WEBVTT - Putin to Come Prepared, Will Trump?, Kaplan Asks

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Douglas

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Cast with Sea Breeze. Now on caution in the market, Doug,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>where are you in your training right now? Are you

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, dooming bloom short? Are you doing something different now?

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing something different. I'm still carrying a small, knit,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>long exposure with a plan. Tom and John too short

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>strengths as the SMP rises to what I believe to

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>be the top end of the range, which is, you know,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>another fifty SMP points or so. Look, my forward looking

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>concerns are plentiful. Trade war is the message of the

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>bond market, as well as the message of the bank

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>stock market, the rising ambiguity of global economic growth, the

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>possible repudiation of the so called synchronized global economic recovery UM,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the rising geopolitical risk, particularly in Europe with the immigration

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>issues dividing the EU and splintering some of the entrenched parties,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and also most importantly, the possibility of policy mistakes at

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>both the White House and said as the latter what

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what what I want to talk about is the wall

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of dooming gloom literature that's out right now. The world's

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>coming to it end. You read it like I read it.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We both try to ignore it as we try to

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think about what we're gonna do with investment. My major

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>thesis is corporations adapt like a Boeing doing a JV

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a dominant manufacturer in Brazil. Do you

0:01:55.240 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>still see corporations adapting to the different economic and finance

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>its out there? Are they adapting in a constructive way?

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they're adapting. UM, But UM policy remains foremost

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in my concern on the front front burner. You know,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>history has proven that one trade parish gets another than another.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Until you get a full blown trade war, no one

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>ever wins. In the consumer seems to always get screwed.

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Currency wars offered lead to trade wars and vice versa,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which in turn can devolve into hot wars. So that

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>cooperation which you described maybe UM in my view, rather

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>short lived. UM. I told you in the past, and

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I've told John and Pin in the past that that

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I approach each day asking three important questions. As it

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>relates to your example of boeing, we live in a paperless,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in cloudy world. Are investors and citizens as safe as

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the markets assume we are? And my answer is no. Secondly,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we're in a lab and interconnected world. Is it even

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>possible for America to be an oasis of prosperity in

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the driver or a vengeon of global economic growth? And

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe so. And finally, most important, as it

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>relates to Trump in the administration with the G eight

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>political coordination at an all time low, getting back to

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what Kaplan was talking about in the last segment, how

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>slow and the nept will the reaction be if the

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>wheels do come off? And what does it mean for

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>global trade and economic growth? Doug is something that the

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>United States economy could be insulated from. And I'm just

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you become more defensive, just in terms of

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>your investments, what is the most the optimal way of

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>being defensive? And can you keep along on the SMP

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>five given that over the last couple of months it

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>has been somewhat resilient. Yeah, I understand, but we're to

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>me we're in this vortex of uncertainty and certainly in

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a new regime of volatility. Um Monetary policy around the

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>world has suppressed volatility, and that's that's changing. We're gonna

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>soon see the end of UH. The E C B

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>S QUI by your end with with it being cut

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>half in half and three months. This is a really

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>big deal, John, as liquidity becomes a train both here

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and over there. So I think the summarize last year,

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen was a year of hope in which

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the SMPS index valuation experienced almost a three handle valuation

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>increase and basically Wall Street triumph over Main Street. And

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this year is a year of reality in which we're

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing contraction, compression and multiples. Main Street is triumphing over

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. It's what happens, you know. Charlie Munger had

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a great quote. He says, it's not supposed to be easy.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who finds it easiest stupid. And I think a

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that are looking UH and saying there's

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>an absence of uncertainty are really applying first level thinking

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and not second level thinking. Where this Douglas cast of

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Sea Breeze with a short term perspective most of us

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and are you know in our lives we're not trading

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or positioning? Is maybe Mr Casses, but it's always interesting

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to get the whims out there. Doug, what is your

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of the media event Fox Disney Comcast? How do

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you interpret that? How do you screen that? Well? I

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>have two exposures. I've been shot at Disney, UM, but

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not because of that event, um, not because the possible

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Fox by Disney. I have been shot Disney

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that the company's secular growth rate was

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>probably half of the eight percent historical rate when Wall

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Street consensus was still looking from the mid teens sort

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of annual growth. UM. And I'm long Comcast, and I

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>bought it after Comcasts fell from about forty three to

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty one on the basis that Roberts has you know,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>who has all of his family's net worth and comcurse.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Comcast is not going to totally shoot himself in the foot. Yeah,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but if he goes out, Doug, what's so interesting here

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on a net present value? And folks, I hate to

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>say this, but Cast is really good at moving the

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers around. He'll never admit including the red Sox one

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 1>game ahead of the Yankees. But Doug, what I would

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>point out here is the private equity slash sovereign wealth

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>plug that Mr Roberts may get is essentially free money,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yes, it is. I mean it's like a

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>plug in, John, This is really important in the Newtonian

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of this game. It's like a slug or plug

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in of just cash, right, Doug. Yes, And I do

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>think that the that the incremental free cash flow whether

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Comcast or Disney gets Fox is enough that Um, while

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the near term UH debt to enterprise value that they're

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>paying is large, it will be paid off in a

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>reasonably short time. And remember Roberts is using he's not

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>using a forever perspective like Warren Buffet, but he's you know,

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking intermediate John, He's not day trading Fox exactly.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But John, what's so important here is Mr Roberts may

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have forever money, which is what sovereign wealth funds are like. Yeah, maybe,

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but the short term date traders so to speak, or

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the investors in the stock right now. Every time this

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>deal looks less likely, um, Comcast rallies. What does that say?

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I, as as I said before, John,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're robbers. Is going to shoot himself

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on the foot and pay a ridiculous price. I think

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that that Comcast ends up with Sky, Disney ends up

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with Fox, Comcast shares trade back up to the high thirties,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and Comcast initiates, reinitiates, UM re establishes it's buy back program.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I'm in Comcast. That's spout out quite clearly,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dusk. And just going forward, you see more

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>companies like what we're seeing in media at the moment,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>leverage the balance sheet. And do you think now is

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a good time to do that? Yeah? I think they were, John.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>There are two industries that have to be rationalized, the

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>media business and the consumer package good business. And you

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>see it in Nelson Pell's going after Procter and Gamble.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>You see it in Dan Loebe uh and others attracted

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to Campbell Soup, which I mentioned in the past to

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom as one of my holdings. UM and UM. All

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these businesses have to be rationalized. Uh. You need synergies,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you need cut in cuts in the fixed cost structure

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in order to survive the secular change in the case

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of media, you know what the changes are the court cutting.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>In the case of consumer package goods, Um, it's just

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>moved towards healthy products and generic competition and Amazon. You

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>dug out one final question, and you've always been very

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>collegial about the battle of you know, the struggle of

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>making and losing money. Mr Einhor in The Great Fun

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Investors really had a tough goal of it. Is it

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>just simply non diversification, you know, like on a c

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>F a kind of chat, most hedge funds are just underdiversified.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, yes, I think that's partially the case. UM.

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>But in in a world tom of suppressed volatility UM,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in which you're being paid management or thereabouts of the

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>profit in order to deliver alpha, there's a need, there's

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a need to be non diversified and concentrated making your

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>best bets. I'm very fond and friendly with David Einharn

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have the absolute most respect for him as

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>an investment manager and as a poker player. I am

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>both as well, and I think he's currently in the

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>World Series of Poker in Las Vegas participating. You can

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>watch it on ESPN live tonight. UM and um you

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>know he plays the odds. He's very, very smart, and

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally confident, even though he faced the performance problems

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>which we get redemption problems, that he will be a survival,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as will Um, as will the others that have faced pressure,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like Acman Duck Cast. Thank you so much for a

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Thursday brief and greatly appreciated. Doug Cast, of course always

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>supporting the dreaded Yankees. A major shout out to all

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of you the huge response we got two days ago

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in our interview with Russell Shorto and his new book

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Revolution Song on six people in the Revolutionary Ward, including

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Mr Washington, and also with Gordon would of Brown University.

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a real special moment, and we thank you

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 1>for your comments. We drive that conversation forward now with

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert Kaplan with my book of the Summer, the Return

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of Marco Polo's World, Thin Gorgeous twelve or so essays

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that will make you brighter about the cacophony we're living in.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And Robert Camplan. I want to dovetail these two books together.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>There's the moment in Shorto's book where Washington meets Lafayette.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea for starters at Lafayette was twenty

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>years old went or twenty three rather when they met,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and we forget about the relationship of the United States

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>with England and France. Now that's away from what you've

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>been doing recently. But the president's gonna vault over to

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell's United Kingdom. How's he going to be greeted

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>or critically, how should he be greeted by the British Normally,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>uh an American president going to the United Kingdom would

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>be greeted as an ally, as a tried and true,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>trusted ally, going back to the late nineteenth century, because

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it was when the British Navy went downhill that weet

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Britain slowly started to hand off global responsibilities to the

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>United States. So there's no greater historical relationship united by

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>language culture in the world. But now we're in a

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>different world, where in a world where the American president

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>has rhetorically disdained Britain and other European allies, and where

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Britain is completely um you know, you know, is completely

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>absorbed with its own nightmare over leaving the European Union.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is not going to be a meeting or

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be a greeting in a

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in it that makes any sense. Historically, going back about

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty years, it was in Prime Minster

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Main one of the first, if not the first, to

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to visit the White House. Um. I believe she was,

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that she and world leaders all over,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Chinese, find whereas we may find Trump vulgar

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and and in every a distasteful for leaders who have

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to do world leaders who have to deal with an

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.359
<v Speaker 1>American president, they don't know how to process him, particularly

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese. Uh, you know, how how to analyze him,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how to predict him, which is something that world leaders

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>do with each other all the time because they're all

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>members of the same elite who have been to similar schools,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have achieved what they have through normal meritocracy. And so when,

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>for instance, of Trump says to Uh, Trump says to

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>shijin Ping, let's be friends, will make will make a

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>deal on the basis of friendship, the Chinese don't know

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>how to process that. In their culture, friends don't make deals.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You make deals with based on your personal interests that

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>intersect with another powers personal interest that has nothing to

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>do with friendship. But just in terms of the politics.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>They sort of couz a friendship with the global elites.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that part of the problem. Well, that's part of

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem, but it's nothing new. If you go back

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the early nineteenth century, the late eighteenth century, you

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>look at Metternick, Tallyron Castle, Reay. All of these people

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>represented different powers, but they were all members of the

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>same elite. In the early modern world, before the modern world,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the world between the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone was related to each other through royal families, so

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone had some relationship to Queen Victoria. So

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so they're the global elite was even more into what

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do. It just got a better understanding

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Prime minister's relationship with the president given the

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that they given the fact that the Prime Minister

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was the first leader from the West to go into

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the wine house, I don't think it helps her, not

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because he has no loyalty to anything or anybody. Everything

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is a zero sum. Everything is a zero sum issue

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. One of the things that changed your Robert

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>kaplan is it was Tillerson and now it's POMPEII. Here's

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the first of his class at West Point. I guess

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he's getting high marks from everybody just to rebuild State.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>How's he doing? And will Pompeo make a difference in Helsinki? Uh? Yeah.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Pompeo was treated with the suspicion at

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the CIA, but got high marks when he left because

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he has a history of caring for the agency. He leads,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, listening to advice. Uh So, Pompeo left the CIA,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, with a very high reputation and and it's state.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He's seen as much better than Tillerson. Um so that

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Pompel himself is an improvement over the beginning of the

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. But it always comes back to the president decides.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the American system. If the president has an instinct

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for something, the secretary of State has to go with that.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the secretary of State is not like the Secretary

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of Defense. The secretary of Defense has a lot of equities.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He can have a bad relationship with the White House

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and still be a successful secretary of Defense. It's not

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>true at Foggy Bottom. Let's forget the main thing with

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>primus to make and the speculation about whether he'll be

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>well received or not and get away from that and

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get to the meeting with President Putin. Now, traditionally, as

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, when two heads of state meet, it is

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly orchestrated. What they're going to talk about has already

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>been decided, The outcome of the meeting has already been

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>decided before they have the meeting. We now have reports

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that we could have in a room just the

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States and the Russian president and

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody else. How unpresidented is this, um, it's unprecedented. Keep

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in mind that Putin is always well prepared, well staffed

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for every meeting he has. C e o s who

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have met with him say they have never met a

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>more prepared, impressive person. Whatever the issue you're going to

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to him about, he studied it for at least

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a half an hour before meeting with you. All right,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So Putin is going to come prepare. The question is

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>will Trump based on experience, He's not. He's not going

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to be nearly as prepared. And there's a context problem.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The context is it's fine to have a cordial meeting

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with your adversary, provided your clothes, with your allies. What

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are we going to give away if the president slips up.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we had a good idea of what he

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>gives away with North Korea? What do we give away

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with Mr? Putin? At this point, I can't see anything

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because the Russians have interfered to a greater or lesser

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>extent in our electoral process allegedly. Um and um you

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>know Ukraine, Uh, Syria, Crimea. You know it's it. It

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>were in a weak position. We don't have much to

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>give away at this point in the time we got left.

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sending four or five books to a student who

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>will do international relations at New York University, and it's

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the usual nine, Power and Independence. I threw in in

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a week moment, I threw in a Kaplan book as well.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh into this, I did William Easterly's Great White White

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know Bill Easterly's classic. Blah blah blah. What's the

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>book right now? Are our listeners should get that? You

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>just say, is so immediate? What's the book right now?

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Where Robert Cappens has just shut up and read this?

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, talking about my own books. Your other people's boss,

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to know what's out there that

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be read right now? Um. Henry Kissinger's first book,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>written when he was twenty six years old, A World Restored.

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating because I've read Diplomacy. Yeah, this is when it

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>was a young Kissinger, absolutely brilliant with twenty six with

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the mind of a seventy year old who has no assistance,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody editing him. He does it all in his you know,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in his dorm room or so. No, that's why it's

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>urgent um. And what it's about is how elites from

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>different European countries constructed a world order at the end

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Napoleonic Wars. And the lessons it teaches about

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>conservatism real is him are timeless. This is fast. I mean,

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean my book of the Year a couple years

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>ago is his on world Order or whatever those essues. Um.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>The thing, this is where you get the real young

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>brilliant twenty years without handlers, without handling. This is kissing

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your without handlers, without editors, et cetera. Fascinating. That's great, Jeoffrey.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to read that. Yeah, I want to see

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Kane without handlers. Right. I fall apart, I mean

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I completely fall apart. What do I do? What we asking?

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>When the show began, Baby wipes, don't don't want it

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was you know you the turret that we're in. I

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted the desk clings. Just Robert Captain, have you seen

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>this side at Tom King? Does he not show this

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on Saving? I think it happens when he comes into

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>They use Q tips on TV? Is that Robert Capping?

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Just wonderful book, The Return of

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Marco Polo's World. Really can't say enough about it. Eight

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>twelve essays, including too fresh and new ones on the

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ever changing relationship of China and across Eurasia as well,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Mr capitants with Ian Bremer at the Eurasia Group. Right

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>now as we talked to Robert Caplan moments ago with

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Euraise your group, this is a joy to revisit where

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>we are with Ben Steele with a Council on Foreign Relations.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He's their director of International Economics, which means he he

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tells me what to do when I do panels there,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and and and stuff. And right now the panel

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be great with the President traveling to Europe

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of a new martial plan to your

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>wonderful book, The Martial Plan Dawn of a Cold War.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>If we needed a martial plan right now. Would this

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>president have done it? No, I would go further than

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the money. Tom. It's not just that

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this president wouldn't play Santa Claus, which is probably how

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>he's thinks about the Marshal Plant, but so many of

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the institutions that we take for granted today as pillars

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of the post war liberal order. For example, the World

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Trade Organization UM created seven as as an accompaniment to

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Marshall Plan. The European Union and NATO were direct

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>offshoots of the Marshall Planet's It's actually inconceivable that we

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>could have an EU and NATO today without the Marsha

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>with within. This is his desire for the Europeans to

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>put up their fair share. I saw a bar chart

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that clearly shows most of them are not. How do

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you respond to that? Is a president onto something? Well wait, wait,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>without question, I mean we've we've been pressuring the the

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Europeans from for many years to to boost their UM

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>commitments on defense spending. This certainly preceded this president and

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he's right to highlight it, but the way he does

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it is is dangerous because the so called Article five

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>security guarantees Um. That so we are extending to our

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>NATO allies in Europe are are critical to the effective

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>functioning of that alliance, and you should not be undermining.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But as you, as you point out, Bend, I mean

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we should. Let's maybe not refer to as the Marshall

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Plan just for this conversation and refer to to what

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it was called. It was the European Recovery Plan. It

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>was because Europe was on its knees. Um. Europe is

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not on its knees. But to your point, they haven't

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>been spending enough on on military spending. So what is

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the right approach to get them to do that? Well,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's both a combination of of friendly cajoling

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and making clear to the Europeans that their own

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>security is at stake here. With Russia clearly UM ratcheting

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>up its aggressive actions on NATO's borders, particularly in in

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Baltics. UM. I think this can be done

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>without undermining the cohesion of the of the alliance. I

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think right now President Trump is really playing being into

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Putin's hands by doing that, so certainly up my job

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to take a position on this. So this is really

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just a question. But The approach that he's taken right

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>now is basically saying just that you've taken the Knights

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>guarantee for grants it. You haven't spent enough on the military.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that we will um, and therefore you've taken

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole institution for granted. UM. Have they? I know?

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that would be fair. The Article five

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>security mutual security guarantees have only been invoked once in

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the Alliance's history, and that was after September eleventh, two

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, when this country was attacked in America's

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>allies invoked Article five to support US, and they did

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan, so they did step up. It would be

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong to see them as free riders. They haven't been

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on trade, have they been? No. If you look at

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>raps broadly in the developed world, Canada, the EU, the

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>United States, UM, um, they're they're roughly equivalent um. President

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump rightly emphasizes that um auto tarraps in the United

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>United States for cars coming into the United States are

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>considerably lower than those in the EU, But he doesn't

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about our own taraups on trucks, which

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>are massively higher than those which back I believe to

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Chicken texts exactly. So we're talking about tax there

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't want to negotiate that. So there are

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>there are good grounds by all means to for revisiting

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>these things, and that could have been part of the

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>productive discussion on a transatlantic trade treaty. We've been still

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>with us with the Council on Foreign Relations. Of course,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we celebrate the Marshall Plan. It's made a huge splash

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a timely splash looking back and six and seven

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got another book, The Battle of Bretton Woods, would

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>basically won every award out there about the history of

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>how we piece together modern central banking? Is our central

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>banking independent at risk? Lawrence Cudlow had a tweet out

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the other day, not directly talking about rates, but linking

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation to jobs. There was why I I tweeted out

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and others there was the first selvo. Is our independence

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of a central bank at risk? Look, some of Larry

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Cudlo's comments were unusual and crossed a traditional line or

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the administration typically did yes, did not comment on monetary affairs.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, um, Larry is in some some sense

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>pushing on an open door. What he's referring to his

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>growing support among monetary economists for what's called nominal GDP targeting,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that is, effectively targeting nominal demand rather than inflation UM

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as a way of stabilizing the the economy. So that's

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a radical direction and cheese pushing things.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised to see the Fed moving

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. You see more pressure coming down on

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve though. I mean, one thing this administration

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>has done brilliantly is nominate really good people to the

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>f O m C and stare well away from getting

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in monastery policy. And if you look at Trump's

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>appointment so far, UM, there's no evidence that he's trying

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to steer rates in one direction or another. What he

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has done, UM looking at the composition of the FOMC

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>now is put more of a deregulatory bias um into

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the organization that was expected and of course is very

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome in the industry. Do you buy the nominal GDP store.

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Scott Sumner at Bentley University and George Mason.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the fact is Janet Yellen and Chair Powell

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even Richard Clarens by Chairman. They're not thinking

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>in that top line animal spirit term, are they? You know?

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a there's great logic behind U n

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>g DP targeting. One could argue that if we had

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>pursued a policy along those lines in two thousand nine, UM,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we would have loosened policy earlier, which was clearly called for.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>My big concern about it, Tom, is that I think

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the support on the left for n g DP targeting

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is very soft. UM. That is, there's no inherent bias

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in n g T n g DP targeting towards loosening policy.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Often it can tell you to tighten policy when an

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation to symmetric. It's yeah, exactly. And I think the

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>moment an n g DP framework tells you to start

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>tightening UH policy, the left will abandon support for it.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I'm not convinced it has legs. Bestil,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for stopping by. And July Thursday,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the book The Marshall Plan Dawn of the Cold War

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who trying to find the tapestry

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from World War Two forward, and of course with General Marshall,

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you can do no better than the Marshall Plan. Ben's

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Steals with the council on for relations. We need to

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>talk tomorrow's jobs report. We usually start the two, three

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or four days ahead. I've mentioned at once. Diane Swack

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>solves the problem. Grant Thornton looking for another solid month

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of employment. Diane, the run rate on non farm payrolls

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is a hundred and nineties some thousand. It's not supposed

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's supposed to be like a hundred and twenty, right, Well,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's given our demographics. Yes, and that higher run rate

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is also what's been pushing unemployment rate down and continue

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to see it new lows. So the good news is

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the more we have that higher run rate, the more

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we have hopes of re engaging those on the sidelines,

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>which we really do have. Um will still on the sidelines,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and we really want to bring them back in from

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the workwork like we did in the late nineties. Diane,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I get the only thing I get more mail on

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>than this is the Chicago Cubs this year. Other than that,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it's people go. People like you say we're fully employed,

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and I get so much mail that says Diane swanks

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>out of her mind. We see that in our neighborhood,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>which is about full employment my comments on I get

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it on Twitter two and I understand it. I understand

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>what it means that it's not the same three percent

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw back in April of two thousand. In terms

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of the unemployment rate, we do have more primate adults

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>who are not engaged, people whose skills have eroded long

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>term unemployment has left them on the sidelines. And we

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>also have some very deep crisis use that we have

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to address the opioid crisis we didn't have that we

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>do today, where people literally in their prime age. Much

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reduction in particularly men participating in labor hood

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>force that means twenty five to fifty four year olds,

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is because they're addicted to drugs, not just prescription drugs

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but also now non prescription drugs. And these are really

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.959
<v Speaker 1>big hurdles that we have to overcome and re engage

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>those people. And frankly, there's no magic wand to do it.

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Diane Swank, I'm gonna ask you to just go into

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the future a little bit, and if you were to

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>look back at this time, let's say, a year from now,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are we going to be saying that this is as

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>good as it gets. Well, that depends I hate to

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>say that as an economist, but it depends on what

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we do with trade. We could have this expansion, make

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it to be the longest expansion of the post World

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>War to era and surpass that of the nineties by

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>making it into summer of nine if we avoid a

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>major trade war. That's not where we're going at the minute,

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but we could late. We could you know, back things

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>off a bit and avoid a major trade war and

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>get some longevity. That's what we need, is we need

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to pace ourselves in this expansion, because the longer the

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>expansion is, it's like fine wine, it gets better with time.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We more of a chance of actually bringing back those

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>workers who have been left on the sideline that you've

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of Knesian theory. That's the Mogen David Um Diane.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's just rather than the hope, let's just UH

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of play out the scenario that there is a

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>trade war, that the Chinese and the United States failed

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to reach some kind of consensus, or if they do,

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it is UH in a way obscured by price increases

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that are already filtering into the economy. What's your best

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>case scenario? There? Best case scenarios that we get what

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we call growth recession, and that is that growth slows.

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It continues, but it slows, and it fails to bring

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>down the unemployment rate further and may even allow the

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate to rise again. At the growth recession where

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you have growth but the unemployment, it's not enough growth

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate those people coming into the labor force and

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that still need jobs. The other issues, of course, that

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would derail some of the wage gains. And you do have,

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of course higher prices tied to tariffs, tariffs or taxes

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and their higher prices, and we're already seeing them come through.

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>The inflation is already beginning to come through. In these

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>facts have been much larger than many people expected. Uneven

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>marginal tariffs, and that's because relating the business cycle, we

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have all that excess capacity. Wounds had to absorb

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of shocks without it being passed immediately. And

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumers. What is your twelve months forward g d P.

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got a broad range from all the different voices

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we speak to. Are you more cautious? I'm cautious, UM

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>cautiously optimistic that will stay close to two in terms

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of our growth potential I'm afraid of though, even without

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a trade war, we're set up for what's called a

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>fiscal cliff in the third quarter of ten because of

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the way our government has decided to spend a lot

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of money today where it all ends in the end

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the third quarter of ten, which would precipitate itself

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>with recession at the end of And believe me, we've

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>seen recessions in election years before. Our government isn't that

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>smart when it comes to figuring these pies out. And

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>then in to your point buried in the News Soul

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>last week because the CBO report, which was sobering greeting

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you said the last swak with Grant Thor and he's

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>always good. She gives us such value, particularly on FED Day.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We're thrilled to have her on the Scarlet Food and

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>her FED coverage to give her perspective as well. Thanks

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane Before the podcast,

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio