WEBVTT - February Q&A (2/15/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal call that for me, I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 1>for day Edith state is that woo woom? And now

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Tye welcome back to the Saliburbo boys and girls.

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hilton Brandt. I am joined as

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>always by my good friend and colleague and co hosts

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>over there in beautiful New York City, a gentleman. You

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>know him well as Dan Rubinstein. Sir, how are you?

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>The audio coffin is dead Tie, That's why they call

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it a coffin. That's true.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I have recorded my final show in the Espianation audio coffin,

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>not because I'm leaving Espanation, but because Espianation left our

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>old space and Vox Media, and you got a tour

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>of it. I did last week when you were in

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>New York briefly. So I am recording.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Now in a gosh six by twelve foot like padded room,

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like a full on voiceover room.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 2>There's a carpet beneath me, the walls have been treated

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 2>for sound. There's actual lights in here.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay. I feel like a new man because the last

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>booth that you were in, they are so called audio coffin. Yeah,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it was legitimately like a stand up tanning booth. Right.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It was really close confines in there.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>And if you do a show with more than one

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>person in that booth, like I've pulled people in like

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>we had who do we have Martin Rickman in there

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>a little while ago? You know, Ryan has come in

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>every so often, Jane has come in, Like, there's all

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>sorts of people that will like end up in this

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>three by three foot audio coffin.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And after like a solid forty five.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Minutes, not getting oxygen and not fully being comfortable where

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>you are, You're just.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Like, I kiss this person? Is what are we supposed

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to do? Our mouths are so close.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>That's what my brain sounds like in an audio coffin, right,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>which should make sense to everybody listening if they've ever

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>listened to the show.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So in a new space.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And we're in the off season now and I'm I'm

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty stacked or stoked about that. I'm also stacked about

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>that tie. This is when we have an opportunity to engage,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess would be the word.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Gauge, really explore the studio space if you will, and

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just go places, Ty, just go places. Yeah, you solicited

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of a bunch of questions and created a document. Yeah,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this is an outstanding list of questions we've got here, Dan.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And what I like about the document is you not

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>only have it loaded up with a ton but you

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>also put it in a very specific and logical order.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So and it fits what we do on the show,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to start off with football and then

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>devolve into just total madness, second stuff early. Yeah, this

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is good. So all right, follow us on Facebook and Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>all those usuals. Don't forget to subscribe at iTunes, dot

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash solid Verbal. We will be here all off

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>season doing one podcast a week every Wednesday. Today we

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>decided to give back to the verbawlers out there. We

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>tend to do Q and a's periodically throughout the course

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of the off season. We have a lot planned, big

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>plans for this offseason and certainly the coming football season.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So keep it right here our website again, isslidverbal dot com. Dan,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into any of our emails and questions

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and comments, did you want to give a quick run

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>through a quick rundown of what's going on in and

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>around the college football ether. Is there any news, Yeah,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean of substance. It's mostly draft stuff, and.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously the transition between college and the pros

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and how people are evaluating players we've watched for three,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 2>four or five years. Arden Ki, though the sophomore stud

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>defensive end for LSU, certainly probably the captain, the guy

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>coming back next year from the Tigers. He has taken

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>an indefinite leave of absence. The circumstances are unknown, so

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>we hope everybody is okay, and it's just some sort

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>of weird situation that needs to be dealt with. I

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's academics. I don't know if it's health.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there was a statement. I hope

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>it's true that there's not a health issue. So hopefully

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>everything can get squared away and everybody's okay. Beyond that,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Jim Harbaugh hired the dad and a notable coach, but

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 2>the dad of a twenty nineteen quarterback recruits. I have

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>coached with him, I believe, at the University of San

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Diego and is now a high school coach.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Not the first time Jim Harbaugh has done that, but.

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 2>It's legal. It's fine. People do it all over the place.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Now it's Jim Harbaugh's turn the tenth assistant coach. Right now,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you're allowed to have nine assistant coaches, but a rule

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 2>allowing for a tenth was up to be voted. It

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look like that'll be happening at least until next year.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 2>So staff size, or at least official ability to coach

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and interact with players, that is still going to be

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>at nine, although schools clearly all over the place hiring

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 2>analysts sort of serve in a behind the scenes game planning,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 2>breaking down tape, extension of the coaching staff role. So

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>beyond that, not too much has been happening. The big

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>health thing that we hope turns out all right is

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Bill Snyder. Yeah, I believe it's diagnosed with throat cancer.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that the official But not losing any time on

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the job.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Correct, We'll be working and we hope for an absolutely

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>speedy and successful recovery for Bill Snyder, who listen, he

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>is a wizard, and we hope it sort of deals

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>with everything that he does. So good luck to Bill

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Snyder and his family and everybody. A Kansas State.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We're rooting for him absolutely, all right, So relatively slow

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>on the news front. As we get a little closer

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>into draft season, we can cover that, bring on some

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of our pals. But in the meantime, let's get to questions. Congratulations, Skippy,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got mail, You've got mail on the Solid Verbal

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Rubinstein. As often as we can, we like to

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>pay homage to those of you who email in at

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>solid verbal at gmail dot com our email address, those

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of you who comment on our Facebook posts, to those

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>of you who write in on the Twitter feed. We

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have a document before us that is laden with questions, Dan,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>where are we going first?

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let's start with this. It's Mike, I don't know,

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 2>is it Sclens? I like made up names?

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Glens. Yes. I asked us every year and your answer

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is always awesome. That's all.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a great way to start a question. Thank you,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Which eligible Which bowle eligible team will see the biggest

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>fall this year? In which non Bowl team will see

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the biggest rise?

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Tie?

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, do any teams including both of our teams go

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Irish go Ducks? Both of our teams finished four and eight.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Those two teams seem like obvious answers. But let's but

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>he said bowl teams bowl eligible. Well, he also said,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you know non Bowl teams can rise. Uh, non boll

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>teams will see the biggest rise. I think of those

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>two are obvious, but let's start with ball eligible teams

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that'll that'll make a fall.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the one that kind of jumps out a

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit at me, with full working knowledge of sef

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>o'loof oul not being with Colorado next year as well

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as Jim Levitt. As well as Jim Levitt, I'm a

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>little concerned about where that could head. They had a

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>charmed season. I'm not rooting for this by any stretch

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination, but I would say Colorado is a

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>team that jumped out to me as someone who might

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be a candidate. Right. I know one of my risers

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>would probably be Georgia. Georgia's defense was actually okay for

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a decent chunk of the year. They had problems on offense.

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>They obviously got a young quarterback, had five losses this season.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I could see them taking a big step forward in

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>year two under Kirby Smart Jacobson.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can get into this in a little bit.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about Nebraska having to replace a good chunk

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the ball, you know, top receivers.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna have a big quarterback battle, return a lot

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>of talent on defense. The secondary should be looking pretty

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>good even with the loss of Nake Airy, But I'm

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>curious about that because they started so quickly. I don't

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>think they're a six and six team, but I think

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a little bit closer this year

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>for them. I think Colorado is reasonable, although they've recruited

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty well and the infusion of talent should should continue there.

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Elsewhere in the Pac twelve, I don't think there's a

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>big foller to me.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the big, the big obvious one is Western Michigan.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they count in this. Yeah, Houston, Yeah,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Western Michigan. Houston obviously both teams losing their coach. Yeah,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Western Michigan losing some of their artillery in terms of offense,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So that to me is pretty obvious.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 2>What about text A and M They were treading water

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>this past year bringing in a grad transfer quarterback. I'm

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>not all that confident that the problem is solved at quarterback.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 2>They lose a number of playmakers up front defensively led

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 2>by Miles Garrett, they lose some weapons on offense. They've

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>recruited extraordinarily well, but they seem to be a water

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>treading team, and I don't know that the John Chavis

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>experiment has fully worked out to the level I think

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Texas A and M had hoped, especially with the Eggies

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and their ability or lack thereof against the run. So

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fully confident that they're going to make an

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 2>aggressive move forward Texas A and M's twenty seventeen schedule,

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of teams are scheduling big, fun,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>exciting neutral site games home and home. So they start

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the season at UCLA. New ish look UCLA team on

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>offense with a new offensive coordinator and Jed Fish coming

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>over from Michigan. The quarterback coach for Michigan Josh Rosen,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>should be much healthier. Still a lot of concerns about

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the UCLA offense even with a Josh rose I think

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 2>fair to say with how they looked most of the

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>season last year. So they're at UCLA and then the

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>rest of their non conference schedule early on nicol State

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Louisiana Lafayette. They're at Arkansas. Well, it's a neutral site

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>game in Arlington at at and T Stadium. South Carolina

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and Alabama at home.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, not bad.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>If you can split those, that's a big win. They're

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>at Florida, which who knows with the Florida offense moving forward,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and they lose a ton on defense. Mississippi State at

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Field, Auburn at Kyle Field, New Mexico.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Play New Mexico in future? Notre Dame head coach Bob Davy.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you do. They go to Ole Miss,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>they go to LSU, so it's a pretty even schedule.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't end favorably, but ole Miss could be who

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 2>knows with Shaye Patterson. But the talent isn't what it

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 2>was a couple of years ago.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 2>I six and six, seven and five isn't super far

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>off to me for texta thank not far off.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>If they do, If they do like the doggy paddle

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>from their current state of whatever through twenty seventeen, I

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>will not at all be surprised they just keep it

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in neutral, right, you know, I wouldn't be surprised. I

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I feel a big rise or a

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>big drop off for A and M. I think A

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and M fans are in that same boat. That's part

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. They're not sure if this thing is

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>turned in the right or the wrong direction. So who

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>are your growers? Then? Well, the big one from East Georgia.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I think Georgia. Anybody else? I think George is a

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>big one. Miami could have been in that conversation, but

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>brag Kaya went pro mm hmm, so that one sort

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of caught me a little bit off guard.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious. I would love to see the momentum in

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Aimes sco Iowas Tate. I'd love to see Matt Campbell

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 2>get them to you know's, there's a drive to six

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>element to a few teams Kansas, ty I'm not insane

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>for saying it.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Having a good recruiting class, aren't they They're recruiting well.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>They did some little things well last season, they beat

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>an app blow average team in Texas.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Tye, get on that train. Syracuse. Do you

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>see them getting to six games? I like their quarterback situation.

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, uh yeah, okay, next question, next question, yeah, next question,

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Top five or just any list of coordinators that you

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>think could be in line to get ahead job sooner

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>rather than later.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is kind of like the Jesse Palmer special

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>right here, right.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Jesse Palmer Memorial, even though we assume

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>he's still alive. Question, right, I think we're both going

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>to agree on Jomo.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Jomo Joe moorehead offensive coordinator for Penn State. He was

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rumored to be in the mix for some jobs that

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>came open this fall, but Joe moorehead is on that list.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Another obvious one's got to be Dave Randa.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, Dave Randa, Yeah, who I think long term may

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>have his site set even higher, But yeah.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Dave Randa, current defensive coordinator at lsu H, Lincoln Riley

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>from Oklahoma, current offensive coordinator for Oklahoma. And Bob Stoops.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a younger guy. I think he's younger than both

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you and I and he's already coaching at the major

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>college level in a serious capacity. So yeah, there's that

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and the other one who I don't know if he

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>gets quite the recognition he deserves, But Todd Orlandos had

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good run the last couple of years. That

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was the name I had as well.

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>He's been putting together defense after defense, be it at

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Utah State or Houston. Now he's in a position at Texas.

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 2>We have no idea what jobs are going to come open,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>very fragile nature of employment at the college head coaching level.

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Tod Orlando will have an opportunity. I know he interviewed

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>for the Houston head job. He was the Houston defensive

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 2>coordinator these past few seeds past couple seasons. That'll be

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>a big name in the PAC twelve, t Martin. If

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Sam Darnold has the other enormous year, I think he's

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>becoming more and more well regarded and obviously has the

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>history in the SEC as a player. I mean Pep Hamilton.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of people like him will be

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>running an offense for the first time in a while

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>at the college level at Michigan taking over there. I

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>know we have a couple questions about Michigan. Tom Allen

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 2>would have been my answer had Tom Allen already yeah,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 2>all right, all of a sudden, So that's my answer there.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think those are that's a good batch, all right,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire. Where are we going next here? Rapid fire?

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>We're going to JP.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>That last question was from I think it was Christoph.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not the full Christopher.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Was that the guy that ran the Truman Show? Was

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that his name Krystal Christof I like that movie. Movie

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>freaked me out a little bit little bit.

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, JP wants to know best taco truck in Los Angeles.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>That is a three pronged answer for me. I still

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>love the Kogie Barbecue truck, a classic, so good Ricky's

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>for fish tacos. It's behind a Vaughan's in East Hollywood,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>not far from the Scientology Center.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Nice. And also the Mariscos Jalisco truck. Mariscos being shrimp.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Seafood nice, well, just seafood come out on as shrimp.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>The Mariscos Halisco truck. They have like two or three

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of them now downtown and East LA. It is the

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>best shrimp taco in America, and it's not particularly close.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>They're crispy and fried and amazing and smothered in salson

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>avocado and related. What do you think of USC's national

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>championship chances in twenty eighteen?

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel better Come, I'll ride the train. I feel

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>better about it. I'm looking at their schedule right now,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Western Michigan. That's a winnable game favorite bye week on

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the schedule. You see, Yeah, Stanford second week, Texas third week.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>That'll be interesting. But they got them at home.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Body blow at body Blow, Tom Herman in a big spot.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>At Washington State, Oregon State, Utah at Notre game at

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Arizona State. Yeah, I mean it's front loaded and backloaded,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of like creamy stuff in the middle. Yeah.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean we've all been there, Washington and Oregon not

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>on this schedule now. It's probably a pretty decent thing.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Oregon will should have a good offense. I'm not going

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to talk about their defense. Washington should return a really

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>nice offense, though they lose John Ross, number of big

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>players on defense, but they returned via to Bay. Yeah,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>they're going to lose at least one game. That doesn't

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>mean they're not going to win the National championship. But

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>without a bye week, they'll probably lose. Man I that

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 2>at Notre Dame, Utah and at Arizona State and consecutive weeks,

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>it feels like they're going to lose one of those,

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>which they should absolutely not lose. I'm not as worried

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>about going to Colorado, although I like Steven Montese some Ucla.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>We have no idea what no will look like, no

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>idea go anywhere. That Texas game, though, Ty Tom Herman

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is a good big game coach, irrefutable, right. Yeah, after

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>last year beating Louisville and oklahom.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>After stanford'll be nice and tender. Yeah, I could see it.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That could be it. Early body blow warning right here,

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>early body blow warning. That's all we're going to say.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I got the sound there you go. Oh oh, just

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what you always wanted?

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, ten and a half over under, That's what

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm just making up for USC wins.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Wins, uh under Wow, Okay, ten in a half a while,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. All right, Next question, Yeah, where's next? Uh?

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 2>Sort of related? Texas back yet from Joey Chamberlain. Texas

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 2>will always be Texas. How many wins does Texas need

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to be? Quote back, it's not even back. It's been

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>so long. Is Texas good? I don't even think.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a win thing, Dan, Ultimately it's to be a

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>win thing in like three years. But I think it's

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a quality thing. I think it's a consistency thing. Okay,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they will get offensive consistency now under Tom Herman.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>That they didn't have previously. He's just so good at

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>coaching offense. If he can do it at Houston, if

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he could do it in the capacity he did at

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State in that crazy turn of events with Cardile Jones,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he can do it pretty much anywhere, especially

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at Texas where he's going to have a ton of talent.

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the schedule. Now, tell me how many

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>losses you think are on the schedule. Texas seven. Texas

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>brings a lot back. They're actually quite young. Maryland, San

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Diego State at USC that could be a loss. That

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>might be one at Iowa State. Excuse me, k State?

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma pencil in nothing with Texas. Iowa State, I pencil

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>in nothing. Oklahoma could be a loss. Probably will be

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State. I don't know about tam Yeah. At Baylor,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>who the hell knows? At TCU could be a loss. Yeah,

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Kansas could be a loss. I mean we say could

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>be a loss. Did they not lose TC like thirty

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one to six in extraordinarily ugly fashion? They did, yep

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at West Virginia and close out the year at home

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>against Tech. Yeah. So if I said over under.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Eight wins, oh, I think I'd take the under Okay,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I okay. So Tom Herman is a great head coach.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>We agree with that in terms of like his ability

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>to sort of establish a culture and communicate and hire

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and recruits. I think he is a very, very very

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>good head coach. Great might be too far. But the

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Houston offense wasn't particularly good last year. No, you speak

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 2>confidently about Tom Herman's offensi ability. They finished season like

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>eightieth nationally in offense, and that's playing in a non

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 2>power conference.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so actually played, They played their best games against

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the best teams in their schedule, exactly.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 2>They got up for games they almost played to their

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>opponents a little bit too much. So I'm curious to

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>see because it's going to be a shift on some level,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and they don't have Danta Foreman, who's gone pro. It's

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about their offensive identity and what it looks like.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not ready to pencil in a statement like we

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 2>know their offense is going to be good.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. I'm not ready to say that.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, Joe, is it Yan's or Yannis

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Our next question? Let's go yan A. What are the

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>top five least likable fan bases in college football? This

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>what is your definition? Time? This question is going to

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>get us in a world of trouble least likable fan bases? Yeah?

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>What is this?

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Is this the fan base that is the most consistently

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>obnoxious by our arbitrary definition of consistent. Is it an

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>in person thing like in the stadium they're the worst?

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Is it, you know, a Twitter thing? Is it a

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 2>harassment thing of everybody that can be harassed?

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it an unrealistic expectation thing? Okay, I see where

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going with this, So I would say it's too

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>pronged the answer. The first thing that I will look

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>at is consistency. Okay, not all fan bases fall into

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that category. Not all fan bases are consistently terrible or

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>consistently great. And then beyond that, if you run out

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>of options, I think you need to look at the

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>extra look at the polls to see, at least in

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>our limited knowledge here, which ones have been at their

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>worst when things are going a little bit haywire with

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the program?

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Can I nominate the worst, very very very very very

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>outlying bottom sure fan base? It's got to be Penn State, right,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 2>I would say so? Yeah, Penn State is on my list.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about the lowest one percent yet, not

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as a consistently terrible fan base. Certainly, every fan as

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole has their obnoxious entities that no one wants

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to claim, but Penn State at its absolute worst. Yeah,

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm saying that as a Penn Staker, I know. Yeah,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say also here as a fan of this team,

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that Notre Dame's fan base needs to be on this list. Yeah.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been in countless stadiums with Notre Dame fans who

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>are just utterly clueless as to what's going on. Do

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that's like a hearing aid thing. I've had

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>bad experiences with Notre Dame and fans in the stadium.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And then along the same lines, I think Michigan needs

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to be on this list, not because again of any

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pure animosity towards you or I, but they're just really

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sensitive in a way that I don't always expect. So Michigan,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel, deserves to be on this list. If I'm

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a top.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Five, I'm going to recuse myself. I am marrying into

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a proud Michigan family.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's fine. You have others.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Now there is there is a self importance to to

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Michigan fans. That's not the most common thing across college football.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 2>But I will say this solid fiance's uncle, who's great.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I was just hanging out in Chicago because I had

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a bridal shower to go to. I had a tasting,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I had a catering tasting whatever whatever it's called to

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>go to. Met with the band anyway, met with you know,

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>had pizza as a family thing. What the uncle was there?

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>The uncle, one of her uncles was there and he's

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>die Die Die Die Hard Michigan. And it was the

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>most sort of realistic and measured a conversation as I've

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>ever had with him. So maybe the like back to

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>back third place divisional finishes, is that what it is?

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the place?

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe that's sort of tempering the Harbor hype a

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit. Okay, maybe I don't know. Yeah, who else.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Is on your list? Tennessee as a whole is you

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>said that show too. I don't have a whole lot

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of experience with Tennessee fans. The Tennessee people I've met

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>have been have been rather kind.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, Oh, there's a great portion of Tennessee fans

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 2>who are kind. But there's something about having a list

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 2>expectations with a non current a list program and seeing

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>everybody else around you have their like moment in the sun, like, Oh,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 2>here's Florida for a few years. Oh here's Auburn for

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years. Because Alabama never ever ever ending.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, South Carolina pops up TEXTA A and m

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 2>pops up with the Heisman, you know, but Tennessee hasn't.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 2>They have that expectation, and there's like this bubbling it's

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the crock pot of evil. Yeah, to me, it's bubbling

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 2>over with Tennessee and that sort of comes out in

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>bad ways.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Florida, for me, is on the list. There are a

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of obnoxious Florida fans. And I say that primarily

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>because most of the Florida fans I know are the

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ones making Notre Dame jokes. I don't think that the

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>worst even in the state. No, Florida State is also

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on my list. So my five teams again Notre Dame, Michigan, Florida,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Florida State, and I got Penn State at the bottom.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Florida State on this list anyway, falls into the same

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>category as Penn State. Yeah, if we're going to define

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>by the worst, Florida State had a little bit of

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a run there with James Winston where it got pretty sour,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but by all large, I haven't had problems with Florida

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>State people in a while, and I root for Florida State.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>They're an exciting team. But there was that one moment

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in the sun that I will never forget. Okay, question

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>where are we going next? Here? Quickly? Just you don't

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>need to rank a top three.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>This is our pal Dan Klobacar asking who's your favorite

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 2>announcing team, aside from like the big A list guys

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>TV announcing or women team that you particularly enjoy and

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>that can include the sideline reporter.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's got to be Adam a mean right,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we do love Adam amean I have.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>We had a couple people at the live show who

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 2>took exception to Mac Brown as a broadcaster.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm a pretty big fan.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I listen, he campaigned against cal and that was garbage,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>But other than that, I enjoy him as a broadcaster.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I will also say, and not many people are going

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to be able to confirm or deny this, but I'm

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>biased We're biased as a show, really like Ted Robinson

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and Yogi Roth. Yeah, we see what Yogi does preparing

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>for games and just how passionate he is about football. Yeah,

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>there is not a single take from Yogi Roth. It

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 2>is all just football streaming out a love of football

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 2>and the deep, deep dive of nerdiness of stuff he notices.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great. I am more apt to give

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you my underrated announcer, my underrated analyst. They call him

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a field analysts. I say it every year. I tweet

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it like two or three times a year. Tom Lougan

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Bill does an awesome job on the sidelines. Yeah, he's

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>also super prepared, does an awesome, awesome job. And to

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that same degree, Todd mcshay's in the conversation too. Those

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>guys bring a lot to every broadcast they work. Yeah.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Interesting how women are sideline reporters and men are field analysts.

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's a separate topic altogether. Huh.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, next question, Jeremy, you guys planning to have kids.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>That's an awkward transition there, man, So it is.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the question before that was what would you do

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 2>if you switch bodies slash lives for a day?

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Wow, what would you do? Ty? I guess the first

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>thing I do would be to try and figure out

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>why you're so bad at ping pong? Oh my god,

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>how dare you beyond that? I think I have respects now, Todd.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd want to go for a run in

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>your body. I don't want to feel your pain. That

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>would perhaps give me a deeper connection to who you

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are as a human. What a strange answer it is.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 2>I would just go over to Mama H's house and

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>enjoy a homemade meal and just enjoy her. Just scorching

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Hot takes on literally anybody under thirty on television.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So if we if we switch bodies, yeah, would we

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell our loved ones and our friends

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that question that we were in someone else's body? Or

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>would we have to like act as if we were

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like a Freaky Friday type scenario? Are you asking me

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>for permission to be with my lady? Well, I'm not

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>directly asking it, but I guess I kind of am. Yeah,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>And it's a two way street. It is a two

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>way street.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I would say no, but I would faint, Like if

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>if why Kate were particularly feeling me, I would say

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I would I would beg off and say not tonight, honey,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 2>not tonight. I never say the word honey. I don't

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 2>know why I'm saying now. I'm trying to inhabit you.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't do that either, Dan, I would say no,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but I would be very curious about, like behind closed doors,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what the dynamic is like. Yeah, so I would not say, Kate,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually Dan and Tie's body I would. I would

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>play it up.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I think she would discover really early because I don't

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>know that i'd be able to speak like you.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a very dumb person. Well if you if you

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>had my body, you'd have my voice. True, But would

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I have your soul? You probably wouldn't have my soul now,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't have your soul either. Okay, good question.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Give me one coach you think would make up for

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>a very good president in college football.

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>James Franklin. Total snake oil salesman. You put him out

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on the on the presidential circuit, on the recruiting trail.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's his element.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's the advert. The adjective excuse me, is enjoyable?

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Right this question, Aaron asked, enjoyable?

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you enjoy a snake oil salesman coach from each

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>conference to most likely, okay, be an enjoyable president.

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>So here's the baseline I'm giving you. I'm gonna speak

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>for Aaron here. I'm gonna need some charm. I'm gonna

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 2>need some likability. I'm gonna need some intellect. I'm gonna

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>need an ability to command a crowd, and i'm gonna

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>need just I need some charisma.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need like a statesman like presence. I think

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>James Frankl is the answer here.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, because you said snake oil salesman. That has a

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>negative connotation. I'm looking for positive attributes.

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, he said presidential candidate, which kind of has a

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>negative connotation too.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I want I want your absolutely true in that statement.

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I want an enjoyable candidate in.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>A positive way. Gundhy would be interesting because he'd be

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a loose cannon. Does he come across as smart publicly

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to you? I think he could.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Kirby's it's already the governor of Georgia, so that's a

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 2>decent enough.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I have Kirby smart written down here. Mm hmm. I

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think he would play well to that southern conservative base,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if only because of how he dresses. Yeah, Mark Rick

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at Miami is interesting. God Man is not high moral character,

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>charisma not so much high diving. Yeah, David Shaw. I

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think David Shaw is my answer. All right, let's get

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the question at hand. We'll just make this

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>quick because we got to do you guys having kids?

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we? Are you having kids together? Me and you? No? No, no, no,

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>with solid wife, solid fiance, solid fiance. Are we going

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to have kids? That's the plan. But but Ty for

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>some reason doesn't work out. Okay, all right? Are you

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>playing on having kids? That? That is the initial plan?

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>What initial ty? You're married? That is the plan as

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of now. Would you go with an H in front

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of hilden brandt? No?

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Would you go with a sound that ends in ill?

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Would you go like Phil Hildenbrand No?

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no? Would you go? How modern would you

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>go with your name? Do you skew classic? I skew classic,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I skew more syllables than less? Probably wouldn't go like JaMarcus,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, but definitely something more of the classic

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>type of per Right.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>These are the fastest rising boys' names for January twenty seventeen.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Twenty top me might need like twenty nineteen, twenty seventeen's well,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I know what I'm just telling you right now. Stop me.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>When we get to a name that you would say

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I could see blank hilden brandt Okay, okay, okay, this

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>is weird, by the way, but okay, oh my god,

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>this name is so strange. Kid kyd No, kid, that's

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a fast riser, that's plus four thousand percent.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, No, definitely not okay. B e n a j

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a h b e n a j a A No.

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't even say it. No Suleian s u l

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>i e n Are you on the English language?

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm on name, I think so, yeah, this is I

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>can't pronounce anything. So number four is CoA five Monther

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 2>six cash and seven Booreguard eight Alb nine Isaac ten Lousian.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The number three fastest rising girl's name is Tahiti. Next question,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 2>so the answer is yes, most likely our friend Dakota

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 2>aka dak just got a vegetable twister.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I've always have one of those. I know this is good.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I've always heard spiralizer, yep, but I like vegetable twister

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot better.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>The solid wife cut her finger on it had to

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>take her to get stitches. That's so be careful, Dakota.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a damn shame.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, makes those like you can make little veggie noodles

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>with them instead of using pasta. Do you guys use

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 2>any out of the ordinary cooking instruments like that on

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 2>a daily basis?

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bonus? What's the weirdest cooking instrument you've seen? I have

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a good answer for this because you spiralized, tie, I

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have spiralized, but I have a new entrant in this category.

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>What I'm head over heels for. Yeah, do you have

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>an answer before I give mine? Not? Really?

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I use a potato masher to make guacamole. Okay, No,

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>I really don't have a strong answer, but I did

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>just register for a spiralizer, so I guess that would

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 2>be my answer.

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>A good thing to have, Yeah, I recently picked up,

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to an Amazon deal, one of these souvied cookers. Okay,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are you familiar with the souvied cooking fad right now?

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I am so.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Basically, if you don't know souvied is you put your

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>food in like correct me if I'm wrong, tie a

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>plastic bag and you set it into a water bath,

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>set to cook it at a very specific temperature. For

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a low temperature for an extended amount of time,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 2>so it evenly cooks to a very specific to a

0:33:58.880 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>decimal point.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>To that's correct. So my very limited understanding of the

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>French language is that souvd means to basically cook in

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum. You're cooking in a vacuum. So you put

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever food it is you want to cook in a

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>plastic bag. You can use a zip block bag, you

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>can use if you've got a vacuum sealer, you could

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>use that too, But you basically put it in. You

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>set your suvie cooker to warm the water to a

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>very specific temperature, drop the food in, let it cook

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>for usually about forty five minutes, and then you pop

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it out and it is awesome. I had one of

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the best steaks I've ever eaten in it. I've had chicken,

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I've had fish, I've I've been trying the full work

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>since I got this thing. So that that way is

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>my answer. Have you done the reverse seer thing? I

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have you slow? Okay, so you souv et it?

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, and then it's cooked all the way through,

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 2>but you want some crust to it, then you throw

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 2>it for a quick sear.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's right or something that's right. That's what I

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>did with my misteak and it was fantastic, So I'd

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>recommend it to anybody.

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Can you let the fans decide a final Fantasy Things

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>score via Google form?

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Hard to hear.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Dan bullied tie for forty five minutes to steal a tie.

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>That comes from Kevin. All right, So did you feel bullied?

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel bullied. No, everybody's on your side. Everybody's

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on my side.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The feedback was unanimous in favor of me. Yeah, so

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I won tie.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the Labor Secretary nominee of the day, I humbly withdraw.

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I humbly withdraw and conceive that I am not the

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 2>man okay to take over the throne. You have won

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 2>our first ever calculated Fantasy Things all right, competition.

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>That was from Kevin. Thank you. All right, let's pay

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some bills and actually, Dan, we got a question about

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>paying the bills we did.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Hans wants to know why you're the one who is

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 2>always sort of in charge of taking care of our advertisements.

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 1>So usually I have the ads in front of me. Right,

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I don't trust Dan with any kind

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of treasured ad reading here. I think it's a good

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>strategy though, he's more than capable. Yeah, would you like

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>me to go first? We have two Would you like

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>me to kind of set the stage? Or do you

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go first? And then I could follow you?

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what, Ty, I'm just going to jump into

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the water. Okay, I'm just jumping in here. We go, Ty.

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 2>As you know, twenty sixteen was one for the books.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Cups finally won the World Series, we said goodbye to

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>far too many celebrities. Hey, rest in peace, Prince, we

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>love you. And the election Game Game Changer, Tie, Game Changer,

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And if twenty seventeen is anywhere near as eventful as

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 2>last year was, it might get a little difficult to

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 2>stay in formed.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Ty.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You know that it's difficult. You know that it's a challenge,

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>so many options out there, But it doesn't have to

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 2>be thanks to our friends at the Texture app Tie

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Texture Texture. With two hundred plus magazines available, Texture offers

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 2>access to in depth interviews and articles from the convenience

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 2>of your phone or tablet. It really is that easy.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Type. Yeah, I've been reading a lot, Ty, Yeah, I've

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>been reading a lot.

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 2>And Texture is a great option for that because so

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 2>much information coming at you fast and furious. It's nice

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 2>to have it offline. It's nice to just have your

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 2>texture and have it ready to go. So you know,

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>they have recommendations, they have feature articles. You can go

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 2>old issues and magazines. You love Sports Illustrated. They just

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>released the swimsuit issue, I believe today. Yeah, did you

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>see and we're gonna keep it about sports here, ty,

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 2>did you see Ali Reisman's butt?

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I did not, because I did, and she is a

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 2>great athlete. Okay, and she is a great athlete. So

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 2>that's Sports Illustrated. That's available nine to ninety nine a

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 2>month normally. But if you sign up right now at

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>texture dot com slash Solid sol i D you get

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 2>a fourteen free day, fourteen day free trial. See now

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 2>you know why Tie does these breeds.

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>What was that offer code? Again?

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Offer code is solid Texture dot com slash Solid s

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 2>l i D when you go to texture dot com

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>slash Solid.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, our second sponsor. That wasn't bad, Dan, I

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>got some butt talk in there. That was good. Yeah,

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you second sponsor. This evening, you've heard him before

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Indo Chino. Yeah, it's spelled I N d O c

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>H I N O. When I first read this many

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>moons ago, I pronounced it Indo Chino on the very

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>first time that I read this, and then from that

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>point forward they sent over a handy little pronunciation guide,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>so now it's Indo Chino. They have cheap che e

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in all caps here so that I don't screw it up.

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you gotten your suit yet for your wedding? I

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have not ty. What are you waiting for? When are

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you getting married again? Late May?

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 2>You gotta get my night ball here, man, I know

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Sunday night of Memorial Day weekends. Okay, I gotta get

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Because when I got married in late April and I

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't have my suit by like mid to late December,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>solid fiance at that time was all over me, all

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>over me about it. You gotta get you gotta get

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that suit. What are you waiting for? You gotta get

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that suit, So don't put it off any longer. I'm

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.879
<v Speaker 1>just gonna throw Indo Chino out there, because every guy

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>looks better in a good fitting suit. Indo Chino they're

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest made to measure men's wear brands

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out there. They make it easier for guys to get

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a great fitting, high quality suit. Not only that, but

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they offer shirts and they'll offer it all at an

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>incredible price. Basically, the way it works is you go

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to Indo Chino dot com again I Indochio dot com

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>or they have a showroom and nine showrooms to be

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>exact here in North America. You can pick from hundreds

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of fabrics and patterns. Basically figure out what it is

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you want on your suit. You pick your customizations everything

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>from lapels to pleas, to jacket linings much much more.

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You submit that, you submit your body measurements, and then

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't got to do anything. You just wait around

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel, you can step into the best, most stylish

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>suit you've ever worn in just four weeks.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I've always said people waiting five plus weeks for suits

0:39:59.480 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 2>or suckers.

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This is what I'm saying. So, if you're really up

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>against it, and if you drag you if you continue

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to drag your feet on this wedding suit thing, I know,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, four weeks, done and done. This week, our

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>listeners can get any premium Indo chinosuit for just three

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine indochino dot com. Enter Solid at checkout fifty

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>percent off the regular price for a made to measure

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>premium suit. The shipping is free indochino dot com. Again,

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the promo code is solid any premium suit for just

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>three eighty nine and free shipping. You don't have to

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about a bad fitting suit, expensive trips to the tailor.

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Get ready to look like a million bucks. And actually,

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the last time we read this, Dan I had a

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>guy email in and ask for the offer code. Wanted

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to know how long it lasted because he was going

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to get not only for his suit, but for the

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>other guys in his wedding as well. So just an

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 1>option for you if you're interested.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 2>What's the best taco to eat for breakfast or longtime

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 2>pal Caroline wants to know. Scramble up some eggs thereso,

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe some crispy potatoes. There's some salsa, hot sauce on there.

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Crisp up your corn tortilla a little bit.

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You're good to go.

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, yeah, tacos al pastor conpina. Oh, scene paint conpina,

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 2>scene pina.

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>With that is not English, right, that is on English?

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I would say, with some pineapple, pineapple when you go

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to dinner. This is from Carter and a movie with

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the solid wife slash fiance, which comes first dinner or

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the movie Carter?

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Carter raises a very interesting question. Yeah, typically it's dinner

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in a movie. You start with the dinner, you finish

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>out with the movie. Mm hmm. My problem is when

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I start with the dinner and you're gonna you're gonna

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>know this all too well done. Not because we've gone

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on many dinner and movie dates together, mind you, but

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you see me in action watching my team in the

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 1>National championship game.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>You see me in action making out during a movie.

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right, I will it's all in the hips.

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Cite my relatively recent performance at the first Avengers movie.

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Whenever that came out. We did the dinner in a

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>movie thing, did a dinner, it was great, went to

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the movie. It was a later showing because we did

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a later dinner and Avengers an action packed Marvel thriller.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I was out cold, out cold in the movie theater

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.959
<v Speaker 1>wearing the three D glasses. Not my proudest moment. That's

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>my problem with the solid fiance. Where I'm going with

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this is that maybe if I do the movie first

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the dinner second. That gives me more of

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>an impetus to stay awake. Right, So maybe I am

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong going to like a.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Five pm, five pm movie, seven pm dinner, because.

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>If you get the early movie, then you beat the

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>rush too. You go at five pm, no one's gonna

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>be at theater.

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally with you. I don't know that I've actually

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 2>ever done it. But upon thinking about this question, yeah,

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 2>movie and dinners great especially.

0:42:58.640 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing.

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, though I don't know if they have this now intown,

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I assume that they do. Do you have the theater

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 2>that serves food yet?

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, like they will bring food to your seats,

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, actual.

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They're building one about five minutes away from here. Yeah, okay.

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 2>I've been to a couple of those those our nights

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 2>and that combines everything, and that's that's excellent.

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't like staying out late. I like sleeping. I

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like lounging. That's the that's the answer. My favorite current

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>movie slash cinema trend is the movie theater down the

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>street now does reserve seating only. Oh that's great, reserve seating.

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.879
<v Speaker 1>See go online. You go Fandango, not a sponsor, get

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your tickets, pick your seats, and then you don't have

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to worry about going super early to get a seat.

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Just walk in, sit down, You're good to go.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Ty On that note, do you see Michigan taking a

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 2>step forward or step back in twenty seventeen?

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Jason, I think a step back? Same I am.

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 2>So they've recruited very well, undeniably, so they have maybe

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 2>the best receiver in the country coming in. I believe

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 2>his name is Donovan People's Jones or one of the

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe five best receivers coming in, which is necessary because

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 2>they lose Jessen and Darbo right sures Jake. But I

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Wilton Spate year was considered to be

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 2>an overwhelming success with how he finished out the year

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 2>and performed against the better defenses on their schedule. Defensively,

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they lose their entire secondary and their entire

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>defensive line, but they blew out a ton of teams

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and of course Gabriel Peppers who was everywhere. They blew

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 2>out a bunch of teams, so they did get a

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 2>ton of rotation experience in I don't see them getting

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:38.439
<v Speaker 2>to the playoff this coming year. No, nor do I ooh,

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 2>this is interesting. How do you just feel in general

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 2>about Bob Diaco and Nebraska.

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge Bob Diako fan. I think it's a

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>great frint at Nebraska.

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I've looked up Nebraska, and as it turns out,

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 2>they lose a lot of people. Yes, they do. The

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 2>secondary is mostly intact. There's a lot of promise and

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 2>depth on defense, but it is not It is not

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 2>rife with experience and offensively quarterback battle. They lose Trell Nuby,

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 2>they lose both Brandon Riley and Jordan Westercamp. Up front,

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>they lose a good deal. I think it's a step

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 2>back year, but I think Diaco puts together a promising

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 2>and it's not an aggressive attacking defense. No, it's much

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 2>more smart reacts. It's ben but don't break. Right, it's

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 2>bend but don't break. And again, the best defenses of

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 2>the Brian Kelly era. We're under Bob Diaco.

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>This is true. They were under Bob Daka, so I

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think he's a good fit. We talked about

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a ton of top top blue chip talent, though, right

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked a little bit about this at the list show.

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a weird dude, right, kind of a weird dude.

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think he will fit in really well there,

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'd be excited if I were a Nebraska fan.

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 2>So I have a question. I think this should be

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 2>our last question. It's a life question from it looks

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.280
<v Speaker 2>like a Wisconsin fan tie page.

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>This is my favorite question maybe that we've ever received.

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 2>It's one of my favorite questions that we've ever received.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And it was such an interesting question to me and

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't have the immediately the immediate answer for

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 2>so I actually conferred with our resident exper our life expert,

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 2>doctor Jane. I don't have a recording. It sounded like

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I was going about to play it, but she had

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a very good answer that I will also talk about.

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>So, why don't you? Since I did the ad read

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>why don't you take this? I humbly call upon the

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>almighty altar of ty ANDed in for life help and

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>how to say no. Here is the background. My wife

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:36.359
<v Speaker 1>works in a relatively small office. One of her male employees,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>along with his girlfriend, became a part of our friend

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>group a few months ago. While they've become part of

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.760
<v Speaker 1>our larger group. They're not necessarily staples in the evening

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and on weekend activities. However, we all enjoy spending time

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>with them. About a month ago, the coworker proposed to

0:46:55.680 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriend and she said yes, congratulations, Hey, give love

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a chance. Jlac Well, apparently the coworker has a large

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>number of groomsmen and the bride to be has quite

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a few less. Over the past couple weeks, she's referred

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to my wife being perhaps one of her bridesmaids, acknowledging

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that she has a lot of groomsmen to match up

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as one of the primary reasons. The wedding isn't for

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>another year and it's on the other side of the country.

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>My wife isn't one hundred percent sure about committing to

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this role. However, she hasn't officially been asked yet. He says,

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as a somewhat recently married man and a one hundred

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>percent recently engaged man, I come to you two gentlemen

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>for help with our quandary. When slash, how should my

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wife raise her lack of interest? Can my wife say

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>no without causing problems at work? Is it weird if

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>my wife is being slotted into this position after knowing

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the bride to be for only mirror months. Dan, Tie help,

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I need life advice. This is an awesome question. It's great.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>This is an awesome question. And I'm not even gonna lie.

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this one for the last twenty

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>four hours.

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So you said you conferred, Yes, do you want doctor

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Jane's opinion first?

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't?

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I think yes? We can go into what doctor Jane said,

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's a good jumping off point.

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what did doctor Jane say?

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 2>She said, part of being an adult, part of being

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 2>a grown up, and I'm quoting because I'm still I

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of questions still, Yeah, is learning how

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to be direct with people and learning how to be

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 2>honest with people in a way that is mature and

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 2>not harsh, but at the same time leaving no doubt

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 2>as to where you stand. It's a tough thing to do,

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this situation and anything else, but that's part

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of what it is now. Obviously you said go sleep

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 2>in another room when we were faced with the convention

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 2>before with the dog.

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're all growing, ty, we're all growing.

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 2>So she said specifically, it doesn't sound like a date

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 2>has been set for the wedding, right, correct, So there

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been an official Hey, I would be honored if

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 2>you were my bridesmaid. That conversation hasn't happened yet. But

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 2>when it does, when a data set and it's across

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the country and she's like, hey, I'd be really honored,

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the proper response is probably, hey, I'm really honored that

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 2>you ask me. I'm not exactly sure if I'll be

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 2>able to travel with you know, just life happening, and

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be able to commit to that anything,

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.839
<v Speaker 2>but I'm looking forward to attending as a guest. I'm

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 2>just not sure I can commit to anything else. And

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't sound very direct. Scene that's hatchie and that's

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 2>not direct. I think it's pretty direct.

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's well, it's not accepting it, and then

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not accepting it and like begging off right, it's

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>saying I don't I can't do the bridesmaid thing, but

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I would love to attend as a guest. Okay, what

0:49:57.719 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 1>does Dan Rubinstein have to say?

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 2>It's tough, man, it's a tough thing, but I think

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 2>it's that's probably the best thing.

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's so.

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Jane also has a really good strategy for reacting to

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 2>an invitation without committing. I don't know if you have

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a strategy for something like that, like you respond in

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 2>an affirmative without actually saying you'll go to something. Jane says,

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the advantages of being married Dan, right,

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 2>because once you always have an excuse, oh thank you,

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to check with so and so. Well, that's

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 2>not really a response for being a bridesmaid. But if

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the bridesmaid or the soon to be wife is talking

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to the woman in the office about you know, we're

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 2>going here for the bachelorette party, always respond with and

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 2>this is I'm quoting Jane here. She does this all

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I've invited Jane to things, and this is what she said,

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh fun, oh fun. It doesn't say, oh my god,

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 2>that will be amazing for me to go to. Right,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 2>She's just acknowledging the fun of what it sounds. She's

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 2>just adding a word behind oh oh fun. Right, oh fun.

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Here's here's what I'm thinking.

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking? You guys are going at this

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way. He gave you. He gave you all

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that you need to know in this question. And so

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of focusing in on mister Wisconsin. How you should

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>get out of it. The most important thing to evaluate

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>first is where in fact this trip would take you.

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 1>All Right, now, he says, that's just the trip. It's

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:38.439
<v Speaker 1>not just a trip. But hold on, as someone who's

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.720
<v Speaker 1>been to a bunch of these types of things, Yeah,

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes the people in this part of the country are

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:50.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have weddings in southern California mm hmm, in Cancun, Yeah,

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the Caribbean, somewhere fun that I wouldn't normally

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have an excuse to go to. Right, judging from the

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's a Wisconsin fan, I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>make a guess here. He's not from a warm weather place,

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and if he's going somewhere nice, then perhaps that gives

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>him him an excuse to go to this thing. So

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the next question is, well, okay, I'd love to go

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to Cancoon or Porta Vay Arts. I don't know, somewhere south.

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to go there, but I'm afraid of the commitment.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>It says other side of the country, other side of

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the country. Okay, so it's probably a coast to coast, right,

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm eager to go to said location. But my wife

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit concerned about the actual level of

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>commitment here. A. You don't got to go to the

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 1>bachelorette party. You can easily wiggle your way out of

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that one. I got something else going. It's going to

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>cost too much money. There are plenty of ways that

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you can be direct about that without ruining any kind

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of friendship in the office. Right. And Secondly, depending on

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>depending on what the requirements are for this wedding, You're

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not always required to buy a special kind of dress,

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>You're not always required to do a whole lot in

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the way of actual commitments surrounding people have to fly

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to showers. I'm saying you don't have to do that. Right.

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>If this is a situation where she's literally just snapping

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>people onto the guest list to try and fill out

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of an even spread here between groomsmen and bridesmaids,

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably within the realm here that she'd

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>get away with not having to commit to the full

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>complement of wedding activities. Yeah, so what I'd say is,

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>first evaluate where it's at. Secondly, if it's somewhere you

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go, push the envelope A little bit and

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>see how much you can get away with if you

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do commit to this wedding without having to commit to everything,

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and if it turns out that you can go to

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a cool place without having to sign your life away

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or pay a million dollars to be part of a

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>wedding and get the official attire and whatnot, then I

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's just a good excuse to go enjoy yourself

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>in a place that you wouldn't normally go to.

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 2>You're not quick to dismiss it, but I there's an

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 2>engagement stuff. There's you know, an engagement party, there's showers,

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 2>there's bachelorette Then there's responsibilities day of you know, instead

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:09.919
<v Speaker 2>of like hanging out in a cool city, you're taking

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:11.240
<v Speaker 2>pictures for three hours.

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not the best. It's not the best. But

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Every destination wedding I've ever been to

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot more lase fair about the guest list,

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about what is expected of guests who are coming to

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that wedding. If in fact, you don't want to go

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to this right and you don't want to cause any

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of rift with your friend in the office, I

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would just use the cost excuse. If you're afraid of

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 1>being super direct, just say you know what, I'd be honored,

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, buy them a nice gift, wish

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>them well, but just say, you know, we're we're saving.

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>We're saving for a house, for a car. What. You

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>don't even need an excuse, but we're saving. It's going

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to cost a little too much. I don't I don't

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that we're going to be able to

0:54:56.320 --> 0:55:00.320
<v Speaker 1>swing this year. Sure everyone understands that. Yeah, to get it,

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you got to talk a little bit more with that. Yeah,

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to sort of paint a picture that isn't

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:10.919
<v Speaker 1>necessarily true. Not necessarily Well, here's related strategy for my wedding. Yes,

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so solid fiance has been a bridesmaid of like fourteen

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>different friends or something crazy. Ooh, she's an a sorority

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at Michigan, so she's a lot of friends. Are you

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>can ask me to be in your wedding? Is that

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 1>what's happening out here? Absolutely not.

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I haven't had to ask a single person because neither

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 2>one of us are having a wedding party. Oh, no groomsmen,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 2>no bridesmaids.

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about it, and I was like, I

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 2>guess you know, four or five dudes.

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel uncomfortable asking a ton of people to like

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 2>travel and buy things, suits whatever. I know you weren't

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 2>like a huge fan of that process either, just coordinating everything.

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 2>But you had a relatively small bachelor party, right, had

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 2>had a small, boring bachelor party, it was right? Yeah,

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 2>so I so the solid fiance would have had like,

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and she had a bachelor party with like, I don't know, twelve.

0:55:58.960 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen of her friends.

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I'm going away with actually like three friends

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and my two brothers. I just I don't care about

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.840
<v Speaker 2>coordinating a bunch of people just because it's tradition. I

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 2>don't want to hang out with fifteen people. I don't

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 2>want to try to get reservations at a restaurant for

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 2>fifteen Like, it's all just a pain.

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>In my Assah.

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going small, and the only people up at

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 2>the altar with the two of us are going to

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 2>be our families. It's easy done right. But in this

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 2>specific situation, if the groom is having like ten groomsmen

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and the bride only has like four people, she's comfortable asking.

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 2>That's a weird dynamic between the two of them. Why

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 2>don't we get down to a better point. Yeah, why

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 2>don't we go three each?

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Like in my wedding, there were there was a

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>situation where one guy had a girl on each arm

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mm hm. Because I had more groomsmen than Solid wife

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>had bridesmaids. So you could do it a setup like that,

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Suggest a setup like that if you're in that situation.

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I was at a wedding where it was uneven and

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the bride's brother actually stood on her side. An unbalanced front,

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 1>an unbalanced front. That's fine, you know, whatever floats your boat.

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think wedding whites. Too many people do things

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 2>just because it's tradition. Yeah, I think it's such a waste.

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm not doing a Like we're not taking dance lessons.

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Why would we take dance lests? I don't even remember

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 2>if you and Solid wife Kate took dance lessons, did you?

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We took the dance lessons but didn't do the dance good.

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 2>So it was just like a background thing, just a

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 2>skill for you guys, just.

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Just something a bonding experience. Did you guys? Did you

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:46.959
<v Speaker 1>toss flowers? We did not, because all of our friends

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>are married already.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're not doing that. I mean that's the same

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 2>for us too. We're not doing that. Are you going

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 2>to be a cake smasher?

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We're not even having cake. We're not even having cake.

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you getting married? What are you doing?

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 2>We don't want to have any Neither one of us

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 2>like cake. Why would we serve people something that we

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 2>don't like? Is there going to be any kind of

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:08.000
<v Speaker 2>sugary dessert?

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm glad you asked, Tie. We're doing a

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>donut wall, a donut wall. Okay, so explain this to me.

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>What's a done? Imagine like a a don't a six

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>by six foot board with like three inch pegs coming

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>out of it every like eight inches, like the Plinko

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 1>game in prices, right, Tie, you nailed it exactly. Okay.

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 2>There's gonna be like two hundred donuts on this wall, okay.

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And people are dancing when you when you're eating cake

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 2>at a wedding, it's basically like you come back from

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the dance floor to like take a sip of whatever

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you're drinking that's at the table, right, and like.

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there's cake here.

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm gonna have a bite of my cake and

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 2>go back to the dance floor. I would pose it

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 2>that seventy three percent of served wedding cake goes wasted.

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I would also say cake is largely for children. I

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 2>think cake is a waste. I think icing is so strong.

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Cake cakes here on the solid verbal cake is this

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is what you get off. This is true, and listen,

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but both of us feel this way. I've never heard

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of a donut wall in my life. Where do they

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>google donut wall? Right now on the show google donut wall?

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But where do you do you hear about it?

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I had heard of donut towers, like these structures that

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 2>you could put donuts. But then in further researching, I

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:19.680
<v Speaker 2>did discover that donut walls exist. You just grab a donut,

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you're on the dance floor, you feel like something sweet.

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 2>There is a wall of donuts that you can easily grab.

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Take it out on the dance floor with you.

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm seeing this now. What are we chasing? Are

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you at all concerned about sanitation? No? Not at all, Ty, No, okay, please,

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll be fine. I'm not sure how I feel about this,

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>dan Ty.

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if you don't like cake, or imagine if you

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:44.160
<v Speaker 2>like cake, but you don't like strawberry cake, or you

0:59:44.160 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 2>don't like chocolate cake, or you don't like vanilla, you don't

0:59:46.000 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 2>like yellow cake. With a donut wall, we're talking variety tie.

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So will you be doing what appears to be in

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:57.000
<v Speaker 1>vogue and having different colored donuts that form a pattern

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on said donut wall. No, I don't think. I don't

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think there will be an organize to it, because i'm looking.

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking one here that says donut worry, be happy.

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Right then it's got like a K and a D

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in a white heart on their donut wall. So they

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this couple took a picture in front of the donut wall.

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's style over substance, and I don't care about that.

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I want I want flavor maximization. So we're gonna you know,

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>if you like glazed donuts, grab a glazed donut, you

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>like sprinkle, you like cake, you like yeast, you like chocolate,

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>you like well, I guess it'll all be circled.

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>There won't be any twists. You like an old fashioned

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>donut tie?

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the place we're getting it from in Chicago has

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>terrific blueberry old fashioned donuts. I cannot wait to have

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a blueberry old fashioned donut while dancing on the dance floor.

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>If you had a donut maybe donut wall, and you

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>spelled out Rubinstein in block lettering, that'd be pretty. That'd

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>be impressive. That'd be impressive. That Yeah, yeah, that's not

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. Well, there'd be the exact number of

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>donuts together. There will be guests or will there be no?

1:00:56.560 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>There will be one. Ty you think I'm gonna serve

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not enough food my wedding. I would expect that your

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wedding that everyone will be well fed. Everybody will be

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>well fed. Most of the food will be handheld, Okay, appetizer,

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>entree and desserts. Okay. And it is really you're really

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going to try a new SAP tradition here.

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, it's not about usurping tradition, Tie, It's about planning

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and customizing to who you are.

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:01:25.000 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to eat cake if you don't like cake.

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>At your wedding, beople there to celebrate you and what

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you believe.

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay. And you're doing the live band thing too, right,

1:01:34.400 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>doing a live band? Yeah, and your great time? Tie?

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Were you a live band type of guy? I am?

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I really like good bands yeah, And I know that's

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>like a stupid thing to say, because everybody loves good bands.

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>But I will take an average DJ over an average band.

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>See, I agree, And I won't put words in your mouth.

1:01:57.200 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I will. I will speak for myself here. I was

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very skittish on the idea. Yeah, I had to be

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tuned into it because you know it is. It is

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more expensive, but I was so excited though.

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't as expensive as I expected it to be, and

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the delta between a DJ and a band was not

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so great that it wasn't doable right, And in the end,

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we went that route.

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>You know what I saw today By the way, you

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>talked about the cake smashing thing. That's the thing with

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>like one year old birthday parties, right, Yeah, everybody like,

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 2>oh they get a cake to smash it. Yeah, there

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 2>is now taco smashing. Taco smashing. There's now taco smashing.

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>You do a lot more damage with a taco, a

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 2>lot more ingredients to you. Could You could do the

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>frisbee throw with a donut if you wanted. That's true,

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to, you know, blaze your own trail.

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I think donuts are at least ten thousand times better

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>than cake.

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Okay, on that note, we could throw that out

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to the listing public. Soliverble at gmail dot com. If

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you went, if you went to a wedding and saw

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and you will be going to a wedding hopefully and

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>see a donut wall instead of cake. I'm interesting.

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>There is part of you, your your flavor antennas are

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>going up in a way that they're not necessarily going

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>up for cake, a white sheet cake. This is no

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>comment on other people that like cake and serve cake,

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>but I'm just saying it's hits snippy.

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's different. I don't know if it's so much flavor antenna.

1:03:20.800 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have that, but uh, yes,

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. It's interesting.

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna you're gonna look at the wall, and you're

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>not gonna look away right away, are you.

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I I will probably do the thing where I crossed

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>my eyes to try and see the sailboat in it,

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>comprehend it, and then yeah.

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna walk up to it like a giant piece

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>of artwork and just sort of study it and figure

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>out how you feel about it and then make a decision.

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess we would eliminate jelly donuts because a decision

1:03:51.800 --> 1:03:54.439
<v Speaker 2>yeah to spike through it would not be yeah right.

1:03:54.920 --> 1:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But other than that, we're going variety. I think everybody's

1:03:57.760 --> 1:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be very happy. There's gonna be so many leftover donuts.

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>We are actually, we've printed up custom to go personal lot,

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>not personalized, but custom donut to go bags.

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm excited to talk wedding stuff with you. Oh man,

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wait till you hear about the food we're serving. I'm excited.

1:04:14.840 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll save that for our next shows off season. Yep.

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to talk wedding stuff with you because by

1:04:20.440 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the time your wedding rolls around, Kate and I will

1:04:23.160 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be in about two years, a little over two years.

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So wow, that's true, which is crazy. But we're veterans

1:04:28.560 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of the process now, mm hmm. And I'm excited to

1:04:31.240 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>see the direction you take it. My hunch is that

1:04:33.080 --> 1:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it will be a decidedly different direction than Kate and

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I took ours.

1:04:36.240 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, we are getting married in a giant church on

1:04:39.440 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the Lehigh campus.

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's and then chartering a plane yeaeah, okay, it's

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a blimp.

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It's an extra large blimp to Chinago. Now it's actually

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>in the same Yours was a separated venue thing separated

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the time of the day too, same venue right there,

1:04:58.280 --> 1:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>all have it?

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that setup. Yeah cool? All right, well,

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you to everyone who wrote in. We got a

1:05:02.880 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch more questions here that we weren't able to address

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps we will next time around. We will be

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>doing more of these Q and A style shows over

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the next couple months. We joke about the fact that

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a long off season, but it's true. It is

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a long off season. We do do one show a week.

1:05:18.520 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to try and pack as much college football

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>content in here as humanly possible, but there will be

1:05:24.000 --> 1:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks like this where we just want to talk to

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the base and see what people are up to out there.

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got our Verbie Show, which is going to be

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up in relatively short order. Stay tuned to our

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and our Facebook pages and all the usuals. We'll

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>post some details for how you can be active with that.

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>We're also going to talk about the NFL Draft that's

1:05:44.720 --> 1:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up. As we said during our live show, this

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually going to be our tenth full season of podcasting.

1:05:52.560 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So I know you're excited. I know I'm excited to

1:05:56.480 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of do a show in the vein of our friends,

1:05:59.040 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the starters, what they do on their tenth anniversary, they

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of tell the full story of the podcast, the

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>deepest of dives. So we've got that coming. We've got

1:06:08.840 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of cool stuff that we've got planned this

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>off season. The only other parting shot that I'm gonna

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>throw out there, I talked about it on the last show,

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but soliverbal dot com slash donate. I am raising money

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for children with heart conditions. If anyone wants to throw in,

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the link is out on our page soliverble dot com

1:06:26.480 --> 1:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>slash donate. Any help you're willing to provide would be

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>much appreciative. A lot of people have pitched in, Thank

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much. If anyone else wants to jump on

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in on that, I'd appreciate it definitely. All right, Dan,

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's all I got. That's all I have. Ty for

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that gentleman over there, Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie Hildebrand,

1:06:44.280 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always for listening to our podcast. Subscribe

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at iTunes dot com slash Solid Verbal. In the meantime,

1:06:52.640 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Base on Peace would