WEBVTT - A Look At Markets, Amazon, And Facebook's New Name 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All Right, one of

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the big big stories on the Bloomberg terminal today, Amazon

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>discloses a steak in e v maker Rivian. Ed Ludlow

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>joins us from uh San Francisco. Ed, big story here,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>big names. What's Amazon doing? Yeah, it's interesting because we've

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>reported the influence that Amazon had over this company already.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, just for the audience. This is a company

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that's made very few vehicles on talking tens of units

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of battery electric pickups, but is really closely followed because

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is also a customer of Rivian. They've ordered a

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand delivery vans. You know, we we've known that

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they've made private investments along the way in this company.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>But stake in a company that's about I P O

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is is important right as part of market functioning. UM.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's just you know it frankly adds evidence to

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the piece we put out last month that this is

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a company under immense pressure because it's biggest customer is

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>also one of its biggest shareholders, and it's kind of

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>pulling the strings of what Rivian is trying to do.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Why would Amazon not just out right by this company.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question because Amazon has taken that approach

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in the past. If you think about its efforts in

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>autonomous driving, it bought Zooks. Now, the context there was

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that Zooks was struggling, it was desperate to raise money, um,

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know it was basically shopping itself around. UM.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>So it has taken that approach in the past. But

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rivian is run by this guy R. J. Scaringe,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a PhD holder from m I T. He has big

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>dreams and visions for electric vehicles. You know, they are

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>already making their own vehicles for consumers right a battery

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>electric pick up. They're already coming off the assembly and

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>limited deliveries. And you know, this is a story about

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a founder and a guy who's built a company really quickly.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But in order to get to this stage, he's had

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to make compromises, and the Amazon stake of seems to

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest compromise of all. Do we know, you know,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting here. Amazon's invested more than one point three

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in this automaker. They have about a hundred

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million shares of preferred stock, but the voting

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do we know what their voting power is here? Because

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like, as you suggested in your reporting,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're really in control here. This is what's kind

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of fun about the story that when Rivian filed its

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>S one, remember the S one's in right and it's public,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they said Ford has a stake of more than five

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>percent in Rivian. They said t ro Price has a

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>stake of more than five percent in Rivian. You know,

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>these big names or x UM. Other investors include Fidelity,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>black Rock. But the Amazon stake was redacted very high up,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so now we know that the ownership

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>interest is um you know, and you'd assume that the

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>voting rights are proportionate based on the volume of preferred

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>stock that's been issued. Amazon has about a hundred and

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty million shares of preferred stock. So well, I don't

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you this because you have the privilege

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of covering them all for us here at Bloomberg. But

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of players in the e V space.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a market that's getting very, very crowded, and and

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of this narrative out there that they're not

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>all going to make it. Does an investment from Amazon

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>make Rivian one of the ones that's going to have

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that sticking power? Yeah, I mean according to sources, as

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we've reported, you know, the valuation of eighty billion dollars

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that Rivian is seeking in its i p O is

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>based largely on the fact that Amazon is an investor

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and a customer. You know, you saw the influence of

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the hurt steal with Tesla this past week. For example,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the infancy of EVS was about selling to consumers gaining

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>traction EVY adoption. But now you're seeing corporates come in

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and decide about their policy with regards to carbon reduction,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can see the power of a big corporate

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>placing a mass order. So Rivian kind of hit that

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot, right. It has three products to consumer ones

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the Amazon Van. The Amazon van gives it

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed revenue. It's a contract for a hundred thousand vans.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We know that, we know what the deadline is and

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they're on track to meet it. And as we reported,

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>according to sources, there's some great perks in the deal,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like they get recurring software revenues. Amazon pays them basically

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for over the air updates for the duration of the contract.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a great thing to have. But as we've also reported,

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Rivian have had to make some sacrifices and put those

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>consumer products on the back burner because if Jeff Bezos

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of your biggest shareholders, right and he is

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>expectations because he tweeted after we published the story saying,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey r J, where's my vans? Um? You know, you

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>can imagine the pressure on that company's management team to deliver.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Just lastly, and what do we know about the product

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that the van itself? Yeah, so the van can do

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>up to a hundred and fifty miles in a single charge.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very much a product for last mile delivery. Amazon

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>already buys delivery and right from Mercedes, from Ram, from

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Ford um it's going to be a direct competitor to

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Ford's e transit van, which is interesting given Forward is

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>an investor in rivian Um and you know it's it's

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing it's having some supply chain issues because it's

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a bulky products. You need a lot of metal, you

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>need a lot of semiconductors. But you know, it's a

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>simple design and it shares common battery and motor architecture

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>with the consumer products. That's how Rivian's been able to

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 1>put it off. That's kind of the key. The underlying

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>technology is the same across all three products. Alright, thank

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much for bringing this story here. In this

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>reporting again, Amazon discloses steak and EV maker Rivian, So

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a big, big validation I guess, if you will, of

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the company's technology. Edlar Low, technology reporter for US at

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. He is based in San Francisco. All Right,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got their strategies for managing this market. Again. Equity

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>markets at or near all time highs. Interest rates uh,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>very much muted, but the tenure at one point five

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. Our next guest focuses on the three bees.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get the latest on that. John Augustine, chief

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for Huntington Private Bank Joints, is on the

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>home on the phone from Columbus, Ohio, where the Penn

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>State Knitney Lions are coming in this weekend to fight

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State University. John, thanks so much for joining us.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the three bees. How are they

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of guiding your investment outlook? Sir Paul, good morning,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and it is gonna be a good game in Columbus

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. So the three be so number one, we

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>want to be bond light. Real yields are still too

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>negative for us in the bond world. We don't see recession,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>so to us, the sixty portfolio should be more of

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a se So that's number one. Number two with respect

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market, we've been here at a lot

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of rotate the value this summer and early now into

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the fall. But our our equity team has stayed with growth.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>They've barbelled between growth and value, and that's worked for us,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that's worked for our customers. They've got good returns here

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in October. So that's the second be barbell and stocks.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The third be is just broadened. And what would mean

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>by broaden is include some commodities, include some real estate

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>with your stocks and bonds. So make sure you're broad

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in your conducts next year. Is going to be more

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of an interest rate driven year, which could bring up volatility.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So we just want to make sure we're broad and

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>our conduct for our clients. So those are three bees.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's talk about a few of your

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>specific holdings, because I see within your top equity holdings

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for a few of your strategies are Apple and Amazon,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and those two companies you know didn't do so well

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>when they reported after the bell yesterday. Are you a

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>buyer of the dip here? Not yet, we have to

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>see how it forms. So they're both that a little

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>over three percent today. Now. One interesting thing though for

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>our for our equity team, what we put on them

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is a five percent limit on positions. The reason we

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>do that is a lot of our institutional customers have

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a five percent limit or feeling on individual positions, so

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that in many cases makes us fang light portfolios. So

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>as an example, Amazon's a little bit about six percent.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, Microsoft and Apple reach six percent of the

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>S and P five, so that puts us at one

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>good point there, but Microsoft having a better month. So

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we are in all those stocks you have to be,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but we do limit positions. So it's interesting you're just

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>love to get your thoughts here. Were more than halfway

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>through earnings, uh this cycle? What's your takeaway? Forward estimates

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are not going down? So so current quarters up? You know,

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the coming into the quarter it was plus percent estimate.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Actual today looks like plus thirty six with a little

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>over half reporting after the company in the SMP five.

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>What surprises us, though, Paul, is we haven't seen forward

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>estimates go down as much as current quarter estimates are

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>going up. That's unusual to us. That's a healthy sign.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's talk about the signs we're getting

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>from the bond market. I know you said seventy and

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>more appropriate portfolio allocation. But when you think about prior

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to today, as of yesterday's close, an equity market and

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>an all time high, and you had a yield curve

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that is telling you that there's some serious fear out

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>there about economic growth. How do you kind of square

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>those things? Well, what's really interesting to us, Keyley, is

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the two year and ten year moves over the past,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, just so far this month in Europe in

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, because they're completely opposite. In the US, it's

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the two year that's moving up. That signals to US

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a more hawkish fe it in Europe. It's the ten

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>uere that's moving up. That sink signals to us our

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>fixed income team a more lenient ECB that wants growth

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's not going to inhibit. So there's a big

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>difference between two and ten years yields US Europe, and

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is going to have to thread that needle

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>next week. They don't want an inverted yield curve. They've

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>already kind of done it thirties to twenty. We don't

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna want to invert the yeld curve anymore.

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So they've got to thread that needle on tapering and

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>potential rate increases at their statement press conference next Wednesday,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>John what's the give us a name or two that

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you've recently edited to your profoilio and why Well, the

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>equity team has come into again under the Barbell theme.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>So what they're looking at more now is coming in,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for instance, UM with a Parker Hannason, but the bringing

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in Johnson and Johnson, so cyclical name, growth name coming

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in with Caterpillar, but then bringing in Crown Castle into

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the portfolios which we own and all three

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of our equity portfolios, so they're coming in with a

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>barbell aspect. Usually they'll bring in a cyclical and they'll

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>bring in a growth at the same time, and we

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like that approach. It's worked for us this year. Hey, John,

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We always love getting

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and some of the names that you and

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>your teams are looking at. Crown Castle, it's a great name.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I did a lot of work with that company back

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the day in the wireless space. John Augustine, Chief

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer, Huntington Private Bank, joining us on the phone

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>from Columbus, Ohio, home of the Ohio State University, which

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>we're welcoming in my pen lines. I know I'm putting

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that out to Matt, so it should be fun. I

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>want to bring on Brenda O'Connor, Senior vice president, Financial

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>advisor for UBS International. Brenda, thanks so much for joining

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>us here. You know, we love to to speak to

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you and just get a sense of you know, what

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>your clients, what your individual clients are asking you. Today.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got markets you know, making backar nearar all time highs.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We've had very strong third quarter earnings. What are you

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing the most from your clients? Well, thank you for

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>having me right. You know, nervous, There risk some nervousness

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about Q three earnings because investors just weren't sure how

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>bad the damage was going to be from three things

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>really delta, supply chain issues and increasing input costs. And

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>here we are well into Q three earnings, two percent

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of companies have exceeded expectations and markets are up twenty

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>three percent year to date. So when I'm looking at

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>my client portfolios, I can't help but think we're up

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>eight percent last year, We're up a dred percent from

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the March lows. Maybe it's time to de risk a

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and we're looking to private assets to do that.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That being said, we are so positive on equities. We

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>think the SMP will be at around for eight hundred

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>by next June and five thousands by the end of

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>next December. Well, I feel like we've been having this conversation,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and granted we have had this conversation many, many, many

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>many times, but the death of the sixty forty portfolio

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and whether that's a strategy that still works. When you

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>say you're looking to de risk a little bit, how

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think about kind of that ratio in your

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>portfolio allocation. Right, So, right now, we really really like

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>private real estate. It is a great inflation heads and

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about that more a bit later. It's

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a diverse fire to equities, and it's also great source

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of income and giving given more fixed income, Marcus that

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's super important. We're also not too concerned about these

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>lofty valuations or the prospect of a housing bubble. Think

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of this. In the US, there's a five point five

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>million deficit of housing units because construction has dragged for

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the last two decades. It's going to take another ten

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>years to make this up, which is great for the sector.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And as vacancy rates are under five percent, which they

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are now, that's great for landlord pricing powers. We really

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like allocating to real estate, private real estate, given where

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>markets are right now. So Brannan, you're in South Florida,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and I love to get a sense of kind of

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what's that market like down there? Is it is robust

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is people make it out to be. We've got obviously

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks here in the New York metro area,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, making their migration down there in this time,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>not temporary, not seasonal, bit more permanent, right And you

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>can see that everywhere in terms of real estate prices,

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you can you can see that in terms of the

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>influx of New Yorkers and finance professionals, tech professionals. In

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of an investment perspective, I've also noticed that the

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>appetite for international is somewhat different than we see in

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the country. So, for example, we're really

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>looking to China right now. We downgraded China over the

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>summer on the back of the regulatory crackdown and education

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and gaming. Chinese equities are down year to day, But

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we do think some of this is priced in. We

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>also think some of the fysical titany this person investors

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to be under allocated to this region. So we

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think there are opportunities in terms of green tech and

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer durable, but in investment preferences for international seems to

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit different in self Florida, given the

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>international dynamic of this market. While we're talking about the

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.239
<v Speaker 1>migration to Florida, one of the reasons it's so attractive

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is because of taxes. Frankly, especially compared to you know,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York tri state area where Paul and I

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>find ourselves. While we're talking about taxes. Given the quote

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote framework that we've gotten in terms of what the

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>tax package is going to look like on capital Hill,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>how does that affect your clients and what you're telling

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>them to do. Right, It doesn't change too much because

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our expectations for for next year already factor in, uh,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>some some tax cuts. So let me talk about this

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the context of something like in growth UM. You know,

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Q three obviously came in at much lower than we

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>saw in in Q two, at six point seven first

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>lower than the consensus. There wasn't anything too surprising here,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>given that the this was the first quarter with no

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>government stimulus, uh, none of the headwinds that we saw

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>earlier like delta or supply bottlenecks. We do expect Q

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>four to be much stronger. People are traveling again, hotel

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>occupancies above sixty five, open table reservation numbers have recovered

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>from their severe August September dip, and we do think

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that UM GDP is going to be about five point

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three percent for two. So all our expectations both on

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on GDP inflation UM outlook do factor in, uh some

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of those those tax sites that we're expecting to see.

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So Brenda, in terms of equities, um, you know, for

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>those of your clients that have the courage to be

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market where the sectors that you're suggesting

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they focus on. When we're talking to our clients, it

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is all about continuing to follow this positive earning story.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>We do not think that the reflection trade is quite

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>over yet. We still energy and financials. Think about financials alone,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a record here in m and A for

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the investment bank banks. Loan moss reserve continue to be

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>released and net interest margins will only start to look better.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that ten uere inches towards one point eight and higher.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The financials that have reported this quarter, by the way,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have been expectations by a margin of so financials is

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>scenario that we're definitely looking at right and we definitely

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>saw some positive beats when it comes to the energy

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>complex to day with Exxon and Chevron and those buy backs.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Man and Goldman sass talking about that, Paul and how

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by backs could be even eight percent above the levels

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they are this year. There's a lot of cash out there.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of cash out there. Hey, Brenda, thank

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. Brenda O'Connor, Senior vice president, financial visor for

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>UBS International, based in the Greater Miami, Florida area. Lots

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>of news coming out of Silicon Valley this week. We've

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>got earnings and uh fast name had earnings from Amazon

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and Apple, and then also Facebook making a big, big

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>investment in what it calls the metaverse, and in fact

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>big enough that they are changing the name of the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>company from Facebook two Meta Technologies, Inc. I believe. Mark Berg,

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology reporter for Bloomberg News, joins us on the

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. Mark, What is meta? What is

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse? What is Facebook doing here? Actually? I think

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's meta platforms. What's kind of confusing is they're what

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing is they're not doing what what Alphabet

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Dead or Google did six years ago, which is sort

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of form a new parent company that that have houses

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different companies. They're sort of renaming themselves

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but keeping the brand. And part of the idea to

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>here is that Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO, as just sort

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of betting on Facebook's future being in augmented reality and

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>what he calls the metaverse, which is sort of this

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a vague idea from science fiction that we will be

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>able to like engage with with each other in mental reality,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>spaces and virtual reality using some sort of all to

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>find headgear. At this point it is an oculous device.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>But during the presentation, Sorry, Zuckerberg also showed off service

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>smart watch and talked about glasses as well. Well, it's

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing to decide your company's future, you know, looks

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, and you're going to push more into the

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>meta metaverse in this augmented reality. You can still do

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that without rebranding entirely and without changing the name of

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>your company, Which makes me wonder how much of this

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually because Facebook found itself in very hot water politically.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of negative news flow over the

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>last several months. Really is this also kind of pr related?

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>We saw a lot of people came out with the

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>comparison to Philip Morris from two thousan three a belief

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>when they re branded, and certainly Facebook has been called

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by critics the new tobacco um. You know, they addressed

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>us very briefly guest during the presentation, there was sort

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of a Interestingly enough, they had Nick Clegg, who was

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the BP of Government Affairs speak and talk about how

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they're when they're approaching the metaverse there going to bake

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>it a lot of the privacy and data controls that

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>arguably have not been part of Facebook from the onset.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Well and Paul I couldn't help but notice what represented

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Alexandria Cossio curt Has tweeted after this and she talked

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about the rebrand and she said meta as in, we

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are a cancer to democracy, metastasizing into global surveillance and

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>propaganda machine for boosting authoritarian regimes and destroying civil society

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for profits. So clearly the progressives are not that impressed,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>not that impressed. And Mark, I mean ten billion dollars

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>next year, that's kind of a big number, but I mean,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it's for Facebook and they can afford in everything.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the sense that this is something that they're going

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to throw real money behind over the next ten years.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think. So if you look at the strategically, you know,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a key thing to focus on here is that Facebook

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>U has been sort of boxed out by Apple and

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Google for it's an entire existence at least on the

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone in the past decade. Right, So Facebook doesn't

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>own the operating system, which is this big existential concern

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for them. You've heard them talk a lot about Apples fees.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>They've really been challenged by Apple's ad tracking changes. And

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the way for Facebook to sort of cleverly

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think strategically get ahead and say the next

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>computing platform, we not only are going to be there,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to be defining company investing the most

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and and um clearly like Apple has been investing a

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lot in augmented reality, Google has a certain extent. Ten

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>billions seems like a lot on paper. I saw something

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>someone to say, like, you know, Netflix invest maybe twice

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the amount in it's media right now. And this is

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a both a I think investment in media, but also

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in hardware, silicon and alto sort of technology that hasn't

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>been betted yet. Well that's a great point that I

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the concept and the idea and they and kind

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of you know the goal behind it, and yet it

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>still feels very esoteric and nebulous in a way. How

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>refined is this idea. I don't know for a fact

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of how much the presentation yesterday was legitimate technology and

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>how much of it was Um, stimulation. It seems like

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of it was was stimulated, and they

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about this is something that we're hoping the next

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>five or ten years. Um. You know, we saw any

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>helpless note to say, this is not the iPhone moment.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no actual device, there's no actual kind of this

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>is uh an imagine well, which which to um, you

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>know Facebook defense. This is something that Google has been

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>doing too, where they talk about, here are these projects

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're working on and then give a demo of

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing that doesn't actually work. Mark internally, How concerned

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>is the company, the board, senior executives about the backlash

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>from Washington and regulators and just the public in general. Um,

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had Emily Chang had senior executive on yesterday.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>We answered this, I thought in a really telling way. Um,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it didn't seem that concerned. I think that they are.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't see advertisers leaving as far as they know. Um,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem as concerned about it about a breakup. Um,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly this has been you know, they are they're kind

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of their positions so far at least both sort of

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>on on the PR side. And then I could say

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>politically has been the fight back a little bit and

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the pushback on this and to make this a broader

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>issue around not just Facebook but with social media and

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and to that point, you know, the lawmakers right now

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are not writing laws about Facebook. They're writing laws about

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the laws that will effect TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, the rest

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of the like as supported digital platforms. Hey, Mark, thanks

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us giving us that update. Here.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark Bergen, technology reporter for Bloomberg News, joining us on

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone from San Francisco. Thanks for listening to the

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Pet On false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at p T Sweeney.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.