Speaker 1: Okay, So I just watched the Crappy Lake trailer. I
Speaker 1: didn't know that it was out, and before I watched it,
Speaker 1: this is exactly what I was thinking. I was thinking,
Speaker 1: I'm excited. I'm excited for Sonya. It makes sense, you know,
Speaker 1: the Lucy and Ethel and Shit's Creak of it all,
Speaker 1: which it's sort of like a reality version of Shit's
Speaker 1: Creek and the name even being Crappy Lake. It's cute
Speaker 1: and clever and creative. I don't know who produced it,
Speaker 1: but I like the concept. I just watched the trailer.
Speaker 1: I don't know what I think. I kind of wasn't
Speaker 1: laughing but wanted to be like Sonia. I recognize Sonya
Speaker 1: in this role like I like it. I like her
Speaker 1: in this role. I think she's kind of the star
Speaker 1: of it. I don't see Luanne in this role in
Speaker 1: a weird way. I don't know who else would be
Speaker 1: in this role, but like Luanne does crazy things that
Speaker 1: make you laugh at her, which is comedy, you know,
Speaker 1: but she's not funny, like she doesn't she's not really
Speaker 1: funny intentionally. Sonya is funny, like she'll say funny things.
Speaker 1: So I don't know what I think they put a
Speaker 1: lot in that trailer. It looks like a good idea,
Speaker 1: but it definitely seems like it's like a Simple Life,
Speaker 1: which did well. And I don't know if I actually
Speaker 1: thought Simple Life was funny. So I root for them.
Speaker 1: I hope it does really really well. It seems like
Speaker 1: it's a great idea, and yeah, I'm rooting for them.
Speaker 1: I just didn't laugh at the trailer, like I really
Speaker 1: will enjoy a real Housewives trailer. I kind of was
Speaker 1: like not laughing but wanting to laugh, Like it was
Speaker 1: like saying, hm, that's funny, but not laughing. So I
Speaker 1: wish them. I hope it does really really well. I
Speaker 1: think it's a great idea, a great name, a great concept.
Speaker 1: I think Sony is really funny and wacky. I just
Speaker 1: in that trailer, I don't know. I feel like there's
Speaker 1: too much storyline being Forrester. I don't know. I can't
Speaker 1: really place it, but I can't wait to hear how
Speaker 1: it does. This is Rewives, so this is a rerant.
Speaker 1: So we talk about housewives, and I talked about Kim
Speaker 1: and Kroy a couple of times because their divorce is
Speaker 1: reminiscent of antics that happen in divorces that hold up divorces,
Speaker 1: that are very costly, that seem like a good idea
Speaker 1: in the moment, and that are side shows. So apparently
Speaker 1: Kim is asking Croy to get drug tested. Now, that's
Speaker 1: fine if that's been something that she has expressed having
Speaker 1: an issue with before that's ever come up in their relationship.
Speaker 1: But if you've been married to someone for years and
Speaker 1: you've multiple children and you've never brought up drug use
Speaker 1: and they want them drug tested because now all of
Speaker 1: a sudden you're fearing that they're an unfit pan that's
Speaker 1: a reach that a judge can smell that a mile away.
Speaker 1: That's an antic that's a side show. Judges don't like
Speaker 1: side shows. Judges are focused on getting the case off
Speaker 1: their desk and the main show, and people are always
Speaker 1: focused on emotion and what their partner did. The judge
Speaker 1: is unlikely unless I don't know the background, which I don't.
Speaker 1: If Kroy has had a history of drug abuse or
Speaker 1: that's been something that's been discussed in their marriage, there's
Speaker 1: a chance that the judge could issue a drug test.
Speaker 1: But I would be betting that a judge is not
Speaker 1: going to ask for a drug test. On KROI if
Speaker 1: that has not been a historical problem or complaint, because
Speaker 1: it has not been affecting the parenting, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: now this is the first time that we're breaking up.
Speaker 1: Now you're going to discuss just doesn't totally track. Kanye
Speaker 1: all of a sudden took issue with Northwest being in
Speaker 1: all of this social media after years of her being
Speaker 1: on a reality show and being in the most fame
Speaker 1: thirsty parent dynamic that any child could ever be in.
Speaker 1: It doesn't track. It's a reach. So it seems like
Speaker 1: Kim wanting a drug tist test on Croix that she's
Speaker 1: never asked for before is a reach. Asking for soul
Speaker 1: custody out of the gate after you've never had any problems,
Speaker 1: never had child Services get involved, never arrested somebody, never
Speaker 1: a real problem, and a marriage is also a reach.
Speaker 1: Judges want parity for parents. Judges want kids to be
Speaker 1: with both parents. Judges want not what's best for the parent,
Speaker 1: and not what the parent desires, and not with the parents'
Speaker 1: emotions and public dramas dictate. Judges want what's best for
Speaker 1: the child, which is a good relationship with both parents.
Speaker 1: There's no way that the judge is going to say
Speaker 1: sole custody and visitation unless one party is doing something
Speaker 1: very fucked up. It doesn't seem like anyone is the
Speaker 1: inferior parent. And certainly a reality show not going to
Speaker 1: show the whole thing. And certainly there are things that
Speaker 1: could be bad about Croy that you never saw because
Speaker 1: it was really more Kim's show, and she has to
Speaker 1: have these crazy antics to be the more crazy one,
Speaker 1: and she's the crazy wife and it's her show, and
Speaker 1: she's the humorous one and she gets the ratings. So
Speaker 1: we don't know what's really going on. But soul custody
Speaker 1: with visitation is a snowball's chance in hell, and a
Speaker 1: drug test on Croy, if in fact we've never heard
Speaker 1: about drugs in their relationship before, is also a snowball's
Speaker 1: chance in hell. These are theatrical antics to create a
Speaker 1: side show that are bothering the individuals that they want
Speaker 1: to sling shit to the other party, and in this
Speaker 1: case it seems like both parties want to sling shit,
Speaker 1: which is never a good idea and means that this
Speaker 1: could go on forever if they have maverick cowboy crazy
Speaker 1: lawyers who are going to do whatever they want, like
Speaker 1: low hanging fruit lawyers that want fame. Then they're both
Speaker 1: fucked because the lawyers are going to be doing their
Speaker 1: own theatrical art in court because they're winning, because they're
Speaker 1: making money, so they just want the media. They want
Speaker 1: the press. And if you get a cheap lawyer because
Speaker 1: they want the fame, you're fucked too, because they're gonna
Speaker 1: want the fame. So that's a disaster waiting to happen.
Speaker 1: You want the nerdy, dorky, non famous lawyer that's been
Speaker 1: successful but that doesn't want the fame. In addition, they're
Speaker 1: gonna go for maverick shit show lawyers because the lawyers
Speaker 1: can only benefit by getting the fame. They're not getting
Speaker 1: money because these two don't pay their bills, They didn't
Speaker 1: pay their taxes. Why are they gonna pay their lawyers.
Speaker 1: Historically people don't that don't pay their bills don't pay
Speaker 1: their lawyers. And another thing that happens, which happened in
Speaker 1: my situation, is when a party gets fired by their
Speaker 1: lawyer multiple times because of not being paid or because
Speaker 1: of antics. That's a disaster too that will hold up
Speaker 1: a divorce. These are all things you don't want holding
Speaker 1: up a divorce. Both of them need to shut the
Speaker 1: fuck up, get a mediator, and get out because it's
Speaker 1: gonna be millions of dollars that they don't have. I
Speaker 1: have so many coincidences with housewives, it's amazing. I go
Speaker 1: to Aspen and I run into Lisa Hawk scene at Matsuhisa,
Speaker 1: and she comes up and talks to me about my
Speaker 1: beauty reviews and her vicious, wretched divorce but nowhere near
Speaker 1: my vicious, wretched ten year divorce. Not that it's a
Speaker 1: divorce competition, but nowhere near my wretched divorce. And we
Speaker 1: talk about that. Then I run into Heather on the
Speaker 1: street for Heather Dubrow from Housewives of Orange County, who
Speaker 1: I knew when my ex husband's brother wanted to date her,
Speaker 1: and she was an actress and like just like a
Speaker 1: you know, regular actress running around LA and we were friendly,
Speaker 1: like so many of the coincidences happened off camera with
Speaker 1: me and these girls. And then I see Kyle and Pharah,
Speaker 1: and Kyle I was friends with a thousand years ago
Speaker 1: before she met Mauricio with when Pharaoh, who's a grown woman,
Speaker 1: was four years old and we used to drive her
Speaker 1: around in the car and she had like the cutest
Speaker 1: little giggle. Like all these I have, all these crazy
Speaker 1: Housewives coincidences off camera, maybe they're not coincidences. I mean
Speaker 1: those were just in another location, so they kind of
Speaker 1: aren't that. I saw Lisa hawkxeen and again in Miami,
Speaker 1: where she's from. I said, Teresa, I watched What Happens Live,
Speaker 1: but we had a long talk about her and Louis
Speaker 1: and Atlantic City and Sebastian Man of Skulko of all things,
Speaker 1: and I love the off camera Housewives interactions. Oh my god.
Speaker 1: I talked about Kim Zolziak. That is I don't want
Speaker 1: to say that's a gift that keeps on giving. She
Speaker 1: has kids and a divorce is challenging. I wouldn't wish
Speaker 1: it on my worst nightmare. Why did she bring her
Speaker 1: daughters into this world of like I guess you just
Speaker 1: you mimic your mom. Like my daughter dresses pretty naturally.
Speaker 1: She's not that into all this stuff. She's pretty down
Speaker 1: to earth and like maybe that's for me, maybe that's
Speaker 1: just how she was born. Maybe that's from her influences,
Speaker 1: her friends, the combination, But like, why would Kim Zolziak
Speaker 1: want that insecurity for her kids, Like it's obviously insecurity.
Speaker 1: You know, it's just so much done to yourself and
Speaker 1: so much filtering, and you can tell when it's insecurity,
Speaker 1: And why would you do that to your kids? I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: it's great to look good, it's great to look pretty,
Speaker 1: but making them think that your looks and how much
Speaker 1: money glam costs and the daughter's talking about eight thousand
Speaker 1: dollars a hair in her head and you know how
Speaker 1: much it's like back to the Erica Jane. It's expensive
Speaker 1: to be me and it's you know that doesn't wear.
Speaker 1: It's fifty thousand dollars a month to get this glam
Speaker 1: and not to mention a stylist and flying them to
Speaker 1: Dubai and they're going first class, your people, and oh
Speaker 1: my god, it's being layered. It's so much worse. It's
Speaker 1: like tabasco on a wound, because this stuff is like
Speaker 1: it's aging like milk. Watching Kim and her kids and
Speaker 1: KROI talk about all their money. At least to recent
Speaker 1: DJA wasn't talking about the hundreds of thousands of dollars
Speaker 1: she paid in cash and furniture on social media because
Speaker 1: it didn't exist then so when they went to jail
Speaker 1: and when they got caught, like it wasn't like ouch.
Speaker 1: All this is all over social media. Just Kim and
Speaker 1: Kroy on this show talking about four hundred thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: breathes like cringe, twenty two thousand dollars, kids birthday party, cringe,
Speaker 1: eight thousand dollars, a hair in your head, cringe. I
Speaker 1: mean it's like it's endlessly cringe worthy. It's disgusting, and
Speaker 1: it's cheating, and it's lying and it's phony, and I
Speaker 1: don't know what she could possibly say to defend herself.
Speaker 1: And she's driving school and a range over to drop
Speaker 1: her kids off. Like, dude, you fucking trade your car
Speaker 1: in right away for a RAB four. You go get
Speaker 1: a studio apartment, You may a collpa. You say, I'm disgusting,
Speaker 1: it's disgusting. I'm turning over a new leaf. You donate
Speaker 1: to some charity, and you fucking keep it moving, keep
Speaker 1: it moving. I don't know what to say. It's vial