WEBVTT - Things Are Really Bad Today In Argentina: BI's Sassower

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money, whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Argentina had an election with a surprise

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>outcome that is sending the assets tumbling to pay so

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>currently the weakest on record record versus the dollar. You

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred year bonds also absolutely falling out of bed.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now Damien sass Our, chief Emerging markets credit

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence and Damien, how big of a

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>potential negative is this for the Argentina economy and frankly

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for its access to international markets at this point? Well,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with the ladder there um, because that's an

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>easy one. This is bad from an external perspective. I mean,

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're an investor that technical view, yeah, I mean

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're a dollar investor and you're looking at the

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>prince this morning, I mean in just about every um

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar denominated a d R that's attached to you know,

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an Argentina a st B at YPF or POMP or

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>even the global x ms C I E t F,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the largest DTF that focuses on Argentine equities.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>They're all off today, which is in line with with

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the dollar RG cross rate, which is now at sixty,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which is yes, quite high and quite painful for a

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors who have who have investments. They're just

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a step back. I mean, what happened overnight. We

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>saw that the Argentine primaries UM basically handed a much

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger victory to Fernandez, who is um as Kirshner, the

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>former president, as his running mate, and um you know,

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the market's perception of that is quite negative, you know,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to return to currency and capital controls. I mean, Fernandez

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is already on the tape is saying he might not

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>pay uh interest on all the leak te bows that

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>offer creditors now own. And so look, as the fifth

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>largest issuer of UM of US dollar denominated sovereign debt,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Argentine is a pretty big position and a lot of

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>emerging market investor portfolios, and so there's some pain here

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure we're going to be seeing that before

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of today. I wonder what the application is

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for companies in Argentina that have borrowed debt externally, because

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the depreciation in the PASO is killer for them. I

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great point. I mean, SMP actually just

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>came out last week on the tape and said they

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see real refight pressure on those uh issuers and

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of of externally denominat external debt. Okay, wait and slow downs.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>In other words, these companies that have borrowed money in

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars or euros, they've pushed out the maturity so far

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that they won't have to necessarily refinance or pay it

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>back any time in the near future, so that relieves

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the pressure. Not the near future. One was

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the years, so they bought themselves about a year and

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a half to two years, let's call it, according to

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>S ANDPS calculations. So it's still the net in the

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>next week. Yeah, right, exactly. So it's not that far out,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is the point. And you know, look, I mean you've

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>got a car account deficit that's narrowed, albeit on the

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>back of r g PA so weakness, so it's four

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>point six percent of GDP. This is an economy now

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>in the longest recession and at least fifteen years. We're

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get a positive print for the second corner.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We very well made yet that. But I mean, my goodness,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter GDP was off five point eight

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>percent year over year, and consensus is calling for negative

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>one point four for this full year. So things are

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>bad on the ground in Argentina. And look, I mean,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that they had an absolutely wonderful harvest,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly relative to last year. Just for full disclosure, Argentina

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>is a very big exporter of soybeans and agricultural products globally,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and so one would have thought that might have been

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a bullish uh you know, would have been good for

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But my goodness, things are really, really really

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>bad today. And um, you know, if this um, if

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this is any indication of how the elections go on

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the October UM. Yeah, returned to the Pernis Kushner ways

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would not be good from the perspective of an off

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>shore investor. So aside from Argentina, which is defaulted on

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>its debt what five times in the past hundred years,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>serial defaulter, yes, serial defaulter. Yet they still were able

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to borrow money for a hundred years and the people

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>who bought that debt really regretting it today with those

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>prices on those bonds in free fall. Aside from our Argentina,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>how idiots and credit I know Jonathan Farroll hates his word,

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but how specific to Argentina are these issues versus endemic

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>within the emerging market space? Yeah? So, I mean I think,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, to that point, we have to

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>take a step back because it's all about us China.

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you just look at some of

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the data that came out of China overnight. I mean

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they released their total social financing data, which is all

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about credit extension that they kind of injected into their economy,

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was bad. I mean, given the word of

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the day, by the way, bad, it was bad. I mean,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we basically were expecting something on the order of one

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>point six trillion of credit being extended I'm talking in

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you on terms into the local China economy. It was

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>only one trillion un which is way less than expected

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and certainly less than the two point three trillion we

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>saw in June. And really what this is is new

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>loans are down, tighter, property market financing. You know, as

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we know in China, the real estate markets a very

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>big portion of about economy. And with credit growth weak,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in light of US trade for US China trade

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>friction escalating, it's just not gonna It just means that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>things are gonna get much worse. Oh and by the way,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the protests in Hong Kong, and we see I P

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and retail sales coming on Wednesday, which is also expected

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be weak. It's just not gonna be a good

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>week for emerging markets. So Jamian, here's the weird thing.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>All that sounds so bad. I'm looking at the ms

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>c I Emerging Markets f X index. It's the lowest

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>levels of the year, all really bad. I'm looking at

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets funds not doing badly. They're not seeing big withdrawals,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and emerging markets debt is actually outperforming US credit. So

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>what gives? Okay, So, well, you know E M dollar

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>debt tends to be driven by the U. S. Treasury

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>market effectively, and spreads within the U S. Treasury market,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>all of which yields have been coming down. Spreads are

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>still tight around the year, or maybe they're about break

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>even but all of that has been fueling the roughly

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>double digit gains we've seen an e M dollar debt. Know, hey,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you make a really good point, because

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I just looked at the constituent breakdown in e M

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>B which is the largest um um emerging market dollar

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>bond e t F. It's the largest e M e

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>t F you know, in existence, and Argentine is really

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>only a small portion of that, despite the fact that

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's five five percent of most benchmark industry, it's only

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>two percent of that e t F. So you know,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>by hook or by crook, you know, maybe that's got

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a positive overlay too. But yeah, no,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I M. Dollward jets done well, will continue to do

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>well so long as US treasure yields are declining and

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>spreads remain benign, if that's if that's true. So yeah,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we're looking at. I mean, you know,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Mexico, Russia, Brazil, it's all been doing

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Yeah, the emerging market conundrum, lots of bad

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>news you can hook into, and yet and yet the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>FED keeps cutting rates and that's typically a technical positive.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Damian SASA are Chief Emerging Markets Credit Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our interactive broker studios. Behind the

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>wall of worry that we have today in markets is

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>what is happening between the US and China, and just

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>not only what is happening between them when it comes

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to trade, but what is happening in each of the

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>economy is when it comes to growth. We're so lucky

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to have Leland Miller here with us who tracks all

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the economic data coming out of China. He's a

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of China beige Book International. Joining us

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>here in our interactive broker Studios. Leland, it really struck

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>me that there was data showing slowing credit growth UH

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for the month of June overnight. This was interesting because

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily stem from a crackdown on leverage ratios.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Does this indicate a slowdown in growth to you? Not yet,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot to be figured out over the

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>next several weeks. The first thing to know is that

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter, our first month out of every quarter,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we typically see less lending, So you get the narrative

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>things are slowing down. The end of the quarter, they

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>pump more stuff in, so we'll have to see this

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>over the course of several months. But the second thing

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is you've got these new tariffs hanging over, uh, hanging

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>over the Chinese economy. But you've also ut the party's

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seventih anniversary in the PRC seventith anniversary in October, so

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are gonna want to boost the economy for that.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of this is timing. When are they

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>going to start pumping things in When do they want

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to improve uh, the optics around the economy. So I

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's too early to say that things are slowing

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>down quite yet. Okay, so right now, where are we

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the trade war and the ammunition

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that both sides have to deploy? Well, this this was

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting what happened in August because you know, as

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we've said for a long time, when you leave Osaka

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and you basically say we are have a deadline at

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, so six months and of

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the year you don't even announce. If you imply that

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing anything until the end of the year,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to get the parties focused on doing

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>anything substitutive. The Chinese don't want to talk about the text.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>They want to talk about how to get to November

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>when they can restart discussions. So all the discussion lately

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had been over Huawei on the U S side and

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>agricultural buys on the Chinese side. And the Chinese got

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>through the last media and thought they had done promised

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>just enough to get what they wanted and have sort

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of a smooth fall. And the President didn't like that,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and he ratchet up tensions. And then the Chinese did

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>what they did with the yuan, which was overdue but

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seen as a poke in the eye. And now we're

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at this position where we could see anything. We could

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see this coming week. We could see tensions relaxed because

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Huawei General License is extended, or some sort

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of concessions are done in Huawei, or we could see

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite. The President does nothing in Huawei. You

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>see tariffs go up to ten percent or even September one,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and this thing's um, you know, breaking down quite quickly.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>What about on the Chinese side, aside from the yuan

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>peg And it's not necessarily a depreciation as much as

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing the currency to weaken perhaps to its market it's

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>actual market weight Aside from that, are you expecting China

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to go after US companies that are doing business in China?

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Not yet. Uh, it doesn't mean that they're not being

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>uh messed with on the margins. But right now, I

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>think that China's goal is to just stop the nightmare

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario from occurring. So they don't want tariffs on all

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>their goods. They don't want Trump to come even harder

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at Huawei and the other tech companies, some of whom

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are on lists that have not been announced yet and

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>would be if things really broke down. Uh. She is

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously very happy the President. Trump hasn't said much about

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong to the extent he said anything, it's almost

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>been encouraging. You've got South China. See, you've got Taiwan

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>arms sales. So things aren't good right now, but the

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are very motivated not to let them fall apart. Meanwhile,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I was reading an article over the weekend that I

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>thought was really interesting about Jiji and Ping's challenge right now,

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that he faces this really difficult move in trying

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to take this very quickly growing economy and shift it

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to a more middle class, lower growth, but more stable

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>developed market of sorts, and I'm wondering where it is

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on that progression, how far along has it gotten, and

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of whether you view this as sort of the

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>albatross that Jim Pig needs to cross. Well, he has

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of he has a he has a lot

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>of challenges coming up. I'm not sure which one I

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would take, you know, the I think that if you

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>if we take it back up to fet what what

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing since was a lot of progress on certain things,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like they cracked down on shadow finance. They didn't do

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>as much on leveraging as they claimed, but they did

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. There was some restructuring about to go on,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and then they saw the Trump trade war hit in

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, and everything they started they began to reverse.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And now it's totally reversed. So this hasn't hit official

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>day yet, so it's not believed by a lot of people.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But we saw a major resurgence in shadow banking in

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter, so it's back. You know, they said

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to deal with it. No that

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>got scared about what was happening in the trade war,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and they brought shadow banking back. You're not seeing restructuring,

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and I seeing reform. We're not seeing evidence of rebalancing

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in our numbers, and so I think what the Chinese

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have done once again is reverted to the short term

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal with their short term problems and said, you know,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna kick the can down road, as everyone seems

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to do these days, and deal with the problems next

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>year or the year after that. So what's the consequence

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, Well, what it means is they can they

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>can defy expectations of a more dramatic slowdown in the

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>short term by by using their various levers to boost growth,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but it means the medium term and the long term

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be much more difficult. The Chinese have an

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage in that they have a non commercial financial system.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons things that haven't fallen apart

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the way they did in the US with Lehman and

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and and in Europe as well. Chinese can just swish

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of capital from one side of the systems

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the other, plugging holes, fixing problems. But that means they're

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>essentially chasing good money after bad and it's gonna hit,

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna stagnate the economy over time. It's gonna it's

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit their return on investment because they're constantly pumping

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>new money into bad projects, so it'll have a long

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>term hit when and a long term slowdown is basically

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the cards. So just to sort of put a

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>bow on all of this, this is a really important point.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>If China has demonstrated it is willing to sacrifice the

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>longer term for the short term boost that it can

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>get by reversing some of the de leveraging, etcetera measures

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>from earlier, then how is the trade war pressuring them?

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Because they're showing that they are willing to use this

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ammunition now regardless of the longer term consequences. I think

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem if you're in the White House. The

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese have the ability because they don't have to worry

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about the politics the way that a democracy would, and

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to worry about a Congress that doesn't

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like certain things. They are just going to fix problems

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that clear the way for the party in the short term.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what they've always done and that's what they'll continue

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. And so the difficulty in causing problems for

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>China is that they always have a quicker response mechanism

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and a more effective one because they don't have to

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>answer to anyone. Real quick, here, what year will the

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>slow down in China be felt? The slowdown that will

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily come despite the stimulus that the PBOC is willing

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to put in. Look, I would think that within five

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>years you're gonna start seeing much slower growth, the questions

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese gonna admit it. I mean, if you

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're already seeing slower growth and people were predicting a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, it just hasn't been enough to to

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>really shake the shape markets. I think over the next

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>five years, you're gonna start seeing a more precipitous decline

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're not gonna be able to do much about.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller so wonderful to get your perspective. As always,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here. Uh And honestly, Leland, you

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>guys have data that is really spectacular because it shows

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what's actually going on, and there's so much question around

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of the official data. To get other measures

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a sense of what's going on on the

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>ground is really important. Leland Miller is chief executive officer

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of China beige Book International, weighing in on both sides here.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who was accused of sex trafficking,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was found dead in his jail cell over the weekend. Now,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there are many questions around the circumstances of his death.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>It has been established as a suicide. Questions though about

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>how he was surveiled by the jail staff. Joining us

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>now is Chris Dolmets. He's a Bloomberg legal reporter joining

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>us from the courthouse. Chris, We're now getting word from

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Bill Barr that there were some serious irregularities

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with the manner in which Jeffrey Epstein was held. Can

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you elaborate, Do we know anything more? No, that's just

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>recently come out. He's he said, you know, they're serious

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>regularities over the weekend. He has vowed to investigate, get

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of what happened. Um. You know, it's

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty secure facility and a lot of people are

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>asking questions as to how this could happen, um in

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a federal prison that's held you know el Chapo for

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for example. So what is the concern here, Because if

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand correctly, it has been established as a suicide,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>even though there have been a number of conspiracy theories

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was murder. I mean, has it been established

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a suicide? So? UM, you know, the only thing we've

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>been told, um by the Bureau Prisons that he was

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>found unresponsive, jail staff tried to revive him, someone emergency

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>medical personnel, and that he was pronounced dead UM at

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. UM, ABC and others you know reported that

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he that he hung himself, and there has been an

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>autopsy performed. That medical examiner verified that, but hasn't officially

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>determined the cause of debt. UM. There has been a

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>city official that told the New York Times that UM,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that the medical examiner is pretty confident that it is suicide, UM,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but needs you know, to complete the autopsy to make

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that determination. So what's the key question here when it

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to the serious irregularities that Attorney General bar was

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Well, there's you know, there's questions about um,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, staff overtime, whether staff were overworked, UM, you know,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>what the conditions that the prison were like. UM, whether

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>or not he was on a suicide watch. We've been

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>told that he was not, even though he was recently

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on one after previous attempts apparently to kill himself. UM,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>so some of the you know, the investigation is going

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to revolve around that who was watching him, um when

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to um be checking on him. Uh,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what was in his cell, how he was able to

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get something that allowed him to hang himself. UM, it's

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a pretty comprehensive investigation, and that's kind

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of launched every time there is a suicide in a

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>federal prison. Chris, I'm wondering what his death means for

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution and for the investigation into the nature of

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the crimes, which included trafficking young girls who

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>were under the legal age of consent. Sure, that's so

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this ends the criminal prosecution as because he's dead, the

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>case just ends, and that kind of ends the attempts

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by prosecutors to kind of seize his assets, um to

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>compensate his victims through criminal proceedings. But that doesn't mean

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>that they can't go um in civil proceedings to seize

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>individual assets, including his mansion, UM, his playing other things

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to attempt to compensate victims. Obviously, there's going to be

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty complicated um state scenario that comes out after

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>his autopsy has finished, and UM, you know, we we

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether he has a will. You know, we

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we would assume with somebody with his number of assets

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>would have a will. Um. So it's a question of

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>who would the executor would be, where it might be filed.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has homes in New York, in the

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Islands, in New Mexico. Uh So any of those

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>places are potential for him to have his will filed

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and as a state divvied up there though certainly states

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we'll want to get a piece of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the tax bill. So there's a question about the assets.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>There's also a question about the tentacles of this case

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that had ensnared at least in the court documents, very

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>high profile individuals who are friends with him, from the

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>political to the legal to the business world. What is

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going on with that? I mean, are those kinds of

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>reaches of the investigation going to be shot at this

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>point or going to be ongoing? No, so, other prosecutors

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have told me that the prosecutors here in Manhattan will

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly continue their investigation with the evidence they've gathered. Obviously,

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a conspiracy count here which implicates other people, um,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and there should certainly could be other charges brought against

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>UM other members of that conspiracy. UM, we wouldn't doubt

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that they were. That they're indeed doing that right now.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So this could definitely ensnare other people UM as it

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>moves forward, UM, which will probably take a little while

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as they go through the evidence. So is there any

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned Chris about finding all of Jeffrey Epstein's assets considering

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the rather secretive nature in which they were all kept.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd say there's definitely a concern through that. I mean,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>even the prosecutors have been unable to determine exactly where

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>all his assets are, and UM says they've been secured

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>away in trust, and you know that there's several layers

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of secrecy that have to be gone through before we

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can they can determine exactly what he has. Crystal Match,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much much for being with us. He's

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg legal reporter joining us from the courthouse. The

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>latest being Attorney General William Barr coming out and saying

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that the prison where Jeffrey Epstein died has quote serious irregularities.

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He vowed to pursue justice for the financiers victims. As

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Chris was talking about, there is some question about seizing

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the assets of Jeffrey Epstein and doling out the proceeds

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to the victims, as might have happened under a successful prosecution,

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But now that he's dead, raises some questions about whether

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they can do that. Time to get us check on

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with the price of oil, where it's headed,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for Saudi Arabia in particular. Joining

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>us now, Dr ellen Wald, president of Transversal Consulting and

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg opinion contributor, Ellen thank you so much for

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>being with us. I want to start with Saudia. Amco

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Is reported its earnings and there were a couple of

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>surprises there. Yes they did. They indicated a twelve drop

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in revenues because of the decline in oil prices. But

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>was that what really caught your eye? Uh? No, I

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>think that the drop in revenue and in profit was expected. Uh.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's really not that bad, considering that oil prices

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have been lower and also that a ram coast producing

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>less oil as a result of its agreements with OPEC.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's really interesting in Uh. The numbers that the

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>company did release are the dividends that it's giving to

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi government. So even though revenue and net profit

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is down, the dividends were really up. Uh and a

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ram coast seems to divide this into two different kinds,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>ordinary dividends and special dividends. And ordinary dividends were about

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the same, but special dividends group by fourteen billion dollars.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is really an area that investors need to

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on, particularly if they're interested in uh

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an a Ramco I e O, which is still forthcoming,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but it could be an area of concern. So just

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to sort of flesh that out a little bit, because

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was really interesting, and you pointed it

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>out in a note where you were talking about how

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>people are concerned. There is discretion at Saudi Aramco about

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>how much of their profits they give to the Saudi

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Arabian government, and this becomes a problem for people who

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>might want to invest in the equity of this company

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because they don't know how much they will be left with.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>What does it indicate to you that that special dividend

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>increased at a time of declining profits and revenue. What

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>does it indicate about Saudi Aramco and the message they're

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>setting to shareholders or potential shareholders. To me, it indicates

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that the government is still Saudi government says it wants

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to wean itself off of oil revenue, of off of

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>its dependency on oil, and that's a very very good

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>goal for them to have, but it's still not there,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and in fact it's actually needing more and more. UH

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they've really still find their relationship in terms of income

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 1>taxes and exactly how much they're going to be reimbursing

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a ramco for the cost of fuel. But they still

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>have to really flesh out this dividend relationship because it

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>does mean that in the end, despite all of the

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>safeguards and the procedures that they've put it put in place,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that in the end the government is

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>still still really holding the purse strings for a Ramco

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and if it needs more money for whatever it is

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's doing that year, it's going to take it

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in a dividend. So the other interesting aspect of the

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Aramco earnings was their announcement that they're planning by

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a stake and they're finding a chemicals business of India's

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Reliance Industries, which is UH chemicals business. It's not an

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas business, and this is I assume, a

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>way for them to continue to diversify away from away

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>from crude. Correct. Yes, it's definitely part of their long

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>running strategy to increase their downstream capabilities to diversify away

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from just upstream and crude productions. But there's there's something

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>very interesting here, which is that when a RAMCO goes

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in to a foreign market, particularly in Asian market. UH

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>China and South Korea are really good examples of this,

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but India, I think it's going to be one not

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't just invest in chemicals or refinery business, but

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it also secures an outlet for its own crude. And

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what was kind of hidden in this deal, which by

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, is still in its very early stages, is

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Reliance agrees that it's going to double

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>its crude imports from a Ramco to bring that up

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to I think five hundred thousand barrels per day. So

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a RAMCO is not just investing in a company that

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it thinks will do well, it's also securing an outlet

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>for its crude. I want to broaden out just a

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit. The price of oil has been whipped around

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in part due to Saudi Arabia or Saudi Arabia's attempts

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever it can to support prices, or least

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what they were. They were making noise about what

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can Saudi Arabia do at this point further and what

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are they likely to do to keep prices from going

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>down further? You know, this is the big question that's

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on everyone who follows the market's mind because prices have

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>really seemed to be disconnected from supply and demand, or

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly from supply, and there's really this focus on, uh,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the future of demand, so this focus on what demand

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>could be in the future based on forecasts about the economy.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And so Saudi Arabia is looking at this and they're saying,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil is going down, down, down, and

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>going all over the place. But there's no indication from

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a supply perspective or even really from a current demand

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective that this should be happening. So they admit this

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and then they say, well, we're going to do what

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we can. They had planned to increase production in September,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they've decided they're not going to do They're going to

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hold off on that production increase, and but really, what

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>more can they do? It's a big question, and some

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, well, OPEC is a whole quick cut

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>production by a million barrels a day, and that might

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>lift prices a bit. But when prices are so disconnected

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from supply, it's really unclear that there's anything they can

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do short of just writing it out. Dr ellen Wald,

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. It's always a pleasure speaking with you.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Dr ellen Wald is a Bloomberg Opinion contributor. She's president

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of Transversal Consulting. You can read her columns on the

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg at O P I n go or Bloomberg dot

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>com slash Opinion on the internets if you will see

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting perspective. She's also, by the way, a

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>nonresident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa bram Woyds. I'm on

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa A. Bram Woyd's one before the podcast,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio