1 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:09,840 Speaker 2: Let's get a little bit more detail. This is the 3 00:00:09,840 --> 00:00:12,320 Speaker 2: ecan function on the Bloomberg terminal. It really helps to 4 00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 2: break down the different inputs to overall CPI. The yellow 5 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:19,360 Speaker 2: bars core services, the purple is core goods, then the 6 00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:22,240 Speaker 2: red is energy, and then the blue is food. And 7 00:00:22,280 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 2: what I find really interesting about this is a disinflationary 8 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:27,920 Speaker 2: trend that we saw back in twenty twenty four is 9 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 2: basically over in this last read. Maybe a little touch 10 00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:35,200 Speaker 2: of a disinflationary trend when it comes to the core goods, 11 00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 2: but for the most part, everything else energy and food 12 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:41,520 Speaker 2: as well as services is still rising now. Albeit services 13 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 2: inflation has come off the boil from one of what 14 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:47,080 Speaker 2: we saw back in twenty twenty four in July, but 15 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 2: still we're right around forty year highs. And anyway you 16 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:52,959 Speaker 2: look at it, those prices appear sticky plus for I mean, 17 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:57,480 Speaker 2: if the disinflation narrative is over, then what then what? 18 00:00:57,600 --> 00:00:59,840 Speaker 1: Let's pose that question to our first guest kicking this 19 00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 1: off to the close is Esther George of course, former 20 00:01:03,720 --> 00:01:07,520 Speaker 1: Kansas City Fed President, and Esther, you've had a lifetime, 21 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 1: really of doing this you've seen these various inflationary cycles, 22 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 1: these various economic cycles. Should we be worried about a 23 00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 1: potential resurgence in inflation or is this just that normal 24 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:21,040 Speaker 1: sort of bumpy road down to what I guess most 25 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,040 Speaker 1: of us hope is going to be that two percent target. 26 00:01:24,319 --> 00:01:26,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, thank you for having me today. And I 27 00:01:26,360 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 3: think you have to be worried about this inflation, not 28 00:01:30,360 --> 00:01:33,240 Speaker 3: because what we've seen so far tells us that there'll 29 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:37,720 Speaker 3: be a resurgence, but because this level of inflation has 30 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 3: remained well above the Fed's target. That, of course, is 31 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 3: a principal job of the FMC is to make sure 32 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:50,480 Speaker 3: that inflation rate gets back to its two percent target 33 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:53,520 Speaker 3: in a timely way. And we've gone on some time 34 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 3: now with inflation hanging out there ways above that. 35 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:00,960 Speaker 1: How dangerous is it? Though? I mean we still talk 36 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 1: at least if you take pals preferred measure the core PCEE, 37 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:07,400 Speaker 1: I mean we're basically at around three percent on some 38 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:11,280 Speaker 1: of the headline CPI numbers. We're certainly in an area 39 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 1: that I think a lot of people can live with, 40 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:15,960 Speaker 1: whether it's the economy, whether it's corporations, or whether it's 41 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: the market. If the economy is healthy as evidence by 42 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:22,480 Speaker 1: consumer spending, as evidenced by the labor market. Should we 43 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 1: still be quibbling over three point three percent on core CPI? 44 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 3: Well, I think you do want to quibble over it, 45 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 3: because once in inflation psychology gets embedded in an economy, 46 00:02:34,840 --> 00:02:38,359 Speaker 3: you begin to see inflation expectations change. And it's one 47 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 3: of the things that would have my attention right now 48 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 3: is the FED has been able to rely on anchored, 49 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 3: well anchored inflation expectations over the course of this post 50 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 3: pandemic period. But if you look at recent prints, you 51 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 3: will see that those are beginning to drift up and 52 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 3: even consumer expectations or begin to signal expectations of future inflation. 53 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:07,520 Speaker 3: And that's why, in addition to the FED zone credibility, 54 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 3: you want to anchor that inflation at the Fed's stated 55 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:13,240 Speaker 3: two percent target. 56 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:16,680 Speaker 2: A lot is being made though esther on seasonality, and 57 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 2: there's January season atalie sort of post vacation movement there. 58 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 2: You also had LA wildfires, etc. Do you buy the 59 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:26,840 Speaker 2: seasonality argument, Well. 60 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:29,119 Speaker 3: There's always an element there that you have to take 61 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 3: note of. But I think what's particularly important right now 62 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:37,120 Speaker 3: is this is just a one off data print. You 63 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 3: have now seen a succession of reports that are telling 64 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 3: us that inflation is hanging in there in the three 65 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 3: percent range. And even though that's not the Fed's preferred 66 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 3: indicator when they are making decisions, the truth is CPI 67 00:03:54,200 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 3: tells us something because so many contracts in our economy 68 00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 3: are based off of this, and so it's not to 69 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 3: be ignored, I think, and just dismissed at this point, 70 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 3: and I'd be paying very careful attention to the numbers 71 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 3: we've seen come in now. 72 00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:10,839 Speaker 2: Clearly at the FED, you guys look at PCEE versus CPI. 73 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 2: So is there a level for PCEE that you guys 74 00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:17,480 Speaker 2: used to talk about. Okay, that's a hurdle for say, 75 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:18,480 Speaker 2: talking about hikes. 76 00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:23,359 Speaker 3: Well, I don't think there was a particular level to 77 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:26,359 Speaker 3: talk about hikes, because what you're always trying to figure 78 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 3: out is that that core level telling us something. Is 79 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 3: that the headline, which can be volatile, as people know 80 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,839 Speaker 3: with food and energy cost. I think what we've seen 81 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 3: over the past few years, though, is something quite different. 82 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 3: This is really telling us that there is real inflation 83 00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 3: in the economy, and the FED has been quite clear 84 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 3: as I think they have to be that they will 85 00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 3: not be satisfied that they have achieved their mandate until 86 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 3: they get back to two percent on a sustainable basis, 87 00:04:57,800 --> 00:04:59,440 Speaker 3: and so there's more work to do here. 88 00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 1: Clearly, are you, generally, though, satisfied with the communication that 89 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,480 Speaker 1: we're getting out of the Fed, whether it's coming directly 90 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:09,279 Speaker 1: from Bow or from some of the other FOMC members, 91 00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:10,520 Speaker 1: Is that helping. 92 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:15,479 Speaker 3: Well? The markets I think have already begun to take 93 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 3: note that this idea of a steady pace of rate 94 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,599 Speaker 3: cuts is not likely to happen. And of course, with 95 00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:26,159 Speaker 3: a hundred basis points of cuts last year, the most 96 00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:30,560 Speaker 3: recent one in December, those expectations are beginning to shift. 97 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:33,600 Speaker 3: And I hear that in the communications from the FED, 98 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,880 Speaker 3: which is to say, we are not going to be moving. 99 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 3: We have time. We want to watch and see what 100 00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:42,800 Speaker 3: happens with the data. And this is true not only 101 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 3: for inflation, but you see a number of other policy 102 00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 3: implications coming down the road as the new administration begins 103 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:54,719 Speaker 3: to look at various levers they have for the economy. 104 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 1: Does the FED have that luxury of just waiting and 105 00:05:57,200 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: seeing and they've been waiting and seeing for a while now. 106 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 1: We played some comments earlier from Muhammadel area, and he 107 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:04,839 Speaker 1: gave an interview on Bloomberg Television where he talked about, 108 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:07,039 Speaker 1: in his words, what he sees as a lack of 109 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 1: strategic vision on the part of the FED, this idea 110 00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 1: of just wait for the whites of the eyes before 111 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: you shoot. And now he seems and certain folks in 112 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,800 Speaker 1: the market also seem to think that maybe the FED 113 00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 1: should be a bit more proactive. 114 00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:22,640 Speaker 3: So I think the FED is certainly going to have 115 00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:25,599 Speaker 3: to be talking about this. And if you listen to 116 00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:28,760 Speaker 3: their language, they continue to refer to current interest rates 117 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 3: even at that four and a quarter four and a 118 00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:35,440 Speaker 3: half to be in restrictive territory. Some refer to it 119 00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 3: as meaningfully restrictive. Some have said maybe it's getting close 120 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:40,120 Speaker 3: to neutral. 121 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:41,240 Speaker 2: And so I. 122 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:45,160 Speaker 3: Suspected their upcoming meeting this has to be a real 123 00:06:45,320 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 3: point of discussion, is really narrowing in on where they 124 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 3: think they are and how they will communicate what their 125 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:56,039 Speaker 3: stance is going to be relative to the objective that's 126 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 3: in front of them. 127 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:01,279 Speaker 2: Esther, isn't it all confusing as to why it seems 128 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:05,039 Speaker 2: like the feed through from rates from monetary policy to 129 00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:07,160 Speaker 2: the real economy has been somewhat stemied. 130 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:11,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that's been interesting to see whether the 131 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:15,520 Speaker 3: transmission of policy has changed, and you can look at 132 00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 3: some of the reasons why that might be. For example, 133 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:21,120 Speaker 3: just look at a market that tends to get hit 134 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 3: directly in real estate, and particularly residential real estate, when 135 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:30,000 Speaker 3: most of the mortgage holders have locked in low rates, 136 00:07:30,440 --> 00:07:34,160 Speaker 3: it will make the transmission of that policy different this 137 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,560 Speaker 3: time and slower. You also see that I think when 138 00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 3: you look at services, a services economy has a different 139 00:07:41,720 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 3: traction I would guess as it relates to that policy transmission. 140 00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 3: So it is a challenge for the FED coming off 141 00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 3: the pandemic, coming off the supply chain issues that were 142 00:07:55,160 --> 00:08:02,040 Speaker 3: complicating their analysis to really understand transmission. I think the risk, 143 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 3: of course, and one they must be very mindful of, 144 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 3: is that waiting too long carries important risks until they 145 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:13,400 Speaker 3: bring that inflation right back down. 146 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:16,400 Speaker 2: Esther, was a true pleasure to get your perspective. Thank 147 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:19,360 Speaker 2: you so much, Esther George, former President and Chief Executive 148 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:21,440 Speaker 2: of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,