WEBVTT - Week 5: A Show So Good, It's Illegal In 49 States

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice,

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Now league dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchi and my co host today

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen, what's up.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Excited to be on the last show of Stop It,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Stop It, It's gonna be It's all gonna be fine,

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Gonna get out of here, Scott Fish. Yes, we're gonna

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>want any of that negativity in this. Spound about this,

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think the only real game that's in doubt

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is Buffalo Tennessee. We talked about it last week.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's just spend a second reiterating some of the best

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>way to handle the possibility of a last minute game cancelation.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>We discussed it last weekend with the provisional player. Yeah,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>we can do the provisional player. And that was something

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan McDowell, I know, suggested on Twitter, where you

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>put on your league's message board. For instance, if you

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have Derrick Henry, yes, who's by the way, put him

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in your flex spot, not in your running back spot,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you have maximum flexibility. So let's say that he's in

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>your flex spot and I have how about Justin Jefferson

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as the wide receiver that I have as my provisional

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>starter in case Derrick Henry's game does not go So

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if the Tennessee game is canceled, then Justin Jefferson's stats

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get put in by my league manager. Commission will need

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to manually make that adjustment. That's all fine. You posted

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on the message board, so everybody knows that you've designated

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that before Justin Jefferson plays his game, and that's something

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not too late to do that for this week

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in your league. You can definitely make this decision now, Commissioners,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the way to handle this. It is the

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>most fair way. There's no thing fair about managers having

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to guess whether or not there will be a game

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on Camesday, right game Monday or Tuesday or canceled. You

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>know that's not evaluating the skill of a manager. So

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the way you certainly want to handle it. We'll

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about that game in just a moment. A reminder,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the segments that we love to get to will happen

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.839
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the show, including premature speculation where

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>we give you three players to pick up this week

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that people will wish they had picked up this week,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually next week. But you know what I mean,

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions you can play along, try to go

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>three and ow and nine players upon whom you can

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>take a chance. But let's get to that Buffalo Tennessee

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>game delayed. We don't we believe and hope that it's

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go off, So you know, let's just cover

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it like it is, like it will be played, because

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we still want to give people advice on this. Do

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you think Hank Williams Jr. Is making a Tuesday night

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>football song right now? Yeah? So now this game is

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, it could get canceled. So, um, I think

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it's probably going to go, but it's not quite. But

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite fifty fifty, but it's close. Um So

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, there's four players I think you should start,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're the four players I gave A grades too

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in this scenario. The other players I think they're just

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too risky with the possible cancelation. But

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the A players have that elite upside that I think

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that you should probably still keep them in your lineup,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and that starts with Josh Allen. Uh. Titans aren't particularly

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>good against the past, allowing two sixty nine yards per

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>game this season, and they gave up three touchdowns to

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>each of the last two quarterbacks they faced, which were

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Minshew and Cousins, not necessarily the cream of the crop

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback position. Uh. Stephan Diggs is the other

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>A grade on the buffalo side. The last team the

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Titans face was digs old team, the Vikings, and rookie

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson had his coming out party against Jonathan Joseph

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and Malcolm Butler. So I think Diggs is an elite

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>play this week as well. Now, John Brown and Cole Beasley. Uh,

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's so, that's a different story. Brown is still dealing

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with the calf injury. It looks bad well. He reaggravated

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it on Wednesday, and he was limited on Friday noticely,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>noticeably hobbling and some of the video that we've seen.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's on the bench for sure. Cole Beasley

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was on the injury report earlier in this week, but

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he dropped off the injury report. He's worth a c

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>start if you need it, I guess, but I don't

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a scenario where I'm starting Cole Beasley here.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I do like Gabriel Davis fill in. If it turns

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>out that Brown is inactive and you need to make

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a last minute pivot, that's the guy to pivot do.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>My say is, if you're if you're playing Brown, you

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be playing Brown at all. You should find somebody

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>else who's playing on Sunday. Anyway. Devin Singletary and Zack Moss,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give them both Sea grades if Moss goes,

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but single Arry bumps up to a B. If Moss

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is out again and Zack Moss is still dealing with

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that toe injury, he's got to be trending more positive

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>after sitting again last week, and this game getting delayed

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>gives him an extra two days to sit, so that's nice. Plus,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>the Titans are allowing five point nine yards per carry

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, and that's absolutely unheard of. And they currently

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have four members of the defense on the I R

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>COVID list, including defensive tackle da Kwon Jones and defensive

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>end Jeffrey Simmons. Let's hope most of those extra couple

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of days are enough to get Moss to a spot

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>where he can play well. Of course you think that.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I buried the lead. This is

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Zach Moss versus John new Smith bull right, It

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is right here. It's the Paul Charchian bull right. In

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this game, let's talk about John new Smith. Let's go

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>right there. There's nobody else for the for Ryan Tannehill

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to pass too. In this game, Corey Davis out. Yeah,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis is on ir COVID and Smith is averaging

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards and a score per game. The Bills are

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing eight catches for ninety yards per game to the

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. John new Smith solid A grade in

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't like any of the wider eivers.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Though A. J. Brown is still on the bench. I

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you could start him still with the

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he has a couple of days and White in all

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>probabilitious probability hit that. I get that. But if he's

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on the field, I think I'm playing him in that match.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>If you have that luxury, have having this game on

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday and possibly get by the way, go see if

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you can trade for Derrick Henry or A J. Brown

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, Yeah, you should your chance. I will mention

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that outside of A J. Brown and Corey Davis, who's

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not playing, Calif Raymond has the most targets of any

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining Titans receivers. He did have three catches

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and eighteen yards against the Vikings in

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the last game they played. And if you're winning one

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of those weird leagues that mandates that you start a

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Titans wide receiver, I think Calif Raymond is the safest

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>play Derrick Henry. He gets an A grade out Outside

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks in the NFL, no one touches the ball

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>per game more than Derrick Henry, who's combining for thirty

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts plus targets per game. So he's in A grade.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And I missed Ryan Tannehill. So let's get to him,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>only giving him a CE. I was going to give

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>him a B, but as receivers are just not there,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and so this is this is like less than a B,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but more than a C. I would call it C prime.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>How about C prime. We're gonna call it. We'll call

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a C. That's a straight CE. Tannehill's averaging two and

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>two the Bills are allowing to nine four and two.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It should be high scoring if this goes off with

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>an over under a forty nine, So Tannehill is startable.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Miami takes on San Francisco. I thought we'd get more

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>production out of the Miami offense last week, Scott, but

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, no, uh, you know, we and

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Tannell only got that rushing touchdown. I was nervous

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about that. Instead he gets to It's a what seems

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like could be a tougher matchup, but still with all

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the defensive injuries for San Francisco, maybe there's a little

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>something to be done here for Miami. Yeah, you might

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're San Francisco is really really banged up. It

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>does concern me that Flora's waited until Tuesday to and

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>now that uh Fitzpatrick was going to be the starter

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>once just the fact that he has to make the announcement. Yeah,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick is going to be the starter. I think two

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a time is coming. San Francisco has held all four

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks they faced. Is it almost two o'clock? Yeah? Yeah,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I did high to myself. I don't know that I

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>give credit for that. We're not gonna We're not gonna

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>reinforce that kind of behavior on this show. San Fran

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>good defense against the past. They've against everything. Really, They've

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>held the two key the four qbs they faced under

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>two or thirty yards and have only allowed three passing

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in those four games. They're allowing under six yards

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>per attempt, which is which is really darn good. That fits. Yeah, exactly.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I have fits on the bench. I have almost the

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>entire Dolphins team on the bench. Honestly, I have Parker

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as a c star because he just gets the volume

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's he's uh, he's just a Study's clearly

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>established himself as the top dog in that offense with

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>team catches in the last two weeks. Um, it does

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sound like Richard Sherman. He hasn't practiced all week. He's

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a game time decision. They said he

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>could go even without practicing. But I'm a little worried there.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't either be hobbled against Parker or he

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Parker won't have to face him. Preston and Ford are

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bench for me. The Preston Preston Williams Man.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I love him, but he's his snaps went from down

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to six. He's just drop here and I think I

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>think he's still recovering or something from the a c

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>L last year. Uh Ford Ford had nine targets twice

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in his last three games. It's no okay matchup against

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>mar Taylor, but he's a little tough to trust, especially

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>against his secondary, even even though it's banged up. Gasicky

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>no thanks, I mean one catch each the last two

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks is shockingly inactive the last two weeks. One catch games. Yeah,

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he did grab a touch on one of them, I think,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But the four in areas allowing just twenty six yards

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>per game to the tight end, that's it's not a

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good spot for him. And and the San Francisco Runday

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Rundy only one runner over sixty yards and that took

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one carries. That Gascon no out. That's a long

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>way to say bench everyone, except for partly, sorry for

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>wasting your time there. Garoppolo named the starter, given him

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a B grade because Dolphins are bottom ten against fantasy quarterbacks.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones should return this week. He's been practicing in fall,

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>so he should return. But it's still been bad even

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with him, so so the last three quarterbacks they faced

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>averaged three d fifty yards and two touchdowns. So it's

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a good spot for Jimmy Garoppolo, even though he hands

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>them off a ton. I'll mention we're gonna talk about

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo in more detail later in the show. Alright, A

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>grade for Kittle because he's George freaking Kittle. I do

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have I do have Samuel on the bench. He's been

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an illness. Uh that he's questionable for this game.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins are allowing over ten yards per target to

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. I think he's just a little more risky

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with his first game back. I trust you just a

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. I can see. I can see having

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the preference either way, but I gave you a C grade.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>He he plays mostly on the left, which means he

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>could face up against Xavian Howard, but they both move

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>around a lot, so maybe they'll try to move aok

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>away from Howard. Maybe Howard will shot who knows uh

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>most and Jet most that is questionable. Uh, if he

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>does go, I have a B grade on Mostart he's

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>going to take most of the work. If he doesn't go,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on Jet. I have Jet

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. If Moster goes basically how it goes,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you want you want the starter in that in that offense.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Although oftentimes this run offense has been able to support

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>two fantasy backs, it has, it has, I just don't

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know what the share is gonna be. Uh, the way

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they were using Mostart early in the year lends me

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to believe that if most Are can go, he's going

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the man. And uh, Miami gave up huge

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>days to James Robinson and Chris Carson. If most of

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it is out, I mean, if most Are plays the

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>RBS with thirteen plus touches against Miami, both top two

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and both scored two touchdowns. So there's gonna

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of of Raheemostard owners who are gonna

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be skittish about putting him back in the lineup. And

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a mistake. Yeah, I'm not. Whichever one starts, get

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>them in your lineup. Agreed. Las Vegas takes on Kansas City.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got a I've been between an A and a

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Josh Jacobs for a while. I think

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go be grade because there you have to

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be madly enough to pick one or the other that

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>happened to know that there's something between an A and

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a B grade when trading scales. When when you do

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the A, B, C, D E F G. You ever

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hear anybody go and and half be and half A

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and half B B and a half see no, your

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>kids not go to school. Josh Jacobs has struggled since

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>his Week one domination over Carolina, since then, averaging just

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven yards per game total. He has His last

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three matchups have been against very tough defenses, though, and

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there is hope for him against the Chiefs, ranked thirty

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>against the run by Football Outsiders, giving a five yards

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>per carry. I think the biggest question and the reason

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I am giving Josh Jacobs a B grade is the

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>game script is going to turn against him sooner or later.

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And while he's still a bigger factor in the receiving game,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think at some point the rushes are going to

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>dry up. Are you saying you would never give anybody

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a B plus grade? Church? Not on this show? If I,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>if I, if I were the six options this week,

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going with B plus graded wide receivers today. What

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this show just Jefferson, was that this show. No, that

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was not this show. That was an entirely different show

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in which one can give pluses and minuses. Were I

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a school teacher, I would give pluses and minuses. Continuing,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Brian. Darren Waller average seven catches and eighty

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>three yards in the two blowout losses against the Chiefs

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>last season, so maybe he's gonna get some mop up

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>duty here as well. Kansas City prob bably deploys Tyrone

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthew on Waller, who is always a tough matchup. But

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>while he's got nine inches on Honey Badger, So if

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are playing from behind, is expected if figure

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Waller is gonna get a bunch of dumpops and that

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>makes him valuable for a B grade Hunter Renfrow comes

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.359
<v Speaker 1>into a C grade. Normally, I don't like slot receivers

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City because they get Tyron Matthew. But as

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I just said, Tyron Matthew's gonna be on Waller, so

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Renfro is going to have lesser coverage, and

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a plausible spot start here. Uh, Henry

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Ruggs expected back Bryan Edwards not clear about that yet,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and but either way, these rookies have been deprived of

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>so much playing time due to injuries. I don't think

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to start them, nor Derek Carr against a

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>very good past defense. Let's go to the Kansas City side.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Hill, Travis Kelsey, the radar all a

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>grades obviously, and I'll just touch on a couple of

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>items for these guys. The Raiders rank twenty seven in

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>coverage and pass rush by Pro Football Focus. It's a

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>shame this game isn't played in Las Vegas because with

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill is going to do it as a hapless

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>slat cornerback. The LaMarcus Joiner is a felony in every

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>state except Nevada. The iron footed Joiner has allowed seventy

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of his passes in coverage to be completed. With

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Joiner busy on Hill, Travis Kelsey is gonna see a

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of coverage from linebacker. I think it's Kyle Littleton

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in his first and he's the worst tight end defender

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>according to Pro Football Focus. Would an iron footed player

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be a good kicker? Yeah, you know, I think that

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>would help. Maybe iron considerate, Maybe he should nick that's

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>his fruit? Still, uh, Kelsey put up seven catches for

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred seven yards on average at his last four against

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, and those are great numbers. Let's talk Clyde

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire. After a Night's first week on the ground,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the rushing has tapered off a bit, just thirty eight,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and sixty four scoreless rushing yards, but after

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>being held catch less since in week one, he has

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>put up some solid receiving numbers. And Las Vegas ranks

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>dead last against the run by football outsiders, and they've

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>yielded the fourth most targets and fourth most receptions to

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs. So I figured the Chiefs get ahead early,

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna run plenty. There'll still be some dump off

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Clyde Edwards a layer and he gets an

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>A grade. Sammy Watkins is the only other guy worth

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>note he is a C grade. He's tied in receptions

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with Tyreek Hill, so he's getting plenty of use, but

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't turn it into much and he does nothing

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>after the catch. If you're looking for five, five catches,

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards, no touchdowns, Sammy Watkins is your guy. He's

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna see Trayvon Mullins and Nevin Lawson on the outside.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>They've given up one touchdown so far. All right, when

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we come back, take a chance on me. Nine players

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>not normally in your starting lineup. We will tell you

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>who they are that you can pick up. And you know,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>may need to make a lot of pivots, last minute

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>pivots to make up for those Bills and Titans. These

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>guys will be valuable this week, very very valuable. Take

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Segment coming up next. It's still

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>possible to join a guillotine league. It's the freshest format

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy sports. Every week, the low scoring team is

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>eliminated from the league and all their players go to

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. Last team standing wins. You don't have

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to be the best team. You just never have to

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>be the worst team in any given week. Guilloteam leagues

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Back for more Fantasy Football Weekly In moments,

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. A segment week call, Take

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Nine players not normally in your

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>starting line at Many of these guys available on the

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. They've got great matchups. Will tell you who

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they are, beginning at the quarterback position and Scott Fish right,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm starting with Teddy Bridgewater. You may remember,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>right before the season started, I said, maybe we got

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this guy ranked too low because everything's shaping up for

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater to throw it underneath all these weapons. And

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>we had him twenty nine, maybe he'd be in the

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>mid teens. Here we are. She's QB eighteen right now.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He's throwing a ton of game two D three hundred

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>yards passing in most games. Now he gets the Falcons

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>with five defensive backs out of the game. Unbelievable. Also,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Falcons team that already the worst past defense in the

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>league with five defensive backs at one point they were

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>playing linebackers as safeties last week. That's unreal. And they've

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed four touchdowns to every quarterback they fit well technically,

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>full Sterbisky combined for four but four touchdowns each week

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to the quarterback position. Yeah. So that defense allowing three

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>three passing yards per game as well, it's it's just terrible.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater. Get him in Teddy bridge Water. All right, Matt,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you take a chance and the quarterback is I don't

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>feel nearly as positive as Scott Fish does about his guy,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but I got Daniel Jones, and let's be honest, This

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>has been a disaster for Jones so far this year,

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty second and passing yards per game. He's only

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>thrown two passing touchdowns on the season. If his offensive

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>line has been brutals, top running back out Sterling Shepherd out,

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but then walk the Cowboys, whose secondary might as well

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>be wearing boots and spurs. The Cowboys have allowed eleven

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes in the last three weeks. They've allowed three

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the four quarterbacks they faced to top two seventy yards. Now,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are probably looking at Danny Dimes as the

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>get right game, but you know Danny Dimes is looking

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Cowboys the same way. For Kirk Cousins, the

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>problem for him from a fantasy standpoint is less about

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>ability and more that he just doesn't pass enough. Like

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He's are dead last and pass attempts averaging per game.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But here comes the Seahawks averaging double that number, literally

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty passes per game. They're seeing fifty. That's virtually unheard up.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So this could game could be the rare exception for

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins where he throws often enough to produce a

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>very good statistical game. Every quarterback to face Seattle has

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>top three fifteen yards and all of them have scored.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle has allowed nine touchdowns to quarterbacks. The emergence of

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson gives Cousins a critical second threat beyond Adam

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Feeling and Seattle be without elite safety Jamal Adams in

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this game. Take a chance and me continues with the

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>running back position. Scott, you know, I'm going I didn't

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of good options in my matchups this week,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going with it doesn't have to be your matchups. Yeah,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>you took a guy from my matchup, but that is true.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>That is true. But I'm going to Damian Harris, who

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked to find out is still just thirty nine

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>percent rostered. I don't know. My theory behind it is

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>people hate New England backs because it's a good theory.

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the only thing I can think of. Hypothesis proven.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He only played twenty three snaps last week. However, he

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>carried the rock on seventeen of those twenty three snaps.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle is still out. He's the guy to own there.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos have given up a hundred and twenty plus

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>yard days to Derrick Henry and James Conner before holding

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>down Ronald Jones to seventy three and Frank Gore to

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. I guess, but Harry has probably lands between

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>those two pairings. Um so I got him in my

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. By the way, Damien Harris

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>has never not had a hundred yards in a Monday

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>night football game that he's played in. That's a great point.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a great one. That's that streak will may very

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>well continue. It might. I need the research of this.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue. Take a chance on the segment or running

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>back Matt I got Chase Edmunds of the Cardinals last week.

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake got a little dinged up towards the end

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Edmunds came in on the final drive

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Of the final eight plays where the

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Cards needed to score quickly, four of them ended with

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball and chase Edmunds hands. That includes a nine

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>yard run, a twelve yard pass, a goal line carry

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that was stuffed, and then a second and goal line

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>carry that resulted in a touchdown. And I've been saying

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it for a long time. Are we sure Kenyan Drake

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is good? Almost all of his fantasy points came in

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two games last year. This week he gets to go

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>visit the Jets. And the last time Chase Edmunds played

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a game at MetLife Stadium six yards and three touchdowns.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not bad. It was against the Giants, but you

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>know he really likes that stadium. Uh. This Jets team

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>has allowed a hundred and fifty two total yards per

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>game to the running back position. And if the splits

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or anything like last week where Drake had thirteen touches

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and Edmunds have nine, or if it starts skewing towards

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Edmunds a little bit more at seventy eight yards for

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds in this game and he catches more passes than Drake. Yeah,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm hearing. I'm hearing from a lot of people

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to trade four Chase Edmonds right now

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>in advance of what a possible perceived change to the

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>starter status Kenyan Drake. In my mind, you know he

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>failed in last week's juicy matchup, here comes another one.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>If he fails in this one, time to make the change.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, remember in the preseason Cliff Kingsbury said

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>we have two start starter worthy running backs on our

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>roster Chase Edmonds and Eno Benjamin. It might be the Panthers.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got Brian Hill, by the way, going up against

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers, who are allowing one hundred sixty total yards

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns per game to running backs. Holy cow,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley seeing over half the snaps, but Brian Hill

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>has a better yards per carry by two yards and

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has twice as many receptions. Two of Brian Hill's best

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>career games have come against Carolina, as he has posted

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a line of sixty two yards and a touchdown and

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>another one of eight carries a hundred fifteen yards against

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>his division rival. I like Brian Hill as a depth

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>play this week against the Panthers. Take a chance on

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>me now moves to the wide receiver position, Scott, So

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I have Tim Patrick. He had a huge day last week,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>which makes me regret him dropping him before the season

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in every dynasty league, and I'm pretty sure that's why

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he did it, and that's to get you back. Yeah,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the number one stat here is that I dropped him.

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna go off this week again. Tim Patrick

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is very revenge minded that way, just to spur me.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Spurned me the Paths have allowed the third most touchdowns

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers and they're going to be without stuff

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on Gilmore this week. Uh, he had quite a connection

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with Rippion. Even if it does end up being Drew Lock.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact that kJ Hamdler is out and

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>no Fantas trending towards out as well bodes well for

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>him to see a decent amount of volume. Agreed, Okay,

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this one's a little deeper. I got Curtis Samuel of

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers as a wide receiver. It's hard to trust

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's averaging only four and a half targets

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>per game. When you add in that he's getting three

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts per game, he's suddenly quite interesting. That's seven

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half touches per game. That's on par with

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what Robby Anderson and d J. Moore are doing. Plus

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, and we talked about this a lot in

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the preseason, Curtis Samuel had an average depth of target

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen point one. Now that's significantly shrunk this season

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>under Teddy Bridgewater. But of Falcons are the worst team

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the league against deep balls. They lead the league

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and allowance of catches over twenty plus yards with twenty

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>one already this year. So Curtis Samuel going down the seam,

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get some long passes in this game. Um,

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we're doing some quarterback wide receiver hookups, right. You had

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater Scott at Bridgewater, Yeah a Samuel, you had Daniel Jones.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Golden Tate going up against Dallas and another

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>languishing receiver who we think could have a breakout game.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Just thirty four yards per game for Golden Tates so far.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The entire Giants offense has just three touchdowns so far.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>That's awful. This is really just about this matchup. Dallas

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is allowing one four yards per game to receivers, that's

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>seventh most. They've allowed the most wide receiver scores with nine,

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>including multiple wide receiver scores in three straight games. And

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Tate has an extremely favorable one on one matchup in

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the slot against Jordan Lewis, who has already given up

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>four scores from the slot this year. That's terrible. It's

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate might take a chance of the wide receiver.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the slot wide receiver who win against

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys last week. He threw a touchdown pass, so

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>play right there. That should count right there. I I

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>totally agree that was a hell of a pass by

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the lady. By the way, Yeah who knew? Yeah I didn't.

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Did you see his quote after the game on that

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>He said he felt like he pitched, but it was

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a laser. I'll give him that. Uh, Matt. Let's go

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona taking on the New York Jets. You've already

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>touched on and we have already touched on some of

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>these players. But for Arizona, this offense really starts and

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>stops at the quarterback position. Kyler Murray having a fantastic

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fantasy season, and we should mention that there was a

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>presumed positive test on the Jets today. They haven't said

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to postpone this, but it's possible that

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>this one could get moved to Monday, but you know,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you never know. Let's start with Kyler Murray. He's an

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>A grade. If you took away all of the passing stats,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray is the thirteenth best running back in fantasy football.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>He has more rushing yards and the same amount of

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns as Alvin Kamara. How about that azing DeAndre

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins he gets an A grade. Eleven and a half

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>targets per game is third in the league, nine point

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>eight receptions, his first yards per game is sixth. He's easy.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk, I'm giving him a C grade. I'm putting

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy Isabella on the bench though only five targets last

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>week for Kirk as he's been hobbled by an injury,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>but he's not on the injury report this week, and

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>he did catch a touchdown last week when Kirk is

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in play. Isabella just doesn't get enough playing time here.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>And they're in eighteen routes last week. And the Jets

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>defense has been better against the past simply because it's

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>been so much easier to run on them this year.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So they haven't seen a ton through the air yet

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>this year. Um, we can talk about Chase Edmonds, who

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is might take a chance on me, but let's talk

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about Kenyan Drake. The Jets have allowed the seventh most

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and the fourth most touchdowns to running backs this year.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>The matchup for Drake was better last week and he

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>let us all down. And if you want to talk

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>about boom games for Rake, and if you describe a

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>boom game as either a hundred yards and a score

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or two scores in a game. He's had five booms

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in his last thirty four games. That means he's making

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more boom booms on the floor than scoring

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>points and Cliff Kingsbury starting to figure that out. I'll

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>give Drake a B, but it's he's getting closer to

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Joe Flacco, he's on the bench on the

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>jet side. He's starting at quarterback this week. I just

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention that. But and first round tackle McKay

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Beckton looks like he's gonna miss this week too. With

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Jones rushing at Flacco's blindside, Cardinals defense is like

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite defense this week. I do want to mention

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Flacco does like to target the tight end.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>We've known that about him his entire career. So is

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon in't play. No, He's averaging three catches for

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen yards per game. But this is the Cardinals, right, Yeah,

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They've been a lot better this year, only allowing forty

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seven yards to the position per game. Jamison crowd about

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder, who seems matchup proof he is. I'm only

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>giving him a C grade. Today um ten targets in

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>his return last week. Yeah, the Cards have been great

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers this year. Uh, They've only allowed two

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>wider sivers to top sixty yards and only two wide

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver scores in four games. And then finally, the running

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>back position just got messier with Levy on Bell looking

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's coming back from i R this week. You know,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore and Michael Perrin have carved out such an

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>awesome role in that backfield, They've earned extra time. Honestly,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the truth is Gaye hates Bell. He's gonna give him

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the start. He's gonna give him ten carries, which is

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not enough to start Bell and not enough to start

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>anybody else on this offense. So until Adam Gaze has fired,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which should probably be soon, Levy on Bell in the

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Jets running game is out of your lineup. All right?

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree. I think I agree with all

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's uh, we won't we won't. Bank I

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have an update on Golden Taide passing for you one

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for one with a twenty three yard touchdown. All right,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's how Golden Tate's gonna work out my for

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>my ticket, and I probably should have used Tate as

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me quarterback. I'm doing it

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all wrong, that's right. When we come back, we will

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>continue working through matchups, including Cincinnati taking on Baltimore. Joe

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Mixon uber hot last week? What are we expect in

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a much tougher matchup with Baltimore. If you want to

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>find all of my player rankings, they're available for free

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>quillotine leagues dot com. Every player ranked and reviewed you

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>can you can read all about them and find out

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if you agree, disagree, and know how to set your lineup.

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Fantasy Football Weekly continues. Welcome back

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchy and Scott Fish and

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison with you If you want to follow us

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I am at Paul Chargie, and Scott Fish

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is at Scott Fish twenty four Scott Fish twenty four,

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison is at Explosive Output. Cincinnati takes on Baltimore.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon enters this game red hot after his breakout

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>performance last week, but a much much tougher assignment this

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>time around, and he's just a B grade here. Baltimore

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is ranked second against the run by Football Outsiders they're

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>giving up just three point nine yards per carry. That said,

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs have had nice receiving days against the Ravens

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks. Clyde Edwards, Hilaire, Antonio Gibson, j D.

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Mcsuckett all posted meaningful fantasy games just through the air alone.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Mixing is not the second coming of Larry centers. But

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he is a capable receiver who could come down with

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>four or five passes to augment his day, and that's

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>how he gets to a B grade. Let's talk about

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow with in with three straight three yard games,

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>He's completing sixty six percent of his passes, which is

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>great for a rookie. But Scott Fish on passes over

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards, he's one for two, one for twenty two.

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>To be at sixty six percent, knowing that he's missed

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on twenty one of twenty two deep balls, the rest

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of him must be like all completed everything under that

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>on the But Baltimore is a brutally tough past defense

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>unless they're facing Patrick Mahomes. You already know this, so

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not expecting a lot here from Burrow. Burrow's best

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and favorite target is Tyler Boyd and slow receivers have

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>had some success against the Ravens, So a C grade

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Burrow and let's go to Tyler Boyd. He

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was held to just thirty six scoreless yards in the

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two meetings against Baltimore last year. That is it. They'll

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>face one of the league's better slock corners, Marlon Humphrey,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who has yielded just two scores in his last fourteen games.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But slow receivers as a unit have done okay. Jarvis Landry,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill, Randall Cobb All averaged five catches for sixty

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>five yards. So a C grade on Tyler Boyd. If

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're cold, five catches for sixty five scoreless yards,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that's how you get a C grade. That's Tyler Boyd.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Tee Higgins is also a C grade who he's as

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sending for sure, And to me it looks like Joe

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Burrow's number two target. I think a j Green's out

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point, running primarily from the outside. He's gonna

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>see Anthony Everett and Marcus Peters at cornerback. Those two

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are better than Higgins, but because he's got such a

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>big size advantage, I could see it possible like box

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out touchdown for Tee Higgins in this game, so maybe

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as a as a touchdown dependent dart throw a C

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>grade for te Higgins And as I mentioned, A J.

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Green's is on the bench because the lack of production,

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the difficult matchup, and he just doesn't pass the eye test.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>He looks unengaged, slow and ineffective. A J. Green dead

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to us until further notice. Let's go to the other

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>side for Baltimore Lamar Jackson, and obviously against the Bengals

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and last year's two meetings he ran for two hundred yards,

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>so obviously we're gonna keep starting him. Now. Hed Come

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>does come into this game questionable with a knee, but

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody expects him to play and if even if the

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>knee holds back the rushing. He threw the ball really

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>well last week and has for most of the season,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to continue to do. Given a grade

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to Lamar Jackson, his favorite target, of course is Mark Andrews,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>who clocks in with a B grade. The Bengals have

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed at least five catches and seventy yards to comparable

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>tight ends Hunter Henry and zach Ertz in recent weeks,

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and the game script could be a concern for Andrews

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if Baltimore takes an early lead, but by then Andrews

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>probably has his numbers. Andrews averages only four targets per

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>game when the Ravens lead at halftime, but hardy eight

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>targets when they trail or tied at a half, so

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>game script could work against him here. Still, Andrews looked

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>really good in his his couple of big plays last week.

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Brown came about one inch away from scoring a

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week after connecting anent of his targets from

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to Brown in the first two games. Lamar Jackson's completed

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just forty of his argets to Brown the last two weeks. Still, Brown,

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what you're getting here. You're asking for a

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>home run. He runs most often from the right side

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of the field, where he will face Darius Phillips, who

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>has not yielded a score yet. So I don't know

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be an easy matchup, and I've got just

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on him. The Cincinnati secondary pretty near good.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie Alexander's played well. William Jackson is very good. It's

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup for Marcus Brown. It's kind of the

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Man, what a freaking mess this has turned

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>out to me. Mark Ingram has become a touchdown dependent runner,

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>offering very little else. He's become Jordan Howard. Yeah, that's

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a good way to put it. He's become Jordan Howard.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Touchdowns in two of his three games, which is great,

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's all he's giving you. He did score in

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>both games against Cincinnati last season. He's handled six of

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the last seven carries in the red zone, but he

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has failed to reach double digit carries in three straight games.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's just you know, a double digit if you're

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not if you're getting eight carries, if you don't get

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown. Mark Ingram's kell has better stats than him

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>on the season, No, for sure. Um so just to

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>see great on mark Ingram. I do think a touchdown

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>is possible here, but he needs more usage and it's

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>all worse for j K. Dobbins and Gus Edwards will

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>get less usage and don't get goal line carries there

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. We've said it now for three straight shows.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards looks like the best runner on eye test

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the three of them, but really they're not getting

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>enough work. Let's go to our next matchup, which is

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Carolina taking on Atlanta. Matt He told us she liked

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater. Uh, we already talked about Uh, Curtis Sammy Samuel,

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So that leaves uh, that leaves a couple of key players.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's stay with the passing game. Tell me what you

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>think about d J. Moore, who is underperformed to this point. Well,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving d J. Moore and Robby Anderson a grades

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in this one. The Falcons will be missing five of

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>their top six defensive backs and almost six with A. J.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Terrell just coming back. In this game, starters Darky's Denard

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Deamonte Kazi, Keian O'Neil, Jalen Hawkins, and Ricardo Allen all

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>look like they're going to be out, which leads the

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Falcons with devastated Kendall Sheffield, Isaiah Oliver, and Fantasy Football

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Weekly favorite Bleedy Ray Wilson rays backs Uh the game

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on baby. His defense was already allowing three three passing

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and three point three touchdowns per game, including two

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred five yards per game to opposing wide receivers, and

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>both More and Anderson rep rank in the top twenty

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in targets and yards per game among wide receivers in

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. They're both easy as by the way, is

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a quick while We're not just on Robbie Anderson. Were

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>we We were all so wrong on Robby Anderson. And

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems so obvious now that Adam Gaze had painfully

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>diminished his value. I think it's where else everybody who

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>leaves Adam Gaze becomes significantly. But weird thing about Robbie Anderson.

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>As you watch in for the Jets crossing routes, you

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can do more that he can do, way more than

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Let us know. But I guess Sam Donald

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>All Pro quarterback in three Just watch whoever the new

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>head coaches. You can't which to watch the Trevor versus

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald et al Right, Ian Thomas Um Normally I wouldn't

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>mention him. He's only averaging two catches in seven yards

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>per game, but I'm gonna give him a desperation See

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, the Falcons have allowed a touchdown to every

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>top tight end they faced this year. Greg Olsen had one,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham had to, Dalton Schultz, and Bob Tanyan and

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>An Tania And by the way, I had three, so

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with injuries to the safety's Ian Thomas is going to

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be open and Mike Davis giving him a B grade

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Davis is averaging just under eight targets per

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>games since starting over taking over the starting role, and

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are allowing eight and a half receptions and

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>sixty three yards and just under a touchdown per game

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>through the air alone. Tomposing backs and we can call

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta good against the run, but that's just because it's

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so easy to pass on them. On the other Brian

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hill was charches, take a chance on me runner, and

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Todd Gurley in a grade in this game.

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Gurley snap snap right, was limited to only thirty eight

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>offensive snaps, but he still saw seventeen touches last week

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay, which means he's getting the ball handed

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to him on nearly half of the plays where he's

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on the field. That's a good rate. So give me

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's got that, especially against the Panthers run

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>defense who's given up two touchdowns per game to opposing

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Calvin Ridley, he's he disappeared from the statuet

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>last week in a very good matchup. Disappeared from the injury.

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say his ankle injury is not

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report anymore. He might not be a

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>D percent, but he's good enough to go. I'm giving

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>him a B in this one. I think it's gonna

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>be easy for them to run, and I'm just a

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>little nervous that he could reaggravate that ankle. But Julio

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones is going to miss this game with that lingering

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.479
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury, and Ridley's target total of thirteen in Week

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>three when Julio was out is probably very safe on

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the even on that bum ankle. I'm gonna give Russell

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Gauge a see as well. Gauge is actually averaging almost

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of receptions as Ridley and Jones on

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a per game basis five point three for Ridley, five

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for Jones, four point eight for Gauge. He's right in there.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers are allowing seventy the passes thrown to the

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>slot to be caught this year, and Oh Lama day, Zakias,

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna sing it, Scott, Oh Lama day. There you go. Uh.

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 1>He could get a desperation start to He's logged sevent

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps and situations where Julio is not on

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the field, Hayden Hurst gets to see if Jones is out.

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If he does happen to play, I'd probably leave him

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Though the Panthers have done a great

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>job against the tight end this year. They held Waller

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to forty five yards, Hunter Henry only managed five for

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty and the Tampa tight ends combined for one catch

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and eleven yards. Finally, Matt Ryan is a B. He's

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>fourth in the league and passing yards in fourteenth and

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns. The matchup does favor the run here to

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the panther Is are way weaker against the run, but

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>dinged up weapons That downgrades Maddie Ice from an A

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to a B. And if if he and Thomas scores

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph week six marked down the touchdown maybe. So

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>final matchup of this segment is Denver taking on New England.

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>We've got about three minutes. You'll need to be fairly

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>tidy with this one. Let's try it. Uh Rippion is

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>or Lock is probably on the bench. I can't do

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it even without Gilmore. It's just too tough of matched up.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna clamb down on him. Patrick was my take

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Fant is really really doubtful, likely out.

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay I can't start in his game back, So now

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we're left with Jerry Judy and Melvin Gordon. Jerry Judy

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade to Judy is now top

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and all four games Hamdler is gonna be out,

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Fans gonna be out. No Gilmore, Uh, Tyreek Kill, Tyler, Lockett, Hunter,

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Renfrell all top sixty yards and scored from the slot

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Paths. I'm giving a Judy a C grade,

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's a plus matchup for him and an uber

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>confidence at C grade plus. I think sixty yards is

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.720
<v Speaker 1>probably his floor, so I would guess sixty plus yards,

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, a C grade, definitely a plus getting

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>him into your flexes. Melvin Gordon, I'm giving a B

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>grade if it's a little risky with Lindsay coming back,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but Denver leaned on the running game with ripping in.

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Gordon has eighteen plus touches in three games this year,

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>all three running backs to top fourteen touches. Also topped

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards against New England Runde, which is allowing four

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>point three six yards per carry. They're not as good

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>as they were last year against the run. So I

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have a B grade on Gordon. On the other side, Stidham.

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the game last week? Start him or Stidham?

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I got stid him on the bench. I'm gonna go

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to the running game here and just say I had

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Harris for my take. Com Uh, take a chance on

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>me running back from my take a chance on me

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>running back White. I am giving the C grade to

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>He caught seven passes last week. I'm we're that all

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>three were with Hoyer, all seven were with Hoyer, and

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he saw no targets from Stidham. He can in the

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. You have to do to throw a White

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Just throw the ball like five yards. I would like

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to think you could do that. That's why I'm giving

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>him the C grade he's got. He's the past catching back.

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 1>He should get some against this Denver defense. I'm giving

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Sea grades crazily enough to both Edelman and Harry. Harry

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>saw three red zone targets when Stidham came in. He

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>might he might save you with the touchdown. Um and

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he's going up against five ft nine, eight eight pound

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>corner slot corner moving outside Bryce Callaghan. That's a five

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>inch thirty seven pound difference. And Edelman he usually just

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>gets enough volume and a J Booye is out, So

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a se grade. That that all

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, I think, and Nikkil Harry to boom or

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bus for him. For sure. It's not the sexiest. It's

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>not the sexiest matchup, but I like you. I like

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>finding out that he's got a what did you say?

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got a five thirty seven pound advantage over a

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>slot corner movie outside. That's that's pretty compelling. Yeah, it's

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty compelling. When we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions, you get to play along, find out

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can go three and oh with our panel

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of experts Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. It is Fantasy

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Don't don't you don't don't no, no, no, don't.

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Baul Charchie and my

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>co hosts are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Matt tell

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>people what they can do at Shock Fantasy dot Come.

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You can, you know, become a member at Shock Fantasy

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I also got these sweet hats like the

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one I'm wearing on my head all the shock Fantasy

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>lids from soda stick. They're so cool. Trucker hats, oh yeah,

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they're nice. All right. If you want to play in

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a Guillotine league, we encourage you to check out Guillotine

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot Com as well. Guys, let's play three tough questions.

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>We begin with wait, wait, tough question number one. We're

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>at the quarter mark of the NFL season and Clyde Edwards,

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a layer has one touchdown. Will he finish with a

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>six or fewer touchdowns? Be seven to nine touchdowns or

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>see double digit touchdowns. I'll begin with Scott. Oh you

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.439
<v Speaker 1>always begin with Scott. That's because I like Scott better.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be seven to nine. I just don't

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>even feel comfortable about it. Just based historically on what

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City running backs have done the last couple of

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>years with the home momes at the helm Um All so,

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they got some really really plus matchups against Las Vegas

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina, Las Vegas twice. In Carolina coming up, Dot

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>offense scores a ton, he's gaining seventy of the running

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>back opportunity share, He's getting over nine of the red

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>zone touches, I think he finds a way to get

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>six in in the last twelve games. So seven. Okay,

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt Scott kind of hit it, but let me expand

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on it. He gets the Raiders this week, they're allowing

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns per game. That's two. He gets Caroline and

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>week nine they're allowing two touch touchdowns per games. Two more.

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>He gets the Raiders again. In week eleven, we're up

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to six, and then he gets Miami and week fourteen

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're allowing one and a half. That's seven and a

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>half right there. So now where he's at eight and

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a half and half, all he has to do is

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>score twice in the other eight games, and he's a

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>double digit score So he's gonna score double digit touchdowns.

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've got I've cracked the code. Okay. To answer

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>this question, largely, you need to know what's going on

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line because that's where the easy

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns come from. Who was on the list of Chiefs

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown scorers from inside the five Well, it's Tyreek Hill,

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins, Anthony Sherman, Tackle, Eric Fisher, and Patrick Mahomess.

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Running one who's not on that list Clyde Edwards, A

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>laire regression. So will he get carries inside the five

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or not? He has not had any carries inside the

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>five since week one when he got six. Can he

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be effective inside the five? Well, we don't really know

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because all six of the carries he got inside the

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>five and week one we're all blown up at the

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage and he was looking at two defenders

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at the handoff. So I don't really know yet. We

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen Andy Reid try to run Clyde Edwards a

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Laire wide inside the five, which I think would be

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>better for his skill set. Hasn't even done that yet.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Now his Clyde Edwards layers diminutive size I don't think

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>helps him in this scenario, but it doesn't mean that

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he absolutely can't get those inside the five touchdowns. He's

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>going to break some longer touchdowns. Don't we all think

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going to break long touchdowns? Yes, at least so

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to this next week, He's going to score on some receptions.

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>He's got room to become a better football player. He's

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>he's only four games into his NFL career. You roll

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>all that together and he will get more touchdowns, But

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he's too far behind the eight ball to get to

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>double digit scores, and the correct answer is B seventh

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to nine touchdowns. Tough question number two. Justin Jefferson has

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:45.959
<v Speaker 1>exploded on the scene over the past two weeks. Would

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you rather have Jefferson or his teammate Adam Feeling on

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>your roster? Matt, Oh, you you went to me even

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>though Scott got it right. I'm gonna say both, not really. Well,

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if he only went to you when I get it wrong,

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>then um, I still have feeling higher. Um Feeling had

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>eight or more targets in seventeen of the thirty games

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that he and Kirk Cousins have played together. Uh, and

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a little bit more trusted in the red zone,

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 1>scoring nineteen times in cousins tenure. And I just don't

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know if Justin Jefferson is a red zone threat as

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of yet. He broke one really long, beautiful touchdown in

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>week three. The explosiveness is there, but I feel like

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.959
<v Speaker 1>he might have to break them from deep in order

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to score. And I think feelings just a little more

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>trusted down by the stripe. Okay, yeah, I'm I'm with you.

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I I have feeling still just a little bit ahead,

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but I I love both, especially in this matchup this week.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Um uh. Basically, Feeling is second in the NFL and

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.919
<v Speaker 1>percentage of his team's targets, which nearly thirty three percent.

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 1>The last two weeks, it's been a little closer, but

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Feeling still seems to be the guy Kirk trust the most.

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're both great. Feeling, but you're answering, Really,

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.919
<v Speaker 1>this is a risk reward question, which liking teammate would

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you rather have? Justin Jefferson or Adam Feeling. Feeling is

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>damn good and we know he's good. He's proven it

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple times, Jefferies, Jefferson has had two really really good games.

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I am going to swing for the fences. Jefferson is

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ProFootball focus, is top rated wide receiver. He leads the

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>league and receptions of twenty or more yards and he's

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>done it all in two weeks. All of his catches

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of twenty more yards have coming two games. How much

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>further back is Adam Feeland though he might just be

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he might just be the second coming of Randy Moss

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.279
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota. We don't we don't know. It's it's the

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.479
<v Speaker 1>right now. This is a coin flip question, and Kirk

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Cousins is Kirk Cousins is this quarterback Kirk isn't. For

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever defects Kirk has, he is a very good downfield passer.

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>He leads the NFL in yard per completion and it's

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not close. Unlocking the deep passing game feels better suited

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>for Justin Jefferson. Tough question number three. Antonio Gibson's role

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington offense is expanding every week going forward.

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Will Gibson be a running back to a flex or

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a bench player Scott So running back to so top

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four running back in this injury laden year doesn't

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:34.240
<v Speaker 1>seem too hard. Um. He has an absolutely brutal weeks thirteen, fourteen, fifteen,

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's okay. Before that Week sixteen he gets Carolina,

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Uh. Basically I see all but two

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or three games him as a a guy. I'm going

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to give us startable grade two. Uh. Like you said,

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his snaps are going up, His past game work is

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going up. Ron Rivera Rivera just said this week that

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Gibson needed a preseason to get used to playing running

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:00.839
<v Speaker 1>back and that he's now more confident and wheels are

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:03.479
<v Speaker 1>going to come off the preseason phases over I believe

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is what he said. So now they're going to take

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the wheels off. He's got Kyle Allen, his quarterback from

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Carolina who throw to Christian McCaffrey. So basically what I

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 1>think is Gibson it's gonna get all the work now

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and he's basically going to be Christian McCaffrey last year now.

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So um, really, so you should have said the number

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>one running back overall should have been in there. So

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess I have to go with RB

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>two given by options, all right, I didn't think anybody

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>would go RB one if I threw it out there.

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should have added that at an option you

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>can't go off the board. It's allowed to it's allowed

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to do that. I have found a very low success

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>rate going off the board, very low. RB two matt

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Is Antonio Gibson going forward and RB one a flex

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or a bench player. I think you're talking about gibbage

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>time chart some gibbage gibbage time again. Do you think

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be more or less gibbage time with Kyle

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Allen or maybe Alex Smith as an upgrade it over

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins that offense might be better that there might

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be less gibbage time. Oh no, it's not that much better. Uh.

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Gibson has forty four rushing attempts on the year. By

0:53:09.880 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, thirty four of them have come when Washington

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is losing. He's gained a hundred and seventy yards and

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.760
<v Speaker 1>scored three times in the in the in the rushing

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>attempts where they're losing, they're always losing. Exactly twenty five

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of his rushing attempts have come when Washington is losing

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by ten points, over half of his rushing attempts. So

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>much gibbage. There's so much gibbage on this team. I

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>he's at RB two. Okay, that was a very very

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 1>circuitous route to get the RB two. Uh. Seventeen touches

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 1>last week for Antonio Gibson his highest yet as a

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>young player at fairly new to the position. He's got

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 1>room to grow and ultimately dominate the touches here, and

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>there's just no threat for his carries. The team cut

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson because they knew they had their new running

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 1>back in Gibson. Over the past two weeks, he's had

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>four carries inside the five yard line and he's scored twice.

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barber over the last two weeks, he's had one

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and he got stuffed. This offense. I think it's a

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit better under Kyle Allen, which you sort of

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.440
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, and just more than anything else. But Antonio Gibson,

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you watch him play, you pass the eye test. That

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>kid's got a little electricity to him. I'm not saying

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he's Barry Sanders, but he's got a last his prime

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that makes him the best play. We should

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>probably rename that Washington team to the Washington Gibson's right,

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, go ahead, seems normal. If it's like

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the drink, then yes, because that's a team that makes

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to hit the bottle. That Gibson. Isn't it

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a Gibson, the with the gin and the that's a gimlet.

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a gimlet, gimlet Gibson. I drink gimlets and watch

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Gibson play. That's fine. I do that. We'll we'll let

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that go. And he is an RB two. Guess I

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 1>think you guys did a very good job, except you've

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>got most of it wrong. We go back to our matchups,

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning with Philadelphia at Pittsburgh for Philadelphia once again, short

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers they've ruled out to show Jackson, all Sean, Jeffrey,

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like every week we're talking about the

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing here. Unfortunately, it's a tough spot for Carson

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Wentz in his passing game. The the quarterback that ranked

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty inaccuracy this year, Dwayne Haskins was benched. The quarterback

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.480
<v Speaker 1>who was ranked thirty first and accuracy, Travisky was benched.

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback who ranks thirty second inaccuracy, actually by a

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 1>good five percentage place. Carson Wentz still the starter, though

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he's nearly twin Here's actually a shocking stat. Nearly twenty

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of his passes are graded not catchable. Man. That's terrible.

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And he hasn't thrown a game too. So I'm giving

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 1>him an A grade here. I got him on the bench,

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have Ward and high Tower and all

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers on the bench. I barely even gave

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Earth's a C grade against a really good Pittsburgh defense

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been top five against tight ends. He just might

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get the volume. With Goddard out and all these wide

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:06.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers out, it might be there for him. C grade

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for Earth's and I don't even love that. I'm giving

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and Miles Sanders a C grade. He came back,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:16.280
<v Speaker 1>took back all the snappers of the snaps in each

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of his games this year, so he's gonna get all

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the work. I know st Kwon Barkley had a terrible

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>six yard performance against the Steelers, but he got a

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:25.919
<v Speaker 1>bunch of air yard. He got a bunch of six

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:27.839
<v Speaker 1>for sixty through the air. And Sanders is great there.

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving him a C grade because he'll get passing.

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 1>It work to get there. So C grades for Earths

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and Sanders. On the other side, I have some really

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>good grades and and I feel like that they're just

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 1>going to destroy Philadelphia this week. I have an A

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:44.240
<v Speaker 1>grade on Big Bend. Uh. Eagles will be without Avante Maddox,

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which their secondary already wasn't good, and now they're down

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at starting cornerback. Uh. They still have Slay out there.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:54.239
<v Speaker 1>They have Nicole Robie Coleman. They haven't been as great

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as you'd think this year. Juju will get Nico Coleby,

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Roan Nickel, Roby comb In Krom but he hasn't been

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>good this year. Is I just mentioned and Juju has

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pad Ben's eye. He's getting the touchdowns. I think it's

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a two headed beast here with Juju and Deonte. Deontay's game,

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the targets in the yards. I got them both with

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>A grades. I think Ben's just gonna throw it all over.

0:57:15.280 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I have Washington on the bench and I'm giving Claypool

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here. We wanna talk about him later

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the show, but he's gonna go up against work

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>working against converted safety Jalen Mills, who runs a four

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>six one Claypool four four two, And we mentioned this

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with Nick kill Harry. He has four inches and nearly

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty pounds on Jalen Mills. His snapshat keeps going up.

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the week he finally definitely overtakes

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>James Washington and a big play could be in the

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>cards with that matchup. So ce grade on Claypool Ibron,

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I gave a B grade two. I know I know

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he's nursing a groin right now, which sounds really weird

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as I say it out loud. Uh Kittle destroyed the

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Eagles last week. Higby had three touchdowns. Even Logan Thomas

0:57:57.400 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>had like thirty sum yards in a touchdown. Be gray

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it on Ibron. He might be a little limited. There's

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of mounts to feed. But I'm still

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>getting a good grade and a B grade on Connor.

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even I don't love it that much because

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just two running backs of that over ninety two yards

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty games. Geez. Against the Philadelphia Eagles,

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're actually pretty good against the run. So I'm

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade Dame because he'll get passing game work.

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I have the wide receiver so uped is.

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a passing game, all right, Rams taking

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Washington football team. We begin with the running

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:34.120
<v Speaker 1>game for the Rams, which got more convoluted this week

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with Cam Acres officially off the injury report. So now

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you do. It's a disaster scenario for all

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of the running backs here, and the same thing to

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do really is to sit this out. And I am

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 1>putting bench grades on all three of the Rams running

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>backs because you can't know who's going to get the ball.

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the only way you can know is if

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 1>two of them are out, probably so, and this might

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be your last best chance to move on from these guys,

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think you're looking at a season long headache

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess. Just ask the Henderson owners who rolled

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 1>into last week thinking they had an amazing matchup only

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to see Malcolm Brown, who wasn't even having that good

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at game, dominate the number of carries. His hands were

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 1>actually hot, they were warm, barely, they're warm hands. Let's

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game with Jared Goff gets a

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>C grade. It's tough to trust him after last week's

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>inexplicable dud. Goff's two critical receivers, Robert Woods and Cooper Cup,

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have favorable matchups. We'll talk about them in a second.

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Golf's got another excellent prospect in Gerald Higbee. We'll talk

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about him in a second too. So let's get to

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Cooper Cup B grade. He's posted eight yards,

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown or both in three straight weeks. He also

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>leads the rams and targets over that span. Washington secondary

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has only allowed one receiver to top seventy yards and

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one reception touchdown this year. Uh, he's only Uh, he's

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 1>got a deep. He's got a favorable matchup against diminutive cornerback.

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Moreland, who ranks eight at the position by Pro

0:59:59.400 --> 1:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Fox guess B grade for Cooper Cup. Robert Woods

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>also gets a B grade. Prior to last week's dud,

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods had either one yards or a touchdown in

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>three consecutive games. Washington has only allowed one receiver top

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards as I mentioned earlier, so an explosive game

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>probably not coming here, but he will see dominutive quarterback

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Darby, which is a mismatch for Woods. Strength. Then

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there's Tyler Higbee, who's been had the one great game

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and three total duds where he's killed his fantasy owners.

1:00:27.240 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>This looks like a boom game for Tyler Higbee. Washington

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>has surrendered the eleventh most catches, the eleventh most yards

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends, and the second most touchdowns to opposing

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>tight ends with five already. Uh touchdowns are paramount for

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Higbee as his ceiling is entirely dependent on scoring and

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so Washington's red zone struggles against position are a very

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>positive sign here, and he's gonna face off against linebacker

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Pierre. Lewis was allowing an eight five percent catch

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rate in his coverage. Tyler Higbee b grade. Let's go

1:00:57.640 --> 1:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Washington side. We already spent a lot of

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>time talking about in Tonio Gibson, why we like him,

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and we like him in this game. His total yardage

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>output is increased in every game so far, and the

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>way to beat the Rams on the ground. And I

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think Ron River and Scott Turner gonna ask Kyle

1:01:11.040 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Allen to go beat the pass rush of Aaron Donald

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in the coverage of Jalen Ramsey in this game, I

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see a lot of Antonio Gibson here. Ezekiel, Elliott,

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders, Devin Singletary averaged one hundred twenty six total

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown against the Rams. Same those are

1:01:27.680 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are good numbers for Gibson, who gets a B grade.

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Terry mclard gets a B grade even with tough shadow

1:01:33.040 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>coverage from Jalen Ramsey because he's always good in almost

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>every scenario, no matter the coverage, and I think this

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is a quarterback upgrade for him. Terry mclauren. Now, what

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>people near Washington have been telling me is that the

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>main reason for the benching, in addition to the inaccuracy

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of Haskins, which is brutal is. They just couldn't even

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>run a full They couldn't run the full playbook that

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>haskins limitations were such that there were a whole swass

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of the field that they couldn't even throw too. And

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe Kyleen will open up the field little bit

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that might help Terry McLaurin a bit. He gets the

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>B grade here. And the only other guy you might

1:02:07.440 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be tempted to play is j. D. Mcsuckett, who has

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>been surprisingly active, but the Rams have limited far better

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving backs like Devin Singletary and Ezekiel Elliott and Miles

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Sanders who combined to average three catches and thirty eight

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. So those are going to gibbage time anyway.

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are gibbage time. That's right. They're going to Antonio Gibson,

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at least we certainly hope. So anyway, all right, let's

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>work in one final matchup into this segment. It's Jacksonville

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>taking on Houston. Matt James Hollywood. Robinson given him an

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>A grade in this game, averaging nineteen touches per game

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred and eleven total yards, plus the Texans

1:02:42.000 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are giving up the farm to Opposing backs Clyde, Connor

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and Dalvin each top two hundred yards in the ground

1:02:47.800 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and scored. The three Ravens backs combined for one hundred

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy six rushing yards. Gardner minshew, I'm only going to

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>give us C grade two, and and that's against an

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>O and four Texans team. They held Mahomes, Lamar big Ben,

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and Kirk Cousins all under three yards and Mahomes was

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the only one to get to the three touchdown pass mark. However,

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the Texans have allowed the passes against them to be

1:03:13.520 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>completed and they've yet to intercept the ball this season.

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I just fear that the Texans defense is due for

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a big bounce back after firing Bill O'Brien this week

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and putting Romeo Cornell in charge. D J. Chark, giving

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a B grade two, finally had a good week last

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend with eight and two on nine targets. I'm still

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit nervous that the fact that Chark isn't even

1:03:35.320 --> 1:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the lead for targets in his own group of

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. He did miss a game, but on average

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Keelan Cole's averaging five point eight per game, Chark is

1:03:45.560 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>averaging five point three la Visca Channault and Chris Conley

1:03:49.840 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are each averaging five targets per game. This is a

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>strange wide receiver by committee. I hate it. I wish

1:03:57.400 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Chark got to nine targets every game. Maybe he will.

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh Chennault and Cole I am leaving on the bench. Um.

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>When you factor in Channault's two and a half rushing

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>attempts per game, that's good. But this matchup just isn't great.

1:04:12.520 --> 1:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>The Texans are only allowing a hundred and fifty yards

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>per game to the wide receiver position, and if you

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>split that three to four ways, it's pretty messy. And

1:04:20.800 --> 1:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>she Alts also nursing a hamstring injury, but he's got

1:04:24.040 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that juicy matchup against Vernon Hargreaves, who's so bad. It's

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not that juicy. They're only giving up a hundred and

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards to wide receivers. I don't know. I I

1:04:32.480 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like n Alt in this, assuming the injury lets him,

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>lets him go in your full strength, and I don't

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>know that. That's watch Houston give up ten points this week.

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bill O'Brien's gun watch, I don't think. So let's

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>go to the Houston side. I got David Johnson and

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I got Duke Johnson. Both Johnson's are on your bench

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Yeah, the Jaguars are a weird, weird

1:04:54.280 --> 1:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>run defense. In Week one, they held the Colts backs

1:04:56.640 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in check on the ground, but gave up seventeen catches

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and forty two yards through the air.

1:05:02.240 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In Week two, they shut out Derrick Henry and they

1:05:05.640 --> 1:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gave up zero running back receptions. In Week three, they

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>made Miles Miles Gaskin look good, but it took him

1:05:11.160 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven touches to get to nine. And then in

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>week four they gave up the farm to Joe Mixon.

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So what is this? It all comes back to both

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of these running backs are averaging less than four yards

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.959
<v Speaker 1>per carrying under fifty yards per game, so they're both

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>not to be trusted. Deshaun Watson. I'm giving an A

1:05:27.440 --> 1:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>grade to every quarterback the Jags have faced has either

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>put up three yards or multiple scores, but not at

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time. I am giving Will Fuller a B.

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He seems to be the most consistent wide receiver. Plan

1:05:39.840 --> 1:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>was an instant replay away from a second touchdown last week.

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He's still hovering right around v catches per week and

1:05:47.280 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine yards per game, which is not the normal

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller. We're due for a big will Fuller game, um,

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Jags haven't allowed a wide receiver to top

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety yards this season, although they have allowed three touchdowns

1:05:59.520 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to the position in the last couple of weeks and

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving Cooks and Stills on the bench because they just

1:06:04.840 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get as much play as Fuller. But I am

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>putting Randall Cobb in giving him a c Tyler Boyd

1:06:09.960 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>had the nine dr game on seven catches from the slot.

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphries and Paris Campbell each did well from the

1:06:15.080 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>slot as well, and there's some weakness there, so Cobb

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>could be the touchdown score. Inexplicable that they didn't use

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb against the Vikings in the slot. Yeah, kind

1:06:23.960 --> 1:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of weird. Uh. And finally, Jordan Aikins and Darren Fells.

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Aikin's We've said it all along. He looks good, he

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>passes the eye test, he looks like a player. He's

1:06:33.400 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>got a pass a concussion He's got a pass a

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>concussion test now after a rough hit by Harrison Smith

1:06:38.280 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>last week. If he does come back. I'm gonna give

1:06:40.520 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>him a C if he doesn't come back. Darren Fells

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>gets the C grade because the Jags are allowing seventy

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>three yards per game to the tight end position, which

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is fourth most in the league, and they've already allowed

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns to tight ends in four games this year.

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>A very comprehensive breakdown. Thank you, Matt. Appreciate that. When

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we've got more match ups for you,

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>including Indianapolis taking on Cleveland. Scott will tell you what

1:07:04.800 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to make of Jonathan Taylor, who's not seeing the ball

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much as we thought he would in a

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>tricky matchup with Cleveland, and I read Hot Offense will

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you what to do with your Browns as well

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt and de Ernest Johnson. That'll be a fascinating one.

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You'll want to stay tuned to Fantasy Football Weekly for

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that breakdown, plus premature speculation coming up near the end

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of the show will tell you three players you can

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>pick up now that other people are going to try

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week. Stay tuned Fantasy Football Weekly,

1:07:58.800 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bucking back Fantasy foot Fall Weekly breaking down every game

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy style for you, including Indianapolis taking on Cleveland Scott.

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>The Indianapolis passing game has been stinky. I think Philip

1:08:12.480 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers looks like he's on his last legs and arms. Yeah, yeah,

1:08:19.120 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of this one? T Y Hilton,

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one last start man? T Y Hilton is really starting

1:08:23.880 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to look like a j Green out there? He is,

1:08:25.800 --> 1:08:29.759
<v Speaker 1>isn't he awfully feeble? Awfully old? The Browns are allowed

1:08:29.840 --> 1:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>in three passing touchdowns per game and have allowed over

1:08:32.640 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty points in three of their four games. So you

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:37.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's big. That'd be great for Rivers, right, I

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>think I think this is the game that slows down

1:08:39.560 --> 1:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for both offenses. Rivers has not top thirty attempts in

1:08:43.600 --> 1:08:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the last three games, so that's why he's not getting

1:08:46.800 --> 1:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>those yards or touchdowns. He's only had one touchdown the

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>last three games. It's just it's just terrible. I have

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:55.639
<v Speaker 1>him on my bench here, um because the games that

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we're big for the Browns, the high scoring ones were

1:08:59.320 --> 1:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jack's and Dak Prescott and Joe Burrow, and I

1:09:02.800 --> 1:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think Rivers is anywhere near those guys anymore. So

1:09:06.240 --> 1:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>I have him and the entire passing game on the bench.

1:09:10.040 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I want none of them. With even mo Ali Cox

1:09:13.720 --> 1:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he ran seven routes last week, that's a total. He

1:09:18.040 --> 1:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown that saved you. But with Burton's back, yeah,

1:09:21.720 --> 1:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>he ran seven team routes. He it's all. It's a

1:09:24.800 --> 1:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>mishmash now. I don't want their wide receivers, nothing but

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor. I'm gonna give us c to grade too.

1:09:31.160 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I know that Jordan Wilkins and new Hem Hines each

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>carried the ball nine times last week nine times, and

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the week before that, Jordan Wilkins carried the ball nine times,

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and the week before that Jordan will could carry them

1:09:44.240 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>all nine times. It seems times it feels like that's

1:09:48.840 --> 1:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>about when it gets a week. Um, So I don't

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>think they're going anywhere. I think that's just what they're

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. The Browns d has held all runners under

1:09:57.800 --> 1:10:02.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty five yards, but they've averaged eight catches for sixty

1:10:02.680 --> 1:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>six yards through the air to running backs over the

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:07.479
<v Speaker 1>last three And Jonathan Taylor is getting a decent amount

1:10:07.560 --> 1:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of pass game work. Um, you would think that helps Hines,

1:10:12.360 --> 1:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but his receptions have gone down a little bit, and

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and Jonathan Taylor's getting it. I think that he's gonna

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>get four teen plus touches, which gives him the se grade.

1:10:21.320 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And just to know, on Jonathan Taylor, nine of his

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>final twelve games are against bottom ten against the run teams,

1:10:28.040 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So don't give up yet. He's got some schedule coming up. Boy.

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, when Marlon Mack went out in Week one,

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I really thought that that was going to crystallize a

1:10:37.760 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>ton of work for Jonathan Taylor, and that Naim Hines

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:42.479
<v Speaker 1>would be one of these guys you could flex in

1:10:42.520 --> 1:10:45.919
<v Speaker 1>most weeks because he was gonna get five six catches

1:10:45.960 --> 1:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a game, and he was gonna run the ball, you know,

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>another four or five times and you can get you

1:10:49.960 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to a decent number most weeks. None of that's really

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>materialized at all. Right, So on the other side, Mayfield,

1:10:58.560 --> 1:11:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm given a C two. The Colts are crushing opposing

1:11:01.520 --> 1:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy quarterbacks, but when you look at the qbs

1:11:03.720 --> 1:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they've faced, it's it's a mishmash of crap, Like there's

1:11:07.920 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a mishmash of crap. The bigger the Mayfield has been

1:11:13.040 --> 1:11:15.479
<v Speaker 1>lights out and he's far better than the other the

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>other quarterbacks they've faced. So I'm gonna give him a

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Here, Oh b J, I'm giving him a

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:23.479
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Unlike previous years, Oh b J is the

1:11:23.520 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>target hog. This year he seems reinvigorated. It's usually been

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Landry that's the target hog, but not this year. So far,

1:11:29.600 --> 1:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he has six targets in every game and four plus

1:11:31.960 --> 1:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>catches and fifty nine plus yards and three straight. Doesn't

1:11:35.160 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sound amazing, but it's mid level consistency and he's got

1:11:38.000 --> 1:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that high upside. So I'm giving him a B grade.

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:45.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Landry an uncomfortable C grade. He catches three

1:11:45.520 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to five balls again, he gets you forty to fifty yards.

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I almost wanted to bench him. He's got He's gotten

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a matchup against Kenny Moore, who has held all three

1:11:57.640 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>slot guys he's faced under sixty five yards. That's what

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get. Three or four catches, six fifty

1:12:02.760 --> 1:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>six yards, that's what you're getting with Landry. Uh. The

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. No culture culture great against the tight end.

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the running game. This is fascinating.

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not to me for this game. I think it

1:12:16.200 --> 1:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>slows down. The Cults have played thirty six regular season

1:12:19.400 --> 1:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>games under Matt Ever flows the DC for the Colts.

1:12:22.479 --> 1:12:26.719
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed one yard rusher in those thirty six games. Alright,

1:12:26.760 --> 1:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but Darius Leonard out, Actually all three line all three

1:12:29.680 --> 1:12:32.479
<v Speaker 1>starting linebackers maybe out for this game. Darius Leonard is out.

1:12:32.479 --> 1:12:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Ocherry, Ocher Prairie or whatever his name is. He's

1:12:35.560 --> 1:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>got a thumb injury. He's out with the he's had surgery.

1:12:38.680 --> 1:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>E J. Speed. Might play, might not play. That's a

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>big difference. And they hold you. They hold you down

1:12:44.160 --> 1:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to the stripe to only five touchdowns from running backs

1:12:46.680 --> 1:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last year and a half. I I I

1:12:49.880 --> 1:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>do think it's a Hunt game. I don't know how

1:12:52.479 --> 1:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>much we can trust to Ernest Johnson in this one.

1:12:55.080 --> 1:12:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is averaging five point five yards per game, and

1:12:57.520 --> 1:13:00.479
<v Speaker 1>we know he's good in the past game. The concerned

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>as his injury. If his injury gets him off the

1:13:02.439 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>field into Ernest Johnson needs to play and and they

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get ahead, that's where Ernest Johnson is going to get

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>his points. I don't feel comfortable starting him, though. I'm

1:13:09.920 --> 1:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>giving Hunt the b I'm keeping Arnest on the bench.

1:13:12.120 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So d Ernest is a fascinating story. He went to

1:13:14.960 --> 1:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a school I did not even know existed called South Florida,

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not to be confused with Florida Southern South Florida USF.

1:13:22.600 --> 1:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>The Bulls come on the bulls South Florida. This is

1:13:28.600 --> 1:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>South Florida, not Florida Southern so um which most uf

1:13:33.880 --> 1:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>ufs must be Florida by the way. Dernis Johnson, former

1:13:37.120 --> 1:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>player on my a F team, really yes, he was

1:13:39.640 --> 1:13:44.599
<v Speaker 1>an a A guy at South Florida. D Ernest Johnson

1:13:44.800 --> 1:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was their lead running back. Now he was so much

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>better than everybody else. He was also used as a

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver often then because he was the most talented

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>guy on the team, they would pitch him the ball

1:13:58.200 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>as halfback. He threw the ball out of the halfback

1:14:00.960 --> 1:14:03.519
<v Speaker 1>option all the time, and he's thrown thirty yard lasers

1:14:03.560 --> 1:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all over the field. Then, because that wasn't enough, he

1:14:06.920 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was also the kick returner. He did everything, and I

1:14:10.280 --> 1:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thought he looked all right last week. And he's got

1:14:12.320 --> 1:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>an iron right foot and can kick really well. It's

1:14:16.080 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not anyway there. Do you do trust Johnson? I do

1:14:22.200 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 1>because I would give him a sea grade. Because these

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:26.559
<v Speaker 1>linebackers are all off with the Colts. I think there's

1:14:26.600 --> 1:14:28.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna be running yards to be had here and it'll

1:14:28.520 --> 1:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>catch the ball as well. Alright, final matchup of this

1:14:30.680 --> 1:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>segments Minnesota taking on Seattle for the Vikings. It's I

1:14:34.400 --> 1:14:36.479
<v Speaker 1>already used Kirk Cousins as may take a chance on

1:14:36.520 --> 1:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback. I like him. His receivers Adam Feeland and

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson have a grades. The Seahawks have been unfathomably

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>bad against receivers, allowing three hundred thirties six yards per

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:51.479
<v Speaker 1>game to the position. That's by far the most in

1:14:51.479 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. They've also allowed to receive the top one

1:14:54.320 --> 1:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards every week. They've allowed seven one hundred yard

1:14:58.160 --> 1:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>performances in four games, and both Theland and Jefferson are

1:15:02.200 --> 1:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>candidates to go over one under fire them both up,

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>fire both up. Jefferson has the most catches of twenty

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>plus yards in the league with eight. Theland has found

1:15:09.880 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the end zone in three of the past four games. Also,

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they may not. They may be without cornerbacks Shaquille Griffin

1:15:14.880 --> 1:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in this one as well. Uh that is that's the

1:15:18.000 --> 1:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>only those are the only members of the passing game

1:15:20.439 --> 1:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that I do wanted to trifle with. Though we're not

1:15:22.280 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>going to old B. C. Johnson at the tight ends.

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Dalvin Cook, who gets a B grade. Here,

1:15:27.080 --> 1:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks are allowing the fewest rushing attempts for the second

1:15:29.960 --> 1:15:33.559
<v Speaker 1>fewest rushing yards per game, just forty six rushing yards

1:15:33.560 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>per game allowed. That's it. That includes games against Ezekiel

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Elliott and Todd Gurley. Cook has seen his total touches

1:15:40.200 --> 1:15:43.679
<v Speaker 1>increase in every game, but Seattle sees the most passes

1:15:43.720 --> 1:15:45.639
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth fewest rushing attempt So I just don't

1:15:45.640 --> 1:15:47.439
<v Speaker 1>know the volumes here for Dalvin Cook to get to

1:15:47.439 --> 1:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>an A grade, but absolutely startable with a B and

1:15:49.680 --> 1:15:51.799
<v Speaker 1>nothing I would say would stop you from starting him anyway.

1:15:52.000 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>For Alexander Madison, we need to find Primrose matches, matchups,

1:15:55.200 --> 1:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is not one of them. Let's go to

1:15:57.280 --> 1:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle side where Russell, Wilson, DK, metcalf and I'll

1:16:00.200 --> 1:16:03.479
<v Speaker 1>lock It are all obvious. A's Russell's my number one

1:16:03.560 --> 1:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>ranked quarterback, metcalfs and my number two ranked wide receiver,

1:16:06.600 --> 1:16:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and lock It is my number six ranked wide receiver

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I don't think those guys really we

1:16:11.920 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>even have to spend much time talking about why they

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>would be obvious. A choices uh in the but don't

1:16:17.160 --> 1:16:21.679
<v Speaker 1>give don't forget the guy I mentioned last week, David

1:16:21.880 --> 1:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Moore shut up with a touchdown last week. I like

1:16:25.920 --> 1:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>him here as another easy matchup against a very thin

1:16:29.320 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Vikings secondary that may be missing at least one cornerback.

1:16:32.240 --> 1:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Starting cornerback in this game. David Moore. He's an ascending

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>talent who Russell Wilson this week said is due for

1:16:38.280 --> 1:16:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a breakout. To that chart there the Sunday night game.

1:16:41.640 --> 1:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you need a guy on your bench for

1:16:44.120 --> 1:16:47.479
<v Speaker 1>one of those Monday or Tuesday players, if you want

1:16:47.479 --> 1:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to pivot David Moore, Mike might give you a little

1:16:50.080 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of time. I like it. Also in the receiving game,

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olsen, somebody I don't normally like. I like him here.

1:16:55.120 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He's been more involved in the Seattle passing game the

1:16:57.160 --> 1:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks, and Minnesota has struggled against f letic

1:17:00.280 --> 1:17:02.639
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. We'll try Greg Olsen with a C grade

1:17:02.680 --> 1:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, and then lastly, Chris Carson a grade. Vikings

1:17:06.280 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the third most rushing attempts the fifth most

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game to opposing running backs. A lot

1:17:12.360 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of that damage is really coming from bell cows like

1:17:15.320 --> 1:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones and Jonathan Taylor. And Derrick Henry who have

1:17:18.280 --> 1:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>averaged nine rushing yards and one and a half touchdowns.

1:17:21.840 --> 1:17:24.519
<v Speaker 1>That is Chris Carson obvious Bell cow here as well.

1:17:24.840 --> 1:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings ranked thirty one in run defense by Pro

1:17:28.520 --> 1:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. All right, we'll take a break. When we

1:17:31.439 --> 1:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>come back, Premature Speculation. We're gonna give you three guys

1:17:35.000 --> 1:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick up this week that everybody's gonna be trying

1:17:37.200 --> 1:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week. But they're already on your

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>roster because you use that time machine sound that we

1:17:45.479 --> 1:17:48.559
<v Speaker 1>just heard their premature speculation coming up in the final

1:17:48.600 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. In Moments, final segment of

1:18:14.520 --> 1:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchi and Scott Fish and Matt

1:18:17.000 --> 1:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Harrison with you at Paul Charchi and at Scott Fish

1:18:19.720 --> 1:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and at Explosive Output. Premature Speculation is a

1:18:25.600 --> 1:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>fan favorite for this show where we give you three

1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>players that other people will be trying to pick up

1:18:29.720 --> 1:18:31.519
<v Speaker 1>next week that we want you to get in on

1:18:31.640 --> 1:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a week early. Scott, who is your premature speculation player?

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I am going there with that that guy that had

1:18:38.400 --> 1:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that toe tapping first catch in the NFL on the

1:18:41.680 --> 1:18:44.519
<v Speaker 1>sidelines in Week one and then a week or two later,

1:18:44.600 --> 1:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you had that big eight r touchdown. They call him

1:18:47.880 --> 1:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>maple Tron on the team because he's from Canada. That's

1:18:51.280 --> 1:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a jujuice in the Schuster calls him. I'm going to

1:18:53.520 --> 1:18:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool six ft four two thirty eight pounds four

1:18:56.720 --> 1:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>four to forty awesome matchup this weekend. People are going

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to see it. His snap percentage and routes run have

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>increased exponentially week after week. He overtook James Washington in

1:19:08.479 --> 1:19:12.519
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week. Uh, Deonte Johnson and Jujuice Smith Schuster

1:19:12.560 --> 1:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't always the picture of health. I think Chase Claypool

1:19:17.120 --> 1:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>shows up this week and I think he's got a

1:19:18.960 --> 1:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of weeks in him this year. Couldn't agree more

1:19:21.040 --> 1:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>love Chase Claypool. That kid is going to be a

1:19:23.240 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>ball or already is Matt Who's your premature speculation player?

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson is only forty owned in ESPN leagues and

1:19:30.320 --> 1:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you might as well pick him up now. He had

1:19:31.840 --> 1:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>six carries for nine yards last week. Nice, Actually not

1:19:35.120 --> 1:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that nice. After Eckler went down. It is a four

1:19:38.400 --> 1:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to six week injury for Eckler. And while I believe

1:19:40.720 --> 1:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Kelly is likely the a back. The Clippers

1:19:43.600 --> 1:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like to use two backs and Jackson is the other one.

1:19:46.720 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Schedule coming up becomes incredibly favorable. After the Saints get

1:19:50.280 --> 1:19:52.519
<v Speaker 1>this week, they get the Jets, whose run defense has

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>regressed significantly, then the Dolphins, Jaguars, and Raiders in the

1:19:56.320 --> 1:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>next three weeks all bottom ten against the run. Pick

1:19:58.840 --> 1:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up justin Jackson right, mine is Jimmy Garoppolo. Now, a

1:20:02.280 --> 1:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of listeners remember the playoff run and the nationally

1:20:07.040 --> 1:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>televised games playoffs who were all watching Jimmy Garoppolo didn't

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>get used against the Vikings and have to, didn't get

1:20:12.560 --> 1:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>used against the Packers, didn't have to, and then he

1:20:14.360 --> 1:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>had a dud play a dud Super Bowl, and so

1:20:17.280 --> 1:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>like everybody thinks about that version of Jimmy Garoppolo. But

1:20:21.080 --> 1:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>let's take a better look at Jimmy Garoppolo through the

1:20:24.280 --> 1:20:28.599
<v Speaker 1>entire second half of last year, when Deebo Samuel finally

1:20:28.640 --> 1:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>started to make an impact in that offense and become

1:20:31.240 --> 1:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it. Garoppolo finished his quarterback eight

1:20:35.160 --> 1:20:38.719
<v Speaker 1>from week eight forward quarterback eight, he was a top

1:20:38.800 --> 1:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ten quarterback, averaging two hundred sixty four yards and two

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>point two touchdowns per game. I think he got to

1:20:44.600 --> 1:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>play the Cardinals twice in that span. I don't know,

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe that uh, you know, Debo is back, George Kittle

1:20:53.400 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is healthy, Brandon Aok looks like a massive playmaker, and

1:20:56.280 --> 1:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that kid's only going to get better. Jimmy Garoppolo, And

1:21:00.280 --> 1:21:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo was a good fantasy quarterback. He's going to

1:21:03.600 --> 1:21:06.599
<v Speaker 1>be another good fantasy quarterback as this team rounds back

1:21:06.680 --> 1:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>into health. Just needs to get healthy. Yeah, but well

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're basically there's an offense where he moastered back.

1:21:12.479 --> 1:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That's that offense is back and click, and I want

1:21:14.360 --> 1:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback two matchups to get to before we wrap

1:21:16.840 --> 1:21:20.559
<v Speaker 1>up the show, including the Giants taking on the Dallas Cowboys. Yeah,

1:21:20.680 --> 1:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones might take a chance on me quarterback, and

1:21:23.400 --> 1:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate was charged just take a chance on me

1:21:25.400 --> 1:21:27.599
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. I gave Tate a C grade in this game.

1:21:28.280 --> 1:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I gave his running mate Darius Slayton a B. He

1:21:31.280 --> 1:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>basically plays the same position that Odell Beckham does. How

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>did O'Dell do last week? All Right? Metcalf Ridley and

1:21:39.840 --> 1:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Bob Woods all had nice days against this secondary from

1:21:42.760 --> 1:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the outside too. So Slayton's a B. Evan and Graham

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade. Two tight ends are averaging

1:21:49.080 --> 1:21:51.519
<v Speaker 1>six and a half receptions per game against Dallas and

1:21:51.640 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Ingram gets about eight targets per games. That works out,

1:21:54.640 --> 1:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys have allowed three touchdowns to the position

1:21:57.960 --> 1:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. Uh the running back Davante Freeman, Wayne Gallman,

1:22:02.320 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Dion Lewis, or how about just none of them. H

1:22:05.640 --> 1:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Freeman has a whopping two point seven yards per carry,

1:22:09.320 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>so the Giants gave him the ball the most obviously. Well,

1:22:12.040 --> 1:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Gallman, maybe he's sneaky good. He averaged five point

1:22:16.320 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carry and that's on the season, but

1:22:19.160 --> 1:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he's only getting like five touches per game and Lewis

1:22:21.240 --> 1:22:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and Land three touches last week. It's a decent matchup

1:22:23.800 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to they just all suck and they're splitting time. On

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the other side, there's a running back that doesn't suck.

1:22:29.600 --> 1:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>His name is Zeke. He's topped a hundred yards are

1:22:31.840 --> 1:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>scored in each of his last six games against the

1:22:34.360 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants and has had six catchers are more

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in each of the last three weeks. And the Giants

1:22:39.000 --> 1:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are bottom ten against pass catching backs. Zeke is an

1:22:41.800 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>easy A and Uh, it's time for the Fantasy art

1:22:45.120 --> 1:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Vark chart. What a fantasy yard Vark. Let's hear what

1:22:49.400 --> 1:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like. I had no idea that all sounds

1:22:56.640 --> 1:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like the time of ship. Together. We are on the

1:23:07.760 --> 1:23:14.559
<v Speaker 1>children's children's book here, Ardvark. Uh Doc gets the double

1:23:14.600 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>A grade in the Fantasy Ardvark this week. He's averaging

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>four or twenty two passing yards per game. He's thrown

1:23:20.439 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for four four and three touchdown passes in his last

1:23:23.960 --> 1:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>three meetings with the Giants. You know, I'll give Amari

1:23:27.000 --> 1:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and a grade two. He's also on pace for

1:23:29.960 --> 1:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like seven thousand yards. Yeah, it's ridiculous. He's thrown for

1:23:33.760 --> 1:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like ninety seven yards in the last two weeks, an

1:23:36.720 --> 1:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>NFL record. Um Cooper a grade UH is top five

1:23:41.320 --> 1:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and targets receptions and yards and hit eight yards and

1:23:44.800 --> 1:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>scored in both meetings last year. Michael Gallup and Ceedee Lamb,

1:23:48.760 --> 1:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving them both B grades in this one. I

1:23:50.840 --> 1:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>especially like Lamb, and I keep playing Lamb on on

1:23:54.240 --> 1:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings and daily because I'm waiting for the blow up

1:23:57.520 --> 1:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>game to happen and I want to be on this

1:23:59.439 --> 1:24:01.519
<v Speaker 1>when it does, and it's it might come this week.

1:24:01.960 --> 1:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh juju Smith, Schuster and Cooper Cup each notched exactly

1:24:06.560 --> 1:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine yards and scored from the slot. Uh and

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe Cup scored twice against Dallas. Gallup is a

1:24:14.680 --> 1:24:18.519
<v Speaker 1>like a low B maybe like be adjacent as a grade.

1:24:19.640 --> 1:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging six targets per game. Uh, that's not bad,

1:24:23.360 --> 1:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>but when you factor in that Dalton Schultz is averaging seven,

1:24:26.360 --> 1:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit puzzling. Still, he avoids the giants best corner,

1:24:30.120 --> 1:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>James Bradberry, who should shadow Cooper, and he did record

1:24:33.320 --> 1:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>seven for one fifty two against the Giants in one

1:24:35.840 --> 1:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>game last year. Last guy to mention is that Dalton Schultz.

1:24:39.320 --> 1:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have yet to allow a tight end touchdown

1:24:41.720 --> 1:24:44.479
<v Speaker 1>this year and only three point eight receptions for thirty

1:24:44.560 --> 1:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>nine yards the position. They held Tyler Higby to twenty

1:24:47.280 --> 1:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>yards last week. Dalton Schultz only gets a c Okay,

1:24:50.320 --> 1:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Chargers against the Saints, our final

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>matchup for for the show. Justin Herbert can play man.

1:24:57.800 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>The only caveat is a lot of time times we've

1:25:00.520 --> 1:25:03.519
<v Speaker 1>seen rookie quarterbacks are and young quarterbacks they get you

1:25:03.560 --> 1:25:06.839
<v Speaker 1>get three games of tape on them, and now defensive

1:25:06.840 --> 1:25:10.599
<v Speaker 1>coordinators know all your tendencies and can start picking away

1:25:10.640 --> 1:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at how you like to play. So I'm just showing

1:25:13.840 --> 1:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of caution on Herbert. But man, these

1:25:15.800 --> 1:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>look good. Yeah, and it'll be better if Vladimer and

1:25:18.360 --> 1:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Jenkins don't play, that will That said, the Saints weren't

1:25:22.160 --> 1:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>playing that great with them on defense anyway. Herbert has

1:25:27.120 --> 1:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>two plus yards in each game and the Saints are

1:25:29.680 --> 1:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>allowing three touchdowns per game to qbs on their way

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>to being the fifth worst against the position, which is

1:25:36.479 --> 1:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not something you would have expected. I have a B

1:25:38.479 --> 1:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>grade on Herbert either way, if Vladimer and Jenkins play

1:25:41.400 --> 1:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or not, I have a B grade on him. I

1:25:43.960 --> 1:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have any other wide receiver options except for Keenan

1:25:47.280 --> 1:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Allen in three games with Herbert. Here are Allen's target

1:25:50.360 --> 1:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>totals ten, nineteen, and twelve. That is forty one targets

1:25:56.000 --> 1:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in three games from justin Herbert. Add to the fact

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that Allen Lazarden Godwin both had great great games playing

1:26:03.920 --> 1:26:07.599
<v Speaker 1>mostly from the slot. Uh, it's he's the only wide

1:26:07.640 --> 1:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>receiver you can trust. I got an A grade on him.

1:26:09.439 --> 1:26:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll just move forward in the running game. August Scott

1:26:13.840 --> 1:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to believe that it was josh Kelly, Joshua Kelly's job.

1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:20.799
<v Speaker 1>August Scott was all in Kelly. I don't remember August

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Scott talking a lot about it. August Scott loved Joshua Kelly.

1:26:24.880 --> 1:26:27.559
<v Speaker 1>After Week one, Scott loved him even more. But this

1:26:27.680 --> 1:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is he's fumbled in two straight games, which is not good.

1:26:32.600 --> 1:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>They did split carries, but he definitely had the the

1:26:35.960 --> 1:26:39.479
<v Speaker 1>RB A role or whatever for them, even after Ekeler

1:26:39.560 --> 1:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, which was like three snaps in, so we

1:26:41.720 --> 1:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>basically got a full game of watching their usage. Um

1:26:46.920 --> 1:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>As for the Saints, only Aaron Jones could get to

1:26:50.160 --> 1:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty six yards and one just one touchdown. I mean

1:26:53.320 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's holding Aaron Jones down basically. So uh seriously,

1:26:58.000 --> 1:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>it takes eighteen plus touches for a back to even

1:27:00.479 --> 1:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have an okay day against the Saints this year. So

1:27:04.120 --> 1:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I I basically have both of him on the bench.

1:27:06.120 --> 1:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>If you have to throw a dart at one of them,

1:27:07.680 --> 1:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Kelly because he's gonna get the more usage.

1:27:11.080 --> 1:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm both on the bench. Uh. Hunter Henry A

1:27:14.880 --> 1:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>grade from Hunter. Henry Saints are second worst. They've allowed

1:27:17.920 --> 1:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns to tight ends they've allowed They allowed over

1:27:21.080 --> 1:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards to Waller. This is a great spot

1:27:23.240 --> 1:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for Henry against his defense. On the other side, we

1:27:26.479 --> 1:27:30.559
<v Speaker 1>got Breeze given a B grade to him. Chargers are

1:27:30.640 --> 1:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fifth worst against qbs. Guess what the Saints are fifth

1:27:34.360 --> 1:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>worst against QB's. Chargers are sixth worst against QB's. Breeze

1:27:38.479 --> 1:27:41.599
<v Speaker 1>might Floir with an A grade, especially with Melvin Ingram out,

1:27:41.680 --> 1:27:43.519
<v Speaker 1>so he's gonna have some time to throw. But I'm

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a strong be here. If Thomas plays,

1:27:46.439 --> 1:27:48.559
<v Speaker 1>he's getting a grade. Get him in because he's he's

1:27:48.560 --> 1:27:51.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna be healthy. If he doesn't though, if he does play,

1:27:51.560 --> 1:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and Smith around the bench. If he doesn't play,

1:27:54.479 --> 1:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is going to get a C grade. He moves

1:27:56.360 --> 1:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>around a lot and Hayward doesn't travel, so uh he

1:27:59.760 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>could get open track Kwon Smith. I mentioned this when

1:28:02.240 --> 1:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I take on take a chance on me for him

1:28:05.080 --> 1:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. He's now played in fourteen

1:28:07.680 --> 1:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>games where he's had three plus targets. He has ten

1:28:10.080 --> 1:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in those fourteen games. He scores when he gets

1:28:13.160 --> 1:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>through plus targets and he's and he's going to again

1:28:15.520 --> 1:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>C grade. I have Cook on the bench. He just

1:28:18.120 --> 1:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been putting up that those kind of numbers and

1:28:20.680 --> 1:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he's injured. As far as running backs, I got an

1:28:23.840 --> 1:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>A grade on Kamara fort Mike Davis tore up the

1:28:26.479 --> 1:28:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Chargers rundy seven teen plus touches in every game, scored

1:28:29.760 --> 1:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in every game, had like has like six seven touchdowns

1:28:32.240 --> 1:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in four games. A grade Kamara, C grade on Murray.

1:28:36.080 --> 1:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If Murray doesn't score, he still gets twelve to fifteen

1:28:38.439 --> 1:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>touches for forty five to sixty five yards, but he

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to score. So yes, that falls right

1:28:43.640 --> 1:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>into the C category. Absolutely, a great job today, Scott Matt.

1:28:47.640 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We've learned a lot, haven't we. Everybody, it's been It's

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:53.479
<v Speaker 1>been very, very special. You'd Fantasy Football Weekly reminder if

1:28:53.479 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out all of my player rankings,

1:28:55.320 --> 1:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>available for free at guilloteen leagues dot com. We're also

1:28:57.920 --> 1:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>continuing to make new guillote leagues. If you've always wanted

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to play but aren't gonna league, it's not too late

1:29:02.920 --> 1:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to join one. Most days we are forming several Guillotine

1:29:06.560 --> 1:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>leagues a day and evening as well, so we will

1:29:09.920 --> 1:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be back next week for more Fantasy Football Weekly. If

1:29:12.000 --> 1:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you miss any part of the show and you're listening

1:29:13.439 --> 1:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>over there, we encourage you to check out the podcast

1:29:15.520 --> 1:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Again, Fantasy Football Weekly. We'll talk to you

1:29:19.040 --> 1:29:22.519
<v Speaker 1>a week everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

1:29:22.560 --> 1:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

1:29:25.280 --> 1:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:28.560 --> 1:29:30.519
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.