WEBVTT - Dimon Sees ‘Storm Clouds’ Over the US Economy

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well this week, man, we

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get reads on a lot of economic data points new

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>home sales, durable goods, GDP, core PC E f O

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>MC minutes or something coming steady say that five times

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>fast not gonna happen. What really tell us about the economy?

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Peak inflation? More so? Many questions, So we're gonna put

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a few of them to our next guest. Peter Atwater

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is adjunct professor of economics at william and Mary. Peter

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Pennsylvania. You may recall

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that Peter is the one who came up with the

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of the K shape recovery, something that we've been

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about for the last two years. Peter, good to

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. How are you. I'm doing well. Tim,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me. Well. We love having

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you on because what you focus on is sentiment, the

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>way that people are feeling, and you connect that to

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the market. So so give us an idea, you know,

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on a day where it seems like we're coming back

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>from touching a bear market in the what sentiment is

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like out there? So depends on where you look. Um.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, within the economy, I am very concerned about

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment of those at the very low end socio economically. UM.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>They have been hit by a barrage of really difficult

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>um actions because of the inflation, whether it's food, energy, housing, childcare.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>They're really facing um enormous challenge in every direction they face.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I look at the sentiment in

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the market and I laugh with everyone looking for a

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bottom because at Loews and sentiment, nobody can anticipate there

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>being a possible bottom. I I feel like the investors

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>today are like kids on a long vacation car ride.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>All going are we there yet, and that doesn't mark

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a market low. You know, later on we're gonna play

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>um a clip of an interview are Bloomberg Surveillance and

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>TV team did with Clembia University professor and Nobel Prize

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>winning economist Joe Stiglets, and he talked about Peter saying

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates is not going to solve the problem inflation.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to create more food. It's going to

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>make it more difficult because you aren't able to be

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>able to make the investment. Um. Tim talks about this

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time. We all talk about this, that this

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>whole idea of the Fed raising interest rates isn't going

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to fix supply chains, certainly not overdight. Maybe it reduces

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>demand perhaps a little bit, but you know, that's not

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going to fix all of our supply chain challenges and

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly not help those who are probably being hit the hardest.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Like you talk about, Yeah, and I and I worry

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is that, Um, you know, the FEDS activity, particularly when

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it ripples through to things like used car loans and

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to you know home, you know the cost of a mortgage. Um,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that's really setting a barrier for those at the at

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the low end. So what's the FED to do? And

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know you're not advising the FED right now,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know the FED FED Chief J. Powell has

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>has talked about the blunt instruments that it has to

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to tame inflation, It needs to tame inflation. Is it

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not doing it the right way? So I have some

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for the folks and at the FED, because you know,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>their tools are not designed for this sort of a

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the supply shock. But at the same time, I think

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to be careful in terms of overreacting to

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>an overreaction in the first place. So if you go

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>back to March, we pushed all of the stimulus onto

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy and and folks were not paying attention to

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the likely bullwhip effect that then manifested. And so I

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like the FED is constantly now chasing the last

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>impactful moment in trying to um respond to what is

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>already a very impulsive um consumer. And I think we're

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>in this environment sentiment wise, where we we tend to overreact.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's not a lot of certainty that

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>people feel, there's not a lot of control people feel,

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a high level of impulsivity, and I

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get concerned that the FED is now trying to to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>play in that same impulsive manner because we the population

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>are being very impulsive at the same time that I

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like sums up so much of what's going on. Peter,

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep talking about, I don't know what they're really

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>economy is, to be quite honest, because we did have

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>so much stimulus globally pumped into it, and now we're

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to find our way back. And I

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like data points don't necessarily indicate that one thing

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that really jumped out along those lines from the research

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you shared with us and our producer Paul, you noted below,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the service of today's record low unemployment rate is a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>crisis that has the potential disrupt to disrupt the broader

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>economy just got about a minute left. So what do

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to kind of have on our radar along

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>those lines? So I think we need to be very

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>aware of the stacked inequities that exist the bottom and

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you have an environment where sentive negative

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>sentiment upon negative sentiment upon negative sentiment, and I think

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we need to be careful that we don't reach a

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>tipping point, particularly because we have an economy today that

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is so dependent on those at the bottom because everything

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is being delivered to us, and that that chain of

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>individuals at the low end of the of the system

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are keeping those who are working from home of flu.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, a good point, and um, wish we

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>had more time. We will have you back very soon.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Peter Atwater, he's adjunct professor of economics. That will Eave

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and Mary on the phone from Pennsylvania. I have to

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you one thing. One of the panels I did

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and Panama was on the global food crisis. And in

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the research I did that it talked about

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>rising food prices often lead to political instability, and so

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>there are repercussions of this type of environment the longer

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes on. Yeah, people allude, you know, people talk

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about what happened back in the Middle East in the

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand tens Arab spring. Exactly. It's exactly right.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So much to talk to you, and we've

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>got lots more to come. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Cow Master Tom Stenovik were Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Yeah, Jimmy Diamond talks. We

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>all listen. And as Charlie mentioned, talking about some storm clouds.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>As you said, here's a meteorologist now at him. Yeah,

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>strong clouds over the US economy. They may dissipate, may dissipate.

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be good. Yes, indeed, let's bring in Sally

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bake Well, finance team leader for Bloomberg News. Sally joins

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>us via zoom from New York City. Sally, good to

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. We got our live blog going

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>right now about JP Morgan's investor Day. Just give us

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the highlights of what's happened thus far. That'st of all.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like the idea of Jamie dian And as

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a meteorologic. If it doesn't, if this whole banking thing

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work out for you, Jamie, we got something else

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know where to go. Um. Well, Diamond has been

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a big champion of the U s economy, and he

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>struck that note again today. Um. You know, it's robust

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because of all the stimulus that has been pumped into it.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But of course he nodded to this very unusual cocktail

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we have at the moment of surging instation quantitative tightening

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>by the Fed. He also nodded to the volatile market

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and lots of liquidity out there, but overall he we

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>got no sense that any recession is in an and um,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he has previously in recent weeks sort of made the

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>prediction that there is a thirty percent or so chance

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of recession, much like the Goldman Sax CEO David Solomon,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>who made a similar forecast. But you know, with Diamond's

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>words today and with projections by the Bank, we've got

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of this this relatively politic positive picture with yeah,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no real imminent recession on the horizon. We we

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>saw new higher guidance for net interest income, accelerating loan growth,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>strong credit quality. In fact, Diamond said that he had

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>never seen credit looks so good. Um, no particular changes

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in consumer behavior and at least flat, if not up deposits.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a particularly negative. You know, there's not

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>too many negatives to take away. I guess the ominous

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is, you know, it's hard and as Diamond said,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to predict what any recession, if it

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>did happen, would look like, because this cocktail is so

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>unusual and um, sort of precedented. I gotta say, Sally too.

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>He said they may dissipate me in those storm cloud

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like if you said, of course, folks, they're going

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to dissipate, just might take a little while. But he

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>said they may dissipate. So I agree with you, right,

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to predict, and I think that's the

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>dilemma that so many CEOs and leaders find themselves in.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Having said that wasn't part of the update about their

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>growth and movement increasingly into the wealth management side of

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the business, and I feel like I want to bring

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that up because it plays to a very specific sector

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of our economy. Yeah, they want to have ten percent

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of wealth market share. They're hiring some one thousand, three

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred advisers as they doubled down in in that area. UM,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's definitely a big focus for them. I mean,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they gave a lot of updates on some of the

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the company's plans. They're expanding by product, there

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is expanding by country. They're entering seven new markets. Um.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>They've announced plans to introduce an interest free paying for

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>option for debit card customers, which is, you know, to

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>compete with the likes of Klana and after pay you know,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the buy now, pay later. UM. They're investing in building

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out their international commercial bank, so they're they're expanding in

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a in a lot of places, and what they had

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to balance maybe today was UM the idea of assuaging

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>investors who had been slightly worried about the bank's higher

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>expenses in forecasts and eight point six increase in expenses

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>versus the need to show where they're expanding and investing

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>UM to capture you know, hopefully something that feeds into

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. But they seem to do that pretty

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>well today because the shares were UM at one point

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>about seven point five pc and lifted, as you mentioned

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, UM lifted the whole of the sector. Well.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>These expenses also have to do with the money that

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond is paid, specifically because there was recently some

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pushback right against that in terms of shareholders support UM.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's part of it, Like Jamie coming

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>out and saying, hey, here's what you're getting for the money.

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably did feel that pressure. It was

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a really unusual rebuke for the CEO to have such

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>little support for his executive pay package. He got about

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>support for his compensation which did include some sort of

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>special perk, special bonuses to entice him and other senior

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>executives to stay on at the bank. UM, And I

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think going into the investor day that was That's why

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this one was particularly significant, not only because it was

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the first one since before COVID, but they had to

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of win back investors who had allowed the stock

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to tank UM over the past well so far this

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>year it was the worst performing among all all Wall

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street banks, so they did have to kind of

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>win back some some shareholders. But in terms of whether

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that UM that those expenses were a link directly to

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>his you know conversation package, UM, certainly within the court.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>At an investment bank, they have about three point eight

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>billion of expenses for this year. I think some three

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>one billion goes technology. UM. So that's the I think

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of it is, you know, technology investment. All Right,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Sally got a round Sally bake Well, she is finance

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>team leader here at Bloomberg News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, with everything going on in the world,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I love love when our Bloomberg team draws our attention

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to innovation going on around the world, and I definitely

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>saw that last week in Panama, Panama, some of the

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Unicorn startups in Latin America. Now, it's Ashley Vance's turn

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in a story in this week's new upcoming issue of

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week out later on this week. Timmy's introducing

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>us to a company that discussed its business with the

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>news media Bloomberg for the first time. Yeah, I had

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>never heard of it before reading this story. The company

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is called Meter, It's founded by two brothers, and it's

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>got a new way to get workplaces online, as well

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>as some noteworthy backers as well. Join us now is

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Vance, features writer for Bloomberg Business Week. Actually is

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>also the author of Elon Musk, Tesla, SpaceX and The

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Quest for a Fantastic Future. Actually joins us on the

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>phone from Palo Alto, California. Joel Webber is the editor

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker's studio. Joel is actually writes a couple of brothers. Uh,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, such as these would could go off and

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they'd graduate college early. They could go off and they

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>could basically do anything. They could go work at a

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto startup or start their own, you know, crypto company.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>They choose to solve a problem that many people would say,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Wait a second, that's not necessarily the you know, for

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better term, sexy thing to be doing

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. That's right, um, although maybe maybe starting another

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>crypto company wouldn't be the right call right now either. Um.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>What I what I liked about the story was just

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we think about the way the world works, Uh,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there are things that just the world seems to maybe

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have forgotten. And have you tried turning off the router

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that have bad WiFi is one of them? Um, And

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've done that at home many times. I've turned it on,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>turn it off during the pandemic. It worked sometimes. The

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>other place that that happens is in offices. And what

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what makes makes these brothers interesting is this whole startup

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is about bringing better WiFi to the office, which, hey,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in these times of r t O, anything counts, right Ashley.

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So where did this idea come from? Yeah? Well, these

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the brothers are fascinating. I mean to your point. There

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a Neil and Sunil VARNSONI are their names, and and uh,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're kind of throwbacks to me. They they

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>had this business in college installing networking equipment at offices

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and they realized it was just too hard, and so

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>they decided to go fix the problem build all this

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>new networking hardware and software themselves. But the big idea

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>here is you're a company, you move into a new

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>office space, you want to set up the Internet. It's

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>still this kind of archaic process where you have to

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>call about five different companies to make that happen. And

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so they wanted to be more like I think up

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your telephone or your water in your office, where you

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially just kind of click a button or a button

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on a website and and it appears, and so you know,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing just for you and I to have

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea. Um, and I'll tell you were like getting

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself there. Actually, uh, but they actually have have an

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting role index and they were able to get some

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting backers. Who who did they who did they call

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and who put money behind them? Yeah, the backers is

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a who's who, But you can imagine

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley you've got the Collinson brothers who started Stripe,

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Diane Green who started gm ware, Egan Durbin who runs

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>silver Lake, Sam Altman, and open A. I mean, the

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>funny thing about this story is the list of investors

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly impressive. But this company is operated for about

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>six years in almost complete secrecy UM and so all

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>these people somehow kept kept as a secret. And this

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is the first time, you know, the founders ever talked

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that anyone's written a single story about this company called Meter.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting actually because these guys, you know, you

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>could try to solve a problem from Silicon Valley or

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, from Virginia or from New York City, but

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>these guys actually moved to Shenzen because the hardware in

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this they really wanted to understand the hardware. Here talk

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about what they did in order to to really make

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it so they understood the ins and out of the business. Yeah,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was this is when I started to

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>think they were the real deal. Uh. They had this

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>previous networking business that they started in college, and they

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>took all that money and they just flew on a

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>whim almost to Shenzen and and decided they were going

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to manufacture their online of routers and switchers and access points.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But they had to talk their way into it. And

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>so they lived in a hospital for eighteen months, and

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and and did manage to talk their way into a factory.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They would sleep on the factory floor, and they had

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>their beds. They had no beds even in their hospital.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It was awful of their networking gear. And so these

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were two kids that you know, they believe in themselves,

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and then they wanted to know every little piece of

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>how this works, and so they fund it, you know,

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>before they got all these big name backers. They funded

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all of that themselves and lived through it. So I

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get it, and I could see and as you report

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of companies, they've already got a lot

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of clients out there, some larger ones. But is there

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>success based on really lining up massive companies who already

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have invested so much in their own networks at this

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>point they want to get there, but it's obviously a

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>harder sell. You know. Traditionally, what you do is you're

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in a building. You've bought a ton of equipment, probably

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from Cisco. Um. You probably have people on staff who

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>manage all that stuff. You've invested millions of dollars to

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have the internet working at your office and so to

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>to rip all of that out and bet on a

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>startup is a little bit harder. But if you're a company,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you could be a large company that's moving into a

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>new office that you don't want to go through all

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that pain. Again, the idea as you called meter and

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they set everything up for you and they bill you

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>per month like UM, and so I think that's the

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the easier cell right now is started larger companies moving

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to a new spot and once you're in the cloud,

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>everything goes great, right like what else could go what

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>else could go wrong? Here? Though? Actually I mean they

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've got serious challenges ahead of them, which

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is like you know, the network. If your WiFi is

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not working at the office, you're gonna hear about it.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>If there's some security disaster, you're gonna you're gonna hear

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about that and possibly get egg on your face publicly.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And so so it's a young company. They have to

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>prove that their networking gear is as good as they

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>say it is. So this is gonna be it's gonna

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>be a long march. That said, they reminded me a

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of kind of like a young vm Ware. Um,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's potentially this huge infrastructure play if they

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>get it right. And so it's a it's a big deal.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Does a company like this Ashley and like, I don't

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>want to put the card too much before the horse,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's got some big name backers and they're looking

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for an exit here. Is this the type of company

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that I p O s or gets it gets acquired

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>by an established player like a Cisco. Yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a conserved Cisco through the years, as they're

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the most inquisitive companies ever. And what generally

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>happens is as soon as you're doing well in networking,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Cisco buys you or Juniper buys you, and and there's

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a tendency for the technology to languish. Of course, these founders,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 1>as they always say, you know, promise me, they're not

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. They're in this for the long haul.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be the ones who stick it out

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there will see if if history is our guy, Cisco

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>tends to end up with this stuff. But but these

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>brothers seem quite determined to go to make make their

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>name for themselves. Well, definitely an interesting model that makes

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sense certainly in today's environment. Um, actually, thank you so much.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Vance, features writer of Bloomberg Business Week, also author

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of Elon must Tesla, SpaceX, and The Quest for a

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic Future. This story, by the way, in the upcoming

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>new issue of Bloomberg Business Week do out later this week,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and of course our thanks to Joe Webber. He is

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the editor of Bloomberg Business Week. You're listening to Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a tale of where reporting out

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the story is probably even more interesting in the story itself.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, everyone, it's a market moving store. It's totally

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>market moving story. Intrigue behind the scenes is pretty good too,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So should we get to it. Yeah. Lenna Baker is

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Deal's team leader for Bloomberg News. She's with us in

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Leona and her colleague for

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Busy Yesterday breaking the news that Broadcom is said to

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.239
<v Speaker 1>be in talks to buy vm Ware. Uh, we do

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>see Broadcom lower vm Ware surging on this story. Uh

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us. Can you take us

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>through your weekend and just what happened when this news

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>broke because you broke this story yesterday. Sure, so on

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>our team, we usually have someone on the weekend shift,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>but I took off this weekend because it was my

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>bridal shower. I'm getting graduation, thank you. Um So, I

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>thought the coast was clear, but I had my phone

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in my hand to take some photos, you know, it's

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>with my future mother in law. And the call came

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in that this deal was in the work. So luckily

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I cleaned up quickly, you know, send people on their way.

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Luckily things were dying down by then and we started

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>working the phones, and luckily, around seven o'clock we did

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>break the story of the broad commas and talks about

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>vm Ware. Alright, to remember, all right above and beyond Bloombergers,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you like a couple of wedding presents right there, and

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm just or maybe like paying for the honeymoon

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>or something unbelievable. Alright, so just kidding, just kidding, Well,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not Let's get to this story, because this is

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>massive and what I like about these stories at the

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>middle of this market volatility, companies are talking about are

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>possibly doing mega deals. So one thing that it does

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>seem counterintuitive, why is big strategic m and A happening

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, especially in the text sell off. But if

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at Broadcom and vm Ware stocks, they've fallen

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in tandem. So as long as you are trading UM

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction as the partner in your deal,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you could still do a deal. If they're trading in

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>different directions, that would then be problematic. But where we

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to see deals like this UM as as

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>things slow down, is it It's not a distressed deal though.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the type of deal that we'd see

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bear market or a downturn where we see

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>some high flying stocks having fallen se like private equity

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>coming in and swooping up some of those companies. It's

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>totally different than that. Totally broad Colm under its CEO

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Hawk Tan, they've been on the lookout for big acquisitions.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to do something to really move the needle

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in software. They've done deals before, you know, ten billion,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion, but now at over forty billion, This would

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>be its largest to date in software. So they're just

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>very deal hungry. Vm Ware has been UH doing deals

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>also for years since bought e m C back in

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>tw e MC hit high controlled vm Ware and Michael Dell,

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the billionaire UH is the top shareholder in vm Ware,

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so he's had his hands in this deal for a

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>long time and he's he's made a lot of money

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>out of vm Ware already. But this will be sort

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the final chapter should they end up selling Lee.

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And I know you're the deals person on here, so

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from that perspective, but I mean a transaction.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this broadcast Com has been a pretty inquisitive company.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>UM strategically. Are people saying this makes sense? Sure? So

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Broadcom does a lot of financial engineering and they're almost

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like a publicly traded like tech private equity firm for

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all the deals they've done. But we are hearing that

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there are synergies here, and you know, some of Broadcom's

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>customers could benefit from being up sold you know, infrastructure

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>software from vm Ware. So it's very complicated and kind

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of the guts of what runs the Internet is what

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>these cloud companies are doing. But yeah, we're hearing that

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>there there are some some cost cuts and synergies. It

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>could happen here, Aleana. Just the latest from from you

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and at Hammond Crossing just about a half hour ago.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The deal is said to come as soon as this week.

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest there? Sure, So when we reported yesterday

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know, you know, what stage they were in,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But now we could safely report that the deal could

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>come as early as this week. There are some earnings

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that are planned, so we're keeping an eye on it.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Although no deal is ever done until it's announced. Even then,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as you can see with Elon Musk and Twitter, even

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if you announce a deal, it's not a done deal

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>until it closes. So we'll be keeping an eye on

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it um to see what happens. Is there a chance

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that somebody else comes in? So vm Ware has been

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded for a while, and um, you know, different

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>companies could definitely swoop in. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at it right now. Always on the cusp

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sale to someone else, you get that final look.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be chasing it as of now. Nothing to report.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>What does the landscape look like right now we've been

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about well, uncertainty and unease with the

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>public markets and the economy and typic leak. During that time,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably see a decline in deal activity. What are

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from your sources? So we are seeing that

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>general M and A activity is down thirty compared to

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>last year, but last year was a blockbuster year, so

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean M and A is dead. If for

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>downt tech deal making has been a bright spot, like

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you see what this deal today, and also private equity

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>firms are licking their chops. They're looking at every software

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>company under like ten billion and thinking I'm going to

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>buy that. So we're gonna be very busy trying to

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>break the next deals and tech. And they've got a

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of dry powder too, they're sitting on mountains of it.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It might be harder for them to exit some of

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>their investments because the I p O market is totally dead.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Um stack market has also died. But if they want

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>to do deals, there's a lot of stocks that have

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sold off as you guys you know, report every day,

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So the flow hasn't slowed down from the market instability

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that we saw. The volatility. I mean pretty extreme last week.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We certainly saw in the first quarter. But I'm curious

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>people that you're talking to your saying no, no, we

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>we still see a pipeline. People are busy, and private

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>equity deals is on track to be like the second

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest year I think for private equity deal making, only

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>surpassed by last year. So things are looking good, especially

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in that space. Yeah, fascinating. Um, well, I hope you've warned,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like your team when you're getting married, when you're going

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>on your honeymoon, so that like if there is a

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>follow up, if this isn't closed, you're off limits. No

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>phone in the hand right, Well, you know if this,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if I break this from the bridle shower, the wedding,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe I'll break a hundred billion dollars. Don't

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>say that. Leanna Baker, thank you so much. She's Deal's

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>team leader at Bloomberg News, joining us here in our

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>interactive broker studio. I do find it interesting even the

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>deal flow is down. She's right, like, we've had a

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>record year last year, so it doesn't mean it's still

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not a busy year. Sure's a broadcast, by the way,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>down about three point five percent, all right, you're listening

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg Radio broad Journal. Yeah,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, should

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be home please, I'll do. I want to drive. Good question.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the Clothes music on Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, here we go, everyone, Just about ten minutes

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>left to today's trading session. Definitely risk on trade, but again,

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the year to date averages, we

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are still way way off our highs, certainly of the trade.

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it with Michael Sheldon, an executive director

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer at High Tower r d M

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Financial Group. Michael joining us this afternoon on the phone

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from New York City. Michael, how are you good? Thanks?

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Yeah, it's good to have you

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with us. Certainly a changing sentiment from what we saw

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last week with you know, we

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>entered the bear market for the S and P five

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred that we didn't close in it. What are you

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing right now? What are you seeing

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right now when you look across the investment landscape. Well,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a challenging and vironment right now, I think, um,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been well documented that fed policy, inflation,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the events in China, the events in Russia, all of

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>those are sort of conspiring to to make it a

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>very difficult market environment, one that's very different than than

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>last year and much different than the past three years.

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's gonna be choppy, I think over the

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>next several months until we get more clarity on on

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>many of those issues. Um. You know, there's a lot

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of talk about do we go into a recession, do

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>we not go into recession, And obviously that may have

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the outcome or the answer to that question may may

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>ultimately determine how much more downside there is. If you

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>look back at all the all the recessions into World

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>War two, for example, there have been twelve of them.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>On average. In a recession, equity markets decline a median

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of two and average of so Um. Many parts of

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the market have already experienced a lot of pain, unfortunately,

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but depending on you know, the direction of the economy,

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there unfortunately maybe more downs before we ultimately get out

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of this and and there will be another bull market

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>at some point um. But we're keeping our sort of

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we're keeping an eye on that. In terms of inflation,

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think, realistically, we need to think about it

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>being a much higher number until we work through some

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of these supply chain problems. And also you know the economy,

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the global economy shifting away from fossil fuels, moving towards

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>alternative energy. I mean, these are things that take time. Yeah,

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. Um. I think in terms of inflation,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we're sort of at the peak pain sort

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of threshold right now. Um. You know, Jeremy Siegel from

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from the Warden School has has famously talked about how

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the money supply has been a big factor in influencing inflation.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, for example, the money supply, the M

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>two money supply, which is basically broadly money and circulation,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>grew it about really about five point four in the

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>decade or so leading up to two thousand twenty. But

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but then due to COVID, the Federal Reserve basically pulled

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>out all the stops and the money supply grow to

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>over on a year of a year basis. And now

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as it's been pulling back liquidity, the money supplies back

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>under ten percent. So there are some potential reasons to

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be more optimistic looking forward. And if you look at

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for example of freight rates around the world are here

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the US UM. You can look at some of

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the comments from the retailers that we heard from earlier

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this week, where individuals are shopping for different items, and

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you can also look at five year forward UM inflation indicators.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So there are some signs that maybe on the margin

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation maybe in the process of peaking, but it's hard

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell how quickly it will come down. Having said that,

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Peter Atwater was on with us Tim and myself, Magic

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>professor of economics Evert William and Mary, and he said,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Feed has to be careful about overreacting to an

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>overreaction in the first place, meaning that you know, we

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>had so much stimulus during the pandemic and now the

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>FET has to be careful about, you know, the impulsiveness

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of today's market and mistake of the FED policy overreacting

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to what was an overreaction in terms of stimulus in

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Well, that's a good point. So there

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are five rate meetings left in this year, and then

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the FED funds rate right now is at one percent,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So the expectation is that the FED will raise rates

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>by a half point at each of the next two meetings,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>which would bring the FED funds rate to two percent,

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and then maybe do quarter point rate hikes

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>into early next year. There are some FED members who

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think we should be doing more than that, raising rates

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of a point or one percent. I think

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Powell was on the camp that, you know, you want

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to see what the effect of current rate increases is

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>over time and not overdo it, and then may re

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>reassess things as we go into the end of this year.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I there are there's a wide range of opinions,

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in that same camp where you don't want

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to overdo it and maybe give time a little bit

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of a give things a little bit of time. Michael,

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something that you said

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes ago. You said that we're starting

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to see signs of optimism, and you mentioned retail earnings

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, which were really brutal when it came to

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Walmart into Target. Why why do those results make you optimistic?

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Because I do. I do agree that to a certain extent,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the slowdown that we're seeing in the stock market, and

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's from some firms during earning season, is kind of

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what the FED is going for. Well, maybe I misspoke

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>when I said optimism, optimism in sense that maybe inflation

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is starting to show that it may be in the

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>early signs of peaking. And if you look at some

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of the earnings from the retailers last week, unfortunately a

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of the earning a couple of the retailers really

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>so their stocks decline significantly, But that's because consumers are

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>shifting their buying patterns, so they're not buying the same

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>things which they loaded up on during the during the

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>shutdown of the economy, and retail sales are way above

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>trends if you look at them on an historical basis.

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So as consumers start to pull back, that will mean

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>left demand and that would be unfortunately, some of the

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>retails will be left with extra goods on their shelves,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>which will lead to lower prices and ultimately what the

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>FED wants in terms of reducing inflation over time. So

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what do we do as investors right now? Michael Well,

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the most important things is you

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have to have a financial plan, and a financial plan

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>will help you meet your long term investment goals. So

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you want to be balanced in your approach.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We've been adding to growth versus Sorry, we've been adding

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to value versus growth. We're still overweight growth and we

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>are trying to take into consideration taxes. Uh. You want

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a little bit of waiting overseas, but it's

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>too early to really get too excited about foreign markets.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And you do want to have be balanced. And unfortunately

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>markets may be volatile over the over the next several months,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>but but having the right asset allocation will allow you

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at night to ride out the inevitable ups

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and downs that come with investing in these times of environments.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>When do you see an opportunity to buy the SMP five, Well,

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if not necessarily the the SMP five itself, you want

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at different sectors of the market. Uh, we

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare for example, and all there's parts of the market.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to continue to have some exposure too to

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>technology because that's the growth party your portfolio. You do

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>generally want to be um. You want to have a

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>variation and you want to be barbelled in your portfolio

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and not just load up on one particular sector going forward. Hey,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, Michael, Energy up forty percent last week. If

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the major industry groups in the SMP

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, it's a top performing group this year. Get

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>up another I think fifty here would you be committing

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>more money to energy? This is one sector that's that's

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to love. And right now it's about four percent

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of the SMP five hundred and and some are talking

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>about the fact it could go to ten of the

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred unless something changes. It looks like energy

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>should continue to to outperform. It is hard to jump

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in after the massive run it's had. It's amazing. Michael

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Sheldon over a Hi Tower, RDM Financial, Thank you so much.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Global see al