640 Speaker 2: So, Ryan, you guys have been doing the best reporting 480 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:10,600 Speaker 2: on what is going on with the ceasefire deal negotiations. 481 00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:14,960 Speaker 2: So I'll pull up here the framework, the text that 482 00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 2: you guys published of the term sheet delivered to Hamas 483 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:21,000 Speaker 2: by Steve Whitcoff, and you can talk us through some 484 00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:24,160 Speaker 2: of the details here and also the larger context Yeah. 485 00:24:24,240 --> 00:24:31,000 Speaker 3: So the original deal understanding, as Hamas kind of described it, 486 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:38,040 Speaker 3: that Jeremy reported on last week into early this week, 487 00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:43,119 Speaker 3: was that there would be a sixty day ceasefire. The 488 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:47,800 Speaker 3: Israeli forces would withdraw to their March second positions. There 489 00:24:47,840 --> 00:24:52,640 Speaker 3: would be five captaves released on day one and then 490 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:56,240 Speaker 3: five hostages released on day sixty And the idea there 491 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:02,200 Speaker 3: was that breaking them in half and spreading them out 492 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:05,320 Speaker 3: forces Israel to abide by the ceasefire for that entire 493 00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:08,720 Speaker 3: sixty days, and during that sixty days, the US would 494 00:25:08,760 --> 00:25:13,919 Speaker 3: guarantee the stability of the ceasefire and would pressure Israel 495 00:25:14,680 --> 00:25:18,640 Speaker 3: to negotiate towards a long term truce that the war 496 00:25:18,640 --> 00:25:21,680 Speaker 3: would not start up again on day sixty one. The 497 00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:26,400 Speaker 3: new agreement. Oh, and how that unfolded. Jeremy was able 498 00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 3: to get the details of this and publish that there 499 00:25:28,160 --> 00:25:34,879 Speaker 3: was an understanding between Hamas and Witkough that the Israel 500 00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:37,920 Speaker 3: immediately comes out and they don't want to do this. 501 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:39,280 Speaker 3: They don't, they say they don't want to do this. 502 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:43,640 Speaker 3: Witkoff then calls Axios Barack Revide and says, I'm really 503 00:25:43,680 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 3: disappointed in Hamas's reaction to this, and so blaming Hamas, 504 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,639 Speaker 3: even though Hamas had had accepted the terms. So then 505 00:25:51,640 --> 00:25:53,920 Speaker 3: Wikoff goes back and he's like, okay, what can I 506 00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 3: what can I tweak in this to get Israel on board, 507 00:25:56,960 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 3: which again tells you that Jeremy's reporting was correct because 508 00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:03,080 Speaker 3: the deal would not have gotten more favorable to Israel 509 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 3: if the original one was okay with Israel but not 510 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:10,840 Speaker 3: okay with Hamas. So now they have a new deal 511 00:26:11,119 --> 00:26:14,920 Speaker 3: which instead of the five, the second half of the captives, 512 00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:20,959 Speaker 3: and they're believed to be twenty living captives remaining in Gaza, 513 00:26:22,160 --> 00:26:24,480 Speaker 3: so the five, instead of being released on day sixty, 514 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:29,680 Speaker 3: would be released on day seven. And the language around Israel, 515 00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 3: kind of withdrawing back to March second, is much vaguer, 516 00:26:32,680 --> 00:26:39,200 Speaker 3: and the language about a long term truce is is vague, 517 00:26:39,960 --> 00:26:45,920 Speaker 3: giving Israel the ability to restart the war. Net Yahoo 518 00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:50,600 Speaker 3: met yesterday with hostage families, and audio of it immediately leaked, 519 00:26:50,920 --> 00:26:55,480 Speaker 3: which people in Israel, reporters in Israel were speculating or 520 00:26:55,600 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 3: and just guessing like that this was a deliberate Net 521 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:03,080 Speaker 3: and Yahoo leak. So in his conversation with the hostage families, 522 00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:05,920 Speaker 3: he was telling them we're going we're going to restart 523 00:27:05,960 --> 00:27:09,600 Speaker 3: the war like it's happening, like I'm sorry, like and 524 00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:13,080 Speaker 3: we hope we get the rest of the living captives out, 525 00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:17,120 Speaker 3: but we'll see and just letting you know, we're going 526 00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:17,960 Speaker 3: to break this deal. 527 00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:18,680 Speaker 2: Yeah. 528 00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:21,360 Speaker 3: And the thinking of Amir ta Bona, a r's columnists 529 00:27:21,359 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 3: who's been on our show. His analysis is that Yahoo 530 00:27:27,119 --> 00:27:29,920 Speaker 3: is push is put that out to pressure Hamas to 531 00:27:30,040 --> 00:27:33,600 Speaker 3: reject the deal. Like his preference is that Hamas reject 532 00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:36,439 Speaker 3: the deal rather than accept it, and then nen Yaho 533 00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:39,399 Speaker 3: has to break it because even though he's willing to 534 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:43,040 Speaker 3: break it, it comes with a political cost, like the 535 00:27:43,119 --> 00:27:45,800 Speaker 3: world has completely lost its patience with nen Yahu and 536 00:27:45,880 --> 00:27:49,080 Speaker 3: his genocide. It's like Europe is, you know, it's twenty 537 00:27:49,119 --> 00:27:53,200 Speaker 3: percent of its trade. Even Germany is telling Israel that 538 00:27:53,359 --> 00:27:55,800 Speaker 3: that this is that this has gone too far. So 539 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:59,680 Speaker 3: on the one hand, you could imagine why Hamas is 540 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:01,880 Speaker 3: still debating this internally. You can imagine why they would 541 00:28:01,920 --> 00:28:07,159 Speaker 3: reject this deal because it may be seven days of 542 00:28:07,200 --> 00:28:10,120 Speaker 3: a ceasefire, right and then right back to where they were. 543 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:10,760 Speaker 6: Right. 544 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:12,680 Speaker 3: On the other hand, you can imagine why they would 545 00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:16,480 Speaker 3: accept it because if Netton, now, who wants them to 546 00:28:16,720 --> 00:28:20,320 Speaker 3: reject it. You could think, okay, whatever net Ya, who 547 00:28:20,320 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 3: wants us to do like, we should do the opposite, 548 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:29,080 Speaker 3: uh and and and it would further isolate Israel internationally 549 00:28:29,760 --> 00:28:35,160 Speaker 3: if they once again broke another ceasefire. And so the question, 550 00:28:35,600 --> 00:28:39,200 Speaker 3: you know, for Hamas is is you know, what is 551 00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:41,360 Speaker 3: what is a seven day or a sixty day seasefire 552 00:28:41,400 --> 00:28:45,240 Speaker 3: worth to them? If they and if they're because there 553 00:28:45,320 --> 00:28:48,520 Speaker 3: as they say their their remaining leverage is is there 554 00:28:49,720 --> 00:28:51,560 Speaker 3: the twenty hostages that they hold if that's down to 555 00:28:51,640 --> 00:28:56,720 Speaker 3: ten and increasingly maybe shrinking, as as Israel's relentless bombing campaign, 556 00:28:58,160 --> 00:29:00,960 Speaker 3: you know, puts the puts their lives at risk on 557 00:29:01,080 --> 00:29:05,200 Speaker 3: a on a minute by minute basis. So there was 558 00:29:05,240 --> 00:29:08,200 Speaker 3: a lot of hope in Gaza. You saw people, you know, 559 00:29:09,280 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 3: almost like pre celebrating the possibility. This was just such 560 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 3: a just a poignant and painful thing to see because 561 00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:20,120 Speaker 3: the the expressions of joy our reflection of the depth 562 00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:20,600 Speaker 3: of the pain. 563 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:21,239 Speaker 5: Right. 564 00:29:21,920 --> 00:29:25,640 Speaker 3: But there's what we don't know yet how this will go. 565 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:31,880 Speaker 3: And it's to me it's pretty hard to hard to predict. 566 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:37,280 Speaker 2: Ryan, what do you make of like what can we 567 00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:41,640 Speaker 2: read into wit Coough and the Trump administration's role here 568 00:29:42,040 --> 00:29:46,200 Speaker 2: and their preferences, because I mean, you know, as we 569 00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:48,480 Speaker 2: sort through all these details, which are really important, at 570 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:51,840 Speaker 2: the end of the day, the you know, probably the 571 00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:54,920 Speaker 2: critical factor is what the Trump administration is willing to 572 00:29:55,040 --> 00:29:57,520 Speaker 2: do to compel BB two end the war. 573 00:29:58,000 --> 00:29:59,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, and it doesn't seem like they're willing to do 574 00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:03,160 Speaker 3: much because if they had just if they had just 575 00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 3: kept the arrangement something similar to all right, five on 576 00:30:08,040 --> 00:30:12,000 Speaker 3: day one and five on day sixty and net Yahoo 577 00:30:12,080 --> 00:30:14,800 Speaker 3: is publicly saying, screw you, I'm going to restart the 578 00:30:14,880 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 3: war as soon as I can. At least at least 579 00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:22,080 Speaker 3: you're then forcing ams to ask the question of is 580 00:30:22,160 --> 00:30:25,680 Speaker 3: a sixty day cease fire and a flood of aid 581 00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:31,360 Speaker 3: worth it to this population that is being pushed into 582 00:30:31,440 --> 00:30:38,560 Speaker 3: total anarchy like at this point, whereas when you say, 583 00:30:38,840 --> 00:30:41,600 Speaker 3: is seven days worth it, it's like, well, you know, 584 00:30:41,640 --> 00:30:43,720 Speaker 3: they might not even let much. They'll barely let any 585 00:30:43,760 --> 00:30:45,720 Speaker 3: aid in for seven days and then start bombing again. 586 00:30:45,920 --> 00:30:49,440 Speaker 3: So Okay, they agreed to sixty but like they're being 587 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:54,080 Speaker 3: very public in their in their you know, confidence that 588 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:57,400 Speaker 3: they don't have to abide by it. So yeah, without 589 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:03,120 Speaker 3: you know, without without witcough pushing it for slightly longer. 590 00:31:03,720 --> 00:31:05,960 Speaker 3: It does suggest that they're not willing to do that much. 591 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:12,320 Speaker 6: It's interesting that from let's just say, from Netanyahu's perspective, 592 00:31:13,200 --> 00:31:15,280 Speaker 6: he probably feels like he is on the presspoe of 593 00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:19,960 Speaker 6: a generational opportunity for like Mara Gaza. 594 00:31:21,280 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 3: Totally. 595 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:25,720 Speaker 4: But then also the flip side of that is a. 596 00:31:27,320 --> 00:31:31,480 Speaker 6: The alternative is the reconstitution of Hamas with any type 597 00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:34,560 Speaker 6: of again, from his perspective, any type of ceasefire. So 598 00:31:34,640 --> 00:31:37,480 Speaker 6: he thinks that he's on He's walking this like very 599 00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:42,880 Speaker 6: very fine line between getting exactly the like fantasy scenario 600 00:31:43,400 --> 00:31:47,640 Speaker 6: from the Israeli far rights perspective, or losing it and 601 00:31:48,280 --> 00:31:51,680 Speaker 6: having Trump and the United States go into a future 602 00:31:51,880 --> 00:31:57,120 Speaker 6: that is much more skeptical of Israel and has a 603 00:31:57,240 --> 00:31:59,880 Speaker 6: much more skeptical alliance with this. 604 00:32:00,960 --> 00:32:02,640 Speaker 4: And I guess it's sort of. 605 00:32:02,760 --> 00:32:07,960 Speaker 6: Like they they feel like they're on a tight rope 606 00:32:09,080 --> 00:32:11,280 Speaker 6: and I don't know, I mean, I don't think they 607 00:32:11,360 --> 00:32:15,240 Speaker 6: realized that the more skepticism of the alliance future is 608 00:32:15,480 --> 00:32:16,360 Speaker 6: kind of already here. 609 00:32:16,920 --> 00:32:19,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I think there's a lot to that, 610 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:21,840 Speaker 2: and I think this ties into it as well. They're 611 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:27,960 Speaker 2: you know, rapidly moving to enable the additional expansion, major 612 00:32:28,040 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 2: expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank. You know, 613 00:32:32,000 --> 00:32:35,800 Speaker 2: they're worried that there will be international, real international pressure 614 00:32:36,080 --> 00:32:39,480 Speaker 2: for some sort of a you know, Palestinian state to 615 00:32:39,560 --> 00:32:41,680 Speaker 2: be recognized in some sort of a two state solution 616 00:32:41,800 --> 00:32:44,680 Speaker 2: to be forced upon them. And so and look like 617 00:32:45,120 --> 00:32:46,920 Speaker 2: BB grew up in the United States, I mean, these 618 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:50,560 Speaker 2: are people deeply understand American politics. They probably understand it 619 00:32:50,640 --> 00:32:53,640 Speaker 2: better than almost anyone, to be honest with you, and 620 00:32:53,800 --> 00:32:55,800 Speaker 2: where the pressure points are and how to get their 621 00:32:55,840 --> 00:32:57,880 Speaker 2: way and when the clock's ticking and when it's not. 622 00:32:58,640 --> 00:33:00,720 Speaker 2: And so look, they can rit a poll as well 623 00:33:00,760 --> 00:33:04,480 Speaker 2: as anyone else. And see the way that first of all, 624 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:11,320 Speaker 2: the privilege that they enjoyed of having lockstep unified bipartisan support, 625 00:33:11,960 --> 00:33:13,760 Speaker 2: it is going to come to an end, Like you 626 00:33:13,880 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 2: cannot sustain a situation where the base of one party, 627 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:20,480 Speaker 2: the Democratic Party, is so dramatically at odds with the 628 00:33:21,320 --> 00:33:23,840 Speaker 2: elected leadership of that party. And that's going to come 629 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:25,080 Speaker 2: to it. I think is going to come to a 630 00:33:25,120 --> 00:33:26,920 Speaker 2: head quickly in twenty twenty eight. I think this will 631 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:29,320 Speaker 2: be a litmus test and that you will not get 632 00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:32,400 Speaker 2: through a Democratic primary without having a very different position 633 00:33:32,520 --> 00:33:35,360 Speaker 2: on Israel than you know, Joe Biden and every other 634 00:33:35,440 --> 00:33:40,440 Speaker 2: Democratic president has had in modern American history. So they 635 00:33:40,560 --> 00:33:43,960 Speaker 2: know that that bipartisan consensus is going away. And even 636 00:33:44,000 --> 00:33:47,400 Speaker 2: within the Republican Party, you know, older Republicans still have 637 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:52,320 Speaker 2: very positive views of Israel. Younger Republicans do not. So, 638 00:33:53,280 --> 00:33:55,600 Speaker 2: you know, Ryan, how much of the actions that are 639 00:33:55,640 --> 00:33:59,880 Speaker 2: being taken now, you know, the attempt to actually consolidate 640 00:34:00,080 --> 00:34:03,960 Speaker 2: some sort of like wild Greater Israel project, the dramatic 641 00:34:04,040 --> 00:34:08,000 Speaker 2: expansion and the dramatic escalation and oppression and violence in 642 00:34:08,080 --> 00:34:11,400 Speaker 2: the West Bank, obviously, the attempt to do the final 643 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:14,360 Speaker 2: solution in Gaza. How much of this is a realization 644 00:34:14,520 --> 00:34:16,479 Speaker 2: of like, this is our moment, and if we don't 645 00:34:16,560 --> 00:34:20,600 Speaker 2: go for everything right now, the landscape is going to 646 00:34:20,600 --> 00:34:21,760 Speaker 2: be different for us in the future. 647 00:34:22,680 --> 00:34:26,600 Speaker 3: Yeah. And I think there's almost a break from reality 648 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:30,040 Speaker 3: among the political class and a lot of the population 649 00:34:30,760 --> 00:34:35,120 Speaker 3: in that there's a real impulse now of Israeli saying 650 00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:37,640 Speaker 3: we don't need the world. The world has abandoned us, 651 00:34:39,760 --> 00:34:41,600 Speaker 3: And it's a break with reality in the sense that 652 00:34:42,400 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 3: for twenty months, the entire world Western world has financed 653 00:34:47,040 --> 00:34:52,960 Speaker 3: and armed their war against this small militia in Gaza 654 00:34:54,840 --> 00:34:58,560 Speaker 3: endlessly like an unlimited capacity in a way that no 655 00:34:58,719 --> 00:35:03,520 Speaker 3: other small country has gotten. Yet they feel like the 656 00:35:03,600 --> 00:35:06,359 Speaker 3: world has abandoned them, that the world has turned against them, 657 00:35:07,160 --> 00:35:09,440 Speaker 3: and so their response to that is, we don't need 658 00:35:09,480 --> 00:35:12,160 Speaker 3: the world. We have a we have this startup nation. 659 00:35:12,360 --> 00:35:14,839 Speaker 3: We've got all these this high tech firms. We make 660 00:35:14,880 --> 00:35:17,880 Speaker 3: a lot of they do make like a non trivial 661 00:35:17,920 --> 00:35:19,640 Speaker 3: amount of their own weapons, like they have their own, 662 00:35:19,920 --> 00:35:23,200 Speaker 3: you know, weapons manufacturing capacity. So they're like, we don't 663 00:35:23,239 --> 00:35:26,400 Speaker 3: need the we don't need the world. We're going to 664 00:35:26,440 --> 00:35:30,440 Speaker 3: go it alone. There are some who are like, we're 665 00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:33,879 Speaker 3: just a couple of million people here and we don't 666 00:35:33,880 --> 00:35:36,520 Speaker 3: ever we don't want to like never leave. And also 667 00:35:36,719 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 3: like a dependent on international trade. We're dependent on all 668 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:43,479 Speaker 3: the favorable terms that we get from the from the US. 669 00:35:44,960 --> 00:35:48,920 Speaker 3: We don't have just the demography to keep up endless 670 00:35:48,960 --> 00:35:52,200 Speaker 3: wars on the north and the northeast and the and 671 00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:55,920 Speaker 3: the south. Like, yeah, there were numbers coming out something 672 00:35:56,000 --> 00:36:00,359 Speaker 3: like seventeen thousand wounded, and then they're talking about tens 673 00:36:00,360 --> 00:36:06,880 Speaker 3: of thousands more with debilitating PTSD. They're recruiting people suffering 674 00:36:07,000 --> 00:36:11,080 Speaker 3: from PTSD back into Gaza, like back into service. 675 00:36:12,280 --> 00:36:15,680 Speaker 2: Well, and they have major long term demographic issues because. 676 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:17,520 Speaker 3: The Palestinians made up a lot of their labor force. 677 00:36:17,960 --> 00:36:19,520 Speaker 2: That's true too, Yeah, people. 678 00:36:19,280 --> 00:36:24,640 Speaker 3: And you know things like the economy is struggling and 679 00:36:24,800 --> 00:36:27,759 Speaker 3: so people, you know, people can't who can leave or leave, 680 00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:31,279 Speaker 3: Like a lot of them have American passports, European passports 681 00:36:31,480 --> 00:36:32,960 Speaker 3: and so can can leave. 682 00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:36,160 Speaker 2: And the ultra Orthodox don't want to work, serve in 683 00:36:36,160 --> 00:36:36,680 Speaker 2: the military. 684 00:36:37,320 --> 00:36:38,239 Speaker 3: They don't want to work either. 685 00:36:38,880 --> 00:36:40,640 Speaker 2: They have a lot of kids, but they don't want 686 00:36:40,680 --> 00:36:41,520 Speaker 2: to do anything. 687 00:36:41,719 --> 00:36:45,360 Speaker 3: So yeah, it's going to be just them and the 688 00:36:45,400 --> 00:36:49,680 Speaker 3: Palestinians that stay behind. It's like or who who survive. 689 00:36:50,640 --> 00:36:55,160 Speaker 3: It's so the idea of where they're going to take 690 00:36:55,200 --> 00:36:59,319 Speaker 3: this to this like Greater Israel accomplished through endless war 691 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:02,719 Speaker 3: and the reality of their demography and their economic base 692 00:37:04,840 --> 00:37:06,919 Speaker 3: are very far apart right now, and I think kept 693 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:08,319 Speaker 3: alive by war. 694 00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:12,440 Speaker 6: Fever, when think of how that's influencing the donor class 695 00:37:12,719 --> 00:37:17,520 Speaker 6: that influences the Trump administration, actually politicians on both sides 696 00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:19,400 Speaker 6: of the aisle. But since they have the keys of 697 00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:23,520 Speaker 6: the car right now, the Trump administration that I don't 698 00:37:23,520 --> 00:37:26,080 Speaker 6: want to say paranoia, because I'm not that would imply 699 00:37:26,239 --> 00:37:32,080 Speaker 6: that it's irrational or unfounded, but that almost desperation you 700 00:37:32,200 --> 00:37:36,560 Speaker 6: can sort of sense it, I think, being pushed to 701 00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:40,239 Speaker 6: the politicians as they're hearing from people who they've taken 702 00:37:40,480 --> 00:37:42,239 Speaker 6: a lot of money from and have seen as great 703 00:37:42,400 --> 00:37:44,279 Speaker 6: allies for a long time. It's sort of been like 704 00:37:44,560 --> 00:37:47,400 Speaker 6: the Republicans, its just sort of been natural and a 705 00:37:47,600 --> 00:37:51,759 Speaker 6: very unquestioned alliance and like a marriage. Really. 706 00:37:52,239 --> 00:37:55,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, And meanwhile, they Notna government announced twenty two new 707 00:37:55,680 --> 00:37:59,640 Speaker 3: settlements in the West Bank yesterday, which the government explicitly 708 00:37:59,719 --> 00:38:03,120 Speaker 3: said the purpose of which was to prevent and make 709 00:38:03,160 --> 00:38:05,719 Speaker 3: impossible the formation of a Palestinian state in the in 710 00:38:05,800 --> 00:38:08,200 Speaker 3: the West Bank. Like they're just saying this out loud. Yeah, 711 00:38:09,160 --> 00:38:11,600 Speaker 3: you know, so the one the path they're choosing that 712 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:14,440 Speaker 3: they want to they they are desperately hoping to go down, 713 00:38:14,520 --> 00:38:17,640 Speaker 3: is this and this one of endless war when you know, 714 00:38:17,719 --> 00:38:21,719 Speaker 3: the world really, despite their paranoia, does not have any 715 00:38:21,760 --> 00:38:27,200 Speaker 3: sympathy for Palestinians. And if Israel today said we accept 716 00:38:27,239 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 3: this term and we accept Hamas's long term truce in Gaza, 717 00:38:32,840 --> 00:38:38,360 Speaker 3: and we accept a technocratic government to run Gaza with 718 00:38:38,480 --> 00:38:42,520 Speaker 3: the support of the you know, Gulf countries, and then 719 00:38:42,600 --> 00:38:45,200 Speaker 3: let Ireland and Spain and some others like recognize that 720 00:38:45,320 --> 00:38:48,759 Speaker 3: little rump as as a Palestinian state and they just 721 00:38:48,800 --> 00:38:53,440 Speaker 3: stopped bombing and starving the Palestinians. The world would be like, 722 00:38:53,520 --> 00:38:57,000 Speaker 3: that's fine, Like, well, we're good, that's that's good enough. 723 00:38:57,840 --> 00:39:00,279 Speaker 3: When it from a perspective of global justice, it would 724 00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:02,480 Speaker 3: not remotely be good enough, but the world would be 725 00:39:02,520 --> 00:39:05,560 Speaker 3: fine with that. The world would just like Israel to stop, 726 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:08,480 Speaker 3: you know, humiliating the West when it comes to its 727 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:13,080 Speaker 3: hypocritic values but doesn't really have much concern for the 728 00:39:13,200 --> 00:39:14,480 Speaker 3: actual Palestinian people. 729 00:39:14,920 --> 00:39:17,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's very apparent. But and to Emily's 730 00:39:17,719 --> 00:39:21,400 Speaker 2: point about the you know, increasing desperation here in the 731 00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:24,400 Speaker 2: US include in particular, we have this new announcement for 732 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:27,080 Speaker 2: Marco Rubio saying the US is implement vigorous new vies 733 00:39:27,120 --> 00:39:30,120 Speaker 2: of policy to prevent foreign nationals with anti Israel views 734 00:39:30,120 --> 00:39:31,640 Speaker 2: from traveling in the US. This is the job that 735 00:39:31,719 --> 00:39:35,879 Speaker 2: Laura Lumer is auditioning for. And at the same time, 736 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:39,840 Speaker 2: you know, even given the cost of pro Palestinian protests 737 00:39:39,880 --> 00:39:44,120 Speaker 2: at this point, you had a large You've continued to 738 00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:47,400 Speaker 2: have large protests at graduation ceremonies, in particular, this was 739 00:39:48,160 --> 00:39:50,080 Speaker 2: you had one at Hunter College. I can pull this 740 00:39:50,239 --> 00:39:53,799 Speaker 2: up drop site again shared this rely on you guys 741 00:39:53,840 --> 00:39:56,759 Speaker 2: so much. Students protesting the administration. 742 00:39:57,360 --> 00:39:59,360 Speaker 3: You know, if you listen to this tale Jane is 743 00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:03,400 Speaker 3: great Talia Otg, people should follow that one. 744 00:40:03,520 --> 00:40:07,600 Speaker 2: She's yes, absolutely absolutely, and yeah, so they you know, 745 00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:10,200 Speaker 2: this was a quite significant protest if you watch this 746 00:40:10,400 --> 00:40:12,839 Speaker 2: video and the you know the percentage of students who 747 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:17,320 Speaker 2: were involved here, so even knowing the incredible consequences that 748 00:40:17,600 --> 00:40:19,120 Speaker 2: student have faced. 749 00:40:19,320 --> 00:40:23,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, the MIT speaker like when you've lost Mi T 750 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:28,440 Speaker 3: and Israel has to be watching this and and and shuddering. 751 00:40:29,120 --> 00:40:31,640 Speaker 3: These are the these are the future elites of this country, 752 00:40:31,880 --> 00:40:34,120 Speaker 3: that's right, who believe that this is there. 753 00:40:34,880 --> 00:40:37,359 Speaker 2: That's why, I mean, that's part of why there's such 754 00:40:37,360 --> 00:40:43,400 Speaker 2: a panicked authoritarian reaction is because it they can. They 755 00:40:43,520 --> 00:40:45,840 Speaker 2: don't see it as just you know, oh, these like 756 00:40:46,480 --> 00:40:49,080 Speaker 2: college kids and they don't really mean it doesn't really matter, 757 00:40:49,239 --> 00:40:51,480 Speaker 2: and this is so impotent. And you know, sometimes it 758 00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:54,040 Speaker 2: does feel impotent because it's not like it has changed 759 00:40:54,080 --> 00:40:56,719 Speaker 2: the policy. But it is again an indication that the 760 00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,320 Speaker 2: writing is on the wall and that even in spite 761 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:04,920 Speaker 2: of your incredibly authoritarian, anti free speech, illegal unconstitutional crackdown, 762 00:41:05,680 --> 00:41:08,880 Speaker 2: that they're still willing to protest and speak out and 763 00:41:09,080 --> 00:41:10,719 Speaker 2: you know, stand for what they see and what I see. 764 00:41:10,719 --> 00:41:12,800 Speaker 3: And it's the most vil it's the most I r 765 00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:16,760 Speaker 3: L version of the beatings will continue until morale improves 766 00:41:17,360 --> 00:41:21,240 Speaker 3: that I've really ever seen. And the more the beatings 767 00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:26,960 Speaker 3: have continued, the worst morale has gotten. That they're willing 768 00:41:27,080 --> 00:41:31,720 Speaker 3: to continue to do push these protests in the face 769 00:41:31,840 --> 00:41:37,239 Speaker 3: of indefinite detention of protesters people, you know, the n 770 00:41:37,320 --> 00:41:39,880 Speaker 3: YU guy losing his diploma. We have a little petition 771 00:41:39,960 --> 00:41:42,759 Speaker 3: going at drop site for the n YU speaker who 772 00:41:42,880 --> 00:41:44,640 Speaker 3: they are withholding his. 773 00:41:44,680 --> 00:41:51,640 Speaker 2: Diploma degree, something very basic thirty seconds. 774 00:41:51,400 --> 00:41:53,520 Speaker 3: Of like don't don't do terrible things to. 775 00:41:54,080 --> 00:41:57,480 Speaker 2: Civilians, how dare you outrageous? 776 00:41:57,480 --> 00:41:59,360 Speaker 3: And in the face of that, to see all of 777 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:03,880 Speaker 3: these kids still doing that, Yeah, it's like the beatings 778 00:42:03,880 --> 00:42:05,000 Speaker 3: are going to have to really increase. 779 00:42:05,480 --> 00:42:07,719 Speaker 2: Well, I also meant a lot to hear from Abu 780 00:42:07,800 --> 00:42:11,280 Speaker 2: Baker that you know, he and other Palestinians and Gaza 781 00:42:11,360 --> 00:42:13,680 Speaker 2: have been tracking those protests and found it very hardening 782 00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:18,040 Speaker 2: as well. Let's go ahead and talk a little bit. Oh, 783 00:42:18,080 --> 00:42:20,200 Speaker 2: we've got actually, we've got Dan here, So we go 784 00:42:20,239 --> 00:42:22,880 Speaker 2: ahead and talk to Dan about the polling. Then we 785 00:42:22,960 --> 00:42:26,120 Speaker 2: can we can push zoron off until until after we 786 00:42:26,200 --> 00:42:26,680 Speaker 2: talked to Dan. 787 00:42:26,840 --> 00:42:27,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's do that. 788 00:42:27,840 --> 00:42:34,560 Speaker 5: Okay, welcome, Hey, thanks for having. 789 00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:36,640 Speaker 2: Me, Thanks for doing it, appreciate it. 790 00:42:37,960 --> 00:42:38,160 Speaker 5: Ryan. 791 00:42:38,200 --> 00:42:38,960 Speaker 2: You want to set this up? 792 00:42:39,080 --> 00:42:41,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's do this. Do I do I let me 793 00:42:42,040 --> 00:42:46,319 Speaker 3: find this, let me find this Axios poll. So yeah, Dan, 794 00:42:46,360 --> 00:42:50,000 Speaker 3: Well I'm looking for this pole. So you you were 795 00:42:50,040 --> 00:42:54,440 Speaker 3: the polster basically who ran this, this viral pole that 796 00:42:54,600 --> 00:42:58,600 Speaker 3: was published first in in Axios that has caused all 797 00:42:58,719 --> 00:43:03,520 Speaker 3: sorts of uh discourse back and forth about polling, about abundance, 798 00:43:03,560 --> 00:43:09,160 Speaker 3: about populism. So just frame up for people kind of 799 00:43:09,200 --> 00:43:12,319 Speaker 3: what the question was that you wanted to get from 800 00:43:13,120 --> 00:43:14,840 Speaker 3: from voters, Like what were you trying? What were you 801 00:43:14,920 --> 00:43:16,880 Speaker 3: trying to figure out? And then I'll pull up some 802 00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:18,000 Speaker 3: of the discourse. 803 00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:22,000 Speaker 5: Yeah. So when I was approached by Demand Progress about this, 804 00:43:22,239 --> 00:43:23,640 Speaker 5: the the idea was. 805 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:28,719 Speaker 3: To andre there are kind of populists like left right, 806 00:43:29,920 --> 00:43:32,200 Speaker 3: like more on the left, but like they work in 807 00:43:32,239 --> 00:43:33,319 Speaker 3: coalition with the right a lot. 808 00:43:33,760 --> 00:43:37,200 Speaker 5: Yep. So the idea was to just test kind of 809 00:43:37,280 --> 00:43:41,440 Speaker 5: the resonance of all of this, you know, the arguments 810 00:43:41,480 --> 00:43:44,719 Speaker 5: around abundance relative to what we look at as more 811 00:43:44,800 --> 00:43:49,080 Speaker 5: traditional populist ideas and look at, you know, in terms 812 00:43:49,160 --> 00:43:53,440 Speaker 5: of people's understanding of why there are economic struggles that 813 00:43:53,680 --> 00:43:56,600 Speaker 5: you know that working class and middle class people are 814 00:43:56,640 --> 00:43:59,200 Speaker 5: dealing with. You know, what do people think is the 815 00:43:59,280 --> 00:44:01,840 Speaker 5: cause of that? Is the cause more within the abundance 816 00:44:01,840 --> 00:44:05,239 Speaker 5: framework or the populist framework, What do people want to 817 00:44:05,440 --> 00:44:09,520 Speaker 5: hear candidates for office or president for Congress talk about, 818 00:44:09,719 --> 00:44:12,080 Speaker 5: you know, the same kind of split, and what do 819 00:44:12,160 --> 00:44:16,439 Speaker 5: people think is the best way to solve those things 820 00:44:16,520 --> 00:44:18,919 Speaker 5: and address the concerns of middle and working class people. 821 00:44:19,520 --> 00:44:20,520 Speaker 6: And we. 822 00:44:22,120 --> 00:44:25,400 Speaker 5: Put it together to just make sense of it. The 823 00:44:25,719 --> 00:44:29,040 Speaker 5: purpose was not to go public to try to prove anything. 824 00:44:29,560 --> 00:44:33,279 Speaker 5: I was skeptical from the beginning because it's not you know, 825 00:44:33,480 --> 00:44:38,440 Speaker 5: they're not usually exclusive concepts, and I you know, it's 826 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:39,520 Speaker 5: much easy. 827 00:44:39,600 --> 00:44:42,200 Speaker 3: The ultimate goal of populism would be to have abundance 828 00:44:42,480 --> 00:44:45,239 Speaker 3: for all, right, absolutely, so I. 829 00:44:45,320 --> 00:44:48,200 Speaker 5: Was skeptical going in. But the idea we just wanted 830 00:44:48,239 --> 00:44:50,600 Speaker 5: to get a benchmark since people were arguing about it 831 00:44:50,680 --> 00:44:52,880 Speaker 5: and there didn't seem to be some good data, just 832 00:44:53,000 --> 00:44:56,279 Speaker 5: kind of placing where things fall. The interesting thing that 833 00:44:56,480 --> 00:45:00,600 Speaker 5: happened when we got the results back was over helmingly, 834 00:45:01,520 --> 00:45:07,359 Speaker 5: like across the board, the traditional populist ideas resonate far 835 00:45:07,600 --> 00:45:11,080 Speaker 5: more people's sensibilities about the cause of their economic anxiety 836 00:45:11,480 --> 00:45:15,160 Speaker 5: and challenges for working class people completely fall into a 837 00:45:15,239 --> 00:45:16,880 Speaker 5: thing where a lot of us, you know, have been 838 00:45:16,920 --> 00:45:19,440 Speaker 5: talking about a lot. Now, that doesn't mean to the 839 00:45:19,600 --> 00:45:23,560 Speaker 5: exclusion of some of the abundance ideas, and I think 840 00:45:23,600 --> 00:45:26,320 Speaker 5: it's it's important that there are places where people do 841 00:45:26,520 --> 00:45:32,080 Speaker 5: understand that there can be regulation that has unintended consequences 842 00:45:32,239 --> 00:45:36,959 Speaker 5: to hinder, you know, to artificially shift the supply curve 843 00:45:37,040 --> 00:45:40,960 Speaker 5: and cause problems there. So again they're not exclusive. But 844 00:45:41,120 --> 00:45:46,600 Speaker 5: if we're thinking about how to realign where democrats credibly 845 00:45:46,920 --> 00:45:50,600 Speaker 5: talk to the electorate to win elections and implement stuff, 846 00:45:51,200 --> 00:45:54,640 Speaker 5: there is no question that that populace framing is the 847 00:45:54,719 --> 00:45:58,680 Speaker 5: stronger way to go about it, and that can access 848 00:45:58,800 --> 00:45:59,360 Speaker 5: of abundance. 849 00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:01,440 Speaker 3: Ye give us the top lines on that and then 850 00:46:01,480 --> 00:46:03,920 Speaker 3: we'll get into some of the criticisms of it. 851 00:46:05,280 --> 00:46:10,239 Speaker 5: Yeah, So the most straightforward thing that we did was 852 00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:14,080 Speaker 5: we tested. We laid out the whole framing of what 853 00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:17,400 Speaker 5: the abundance argument is, you know, based on you know, 854 00:46:17,600 --> 00:46:19,400 Speaker 5: the book and the literature, what people are saying. We 855 00:46:19,480 --> 00:46:22,239 Speaker 5: tried to be you know, really good faith capture what 856 00:46:22,400 --> 00:46:25,400 Speaker 5: it is that they're talking about, and we asked the question. 857 00:46:27,400 --> 00:46:30,800 Speaker 2: I pulled it up here at least the first sentence 858 00:46:30,960 --> 00:46:33,600 Speaker 2: of the abundance framing versus the populace framing. 859 00:46:33,719 --> 00:46:38,400 Speaker 5: Yeah, great. So overall, we asked if a candidate for 860 00:46:38,480 --> 00:46:41,000 Speaker 5: Congress or president made that abundance argument, would that make 861 00:46:41,040 --> 00:46:43,760 Speaker 5: you more or less likely to vote for them? Overall? 862 00:46:44,920 --> 00:46:49,000 Speaker 5: Twelve point six percent said much more likely, thirty point 863 00:46:49,120 --> 00:46:51,840 Speaker 5: nine said somewhat more likely. So it's a total of 864 00:46:52,000 --> 00:46:55,800 Speaker 5: forty three point one percent said more likely, almost thirty 865 00:46:55,840 --> 00:47:00,759 Speaker 5: percent said less likely overall, so that's you know, not 866 00:47:01,120 --> 00:47:06,120 Speaker 5: super strong. The populist argument, which focused on you know, 867 00:47:06,440 --> 00:47:10,400 Speaker 5: corporate power primarily. The much more likely to vote for 868 00:47:10,440 --> 00:47:13,560 Speaker 5: a candidate using that rhetoric was twenty six point three percent, 869 00:47:13,760 --> 00:47:16,480 Speaker 5: the somewhat more likely twenty nine point three percent, So 870 00:47:16,640 --> 00:47:20,480 Speaker 5: a total of fifty five point six percent more likely 871 00:47:20,640 --> 00:47:24,320 Speaker 5: and only twenty four point two percent. Now that again, 872 00:47:24,640 --> 00:47:29,560 Speaker 5: like that was primarily among Democrats, but independence very much 873 00:47:29,719 --> 00:47:34,719 Speaker 5: to the extent that there was an appetite for a 874 00:47:34,800 --> 00:47:38,080 Speaker 5: lot of the abundance arguments there it felt not exclusively, 875 00:47:39,080 --> 00:47:43,440 Speaker 5: but disproportionately toward the Republican side, and independents acted more 876 00:47:43,560 --> 00:47:47,520 Speaker 5: like democrats in these frameworks. Interesting, and then one of 877 00:47:47,560 --> 00:47:51,279 Speaker 5: the important things, right, so then we just asked the question, well, 878 00:47:51,400 --> 00:47:54,360 Speaker 5: now that you heard both these perspectives, which one do 879 00:47:54,480 --> 00:47:58,399 Speaker 5: you agree with most, even if neither is exactly right. 880 00:47:59,320 --> 00:48:02,600 Speaker 5: The abundance got twenty nine point two percent, the populace 881 00:48:02,719 --> 00:48:05,919 Speaker 5: got forty two point eight percent. I'm sure got twenty 882 00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:08,800 Speaker 5: eight percent. And that goes back to one of the 883 00:48:09,080 --> 00:48:12,440 Speaker 5: amusing things about how all of this went viral and 884 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:14,600 Speaker 5: there was all this debate on social media for the 885 00:48:15,160 --> 00:48:18,080 Speaker 5: past couple of days where it's like, this is not 886 00:48:18,280 --> 00:48:21,600 Speaker 5: the end of the story or the end up into 887 00:48:21,840 --> 00:48:26,320 Speaker 5: these issues. This is one poll and they're you know, 888 00:48:26,440 --> 00:48:27,759 Speaker 5: and a lot of the stuff that came up, a 889 00:48:27,760 --> 00:48:29,960 Speaker 5: lot of the critiques people are like, well did you 890 00:48:30,000 --> 00:48:31,160 Speaker 5: try polling this language? 891 00:48:31,400 --> 00:48:34,840 Speaker 8: Like oh, like, we will in the future will continue 892 00:48:34,920 --> 00:48:36,400 Speaker 8: to look at this, and other people will in the 893 00:48:36,480 --> 00:48:43,200 Speaker 8: future as well, but the striking thing is how people 894 00:48:43,719 --> 00:48:45,799 Speaker 8: you know, are are telling us in this. 895 00:48:46,800 --> 00:48:51,279 Speaker 5: They think the cause of their economic anxiety is corporations 896 00:48:51,520 --> 00:48:53,960 Speaker 5: having too much power. They're being too much corruption on 897 00:48:54,000 --> 00:48:57,120 Speaker 5: the levels of government. And then even when we ask 898 00:48:57,280 --> 00:48:59,120 Speaker 5: like later, and this is stuff that hasn't gotten like 899 00:48:59,200 --> 00:49:03,440 Speaker 5: public yet, we asked, to the extent that there's excessive regulation, 900 00:49:03,880 --> 00:49:06,960 Speaker 5: is that the fault of big corporations using their influence 901 00:49:07,000 --> 00:49:08,880 Speaker 5: for their own profit or is that the fault of 902 00:49:08,960 --> 00:49:13,400 Speaker 5: actualist groups? Overwhelmingly more people said it's the fault to 903 00:49:13,440 --> 00:49:14,439 Speaker 5: the big corporations. 904 00:49:15,520 --> 00:49:21,600 Speaker 2: Even interesting into the apportioning the blame for these bottlenecks, 905 00:49:21,760 --> 00:49:23,120 Speaker 2: they're like, corporate power. 906 00:49:23,600 --> 00:49:27,719 Speaker 5: Yeah, right, absolutely, And so that's why we ended up 907 00:49:27,760 --> 00:49:29,719 Speaker 5: going public with this stuff because they're like, actually, these 908 00:49:29,760 --> 00:49:32,080 Speaker 5: results are really striking. Of course, it's not going to 909 00:49:32,120 --> 00:49:35,319 Speaker 5: be the final word on any subject, but it's it's 910 00:49:35,360 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 5: a pretty important thing to get out there. 911 00:49:37,760 --> 00:49:40,560 Speaker 2: Ryan, Can you put back up, Yeah, put back up 912 00:49:40,560 --> 00:49:42,680 Speaker 2: the Eric levittz tweet here, and let's just get you 913 00:49:42,800 --> 00:49:43,360 Speaker 2: to respond to. 914 00:49:43,400 --> 00:49:44,560 Speaker 3: This critique thread here. 915 00:49:44,680 --> 00:49:48,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, to this critique. He says, this poll is shamelessly hackish. Yes, 916 00:49:48,600 --> 00:49:53,840 Speaker 2: and populus rhetoric is definitely more resonant the technocratic critiques 917 00:49:53,840 --> 00:49:56,800 Speaker 2: of zoning ANIPA three. The political case for monents is 918 00:49:56,840 --> 00:49:59,640 Speaker 2: that voters will punish you if shit gets expensive, not 919 00:49:59,760 --> 00:50:03,480 Speaker 2: that fight bottle next is a popular message. And this 920 00:50:03,640 --> 00:50:06,000 Speaker 2: is I think consistent with a number of the critiques 921 00:50:06,040 --> 00:50:08,480 Speaker 2: that I saw. You you sort of reference, so there 922 00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:11,560 Speaker 2: were critiques about the language could have been different, or 923 00:50:12,640 --> 00:50:14,680 Speaker 2: you know. Another one we saw is basically like, well, 924 00:50:14,840 --> 00:50:16,960 Speaker 2: this wasn't really meant to be and Eric is kind 925 00:50:17,000 --> 00:50:19,600 Speaker 2: of getting at this like abundance messaging isn't meant to 926 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:23,800 Speaker 2: be the most politically potent messaging. It's about delivering for people. 927 00:50:23,880 --> 00:50:26,200 Speaker 2: What did you make of some of the points that 928 00:50:26,280 --> 00:50:28,480 Speaker 2: are raised here, though, Well, my favorite is. 929 00:50:28,520 --> 00:50:31,880 Speaker 5: His first point that the poll is, uh, was it 930 00:50:32,680 --> 00:50:39,040 Speaker 5: shames hackish? Yeah? Absolutely, And every single person part of 931 00:50:39,120 --> 00:50:42,719 Speaker 5: this debate on any side is absolutely hackish. This is 932 00:50:42,800 --> 00:50:47,000 Speaker 5: not being discussed in corporate breakrooms, you know, this is 933 00:50:47,120 --> 00:50:52,399 Speaker 5: completely in the realm of hacks. His second point like, okay, 934 00:50:52,760 --> 00:50:56,080 Speaker 5: so then we're in agreement. The populist framings are far 935 00:50:56,200 --> 00:51:01,839 Speaker 5: more resonant than it is rather technical. It's framings, right, 936 00:51:02,520 --> 00:51:05,400 Speaker 5: So like no disagreement there that's what we're saying. 937 00:51:06,239 --> 00:51:07,960 Speaker 2: Right, So then I mean that to me raises the 938 00:51:08,040 --> 00:51:12,279 Speaker 2: question then is the goal to run as a populist 939 00:51:12,400 --> 00:51:15,279 Speaker 2: challenging corporate power, but then to a bate and switch 940 00:51:15,360 --> 00:51:18,440 Speaker 2: where the actual program is like zoning reform, because it 941 00:51:18,520 --> 00:51:21,359 Speaker 2: seems like a recipe for also political disaster of people 942 00:51:21,440 --> 00:51:24,240 Speaker 2: being like you ran on something and you didn't deliver 943 00:51:24,440 --> 00:51:26,760 Speaker 2: on what you promised and the way you positioned yourself. 944 00:51:27,320 --> 00:51:29,800 Speaker 5: When when this poll came out, I had numerous friends 945 00:51:30,000 --> 00:51:32,239 Speaker 5: text me and go, So the solution is to run 946 00:51:32,320 --> 00:51:34,040 Speaker 5: on populism and then do abundance. 947 00:51:34,080 --> 00:51:34,680 Speaker 4: And it's just like. 948 00:51:36,719 --> 00:51:39,960 Speaker 5: I think the reality is. And this is an important 949 00:51:40,000 --> 00:51:42,120 Speaker 5: thing when we talk about what the message should be. 950 00:51:42,200 --> 00:51:44,640 Speaker 5: There's been all this discussion there was during the previous 951 00:51:44,719 --> 00:51:47,800 Speaker 5: presidential race and going to midterms, what should the Democrats 952 00:51:47,880 --> 00:51:51,600 Speaker 5: message be? Message requires that you have credibility, and if 953 00:51:51,640 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 5: people don't believe that you're actually going to stand up 954 00:51:53,800 --> 00:51:57,120 Speaker 5: to corporations and fight corporate power do all that, then 955 00:51:57,160 --> 00:51:59,320 Speaker 5: it doesn't matter if you're you know, it might be 956 00:51:59,440 --> 00:52:03,120 Speaker 5: marginally better to say you are, but it doesn't ultimately help. 957 00:52:03,239 --> 00:52:05,840 Speaker 5: You have to be doing it, And I don't know 958 00:52:06,000 --> 00:52:09,840 Speaker 5: anyone who doesn't believe there are some regulatory changes that 959 00:52:09,960 --> 00:52:15,000 Speaker 5: would help in certain industries at certain places to reduce 960 00:52:15,120 --> 00:52:18,000 Speaker 5: the price of things and to create more goods, like 961 00:52:18,239 --> 00:52:20,400 Speaker 5: which is in the abundance wheelhouse. Like I don't know 962 00:52:20,480 --> 00:52:23,120 Speaker 5: anyone who disagrees that there's not places to do that. 963 00:52:23,960 --> 00:52:27,080 Speaker 5: But that has nothing to do with where are you 964 00:52:28,560 --> 00:52:32,760 Speaker 5: insisting taxes come from, you know, relative to the working 965 00:52:32,800 --> 00:52:35,840 Speaker 5: class to you know, the very rich, Like how are 966 00:52:35,880 --> 00:52:38,399 Speaker 5: you dealing with those other policy things? So I think 967 00:52:38,480 --> 00:52:42,879 Speaker 5: the solution is build the confidence of the voters by 968 00:52:43,760 --> 00:52:50,040 Speaker 5: running on populist ideas doing concrete populist things. And also 969 00:52:50,320 --> 00:52:54,160 Speaker 5: when you find that someone who's in the abundance camp goes, hey, 970 00:52:54,280 --> 00:52:56,719 Speaker 5: here's a regulation that's actually like not doing what it 971 00:52:56,800 --> 00:53:00,000 Speaker 5: intended to and is like mucking up some economic system. 972 00:53:00,000 --> 00:53:02,399 Speaker 5: So of course, then take care of that. Yeah. 973 00:53:02,920 --> 00:53:05,600 Speaker 6: Yeah, Here I'm sharing this post from Chris Murphy, Senator 974 00:53:05,640 --> 00:53:10,160 Speaker 6: Chris Murphy, who has dabbled in trying to, I guess, 975 00:53:10,560 --> 00:53:14,080 Speaker 6: make the Democratic Party's message respond to the populist moment. 976 00:53:14,160 --> 00:53:17,040 Speaker 6: He says it's a weird exposition because why not craft 977 00:53:17,080 --> 00:53:20,000 Speaker 6: a message where we aggressively reduce concentrated corporate power and 978 00:53:20,239 --> 00:53:23,279 Speaker 6: we fix bottlenecks and build more stuff. And Dan, this 979 00:53:23,400 --> 00:53:27,400 Speaker 6: brings us to, I think an interesting question as to 980 00:53:27,560 --> 00:53:31,400 Speaker 6: whether sort of mainstream establishment Democrats and I think everyone 981 00:53:31,719 --> 00:53:35,040 Speaker 6: has to include Chris Murphy in that group, are capable 982 00:53:35,480 --> 00:53:39,600 Speaker 6: of adopting the messaging of populism. And you know, we 983 00:53:39,600 --> 00:53:41,760 Speaker 6: could talk about in substance, as you just said, marrying 984 00:53:41,880 --> 00:53:47,400 Speaker 6: it with genuine populism and abundance downstream after being elected 985 00:53:47,480 --> 00:53:50,480 Speaker 6: because voters say, we trust you and that message is. 986 00:53:50,480 --> 00:53:54,479 Speaker 4: Appealing to us. But can they actually pull it off? 987 00:53:55,080 --> 00:53:58,880 Speaker 6: Given the way Democrats tend to approach these questions, do 988 00:53:58,960 --> 00:54:00,800 Speaker 6: you have a take on that, like, what would this 989 00:54:00,960 --> 00:54:04,760 Speaker 6: look like in practice for a mainstream establishment democratic politician 990 00:54:04,760 --> 00:54:08,000 Speaker 6: who's not Bernie Sanders to Kamala Harris tried to do 991 00:54:08,080 --> 00:54:13,360 Speaker 6: this a little bit, to actually embrace that type of messaging. 992 00:54:13,440 --> 00:54:14,600 Speaker 4: It seems pretty hard. 993 00:54:15,480 --> 00:54:15,680 Speaker 6: Yeah. 994 00:54:15,760 --> 00:54:20,279 Speaker 5: I mean, look, ultimately, when elections are happening, they are 995 00:54:20,440 --> 00:54:24,640 Speaker 5: run by candidates and not parties, So it's really case 996 00:54:24,719 --> 00:54:28,000 Speaker 5: by case who would have credibility kind of carrying that 997 00:54:28,560 --> 00:54:31,239 Speaker 5: populist water. And I think that people who have been 998 00:54:31,320 --> 00:54:34,120 Speaker 5: viewed as part of the larger Democratic establishment to date 999 00:54:34,480 --> 00:54:36,240 Speaker 5: are going to have a hard time doing that because 1000 00:54:36,280 --> 00:54:39,400 Speaker 5: the voters clearly and we you know, tested some of 1001 00:54:39,440 --> 00:54:40,800 Speaker 5: that in the beginning of this just to get some 1002 00:54:40,920 --> 00:54:44,480 Speaker 5: benchmarks that people don't have great confidence in either party 1003 00:54:44,719 --> 00:54:47,160 Speaker 5: to really carry that water, you know. I think if 1004 00:54:47,160 --> 00:54:53,160 Speaker 5: there's an immediate lesson, it's you need new faces talking 1005 00:54:53,160 --> 00:54:59,240 Speaker 5: about you know, some really traditional classic ideas, but highlight 1006 00:54:59,440 --> 00:55:03,319 Speaker 5: the success us where that's that's working. And I mean 1007 00:55:03,360 --> 00:55:06,040 Speaker 5: that would be my advice, like generally, like if you're 1008 00:55:06,160 --> 00:55:09,800 Speaker 5: starting from a point where voters have so little confidence 1009 00:55:09,840 --> 00:55:11,919 Speaker 5: in you, but you feel like you've got a winning 1010 00:55:11,960 --> 00:55:14,480 Speaker 5: message and a winning agenda, you have to first of 1011 00:55:14,480 --> 00:55:17,880 Speaker 5: all mean it. And I'm sure everyone could debate for 1012 00:55:17,960 --> 00:55:21,440 Speaker 5: hours whether most of the top level Democrats really give 1013 00:55:21,480 --> 00:55:22,680 Speaker 5: a shit about this stuff or. 1014 00:55:22,719 --> 00:55:26,080 Speaker 4: The senator from Connecticut Yeah, yeah, But. 1015 00:55:26,160 --> 00:55:29,040 Speaker 5: It's like, if you really want to build a populist 1016 00:55:29,280 --> 00:55:34,640 Speaker 5: based Democratic party, then you need to uplift leaders who 1017 00:55:34,840 --> 00:55:38,320 Speaker 5: are credibly carrying that water to some degree already and 1018 00:55:38,480 --> 00:55:41,000 Speaker 5: keep kind of amplifying that. Yeah. 1019 00:55:41,000 --> 00:55:43,759 Speaker 2: I think that's it's such an important point. Is why 1020 00:55:43,920 --> 00:55:48,200 Speaker 2: the Bernie aoc Oligarchy tour has been so effective is 1021 00:55:48,280 --> 00:55:50,440 Speaker 2: not only because the message resonates, you know, when it's 1022 00:55:50,440 --> 00:55:53,400 Speaker 2: consistent with the populist messaging that you're testing here. But 1023 00:55:53,440 --> 00:55:56,719 Speaker 2: they're both people that have, you know, some credibility in 1024 00:55:56,719 --> 00:55:59,680 Speaker 2: the space, Bernie Sanders in particular, and so you know, 1025 00:55:59,719 --> 00:56:03,759 Speaker 2: I think people sometimes miss that is an important part. 1026 00:56:03,880 --> 00:56:06,920 Speaker 2: You can't just you can't just we appreciate posters, appreciate 1027 00:56:06,960 --> 00:56:09,279 Speaker 2: the work that you do, but there has to be 1028 00:56:09,360 --> 00:56:12,520 Speaker 2: some credibility to back it up. The thing that, you know, 1029 00:56:13,160 --> 00:56:16,400 Speaker 2: was the funniest dodge to me was the claim by 1030 00:56:16,480 --> 00:56:19,640 Speaker 2: some that abundance in like I said, Eric Levitz and 1031 00:56:19,680 --> 00:56:22,240 Speaker 2: his critique, they're kind of gestures at it, that abundance 1032 00:56:22,280 --> 00:56:25,280 Speaker 2: isn't really meant to be a political platform. 1033 00:56:25,360 --> 00:56:27,880 Speaker 3: Because that's while you're speaking. I'll put up a couple. 1034 00:56:28,560 --> 00:56:32,359 Speaker 2: Examples of this. Yeah, because the I mean, I had 1035 00:56:32,440 --> 00:56:35,319 Speaker 2: Derek on breaking points. I got to engage with him 1036 00:56:35,360 --> 00:56:37,239 Speaker 2: on a bunch of these points. You know, I explicitly 1037 00:56:37,280 --> 00:56:39,279 Speaker 2: asked him the question, Okay, well, is this is how 1038 00:56:39,320 --> 00:56:41,640 Speaker 2: a policy reforms because that's one thing, or is this 1039 00:56:41,800 --> 00:56:45,279 Speaker 2: like a central message and political platform and movement. I've 1040 00:56:45,320 --> 00:56:47,080 Speaker 2: read the book, by the way, you know, I read 1041 00:56:47,080 --> 00:56:49,440 Speaker 2: the whole book. I've engaged with the critiques, I've engaged 1042 00:56:49,480 --> 00:56:51,759 Speaker 2: with the defenses, all of those sorts of things, and 1043 00:56:51,840 --> 00:56:55,880 Speaker 2: they're consistent in saying, no, this is yes, it's some 1044 00:56:56,120 --> 00:57:00,400 Speaker 2: specific policy ideas, but this is really about how we 1045 00:57:00,520 --> 00:57:03,920 Speaker 2: think the National Democratic Party should be oriented. And this is, 1046 00:57:04,120 --> 00:57:05,880 Speaker 2: you know, in evidence by the fact that as re 1047 00:57:05,960 --> 00:57:09,480 Speaker 2: client is like meeting with the Senate Democratic Caucus. If 1048 00:57:09,520 --> 00:57:12,280 Speaker 2: you were most interested in like the you know, local 1049 00:57:12,360 --> 00:57:14,880 Speaker 2: level zoning reform, you wouldn't be going to the national 1050 00:57:14,920 --> 00:57:16,640 Speaker 2: Political Party. You'd be going, like, you know, to the 1051 00:57:16,680 --> 00:57:20,400 Speaker 2: San Francisco board or mayor or you know, other localities 1052 00:57:20,440 --> 00:57:23,240 Speaker 2: where you think that this program really needs to be effectuated. 1053 00:57:23,560 --> 00:57:27,200 Speaker 2: So that was to me, you know, an interesting almost 1054 00:57:27,240 --> 00:57:31,440 Speaker 2: admission that they recognize that well actually as a messaging 1055 00:57:31,560 --> 00:57:35,400 Speaker 2: device to organize a political project around there are some 1056 00:57:35,520 --> 00:57:36,200 Speaker 2: weaknesses here. 1057 00:57:37,440 --> 00:57:41,680 Speaker 5: I think that people were arguing that point from different sides, 1058 00:57:41,720 --> 00:57:44,600 Speaker 5: at least in the little firestorm online. Yeah, because there 1059 00:57:44,680 --> 00:57:46,320 Speaker 5: was a lot of focus on, oh, if you had 1060 00:57:46,440 --> 00:57:50,880 Speaker 5: used this slightly different language, maybe it would have pulled better, 1061 00:57:51,080 --> 00:57:55,560 Speaker 5: which was also an amusing criticism because we use the 1062 00:57:55,640 --> 00:57:59,160 Speaker 5: exact language that the leading proponents of abundance have been 1063 00:57:59,200 --> 00:58:02,200 Speaker 5: putting out there. So if the argument is that that 1064 00:58:02,480 --> 00:58:05,040 Speaker 5: language actually sucks, like maybe you should talk. 1065 00:58:04,880 --> 00:58:09,120 Speaker 2: About where can you can you just elaborate on that, Dan, 1066 00:58:09,160 --> 00:58:10,440 Speaker 2: Where did the language come from? 1067 00:58:10,920 --> 00:58:12,960 Speaker 5: So a lot of the frameworks in the book, like, 1068 00:58:13,040 --> 00:58:18,440 Speaker 5: for instance, the concern about using bottlenecks and the suggestion 1069 00:58:18,600 --> 00:58:21,360 Speaker 5: of using red tape, like a couple things on that 1070 00:58:21,520 --> 00:58:25,320 Speaker 5: first off, like sure in future polling, like we'll test 1071 00:58:25,600 --> 00:58:27,600 Speaker 5: red tape, like cutting red tape, Like I have no 1072 00:58:27,680 --> 00:58:33,360 Speaker 5: problem with that. The language itself came from largely the book, 1073 00:58:33,400 --> 00:58:37,040 Speaker 5: which mentions bottlenecks at least a dozen times, and to 1074 00:58:37,360 --> 00:58:41,480 Speaker 5: my understanding, does not mention cutting red tape once, and 1075 00:58:41,800 --> 00:58:44,280 Speaker 5: we do talk about, you know, reducing regulations. But the 1076 00:58:44,480 --> 00:58:48,200 Speaker 5: other point is like in understanding polling, like we're not 1077 00:58:48,680 --> 00:58:55,240 Speaker 5: testing words, we're testing a political program that uses those words. 1078 00:58:55,240 --> 00:58:59,440 Speaker 5: So if someone reads a full paragraph explaining a policy, 1079 00:58:59,640 --> 00:59:03,160 Speaker 5: set up policy ideas and one word is different from 1080 00:59:03,200 --> 00:59:06,280 Speaker 5: what you think the ideal word, that's not going to 1081 00:59:06,360 --> 00:59:10,600 Speaker 5: substantially change the results because people understand what the concept is. 1082 00:59:11,040 --> 00:59:13,280 Speaker 5: So a lot of the focus on that, like one 1083 00:59:13,360 --> 00:59:17,160 Speaker 5: word in one term, like sure, we can test things differently, 1084 00:59:17,320 --> 00:59:20,840 Speaker 5: But that's really not gonna be like, you know, the 1085 00:59:20,920 --> 00:59:25,200 Speaker 5: magic bullet that suddenly makes abundance the thing everyone's clamoring for, because. 1086 00:59:25,080 --> 00:59:27,960 Speaker 2: Especially when it wasn't close, you know, if this was 1087 00:59:28,040 --> 00:59:31,720 Speaker 2: like a fifty two forty eight kind of a proposition, maybe, 1088 00:59:32,160 --> 00:59:34,880 Speaker 2: but it was pretty clear, especially when you're talking about 1089 00:59:34,880 --> 00:59:38,000 Speaker 2: a democratic base, which is this is an intrademocratic party 1090 00:59:38,040 --> 00:59:38,800 Speaker 2: fight at this point. 1091 00:59:39,800 --> 00:59:42,960 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, but what's so important and I don't 1092 00:59:43,000 --> 00:59:46,120 Speaker 5: think this is like a new addition to the discussion 1093 00:59:46,160 --> 00:59:49,680 Speaker 5: about how the Democratic Party should rebuild itself. It's an 1094 00:59:49,680 --> 00:59:55,960 Speaker 5: intrademocratic fight right now that requires for ultimate success. That's 1095 00:59:56,080 --> 01:00:01,040 Speaker 5: that's credibly resonant with independence along the way right, And 1096 01:00:01,200 --> 01:00:04,400 Speaker 5: that's the thing that really stands out, Like the fact 1097 01:00:04,440 --> 01:00:06,720 Speaker 5: that the Democrats are falling on like what is like 1098 01:00:06,880 --> 01:00:10,600 Speaker 5: a more traditional yet populist liberal. I think that's not surprising, 1099 01:00:10,680 --> 01:00:14,680 Speaker 5: but the number among independents are just really clearly falling 1100 01:00:14,680 --> 01:00:16,040 Speaker 5: along the populist line as well. 1101 01:00:16,200 --> 01:00:20,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a great point. That's a great point. Got 1102 01:00:20,280 --> 01:00:23,560 Speaker 2: any other questions, guys, you want to throw it Dan, My. 1103 01:00:23,640 --> 01:00:27,040 Speaker 3: Last one would be, would you commit to if Jonathan 1104 01:00:27,120 --> 01:00:31,439 Speaker 3: Chait or somebody comes to you with a better question, can. 1105 01:00:31,360 --> 01:00:32,800 Speaker 5: You Yeah, I mean, if you put it out in 1106 01:00:32,840 --> 01:00:36,320 Speaker 5: a poll, I would be more than happy to. I mean, 1107 01:00:36,360 --> 01:00:40,080 Speaker 5: I just can't emphasize enough, like my skepticism about this 1108 01:00:40,240 --> 01:00:42,840 Speaker 5: initial project from the get go. You know, some people 1109 01:00:43,120 --> 01:00:46,520 Speaker 5: were like mocking, like, oh, this is obviously not disinterested. 1110 01:00:46,840 --> 01:00:49,600 Speaker 5: I was both disinterested and uninterested. I didn't even want 1111 01:00:49,600 --> 01:00:55,000 Speaker 5: to do this whole the perfect combo. So, like, for sure, 1112 01:00:55,160 --> 01:00:58,040 Speaker 5: if there's any any subsequent uh, you know, research we 1113 01:00:58,160 --> 01:01:00,640 Speaker 5: do on this, like a lot of stuff people have 1114 01:01:00,720 --> 01:01:06,480 Speaker 5: brought up, you know, as as suggestions and criticism, like yeah, well, also. 1115 01:01:06,800 --> 01:01:09,360 Speaker 3: Can you also pull how many people know the actual 1116 01:01:09,600 --> 01:01:15,400 Speaker 3: difference between disinterested and uninterested? Just throw that question in 1117 01:01:16,680 --> 01:01:17,280 Speaker 3: I would. 1118 01:01:17,560 --> 01:01:19,640 Speaker 5: I think people will get confused answering. 1119 01:01:19,400 --> 01:01:22,600 Speaker 3: That though, And for everybody watching, let's do a public 1120 01:01:22,640 --> 01:01:25,800 Speaker 3: service here. Disinterests, I mean you're you're like unbiased, You like, 1121 01:01:25,880 --> 01:01:29,200 Speaker 3: you don't have an interest. And by interest, it doesn't 1122 01:01:29,240 --> 01:01:32,280 Speaker 3: mean you're not excited about the thing, means you don't 1123 01:01:32,320 --> 01:01:35,480 Speaker 3: have a financial or personal vested interest in the thing. 1124 01:01:35,520 --> 01:01:41,760 Speaker 3: You are disinterested outside as an observers uninterested, which means 1125 01:01:41,760 --> 01:01:44,600 Speaker 3: you're bored by it. So just everybody get that. 1126 01:01:44,920 --> 01:01:46,880 Speaker 2: We're going to do a special show Jess for Ryan 1127 01:01:46,920 --> 01:01:49,280 Speaker 2: where he just spends an hour defining relevant terms. 1128 01:01:49,360 --> 01:01:53,320 Speaker 3: Yes, I'll do it. If you do that pole question 1129 01:01:54,800 --> 01:01:55,800 Speaker 3: and we'll record on. 1130 01:01:56,080 --> 01:01:57,960 Speaker 5: We'll come back and be part of that lesson. 1131 01:02:00,080 --> 01:02:02,360 Speaker 2: All right, Thank you, Dan, great chat with you? 1132 01:02:03,400 --> 01:02:03,760 Speaker 5: All right? 1133 01:02:04,280 --> 01:02:04,800 Speaker 4: He was great? 1134 01:02:05,360 --> 01:02:08,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, he was great. Did you know him, Ryan, you've 1135 01:02:08,840 --> 01:02:09,479 Speaker 2: talked to him before? 1136 01:02:09,560 --> 01:02:09,760 Speaker 5: Yeah? 1137 01:02:09,760 --> 01:02:11,880 Speaker 3: I talked to him about some polling in the past. 1138 01:02:12,120 --> 01:02:14,480 Speaker 3: He's done a lot of work with David Siegel in 1139 01:02:14,520 --> 01:02:16,800 Speaker 3: the band Progress. But he's he's really good. 1140 01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:19,560 Speaker 2: Gotcha nice? Yeah, fun talking to him. We'll have to 1141 01:02:19,600 --> 01:02:23,000 Speaker 2: find other excuses to have him back. Should we circle 1142 01:02:23,000 --> 01:02:24,640 Speaker 2: back to his arm? Because I actually feel like this. 1143 01:02:24,800 --> 01:02:27,000 Speaker 2: All right, guys, thank you so much for watching the 1144 01:02:27,240 --> 01:02:28,920 Speaker 2: free portion of the Friday Show. We're going to move 1145 01:02:29,000 --> 01:02:31,760 Speaker 2: into some premium bonus content, so if you want to 1146 01:02:31,920 --> 01:02:34,280 Speaker 2: watch that as well, make sure to go and subscribe 1147 01:02:34,400 --> 01:02:37,040 Speaker 2: at Breakingpoints dot com. And for all of you guys 1148 01:02:37,040 --> 01:02:39,520 Speaker 2: who are already premium subscribers, that portion is going to 1149 01:02:39,560 --> 01:02:40,080 Speaker 2: start right now.