WEBVTT - India: All Growth, No Jobs

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. The Indian economy has grown by

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at least six or seven percent in nearly every one

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the past twenty years. That's almost double the growth

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>rate it achieved in its first fifty years as an

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>independent state. But somehow that success isn't translating into jobs.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, less than half of the working population is

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>working or even actively looking for work, and the vast

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>majority of Indian women are out of the workforce altogether.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So what's going wrong and how important will it be

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for the newly elected Prime Minister nor Indo Moody to

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fix it? While a few minutes I'll talk about it

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg columnist and writer Mihir Shama. I'll also have

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>some brand new research on exactly how the US China

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>trade wars and tariffs are destroying economic activity the US,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>China and other countries. But first, here's my colleague Aniban

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Nag who took a closer look at India's job shortage

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with fellow reporter Fristie p Anywell. That is the busy Promhabib,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the station here in central Mumbai with thousands of commuters

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>mill in and out during the morning rush hour. The

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Indian railways are famous as one of the biggest employers

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and this particular station is being manned

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>by a station master, booking clerks and a few sweepers.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>These jobs don't pay much, but a staggering twenty eight

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>million implied to do one of them recently, and the

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>department that runs the railways announced agnes. One of those

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 1>who try to get a railway job was sish Kumar.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to stick to a job with computers, but

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so difficult to land a job. If someone knows you,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>then you get a job. Otherwise it's next to impossible.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>About We met Sorresh there his one room, rented a

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>house that is a stone's throw away from an open

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>drain and part of one of the most densely populated

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>colonies of Delhi. He's medium built and dressed up for

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>work in a formal cotton shirt and trousers. It's morning,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's already starting to sweat in the Indian summer,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>where temperatures can soar past hundred and ten. They raised

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>farre and high. He's thirty years old and holds a

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>diploma and computing from a private institute, but he's working

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as someone's driver, his wife as a maid. I was

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>hoping for older than that when he moved here from

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>India's central region of mad Depradation. But he recognizes he's

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the lucky ones back in the village. There's

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so much poverty. We can't even open our own business

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and there are no banks to offer support with loans.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>In Delhi, at least you can get a job. I

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>am driving as I have a home to run and

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>send kids to school. Sy Ha's a job, but he's

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>under employed. India's economy is not getting the best out

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of him. Twelve million Indians entered the labor market each year,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and an increasing number of them are under employed, lights

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>race or not in work at all. It was like

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>any week of December that we were told that they

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>will be letting go of the staff and then from

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>there try and if they can survive this stress, which

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>also did not happen because in April almost everybody was

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>asked to go. We found a woman we call Alia

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because she did not want us to use her real name.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We met up in Bloomberg's office in New Delhi, where

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>she lives. Aliyah, who's in her mid thirties, lost her

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>job as a marketing and communications manager after her company's

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>sales failed to gain traction, just as the country was

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>put through a huge challenge of changing much of the

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>currency in circulation. Did they tell you what was the

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>reason for that? No, they just told that they were

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>not able to kind of sustain the operations that they

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>were having. Her mother isn't aware she has lost her job.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Her father knows the truth and can sometimes get despondent

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about her job prospects. Aliyah says she has been able

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to get some work here and there. She has even

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>managed to repay a Carlo, but it has been tough.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I take up freelance projects from time to time, and

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I try to and obviously try to find, you know,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>anything that I can apply to. So what I mostly

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>get as a response is that either there are too

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>many aspirants buying for a singular job and so the

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>competition is obviously increased. A part of it was also

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>given to the fact that you know, I'm looking for

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a job role which is intermate management kind of position

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and order fresh level, and also the fact that you

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>know the plans keep changing. A lot of positions that

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are that are actually they think are available go on

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hold for no reason. There's a lot of uncertainty in

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 1>terms of organizations in terms of what they they're planning

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>for the next six months to a New York time earlier.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Part of the official jobless numbers, and that is probably

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the iceberg. The bigger problem is that

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>half the working age population and of women are not

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>even included in that official jobless total, but they're not

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for work at all. India is not the only

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>developing country struggling to bring women into the workforce. What

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is troubling is that the situation has been getting worse

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>even as the overall economy has been doing quite well.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>According to the World Bank, nearly twenty million women, a

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>number roughly equivalent to the population of Sri Lanka, dropped

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the workforce between two thousand and five and

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve. Economists tell us that this is

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>an enormous missed opportunity, but don't take their vote for it.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Ask Christine Lagard, the head of the International Monetary Fund,

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you can increase US t DP by five because you

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can increase Indian GDP by twenty seven and decent. If

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at diversification, we have now documented evidence of

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that when women participate in the economy and

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market as much as men do, you

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have a more diversified economy. And by bringing women to

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the to the labor markets, giving them access to finance,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you reduce the inequality. What would that take in India?

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We asked some Toshirotra, a professor at New Dearle's Jawaharlal

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Nehru University. He's an export and employment and labor issues

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for girls. If you want to make sure that they

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>get jobs, then we have to ensure that childcare. Affordable

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>childcare is much more easily available. UM, public transport is

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>much safer than it has been in the past. UM.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And above all, of course, job growth, non agricultural job

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>growth has to happen in construction, in manufacturing and in services.

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't know there's a problem from the latest election results.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister in the Rain the Remote won the country's

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>massive vote last month with an even larger majority than before,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but he does recognize the issue. One of the first

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions after taking office for a second five year term

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was to form a committee of senior ministers to try

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and address rising on employment. Oh yeah, says it's hard

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>time they deal with the issue because it's a lot

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the numbers indicate. Comar, the driver, blames India's

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>education system for the lack of opportunities. Way was that

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that can't be there? Who made the English community? My

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>English is weak in the villages. They don't teach much English.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I started studying English only in the fifth grade and

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>not the first. If I have to blame anyone, it

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is perhaps myself. So I think I should have more

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>complications of degrees. It can really need to lay out

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the lack of suitable opportunities. So someone like Coomar risk

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>astonishing the country's image as a major investment destination. Not

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>only that there's a chance of social unrest. Above all,

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it poses a challenge to policy makers who are keen

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to read the demographic dividend of a young population, which

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>means it can be a major drive of economic growth.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The time is ticking, though, by the share of India's

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>population to that of working age will start declining. India

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>will have to act fast if it has to harness

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that demographic dividend. By providing jobs to millions sooner rather

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>than later. Kumar thinks it's already too late for him,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's still holding out hope for the next generation.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>A year, I have given up hopes of getting a

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>better job. I will get along with whenever it takes.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The kids should have better prospects. So I'm very happy

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>now that I can speak to one of Bloomberg's key

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>India columnists, Mihir Shama, about what this means for in

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>his economy and what Prime Mr Modi might be able

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to do about it going forward, having just been re

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>elected last month. Here, I guess one question people might

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>be asking. I started the program mentioning that India was

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>an economy that had grown six or seven percent a year,

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every year for the last twenty years. How

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>has it done so well while not finding jobs for

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe half of its working age population. I think that

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the real joblessness is a relatively recent phenol. The real

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>jobless growth is a relatively recent phenomenon. Um Up to

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>around twenty eleven, I think jobs were getting created. A

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of those were in, for example, the construction sector,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>which has traditionally managed to soak up large numbers of

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>relatively underskilled people, particularly from rural areas, in a rapidly

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>expanding urban economy. Around twenty eleven or twenty twelve, the

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>economy begins to slow. You know, you have the crisis,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>then you have the post crisis stimulus, and then when

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus over reaches in around twenty twelve, the economy slows.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Investment slows for some reason. Um that slowing is reflected

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>in the job growth numbers are both official and unofficial,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but is not showing up as much as one would

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>expect in the new GDP statistics, which has led many people,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as as it happens, to start questioning India's growth figgers themselves.

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is that from after liberalized fastion, the

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>first ten, fifteen, even twenty years were pretty good for jobs,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not as great as they could have been, but not bad.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really in the past father, nor though year, that

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we've begun to see something of a crisis. And if

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>you look at the structure of growth, I mean, is

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it is it to do with the composition of growth

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're not getting the jobs. Like our our economist

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberger, Abishek Gupta, has looked at how in a

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sense the whole is not necessarily in the manufacturing silence

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in service sector, and the inability to inability to unleash

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the service sector is that a big part of it.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>No country in history has been able to um incorporate

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>unskilled people from the rural economy into a growing middle

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>class with secure jobs without building a manufacturing sector. It

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is possible, surely, perhaps to do it without but unless

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got oil or something, you can't. There's no there's

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>no roadmap. It's never been done before. India has been

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>d industrializing since the late nineties, which means that the

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>contribution of industry to GDP peaked in around nine ninety

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>seven and since then it has been going down. That's

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not okay because what that gets replaced with is, of

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>course an increase in the proportion of the service sector

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>in g d P. And the service sector is not

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not talking high level it stuff here,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>all right. That maybe the image of India, But what

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the service sector actually is is very very small enterprises

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one person, two persons, three people working together. In the

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister's words, even a guy frying up dumplings is

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>also a job, right, But those aren't the kind of jobs.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that people think about when they want them,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and those aren't the kind of jobs that create a

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sustainable middle class. There is really no on for even

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>right now after what could repleeve math manufacturing export oriented

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>math manufacturing as the creator of job So I know

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you like giving primers demodi advice which he doesn't follow.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't necessarily stop now if you're just been reelected

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and have some pressure on you, maybe surprisingly not as

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>much pressure as you might think. I think if less

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>than half of the working age population in the UK

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or the US we're in work, there would be that

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>would be the only issue on the horizon. I see

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's not really the case in India. But if

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you're under pressure to deliver m after this election victory,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what leavers can he pull? I mean, what would be

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the key reformer is that you would think of to

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>try and change how much jobs are being created. I

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think there are three things that you need to do

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>almost immediately because time is running out for all of them.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The first is to obstantively change what are called factor markets,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so the markets for land and labor in particular. UM,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to fire people in India which is

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>why very few people hire them. We have incredibly small

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>textile production facilities, like our textile factories are you know,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe an average of fifteen or sixteen people in India

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to over two to three in just in

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Bangladesh next door. And so we're uncompetitive when it comes

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to producing textiles, which is a labor intensive sector. Um

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So you need to change the laws that constrain the

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sale of land, that constrain hiring and firing workers. That's

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>point one. Point two is that you have to ensure

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that you get embedded into global supply chains. Currently, India is,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like many other countries around the world, moving in a

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat protectionist direction. We're putting up tariffs on you know,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>things like mobile phones and the idea areas to try

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and create a domestic electronics manufacturing sector, but obviously we

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>know that's not going to happen because of the way

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that that manufacturing is now organized globally. Um So you

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have to embed yourself in these global supply chains rather

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>than you know, extracting yourself from them. And the third

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think really the most important at this point

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is that you need to work on basic educational and skills.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>We have some of the worst schools in the world.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>According to many studies, there are kids in class eight

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, in their eights here of schooling

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in the eighth grade who cannot do maths at a

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>second grade level, and that's the majority of So you

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>need to intervene both of the primary level and with

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>those who have already left school and are and are

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>currently underskilled. So those interventions have to be massive and immediate,

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the educational ones. And you did mention we had at

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of that segment as well. This question is

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the time pressure. Um. You know, you might think India

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>had all the time in the world given the scale

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of its economy and a number of people, but this

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>key demographic point that you have a sweet spot as

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>an economy where you have a sort of peak a

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>number of working age people with fewer children, having fewer children,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but no longer, not not getting older yet. How important

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is it for India to get this right before it

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>starts seeing that demographic change and the aging that we've

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>seen in that obviously in other countries. So one of

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the crucial questions in development of can a country get

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>rich before it gets old? Right? And the truth is

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that we are a much younger country than a lot

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of others where our average age is still in the

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>twenties where within China, Japan, But that obviously won't last forever.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>As birth rates begin to fall going forward, our average

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>age will increase, which means that the proportion of people

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in the working age population as opposed to those out

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, will begin to Right now, we are seeing

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of growth and a lot of dynamism precisely

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because that working age population is increasing in composition, in size,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>in proportion. That will not be the case going forward.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And the bad news is it is already the case

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that we are facing demographic demographic pressure in some of

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the more advanced and developed parts of India. States along

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the coast in the south of India, which have higher

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>human capital levels, which are more integrated with the global

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>economy um which have better skills, those areas are in

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>fact already beginning to see this demographic change. They're getting older.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Where population growth is really coming from, where we have

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>our current youth bulge, all these working age population, working

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>age people applying for these jobs in the railways and

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. That's in the north, in

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the interior, and that's not that's not a part of

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the country that is properly connected to the global economy.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not connected to markets. These are people who are underskilled.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So there is this a regional disparity in how things

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>are turning out that evolved a problem. Some people listening

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>may have the same experience that I have that the

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the Indian business people that one sees at conferences or

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed often on Bloomberg or in anywhere else, you get

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense of an incredibly dynamic economy really digitally switched

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>on developing things that actually are ahead in many cases

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of advanced economies on the digital front um, and even

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on applying it to some public sector challenges. Is that

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>just are we seeing just a tiny fraction, Because if

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you listen to those people, you would think, wow, India

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to ride the wave of

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>all these technological changes that are happening around the world

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that everyone fears India is going to clean up as

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a result of those changes. Well, I mean there are

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.239
<v Speaker 1>two things to be said there. The first is one

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>should never trust what people in Indian business see, only

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what they do and when they start investing in India,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>then I will take their claims that India India has

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a bright future. Seriously, we have a crisis and private

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>investment has been shrinking for for years as a proportional GDP,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't appear to have cleared up yet, so

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>they don't appear to have confidence in where they're putting

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>their money. So I don't believe anything they say about

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when they make all these sort of

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>claims about India's future. The other thing about you know,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can India righte the you know, automation digital wave of

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the future. Everybody else is worrying because they're losing jobs.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I suppose you can be more optimistic

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>about it when you've never had the jobs in the

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>first place. If you see the entire world moving towards

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>an economy, you know, which is precarious when nobody has

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a real job where you have to work three things,

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know you have service sector jobs that don't

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pay enough. Well, we've lived that already. But the truth

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is that we are worth off because we need to

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at least have a phase of those manufacturing jobs in

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>order to build the middle cloths that can then complain

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we've never built the middle cloth that can complain, so

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not hearing any completely well uh here, that's many

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>people who read your college would say that's a characteristically

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>blunt assessment of the situation for India's economy. But thanks

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us. Thanks so Some people would

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>say that we talk too much about trade wars on

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but we have a lot to say about them,

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and this week is no exception because we have a

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting analysis by our economists who are part of

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics, of the impact that trade wars are having already,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly in China, but also on production levels and sales

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US. And I'm very glad that I can

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.479
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit with one of the people who crunched

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers on this, one of our Eurozone economists, maybe

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>a Kuza maybe. Thank you very much for joining us

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>from Zurich, Hasty if any, thanks for inviting me. So

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me a little bit about this research, because what

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to me is that although often people have

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about the big picture potential impact of trade wars

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on global growth, you took a micro approach looking at

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the imports that have been affected by tariffs. What did

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you find so yes, we used very detailed data from

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the US International Trade Commission, and we looked at the

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>different categories, the six thousand plus categories of products that

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have been imposed some tarifts by the US on US

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on imports from China. And what we've found first is

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that when you look at the value of imports from

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>China across those categories which have been parift since Juday

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to September twenty eighteen Juday to September last year, if

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the time series, you can see a

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>sharp top which happens just after the introduction of the

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>different waves of tariffs. And in total, if you look

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at the value of US imports from China across those

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>categories in the first quarter of twenty nineteen, so after

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of all the tariffs of the first wave

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs, and you compare with what happened a year earlier,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that is value on those goods is done by twenty

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>six percent. That's fifteen point eight billion dollars worth of

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Chinese imports that have not entered the US across across

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those those products. What's interesting as well is that when

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we looked at what happened to imports of those products

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of the world. They have increased a

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but only by five point four billion dollars

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the year to UH the first quarter of twenty nineteen.

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So in total, it's a gap of ten point four

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar worth of imports that has not entered the

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>US and those categories that have been tariffed for China.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen any evidence of this diversion of trade

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as a result of these harriffs that you just get

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the same products coming in from other countries rather than

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the reduction in imports overall. So we've seen a little

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>bit of that, indeed, of diverge, diversion from them away

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from China and to other countries um as you can see,

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because there's still a ten billion gap in imports across

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those categories. It does only partly of set the impact

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of lower trade with China, but we've seen some of that.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>We've seen in particular if you look across the main

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>trade partners for the US and the main countries in

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the Asian subplate chain, countries like Vietnam, Vietnam, Taiwan, and

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, I've seen an acceleration of their exports to

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the of their exports to the US. I noticed in

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>your report that they also looked like there were just

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of creative ways around these tarriers that were

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>being found, like, for example, those big surge in the

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>number of TVs coming in from China to the US

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>which are not subject to tarriers, and a reduction in

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the number of TV parts coming in because those are

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>subject to tariffs. But you would say that there's still

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>been a real impact on Chinese producers. Yes, I think so.

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there has been a little bit of moving

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>across categories from from tarift categories to nontarift categories at

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the margin, but overall, I think that's on the top.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And indeed, um total Chinese imports, total imports from China

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to the US acrourse tarift and learned tarift categories of

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>decline from the first quarter of twenty eighteen to the

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of because I mean President Trump would say

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this is all great, because it's going to provide room

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for all these US manufacturers to get in and start

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>producing things themselves. Have we seen domestically made goods filling

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the gap? So unfortunately we can't see that from the

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>data we have because there are childe data, so we

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>only imports. What I would say is that when you

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>look at them at this imports number, it has clearly

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>has had a very disruptive effect on US imports from China.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 1>It has had a disruptive effect on US imports total

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>total imports from the world in total, as we can

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>see these ten billions worth of goods that didn't enter

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the US. And that's because China was such a dominant player,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>such a big player across those categories that as the

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of factories in the rest of the world, we're

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>not big enough to pick up the slack and to

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>HaVeset the effect. And because many of those goods are

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>actually intermediate goods, good that US factories would use in

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>their production process, it is likely to have a creeping

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>impact on US industry because basically what happens is that

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the supply chain, the backward looking part of

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>their access to supply has been broken. Thank you very much.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope we have you on again as we track

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the impact of this trade will thank you thanks for

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>listening to Stephanomic. Join us next week for more on

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the ground insight into the global economy. In the meantime,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, website, app

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We'd love it if

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you took the time to rate and review our show

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so it can reach more people. And for more news

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and analysis through the week from Bloomberg Economics, you just

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have to follow us Economics on Twitter. You can also

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>find me on at my Stephanomics. This episode was written

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and reported by Anaban Nag and Rishti beneval I should

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mention that you also heard a clip in that piece

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from Christine Leguard, which was actually recorded at a Bloomberg

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>event in December six. It was produced by Magnus Hendrickson

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and edited by Nastrine Syria and Scott Laman, who's also

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the executive producer of Stephanomics Special thanks to Mehir Sharma

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and Mahiva Kuzan. Francesco Levy is the head of Bloomberg

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast