1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,320 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash Podcasts. We're live from 6 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:26,439 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio today, Brett Kavanaugh heard his 7 00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 1: first oral arguments as a Supreme Court justice, taking his 8 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:31,760 Speaker 1: seat on the far right of the bench as a 9 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: junior justice. After a long and contentious confirmation process. At 10 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 1: a White House ceremony last night, Kavanaugh promised to serve 11 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 1: on the Court without animosity over the confirmation process. Mr President, 12 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 1: thank you for the great honor of appointing me to 13 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: serve as a Justice of the Supreme Court. Joining me 14 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 1: is Greg Store Bloomberg new Supreme Court reporter who was 15 00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 1: there for those first oral arguments? Greg, I understand there 16 00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:58,960 Speaker 1: were lines outside the Court house this morning. What was 17 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 1: it like inside the court for Kavanaugh's first oral arguments? 18 00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:06,600 Speaker 1: You know, June, it was remarkably light. It was almost 19 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: there was almost an error frivolity to the arguments. Um 20 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 1: not especially huge cases they have to do with sentencing 21 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 1: for gun crimes. Um, But there were plenty of jokes 22 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 1: that the session started off with. Uh. Right before the argument, 23 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: Justice Lena Kagan was was quietly joking with new Justice Kavanaugh. 24 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:26,760 Speaker 1: And then later on in the argument, there was a 25 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 1: moment where Justice Sonya so so Do Mayor appeared to 26 00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:34,119 Speaker 1: playfully pinch Justice Neil gorsch Um to demonstrate a point 27 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 1: a question she was asking about the reach of this 28 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: federal statute. Uh. No disruptions in the courtroom. Uh no, 29 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 1: No signs for those couple of hours that there had 30 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 1: been this incredibly contentious fight. Do you believe that this 31 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:49,880 Speaker 1: was deliberate on the part of the justice? Is this 32 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: very lightheartedness? I do it. It's hard for not to be. 33 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 1: And you know, certainly I mentioned Justice Kagan. She is 34 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:02,080 Speaker 1: somebody who's very much of coalition builder. She's somebody who 35 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 1: cares off a lot about having good relations with with 36 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 1: her colleagues, including the ones who don't agree with her, 37 00:02:07,560 --> 00:02:10,800 Speaker 1: because she knows she might neither votes and in some cases, 38 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 1: so it wasn't surprising to see her being very friendly 39 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:17,240 Speaker 1: towards Justice Kavanaugh. And I think you know, all the 40 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: members of the Court would like to be able to 41 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:21,799 Speaker 1: take a deep breath and and you know, stay out 42 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,280 Speaker 1: of this political fray and just focus on uh, you know, 43 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 1: you know, going about business as normal. And that was 44 00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 1: essentially what they were trying to do today. Judge Kavanaugh 45 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:34,720 Speaker 1: was known as an act or, should say, Justice Kavanaugh 46 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 1: was known as an active question or on the d C. 47 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 1: Circuit Court of Appeals. Did he ask many questions today? 48 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: He did? Um, He asked, I believe a total of 49 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:46,560 Speaker 1: eight questions in the two one hour arguments. UM. In 50 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,560 Speaker 1: the first case, he asked questions of both sides. In 51 00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: the second case, just asking questions of the lawyer for 52 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 1: the defendant. In the case, Um, he was focusing, among 53 00:02:57,160 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 1: other things, on a key precedent about the reach of 54 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 1: this federal law. In the first case, asking both sides, 55 00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:05,920 Speaker 1: how do you square your argument with what we said 56 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 1: and what the Supreme Court said in this case? Uh. 57 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:12,360 Speaker 1: He had definitely done his homework before the argument talking 58 00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:16,680 Speaker 1: about President Okay, no tell us about his duties as 59 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:20,639 Speaker 1: the junior justice. Yeah, So, as you mentioned, he saits 60 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:22,400 Speaker 1: at the far end of the bench. Everything at the 61 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:26,119 Speaker 1: Supreme Court is done on the basis of seniority. He's 62 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 1: the most junior, so he's sitting in the most junior 63 00:03:28,040 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 1: spot on the bench. They're going to have a private 64 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:33,639 Speaker 1: conference later this week where they'll talk about pending cases. 65 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: When they talk about a case, he'll be the last 66 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:40,040 Speaker 1: justice to speak uh in that discussion. Uh. And then 67 00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 1: there's this duty that the junior justice always has when 68 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:44,560 Speaker 1: they're in that conference room and it's just the nine 69 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: of them. When everybody comes to the door to deliver 70 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:52,640 Speaker 1: something or pick something up, Uh, it's the junior justice 71 00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:54,240 Speaker 1: who has to get up out of his or her 72 00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 1: chair and answer the door. Um, and then you know, 73 00:03:57,120 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 1: pass on to some other justice whatever was was delivered. 74 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 1: Justice Stephen Bryer had to do that for more than 75 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,280 Speaker 1: eleven years, and uh, Justice Kavana will we'll start doing 76 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:09,000 Speaker 1: it today. And Judge Neil Gorcich only had to do 77 00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:12,720 Speaker 1: it for about a year. So there's no fairness there. Now, 78 00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: what cases are coming up that might draw more attention 79 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:20,080 Speaker 1: from the public and put more attention on Kavanaugh. Yes, 80 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:23,280 Speaker 1: So so this term that the cases they've granted are 81 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: almost uniformly pretty low profile things. One interesting case they 82 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:30,200 Speaker 1: have granted having scheduled an argument yet could be December 83 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:33,560 Speaker 1: is a case that could affect Donald Trump's pardening power 84 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:35,279 Speaker 1: in the reach of it. It has to do with 85 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,680 Speaker 1: the double jeopardy clause, and essentially what it could mean 86 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:41,839 Speaker 1: is that a Trump pardon would also knock out some 87 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,040 Speaker 1: state law crimes that that a person may have been 88 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:48,560 Speaker 1: involved in. UM So that's one to watch. And then 89 00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:51,320 Speaker 1: later on in the term, maybe next year, the Court 90 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: could get back into the fray on partisan jurymandering. They 91 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:56,480 Speaker 1: could take up a case on federal job discrimination and 92 00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:00,280 Speaker 1: whether the ban on job discrimination includes discrimin nation on 93 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:03,159 Speaker 1: the basis of sexual orientation. And they could have a 94 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,800 Speaker 1: case involving the DOCTA fight the UH the Obama policy 95 00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:10,480 Speaker 1: that deferred deportation for some some young immigrants, and President 96 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:13,599 Speaker 1: Trump is trying to rescind that that's an issue they 97 00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:15,279 Speaker 1: could could take up. And then of course there's a 98 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,480 Speaker 1: Moler investigation. There are issues that could come from that 99 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 1: that could be huge deals here at the Court early 100 00:05:21,160 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 1: next year. At Princeton University last Friday, Justice is Elena 101 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:28,159 Speaker 1: Kagan and Sonya Soto Mayor admitted they're concerned about a 102 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:32,360 Speaker 1: public perception that the Court is being politicized. Will there 103 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:36,359 Speaker 1: be pressure on Kavanaugh to recuse himself in some of 104 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:40,120 Speaker 1: those cases that you mentioned that involved President Trump or 105 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:44,679 Speaker 1: things that might apply to possible impeachment proceedings. There certainly 106 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 1: will be pressure, but there's no requirement. Um. It's clear 107 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:51,719 Speaker 1: that Justice has has to recuse if if he or 108 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:53,920 Speaker 1: she has a financial interest in a case. But when 109 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: we're talking about the appearance of a conflict because you 110 00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:00,520 Speaker 1: may have said something in the past about an issue 111 00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: or a litigant, Justices had broad discretion and they rarely 112 00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:08,440 Speaker 1: do recuse themselves themselves. So Ruth Bader Ginsburgh has not 113 00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: recused herself even though she called Donald Trump a faker. 114 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: She hasn't refused herself from any Trump related cases. Anton 115 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,520 Speaker 1: and Scalia didn't refuse in cases involved in a case 116 00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:20,280 Speaker 1: involving Vice President Cheney, even though the two of them 117 00:06:20,279 --> 00:06:23,400 Speaker 1: went hunting together. Uh. It's really really rare for a 118 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 1: justice to recuse for that sort of a reason, and 119 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,279 Speaker 1: I would be very surprised if Justice Kavanaugh did either. 120 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:31,719 Speaker 1: Only thirty seconds here, Greg, I have one last question. 121 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: Did Justice Roberts say anything? Was there any acknowledgment of Kavanaugh? Yes, 122 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 1: he acknowledged Justice Kavanaugh. He said, Uh, he wished him 123 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: a long and happy career in our common calling, pretty 124 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:45,839 Speaker 1: much standard language he uses whenever somebody knew joins the courting. 125 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,280 Speaker 1: All right, thanks so much. That's Greg Store, Bloomberg News 126 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:56,679 Speaker 1: Supreme Court Rewarder. We're live from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. 127 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 1: Over the summer, President Trump announced that White House counts 128 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:02,599 Speaker 1: old Don McGann would be stepping down from his role 129 00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:05,719 Speaker 1: after the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. 130 00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:09,760 Speaker 1: At the time, Trump speculated about what McGann might do next. 131 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 1: He'll be moving on probably the private sector, maybe the 132 00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 1: private sector, and he'll do very well. But he's he's 133 00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:21,280 Speaker 1: done an excellent Joel joining me is Alberto Gonzalez, former 134 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:23,960 Speaker 1: U s Attorney General and White House Council. He is 135 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,040 Speaker 1: dean of the Belmont University School of Law. Thanks for 136 00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:31,600 Speaker 1: joining us, Judge, Hello, how you doing okay? Well, let's 137 00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 1: start with your assessment of the job Don McGann has 138 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: done in the job that you once occupied when George W. 139 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:43,320 Speaker 1: Bush was president. I think my most measures, and only 140 00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:45,720 Speaker 1: by the words of the President, he's done a good job. 141 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: Although much of I have to tell you that much 142 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,880 Speaker 1: of the work of the council goes unnoticed, It's unspoken about, 143 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:55,720 Speaker 1: and most council would say, you know, I shouldn't be 144 00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 1: in the news the work of the council. I'm like 145 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:01,080 Speaker 1: the work of the Attorney General generally your staffer, and 146 00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:04,160 Speaker 1: that the publicity and the good works of the president 147 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:07,160 Speaker 1: come first, and the things that you do generally are 148 00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:10,480 Speaker 1: not publicized. But I think as a general matter, Domagann 149 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:15,600 Speaker 1: is praised primarily for his work in getting the president's 150 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:18,720 Speaker 1: nominees confirmed, uh, not only to the Supreme Court, but 151 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 1: also to the lower courts, and I think that will 152 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: see meant President Trump's legacy police several generations. He is 153 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:28,840 Speaker 1: seen as one of the architects of Trump's success in 154 00:08:28,880 --> 00:08:31,400 Speaker 1: that area. I want to go into just a little 155 00:08:31,400 --> 00:08:34,080 Speaker 1: bit about the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation because, according to The 156 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:37,960 Speaker 1: New York Times, McGann made sure that some relevant questions 157 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:41,840 Speaker 1: were not explored in the FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh, 158 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:47,200 Speaker 1: and because of quote, potentially disastrous for Kavanaugh's chances of 159 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:54,200 Speaker 1: confirmation was that outside his legal authority as White House counsel, No, 160 00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 1: it would have been perfectly appropriate for the White House. 161 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:02,960 Speaker 1: As a general matter, would come through the White House 162 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:07,360 Speaker 1: Council to um give parameters to the FBI in terms 163 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:14,040 Speaker 1: of the breadth of their examination. Otherwise, you know, but 164 00:09:14,520 --> 00:09:17,959 Speaker 1: if you're operating under a strict time frame, So I 165 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:22,040 Speaker 1: would say no. Now, there obviously can be political consequences 166 00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:24,760 Speaker 1: to giving that kind of direction. And I don't know 167 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:27,959 Speaker 1: exactly what happened, what was said, what the direction was. 168 00:09:28,040 --> 00:09:31,840 Speaker 1: But obviously some of the political opponents might claim that 169 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:35,720 Speaker 1: the direction given by the White House made it would 170 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 1: have made it more difficult to uncover anything that would 171 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 1: have been negative about Brett Kavanaugh. But after whether or 172 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:43,680 Speaker 1: not that happened and who was ultimately responsible, you know, 173 00:09:43,720 --> 00:09:47,760 Speaker 1: I just have no idea. Turning now to Robert Mueller's investigation, 174 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:50,920 Speaker 1: McGan met with Special Council Robert Mueller's team for some 175 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:54,240 Speaker 1: thirty hours in the Russia investigation, which caused more of 176 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,720 Speaker 1: a rift with Trump. Was he required to do so 177 00:09:57,880 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 1: and were there any restrictions on what he could say? Uh? 178 00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:06,679 Speaker 1: Was he required? I would say probably required. Uh, if 179 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:12,720 Speaker 1: you're talking about personal conduct, uh, personal wrongdoing by the president. Yes, 180 00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:16,320 Speaker 1: Don McGann. Don McGann is not the lawyer for Donald Trump. 181 00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:19,760 Speaker 1: Don McGann as a government lawyer, and therefore, yes, he 182 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:23,679 Speaker 1: would be expected to come to cooperate with the special prosecutor. 183 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: When I was a White House counsel, we had an 184 00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: investigation connection with the Valerie Playm investigation, and I told 185 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:33,480 Speaker 1: President Bush I was not his lawyer. I helped him 186 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,079 Speaker 1: get a private lawyer, and when I was asked by 187 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:40,559 Speaker 1: the Special Counsel Pat fiss Gerald to provide information, I voluntarily, 188 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:44,440 Speaker 1: you know, sat before the grand jury again because I 189 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:47,320 Speaker 1: don't represent I don't the Council does not represent the 190 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:50,360 Speaker 1: president and your government lawyer. As a government lawyer, you 191 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 1: have an obligation to cooperate fully with investigation by the 192 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:58,840 Speaker 1: Department of Justice. Trump has indicated several times that he 193 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:03,160 Speaker 1: sees the FBI and the Justice Department as working for him. 194 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 1: Do you think he understands the concepts of no attorney 195 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:11,160 Speaker 1: client privilege when he's talking to Don McGann. I don't 196 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:14,480 Speaker 1: know whether or not he understands that he understands the 197 00:11:14,520 --> 00:11:17,800 Speaker 1: limits of privilege. Obviously, he's not a lawyer. One of 198 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:19,680 Speaker 1: the first things that I did when I became White 199 00:11:19,720 --> 00:11:23,400 Speaker 1: House Council uh in dealing with a non lawyer President 200 00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: and George every bushes. We would have these kind of 201 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 1: conversations about about legal issues, the legal authorities of the president, 202 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,600 Speaker 1: legal protections of the president. We talked about the kind 203 00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:37,199 Speaker 1: of you know, judicial philosophy, uh that he might think 204 00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 1: about in connection with making an appointment. So one of 205 00:11:39,880 --> 00:11:42,719 Speaker 1: the responsibilities I think of a White House council a 206 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 1: good one, is to have these kind of conversations with 207 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 1: the president as an initial matter, so that there's no 208 00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:52,600 Speaker 1: misunderstanding about the scope of privilege or protections that a 209 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:56,200 Speaker 1: president might have with respect to his both official and 210 00:11:56,280 --> 00:12:00,120 Speaker 1: unofficial conducts. Can you explain as White House count So 211 00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:04,160 Speaker 1: at some points you may be giving advice that the 212 00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: president doesn't want to hear. Do you have to keep 213 00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:12,240 Speaker 1: a certain good working relationship with the president or or 214 00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:16,680 Speaker 1: you know you should leave the post. Well, obviously a 215 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:19,559 Speaker 1: good working relationship is important. It makes you more effective. 216 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:23,040 Speaker 1: But you have an obligation to be truthful and and 217 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:26,719 Speaker 1: uh be complete in your advice to the president. And yes, 218 00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: there are times when I had to say, as president, 219 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:31,400 Speaker 1: that's you know, we don't believe you have a legal 220 00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:35,240 Speaker 1: authority to do this now as a as a legal matter, 221 00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 1: as a constitutional matter, the president's head of the executive branch, 222 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:41,839 Speaker 1: can override the advice of the Council, can override the 223 00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: bos the Astorney General, and make a decision as what 224 00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 1: is a legal position for the for the executive branch. Now, 225 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:53,320 Speaker 1: there are serious political consequences in doing so. As a 226 00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:55,839 Speaker 1: general matter, you want the President of States following the 227 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 1: advice of the Council and certainly following the advice of 228 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:02,040 Speaker 1: the Attorney General, because it is when when that decision 229 00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:04,800 Speaker 1: is made by the President and that decision is challenge, 230 00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:06,880 Speaker 1: it will be the Attorney General and the Department of 231 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:11,079 Speaker 1: Justice that defends the present's actions in the court. All right, 232 00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:13,920 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us on this show. Judge. 233 00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 1: That's Alberto Gonzalez, former US Attorney General and White House Council. 234 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 1: He is now Dean of the Belmont University School of Law. 235 00:13:22,080 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can 236 00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 1: subscribe and listen to the show on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 237 00:13:28,920 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. 238 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:37,079 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Ye