WEBVTT - Selects: Is birth order important?

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Chuck here with this week Saturday Select. That's

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>when Josh and I curate specially selected episodes to rerun

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>that may be a few years old. They may be

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>oh heck, they may be ten years old, maybe even older.

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You never know, because a lot of people don't know

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these episodes even exist. So that's why we do this.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, this one's on birth order. It's called is

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Birth Order Important? I believe this was originally a Chuck

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>idea to begin with. This is from April twenty three,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, and I am just pretty obsessed with birth order,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why I picked it to begin with,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I'm picking it again right now.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Charles Aby, Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry over there, and this

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>is Stuff If you Should Know. Jerry cast Jerry, were

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>you a uh what was your birth order? Oh, Jerry's

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 3>a middle child two of two or two of more.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 3>So you're the baby.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't know this?

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 3>No? Did you? Sure?

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>No? I've know Jerry for like thirteen years. Hey, So

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have I, Well, not that long twelve years, so have I?

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>No no comment?

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>What am I?

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know? That's right, I know what I'm the baby,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I didn't ask what you were. I know you

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 3>know what you are? What am I?

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>This isn't quiz not You're not gonna just yeah, yeah,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't calling you out. Oh well I was calling

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you out. You were in a humorous way, and I

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>called you out. It's hard not to look at this

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff through your own lens though, of your own family.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, are you changing the subject?

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, I'm getting on with it. Oh okay, because

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as the youngest of three and all of us have

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>three distinct personalities, it's hard not to kind of like

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think about birth order right and if that's a thing right,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And it may be and it may not be. Yeah,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>depends on which scientist you're asking.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I tend to think like, there's just no way it

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have any effect.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Now there, I think it definitely has an effect. But

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as we will see, it is one part of a

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>huge pie.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Indicates what kind of person and personality you might have. Well.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 3>Plus also it's devilishly tricky to analyze to study because

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 3>of how big that pie is. Yeah, there's so much

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 3>going on with your personality that to just pinpoint one thing,

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 3>even a big thing like that where you're born in

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>a family, but it's just tough to pin down. So

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 3>you're the youngest, right, good guess, Yes, I am. I

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 3>knew you were the youngest. I'm like, I wear that

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>on my sleeve.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I kind of do too.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Mmy, I guess in some ways, but like I was

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>reading this checklist for the youngest. Yeah, I'm like, yeah,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess. So let's let's let's do it.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Should we go over that that stuff first?

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Totally all right.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is like the sort of macro view of

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of people think of birth order pop psychology.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so if you were born into a family, there's

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 3>basically four ways that you can be born in some

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of order. You can be the first born, you

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 3>can be a middle child, or you can be the

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>last born. And then if you're a real outlier, Okay,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you're right, so there's five or triplet. Oh god, yeah,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 3>get me started. Let's just say a multi okay, a multi,

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>or you can be an only child too, sure, and

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>all of them have distinct personalities, again according to pop psychology,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>but also according to every person who's ever been born

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>into a family, especially and so with the firstborn. The

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>whole theory of basically birth order, where you're born into

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the family unit that you're born into, and what effect

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>that has on your personality and how it develops, It

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 3>all seems to come down to this idea that you

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>are born into a family where there is a finite

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 3>resource called parental attention, and then that is a pie

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that gets increasingly divided up into smaller and smaller pieces

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the more and more children that are born, because your

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>parents can't possibly give five kids the same amount of

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 3>attention that they could give an only child. It's just

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>not possible. And so what dynamics are created in the

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 3>personality of the kids born into that family depending on

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 3>how many others are born and depending on where they

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>fall in that birth order. That's kind of the premise

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>of the whole thing. And over time people have said, well,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 3>this is what the firstborn's like, this is what the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 3>middles like, this is what.

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The yeah, and there were I mean a lot of

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this are these are generalizations, but they are generalizations. Like

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you said, that kind of everyone who's ever been in

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a family can kind of say, yeah, that's kind of true, right.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you have an only or your first kid,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they this article references as that first sort of experiment.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what you're doing yet You're probably going

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all in, depending on how lazy you are, how motivated

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you are as a parent with this, you know, being

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a super parent. And then if supposedly as you have

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more children you get it's not only as your attention divided,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, but there's the notion that you also are like,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I probably don't need to be as crazy

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with number two and number three, leave them to their

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>own devices as a third kid. I'm not going to

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get into too many depressing details of my family growing up,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but like by the time I was ten and eleven,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>my parents had other things going on. Yeah, and I

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't fair with.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Other kids on the side.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Not exactly. I wasn't fair old by any means, but

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I was. I did not have rules imposed on me

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like my brother and sister did. I did not have.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I was allowed to go to Panama City for spring

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>break and they weren't. I was allowed to kind of

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>do my own thing, and I was trustworthy, so that

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>probably had a lot to do with it. Yeah, if

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I would have been a real problem, they might have

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>clamped down a little more, or maybe not.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 3>And they probably wouldn't have necessarily clamped down like we

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>need to give Chuck way more attention and guidance than

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 3>we have been. They would have probably been.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Like crime and punishment.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 3>They would have been like we're sending Chuck to rehab

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, you know what I mean, Let rehab take

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 3>care of her, reform school or something like that. Because

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 3>once you get X number of kids in, you're just

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>so tired. Yeah, so tired. And you're older too. Sure,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>like when you're chasing a little kid around in like

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>your forties or fifties, that's different than when you're chasing

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.679
<v Speaker 3>a little kid around in your mid twenties.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine a world of difference.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 3>You know. So there's there's there's a lot of resources,

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>not just you know, parents' attention, but also their time,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>intellectual attention that they'll give a kid, like and say

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>like hanging out, teaching the kid to read that kind

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, and just attention in general, and also financial resources,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>the family's resources in general, are a pie that must

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>be divided among.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>All the financial, emotional, all that stuff instructive. So generally speaking, firstborn's,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people say, tend to be very conscientious and structured and

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>reliable and achieve high achievers.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because their parents are focusing like a laser on them.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>They know everything that kids got going on, maybe a

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>little too much, and the kid is responding to this

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>by basically becoming a perfectionist and really wanting to be

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>around their parents and.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Their parents' friends.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>More mature, very much mature, because they're all of the

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 3>people are most of the people are hanging out with

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>are adults.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so that's a firstborn typically, right, everybody knows it.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Don't try to deny it.

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Middles in general are people pleasing, which is so my brother.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>That's weird to me because when I think of middle children,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I think of jam Brady and Jan Brady was not

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>a people pleaser. She was just you know, a lump,

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 3>like a lump with a cloud over head.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Poor Jan.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>But that's true, Like I would not characterize jam Brady

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>as a people pleaser, would you know? Like she was

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 3>going to burn something down eventually. If the Brady bunch

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 3>had stayed on the air long enough.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Was also a blended family. So what was uh yeah,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who was the It was Bobby and then Peter was from.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>The lateral, I guess you'd call it was he was

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>he a people pleaser or just Jan more than Jan.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But blended families do confound things. We'll get into that

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 3>yet for.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but people pleasing, somewhat rebellious, which is not my

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>brother at all, large social circle, not really my brother,

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and a peacemaker, totally my brother. He's the best, He's

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the best. And then the youngings, youngies young'in's like us,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>most free spirited, fun loving, uncomplicated, manipulative. I've been called

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>some of these things severing degrees, self centered, attention seeking and.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Outgoing check and check.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But combined you and I and we're sort of like

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the proto youngest uncomplicated.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Though I'm like, I don't get that. I'm exquisitely complicated.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the surface you wouldn't think it, but I'm

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty complicated, sure, as we all know in this room.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>But that's the only one that I'm like that I question. Yeah,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>all the rest of them are like, yeah, that makes sense.

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like the Chinese zodiac. You look at that menu

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're like total dog.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and movie guy pant sounds great right now?

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Only no siblings. You are what they call almost like

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a super firstborn.

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>So sounds scary.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>All the traits of a firstborn on steroids, very much perfectionists,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>very much more mature for your age, conscientious, diligent, prone.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 3>To be leader, can leap over tall buildings.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And then this is where it gets interesting, and this

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of starts.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 3>To finally, everybody, this is where it starts to get interested.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is where it gets in a little bit,

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like how complicated it can get because there's so many

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>factors at play, Like what if you're in a blended family,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of throws it all out of whack. Yeah, dude, can.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 3>If you're born a firstborn and you your parents, your

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>parents get divorce and you go with your mom who

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>gets remarried to a dude who has.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Brady Yes to a smashing cool architect.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 3>For sure, and he has a kid that's a little

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>older than you, Greg, Greg's the firstborn. You're not the

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>firstborn anymore. The best you can hope for is to

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>form some sort of confederacy or alliance with Greg to

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>rule the rest of the siblings. But you're not the

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 3>head honcho anymore. You're not in charge. That's a big deal.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine many more traumatic experiences, especially when that

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>follows closely on the heels of your parents divorce or

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the death of like your other parent. That's got to

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>be one of the most traumatic things a kid can

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>go through is to lose their identified perch in the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 3>family order.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's we were talking about, like the firstborn,

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>like the baby of the family. If all of a

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sudden there's a younger, no good, no, Like I remember

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>my parents for some reason talking about adopting a kid.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember how old I was. I must have

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>been about seven, and I remember breaking down and crying

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and just being like, you can't do this, you cannot

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>bring it someone younger and cuter right than me. And

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that happens blended family. All of a sudden, you have

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be a younger or god forbid, a baby. Just forget

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't compete with that.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You gotta kill that baby.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what happened too. When Brady Bunch started to

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>lose ratings. Apparently your family was losing ratings. So they

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 3>brought in cousin Oliver a new baby, and I don't

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 3>think Bobby was very happy about that either.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>No, but just think about jan it all makes a

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more sense. Like she was like, I'm the

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>middle child, and then they brought in three more and

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>she was like, I'm even more.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Middle Yeah, you're deluded. The middle child is deluded. And

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>if you have multiple middle children, forget about it.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>That's right. However, here's the thing with blended families. They

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>say by about the age of five that a lot

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of your personality is set. So if you're older than

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>five and all of a sudden your family is blended,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they say, it may not make that much of a difference.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 3>No, no, No, that's where it's trouble. If you're younger than

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>five and you your personality is a little more plastic.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>If you were born a baby of the family and

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>suddenly you're a first born or you're not there, or

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>you're a middle kid, yeah, you'll adapt to that a

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 3>lot better than you would if you're like older and

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you're you're more solid in your birth order.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I didn't mean not trouble. What I meant was like,

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're like twelve years old and the family blending happens,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's trouble, but it's not like your personality is like

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, I'm the youngest or you know

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like, you don't all of a sudden

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>swap to a different birth order personality, I don't think.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, But if you're younger and it happens, you.

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Do right under the age of five, which.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Goes to show that if this is a thing, and

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk about whether it is or not soon. Yeah,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>it has nothing to do with biology, has everything to

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 3>do with with nurture, not nature, because a kid can

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 3>adapt depending on when this happens, they can adapt to

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 3>a change in birth order if they're young enough. Yeah,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>that means it has nothing to do with biology. It's

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>all the environment you're raised in, which is the most

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.599
<v Speaker 3>boneheadedly obvious thing on the planet.

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>And then before we take a break, there are also

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gap children. Supposedly, if there's at least a five year

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gap between births, then it just sort of resets.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 3>That was like me and my oldest sister. She was

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>thirteen years older than me, right, she was just like

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 3>this older, cool person, but not like an old, older sister,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 3>not at all overbearing, like really like for me, I

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>guess a little bit, yeah, or like a second mom

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of to an extent.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Because that does happen too if there's a big gap

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or a big family. Like I dated a girl in

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey that had that was like six or seven

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of them, and by the time she came around, she

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of fully being raised by her siblings.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, So what happens when there's enough of a gap,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>a new family birth order forms. So like if you

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 3>have an oldest and then there's multiple years, like say

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 3>ten years between your oldest and your middle and then

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>two years between your middle and your baby, the middle

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and the baby are going to form a firstborn and

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a last born type relationship.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the last born is always going to be

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the last born, yes, regardless of gap.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>But then twins, like you were saying, is one last

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 3>confounding thing. They twins or triplets multiples as you call them. Yeah,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I think so. They form their own family unit within

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the family two with each other. And apparently no matter

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 3>where they're born, twins never act like middle kids. They

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>always act like the firstborn or the baby, but to

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>one another.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, and I think they generally come together to kill

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the parents.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Basically, right, they hold hands, it's like an elevator of

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>blood washes around them.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, with adoption, they say that depending on

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when your child has adopted, the same kind of scenario

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>scenario happens as in like with gapped and blended.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Families, Whereas, if the kid's young enough, he or she

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>will tailor their their their birth ordered to the family

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that they're adopted into. But if they're older, there'll be trouble.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's a good overview, I think.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a great overview, Chuck. We're glowing

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 3>from it.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna you do have that overview, glow. We're gonna

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>take a break, and we're gonna talk about science right after.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 3>This, all right, Chuck, as promised, we're going to talk

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>about science, because, like I said, this is so owe

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>headed and obvious that every single person who's ever been

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 3>born into a family, everybody knows the stuff. But as

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>far as science is concerned, this is not proven that

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 3>birth order effects as they're called, actually exist. That science

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>is saying, hold your cell, your role, everybody. We can't

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 3>actually prove that what everybody knows is actually true. Some

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 3>studies show that, yes, there is such a thing as

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 3>birth order effects. Other studies show that there is no

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 3>birth order effect whatsoever. And then some studies suggest that

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 3>if there are birth order effects, they're so small that

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they are basically a blip on your personality. That all

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the other factors that form your personality, things like the

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>socioeconomic status of the family you're born into, your racial background,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 3>your gender, all the other stuff that is what really

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>forms your personality, not the order you're born into your family.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of science's position right now.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But what they all agree on is that it

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is therapy.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Cash cow right, that, yes, it's a good it's a

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 3>useful framework to approach psychotherapy from it.

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>They all want to talk about it at high hourly rates.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 3>See. To me, I'm like, this is sure, this is

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 3>exactly what forms your personality. But I get science's position.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I respect it.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So if we go back in time to the early

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundreds, it was a man named Alfred Adler. He

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was a part of a He was a contemporary of Freud,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is when all these dudes were getting together

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about all this stuff. In this burgeoning science,

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and they all thought they were so cool and important,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And he was one of the only ones among his

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>peers though at the time, that was talking about birth

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>order that early. And he went on to form what

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we know is Atlarian psychology or individual psychology, and it's

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>based therapy based on how you perceive your own level

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of power in your family, at your workplace.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>In the world at large in general, like your perceived power,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 3>place of position, or status.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, And if he believed in birth order having

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a significant influence on your personality, then that in turn

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would influence how powerful you may or may not feel.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Because the Adler, if how you perceived your own

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 3>power not necessarily how powerful you were, but your own

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 3>perception of power was the driving force of like how

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 3>you interacted with the world your personality, birth order would

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 3>make total sense because birth order, as everybody knows, is

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 3>nothing but positions of superiority or inferiority. Yeah, And it's

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>as simple as that. Because when you're born and you're

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 3>a little kid, and you're born into a family with

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 3>an older sibling, they are a couple of steps ahead

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of you because they've already been through a bunch of

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 3>stuff Yeah, so they're inherently superior to you. They can

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 3>also beat you up on a very basic level. They

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 3>can twist your arm behind your back until it feels

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's going to break. And Maria, how many times

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 3>you say uncle, uncle? Uncle? They won't stop until they're satisfied.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Or protect you, like my big brother did. That's great

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from his friends that were jerks to me. Right, he

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't stand for it.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 3>No, a couple of.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>We went at it too, you know, we were brothers.

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But sure he never picked on me. No, you know why,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because you chuck and he's Scott.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>In the eighties is when, I mean, there were always

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>studies starting since Adler and freud'stein, but in the nineteen

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>eighties is when it really blew up thanks to the

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Big Five in cocaine, the Big Five personality trait view

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of things, and that's when things in the eighties, that's

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>when everybody was just like eating the stuff up.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because so the Big Five personality inventory is we've

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 3>talked about it before, but basically it is a self

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 3>reported measure that is actually valid. It actually works, like

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 3>you can say this person is highly neurotic, or this

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>person is extroverted or well three others that I can't

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 3>bring to mind right now. But these things are also

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of broken into subcategories, like these are big umbrella

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>terms have more specific subcategories. But it's actually valid, Like

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 3>somebody who fills this survey out, it's going to be

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>an accurate assessment of their personality. So if you have

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 3>somebody's personality, that's huge, Right, you can say, all right,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>if this person's neurotic, they're highly neurotic. Let's see what

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 3>birth order they are. Oh, they're a middle child. Let's

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>compare them to other middle children who filled out this

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 3>personality survey scored high on neurosis, And all of a sudden,

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 3>we can show if you're a middle child, you're a

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 3>far likelier to be highly neurotic under the Big five

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>personality inventory. Then a firstborn is right, boom bam, you

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>just proved that birth order effects exist? Or did you?

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, They're like we can put people further into a

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>box and label them. Sure, or did you? Because that

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the paradox that arrive that we arrive at,

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>which is you pointed to it a little bit earlier.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>There are so many, so many influences that go into

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>what makes you you that it's hard to look at

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>birth order as a mere small part of that. Yeah,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so so like you can't account you can account for

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these and studying it, right, you know, there's

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of studies over the years and they do

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their best, but you can't account for all of them.

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, so we'll go back to that example. So

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>you've you've just gone to your peers and said, look,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I have just proven that middle children are highly neurotic

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 3>compared to other children in birth orders. Right, yeah, then

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>you're shaking your own fists around your your shoulders in triumph.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 3>And they said, well, wait a minute, Wait a minute,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>did you control for socioeconomic background? And you go no,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't. Well wait did you control for race?

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Did you control for gender?

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>And so all of a sudden you realize there's all

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 3>these different independent variables out tons in this case would

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 3>be confounding variables that might actually be the thing influencing it.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 3>It might be the fact that they are women born

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 3>into families of a low ceoeconomic state that is driving neuroses.

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 3>That that's actually the thing that is driving it rather

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 3>than birth order. It has nothing to do with being

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>a middle child. It's just a fluke, a coincidence. And

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 3>like you said, there's so many confounding variables and so

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 3>many things that make our personalities who we are. That

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 3>some people who are like birth order effects do not exist.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Basically say that any birth order study that shows that

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 3>they do exist has some confounding variable that's the actual

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 3>hidden thing that's driving it that you can't possibly control

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>for everything to make a perfect, perfectly designed experiment for birthwork.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like when you start to think about, like if

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you were just to sit there and sort of jot

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>down things as non scientists, just regular schmos like us,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and just jot down a list of what other factors

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>might be at play, we could probably come up with

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a list of one hundred things between.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Us let's start now.

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>But that would like if I was studying the stuff

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and I started to make that list, I would just

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>walk away and go into another line of study. Sure,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, dude, I just you know where

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>your parents married, where they divorce, When did they get divorced?

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Did you like hot dogs?

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You live with mom or dad? How far apart did

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they live? What could do? Were you suburban? Were you Urbana?

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Where did you live in an excurb Did you grow

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the woods? Did you start work at twelve?

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>For you like old timing, I started to work at twelve.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I did too. I had a paper route. Yeah,

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I was a bus boy.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh nice? Oh wait was that where the guy put

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 3>his foot into the Yeah, brothers do what a criminal?

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I told you that's a title Max. Now that restaurant,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but not too long ago. Yeah, go JJ's barbecue title Max.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Now they're putting their foot on titles, just stomping on them.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they got your money, your money, your real money.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>They're never gonna sponsor us. Now. Another few things that

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can confound these studies are things and and Ed helped

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>us put this research together, things like demographic shifts. So

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he gave a great example of like the baby boom,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if there's a big population bulge that also coincides with

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other stuff. And the example he uses

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>prevalence of cigarette smoking. There may be a false correlation

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there between being a first born and smoking, whereas if

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you were second born twelve years later. I guess that

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>would fall outside that range though of gap.

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 3>Child maybe, but that's even more confounding. The point's still valid,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 3>sure that, Like, there's just way more firstborns who smoke

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 3>than second borns. But that's because those spoking was more

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 3>prevalent when there were a bunch of kids born who

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 3>were all of the same cohort and all firstborns. Right,

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>that's just one of the ways this thing can be confounded.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, this one really speaks to me, which is

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>labeled as growth. When a birth order effect does appear,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it is strongest when they subject is with their siblings.

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when you're a family or union, its back into

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>So funny how that happens. Yeah, I see myself do it.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Like good example, I turned forty eight a couple of

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. My family, my sister and her husband happened

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in town. Didn't come for that, but we

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>were texting and I was like, hey, let's all you know,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this is great, let's all go out to dinner. She's like, oh,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to. I just figured you wouldn't want

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to spend your birthday with your friend. You'd want to

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>spend your birthday with your friends and not your family.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I saw Michelle when she got in town, and

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>she said the same thing in person, and I was like, dude,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm forty eight. Yeah, it's like I'm not twenty two

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>year old chuck, I know some burnout like I used

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. And she just sort of laughed. But that's

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example of how like, no matter what happens

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in my life, I will always be the baby. Yeah,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and she will probably feel like she has to look

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>out for me, which is a nice feeling. It is

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I see Emily fall into patterns with her family. Well,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>she is a She's an interesting case because she was

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an only and then has a half brother and a

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>half sister. Her dad. Yeah, her dad went and had

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a son with another woman, and then her mom got

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>married to her father in law, Steve, who already had

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a daughter. So it's this sort of a weird mix.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But I just mean in general, not even with siblings,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just in how their family dynamic is. She's

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a different person when we go over there, all of us.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody is around their family so strange.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is when it sort of started me down

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the path of like what is personality? Is a personality trait?

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it? This? Just is it repeated behaviors? Is it

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a set of behaviors, Like is that personality?

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Are you asking me?

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean I don't even know, Like what is personality?

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>We should do a show on that.

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we totally should. But from what I understand, just

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of briefly put it, personality is the kind of

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 3>predictable way that you'll react to the world. Right. Is

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 3>it easy for somebody to press your buttons? Are you

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 3>laid back? Are you like could somebody? However, if somebody

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 3>were presented with this is going terribly If somebody represented

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>with a like an event in life, Okay, you could say,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Josh would probably respond to like that, Yeah, that's a personality.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, But is that something inherent or is it birth

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>or order or no? Is it just a collection of

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>learned behavior?

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a collection of learned and reinforced behaviors too.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>If you're told you're the baby the family all the time,

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna act like the baby of the family. You're

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna act self centered, you're gonna act manipulative. It's reinforced.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're told you you can do anything, you can

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 3>go out and do anything. You can literally walk through

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 3>walls because someone told you to. They reinforce that behavior.

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think that's what personality is. And this is

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>just me talking. I also believe in birth order effects,

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>by the way, but I think that that is it's

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>learned and reinforced, which means it can be unlearned. You

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 3>can learn to be different.

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. At that same birthday dinner, I picked up the

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>check for everyone, and there was a bit of a

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>not an argument letty's struggle. My mom and I were,

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of off to the side with the

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>people who work there doing the credit card battle, and

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't super happy and I should have just let

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>her pay. But it's part of that thing, like I'm

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the baby of the family, and I kind of just

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>finally told a sec Listen, Mom, it's like it's my

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>turn to pay nice. You know, I'm not the baby anymore.

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Like quit writing me a check for one hundred dollars

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on my birthday.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you do you catch this?

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I generally just put it in my kid's

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bank account.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's a good thing, you know. Yeah, we don't

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>catch the ones.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I also don't want to take away the joy

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that she gets from writing me that hundred dollars. Yes, sure,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not cool. No, it's like I don't need that

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>from her, but like that's what brings her joy.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, giving you money, it's complicated. So let me teach

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you a little trick. Oh okay, if you don't want

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to get into that tussle, if you just wanted to

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 3>be done, sorry, it's too late. When you order, when

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 3>you hand the menu back to the server, just have

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 3>be holding your credit card with your thumb and give

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 3>them a look. It's universal, dude, They all know, and

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 3>they'll take it and be like, and you got to first.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Nobody else does that. They always wait and they pretend

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to go to the bathroom, like after everybody's done. It

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>so obvious. You got to start before the food even comes,

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 3>before the drinks even come.

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what I did? What when we got to

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant, the very first thing I did was go

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the manager while everyone was being seated. I said, listen, dude,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>my mom's going to try and pay, or one of

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>these other trumps in my family's going to try and pay.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I don't want any of them paying. It's

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like twelve people. I picked the place. I picked a

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>nicer place. It's like I don't want to do that.

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, so, just here's my credit card.

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Please make sure that the server there's no battle.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 3>They didn't follow your orders.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>No, because my mom she tried to jump me later

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on the side and didn't realize I had already jumped her.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 3>So it should have been done.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I know. But then when we went over there, he

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, listen, man, your mom is over here now,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like she's the mom. We generally side with the parents

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 3>What place was this?

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just a restaurant.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I demand to know. I'm mad.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I my move should have just trumped all moves because

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it was No. I agree, and that's what I basically said.

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, listen, man, I was like, there

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are factors at play here that I don't want to

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about. It's like, just please. And my mom got

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a little mad, and then.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I was I blame this manager. I think you should

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 3>expose them. Well, I'm glad it all worked out in

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the end.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Man, Should we take a break.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I thought we were right now.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>No, all right, we'll be back right for this.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're back, Chuck. Yes, And like we said,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 3>we showed science is kind of like we're not quite

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 3>sure about the birth order effect. That hasn't kept like

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a whole cottage like field of psychology from continuing since

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the eighties basically non stop. Like if you go look

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 3>at birth order effects, there's it's very rare you're going

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 3>to run into anything that says like this is all

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 3>b Yes. Most of it's like, yeah, this is true.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Everybody knows it. There have been some like dominent people

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 3>in favor of like like let's say, yes, there is

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>such thing as birth effects. And there was one guy

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 3>in particular who made a big splash in nineteen ninety

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 3>six with a book called Born to Rebel. Yeah sol Away, Yeah,

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Frank Soloway, Frank J. Soloway, if you want to be

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>fancy about it. And he got a MacArthur Genius grant

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen eighty four to kind of study this and

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>write about it, and he did. He wrote a book

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 3>called Born to Rebel. It was about birth order and

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the whole premise of the book was he looked at

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>scientific revolutions throughout the ages. It's pretty interesting identified which

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 3>scientists were on which side of it, either in support

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>of this revolutionary thinking or opposed to it, meaning that

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 3>they were in favor of keeping the status quo, and

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 3>then determined what birth order they had. And he found

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>after this study, which is really it was a big study.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they did.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 3>It was a pretty a lot of legwork and a

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of research, he determined that first borns are much

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 3>more likely to support the status quo, whereas second borns

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 3>or later borns he calls them, are much more likely

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 3>to support revolutionary thinking.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just one example, as far as he used Darwinism,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, later borns between eighteen fifty nine and eighteen

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>seventy five were four point six times more likely than

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>firstborns to support Darwinism.

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Thinking yeah, yeah, so yeah, And that was one of

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 3>many examples that I think there were one hundred and

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 3>twenty one historical events with sixty five hundred individuals either

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.959
<v Speaker 3>supporting or opposing them. So it was a big, big

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 3>work for sure.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And one of his I mean he put some

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>reasoning behind it too. He was like, if you're a

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>later born, you might have a hard time competing with

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your older who might have a tighter bond with the parents. Maybe,

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and so that sort of symbolically forces you as to

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be almost an out within your own family. So you

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>may be more prone to join up with an outsider opinion.

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Right to go, look outside of the family union and

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 3>all of the values and the ideas that it holds,

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 3>to make your own mark in order to get attention

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 3>or support or whatever from your parents. Whereas if you're

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 3>a first born, you just got the easiest thing to

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 3>do is to just fall in line with your parents

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and hence support the status quo. It makes sense, but

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Born to Rebel was torn apart by some scientists. Sure

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 3>it's like this is just pure pop psychology tripe. I

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 3>think that's an unfair characterization of it. Like, the guy

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>worked for basically twenty something years on this stuff, and

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 3>it was a very robust study. One of the pitfalls

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 3>that he seemed to have run into, though, was he

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 3>was analyzing historical figures, which is really sticky stuff. Yeah,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 3>you can't analyze people even from Afar, even if they're

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 3>content prairie let alone, they've been dead for a couple

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred years. To base it on that is kind of

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 3>is kind of difficult and tricky, But I just want

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 3>to say he worked really hard on it.

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Another part plucked from his research I thought was pretty

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting was the idea that part of this less rebellious

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>nature of a firstborn might be due to the long

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>standing but now sort of antiquated practice of primogeniture, which is,

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the firstborn gets the inheritance, so they're more likely, just

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>through thousands of years of this, more inclined to like

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>not ruffle the feathers of the parents, right.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 3>And then the later borns who are like, I've got

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 3>basically zero chance of inheriting the family titles in a state,

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll just go do my own thing. I don't have

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 3>to fall in line. That makes sense as well.

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And the other interesting thing with that is another factor

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was the removal of a child from a family. He's

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>found that a later born who was removed from the

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>family and reared by relative will end up behaving like

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a typical firstborn. And again I'm assuming if that's under

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the age of like five.

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 3>But I wonder so I'm wondering if that just is

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 3>supported by other research, or if all of the parenting

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>magazine articles that mention that whole, you know, the personality

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 3>is tailored, is really just citing that work. Because that's

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the big problems with pop psychology in general

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 3>is it's self reinforcing. One person says one thing and

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it gets picked up by a bunch of people and

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 3>they're all pointing to the same thing. But since so

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 3>many of them are pointing, there's so many of them

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 3>out there doing the pointing, right, it seems like it's

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 3>a very robust and like a widespread body of work,

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 3>when really it was just one study that said one

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 3>thing that everybody's citing.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, like in his case, he likes to cite

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this Norwegian study. It found a difference of two point

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three IQ points between first and second and born children,

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sample size of two hundred and forty one thousand subjects.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 3>That's big.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It is big, But then you know ed sort of

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>brings up a good point, like okay, maybe, but like

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is a two point three first of all IQ tests

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are problematic, they're bond for like a lot of reasons,

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly bunk. But even if they're not, is a two

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>point three IQ point difference even meaningful? Yeah enough to

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be like, well look two points.

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 3>So no, it's not meaningful in that like you know,

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't that's not going to lead to any like

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 3>closed doors or open doors or anything. It's just such

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 3>a narrow difference but if that's like an average, and

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 3>it's it is found across you know, firstborns and later borns,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 3>like like in a very large population like that it is,

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 3>it does make you wonder, like what would that come from?

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.439
<v Speaker 3>It does raise more questions. Yeah, you know what I mean. So, Yeah,

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 3>it's an insignificant difference as far as like actual intelligence goes,

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 3>but it does suggest that there's something weird going on

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 3>there that does have to do with birth order.

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess that brings us to this really interesting

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that I had never heard of before. Oh, y,

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 1>had you heard of this fraternal birth order effect? Which

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is basically the idea and a lot of studies have

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>backed this up. Meta analysis of tons of studies have

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>backed this up. The idea is that if you have

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple boys in your family, each successive boy that's born

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is it's just boys, has a higher chance

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of being gay.

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think And when I first saw that, I

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, that can't be real, right, And then I

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 1>did a lot more poking around. I was like, Wow,

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it is real. The statistics sort of bear it out.

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. If there's a big disagreement about whether actual just

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 3>regular birth order effects exist. This one is much more

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 3>supported by the data. Yeah, this the fraternal birth order effect,

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 3>and so much so that there was a sexologist, which

0:39:57.880 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>if that were my feel is study, I'd be like,

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 3>call me sexologists, Josh, please, I can't find his name

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 3>is Ray something he said, and I'm not sure what

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 3>he was basing this on, but he said that there

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 3>is an increase of thirty three percent in likelihood that

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 3>you will be gay with each additional older brother you have.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, so that means if you're born into a family

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're the youngest of four brothers.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I did this math.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Because I know these people family.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Zero percent chance, I guess that that you are going

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 3>to be hetero, that you were one hundred percent chance

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 3>going to be gay?

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, how many it could be one hundred and

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent? Right, it just keeps going right, Yeah, I

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>think that can't be right.

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Eventually you become so gay you pop out the other

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 3>side and you're straight because you have like ten brothers.

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I did see that meta analysis of multiple multiple

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>studies indicated that between fifteen and twenty nine percent of

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>gay males owe their sexual orientation to this effect.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Supposedly Okay, so so, and we should say there are

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 3>some studies that have not found this. There was a

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 3>big one that had it was like a survey of

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 3>British young men that surveyed like eleven thousand of them

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 3>or whatever and did not find this. But so many

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 3>studies have found it that science is like this, this

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 3>actually might be a thing, and we're not quite sure

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 3>what it is. And at first they explained it that

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the more boys there are, the less social pressure there

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:39.439
<v Speaker 3>are for you to be like hetero and and responsible

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 3>for carrying on the family line right right, right, like

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 3>after two three brothers who are gonna, you know, carry

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 3>on the family line, go go crazy, go do what

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 3>you want, And that that was the idea behind why

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 3>it became likelier that you would be gay if you

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 3>had more older brothers. There's a couple of things with that.

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 3>It kind of suggests that like being gay or not

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>as a choice, are being straight or not as a

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 3>choice rather than something biological, right whatever, That has kind

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of gone out the window with another really surprising finding

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>that has to do with handedness that really undermines that

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>whole idea.

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this is so just mind blowing and interesting.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So the increase in probability of a boy becoming gay

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is only only if that boy is right handed. Right

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>handed yep, So if you're left handed. Among left handed men,

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no statistical difference in the incidence of homosexuality,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you've got a thousand brothers.

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 3>And the weird thing about that is that they've found

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 3>if you are taking birth order out of the equation,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 3>if you are left handed, there is a slightly higher

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 3>incidence of being gay, just period, yes, for being left handed,

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's with men and women apparently, So the idea

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that not only does it not make you more likely

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 3>to be gay in as far as fraternal birth order

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 3>is concerned, it actually negates the effects of fraternal birth order.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 3>It negates it. It shows that that social pressure from

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 3>brothers doesn't have anything to do with it, right, because

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 3>a right handed or a left handed kid is not

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be under any more or less social pressure

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 3>from older brothers to be straight. Right, that makes zero

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 3>sense whatsoever. And that would also suggest it's handedness, that

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 3>it has something to do with genetics too.

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're ambidextriousity bisexual, I guess so, where's that study

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense? So I did a little more digging

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in this, but I don't understand it at all. But

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>more recently, as in just a couple of years ago,

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>they think they found an actual physiological biological explanation for that. Oh,

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>did you understand that.

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if they found it or if somebody

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 3>made it up, and everybody's.

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, I read a bunch of papers that said that,

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, they think this may be it, okay, but

0:43:59.000 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get it.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 3>So what they think is that a mom. When a

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 3>mom carries a boy, her body has a reaction to

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the male male proteins, the stuff that makes him a

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 3>male creates an allergic reaction of sorts in the mom,

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and the mom produces antibodies. The first time the mom's

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 3>bodies totally caught off guard, has basically no effects whatsoever

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 3>on the boy's development as a boy. As more and

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 3>more boys are born, and just state in that same

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 3>poor mom, the antibodies get better and better at recognizing

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 3>these proteins and can actually get to the point where

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 3>they affect the expression of these proteins, and so what

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 3>makes the boy straight from the basis of these proteins

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 3>is actually affected and they develop differently starting in the

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 3>womb because the mom has developed antibodies to basically maleness,

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 3>which is the most mind boggling, amazing idea I've ever heard.

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.919
<v Speaker 1>That summary was so much better than the scientific paper

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>summaries that I read today. Good John, thank you you

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>should do that.

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Thank I do for a living. I just did.

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a good point. I thought this was interesting too.

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've kind of gone over most of these

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>birth order theories I think in general, but this one

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we super touched on, and I think

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. The confluence theory. So this is sort

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of like resource solution of parents that we were talking about, Yeah,

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like only so much emotional support or financial support to

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>go around, But this takes it down to the sibling level,

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of basically like if you were first born,

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you are then have a degraded emotional environment and intellectual

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>environment once you get a younger. Yeah. So it's like

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>playing tennis against better or worse competition. If you're the

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>better tennis player, you're not going to play as good

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>against a lesser tennis player. And they're saying that that

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of happens with firstborns. Because they have to spend

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>time with this dumb kid, this dumb baby.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 3>But the dumb baby gets a leg up exactly.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's when you play tennis against someone better than you. Eventually,

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's called the tutor effect. They surpassed that firstborn.

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 3>The student becomes the mass. That's right, exactly, and your

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 3>skin turns to alabaster.

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting, says Sting said Sting. Well the Police, Oh okay,

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, I thought you were like a dream of

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Turtle. Sting.

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.399
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm more of a nothing like the sun.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, synchronicity, that's good too. I'm still mad at them

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for that reunion tour.

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, they really phoned it in. You said, just

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 3>phoned it in? Hey, I saw for some so I

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 3>just thought of the Police, and then Stuart Copeland, which

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 3>made me think of Less Claypool. Remember he's in that

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 3>band with Less Claypool and Trey Anastasio.

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's called kill Me.

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it's the three talented individuals. But then that made

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 3>me think of Less Claypool, who was in a documentary

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I just saw on The Residents. Have you seen it?

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>No? The Residents were the mystery band, right, that were

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the big ping pong heads.

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Eyeballs, eyeballs right, still are a mystery band, still going

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 3>really Yeah, they're good, but it's good. It's like it's

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 3>an intellectual kind of like examination of their history and everything,

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 3>but it's really interesting. But Less Claypool's in it.

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you think when Less Claypool, fish guy what's his name?

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Tresso and Stuart Copeland.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And Stuart Copan you think when they got together to

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>form that band, all they did was just sort of

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>work out who's solo is next. Probably it's like, I

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>want to do the bass solo first, and then we

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can go right into the guitar solo and then the

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>drum solo and then the song's over.

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully the birth order of the three worked out so

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.399
<v Speaker 3>that it all They were like, yes, this all makes

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 3>sense to me.

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Man, there's nothing better than old videos of Stuart Copeland

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching fits.

0:47:57.760 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh Diddy, I always heard it was thing that was

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>a jerk to Stuart Copeland. Was Stuart Copeland's jerk?

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, Stuart Copeland was a hot head and Steven was

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a could poke his buttons. Oh yeah, it's pretty fun.

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>There's Stuart pretty Opland. No, don't feel bad for Stuart Copeman.

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 3>He might be. I think he might be the best

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 3>drummer I ever lived, everybody says Neil Pert. I don't know, man,

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Stuart Copeland was pretty good.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and like crazy, uh, like doing his own thing.

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 3>And he's from Macon. What yeah, Macon, Georgia, Macon, Georgia.

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I didn't know that.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 3>This concludes this episode of stuff you should know. If

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 3>you want know more about birth order, go talk to

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 3>your family. We don't care. Since I said that's time

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 3>for listener mail.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the Motley Crew movie yet on Netflix?

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:44.879
<v Speaker 3>No? No, I didn't know. It's out.

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's out.

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Is it good?

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Uh? No?

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Is it based on that book?

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not good, but it's great, you know what I mean?

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh yeah, it's based on the book. Okay,

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's so I mean, it feels like one of

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>those VH one Are you literally making a note? It's

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of like when of those VH one movie music movies. Okay,

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 1>like the Jackson's one. It's it's it's.

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Good, Okay, I'll check it out, all right, who plays

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Vince Neil?

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>They're all, you know, the only one of the not

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the only thing. There's a lot of distracting parts. But

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy who plays Vince Neil and his hair looks

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot like Garth, looks not like Dana Carvey is Garth,

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of hard to fully go there. The

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who played Tommy Lee is pretty good?

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Was it Christian Navarro? No?

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Did he wants? He can't play Tommy Lee? He could.

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Lee's like six'.

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Five that kid can play. Anybody, well, NO i. Agree all,

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 3>right it's time for listener, MAIL i, Said.

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Chuck the bar is more mc mars. Guy, okay all,

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>right here we.

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Go is that From is That? Dawkin, No Mick marsh's mot?

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Legruw who is?

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 3>That he's a guitar?

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Player oh the Old?

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Creep, yeah, yeah SURE i know who you're talking. ABOUT

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 3>i GUESS i never knew his.

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Name by, creep he was a. Creep he was. Creepy,

0:49:58.400 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that's WHAT i.

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Mean still is all?

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Right here we? Go this is From. Sam i'm just

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna call this. Heartfelt it's always nice to hear. This,

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>hey guys probably could have sent this a million, times

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but TONIGHT i really felt the need. To you were

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:13.720
<v Speaker 1>with me WHEN i transitioned from high school to. College

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you were there the night my dad died two years,

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ago and now you're here As i'm in the process

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with my girlfriend dumping me up to three.

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Years you're always, there. Guys sure you hear this all the,

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>time BUT i want to tell you that some tough,

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>days on tough, days you really help keep me, sane

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>plain and.

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 3>Simple help keep me sane and playing and.

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Simple not that we keep them playing and. SIMPLE i

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>read that.

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Wrong it's like eight shoots and. Leaves that's.

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 1>RIGHT i have depression and anxiety and the podcast is

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge help on nights like this when nothing seems

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to help or it's. COMFORTING i can tell if things

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get really, bad if even the podcast doesn't. Help you

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>guys have also been like role models for. Me so

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this is all just to say thank you so much. Much,

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>guys who knows how much darker some spots of my

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 1>life have been without? You could say much, more BUT

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>i THINK i got the message. Across that is From,

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>sam and he, says, PS i am a he hymn

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 1>AND i spank this email on the.

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Bottom oh, good that's how we got.

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Here that's.

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Great nice. Work if you want to get in touch

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 3>with us Like sam. Did thank you very. Much, sam

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 3>by the, way that was very sweet of you to

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 3>tell us all that hope you're pulling.

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Through, yeah hang in, there.

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Man you can get in touch with us by going

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 3>to stuff Youshould know dot com and clicking on our social,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 3>links and you can also send us an email Like sam.

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Did don't forget to spank it on the bottom to

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 3>stuff podcasts at iHeartRadio dot.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Com stuff You Should know is a production Of. iHeartRadio

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 2>for more podcasts my Heart, radio visit The iHeartRadio, App Apple,

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 2>podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite.

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Shows