WEBVTT - It Is, In Fact, Rocket Science

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer at

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works and I love all things tech. And

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we are continuing our epic series about space and space travel.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've covered the various spacecraft involved during the actual

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>space race, from the vast Stock to the saw Us,

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>from the Mercury to the Apollo, but I didn't really

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>go into much detail about the launch vehicles or what

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we would more casually refer to as the rockets. So

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna talk about rockets and the science behind

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>them and some of the ones that have been used

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to put stuff what was once on Earth out in

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>space somewhere. And don't worry, I'm not going to cover

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>every single rocket that ever was put to such use.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:58.959
<v Speaker 1>That would sound like I was reading off a very

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>weird phone book, because it would involve not just all

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>these odd names that we as Americans we asn't I'm

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>saying myself here the Americans created, but also all the

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>different designations that have been made by various countries around

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the world. Lots of countries have made launch vehicles. So

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna focus on some of the ones from

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the space race period because I think, uh, you know,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the episodes I just did mainly, and

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>also it has a nice narrow focus. The history of

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rockets stretches far back before there was ever a space race,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or before there was a Soviet Union, or before there

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was a United States of America. And of course by

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that I mean before there were those nations. Obviously the

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>land masses were there and there were people living on them.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know what I mean. The origins of the

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>rocket are closely tied to that of fireworks, and I've

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>covered fireworks in previous episodes. Scholars have nailed down the

0:01:55.560 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 1>emergence of rockets in Chinese alchemy sometime during the dynasty

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that stretched from nine sixty Common era to twelve seventy

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>nine Common Era. The former curator of rockets for the

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, a guy named Frank Winter,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>attempted to narrow that down a bit, and his work

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>suggested that during the eleventh century, Chinese alchemists were trying

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to suss out a formula that would lead to eternal life.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>They were attempting to make practical use of the Chinese

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that all the universe is divided into passive and

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>active forces, and that mixing your yin and yang materials

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in a proper way would create various amazing results, such

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>as presumably never dying. So they never landed on a

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>mixture that would preserve life indefinitely, but some of the

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>mixtures did up having other interesting properties, like blowing up

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>if you lit them, so they effectively invented an early

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>form of gun powder. By twelve thirty two, the Chinese

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>were using rockets in warfare. They had a weapon that

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they called the fai Ju san Uh. And I know

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm mispronouncing that. I apologize my Chinese is terrible, but

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it means flying fire lances. And if you listen to

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the fireworks episodes that we did on text of years ago,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know there are various myths and legends about Chinese

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>thinkers who tried to use rockets for flight and the

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>various results of those experiments. So I'm not going to

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>go into those here. Instead, we're just gonna skip ahead

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a few centuries. In the fifteen nineties, in Germany, there

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was a fireworks maker named Johann schmid Lap, who attempted

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to create fireworks that could reach much higher altitudes through

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a process called staging. Staging is where you divide up

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a rocket into two or more stages, and each stage

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>contains its own propellant. So when the first stage burns out,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it ignites the second stage, which in schmid Lab's case

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was a smaller rocket that was carried by a larger

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>first stage rocket. So the first stage rocket ignites launches

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as it gets towards the end of its fuel, it

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ignites the fuel inside the second rocket, which then continues

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to launch and go even higher into the sky and

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>deliver the payload way up in there, and you get

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a really impressive firework. While schmid Lap made a practical,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>practical multi stage rocket, the idea had previously been theorized

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>by an Austrian military engineer named Conrad hass hass wrote

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a manuscript about his ideas that predated schmid Laps designs

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>by a few decades, including multi stage rockets. Even talked

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of using liquid fuels as propellant, although

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that would take quite some time to come true. Now,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whether schmid Lap knew of Hassa's work or not. I

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe he did. It's possible that this was

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>a case of two people coming up with essentially the

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>same idea around the same time that has happened before.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be that schmid Lap had heard of

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Hassa his ideas and that schmid Lap was the one

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who was able to make practical use of them. Either way,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>whether he came up with the idea or not, schmid

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Lap was the one who actually made it work. In

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>seven Sir Isaac Newton published his work Principia, which included

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his three Laws of motion. So we see that the

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>practical understanding of rocketry preceded a more nuanced scientific understanding

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of what was going on by several centuries, which is

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>often the case where we notice something, we observe something interesting,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and we even make use of that something for some time,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have a full understanding of what's really

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going on until much later. That has happened on numerous

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>occasions throughout human history. So what are the three laws

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of motion and why are they important? Well, the first

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>law is every object in a state of uniform motion

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>tends to remain in that state of motion unless an

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>external force is applied to it. We also call this

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the law of inertia. So, for example, if there is

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>a rock sitting on a level section of ground, we

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>would expect that rock to just sit there, to remain

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in that position, to stay still, unless some external force

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like someone's foot were to come in and be applied

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to the rock. So soone kicks the rock, then we

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would expect it to move. But we wouldn't expect the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>rock to move on its own. It wouldn't just spontaneously

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>start rolling around. That would be in violation of the

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>first law of motion. The second law of motion is

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that the relationship between an objects mass, it's acceleration and

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the applied force is force equals mass times acceleration. Acceleration

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and force are vectors, meaning they don't just have a magnitude.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They also have a direction, so you have to describe

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>them as having a direction while you're working with them.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't just give, you know, just a unit and

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be accurate and this law. In this law, the direction

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.799
<v Speaker 1>of the force vector is the same as the direction

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of the acceleration victor, so you can't have an acceleration

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>vector that's an opposite direction of the force vector. The

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>equation lets us understand how velocities change when we apply

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>different forces to the system. And a change in velocity

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is acceleration, right, Velocity itself is uh is speed and direction,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So acceleration is when you change something about that. You

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>either change the speed, so you make it speed up,

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or you make it slow down, or you change the direction,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>which you know because velocity is a vector, and either

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those would be considered a change in acceleration,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>or rather it would be acceleration itself. And the third

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>law of motion is for every action, there is an

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>equal and opposite reaction. So you've probably heard this before,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you have a decent understanding of it,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but just in case, here's a way of thinking about.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you're standing on a platform that's suspended by ropes,

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>right like it's a square platform. There are four ropes,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>one at each corner, and there's a second platform on

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a column that's in front of you. But in order

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to get there, you're gonna have to take a pretty

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>big step. Not not a huge step, but a decent one.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>As you take that step, if there were another observer

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>watching all this, they would notice that the platform you

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>stand on would move the opposite direction of where you

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were stepping. This is that equal but opposite reaction. That's

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an exemplification of Newton's third law of motion. It's also

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what explains the phenomenon of a rocket flying into

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the air. When it's blasting what appears to just be

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fire and smoke out of its business end, the rocket

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually throwing mass in one direction in the form

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of very high pressured gas. The rocket itself moves in

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction because of this. If you were to

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sit in an office chair that has wheels on it,

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you had a mess and ball in your hands,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and you threw the mess and ball straight ahead of you,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that you and the chair would roll backward. Because of

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this principle, rockets work the same way. It's just that

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the rocket is throwing up mass in the form of

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that high pressure gas an incredible rate. So remember that

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>second law forces equal to mass times acceleration. That's also

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>very important. The rocket has a lot of mass, particularly

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>when it's full of fuel. You have the mass of

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the rocket structure and you have the mass of all

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the fuel inside of it. When a rockets engine, which

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is a reaction engine, It's important to note because when

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we hear the word engine. I don't know about you,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but when I hear the word engine, I'm usually thinking

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about a mechanical device that forms some form of rotational power, right,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a rotational force, like a reciprocating gasolene engine. That's kind

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of what I think about. But a rocket engine is

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a reaction engine. Rocket engines fling mass in that form

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>of hot gas uh at a very high rate of acceleration,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and the combination creates a lot of force. Right. So,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>however much mass it is times that acceleration that equals

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the force. Well, the equal and obvious that reaction means,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're pushing that much mass downward at a very

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fast rate, then you're moving upward. Uh. And the speed

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at which you move is based upon how fast and

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>how much stuff you're pushing down That that equation tells

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>us all of this stuff, and we can actually figure

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>out how much acceleration the rocket will experience if we

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know the mass and the acceleration of the hot gases

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of its engine. The two sides of the

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>equation have to balance out. It has to be equal

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and opposite, right, So rocket science is hard But let's

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to that office chair and medicine ball example,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because that makes it way easier to understand. So practical example,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say I'm sitting in an office chair and I

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have a mass of about sixty eight ms. The chair

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.479
<v Speaker 1>has a mass of about twenty two kilograms, so collectively

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the chair and I are nine DRAMs. The medicine ball

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I have has a mass of four point five rams.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So at the very beginning of this I have a

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>total mass of ninety four point five ms because I'm

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>holding the medicine ball right, and then I also have

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a velocity of zero. I'm not moving, so I'm staying still.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got this messin ball in my hands, and then

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I throw the mess and ball straight out in front

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of me at fifteen per second. That's about thirty three

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half miles per hour, and that's probably way

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>faster than I could actually throw a messin ball. But

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>forget that for now. How fast am I going to

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>travel back in my chair? How fast will the chair

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>roll backward in opposite direction from my throw? Well, to

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>understand that, we take the velocity of the messin ball

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>times it's mass, So we take that fifteen per second

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>times four point five ms, which gives us sixty seven

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>point five Newton's technically that represents the force of the

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>medicine ball flying away from me. There must be an

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>equal and opposite reaction, So that means the product of

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>my mass and vela city has to equal negative sixty

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>seven point five. It's equal and opposite of the original.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Now it's negative because we're looking at velocity in the

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction of the medicine ball's flight, so it's it's

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of medicine ball's flight being positive. Mine

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>has to be negative. So it doesn't mean that I

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of weird negative unit of measurement. Instead

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is referring to it being a different direction and opposite direction.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So again forces mass times acceleration, and we know what

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>my mass is with the chair right, it's nine. And

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>we know that the force is equal and opposite of

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the force that was in the medicine ball side of

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the equation, so we know it's the forces minus sixty

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>seven point five. So that means we have to divide

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>both sides by my mass. We divide minus sixty seven

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>point five by my mass of ninety kilograms and we

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>end up getting minus point seven five meters per second,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So that means I'm traveling backward in my chair at

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>point seven five per second initially before friction slows me down.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Rocket science is exactly like that, only of course, way

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>more difficult. We'll get into why it gets way more

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult in just a second, but first, y'all, I need

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to take a quick break. I'm gonna thank my sponsor.

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>The science of rocketry continued in large part because rockets

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>could be effective weapons of war. In four engineers discovered

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that by designing jet vents on an angle so they're

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not coming just straight out, a rocket would spin when

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it was ignited, and that spinning motion would actually create

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a stabilization in the rockets flight path, kind of like

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a bullet experience when it emerges from a gun, It

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>spins and that produces stability. Uh. The st to ability

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of spinning objects would become a very important component, not

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just in space travel, but in technology in general. It's

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've talked about that with gyroscopes in Constantine.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Soolkov Sky, who I talked about in the first episode

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of this whole series, proposed the possibility of space travel

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>through rocketry. Moreover, he theorized that a liquid propellant would

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be a more suitable fuel source to provide the energy

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>necessary to push a rocket into space, but had not

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>quite worked out how that would actually happen. Solkovski worked

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on some really important details about the relationship between a

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>rocket's mass and its speed and what it would take

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a rocket into space. So let's take a

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>few moments to understand the calculations that are necessary. Now

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we've already covered the equal and opposite reaction. We understand

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that that whatever we want the rocket to do is

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be based upon the amount of mass it's

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>throwing out through its engine and how fast it's throwing

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that mass out. But now we have to consider some

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>other complicating fact. There's first, a rockets mass when it's

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>fully fueled is different than the rockets mass one second

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>before all the fuel burns up. That mass is decreasing.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Now the mass is not being destroyed, it's just being

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>thrown out of the engine. Because you cannot create or

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>destroy matter. You can't convert it from one form to another,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can't destroy it, So that mass isn't being destroyed.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>If you talk about a rocket that has, you know,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand tons of fuel aboard it. That twenty thousand

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>tons of fuel gets turned into twenty thousand tons of

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>high pressured gas during the process of being shot out

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the engine. So burning fuel means you're ejecting mass

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>through the rocket engine. So the rockets mass decreases throughout

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the engine burn and that affects the equations. And if

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you want that rocket to actually carry something into space,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the payloads mass has to be taken into account along

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with the rocket in the fuel. Sometimes that can seem

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's negligible, but it's still really important. So getting

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a payload into space as a matter of the earning,

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>how much force you will need to escape Earth's gravity,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>how large your rocket will need to be to do that,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>how much fuel you're gonna need to move that rocket,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>which in turn might mean that you have to make

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>changes to how big the rocket is. And as this continues,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you can easily see it get away from you. Right,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, to move something of this mass,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>i'm gonna need x amount of fuel. But if you

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>have X amount of fuel, that's too much fuel for

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this rocket. So the rockets gonna have to be bigger,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but the rockets bigger than the mass is greater, which

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>means I'm actually gonna need more fuel than what I

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thought before, and that can quickly run away from you.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's another complication. Any changed the design of the

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>rocket or the payload is going to affect the amount

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of fuel you're gonna need to use. And of course,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>when you add more fuel, you add more mass, so

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really slippery slope. When you burn the fuel, you

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>create this high pressure gas, and releasing that gas in

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a specific direction provides the thrust to push a rocket.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The weight of fuel you burn is equal to the

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>weight of the gas that is generated, So if you

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>burn a ton of fuel, you have created a ton

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of high pressure gas. The burning process is what actually

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>accelerates the mass with the release through the nozzle that

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>provides thrust, and the nozzle also can increase the the

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>acceleration or it accelerates. Rather, I shouldn't say increases the acceleration,

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it accelerates the mass further. And by this incredible acceleration

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>multiplied by the mass of the high pressure gas that

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you're shooting out of this rocket engine, that's what creates

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the force that allows a rocket to lift off the ground,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and we measured thrust in either Newton's as I mentioned earlier,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or in the good old us of A. Because we

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously refuse to do things the way the rest of

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the world does it, we refer to it as pounds

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of thrust. One pound of thrust is equal to four

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>point four or five Newton's of thrust, and one pound

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of thrust is what would take to keep a one

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>pound object stationary against the force of gravity on Earth.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>One Newton is the amount of force necessary to make

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>one mass of one kilogram accelerate at a rate of

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>one m per second squared. This means on Earth, a

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>mass of one kilogram pushes against whatever it is resting

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on with a force of nine point eight Newton's on average.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a kilogram weight on a table,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that kilogram is effectively pushing against the table with nine

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>point eight newtons of force, the tables pushing back with

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nine point eight newtons, a force equal and opposite. And

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason why it's nine point eight Newton's it's because

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Earth's gravity, at least at mean sea level, is nine

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>point eight meters per second squared. To get space to

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get up to space. You have to travel fast enough

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to break free of the gravitational force of the Earth.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We actually figured out exactly what speed we need to

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do that, so that speed would be eleven kilometers per

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>second or seven miles per second. You gotta get at

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>at that speed in order to breakthrough an escape Earth's gravity.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>On March sixteenth, ninety, Robert Goddard, whom I also mentioned

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in that earlier episode, created a rocket that used liquid

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>oxygen and gasoline as propellant. Liquid oxygen was used as

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the oxidizer. He also got to work developing multi stage

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>rockets and liquid fuel rockets. This was a big deal.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It was the first liquid fuel rockets. They're very important,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but up until Goddard, no one had figured out how

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to do them. They had been using solid fuel rockets,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like the gunpowder rockets that the Chinese had created way

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>back in the Sum dynasty. Uh. Solid fuel rockets burned quickly,

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and if they're designed properly, they do not explode. It's

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>easier said than done. It requires finding the right mixture

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of components so as you can have a rapid but

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>controlled burn, and uncontrolled burn turns into an explosion. So

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>typically solid fuel rockets have a whole kind of down

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the center think of think of a solid fuel rocket.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Think of it as taking the case of the rocket

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>off and you have a a solid cylinder of fuel.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Down the center of that cylinder is a tube or

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a hole, and you ignite the fuel in the center

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of this tube and it burns from the center out

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>towards the edge where it's making contact with the casing

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the rocket, and then the fuel is spent. The

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is, once you ignite a solid fuel rocket,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it burns until all the fuel's gone. There's no stopping

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>the engine once you start. Liquid rockets, however, offer up

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more control. You can actually turn on or turn off

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the burn process, so you can control the rocket engine

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that way. But they also come with other challenges. So

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to burn stuff, you need three things. We all remember

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the triangle, right, You need heat, you need fuel, and

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you need an oxidizer. And here on Earth we tend

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to just rely on oxygen. Right, that's our oxidizer. We

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>also don't have to do anything special with it if

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we're on the surface of the planet. But in liquid

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>rocket design, you need to have an oxidizer incorporated into

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the design of the propulsion system in order to create

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>an environment in which fuel can actually burn. You cannot

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>burn fuel without an oxidizer. Liquid oxygen is a frequent oxidizer,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least in the early rockets, that was frequently used,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Goddard did. The oxidizer and fuel end

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>up being pumped into a combustion chamber and it's mixed there,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so you get a fine mix of oxidizer and fuel

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>which can then be ignited that ends up burning off

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and creating this high pressure gas that then can be

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>directed through a nozzle to create the thrust. The combustion

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>chamber and the nozzle can get really really hot, like

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>hot enough to break down if the heat goes unchecked.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So typically a liquid fueled rocket design will include either

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the oxidizer or the fuel as a super cold cryogenic

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>liquid like liquid oxygen obviously has to be a cryogenic liquid,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or liquid hydrogen has to be a cryogenic liquid. You

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have to get them at very very cold temperatures in

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>order to keep that stuff in liquid form. Typically those

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>cryogenic liquids would pass through lines that are adjacent to

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the combustion chamber and nozzle and transfer heat away from

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>those parts of the rocket engine and the pumps that

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>provide the oxidizer in the fuel to the combustion chamber

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have to be incredibly strong because inside that combustion chamber

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you're generating that high pressured gas. If the pumps are

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not strong enough to overcome that high pressure, then the

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gas is gonna go up those pump lines instead of

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out the nozzle, or they'll go up the pump lines

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and out the nozzle, and you don't want that. So

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to have very very strong pumps in a

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>liquid fuel rocket, which is why, uh, it's a complicated process.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Is a complicated technology, and it's why it took a

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>good long time for someone to develop one that could

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I actually work. Even Goddard's demonstration was pretty modest, and

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if you saw the launch today and you just watched

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as it happened, you'd think, well, what's the big deal.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It didn't even go that high and when a few

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>meters up in the air and then came right back down.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But when you understand the technology behind it, how complicated

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was very impressive. Most importantly, you can

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>control the burn of a liquid fueled rocket because you

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>can stop the flow of oxidizer and fuel into the

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine. You can turn the pumps off and once

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to burn the engines off, it's not gonna

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>create any more thrust, and then you could start it

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>back up again when you needed to, so you it

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an all or nothing the way a solid fuel

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>rocket would be. Solid fuel was much more simple, but

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it was more limited. So liquid fuel is the way

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Pretty much all the propulsion systems of all

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the spacecraft had to be liquid fueled. They there were

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>several spacecraft that would also depend on solid fuel for

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>some stage or another. May it was like a retro

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rocket or a breaking rocket or something like that, or

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>sometimes solid fuel booster rockets to get up into space.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But when it came to fine tuning, we're talking about

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>liquid fueled rockets. Well, I've got a lot more to

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>say about rockets, but before I jump into that, let's

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break to thank our sponsor. In the

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forties, German engineer Werner von Braun, who would later

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>be brought over to the United States under Operation paper Clip,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>worked on developing the V two rocket for Germany, and

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>those rockets used a mixture of oxygen and alcohol for propellant.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>They consumed fuel at a rate of one ton of

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>fuel every seven seconds, So that tells you how much

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>mass is being thrown out by this rocket engine. It's

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot a ton of fuel every seven seconds. And

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>this was the first rocket design that could actually cross

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Carmen line into who space. The Americans would end

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>up taking not just the German scientists and engineers, but

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>also some of the V two rockets during Operation paper Clip,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and then adapt those rockets for scientific experiments such as

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>making measurements of the atmosphere at very high altitudes. The

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties saw the development of i C b ms,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>also known as intercontinental ballistic missiles scary scary technology. This

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is where we get into the nuclear arms race, and

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that whole assured uh mutually assured mass destruction where you're

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>your whole philosophy is we need to build up our

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>weapons enough so that no one will dare pick on us,

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and our enemies have their weapons built up in the

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>same way, so that way will always be at peace,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because if we were to launch an attack, everybody would die.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And so the only way to win is not to

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>play anyway without I c b ms. We also would

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not have had the launch vehicles that we use during

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Space race. So some scientific good came out of this,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>uh and a lot of scary military stuff came out

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of it too, But this is where we started getting

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>into putting stuff into space with satellites like spot Nick

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 1>or spacecraft like the Mercury Capsule. So now I can

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about specific rockets. Not generally speaking,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a space rocket tends to have four major components, each

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 1>of which might have thousands of individual parts to them.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>You've got the actual casing or structure of the rocket.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the physical form of the rocket. It's the bit

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that holds all the other bits in place. And then

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got the propulsion system that would be the fuel,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the rocket engine, all the components necessary for providing thrust.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a guidance system because you want the rocket to

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>go where you want it to go, so you have

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to have some way of guiding it, of steering it,

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and there are multiple ways that that has happened throughout

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the years. So you gotta have a guidance system. And

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>then you have the payload that's whatever the rocket is carrying,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like in these cases we're talking about satellites or spacecraft. Obviously,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in military applications you might be talking about the satellite,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're probably talking about some sort of warhead. And

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>most rockets contain at least two stages, with each stage

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>having its own guidance system and propulsion system. The final

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>stage is usually what ends up carrying the payload. The

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>earliest designs for I C b m s which were

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>intended as weapons of mass destruction that would carry a

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapon. Uh, we're sort of the brainchild again of

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Werner von Brawn. He was working on a design in

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Germany during World War Two. It was designated the A

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>nine Slash ten. The US and the Soviet Union both

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rushed to develop I C b ms in the wake

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of World War Two. That was at the beginning of

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War between the two countries. The Soviets got

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there first. They built the first I C b M.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>It was a two stage missile and it was called

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the R seven. It was one twelve feet or thirty

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>four meters long and measured nine point nine ft or

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>three point two meters in diameter. It used liquid oxygen

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>as the oxidizer. In those early early ones and kerosene

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>was the fuel in the early ones. It weighed two

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>eight metric tons. The first stage of the rocket consisted

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of four strap on rocket boosters around a central rocket engine.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh The central engine would continue providing thrust through both

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>stages of the rocket. The R seven demonstrated that the

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union could launch a missile at targets on the

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>other side of the world, and the Soviets used modified

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>versions of the R seven for splot Nick, for the

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>VOS stock spacecraft, for vos CAD, and for the early

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Soya's launches. About half of the launches used using the

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>early R seven launch vehicles suffered failures. It was notoriously

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>unreliable early early on in its design, and that prompted

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet engineers to revisit that design and make changes

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to improve reliability. But the R seven would continue to

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the point where today the Soviets are using launch vehicles

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that are based off that same design. Even the Soyuz

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>rockets that we use are relying upon those types of

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>launch vehicles. They're still part of that our seven family.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So some of the variants also include the option of

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a third stage of the rocket. That was one of

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that was planned when the Soviets were thinking

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about going to the Moon. Over in the United States,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the Atlas rocket would become the first American I CBM.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The first successful demonstration of an Atlas rocket took place

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a little more than a year after the Russians had

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>launched sput Nik into orbit, and the Atlas, like the

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>R seven, had a notorious reputation for malfunctions and launch failures.

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Though General Dynamics and corvet Are, the companies that were

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>building the missile, worked very hard to solve those design

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>problem loans, but it was a particularly complicated rocket design,

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>liquid fueled rocket, and it was really complex, and that

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>created multiple points for potential failure, so all that stuff

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>had to be worked out. The Atlas LV three B

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or Atlas D became the launch vehicle for the last

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>four manned Mercury Project missions. The failure rate created real concern,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but the Atlas was literally the only vehicle that the

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>United States had access to that would be capable of

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>putting a payload into orbit. Atlas had what was referred

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to as a stage and a half design, with a

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>first stage that was bolstered by booster. A booster rocket

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>now the first three manned Mercury missions. What did they use?

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean if the last four used the Atlas d

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>um what did the actually I guess the first two

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Mercury missions, there were only six manned Mercury missions. What

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>did they rely on? Well, they relied on a rocket

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>called the red Stone that was the first American space booster.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But the Redstone did not have enough fuel capacity or

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>thrust capability to put a payload into orbit. It could

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>only do suborbital flights. So while the Redstone was the

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>first space booster for a manned mission, UH, it was

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>not capable of putting anyone into orbit. For the Gemini missions,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>NASA would end up using the Titan two g LV

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that was their launch vehicle of choice. The Titan, too

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was a second generation I C B M and it

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was a two stage liquid fuel rocket that used nitrogen

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>tetroxide as an oxidizer I mentioned that earlier and aerosigne

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty as a fuel. And it was a simpler design

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>than the Atlas, which made it a little more reliable.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>There were fewer things that could go wrong. The Apollo

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>program would rely on two variants of a launch vehicle

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>called the Saturn. The Saturn one or I B if

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you prefer, that's the one B for all Apollo missions

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>up to and including Apollo seven. Then starting with Apollo eight,

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they switched to the Saturn five, so a follow eight

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to Apolo seventeen used the Saturn five launch vehicle. The

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Saturn one was the first heavy lift spacecraft launch vehicle

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and while NASA was originally going

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to use it for the early Apollo missions, the organization

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decided that the cuts they would need to make

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in payload weight in order to make this work weren't

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>worth the efforts, so instead they decided that they would

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>use the upgraded Saturn one B instead. Uh It was

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a two stage rocket, with the second stage called the

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>S four B, which I talked to about in previous episodes.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>A modified version of the S four B would become

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the third stage for the Saturn five. The Saturn five

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was capable of sending a fueled CSM Command Service Module

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and LM or lunar module to the Moon. The S

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>four B would provide the thrust needed to go from

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>an Earth orbit into a translunar injection. So the Centurn

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>five was the only vehicle that the US had that

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>would have that capability of actually getting someone to the moon.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>The Soviet counterpart to the Saturn five was not an

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>R seven variant. It was a launch vehicle called the

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>N one. It was a super heavy lift launch vehicle

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and had three stages. The Soviets wanted the INN one

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to deliver cosmonauts to the Moon during the Space Race,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so this was gonna be the launch vehicle that would

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>put cosmonauts to the Moon, hopefully beating the Americans in

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the process. The development of the N one started several

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>years after the Saturn five development process had already begun,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>so the Americans were already ahead on rocket design, so

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the Soviets are behind. As a result, there was a

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.239
<v Speaker 1>ton of political pressure to rush through the design and

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>production of the launch vehicle, and there was a lack

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of funding to do it too, so it was the

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>worst of all worlds. Uh. This ended up including a

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>design for the most powerful first stage rocket ever constructed.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The designer of the N one was Sergei Koraev, but

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>he died during a surgical procedure in nineteen sixty six,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of in the middle of the process

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of developing the INN one that caused further problems in

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that whole development process. Obviously, there were only four test

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>launches held for the N one, and every single one

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of those test launches resulted in failure. The second one

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>resulted in a launch pad explosion so spectacular it entered

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the history books as the ninth largest non nuclear man

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>made explosion. It was equal to the detonation of a

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>kilo ton of T and T. So the project was scrapped.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>No one outside the Soviet Union would even learn about

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this until the Soviet Union itself collapsed. It was finally

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>revealed in the late nineteen eighties after the Soviet Union

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>had collapsed. So for for more than a decade, more

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>than two decades, the United States had no idea that

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this was going on over at the Soviet Union, or

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>at least very little confirmed idea of it. The Space

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Shuttle program, which I'm going to talk about in our

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>next episode, had its own launch vehicle. One of the

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about that vehicle is that the Space Shuttle

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>would be attached to an external tank. And also attached

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to this external tank, we're a pair of solid fuel

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>rocket boosters, and those boosters could be recovered and reused.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The external tank could not be reused, so it was

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not designed to be recovered. The tank was essentially just

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a fuel tank. So the shuttle itself had three main engines,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and the external tank would provide fuel to those three

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>main engines. Those engines would ignite it left off, and

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the two solid fuel rocket boosters would ignite at liftoff.

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Once the solid fuel rocket boosters had burned through, they

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would jettison from the external tank, fall back to Earth

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and get recovered for reuse. And then the Space Shuttle

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>would eventually jettison the external tank as it was heading

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>up toward orbit. The external tank would not be reused.

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'll talk more about the Space Shuttle in our

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>next episode, and I'll also use that time to talk

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the private launch vehicles that were

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>created by SpaceX. I was going to do it in

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but these shows are running kind of along

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because I get gabby about all right, let's be honest,

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I get gabby about everything, but I I get particularly

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>gabby about space stuff. And I know that's the case.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna save that SpaceX discussion for the end

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the next episode. That's when we'll talk about the

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Space Shuttle program. That will be the conclusion of the

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 1>space block of content, and then we'll switch gears or

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll change navigation to go to some new destination. If

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for what I should talk about

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 1>an upcoming episodes of tech Stuff, send me an email.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The address is tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>or you can drop me a line on Facebook or

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter to handle at both of those is tech Stuff

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>hs W. Don't forget. We have a brand new merchandise

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>store t public dot com slash tech Stuff that's t

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>e public dot com slash tech Stuff. You can go

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>check it out. We have a whole bunch of different

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>designs up there for various products. We've got the I

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Heart Tech. If you want to be like me where

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I start with every every podcast, but I love all

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>things tech, get yourself an I heeart tech t shirt.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Everything you purchase a little portion of that ends up

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>going to the show, so you end up supporting the show,

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.439
<v Speaker 1>but you also get something cool in return. So I'm

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not asking for any donations or anything. I'm saying if

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you've ever wanted a tech stuff T shirt, go check

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it out and just know that if you buy one,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>only do you get a really cool T shirt or

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sticker or phone case or whatever. You also end up

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 1>throwing a couple of bucks the way of tech stuff

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>helping us keep our show going, I really appreciate it.

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And also, hey, before I leave, don't forget go follow

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram Crystal Our our social media managers really

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on my case about that, and I'll tell to you

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. For more on this and thousands of

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is that how stuff works dot com